WEBVTT - From the Vault: Aphantasia

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:10.479
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and this is

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>one of our from the Vault selections. Yeah, this particular

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>episode originally published May two thousand sixteen, and it concerns

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a fantasia blindness of the mind's eye, the idea that

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're reading a description in a book or someone's

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>explaining something to you, certain individuals will not be able

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>to form that mental picture. And this is this is

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating topic. When we originally aired this, we heard

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>from a lot of people, some people who suddenly realized, Hey,

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I think this is this is how my mind works.

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.599
<v Speaker 1>I think this episode generated some of the most listener

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>male of anything we ever did. Yeah, we did a

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>whole additional listener mail episode that came out after this. Yeah,

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and we'll make sure to link to that on the

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>landing page for this episode. Anyway, we hope you enjoy

0:00:55.600 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>this episode from the old days. Welcome to Stuff to

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind from how Stuff Works dot com. He

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name is

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and today's episode concerns

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the mind's eye concerns mental imagery, and so we decided

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>that the best way to kick off this episode is

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to take you on a little guided mental journey. Yeah,

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>so close your eyes unless you're driving or doing something

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that requires your eyes to be open, and in that case,

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>don't close your eyes if you If you are able

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to close your eyes, close your eyes if not. Just

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>imagine you're eight years old and you're walking along a

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>beach with your mother, your barefoot. The tide is coming

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in and you see trails of footprints leading back and

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>forth along the beach where other people have walked the

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>same path today. But the waves are coming higher and

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>higher and slowly smoothing all those footprints way. But then

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you look up at your mother and you notice something strange.

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>She's wearing armor, a steel chest plate and a visored helm,

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 1>with chainmail drooping across her arms and legs, rustling lightly

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>as she walks. Across the front of her chest plate

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>is a painted figure. It's foghorn, Leghorn. She raises the

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>visor on her helm and smiles at you. A mosquito

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>hovers in front of her face, and she flails one

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>arm to knock it away and you both laugh, but

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>then you notice something else. Your mother has a piece

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of metal dangling from her hip opposite you. It's a

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>long sword. She puts one hand on the hilt and says,

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>don't worry, only a bit of insurance in case he

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>shows up. A wave of seawater rolls up over your feet,

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>washing dry sand from between your toes, and you ask who.

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.519
<v Speaker 1>Then there's a faint rumbling under your feet. It's not

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>just the tickling wash of the waves. The ground is shaking,

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and about two out in the water, a dark shape

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>begins to rise up from the waves. At first it's

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>just a green, black lump, but then the huge glaring eyes,

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the cavernous mouth, climbing higher and higher as it approaches.

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>It's Godzilla. Not the friendly Godzilla who defends Earth against

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>all the heel monsters. This is the angry Godzilla who

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>breathes beams of radiation and crushes ten story buildings with

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a single swipe. Your mother puts an arm across your chest.

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>She draws her long sword and says stand back. This

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>could get serious, And with the flip of a switch,

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>her hover boots engage, her feet lift off the ground,

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and then she's rocketing towards the head of the monster

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to defend the realms of humankind. Alright, so uh, we

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.839
<v Speaker 1>we tried to draw in a few different types of

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of imagery. They are a few different types of memories memories, right.

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>We wanted to have sort of generic landscape that would

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>be easy for a lot of people to picture, like

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a beach. Most people have some kind of image, generically

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of what a beach looks like. We also wanted something familiar.

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Usually they say to picture a relative or familiar family member,

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully you've got an image of a mother or

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 1>family figure there, but then also some pop culture images. Right,

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>most people hopefully know what Godzilla looks like. If you don't,

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you gotta go back and watch the original Godzilla from

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 1>the fifties and right, uh and then uh and then

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>fall horn like horn and personal favorite of mine. You know.

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the interesting things with this exercise is

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to think back on it, and think back of the

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>specifics and ask yourself questions like who did I have

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a more vivid memory of what I looked like as

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a child, what my mother looked like, what Godzilla looked like?

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And in these details are not necessarily telling of your

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>relationship with your mother versus your relationship with Godzilla. But but,

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>but it it kind of just raises our awareness of

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>the vast spectrum of visual stimuli that are informing are

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>our inner vision of the world. Yeah, and this is

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a strange thing because the only person who can experience

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>your mental imagery is you. You can sort of describe

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>your mental imagery to other people, but nobody can take

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a look at it to see what it is you're

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>picturing in your mind. So this is something that you

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>largely have to deal with entirely on your own, and

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't know how similar or how different your own

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>process of mental imagery is to that of other people

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>unless you really put your heads together and start talking

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>about your mental images and detail and trying to figure

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>out if their difference is. It's not a standard thing

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that people do, really right, because even to describe it,

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>if I describe my mental images to you, they become

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>your mental images. Like it's in a way, I'm kind

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of handing off the blueprints and then you build a

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>different building. It's the same building, but a different building.

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>And likewise, maybe you paint, maybe you write um and

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>some other artistic medium you create music to try and

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>convey these images in your head. But you're still but

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you're still then limited by your artist artistic ability and

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>then other people's interpretations of those works of art. You know,

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I already realized. I didn't think about this when I

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>was writing this, but I did already see a contradiction

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in what I told people to imagine the original angry Godzilla.

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>But then I also said green black, Right, Well, Godzilla

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in color is sort of greenish black, but the original

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>anger Godzilla black and white. He's just you know, you

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>look at him and he just looks like this charred monstery.

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>So this is a this is already a mental confabulation

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>on my part. I'm imagining a Godzilla that never existed

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 1>anywhere in reality. But anyway, so most of you were

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>with us there on that journey. You were, to some

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>extent able to picture some of the things we were

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about. You could see in your mind's eye the beach,

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:56.559
<v Speaker 1>the armor, your mother, the sword, the fog horn, leg horn,

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the Godzilla. But there are some people who probably couldn't

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>see any of that. They were there with us, they

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>were understanding the concepts. They were able to follow the plot,

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>whatever plot there was, and they could probably recount a

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>list of the events that happened in the little scene

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>we just described, but they couldn't see any of it

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>in their imagination. And this is the concept we're going

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to be talking about today. One study has found that

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>this might be about up to one in fifty people

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>who have this kind of experience where they just don't

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>create pictures inside their mind the way most people do.

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh And this condition now hasn't come to be known

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>as a fantasia or the blindness of the mind's I So,

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the American biotech leader Craig Venter, you know about him, right.

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>He's famous for being a leader in the quest of

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>sequence the human genome, and he's famous for creating a

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>synthetic organisms. Uh So, he has actually described that he

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>has an unusual way of thinking, a way of thinking

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that's essentially purely conceptual, like we've been describing, without any

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>mental imagery. Venter says, quote, it's like having a computer

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>store the information, but you don't have a screen attached

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to the computer. He's describing his own mind. I don't know.

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I I have trouble understanding what that would be like.

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>But maybe maybe to understand it better. We should first

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>look at some facts about what the mind's eye itself

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is before we get into the blindness of the mind's eye.

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.719
<v Speaker 1>What's going on when you create pictures in your head? Well,

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of course we're talking about mental imagery here, but also

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>there's some other sensations thrown in as well. It all

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>amounts to a quasi perceptional experience that occurs in the

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>absence of the appropriate external stimuli. Um. So, I can

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>close my eyes, I can see a deceased loved one's face,

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I can hear their voice. I can imagine myself standing

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>on the shore of a distant ocean, a past ocean,

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>or even some future sure that I haven't even walked

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>on yet. I mean this, this is the kind of

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>thing that I mean, most of us take for granted.

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>We use it, we employ it every day. Um well,

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as I did with the Angry Godzilla and color,

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you can picture things you've never actually seen, right, Yeah

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you can. Yeah, there are things if you're like me,

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I feel there are things in books. For instance, no

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>one has ever painted a picture of this character or

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>this scene. Uh, and yet you have a very like

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>crystal clear vision like I have a better visual memory

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of some things that have occurred in books than things

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that have occurred in real life. You know, Oh yeah, yeah,

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I know exactly what you're talking about. Uh. Isn't it

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>so weird to finally see a book you've read but

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 1>it's never been illustrated or made into a film, or

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 1>anything finally made visual by someone else. It's always people

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>always have the same reaction. That's not what I thought

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>so and so looked for. It's not what it looks

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>like now. The things we perceive in the mind's eye,

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 1>their their products of memory. There can structed from specific

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>or varied memories. They may be accurate, they may be

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 1>amalgams of diverse influences. Really, this runs the gamut from

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>something you saw yesterday that you near perfectly remember, to

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>have you know, vague side from your childhood that you

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>at least think you remember, to an envisioned future scene

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.559
<v Speaker 1>in your own life, something you dreamt, something you daydreamed,

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>landscape be viewed from the imagined walls of a fictional world,

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>or your own creation of a of a an author's creation.

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just like pretty much any time we are envisioning something,

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>any time we are closing our eyes or even keep

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:36.559
<v Speaker 1>with our eyes open are imagining something, we are seeing

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>something in our mind that is of course the mind's eye, uh,

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>doing its thing. Yeah, And I think this has always

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>been a very interesting avenue for philosophy to investigate because

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it is something that we recognized was sort of strange

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>about the human experience before we had neuroscience or psychology

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>or or any of these scientific ways of instigating it. Yeah. Yeah,

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean because because it obviously plays such a central

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.599
<v Speaker 1>role in the way we navigate the world and the

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>way we think about time and a world of movable objects, right. Um.

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>And so yeah, we've been as long as we've had philosophers,

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>as long as we've had people among us with with

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>time to you know, look up from their labors and

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>think about the human condition, we've been thinking about the

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>mind's eye. Um. On the podcast here, we've talked about

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the method of Loki before the the ancient Greek technique

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 1>in which person utilizes spatial memory to memorize nonspatial information. Uh. Look,

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that kind of plays into into some of this. That

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 1>involves a certain amount of a reflection on what's on

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>how we're using the mind's eye, you know, I I've

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>tried to use the method of Loki, and I have

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>not been very good at it. Yeah, I wonder if

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not doing it right. Like when I'm able

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to to really get it set in my mind, it

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>does help me remember the By the way, this is

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>so a quick version of it is, if you need

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to make a list of digits of numbers to remember,

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to remember those digits. So instead you

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>imagine your house being full of odd characters that each

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 1>embody one of the digits in that number sequence, and

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>then you can remember by picturing the room and where

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.839
<v Speaker 1>all of the odd characters were in the room, and

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>then you just remember what digit they correspond to or

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Yeah, like a very simplified version of

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>this that I have employed frequently in the past. It's

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a um uh you know, often called

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the memory palace because it's an imagined place that you

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>fill with these examples. But oftentimes I only have room

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in my mind for one example, and that is, uh,

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that's when I am a swimming laps and I want

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to remember what number lap I'm on, because if I

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>forget the lap number, then I'm going to make myself

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>revert to the to the lower number. So if I

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>if I don't know for sure I'm and four, I'm

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna do three. And I don't want to keep doing

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>one less than I want to do because I'm gonna

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>wear myself out right. But I'm also busy swimming. I'm

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>having a hard time necessarily remembering which lap I am

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>currently on. So instead of trying to remember four, as

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>easy as that would seem, I find it easier to

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>just force myself to think of, say, the four Horsemen

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Apocalypse, like, think of think of that, and

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>that'll stick in my head just a little better as

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm you know, vigorously of swimming these laps um, you know.

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So it'll just be some sort of visual association with

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>just a single digit. I don't know. I don't know

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>if anybody else out there has has done something of

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that that that nature, but that is kind of a

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>simplified um, good crap. What's what's your visual image for eight?

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't think of anything for eight? Oh for eight,

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I think of Alan robe gerlays The Voyeur, where you

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>have a character who keeps making figure eights out of rope. Yeah,

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:00.319
<v Speaker 1>so I think of him setting by the shore um

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 1>not quite contemplating horrible things and making little figure eights.

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a good thing to have in your mind here

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>at the gym or the y m c a guess

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>wherever you swim laps. So one of the important things

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:14.439
<v Speaker 1>when when thinking about the memory palace and then ultimately

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking about memory and the mind's eye, is just to

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to refresh here a little bit about human memory itself.

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Human memory is not just like a tape real rolling

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in the brain that we just, oh, let's go back

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and look and see what happened yesterday. Human memory in

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>multiple ways. It's not multiple, certainly not that accurate, right,

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>because human memory consists of several different types of memory

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that are working in uh kind of an unequal chorus

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>um to create the human experience of memory that we have.

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>So we have sensory memory, um, you know what something

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>feels like, what it smells, It smells like, that sort

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of thing. We have short term memory. We have long

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>term term memory. We have and then we divide long

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>term memory out. We have explicit memories of consciousness, we

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>have in iplicit memories of unconsciousness. We have declarative memories

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of facts and events. We have procedural memories involved that

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>involves skills and tasks. We have episodic memory that deals

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>with events and experiences, and we have semantic memory that

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>concerns facts and concepts. So we have all these different

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>types of memories, each one dealing with in a way

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>certain you know, different types of skills, different types of

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>ways of utilizing memory when we engage with the world.

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>And studies have shown in the past that, uh, if

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you have a part of the brain associated with the

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>one type of memory is injured, sometimes you see those

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>other types of memory compensating. So it's like a a

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>in a way, it's like a staff. It's like a

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>staff of different memory drones and they all have their

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>jobs to do. But if somebody is slacking, then it

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>may fall to another employee to uh to to you know,

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to step up and and cover for their shortcomings. Yeah.

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a good metaphor that the brain is

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>more like a workforce than a machine. If one part

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of a machine breaks, the whole machine gen probably isn't

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna work. But if one part of a workforce is

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>slacking or calls in sick today, the others can often

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>find a way to cover for them, right, and they

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>might cover you know, everyone does their job a little

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>bit differently, so their their skill set might allow them

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to cover in a slightly different way. But back to philosophers.

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>So philosophers have continue to argue about the minds, and

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>we're certainly not gonna be able to do an exhaustive

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>journey through all of their their takes. But you go

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>back as far as Plato, for example, and Plato brought

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>us one of the most famous examples of this. Uh.

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>He utilizes mental images in his famous allegory of the Cave. Yeah,

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's sort of the idea that the world that

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>we perceive is not the true reality, you know. But

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Plato had this whole belief in ideal forms, you know,

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>things that were the more true version of the thing

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>than the thing we're familiar with. Right. There's a realm

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of forms out there, and in that realm of forms,

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>there's such thing as a perfect chair. But in this

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>world we can only build imperfect chairs that inch maybe

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a little closer and closer towards that unobtainable ideal. Yeah.

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And so his metaphor for explaining this was that of

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>the cave, where there are people who are chained up

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>in a cave and they don't even really realize that

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>they're in a cave. And uh, and there's an opening

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to the cave through which light comes through, and figures

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>pass in front of the opening to the cave, casting

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>shadows on the wall of the cave, and all we

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>see we're facing the back of the cave, the wall,

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>and we see the shadows, and we think the shadows

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>are the real things, but they're not there. They're only

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>the the sort of like the vague outlines of the

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 1>things that that are the true forms. If anyone out

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>there is watching The Path on Hulu, there's actually a

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>scene um in the first episode where they roll out

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>this this allegory and it's it's pretty entertaining, but but

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, certainly it's an it's an allegory. You can

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of fun with either trying to contrast

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>your worldview to another individual's worldview, to try and win

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 1>someone over with your true version of reality versus there

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>they're you know, their illusion based understanding of reality. But

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it also you know, gets down to like what is

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>our perception of reality itself? These mental images that fill

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>our mind when we close our eyes those are imperfect.

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>But also the mental images when we have our eyes open,

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>we're still just in a sense, we are still just

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing those shadows on the walls of a cave. Yeah.

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>So Aristotle also referred to mental imagery and his work

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>referred to it as a as a fantasia with an

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>F with a P, not an fright, not the Disney movie. Uh,

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>And this was central to his theory of memory. Yeah.

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Though you know, I can see why the Disney movie

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>would be called that, I mean, they it evokes the

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 1>concept of fantasy, even though he didn't I think directly

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:50.120
<v Speaker 1>mean fantasy and the way we do, like somebody coming

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>up with a with a fantasy to escape from life. Yeah,

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it was the idea of being able to to imagine

0:18:56.560 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>things in your mind now. And A. Carts also thought

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot about mental imagery and how they form in

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 1>the mind. Uh, the view that an idea is a

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>quasi perceptual thing, perhaps even pictorial, formed in the imagination.

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>And he did distinguish between images formed in the brain

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and ideas in the mind because he was a duelist

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>he saw uh, he saw the mind and the body

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>as separate. The essence of mind is thought and the

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 1>body is an extension of it. Thoughts are not extended

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in space, but the body is now us. Where in

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>philosophy you have you have like idealism, which states that

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>reality is equivalent to mental images, and the mental images

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>are reality itself. Well, yeah, I mean, if you want

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to take this very far, the people who believe in

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>hardcore idealism would probably say that there is no like

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that reality is merely the mental image of a higher

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>being or something like that. Yeah. So, as you can see,

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you can really go down the deep end, into the

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>deep end, uh, contemplating mental imagery and what are the

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>philosophical ramifications of it? Um, there's you know, there's a lot,

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a great deal more we can discuss this kind

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>of the philosophical groundwork. I guess you could say. Um.

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>For instance, though in the nineteen eighties, there's a great

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>deal of debate over the over the connection from between

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>mental images and language. So one side argued that representations

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>underlying the experience of mental imagery are the same type

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>as those used in the language. And then there was

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the other camp, and they held that that these representations

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>served to depict, not describe objects. Okay, so what does

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that mean in practice. Well, my understanding is that basically

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 1>comes down to, you know, to what extent is mental

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:40.479
<v Speaker 1>imagery like the the the groundwork of language itself. Um well,

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>like I said earlier, at times, it feels like it's

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult to um to overstate the importance of

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:51.719
<v Speaker 1>mental imagery in our perceptions of reality. Um So, just

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>how deep does that go? Does it underlie just about

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>everything in cognition? Does it underlie language? Does it underlie um,

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, just every free, little detail of our experience. Yeah, well,

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>this does seem to sort of tie into us stuff

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>we talked about in the Tip of the Tongue episode,

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>where you can you can perhaps you can have the

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>face in your mind, you know, oh, I know this

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>actor's face, and you can picture it, and you can

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 1>know the actor's name well enough that if somebody said it,

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you'd be like, yeah, that's it. You'd immediately recognize that.

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>But you can't make the connection. But of course, in

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>recent years, we've seen the study of mental imagery make

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a more scientific transition. I think we we've started to

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>look at it from a neuroscientific point of view, where

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>people are saying, okay, well, let's identify what brain regions

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:43.199
<v Speaker 1>are actually being used and activated when people are in

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the process of coming up with mental pictures. And one

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>of the sources we used for this episode, it was

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a paper by Adams Salman and colleagues and and UH,

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>these authors identify that essentially in the brain voluntary imagery,

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that the mental images you come up with have been

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>associated in previous research with the brain's frontal parietal executive

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>systems or of the executive control you know, the president

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of your brain sitting there directing traffic, and with the

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>posterior brain regions, which you know in the back of

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the brain that's often the identified with visual processing. And

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>together you sort of put these things uh into a

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>teamwork relationship and they are what allows you to come

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>up with mental pictures. That's right. And UH, we've also

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>seen studies where we've taken f M R I, We've

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>done a PET and we've done PET scans on individuals

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 1>summoning mental images. You know, they're asked to summon a

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>mental image and then we look at the brain and

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>see what it's doing in real time. And UH reveals

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that activation in brain areas that are used in visual perception,

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't sound that surprising. Uh, this is pretty cool.

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Visual and mental imaging share roughly two thirds of the

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>same active activated brain regions, So there's a lot of

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cross over there between the usual and

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:04.360
<v Speaker 1>mental imaging systems, a lot of shared mechanics. Yeah. Like if,

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 1>for example, if you show somebody a picture of somebody's

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>face and then you asked the same test subject imagine

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>this person's face, a lot of their brain activity is

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:16.959
<v Speaker 1>going to be roughly similar. Right. In fact, the study

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>found that when the same task is performed in perception

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>and then with eyes closed using mental images, you get overlaps.

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>So so again, a lot of the same mechanisms, a

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of the same brain equipment is being used, whether

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you're dealing with just visual perception or mental perception. Of course,

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that's funny because the phenomenal experience is completely different, right,

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Like you, uh, somebody, to somebody who has a fantasia,

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 1>this might be new information, but it's obviously not going

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to be new information to most people out there. Uh.

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>When you picture something in your mind's eye, it is

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>extremely different than seeing it in front of you, But

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to explain how it's different. Yeah, you know. Yeah,

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a there's a two thousand fifteen BBC

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 1>article titled a Fantasia, A Life without Mental Images by

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>James Gallagher, and I'll be sure to include a link

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:17.719
<v Speaker 1>to that article on the landing page for this episode

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow your Mind dot com because in addition

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to running through some examples of uh, some accounts of

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 1>individuals who have this blindness of the mind's eye, which

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 1>we're going to discuss more here, there's also a quiz

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you can take, uh. And it's just an eight question

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>quiz about asking you like the level of detail that

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you experience when you are asked to mentally envision, uh,

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, someone you see every day, Uh, A sunrise,

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>I believe, clouds in the sky, the clouds clearing in

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the sky, a thunderstorm, the these sort of images some

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 1>of the same kind of stuff that we ask you

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>to summon at the beginning of this episode. Yeah, but

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't just ask you can you picture it? It

0:24:56.880 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>asks you to rank level of details. So for each ample,

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>it might say picture, get someone in mind and maybe

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a close friend or spouse or close family member, and

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 1>picture that person and then on a scale of not

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.360
<v Speaker 1>very well at all too extremely well, how well can

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you see in your mind's eye the contours of their

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>face and the shape of their body, and what color

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 1>their eyes are, and and so it's asking for specific

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>details of the image to to get at the vividness

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of the picture in your mind. And that suggests to me,

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>and I think their findings do suggest so far that

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not just an on off switch. It's not like

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>you can make pictures with your mind or you can't.

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 1>There seems to be a spectrum, that's right. Some people

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>seem to have very intense, very lucid, vivid mental images.

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Other people have kind of hazier, blurrier or more generic

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>mental images, and some people have almost no mental imagery

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>at all, or even report having none. And it's so

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>at the opposite end of the scale of the main

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 1>topic today. You know, we're talking about these a fantasiacts,

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:07.400
<v Speaker 1>but there's also what's come to be known as hyper fantasia, right,

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and these would be people who I think would experience

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>visions of the mind ie with just extreme lucidity is

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>far compared to most of us. So they're not just

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>vague pictures, but they have bright colors and vivid details.

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>So if I tell you imagine a beach, you might

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>picture sand and waves and maybe some umbrellas. But I

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.439
<v Speaker 1>bet you wouldn't naturally say, Okay, I can tell you

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>there are seven umbrellas in the picture in my mind,

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and these are the colors of stripes on the umbrellas.

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>But somebody might actually be able to have that level

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of vividness in their mind's eye. Yeah. This idea of

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a spectrum of of of mental detail and visual imagery,

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it uh, it really makes you reanalyzed just how you're

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>painting the picture in your head. Uh, these memories, you know,

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>like it. I think we both scored around the same

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>on this where we had kind of like typical image.

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I was in the typical range. Yeah, but even even

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 1>then I was I found myself asking questions like, well,

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.400
<v Speaker 1>how when I think about these people that I see

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:14.400
<v Speaker 1>every day in my life and they are very important

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:16.679
<v Speaker 1>to me, Uh, you know, what does it mean that

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't have like just a picture perfect vision of them?

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean that when I think back on

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>a beach, I find my like a sunrise on a beach,

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 1>I keep thinking of, you know, images of sunrises from

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>paintings and films more so than actual beach sunrises that

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I've witnessed. Do you think about the final scene of

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors, Yeah, that sort of thing, like I end

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 1>up like putting a fictional Instagram filter over all of

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 1>these these memories, and I'm not really remembering. I'm not

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>really summoning a mental image of a thing I actually saw.

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm summoning this mental image that's composed of these varying elements.

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>You know. One thing I read when we were doing

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>our research for this episode was a first person essay

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>that I came across by the software designer Blake Ross,

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>who was involved in Mozilla Firefox on Facebook, and he's

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>also done some screenwriting. And he found out after reading

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 1>an article I think in either in the New York

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Times or in Discover magazine by Carl Zimmer about a

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>fantasia that he he had this experience, and he also

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 1>was just shocked to find out that other people weren't

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>like him. His discovery was that, oh, I never realized

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:28.160
<v Speaker 1>other people could see pictures in their minds. His whole life.

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 1>He thought when people said stuff like picture this, they

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>were just being metaphorical. He didn't realize other people could

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>actually hold these pictures in their brains. And in this

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>essay he starts he recounts how when he found out

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>about this, he was asking all his friends, what's it

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>like to picture something in your mind? And asking all

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>these questions I've never really thought to ask myself about

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>my process of mental imagery that were very interesting, Like

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>he was asking his friends, Okay, when you see a

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>picture in your mind, like you picture a beach, is

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>it still? Is it a still photograph or is it

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>more like video where things are moving? And that distinction

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>just hit me like a wrecking ball. I was like,

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. When I picture something in my mind,

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I can make it move consciously if I need to.

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>But when I just picture a beach, it is almost

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>neither still nor moving. It is it exists in super

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>position between these two things. It's kept for me. I

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>guess when I think about it, it's kind of like

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the old music video for What Was It where the

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>people go into the painting or into the drawing Take

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>on Me. Yeah, I feel like my my mental imagery

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is kind of like the take on Me video. It's

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff is moving, but it's all kind of stationary as well. Yeah. Well,

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I certainly can imagine something moving on purpose.

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 1>But when I just picture a thing and I don't

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>imagine it moving on purpose, I don't think it's still,

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's not moving either. It's very strange. It reminds

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>me of two of the experience of reading a book,

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>especially a book to set more or less in the

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>real world, And at times I'll find myself stopping and

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>thinking about, like, oh, I'm picturing this in this living

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>room from that I've limp that I visited or lived

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>in at some point in my life, Like that, for

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>some reason, is the living room that my brain is

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>drawing in for this setting where I'm picturing this character. Sometimes,

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, sometimes the character just is that character and

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that and there's not really like a firm mental image

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in your head exactly what they look like. Other times

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't shake their um their appearance as being that

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of someone you know or or you know a character

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>actor from a movie, etcetera. But I do find myself

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>like analyzing, like where are all these elements coming from?

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Like some of them are obviously coming from the the author.

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>The author is providing the blueprint, the author is providing

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the scaffolding. But then that scaffolding is kind of like

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>magnetically drawing in elements from my own visual memory. Yeah, definitely, Uh,

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I know exactly what you're talking about there. Uh. An

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing about fiction that that Blake Ross says in

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 1>his first person essay about this is he he reports that,

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>so he's always read books, you know, he's enjoyed fiction,

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and he's written fiction. But when he writes fiction, he

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>has almost no visual description because he just doesn't picture

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>things in his head. And when he reads, he skips

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>visual description. He just kind of jumps over it. That's

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>not it has no meaning to him. Really. Huh, yeah,

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's fascinating. Okay, now it's time to take

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a quick break to hear from our sponsor. But when

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>we come back, more on the mind's eye and a fantasia.

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, So, just how common is a fantasia? Um,

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a difficult question because this is something that hasn't

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 1>really been uh in the public mindset. It hasn't been

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 1>out there, it hasn't been something you get a pamphle

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it on until very recently. There was one interesting study

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>on this from before it had a name. Before this

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a fantasia term came out that was studying sort of

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the lack of generative power and mental imagery, and that

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that was in two thousand nine, right, study by Fall, Yeah,

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Bill Fall psychologists. And what did it find? He found

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that between two point one percent and two point seven

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>percent of participants in his study claimed to have no

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>visual imagination. So that's where we got that number up

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning, that it might be around one in

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty of you who just didn't see any pictures when

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you were following along in the story with us. Yeah, Now,

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of course we have to that that number is not

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:41.239
<v Speaker 1>coming from like a you know, large scale study, so

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>results aren't really fully supported, but it gives us sort

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of at least a ball park. I think, yeah, it's

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>something to work with. But but a lot of this

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:54.959
<v Speaker 1>recent research has popped up because of an interesting I'm

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>about to use a great word here, synergy between between

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>actual medical rea search and some writing in the popular press. Actually,

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:05.719
<v Speaker 1>I think like Carl Zimmer's articles had something to do

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>with people coming out of the woodwork to say, hey,

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>now I have this experience of a fantasia. I can't

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 1>make mental pictures. But it started with the research of

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Adam Zaman, Right. Yeah, he's a professor of cognitive and

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>behavioral neurology at the University of Exeter Medical School, and

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>along with co authors uh Um, MICHELLEA. De Wira, and

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Surio Della Sala, they coined the term a fantasia in

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>their two thousand fifteen paper Lives Without Imagery congenital a

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Fantasia that was published in the journal Cortex. Now, people had,

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>as we said, previously described things along these lines like

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it had always been kind of noted that, well, there's

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>some people out there who say that they can't create

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>any mental pictures. But nobody really looked very deeply into this,

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think some of the I think the earliest

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>example that the authors we were looking at were able

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to draw on was just the nineteen century. Now, this

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>condition and the condition had in these earlier works and

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>condition had previously been referred to as a defective revisualization

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>or visual ear reminiscence. What a great word, ear reminiscence.

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Somebody was trying to make us say that, yeah, sorry,

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 1>not gonna work. It's a fantasia. Uh And there are

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:21.839
<v Speaker 1>skeptics actually out there who say that that what we're

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about here does not exist at all. I think

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>that's fascinating because how would you prove them wrong? Yeah,

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and why why would you make that argument? I don't know. Well,

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, arguing about the existence of somebody else's internal experience.

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's just it's crazy. Yeah, I mean it

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 1>almost seems seems like you'd have to be making the

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 1>counter argument of saying, oh, you don't have a fantasia,

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you just have a lazy mind, right, your imagination is

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:49.280
<v Speaker 1>just a bit stunted. But I can understand why people

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>might be tempted to this direction because I, as I

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 1>we've said before, I think you probably would agree with this.

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine what this is like. Yeah, I have

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>no ability soever to put myself in a position of

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:05.439
<v Speaker 1>not being able to make mental pictures that I don't

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>even understand what that means really, Right, It's kind of

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>like if most of us are more or less the

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>same computer hardware with differing software. You know, we can

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>talk all day about I don't understand how your software works,

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:20.799
<v Speaker 1>and this is how my software works. But here we're

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 1>talking about essentially a difference in hardware. Um, I don't

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 1>know if that analogy completely holds up. But essentially there's

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>something a little more, uh, you know, base level is

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>different and and how do we even begin to describe

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that to each other? Yeah, So Zaman first started studying this,

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 1>I think in two thousand ten, right, because of the

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 1>story of this. So there was a patient who reported

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>having contracted, like acquired a fantasia after a medical procedure, right, right,

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>So there was a sixty five year old man who

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 1>had coronary angioplastic and that's where they So if you

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>have a blockage in one of your arteries or something

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 1>like that, they'll open up one of your arteries and

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>stick a catheter in it, and somewhere along your body

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>wherever the blockage is occurring, they'll inflate a small balloon

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 1>or something inside your artery to widen it, essentially and

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>allow easier passage of blood. Yeah. It's not the kind

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:20.399
<v Speaker 1>of thing that you would initially imagine altering your brain functioning. Yeah,

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 1>and it's generally not considered a major surgical procedure, but

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's you. I think you're typically left awake

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>for it. They don't even necessarily put you under, though

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>they might need to give you some drugs to calm

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 1>you down. But yeah, it's this is this is not

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 1>like a gigantic big deal. So it's coronary angioplasty. And

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:42.440
<v Speaker 1>after the procedure, this patient was unable to form mental

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:46.399
<v Speaker 1>pictures and he had not had this problem before, and

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, and that's where this study comes in. And afterwards,

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>after there were some pieces published about this, Zaman started

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to hear from people who said, Hey, I have this condition.

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>And not only do I have it, I didn't get

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:04.359
<v Speaker 1>it from I didn't have an angioplastic or any you know,

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>injury or or surgery. I've always had it. This is

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 1>just how I am. So Zaman and his co authors

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>they they looked at twenty one of these self reporting

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 1>cases and then they discovered most of these individuals um

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of discovered their condition, their own condition in their

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>twenties when through conversations or or readings they found a

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>discrepancy between how other people described the use of the

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 1>mind's eye and their own experiences. Can you imagine I

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 1>just have a hard time imagining how you get that

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>far in life without realizing. Now, this is another thing

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that's addressed yet again in that that essay I mentioned

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:45.320
<v Speaker 1>by Blake Ross, where he just talks about how whenever

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 1>he heard people using the language of the mind's eye

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>were talking about, you know, picturing something, imagining something, he

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>thought it was all metaphorical. He thought they were just

0:37:56.280 --> 0:38:01.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about conceptually meditating on the idea of a beach

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>or something. So you're sitting there thinking about the concepts

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 1>of sand and water and sunshine and umbrellas. But he

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize that other people were literally seeing something in

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 1>their mind. Yeah. I mean, it's like we said earlier,

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>when one when you have all these different types of memory,

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and if one is taking uh, you know, a back seat,

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:22.839
<v Speaker 1>the other ones are going to compensate. So it's not

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:25.440
<v Speaker 1>like if you have a fantasia, you're not gonna be

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>able to function in society at all. It seems like

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 1>quite the contrary. Uh, individuals find a way to function.

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 1>They find they just end up utilizing these different modes

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of memory. Okay, but of these twenty one self reporting cases,

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 1>what did Zalmon find about them? Well, so I found

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that nineteen of the twenty one were male. And uh,

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:45.959
<v Speaker 1>it's worth noting that this might have more to do

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:49.279
<v Speaker 1>with the readership of Discover magazine. This is not a

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:52.919
<v Speaker 1>randomized self selected because right this is where people would

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:55.239
<v Speaker 1>have read that Carl Zimmer article, and they were the

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:56.840
<v Speaker 1>ones who said, hey, so yeah, I just might have

0:38:56.880 --> 0:38:59.799
<v Speaker 1>to do with the male readership discover On the other hand,

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 1>they found it. Five of the twenty one reported that

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:05.919
<v Speaker 1>it affected relatives as well. This is something I've read

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of people's experiences online. Some of them say, one of

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:11.239
<v Speaker 1>my parents has this. Yeah, so this leads us to

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:14.799
<v Speaker 1>believe it might be hereditary. And then ten of the

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty one said, uh, said that all all versions of

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the imagery were affected. Now, now, like I alluded to earlier,

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 1>this does seem to me, based on what I've read

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:28.399
<v Speaker 1>so far, to be sort of a um it's not

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:32.719
<v Speaker 1>necessarily an all or nothing. It's sort of a spectrum condition.

0:39:32.840 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Because one of the things that these people reported is

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that it's not like they've never ever in their entire

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:43.799
<v Speaker 1>live seni mental image. They just generally don't see them,

0:39:44.560 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 1>like some of them sometimes reported that they might have

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>had very brief involuntary mental images, like they they might involuntarily, quote,

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 1>flash an image of somebody's face, but it's just that

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 1>this is rare and they can't do it on man, Right,

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it's something that just might occur during while they're awake.

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 1>It might occur during dreams some of them. This is

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:10.280
<v Speaker 1>another thing, the interesting variation on dream experience. Some report

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that they don't have dreams at all or don't remember

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 1>having them if they do have them, and some report

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that they do have dreams and can experience visual content

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and dreams, but just can't do it while they're awake

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 1>or on command. Yeah. Zeman is a big believer that

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this is essentially a variant of neuropsychological functioning and kind

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of like synesthesia in a sense, and again kind of

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 1>on on a spectrum as well. So so again, don't

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 1>think of it as a you know, as a as

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:40.839
<v Speaker 1>a as a brain injury, don't think of it as

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a as as an ailment. It is just a different,

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:48.799
<v Speaker 1>uh a different way that the mental chorus is coming

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:51.879
<v Speaker 1>together to receive reality. Yeah. Another thing that I thought

0:40:51.920 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>was interesting is, uh so we've been talking about images

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>being visual as in like what you know, light, photons,

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and the eyes, but this does seem to extend to

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>varying degrees to other senses as well. Right, Some of

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the people who report that they have a fantasia for

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>visual images. Also can't imagine the feelings of other senses,

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:16.240
<v Speaker 1>if you know what I mean. And then some report

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that they sort of can, again, making it seem like

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:22.239
<v Speaker 1>a kind of spectrum issue, like can you hear a

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>piece of music that you're not currently listening to? Yeah? Yeah,

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that's that's That's another good one. I certainly can. Like

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:31.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the ones I wanted to think was the

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars theme. I can just play the whole Star

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Wars theme in my mind from beginning to end. Yeah,

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:40.360
<v Speaker 1>And certainly we've all experienced earworms, so that's kind of

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a variant of that now. Um. Also in this UH

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:47.239
<v Speaker 1>the Zaman paper, they said of the individuals, a number

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of them reported modest effects on their relationships, which I

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>guess one can imagine if you and your um, your

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 1>significant other are ultimately engaging with mental imagery and drastically

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>different ways. And also, fourteen of the twenty one participants

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:05.320
<v Speaker 1>reported difficulties with autobiographical memory. So here's a quick quote

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>from the paper. The same number identified UH compensatory strengths

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 1>in verbal, mathematical, and logical domains. They their successful performance

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:18.279
<v Speaker 1>in a task that would normally elicit imagery count how

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:20.960
<v Speaker 1>many windows there are in your house or apartment, etcetera

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 1>was achieved by drawing on what participants described as knowledge, memory,

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and subvisual models. Yeah, this is interesting. So this again

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 1>gets back into the idea that you end up just

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:33.759
<v Speaker 1>utilizing different modes of memory the workforce of the brain. Yeah, right,

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:36.120
<v Speaker 1>because I can't imagine. So if somebody said how many

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 1>windows are there in your house? I would do that

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:40.799
<v Speaker 1>with a picture. I would picture my house and sort

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of picture walking around the sides of my house and

0:42:43.600 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing how many windows are there. But they can do

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:49.719
<v Speaker 1>this without the picture. It's not like they're unable to

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>do it. So there's something else kicking in. Must be

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 1>conceptual facts logged about the house. Okay, so we need

0:42:56.680 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to take one more quick break and then we'll be

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:08.000
<v Speaker 1>right back with more a fan tasia. Now that BBC

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:11.240
<v Speaker 1>paper that we mentioned earlier by James Gallagher. In that paper,

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Gallagher spoke with one Neil kin Mure of Lancaster. Uh,

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a self reporting individual with blindness of the

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 1>mind's eye, and he provided some interesting insight on the condition.

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 1>So I have just a couple of quotes here from

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that that piece that I found were interesting, he said. Quote,

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 1>my stepfather, when I couldn't sleep, told me to count sheep,

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and he explained what he meant. I tried to do it,

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:36.919
<v Speaker 1>and I couldn't see any sheep jumping over fences. There

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:40.880
<v Speaker 1>was nothing to count. No, that's a that's that's an

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 1>interesting because I guess that might be one of the

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 1>earliest examples of of here mentally mentally imagined this. Like

0:43:48.000 --> 0:43:51.759
<v Speaker 1>with my own uh son, I had a similar situation.

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Like I distinctly remember the first time I told him

0:43:54.560 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to close his eyes and encouraged him to imagine an

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 1>elephant because he was really obsessed with the elephants at

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:03.239
<v Speaker 1>the time. And Um, I saw the delight on his

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 1>face as he imagined the elephant. Um. But you know,

0:44:07.080 --> 0:44:09.799
<v Speaker 1>after doing this research, I realized, well, there's equally a

0:44:09.800 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 1>possibility that he wouldn't be able to see the elephant.

0:44:12.400 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know, there wouldn't be anything go wrong with

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:17.760
<v Speaker 1>him if he couldn't see it. In the BBC piece,

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 1>um the the the interviewed individual, Neil kim Miller also

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:23.719
<v Speaker 1>said that he had a terrible memory, but he was

0:44:23.760 --> 0:44:27.040
<v Speaker 1>good with facts and and then there's an additional quote

0:44:27.880 --> 0:44:30.040
<v Speaker 1>This is the hardest thing to describe what happens in

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:32.239
<v Speaker 1>my head when I think about things. When I think

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 1>about my fiancee, there is no image, but I am

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:38.080
<v Speaker 1>definitely thinking about her. I know today she has her

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:40.920
<v Speaker 1>hair up at the back, she's brunette. But I'm not

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:44.320
<v Speaker 1>describing an image I am looking at I'm remembering features

0:44:44.360 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 1>about her. That's the strangest thing, And maybe that is

0:44:47.080 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a source of some regret. Yeah, I mean, this is

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:52.239
<v Speaker 1>the thing because typically these people report that they it's

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 1>not like they can't they don't know what somebody looks like. Right,

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:57.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not like that scene in like Hannibal where they

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 1>show face blindness as just seeing p but with like

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 1>smooth skin over their face. Yeah. What's that condition called

0:45:03.560 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a congenital prosopagnosia? Is that a where you you have

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a born condition where you just can't recognize faces people

0:45:10.280 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 1>You see people who are familiar to you, but you

0:45:12.719 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 1>just they just don't look like anybody, uh you know,

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:19.120
<v Speaker 1>whoever that is. And and it's not like that you

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:21.200
<v Speaker 1>or at least not for everybody. Like we said, there

0:45:21.200 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a wide variation in how this applies

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to people's lives, but I haven't read that it's like that.

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:28.600
<v Speaker 1>For most people, it seems like they report, yeah, they

0:45:28.719 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 1>recognize people. Once they see a picture of of a

0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:35.480
<v Speaker 1>close family member or of the president or whoever it is,

0:45:35.560 --> 0:45:37.759
<v Speaker 1>they know who it is. They just can't make the

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:40.839
<v Speaker 1>picture without looking at it. It's almost kind of like

0:45:41.080 --> 0:45:44.080
<v Speaker 1>we talked about in the P versus NP episode, like

0:45:44.120 --> 0:45:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of problems that once a solution is presented,

0:45:47.360 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you can easily check to see if it's correct, but

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you can't come up with a solution and a reasonable

0:45:52.640 --> 0:45:55.800
<v Speaker 1>amount of time by yourself. It sounds like a version

0:45:55.800 --> 0:45:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of that. You can't make the picture, but when somebody

0:45:58.280 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 1>shows you the picture, you can say, oh, yeah, that's it. Yeah, definitely.

0:46:01.640 --> 0:46:05.280
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, I I just find this condition really fascinating.

0:46:05.360 --> 0:46:09.400
<v Speaker 1>And so if you yourself are somebody who thinks you

0:46:09.440 --> 0:46:13.239
<v Speaker 1>may be experiencing a fantasia, or if you just want

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:15.759
<v Speaker 1>to learn more about it, one interesting resource I think

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 1>would be to go and look at some of the

0:46:18.560 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 1>message boards online that have recently been created by people

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:27.239
<v Speaker 1>who claimed to have this experience. Because there's one I

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:32.239
<v Speaker 1>found that was a fant dot asia. Nice. Yeah, but

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's just like a forum online, people talking

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:38.000
<v Speaker 1>about their experiences. Uh, and it seems to be a

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of people having this kind of, uh, this awakening

0:46:42.280 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of experience. They're like, oh, man, I didn't even

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:48.000
<v Speaker 1>realize that this was what was causing all this confusion

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:50.759
<v Speaker 1>between me and other people all these years, or I

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:53.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize I was the I wasn't the only one

0:46:53.800 --> 0:46:56.839
<v Speaker 1>who was like this, or you know, people really seem

0:46:56.920 --> 0:46:59.279
<v Speaker 1>to be having a lot of fun coming together with

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:02.359
<v Speaker 1>a community of other people who have the same issue. Well,

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:04.319
<v Speaker 1>like it reminds one of the whole you know, the

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 1>old example of hey, what if when I think of

0:47:07.040 --> 0:47:09.400
<v Speaker 1>purple and you think of purple? What if we what

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:12.719
<v Speaker 1>if we're each seeing different colors? But there's never a

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:14.799
<v Speaker 1>way to prove that out. But but this is kind

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of like a case where what it's kind of like

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 1>if you were one day able to say, oh, yeah,

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:21.879
<v Speaker 1>the purple I see is different from the purple these

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 1>people see. I'm gonna I'm gonna go hang out now

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:28.000
<v Speaker 1>with individuals who see purple the way I see people.

0:47:28.320 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I've never understood what the deal with Barney was, but

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:33.680
<v Speaker 1>now I get it. Uh No, but so I have

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:37.440
<v Speaker 1>all these questions about a fantasia, like what it means.

0:47:37.480 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 1>And again, just to emphasize, it does seem like we

0:47:40.560 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 1>haven't nailed down that there's a specific cause and a

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:47.279
<v Speaker 1>very specific effect yet, because there seemed to be a

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:51.200
<v Speaker 1>range of different ways this manifests in people's minds. It's

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:54.120
<v Speaker 1>associated with different things. Some people dream, some people don't,

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:57.279
<v Speaker 1>some people have memory problems, some people don't um. But

0:47:57.400 --> 0:47:59.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I was wondering about was can

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a fantasiacs hallucinate? Yeah? So what if an a fantasiac

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 1>takes a drug that often causes visual hallucinations? Do they

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:12.560
<v Speaker 1>see anything different? Yeah? Are they just going to get

0:48:12.560 --> 0:48:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the non visual hallucinatory effects, uh? Or is it going

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to sort of ignite a type of visual imagery that

0:48:21.160 --> 0:48:23.759
<v Speaker 1>isn't normally there sort of heighten the flashes that some

0:48:23.800 --> 0:48:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, the the the occasional flashes that

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:29.240
<v Speaker 1>some of these individuals experience. Yeah. And so I looked

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:31.640
<v Speaker 1>this up actually on the on the forum boards, and

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 1>they had actually addressed it. So one member of a

0:48:34.640 --> 0:48:37.920
<v Speaker 1>message board said they typed a question that struck me

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:42.279
<v Speaker 1>as intriguing. This person said they were confused Essentially, they said,

0:48:42.320 --> 0:48:47.200
<v Speaker 1>how is hallucinating different from seeing things in your mind? Again,

0:48:47.239 --> 0:48:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that question is hard to answer, but to somebody who has, uh,

0:48:50.680 --> 0:48:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, a mind's eye, it's very clearly different. I

0:48:54.719 --> 0:48:57.400
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like I'm hallucinating when I imagine something, But

0:48:57.440 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 1>try to describe the difference. Well, you're seeing being something

0:49:00.680 --> 0:49:04.799
<v Speaker 1>in your mind that's not there. Okay, that sounds like hallucination,

0:49:06.280 --> 0:49:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I think, but then it's also been It's also just

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:11.759
<v Speaker 1>like seeing it. So, yeah, we come back again to

0:49:11.960 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the cave. We're all still lined up staring at the

0:49:17.840 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 1>play of shadows on the wall. Yeah, some of us

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:23.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe just have a slightly different view of the shadows

0:49:23.960 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 1>and others. Okay, Robert, I've got a question for you. Okay,

0:49:26.800 --> 0:49:32.040
<v Speaker 1>hit me. Do you think you could try to simulate

0:49:32.400 --> 0:49:36.080
<v Speaker 1>this in your in your own mind? Like? Could you try?

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I know you it would be impossible for us to

0:49:38.280 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 1>really fully be able to do it, But can you

0:49:40.760 --> 0:49:44.960
<v Speaker 1>try to go through a standard day to day process,

0:49:44.960 --> 0:49:47.520
<v Speaker 1>something you would do all the time without using any

0:49:47.560 --> 0:49:50.840
<v Speaker 1>mental pictures. I was trying this morning, and I couldn't

0:49:50.920 --> 0:49:54.759
<v Speaker 1>do it. Just trying, yeah, trying not to think of

0:49:54.800 --> 0:49:58.040
<v Speaker 1>mental images immediately calls to mind mental images. It's like,

0:49:58.400 --> 0:50:01.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, telling somebody like, don't think of a rhinoceros

0:50:02.000 --> 0:50:05.200
<v Speaker 1>wearing a jet pack. Yeah, you just did it. Uh.

0:50:05.320 --> 0:50:07.799
<v Speaker 1>And even it works in the in the general sinse

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:10.440
<v Speaker 1>just saying, try not to think of mental images, and

0:50:10.480 --> 0:50:14.359
<v Speaker 1>immediately my mind is filled with rhinoceroses and jet packs. Yeah.

0:50:14.360 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if anything, I have to try and keep

0:50:16.440 --> 0:50:19.400
<v Speaker 1>from daydreaming and keep from or keep from you know,

0:50:19.440 --> 0:50:22.840
<v Speaker 1>pummeling myself with with different mental images. Uh, and and

0:50:22.880 --> 0:50:25.719
<v Speaker 1>actually focus in on a task, you know. Yeah. I

0:50:25.719 --> 0:50:28.480
<v Speaker 1>mean the way this really seems like it would come

0:50:28.520 --> 0:50:31.480
<v Speaker 1>through is like, how does if you can't have mental images,

0:50:31.800 --> 0:50:34.520
<v Speaker 1>how do you have fantasies about things you would like

0:50:34.640 --> 0:50:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to do? So you imagine, you know, your boss makes

0:50:37.200 --> 0:50:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you furious and you wish you could punch him in

0:50:39.000 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the nose. You wouldn't actually do it, but you at

0:50:41.200 --> 0:50:44.440
<v Speaker 1>least have that image for a moment, right. Uh. I

0:50:44.480 --> 0:50:49.439
<v Speaker 1>think that's probably a nearly universal experience for people. Thought

0:50:49.520 --> 0:50:51.759
<v Speaker 1>of it. But what happens if you can't have that

0:50:51.840 --> 0:50:55.799
<v Speaker 1>image in your mind? Do you do? You think about it? Conceptually?

0:50:56.280 --> 0:50:58.839
<v Speaker 1>It's like I I just thinking about the concept of

0:50:58.840 --> 0:51:01.759
<v Speaker 1>punching my boss in the well. And then also even if,

0:51:01.880 --> 0:51:04.000
<v Speaker 1>like I was just thinking to myself, like, what are

0:51:04.000 --> 0:51:07.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the times when I'm actually able to to not,

0:51:08.280 --> 0:51:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, mentally imagine anything and have these mental visualizations

0:51:12.120 --> 0:51:13.960
<v Speaker 1>in my mind? I think, well, okay, maybe when I'm

0:51:13.960 --> 0:51:15.839
<v Speaker 1>doing yoga, because I'm able to sort of shut out

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff, I'm able to shut off the

0:51:18.160 --> 0:51:21.160
<v Speaker 1>default mode network to a large extent. But even then,

0:51:22.120 --> 0:51:26.279
<v Speaker 1>if I'm focusing on a pose, I am also focusing

0:51:26.400 --> 0:51:29.879
<v Speaker 1>on a mental image of what I must look like

0:51:29.960 --> 0:51:32.640
<v Speaker 1>in that pose, which may or may not have a

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:37.080
<v Speaker 1>match up to how I'm actually doing the pose. So

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:39.880
<v Speaker 1>what is it like then to engage in a in

0:51:39.960 --> 0:51:44.839
<v Speaker 1>a physical activity like that with a fantasia? I mean,

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:47.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously you can do it, but it just

0:51:47.880 --> 0:51:53.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of drives home just how much mental visualizations, um,

0:51:54.040 --> 0:51:57.359
<v Speaker 1>how big a role they play and just everything we do. Okay,

0:51:57.400 --> 0:52:01.160
<v Speaker 1>another question, ok, fiction writing. This is something again from

0:52:01.160 --> 0:52:03.759
<v Speaker 1>the from the Blake cross piece. So he's he is,

0:52:04.080 --> 0:52:07.200
<v Speaker 1>he's done some screenwriting, and he describes his process for

0:52:07.239 --> 0:52:10.680
<v Speaker 1>fiction writing without having mental images, which he described in

0:52:10.800 --> 0:52:13.839
<v Speaker 1>terms of words and parts of speech. I thought this

0:52:13.920 --> 0:52:16.520
<v Speaker 1>was interesting. So he said, like, when I'm imagining something,

0:52:17.160 --> 0:52:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I imagine a noun, the word, and then I imagine

0:52:21.000 --> 0:52:24.879
<v Speaker 1>a verb that follows it, the word um. And so

0:52:24.920 --> 0:52:28.239
<v Speaker 1>there's something very different about his process for writing than

0:52:28.280 --> 0:52:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I would have. So when I'm imagining a scene, there's

0:52:31.800 --> 0:52:34.839
<v Speaker 1>there's translation going on. I think of a picture, and

0:52:34.880 --> 0:52:37.719
<v Speaker 1>then I have to put the picture into words. But

0:52:38.160 --> 0:52:40.840
<v Speaker 1>could it be possible that this allows people to do

0:52:40.960 --> 0:52:46.399
<v Speaker 1>creative writing without any translation the original creative thing that's

0:52:46.440 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 1>happening these words. That's interesting. Yeah, Like they're not having

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:53.760
<v Speaker 1>They're not in that situation that I mentioned earlier, where

0:52:54.120 --> 0:52:56.600
<v Speaker 1>as an artist or a creator of any kind, you

0:52:56.640 --> 0:53:00.480
<v Speaker 1>are stuck trying to translate the mental image into something

0:53:00.640 --> 0:53:03.600
<v Speaker 1>another person can share in. Like you said, there's no

0:53:03.640 --> 0:53:06.360
<v Speaker 1>translation going there. Well, it makes me wonder if the

0:53:06.800 --> 0:53:12.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe the ultimate form of direct written communication with almost

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:16.520
<v Speaker 1>nothing lost in between, would be an a fantasiac writing

0:53:16.520 --> 0:53:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to another a fantasiac somebody, because there you're not translating

0:53:21.400 --> 0:53:25.280
<v Speaker 1>it into pictures on both sides or on either side.

0:53:25.960 --> 0:53:28.319
<v Speaker 1>I will say that something that does remind me of

0:53:28.440 --> 0:53:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is like in my own writing process. There there's definitely

0:53:31.560 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the point where I have an image in my mind

0:53:33.719 --> 0:53:35.840
<v Speaker 1>or seen in my mind, characters in my mind, and

0:53:35.880 --> 0:53:38.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to bring that to life on the page.

0:53:38.280 --> 0:53:41.720
<v Speaker 1>But then if I'll get into these situations where I'm writing,

0:53:42.480 --> 0:53:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and in a way what I'm writing is coming before

0:53:46.160 --> 0:53:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the mental image, so I kind of create the point.

0:53:49.280 --> 0:53:52.319
<v Speaker 1>Not to say it's it's a fantasia at all, but

0:53:52.800 --> 0:53:56.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of writing before the mental visualization. I'm kind

0:53:56.280 --> 0:53:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of reading what I've writen I've written and and experiencing

0:54:00.080 --> 0:54:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it more or less in real time as a reader would.

0:54:02.239 --> 0:54:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, well, I bet you've had the experience I

0:54:04.360 --> 0:54:07.520
<v Speaker 1>know I have of writing something before you get the picture,

0:54:07.880 --> 0:54:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and then getting the picture, and then going back and

0:54:10.160 --> 0:54:13.959
<v Speaker 1>revising what you've written based on the picture. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:54:14.000 --> 0:54:17.560
<v Speaker 1>for sure. So this is Yeah, the writing is definitely

0:54:17.600 --> 0:54:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating area to think about this because it is

0:54:20.040 --> 0:54:22.680
<v Speaker 1>this sort of it's the mental image, but then this

0:54:22.800 --> 0:54:25.520
<v Speaker 1>stripping down of the mental image, the translating it into

0:54:25.760 --> 0:54:31.120
<v Speaker 1>into another form. Uh yeah, yeah, Well, it's fascinating to

0:54:31.160 --> 0:54:34.080
<v Speaker 1>be coming into this topic and it's such an interesting

0:54:34.120 --> 0:54:36.720
<v Speaker 1>time for it, you know, when when it seems we're

0:54:36.760 --> 0:54:38.760
<v Speaker 1>on the cusp of a lot of new learning about

0:54:38.800 --> 0:54:41.319
<v Speaker 1>what this condition is, how many people have it, what

0:54:41.440 --> 0:54:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like for them, And Hey, if you out there

0:54:45.200 --> 0:54:48.880
<v Speaker 1>actually experience this, if you have some level of a

0:54:48.960 --> 0:54:52.200
<v Speaker 1>fantasia or you're toward that end of the mental image

0:54:52.239 --> 0:54:54.440
<v Speaker 1>re spectrum, I think it would be great to hear

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:56.279
<v Speaker 1>about your experience. If you want to write in and

0:54:56.280 --> 0:54:58.360
<v Speaker 1>tell us what it's like. Yeah, and if you're on

0:54:58.400 --> 0:55:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the other end of the spectrum, if your hyper visualizer, uh,

0:55:01.840 --> 0:55:04.280
<v Speaker 1>let us know about that as well. Uh. In the meantime,

0:55:04.320 --> 0:55:06.040
<v Speaker 1>head on over to stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:55:06.040 --> 0:55:08.000
<v Speaker 1>That is the mothership. That's where you will find all

0:55:08.040 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the podcast episodes. You'll find videos, blog post links up

0:55:11.040 --> 0:55:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to social media accounts such as Facebook and Twitter. We

0:55:13.719 --> 0:55:16.000
<v Speaker 1>are blow the Mind on both of those. We also

0:55:16.040 --> 0:55:19.239
<v Speaker 1>have accounts on Tumbler and Instagram. And if you want

0:55:19.239 --> 0:55:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to get in touch with us with your experience of

0:55:21.719 --> 0:55:24.520
<v Speaker 1>mental imagery or with feedback on this episode or any other,

0:55:24.560 --> 0:55:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you can email us at blow the Mind at how

0:55:26.640 --> 0:55:38.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. Well more on this and thousands

0:55:38.680 --> 0:56:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of other topics. Is it how stuff works dot com.

0:56:00.040 --> 0:56:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Star to start back by