WEBVTT - Weirdhouse Cinema: Silent Era Double Feature

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Hey, welcome to Weird House Cinema. This is Rob Lamb.

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe McCormick. And today is going to be

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 3>the first time on this show that we are going

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 3>to be looking at films of the Silent Era. Rob

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 3>and I were talking about this, and we think maybe

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 3>this will be a recurring episode type where we look

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 3>at a couple of short films from the Silent era,

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 3>because most films of this time are not very long.

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Though maybe it would be hard to talk about for

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 3>an entire episode on their own, so we're doing a

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 3>double feature today.

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Boy, Already there's a lot of to unpack though,

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 2>because yes, it's true, there are a lot of short

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.959
<v Speaker 2>silent films, but they are also a fair number. When

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 2>I was looking around at possibilities for today, some of

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 2>them are longer than you'd expect them to be. And

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 2>add to that that they are also silent films, which,

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 2>if you know, unless you're dealing with very certain high

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 2>standard silent films, you know, true classics of the time period,

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 2>it could feel a lot longer than it actually is.

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.199
<v Speaker 3>You know, Oh yeah, totally. I mean I was thinking

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 3>about this before we got started. I was thinking about

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 3>that quote from Videodrome where Professor Brian Oblivion is talking

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 3>about television and he says, the television screen is the

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 3>retina of the mind's eye. Therefore, the television screen is

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 3>part of the physical structure of the brain. Therefore, whatever

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 3>appears on the television screen emerges as raw experience for

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 3>those who watch it. Therefore, television is reality, and reality

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 3>is less than television. Now that's turned up a little

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 3>bit past the ten marker to get it into the

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 3>weirdness of Cronenberg territory. But essentially there's a nugget of

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 3>truth in that. And what I mean by that is

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 3>that the films of the Silent era have generally not

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 3>yet breached the raw experience threshold. They are works of

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 3>art that have to be appreciated across a kind of

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 3>mental distance and with effortful dedication of attention, more like

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 3>a painting or a work of fiction. In text, like

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 3>reading a book. You know, it takes a certain amount

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 3>of sustained, effortful attention to read a story, but at

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 3>a certain level of development. The techniques used in film

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 3>and television, especially once you introduce synchronized sound, and like

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 3>really good film editing techniques and good acting and all that.

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 3>At a certain point, they become so well honed that

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 3>no effortful dedication of attention is required and no distance

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 3>must be crossed, Like the films of today are generally

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 3>automatically engrossing, even if they're not good, as soon as

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 3>you're aware of them, they're simply happening in your mind.

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a great point. So it's in a way,

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 2>interacting with a silent film or even a challenging piece

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 2>of stationary art, it's it's like one of those scenes

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 2>in Cronenberg Scanners where you're staring intently at another thing

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 2>and your your your brain is beginning to like boil

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 2>and swell in your head as you concentrate and force

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 2>yourself to merge your your consciousness with the art before you.

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, totally. And so while I would say I really

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 3>enjoy a lot of silent films, but for me they

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 3>are they are not as easy, not as automatic, not

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 3>as magical as the films of the modern era that

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 3>are automatically engrossing. Like that, they're more like the way

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 3>I have to appreciate written fiction as text. You know

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 3>that there's something that can be very rewarding to pay

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 3>close attention to, but it takes work.

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And you know, when you when you mentioned films

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 2>of the modern era, it is worth noting just how

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 2>quickly the technology and the craft evolve, because I think

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 2>both of our films that we're going to focus on

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 2>at lengths today are from the nineteen twenties. And as

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 2>an experiment, I looked at the year nineteen twenty five

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 2>and there's a silent film titled The Lost World from

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 2>that year, based on the story by Sir Arthur Conan

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Doyle with dinosaurs in it. So of course it has

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 2>pioneering stop motion dino animation in it that looks really cool,

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 2>but it is still a silent film. There's still all

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 2>these barriers to being able to properly immerse yourself in it.

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 2>You fast forward just one decade and you have nineteen

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 2>thirty five, that's the year Mad Love came out, which,

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, despite very much being an older film, you

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 2>can watch it and you become immersed in it and

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 2>you're feeling the characters and you feel like you're a

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 2>part of this world, and it illustrates just how far

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 2>it came in those ten years, you know, just how

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 2>much the craft and the technology changed, enabling you to

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 2>tell different types of stories and bring the viewer closer,

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, truly creating this videodrome situation that you described earlier.

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I would say there are a couple of

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 3>things there. I mean, I would say, like you're pointing out,

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 3>one of the main technological differences is synchronized sound. I

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 3>mean that that's a game changer on its own. But

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 3>on top of that, i'd say, with Mad Love, you

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 3>have a really exceptional example from its era as well,

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 3>the exceptional photographic techniques of Carl Freund. You know, behind

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 3>the camera, you've got the exceptional charisma of the actors

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 3>on screen, of course, the incomparable Peter Lorrie. Then you

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 3>have the hyper nervous energy of Colin Clive in it,

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 3>and so so all of that is true. But yeah,

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 3>as time goes on, it's funny how much the techniques

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 3>just like get developed and become sort of self referencing

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 3>and industrial automatic cliches, where even the bad movies of

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 3>today are typically very engrossing automatically, like if one's playing

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 3>in the room, you so easily just start watching it

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 3>and then it's just in your brain.

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, and it is worth with no you mentioned

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Carl Frond, the director of Mad Love. He of course

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 2>was cinematographer on nineteen twenty seven silent masterpiece Metropolis. So

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 2>the great work that would come with the talkies, I

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 2>mean it very much emerges from the silent era. Like

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 2>the silent era is the period in which the tools

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 2>were coming online, the sort of substructure of our cinematic

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 2>legacy was being built.

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 3>That's a very good point, and I would say for me,

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Metropolis is probably the most engrossing silent film I've ever seen.

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's one of the all time greats. So we

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 2>have to mention Nosferatu, the Cabinet of Doctor Caligari, a

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 2>trip to the Moon, and I believe we talked about

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 2>a trip to the Moon a little bit in our

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Invention series on filmmaking and photography, where we discussed more

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 2>of the technological side of the silent film era.

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:57.479
<v Speaker 3>Oh, that's a very good point. If you want to

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 3>get some background before the rest of this episode, you

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 3>could pause here, go listen to our entire series on

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 3>the Invention podcast that we did. But I think we

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 3>did one that started with the history of photography, beginning

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 3>with the camera.

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh I think we started with the camera obscura.

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, even going back to there, but then then

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 3>going into photography and then going into motion pictures, and

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 3>so if you want more contexts, probably a lot of

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 3>things that at this point I don't even remember that

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 3>we talked about, so I may have lost some really

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 3>good contexts. So if you want, go listen to that

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 3>and then come back and listen to the rest of this.

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 3>But so today we are going to be talking about

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 3>a couple of silent films. I think are they both

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 3>from the early twenties. Minds from nineteen twenty two is

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 3>yours from twenty.

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 2>One, It is, indeed from nineteen twenty one. Yes, Okay, However,

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 2>we are not doing any of the classics we discussed earlier.

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 2>I think both of these are harder to come by.

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 2>They're maybe more obscure, So, you know, I think they're

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 2>both very fun choices, and in a way they're choices

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 2>that circumvent your expectations the silent era, unless you, of course,

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 2>are already just versed in the silent era and you

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 2>know a lot of the history and the culture of

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 2>what was going on at the time.

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all right, Joe, do.

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 2>You want to you want to go first and roll

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 2>right into your selection?

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Sure, I'll go first. The film I selected for this

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 3>episode is an early animated film by a German filmmaker

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 3>named Latta Reineger, and it is the nineteen twenty two

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 3>short film Cinderella. The German title is Ashenpuddle. Now. My

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 3>main source of biographical information about Reineger comes from the

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 3>twenty nineteen New York Times retrospective by Debbie Lockwood, which

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 3>is part of a series called Overlooked, which seems to

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 3>be sort of post hoc obituaries for remarkable people who

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 3>originally didn't get obituaries in the Times when they passed away.

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.679
<v Speaker 3>So Lota Reineger was born Charlotte Reineger. I think Lotta

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 3>is a German shortening of the name Charlotte. She was

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 3>born on June second, eighteen ninety nine to carl and

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Eleanor Reineger and live in Berlin. And when she was

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 3>in school she learned about something called scheren Schnitte, which

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 3>means scissor cuts in German, and this was similar to

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 3>a Chinese art form that dated back hundreds of years,

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 3>but it had become popular in German art at the time,

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 3>I think in Swiss art too, and essentially it consisted

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 3>of making art by cutting silhouette images out of paper

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 3>with fine shears. But Lotta Reineger enjoyed this art form

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 3>when she was young, cutting out silhouettes of people. She

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 3>knew not just to mount them on the wall or

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 3>press them in an album, but she would make them

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 3>move and act out scenes in a homemade shadow theater

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 3>to do scenes from the plays of Shakespeare. And as

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 3>she got older, she became interested in the at this

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 3>point blossoming art form of film, originally thinking of becoming

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 3>an actress, but she soon discovered the possibilities of animation

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 3>as an art form that's unique to film, and of

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 3>course this would have been still during the Silent era,

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 3>and she ended up studying at the Max Reinhardt School

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 3>of Acting under the German filmmaker Paul Wegner, where she

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:13.719
<v Speaker 3>showed off her talent for silhouette cutting, cutting out these

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 3>figures in paper and then, to read from Debbie Lockwood's

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 3>article quote, Wegner soon enlisted her to help with his

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 3>nineteen eighteen film The Pied Piper of Hamlin, an adaptation

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 3>of the folk legend about a man who's hired to

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 3>play his magic flute to lure away rats from a

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 3>German town. When the town refuses to pay him for

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 3>his services, the piper plays another tune to hypnotize the

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 3>children and lead them out of the town, never to

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 3>be seen again. Wegner had Reineger help him animate wooden

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 3>puppet rats for the film, and after this she had

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 3>the bugs. She wanted to make films for a living,

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 3>so she later met and married an art historian named

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Carl Koch, who she would collaborate with on a number

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 3>of her films, and her career would go on at

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 3>this point to span sixty years, including over seventy films

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 3>animated by this silhouette cutout technique, where she would cut

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 3>figures out of paper with scissors and then film them

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 3>moving on a transparent surface to create the action that

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 3>you see on the screen.

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Now, Paul Wegen, who you mentioned earlier, for anyone out

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:25.079
<v Speaker 2>there who just wondering who that is, he was one

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 2>of the directors and writers on the nineteen fifteen film

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 2>The Golum. You've probably seen images of this. The clay

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 2>golum figure in black and white, very haunting, and he

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 2>also played the golum.

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that is correct. So in nineteen nineteen, Lada Reiniger

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 3>and Carl Koch together created a silhouette animated short film

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 3>called The Ornament of the Heart in Love, which is,

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 3>in the words of Debbie Lockwood, here about two lovers,

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 3>both ballet dancers, and a morphing ornament between them that

0:11:57.520 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 3>represents their emotions.

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Now, one thing I really love about that description is

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 2>that if that description sounds like you could easily describe

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 2>a current or upcoming Pixar short, you know. So an

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 2>area of animation, of mainstream animation where we often think

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 2>of like this is where the really inventive ideas and

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 2>formats that are going to be explored, you know, and

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 2>we think of it as kind of at times, we

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 2>can think of it as a place that we can

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 2>only come to after, you know, a century of animation

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 2>and filmmaking. But here we are in nineteen nineteen, and

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 2>there's just as much ingenuity and creativity in using you know,

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 2>different formats to tell a story with visuals.

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 3>That's a very good point. Yeah, early on, there was

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 3>a lot of elasticity about what a film could be,

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 3>what should be the contents of a film.

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 2>So while well, today it's more like what can we

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 2>break to create something new? Like this is an age

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 2>where a lot of stuff was unformed, you know. It

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 2>was the amorphous age of filmmaking.

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, So her most his famous film is the

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 3>nineteen twenty six silent movie The Adventures of Prince Ahmed,

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 3>which is an adaptation of the Arabic classic One thousand

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 3>and one Nights, which was one of the first feature

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 3>length animated films in history. And to quote from Lockwood

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 3>here describing her technological and creative process, quote, Reineger's editing

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 3>was meticulous. Starting with more than two hundred and fifty

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 3>thousand frames, she and her crew used just over one

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 3>hundred thousand in the film, which ran for an hour

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 3>and twenty one minutes each second, requiring twenty four frames.

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:39.959
<v Speaker 3>It took three years to complete and premiered in Volkspoon

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 3>or People's Theater in Berlin when Reineger was twenty seven.

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 3>The film showcased the fantastical potential of animation. A prince

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 3>defeated an army of demons to win over a princess,

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:57.959
<v Speaker 3>birds battled witches and sorcerers, horses flew. The French film

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 3>director Jeanrenois saw Princemed on its opening night in Paris

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 3>and later recalled that he wanted to tell her, you

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 3>have fairy hands. Reineger designed a complex process to make

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 3>her films. She cut each limb of each figure out

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 3>of black cardboard and thin lead, then join them together

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 3>with wire hinges. For research, she spent hours at the

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Zoo Berlin watching how the animals moved. And then I

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 3>was reading later in this article that she also pioneered

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 3>new technology for creating animated films, including a device called

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 3>a trick tish or trick table, and this involved a

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 3>camera that would be hanging in the air facing down

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 3>onto a table made of layers of glass, which would

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 3>form the stage for the silhouette cutouts to play upon,

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 3>and then you would have a bright light underneath that

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 3>would cause the wire hinges used at the joints of

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 3>these figures to disappear, and it was basically stop motion animation.

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 3>They would take a photo of a that she had

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 3>set out, and then she would advance the figures slightly

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 3>in their movement to advance the action, and then take

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 3>a photo again building the film frame by frame. Now,

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 3>as with any German filmmaker working in the first half

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 3>of the twentieth century, you end up wondering, okay, did

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 3>they end up within the Hitler machine right, Because of

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 3>course Nazi Germany was big on using film as propaganda.

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 3>So I was reading about this, and it seems like

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 3>after Hitler came to power, Lata and Carl left to

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Germany and tried to make a life in other countries

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 3>like France and Italy and England. Apparently they were politically

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 3>opposed to Hitler, but they could not get visas, or

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 3>they couldn't get the visas they wanted to stay permanently

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 3>in the other countries they went to, so it seems

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 3>like they were essentially taking long vacations in other countries

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 3>where they were working and then having to come back

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 3>and then leave again. They were eventually forced to move

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 3>back to Berlin in nineteen forty four, apparently to take

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 3>care of Latta's mother, who is very sick, and I

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 3>can only find evidence that she worked on one film

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 3>in this period called The Golden Goose, which I have

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 3>seen described as a propaganda film, but I can't find

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 3>much about it, so I don't know, but together they

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 3>moved to England in nineteen forty eight and she made

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 3>some children's films for the BBC, and she passed away

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 3>on June nineteenth, nineteen eighty one, at the age of

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 3>eighty two. So the film that we're going to be

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 3>looking at today is from her early period, from nineteen

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 3>twenty two, and it is an adaptation of the Cinderella

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 3>folk tale. I was reading about this in Lockwood's article

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 3>where apparently the Cinderella adaptation was reviewed by The New

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 3>York Times in nineteen twenty eight, where the author Charles

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Morgan wrote, the small black shapes laugh at you from

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 3>a world of their own, into which naturalism makes no

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 3>laborious entry. And I really like phrasing it like that,

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 3>because I think this little animated film is wonderful. And uh,

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 3>and I see what he meant by that with naturalism

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 3>makes no laborious entry. Something about the animation style feels

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 3>so free.

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, this is a beautiful picture. And if anybody

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 2>who wants to see that, the two films that we're

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 2>discussing here, I'll make sure that I include links to

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 2>them or embedded versions of them on the blog post.

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 2>That accompanies this episode at Summuda music dot com. But

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 2>the yeah, the style of this is so divorced from

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 2>from reality. It just comes out of It's like it's

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 2>a reality that is passed from from from fairy tale

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 2>book to fairytale book. You know, there was a there's

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 2>a quote that you included in the in our notes

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 2>for this episode from Ao Scott where he describes quote

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 2>dreamy images that seem to tap right into the collective

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 2>unconscious that suggests both in antidote to Disney and a

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 2>precursor to Tim Burton. And it's interesting that Scott mentioned

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Disney here because in nineteen twenty two, Disney Walt Disney

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 2>the Animator also put out a Cinderella animated short. But

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 2>it is very much connected to the real world. Like

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 2>you see, I didn't even watch it in its entirety.

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 2>I just kind of flipped around and got a sense

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 2>of it. But like there are scenes of like flapper culture,

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, and stuff like that, and like it's very

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 2>it's hitched to the real world of the time, whereas yeah,

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 2>this one is it seems to exist in an artistic

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 2>unreality that is so much more engrossing.

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so it is the story of Cinderella. The story

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 3>element is fairly straightforward, but it's the animation that really

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 3>sings here. It is an animation based on these silhouettes,

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 3>these cutout these paper cutout figure silhouettes and stop motion animation.

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 3>And as for the plot content, it is decidedly more

0:18:56.280 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 3>in the brothers grim direction than the sanitized versions would

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 3>come later, like the in the full length animated Cinderella

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 3>by Disney and so in that version, And so that

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 3>means that in this version it is a magic tree

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 3>instead of a fairy godmother, a creepy magic tree on

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 3>a hill and a cemetery.

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's as if nature itself is the force that

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 2>answers her call, as opposed to, you know, any particular human,

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:22.679
<v Speaker 2>humanized force.

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. You also get that Cinderella's wicked stepsister absolutely does

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 3>chop off part of her own foot in order to

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 3>fit into the slipper and get with the prince. Oh yes,

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 3>but the slipper fills up with blood and it doesn't work.

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 3>And then there's a really funny scene where the other

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 3>sister tries is she's about to chop off her own

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 3>foot to fit in the slipper, and the Prince is

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 3>just like, no, no.

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is such a fun silent film. Like when

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 2>I told that my family, I'm like, hey, guys, we're

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 2>gonna sit down and watch a silent film together. And

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 2>the boy didn't really even know what I meant by

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 2>that because he didn't have much exposure to sign films.

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:01.360
<v Speaker 2>My wife was hesitant. Then I'm like, don't worry. It's

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 2>it's animated, and it's it's Cinderella, and it's really really delightful.

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 2>It's you know, has kind of a shadow puppetry. I

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 2>look to it, and so they're like, okay, and we

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 2>sit down. We watched it. The the the bits of

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 2>humor generated laughter from all of us. The toe cutting

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 2>made us all scream out loud, you know, in a

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 2>fun way, because it's, you know, the style divorces it

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 2>enough from reality that you're not legitimately horrified, but you're like, ah,

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 2>don't do that, so it Yeah, it's just tremendous fun. Now.

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 3>One choice about this movie that I found very interesting

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 3>was the choice to include the animation method as part

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 3>of the narrative. So I don't know, Rob, did the

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 3>version you watched have title cards or or what language

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 3>were the title cards in if it did.

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh, well, the version I watched it did have some

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 2>title cards, but I believe they were No, they were

0:20:55.280 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 2>in English. Maybe I just didn't read them. I was

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 2>just getting set up at the time. But for the

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 2>most part, Yeah, it's just a visual presentation, and I

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 2>guess it helps to know the story. So as we

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 2>watched it, we were kind of taking it apart a

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 2>little bit. We're like, oh, yeah, I guess she's doing

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 2>this now, Oh, yes, this must be instead of a

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 2>fairy godmother, it's this tree and now the birds are

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 2>involved that sort of thing.

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, I meant the inter title cards, yeah, between the action.

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know now that you mention it, though, Joe.

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 2>The version that I watched with my family was on vimeo, okay,

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 2>and I don't think that one had title cards in it.

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 2>I think that was just the animation. But I've been

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:35.679
<v Speaker 2>playing the YouTube version in the corner of my screen

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 2>as we record here, and yeah, I'm getting some dialogue

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 2>that was not present in the version we screened.

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.239
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so at the beginning of the version. There are

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 3>different versions. Different ones have different title cards, inner titles,

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 3>and the version that I was watching had the English

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 3>titles that begin what Cinderella suffered from the two sisters

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 3>and her stepmother, how she grew into a fairy princess.

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.880
<v Speaker 3>Here is seen told by a pair of scissors on

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 3>a screen, so they're like including the fact that this

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 3>is made by scissors, and it's in the animation too.

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 3>It begins with black silhouettes on a blue background of

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 3>a small pair of scissors kicking around in the void,

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 3>almost like a frog paddling in the water. And then

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 3>a pair of hands comes in and they chase the

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 3>scissors around, they catch them, and then they use them

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 3>to cut a figure out of a piece of paper,

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 3>and that figure will be our heroine, Cinderella, which I

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 3>thought was a very interesting choice. One totally unrelated side

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 3>note about the inner titles. If you're watching this with kids,

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 3>you might want to check the version you're watching first

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 3>because one of the inner titles in one of the

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 3>ones I saw, had a word in it that used

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 3>to have a different connotation now has Now it is

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 3>a pejorative term used for women, but I think it

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 3>was previously a pejorative term used for women, but with

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 3>different connotations.

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Fortunately that was not in the version that I

0:22:58.359 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 2>watched with my family.

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 3>Yes, check which version if you're going to show it

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 3>to kids, But I.

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Do love the visual opening of watching the hands cut

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.159
<v Speaker 2>out a character with the scissors. It reminds me of

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 2>some of the differences you see in puppetry, where you know,

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 2>sometimes it's about hiding the fact that it's puppetry and

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 2>hiding the puppeteer and letting the figures take on a

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 2>life for themselves. Other times you have very visual puppeteers,

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 2>and part of it is about acknowledging that the role

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 2>that the puppeteer plays and bringing this to life, and

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 2>it not mattering that you can see that it is

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 2>not real and is in the story you like. You know,

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 2>you're not looking at real people, You're looking at a

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 2>very stylized form of paper cutting and an animation. But

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 2>that's part of the magic.

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:46.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, totally. And it's very creepy at the beginning actually

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 3>with the scissors and the figure, because when the hands

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 3>finish their work, there's this moment where the figure of

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Cinderella is created and then she's posed dangling with the

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 3>scissors attached to her head and displayed open, and it

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 3>resembles a kind of torture device or something. I don't know.

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 2>I didn't get that so much. I thought I thought

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 2>it was more she was manipulating it with the scissors.

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 2>So it's just the artistos now I do want to

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 2>This is a great place to discuss this though, the

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 2>creepiness quote unquote of this short film. The version that

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 2>you sent me had some added music. Music is a

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 2>whole separate issue in silent film, because, yeah, sometimes you

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 2>have specific works that are passed down where we can

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 2>look at the sheet music and reproduce it. Other times

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 2>we don't know what music, if any, was associated with

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 2>a particular silent film. A lot of times music from

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 2>that era can sound herky, jerky and kind of annoying.

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 2>And you can, of course always play your own music

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 2>on top. And there have been numerous cases where someone

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 2>has composed new music, you know, be it rock or

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 2>electronic or what have you, for classic silent films. So

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 2>the version you and ually sent me had some added music.

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it was composed by him for

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:07.199
<v Speaker 2>this or someone who just picked a track by them,

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 2>but it has music by evangelists.

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 2>The composer, of course, probably most famous for his work

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 2>on Blade runner and I love vangelists, but it's kind

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 2>of creepy music, and it was kind of leading to

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 2>a creepy interpretation of what I was seeing. So just

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 2>a minute or two into it, we switched to some

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 2>more upbeat music to play over it. We played just

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:32.959
<v Speaker 2>a channel on Soma f M, and I found that

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 2>lighter tone hit almost immediately and was ultimately more fun.

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 2>But the music that we choose or is chosen for us,

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 2>with silent films like this, they can have such a

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 2>huge effect on how we interpret them.

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think you're exactly right about that. And it's

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 3>funny because the animation has both elements, Like the animation

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 3>is a little bit creepy, but it's also funny. It's

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 3>both at the same time, and so you can easily

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 3>lean more in one direction or the other by adding

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 3>the right tone in the sound.

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Because again, it has some laugh out loud moments. Yeah,

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure we'll get to them here in a minute.

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 3>So I'm obviously not going to spend a lot of

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 3>time explaining the implied plot. Like it's Cinderella, you basically

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 3>know the plot. I love the cutouts of the Wicked Stepsisters.

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 3>One is very thin and very tall, and the other

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 3>one is very short and stout. And so we see

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.119
<v Speaker 3>the wicked stepsisters being mean. We see the wicked step

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 3>mother abusing Cinderella. She's like poking her with a cane

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 3>while Cinderella is cleaning the stairs. And then you get

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 3>more references to scissors and cutting intertwined with the plot

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 3>in the inner titles. So there's an inner title that

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 3>says snip and we have the Kings rs VP snip

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 3>and the magic birds have set her free.

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a lot of fun is had with the magic

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 2>birds in this. Oh, I love the magic birds are

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 2>perfect for this kind of cutout technique.

0:26:55.800 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And so according to the story, Cinderella cannot go

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 3>to the Prince's ball, but she has to help her

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 3>wicked stepsisters get ready to attend, and this is a

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 3>good comedic scene. She has to comb their hair and

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 3>lace their corsets for one of their sisters, the very thin,

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 3>very tall one. There's a moment where you see Cinderella

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 3>dumping household objects into her bodice, presumably to fill it out.

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 3>So she's like throwing I think like pots and pans

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:23.119
<v Speaker 3>in there. It's very funny.

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is this is a lot of fun. And

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:27.959
<v Speaker 2>you know, another thing worth driving home. You mentioned how

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:32.199
<v Speaker 2>we didn't really have to describe the plot of of Cinderella.

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 2>One of the reasons is that, like this is pretty

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 2>much a universal story. The basic story of Cinderella exists

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 2>in various cultures. You know. It's just it's it's that

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 2>important of a trope, you know, this idea of the

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:50.439
<v Speaker 2>downtrodden and the oppressed rising up in this in this nature.

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 2>There's a there's an old Chinese version of this as well.

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I don't think I knew that.

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, and there are various other versions of it

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 2>from just around the world, like the It's it's interesting

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 2>how such a potent fairy tale like this you just

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 2>find versions of it throughout human culture.

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm sure that does help with getting it. And

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 3>the other thing is you mentioned earlier the idea of

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 3>like nature itself sort of being the thing that helps Cinderella.

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 3>In this version, it's not like a single fairy godmother,

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 3>but it's the birds and it's the tree. And it's

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:26.360
<v Speaker 3>really interesting the way she's got this pre existing connection

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 3>with the birds, like they're just on her side from

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 3>the beginning. So the wicked stepmother is having Cinderella clean

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 3>up spilled lentils from the floor while the wicked stepsisters

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 3>go off to the ball. But then a flock of

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 3>birds come by to help her out, and we get

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 3>a title that says snip and she gathers from her

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 3>apple trees the golden gown of the hesperites the silver coach.

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 3>But when the clock strikes one warn the bird voices

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Cinderella run, and so we see the magic tree and

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Cinderella goes out to this creepy, lonely hillside with a

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 3>tree at the top of it. It's kind of sad

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 3>drooping tree, and the tree ends up granting her wish

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 3>for a gown and a coach to take her to

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 3>the ball.

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 2>I like how this was pre code so she could

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 2>stay out till one.

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 3>And Cinderella's gown I have to say, this looks sort

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 3>of like a cyberpunk pressure suit like Bruce Willis is

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 3>wearing at the beginning of Twelve Monkeys. I guess maybe

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 3>she's going to work in the Prince's virology lab. But

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 3>it's very puffy and it's covered in these lines around

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 3>the top that could be gas hoses.

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it looks like it's just made out of nature,

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Like she's coated in mycillium and stuff. You know, it's

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 2>pretty cool looking.

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's really good. So Cinderella goes to the ball.

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 3>She dances with the prince. The stepsister is very jealous.

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 3>The prince falls in love with Cinderella and kisses her,

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 3>but then of course she has to flee at midnight,

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 3>and the prince loses her. And then comes the search

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 3>you know from the story, based on the slipper that

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 3>she drops while she's running out, and so you see

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 3>this royal raid go out to find the owner of

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 3>the slipper. They're putting it on people's feet, and when

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 3>the prince comes to the house, Cinderella is made to

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 3>hide in the cellar because the wicked stepmother does not

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 3>want her to be seen by the prince, and the

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 3>wicked stepsisters are trying to they're trying to snag the prince.

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 3>So one of them, yep, she chops part of her

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 3>own foot off. And that part was seriously hilarious.

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, again, we were all just going ah

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 2>when it happened, and you know, I know that that's

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 2>a part of you know, the grimmer versions. Of this tale,

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 2>but I guess it wasn't quite expecting and it happens

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 2>so suddenly too it catches you off guard.

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, she just reaches down with the knife and just

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 3>chops off the front of her foot, and then she's

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 3>still trying to put the mutilated foot into the slipper,

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 3>but it fills up with blood. So this is the

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 3>X rated version. But eventually, of course, the magic birds

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 3>tell the Prince that Cinderella is hiding in the cellar,

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 3>and he goes down and he gets her out and

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 3>he lifts her up, and it's a happy ending, true love.

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 3>And then there's a great moment where I don't know

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 3>how else to describe this. The wicked stepmother is so

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 3>mad about Cinderella getting to marry the Prince that she

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 3>literally cracks in half, like a fissure runs down the

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 3>middle of her and she looks like a venus fly

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 3>trap opening up.

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting. It was interesting because it made me think

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 2>of one of our recent episodes. We were talking about

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:26.719
<v Speaker 2>changes to fairy tales, and there was one in particular

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 2>in which somebody gets so mad they basically explode, which

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 2>I so, I guess it was an idea that existed

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 2>sort of in the fairy tale storytelling world at the time,

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 2>and you know, though, I and perhaps it occur as

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 2>in a written version of Cinderella, but it was. It

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 2>was a delightful surprise here that you're having sort of

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Mortal Kombat type fatalities occurring in this children's tale. Oh but,

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 2>on the speaking of violence in this animated short, on

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 2>the foot cutting, that the first foot cut was fabulous

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 2>and shocking and hilarious, but the second one was even better.

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh yes, the second sister goes to put on the

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 2>shoe and it's not fitting either because her foot is

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 2>like too plump. And then you see her hand come

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 2>down with the knife because she's going to do the

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 2>exact same thing cut off part of her foot, and

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 2>the prince's hand slaps it out of the way as

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 2>it's like, nope, nope, you're not doing that trick.

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 3>That not allowed against the rules, no foot cutting. And

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 3>I love the implied sneakiness with the knife or she's like,

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 3>oh I think I dropped something.

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let me saw through the bones of my foot.

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 3>So yes, in the end, this movie is definitely worth

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 3>checking out. You can find different versions of it online.

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 3>I think that I have different title card situations and

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 3>different levels of restoration, but I absolutely love her animation style.

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's tremendous. I'm really glad you turned me onto

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 2>this one. Yeah, So if you want to see it,

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 2>I just recommend you, know, you can find it on

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 2>the blog, but just go to something like YouTube or

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 2>or any other streaming video side and if you just

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 2>do a search for Cinderella nineteen twenty two, this will

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 2>turn up. You'll probably also turn up the Disney the

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Walt Disney version as well, But this is the one

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 2>to watch. Choose your own music though, whatever you want.

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Really you want to listen to Nurse with Wound while

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 2>watching it, then that's going to create at a certain feel.

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 2>But you can also put on something up beaten peppy.

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, you could put on the hair metal band Cinderella.

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Why yeah, why not? I mean, that's that's ultimately the

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 2>fun about this stuff. Do what you will with the

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 2>music on a silent film. I noticed in the Psychotronic

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 2>book by Michael Weldon, like he pretty much had the

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 2>same advice. Like he was like, the music often sucks,

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 2>turn it off if you don't like it, and then

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 2>realize You're gonna have to put in a little bit

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 2>of work sometimes to enjoy these films, but it's worth.

0:33:51.160 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 3>It, all right. Are we ready to look at our

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 3>second silent film today?

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? And again, this is one that I think a

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of people are not going to be that familiar with.

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 2>I was not familiar with it until I started looking

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 2>around for something to cover, and you know, again, I

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 2>wanted to cover something that that wasn't one of the

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:19.319
<v Speaker 2>classics that were all somewhat familiar with, you know, that's

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 2>not Nosferatu and so forth, And so I came across

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 2>an Italian science fiction action comedy from nineteen twenty one,

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 2>The Mechanical Man. And it's especially worth discussing on weird

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 2>House cinema because this is the grandfather, or even the

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 2>great grandfather of films like Robot Jocks and gun Head.

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 2>Not only is it a film about robots battling each other,

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 2>it is seemingly the first film about robots battling each other.

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Whoa so the elevator pitch on this one is a

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 2>remote control robot man with exceptional speed and strength is

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 2>captured by criminals and forced to do evil and this

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 2>eventually Coleman in an all out battle between two different robots.

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Now, from what I understand, the robots are definitely what

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:09.240
<v Speaker 3>drew us in to watch this, and they're a major

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 3>part of the section of the film that remains in

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 3>the archives. But if I understand correctly, the majority of

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 3>the original film was really focused less on the robots

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 3>and more on sort of the exploits of the lead

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 3>villain or antagonist.

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 2>Right, yeah, yeah, that's that very much seems to be

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 2>the case. This was a second film in a proposed

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 2>trilogy that revolved around a cunning female criminal as opposed

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:43.359
<v Speaker 2>to the robots. The robots I am to understand, we're

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 2>not in the first film.

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.879
<v Speaker 3>Right, and this criminal lady is named do you call

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 3>it her? It's m a d O? Is it Madow

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:50.800
<v Speaker 3>or Mayto?

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure, you know. They never say it out

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 2>loud in the film, so I read it as Matdow

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:00.959
<v Speaker 2>in my head and kept thinking of it as such. Yes,

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Maddow is described as an evil countess. And the first

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 2>film was a human document from nineteen twenty and there's

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:12.760
<v Speaker 2>not really much I could find out about it. It's

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 2>possibly probably a lost film in its entirety, so I

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 2>don't think there's any of it that remains, but it

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 2>featured many of the same characters as this film does,

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:26.240
<v Speaker 2>and perhaps deals with the same central conflict between Maddow

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 2>and the Dara family, which is considered which is centered

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 2>around a dar a patriarch who is a brilliant inventor.

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yeah, So throughout this film, or at least the

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 3>parts of it, we were able to see Maddow is

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 3>running around doing evil with her identity hidden behind a mask.

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 3>So she's got like a thing wrapped around her face

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 3>and head. And then at the end she is unmasked

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 3>and it is revealed that she is this Russian countess.

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, and she's also electrocuted at the end. But I

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 2>guess she wasn't supposed to die because there was a

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 2>third film planned, but it didn't come together in the

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:04.319
<v Speaker 2>post World War One period. So I thought we might

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 2>just look at some of the people involved in this one,

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 2>since you know, Cinderella did not have people in the

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:11.959
<v Speaker 2>actual film it was animated and was largely revolved around

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 2>a singular individual. This one had multiple people involved that

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 2>are worth mentioning. First of all, the director was a

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 2>man by the name of Andre Dead who lived eighteen

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 2>seventy nine through nineteen forty He was a French actor

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 2>and director who made a name for himself in this

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 2>series of comedy shorts called the fools Hed Comedies, and

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 2>they all had titles like fools Heads Holiday or Fool's

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Head Has Lost a Needle, So, you know, just little

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 2>comic adventures centered around this one ridiculous individual.

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Fools had Scared Stupid.

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah exactly. You know, these were the earnest movies of

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 2>the day, and these were apparently internationally successful during the

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 2>nineteen hundreds and the nineteen tens, like these were, you know,

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 2>big money as much as anything was big money cinematically

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 2>in those days. They're mostly forgotten today, and certainly Deed

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:06.839
<v Speaker 2>is I think mostly forgotten today by the public at large.

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 2>But he was a big deal at the time. But

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:11.919
<v Speaker 2>his career was somewhat disrupted by the outbreak of World

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:15.320
<v Speaker 2>War One, in which he was conscripted into the reserves,

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 2>and he may have served in the trenches. It seems

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:21.880
<v Speaker 2>a little foggy on that. And afterwards he returned to

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 2>direct just a few more movies, and The Mechanical Man

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 2>was his final directorial effort. He continued to act through

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 2>nineteen thirty eight, and he acts in this as well.

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 2>He plays a comic character name Saltarello who pops up

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 2>at one point. But yeah, for the most part, like

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:44.240
<v Speaker 2>he's the director of this is his baby, his mechanical baby.

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Do you know if he was the guy who was

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:48.359
<v Speaker 3>bouncing his butt up and down on the chair in

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 3>that scene that I couldn't understand.

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:54.360
<v Speaker 2>I think he was, Yes, a very physical comedy, you know.

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 2>I guess it would be like because I think he

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 2>played Fool's Head in the fools Head movies. So it's like,

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, if Ernest Or to direct a film like

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 2>he'd have to go in there for a cameo just

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 2>to keep the crowd happy, that.

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Sort of thing. Okay, Yeah, yeah, So I enjoyed the

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:11.919
<v Speaker 3>parts of this movie that we were able to see

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:14.879
<v Speaker 3>that remain I will say, I don't think this guy

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 3>is quite on the Buster Keaton level as far as

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:20.320
<v Speaker 3>the physical comedy of the Silent Era goes.

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Now, the main star of this again, this is

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:28.760
<v Speaker 2>ultimately about, yes, the robots, but also it's about Matdow,

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 2>this villainess that we've been discussing here, and she is

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 2>played by Valentina Frascaroli, who lived eighteen fifty five through

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 2>nineteen fifty seven. She also played the role in the

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 2>previous movie. She has eighty six film credits on IMDb,

0:39:44.560 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 2>including a bunch of Fool's Head shorts. According to Mary

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Anne Lewinsky, writing for Il Cinema rich Ovata, she was

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:55.800
<v Speaker 2>a versatile leading lady actor of the day. She starred

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 2>in both comedies like Clearly the Fools Heead Movie and

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:01.400
<v Speaker 2>This to a ar degree, but she was also in

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 2>serious films as well. She was in a nineteen twenty

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 2>two film about Dante I believe it had a title

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:10.759
<v Speaker 2>that translated to the Life and Times of Dante, and

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:14.440
<v Speaker 2>she was also in an interesting looking puppet themed film,

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 2>The War and the Dream of Momi, from nineteen seventeen. Now,

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:23.359
<v Speaker 2>as I learned in a Bruce Sterling article about this

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 2>is a twenty twelve piece for Wired magazine. This was

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 2>the second film in what Deed Planned is a Mado trilogy,

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:34.799
<v Speaker 2>which he says explains why Mattos given so much screen time.

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Mattow is the adventuress. She is a quote scheming white

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Russian exiled countess, So you get the impression that again,

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 2>the first film I think is entirely lost. I can't

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 2>find in really any details about what it was about.

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 2>But she seems like she's always on the run, always

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:55.240
<v Speaker 2>escaping and falling into more schemes. Even in this film.

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 2>I think she escapes a couple of times, once from

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:01.799
<v Speaker 2>a prison infirmary by setting it on fire. And this

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 2>scene is also interesting because it contains some mild nudity,

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:08.720
<v Speaker 2>like some side nudity, but you can't really make anything

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 2>out of it given the quality of the film, Like

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:12.879
<v Speaker 2>you really have to squint to even tell that there

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 2>was maybe some mild nudity in this scene.

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 3>It's very European.

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 2>And also, I mean it speaks to like what this

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 2>movie was trying to do. It did not have as

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 2>much of a high minded artistic purpose this was about.

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is a film in which giant robots

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:32.320
<v Speaker 2>ultimately battle each other. It has the same sort of

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 2>appeal that it's always had to us, you know, and

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:39.360
<v Speaker 2>which again I think it speaks to the certainly the

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 2>creativity and you know, the science fiction dreams that were

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 2>present even in the nineteen twenties, but also the fact

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:49.319
<v Speaker 2>that like people went to the cinema to be entertained this,

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:51.720
<v Speaker 2>and this was a film that was trying to entertain people.

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Now again, indeed, never got to make that third Matto picture,

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 2>but you know, we can only wonder what could have

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:02.719
<v Speaker 2>transpired in it. You know, she's again she's electrocuted at

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 2>the end of this film, though perhaps isn't dead, so

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:07.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm guessing she would have escaped authorities again and she

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:10.840
<v Speaker 2>would have come back after the Darra family, the Dara

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:14.240
<v Speaker 2>family again being the family of the inventor who creates

0:42:14.280 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 2>giant robots.

0:42:15.800 --> 0:42:18.319
<v Speaker 3>So the version of this that I saw had Italian

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 3>inner titles, and there was there were a lot that

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:23.319
<v Speaker 3>I went by, and I did not have time to

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 3>translate them, so I don't know what they said. But

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 3>there was one I recognized multiple times, which was where

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 3>it just said corto cercuto.

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:38.439
<v Speaker 2>And short short circuit. Oh there you go. Yeah. Now,

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 2>as we've alluded to already, this was for a long

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:45.359
<v Speaker 2>time a lost film, and today we do not have

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:47.279
<v Speaker 2>all of it. You know, this is another sad fact

0:42:47.320 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 2>about film from this period is that they are not

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:53.440
<v Speaker 2>always complete if they did survive, and in many cases

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 2>we've lost everything. There are some really notoriously lost or

0:42:56.880 --> 0:43:01.959
<v Speaker 2>partially lost films, probably the the the gold standard being

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Todd Browning's nineteen twenty seven horror film London After Midnight,

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:10.200
<v Speaker 2>which starred Lawn Cheney. I feel like, even though you

0:43:10.280 --> 0:43:13.799
<v Speaker 2>know you haven't seen it, you've seen images from it.

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:17.360
<v Speaker 2>You've seen those stills of lawn Cheney and this brilliant,

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:21.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, frightening get up is this kind of ghoulish

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:22.960
<v Speaker 2>vampire in a tall hat.

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. We talked about this, I know, in our Invention

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:29.000
<v Speaker 3>episodes about the early days of film, Like I think

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 3>when we were discussing Ali Ski Blachet, we talked about

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 3>how a huge number of her films are lost.

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:36.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And it's crazy to think about this, especially with

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 2>films like London After Midnight, because this was a film

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:43.240
<v Speaker 2>that grossed over a million dollars in nineteen twenty seven.

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:46.000
<v Speaker 2>But you know, the last known copy of it was

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:49.480
<v Speaker 2>destroyed in a nineteen sixty five MGM vault fire. So

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 2>the only thing that survives today are our images from it.

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:55.440
<v Speaker 2>And we do have a lot of images from London

0:43:55.480 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 2>after Midnight, but that's what some people have used to

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 2>reconstruct the film in its entirety, just making remaking the

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:06.360
<v Speaker 2>film with still images. Now It's a similar case with

0:44:06.440 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 2>the Mechanical Man, except we were not able to We

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 2>were able to bring back some of it. So the

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 2>original film is thought to have been sixty to eighty

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:18.320
<v Speaker 2>minutes in length, but it was a thought completely lost

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 2>for many years until reels from the Portuguese version turned

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:26.399
<v Speaker 2>up in Brazil, and this amounts to about twenty six

0:44:26.440 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 2>minutes of film total. And luckily it's footage from the

0:44:29.760 --> 0:44:33.320
<v Speaker 2>later portions of the film. Because it's a giant robot movie.

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:36.120
<v Speaker 2>You know how giant robot movies go, They're going to

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 2>really have most of the special effects in the back end.

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:41.760
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of like if RoboCop two were a lost

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:44.280
<v Speaker 2>film and you got to reclaim half of it, which

0:44:44.320 --> 0:44:47.120
<v Speaker 2>half would you get? Which half would you want? You

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 2>would want the later half in which the robots battle

0:44:49.680 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 2>each other.

0:44:50.320 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 3>I guess then you would miss most of that stuff

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:56.360
<v Speaker 3>with like the twelve year old drug dealer hitman or whatever.

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Right, you would lose a lot of interesting stuff, and

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:01.400
<v Speaker 2>more of the point, you would lose stuff that helps

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:03.880
<v Speaker 2>you make sense of the later stuff. And certainly that's

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:07.920
<v Speaker 2>one of the cases with the Mechanical Man, watching the

0:45:07.960 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 2>fragments that remain. It's very interesting. The robots are fabulous looking.

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:16.680
<v Speaker 2>They're these oh man, they're like they they're you know,

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:20.759
<v Speaker 2>they're obviously costumes, but they have this cool mechanical like

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:22.560
<v Speaker 2>steam punk kind of look to them, or I guess

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:26.160
<v Speaker 2>it would be diesel punk, and you know, they're they're

0:45:26.200 --> 0:45:29.799
<v Speaker 2>sort of mean faced and violent and oh it's They're

0:45:29.840 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 2>just fabulous, but you're often confused as to what's going on.

0:45:33.960 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, I had to I had to look back

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:39.880
<v Speaker 2>at It's some ride ups to really make sense of

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:43.600
<v Speaker 2>what was happening and how this would have featured, how

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 2>this would have factored into the full version of the film.

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:49.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, with those limitations in mind, would you like to

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 3>talk about the plot?

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, such as it is. This is the plot. Basically,

0:45:54.360 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 2>a Professor Diara creates a super fast, super strong, remote

0:45:58.080 --> 0:46:00.920
<v Speaker 2>control robot that is going to help out humanity, but

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:05.920
<v Speaker 2>then enter the criminal mastermind Madow. She has the scientist

0:46:06.120 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 2>killed and tries to steal the plans for the mechanical

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:11.960
<v Speaker 2>man the criminals. She and the criminals are caught, but

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:16.400
<v Speaker 2>she escapes again by setting the infirmary on fire, kidnaps

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:19.720
<v Speaker 2>the scientist's niece, and obtains the plans, so she builds

0:46:19.719 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 2>her own mechanical man, goes on a rampage with it.

0:46:23.280 --> 0:46:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Just sort of like I don't know that there was

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 2>any like grand criminal plan. It was just sort of

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:30.600
<v Speaker 2>like crime in general, Like, Wow, now that I have

0:46:30.680 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 2>the robot, I can do crime, more crime and faster

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:37.640
<v Speaker 2>crime than ever before. So that's what happens. But the

0:46:37.680 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 2>scientist's brother, who survives, uses the original mechanical man to

0:46:42.280 --> 0:46:44.920
<v Speaker 2>stop her, so it all culminates in a big robot

0:46:45.040 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 2>battle inside an opera house that ultimately destroys the opera house.

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Yes, now, I was making a few notes as I

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:53.760
<v Speaker 3>was watching this. One is that I really liked Madow's

0:46:53.880 --> 0:46:57.000
<v Speaker 3>escape from prison or the hospital or wherever she is

0:46:57.640 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 3>because it's a multi stage procedure where she injects something

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:05.720
<v Speaker 3>and fakes out the orderlies and then starts a fire

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:09.680
<v Speaker 3>and then gets out. It's it's it's a good sequence.

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 3>But beyond that, as I was saying earlier, you know,

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:15.239
<v Speaker 3>I tried my best, but there were some scenes where

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:18.680
<v Speaker 3>I had no idea what's going on on screen. So

0:47:19.040 --> 0:47:21.560
<v Speaker 3>the main thing I wanted to ask about is what's

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 3>going on with the dude? Possibly the director frantically bouncing

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:27.720
<v Speaker 3>on the armchair. Could you tell?

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 2>I could not tell this was This was a scene that,

0:47:31.360 --> 0:47:33.840
<v Speaker 2>again I'd have to chalk up to maybe being just

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:37.880
<v Speaker 2>a wink for the audience that involves like a beloved

0:47:37.960 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 2>comic actor who also directed the film, kind of a cameo.

0:47:41.320 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that means nothing to modern viewers.

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:47.479
<v Speaker 3>It's the it's the nineteen twenty one version of Jim

0:47:47.560 --> 0:47:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Carrey going alrighty.

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Then yeah, yeah, maybe so yeah, it would be it

0:47:52.680 --> 0:47:55.960
<v Speaker 2>would be like if if Jim Carrey directed a robot

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 2>movie but also showed up and did one of his

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:00.319
<v Speaker 2>old bits just in the middle of it, you know. Yeah.

0:48:00.320 --> 0:48:02.840
<v Speaker 2>But the other thing about you know, confusing moments in

0:48:02.880 --> 0:48:05.719
<v Speaker 2>this film, you know, we can chalk a lot of

0:48:05.760 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 2>it up to the fragmentary nature of what remains, but

0:48:09.719 --> 0:48:12.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, we can also point to possible shortfalls in

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:14.279
<v Speaker 2>the state of the medium at the time, or even

0:48:14.360 --> 0:48:17.960
<v Speaker 2>filmmaker capability, because ultimately, Deed would not will not be

0:48:18.000 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 2>the last film director to craft an incoherent action picture

0:48:21.960 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 2>or to struggle transitioning from short form laughs to longer

0:48:25.680 --> 0:48:29.360
<v Speaker 2>form dramatic storytelling. So I don't know, it's hard to

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:32.080
<v Speaker 2>tell exactly where all the blame levels out.

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:35.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so there's some of that disconnect in movies that

0:48:35.440 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 3>we've looked at. You remember with Doctor X there was

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:41.920
<v Speaker 3>this strange mixture of creepiness and comedy, and not the

0:48:42.160 --> 0:48:45.799
<v Speaker 3>kind of comedy that usually goes along with creepiness in

0:48:45.880 --> 0:48:52.319
<v Speaker 3>movies today, a very wet, kind of slapstick, goofy, gooberree

0:48:52.360 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 3>comedy alongside the synthetic flesh.

0:48:56.160 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Synthetic flesh.

0:48:58.320 --> 0:49:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but I will also say to give the director

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:04.640
<v Speaker 3>credit here. I mean, we're dealing with a number of limitations.

0:49:04.640 --> 0:49:07.560
<v Speaker 3>We are dealing with time distance. This was a long

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:10.920
<v Speaker 3>time ago things just you know, cinema felt different than

0:49:11.239 --> 0:49:13.480
<v Speaker 3>we were dealing with a language barrier. We were not

0:49:13.600 --> 0:49:16.920
<v Speaker 3>watching this in translation. This was in a language we

0:49:16.920 --> 0:49:21.200
<v Speaker 3>don't speak, and we're dealing with and like watching only

0:49:21.320 --> 0:49:25.360
<v Speaker 3>a fragmentary part of the second half of a silent film.

0:49:25.840 --> 0:49:28.120
<v Speaker 3>So there's a lot of stuff getting in the way

0:49:28.120 --> 0:49:29.040
<v Speaker 3>of us understanding.

0:49:29.360 --> 0:49:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, but I'm glad that this much of it

0:49:33.200 --> 0:49:37.719
<v Speaker 2>has survived because you know, especially the scenes where well, yes,

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:39.920
<v Speaker 2>when the robots are battling each other, it's awesome, but

0:49:40.120 --> 0:49:43.680
<v Speaker 2>are all the scenes of robot Mischief are just excellent.

0:49:43.880 --> 0:49:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh yes, yes, I love So. There's one part with

0:49:46.560 --> 0:49:49.760
<v Speaker 3>a cocktail party where they're playing some kind of Marco

0:49:49.880 --> 0:49:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Polo type game. They tie a napkin around a man's

0:49:52.760 --> 0:49:54.920
<v Speaker 3>face and they spin him around and he's chasing all

0:49:54.920 --> 0:49:57.480
<v Speaker 3>these women in the in the party room. And then

0:49:57.520 --> 0:50:01.200
<v Speaker 3>a giant mecha man just burst through the window and

0:50:01.320 --> 0:50:04.480
<v Speaker 3>is like, I am here to cause panic, and he

0:50:04.600 --> 0:50:08.520
<v Speaker 3>puts a dude inside a wardrobe, carries him up to

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:11.120
<v Speaker 3>the roof of a castle, and I think he's gonna

0:50:11.200 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 3>throw him off the castle tower. Yeah, then I guess

0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:16.239
<v Speaker 3>the guy gets away and he kind.

0:50:16.160 --> 0:50:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Of like falls out of it and then repels down

0:50:18.239 --> 0:50:22.920
<v Speaker 2>the tower. It's elaborate and ridiculous. Yeah. There's also the

0:50:23.000 --> 0:50:26.359
<v Speaker 2>wonderful scene where it's like a dinner party and I

0:50:26.400 --> 0:50:29.480
<v Speaker 2>had to I had to rely on Sterling's right up

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:31.799
<v Speaker 2>and wired to make sense of what was happening. But

0:50:32.440 --> 0:50:35.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean fully happening, because apparently the idea is the

0:50:35.800 --> 0:50:41.440
<v Speaker 2>robot has shown up controlled by Mattow at this at

0:50:41.480 --> 0:50:44.960
<v Speaker 2>this party, and it's but it's pretending to be a

0:50:45.000 --> 0:50:48.719
<v Speaker 2>person in a robot costume. Yes, yeah, and so they're

0:50:48.760 --> 0:50:51.200
<v Speaker 2>all like, oh, it's a wonderful, wonderful costume. Come on

0:50:51.280 --> 0:50:53.320
<v Speaker 2>in and have some champagne. And so it's like calling

0:50:53.360 --> 0:50:56.560
<v Speaker 2>for champagne and having a lady set on its lap.

0:50:56.880 --> 0:50:58.120
<v Speaker 2>And then things get out of hand.

0:50:58.320 --> 0:51:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the robot sexually harasses a female partygoer, and then

0:51:02.600 --> 0:51:06.160
<v Speaker 3>the woman's husband gets mad at the robot and punches it,

0:51:06.640 --> 0:51:09.560
<v Speaker 3>and then he he pulls out a pistol to duel

0:51:09.600 --> 0:51:11.600
<v Speaker 3>the robot, and the robot crushes him.

0:51:12.160 --> 0:51:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. There there's more than one scene in which somebody

0:51:14.440 --> 0:51:16.920
<v Speaker 2>pulls out a pistol and fires a bunch of shots

0:51:17.480 --> 0:51:21.040
<v Speaker 2>point blank into the robot to no avail, and then

0:51:21.040 --> 0:51:22.439
<v Speaker 2>the robot just like swats them.

0:51:22.640 --> 0:51:24.680
<v Speaker 3>So there's chaos at the opera. But then in the

0:51:24.719 --> 0:51:27.640
<v Speaker 3>midst of all this, you end up with a mecha

0:51:27.719 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 3>man versus mechamn because there's I think, as you already

0:51:31.080 --> 0:51:34.839
<v Speaker 3>said this, but the dead scientist's brother makes his own

0:51:35.040 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 3>mecha man and or.

0:51:36.200 --> 0:51:38.680
<v Speaker 2>He uses the original I think to battle the new

0:51:38.680 --> 0:51:41.440
<v Speaker 2>one that the that the criminals have made. Oh, either way,

0:51:41.480 --> 0:51:43.800
<v Speaker 2>you end up in the same place, good robot versus

0:51:43.800 --> 0:51:46.960
<v Speaker 2>bad robot. You know, a time tested formula.

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:49.319
<v Speaker 3>Right, but they're having to be controlled like Mattow is

0:51:49.480 --> 0:51:54.080
<v Speaker 3>actively controlling the robot in real time by like, by

0:51:54.120 --> 0:51:58.640
<v Speaker 3>like turning wheels and stud operating steam vents and things.

0:51:58.960 --> 0:52:02.440
<v Speaker 3>This is going to get a very score on intuitive controls.

0:52:02.520 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 3>But the other thing that I thought was interesting was

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:10.400
<v Speaker 3>as Madow controls her mechaman during the duel. Unless I'm misunderstanding,

0:52:10.440 --> 0:52:14.200
<v Speaker 3>it looks like she's watching the duel live on some

0:52:14.280 --> 0:52:18.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of TV screen as she controls her robot fighter.

0:52:18.960 --> 0:52:21.080
<v Speaker 3>And this was in nineteen twenty one. There's no such

0:52:21.080 --> 0:52:23.080
<v Speaker 3>thing as CCTV at this time.

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, this was a complete glimpse into the future.

0:52:26.680 --> 0:52:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Sterling wrote that at the twenty two minute twenty nine

0:52:29.640 --> 0:52:33.400
<v Speaker 2>second mark quote Mattow watches the mechanisms battling through a

0:52:33.560 --> 0:52:38.920
<v Speaker 2>flat wall mounted remote surveillance televisor screen. So I mean,

0:52:38.920 --> 0:52:42.200
<v Speaker 2>that's awesome. I mean, this is a great This is

0:52:42.239 --> 0:52:44.319
<v Speaker 2>a great example of early science fiction and that it

0:52:44.360 --> 0:52:48.240
<v Speaker 2>gets something phenomenally right, while also you know, it maybe

0:52:48.239 --> 0:52:51.360
<v Speaker 2>doesn't properly predict the way that controls will work in

0:52:51.400 --> 0:52:53.839
<v Speaker 2>the future. For things like this, you know, it's a

0:52:53.880 --> 0:52:59.480
<v Speaker 2>wonderful mashup of actually pretty spot on digital technology to come.

0:52:59.640 --> 0:53:03.360
<v Speaker 2>And then also a reliance on very mechanical control systems.

0:53:03.600 --> 0:53:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Another thing that's interesting is that the screen she's watching

0:53:07.120 --> 0:53:09.719
<v Speaker 3>things play out on is not from the point of

0:53:09.840 --> 0:53:13.560
<v Speaker 3>view of the robot, right, So what's sending the image?

0:53:14.000 --> 0:53:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it would have to be like a robotic drone

0:53:16.480 --> 0:53:18.680
<v Speaker 2>that is also part of the operation that is not

0:53:19.239 --> 0:53:22.520
<v Speaker 2>presented in the film. I don't know, something of that nature. Yeah,

0:53:22.680 --> 0:53:24.480
<v Speaker 2>or maybe it's a telescope. I mean, there's so many

0:53:24.480 --> 0:53:27.640
<v Speaker 2>different directions you could go in and then ultimately, you know,

0:53:27.640 --> 0:53:29.120
<v Speaker 2>given the nature of the film, I guess they don't

0:53:29.120 --> 0:53:31.640
<v Speaker 2>really have to explain it. They just But it's interesting

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:34.360
<v Speaker 2>too that they didn't explain it. There's so many films

0:53:34.400 --> 0:53:37.360
<v Speaker 2>I can think of where the film is that it

0:53:37.360 --> 0:53:41.840
<v Speaker 2>it pains to really elaborate and describe to the audience

0:53:41.880 --> 0:53:45.239
<v Speaker 2>what sort of technology is being used and how it

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:48.680
<v Speaker 2>works and what the rules are. And yet this film

0:53:48.760 --> 0:53:52.120
<v Speaker 2>is rolling out, you know, to your point CCTV on

0:53:52.160 --> 0:53:55.040
<v Speaker 2>a flat screen and they don't seem to have to

0:53:55.040 --> 0:53:57.439
<v Speaker 2>explain it at all, unless it's explained in the lost

0:53:57.480 --> 0:53:58.560
<v Speaker 2>portion of the film of course.

0:53:58.760 --> 0:54:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Well it's funny because it's an that is it's immediately

0:54:02.000 --> 0:54:04.719
<v Speaker 3>apparent what you know, what its function is like.

0:54:04.680 --> 0:54:08.040
<v Speaker 2>You, Yeah, it probably comes back to the video drone quote, right. Yeah,

0:54:08.080 --> 0:54:10.160
<v Speaker 2>she is doing what you were doing right now and

0:54:10.200 --> 0:54:13.160
<v Speaker 2>watching the screen. So in a way, it's kind of brilliant.

0:54:13.360 --> 0:54:17.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. The televisor screen is the retina of the mind's eye.

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Whatever robots appear on it emerges raw experience.

0:54:23.560 --> 0:54:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's the other things to mention about this film. I

0:54:25.960 --> 0:54:29.440
<v Speaker 2>would say that the special effects are pretty cool. There's,

0:54:29.520 --> 0:54:32.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, in addition to robots like breaking through gates

0:54:32.239 --> 0:54:35.720
<v Speaker 2>and pulling out safes and whatnot, there's a scene where

0:54:35.760 --> 0:54:39.120
<v Speaker 2>a speeding robot chases after I believe it's a car

0:54:39.719 --> 0:54:43.200
<v Speaker 2>and tears you know. So it's it's it creates this

0:54:43.200 --> 0:54:45.680
<v Speaker 2>this wonderful illusion that you don't you don't instantly think

0:54:45.719 --> 0:54:48.200
<v Speaker 2>of as being even possible at the time in filmmaking,

0:54:48.239 --> 0:54:50.759
<v Speaker 2>and yet they're they're pulling it off. Yeah, and then

0:54:50.800 --> 0:54:53.200
<v Speaker 2>I think the other thing that was surprising about this is,

0:54:53.200 --> 0:54:55.520
<v Speaker 2>on one hand, you just don't expect to see a

0:54:55.560 --> 0:54:58.760
<v Speaker 2>giant robot battle in a film from the nineteen twenties.

0:54:59.280 --> 0:55:03.200
<v Speaker 2>But fiction has basically been around, had been around for

0:55:03.239 --> 0:55:06.680
<v Speaker 2>decades at this point, with such titles as The steam Man,

0:55:06.719 --> 0:55:09.560
<v Speaker 2>of the Prairies by Edward s Ellis from eighteen sixty

0:55:09.560 --> 0:55:14.640
<v Speaker 2>eight or Jules Verns The Steamhouse from eighteen eighty. So

0:55:15.480 --> 0:55:17.920
<v Speaker 2>again it's just neat and worth remembering that people in

0:55:17.920 --> 0:55:22.560
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen twenties were also really into cool sci fi concepts,

0:55:22.600 --> 0:55:25.839
<v Speaker 2>many of which still enthrall us today, and you know,

0:55:26.000 --> 0:55:27.920
<v Speaker 2>are still going to always keep making them. We're not

0:55:27.920 --> 0:55:31.520
<v Speaker 2>going to stop making giant robot battle movies. There's just

0:55:31.560 --> 0:55:34.120
<v Speaker 2>something about them that is wonderful. You know, there's the

0:55:34.760 --> 0:55:39.000
<v Speaker 2>idea of you know, the small made large of things

0:55:39.040 --> 0:55:41.480
<v Speaker 2>that are echoes of the human form or animal form

0:55:41.560 --> 0:55:45.759
<v Speaker 2>and mechanical construction battling each other. And then also we

0:55:45.800 --> 0:55:48.080
<v Speaker 2>have to consider that this film came out after World

0:55:48.120 --> 0:55:51.840
<v Speaker 2>War One, and that Deed himself was apparently witnessed to

0:55:51.880 --> 0:55:54.160
<v Speaker 2>the European conflict, perhaps directly.

0:55:54.560 --> 0:55:54.640
<v Speaker 3>So.

0:55:54.880 --> 0:55:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Despite the fact that this is totally not a serious film,

0:55:58.320 --> 0:56:01.840
<v Speaker 2>that it has a very farcical fee to it, it

0:56:02.480 --> 0:56:04.880
<v Speaker 2>still may have something to say, no matter how shallow,

0:56:05.160 --> 0:56:07.880
<v Speaker 2>about the new age of warfare in which machines like

0:56:07.960 --> 0:56:11.919
<v Speaker 2>tanks and warplanes have just utterly changed the landscape of war.

0:56:12.280 --> 0:56:14.080
<v Speaker 3>I think it was around the same time that we

0:56:14.120 --> 0:56:18.640
<v Speaker 3>talked on Invention about remote controlled robots as something that

0:56:18.680 --> 0:56:22.959
<v Speaker 3>people were claiming to have invented at this time, whether

0:56:23.040 --> 0:56:26.200
<v Speaker 3>or not they were actually very effective. Yeah, I don't

0:56:26.200 --> 0:56:28.880
<v Speaker 3>recall the details on that, Yeah.

0:56:28.680 --> 0:56:31.239
<v Speaker 2>But certainly it's something that is an idea that's been

0:56:31.520 --> 0:56:34.520
<v Speaker 2>knocking around the human imagination for quite some time. So

0:56:34.960 --> 0:56:37.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, it shouldn't come as surprised to see it

0:56:37.160 --> 0:56:40.239
<v Speaker 2>in the nineteen twenties. But I guess on some level,

0:56:40.440 --> 0:56:43.200
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I have been kind of reprogrammed to

0:56:43.280 --> 0:56:46.759
<v Speaker 2>think of the nineteen fifties as the birth period of

0:56:46.800 --> 0:56:49.160
<v Speaker 2>the sci fi robot, you know, because maybe in part

0:56:49.200 --> 0:56:51.480
<v Speaker 2>because of there being a lot of images from that

0:56:51.520 --> 0:56:55.799
<v Speaker 2>time period. And you know, if you had to, like,

0:56:56.120 --> 0:56:58.040
<v Speaker 2>if you were to quiz me before this and say,

0:56:58.080 --> 0:57:01.000
<v Speaker 2>when was the first Sci Fi robot? Might just instantly

0:57:01.040 --> 0:57:04.279
<v Speaker 2>think to the fifties, even though there are definitely examples

0:57:04.320 --> 0:57:06.919
<v Speaker 2>from a prior to that decade. And you know, here

0:57:07.000 --> 0:57:08.480
<v Speaker 2>is one of the prime ones right here.

0:57:08.640 --> 0:57:10.279
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I think that thing I was just

0:57:10.320 --> 0:57:12.759
<v Speaker 3>talking about is in our episodes of Invention on the

0:57:12.880 --> 0:57:15.839
<v Speaker 3>Death Ray if you want to warn Oh, okay, but yes,

0:57:15.920 --> 0:57:18.720
<v Speaker 3>I agree with you on all of that. About fiction.

0:57:18.840 --> 0:57:20.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's gonna be robot jocks forever.

0:57:22.720 --> 0:57:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, we just we just keep doing it and

0:57:25.880 --> 0:57:29.680
<v Speaker 2>I will keep watching them apparently no matter what era

0:57:29.720 --> 0:57:31.960
<v Speaker 2>they're from. All Right, Well, I hope this was a

0:57:32.000 --> 0:57:34.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of fun for everybody. Maybe we introduced you to

0:57:34.240 --> 0:57:37.520
<v Speaker 2>a couple of new silent shorts that you weren't familiar with.

0:57:37.760 --> 0:57:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you did know of these films already and would

0:57:40.800 --> 0:57:44.480
<v Speaker 2>like to share your take on them. Certainly, go out

0:57:44.520 --> 0:57:47.400
<v Speaker 2>watch them and let us know. Also, let us know

0:57:47.440 --> 0:57:49.560
<v Speaker 2>if you like this kind of format, because obviously there

0:57:49.560 --> 0:57:51.800
<v Speaker 2>are a lot of short films out there. It might

0:57:51.840 --> 0:57:54.040
<v Speaker 2>be kind of neat to do this from time to time,

0:57:54.920 --> 0:57:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Like maybe you know, to come back to Cronenberg, maybe

0:57:57.120 --> 0:57:58.400
<v Speaker 2>we do one where we look at a couple of

0:57:58.440 --> 0:58:02.360
<v Speaker 2>short films, early films from David Cronenberg, crack those open,

0:58:03.120 --> 0:58:06.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, tackling things that you know otherwise wouldn't make

0:58:06.400 --> 0:58:08.040
<v Speaker 2>for a full episode of Weird House.

0:58:08.400 --> 0:58:10.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't know about that one in particular, but in general,

0:58:10.760 --> 0:58:11.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm game.

0:58:14.080 --> 0:58:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's see. So yes, Weird House Cinema. If you want

0:58:17.200 --> 0:58:20.160
<v Speaker 2>to catch other episodes, this airs every Friday in the

0:58:20.200 --> 0:58:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Stuff to Blow your Mind Feed It is a place

0:58:22.720 --> 0:58:24.680
<v Speaker 2>for us to step away from the science for a

0:58:24.720 --> 0:58:27.880
<v Speaker 2>little bit and talk more about just a weird movie,

0:58:27.960 --> 0:58:30.560
<v Speaker 2>or in this case, movies. But as you can see,

0:58:30.640 --> 0:58:32.800
<v Speaker 2>we often find ways to tie it into other pieces

0:58:32.800 --> 0:58:36.040
<v Speaker 2>of content that we've put out. And oh yeah, and

0:58:36.360 --> 0:58:38.040
<v Speaker 2>of course we'll be back next week. And I'm not

0:58:38.040 --> 0:58:39.280
<v Speaker 2>going to tell you what the film is going to be,

0:58:39.520 --> 0:58:42.360
<v Speaker 2>but I will say it is another Florida movie, So

0:58:42.440 --> 0:58:43.120
<v Speaker 2>be prepared.

0:58:43.320 --> 0:58:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Cueue up that Lion King song. Huge Things. As always

0:58:47.720 --> 0:58:51.160
<v Speaker 3>to our wonderful audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you

0:58:51.160 --> 0:58:53.400
<v Speaker 3>would like to get in touch with us with feedback

0:58:53.440 --> 0:58:56.000
<v Speaker 3>on this episode or any other, to suggest a topic

0:58:56.040 --> 0:58:58.040
<v Speaker 3>for the future, or just to say hello, you can

0:58:58.120 --> 0:59:01.160
<v Speaker 3>email us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind

0:59:01.280 --> 0:59:09.080
<v Speaker 3>dot com.

0:59:09.240 --> 0:59:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:59:12.280 --> 0:59:15.080
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:59:15.200 --> 0:59:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.