WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off Sept 13th, 2023 (Ep. 738)

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Hello, friends, and welcome in. It is leading Off byem

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Chris Welstatt is Casey Bubba. We're here on Fantasy Pros

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Brock Shoot. Buy prize picks from a code leading off

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>get you a one hundred percent matchup to one hundred bucks.

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Go and do it today because Bubba and I are

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be building some prize picks here in just

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, as well as talking about all the

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>latest around MLB, all the stuff, all the things. Answering

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>your questions if you have them, put them in the chat.

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>If you're watching live, do it right now, Bubba and

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll get to that. If you're not watching live, you

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>can rectify that just by going over to the YouTube

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.279
<v Speaker 1>channel YouTube dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB. You can

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>hit the uh follow. But I always forget the YouTube

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>one subscribe button. I think it's subscribeb subscribe to thumbs up,

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>subscribe with thumbs up. There's so many things to do,

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:55.959
<v Speaker 1>there's so all the things.

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 2>All the stuff and things, all the stuff and things.

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's September, Bubba, it's like making it bigger to

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>me because there's baseball and there's football, and you got

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>kids coming back and you've got out here in Arizona.

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Whether there's just so much. It's easy to subscribe, though

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just not easy to remember to do it. You

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>can also make sure that you guys are subscribed to

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. On the podcast side, we're gonna do all

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 1>the stuff and things, like I said. Plus where in

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the world are Welsh and Corbyn Carroll? Yes we have

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it all. We've got it all to hear, Bubba, Bubba,

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>your head is looking very beautifully bald today, your very

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>piece of pa ESQ, my friend, do my best.

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, I can't be a stealth and stunningly you know,

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 3>the eyes don't pop like Joey Peas do. But I'll

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 3>do everything I can to bring a little bit of

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 3>bald presence to the show.

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's good. I think we need to like

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I probably need to get some wafting hair back here

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and another tar.

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 3>It's been people have asked many times we need Tiara

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 3>for the Welsh.

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, I just haven't thought, what's the thing.

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 3>I think it's gonna be like you and Corbyn Carroll

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 3>go to Cinerella ball.

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, but that's a that's a giveaway, guy, man, I

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>could if I could get to Corbyn Carroll get him

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to autograph a tier or something like that.

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 3>So he might get a restraint order if you go away, Like, Okay,

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 3>that's enough, man.

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I just need to set a goal, you know, Like,

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>like I said the other day, very disappointed in some

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of the not the bait when people are out on baseball,

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the like going away from the YouTube channel, going under

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>our number, which got the mustache. So I don't think

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 1>I can set any goal like that. Maybe it's the

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.399
<v Speaker 1>home run contest, like, you know, maybe if I can

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>finish as the top person or yeah, or forty five

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. I'll think about it. We'll talk

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>about it on Friday. We'll get the Tiara back in

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>some capacity. By the way, I text Joe something yesterday

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and I was up stupidly late last night and I

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>was almost asleep, and we're we're obviously different time zones.

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>He texts me at two in the morning my time,

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>which was five his time. I was like, what are

0:02:59.080 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you doing up.

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 3>At My alarm goes off at time. You guys are crazy,

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 3>you guys just the way. Well, I was laughing because

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 3>I listened to because I'm a man of the company here.

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 3>So I was listening to the Fantasy pros Waiver Wires

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 3>show that Joey runs with Deebro and Company. And they

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 3>recorded that thing at seven ish, I think East Coast time,

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 3>like it was early as can be. And if you

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 3>guys want one of the best viral clips that should

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 3>be made of all times, listen to that show.

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 2>It's almost say I'm not gonna say what it was.

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Just involves Pooka and other things. So check that out.

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, be careful, might want to be careful here. All right,

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get into the stuff and things that is

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy playoff run. I believe this is countdown to

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>fifth of the last five shows we have got here

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>at least for the season.

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Who's counting that?

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Who's counting exactly? Who is actually counting here?

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Not me?

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Matt Olsen. It is fifty first home run on Tuesday

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>as the Braves beat the Phillies in extra innings, and

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Matt Olsen has been an absolute cheat code. There's nothing

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>really necessarily to take away from it outside of just

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about that home you know, home run leader board

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>is something we always like to look at towards the

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>end of the year. Something to talk about though. Max

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>sus you're going to undergo an MRI after leaving Tuesday's

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 1>game due to right triceps spasm, and he was not

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>right the previous game, but I believe this one he

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>was going good and then he just It has been

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a disaster for Max and a disaster for the Rangers

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>in general. Kind of a team. I am looking to

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>pick on it. I made my money. You know, it's funny.

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>So we have the lead betting pros I got betting

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.919
<v Speaker 1>pros had on today leading off group, which we have

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>a couple hundred people in there that you guys all joined,

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>So that was awesome. Tapered off towards the back end

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of the year. But you can go and look at

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>stats of people and you can you can go and

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>follow me if you want, on the lead on the

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>betting pros Leading off group or just betting pros in general,

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and it shows your stats, like, you know, what were you?

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>What's your best sport? Minds MLB over I think I

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.919
<v Speaker 1>was fifty four to fifty five percent props. That's my

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.799
<v Speaker 1>best and it says your best team. My best team

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>is the Texas Rangers to bet on this year. It's

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the number one team. I was making my money early on.

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I am picking on them now because all they do

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>is lose games. So that is that's kind of my

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>thing right now. As far as Max suers are, any

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on this MAC, this potential backs injury the Rangers

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in general, any takeaways, you know, the tough decision might

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>come for people that they might need that roster spot.

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>And I think you can, you know, you can freely

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>dump if you need to, especially if this carries.

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, to see how it goes, because weird happen

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 3>that doing warm up pitches in the fourth inning, never

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 3>even got to start the fourth inning. They said it

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 3>would be MRI on Wednesday. Has not happened yet at

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 3>the time of this recording, of course, so that'll depend

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 3>if you're dropping or not, depends on what happens. They're like,

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 3>sures are you're gonna have to basically cut his arm

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 3>off to not let him pitch.

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>We already know that, but that might be what happened.

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 3>That might be what happens. Yes, so just kind of

0:05:57.720 --> 0:05:59.359
<v Speaker 3>see what this MRI looks like on Wednesday, and that

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 3>could be the fust.

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and and JP said, let's go Texas you know what,

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 1>that was one of my big preseasons.

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 2>I wanted Texas. I was rooting for Movie Me Too, big.

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Preseason prediction, and it looked great. And then it is

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>just tank. This entire team has just absolutely tanked. Also

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a tank job. And there's a

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>bigger thing to this. But Justin Verlander five runs over

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 1>seven innings against the A's. The A's beat up him

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>and Framber Valdez, which, by the way, we got a

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 1>question which we'll answer here a little bit about Hunter Brown,

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>which has no scientific nature to it. But if you're

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna tell me that the A's are going to take

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>three straight from the Astros, then just take my money now.

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>But like the INCNS, this is the thing I want

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to do in the off season. I want to go

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and do a two month timestamp of like not even

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>into late September. I want to go September fifteenth to

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>like August one or July fifteenth, and I want to

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>go and find not just bad numbers, but inconsistent starts,

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>like you might get a guy that ends up having

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>like a Justin verlanda like a I don't even I

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't look what his post All Star break era is

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>but a guy that has like a four to one

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>era and you're like, Okay, it's a little abnormal. But

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>what I'm looking at is I want to see how

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>many of these guys are going six, giving up one,

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>striking out eight, then giving up five, then giving up four,

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>then coming back and being good again.

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Babba.

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to see the inconsistent because I feel like

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>there are more inconsistent starters right now than usual.

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's insanely inconsistent. As a season's gone, has gotten

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 3>even worse. It's weird to see. And these are and

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 3>we're talking guys that were traded for big thing let alone,

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Like you know, al Kantar has been inconsistent all year.

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.239
<v Speaker 3>There's been a lot of guys you wanted to trust.

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 3>Could it be the pitch clock? They're still like not

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 3>comfortable in that world. I don't know, but it is

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 3>very very interesting to see how that all plays. I'm

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent with you on that.

0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like I want to I don't know what it is.

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to have a term for it, but it's

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a very specific term. Like Richard said, Sure's or Verland

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>or Darvis Kershaw, those eras are over it's a lot

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of those guys, but I want to find some identifier

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if I don't know if rookies

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>can really qualify for this of what I'm trying to

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>get at, it's guys that we have trusted for the

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>most part that are showing not just bad ritual. Like

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>if a guy is going to be you know, he

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>was what the two and a half the ra in

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the first half of the year, and then he's just

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be a four and a half the RA

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>guy the rest of the year, you know what. We

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>can kind of understand that. But it's these guys that

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>will have two bad starts then we're like, all right,

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>we can move on, and then bam they go bonkers.

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to have a name for it, and I

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>want to find like a good like stat like what

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>do you think the stat lock in should be for

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that inconsistency? Should it be like over he should be

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>four runs or five runs? Like going under five? I mean,

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously it's non quality start stuff, but it's like you know,

0:08:55.679 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>two plus walks, four plus earned runs, or maybe it's

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>differentials of starts. You know, it's like the swings, like

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>four run, four run earned run swings between starts and like,

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, two innings pitched differentially. I'm one live workshopping it.

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 2>I know. I know what you're saying, like did they

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 2>go deep in the game. They're not going deep.

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 3>They give up a ton of runs and they like

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 3>there's because there's different ways to specify a good bad situation,

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Like look at Strider. I did some work on Strider

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 3>last night. Yes, three of his last six starts have

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 3>been really good. The other three he's allowed like five

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 3>and runs are more. He's allowed six twice. So three

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 3>starts are very good. Three starts were horrific. It's so

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 3>that's like where do you choose a sample kind of

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.719
<v Speaker 3>what you're going with there? And I think it's I

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 3>don't know there's any rhyme or reason to it. That's

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 3>a great spot for like the really really smart people

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 3>in the world that can make like formulas and stuff.

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 3>But I see where your head's at for sure, Like, yeah,

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 3>what do you what do you determine is that point?

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, I got the perfect guy and I was inspired

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>by Mike here. It's like the in it's like the

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>crunch time inconsistency, or it's the clutch starting pitcher. You

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>know where does the the it's the anti clutch here

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>because check this out. This is the perfect example of

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly what I'm trying to cipher here, which is becoming

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>more of a cipher and amaze for you guys to

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>figure out. But August first on Corbyn Burns goes six,

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>gives up two walks, four strikes out five. That's the

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>fifth against Pittsburgh. That's okay. Next start against against the

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>White Sox, goes five and two thirds, gives up five

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>earned runs, five strikeouts. Those are two not good teams.

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>He then goes in to the Dodgers on the seventeenth

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:46.319
<v Speaker 1>of August, goes seven, gives up two hits, strikes out nine.

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Next start Minnesota, who strikes out like crazy. He goes six,

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>gives up six, strikes out only five. Next start Chicago

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the Cubs, go seven, strikes out seven, gives up one

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>ed run. Then the last two Pittsburgh he gives up

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>four earned runs in six and then against the Yankees

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>on the tenth he went eight with no earned runs,

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>no hits, in seven strikeouts. He is the epitome of

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>this like inconsistent playoff run pitcher, and it would almost

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>just be interesting to try to probably need two years

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of data to see who are guys that are inconsistent

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>in the most clutch time. But like you also said,

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.079
<v Speaker 1>there's probably not necessarily a year to year correlation. It's

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>just I wish we could identify these guys and give

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>people better advice.

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Burns is a great one, because that's one guy that,

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 3>like Bloomfield and I talked about the Brewers top three

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 3>a couple of weeks ago, and I've had Burns my

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 3>third and then everybody I was getting so much flak

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 3>for it, and I'm like, yeah, is he good? Yeah,

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 3>But the consistency party you just hit on, like Freddy

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 3>Peltz has been a beast outside of one to start,

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.079
<v Speaker 3>Woodrif just threw a shutout like and he's been getting

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 3>better at better since coming back from the IL, and

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Burns is that guy.

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 2>You don't know what you're getting.

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 3>You have no clue what you're getting from time, Like

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 3>it's a short start, it's like a runs Like you said,

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 3>everything you mentioned there, it's all over the board. But

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 3>were you ever going to tell someone those sick Corbyn Burns?

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:07.319
<v Speaker 3>Probably not, But like like you're saying, is there a

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 3>formula to help someone save a team, because like, I know,

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 3>you got your chats with with IL, I got stuff

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 3>with with what I got going on with Gain and

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 3>the Edge, and I got people like, oh my ratios

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 3>just got destroyed and playoff week and I'm like, dude,

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 3>you are never not starting. This guy like to cry

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 3>about it, like I don't know what to tell you.

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, And that's why what I'm what I'm hoping to

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>contemplate here is like something that maybe maybe is the

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>differentiating factor in like draft season. Again, it might not be,

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.079
<v Speaker 1>it might be nothing like it's just it might be

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the most non sticky thing on the planet where it's

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>just like it's just something to kind of monitor, you know,

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah. And but if you could find some

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>type of correlation, especially year over year, maybe that's going

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to be you know why you don't draft you know,

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Clinton Kershaw is kind of becoming this a

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit. It just it'd be a fun thing to explore.

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't help anybody right now. But Corbin Burns is like

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the prime example, So think you might of exactly the

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 1>type of player I'm talking about in this and it

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is super frustrating, like you said, because what can you do?

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>One of the craziest stories all season. He just continues

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to go. And I just laugh at myself about how

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I just remember being asked about him and just I

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>was just like, ah, nothing, and it was just stupid

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to me. But David Snyder just continues to roll.

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Man.

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>He had a solo homer, we went two for four

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>here on Tuesday night. But you look at the numbers

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in general, he has a twenty one percent barrel percentage

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 1>on the season. He's got a two point fifty three

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>expected batting average compared to his three seventies. Obviously there's

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a huge swing, but it's still pretty good. You're looking

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>at a forty percent hard hit rate. Cas are a little

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>bit high. Hard hit numbers look pretty good in general.

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Expected slug is up there. If he qualified, you guys,

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean you can see the kind of muted out

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>colors of his Baseball Savant page. But he doesn't qualify.

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.839
<v Speaker 1>It would be a phenomenal qualification. I mean, it looks

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>like expected slug expected wOBA is in like the top

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>five percentile. And he has just been a beast all

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>season long. And David Snyder is going to probably be

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 1>still a late round draft guy next year, but I

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be worth while as long as it

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:16.959
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get too crazy. But the Homers have been there,

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>He's been a crazy good story, and he is hitting

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball consistently.

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Bubba yep, I love him. I have him in a

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 2>lot of places.

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 3>I was kind of bummed because I dropped him while

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 3>back because he wasn't playing at all. And then Chapman

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 3>gets hurt. Snyder's back in there playing every day, but

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Chet came back, shifting him primarily to third base.

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Just be prepared, though.

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Chapman is starting to do baseball activities and might come

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 3>back sometime late this week or early next week. Then it

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 3>gets interesting for Schnyder. But yeah, while he's out there,

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 3>he's awesome. And I'm really curious to see where he

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 3>fits with the Jays next year because that'll obviously affect

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 3>where we draft him.

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. And then finally in keeping with the Blue Jays.

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>This is like a wild story. But I don't know

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>if you guys saw this, but our beloved Alec Manoa,

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>who we talked so much about, Apparently Alec Manoa has

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>not reported to triple A since being sent down, I

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>believe a month ago.

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Was it was like mid August, Yes, about a month ago.

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was. It was right around mid August that

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>he was sent down.

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 2>I think we all assume he just went because nothing

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 2>was said.

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well we just didn't think we No one was

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking about him. And the report is that it's over

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a disagreement just in general about it now. My immediate

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>response when I looked at this is I wanted to

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>be I wanted to be a little sensitive to like

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to think of, like, Okay, if I

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>were Alec Manoa, everybody in the world's on my case.

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Everybody thinks I kind of stink and stuff like that,

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and that would be upsetting, and maybe there's like a

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>mental health side to it. But there's then also the

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>idea that, like, you make a lot of money, you're

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a professional athlete, and this isn't like, hey, I need

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>like a mental break because this is tough or your

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of upset whatever it is. This is like you

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't report to your job because you're being a cry

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>baby about not liking the results or what's going on.

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't even be the mean to caut more.

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>But you stink like you stink. You got to get

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it fixed. And if they send you down there to

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>not report, I think it's wild that dude. That dude's

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>on a whole nother spectrum right now and we should

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>all be out on alec Mino. And I would expect

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>he's out with this team. I mean, you can't just

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>not report. This is probably going to get messy in

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the offseason, or I don't know, maybe they'll just be like,

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll learn that they really did just give him

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>some time off. But the report came out that they

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't and he didn't report, and he is mia.

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of mining offenses that's gonna have to

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 3>take place to make this work. He was crying playing

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 3>time manipulation, and I said, they weren't going to manipulate Jack.

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 3>If you learned how to pitch properly, you were their

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 3>ace coming in the season. There was no manipulation in place.

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 3>You struggled, they tried to send you to get help

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 3>in like the low rookie ball in Florida that didn't

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 3>work out. They tried to put you on a diet

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 3>that door and I can make that joke. People I

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 3>can go there. Yeah, so they've tried all these things.

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 3>They've brought you back. You had one good start against

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 3>a bad team, then you got shelled again. This is

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 3>a business in the end, you're paid to perform. You

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 3>were not performing. Very simple stuff. You need to go back,

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 3>you need to get it fixed, or you need to

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 3>find something else to do. I don't know what it is.

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it's working for sharmans. You can get your tears

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 3>cleared up, something like that. Maybe I'm sorry I should

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 3>be sensitive, but I'm not. When I see a professional

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 3>athlete basically pull stuff like.

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>This, like if he were like I need a break,

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>if he would have said, like I needed a break everything, like.

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Trevor May had a mental health break. Cool, go for it,

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 2>do your thing. This ain't it.

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Austin Meadows has been gone for like two months because

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of it. I would have understanded that. And I know

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of people would have been like, oh,

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the soft player. I'd have understand it, Like, no one's

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>got more hate and fan fabi's I have been pretty

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>rough on Manoa.

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but he was my list this year.

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>He was a bust. He was in my bust stuff

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>all season. Long and he has been atrocious, so but

0:17:57.600 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to be a little sensitive to that because

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 1>people are rough, But like, that is not what this

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 1>scenario is. And that team let this leak and it's

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 1>a it's.

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 2>A it's a rough.

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot going on there and it's not gonna

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 3>get good for a long time.

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a real look rookie, lookie. Ronnie Mauricio hit his

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>first major league homer. It was a two run shot

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>as the Mets beat the Diamondbacks, which was stupid. It

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 1>went four forty one twelve off the bat. And I

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>was incorrect by the way about Lawler versus Mauricio. At

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the back half of the year, Mauricio is doing this stuff.

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Lawler has stunk, so you know, there's nothing to be

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>said here outside if you're looking.

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 2>For a little boost.

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 1>And Mauricio is out there getting consistent playing time and

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 1>he's hitting the ball and he's gonna he's gonna be

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 1>really fun next year.

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Bubba.

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, No, I'm a big fan. I was all all

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 3>over him when him and Dominguez came up. I have

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 3>a lot of shares of Ronnie Mauricio right now. So

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 3>it's been very nice. One homer, four stolen base, is

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 3>hitting over three hundred and his first ten career games.

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Not bad, not too shabby as well, the Dodgers called

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>called up Kyle Hurt, who struck out three in two

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>innings and he got the big brunt of the order.

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to point out as well, twenty five

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>year old pitcher in the stable of Dodgers guys that

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>they just continuously throw out innings this year. He pitched

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>around sixty five in Double A where he had a

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>fifteen K per nine, and then he went to Triple

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>A where he had a thirteen K per nine and

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 1>around twenty three. So he's right around the ninety mark,

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be in this pseudo relief role for

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers. He's a ra total ratios guy. Actually was

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>putting him in this prospect update that I'm just finishing

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>up over on on in this league dot com that

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he's the leader in K percentage and all

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of my leader is ratio. Yeah, yeah, K per nine

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>K percentage and maybe even K minus walk percentage, so.

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 2>And like eighty eight innings give or take something like that.

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 2>But he's crazy, Yeah, he's crazy.

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 1>So he is worth a look, if you're trying to

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 1>play some ratio his friend does.

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 3>All right, the quick question, real quick, I want to

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 3>ask you. Yeah, so we're talking ratios and strikeouts. Would

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 3>you rather have Hurt or Mason Miller the rest of

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 3>the way.

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh, Mason Miller. I mean, I shouldn't be so dismissively.

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 2>In the pitch in the back of the of LA.

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>There he is dodger. I completely agree with that. I'd

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 1>still go with Mason Miller because I think I can

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.719
<v Speaker 1>get it. I can get more out of Mason Miller.

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>And but he is an A. I'm gonna stick with

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Mason Miller. But that's a really good question. Are you different?

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 3>I think I am, Because Mason Miller it's gonna be

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 3>one or two, three, two to three innings appearances a

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 3>week where Hurt could get your three innings, maybe six

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 3>to eight keys the way he pitches and sneak in

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 3>a win. I'll take my chances.

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Listener questions Hunter Brown versus Oakland. That is what Peter said.

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 1>So this is coming back to there's no good science

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>behind it. There's no way that A's take three from

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the astros right.

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, this is going to steal my DFS Thunder, which

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 3>we're going to talk about later. I'm not saying the

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 3>A's are going to win. I'd be very nervous about

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 3>Hunter Brown. He's gotten Sheldon three of his last four

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 3>and the A's This is where it's fun, striking out

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty five percent versus rieties over the last month, hitting

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 3>two forty four.

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 2>Not bad. They have a two hundred.

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 3>ISO first righties Noda Brown even Soda from slightly gel off.

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 2>They have a sneak even like tied. I screwed up

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 2>his name again.

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 1>Lewis with Lawrence Butler.

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 2>Lawrence Butler again, Sorry, Lawrence, one of these days will catch.

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:28.239
<v Speaker 1>You should just never call him by the right name.

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Butler.

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Louis Butler is doing great.

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but they have this young core that's just gonna

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 3>annoy these pitchers.

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 2>And I wouldn't.

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 3>And in the three bad starts that Brown's had out

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:40.880
<v Speaker 3>of his last four, at least one home run, He's

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 3>walking a lot of guys. I got the A's as

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 3>a stinky stack today, So I wouldn't. I'm not confident

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 3>in Brown's. Hayes put that way.

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I don't feel I said this like

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>three weeks ago. That I'm not sure Brown's innings, what

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>was Angela's common.

0:21:57.560 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 2>He's the Braves are elier this year.

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I can't do it, guys, I can't do it, but

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you this. I had said, like, with

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>how Brown is, you know, on that peak of innings

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and how he'd been performing, I think you can move

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 1>off of him. He's not a must start. This feels

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 1>like a must start, Peter. I wouldn't blame you for

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 1>doing it. I think I could do it, but I

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>think there is way more risk than it feels like.

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 1>But I guess my brain also goes to the betting side.

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just like, give me some part moneyline parlay and

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>put the.

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying the Aids are going to win. I

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 3>just think that the A's are going to have fun

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 3>with Hunter Brown.

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, I don't Bubba, you zip it

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>all right? Mason says a two week championship. Next week

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>had to head points league, drop Evaldi for Reagan's or

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Pepio or do I keep him?

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 3>You want Pepio's two step. We talked about it last time.

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 3>He gets I'll double check. I'm pretty sure it's the

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Padres and the Giants.

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>He's got today.

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 2>He's pitching today for sure. I know it's two great starts.

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>But this is next week, so he's going for next

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>week week start Regan, why is out there?

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't know what league is in an eighteen league,

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm not even trying to be rude of me and sarcastic,

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 3>but to have cool Reagan's.

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Availables, Yeah, we need to see what the Royals.

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm pull I'm pulling it all up real quick here.

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 3>So next week, if you're looking at pepioh you get

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Detroit and the Giants. Oh my god, I've been promoting

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 3>this one for a long time. Next week for Reagans,

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 3>it's at Houston, is all you get?

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you gotta go pick up Peppio.

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you gotta do it.

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 3>That's nice. And I said last week, pick up Pepio.

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 3>He gets Padres this week. You want him for next week?

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 3>You're playing for next.

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Week and you've always been good.

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 2>But the that's horrible velocity again in his return for me, Yeah, I.

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Would rather have Pepio than everybody right now, especially for

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the in a points league. Two volume on the starters

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is one hundred percent where I would go. So that's

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 1>a that's a really good one.

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Who is the best relief pitcher of the next ten days?

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Trevor May, Clay Holmes or Brian shaw Dare we say

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Trevor May.

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 2>I was going to go there because he's been outstanding.

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 3>If you like, ten days here after this Houston game,

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.919
<v Speaker 3>it's Padre Seattle on Detroit. They play all seven games

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 3>next week. I am like I said, the a's have

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 3>been passed like they're just annoying people right now.

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 2>So I would go with Trevor May.

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I would go with Trevor May as well.

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Here better rest this season. A bray you or Nate Lowe.

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:17.719
<v Speaker 3>That's tough a brain. He's heating up again. He's done

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 3>this earlier this year and the Rangers are struggling.

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Go with bra I'm gonna go bray you as well.

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:25.439
<v Speaker 1>What was this, oh, Richard? I think this was the

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>double down of I put this here. Was not on

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn Burns. I think this was a double down. And

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Angelo had said, I'm starting Pepio in all five of

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 1>my teams.

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Everywhere I got him. I'm doing it to Angelo. It's

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 2>have some fun.

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Rider, die baby, that's a rider on the Welsh and

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn Carroll we're going to be doing here in just

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I'd also promote you guys should check

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 1>out my buddy Ino Sarahs just did an article on

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn Carroll, a pretty interesting article with quotes from teammates

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. I actually talked to him about

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of it. I'm like a little ghost

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:57.880
<v Speaker 1>info guy on it. Go and check that out over

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 1>on the Athletic. But I'm actually not going to give

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.719
<v Speaker 1>you a hint for the Corbyn Carrol Welsh thing today.

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So the hint is this, if you haven't got my

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>vibe lately, I changed from goofy destinations to following relevant things.

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>For the last two or three weeks, I've kind of

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>followed relevant things going on in the world or stories.

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's how I'm going to leave it. Just think

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>of what's going on in the world. Throw your guesses

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>in under here. I'm not going to give you any

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>specific hint. You just have a hint to what is

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 1>happening in the world. I've I did literally a Thursday

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>night football one that type of stuff, so you know,

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.199
<v Speaker 1>put them in the chat. Just think of, you know,

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the last ten days or what what would catch my

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>eye on what we would be doing, and Bubble looks

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>like he has a guess that we can get to it.

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, I have a few, and that they're popping up

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 2>with the chat. I'm trying to narrow down which one

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 2>I want to go with.

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we'll get there here shortly. Injuries, you Darvish shut

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 1>down for the rest of the season. We saw that coming,

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>We felt that coming, so bye bye. We can say

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>goodbye to that. Kenley Jansen also left Tuesday's game with

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>fatigue after missing six games with a leg injury. So

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.919
<v Speaker 1>the relief side of that, that's brtal timing for Kentley Jansen.

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:14.439
<v Speaker 1>My friends very about to put it.

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 2>On there real quick.

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Edward Alzela went to the IL because I saw someone

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 3>with the Merriweather comment and the chat. Maryweather got to

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 3>save Sunday, former got to save Monday. So buckle up,

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 3>buckle up.

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh three up and three down. Richie Pealasios went two

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>for three with a double dong. Richie Pelasios, look at him.

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Freddy perulta six and one third nine strikeouts, gave only

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 1>two hits over one earned run with one run, with

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>two hits and to your point what we were talking about before.

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Freddy Pralta used to be mister inconsistent, and he has

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>been consistent for the back.

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Of eight years. The Brewers Baby can't wait to see

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 2>where he goes in draft next year.

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm gonna be like very in unfrin, I

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>was very out. I'm gonna be very in on Freddy Perlta,

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>especially if I'm going to get like the do you

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>remember where he went in some of your draft stuff,

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>because if he's outside the top twenty, God, I think

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have a lot of shares of Freddi Pearlton

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>next year.

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 3>If you give me two seconds, I have me low

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 3>this picture off my desktop from the.

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Early draft on a picture you got there.

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh, never mind, I think I don't have it. I'll

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 3>fine later continue doing it, Okay.

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I just I think if he's like an outside the

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>top twenty sp I think I'm gonna probably have a

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of shares. Also in the most Bubba and Welsh

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>dismiss and don't even think one second about it, Chris

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Bryant comes back two for four with a homer and

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>three RB high just to shove it in all of

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>our face that We're like, oh, Chris Briyan's the worst.

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>There you go on the three down. The number one

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>player for the last month that I target against every

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>single time I can't is Tuki des Saint. I play

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>the team total run, I play the first five, or

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I play whatever I can against Tuki. And he lived

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>up because he gave up one earned run or one inning,

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>he gave up eight earned runs, got absolutely blasted. He

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>did al waka kind of same thing. Four innings, seven

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>earned runs, also walk three. And I put this in

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>here because one part was good. Ever since, Perira, who

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>has been up with the Yankees, has been bad. He

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>had a good singular statistical outing of having two stolen

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>bases yesterday, except he also went one for six with

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:23.439
<v Speaker 1>four strikeouts. So it has been a lot rougher with

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>him than it was with Jason Diminga's Jason Dominga's God,

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>God rest your ucl or that's right. Price Picks Friends,

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Prize Picks promo code leading Off. Use the promo code today,

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>get a one hundred percent matchup to one hundred bucks,

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>make some money. You still got time, and you also

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 1>don't even have to just do it with baseball. You

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>can lock in with multiple sports. You can do the

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>football side whatever you want, but when you do, you

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>can do it with us promo code leading off, Bubba,

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>how you prize picking Today.

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna go to Coors because that game is not

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 3>for another couple hours after this recording. Give me Dancy

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Swanson over one and a half total bases against Ty

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Block and the Rockies bullpen a Locke. That's pretty wild

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Estevon Florial another Yankee getting the job done. He let

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 3>off on Tuesday, like what I'm seeing out of him

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:14.959
<v Speaker 3>against Tanner halg over a half a total base. He's

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 3>shown some great skills in the minors this year, and

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 3>then a little Mattinee action by the Bay Two lefties

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Logan Allen Kyle Harrison. It's all about how long can

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 3>they go in the game. But over ten strikeouts, even

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 3>when Harrison struggles, he still gets your five. Plus Allen's

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 3>been looking good of late. Giants strikeout over twenty seven

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 3>percent vers lefties. Give me Alan Harrison over ten k's.

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, Floriel is just the most hilarious story

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>if this ends up working out, because I used to

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>love Floriel, but that was back in like twenty seventeen

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>when he was in like there's a fall league and

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>it has just been a disaster. But this year he

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>outside of the strikeout stuff, he has definitely put up

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a good statistical season and if you're sitting high in

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the lineup, it's actually a pretty good debt there. And

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I do worry a little bit on any strike out

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>against Cleveland. I alway worry about THO numbers because I feel.

0:29:58.040 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Like it is rough.

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 3>They don't strike out as much, but they've increased over

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 3>the last month. I think with after trades and moving

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 3>around pieces that yeah, somehow with Josh Bell leaving and

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 3>they strike out more.

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Just throwing that out.

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>There, I guess how I look at it is like

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland pitcher in my mind has to pick up

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the slack, and I suppose this is a matchup where

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Logan Allen can pick up some of that slack.

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 2>That's kind of it.

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of the hope here for mine. I'm

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>going with Edward of Rodriguez. His fantasy score thirty and

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a half. I believe they got the reds and he's

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>at home. He puts up those He's still got like

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a sub three era. He just loves being in Detroit still,

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Zach Gallon, even though he went nine, I'm gonna continue

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>this run. Diamondbacks are not going to lay off with him,

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>this guy that just goes deep into games. Also we

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk you about the bets side here in a second,

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>but thirty four and a half fantasy score and Jo

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Hudio fantasy score, I'm going to go with nine, going

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>over to the best bets, Bubba, where are you putting

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that money today?

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 3>I like the White Sox today against a little bullpen

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 3>game for the Royals. Andrew vnover one and a half

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 3>total bases at plus one forty seems like some beautiful

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 3>plus money here. Ryanoda Oakland Athletics over one and a

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 3>half hits, runs and RBI is at plus one twenty five.

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 2>I'll take that all.

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 3>Day long against Hunter Brown and then Josh Donaldson over

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 3>one and a half hits, runs and RBI is at

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 3>plus one fifteen. Does not feel great, but he's played

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 3>two games for the Bruden Now he homered on Tuesday.

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 3>I know he's actually been productive in the two games.

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Coming back gets the lefty and Braxton Garrett, who has

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:22.239
<v Speaker 3>been pitching to a lot of contact of late. I

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 3>don't love it, but to get plus money and a

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 3>guy that's actually swinging it, well, we've seen Donaldson in

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 3>his career when he's hot, he's hot.

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna let this one go for that kind.

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Of I actually don't hate that one. I don't hate

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that one.

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Plus money is not bad.

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I saw Donaldson starting to hit like it might be

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a little contagious thing. He definitely is like a street guy.

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>My Betsford today, I told you I'm kind of going

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>up against Texas Toronto first five money line. I haven't

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 1>checked the updated number. It was one twenty five. Shop

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>around for it, but through the first five, I'm going

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>with Toronto's money line. One side of the tech the

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Texas that I am attacking, and I will admit I

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know if this has changed. I took this in

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>last night. If it did bump up, I'm touching it.

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>But maybe you can play all lines. Last night, Jordan

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery's strikeout number was three and a half, and I

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>mean he has gone over the I think five of

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>his last six or six of his last seven. This

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is not a bad matchup for strikeouts either. I just

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>need four. I'm hoping he doesn't get blasted but three

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half. And I'm adding that with Zach Gallon

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts at five and a half over and I got

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>plus one eighty. So I set this last night. The

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Gallon one was pretty juiced up. I think that was

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the main problem. But both of these are intriguing if

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you can find a way to get back to it.

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>If they've changed, do that. And Edwardo Rodriguez outs at

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and a half, Edwardo goes six, and this is

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>just saying he needs to go six. I really like

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>this bet, and I don't believe it was juiced too bad,

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>too too bad. So those are some of the bets

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that I am looking at today. DFS. All Right, you

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>said we already kind of stole some of the DFS thunder,

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>But what else do we have?

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's the pitches on ideal.

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 3>It's a seven games slate starting a seven or five

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Eastern Blake snowgum begains the Dodgers touch. Tough matchup, but

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 3>that means he'll come in low owned. He's ten point

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 3>one k and he is the cy young winner of

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 3>the NL. The way Strider's been going, we'll see I

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 3>think it's gonna be interesting. Ryan Pepio, we talked about

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 3>him plenty eight point nine vers San Diego. If you

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 3>need some value, Clarke Schmid is seven point one versusossible.

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 3>He's just a quality start machine. So he might not

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 3>like just stack all the stats up for you, but

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 3>he will usually does not crush you. Speaking of stacks,

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 3>give me the White Sox vers Kansas City, Houston versus Blackburn,

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 3>and oh the Oakland Athletics versus Hunter Brown And then

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:31.959
<v Speaker 3>value wise, Ryan Note is only two point nine k.

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 3>It's another reason why I like Oakland. Cheap, cheap, cheap.

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 3>My note is two point nine, Seth Browns two point nine.

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 3>There's many more that are less than three k. And

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 3>then Estevan Floria, like I mentioned in the props, he's

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 3>only two thousand dollars. He's the minimum versus Tanner. How

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 3>can he's leading off? I have him locked in the lineups.

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 3>If he's leading off for tannan off for two k.

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>You better have an Oakland A is your home run

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>call of the day, just.

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Pointing out, I'll change it right now, you don't.

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 2>I almost did it. I almost did it.

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 3>If I'm like, I can't go full. A's because I

0:33:57.440 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 3>might be drinking by like five o'clock to night. Cany

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 3>start fortunes.

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know what they say, never go full

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>as So.

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 3>I found a million lines in my head getting ready

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 3>for the show on this stuff because I was gonna

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 3>have to put my my hammer down on this one.

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:10.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, Oh, you're gonna get your brad Evans and

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 1>hammer hammer. You can do that.

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 3>I'll think of something else here. We're gonna I'll throw

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 3>us something against I don't know, figure out.

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, throw something again. Oh you know that would

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 1>be great. It's like right behind you, if you had

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>just had something you could throw against the wall, this

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>would be the wall slam bet of the day. I

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>love that.

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:23.879
<v Speaker 2>Do that?

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>All right? Where did Corbon and I go? I told

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you just think of the hint, and probably the hint

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 1>moving forward is gonna be like what's going on in

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the world. You guys take your guesses here. You got

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>some good ones in here, and we may have a

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>winner or two. But man, I'll tell you, every time

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>I look at that picture, it's like I just wish

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I could take any better. I am just the least

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>photogenic person on the planet. It drives me bonkers. I'm

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 1>just like, hey, like, that's the sound of that picture?

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Is Eh, it's just the worst. It kills me, all right.

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>So I said, what's going what's going on? That's what's

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>going on in the world. You can take I could

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 1>guess here. There are some phenomenal guesses. I'm gonna just well,

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 1>but I want to get yours. I want to get

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>your guests before I start throwing out because if I

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:12.359
<v Speaker 1>start throwing out ones, it's gonna tip you off here.

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 1>So what is your number one guess of what's going

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 1>on with me and Corbyn?

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Carrol? There's a lot of great ways to go with this.

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Didn't know where you would go.

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 3>So my guest though, is because you want to stay current,

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna go you're getting like an MRI or something.

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 2>You're you're with Aaron Rodgers.

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh there, okay, you know what. Aaron Rodgers was a

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>big one right here? Hospital with Aaron Rodgers. I mean, dude,

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>m RI, I Aaron Rodgers. There's another one, and I

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 1>think there's like two or three more.

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 3>I hope, I'm I hope it's the other ones I wanted,

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 3>but I want to hear I was my guest, what

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 3>do you got?

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Michael said v M as I thought was interesting, Uh,

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the Apple conference. Is there a hurricane going on? I'm

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:49.800
<v Speaker 1>on the east coast, I'm on the west coast.

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:52.359
<v Speaker 2>On the on the northeast. It's heading up the coast.

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, there's a couple of those.

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Please tell me. I'm gonna cut you off. Can just

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 3>tell me you're in Pennsylvania.

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Please. That was my initial guess what a Pennsylvania one?

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 3>O the inmate that escaped by like crowd, because that

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:07.359
<v Speaker 3>would have been an il thing right there.

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:08.799
<v Speaker 2>And I'm like, there we go.

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I missed an opportunity for us to be with the guy.

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Huge missed opportunity. I don't know if this is gonna

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if this is gonna live up to

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it now that I'm thinking about it. Python hunting in Florida.

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>These are great ones that you all suggested. They're all incorrect.

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Now, I will tell you though, there a couple of

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>them towed the line of correct, but you added something

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 1>that didn't work. One person made it very simplistic, and

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give them the credit for it, because

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 1>if you heard the news yesterday, our dear friend yond

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Diaz got a testicle. I took it off the sheet

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 1>because Corby Carroll and I we went to the hospital

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to visit him. Oh, look at that. They're checking out

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>his balls because they got confused. And guess what, he's

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:07.279
<v Speaker 1>actually back in the lineup. I thought this was going

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to go the route. I thought it was going to

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 1>go there out of Chris Snyder, who had to have

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 1>surgery from a I guess his was a testicular like fracture.

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 1>But I saw testicular contusion and Corbon and I we

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 1>rushed to the hospital. Look, they're doing some work on

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>him right there. So we are in the hospital checking

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:33.399
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that Yandy's testicular contusion is okay. That's

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 1>all that we were trying to do. And hej local

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>said hospital. Now I do want to point out, you know,

0:37:41.640 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody said hospital, but with Aaron Rodgers. No, we were

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>there with Yandi Diaz making sure that the Kahonas were

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 1>all good.

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:52.319
<v Speaker 3>Should have known wells prefers the groin region over the achilles.

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:53.240
<v Speaker 2>It makes sense.

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I'm I was more worried about Yeah, I'd

0:37:56.520 --> 0:38:01.799
<v Speaker 1>be worried to nuts than I was Aaron's achilles it's

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 1>also looked up. I was trying to find different words,

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, oh, what's the deesticles in Spanish?

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And it was like testiculo. And I was like, all right,

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm just we're gonna give you guys.

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 2>The slang as we say wavos.

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Like there was literally no word I can't give.

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say cup. But then you guys, like

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:21.240
<v Speaker 1>every one of it. You would have either said Cooper

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>or you would have said Yandi. So uh, there you

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:27.560
<v Speaker 1>go testicular contusion. But Yandi is tough. He is there

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 1>made of steel because he's right back out there, friends,

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:34.879
<v Speaker 1>so you know, godspeed for him. Home run, yep, home run.

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Look at that. I'm back. Oh I gotta get DJ

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>off the board. DJ, you're blocking, You're blocking the goods

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>here man, there we go right there. I'm in tenth

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:45.879
<v Speaker 1>with forty three because I had a Fernando tatist one

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Wonky right above me at forty four. But the leader

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is Blue Harvester. But check this out. Closest this race

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:54.840
<v Speaker 1>has been I think in over a month, because JJ

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Tator is three behind Harvester and Razor Ramon is one

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>behind Tater, so it is a four homer separation between

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:05.880
<v Speaker 1>one and three. It has never been that close, at

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 1>least in you know, like the beginning of the year.

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's the closest it's been in quite a while.

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 1>One of them is going to win this custom autograph

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn Carrol full size helmet that is just hanging out

0:39:17.280 --> 0:39:19.319
<v Speaker 1>with me. So, Bubba, where you going with your home

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 1>run call today?

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 3>I should have went to Houston with the Oakland Athletics,

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:24.439
<v Speaker 3>but I'm a failure to the show. So I'm gonna

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 3>go with Julio Rodriguez.

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Where's your Oakland or was your A?

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 3>I know I should have Okay, I'll change it. Give

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 3>me Seth Brown off a Hunter Brown, Brown on Brown

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 3>crime in Houston. Like Seth Brown, there you go of

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:37.919
<v Speaker 3>it because I have Julio. If you didn't even look,

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:44.399
<v Speaker 3>I got Julio for today joke earlier. Okay, So Seth Brown,

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 3>you said, yeah, Seth Brown, I almost want to be like,

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 3>I'll give you the entire A's team, but they're going

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 3>to hit a home.

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna hit three.

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 1>Then you know what, I'm gonna give you three three

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Oakland A's.

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 3>You can pick fun Seth Brown, Ryan Noda and let's

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:00.319
<v Speaker 3>just go go off for fun because I can have

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:01.839
<v Speaker 3>them on brand.

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, who is it? Cards? Cards was like the keeper.

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 1>If I ever tried to do anything last year, he

0:40:07.719 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>would yell at me, you can't do this to the

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 1>But he's not here. I haven't seen you in the

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:13.399
<v Speaker 1>show for months or in the live chat, so I'm

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:15.279
<v Speaker 1>making up a new rule all the way. By by

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the way, also, like Bubba can't get to the leaderboard,

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:19.879
<v Speaker 1>so I'm giving you some extra shots and we will

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 1>get back to it. There you go, friends, Thank you

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 1>guys for hanging out with all the stuff. Hopefully the

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 1>playoffs are going well and everything else. We will be

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>back again on Friday. We'll have a fun Friday doing

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:32.399
<v Speaker 1>all the same things, answering your questions, so bring those.

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I will have my Fun Friday shirt on. Bubba will

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:38.719
<v Speaker 1>shine that beautiful bald head and we'll figure out something

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:40.879
<v Speaker 1>we can throw against the wall when he really has

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 1>something locked in. You guys know where to find us

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, at is it the Welschaft, Bogman Sports, go

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>check out price picks and Tree or subscribed everywhere.

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Wow what at bog Sports?

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I did the sports I did the Shannon Sharp thing.

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you see Shannon Sharp the other day? Skip anyway

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 1>beat and trick. It's Baba, it's Ben.

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:03.279
<v Speaker 2>It's media trick. Is it?

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get out of here. Thanks for hanging out

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 1>with those guys. Wanna talk to you on Friday. Oh

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>boy boy blagman

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 2>H