WEBVTT - Are Plants Conscious?

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff from How Stuff Works. Hey, brain Stuff,

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it's Christian Seger. So there's this old episode of Star

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Trek called Wink of an Eye. You may have seen it.

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>There's this race of aliens that live in hyper sped

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>up acceleration. So when the crew of the Enterprise appears

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to meet up with them, they seem so slow that

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>they're unable to move. Now, imagine that scenario. If you

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>were the aliens, wouldn't you assume humans were inert objects

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>with no consciousness. Now let's take this and apply it

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to our relationship with plants. When we watch videos of

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>plant life sped up, we see their lively movement. But

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>even though plants move and respond to stimuli, they're not conscious. Right, Otherwise,

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>every time we ate vegetables, we'd be causing them pain. Wait,

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, can plants feel pain? Well? Okay, there

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>was this guy once. His name was Charles Darwin. You

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>might have heard of him, and he once proposed something

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>called the root brain hypothesis. He proposed that the tip

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of a plant's root could act like a brain does

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in some animals, receiving sensory input and directing movement. In

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the years since Darwin made this proposal. There's been a

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>growing movement in science called plant neurobiology, and it debates

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the way we think about plants and consciousness. Other scientists

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>hate this term, but who cares, because here's some of

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:42.279
<v Speaker 1>the things we know about plants because of this really

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>unusual research. Let's start with plant senses. We know that

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>plants have a variety of sense some that can actually

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>act as analogs to our site smell, touch, taste, and hearing.

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>In fact, there's evidence that when plants hear the sound

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of a caterpillar chewing on a leaf, they respond defensively

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>by producing chemicals like mustard oil. This happens even if

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>the sound is a recording and nothing is eating the plant. Creepy, right.

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Plants can also communicate sometimes. Plant chemical production is like

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a method of communicating with other plants. So here's an example.

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>That smell of freshly cut grass that we all know

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that's actually a distress call to warn other plants of danger.

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:39.119
<v Speaker 1>It's true in gardens, no one can hear you scream. Now,

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>when this distress call reaches other plants, they will also

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>emit the chemicals to warn their neighbors as well. And

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>these calls can even work on different species of plant.

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>For instance, a sage plant can signal a tobacco plant

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to emit an odor that's not just to animals that

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>are eating the sage. All right, So you hear the

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>term plant neurobiology and you say, but plants don't have brains. Well,

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why many scientists hate that term

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>is because plants don't have neurons, but they do produce

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>neuroactive chemicals that act like those in the human brain.

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Glutamate receptors form memories in humans, and they're also found

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>in plants, and some hormones are transported around plants similar

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to how neurotransmitters move through animal brains. Likewise, some plants

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>are vulnerable to drugs that disrupt neurotransmitters in the human brain,

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>like prozac or meth amphetamines. They even produce their own ethylene,

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>which is possibly used as an anesthetic when they're stressed out.

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Plants even have a kind of nervous system, and that

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>may allow information to travel around the plant via electrical

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>sick mills. So if plants have sort of brains, do

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>they remember stuff? Well, yeah, plants also have their own

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of memory. In fact, there's a plant called the

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Mimosa pudica plant, and it closes its leaflets immediately after

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>they're touched, but because this requires energy, the plant won't

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>do it if it's unnecessary. However, when researchers dropped potted

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>mimosas fifteen centimeters onto foam, the plants learned that the

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>fall wasn't dangerous, so they stopped closing their leaves. Even crazier,

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:41.119
<v Speaker 1>after one month, the plants still remember that the drop

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't dangerous and they wouldn't close their leaves in response. So,

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>given what we know about plants, senses, communication, nervous systems,

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and memories, should we consider them to be either conscious

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>or intelligent? What about pain? Does the fact that plants

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>react to danger indicate that they feel pain? Well, some

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>scientists argue yes, while others loudly say no. Check out

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the brainstuff channel on YouTube, and for more on this

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of other topics, visit how stuff works dot

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>com