WEBVTT - Surveillance: Speculative Bubble With Cooperman

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Daily

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg Right

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Now our interview of the day without question, on the

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>future of Global Wall Street. He was the first kid

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:36.919
<v Speaker 1>in his family to go to college. He ended up

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>landing at Xerox, went on to Columbia University with the

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>usual NBA and landed at a small investment shop a

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>million years ago, and there he built their investment research department,

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the II winner for I believe it was nine even

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>ten years in a row. Leon Cooperman joins us, this

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>could be a four hour conversation. We don't have that,

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>so let's get to it with a gentleman from Omega. Leon,

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk right now about the future of

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Golden Sex. You have a beloved relationship with it. You

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>and I have talked about this many times before. I

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>guess they're trying to be a retail bank. We went

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>from Lloyd over to David. How is your Golden Sex doing.

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they're doing very well. I didn't expect this question,

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and I retired from Golden Sex excuse me at the

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:35.119
<v Speaker 1>end of so I'm gone for what twenty years? Um,

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>so maybe more than twenty years, to be closer to

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty years, and so things have changed. But I have

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary high requ off for the firm to have

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a great culture. They're they're they're terrific people. But in

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>all honesty, uh, I'm not current. What do you point? Okay,

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that's diplomat. I made a big mistake when I got

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>my stock when they went public. I gave it all

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to charity, and that I should have given a cash

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and kept a stock we Okay, that's a good way

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to put it. But Leon Cooperman, what's so important here

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>is this experiment of trying to do investment banking, trying

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>to do investment research and strategies you did and Golden

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>successet management, and also trying to be a bank. Do

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you think that can be a successful strategy. I'm sure

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>if Goldman Sacks Persuser will be successful strategy. What can

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I say? You know, I don't run the shop. When

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I was there, we were a private partnership. We used

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to laugh about the banks uh, and then what happened

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>during the financial crisis in two thousand and eight, we

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>were they were forced to survive, and you know, they'll

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>go with the they'll go with the float. You know,

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>when I was dead, they were very reluctant get into

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>money management. Now that in my management with two feet,

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>so you know, they adapt to the environment. They're smart people,

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>they're good people, and I would have great confidence in

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the farm. Leon Cooperman Jerome Power will speak at Jackson

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Hole today a virtual jackson Hole this week. Rather, I

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.679
<v Speaker 1>should say, tell me how you perceive the interest rate

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>structure that the FED has set. What is the FED

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 1>rant on Global Wall Street? They have created a real

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>speculative bubble. In my opinion, I have to admit that

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm uncomfortable at the present time because not because of

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the virus, it's a factor. Uncomfortable because focus on something

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the market isn't focused on, and that is the amount

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:28.959
<v Speaker 1>of debt that's being created. Who pays for the party

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>when the party is over? You know, we just celebrate

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.839
<v Speaker 1>our two and forty fourth birthday. And basically it took

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>us two and forty four years to go from zero

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>national debt to twenty one trillion will probably end this

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>year trillion. That is a growth rate in debt far

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>in excess of what the economy is growing at. And

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's going to be a problem down

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the road. And I think they they've created a real

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>speculative environment. You know, I was just looking give me

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>some statistics. Apple announced their fourth one split on July.

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>The twenty day average call volume at that time with

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>seven and one calls. Okay. This past Friday, Apple traded

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>two point one million calls, three times the average of

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty days okay, And the stock is up sevent since

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the announcement of the split. Next before this morning, Tesla

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>announced their five for one split August eleven. Same thing,

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>big increase in call volume. The stock is up forty

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>nine percent since the stock split was announced against the

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>SMP up one. Now, the last time I checked, if

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>somebody gave me five singles for five dollar bill, it

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't create a new wealth, right, did not create Well,

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that was the old calculation. Now this is the new calculation.

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.799
<v Speaker 1>When you've got a big component of robin hood investors,

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that sort of one theory out there, what's risk your

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:53.919
<v Speaker 1>right now? The high flying stocks or bonds. Well, I

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>think no question that bonds to me present the return

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>free risk. Uh, and that's what's work in favor of

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the stock market. What I have not fully appreciated is

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>the what a zero interest rate environment does for stocks.

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I was focused on the fact that we've had zero

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>interest rates in Japan and Europe and their stocks are

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>five or six multiple points below the United States market.

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>So I think low interest rates are indicative of a

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 1>problem economy. You know, we've had artificial support for the

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:30.119
<v Speaker 1>economy since two thousand and eight. You know, it's thirteen years.

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I don't look at that as being the positive.

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I look at that as possibly being a negative. You're

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you're Stephen Ratner, close to Mike Bloomberg, who I have

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>enormous respect for, basically wrote an article this morning in

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>The Times preach the economic recovery that isn't you know? Um,

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that the zero rates is creating a very

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>speculative tone to the market. I have said for months

0:05:56.440 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>now that we're really dealing with three markets, not one market.

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>The first market is the fang market. And frankly, uh,

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 1>these are very fine companies, these technology companies whose demand

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>has been pulled forward by at least five years due

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to the virus. They're not cheap, but by the historical

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>standards of the nifty fifty of nineteen seventy two and

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>UH the technology bubble of two thousand, they're not in

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>any way expensive, and people could conjure up with I

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>want to come up, Leon, I want to go through this,

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and we should mention to all of you on our simulcast,

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>we welcome you to Bloomberg Radio and Television. We are

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>with Leon Cooperman of Omega. Of course he's mentioned Mr Bloomberg,

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the founder of Bloomberg LP, this radio and TV property

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 1>as well, and also Mr Rattner writing today an essay

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>on the market, Steve Rattner of course managing uh some

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of the assets of Mr Bloomberg, And of course he's

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>appeared with this many times before. Leon Cooperman, to the

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 1>world of Stephen Ratner. You learned a Columbia business school

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of a sixty forty or a six efficient market and

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>proper asset allocation? What is the Cooper theory Cooperman theory?

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Given the distortions that we have now, can you stay

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>with with original investment science or do you have to

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>invent something new for the next ten years. Book of

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven years of age. I have no clients. I

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>retired at the end of twenty eighteen, and I do

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>what makes me comfortable. Right now. I have very, very

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>very few bonds. I think bonds represent a return free risk. Uh,

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and I don't. I was beginning to explain to you

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>there three markets out there. There's the fang market, richly

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>appraised but not ridiculously appraised. Okay, then the Robintive market,

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>which is ridiculous, totally ridiculous. Regrettably, I said this on

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>TV about a month ago, that that mark would end

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>in tears, and the very next day, some young man,

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>yes seven creating, committed suicide. Okay, when you carl i

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>con is as bright as they come. He liquidates his position,

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>hurts at seventy two cents a share in three weeks later,

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>his training of five dollars. And you check into what's

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>going on in the Robin hood uh, platform Eastman, Kodak Robin,

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the platform, Tesla, Robin and platform. So you know that's

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna end in tears. I have no interest in that market.

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not rational to me. I don't spend time on

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it the third market, the things to be done, and

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that's everything else. So I give a shout out to

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>my former partner Sam Martini who did great work or

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>something called Mr Cooper c O O P. I own it, Okay,

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I like it. I would add to it right here,

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. He did work. The work he did was

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>knowable by anybody. Okay, he's a digger, he's a smart

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>on the average guy. The coming three weeks ago reported

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>earnings in the second quarter five hundred million dollars in

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>cash earnings, which was fifty percent of the market value

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of the company in one quarter. Everybody was thinking about

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the stocking work twelve or thirteen. Now that you are right,

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>just because the time I want to circle back. We're

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:05.319
<v Speaker 1>talking about the future of Goldman Sachs, the future of

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Global Wall Street. Can you own the banks here? And

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>if Mr Diamond is running the sterling performer of the banks,

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>can you acquire shares in JP Morgan? This morning? I

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>could I own City Bank, and I'm I'm concerned about

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>financial conditions generally, so I'm not adding to my banks.

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they're probably cheap. Uh, They're a cheap group

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in the market. You keep with perseverating about Goldman. Don't

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>worry about Goldman. Goldman will be just fine. They go

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>with the flow, They'll figure out what they gotta do. Right. Well, well, Leanna,

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps don't worry about Goldman. But what about hedge funds?

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>You moved to a family office. If you were starting

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:46.839
<v Speaker 1>your career out now, would you start a hedge fund

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>or would you stay in the private realm? Would you

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>say away from that industry? Let me tell you what's happened. Okay, uh,

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>And maybe indirectly, I'll answer you a question. If you

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>came to me in two thousand and eight and said, Lee,

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to invest in your hedge fund, and I

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>said to you, know, you don't want to be in

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a hedge fund. You want to be in a relative

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>return vehicle. Hedge funds are hedged. Basically, they have a

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>short position. We are now in front of a ten

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>year bull market in the economy, a tenure bull run

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in the stock market. You don't want to have any

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>hedges on. You want to be bulls out investment. You

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>would have had me arrested. That's exactly what's happened. Okay.

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Now everybody says, well, the passive index is that beat

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the hedge funds. We don't want to be in the

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds. And you have to ask yourself a question

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>now the time you want to be fully invested on

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>alongside and not have a hedge on and I'd say no,

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I think hedge funds make sense now. So the people

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.439
<v Speaker 1>that went into hedge funds in two thousand and eight

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>are disenchanted, But the fact is they made that decision.

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 1>I retired the top. I retired to do the path right.

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>It's uh and uh, you know, I want to have

0:10:56.080 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a life of my own. You know, I'm basically I'm

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>very focused at philanthropy now. You know. I tell the

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>young kids that I meet with it, you know, I

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>give them a quote. I gotta fine, Okay, Leon, we're

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>on a time. All I can say is that's either

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a phenomenal backdrop in front of three guys on Madison

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Avenue or the island you're on, Lisa and I want

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to visit my con February mean, I I am totally

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>illiterate technologically. I pressed a button in my computer that

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>background appeared. I can't get rid of it. Short Hills,

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey. I am a Florida resonate. Uh. So you're

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>doing this to get you're doing this to get a

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>tech dodge from the I R S. That's what he's doing, everybody.

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Leon Cooperman's in Florida today and for the other hundred

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>eighty one days he's gotta be there as well. Mr Cooperman,

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. With Omega as well. Right now,

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Dr Bremer to just as well. My book of the

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>summer is Richard hass Magisterial The World. It is a

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>primer on our international relations. Of course, Ian Bremer knows

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>every word of that. He joins us now because he

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>is doing one of the coolest things in international relations.

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Ian Bremer escapes every summer to Nantucket and you think

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>he's leading the big life. But what he's doing is

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>leaned over a desk working like crazy on his next book.

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.719
<v Speaker 1>And that next book. We are in anticipation of the

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>crisis we need. What is the crisis, Dr Bremer, that

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>we need? And you'd like to believe that it's coronavirus, right,

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's the biggest of our lifetimes. As we all know,

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>crises do give us the opportunity to respond to things

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that are deeply broken. Uh. It is hard to see. Uh,

0:12:56.000 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>in this environment that we are taking advantage of the

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>opportunities this crisis affords us. So the book is all

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>about that and other such opportunities on our horizon. What

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>we have right now is we jump from news item

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.079
<v Speaker 1>to news item. This morning, Dr bremer It is a

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of State making a convenient trip to Israel so

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>he can speak from Jerusalem to support his president with

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>his evangelical base. Comment on the appropriateness of a Secretary

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 1>of State speaking at a convention from Jerusalem. Uh, there's

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>not much that this administration is concerned about in terms

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:43.839
<v Speaker 1>of symbolic appropriateness. Uh. I've never seen anyone in the

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>White House state we couldn't do that because it wouldn't

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>be appropriate. That's that's not the way they being UM,

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and frankly, it's not the way their base wants them

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:58.839
<v Speaker 1>to be. But let's be clear that the US relationship

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>with Israel UM is one of Trump's best in the world.

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>His foreign policy successes are more about Israel than just

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>about anywhere else. Remember, they moved the embassy to Jerusalem,

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>so you wouldn't be surprised if Pompeo is speaking from

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the new US embassy that many administrations had supported but

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>no one had done. You also have now normalization of

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>relations between the Israelis and the UA, something actually facilitated

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>by the Trump administration. And it looks like Pompeo is

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>going to Sudan after that. I think that that my

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>expectation is Sudan is also going to normalize. This is

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>not going to stop with the U a E. It's

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>actually quite something. And since we usually beat up on

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump in terms of foreign policy failings and how different

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>leaders don't like him, this is one way they do

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 1>forgetting about the way they do it, or the this

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>course or the tone. What is the distinction between a

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Biden foreign policy in a second term Trump foreign policy?

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>The biggest difference is probably Europe. President Trump and the

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>entire administration believes that the EU is bad for the

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>United States. They want to deal individually with European governments.

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>They strongly supported Brexit. President Biden if he became, if

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>he won, would be the antithesis of that. He would

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>support a stronger EU. Um he would clearly and build

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>up the multilateral aspects of that relationship, where Trump there's not.

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>On China, Tom the Biden administration and the Trump administration

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>would be almost identical. And it's so interesting from the

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>d n C last week, you didn't hear anyone talking

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>about China, despite the fact that that's probably the single

0:15:56.520 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>issue that exercises and animates President Trump the most internationally.

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's because quietly, when you talk to Biden's national

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>security and foreign policy team don't have problems with the

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>way that Trump does some of these things. But actually,

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of you know, Taiwan, Hong Kong, South China,

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>CE technology based one trade deal, all of that, Biden

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and Trump were nearly identical. All Right, Ian Bremer of

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>eur Asia Group joining US right now, let's talk about China.

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>President Trump has come out saying that he was going

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to ban all transactions of US businesses with the likes

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of ten Cent and TikTok's parent company. We're seeing him

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>perhaps dial back some of those threats, at least in

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>private conversations. Where are we on that and how pivotal

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>is that to the relationship between China and the US.

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Um it's it's significant. I wouldn't say it's pivotal. UM.

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I would say Huawei is more pivotal. Huawei is the

0:16:56.560 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>most important technology company for China. It is their national champion.

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>They're using it to drive five G, which is their

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 1>effort to control the Internet of things and all of

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the data and the monetization of that data, and and

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 1>the advance is an AI that come from it, and

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the United States is not all dialing back. In fact,

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>last week we saw tougher efforts against Huawei and specifically

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>more companies that would be put on watch lists if

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 1>they are providing semi conductors and other critical pieces of

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of of of supply to Huawei. And you know they

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:34.959
<v Speaker 1>have some semi conductors store up, but within a year

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.479
<v Speaker 1>they're in serious trouble. So I mean, I really do

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>think that on every issue that matters between the US

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and China, whether it's national security or internal human rights,

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>or whether it's the economy or tech, the relationship between

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the US and China is heading in a bad direction. Um.

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.920
<v Speaker 1>And so there It's true. I was talking to Jared

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Kushner a few days ago, and he was being considerably

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>softer I would argue than say Peter and Navarrow on

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>issues like the importance of still doing business with China,

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>not breaking tech company's ability to engage. Then I would

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>see from others like light Highs or like Pompeale in

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 1>particular my Pompeio securiy state. Um. But in general, we

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>know where this relationship is heading, no matter who wins

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 1>in November, and it's probably the most important geopolitical issue

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>for the markets by by a factor of magnitude. Yeah. Well,

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the way that you distinguish that is really important. The

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>idea that ten Cent shares rallying with the idea that

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>perhaps President Trump is softening his stance ambanning these businesses,

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>but the direction of travel is what's important to watch.

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Nile Ferguson, a Bloomberg opinion columnist, writing that Joe Biden

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>could end up being a wartime president, talking about the

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>concern that some people have that the US China titfor

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>tat is going to lead to a hot war. Do

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 1>you think that we are getting closer to that? No? No,

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I wrote Neil after he wrote that piece, And you

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>know sort of that it would amused me because I

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:03.679
<v Speaker 1>mean he has become a bit of a bomper on

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that issue. I do think that we are in a

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>technology code war with the Chinese, where we literally want

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 1>their tech companies to fail and we will punish not

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>just those companies, but those that work with them. But

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean the likelihood of a hot war. First of all,

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese truly don't want one. They understand they're a

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:30.239
<v Speaker 1>c asymmetric capabilities compared to the United States. I mean,

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>there are a regional military power. They know we're close

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to American capacity, but they also still understand that there's

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot in that we work on together. I mean,

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>no matter how bad the US China relationship gets, I

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>still think we're gonna be selling them crude oil. No

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>matter how bad it gets. I still think when we

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>go to Walmart, we're gonna be buying a lot of

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 1>goods that are made in China. And I still think

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of our universities are gonna be working

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 1>really hard to make sure that Chinese foreign students can

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>come and pay a pull freight, because otherwise many of

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>those colleges will be in a lot of trouble. So

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>not only do I not see a hot war, I

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.880
<v Speaker 1>think there are limitations to how bad this relationship can get,

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and and they considerably greater than say with the Russians.

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh Ian Bremer. Just with the time left, I want

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to turn ourselves to the levant into the future for

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>mr Ara Tojan. We don't have time to really dive

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>into this correctly. But there's been three or four air

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to ones across the span from two thousand two, which

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 1>are to Wan is affecting Greece, affecting hydrocarbons north of crete,

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>which air to Wan is affecting Libya. Uh. Well, Libya,

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>we have a cease fire now that actually seems to

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to stick. That's a good thing, um, And

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I would say that I recognize that overplaying his hand

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:58.120
<v Speaker 1>is only gonna lead um to military confrontation. Doesn't want

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>The same thing has been true in Seria, uh, with

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>their claims for buffer zone but backing away when the

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Russians pushed them hard. Um. I think the same thing

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>is true in the East Mediterranean. I mean, you know

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>they're saying they're gonna drill, but that's in part it's

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's easy to beat up on the Greeks by

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>themselves when you have divisions inside the European Union, unwilling

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to have a comedy united front against Turkey. That's been frustrating,

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I think to the Greeks. Um. So the problem is

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that Turkey is in massive economic trouble right now. The

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Turkish leyra, of course, UM continues to fall. Um, the

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the indebtedness is a serious problem. UM and uh and

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and and the the small and medium enterprises. You're doing

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 1>very badly. And so if you're Earnwan and you're thinking

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>through how you can continue to leave that country and

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 1>not end up in jail um and a Turkish prison

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>is not a fun place to be right Um. You're

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking about what you can do to rally the

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:58.239
<v Speaker 1>population behind you. And a lot of this UM is

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 1>overt nationalism and bomb throwing, but it's it's not getting

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>involved in serious military confrontation. And I do think that

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>earn One is savvy enough to understand how deep doesn't

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>want to go. Remember remember Tom that you have that

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>turn the Russian relationship which was totally broken. It was

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>arder One that ended up apologizing with a face because

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 1>it was hurting his economy. He understands that he can

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 1>only go so far. Ian Bremer, thank you so much

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and good writing to you in Nantucket. He of course

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is with your Asia group an oil and read a

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>cent of Energy aspects and reading what is the distinction

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>right now in supply, demand dynamics and oil. What are

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 1>you focused on all right now? Even with the storms

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>comming Thomas Unfortunately, so long demand and how much we

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 1>are recovering, how far away we are from pre twenty

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that will put it along way away, and we have

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 1>built so much infant treat that. Yes, while these storms

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>are supportive for crude in the sense that we are

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 1>shutting in a lot of classes Mexico prodition, it's not

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>really going to move the needle. That comes to just

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the shire volume of inventory that we still need to

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>run down, all right, So what will move the needle?

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking right now Crewe traded on the n imax

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>forty two dollars and seventy six cents. It's been moving

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>in this forty to forty three dollar range for a

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>while right now at the upper end of that range.

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:25.400
<v Speaker 1>What would take? What would it take to break out?

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 1>And it will break out to the upside or to

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the downside? I mean, honestly, had it not been for

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the weaker dollar, given where the physical market is right now,

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>crude would have been five dollars law. So this is

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>very much in a financial market supporting the price of oil,

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>because if you look at the contango, which really tells

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you how weak or strong the market is. The crude

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>curves have moved into more of a contango, you know,

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>for the front month is far more depressed than future prices. Um,

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>we will get there, It will. It will take another

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:58.160
<v Speaker 1>year or so to run down this massive infantry overhand.

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>We built over the first five months of the year.

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>We are drawing stocks right now. The hurricanes again will

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>help draw down that faster, but it just will take

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>us a good year given that demand. It's not recovering

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:13.439
<v Speaker 1>in a straight line. Right. There's a lot of stops

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and starts that are parts of the US that are

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>getting better, pots that are not. Even the rest of

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the world is the same too. Short of visit, Amrina

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>sent thank you so much for joining us today with

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 1>energy aspects. This is a joy. She was a strong

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>which if you're in the game, everyone knows, was one

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of the premier value houses of another time and place,

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 1>and is now head of active equity at Wells Fargo

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Asset Management. And Melody joins us now from the land

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>of PEPs blue ribbon beer. Uh. And I've got to

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:51.439
<v Speaker 1>ask right now. It's a simple question. Our Amazon and

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Apple value stocks. Well, you know, tom As we used

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to say, prices what you've hey, value is what you get,

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and the market would say that you're getting a lot

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of value still out of these larger cap names. Certainly

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the price seems very high. But as you know, and

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>as you have been talking about four months and months

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and months um, investors are seeking growth in this market

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>where there's very hard to come by. We're all looking

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>at three years, four years, five years. You as a

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>value pro if it's stupid crazy pricing on so many

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>different sectors, how far out are you rationalizing revenue and

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>earnings growth? Those are two lines, folks that cross out

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in the distance. Is in melody buying for five years

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>from now? Well, you know, I think our managers really

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.360
<v Speaker 1>are looking three to five years out, and that's kind

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of typical for portfolio managers to do when they're building models.

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the interesting thing about this time is, you know,

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I was taught early in my career really try to

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>figure out what the market is telling you, and it's

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 1>really difficult. It's a difficult question to answer in today's world.

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>But I have to wonder if the market's not saying, gosh,

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a big te tonic shift happening in our economy,

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's happening at a pace that we haven't seen before,

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 1>just accelerated because this pandemic UM and that might be

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the reason for that. Our contrast between the winners and

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the losers in the market and so when you look

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>three to five years out doesn't look a lot different.

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean that, you know, technology UM really drives productivity,

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 1>supports profit margins um and drive expansions right, and and

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that some other sectors that we're really supportive

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of our of our our economy, like travel and leisure

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and bricks and mortar retail just don't anymore well. And

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>this is the whole idea that what we're seeing in

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:13.159
<v Speaker 1>the stock market is the reality that the future has

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>been brought forward by ten years due to the pandemics.

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>It's accelerated a lot of these changes that already were happening.

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 1>As an active equity manager, how do you get an

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>edge on that? Do you just go Apple Amazon? No?

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>In fact, when I look across the board at all

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of the managers that now are on the Wells Fargo

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Asset Management platform UM, we have two very prominent growth

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>teams that have done both done extremely well. One of

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 1>them doesn't own Apple at all, the other one is

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:53.120
<v Speaker 1>slightly overweight Apple. And so there you take two different

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, two different dynamics there. Um both doing well,

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.919
<v Speaker 1>but it's difficult as a growth manager not to be

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>UM and have some exposure there. Now they both have

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>exposure to a lot of other names in technology. They're

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>both overweight that space because they do believe in the

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>power of technology driving all of those things that I

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>talked about profit margins, productivity, etcetera. UM, But they're also

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.640
<v Speaker 1>very diversified in other sectors. And I would say so

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>are our value managers who see the US manufacturing renaissance

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:37.360
<v Speaker 1>really truly happening, right, And this is not just about jobs,

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's about cost structure and margins. And so we

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>have seen more and more manufacturing coming back to the

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Midwest in other places in the US, and it seems

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>like that really is truly, you know, here to stay.

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad that you mentioned that. I mean, there was

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a story on the Bloomberg over the weekend about the

0:28:56.240 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Kenosha region in Wisconsin, which I'm sure is close to you.

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>This idea that there there was actually a twenty five

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>salary increase in certain areas. Do that fox Con uh

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>factory that was brought to the region. Where do you

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:16.959
<v Speaker 1>see the most potential upside due to what you call

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the manufacturing renaissance that you see taking place. Well, I

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to continue to come from you know,

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, all different areas of manufacturing across the board,

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it is in tech manufacturing but also industrial manufacturing.

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>And so we've seen it in Wisconsin certainly, We've seen

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it in the rust bells in Ohio and other states. UM.

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>So fox Con was clearly electronics, but we're seeing it

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>UM in other places. So UM, I have friends that

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>work in the manufacturing building. You know this isn't in

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 1>great you know standing today, but um auto airplane manufacturing parts, UM,

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly automn automobile manufacturing part appliances. So UM across all industries.

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 1>What is your view forward? I mean, and you know

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you've so experienced at value in the conundrum of growth

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and value and now heading active management where you're in

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>brutal competition with index funds as well. Where is the

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>where I don't mean this by value like stock fundamentals,

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>but what's the value opportunity now for active management, how

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>do you place yourself to outperform whatever the mandate is

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>against index funds. I actually think this is kind of

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a unique time for active management to really show its

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>true advantage. When we saw volatility levels like we saw,

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we saw I'm starting in March and

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in April, when this pandemic really hit, that's when active

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>management truly can show its power, right because managers, portfolio managers,

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that analysts can go in and analyze fundamentals and where

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>those companies might be three to five years from now.

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>And so more than sixty of our active managers are

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:20.719
<v Speaker 1>outperforming six in a five year time frame. When you

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>look out UM over over five years, when you look

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>over three years, it's more than seventy five. So this

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>is a time for active to really shine, and you know,

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>hopefully taking advantage of more and more volatility overpassed UM

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>will clearly showcase that what do you do on the banks?

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Strong was so good at avoiding bank tobaccos

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>along the way, what do you do with the financials?

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Right now, our managers are underweight that space, and I

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's clear that it's going to be difficult for

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 1>banks to really outperform with rage with race as low

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 1>as they are and seemingly as low as they will

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>be for the next couple of years. Melody, I'm curious

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>about the bogey that you're looking for an active management.

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>In other words, what type of returns target for an

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>active equity portfolio seems appropriate over the next five to

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 1>ten years. You know, I think you have to look

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>at out performing the benchmark by two to three I'll

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>pay I'll perform in your specific benchmark by two to

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>three percent to really showcase, um, the strength of active

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>management now clearly, um. You know you have to cover

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 1>your fees. That's ground one. So if you can cover

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>your fees and beat passive, to me, that's a win.

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>And I'm a believer in active. If an active manager

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>can do that, I'd actually rather be an active manager,

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>meant because that's going against the crowd, and I'd rather

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>be not with the crowd today, um, than with the crowd.

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But ideally two all right, So if you want to

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>be against the crowd or you want to take a

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>have a contrarian take of some sort. What's the one

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 1>popular stock right now that you'd sell you know what

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I am not because of my new role and I'm

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>not actually managing money. I'm not allowed to talk about

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 1>specific stocks. I can only talk Come on, no, who's listening.

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>We're in We're in the Aderondecks. We're doing right. Um.

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I heard you get hassled all morning from thank you,

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you? Tom? Did you hear that somebody is on

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>my side? And come back any time. We're really to

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>take a vacation, and Tom, you need to take one's

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>right kids and work. What's sick is Lisa. The deer

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>flies up in the aderondis or like a B fifty

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>two bomber, you camp draw them. They're even bigger out

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>in northern Wisconsin. It's true. I spent a lot of

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>time in northern Wisconsin. I'll just let you know that

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I had, I have family in Wisconsin. It's beautiful up there.

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Dead silence, you guys just like I just a confirming that, yes,

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 1>there are incredible Let us know, folks, what time of

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>years should Lisa and I traveled in northern Wisconsin. It's

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>beautiful now, Okay, Emma bloody, thank you so much. I

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 1>greatly appreciate it. With Will's Fargo Asset Management really really

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:22.760
<v Speaker 1>quite good, and value investing is there as well. Thanks

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast.

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio