WEBVTT - Trump's Tariff Changes + Predicting Future of Fox News & The Murdoch Empire

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I have a little bit of a theme with a

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of my interviews this week. Happy Monday, Welcome to

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>another episode of the Chuck Podcast. So today I'm interviewing

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>McKay Coppins. It's a fascinating interview. He's a writer and

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:20.319
<v Speaker 1>reporter for The Atlantic, and he did the deepest of

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>deep dives with incredible access on the fight for control

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Murdoch Empire James Murdoch in particular, the second son,

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>eldest son of Rupert Murdoch, and who's the Murdoch children

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>are in this big fight over whether to split up

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>the empire equally or to in Rupert's case, he's afraid

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of his more liberal children taking a piece of the

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Murdoch Empire. So there's an ideological aspect to all of

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>these things. Yes, if you're wondering this is the story

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of succession in real life, well certainly we'll feel familiar

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to you. But it's an incredible piece that McKay did,

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and we spend a good chunk of time not just

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about his piece, but sort of understanding sort of

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the ecosystem that Rupert Murdoch created and what it is

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:19.479
<v Speaker 1>done in at least the three places he's had the

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>most success in acquiring media organizations Australia, the UK, and

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>of course here in the United States. But let's be honest,

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why there's so much distrust of

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>media in general is arguably due to the tactics that

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Rupert Murdoch has employed for some thirty years, the weaponizing

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of journalism for partisans. While he's not the first person

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to try and do it, I mean, I've told you this.

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>The nineteenth century was filled with this type of mindset

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to journalism and media, but this modern

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>era version of it, and this attempt to sort of

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>essentially weaponize the information ecosystem that we're all living in today.

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Arguably the modern version of this began with the decision

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of what's happened with Fox News? But you'll hear an

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting conversation about how And I'm going to leave you

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.959
<v Speaker 1>with this question before I go into the weekend politics

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and what to expect this week, And that's simply this,

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 1>would we be better off if Roger Ayles We're still

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>running Fox News? So I'm gonna let you steal on

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that a minute before we get to my interview with

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>McKay coppins. And by the way, later this week we

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about trust and media. Well, you want to know

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>why there's such little trust in government, I'd argue it

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>has to do with a certain cover up or supposed

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>cover up of probably the most famous assassination of the

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century. So with that, I want to put a

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>pin in that and instead talk about what we learned

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>this weekend and what to expect in the topsy turvy

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>world that is politics these days, and frankly, the tariff

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>trade wars that Donald Trump has started around the world.

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>The big news over the weekend, of course, is his

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>decision to exempt, essentially exempt Silicon Valley as best he

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>can from the tariffs. The question is is this a

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 1>permanent exemption or a temporary one. Like with everything in

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>how Donald Trump has handled the tariff situation, in the

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>trade situation, his administration is giving mixed signals. On one hand,

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>this looks like, hey, we can't step in front of

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 1>something that has been that has allowed America to take

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the lead, whether it's on the development of smartphones or

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence, and the big chips and all these companies

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that desperately need this tech imported without big tariffs. They

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:42.119
<v Speaker 1>got their exemptions on that front, but the Commerce Secretary

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>went out there on the Sunday shows and said, hey,

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>these are only going to be temporary. So is this

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a permanent exemption? Is this a temporary exemption? And what

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>does it mean to start handing out exemptions. If you recall,

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>in the previous iteration of the Chuck podcast, I had

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple of experts on trade and tariffs and we

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>were talking about what could be And this was back

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>before the November election, but sort of like, what is

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it about tariffs that Donald Trump just loves so much?

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>And what tariffs do when you start to implement him

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the way he implemented him very scattershot, is that it

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>puts him at the center of every single negotiation. If

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you're a country with tariff slapped on you, you've got

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to go to Donald Trump. You're not going to some

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>other entity, some other multinational trade agreement that you try

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to renegotiate. You have to go to Donald Trump. And

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 1>if you're an industry impacted by tariffs and you're looking

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>for an exemption so that you continue to do business

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 1>in a reasonable way, you got to go to Donald Trump.

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>And it really, this is why he loves it. He

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>loves to be able to be in the middle of

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a one on one deal. And if you're wondering if

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the goal of the tariff policy is to achieve what

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>he wants to achieve, which is to bring manufacturing back

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to America, then he's undermining his own policy with all

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of these exemptions. If you continue to give the tech

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>industry all of these exemptions, they have no incentive to

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 1>break ground in the United States of America. But you

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>got to ask yourself, what's the motivation of Donald Trump

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to do this. Well, he's just trying to deal with

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>short term political pain. Because you will see the markets

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>briefly go up early in the week, perhaps early on Monday.

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's a great day all day Monday with the

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>tech Scott stocks, your apples, your Palenteers, your Navidia's. The

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>people that have right now have the president's ear. And

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of course it's not lost on some people that hear

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>apples getting a big benefit here. And we all know

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>all of the amount of money that has been given

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Inaugural Committee by many of these tech companies

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>or the library that may or may not ever exist

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in a future world of Donald Trump. But there is

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>this essentially piggy bank of money and chits that he's

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>been acquiring from these tech companies, and perhaps this is

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 1>one way they've just cashed him to make sure they

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>get these exemptions. But again, it undermines the stated goal

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of what they're trying to do. And if you're opening

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the door on this front with tech tariffs, you're going

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to start opening the door to other industries. And the

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>next big industry that's going to be looking for an

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>exemption there's going to be a politically powerful one, and

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that is folks that are involved with anything having to

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>do with babies, whether it's taking care of if it's

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>bringing in the right equipment that you want to import

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>to take care of your kid, car seats, things like that.

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>We already know if you recall remember the baby formula

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>crisis and they had to temporarily wave tariffs in order

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to try to save money. There. When people start complaining

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>about the cost of their coffee, are the coffee importers

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 1>going to get an exemption? And is Donald Trump going

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to sit here and essentially play whack a mole with

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:50.239
<v Speaker 1>ways to try to soften the economic blow to the public.

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>That's what this looks like so far. And if you

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>do that, this is no way to run an economy.

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 1>It is going to end up blowing up up both

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>goals that he might have if he's trying to stabilize

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the economy by trying to do some of these exemptions. Okay,

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>there's some sort of uneasy stabilization here right in the

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>tech stocks. Maybe you'll have unevil even stabilization. They'll be

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>relief that the cost of an iPhone isn't going to

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>be so much that it impacts the earnings of Apple.

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>And then maybe you know those that lobby the administration

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the various things that impact having

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a baby and taking care of kids in this country,

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and you get rid of the tariffs on anything having

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to do with baby formula or car seats or strollers

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>or things like that. Okay, so then there's that, and

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>then every industry starts coming to the White House for something,

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and it means everything is a transaction. Now, look, the

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>darker part of my brain is going to the world

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of a kleptocracy. This is how a kleptocracy is. Okay,

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>before you go to a full fledge authoritarian regime, you

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>go through this sort of midpoint between democracy and authoritarianism,

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>which is kleptocracy. Arguably that's what Turkey is right now.

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>That is what Venezuela is times one hundred, where there's

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>still some remnants of a democracy. Maybe in Turkey, for instance,

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the actual vote itself isn't rigged, but all of the

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>industries are. Essentially you got to pay some sort of

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>fee or honorarium or whatever you want to call it

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to the government in order to be able to do

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>business in certain ways. And suddenly, when you're at the

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>center of a terriff regime that Donald Trump is put on,

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>every industry is coming, and they're going to be coming

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit with hat in hand and perhaps an

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>offering or two. And what is that offering? Sometimes we

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>may know sometimes it's a quid pro quo that he

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>may claim will help the country, and sometimes it may

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>be a quid pro quo that helps one of his

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>friends or himself. Some of this stuff will be transparent

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and some of this stuff will be opaque. But even

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the very idea that this econ, we no longer under

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>a system like this can say we have a free

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>market economy. Our economy is being dictated by government intervention.

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>And there's some irony to this because right now it

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>is the folks on the right that like to talk

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>about folks on the left wanting a socialized government, wanting

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>socialism in this country. Well, when you're attempting to control

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 1>and manipulate business, that is the very definition of getting

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>into the world of nationalism and socialism. And there really

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>isn't a lot of difference. Right he may proclaim himself

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a nationalist, but the ability to manipulate an economy is

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>something that socialist governments want to do as well. So

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>in many ways, he is now practicing his own form

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>call it national socialism. I'll let you go down that

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>rabbit hole when you make that phrase, and have some

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>fun with that phrase. But this is where we're headed.

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>And now that he's been willing to cut a deal

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>with Tech, others are coming. What does this do to

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the overall terrorf regime. I think it only is going

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to create continue to create long term concern about the

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>stability of the economy and everything that his stated goal is,

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>which is to essentially redo the manufacturing sector in this

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>American economy, doing all of these sort of half in,

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>half out all of this, it is not incentivizing business

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to break ground in this country. It is incentivizing business

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to wait him out or buy him out. Right. They

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>might buy him out by getting an exemption. Hope they

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>can survive maybe two years till the midterms, four years

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 1>until the next presidential and then we go back to

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the global economy that frankly is already there and probably

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>impossible to end. You might be able to slow it,

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>slow it down. You might be able to take an

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>industry here and industry there and try to manipulate it

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of years, but ultimately it is going

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to be really hard to stop the movement of progress.

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>You can slow it down, you could possibly cause equity

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>markets uh to freeze, you can, you can certainly disrupt things,

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>but the long term it's going to be impossible to stop.

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>And the short term at this point, you know, again,

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I think he's hoping that by doing these whack a moles,

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>he can minimize the inflationary impact on people's pocketbooks. The

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>next month or two, probably folks aren't going to see

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:38.959
<v Speaker 1>too much inflation. But starting around June first, when all

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of the inventories that people have already accumulated in this

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>country without the big tariffs are completely sold down and

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>sold down, and you know, sold sold out and and

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and are sort of brought back down. That's when you're

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.839
<v Speaker 1>going to start to see the increases. And then the

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>question is is he going to continue to do these

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>whack a moles when the ninety day pause expires, does

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.719
<v Speaker 1>he extend it another ninety days? Do we have extensions

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of thirty days at a time. A lot of it's

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>going to depend on the perception of the economy. A

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of it's going to be about of the actual

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>bond market itself. Is it collapsing still? Is the price

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of the dollar continuing to go down threatening our status

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>as the reserve currency? So look, this has been a

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 1>can of worms that he's opened up. He is trying

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>to play whack a mole here. I don't think this

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 1>is going to go well, but we're going to see.

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>My guess is the markets react okay on the early

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>part of the week, and then reality is going to

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>set and you realize this instability. Who speaks for the administration?

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Is it the Commerce Secretary? Is it Peter Navarro, is

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it Scott Bessen? Is it Donald Trump? Right? We know

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it's Donald Trump ultimately, but who's got his ear at

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>any given moment, That to me seems to be an

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>open question. So prepare for another tumultuous week. As you

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>see by the way his poll numbers continue to erode,

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>they're going to continue to go down. This is this

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>is not you know, there has been no positive coverage.

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>He has no ribbon cuttings of new factories. He is

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've gone through this before. But he couldn't

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>have politically mishandled the rollout of this tariff regime any worse.

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>There are better ways this could have been done. I

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>told you about how Owen Cass, who's somebody who's ideologically

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>essentially tried to defend what Trump is doing. But he

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>actually had a better, more coherent, methodical plan to do

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>this than what this administration has done. And they've likely

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>set themselves up for just what's going to continue to

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>be political pain in the polls, financial instability in the markets,

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of uncertainty with our international relationships. Let

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>me sneak in a break here and when we come back.

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>My conversation with McKay coppins on the future of Rupert

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 1>Murdock's Empire and joining me now is the author of this. Frankly,

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>it feels like a mini book, a novella, if you will,

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>except it's real life. It is not. It is nonfiction,

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>even if it reads like incredible fiction. Is Mickay Coppins

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of The Atlantic McKay, it's good to talk with you.

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thanks for having me on seck.

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>So first I want to get more of your sort

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of credentials and accolades out of the way. You are

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the author of a book that I've been using as

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a teaching tool for students in my I teach a

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>class of USC students that are interning in DC, and

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>in the class is called How Washington Works. And I

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>give them sort of four or five books to choose

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>from as a midterm assignment, and one of them is

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the Romney book. Wow, that's you, Because I think I

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>look at it this way, there's sort of a few

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>books right now that I feel like are perfect almost

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>textbooks for understanding politics these days, which is, you know,

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>how did the Republican Party move from the Eisenhower Romney

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>era to this Trump era? And Mitt Romney your Romney Book,

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>where Mitt Romney essentially give you incredible access to his

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>innermost thoughts. I think does better job of any book

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>out there of showing that evolution. You know, there's and

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>when you're trying to put together you know you want

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to understand Washington these days, you've got to understand the

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>evolution of the Republican Party. Your book does that. There's

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a great book by Roy ta Chera about Where Have

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>All the Democrats Gone? That explains the Democrat It's so

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I use this piece Bill There's Brody.

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 2>That's awesome.

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>The Mullins brothers did that great book about the lobbying community.

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>That's my textbook for lobbying. So it's been It is

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a reminder that I think the best journalism these days

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>is in this long form element that we're in. But look,

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I booked you because of this incredible access you got

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>with the Murdoch family, where whether the succession was real

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>life Murdocks or not the great HBO show. It is

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a reminder no matter how you fictionalize something, the reality

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is so much weirder, so much more important. Let me

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>just start with before we get it. By the way,

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I love that the Atlantic magazine tells you how many

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>minutes it will take to read said article. We are

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be talking for less time than it will

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>take to through the whole thing.

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully it doesn't. It doesn't feel like too much of

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 2>a slog. It is long, but it's but I know

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 2>when you when you write something that long, the thought

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 2>is like when you have to take extra care to

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 2>make sure it's not boring because you'll lose perilla, you know, I.

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Mean, you know, other than the time element here, how

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>tempting is it to do a full book? Or in

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>some ways would James not have cooperated James Murdoch, who

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>clearly is the most important narrator here.

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 2>For you, You know.

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>It was that part of the bargain that it wasn't

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be a book.

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 2>We didn't even talk about it being a book. And

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 2>I have to say, like about a few months into

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 2>the process, it kind of occurred to me that this

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe should have been a book, or at least first

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 2>of all, might have been more lucrative. Although the Atlantic

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 2>pays me very well, etcetera. But you know, I think

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 2>that there's an urgency element to it, you know, as

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 2>much as this is kind of a timeless story and

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 2>we talk about how the Murdochs kind of resemble these

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 2>dynastic families throughout history. It also the murder. I was

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 2>catching the Murdocks at this moment where the family was

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 2>melting down over the control of the empire. And the

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.160
<v Speaker 2>problem with a book is that, like that's a multi

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 2>year process to get it out, and who knows how

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 2>things would have changed by then. So I really appreciated

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 2>that the Atlanta could get it into the bloodstream at

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 2>this kind of moment.

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I actually as if I were playing book editor or

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>book publisher, I probably would have said, you know what

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 1>we got, you got to get it out, now do

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>it as and you know, who knows, maybe you go

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>back to the old days. It turns in you write serials. Yeah, yeah,

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a sudden somebody goes ahead and turns it into a

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>book totally a few years from now. But look the urgency,

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and I agree that there's urgency here. What happens to

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the Murdoch Empire will have a profound impact on how

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the Trump right wing, and I do think it's sort

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of that version of the right wing, the populace right wing,

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and around the western world, not just in America, how

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 1>they communicate with voters. Right how they communicate their message.

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Who controls the Murdoch Empire. You know there are there's

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>others nipping at their heels. Right in America it's news Max,

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>there's ones in the UK, and there's ones in Australia.

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>So this will have a profound impact on our politics, right.

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. That That's what made the story, what gave

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 2>it stakes, right because on one level, this is like

0:18:56.119 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 2>a human drama about this traveling and if you watch

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 2>Succession it will feel very familiar. Or if frankly you

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 2>read Greek tragedies, it might feel familiar as well, King

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 2>Lear or Shakespeare or whatever. But the stakes are that

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 2>this is I think arguably the most powerful, certainly conservative

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 2>media empire in the Western world, one of the most

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 2>powerful media empires in the world. And they have become

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 2>very deliberately the organ of this right wing populism that

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about. And it's we see it in Fox

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 2>News here in the US. But this, this empire, these

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 2>media outlets have played a key role in Brexit, They

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 2>played a key role in in toppling governments around Europe.

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they know if they if this, if these

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 2>outlets change hands and the direction changes it dramatically changes

0:19:56.320 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 2>how politicians throughout the English speaking world U on the

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 2>right connect with their their audiences.

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let's let's narrow it down here. We're talking Australia,

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the UK, and the United States. Yeah, that's the most

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that's most where truly his media empire has either served

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>as an organ of political power or as a sorter

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of political power, right.

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, and there's and the thing that connects all

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 2>of them is that there's always been and this of

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 2>course back to the very beginning in Australia, this kind

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 2>of like puckish anti establishment streak, right that defines all

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 2>the from the first Australian newspapers that Rupert bought, to

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 2>the tabloids on Fleet Street to certainly Fox News. The

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Murdoch Press is really good at identifying kind of the

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 2>sacred cows of of you know, the liberal or centrist

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 2>and liberal establishment and like slaying them right needly. Yeah,

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 2>but what but that has I think that and you

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 2>can we'll see some of that. But in the last

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 2>twenty years, and certainly in the last decade, you've seen

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 2>that kind of kurdle into this full throated support for

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 2>something that you could critics would argue is more illiberal

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:17.719
<v Speaker 2>and more toxic than just kind of like mischief making.

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>I was just going to say, you know, look, the

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>New York Post of my of the nineties was fun, right,

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the New York Post of the New York Post of

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>today is is predictable and brutish. I guess, yeah, I

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>would describe it as you know, yeah, and and and

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Fox feels that way. There was a time. I mean

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>there's actually an individual I think about a guy like

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Great Guttfeld, who I knew when he was the editor

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>at maxim UK. And he was he was just a

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, a provocateur, but intellectually honest about it, right,

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and and and and even as a commute you know.

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 2>But in Dennis Miller on Fox right, similar.

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, and now it's almost like, nope, they have to

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>be on a message. Right, He's lost, They've lost what

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>there was a rebelliousness to them that made it interesting.

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:14.360
<v Speaker 1>And now instead of being a rebel still, right, it's

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 1>stead they're weirdly their own establishment.

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like it's a it's an organ of the

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of populist right establishment makes makes them less interesting,

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 2>for sure, I.

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Think it does. Right, It made it less uh, less sticky.

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 2>It also makes the Murdoch family and Rupert in particular,

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.199
<v Speaker 2>I think, less powerful in a way because for so

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 2>long he was the one kind of making the weather

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 2>on the right, you know, and now it really does

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 2>feel like ever since Donald Trump arrived on the scene,

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 2>at least in America, he is the one making the weather,

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:52.679
<v Speaker 2>and Rupert had to kind of make a decision about like,

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 2>are we getting on board with this or not, and

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 2>basically decided he.

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Was both breaks it and Trump were that way, which

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 1>is and this was a case. Look, I think the

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>problem with media in general is that is that a

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of traditional media followed the Murdoch model. Here, Murdoch

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>chose to follow the viewers, to follow the readers. Oh

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 1>oh wait a minute, our readers are anti immigrant, we

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.439
<v Speaker 1>better do this now. Even though he was, you know,

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to be pro immigration, right. He wanted to

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:25.199
<v Speaker 1>do this until Rush Limbaugh told him otherwise. And it

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that he told him that it's this they realized, oh,

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>our entire listening audience. So that was the first moment

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>where Rupert realized I think that he couldn't make the weather.

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Somebody else was actually in charge of it. And then

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 1>what's ironic is that everybody else followed suit.

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest problem with media right now is

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>too many people catering to their audience.

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:47.439
<v Speaker 2>It's an audience capture, right.

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>They're one hundred percent.

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 2>And I think about this all the time, you know,

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 2>I in my early years of my career worked for

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 2>Ben Smith at BuzzFeed and at the time, BuzzFeed News.

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 2>The whole idea was, We're going to be the news

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 2>outlet that speaks to the social web, and we write

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 2>these stories that go viral on Twitter or Facebook or whatever.

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 2>And Ben ended up, you know, a couple of years ago,

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 2>writing this book declaring the end of the social media

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 2>era and that you know, the new media era is about,

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, cultivating these audiences and subscription models and all

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 2>that stuff, right, And I think he's right. But it's

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 2>funny because I'm now kind of for all the problems

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 2>the social media era had in media. I'm a little

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 2>nostalgic for it because we really were trying to write

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 2>for as broad an audience as possible. And what's happened

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 2>is now, with the fragmentation of the media landscape, everybody

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 2>has just been able to figure out. You know, this

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 2>is my audience of in Fox News' case, four million people.

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 2>In like a substack writer's case, my audience is fifteen

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 2>hundred people. But they're willing to pay me, and I

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 2>just write. I tell them exactly what they want to hear,

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.360
<v Speaker 2>three times a week. And I think that's a real

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 2>problem for news media.

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Look, I'm I'm going about this thinking that there's still

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>an audience out there that just sort of wants a

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of a rational, analytical view of what's happening, you know,

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm trying to attack it like a political anthropologist.

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:20.439
<v Speaker 1>And that's how I sort of have always viewed my

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>role is that I'm more of an anthropologist about our

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>politics and our media than anything elsewhere. I certainly have

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>my own opinions, but I'm I am more of like, Okay,

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 1>but how is this all interacting and creating the politics

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that we have versus the politics that we want?

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:37.640
<v Speaker 2>And so can I ask you, Chuck, because the.

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Difficulty is there isn't a constituency there per se other

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:42.400
<v Speaker 1>than but.

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 2>It's not a political constituency.

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of this is gathering as political Yes, well.

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 2>And that was my question do you I know this

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 2>is your your show, but the one question I'll ask you,

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 2>do you feel that poll, like the poll of the

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 2>audience like wants a certain thing from you?

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's the other way around. It's why I

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>left to because I actually felt as if the business

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of NBC was more worried about the audience that it had,

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 1>not the audience that it wanted. And it's not just them, right,

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.199
<v Speaker 1>this is where all traditional media and it's understandable, right,

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>it's being it's it's a business decision. It's not necessarily

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>what's in the best interest of the ecosystem. And I

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you know it's it is. I will tell you this.

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>The easy way to do this is to pick aside.

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Right what Megan Megan Kelly made this decision. Right, we

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>know she's we've seen her own discomfort with what the

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 1>politics of this era is, but she chose to make

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 1>a living God bless her. Right. I think she's you know,

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a very talented broadcaster who made the

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>choice that if we take a side, then we can

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe be the most trusted media person for the Trump right.

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 1>You know it, By the way, it's it's there's nothing

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:58.360
<v Speaker 1>wrong you know, just like there's people the most trusted

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 1>on the left right for that it is that is,

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>And I don't I don't see it as a I

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>don't lament this. I think that's a healthy I think

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that's healthy as long as there's something. There's a lot

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of this out here, and it's almost an acceptance that, hey,

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>you're actually only speaking to a small slice of the electorate,

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>no matter how large your slice looks in comparison to

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the entire ecosystem.

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Right yeah. And there's a role for you know, being

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 2>the kind of person that grounds the whatever your political

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 2>constituency is, grounds it in reality, gives it facts maybe,

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, helps them understand an intellectually honest way to

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 2>make their arguments as opposed to you know, all.

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>I look at it, but I you know, and people

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 1>hate this. I do compare it to sports in this way.

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I can't stand listening to, you know, Yankees

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:53.120
<v Speaker 1>announcers broadcast a Yankees game because I just I want

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>an honest portrayal of the game. I don't want the

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Yankee perspective, right yeah. And so I am surprised the

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>number of people that don't that that you know, think

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that you know that that just live in the in

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the right or the left wing ecosystem and don't want

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a reality check.

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I happen to think this is where everything is cyclical, right,

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, the late nineteenth century, in the

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:19.199
<v Speaker 1>early twentieth century was all partisan media, yes, until we

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.120
<v Speaker 1>all got tired of it, right, And so I do

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 1>think there's a moment here and that's what that's what

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean. We're in a fragmented world again, just like

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 1>we were in the early days of magazines, the early

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>days of the muckrakers, early days of radio. And then

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>we will you know, there'll be winners and losers. They'll

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.919
<v Speaker 1>be the big curators, the big networks, and you know,

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll have a new It may be and we're going

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to get to the Murdos here. It may be that

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Megan Kelly's the next Rupert Murdoch and we just don't

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>realize that yet. Yeah, right, yeah, and she creates her

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>own new conservative ecosystem because the Murdochs fracture completely, which

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>brings me back to back to your story and James.

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Before we get into some of the details, when James

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>started talking with you, you know, at what point did

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you realize that Succession. Did Succession have an insider a

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>count you delve into this yeah? Or was it simply

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>there just were a predictable, dynastic family and it was

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>actually easy to write it.

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Was the weirdest thing about doing these interviews was that,

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 2>like I remember the first few interviews I did with

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 2>James and his wife Catherine was also a big part

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 2>of it. I would have these experiences where they'd be

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 2>telling me a story and I'd have like this weird

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 2>deja vu where I'd be like, I feel like I've

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 2>heard this story before and they're like, no, We've never

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 2>told this to anybody, and I was like, well, has

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 2>it been reported? And then I'd realize it was a

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 2>storyline on Succession, and that's why it was familiar. There

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 2>is this you alluded to, this, this whole parlor game

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 2>among the Murdochs about who was leaking to the writers.

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Like all, everyone in the family is obsessed with the show,

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 2>even James, who claims that he never watched it beyond

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 2>the first episode, still has theory is about who was

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 2>leaking to the writers. You know, James and Catherine thought because.

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>You don't watch the show doesn't mean you don't read

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>every review of it.

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, and and everybody in his life watches it and

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 2>wants to talk to him about it, and you know,

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 2>it's all out there, right, and you know, they thought

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 2>that his sister Liz was was leaking to the writers.

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Liz said no, but he thinks that her ex husband

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 2>was Like there was this whole, this whole thing. And

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 2>I think at the end of the day, I should

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 2>say Jesse Armstrong. I ended up finally talking to him,

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 2>the creator of the show, and he just kind of

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 2>laughed about it. It was like, there's this whole psychodrama

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 2>with the Murdocks where they all think that somebody is

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 2>leaking to us, and the reality is we could figure

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 2>out the dynamics pretty easily. They're not the most complicated

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 2>you know family.

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, I always say that about Donald Trump. There is

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>no you know, when people ask me about, you know,

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>understanding Donald Trump, I said, it's you know, it's not hard. Yeah,

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's you know, he's a he's arrested development,

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>he's thirteen. He's constantly thirteen and what thirteen? Like every

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>thirteen year old there are moments of adulthood and moments

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of stupidity and he is transactional, and you know, it's

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>very simple. He wants power and attention and affection and

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>all these things. And it's like, I think that that's

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>what I took away here, is that the Murdochs are

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 1>actually a very normal, dysfunctional, wealthy family.

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, that was actually something James talked about early

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 2>on because he had that famous quote from Anna Karenina

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 2>about all happy families are alike, all unhappy families are different, right,

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 2>unhappy in their own way, and he was saying he

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 2>doesn't actually believe that because if he looks at the

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 2>history of families like his, for example, wealthy families that

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 2>fracture over power and money, he feels like they're all

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 2>pretty similar and he sees the same patterns repeating over

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 2>and over again, including in his own family. And he

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 2>actually told me, what I think the real tragedy here

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 2>is that nobody else in my family seems to have

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 2>read the history right, Like, what is happening to my

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 2>family has happened to a thousand families before ours, and

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 2>we should have all seen the warning signs and figured

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 2>out how to avoid this. Faith.

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's where are we in this suit? What what

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>is the is it going to be, you know, is

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Rupert going to be able to rewrite his trust or not?

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 2>It's we don't know for sure yet, but it seems

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 2>like probably not. So Rupert tried to rewrite the trust.

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 2>There was a year of litigation, there was a trial

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 2>last fall. The judge in December or the actually the

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 2>probate commissioner, I should be careful here. The Reno, Nevada

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Probate commissioner, overseeing the fate of this multi billion dollar empire,

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 2>decided that ruled against Rupert on basically every count, said

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 2>he could not rewrite the trust was not operating in

0:32:55.360 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 2>good faith. Rupert and Lachlin have appealed that decision, and

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 2>so we are now waiting and it could be months

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 2>before a judge makes the final to call. But all

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 2>indications point to Rupert not being able to do this,

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 2>which means that when he dies, unless something else changes,

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 2>control of the empire will be split equally among Lachlan, James,

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Elizabeth and Prudence.

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, I want to get to that. So those are

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the four children that get a piece of this. What

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 1>about the other children.

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 2>The two younger ones gracing.

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the one with Wendy right yes, that's right.

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 2>They get significant share of the money, but no controlling

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 2>vote in the direction of the empire. And this was

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 2>actually by design. So Rupert's second wife, Anna, who is

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 2>the mother to James, Lachlan and Liz, actually when they

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 2>got divorced twenty five years ago and in nineteen ninety nine,

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 2>she basically said, I am willing to give up a

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 2>significant portion of the money that I'm entitled to here

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 2>if we establish this trust that secures control of the

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 2>empire with these four oldest children, including one from Rupert's

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:15.359
<v Speaker 2>previous marriage, and so if he has more kids later,

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:17.760
<v Speaker 2>they can get money, but you know, not not control

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:20.400
<v Speaker 2>of the empire. And specifically she wanted it to be

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 2>split equally because she thought, and this is kind of

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 2>ironic in retrospect, that it would incentivize them all to

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 2>work togethers right, that it would basically prevent the them

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:35.359
<v Speaker 2>their lives being consumed by this succession battle.

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Which, by the way, what you just described, I mean

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that was the storyline in succession of how the ex

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 1>wife you know, sort of had played the the the

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>mediator here. I'm curious, you know, there's been a lot

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 1>of speculation about Wendy and whether you know that relationship,

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 1>and was it an operation or not? I mean to

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:00.800
<v Speaker 1>be frank right, was it? Was it an intel leigence operation?

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Was he honeypotted? Where does James fall on that?

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 2>James and Lachlan both, at least according to James, strongly

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 2>opposed the marriage in nineteen ninety nine.

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Were they very skeptical of her?

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:17.839
<v Speaker 2>They were very distrustful of her. They were suspicious. They

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 2>felt like she couldn't be trusted. They felt like she

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 2>came out of nowhere. She was this executive at the

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Asian satellite company that they owned all of a sudden.

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, if you were to design a

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, John Leacree or whatever, you know, sort of

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 1>cheap plot line here of an intelligence operation by the

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government, it might look something like this.

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 2>James and Catherine still will talk about how they don't

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 2>trust her. Catherine actually joked to me that Wendy had

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:52.799
<v Speaker 2>evaded a subpoena in this current litigation with by using

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 2>a CCP issued burner phone, which she says is a joke.

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 2>But honestly, I really think there remains a lot of

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 2>serious suspicion about her and her ties to the Chinese

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 2>government and everything else. I should say, Wendy didn't respond

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 2>to my request for comments. She's obviously denied being like

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 2>a Chinese passet just just to cover our bases.

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Here, no doubt she has. But her behavior since then

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>has not helped her cause. And the relationship she is in,

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:24.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, people she has chosen to be associated with,

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:26.760
<v Speaker 1>has not helped put those rumors to rest.

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 2>She is constantly, it seems like, rumored at least to

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 2>be in relationships with various very powerful men throughout the

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 2>West Western worlds. Yes, yes, yes, it raises questions.

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Why do I think James and Lachlan will reconcile when

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 1>their dad dies?

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Hmm?

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 1>Do you That's what happens in a lot of these families, right,

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:51.759
<v Speaker 1>if you just go about that. And that's why I'm

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:53.839
<v Speaker 1>curious if you could see any of that, because there's

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a few things sort of reality has is a very

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:02.439
<v Speaker 1>powerful organizing force, okay, and the reality of his death

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and the reality of do I want to have some

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>access to power? Do I want to have some empire

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to jointly run, or do I want to take my

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>ball and go home and just sit in litigation for

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>five years and ten years or whatever it is, or

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 1>we sell it and break it up and one gets

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a quarter, one gets a quarter, and it fractures. I

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 1>have no doubt that's one possibility. Right, everybody takes a

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 1>piece and run and goes their separate ways. And Lachlan,

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, finds right winger billionaires to fund him, and

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 1>James and Catherine find whatever, either independence or left wing.

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know who knows right. But it could also

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 1>be reconciled, and they could somehow figure out how to

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:43.919
<v Speaker 1>manage this thing together, because in some ways it could

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.319
<v Speaker 1>be the father that's the divisive figure between the two

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of them, right in most of these Shakespearean things that

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 1>once you you know, look, I've got family members who

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:56.880
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty clear to me the living parent is the device.

0:37:56.920 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 1>They all seem to not get along, but they do

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>agree about one thing. Is how the parent created this distrust?

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess is they probably right. Weirdly, even though Lachlan

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:10.319
<v Speaker 1>has Rupert on his side, he probably resents the fact

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that Rupert blew this.

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that is I think that is a key insight

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 2>to the dynamic. It is no, it is absolutely true

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 2>that Rupert, the role Rupert has played throughout his kid's

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 2>life is by pitting them against each other for his

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:30.319
<v Speaker 2>attention and affection and approval. And so yeah, you could

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:33.280
<v Speaker 2>make a case that removing him from that dynamic actually

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 2>leaves these adult children now some space to kind of

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:40.319
<v Speaker 2>work out their own relationships with each other. I think

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:43.399
<v Speaker 2>that in the case of James, and by the way,

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:46.839
<v Speaker 2>I would say James's sisters I could easily see reconciling

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 2>with Lachlan right now. I think they're not really talking

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 2>that the sisters are lined up with James in this litigation,

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 2>but I could see them them kind of reconciling. The

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:00.200
<v Speaker 2>question is if there's just been too much damaged on

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 2>to the specific relationship between James and Lochlan. They tried

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 2>to run the companies together in twenty sixteen, seventeen, eighteen nineteen.

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Like that, there was a moment where Rupert said, Okay,

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 2>we've we've resolved the succession battle. They're both going to

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:23.399
<v Speaker 2>do this together, Lachlan as chairman, James is CEO, and

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:24.360
<v Speaker 2>it was a disaster.

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, but here I'm going to introduce a butterfly effect

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 1>theory here, which is, if Hillary Clinton is president in

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen and not Donald Trump. Does Lachlan and James

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>have more? Are there more? Is it easier to come

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:45.360
<v Speaker 1>up with a strategy that makes sense for the empire

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 1>versus the disruptive force that is Trump, right, that had

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, and the disruptive force that was breaks it

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:55.800
<v Speaker 1>right without breaks it in Trump, do Lachlan and James,

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 1>while they may ideologically not be on the same side

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of the aisle, there would be more comfort working with

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:06.399
<v Speaker 1>each other because the opposing force wasn't a threat, an

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 1>existential threat that I.

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Could I could see that, and I would add that

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:12.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the kind of key moments of division

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 2>between the two brothers when they were co running the

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:18.240
<v Speaker 2>company had to do with Trump. Right. It was Charlottesville,

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:22.240
<v Speaker 2>it was the Muslim ban, like the these key early

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:27.319
<v Speaker 2>moments of that first Trump term that were frankly devisive everywhere. Right,

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 2>they caused countless Thanksgiving you know, debates in living rooms

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 2>around the world, like it was very you know, it

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 2>drove a huge wedge between the two of them. I

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 2>think that there is something to be said for that.

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:45.360
<v Speaker 2>It's also true that like Trump's arrival caused these outlets

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:48.320
<v Speaker 2>to start to remake themselves in Trump's image in a

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 2>way that you know, James could have stomached and still, honestly,

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 2>I think would be okay with Fox News being a

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 2>center right outlet. Right he's he still will get sense.

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:00.880
<v Speaker 1>My guess is he really is that he really is

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:05.360
<v Speaker 1>more of a probably economically and maybe.

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 2>He left He calls himself a centrist, and I think

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 2>that's he's where a lot of kind of wealthy centrists are,

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 2>which is yeah, exactly, and and free markets are good

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 2>and etcetera. I think that he he just he could

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:26.239
<v Speaker 2>not stomach Fox News becoming in the trump eraw what

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 2>it became. Right. He also, frankly, spent a lot of

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 2>his time working when he was working in the family

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 2>business overseas. He was in Asia and Europe and so

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:36.319
<v Speaker 2>Fox News.

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 1>So he felt the effect of anti Americanism in some way.

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 2>And and then he came back and Fox News was like,

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:46.400
<v Speaker 2>I think it hurt he. He didn't realize quite how

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 2>much Fox News defined the entire empire until he came

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:53.360
<v Speaker 2>back to America and realized that. You know, He's like,

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 2>We're doing all these great things in India and Hong Kong,

0:41:56.600 --> 0:42:01.840
<v Speaker 2>and we have this huge media, you know, apparatus in Britain,

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 2>and all anyone wants to talk to me is about

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Sean Hannity, And like, I think that it really underscored

0:42:08.600 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 2>for him how how much it had kind of polluted

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 2>the Murdock name and also made it harder for him

0:42:13.600 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 2>to expand the empire in ways that he wanted to.

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:21.439
<v Speaker 1>One of my thesis about Fox News is how off

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the rails it went after Roger Ales left, mm hmm,

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and that Roger Ales was actually a more stabilizing force.

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Roger Ales actually understood that you actually had to have

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 1>journalists in order to give credibility to the nighttime guys.

0:42:33.680 --> 0:42:33.839
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:42:33.960 --> 0:42:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I actually think if Roger Ales were alive today, he

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:40.359
<v Speaker 1>would not like that they had they basically benched all

0:42:40.360 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 1>their journalists. Yeah, right, they have totally. I've always said

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Fox has journalists, but they don't practice journalism as a network,

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:50.719
<v Speaker 1>right they But they have individuals who do, right, You're

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Jennifer Griffins and folks like that. In brit Hume, even

0:42:54.880 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 1>as an analyst, still is sort of a newsman first, right,

0:42:57.239 --> 0:42:59.239
<v Speaker 1>You see it, you feel it in him because that's

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>just who he is. And I'm curious because I know

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 1>James it wasn't a big Ales fan, But did that

0:43:09.160 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 1>ever come up that we talked realized that Roger actually

0:43:14.040 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 1>was a was a more stabilizing force than maybe we

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 1>all realized.

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:18.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think some of this ended up on the

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:20.959
<v Speaker 2>cutting room floor, but we talked about you know, he

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 2>he was appalled by Roger Ale's personal behavior and you know,

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 2>he was actually privy to the findings horrendous.

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not defending it, and I'm just.

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Bringing that up because what he said is that, you know,

0:43:35.400 --> 0:43:38.400
<v Speaker 2>what he realized once his dad, once Rupert stepped in

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 2>to be the interim CEO of Fox News, was that

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 2>there was a benefit to having Roger Ales, who's basically

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:50.840
<v Speaker 2>like a operated like an authoritarian leader of Fox News,

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 2>but ruled with an iron fist over the talent there. Right.

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:58.759
<v Speaker 2>And he had a very clear vision of what Fox

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 2>News should be. There's be news during the day, there

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 2>should be provocation and opinion at night, and and and

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:12.640
<v Speaker 2>but he always maintained the belief that nobody is bigger

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:15.319
<v Speaker 2>than Fox News, right, and and you had all these

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 2>cases where he would toss somebody like Glenn Beck. Uh,

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:20.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, I if Glenn Beck was getting a little

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 2>too big for his britches and wouldn't be a team player.

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 2>And Rupert got in there and he just was totally

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 2>outmatched by the talent. I think, you know, like the

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 2>hosts were running wild, they were doing whatever they wanted

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:37.759
<v Speaker 2>and and Rupert just had either no ability or no

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 2>interest in trying to rain them in. And Fox News

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 2>really did become much more of a kind of inmates

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:46.880
<v Speaker 2>running the asylum situation after all, Oh.

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>They have no leader, They're they're leaders now. It is

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 1>one of those just like the channel feels like they

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:56.279
<v Speaker 1>follow the audience, the media executives followed. Let the talent, yeah,

0:44:56.480 --> 0:45:00.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, decide right. They have totally ceased trying to

0:45:00.360 --> 0:45:03.760
<v Speaker 1>be any sort of and this governing force totally.

0:45:03.800 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 2>And this was a key key moment though, because I

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 2>will say, uh, I report about this in the piece.

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:12.960
<v Speaker 2>When Roger Ayles left, there was this big debate between

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Lachlan and James about who should replace him, and James

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 2>wanted what's the CBS guy, David Rhodes. He wanted David

0:45:22.200 --> 0:45:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Rhodes to come in and replace roder Ailes and basically

0:45:26.160 --> 0:45:30.799
<v Speaker 2>build Fox News into a center right journalistic outfit with

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 2>editorial guard rails.

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:35.839
<v Speaker 1>And a Wall Street Journal exactly to.

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street Journal on cable right right, and Lachlan was

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 2>adamantly opposed to this. They went back and forth and

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:46.520
<v Speaker 2>bickered and fought for a while, and then Rupert finally

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 2>stepped in and resolved it by saying, I'll just be

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:53.920
<v Speaker 2>the CEO. And and but you wonder what would have changed,

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:56.759
<v Speaker 2>Like if James had gotten his way, you actually could

0:45:56.800 --> 0:45:59.680
<v Speaker 2>have seen a situation where I don't think David Rhodes

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:03.480
<v Speaker 2>led News would have been airing you know, rigged election

0:46:03.600 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 2>conspiracy theories after twenty twenty, for example. And this is

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:10.359
<v Speaker 2>I think what's at stake now If James gets his way,

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 2>when Rupert's gone, Fox News and other outlets that he

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:20.000
<v Speaker 2>believes are really reckless purveyors of kind of misinformation will

0:46:20.040 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 2>be turned into either dismantled and sold off or turned

0:46:24.080 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 2>into real you know.

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 1>The irony But McKay, the irony to this is by

0:46:28.560 --> 0:46:31.279
<v Speaker 1>the time James and Lachlan get control of this, right

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 1>because Rupert, you know, I mean, look he seems to

0:46:35.760 --> 0:46:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's in his nineties, and it's like, I mean,

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:41.360
<v Speaker 1>who knows, right, the actuary tables are the actuary tables

0:46:41.360 --> 0:46:41.680
<v Speaker 1>he does.

0:46:41.960 --> 0:46:44.040
<v Speaker 2>There are no indications that he's nearing death.

0:46:44.080 --> 0:46:45.840
<v Speaker 1>He is did he get did he end up getting

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:46.440
<v Speaker 1>married or not?

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 2>Good? Yes?

0:46:47.920 --> 0:46:50.120
<v Speaker 1>So there is another there is another.

0:46:49.800 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Wife, right, fifth or sixth wife I think six? Ye?

0:46:53.360 --> 0:46:56.080
<v Speaker 1>No kids with this one right right that we know of.

0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, No, the only kids are with with Wendy and

0:46:59.360 --> 0:47:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Anna and then his first wife.

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Right. So by the time James and Lachlan get control

0:47:04.480 --> 0:47:06.279
<v Speaker 1>of this. I mean, one of the things I think

0:47:06.360 --> 0:47:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that the Fox News hosts have realized is, you know,

0:47:11.239 --> 0:47:13.840
<v Speaker 1>there's always someone else willing to go further than them,

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and there's always an audience that's willing to follow the

0:47:16.239 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 1>first and that goes further than them. Like, I just

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I think the toothpaste is out of

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the tube. And the problem is Fox's is never going

0:47:23.800 --> 0:47:25.959
<v Speaker 1>to be They're never going to be able to chase

0:47:26.040 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Newsmax or o An right there. Those guys are willing

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to literally be arms of our tea if they have to,

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:35.399
<v Speaker 1>and and so I don't know if there's I don't

0:47:35.440 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>know if it's possible to. I mean, the smarter thing

0:47:39.080 --> 0:47:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to do would be to zag while everybody else is digging.

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:43.880
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know if they'll know how to do

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:44.759
<v Speaker 1>that by the time.

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I mean this is this is the big

0:47:47.040 --> 0:47:49.680
<v Speaker 2>caveat when we talk about the stakes here, Like we

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:52.440
<v Speaker 2>are now in a media environment where there are so

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 2>many competitors and insurgents in that space on the right

0:47:57.200 --> 0:48:02.000
<v Speaker 2>that if Fox News disappeared from the planet tomorrow, it

0:48:02.200 --> 0:48:04.920
<v Speaker 2>changes I don't I don't know. I mean that certainly

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:08.040
<v Speaker 2>the media landscape would be scrambled, but I'm not sure

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:12.839
<v Speaker 2>that audience ends up in a much more responsible information ecosystem.

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, you do see Fox trying to position themselves

0:48:18.239 --> 0:48:21.600
<v Speaker 2>for this future, right They've recently acquired Red Ventures, which

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:24.120
<v Speaker 2>is the podcast distributor for Making Kelly and a bunch

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:25.720
<v Speaker 2>of other prominent.

0:48:25.400 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And Fox Nation is kind of their attempt at sort

0:48:28.080 --> 0:48:30.719
<v Speaker 1>of making sure that if YouTube is the future, they're

0:48:30.760 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 1>going to have a significant place in it too.

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:34.880
<v Speaker 2>And again I think that this is the case that

0:48:34.960 --> 0:48:38.319
<v Speaker 2>Lachlin and Rupert are making, which is basically, this is

0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:41.239
<v Speaker 2>this is what the empire was built on, right, this

0:48:41.320 --> 0:48:45.520
<v Speaker 2>is what this is our our value add proposition. We

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:47.960
<v Speaker 2>can't abandon this audience. We need to just be doing

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:51.319
<v Speaker 2>everything we can to hold on to this audience and

0:48:51.360 --> 0:48:56.239
<v Speaker 2>the next generation of conservatives, and James would tank our

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:57.200
<v Speaker 2>ability to do that.

0:48:58.280 --> 0:49:01.399
<v Speaker 1>So what the so what does James want to do now?

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 2>You know? So James when he left the company in

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:08.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty nineteen after the Disney sale, which he was he

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:11.719
<v Speaker 2>played a big role in, uh negotiating the sale of

0:49:11.760 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 2>the films.

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Do they regret that, by the way, selling that off

0:49:14.760 --> 0:49:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and murder strapping.

0:49:16.239 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't think they. I Well Lacklin I think

0:49:19.040 --> 0:49:21.120
<v Speaker 2>was always against it because he didn't like that it

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:23.719
<v Speaker 2>made the empire much smaller and less claim it is.

0:49:24.800 --> 0:49:27.960
<v Speaker 2>But if you look at the number they got, the

0:49:29.120 --> 0:49:33.440
<v Speaker 2>the number that they got is wildly inflated. Analysts now

0:49:33.480 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 2>will tell you that they sold at the very height

0:49:36.840 --> 0:49:37.719
<v Speaker 2>of what they know.

0:49:38.000 --> 0:49:41.840
<v Speaker 1>They have to thank for that. Brian Roberts, Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:49:41.760 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 1>who drove the sale price that you know he wanted?

0:49:45.040 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, the it was we were you know, there

0:49:47.080 --> 0:49:49.360
<v Speaker 1>was this whole you could argue there was sort of

0:49:49.400 --> 0:49:52.399
<v Speaker 1>this land grap right of content in that in that

0:49:52.440 --> 0:49:53.759
<v Speaker 1>one moment, you.

0:49:53.640 --> 0:49:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Know, we need the IP, we need all the I

0:49:56.040 --> 0:49:58.080
<v Speaker 2>everybody wanted to our streamers.

0:49:58.160 --> 0:50:01.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, it was it was this you know, constant

0:50:01.160 --> 0:50:04.279
<v Speaker 1>and so and uh, you know, it's the It's the

0:50:04.280 --> 0:50:06.760
<v Speaker 1>best thing that happened to Comcast is that they didn't

0:50:06.880 --> 0:50:10.120
<v Speaker 1>get saddled with it. Frankly, I think they regret buying

0:50:10.160 --> 0:50:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Sky right well.

0:50:11.160 --> 0:50:15.000
<v Speaker 2>And they also acquired so interesting And you know, James

0:50:15.000 --> 0:50:17.120
<v Speaker 2>that was like his white whale forever. He wanted to

0:50:17.120 --> 0:50:19.640
<v Speaker 2>buy a Sky and they just couldn't get it done

0:50:19.680 --> 0:50:23.800
<v Speaker 2>because you know, the public profile is just too toxic

0:50:23.840 --> 0:50:28.000
<v Speaker 2>for news corporate Fox. But the point is James left

0:50:28.120 --> 0:50:31.759
<v Speaker 2>that that when he left after that sale, he got

0:50:31.760 --> 0:50:35.319
<v Speaker 2>two billion dollars in cash, all the siblings did. So

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:39.160
<v Speaker 2>he set himself up and price and he's kind of

0:50:39.200 --> 0:50:42.319
<v Speaker 2>building his own little mini empire, right and it's very

0:50:42.400 --> 0:50:45.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of James. And he's bought controlling stake in Art

0:50:45.680 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Basel and uh, you know the Tribeca Film Festival or

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 2>the yeah, and you know, like he's he's investing in

0:50:53.040 --> 0:50:55.480
<v Speaker 2>India again, which is where he started his career, and

0:50:55.800 --> 0:51:00.880
<v Speaker 2>he's kind of building up his own portfolio. And I

0:51:00.920 --> 0:51:03.640
<v Speaker 2>think he's fine with that. And you know, when when

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:07.279
<v Speaker 2>Rupert's gone, there is a possibility that Lachlan just goes

0:51:07.320 --> 0:51:09.399
<v Speaker 2>to James and says, let me just buy you out,

0:51:09.719 --> 0:51:12.960
<v Speaker 2>like I'll there were there have been buyout attempts before,

0:51:13.000 --> 0:51:15.799
<v Speaker 2>but James always felt like they were low balling him.

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:18.680
<v Speaker 2>It's possible that Lachlan says, and maybe even before rupertiz,

0:51:18.760 --> 0:51:22.879
<v Speaker 2>maybe Rupert is the catalyst for it. Maybe Rupert says, look,

0:51:23.000 --> 0:51:25.600
<v Speaker 2>let's just could we tried this kind of scheme. It

0:51:25.640 --> 0:51:28.600
<v Speaker 2>didn't work. Let's just go straight to him, give him

0:51:28.640 --> 0:51:31.920
<v Speaker 2>exactly what he wants for his stake, and James walks

0:51:31.960 --> 0:51:35.000
<v Speaker 2>away an even wealthier man with the freedom to build

0:51:35.040 --> 0:51:35.800
<v Speaker 2>whatever he wants.

0:51:36.120 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And you assume the sisters go along with whatever James

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:41.360
<v Speaker 1>wants to go along with on this.

0:51:41.320 --> 0:51:42.880
<v Speaker 2>It would be no I think they would make their

0:51:42.920 --> 0:51:45.919
<v Speaker 2>own decision. But I think that Prudence in particular has

0:51:46.000 --> 0:51:48.960
<v Speaker 2>never shown any interest in the business at all. She

0:51:49.040 --> 0:51:52.120
<v Speaker 2>would probably I'm speculating here, but probably be happy with

0:51:52.239 --> 0:51:55.359
<v Speaker 2>just taking her money and going home. Liz is more

0:51:55.360 --> 0:51:58.479
<v Speaker 2>of a wildcard. Liz is actually a very successful TV

0:51:58.600 --> 0:52:00.560
<v Speaker 2>and film developer and her own way I just set

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:04.960
<v Speaker 2>up her own production company. But Liz, Prue and James

0:52:05.000 --> 0:52:07.320
<v Speaker 2>are all embarrassed by Fox News and by kind of

0:52:07.320 --> 0:52:10.120
<v Speaker 2>the more right wing elements of the company. So if

0:52:10.480 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 2>they don't see a way to reforming it. I think

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:15.080
<v Speaker 2>they would want to just kind of wash their hands

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:15.680
<v Speaker 2>and walk away.

0:52:16.000 --> 0:52:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's interesting. Look, I think there's going to be

0:52:17.680 --> 0:52:20.920
<v Speaker 1>an existential moment for Fox that comes up when because

0:52:20.960 --> 0:52:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the NFL has decided that they want to opt out

0:52:24.160 --> 0:52:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of their TV deal, and this is going to be

0:52:27.440 --> 0:52:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a huge decision by Fox and whether they're going to

0:52:29.600 --> 0:52:32.240
<v Speaker 1>financially try to keep up with Google and Apple and Amazon,

0:52:32.560 --> 0:52:35.160
<v Speaker 1>who all are suddenly you know what the NFL sees.

0:52:35.200 --> 0:52:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Although I do wonder if the tariff environment, if the

0:52:37.760 --> 0:52:41.279
<v Speaker 1>economy is as bad as I think it could end

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:43.239
<v Speaker 1>up being in the next year or two, you know,

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:46.320
<v Speaker 1>we may see a situation where where there's no ad

0:52:46.400 --> 0:52:53.040
<v Speaker 1>market is collapsing and the NFL backtracks. But I wonder

0:52:53.280 --> 0:52:56.000
<v Speaker 1>whether Fox is going to have the resources to keep up,

0:52:56.400 --> 0:52:58.960
<v Speaker 1>because that's it. The NFL is such an important part

0:52:59.000 --> 0:53:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of them having a foot hold in legitimacy. I know,

0:53:02.040 --> 0:53:05.680
<v Speaker 1>like Fox News is becoming less and less legitimate, it's

0:53:05.719 --> 0:53:08.520
<v Speaker 1>becoming more and more of a pariah. But Fox Sports

0:53:09.160 --> 0:53:11.560
<v Speaker 1>is the narrator of our sports lives in many cases

0:53:11.560 --> 0:53:14.239
<v Speaker 1>with the NFL, and it's such a huge if they

0:53:14.320 --> 0:53:18.759
<v Speaker 1>lost it, so but it may become financially impossible to keep.

0:53:19.040 --> 0:53:21.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's this is the position that all of

0:53:21.400 --> 0:53:24.680
<v Speaker 2>these these broadcast networks are in, Like how do you

0:53:24.800 --> 0:53:29.960
<v Speaker 2>compete with with something like Amazon or Apple where they.

0:53:29.800 --> 0:53:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Just doesn't need to make money on this thing streaming,

0:53:32.960 --> 0:53:35.240
<v Speaker 1>They don't care neither dose Amazon.

0:53:35.440 --> 0:53:39.399
<v Speaker 2>Billions of dollars on fire to outbid them, and uh

0:53:39.480 --> 0:53:42.120
<v Speaker 2>and and you know these big tech companies are coming

0:53:42.120 --> 0:53:44.960
<v Speaker 2>for them. And I will say this was something that

0:53:45.080 --> 0:53:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Rupert saw coming down the line, and it's part of

0:53:47.440 --> 0:53:50.600
<v Speaker 2>why he sold the Disney assets because he kind of

0:53:50.840 --> 0:53:53.439
<v Speaker 2>or the assets to Disney. He kind of realized, we're

0:53:53.480 --> 0:53:56.880
<v Speaker 2>not going to be big enough to compete with the

0:53:56.920 --> 0:53:59.480
<v Speaker 2>netflixes of the world, right, We're just not. We're not.

0:53:59.719 --> 0:54:03.800
<v Speaker 2>It's not possible. And so he basically decided, let's whittle

0:54:03.840 --> 0:54:05.879
<v Speaker 2>this back down to the thing I actually care about,

0:54:05.880 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 2>which is news. And maybe that ends up being the right,

0:54:08.760 --> 0:54:12.200
<v Speaker 2>right call. It's a much smaller business, but it is

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:15.000
<v Speaker 2>more in line with what Rupert cares about.

0:54:15.840 --> 0:54:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Is there a third generation of Murdocks that are adults yet?

0:54:18.680 --> 0:54:20.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think they're so right? And are they?

0:54:21.000 --> 0:54:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:54:21.280 --> 0:54:24.600
<v Speaker 1>They want in on this, are they a part of it.

0:54:25.920 --> 0:54:29.719
<v Speaker 2>I did not talk to James and Catherine's kids. I

0:54:29.800 --> 0:54:32.319
<v Speaker 2>met one of them, but they they're pretty adamant about

0:54:32.400 --> 0:54:34.960
<v Speaker 2>keeping their kids out of the press, and I understand why,

0:54:35.120 --> 0:54:38.719
<v Speaker 2>given what James has been true. But no one thing

0:54:38.800 --> 0:54:40.839
<v Speaker 2>James and Catherine did tell me is that they are

0:54:40.880 --> 0:54:44.040
<v Speaker 2>gratified by the fact that they have three kids. They're

0:54:44.120 --> 0:54:47.520
<v Speaker 2>all on very different career paths, and they have taken

0:54:47.719 --> 0:54:51.440
<v Speaker 2>pains to not try to draw them into whatever kind

0:54:51.440 --> 0:54:55.040
<v Speaker 2>of professional world day inhabit, because they James feels like

0:54:55.120 --> 0:54:57.960
<v Speaker 2>he lost a good chunk of his life to just

0:54:58.040 --> 0:55:00.399
<v Speaker 2>trying to play in his dad's sandbox, and they would

0:55:00.480 --> 0:55:02.640
<v Speaker 2>rather let their kids kind of figure out their own way.

0:55:03.239 --> 0:55:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately, Rupert was a news guy. He loves to read

0:55:08.480 --> 0:55:11.399
<v Speaker 1>a newspaper. He loved, you know, the stories of him

0:55:11.400 --> 0:55:16.600
<v Speaker 1>calling up editors constantly. You know, you know, he loved ultimately,

0:55:16.640 --> 0:55:21.000
<v Speaker 1>he loved being provoked by his newspaper columnists. He loved

0:55:21.080 --> 0:55:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. What is James and what is Lachlan? Are

0:55:26.040 --> 0:55:29.880
<v Speaker 1>they Are they ultimately news guys? Are they ultimately curious guys?

0:55:30.080 --> 0:55:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Or are they media executive mogul types? And they're more

0:55:34.239 --> 0:55:37.320
<v Speaker 1>mogul thinking rather than yeah, like I said, Rupert, Look,

0:55:38.120 --> 0:55:41.879
<v Speaker 1>I I sense that Rupert cares about the Wall Street

0:55:41.960 --> 0:55:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Journal's reputation, right, Sure, he does. Right, So there's you know,

0:55:46.400 --> 0:55:48.719
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of like Darth Vader. There's some good in

0:55:48.800 --> 0:55:51.480
<v Speaker 1>him somewhere, right that that at least sees what what

0:55:51.520 --> 0:55:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a good newspaper like.

0:55:52.719 --> 0:55:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, another way to put it is that he

0:55:54.880 --> 0:55:57.879
<v Speaker 2>likes Rupert likes it, realizes that one of the great

0:55:57.920 --> 0:56:01.440
<v Speaker 2>pleasures of being a media baron is that you get

0:56:01.480 --> 0:56:04.440
<v Speaker 2>to have these outlets that kind of needle the powerful,

0:56:04.520 --> 0:56:06.480
<v Speaker 2>even when the powerful are on your side. And so

0:56:06.520 --> 0:56:09.160
<v Speaker 2>you see the Wall Street Journal taking Trump to task

0:56:09.239 --> 0:56:11.240
<v Speaker 2>over tariffs over and over again, I think.

0:56:11.160 --> 0:56:13.919
<v Speaker 1>And the New York Post. It's interesting that those two

0:56:13.920 --> 0:56:17.399
<v Speaker 1>are doing it. And the assumption is that's Rupert has

0:56:17.440 --> 0:56:19.920
<v Speaker 1>no control over Fox. Right, But if he calls up

0:56:19.920 --> 0:56:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Paul she go to at the Wall Street Journal, or

0:56:23.000 --> 0:56:26.040
<v Speaker 1>if he calls up his buddies over at the Post,

0:56:26.160 --> 0:56:26.720
<v Speaker 1>they'll listen.

0:56:27.600 --> 0:56:29.799
<v Speaker 2>I think that to answer your question, Lachlan and James

0:56:29.800 --> 0:56:32.920
<v Speaker 2>are very different. Lachlan is, you know, a kind of

0:56:33.000 --> 0:56:37.479
<v Speaker 2>rugged outdoorsman. He's most at home in Australia. He likes

0:56:37.560 --> 0:56:39.879
<v Speaker 2>being a big shot. He was for a long time

0:56:39.880 --> 0:56:42.279
<v Speaker 2>in Australia, this big shot media investor. His wife was

0:56:42.320 --> 0:56:45.879
<v Speaker 2>the host of Australia's Next Top Model. That they are

0:56:46.000 --> 0:56:48.279
<v Speaker 2>very much in that they're swimming in those waters of

0:56:48.400 --> 0:56:52.640
<v Speaker 2>just kind of corporate elite world. Right, And I don't

0:56:52.680 --> 0:56:56.080
<v Speaker 2>know how much he cares about news. James is actually

0:56:56.160 --> 0:56:59.680
<v Speaker 2>a pretty voracious consumer of news, but it's not the

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:01.840
<v Speaker 2>for the most part, the kind of news that the

0:57:01.920 --> 0:57:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Murdoch Press creates. Right. He doesn't read I think the

0:57:05.680 --> 0:57:08.880
<v Speaker 2>New York Post, he said, even when he was running

0:57:08.880 --> 0:57:11.360
<v Speaker 2>all of Europe and Asia, he didn't read the news

0:57:11.360 --> 0:57:13.480
<v Speaker 2>of the world and kind of the down market tabloids

0:57:13.480 --> 0:57:16.080
<v Speaker 2>because it just wasn't his speed. He reads the New

0:57:16.160 --> 0:57:19.880
<v Speaker 2>York Review of Books and you know, the Atlantic, the

0:57:19.920 --> 0:57:24.040
<v Speaker 2>New Yorker. He's just texting me about. I mean, he is,

0:57:24.640 --> 0:57:27.800
<v Speaker 2>He's the kind of person that Great Guttfeld makes fun of, right, right,

0:57:29.560 --> 0:57:33.840
<v Speaker 2>But but but because of that, I would argue that me.

0:57:34.120 --> 0:57:36.160
<v Speaker 2>And you know, also, he really liked being involved in

0:57:36.200 --> 0:57:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the movie stuff, and you know he's like knows Wes

0:57:38.600 --> 0:57:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Anderson and stuff like that. He I think that he

0:57:42.680 --> 0:57:46.000
<v Speaker 2>actually has more interest in the media business than Lachlin

0:57:46.080 --> 0:57:48.840
<v Speaker 2>in some ways. But it's part of the reason that

0:57:48.880 --> 0:57:50.800
<v Speaker 2>he has a very different vision than his brother and

0:57:50.800 --> 0:57:52.440
<v Speaker 2>father for what the outlets should be.

0:57:53.600 --> 0:57:55.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not lost on me that, as you described the

0:57:56.040 --> 0:58:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Murdoch kids, that you know that we're probably a decade

0:58:01.240 --> 0:58:05.520
<v Speaker 1>away from the Trump family like this. I know we

0:58:05.520 --> 0:58:07.920
<v Speaker 1>don't see it yet, but it's sort of like it

0:58:08.000 --> 0:58:10.840
<v Speaker 1>seems inevitable that these family run companies always turn to

0:58:10.880 --> 0:58:15.880
<v Speaker 1>this once there's a patriarch that actually does pit kids

0:58:15.880 --> 0:58:18.720
<v Speaker 1>against each other, which Donald Trump in many ways is

0:58:18.800 --> 0:58:21.400
<v Speaker 1>very similar to Murdoch. There is there is a a

0:58:21.480 --> 0:58:25.240
<v Speaker 1>familiarity to the two of them, and I've watched the

0:58:25.280 --> 0:58:29.160
<v Speaker 1>way he works. Eric versus Junior, versus Sodavanka versus Jared

0:58:29.240 --> 0:58:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and all this stuff there. You know, right now they're

0:58:31.800 --> 0:58:36.480
<v Speaker 1>all swimming in the same pool. But you know, we

0:58:36.480 --> 0:58:40.680
<v Speaker 1>can all see this coming. You know, it's how big

0:58:40.720 --> 0:58:41.160
<v Speaker 1>is it? You know?

0:58:41.240 --> 0:58:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I actually wrote a cover story for The Atlantic six

0:58:43.880 --> 0:58:47.640
<v Speaker 2>years ago about the Trump family and the kind of

0:58:48.320 --> 0:58:51.440
<v Speaker 2>battle between Evanka and Don Junior. At that time that

0:58:51.520 --> 0:58:56.040
<v Speaker 2>was kind of the defining beef about who would be

0:58:56.120 --> 0:58:58.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of the heir to the You know, the Trump Empire.

0:58:59.200 --> 0:59:02.160
<v Speaker 2>And the interesting thing with them is that Trump, for

0:59:02.200 --> 0:59:05.760
<v Speaker 2>a long time and still to some extent, prefers Avanka

0:59:05.800 --> 0:59:09.200
<v Speaker 2>as the face of his his family because he always

0:59:09.280 --> 0:59:11.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of wanted to be on the inside. He wanted

0:59:11.760 --> 0:59:15.040
<v Speaker 2>the kind of Manhattan elite crowd to accept him. But

0:59:15.320 --> 0:59:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Don Junior was the one who actually went to where

0:59:17.520 --> 0:59:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Trump's real base is and understands the better. And and

0:59:20.960 --> 0:59:25.840
<v Speaker 2>you can sense the kind of way that Trump resents

0:59:25.920 --> 0:59:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Don Junior for that because on some level, I think

0:59:28.600 --> 0:59:30.760
<v Speaker 2>he looks in the mirror and with with with his

0:59:30.840 --> 0:59:34.440
<v Speaker 2>son and sees himself and doesn't like what he sees. Well,

0:59:34.800 --> 0:59:37.480
<v Speaker 2>that Don Junior is more successful than Evanka in this

0:59:37.640 --> 0:59:38.880
<v Speaker 2>in this world kind of.

0:59:38.800 --> 0:59:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, what's interesting is I actually go deep, I go

0:59:41.640 --> 0:59:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. You know, it's it's you know, it's

0:59:43.720 --> 0:59:47.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of what happened with his dad, right, Fred, the one,

0:59:48.800 --> 0:59:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the son who Fred gave his name to, disappointed him. Yeah, right, yeah, right,

0:59:53.480 --> 0:59:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Fred Junior did, and you know he ends up favoring

0:59:57.400 --> 1:00:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the son. And you know there's so there's probably blee.

1:00:00.400 --> 1:00:02.520
<v Speaker 1>We don't know this for sure because Fred's never you know,

1:00:02.560 --> 1:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>by the time Fred might have spoken about it, he'd

1:00:04.520 --> 1:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>already sort of was slipping away. But you do get

1:00:07.240 --> 1:00:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a sense that, at least in my sort of study

1:00:09.960 --> 1:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and research of this, that that there was almost a

1:00:12.520 --> 1:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>disappointment that that Fred wasn't the guy, right, Fred was

1:00:16.240 --> 1:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be the guy, and he wasn't. It was Junior,

1:00:19.480 --> 1:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think when it was Donald, and then when

1:00:21.640 --> 1:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you have Donald, you know, you see who does he

1:00:24.360 --> 1:00:27.439
<v Speaker 1>trust to run the business. Not Junior. He trusted Eric.

1:00:28.000 --> 1:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not lost on me. Eric does all the deals,

1:00:30.520 --> 1:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Eric does that, and Eric. But then there's little superficial things.

1:00:34.880 --> 1:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Eric's taller than Junior. Eric has blonde hair, Eric has

1:00:38.800 --> 1:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you know I have? You know it is And you

1:00:42.040 --> 1:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>could always tell there's been this weird relationship between father

1:00:46.120 --> 1:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and son, Junior and Senior, because you know that what

1:00:49.920 --> 1:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Donald cares about is what his name looks like. Right,

1:00:53.320 --> 1:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>His brand is with one son. So there's he probably

1:00:56.760 --> 1:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>can never live up to Senior. Yeah, and there's no

1:00:59.400 --> 1:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>doubt to me, Junior's constantly trying to get his dad's approval.

1:01:03.640 --> 1:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>So he thought, I'll go down this political road. Okay,

1:01:06.280 --> 1:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll do this, right, will this do it? And he's

1:01:09.320 --> 1:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>got him jd Vance. Will this do it. Yeah, I

1:01:12.080 --> 1:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it does. Right. At the end, he

1:01:14.000 --> 1:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>still has Eric running the empire. He still wants Evanka,

1:01:17.720 --> 1:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, he won't totally push her out, you know,

1:01:20.720 --> 1:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>but there's no doubt in my mind this is coming.

1:01:23.560 --> 1:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>The question is I mean, please, can you imagine what's

1:01:27.840 --> 1:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>going in Junior's head that his ex wife's stating Tiger

1:01:30.320 --> 1:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Woods and his father is going to be obsessed with

1:01:33.800 --> 1:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>hanging out with Tiger Woods. Yeah, yeah, right, like this

1:01:36.680 --> 1:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to cause all sorts of bizarre Like I'm

1:01:39.080 --> 1:01:42.320
<v Speaker 1>just it just feels like, if you're looking for the

1:01:42.360 --> 1:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>next succession, I have a feeling it's probably the Trumps.

1:01:47.600 --> 1:01:50.919
<v Speaker 2>I think that's probably right. Maybe that's the book. Maybe

1:01:51.040 --> 1:01:54.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe I end up writing the succession that it's somehow

1:01:54.800 --> 1:01:57.200
<v Speaker 2>even more unseemly than the Murdock one.

1:01:57.320 --> 1:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>But well, because it will be confused with politics, right,

1:02:00.120 --> 1:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially if Junior runs right, you know, if

1:02:03.120 --> 1:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>he runs himself at some point, whether it's in twenty eight,

1:02:05.320 --> 1:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in thirty, whatever it is. You know, That's

1:02:07.320 --> 1:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>always been my theory is that it's it's Vance and

1:02:09.960 --> 1:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump right is a ticket and that Vans and Junior

1:02:13.480 --> 1:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that is not senior, and then how that will play out? Right? What?

1:02:17.760 --> 1:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>How does how does Dad handle that?

1:02:20.000 --> 1:02:22.320
<v Speaker 2>I think I think that the last thing I'll say

1:02:22.320 --> 1:02:26.520
<v Speaker 2>about this is that it reminds me of the Murdock dynamic,

1:02:26.640 --> 1:02:31.280
<v Speaker 2>in that the more successful James became, the more Rupert

1:02:31.480 --> 1:02:34.680
<v Speaker 2>was threatened by him and alienated by him, and it

1:02:34.760 --> 1:02:37.439
<v Speaker 2>actually drove you know, James thought the way to win

1:02:37.480 --> 1:02:40.320
<v Speaker 2>his dad's approval was to succeed at the company his

1:02:40.440 --> 1:02:43.880
<v Speaker 2>dad owned. That seems like thinking, a pretty rational idea.

1:02:44.240 --> 1:02:47.320
<v Speaker 2>But the more successfully he became, the more power he accumulated,

1:02:47.320 --> 1:02:51.320
<v Speaker 2>the more wins he notch, the more Rupert kind of

1:02:51.480 --> 1:02:55.280
<v Speaker 2>resented him, And I could very easily see a similar

1:02:55.320 --> 1:02:58.600
<v Speaker 2>dynamic playing out with Junior and and Trump.

1:02:59.120 --> 1:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, McKay, how many interviews with James and Catherine did

1:03:01.640 --> 1:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you end.

1:03:01.960 --> 1:03:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Up with between the two of them? Fifteen sixteen something

1:03:05.920 --> 1:03:10.600
<v Speaker 2>like that? Any in Lachlan Lachlan when to talk Rupert?

1:03:10.640 --> 1:03:13.600
<v Speaker 2>When talk I did talk to Liza. She was also

1:03:14.160 --> 1:03:17.000
<v Speaker 2>in some ways real and almost more helpful because she

1:03:17.040 --> 1:03:19.960
<v Speaker 2>could see the thing, the dynamic objectively, a little bit

1:03:19.960 --> 1:03:20.200
<v Speaker 2>from the.

1:03:20.240 --> 1:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Middle side, right right, because she wasn't involved in it,

1:03:23.080 --> 1:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, involved with the fight. Well, look, it's uh,

1:03:27.040 --> 1:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it's fantastic. And like I said at the top, I mean,

1:03:30.000 --> 1:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you're you know, there's there's you're, you're you're generational in

1:03:34.080 --> 1:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>your ability to do this, and it's, uh, it's it's fantastic,

1:03:38.480 --> 1:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it's necessary, and it's illuminating, whether it's understanding the dynamics

1:03:43.400 --> 1:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of what happened in the Republican Party. And again I

1:03:45.840 --> 1:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>tell people there's no other book to read. And you know,

1:03:48.880 --> 1:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you read these Trump books or you read these history

1:03:50.880 --> 1:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party books, and you're like, Okay, they all

1:03:53.680 --> 1:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>have sort of the same anecdotes, right, or the anecdotes

1:03:56.520 --> 1:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>are different, but they but it's the same the same, Right,

1:03:59.400 --> 1:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>they all feel the same. I always say every Trump

1:04:01.080 --> 1:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>book's the same. You won't believe what he tried to do,

1:04:03.640 --> 1:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you won't believe who stopped him, and you won't believe

1:04:06.280 --> 1:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>where they headed next. Right, Like, it's always like it's

1:04:09.000 --> 1:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>some version of that, and yet you tackled it in

1:04:12.600 --> 1:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a way through sort of the Last of the Mohicans,

1:04:15.560 --> 1:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>if you will, with Romney, and it was more illuminating

1:04:19.360 --> 1:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>than any any supposed Trump insider book you could get

1:04:22.080 --> 1:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>on where the party is today, and I think this

1:04:24.360 --> 1:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>on media and conservative media in general has a similar

1:04:28.360 --> 1:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>feel to me.

1:04:29.440 --> 1:04:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, I appreciate it. I appreciate all your support. You

1:04:32.720 --> 1:04:36.600
<v Speaker 2>were the first person to interview me on stage about

1:04:36.600 --> 1:04:39.360
<v Speaker 2>that Romney book back in twenty twenty three, kicked off

1:04:39.360 --> 1:04:41.800
<v Speaker 2>the book tour, and it really made a difference.

1:04:41.800 --> 1:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>So I appreciate, well, your your your kind of your

1:04:43.720 --> 1:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of say that. I think your work is what

1:04:45.480 --> 1:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>made the difference. Let's let's let's not get that, get

1:04:49.120 --> 1:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that distracted there, McKay. I mean this was I'm sure exhausting,

1:04:53.480 --> 1:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a labor of love. And now you've got to, you know,

1:04:56.400 --> 1:04:58.600
<v Speaker 1>go find some some I assume you've got a couple

1:04:58.600 --> 1:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of things you're working on now.

1:04:59.560 --> 1:05:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Onto the story, but always searching for a confessional, influential

1:05:05.720 --> 1:05:07.440
<v Speaker 2>person who wants to bear their soul to me. So

1:05:07.440 --> 1:05:12.120
<v Speaker 2>if anyone listening wants to talk, you can find me.

1:05:12.600 --> 1:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>There you go. He can be your therapist and you

1:05:14.640 --> 1:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>don't have to pay. There you go, McKay, Thank you, Chuck.

1:05:21.880 --> 1:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>So do you buy our theory that perhaps Fox News

1:05:25.560 --> 1:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>would be better today if Roger Ailes are still running

1:05:27.600 --> 1:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it and we're still alive. Anyway, I would love to

1:05:30.920 --> 1:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>hear your comments and results on that and your responses

1:05:34.440 --> 1:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>to that. By the way, don't forget to ask Chuck

1:05:38.040 --> 1:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>at the chucktodcast dot com. That's where you send in

1:05:40.880 --> 1:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>your questions. That's where you send in your feedback. That's

1:05:43.760 --> 1:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>where you throw ideas out there that you'd like to

1:05:46.800 --> 1:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>see me to tackle that. Perhaps we haven't tackled that,

1:05:49.280 --> 1:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>And of course later this week I will try to

1:05:51.440 --> 1:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>answer as many of your questions. And my theme this

1:05:54.840 --> 1:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>week of sort of institutions who helped facilitate the great

1:06:00.360 --> 1:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>distrust environment that we all live in today. We just

1:06:04.080 --> 1:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>finished up media today. We're going to tackle government distrust

1:06:07.720 --> 1:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>later this week with one of the great experts these

1:06:11.440 --> 1:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>days on all things at JFK. So I hope you

1:06:14.360 --> 1:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>look forward to that later in the week. And with that,

1:06:17.040 --> 1:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll sign off and I'll see in the next episode

1:06:19.440 --> 1:06:21.479
<v Speaker 1>of the Chuck Podcast until we upload again.