WEBVTT - SYSK Selects: How Wine Fraud Works

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Happy Saturday everyone. This is Chuck from Stuff you Should Know,

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to my select pick for the week. This

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>is from October fift two thousand fifteen, and it's called

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>How Wine Fraud Works. And I selected this because spend

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a minute since I've listened to it, and I love wine,

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>as you know, and I hate wine fraud as you

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>probably know as well. So let's learn about it together.

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know, a production of my

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey, and welcome to the podcast.

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:37.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh Clark. There's Child's of w Chuck Bryant and

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>no little bit even this Stuff you Should Know. Man,

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that coffee smells good? You want something? Have a sip? No,

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm fine, but just I just love that smells so nice,

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>even though I don't drink much coffee. Oh yeah, I'm

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>with you. You know, it's just a delicious smell. Sometimes

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll go to a department store and just walk through

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the fragrance s aisle and just smell the coffee samples.

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Today open. Well, I thought you were gonna say you

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>go through the lingerie and just brushed up against things

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>after the coffee, So after the coffee, sniffing is done

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 1>and I can't smell anything anymore. How are you? Thanks

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>for outing me? Man, that's creepy. Yeah, I'm sure there's

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>weirdos out there who do that. Are you kidding me?

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>There's probably websites dedicated to it. Yeah, I'm fine. Good. Good?

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you like wine? I love wine? How do you know,

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Chuck that the wine you're drinking it's actually the wine

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking it because nobody bothers to fraudulently rip off

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>bottle of one. Not true. Yeah, there's a famous issue

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world of wine fraud watch people. Okay, um

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>from Tesco, which is I think it's just a straight

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>up like supermarket kim In Britain, I saw that. Actually, yeah,

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you're right. And there was a Louisia dough which normally

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>goes for about fifteen pounds. It was selling on sale

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>for five pounds, but one of the guys who purchased

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it contacted some people who are into wine and said,

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I think this is phony because the label looks like

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a photo copy. So somebody was doing knock off

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Luisia dough which normally goes for not that much, and

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>sold it to Tesco, who was in turn selling it.

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>And this is a huge thing, and there's a big,

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>big debate even still and just how widespread wine fraud is.

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>And it's really difficult to get to the bottom of

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>because there's so many people who have their fingers in

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:43.679
<v Speaker 1>this fraudulent pot, whether wittingly or unwittingly, in either way,

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>are unwilling to admit that it's as extensive as it is,

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:49.959
<v Speaker 1>or the people who are burned are making a bigger

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>deal out of it than they are than it really is,

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 1>because they have the money in the context to get

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 1>CBS to do a story on how they got burned

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>by buying some fake wine. So it's not entirely clear

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>how widespread it is. But there have been some really great,

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>very famous, almost proven stories of outright wine fraud. But

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty new phenomenon. Uh well, if you think

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>ancient Rome is pretty new, let's hear it man. Well

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that's I mean there ever, since there was wine, people

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>were making fake wine or trumping it up as something

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>other than it was. So the newer practice, like you

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>can divide it into two things. There was an ancient

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>room they were doing stuff like this and adding like

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>lead to wine. To sweeten it while they were killing people. Uh.

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>But then there's the new practice of like, hey, this

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>is a Thomas Jefferson bottle of wine and you can

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>bide it to Christie's auction for a hundred thousand dollars

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's really not that at all. Do you remember

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>back in the eighties, Um, I think Reo Needy was

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>adding like when you wipe her fluid or something. Yeah,

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it was at the at least an urban legend. More recently,

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>there was something added to wine to make it sweeter

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that was really bad for you. But I don't know,

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't confirm if it was that case or No,

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>this was specifically re Needy in the eighties. And it again,

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it could have just been an urban legend because it's

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>at the same time that there were spiders eggs in

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>bubble yum. You know. Yeah, there was a lot of

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>like a consumer uh panic. I think. Yeah, it was

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a golden age for urban legends. Yeah, agreed. Uh. And

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you know what we need to do one on wine period? Yes,

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>this is so us. Yeah, we'll do episodes on everything

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 1>but the actual thing, and then we'll finally get to

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the thing. And we could also probably do a completely

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>separate podcast on wine tasting, because man, that's a really

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>bitter pill. Because there are some people who say there

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>really is no difference in these wines, and there have

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>been numerous occasions over the years where jerks have set

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>up wine tasters to fail by just switching out wines

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and saying, this is a really nice bottle. What's really

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 1>crappy and they say, whoa, this is lovely. The tannins

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>are really coming in. It's jammie and full, and they're like,

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you're drinking too buck chuck. Um. People love that stuff

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that it's a big bone of contention with wine drinkers

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and also people who like to poop poo that right

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>and say it's all subjective and you're all just snooty

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and either really is no difference, but there really is

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 1>a difference. Well, okay, so there is a like you say,

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a big debate over that, right, um, But

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>if you if you dive into the world of high

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>end vintage wine collecting, it is very um it's like

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 1>an aura borus, right, that snake that eats its own

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>tail in that the people who are in charge of

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>judging whether something's real or not are basing that on

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>their previous experiences, which may or may not have been

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>in experience with the fraudulent wine. So even if you

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>can tell the difference, if you've only been exposed to, say,

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>fraudulent eight century wine, then when you are asked to

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>judge a bottle of eighteenth century wine, you're gonna compare

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>it to that, and if it's ultimately coming from the

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>same counterfeitter, you will be like, yes, this is the

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>real thing, because I've had that before and it tastes

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>like that. Well, yeah, And here's the other thing. Is

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>there there is vintage, uh, appropriately aged wine that is

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>tastes great because it has aged in such a way,

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:41.799
<v Speaker 1>and then there are these super old bottles that apparently

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>tastes like canned asparagus. Is the note that it brings out,

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>And these don't even taste that good. It's just the

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that you can own it and show people you

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>don't even drink it. In most cases, you don't drink it.

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson Wine, you have it in your collection, so you say,

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>look at Michael Alec exactly. That's the whole point A

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are For a lot of people, that's

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>the whole point it's just own this bottle. It's like

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>owning a piece of Thomas Jefferson. You get to show

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>off and and tell people how great you are, right exactly. So, Um,

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that's how a lot of wine counterfeiting has gotten away

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>with because the people are never going to open the wine,

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>So whatever tampering you did with the seal is never

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be discovered. Um, they're never gonna taste the

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>wine inside, so it could be two buck chalk or

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever we see the cork. Yeah, Um, and they're just

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>they're just happy to have this thing and their status

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to be elevated to the point where they don't really

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>want to know if it's a counterfeit so long as

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>they can walk around and tell people this is Thomas Jefferson. Right, Well,

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we should go ahead and start talking about Bill Coke.

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>He is uh, one of the other brothers. He is

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>not Charles or David Coke of the famous uh Republican

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Coke brother fame. Yeah, billionaire supporters of the Republican Party. Yeah. Yeah,

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>she's saying that's like the nicest way to describe them. Yeah,

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it is. Uh. He is the brother, one of the

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>brothers who got out along with another brother. Um, not

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>another brother from another mother. No, they're all the same mother,

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>right right, Okay, Yeah, he got out of the family

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>business and said, you know what, I'm a billionaire. I'm

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna what I'm gonna do is I'm gonna start collecting

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>really rare and expensive things. Um. One thing he has

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>as a gun collection. He owns Custer's rifle, Billy the

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Kid's pistol. Does he yea, he owns the gun that

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>killed Jesse James. Oh, I'm sorry, is Jesse James pistol?

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>And that gun and that what was his name, Robert Ford? Yeah?

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And that boy was it really good? Beautifully shot as

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>well WIDEPS rifle dot Holiday's rifle. He has a lot

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of vintage guns. He has a lot of very famous

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>works of art, like original Picassos and Monaise. As far

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>as he exactly, he sounds like a big sucker to me.

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And he also owns, uh as this article says, several

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred bottles of what he calls moose piss. Yeah, that's

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>what he calls it. He's he well, he's saying that

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>for all he knows. That's what's inside. He got duped

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>very famously, many many times. Yeah, and he has had

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.199
<v Speaker 1>many many lawsuits over the years that have come out.

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Guy loves suing people. He does what he calls dropping

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>subpoena is on people. Yeah, he sees people almost recreationally

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>he drops a subpoena on their head. Yeah, what a guy.

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>So he um. He bill Coke again very famously. He's

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>probably the most famous victim of wine fraud because he

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>sues everybody he possibly can who may or may not

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>have sold them a fake. Really takes it personally, and

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>he really goes after people. Um. And he did a

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of media about this too, so he's very famous

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>for this. UM. And he brought in some wine experts

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and said, here are thirty thousand, forty thousand bottles of

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>wine that I have in my cellers. How many are fake?

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>And they just took a random sample of three bottles

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>kidding me, no, they said exactly. They're like, we'll bill

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you for this. Um. They took a random sample of

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>three thousand bottles and it yielded a hundred and thirty fakes.

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So I mean he has hundreds and hundreds and hundreds

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>by by extension, of fake bottles of wine in his cellar.

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And that was actually that's about on par with what

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the average not necessarily uninitiated or uneducated wine buyer, but

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>fervent vintage wine buyer would have that about four million

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>dollars seller, about a million of it will be on fakes.

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:01.439
<v Speaker 1>And he supposed at he spent close to five million

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars on fake wine over the past quarter century, um,

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>including some of those Jefferson's that we'll talk about. Uh.

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of this wine came from a man

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>named Rudy Uh Croniawe Oh, that's good stuff. Yeah, it's

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>even better than I had in my head. Would you have?

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I like that? I think? And this guy was one

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of the most famous um really alongside another guy that

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about, one of the most famous wine fraud discs, fraudster, fraudster, counterfeitters,

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 1>counterfeiters of all time. Um. And he was sentenced to

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>ten years in prison and supposedly was to pay close

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to fifty million dollars in damages, which is easily what

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>he made by selling fake wine. In two sales in

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and six, he made thirty six million dollars

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 1>selling fake wine. What a jerk. And it's easy to

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>sit back and the defense team even used this in

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>court to say, these are rich guys, like, no harm,

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>no foul, who cares very if you're ripping off the rich.

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>And I even found myself kind of thinking that. But

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, who it's wrong. It's wrong.

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:19.719
<v Speaker 1>It's wrong. Sure, I mean like I wouldn't do it.

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't sell a counterfeit bottle of wine. Yeah, it's wrong,

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.199
<v Speaker 1>it's illegal, and it's it's gross. And just because you're

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>ripping off the rich, it's not like he's Robin Hood

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and giving that then to the poor. You know, he

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>was him. I didn't have the idea that he was

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>doing that. Plus Um, Dave Rouse, who wrote this, made

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>this point, but I take issue with it that ultimately

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>vintage counterfeit wine fraud affects all wine drinkers because that

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff trickles down. I don't think that's true. Because from

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>reading this UM, there are two really great long form

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.439
<v Speaker 1>articles that this article was partially based on when was

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in The New Yorker, and one was on Vanity Fair,

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and both of them were totally worth reading. Um. But

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>just from reading those you get the impression that those

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>are two very different worlds, that the world of like

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:19.599
<v Speaker 1>just regular wine appreciation and vintage wine collection form of

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Venn diagram that just barely overlaps, and that one really

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>does not affect the economy the economics of the other.

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:30.959
<v Speaker 1>So if there's a bunch of counterfeit stuff going on

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in the vintage wine world, it probably wouldn't drive up

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>prices for the wine that you're buying that's, you know,

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 1>ten years old tops. So I don't think that that's

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>necessarily true his point that we all shoulder the burden

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that counterfeiters do because these two worlds are so divorced.

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>But even still, like if you were a people are

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>losing money and reputations are being built up and lost.

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, I get that. All right, Well, let's take

0:13:57.679 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a little break and we'll come back and uh, we'll

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about the two ways that you can generally go

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>about trying to fake a wine. All right, we're back.

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>We're drunk on wine. It's so drunk. I wish what's

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>your favorite wine? Uh? My favorite wines are big bodied

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>California cabernets generally, like not a specific like wine maker.

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>If that's what you're asking, I'm not gonna like, Yeah,

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>there was no wrong answer. Yeah, No, Well what was

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that funny? Because it made me think of fat bottom girls,

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that Queen song. Big bodied California. Yeah, it just potts

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in my head and I laughed like a goon. Yeah,

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I like really full bodied wines, zim Fidel's and Cabernets. Yeah,

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I think California is just they're doing it right. You know.

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>They say Pa titzeras the Rodney danger field in the

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>wine world. I've heard that. So if you're gonna go

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>about faking a wine, um you uh, there are two

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>things you can do. You can either fake the wine

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>inside a real bottle or you can fake the bottle

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>with real wine. Yeah, and it's all real wine, you know,

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>different vintage maybe yeah, but like it could be like

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a really nice nineteen seven wine that you say it's

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>actually from nineteen fourteen or even one. I mean like

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>it could be within a couple of years. It ends

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>on whether it was a good year, good point or

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>if the if there's a scarcity of it, that kind

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. And actually Bill Cooke makes a pretty good point.

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>His whole thing is he wants to have I think

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty years of Lafitte or some some

0:15:54.600 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>house like every single vintage that they released of every

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>single variety over the course of a hundred and fifty years,

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>which is extremely ambitious. And he said, it's easy to

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>get the really prized ones because those are the ones

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that like people saved and all that. He said, it's

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the mediocre years that are old that nobody bothered to

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>say this, drank and throw away the bottle or or

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>just didn't keep it. Those are the ones that he

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>has the most trouble finding. Or they did skeet shooting.

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>They just had the servants stowed up in the air

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and then shot him with shotguns. That's what they do.

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Richie Riches. Uh, well, you make a good point too,

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>because Colnie Allen, although he dealt in the super high echelon,

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>he would also take a two bottle of wine and

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>fake it to be like a thousand dollar bottle. Yeah,

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>he did it both ways. He would he would take

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>out he would take an old bottle, legitimate real bottle,

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>put in his own mix of wine and cork it

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>again and make it look like it had never been open.

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Or like you said, he would take just say a

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>forty seven Lafitte and mess with the label to make

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>it look like a forty one Lafitte, which would be

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>worth ten times that what the forty seven Lafitte would

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>be worth. Right, and clearly, I also want to point

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>out Lafitte is obviously the only fancy wine that I'm

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>familiar with, because that's my go too. So if you

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>guys are out there and you're getting the impression that

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I know what I'm talking about as far as wine goes,

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you have been duped. Well, you're not a big wine guy.

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 1>You're on record as such. I like wine. I'm I'm

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>definitely not a wine guy exactly. Yeah. Uh, And I'm

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>not wine guy either. I'm I'm at the very i'm

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 1>wine guy in the their sense of the word. I

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 1>like really good wines. I like going to wineries, but

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm certainly no like. I'm not saying I have some

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>amazing palette. I can't pick out vanilla notes and things

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:47.880
<v Speaker 1>like that. I'm just like, man, this tastes really good

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>for up the bottle of it. And I tend to

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>fall into that camp where I'm certain that there are

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>people out there, literal tastemakers who can tell the difference

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>between wine and I've had had wine that I didn't

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>like before, I've had wine that I do like. Um,

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 1>but I fall into the camp where I'm ultimately like

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's whatever you appreciate. It's no hierarchy. There doesn't

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>need to be. Um, you know, a two thousand dollar

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>bottle is not necessarily going to taste as good as

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a twenty dollar bottle. That that you The whole thing

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is just about individual enjoyment and a kind of snobbery

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>associated with it to me just misses the point. Yeah,

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>here's my deal is. I can really tell the difference

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>between what I would consider a cheap wine and like

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a decent bottle or a good bottle. But that's where

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>my taste level max is out. I can't tell the

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>difference between a two bottle and at bottle. But if

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you gave me like a six dollar bottle, you can.

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>You can taste the difference it's between that and like

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a twenty bottle. Yeah, but even then, if that's what

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you like, that's what you like. I'm not. It's just

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>not what I want, right, you know. Man, a lot

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of caveats there. So Um. We were talking about Rudy kay, yeah,

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>and how to how to he faked wines and he

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>he got real bottles correct in general, and made his

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>own wine concoctions. Here's what this dude did right to

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>get to the point where he could even counterfeit. Yes,

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>he got his hands on real stuff, and he ran

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>up some serious, serious bar tabs while he was doing it.

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a very um legendary story of him hooking up

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>with this guy who was the head of wine sales

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>at a UM, a an auction house called Acker Meryll.

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>They factor in big time into this guy's ascent and

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Rudy Kay's counterfeit ascent, not weddingly necessarily, but they they

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>let him used their reputation to build his own. But

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>he did it by duping them by throwing like these

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 1>crazy parties at like uhum at um restaurants and having

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>like two fifty thou dollar tabs, picking up the tab himself.

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>But then after everybody left, going to the staff at

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 1>the restaurant being like, mail me every single one of

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>those bottles, and they go, well, okay, it's your wine,

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>but that's weird, not enough to make mention of it,

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 1>but it was odd to them. His big thing was

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that he did it at the same place over and

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 1>over again, so they did start to notice. But while

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>he was doing this, he was also collecting wine to

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>really expensive vintage wine, and there was already a market

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>for it, but it didn't look anything like the market

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that he built almost himself. He drove the value of

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>vintage wine up, almost singlehandedly by buying up as many

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>bottles of old stuff as he could. Um. And while

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>he was doing that, he was building his reputation. He

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>was making connections, and he was getting his hands on

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 1>legitimate wine that he could use to resell now that

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>the market was up at a higher price, after he

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>had already consumed it. It say like a party. Yeah.

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>And one thing he was doing that tipped off some

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>people early on was um like you were saying. He

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>was buying off years of good vintages, great vintages, to

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>where there was one guy who thinks Jeffrey Troy was

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>his name. He was a wine merchant, and he said

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>he was buying these good bottles for French Burgundy, but

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>they weren't great, they were off years, and it was

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>just if he was a collector, it was just weird

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to buy these, uh, and to be adamant about buying

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>these because he could get him for cheaper and fake

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>them easier exactly, like he could just kind of smudge

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the year and all of a sudden it's a much

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>more expensive vintage. UM. So he's he's driving the market up.

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>He's buying legitimate wine. Apparently he's taking out loans that

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 1>he defaulted on to to build this reputation is um

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and so when the market hits he starts counterfeiting. And

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>there was one story that actually was pretty prominent in

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:04.199
<v Speaker 1>the Vanity Fair article where he was apparently confused. He thought,

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's no way that any of us would have

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>ever thought this, but he thought that a Ponceau close

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Saint Denis was the same thing as the Christine ponce

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>So close St. Denis. Right, he was way off. So

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that um, he figured that ponce Uh

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>made this wine in Burgundy in the forties, because Christine

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>ponce So close Aint Denis made this wine in the fourties.

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Turns out that the regular Ponceo, the very famous Ponceau family,

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>made their close End Denis starting in the eighties. So

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>he actually got found out because of this one mistake.

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>This led to his unraveling, and he was going to

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>auction or sell about like nine bottles of this stuff

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that was overtly counterfeit. It had never existed, which also

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>said a lot about the collectors at the time too,

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.479
<v Speaker 1>because they were coming and paying for wine that they

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>never even heard of. It didn't exist strictly because these

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.679
<v Speaker 1>these people were attached to it. Yeah, it's pretty amazing,

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>it really is. And that's how he was able to

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>get away with it for so long because that dinner,

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>the guy Ponceau himself, um, the guy who was the

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>proprietor of the vineyard, showed up at that dinner, flew

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>from Paris to I think New York to be at

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the dinner to make sure that they didn't auction off

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>those things because he knew they were counterfeit. And Rudy

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Kay still was left to just keep going for years

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>after that because because of reputations. Well, and like you said,

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>he had built up this reputation, which is a big

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>part of it. Um, you have to be a true

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>con artist. You can't just go in there, uh and say,

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I've got all these Jefferson wines. I'm chuck. You know,

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to be known in the community, and it

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>takes a long time, and they have to think of

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that right, Yeah, I have to think you have money,

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>real money, which he did. No, he borrowed it all. Well,

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought he came for money a ruse. Well, he

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>had money at one point he borrowed on now, but

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>then he made a lot, right, So think about this.

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he defaulted on a three or four million

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 1>dollar loan, and then another one or two million dollar loan,

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>and then he also borrowed privately from other like wine

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>collectors that he knew. But even still, let's say he

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>borrowed ten million dollars that he defaulted, he made tens

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in tens and tens more millions, thirty four million dollars

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in one year just from two sales. Yeah, and he

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>currently is appealing his conviction um on the grounds that,

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>uh that when when he was arrested, he was arrested

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 1>on his front porch. Then they searched his house and

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>they said you can't do that. That they got the

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the search warrant afterward, and he said, well you can't

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>do that. There should I should have never been searched.

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:51.719
<v Speaker 1>And it's looking like they're saying, now you know what

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>they had reasonable uh doubt? Uh yeah, exactly. So I

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>don't think the appeal is going to go anywhere, but

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>this is recently, it's like this year, I think he's

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>still appealing. Yeah, but he got ten years right, ten

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 1>years man UM, So he got caught and he got

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>caught red hand, red handed. It sounds like UM and

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the people who were attached to him that helped build

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>up this market definitely suffered uh some dings to their reputation,

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>but are saying like, we had no idea, we trusted

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 1>this guy. We were duped too, and UM to their

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to their merit acker meryll Um offered like, uh money

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 1>back guarantees on anything that was considered found to be

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 1>fake and and paid up on it after one auction. Well,

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the guys Cocu is suing is uh, I

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>can't remember his name, but he supposed supposedly he's like,

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.199
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know I was selling you fake wine, like

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>I got duped, and he's saying, no, you knew. So

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to prove whether or not this guy

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 1>actually knew. And so that's that's another part of that

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>debate where how widespread is is who knows what UM

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and who's like how far do you go back before

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you find the person who did it right. So we'll

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about one other person who allegedly did it right

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 1>after this break. So, Chuck, there's another man, very famous

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>man in the wine world. His name is Hardy Hardy

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>roden Stock, but I don't believe that's his real name.

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 1>His real name is what mine heart gooka. That's right,

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>what a name. That's his given name. But he goes

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:52.880
<v Speaker 1>by Hardy roden Stock and has since the seventies. And

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>he to be a truly great wine counterfeitter, not only

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>do you have to build up a reputation as rich

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and um willing to crack bottles of ridiculously expensive, um

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>historically valuable wine at parties where there's wine critics and

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 1>auctioneers and wine experts, um. But you also have to

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>have a certain love for wine. I think Rudy Kay

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:27.919
<v Speaker 1>definitely loved wine. Yes, so they but they all have.

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, and Hardy Rodenbach definitely does too. And apparently

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a big question about whether he is one

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of the better wine mixers on the planet. Yeah, because

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a real job, where like like someone will

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>work at a winery and they'll take a little bit

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of this and a little bit of that and then

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, you've got there. Yeah, they're they're

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>they're blend. Some blends are better than others. Apparently roden

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Stock is a master blender. If he is in fact

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a counterfeiter, this article on how stuff works make it

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>makes it sound like built coax hired, FBI gun closed

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the book and like it's done. But it's never been

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>proven in a court of law that roden Stock actually,

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 1>um was this counterfeiter and he still denies the allegations. Oh,

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the circumstantial evidence is pretty pretty substantial. Yeah, I mean,

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the only reason is because he refuses to

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:22.479
<v Speaker 1>come to America to go to court. Yeah, you know,

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>but there's no criminal prosecution. It's all civil as far

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>as I understand. Yeah, I think that's the case. So

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:33.679
<v Speaker 1>he was a former music manager and um he I

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>think they're making him. There's a book called The Billionaires

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Vinegar about this about the Jefferson Wines. Interesting that they're

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>making into a movie with McConaughey. Of course. Oh yeah.

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Does he play Bill Coke or Hardy roden Stock. I

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know who he's playing, or does he just kind

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of like wander around days in the background, he's the

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:57.719
<v Speaker 1>winemaker man. Uh yeah, I'm not sure who he's playing actually,

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>but it was a big book and it was about

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the famous Jefferson wines. And basically the deal is Thomas Jefferson,

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>as we all know, was way into wine, way into France. UM,

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a big Francophile, and he had either bottles in his

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>collection or he had his own vintage as well. Um,

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Jefferson wines, and very famously Hardenstock was rooted out allegedly.

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess do we have to say that as faking

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>these Jefferson bottles. Um, he would force you know, you're

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>supposed to spit out when you're drinking wine tasting he

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>would he would I don't know about force, but highly

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>encourage his guests to swallow so they would be drunker

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>by the time he got to the real good stuff

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>at the end, which is and again, so it's unusual

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to force your guests to drink rather than spit out

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the wine at a tasting party. And then it's also

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>unusual to bring out your best stuff at the end

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>because everybody knows your palette is saturated and you can't

0:29:57.320 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>really tell the difference anyway. Well, if you've ever been

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>on a wine tour and go to like several wineries,

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you definitely at the last winery, you're like, give me

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a case. Right, is great? Yeah, So when he's throwing

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 1>these parties in these tastings, again he's invited and very

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>smart to invite wine experts, wine critics, wine journalists. It's

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>an event. It is an event. And again, all these

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>people think that this dude is just this eccentric, extraordinarily

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>rich dude who is literally opening to drink and share

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>with them. He's wonderful. These these people who are peons

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>compared to this man. He's such a great man because

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>he's opened a seventeen eighties seven bottle of Thomas Jefferson's

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>wine and he's given me a glass. I've got to

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:43.479
<v Speaker 1>go right about it. I got to talk about how

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>great Hardy roden Stock is. So it's very smart to

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:48.719
<v Speaker 1>have surrounded himself with the people he did. Yeah. So

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>his story was that he said, um, he claimed that

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>he found a batch of Jefferson bottles behind a brick

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 1>wall in a Paris Parisian basement that he still hasn't

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>revealed where this is a little suspicious. Uh. And then

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.959
<v Speaker 1>so if you already got all the wine out of there, Yeah, exactly. Uh.

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>And then he and uh he went and sold a

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of these two people like Coke and Christopher Forbes

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and other billionaires for um, hundreds of thousands of dollars

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>per bottle. And I think they were like about a

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty bottle. Yeah, it's a ton of money.

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>And um, they were fakes and it was all. It

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>all came down to a little matter of punctuation, which

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>is hysterical to me that Thomas Jefferson bottles. Um. Well,

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 1>first of all, he kept really meticulous records because he

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>was so into wine. J did. Yeah, so on the

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>bottles chuck it said, and it was engrave t H period,

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>capital J period. Right, Supposedly Jefferson when he wrote his initials,

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it would be T colon capital J period. So that

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>fatal flaw of the matter of punctuation is what gave

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>him away. Basically. Yeah, well there's a larger question too.

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So the idea that Thomas Jefferson would have his bottles

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>engraved was based on a letter, a verified letter. Um.

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 1>It was an order that Jefferson placed for French wine

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of himself. And George Washington, which makes these

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>bottles even more amazingly awesome because they think, well, these

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>came from an order that Jefferson placed, that we're also

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>in George Washington's shipment as well, and that they they

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 1>they needed to be separated out by initials. But if

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you step back and you think they wouldn't go in

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and grave all the bottles, they just marked the crates

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that the bottles came in. This crate goes to George.

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>This crate goes to Jefferson because he was ordering it

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>by the case, not by the bottle. So the idea

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that the bottles would be engraved is also dubious in

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and of itself. But Monicello historians are like, number one,

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 1>he this is wrong. The way that this is engraved,

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>That's not how he would have done it. And secondly,

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>there's no records in all of we have the records

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>for this era, and there's nothing in there about these

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 1>vintages being in Monicello or being ordered by Jefferson. And

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>then also um, once Bill Coke put his FBI dude

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>on the on the case, it turns out that it's

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>likely that this this engraving was done by modern instruments. Yeah,

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>he hired a guy named an ex fed named Jim

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>McElroy or I'm sorry, Jim Elroy. And you know I

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>kept on say macail roy too, I guess because of

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the maclroy brothers. So he hired this guy, paid him

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money, I imagine, to try and do

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>some digging on this. And one of their first lines

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of defense was there's something called uh cessium dash one

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven, and that is UH a radioactive isotope that

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>exists because it's a product of nuclear fission of uranium.

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>So it didn't exist until we started doing that, before

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>we started launching nuclear bomb explosion tests. Yeah, exactly. Uh,

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>now it exists, and you can actually test for this stuff,

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 1>so if you find you know, it basically can date

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>something back to night. However, in the case of harden Stock,

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 1>he was smart enough at least to use wine older

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 1>than n so that didn't really help him much. Yeah,

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder if he just surely he just lucked out.

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, because I wonder if that Caeson test

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:27.760
<v Speaker 1>was around when he did this, because this he supposedly

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>found him in eighty five and started selling him immediately. Yeah,

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>who knows. Maybe he got lucky, or maybe he just

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>was like, I need to use some really old, nice wine, yeah,

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to at least try and get away with it. So

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>again there's like and then there. One other part of

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the case against him was that he had a tenant

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:47.919
<v Speaker 1>once at his family's house who had an apartment near

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 1>his in the house and in the basement, the tenant

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>said that he saw like basically tons of empty bottles

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and um stacks of labels and all this stuff, which,

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to the it meant, well, this guy's forging wine. Right,

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>that's a little more. That's probably what I would think.

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I hope you doesn't go by my recycling every Wednesday

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>here a wine counterfeitter, it could be. Uh. So there

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of there's nothing you can do about

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 1>these these old um I mean, you can have people

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:24.879
<v Speaker 1>inspect them and try and verify them, but there's really

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing you can do as a like a full proof method.

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 1>But really nice wineries now are doing. There are a

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of methods you can do now for future generations

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:36.759
<v Speaker 1>of wine fraud. Yeah, for the vintage stuff you're s

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>o l basically, yes, you just have to really trust

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 1>where it's coming from. Probably hire an expert, and um,

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe stay away from rodent stock if you're Bill Coke, right,

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that's right. But there Yeah, like you said, the modern

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>guys are using things like um R f I D tags,

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>um QR codes that you scan and it takes you

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to a website or something. Microchips like you have in

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>your doll Yeah, so you can track the actual bottle.

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 1>There's also like tamper proof um capsules, the that the

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:12.479
<v Speaker 1>wine is encased in the bottle's neck that when that's open,

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it changes color if it's ever been opened, and some

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 1>actually alert the Internet or I guess back home at

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 1>headquarters the Internet once it's been open. And there's another

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:28.840
<v Speaker 1>one that's pretty cool. There's this company that inserts a

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>specific DNA marker into like the ink on the label

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:37.839
<v Speaker 1>that can't be counterfeit and that they can go back

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and later and be like, no, this is real. At

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the very least, we know the labels real. And Rudy

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>case case, he had a bunch of credit card charges

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 1>for glue and labels and ink and he and he

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>had a pretty nice trail of evidence behind him. Yeah,

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:53.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it's not very smart with it. Well, I mean,

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>if his apartment was just a counterfeiting factor, and then

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>lastly checked the one of the pieces of evidence that

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people point to when they say that

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>UM wine fraud is a big deal. UM is eBay. Yeah.

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:11.760
<v Speaker 1>You can go on eBay and spend a hundred bucks

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:16.400
<v Speaker 1>on a empty bottle that, if it weren't empty, would

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 1>go for a thousand or ten thousand or whatever. And

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the idea behind it, of course, is that somebody's filling

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it up and putting it back on the market as

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a counterfeit. Why would someone sell that that reason to

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 1>make a hundred bucks on a ten tho dollar bottle

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of wine? Some people love money, I don't know. It

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>just seems like a lot of just people who buy

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that kind of wine. I don't picture them going on

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:45.439
<v Speaker 1>eBay and running auctions over it. Makes you wonder also

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:47.880
<v Speaker 1>if like those are people who they're like, they're just

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:50.440
<v Speaker 1>working at a restaurant, and well, that's what it sounds

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>like to me. You can take that home and put

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it on anybay. The servant throws the uh, you know,

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 1>cleans up after the dinner party. Yeah, that's what I figure.

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>What's going on? And apparently a lot of restaurants now

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>because of guys like Rudy Kay and uh Hardy Rhodes.

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Rodent Stock now um smash vintage bottles once the wine

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>has been ordered and drunk with. Well with the shotgun

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in the skeet shooting, I got one last thing. Supposedly

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 1>there were only five magnums of ninety seven Fleur produced

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 1>uh between two thousand and five and two thousand seven,

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 1>eighteen magnums of ninety seven La Fleur were sold at auction.

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 1>That's so easy to like, how can that happen? That's

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>so easy to check when there's only five of something.

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 1>The argument is that either the guy who works at

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 1>La Fleur and did in ninety seven and says no,

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 1>there was only five magnums doesn't remember because the record

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:53.840
<v Speaker 1>keeping in like Burgundy is terrible back in the day um,

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 1>or that the there's just no will. There's so much

0:38:57.239 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of a market for counterfeit wine and there's not enough

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>pressure being put on the people who are actually selling

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it are allowing it to happen, that it's just whatever.

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>And supposedly, now that America has gotten more and more savvy,

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 1>this counterfeit market is moving over to China. So where

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 1>there's like a lot of wealth coming up and not

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of wine education and people are just getting

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 1>taken for rides. Man good stuff. Yeah, this is a

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 1>good one man, good pick. If you want to know

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:27.800
<v Speaker 1>more about wine fraud, you can type those words in

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the search bar house to works dot com and I

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 1>said search bar should chuck. What is it time for Facebook? Question?

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 1>All right? Sometimes we pool questions from Facebook to answer them.

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 1>So what we're doing now? This is from Diane Martin,

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Diane F. Martin. UH Center podcasts are essentially what would

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 1>be called literature reviews and research lingo. How do you

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 1>decide which references to include an exclude, use any kind

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of quality indicators to this side what you will and

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 1>will include, especially when they're deeply debated. There's a good question. Um,

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about our research process. I think we tried

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to use peer reviewed journals and what I mean, if

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:15.840
<v Speaker 1>we find something on the internet, we try and double

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and triple check that information. I know, a big giveaway

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you always talk about as if it's the same exact

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:23.840
<v Speaker 1>thing printed a bunch, that's usually a sign that it

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 1>could be bogus, like riding a danger field, being in

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the scale and the movie The Scout. Uh, but it

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:32.800
<v Speaker 1>still bears mentioning. Sure, you just have to mention it

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 1>with the caveat. We don't find it credible, but it's

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:38.279
<v Speaker 1>out there because it doesn't. It exists in some form

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of fashion. Uh, scientific journals, medical journals, I mean peer reviewed.

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just a great way to go if you can

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>get your hands on it. I remember this great article

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>called like why is science behind a paywall? About the

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 1>basically the cart the science publishing cartel. But if you

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 1>can get your hands on pure reviewed stuff, that's the

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>best stuff to work with. Agreed, go ahead. Another question, Yeah,

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Chuck for me? This from Shane Elliott. I knew I

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 1>think he meant no because question will find a special

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 1>place in Chuck's heart. What are your favorite types and

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 1>kinds of beers? And why do you brew your own beer?

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:23.879
<v Speaker 1>And somebody else said recently on Twitter that you said

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:25.839
<v Speaker 1>in the beer episode that you were going to get

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:28.279
<v Speaker 1>into homebrewing. Did you ever? So that's a two part

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>question for you, Chuck from Twitter and Facebook. Well you're

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a beer guy too, I like, I do not brew

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 1>my beer, but on the record, is really liking I

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>P A S and o. There's a backlash going on

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:43.279
<v Speaker 1>now why because there's so many of them, and people

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 1>are like, there's other kinds of beers in the world.

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I pas tastes like soap. I love. I love anything

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that's super hoppy. Yeah, I do. I just that's what

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I like. Our friend Dave dropped by from Sweetwater Sweetwater

0:41:55.280 --> 0:41:58.799
<v Speaker 1>and brought us some hot hash. I haven't tried it yet,

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>have you know? But his all that stuff is good.

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Sweetwater does a great job. And we've always both kind

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:08.839
<v Speaker 1>of agreed that uh uh Sierra Nevada Palele is one

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 1>of the great all time great, but there's so many

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:14.759
<v Speaker 1>great ones. Bells too hearted. I love man, that might

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:17.319
<v Speaker 1>be the best ever. Yeah, and that plenty of the

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:19.319
<v Speaker 1>elder we got sent some of that that was delicious.

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Um Oh here in Athens, Georgia. Creature Comforts tropically have

0:42:24.080 --> 0:42:28.319
<v Speaker 1>not had that one delicious um Orphee is Brewing is

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 1>here in Atlanta, and they make a sour that I

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:35.400
<v Speaker 1>tried that was really really good. I'm not into the sours.

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Have you tried it sours? Yeah? Yeah, I don't like it.

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I love it now. I don't give it so weird

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that I was like this is kind of good. Yeah,

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:45.959
<v Speaker 1>it was weird in a good way, because sometimes weird

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 1>can just be novel and you're like, okay, I tried that,

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it's done. This is I mean, I like it. Yeah,

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't like wheat beers. Um Belgium whites not a fan.

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:02.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, there's your it's her fish bowl. Now I'm thirsty,

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Blig. Other than Atlanta, what are your top five

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 1>favorite cities each? Geez, New York, San Francisco, Seattle. Do

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>they have to be American cities? Yeah? Uh in that case,

0:43:21.160 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 1>then I'll throw in Paris and uh London. Look at me? Well,

0:43:26.640 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 1>fancy things, I know. Uh, let's see. I love Hiroshima,

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:36.279
<v Speaker 1>Japan is a really neat city. So is Kyoto. I'm

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna make those tied for one though. Of course New York. Um,

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:44.320
<v Speaker 1>let's see you are? I like DC a lot too. Yeah,

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:50.879
<v Speaker 1>that's a great time. Um Rome, Italy is surprisingly neat. Surprisingly,

0:43:50.960 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>what are you getting? I mean it's a major cities, yeah,

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's packed with people, so you would think like, hey,

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a city, sure, but it also has I mean,

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 1>like you just walking along the street and all of

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a sudden you're walking next to like a three thousand

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:07.800
<v Speaker 1>year old wall that's not even part of a museum.

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:10.840
<v Speaker 1>He just built up around it. Yeah. Did there'd be

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:13.919
<v Speaker 1>like a fountain on a corner, like somebody's peeing in

0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a thousand years old. It's it's a very neat

0:44:17.200 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 1>city in that regard. Um, I like, uh where else? Um,

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that's all I can come up with right now. Oh

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I don't have to go off fancy

0:44:30.760 --> 0:44:33.480
<v Speaker 1>pants like Charleston, South Carolina one of my favorite it's

0:44:33.480 --> 0:44:37.919
<v Speaker 1>a great place for food. Savannah. Yeah, I like Charleston.

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, they're similar to me. Yeah, Charleston is a

0:44:42.600 --> 0:44:48.160
<v Speaker 1>little more refined, but also a little more modern. Yeah yeah, yeah,

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't. It's not fancy pants to like cities overseas, no,

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I know. But when once his Paris, you're like, yeah,

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:57.160
<v Speaker 1>but Paris is awesome. It is. It's a great time

0:44:57.320 --> 0:45:00.279
<v Speaker 1>in London. When's the last time you're in London, like

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:04.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty years ago? Okay, you should go back because London

0:45:04.360 --> 0:45:07.359
<v Speaker 1>is like a brand new city. There's something to do

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:10.759
<v Speaker 1>at all times. Now. They have cabs, which was apparently

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:14.479
<v Speaker 1>like the big thing that changed there. Um, And it's

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:17.759
<v Speaker 1>just an awesome, little town beautiful. Well maybe we can

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:21.359
<v Speaker 1>go there on a tour. Yes, let's uh, well, that's

0:45:21.360 --> 0:45:24.880
<v Speaker 1>your turn for the question. Uh. This is from Gus M. Parker.

0:45:25.440 --> 0:45:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Why did Josh grow his hair? Gus, there's a simple

0:45:28.360 --> 0:45:31.640
<v Speaker 1>answer that that's a good question because I can't because

0:45:31.680 --> 0:45:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I realized that I have hair, and I'm going to

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:38.839
<v Speaker 1>live it up while I got it. I'm gonna go

0:45:38.960 --> 0:45:42.919
<v Speaker 1>with Gary Rickleman. What is the best flavor of pop tart? Hint,

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 1>there was only one correct answer. That's not true, Gary.

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I think what the answer you're looking for is brown

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:53.920
<v Speaker 1>sugar and cinnamon. It's a good one. There's nothing wrong

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:57.400
<v Speaker 1>with blueberry or strawberry. Strawberry is really good as frosted

0:45:57.400 --> 0:45:59.800
<v Speaker 1>straws as long as it's frosted. That's the key. Like

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:02.480
<v Speaker 1>there's another key. And here's a tip for you that

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:05.760
<v Speaker 1>don't mind clogging your arteries. Pop it out of the toaster.

0:46:05.960 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I know you don't want to get a stick of

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:10.240
<v Speaker 1>butter and rub it on the back of the dry

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:13.120
<v Speaker 1>side and then around the edges of the other side

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and just thank me later. I have not tried that,

0:46:16.080 --> 0:46:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and I actually heard that before from Jessica Simpson when

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:23.000
<v Speaker 1>she was pregnant. Oh really, apparently just went berserk on

0:46:23.120 --> 0:46:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the buttered pop tarts. Never heard of that. You got

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:28.320
<v Speaker 1>time for one more? Yeah, we got time for a

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:32.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of morning This an unusual one from Michael Snively

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:35.279
<v Speaker 1>or Snoopiley, one of the two, probably Snively. If the

0:46:35.360 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Bryant and Clark were units of measure, what would they measure? Oh? Man,

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 1>mine would probably oh I know what mine would be

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:47.959
<v Speaker 1>as some uh sweat level, like units of sweat per

0:46:48.480 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 1>square inch or something that's a good one. Mine would

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:59.280
<v Speaker 1>measure the distance between any one place and awesome. Oh wow,

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:03.480
<v Speaker 1>whoa how is that? That's good? Thank you? All right?

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I got one more. Chelsea Hamilton's what's the most rewarding thing?

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:07.400
<v Speaker 1>That stuff you should know has brought to you or

0:47:07.440 --> 0:47:09.839
<v Speaker 1>allowed you to do. We've done a lot of really

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:12.080
<v Speaker 1>neat things that were very thankful for. But I'm gonna

0:47:12.120 --> 0:47:15.479
<v Speaker 1>just say the live shows because they're so much fun.

0:47:15.600 --> 0:47:17.000
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of fun and it's fun to

0:47:17.000 --> 0:47:18.680
<v Speaker 1>go to cities I've never been to, and it's fun

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to meet people and get out of this little room. Uh,

0:47:21.480 --> 0:47:24.239
<v Speaker 1>this is very rewarding and very fun. I'm going with

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Chuck s answer at right. Uh well, thanks to everybody

0:47:27.719 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 1>for those Facebook questions. UM. If you ever want to

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:32.840
<v Speaker 1>get in touch with us on Facebook, you can go

0:47:32.880 --> 0:47:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to Facebook dot com slash Stuff you Should Know. You

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>can also tweet to us at s y s K podcast.

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:41.239
<v Speaker 1>That's our handle. You can send us a good old

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 1>fastioned email to stuff podcast the House, Stuff Works dot

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:46.719
<v Speaker 1>com and as always, joined us at our home on

0:47:46.760 --> 0:47:53.719
<v Speaker 1>the web. Stuff you Should Know dot com. Stuff you

0:47:53.719 --> 0:47:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Should Know is a production of iHeart Radio's How Stuff

0:47:55.960 --> 0:47:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Works for more podcasts for my heart Radio because at

0:47:58.400 --> 0:48:00.719
<v Speaker 1>the iHeart Radio app, Apple podcas tests, or where ever

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:07.319
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows. H m hm