WEBVTT - US Reversal On ZTE Shows Weakness On Trade Negotiations: Miller

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. The

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>tone is more positive in markets today and a lot

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of people are saying that this because the trade tensions

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>between US and China have eased. Why, well, it all

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>has to do with this company, ZTE Corporation. And here

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>to tell us what happened and what the significance of

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>this is is Leland Miller, chief executive of the China

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Beige Book International in New York. Leland, thank you so

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. So just lay out in

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>broad strokes what happened and why this is a huge

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>deal in your opinion. Well, there's a lot of things

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that are going on on the on the trade side,

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and you've got the tariff list, multiple tariff lists. We've

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>got investment protection regimes that have been rumored for a

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>long time. Uh. You also have a crackdown on on

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>certain corporates, and the one that China is really really

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>upset about is this recent crackdown on z T, which

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>is one of their major telecom firms. It's one of

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 1>the two big ones along with Huawei. And what essentially

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>was done over the past month until potentially UH pulled

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>reversed by a tweet over the over the weekend, was

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a um A near life almost a ban UH lifetime

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>ban of of the z T equipment. ZT was not

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna be sold United States. They were being punished for

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>violation of US law. Essentially, the US was gonna put

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>z T out of business and and now well hold on.

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>So the Commerce Department enforced certain bands on z T

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>products and the reason why was because they had been

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>selling to Iran and North Korea. Is that right it is?

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>And then they lied about it and were caught lying

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 1>about it, and so this was a particularly egregious example

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Chinese cheating. You know, if the if the

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>entire the entire U S. China trade push is about

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 1>cutting down on China's cheating, then this was the ultimate

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>example of brazenness and UH and cheating that hurt US

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:26.679
<v Speaker 1>consumers in U S. NAH security and so the reversal

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of this has significant repercussions beyond just a concession or

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:34.519
<v Speaker 1>a chip that the President is offering up. Z t

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>E uses components that are made by Qualit, Common Intel correct. Correct,

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and those companies cannot sell those products to z T

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>E because of current regulations. That was that was the

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>recent decision. Yes, okay, so the President would have to

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>reverse that in order to allow that that take place. Correct.

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>And what's happening right now is is that the Commerce

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 1>Department came out with a very strong language about how

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:08.239
<v Speaker 1>much ZT had transgressed over the past few years. Wilbur

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Ross had headed that up. And now what the tweet

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>suggests is that President Trump has ordered Secretary Ross to

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>reevaluate his conclusion on this and to find a way

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to get around it. So it puts Secretary Ross in

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a very difficult position here because some of the stuff

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>he said is really impossible to walk back. All Right,

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So let's zoom out a little bit, because a lot

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:29.839
<v Speaker 1>of people are looking at this deal and saying, well,

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this is This shows that President Trump has taken a

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>softer line with China, is perhaps not as interested in

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>having a trade war that a lot of people say nobody,

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>nobody can win. This is a good thing for world

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>peace and world commerce. Why why is that not the case? Well,

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the question is, you know, what is the US side

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>pushing for. I mean, that's been the question from day

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>one and has not yet been answered. If this is

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>pushing towards a more equal relationship, if this is pushing for, um,

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a reckoning on the trade theft to eliminate hurdles for

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the future, then all of this is good. Nobody wants

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a terror for nobody wants a trade war. But if

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're showing, if you're from the US perspective,

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're showing weakness that a foreign company can exert

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>some economic leverage over you and have you reverse Nash

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>security decisions, it's a problem. It's also a problem if

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you go into a trade negotiation thinking that the trade

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>deficit is what you should be negotiating instead of market

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>access or intellectual property theft or some of these other

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>important things that really do affect businesses and consumers. So

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the question is what have we done this all for,

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>And if it ends up being something that sort of

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>dwindles out over the course of the next few weeks,

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and months, which which I don't think will happen. Then

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>then you you're basically telling China that they've that they

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 1>have a ready made formula for putting this behind them,

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and um, they don't have to to worry about these

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>things which just a few weeks ago were worthy of

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>a trade war. So it's it's it's all very bizarre.

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Does it also matter that it coincides with the visit

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to the United States and the Vice Premier Leu the

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Chinese trade negotiator, so that what was told by the

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Chinese to the U. S side was that they wouldn't

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 1>have the delegation unless CT was taken care of. So

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the President wanted to make sure this trade delegation happened,

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 1>not mostly because there was trade stuff to discuss to discuss,

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>but also because North Korea is playing into this, and

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>so you've got a few different issues at play here.

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>You don't want disruption in front of the North Korea summit.

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>You don't want any of this trade war stuff to

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>blow up before the U. S has a plan in place,

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 1>and they've been very slow getting the documents for three

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>oh one ready, So the President apparently did not want

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 1>to lose steam on this and and decided to to

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>make the ZT decision. Um that said, all of this

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>is part of a long process. And whether Leoho visits

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>this week and they come to a mini bargain many

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>many deal, not a bargain um, then you know this.

0:05:57.880 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 1>This is something that's going to go on for a

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>long time. I want to thank you very much for

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.119
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Leland Miller is the chief executive of China

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>beige Book International. You can follow their work on Twitter

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>at China beige Book. Talking about the President of the

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>United States, Donald Trump and his tweet regarding ZTE Corp.

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>And perhaps easing trade sanctions against the company. I want

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to pick up on what Dave mentioned, Scientific Games rising

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>more than ten percent, so the shares also avoid Gaming

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and GM and several other gaming companies also rising significantly

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 1>on the news that the Supreme Court struck down a

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>federal law that bars gambling on individual sporting events. Joining

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>US now, I am pleased to say Brian Eager, he

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is senior gaming and lodging analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence. Brian,

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>how big of a deal is this decision by the U. S.

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court? So if you think of the pool um

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:12.239
<v Speaker 1>of basically would have to date been illegal sports bets

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that have been taking place, and you you assign a

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>reasonable wind whole rate to that, there's probably about a

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half billion dollar UH newly released revenue

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunity across h the across the states that would now

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>have an opportunity to have legalized sports betting. Among those,

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey and Pennsylvania are kind of front of the line,

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey being the petitioner here in Pennsylvania having recently

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>legalized on sports betting, but certainly an opportunity that both

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>casino operators and the back end operators of sports books

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>would all likely capitalize on. So who are some of

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the big winners? I mean, Lisa was mentioning some of

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the stocks, also adding BOYD Gaming, as she mentioned up

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more than three ten, National Gaming up

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>four and a half percent, Empire Resorts higher by ten percent.

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>So I would kind of breaking it down at least

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>additionally into three categories. First, you've got operators like MGM

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and Caesars that have existing operations in Nevada and also

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>an Atlantic city. Those are the two major public companies

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that have operations in the Atlantic City market, which is

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the petitioners here which be likely to benefit. Another subgroup

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>which we used to kind of touched upon our companies

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>like Churchill Downs, Boyd Gaming, National Gaming, El Dorado Resorts,

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>which either have or are in the process of acquiring

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>assets in the Pennsylvania market that stayed also legalized sports

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>betting subject to the Supreme Courts repeal of pasta which

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>happened today. And then the third group, Tim and Lisa

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 1>is the operators of the various gaming systems of sports

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>book operators. A couple comes to mind. William Hill, the

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>British company operates of all the Vada based retail sports books.

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>You've got the Stars group that acquired Sky Betting, and

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>then you've got Scientific Game which Lisa mentioned, which recently

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>acquired m i X Gaming, which has an open bet

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>platform which has the ability although right now UH takes

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>place in the UK to operate kind of the back

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>end of the sports betting platforms. So you basically got

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Jersey operators, You've got the operators in

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>other regional states, and then you've got the operators of

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the equipment and systems that could benefit from the expansion

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of sports books nationwide. Just to give a sense of

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:34.199
<v Speaker 1>how big a business this is. According to one research unit,

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Americans place a hundred and fifty billion dollars a year

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>in illegal sports bets. Other research firms put that at

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a much lower amount. But I'm just wondering, from your

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>perspective or most of these online do most people like

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 1>to go to a venue? What's sort of the look

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of the most popular place to bet on individual teams? So,

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the sports books in Nevada, although they only generate about

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>two of the total gaming revenue in that state, are

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>big traffic generators. They're not necessarily a sizeable casino ways

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>or generator, but they generate excitement that makes its way

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>by way of casino play into the gaming portions of

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the casinos. You've got that portion right now. Gaming sports

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>betting only legal on an unrestricted basis uh A Nevada.

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.559
<v Speaker 1>The hundred fifty billion dollar number you mentioned, that's the

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>American Gaming Association estimate of that amount currently wagered illegally

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>on sports betting. And so you put a five percent

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>hold rate on that, you get that the seven and

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:35.559
<v Speaker 1>a half billion dollar revenue opportunity I mentioned. And to

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>answer your other question, you know physical venues actual sports

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>books UH where a lot of the action takes place.

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>But all these companies, among them William Pill and others

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>have kind of the mobile platforms UH the other ways,

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>where within the state's legal bounds, you could use a

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>mobile device, smartphone device, etcetera to place your bets. So

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly mobile is the direction of the future, even though

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a large physical presence of these sports books.

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:04.719
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you very much for joining us

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and shedding light on this issue. Brian Edgar is our

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>expert when it comes to gaming and lodging for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>He's our senior industry analysts and just taking a look

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>once again at some of the stocks making moves as

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a result of the Supreme Court decision avoiding the ban

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>on national sports. But well, just last week we learned

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that Alliance Bernstein is going to relocate about a thousand

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of its employees to UH to Memphis, Nashville, Tennessee. I

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>beg your pardon, and perhaps it has to do with

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>compensation levels and making the money go a little bit further.

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Here to tell us more about compensation and incentive pay

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in the financial industry is Alan Johnson, President Managing director

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and founder of Johnson Associates, Alan, thanks very much for

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>being with us. What is the current trend in terms

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of compensation and head count in the financial services industry?

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Will get into the specifics later, but what is the

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>general trend that you're seeing. Compensation is projected to be

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>higher in two thousand and eighteen, and sentives are probably

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be up five or ten percent. Um Uh,

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>it's probably more of a mixed bag. And um in

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>recruiting and employment, probably more outside the traditional money centers,

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 1>more more in other parts of the country of the world. Um,

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's got that's a little bit more of a

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>mixed bag. But clearly compensation is trending up for two

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eighteen. Yeah. Alan, Well, if it weren't, I'd

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>be shocked because pretty much across the board we've seen

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>gains over the past twelve months. And Allen, I'm so

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>glad you could join us, because really, if you want

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to know what's going on in Wall Street, just check

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the bonuses and that will tell you everything you need

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to know. And I was looking just to dig into

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the details. I noticed that hedge funds, the average bonus

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>was a zero to five increase from last year, whereas

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>private equity was five to ten higher than last year.

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk a little bit about that and sort

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of what this tells you as far as private equity

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>being more of the place to be right now. Well,

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>private equity is continuing its momentum from the last three

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>or four years, the up the the higher markets. They

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>have had great realizations of prior investments. They have been

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>able to go out in fund raise. So private equity

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>is clicking on all cylinders. Hedge funds have had a

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>very difficult run in the last several years. There we're

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>projecting they're going to be up only slightly, perhaps zero

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to five incentives for this year, and again it's their

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:56.679
<v Speaker 1>fundamental business model of trying to beat the markets is

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>much harder UM, so they're one of the two different ends.

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Private equity continues to be on a roll of hedge funds.

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully the volatility will help them, but it's a question mark. Well, Alan,

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe shift your attention now to investment in commercial banking

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and UM you say that the incentive pay would be

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>generally in line with the entire firm's performance. Correct, Yes,

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the the banks have done better. They don't get the

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>attention that they once did on their pay, but they

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>continue to do well. What's different than the past that

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>we all remember is that today it's somewhat of the

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>boring parts of the commercial banking, which is commercial lending, retail,

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>credit cards, cars, things that are steady and profitable um,

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>but not as much of their business is the more

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>um risky parts of the business that they used to

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>do so well ahead. One thing I'm wondering is how

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the bonuses at US banks compared to those at European

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>banks and whether you've seen in a pretty big attrition

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>out of European banks and into into the US ones. Now,

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a very good question. The US banks continue to

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>not only a business but all pay perspective, continue to

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>move ahead. The European banks have kind of been in

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>lembo now for a number of years. We saw Deutsche

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Bank cutting back and others, so they have not had

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the progress that the US banks have had in the

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>last five or so years, either from a business results,

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>stock price, or pay um. They are lagging UM significantly well.

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>But I have to wonder just you know, with Deutch

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a bank, for example, I'd heard a while back that

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>they were actually offering some huge bonuses to try to

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>get talented people to come join them, given how much

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>bad press they've gotten. And I wonder if you do

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>see more sort of one off huge compensation offers from

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>banks that are looking to sort of revive their franchise.

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>You certainly don't see that as much in the United

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 1>States because they don't need to to do the have

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and they don't want to. I think they don't need

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you because sorry to break in, but they don't need

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to because there are so many people looking for jobs

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that they can hire. Uh, most of them are got

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a pretty stable um cadre of senior people. They don't

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>really need. They don't need the savior at this point.

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>They're they're they're certainly looking for really good people, and

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>they're certainly going to pay a lot for expensive people,

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>but they don't need the savior you mentioned. If you're

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>more troubled or more um in a in a fall,

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you're more likely to go out and spend an awful

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of money a free agent um and perhaps overpay um.

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>The U S banks historically have always done that, but

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it certainly in the last five years or more they

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have not felt the need to or weren't allowed to

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>do that. Um, So you know you're right if you're

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>If you're going to hear an outsized number, it's not

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>likely to be a brand name US Bank. It's likely

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to be somebody from probably from Europe. All Right, just

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>really quickly, about thirty seconds. I don't know if you

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>saw the news, Goldman Sachs is just announcing that to

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>heads out of the three that lead the securities division

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>are planning to retire. Just really quickly. Is this is

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>this a significant thing? Um? I think it's a significant

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>move for those two individuals. But certainly Goldman traditionally has

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 1>had duel heads and a lot of businesses to give

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>them a deeper bench. Um So, I don't think it

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>tells you anything that they continue to rotate quality people

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>through these jobs, and they've been I think the biggest

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>practitioner of having dual heads, which they have. Their view

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>is we need a deeper bench than relying on a

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, just a single person most of the time.

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>So they still have somebody left from that team. Allan Johnson,

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us today. Always a

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>pleasure and always important to take a look at what

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>those bonuses are showing us about Wall Street Allan Johnson,

0:17:47.920 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>managing director and founder of Johnson Associates, the shares of

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>n XP Semiconductor. They are hired by about nine and

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 1>a half percent after Chinese regulators have restarted their review

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of Quacom's application to acquire an XP Semiconductors. They previously

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 1>had shelved this work in reaction to growing trade tensions

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:25.679
<v Speaker 1>with the United States. This according to people familiar with

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the matter, So better who better than Victoria Espinel, the

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>president and the chief executive of the Business Software Alliance

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 1>b s a UH to tell us a little bit

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>more about what's going on when it comes to trade,

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property and technology between the United States and China.

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>She's also the president of Software dot org and she

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 1>can be followed on Twitter at Victoria Espinel. She joins

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>us in our eleven three oh studios. Victoria, thank you

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>very much for being with us UM. Just to give

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>people the background prior to being the head of the

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the b s a UM, you or the United States

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 1>in Collectual Property Enforcement Coordinator for the White House UH,

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:07.199
<v Speaker 1>and you were appointed by President Barack Obama back in

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>September of two thousand nine. So what is your take

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>on the back and forth over intellectual property and technology

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>issues between the United States and China that currently are

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>in the headlines. So this has been a long standing

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>issue UM. In fact, before my time at the White House,

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>I was a trade negotiator UM under the President Bush's

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>administration from two thousand and one to two thousand seven,

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>and I was the chief Intellectual property trade negotiator for

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the United States. But these concerns between the United and

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.959
<v Speaker 1>United States and China have predated even my time at USTR.

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>And so this is I think we're seeing what may

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>becoming close to the culmination of a long history of

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 1>concerns where some things in China have gotten better, but

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>other things have have gotten worse potentially. And I think

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.719
<v Speaker 1>speaking from the respective of the software industry, well, we

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely have concerns about intellectual property in China. I think

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>there are a are types of market access barriers that

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>are potentially even more concerning, so for example, joint venture

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>rules or the cybersecurity regulations that China has in place.

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>All that said, China is an incredibly important, perhaps the

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>most important bilateral trading partner that we have with the

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>United States, and so what I think is important for

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 1>everyone to remember at this point is what we really

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>need is for the United States in China to be

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 1>having a constructive dialogue and be working together on solutions

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 1>that are going to benefit both of us. I don't

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's it is it's not beneficial for China or

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>the United States to be harmed in this process. Um.

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>And the second point I would make is it's about

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States in China, but it's also about the

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>global economy. And so one thing that I think would

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 1>be very helpful that we're not seeing that much of

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>at the moment is for the United States to be

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>working with other countries as well. This is not just

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>about the United States in China. This is about making

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the global economy work well. And I think, um, while

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>it has been hardening to see the administration working through

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 1>organizations like the World Trade Organization to a certain extent, um,

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the more that we the United States can

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 1>be building alliances and we the United States can be

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>working constructively with a range of countries, including with China,

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that's ultimately that's going to be helpful for everyone. So

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>one sort of battle that's being waged between China and

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the US aside from the very clear headlines about trade

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 1>tensions is over artificial intelligence, and China has made a

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>real concerted effort to push forward any new technology on

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that front. The White House had a meeting last week

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>where it had the executive of some of the leading

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.679
<v Speaker 1>tech companies in the US, and White House officials said, listen,

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>if you want to experiment develop artificial intelligence, go crazy.

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 1>We are going to have a very light touch with

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>respect to regulating this. What is the cutting edge of

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.479
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence? And how important is this sort of lazy,

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>fair at tude by US representatives. So I think artificial

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>intelligence is already and will become even more important to

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>our economy. So then the same way that trans software

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>transformed every sector of the economy. I mean, software is

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>like electricity, It is used by literally everyone, I think

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 1>eventually artificial intelligence is going to rise to that same

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 1>level of being a truly transformative technology in terms there

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of different kinds of artificial intelligence. And

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>so one of the things that you're reading the headlines

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>in terms of China's investments and research, um, you know,

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>China is investing significant amounts of money, not just at

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the central level, but at the prevential level. At the

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>same time, in the United States, more through the private

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>sector and through UM we are also having significant investments

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>in artificial intelligence. And speaking for the software industry, I

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>think what we are most focused on is how you

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>can use artificial intelligence to try to help people make

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>decisions better, So decisions that people are already making, how

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:00.199
<v Speaker 1>to make how to give them the tools that they

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 1>are making those decisions more quickly and with more information.

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>And I can give you a couple of examples of that.

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>But I will also tell you I think this is

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be present in every sector, healthcare, finances, manufacturing, agriculture.

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, five to ten years from now,

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see the ripple effects of this across

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the industry. Give us, though, one concrete example, just so

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>we have a picture in our head. Sure, I'll give

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you one that's personally important to me. UM. So, I

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>have two boys, six and ten. UM And for a

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>very short period of time, Uh, my eldest son was

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 1>in the natal intensive care unit the nick you after

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>he was born. Uh And and happily he he was

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and is fine. But one of the things that's happening

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>in artificial intelligence right now that I think is really

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is really amazing as a mother, UH is that doctors

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>are using artificial intelligence to monitor the vital signs for

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>babies that are in nick u's and one of the

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>things that they have found in doing that at is

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that it is actually a danger sign for for very

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>small babies when they're vital signs stabilized, which is completely counterintuitive,

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>right you would think the vital signs are stabilized, that

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 1>means um that that child is doing better and therefore

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>care should move to another baby. In fact, that is

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>not the case. In fact, when vital signs stabilized, that

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>is actually a very good predictor that a crash is coming,

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and so monitoring of that babies should be increased rather

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>than decreased or the amount of care and attention to

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it um. Doctors still don't know exactly why this is,

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>but one of the things with artificial intelligence is it

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 1>can be great to know why, but sometimes it also

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>just mataged to know that it is. And this is UH.

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>This is changing the way that doctors are treating UH

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>babies that are in native and that are in the

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>nick us and I think it's really important that that

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>is one example, you can look at almost any hairry

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of health care right now and see the advances that

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>are being made in artificial intelligence, and most of them

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 1>go to to be more specific, they go to increasing

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 1>the accuracy of diagnoses, increasing the speed of diagnosis, and

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 1>then coming up with treatment plans that may not have

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>been as obvious to the doctors without the ability to

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>use artificial intelligence tools. I'm just wondering if you could

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>just give us maybe a twenty second update. In the

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>world of piracy and the piracy of either stealing software

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 1>code or intellectual property, it can be anything from movies

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to music. But that's also a big concern for technology companies. So,

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think for software, I don't like the

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>term piracy and I don't use it. You know. I

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>think we encourage We think all companies should use software

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>within the terms of their licenses. But I don't think

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it's company that isn't is not an organization that I

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 1>would call a pirate. UM. I think there are, particularly

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in counterfeit pharmaceuticals, there are organizations involved in criminal distribution UM,

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's reprehensible behavior because of the public

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>safety impacts that it can have. UM. You know, I

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>think There's there's a lot of progress that's been made

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>in terms of trying to address intellectual property issues, and

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to continue. Victoria Espinel, thank you

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us. Victoria Espinel as President

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and chief executive officer of the Business Software Alliance based

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, d C. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 1>p m L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa abramoits one before the podcast. You

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.