WEBVTT - Markets Tumble, Chip Makers See Low Demand

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Changing in San Francisco, and this

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology coming up in the next hour of

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>robust US labor market spells bad news for financial markets.

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>Today's jobs report sent shares tumbling as investors predict more

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>rate hikes. We're going to talk about why tech is

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in a particularly tough position plush. Chipmakers warn of a

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>major industry slowdown, sending tech shares even though we're the

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>biggest names from a m D to Samsung and Micron

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>are all saying the same thing. Demand is tumbling. Gonna

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have more on that in a moment. And Facebook is

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>sending its own warning to users you may have been hacked.

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Meta says one million user logins may have instolen compromised.

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Later this hour, we're gonna talk to Meta security policy director.

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Chip makers warning weekly that demand is faltering, this as

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>they face surging shipping and materials costs, and in the

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>latest sign of trouble, Samsung and a m D reporting

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>these disappointing results. Bloomberg's Ian King, our residentship expert with US. Now,

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>So Ian didn't we know demand was bad? Why are

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 1>we seeing such a strong reaction here? Absolutely? Right. We've

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>had companies going out there for a while and I

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>was saying, yeah, things things are getting bad. We've got

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of infantry. What happened yesterday provoked unless to

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>be writing with thoughts with expletives in the headlines. I mean,

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it was really bad for ame d and ED actually

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>sold something a bit short. Yes, it's the biggest memoryship maker,

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's also the world's biggest hip maker. Company like

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that comes out and says, yeah, things are actually bad.

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not just bad, but it's way worse than

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>we thought. So that's kind of recalibrating people's expectations. They're

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 1>no longer just looking for the bottom. They're back to

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>worrying about how about get it meantime, and you've got

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the White House adding new restrictions on China's access to

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>US chip technology. Is that making things worse here? Absolutely?

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a that's an ongoing concern because this isn't just

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>one isolated incident. This is like an incremental set of

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>increases of intensification in this dispute between the world's two

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>largest economies. And you know, if you're an investor out there,

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking, well, what's going to happen next? And the

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>trend within these you know, so called security related national

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>security related measures is to intensify, is to broaden them,

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's going to place greater restrictions on chipmakers that

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>want to do business in China. Talk to us a

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about what's behind these new rules from

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 1>Washington and how you expect these two evolve. Well, just

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to give you an example, we had a story out

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>earlier this week which had that Huawei, which is a

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>company that we know, a Chinese company that's been on

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 1>this sort of entity list in the US for a

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>long time, being cut off from US technology, it's actually

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>taking steps to work around that. So obviously there is

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a concern in Washington. There are a lot of Washington

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:20.679
<v Speaker 1>who are saying, look, we need to get tougher, We

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>need to do more and more to really choke off

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>China's ability. That just being better than China and technology

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.239
<v Speaker 1>isn't good enough. We have to make sure that we

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>freeze China's technology and where multiple generations ahead and as

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>while driving this, So how do you think this is

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>going to impact the ongoing relationship between the US and

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>China as it pertains to chips. Yeah, I mean, we

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen any reaction from Beijing yet, and I've heard

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>people say we're surprised that Beijing has been so restrained

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>so far. Fundly, China is the largest market for semiconductors.

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>If you're a US company, if you're a European company

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>in the industry, you have to be there. You have

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to have those sales revenue to fuel your investing in

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>innovation to stay ahead. So it's a it's a very

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>difficult situation for Washington to sort of navigate that fine

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>line between cutting off China from what it doesn't want

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it to have and also keeping the money flowing and

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>keeping US companies having the R and D edge and

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>staying on the leading edge in terms of the technical ability.

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Ian King, who has of course covered the

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>chip industry for a couple of decades, and thank you

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>um for your expert insights today. Appreciate it. Meantime, Tesla's

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>all electric Chuck will roll out before the end of

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the year. In a tweet, Elon Musk said production has

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>begun and the first deliveries will had to PepsiCo December one.

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>The Big Rig was first unveiled November, but the launch

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>delayed many times due to battery cell shortages and a

0:04:48.520 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>decision to focus on consumer models. As we discussed at

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the top of the show, was a brutal day on

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street after the September jobs report, the NASDAC one

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 1>plunging more than four percent as more severe fed rate

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>hikes are priced into the markets. Chip makers got crushed

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>after manufacturers warned of an industry wide slowdown and demand.

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in Sara const managing director at

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Cleo Capital. So, Sarah, how alarming are these warnings from

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>chip makers in your view? I mean, the only chips

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>right now, anyone wants our potato, right, Like, this is

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>not good for chip makers. Uh, there's twin pressures here, right,

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Certainly the weekend consumer demand for things like PCs, but

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>also you know, the increasing restrictions around selling to China

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>mean that a massive market is largely off limits. And

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>so that's also going to cause problems for the hardware

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>companies because you know, they're the ones who aren't buying

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the chips, so they're not selling hardware. And I think

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple's you know, lowered forecast for for some of the

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>models of its new iPhone is sort of an early

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>indicator of the trouble to come. So when you look

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>at other areas of technology, you know, their social media,

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>there's advertising, their streaming, you know, where do you see

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>other potential problem areas everywhere? Uh, you know, I think

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>that that it's just gonna be a tough you know quarter.

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that that advertising. You know, we're seeing a

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 1>slump based on the waning consumer demand. So you know, Google, Pinterest, Snap, Meta,

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>they're all probably going to be in for a tough

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>holiday season. And you know, most of the rallies right

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>now in tech, they're not based on fundamentals. And and

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 1>the reality is that the fact show a really bleak

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>picture for all of these really high price, often unprofitable

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>companies that just have flown so high over the last

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>few years. And even now when their stock prices are

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>coming down, you look at you know, their their pe ratios,

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>they're still insane. The you're just still really expensive companies.

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>So how much more tech volatility are you preparing for?

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Like a, are you preparing for this downturn to last

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a good long time? Uh, yeah, I am a bear

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>preparing for a long cold wind. Her Um. I think

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>it's there's just not a lot to be bullish about

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>right now in the US, you know, with the FEDS

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>very hawkish stance even today about inflation, and you know,

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the right the rate hikes are going to continue until

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the moral improves, and that's probably not till mid delayed

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, and then globally things are just way worse.

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Right we are the bright spot right now globally. Uh

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the UK is in is in chaos, you know, Russia, China,

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>all of the problems that global central banks are having

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>because of the US dollar strength right now, there's just

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of problems and I think you have to

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>batten down the hatches, you know. I'm a fan of

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>selling rallies right now if you can get out with

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a profit on something and and just buying the dips

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>really carefully, Like if you're passionate about a core business

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and see a reasonable pe ratio and it's a historic

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>low for the company, maybe consider buying. But I'm not

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>even looking at like the fifty two week or year

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to date right now numbers. I'm looking at the five

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>year charts and saying is this company you know where

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>it was before covid or is it still priced way

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>higher because of the bumpet got during the pandemic? So

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>how is this impacting your strategy and and other venture

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>capitalist strategy. I mean we've been talking about all this

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>dry powder that's probably stacking up on the sidelines with

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>nowhere to go. Yeah, So you know, I think M

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and A is the new I p O for companies.

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I think right now startups are are less focused on

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>an I p O. You know, we saw that a

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of those tech I p o s aren't working. Um,

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:33.199
<v Speaker 1>you know posh marks exit from the public markets was

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>was a big piece of that. You know, the Peloton

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>ceo flat out saying that you know, six more months

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna sell out and and you know go private.

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Is it's a good indicator that that's staying public as

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>an unprofitable tech company right now is just tough. So

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that we're going to see a lot more

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>late stage M and A activity and less bell ringing.

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know, when it comes to the dry powder,

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>vcs have a lot of it, but they're sitting on it.

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>You know what I'm hearing from my peers at top

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:06.079
<v Speaker 1>doctile funds, they're spending more time in Monday meetings triaging

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>their current portfolios than they are looking at new deals.

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Then this is in large part because these you know,

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>these new deals founders are still asking for prices from

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>vcs who are very much in a recession mindset. And

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I think until vcs can get into deals at prices

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that better reflect this moment, a lot of my peers

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>are just sitting on the sideline and focusing on following

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>on the companies they're already on boards of. We're likely

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to have a tough time in the coming months. So

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about light stage M and I gotta ask your

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on the latest in the elon Musk Twitter saga Twitter,

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, holding Musk to the terms of the deal,

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the price, not accepting anything lower, Musk

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>saying okay, I'll go through. I say, you know, what's

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>your take on what's happening here, whether or not this

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:56.359
<v Speaker 1>deal is actually gonna happen. I mean, so many embarrassing

0:09:56.440 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>text messages, just so many, that's Saudie hac level in

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Parrasine tech messages, right, And I think that the whole

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>situation is just getting to a point where, you know,

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Ellen's displaying what seems to be a rare moment of

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>accepting reality and saying, look, I agreed to buy it,

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:16.839
<v Speaker 1>so now I'm going to have to buy it, and

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that that's the best outcome for shareholders.

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Will that be the best outcome for Twitter users, for

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.599
<v Speaker 1>Twitter employees, I don't know, but at this point it

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>looks like that's what's going to happen, all right. Sarah Kunst,

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Managing Director, clayo Capital love having you here, Sarah, Thank

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us on this volatile Friday afternoon. Okay,

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>coming up, Disney and DraftKings and Bloomberg report about a

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings ESPN deal in the works send shares higher. But

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>how does the family brand embrace sports gambling? Talk about

0:10:49.000 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that next? This is Bloomberg. ESPN is nearing a large

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>new partnership with sports betting firm Draft Kings, a deal

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:11.839
<v Speaker 1>which would pave the way for the media giant to

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>capitalize on the growing wave of legalized sports betting. Shares

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of DraftKings spike this afternoon on this Bloomberg report. Disney

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>already has a stake in draft Kings here to discuss

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg deals, Reporter Crystal Z. So, what do we

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>know about this agreement, Crystal? So, so far all we

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>know is that there is an intention for a large

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>partnership between draft Kings and ESPN, which is owned by Disney.

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>But how exactly is this deal going to be structured,

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>how is it going to be paid? We so we

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>don't have much detail on it. But it would be

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a really really big step for ESPN to really take

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 1>advantage of that, legalizing sports betting in almost half of

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the country now, and it will be a real cultural

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>shock for ESPN because Disney has this really wholesome um

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 1>image that they have and getting into sports betting it's

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>actually a really really big st Now there's been speculation

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>about an acquisition. Is this a step in that direction

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.959
<v Speaker 1>or no? So because of that cultural difference, um, it

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>will right now, we're not hearing about outright acquisition. So

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>in order to do that, so Drafting here is the

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>license holder for sports betting, So if THESPN really want

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to get into it in a really really big way,

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>it would make sense for them to buy. And also

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>note that Draft Kings stock price of trading around sixteen dollars,

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's high. In March last year was around so

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you could say that it's a really really cheap buy.

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>But for Disney shareholder to get over that wholesomeness reputation

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 1>of Disney, it will still be a big leap, and

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.199
<v Speaker 1>we're not sure if that's uh, if they're ready to

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>make that step. Yes, So actually a lot of analysts

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>have dismissed the m and A speculation, but we shall see.

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 1>What about when it comes to, you know, other sports

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>scambling platforms More broadly, I feel like I've heard about draft,

0:12:56.440 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>We've heard some draft kings m N a UM specular

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>relation for a couple of years. So Draft king is

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>in a really really competitive space and they are constantly

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>at war with UM places like fanjuel, and they're all

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>offering these really really cheap discount or even giving UM

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>users free money just to get on their platform. So

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.199
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot of room for consolidation. And with

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 1>this partnership with ESPN, even how it looks like it

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.959
<v Speaker 1>will still be unclear. It could really emerge looking like

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a new platform. It could look like an ESPN platform,

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>or it could look like an extra button on the

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>existing ESPN app so it could probably look like it

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>would look more crowded, um than than less. But you're right,

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>like there could be more deals. Draft Kings hasn't been

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>public for that long. They only go in public through

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>respect a year ish ago, so whether they are ready

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to take on a big deal it's also um waiting

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to be seen. And you know, obviously the stock price

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>not doing too well for them to sell equity would

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>also be really challenging. So there will be consolidation in

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 1>the space. We just don't know who are buying who

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is selling it. And what's your take on the pace

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:04.319
<v Speaker 1>of M and A and I p o s through

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year, given this is your beat

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and we've where you know, we just had a guest

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 1>who said she's bundling up for a long cold winter. Yeah,

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>she was just saying, how I M and A is

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a new ip here, right, and that was absolutely true.

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:17.839
<v Speaker 1>We haven't really seen many many I p o s

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and usually this time post Labor Day pre Thanksgiving has

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>historically been the most popular time for I p O

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't really seen any of them. And um,

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>there's always been speculation about you know, there have been

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>one or two companies that could still go public this year,

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's been quiet, and you know M and A.

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>It's also em and is coming back in some way.

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>But financing has been extremely challenging. And if you look

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>at technology that are growthing, uh and not really generating

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>cash flow, those are not things that investors are liking

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. So all know, if you're a growth company

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that are looking to I p O or doing M

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and A, it's still a really, really tough environment. So

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>um A lot of dealmakers are saying that we should

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>probably expect you're making to come back in three even

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the second quarter and even the first quarter, and all

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that would be market dependent obviously, so we will will

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>continue to tract to all right, the second quarter of

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll looking towards that. Bloomberg's Crystal Z thank you so

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>much for staffing by and as we talk about media

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>companies looking for ways to cash in as more US

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>states legalized sports betting, Bloomberg The lineup with Damien sass

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Hour and Kaylee Lines continues the conversation tonight, seven pm

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>New York Time. You don't want to miss it. Welcome

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>back to Bloomb're technology and Emily changing in San Francisco.

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to the markets and the big story

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of the week, Ellen and his Twitter takeover potentially not

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a done deal yet. Are at Ludlow has been looking

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a little deeper here at what's the latest that we know? Yeah, well,

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Friday was unusual when and so far there was absolutely

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>no news about the deal at all, which was a

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>massive relief for me and you because we haven't slept

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>for four days. But you would look at this monster

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>jump in Twitter shares from Tuesday when we had that

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>disclosure that Elon Musk had gone back to Twitter and

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>back to the original offer fifty tents a share. But

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>in the four sessions that have followed, the stock has

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>trickled lower again because there are concerns about the financing

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>element of this deal, how likely it is to happen.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And we still continue to look at the spread. Right,

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>if we bring up the spread chart, this is the

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>gap between that fifty four dollar twenty cents per share

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>offer and the current share price, and again it has

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>noticeably come down in recent sessions. The latest is, you know,

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>m is that Judge Kathleen St. Jude mccormicker of Delaware

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Chancery Court has suspended, paused the trial until October and

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>told the two sides that they need to close the

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>deal by five pm on October. If they do not,

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>then we're heading to trial in November. And the market

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>is trying to pass what's actually happening behind the scenes.

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>In the broader context of market. It's a really interesting

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>stock to watch, is of course, Tesla. Tesla just had

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>its worst week since March of March. And it's not

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>just the idea that Elon Musk might have to sell

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Tesla shares in order to fund some of the financing

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to buy Twitter, but also this idea that there's key

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 1>man risk that will be distracted if he runs a

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>third company on top of Tesla and SpaceX. But the

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>gap between the SMP performance and Tesla, it's been a

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 1>real drag on a points basis for that broader index.

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just, of course, the news cycle. Tesla

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>does trade at higher multiple and so is vulnerable to

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the narrative around higher rates. But you know so much

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>going on at work here. You and I are not

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.959
<v Speaker 1>going to Delaware on October seventeenth, But on a daily basis,

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>we continue to track this deal all right, I'd love

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:51.679
<v Speaker 1>hope you get some sleep this weekend. Well, you might

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>have received an alert from Meta today saying you may

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>have logged onto Facebook from a malicious app. What does

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that mean? Well, Matter has reported more than four hundred

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>credential theft malware apps to Google and Apple targeting mobile

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>users devices to steal their Facebook log and information. The

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>apps were disguised as things like photo editors, mobile games,

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 1>health trackers, and they can target more than just Facebook accounts.

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>For more on this, metas director of Threat Disruption, David

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Agranovich joins me. Now, David, thank you so much for

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>joining us so talk to us about these apps, what happened,

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and how people can protect themselves. Thanks so much for

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>having me, Emily, and appreciate the opportunity to talk about

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>this report. Today, we released some research into four hundred

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>malicious mobile applications. They were designed to steal Facebook log

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and information. And the apps were listed on the Google

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Play Store on Apple's App Store, and they would disguise

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 1>themselves as a variety of different things VPN services, business apps,

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>mobile games, different utilities for your phone to try and

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>trick people into downloading them. How do you know if

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you've been affected, like, how can you tell? So? Because

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>these applications are available on the open Internet, it's no

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>single company can protect people alone. We also know that

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>these scammers constantly adapt to detection UM by app stores,

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>by researchers now here. We reported our findings to Apple

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>into Google, and as far as we know, all of

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>these applications have been taken down. But we also are

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>sending notifications to users on our platform who may have

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>been impacted by these applications. UM. Those notifications will include

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>some steps that people can take to protect their accounts

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 1>more effectively, as well as some tips for how to

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 1>spot these types of applications elsewhere on the Internet. Why

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>are you doing this now? I mean surely this has

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>happened before, right, So, our teams have been investigating this

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>type of malicious application activity for years. We're always looking

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>for malware or other efforts to steal people's credentials. UM,

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 1>but this particular p s A is the first time

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>we're releasing one of these kind of public service announcements.

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>And the idea is that in addition to working to

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>get these apps taken down, providing tools for people to

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>identify those apps, we felt it was important for people

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to have tips that they can use both to keep

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>themselves safer on our platform and also to stay safe

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>across the internet, so that they know what to look

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>for if someone is trying to target them with an

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>application like this. Now, you also worked at the U. S. Government,

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>You led efforts to address foreign interference in democratic systems

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and elections. We've got a midterm election coming up. What

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>are you most concerned about and how ready do you

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>think META is this time? So whenever there's an election,

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>we know we have to stay vigilant. Our teams are

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>continuing to monitor for any kind of threats on the

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>on our platform, and a good example of this would

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>be just last week, we released a report into two

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 1>influence operations, one from Russia one from China, um that

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>we caught very early, but in that report we included

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of information about what they were doing, what

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we had found, who we believe was behind the activity,

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and in that case, like we did with the malicious

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>apps investing Asian today, we shared information with our partners

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 1>across the industry, with the U. S. Government, and with

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a public to make sure people knew what to expect

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>what we were seeing um I spoke with Francis Hogan

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:14.880
<v Speaker 1>earlier this week, the Facebook whistle blower, and she raised

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>some concerns about safety and security in social media, and

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>she used an interesting metaphor, take a listen to this.

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we can't see behind the curtain of social media.

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 1>We were able to push for safety features and cars

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.640
<v Speaker 1>were found in the partner of transportation, you know, reducing

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the fatality from automobile automobile accents by effectively three and

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a half times because we could actually control cars, you know,

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>we can crash test them. Right now, we can't do

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>any of those things for social media. We can't crash

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>test it, we can't confirm how it could be safer,

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 1>so we don't know what to demand. What do you

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 1>think of her thought there and do you think more

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>regulation would help? So I think that the security area

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that my team focuses on is an area where we've

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>We've worked very hard to be transparent about our work.

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>We've reported on more than a hundred and fifty coordinated

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>in authentic behavior influence operations over the last several years

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that originated from more than fifty different countries that operated

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to more than thirty different languages. We've reported on on

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:17.959
<v Speaker 1>a cyber espionage activity, hacking activity, both related to our

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.959
<v Speaker 1>platform and more broadly across the Internet. I do think

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that there's always more work to be done in the

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>security space, but I think that the more important work

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 1>here is that we are sharing information with our industry partners,

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that we're sharing with governments were appropriate, and really importantly,

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that we're sharing with the public, that we're publicizing these reports,

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>publicizing our findings, enabling the research into these types of

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>behaviors not just on our platform but across the Internet

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>in general. There's also some, you know, been some broader

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>questions lately about how much Meta is investing in not

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>just English language platforms. Obviously, you've got you know, tens

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of people of people working on trust and

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>safety around the world. What can you tell us about

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>how much of that investment is focused on on languages

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>other than English. So our security work is global. Um

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned, we've taken down more than fifty of

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>these of these coordinated in authentic behavior operations around the world.

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Those operations operated for more than fifty different countries in

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 1>more than thirty different languages, and so we're making sure

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 1>that We're protecting people on our platform wherever they happen

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to be, from threats wherever they may happen to originate. Again,

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.439
<v Speaker 1>there's always more work to be done here, but by

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 1>focusing on on violating behaviors and threats across the platform,

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>we can do our of most to key people safe.

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I know in the security world there's always something keeping

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:36.239
<v Speaker 1>folks up at night. What's keeping you up at night?

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we are laser focused on protecting elections around

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the world. Of course, the U S midterms coming up

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty soon, the Brazil elections that just happened. Our teams

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>are constantly monitoring for security threats related to those elections,

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>as well as broader global potential threats. This is probably

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a conversation we can also have after the mid terms

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.640
<v Speaker 1>about what we end up seeing. All right, I would

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>like that David Igranovich, met Director of Threat Disruption. Thank

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you for stopping by. All right, Coming up, our next

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>guest just raised eleven million dollars despite the worst crypto

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>downturn in years. We're gonna talk about growing demand for

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:36.479
<v Speaker 1>crypto accounting software. Next. This is Gloomberg, So I'm now

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 1>for crypto reporting. Today We're focusing on crypto accounting. After

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>tactics eleven million dollar funding around lead by x t

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>X Bloomberg, Shonali Bosik is in New York. Sheanale table.

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, Emily. We're going to bring in

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>tactic founder and CEO and ask you because it's such

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>an interesting thing to see another company raised money in

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>this crypto downturn. But with so much volatility and crypto

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 1>mark it's your clients must have a hard time here

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of getting a handle on what it's worth

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and how to account for it. So what is the

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 1>biggest challenge your clients are facing here amid the volatility

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 1>not just among Bitcoin but all sorts of Web three assets.

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just the fragmentation of activity. We're seeing

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:23.199
<v Speaker 1>people use different blockchains across different wallets and different currencies,

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's just very difficult to get a holistic view

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of the digital asset ecosystem. Well, it's interesting because it's

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>not just to your point digital assets. Currencies are also

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>fluctuating like crazy. So I mean, how does that kind

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of compound the issues here? Is it harder now to

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 1>account for cryptocurrencies than it had been even a year ago?

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>For some reasons. I don't know that it's inherently more difficult.

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's inherently more important though, given the increased

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 1>regulatory scrutiny in the space. Well the regulatory scrutiny also,

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean rules have changed, and you've seen other companies

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>like micro Strategy really mold to the accounting here of

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>crypto when it comes to bitcoin, So how might the

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>rules keep on changing That will make it different for

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>firms to have to mold to what the regulators ask

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of them. I think what we're seeing actually is a

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of activity in tech companies. So venture capital firms

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 1>remain extremely bullish on the potential applications of blockchain technology,

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and that translates to more capital for tech companies. Now

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing venture capital cool across all sectors and especially

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 1>in the crypto space. But venture firms still have a

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of committed capital to deploy. They're definitely slowing the

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.400
<v Speaker 1>pace there, but that means they're looking much more closely

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>at financials of crypto companies before they continue to fund them.

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And right now, the landscape is so complicated and fragmented

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that without automation and tools like tactic, it's increasingly difficult

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>for these companies to survive. Okay, So that's interesting because

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>you yourself obviously just we're kind of in the market

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:55.880
<v Speaker 1>here when it came to fundraising. What are vcs asking

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>firms in the crypto worlds here to get more comfort

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of what's going on there? I think they want to

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a clear review of financials, the same way they would

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>for any traditional company. And right now, with a lot

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of that revenue or a lot of that spend is

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>coming in the form of a token, it's much more

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>difficult to track than it is an ordinary US dollar.

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So if it's in the form of a token, I'm wondering,

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 1>even for yourself, how are you taking money from clients?

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>How has your business been impacted in the crypto winter.

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>So we actually operate almost entirely in traditional US dollars

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and and continue to use traditional products in that space,

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 1>and that's actually the way the bulk of our clients

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:36.880
<v Speaker 1>operate for the post part. So we uh, we admittedly

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>continue to live in a fiat world. A private company

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to pay for their office space to pay

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>their employee salaries in US dollars, but token spend and

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>various cryptocurrencies are going to be an increasing part of

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>their of their balance sheets as digital asset adoption continues. Now,

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>when you're looking at crypto, you're talking about tokens. You

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:00.879
<v Speaker 1>already had kind of mentioned here the difficulties when it

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.120
<v Speaker 1>comes to accounting for them, But what about other assets

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and f t s, other types of Web three assets.

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about dows in this world when

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 1>it comes to staying accountable to shareholders and regulators. I

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:16.439
<v Speaker 1>think that's an extremely difficult question right now to answer,

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be unfolding in the next several months.

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>How we govern something that is theoretically decentralized and isn't

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>incorporated the way traditional companies, And you know, it's interesting.

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Another thing that makes this even possible is your work

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>with other companies like coin base and custodians like that.

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>How much do you see your work growing with custody solutions,

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>both on the crypto side, if you will, and the

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 1>traditional finance side. I think custody solutions are going to

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>be absolutely crucial here, and that's why we're so excited

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to be backed by FTX as a leader in the space.

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>We're back by coin base as well, because we acknowledge

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that there are going to be a lot of players

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in the ecosystem. Even though there's a longer term view

0:28:57.880 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of players in the ecosystem, the reality

0:28:59.880 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is it's a tough market now. And so if that's

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the case, I know you said that you upbridden FIAT,

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>but how do you navigate your business through a time

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>when clients are also having a time tough time. I

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>think we're very lucky to work with people who have

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>long term time horizons. So consumer demand has admittedly cooled

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>for digital assets like n f T, s UM as

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>well as various tokens. Many retail investors who lost money

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>or we're definitely staying away from cryptocurrency. However, if you

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>look at financial institutions that have much longer time horizons,

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>they're thinking five to ten years out. They have not

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>abandoned cryptocurrency as an asset class. Well and Joska, thank

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you so much for your time. That is a tactic

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>founder and CEO, thank you for walking this through the

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>plan here Emily, it's back to you, Shanali, thank you.

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Carmakers and tech companies around the globe are facing the

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>prospect of an energy crisis and volatility in chip supply,

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>those pressures will continue. According to the Attack and EV

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>components Giant Bosh, Stephan her Tongue, the top executive at Bosh,

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Folks with our own blood Low Cridy Gupta and Guy

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Johnson on the European Clothes take a lesson. We're fighting

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>against that, that supply shortage. So what we will see

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is even if the demand is slowing, and even if

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>some parts of production is probably reallocated, there is still

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 1>an over high demand and that will last four months.

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So even if we see recessive motions in the whole

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>entire environment the automotive industry, especially in the car side,

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>we remain relatively stable for a certain amount of time.

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Give me some granularity in the supply chain. Where are

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the pain points still present? Where are things improving, and

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>especially when we think about energy and input costs, where

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 1>are you still fighting that supply chain inflation. Well, the

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>real problem with the supply chain is still with the

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>semi conductors, and that is special semi conductors which are

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>used for a motive. So these are lots, are large structures.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>We're not talking about this and below, but rather a

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred n or ninety or lowest is probably about fourty

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>or twenty three for the controllers we use, so that

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>still is short. Even if we see that slowing down

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>in the mobile phone market which unlocks capacity and semiconductors,

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>automotive supply will still be let's say, at least reasonable constraint.

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Even for the next year. There will not be a

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>complete free speech, right. There will be always a bit

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of restrainment, So there's always some fight for the components.

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>The energy part is definitely also a risk for those

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>parts of supply chain which are on the row material

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>side energy intensive. So here's for us more supplier question.

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Where we are with our partners in tight control where

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>things going. What is unenterpricing, and obviously that makes things

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>not cheaper, it makes it more expensive. Well, what do

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you make of the President Biden's big push to create

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 1>some of this manufacturing capacity right here in the United States.

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a plan that's going to last at least a

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>decade to really get fully operational. What is that something

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>at your positioning for or preparing for. Well, that resonates

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>very much with us, right because we are if you

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>see us very strong in Europe, we're also reasonably strong

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in Asia. But we see ourselves underrepresented here. We are

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>here since ninety six. In the North America. We are strong,

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>but we should be much stronger. So that resonates very

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>well and very happy that this policy comes into place.

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>We are expanding, we are growing, We're buying companies, were investing.

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>We just announced an investment in Enders and that we

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>will announced further investments in our facilities. We invest in Mexico,

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>We expand into new companies. We buy like Hydroforce. We

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>just bought that, which perfectly fits to us. So definitely,

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the North American space, especially USA, is a big opportunity

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>for us. This is the day that we were getting

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>news some Tesla on the fact that it's going to

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:47.719
<v Speaker 1>be producing trucks, and we're starting to see those Tesla

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>planning to deliver semi trucks to Pepsi. They unveiled them

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a while ago, but they're now starting to potentially look

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to deliver them. Stephan, do you think that the auto industry,

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the truck industry will broadly though, has been too focused

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>on a treat technology Now, it's both right, that's so

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting in the automotive and mobility world. Anything is right.

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, you have to go heavily for

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 1>electrification also, and trucks especially. There are some medium sized trucks,

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>so also some heavy trucks if they go in only

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>short ranges where you need electrified trucks. Other machinery you

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>don't want the electrification because the batteries are just too heavy, right,

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you can't use it. You don't have the electricity infrastructure

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>where you have a too long range necessary or you

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>drive over the whole day, which also may be a

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>problem there. So I would say yes, everything right, we

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>just have to see how which technology finds which application,

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we have the market for. Stephen Hardtungue,

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 1>there Bosh chair of the management board, with our own

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>bloodlog I Johnson and critically Dea. And that does it

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. You can stay with

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Television tonight. We've got the lineup coming up with

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Damien Sassaur and Kaylee Lines. They talk about how media

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>companies are looking to make a profit off the legalization

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of sports betting. Seven p m. Easter and don't forget

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>check out our podcast wherever you get your podcasts. I'm

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Emily Changing San Francisco. Have a wonderful weekend. Everyone, this

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Gloomberg