1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:06,760 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. 2 00:00:11,960 --> 00:00:15,560 Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene along 3 00:00:15,600 --> 00:00:18,960 Speaker 2: with Paul Sweeney. Join us each day for insight from 4 00:00:18,960 --> 00:00:23,160 Speaker 2: the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. You 5 00:00:23,160 --> 00:00:26,520 Speaker 2: can also watch the show live on YouTube. Visit the 6 00:00:26,520 --> 00:00:31,280 Speaker 2: Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube to see the show weekday 7 00:00:31,280 --> 00:00:34,320 Speaker 2: mornings from seven to ten am Eastern from our global 8 00:00:34,360 --> 00:00:39,000 Speaker 2: headquarters in New York City. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, 9 00:00:39,360 --> 00:00:42,920 Speaker 2: or anywhere else you listen. And always I'm Bloomberg Radio, 10 00:00:43,080 --> 00:00:47,720 Speaker 2: the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business App. Richard Clarita 11 00:00:47,840 --> 00:00:50,279 Speaker 2: comes back for more this morning. Thank you so much 12 00:00:50,320 --> 00:00:51,640 Speaker 2: for joining Bloomberg this morning. 13 00:00:51,840 --> 00:00:53,640 Speaker 3: As always, thanks for having me. 14 00:00:53,840 --> 00:00:57,320 Speaker 2: What changed yesterday? The fact that I understand there's some 15 00:00:57,400 --> 00:01:01,160 Speaker 2: geopolitical yield going on there is well, but we had 16 00:01:01,320 --> 00:01:06,640 Speaker 2: fixed income up yield down equities to the moon. What 17 00:01:07,600 --> 00:01:11,280 Speaker 2: was the FED signaling that gave markets confidence? 18 00:01:12,680 --> 00:01:13,600 Speaker 4: I think a couple things. 19 00:01:13,600 --> 00:01:15,920 Speaker 3: First of all, one could argue that, if anything, the 20 00:01:16,000 --> 00:01:19,720 Speaker 3: FMC statement itself maybe was a little bit less dubbish 21 00:01:20,080 --> 00:01:23,640 Speaker 3: than folks might have thought. But yet again, the press conference, 22 00:01:23,680 --> 00:01:26,640 Speaker 3: I think a fair reading of the press conference was 23 00:01:26,680 --> 00:01:29,360 Speaker 3: that it skewed a bit dubbish. Now, again, the moving 24 00:01:29,440 --> 00:01:33,440 Speaker 3: prices was quite small. The September cut was fully priced 25 00:01:33,440 --> 00:01:37,479 Speaker 3: in before the meeting, it's fully priced in after the meeting. 26 00:01:37,520 --> 00:01:40,319 Speaker 3: But this is a committee that cares about both sides. 27 00:01:39,959 --> 00:01:41,759 Speaker 4: Of the dual mandate. 28 00:01:41,959 --> 00:01:46,039 Speaker 3: They've made that clear now in the statement, and they 29 00:01:46,160 --> 00:01:50,160 Speaker 3: also made clear they're getting increasing confidence that inflation's on 30 00:01:50,240 --> 00:01:53,040 Speaker 3: a path to two. And finally that they actually discussed 31 00:01:53,760 --> 00:01:57,400 Speaker 3: at the meeting yesterday cutting rates at the meeting yesterday. 32 00:01:57,480 --> 00:01:59,800 Speaker 3: So all in, I think that's what the markets were 33 00:02:00,160 --> 00:02:00,920 Speaker 3: reacting to. 34 00:02:00,920 --> 00:02:04,120 Speaker 5: Tom Richard, there are folks in academia and in practice 35 00:02:04,160 --> 00:02:06,040 Speaker 5: in the marketplace that feel like the FED is already 36 00:02:06,040 --> 00:02:08,120 Speaker 5: behind the curve, that the real time data suggests that 37 00:02:08,200 --> 00:02:11,160 Speaker 5: the economy really is slowing, and by the time they 38 00:02:11,160 --> 00:02:13,680 Speaker 5: get cutting rates it may be too late. How do 39 00:02:13,680 --> 00:02:14,520 Speaker 5: you respond to that? 40 00:02:15,240 --> 00:02:17,800 Speaker 3: Well, good question, because I think that is a risk 41 00:02:17,919 --> 00:02:21,840 Speaker 3: they have been willing to take for a couple of years. Indeed, 42 00:02:21,880 --> 00:02:24,560 Speaker 3: Chirpal made that very clear of Jackson Hole in twenty 43 00:02:24,639 --> 00:02:29,160 Speaker 3: twenty two. As inflation has moved towards target from above, 44 00:02:29,760 --> 00:02:33,200 Speaker 3: they've increasingly and yesterday in the statement indicated that they 45 00:02:33,320 --> 00:02:35,760 Speaker 3: now are looking at both sides of the dual mandate. 46 00:02:36,160 --> 00:02:38,400 Speaker 4: That said, I agree with them. 47 00:02:38,480 --> 00:02:41,480 Speaker 3: I think the data coming in are certainly consistent with 48 00:02:41,520 --> 00:02:44,919 Speaker 3: an economy operating at or perhaps a bit above trend. 49 00:02:45,040 --> 00:02:48,080 Speaker 3: So I don't think they're in a danger zone here 50 00:02:48,160 --> 00:02:51,080 Speaker 3: of falling behind the curve. Moreover, they've made very clear 51 00:02:51,120 --> 00:02:54,440 Speaker 3: that if they do see any softening in the labor market, 52 00:02:55,040 --> 00:02:57,639 Speaker 3: looks like they won't hesitate to start cutting. So there's 53 00:02:57,720 --> 00:03:00,160 Speaker 3: risk management here. Agree, But I think I think think 54 00:03:00,160 --> 00:03:01,040 Speaker 3: they're in a good place. 55 00:03:01,240 --> 00:03:03,679 Speaker 2: You under sell this, you know, you got to get 56 00:03:03,680 --> 00:03:10,200 Speaker 2: some pr Richard. Basically, Richard Clarita made modern Columbia economics. 57 00:03:10,200 --> 00:03:12,960 Speaker 2: He took the heritage of a guy named Stiglitz, a 58 00:03:13,040 --> 00:03:15,760 Speaker 2: heritage of a guy named Phelps. There was some guy 59 00:03:15,840 --> 00:03:18,560 Speaker 2: doing fancy math at Princeton. He said, come on up 60 00:03:18,600 --> 00:03:22,160 Speaker 2: to Columbia, and what's amazing about this? Did you even 61 00:03:22,240 --> 00:03:26,680 Speaker 2: teach microeconomics at Colombia? Is still like Pierre Andre Chapori, 62 00:03:27,320 --> 00:03:30,000 Speaker 2: I mean, you got Mike, Well, how does microeconomics fit 63 00:03:30,080 --> 00:03:33,079 Speaker 2: in it Columbia? Unlike the madness at Chicago. 64 00:03:33,800 --> 00:03:36,400 Speaker 3: Well, I work in some micro in my classes. I 65 00:03:36,440 --> 00:03:38,840 Speaker 3: think it's best for all concern that I stick to 66 00:03:38,880 --> 00:03:42,320 Speaker 3: the stick to the macri. He also mentioned Bob Mundell, 67 00:03:42,400 --> 00:03:45,280 Speaker 3: who passed away not too long ago, a dear friend 68 00:03:45,280 --> 00:03:46,880 Speaker 3: and colleague. So at one point I think we had 69 00:03:47,240 --> 00:03:49,800 Speaker 3: four Nobel Laureates on the faculties. 70 00:03:49,840 --> 00:03:52,840 Speaker 2: So yeah, let's bring in our Nobel lawyate. Animong with 71 00:03:52,880 --> 00:03:56,360 Speaker 2: a question for the former vice chairman, Anamog of Chicago 72 00:03:56,520 --> 00:03:57,800 Speaker 2: in Bloomberg Economics. 73 00:03:58,000 --> 00:04:01,200 Speaker 1: Yeah, Richie mentioned that this committee is one that's very 74 00:04:01,240 --> 00:04:04,360 Speaker 1: focused on both sides of the mandate. And do you 75 00:04:04,520 --> 00:04:09,560 Speaker 1: think that going forward, you know, suppose that we do 76 00:04:09,720 --> 00:04:13,440 Speaker 1: have the Trump number two administration with what's happening with 77 00:04:13,520 --> 00:04:19,160 Speaker 1: the potentially higher tariffs, would that factor in into the 78 00:04:19,200 --> 00:04:23,480 Speaker 1: committee's September meeting deliberations or even November deliberations. Should they 79 00:04:23,560 --> 00:04:24,599 Speaker 1: turn preemptive? 80 00:04:25,000 --> 00:04:28,039 Speaker 2: Should we just leave the studio right exactly? That was 81 00:04:28,080 --> 00:04:32,320 Speaker 2: a totally unfair question. Rich Well. 82 00:04:32,360 --> 00:04:33,719 Speaker 3: First of all, An, as you know, I'm a big, 83 00:04:33,720 --> 00:04:36,159 Speaker 3: big fan of your work, So keep up the good work. 84 00:04:36,279 --> 00:04:38,719 Speaker 3: I think Jay Powell made it very clear yesterday he 85 00:04:38,760 --> 00:04:41,960 Speaker 3: got a couple of questions and he said, look, we're 86 00:04:41,960 --> 00:04:46,320 Speaker 3: going to base policy on achieving our mandate. I think 87 00:04:46,320 --> 00:04:48,479 Speaker 3: he mentioned he'd been at the FED for now four 88 00:04:48,520 --> 00:04:52,359 Speaker 3: presidential election cycles, so I don't think it will be 89 00:04:52,400 --> 00:04:54,600 Speaker 3: a factor. And I'm actually glad they clarify that because 90 00:04:54,600 --> 00:04:56,800 Speaker 3: there had been some meme in the markets that the 91 00:04:56,839 --> 00:04:59,240 Speaker 3: pal Fed might hold off doing anything to see how 92 00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:01,800 Speaker 3: the election turned out and that, and I think clearly 93 00:05:01,880 --> 00:05:03,640 Speaker 3: he set that aside. 94 00:05:03,320 --> 00:05:06,800 Speaker 2: And this was really something his voice changed. I'm sorry 95 00:05:07,760 --> 00:05:09,640 Speaker 2: this happens like man Q when he was at the 96 00:05:09,640 --> 00:05:12,560 Speaker 2: White House. Up you get upset, and all of a 97 00:05:12,600 --> 00:05:15,480 Speaker 2: sudden he go into Harvard lecture form when he got upset. 98 00:05:15,520 --> 00:05:17,760 Speaker 2: Bernanke used to do the same thing, And I asked 99 00:05:17,800 --> 00:05:19,480 Speaker 2: another question to make us look puny. 100 00:05:19,640 --> 00:05:22,200 Speaker 1: Yes, I want to push on that a little bit. 101 00:05:22,279 --> 00:05:22,479 Speaker 2: Rich. 102 00:05:22,640 --> 00:05:25,320 Speaker 1: You were there during the Trump first Trade War as 103 00:05:25,320 --> 00:05:28,760 Speaker 1: it was. I you understand you were brieved about the 104 00:05:28,760 --> 00:05:32,400 Speaker 1: inflationary impact of the first Trade War, and you probably 105 00:05:32,520 --> 00:05:36,240 Speaker 1: remember that the briefing was tilting toward saying that the 106 00:05:37,520 --> 00:05:40,960 Speaker 1: terrorists were inflationary, which didn't turn out to be. And 107 00:05:41,080 --> 00:05:43,840 Speaker 1: right now, the mainstream economy is Wall Street economis are 108 00:05:43,920 --> 00:05:47,320 Speaker 1: uniformally saying that it will be very inflationary. Again, what's 109 00:05:47,400 --> 00:05:48,960 Speaker 1: your thought on that, Well, there are. 110 00:05:48,880 --> 00:05:49,480 Speaker 4: A couple of things. 111 00:05:49,800 --> 00:05:54,559 Speaker 3: First, if anything, during my time at the FED before 112 00:05:54,600 --> 00:05:57,920 Speaker 3: the pandemic, inflation is running a little bit low. The 113 00:05:57,920 --> 00:06:01,200 Speaker 3: main thing that emerged at that point in twenty nineteen 114 00:06:01,400 --> 00:06:04,360 Speaker 3: was that the trade war. Concerns about the trade war 115 00:06:04,640 --> 00:06:09,560 Speaker 3: were very negative on economic activity and sentiment. I do 116 00:06:09,600 --> 00:06:14,200 Speaker 3: think the details will be important. I think that in particular, 117 00:06:15,040 --> 00:06:17,560 Speaker 3: there'd be an inclination depending on how there were structured, 118 00:06:17,600 --> 00:06:20,360 Speaker 3: if there were tariffs, to try to distinguish between if 119 00:06:20,400 --> 00:06:23,120 Speaker 3: it's moving up the price level like a value added tax, 120 00:06:23,120 --> 00:06:25,880 Speaker 3: whereas its inflationary. But I think the key thing for 121 00:06:25,920 --> 00:06:28,640 Speaker 3: your listeners to bear in mind is that's a decision 122 00:06:28,720 --> 00:06:31,000 Speaker 3: the Paler FED does not have to make now. They 123 00:06:31,040 --> 00:06:33,880 Speaker 3: made it very clear twenty twenty four rate decisions are 124 00:06:33,880 --> 00:06:36,839 Speaker 3: based on twenty twenty four data and outlook, they'll have 125 00:06:36,920 --> 00:06:40,680 Speaker 3: plenty of time to reassess and think about this as 126 00:06:40,680 --> 00:06:43,400 Speaker 3: they go into twenty twenty five. So good question, but 127 00:06:43,440 --> 00:06:45,479 Speaker 3: I don't think it will be a factor now. 128 00:06:45,600 --> 00:06:48,479 Speaker 6: You defended William McChesney. Martin Paul. One more question in 129 00:06:48,520 --> 00:06:49,960 Speaker 6: this section with rich clarity. 130 00:06:50,200 --> 00:06:53,640 Speaker 5: All right, let's assume the FED starts cutting in September. 131 00:06:54,200 --> 00:06:57,760 Speaker 5: Then what how do they prosecute this policy to get 132 00:06:57,839 --> 00:06:59,719 Speaker 5: rates down? Is that every other meeting? 133 00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:01,880 Speaker 2: Does that work well? 134 00:07:01,960 --> 00:07:04,840 Speaker 3: The TRIAD answers, it's data dependent, but I think they've 135 00:07:04,880 --> 00:07:07,719 Speaker 3: acknowledged that if they cut once, they will be thinking 136 00:07:07,760 --> 00:07:10,720 Speaker 3: there's more than one cut. We'll get good information on 137 00:07:10,800 --> 00:07:13,560 Speaker 3: that in the projections. We'll get another set of projections 138 00:07:14,040 --> 00:07:17,440 Speaker 3: in December. Here's what I think. I think they're basically 139 00:07:17,520 --> 00:07:20,840 Speaker 3: a couple scenarios. One is a very very soft landing, 140 00:07:20,880 --> 00:07:22,840 Speaker 3: you know, in the spirit of the Olympics, sticking the 141 00:07:22,960 --> 00:07:27,000 Speaker 3: soft landing. In that case, the econmomyist chugs along trend, 142 00:07:27,040 --> 00:07:30,040 Speaker 3: unemployment doesn't go up, inflation moves gradually down to two, 143 00:07:30,160 --> 00:07:33,520 Speaker 3: and then they can gradually cut rates as inflation falls. 144 00:07:33,800 --> 00:07:34,000 Speaker 7: You know. 145 00:07:34,040 --> 00:07:36,880 Speaker 3: Another scenarios the economy slows more sharply, and then I 146 00:07:36,920 --> 00:07:40,240 Speaker 3: think they can cut more rapidly. I do think the 147 00:07:40,280 --> 00:07:42,400 Speaker 3: bar right now is pretty high to hike rates, and 148 00:07:42,480 --> 00:07:44,920 Speaker 3: so I think if the economy gets stuck at inflation 149 00:07:45,000 --> 00:07:48,000 Speaker 3: at current levels, they they may not cut very many 150 00:07:48,040 --> 00:07:52,320 Speaker 3: times and keep rates at an elevated level. But importantly, 151 00:07:52,360 --> 00:07:55,200 Speaker 3: it could depend on the outcome of the election. But again, 152 00:07:55,280 --> 00:07:57,320 Speaker 3: that won't We won't know how that plays out until 153 00:07:57,320 --> 00:07:58,280 Speaker 3: twenty twenty five. 154 00:07:58,400 --> 00:08:01,320 Speaker 2: So Richard Clarin stay with us. You got so much 155 00:08:01,320 --> 00:08:02,560 Speaker 2: to talk about it. I'm going to look it up 156 00:08:02,640 --> 00:08:05,800 Speaker 2: right now. You can do this on the Bloomberg Professional Service, 157 00:08:05,960 --> 00:08:11,280 Speaker 2: the FOMC meetings. Paul there, it is January twenty ninth, 158 00:08:11,480 --> 00:08:12,680 Speaker 2: after the inauguration. 159 00:08:13,400 --> 00:08:14,280 Speaker 6: That'll be the meeting. 160 00:08:14,800 --> 00:08:17,200 Speaker 2: Put it on your calendar, Doctor Clarida, we're going to 161 00:08:17,280 --> 00:08:21,400 Speaker 2: have you back there January at twenty nine. Annawong, thank 162 00:08:21,440 --> 00:08:25,120 Speaker 2: you so much for joining us with Bloomberg Economics. Important questions, 163 00:08:25,360 --> 00:08:28,240 Speaker 2: tough questions on politics. She can answer them. You know, 164 00:08:28,280 --> 00:08:31,600 Speaker 2: we can't answer Wed questions. That's what I want. Yeah, 165 00:08:32,320 --> 00:08:35,920 Speaker 2: it's different. It's there's a different oxygen out there. What 166 00:08:36,040 --> 00:08:38,320 Speaker 2: a joint of Ana Wong with us from Chicago and 167 00:08:38,320 --> 00:08:41,600 Speaker 2: Bloomberg Economics. And we continue with the former vice Chairman 168 00:08:41,640 --> 00:08:45,600 Speaker 2: of the Federal Reserve System Richard Clarida. This morning, Richard, 169 00:08:45,600 --> 00:08:47,400 Speaker 2: you and I could turn this into a three hour 170 00:08:47,720 --> 00:08:50,280 Speaker 2: love fest. We don't have the time to do that, 171 00:08:50,320 --> 00:08:52,440 Speaker 2: so I'm just going to cut to the chase. I 172 00:08:52,520 --> 00:08:57,040 Speaker 2: was busting Annawan's chops about Frank Knight nineteen twenty one, 173 00:08:57,200 --> 00:08:59,840 Speaker 2: one hundred and thirty four pages. It's right of passage, 174 00:09:00,600 --> 00:09:02,600 Speaker 2: and it's where we really began to think in the 175 00:09:02,640 --> 00:09:07,320 Speaker 2: modern era of the unknown unknowns, the idea of what's 176 00:09:07,360 --> 00:09:11,040 Speaker 2: the mystery that's out there. We have a pandemic overlay 177 00:09:11,240 --> 00:09:12,080 Speaker 2: we're coming out of. 178 00:09:12,559 --> 00:09:13,000 Speaker 7: We have an. 179 00:09:13,000 --> 00:09:16,920 Speaker 2: Immigration dynamic we don't understand on the edge of Angus Deeton. 180 00:09:17,480 --> 00:09:20,199 Speaker 2: There's too many mysteries out of productivity. Yeah, there is 181 00:09:20,240 --> 00:09:24,080 Speaker 2: a mystery we have. What is Richard Claared isnwn unknown 182 00:09:24,400 --> 00:09:27,120 Speaker 2: If you were to sit down with the chairman this. 183 00:09:27,000 --> 00:09:31,880 Speaker 3: Morning, well that those three would certainly be on Those 184 00:09:31,920 --> 00:09:35,160 Speaker 3: three would certainly be on the list. I think that 185 00:09:35,840 --> 00:09:42,200 Speaker 3: an additional known unknown is the global fiscal outlook is terrible. 186 00:09:43,240 --> 00:09:46,360 Speaker 3: You know, twenty years ago, debt to GDP ratio was 187 00:09:46,400 --> 00:09:47,080 Speaker 3: forty percent. 188 00:09:47,120 --> 00:09:49,240 Speaker 4: It's north of one hundred now. 189 00:09:50,320 --> 00:09:53,800 Speaker 3: Debt service cost to exceed the defense budget in the US, 190 00:09:53,840 --> 00:09:57,920 Speaker 3: and so everyone acknowledges that global fiscal paths are unsustainable, 191 00:09:57,960 --> 00:10:00,160 Speaker 3: but there's no political will. So I think I think 192 00:10:00,200 --> 00:10:03,560 Speaker 3: that the known unknown is when and what brings about 193 00:10:03,600 --> 00:10:08,960 Speaker 3: the ultimate adjustment in fiscal policy, because it will happen eventually. 194 00:10:09,040 --> 00:10:10,920 Speaker 3: I don't know if it's next year, in ten years, 195 00:10:10,920 --> 00:10:12,840 Speaker 3: but I think, to me, that's the known unknown. 196 00:10:13,000 --> 00:10:15,600 Speaker 5: And you know, I'm of a certain vintage. I've heard 197 00:10:15,600 --> 00:10:18,520 Speaker 5: that my entire life. Yeah, we've had this little sharp 198 00:10:18,600 --> 00:10:21,520 Speaker 5: down in Lower Manhattan that ticks up the debt. I 199 00:10:21,559 --> 00:10:23,480 Speaker 5: remember that as a kid driving the piece, you know, 200 00:10:23,559 --> 00:10:28,839 Speaker 5: the east side, And when where will we see that? 201 00:10:28,960 --> 00:10:31,880 Speaker 5: The concerns about global debt. 202 00:10:32,080 --> 00:10:35,360 Speaker 3: So excellent point because why has it fallen? Why have 203 00:10:35,400 --> 00:10:38,400 Speaker 3: the bond market vigilant has been in hibernation. Some would 204 00:10:38,400 --> 00:10:42,960 Speaker 3: say they're extinct. And the simplest answer is because global 205 00:10:42,960 --> 00:10:45,679 Speaker 3: interest rates have fallen by more than debt has gone up. 206 00:10:45,720 --> 00:10:48,400 Speaker 3: So until recently it seemed like a free lunch to 207 00:10:48,480 --> 00:10:52,719 Speaker 3: politicians borrow. But your debt service costs go down because interest. 208 00:10:52,520 --> 00:10:53,240 Speaker 4: Rates are falling. 209 00:10:53,320 --> 00:10:56,400 Speaker 3: And so the point is, going forward, interest rates are 210 00:10:56,440 --> 00:10:57,800 Speaker 3: not going to be as low as they were in 211 00:10:57,840 --> 00:11:00,440 Speaker 3: the prior twenty years, and so the cast of that 212 00:11:00,480 --> 00:11:03,440 Speaker 3: debt service will be more evident, and so at some 213 00:11:03,559 --> 00:11:07,080 Speaker 3: point that will drive a political outcome. 214 00:11:07,240 --> 00:11:08,400 Speaker 4: But I do agree with you. 215 00:11:09,400 --> 00:11:11,600 Speaker 3: The can has been kicked down the road for a 216 00:11:11,640 --> 00:11:13,600 Speaker 3: long time and it may be a while. 217 00:11:13,640 --> 00:11:15,480 Speaker 4: But to me that's a non unknown. 218 00:11:15,240 --> 00:11:17,520 Speaker 6: And what is the fix? 219 00:11:17,840 --> 00:11:20,400 Speaker 5: Ultimately from an economic. 220 00:11:19,960 --> 00:11:23,880 Speaker 3: Physics, it depends on the country. But the usual if 221 00:11:24,000 --> 00:11:26,839 Speaker 3: your deficits are too large and your debt service costs 222 00:11:26,840 --> 00:11:29,280 Speaker 3: are too high, there's going to be some combination of 223 00:11:29,360 --> 00:11:33,240 Speaker 3: adjustments on revenues and adjustments on alays. 224 00:11:33,280 --> 00:11:35,120 Speaker 4: But neither party is running on. 225 00:11:35,080 --> 00:11:38,440 Speaker 3: A platform to address that, and so I think it 226 00:11:38,480 --> 00:11:40,720 Speaker 3: will not be It will not really be an issue 227 00:11:41,360 --> 00:11:42,880 Speaker 3: in the campaign way. 228 00:11:42,840 --> 00:11:45,040 Speaker 2: Lee was with this last hour stunning us with a 229 00:11:45,080 --> 00:11:49,120 Speaker 2: potential three handle on China GDP growth. I want to 230 00:11:49,160 --> 00:11:51,199 Speaker 2: go to a guy named Stiglitz who way back at 231 00:11:51,240 --> 00:11:54,160 Speaker 2: Stanford started to think about the little G of the 232 00:11:54,200 --> 00:11:58,680 Speaker 2: growth rate. Olivia, Blanchard and Stiglets have really focused on 233 00:11:59,400 --> 00:12:03,079 Speaker 2: the fact the global little G growth rate is better 234 00:12:03,120 --> 00:12:07,520 Speaker 2: than good to sustain our fiscal policy. Do you suggest 235 00:12:07,920 --> 00:12:11,640 Speaker 2: that we could see a diminished global growth rate that 236 00:12:11,840 --> 00:12:13,720 Speaker 2: finally upsets the apple cart? 237 00:12:14,120 --> 00:12:16,800 Speaker 3: It could be growth, or it could happen through the 238 00:12:16,840 --> 00:12:20,319 Speaker 3: interest rate channel. Remember Olivier's famous equation is it's about 239 00:12:20,440 --> 00:12:22,959 Speaker 3: R minus G, and so if G. 240 00:12:23,120 --> 00:12:24,600 Speaker 4: Falls or R goes up. 241 00:12:24,600 --> 00:12:27,240 Speaker 2: Can you figure Can you call Stockholm after the show 242 00:12:27,559 --> 00:12:29,920 Speaker 2: and say, can we get a shingle out for Blenchard 243 00:12:30,200 --> 00:12:31,520 Speaker 2: on our minus G. 244 00:12:31,520 --> 00:12:32,839 Speaker 6: Give it to Williams as well. 245 00:12:33,120 --> 00:12:36,440 Speaker 3: Okay, exactly, So what do we do when we have 246 00:12:36,520 --> 00:12:40,000 Speaker 3: two small G on our minus well exactly. And so 247 00:12:40,040 --> 00:12:43,200 Speaker 3: if you have too small a G, then it brings 248 00:12:43,240 --> 00:12:46,880 Speaker 3: forward the day of reckoning on fiscal adjustment. 249 00:12:46,920 --> 00:12:47,960 Speaker 4: I'll just leave it at that. 250 00:12:48,240 --> 00:12:52,480 Speaker 2: Okay, being careful, but this is real because Italy there 251 00:12:52,559 --> 00:12:56,120 Speaker 2: was a you know, with their demographics, it was like overdone. 252 00:12:56,200 --> 00:12:58,920 Speaker 2: Small g's done, and with the revolution of their politics, 253 00:12:59,040 --> 00:13:01,920 Speaker 2: they've got actually very good G. Because you're spending money 254 00:13:02,160 --> 00:13:04,719 Speaker 2: in that little quarter in Venice, buying. 255 00:13:04,520 --> 00:13:05,640 Speaker 6: Lots of stuff. 256 00:13:05,720 --> 00:13:07,160 Speaker 2: Little G matters in Italy. 257 00:13:07,280 --> 00:13:10,360 Speaker 5: How about in China though, I yeah, how big of 258 00:13:10,400 --> 00:13:12,719 Speaker 5: a concern is that for the global economy? Because I'll 259 00:13:12,720 --> 00:13:17,080 Speaker 5: look at too, something like their population. I mean, it's 260 00:13:17,120 --> 00:13:19,120 Speaker 5: just aging, and it's aging at a much higher rate 261 00:13:19,160 --> 00:13:21,480 Speaker 5: than a lot of other Yeah, populations. I don't see 262 00:13:21,520 --> 00:13:24,680 Speaker 5: that changing. So what does that mean for global growth? 263 00:13:25,520 --> 00:13:29,320 Speaker 3: Well, obviously China's global growth has been slowing. 264 00:13:29,800 --> 00:13:31,400 Speaker 4: We all remember when the number. 265 00:13:31,200 --> 00:13:33,120 Speaker 3: Was seven or eight, then it was five or six, 266 00:13:33,200 --> 00:13:36,360 Speaker 3: and now it's four or five. So now it's very 267 00:13:36,360 --> 00:13:38,760 Speaker 3: big economy. So four and a half percent growth in 268 00:13:38,840 --> 00:13:41,600 Speaker 3: China is still a big part of the global outlook. 269 00:13:41,640 --> 00:13:43,679 Speaker 3: I think the real difference, though, compared to the past 270 00:13:43,720 --> 00:13:47,359 Speaker 3: twenty years, is the way in which the Chinese economy 271 00:13:47,920 --> 00:13:51,600 Speaker 3: interacts with the rest of the global economy. Commodity prizes activity, 272 00:13:52,200 --> 00:13:54,280 Speaker 3: you know. I think everyone agrees the big era of 273 00:13:54,320 --> 00:13:58,880 Speaker 3: global hyper globalization is over, and so the way in 274 00:13:58,920 --> 00:14:01,720 Speaker 3: which Chinese growth drives the rest of the economy I 275 00:14:01,720 --> 00:14:04,120 Speaker 3: think is changing. And it's actually something we're looking at 276 00:14:04,200 --> 00:14:05,120 Speaker 3: closely at PIMCO. 277 00:14:05,480 --> 00:14:08,560 Speaker 6: We mentioned this yesterday. I busted your chops as Lawrence 278 00:14:08,640 --> 00:14:10,319 Speaker 6: Meyer PAULI wrote. 279 00:14:10,160 --> 00:14:12,480 Speaker 2: A little small book about the green Span fed where 280 00:14:12,480 --> 00:14:16,079 Speaker 2: it was Alan green Span and everybody follow I'm sorry, 281 00:14:16,280 --> 00:14:17,920 Speaker 2: q Pill, Jonathan. 282 00:14:18,920 --> 00:14:21,720 Speaker 6: Began Green And there's that troublemaker. 283 00:14:21,800 --> 00:14:23,760 Speaker 2: Catherine Mann descent. 284 00:14:23,520 --> 00:14:27,479 Speaker 3: To you, Pill is the chief economists. 285 00:14:27,560 --> 00:14:30,960 Speaker 6: He's went against a governor. Why can't you fed? 286 00:14:31,520 --> 00:14:35,600 Speaker 2: He as normal in Cuman as Catherine Mann's Bank of England. 287 00:14:35,720 --> 00:14:37,720 Speaker 3: Well, I will say that the Bank of England is 288 00:14:37,760 --> 00:14:41,120 Speaker 3: certainly beginning with my good friend and mentor Mervyn King 289 00:14:41,360 --> 00:14:42,600 Speaker 3: thirty plus years ago. 290 00:14:43,320 --> 00:14:44,120 Speaker 4: It was a point of. 291 00:14:44,080 --> 00:14:47,640 Speaker 3: Pride that their culture did not discourage dissense. And indeed, 292 00:14:47,640 --> 00:14:49,320 Speaker 3: I think it was one or two meetings when Mervyn 293 00:14:49,400 --> 00:14:50,080 Speaker 3: was outvoted. 294 00:14:51,000 --> 00:14:52,360 Speaker 4: In this case it was five to four. 295 00:14:52,400 --> 00:14:55,720 Speaker 3: But when the chief economist votes, it definitely gets the 296 00:14:56,320 --> 00:14:59,920 Speaker 3: it gets the headline. Sure, there are descents at the 297 00:15:00,080 --> 00:15:02,400 Speaker 3: FED during my time, we had several meetings where there 298 00:15:02,440 --> 00:15:05,560 Speaker 3: were three descents. But it is the case that in 299 00:15:05,600 --> 00:15:08,400 Speaker 3: the post green spanning and era that you refer to, 300 00:15:09,040 --> 00:15:12,600 Speaker 3: or green span and then post green Span, descents among 301 00:15:12,680 --> 00:15:16,680 Speaker 3: governors have been pretty rare on monetary policy. And that 302 00:15:16,680 --> 00:15:18,720 Speaker 3: that's an entire another show we could. 303 00:15:18,800 --> 00:15:19,640 Speaker 4: I won't spend time. 304 00:15:19,600 --> 00:15:23,680 Speaker 3: Talking about why that is. You may come back tomorrow, Okay, Well, okay, Rich. 305 00:15:23,520 --> 00:15:26,280 Speaker 2: Clarida, thank you so much for John Fair, Lisa brown Winson, 306 00:15:26,400 --> 00:15:29,960 Speaker 2: myself yesterday that decides, for Paul Sweeney and all. This 307 00:15:30,040 --> 00:15:32,200 Speaker 2: has just been very generous of you at this key 308 00:15:32,240 --> 00:15:34,560 Speaker 2: time for our monetary policy. 309 00:15:34,600 --> 00:15:36,000 Speaker 6: What are they going to do at the next meeting. 310 00:15:36,600 --> 00:15:38,640 Speaker 3: They're gonna they're gonna cut raids. 311 00:15:39,080 --> 00:15:42,440 Speaker 6: There you go, that's all we know. We'll leave it there. Eric, 312 00:15:42,480 --> 00:15:44,920 Speaker 6: be sure that gets a single best idea. 313 00:15:45,160 --> 00:15:59,040 Speaker 2: Rich Clarida of Pimcal of Columbia an extended conversation with WAYE. 314 00:15:59,080 --> 00:16:00,200 Speaker 6: Lee of Black Right. 315 00:16:00,440 --> 00:16:02,800 Speaker 2: Well, let's just start with the why why do we 316 00:16:02,840 --> 00:16:04,800 Speaker 2: see price up, yield down. 317 00:16:06,640 --> 00:16:06,880 Speaker 8: Well? 318 00:16:07,520 --> 00:16:12,080 Speaker 7: From the FED meeting yesterday. I think September is pretty 319 00:16:12,160 --> 00:16:17,000 Speaker 7: much a down deal. The bar for not cutting is 320 00:16:17,560 --> 00:16:21,080 Speaker 7: very high, so I think that's what markets got excited. 321 00:16:21,200 --> 00:16:25,760 Speaker 7: But importantly, the way that JPAW framed the reasons for 322 00:16:25,880 --> 00:16:31,280 Speaker 7: September cut is also why markets are happy with yesterday's meeting. 323 00:16:31,680 --> 00:16:37,000 Speaker 7: He characterized what's happening in labor market as normalization rather 324 00:16:37,080 --> 00:16:42,360 Speaker 7: than labor market weakening. And what is going to lead 325 00:16:42,360 --> 00:16:45,160 Speaker 7: to a September cut that is looking very likely. It's 326 00:16:45,240 --> 00:16:48,360 Speaker 7: more around better behaving inflation rather than weaker labor markets. 327 00:16:48,400 --> 00:16:50,560 Speaker 7: So I think that's a good combination for risk asses and. 328 00:16:50,480 --> 00:16:53,680 Speaker 2: A y access. It's lord rhythmic. You end up looking 329 00:16:53,680 --> 00:16:57,520 Speaker 2: in a curve is convexity? Is there literally a short 330 00:16:57,640 --> 00:17:02,160 Speaker 2: cover in bonds now? Is there literally an equity like 331 00:17:02,760 --> 00:17:06,639 Speaker 2: short cover where everybody goes OMG, yields are going lower? 332 00:17:07,920 --> 00:17:11,160 Speaker 7: Well, if you look at the hedge fund positioning, absolutely 333 00:17:13,200 --> 00:17:17,480 Speaker 7: a lot of the speculative positions went from short bonds 334 00:17:17,520 --> 00:17:21,399 Speaker 7: to long bounds. But I would observe that front end 335 00:17:21,400 --> 00:17:23,840 Speaker 7: of the curve has done better than the back end 336 00:17:24,160 --> 00:17:27,159 Speaker 7: of the curve, so mainly in response to kind of 337 00:17:27,480 --> 00:17:31,800 Speaker 7: markets pricing in more cuts. But our concern for the 338 00:17:31,840 --> 00:17:34,919 Speaker 7: back end of the curve, especially over a longer tem horizon, 339 00:17:35,320 --> 00:17:40,560 Speaker 7: still stays, which is a higher fiscal trajectory, higher m 340 00:17:40,640 --> 00:17:43,680 Speaker 7: premier which currently is still in the negative territory. 341 00:17:44,680 --> 00:17:46,720 Speaker 5: You know, you've got a great note out here, your 342 00:17:46,760 --> 00:17:50,240 Speaker 5: weekly note, Wayley, and I'm looking at your assets and review. 343 00:17:51,359 --> 00:17:52,280 Speaker 2: You know, one of the best. 344 00:17:52,119 --> 00:17:53,560 Speaker 5: Performers is gold here. 345 00:17:54,200 --> 00:17:55,200 Speaker 6: What do you make of that? 346 00:17:57,440 --> 00:18:02,040 Speaker 7: Well, I think if you look at what's been working 347 00:18:02,359 --> 00:18:06,720 Speaker 7: so far this year as a diversifier, is not your 348 00:18:07,480 --> 00:18:11,240 Speaker 7: go to good old duration in a portfolio, but rather 349 00:18:12,440 --> 00:18:17,040 Speaker 7: some of the other assets such as such as gold. 350 00:18:17,600 --> 00:18:20,560 Speaker 7: And on top of that, the negative correlation between gold 351 00:18:20,640 --> 00:18:24,960 Speaker 7: and real rate has helped there as well. Now having 352 00:18:25,040 --> 00:18:27,520 Speaker 7: said that, it's really hard to kind of think about 353 00:18:27,880 --> 00:18:31,520 Speaker 7: gold in the context of a longer term portfolio construction 354 00:18:31,560 --> 00:18:35,160 Speaker 7: simply because there's no cash flow to discount futer cash flow. 355 00:18:35,280 --> 00:18:38,080 Speaker 7: With now having said that, there is a case to 356 00:18:38,080 --> 00:18:41,600 Speaker 7: be made to allocate to gold in portfolio because of 357 00:18:41,680 --> 00:18:47,080 Speaker 7: the characteristics that it has exhibited as you observed as well. 358 00:18:47,600 --> 00:18:50,159 Speaker 5: So you know the central banks are certainly in focus 359 00:18:50,240 --> 00:18:52,080 Speaker 5: yesterday with the Fed today with the Bank of England 360 00:18:52,359 --> 00:18:56,720 Speaker 5: cutting interest rates. Traders believe that there'll be another rate 361 00:18:56,760 --> 00:18:58,920 Speaker 5: cut in November. What do you make of the Bank 362 00:18:58,960 --> 00:18:59,399 Speaker 5: of England? 363 00:19:00,640 --> 00:19:04,440 Speaker 7: Well, Bank of England is very interesting, right, so hasline 364 00:19:04,480 --> 00:19:09,160 Speaker 7: inflation is already at targets, but col inflation service inflation 365 00:19:09,520 --> 00:19:12,320 Speaker 7: is still somewhat sticky. You can talk about some of 366 00:19:12,359 --> 00:19:17,080 Speaker 7: the tailor swift effect and labor market a wage as well, 367 00:19:17,080 --> 00:19:21,560 Speaker 7: but broadly we see better behaving inflation and I think 368 00:19:21,600 --> 00:19:25,040 Speaker 7: that's what gave the Bank of England comfort to cut rates. 369 00:19:25,200 --> 00:19:26,919 Speaker 7: We think that there is more room for them to 370 00:19:27,000 --> 00:19:32,000 Speaker 7: cut than the fat because of a structurally weaker growth outlook, 371 00:19:32,000 --> 00:19:34,439 Speaker 7: which is why we prefer guilts over treasuries. 372 00:19:34,720 --> 00:19:36,960 Speaker 2: Right, welly, we want you to come back for the 373 00:19:37,000 --> 00:19:39,480 Speaker 2: next segment. I really want to focus on Asia and 374 00:19:39,600 --> 00:19:42,600 Speaker 2: China with your immense skill and heritage there. 375 00:19:42,640 --> 00:19:43,760 Speaker 6: But I got to asked the question. 376 00:19:43,880 --> 00:19:46,440 Speaker 2: You stumbled into it, and I hope that your badge 377 00:19:46,520 --> 00:19:47,480 Speaker 2: works at black Rock. 378 00:19:47,560 --> 00:19:52,600 Speaker 6: This morning you mentioned gold without cash flows. That reminds 379 00:19:52,640 --> 00:19:53,480 Speaker 6: me of bitcoin. 380 00:19:54,280 --> 00:19:58,240 Speaker 2: Is bitcoin developing as a gold equivalent. 381 00:20:00,160 --> 00:20:04,399 Speaker 7: Well, what we have seen is that it has the 382 00:20:04,440 --> 00:20:10,280 Speaker 7: ability to demonstrate a huge price appreciation but also depreciation, right, 383 00:20:10,320 --> 00:20:12,760 Speaker 7: so basically a lot of volatility. So I think a 384 00:20:12,880 --> 00:20:16,240 Speaker 7: case can be made, A tactical case can be made 385 00:20:16,760 --> 00:20:22,320 Speaker 7: for bitcoin from a speculative kind of perspective, not unlike 386 00:20:22,520 --> 00:20:27,120 Speaker 7: venture cap capital type of investment. But again, it's really 387 00:20:27,160 --> 00:20:29,480 Speaker 7: hard to think about kind of the longer term allocation 388 00:20:29,600 --> 00:20:31,159 Speaker 7: because there's no future cash flowing. 389 00:20:31,040 --> 00:20:31,920 Speaker 6: There's no future care. 390 00:20:33,400 --> 00:20:35,600 Speaker 2: I don't know how she gets launched Blackrock with because 391 00:20:35,800 --> 00:20:39,320 Speaker 2: they're likely first in the easiest I bust in your chaps, Wally, 392 00:20:39,800 --> 00:20:42,960 Speaker 2: I'm sorry, welly, what's the character of this ballmarket we have? 393 00:20:43,119 --> 00:20:46,080 Speaker 2: The rebound in video is gone from a one oh 394 00:20:46,200 --> 00:20:47,920 Speaker 2: four to a one twenty three. 395 00:20:48,280 --> 00:20:50,600 Speaker 6: Is this an AI celebration. 396 00:20:52,000 --> 00:20:56,760 Speaker 7: Well, let's not forget the AI nervousness that characterized the 397 00:20:57,040 --> 00:21:01,119 Speaker 7: fuel trading days before Yesterday. Is meaningful rebound. So I 398 00:21:01,119 --> 00:21:04,440 Speaker 7: think what we're experiencing right now is the code feet 399 00:21:04,560 --> 00:21:08,560 Speaker 7: that we're now used to before PEG companies reporting earnings. 400 00:21:08,600 --> 00:21:13,720 Speaker 7: This is the sixth quarter of chat GPT error and 401 00:21:13,920 --> 00:21:17,120 Speaker 7: every quarter they come in, they beat, and markets kind 402 00:21:17,119 --> 00:21:21,280 Speaker 7: of get reassured. Similar to April, market's got nervous, and 403 00:21:21,320 --> 00:21:23,600 Speaker 7: then the earnings were okay, and then we continue to 404 00:21:23,640 --> 00:21:25,560 Speaker 7: go from strength to strength. I think this is what 405 00:21:25,600 --> 00:21:28,119 Speaker 7: we're seeing right now. In Vidia is not reporting until 406 00:21:28,200 --> 00:21:30,639 Speaker 7: end of August, so I think there is still a 407 00:21:30,720 --> 00:21:34,800 Speaker 7: lot of anxiety, but excitement as well. 408 00:21:35,080 --> 00:21:38,600 Speaker 2: Can the tenure yield go under four percent? And how 409 00:21:38,600 --> 00:21:41,720 Speaker 2: does our world change with a three ninety eight ten 410 00:21:41,800 --> 00:21:43,520 Speaker 2: year yield? 411 00:21:43,600 --> 00:21:46,760 Speaker 7: Well, I think four percent three ninety eight these are 412 00:21:47,320 --> 00:21:51,840 Speaker 7: psychologically important levels. But we're talking about not far from 413 00:21:51,920 --> 00:21:55,040 Speaker 7: where we are right So given how volatile rates have been, 414 00:21:55,400 --> 00:21:58,439 Speaker 7: I think it's possible that you can break four percent, 415 00:21:58,600 --> 00:22:02,160 Speaker 7: especially given the pricing momentum. But I think the big 416 00:22:02,200 --> 00:22:05,320 Speaker 7: picture here is important, which is number one, rates have 417 00:22:05,440 --> 00:22:08,840 Speaker 7: been very volatile. Markets have been swinging from one narrative 418 00:22:08,920 --> 00:22:13,000 Speaker 7: to the other narrative in very quick succession. So I 419 00:22:13,000 --> 00:22:16,520 Speaker 7: think expect volosildia number two. Once we look through that 420 00:22:16,640 --> 00:22:21,080 Speaker 7: VOLATILIZI still're talking about higher than three pandemic rate levels 421 00:22:21,080 --> 00:22:24,399 Speaker 7: because of structurally inflationary forces. Let's not forget that. 422 00:22:24,600 --> 00:22:27,040 Speaker 2: With this Waley of black Rock, and of course with 423 00:22:27,160 --> 00:22:30,440 Speaker 2: all of her heritage from China, her ability to win 424 00:22:31,080 --> 00:22:36,480 Speaker 2: their most prestigious mathematics event two years in a row. Extraordinary, 425 00:22:36,640 --> 00:22:37,680 Speaker 2: thrilled she could join us. 426 00:22:37,640 --> 00:22:38,800 Speaker 6: Today, Wally. 427 00:22:38,880 --> 00:22:42,520 Speaker 2: In twenty fifteen, I walked down the stairs at the 428 00:22:42,560 --> 00:22:48,200 Speaker 2: Metropolitan Museum of Art and they're in a phenomenal a show. 429 00:22:48,960 --> 00:22:52,320 Speaker 2: China through the looking Glass was one of the few 430 00:22:52,520 --> 00:22:59,359 Speaker 2: extent nineteen sixties Chinese military uniforms. I guess they're extremely rare, 431 00:23:00,000 --> 00:23:02,639 Speaker 2: and it was from a China from another time and place. 432 00:23:03,359 --> 00:23:07,240 Speaker 2: There's talk that President g wants to take elements of 433 00:23:07,320 --> 00:23:11,040 Speaker 2: the malpast and drag it forward. Do you see that 434 00:23:11,280 --> 00:23:14,720 Speaker 2: in any way that after the Planum, China wants to 435 00:23:14,800 --> 00:23:18,879 Speaker 2: revert to a sixties or dare I say a fifties model? 436 00:23:21,359 --> 00:23:21,679 Speaker 8: Tom. 437 00:23:21,760 --> 00:23:26,320 Speaker 7: It doesn't take a math olympiads to see that growth 438 00:23:26,320 --> 00:23:29,480 Speaker 7: in China is slowing down, right, You look at the 439 00:23:29,560 --> 00:23:34,960 Speaker 7: latest Taichien PMI print that decreased versus the previous print 440 00:23:35,440 --> 00:23:40,600 Speaker 7: following disappointing Q two growth number. To your point, Plannont 441 00:23:40,720 --> 00:23:45,560 Speaker 7: came and went, State Council came and went, and Politburo 442 00:23:46,160 --> 00:23:49,959 Speaker 7: came and went, and they all paint a similar picture, 443 00:23:50,440 --> 00:23:55,000 Speaker 7: which is that they would support growth in a kind 444 00:23:55,000 --> 00:24:00,639 Speaker 7: of bite size fashion, including surprise Raycots, but we're not 445 00:24:00,920 --> 00:24:04,760 Speaker 7: talking about big Badjuka. So yes, we're looking at maybe 446 00:24:04,760 --> 00:24:08,439 Speaker 7: around five percent growth for this year, which is their targets. 447 00:24:08,520 --> 00:24:11,600 Speaker 7: But there is a huge amount of focus around median 448 00:24:11,760 --> 00:24:16,560 Speaker 7: term reform and that is a tradeoff median term progress 449 00:24:16,640 --> 00:24:19,520 Speaker 7: versus the near term, near term growth, which is why 450 00:24:19,520 --> 00:24:24,320 Speaker 7: we have a neutral allocation despite the appealing valuation opportunities 451 00:24:24,359 --> 00:24:24,840 Speaker 7: in China. 452 00:24:24,960 --> 00:24:27,560 Speaker 2: From where you said and the experts of Blackrock, I 453 00:24:27,600 --> 00:24:29,840 Speaker 2: just don't want to put this on you, but do 454 00:24:29,960 --> 00:24:33,320 Speaker 2: you see them going back to the standard formula of 455 00:24:33,480 --> 00:24:40,919 Speaker 2: state enterprises, is being the solution manufacturing industrial production or 456 00:24:40,920 --> 00:24:45,400 Speaker 2: can they actually jump start and make permanent a consumer revolution. 457 00:24:46,800 --> 00:24:50,720 Speaker 7: Well, consumer savings rate is one of the reasons why 458 00:24:50,840 --> 00:24:53,919 Speaker 7: they need to support Nearton growth because coming out of 459 00:24:53,960 --> 00:24:59,720 Speaker 7: the pandemic, consumers have not really boosted growth the way 460 00:24:59,760 --> 00:25:03,560 Speaker 7: that US consumers have and European consumers have. And this 461 00:25:03,720 --> 00:25:07,400 Speaker 7: is really in the context of high youth employment rate, 462 00:25:07,480 --> 00:25:10,320 Speaker 7: in the context of aging population, in the context of 463 00:25:10,440 --> 00:25:15,520 Speaker 7: still lingering deflationary fears, So consumers are not really kind 464 00:25:15,560 --> 00:25:18,320 Speaker 7: of picking up the battle, so to speak. And we 465 00:25:18,440 --> 00:25:22,720 Speaker 7: have seen manufacturing inside of things having to do more 466 00:25:22,920 --> 00:25:26,240 Speaker 7: heavy lifting. So indeed, I think we need to really 467 00:25:26,320 --> 00:25:30,600 Speaker 7: kind of think about how far consumers can support the economy. 468 00:25:30,640 --> 00:25:33,200 Speaker 7: And this is also why over the longer term, we're 469 00:25:33,200 --> 00:25:35,639 Speaker 7: looking at Chinese growth with a three handle by the 470 00:25:35,720 --> 00:25:38,800 Speaker 7: end of the decade because of the structural Stile is 471 00:25:38,880 --> 00:25:39,399 Speaker 7: talking about. 472 00:25:39,840 --> 00:25:43,760 Speaker 5: So, you know, it seems like their policy here of 473 00:25:43,960 --> 00:25:47,840 Speaker 5: isolating themselves, whether it's from a technology perspective or just 474 00:25:47,880 --> 00:25:51,520 Speaker 5: an overall economic perspective, whether it be in the context 475 00:25:51,600 --> 00:25:55,240 Speaker 5: of US tariffs, European tariffs, I just don't see how 476 00:25:55,240 --> 00:25:58,920 Speaker 5: the Chinese government feels like that is a viable long 477 00:25:59,000 --> 00:26:02,199 Speaker 5: term strategy. It would seem like they would want to 478 00:26:02,280 --> 00:26:06,560 Speaker 5: integrate with the global economy, not isolate themselves. Is that 479 00:26:06,600 --> 00:26:07,680 Speaker 5: part of your neutral call? 480 00:26:09,040 --> 00:26:12,760 Speaker 7: This is actually one of our mega forces that black 481 00:26:12,840 --> 00:26:19,760 Speaker 7: Rock has identified. Geopolitical fragmentation. Isolationist policies are possible, not 482 00:26:19,840 --> 00:26:22,720 Speaker 7: just in China, but you look at what's happening globally, 483 00:26:22,720 --> 00:26:25,320 Speaker 7: you look at what could happen in the US as well, 484 00:26:25,400 --> 00:26:28,240 Speaker 7: And this is why we're looking at an environment where 485 00:26:28,560 --> 00:26:34,040 Speaker 7: spheres of influences are moving further apart. The fragmentation of 486 00:26:34,200 --> 00:26:38,680 Speaker 7: supply chains creating inflationary pressure. This is also why, even 487 00:26:38,720 --> 00:26:41,680 Speaker 7: though we have had the last quarter of inflation better 488 00:26:41,720 --> 00:26:45,040 Speaker 7: behaving downside surprises, we think inflation is likely going to 489 00:26:45,400 --> 00:26:48,560 Speaker 7: actually settle at a higher level compared to before because 490 00:26:48,560 --> 00:26:53,760 Speaker 7: of frictions coming from isolationism, coming from the fragmentation of 491 00:26:53,880 --> 00:26:58,800 Speaker 7: supply chain, duplication of supply chain. So really, inflation protecting 492 00:26:59,040 --> 00:27:03,120 Speaker 7: portfolios is what we're thinking about for strategic as allocation. 493 00:27:03,600 --> 00:27:06,199 Speaker 2: Again, really, and not depend just on you, but the 494 00:27:06,240 --> 00:27:08,760 Speaker 2: greatest thinkers at Blackrock globally, and I know you've got 495 00:27:08,800 --> 00:27:12,400 Speaker 2: a huge Asian presence. You just set a three handle 496 00:27:13,080 --> 00:27:16,920 Speaker 2: on a run rate of China growth. I believe what 497 00:27:17,000 --> 00:27:21,000 Speaker 2: does that do to Vietnam? Frankly, what does that do 498 00:27:21,119 --> 00:27:26,400 Speaker 2: to Japan? That's an entirely new Asian regime, isn't it. 499 00:27:27,560 --> 00:27:31,840 Speaker 7: Well, what we have seen is whilst the experts from 500 00:27:32,080 --> 00:27:36,520 Speaker 7: exports from China to the US has decreased, the export 501 00:27:36,600 --> 00:27:41,320 Speaker 7: from Mexico, for example, to the US have overtaken that 502 00:27:41,520 --> 00:27:45,679 Speaker 7: from China. So I think there is a restructuring of 503 00:27:46,280 --> 00:27:50,840 Speaker 7: supply chain and trade relationships. Day is happening. It takes time, 504 00:27:51,119 --> 00:27:56,040 Speaker 7: but it is happening. So likes of Vnam you talked about, 505 00:27:56,080 --> 00:27:59,960 Speaker 7: but India and also Middle East and Mexico for them 506 00:28:00,080 --> 00:28:04,159 Speaker 7: matter are likely going to benefits as we think about 507 00:28:04,280 --> 00:28:10,320 Speaker 7: this fragmentation of the geopolitical relationships and a fragmentation of 508 00:28:10,400 --> 00:28:13,960 Speaker 7: supply chains, but elevating on a higher level, So that's 509 00:28:14,000 --> 00:28:17,479 Speaker 7: one of the mega forces. Other mega forces like aging 510 00:28:17,560 --> 00:28:21,359 Speaker 7: population also benefits these countries that I just talked about. 511 00:28:21,440 --> 00:28:25,320 Speaker 7: So really think about international diversification as we think about 512 00:28:25,320 --> 00:28:28,359 Speaker 7: portfolio construction in the context of everything that we distached. 513 00:28:29,200 --> 00:28:32,120 Speaker 5: Willie, I seen you in the Blackrock research. You guys 514 00:28:32,119 --> 00:28:36,159 Speaker 5: are overweight Japan, and that's something I have heard in 515 00:28:36,200 --> 00:28:36,800 Speaker 5: a long time. 516 00:28:41,000 --> 00:28:45,440 Speaker 7: Yes, we have been overweighted Japan for quite a long 517 00:28:45,480 --> 00:28:50,680 Speaker 7: time now. We prefer Japanese equities over JGB Japanese government bondes. 518 00:28:51,400 --> 00:28:53,960 Speaker 7: What we have seen this week is Bank of Japan 519 00:28:55,280 --> 00:28:58,800 Speaker 7: indicating that they are likely going to move faster on 520 00:28:58,840 --> 00:29:01,920 Speaker 7: the path of normalzation. And this is important because the 521 00:29:02,000 --> 00:29:06,000 Speaker 7: destination hasn't changed. Is the speed off normalization that seems 522 00:29:06,000 --> 00:29:09,080 Speaker 7: to be faster. But my most important takeaway from the 523 00:29:09,080 --> 00:29:12,800 Speaker 7: BOJ this week is that the backstop is still in place. 524 00:29:13,080 --> 00:29:16,200 Speaker 7: If data does not give them comfort to move fast, 525 00:29:16,320 --> 00:29:19,400 Speaker 7: they would slow down. So as important as we think 526 00:29:19,400 --> 00:29:23,760 Speaker 7: about the Japan call, but certainly risks have increased because 527 00:29:23,800 --> 00:29:27,080 Speaker 7: of the faster pace of normalization. I would know though 528 00:29:27,600 --> 00:29:30,880 Speaker 7: US dollar Japanese applees is just one percent lower compared 529 00:29:30,920 --> 00:29:33,200 Speaker 7: to the peak, So we like Japan on a currency 530 00:29:33,200 --> 00:29:34,520 Speaker 7: hatched basis for that reason. 531 00:29:34,840 --> 00:29:37,600 Speaker 2: This has been wonderful Wayley, thank you so much, particularly 532 00:29:37,600 --> 00:29:45,800 Speaker 2: in the comments on China. Jumana Bratacci. We are thrilled 533 00:29:45,800 --> 00:29:49,200 Speaker 2: that she's in Dubai driving all of our Middle Eastern 534 00:29:49,240 --> 00:29:53,640 Speaker 2: coverage with the leadership of Horizon in her program there, 535 00:29:53,680 --> 00:29:57,360 Speaker 2: but far more the spirit of speaking to people across 536 00:29:57,440 --> 00:30:00,480 Speaker 2: the Middle East, and we speak now with Juma about 537 00:30:00,480 --> 00:30:06,840 Speaker 2: her Lebanon and about what we see in Israel and such. Jumana, 538 00:30:06,960 --> 00:30:10,040 Speaker 2: first of all, to your many many contexts in Lebanon, 539 00:30:10,440 --> 00:30:14,640 Speaker 2: the tension north of Israel right now, the tension in Lebanon, 540 00:30:14,960 --> 00:30:16,320 Speaker 2: give us a description of that. 541 00:30:18,720 --> 00:30:21,720 Speaker 9: It's difficult to describe. I guess my size speaks for itself, 542 00:30:21,760 --> 00:30:25,240 Speaker 9: but overall, tension is possibly the highest it has been 543 00:30:25,960 --> 00:30:28,719 Speaker 9: in the last couple of decades. This is an extremely 544 00:30:29,680 --> 00:30:32,640 Speaker 9: fraud moment for the Middle East, given the events over 545 00:30:32,680 --> 00:30:35,840 Speaker 9: the last couple of days and the various fronts that 546 00:30:35,880 --> 00:30:38,880 Speaker 9: are opening up, not just within Gaza, but of course 547 00:30:38,960 --> 00:30:42,680 Speaker 9: now you have a new potential active front in Lebanon 548 00:30:43,080 --> 00:30:47,240 Speaker 9: after the Beirut strike that took out the right hand 549 00:30:47,360 --> 00:30:49,520 Speaker 9: man of the Hesbalaalider a couple of days ago. You 550 00:30:49,600 --> 00:30:52,520 Speaker 9: have a potentially new front opening up in Iran after 551 00:30:52,640 --> 00:30:55,200 Speaker 9: the air strike in Tehran the same night as the 552 00:30:55,200 --> 00:30:57,400 Speaker 9: Beirut air strike. And then of course you have the 553 00:30:57,440 --> 00:31:00,440 Speaker 9: ongoing Houthy attacks on the vessels. It's not for about 554 00:31:00,480 --> 00:31:04,760 Speaker 9: those as well. So you've got multi dimensional hotspots opening 555 00:31:04,880 --> 00:31:08,560 Speaker 9: up around the region, and there is serious concern that 556 00:31:08,800 --> 00:31:13,040 Speaker 9: there is a potential slippage. One miscalculation could have this 557 00:31:13,120 --> 00:31:16,160 Speaker 9: thing really blow up and end up in a scenario 558 00:31:16,160 --> 00:31:17,520 Speaker 9: where all sides ends up regretting. 559 00:31:17,640 --> 00:31:21,120 Speaker 2: And you're reporting on horizon as you speak to Emarati 560 00:31:21,360 --> 00:31:25,520 Speaker 2: leadership and for that matter, Arab leadership of the Levant, 561 00:31:26,000 --> 00:31:28,960 Speaker 2: who are they supporting, who are they focused on here 562 00:31:29,360 --> 00:31:31,280 Speaker 2: among the various parties. 563 00:31:32,920 --> 00:31:36,880 Speaker 9: Interesting you raise that, tom because it's very nuanced depending 564 00:31:36,960 --> 00:31:38,880 Speaker 9: on which country you speak to in the region. Now, 565 00:31:38,920 --> 00:31:42,600 Speaker 9: don't forget that many of the Gulf countries actually did 566 00:31:42,680 --> 00:31:47,400 Speaker 9: sign and Abraham accords in a normalization agreement with Israel 567 00:31:47,520 --> 00:31:50,400 Speaker 9: back in twenty twenty that includes the UE, that includes Bahana, 568 00:31:50,440 --> 00:31:54,480 Speaker 9: also includes Morocco as well, So they've been treading very 569 00:31:54,520 --> 00:31:58,320 Speaker 9: carefully on the subject of the war in Gaza. Of course, 570 00:31:58,440 --> 00:32:01,600 Speaker 9: Saudi Arabia as well, I've been playing a very fine 571 00:32:01,600 --> 00:32:04,920 Speaker 9: line diplomatically because, as we've been reporting over the last 572 00:32:05,000 --> 00:32:07,840 Speaker 9: few months, they have been working very closely on a 573 00:32:07,880 --> 00:32:10,840 Speaker 9: normalization deal that would coincide with the defense deal with 574 00:32:10,880 --> 00:32:12,440 Speaker 9: the US as well, So they don't want to give 575 00:32:12,520 --> 00:32:14,680 Speaker 9: up on that. But what the Saudi has told us 576 00:32:14,800 --> 00:32:17,200 Speaker 9: is that essentially they can't push forward with the normalization 577 00:32:17,320 --> 00:32:20,000 Speaker 9: deal while there are still boots on the ground in Gaza. 578 00:32:20,400 --> 00:32:23,280 Speaker 9: Other countries, you look at the likes of Egypt and Kuttar, 579 00:32:23,440 --> 00:32:26,320 Speaker 9: while their role throughout all of this has been to 580 00:32:26,360 --> 00:32:28,560 Speaker 9: play the role of the mediator to push forward the 581 00:32:28,640 --> 00:32:30,800 Speaker 9: cs FAR discussions, and I thought it was really telling 582 00:32:30,880 --> 00:32:33,800 Speaker 9: yesterday that the Prime Minister of Kutar, who also serves 583 00:32:33,800 --> 00:32:36,240 Speaker 9: as their foreign minister, put out a tweet right after 584 00:32:36,600 --> 00:32:40,160 Speaker 9: the killing of Ismayhanie saying that it is very difficult 585 00:32:40,200 --> 00:32:43,320 Speaker 9: to push forward with these negotiations if one of the 586 00:32:43,480 --> 00:32:46,800 Speaker 9: sides of the negotiators has been assassinated. So I think 587 00:32:46,800 --> 00:32:49,400 Speaker 9: there's a lot of pessimism now about the future of 588 00:32:49,400 --> 00:32:50,040 Speaker 9: these cs FAR. 589 00:32:50,080 --> 00:32:52,800 Speaker 5: Talks and Dremono. You mentioned, you know, some of the 590 00:32:52,840 --> 00:32:55,800 Speaker 5: countries Asa Kutar that are trying to act as mediators, 591 00:32:55,840 --> 00:32:59,640 Speaker 5: but it appears at this point the Israel has had 592 00:32:59,680 --> 00:33:03,640 Speaker 5: no interest in pursuing peace or at this moment even 593 00:33:03,680 --> 00:33:07,320 Speaker 5: you know, thinking about their relations with the US. Is 594 00:33:07,320 --> 00:33:09,000 Speaker 5: that a concern in your part of the. 595 00:33:08,920 --> 00:33:12,360 Speaker 9: World, It's definitely a concern. I think there are many 596 00:33:12,360 --> 00:33:15,920 Speaker 9: analysts out there who are questioning the full faith of 597 00:33:16,280 --> 00:33:21,040 Speaker 9: the Israeli government to actually engage in these cease fire discussions. 598 00:33:21,360 --> 00:33:25,360 Speaker 9: We know that there have been several many diplomatic attempts 599 00:33:25,400 --> 00:33:28,320 Speaker 9: to push forward to the discussions. Even Sector of State 600 00:33:28,360 --> 00:33:32,400 Speaker 9: Anthony Blincoln has been in Asia this past week, and 601 00:33:32,480 --> 00:33:35,680 Speaker 9: he gave some comments in Malaysia overnight saying the path 602 00:33:35,760 --> 00:33:38,479 Speaker 9: that the region is on is towards more conflict. It 603 00:33:38,560 --> 00:33:40,520 Speaker 9: has to make the right choices in the day ahead, 604 00:33:40,520 --> 00:33:42,959 Speaker 9: because those choices are the difference between staying on this 605 00:33:43,000 --> 00:33:46,240 Speaker 9: path of violence, of insecurity of suffering, or moving on 606 00:33:46,280 --> 00:33:49,160 Speaker 9: to something very different and much better. So the US 607 00:33:49,200 --> 00:33:52,960 Speaker 9: are still trying very hard to push forward to these discussions. France, 608 00:33:53,440 --> 00:33:56,240 Speaker 9: Germany or other countries looking to get involved as well. 609 00:33:56,400 --> 00:33:59,920 Speaker 9: And the feedback from the qataris even though they're pessimistic, 610 00:34:00,480 --> 00:34:02,520 Speaker 9: they still want to push on. But the question, the 611 00:34:02,560 --> 00:34:05,320 Speaker 9: other question is who is going to be representing Hamas 612 00:34:05,360 --> 00:34:08,160 Speaker 9: because two of the most senior figures have been eliminated 613 00:34:08,239 --> 00:34:08,920 Speaker 9: in the last two days. 614 00:34:09,040 --> 00:34:11,000 Speaker 2: Jermin I got one minute left and I just want 615 00:34:11,040 --> 00:34:14,719 Speaker 2: to take advantage of your encyclopedic knowledge of Lebanon. I 616 00:34:14,760 --> 00:34:17,560 Speaker 2: get out a map like an ugly American, and I'm 617 00:34:17,600 --> 00:34:22,080 Speaker 2: shocked that Haifa is sixty seventy miles from Bayrout. The distance, folks, 618 00:34:22,080 --> 00:34:25,920 Speaker 2: are so short. How far do you perceive that Israel 619 00:34:25,960 --> 00:34:30,640 Speaker 2: would move north across the Lebanese border? Is it one 620 00:34:30,719 --> 00:34:34,200 Speaker 2: or two miles like Syria and Turkey or do they 621 00:34:34,239 --> 00:34:35,920 Speaker 2: move into the suburbs. 622 00:34:35,440 --> 00:34:36,080 Speaker 6: Of Bay Route. 623 00:34:37,920 --> 00:34:40,759 Speaker 9: So the short answer is there was a war in 624 00:34:40,760 --> 00:34:42,759 Speaker 9: two thousand and six eleven. In two thousand and six, 625 00:34:42,840 --> 00:34:45,000 Speaker 9: a July war, and on the back of that it 626 00:34:45,040 --> 00:34:47,719 Speaker 9: was very costly war for both sides. A resolution was 627 00:34:47,760 --> 00:34:50,719 Speaker 9: put in place called Resolution seventeen on one, which dictated 628 00:34:51,200 --> 00:34:54,759 Speaker 9: that Hesbola has to move about thirty kilometers away from 629 00:34:54,760 --> 00:34:57,239 Speaker 9: the southern border north of the Litani River and give 630 00:34:57,320 --> 00:35:00,759 Speaker 9: up its arms. Obviously, the resolution hasn't been iplemented, but 631 00:35:01,440 --> 00:35:03,840 Speaker 9: the analyst within the community will say, Israel, I'm not 632 00:35:03,880 --> 00:35:06,799 Speaker 9: going to stop until seventeen oh one is implemented. And 633 00:35:06,880 --> 00:35:09,200 Speaker 9: even the prime minister, the Lebanese Prime Minister, is saying 634 00:35:09,440 --> 00:35:11,560 Speaker 9: it's time for seventeen oh one to be implemented. So 635 00:35:11,600 --> 00:35:12,680 Speaker 9: they just want to push back. 636 00:35:12,760 --> 00:35:15,400 Speaker 2: Hazballah, do you say that Jumana does that she stays 637 00:35:15,400 --> 00:35:16,279 Speaker 2: in kilometers. 638 00:35:17,200 --> 00:35:19,000 Speaker 6: We're nationwide in America. 639 00:35:19,480 --> 00:35:23,040 Speaker 2: I think my math is the American ac is eighteen 640 00:35:23,200 --> 00:35:25,239 Speaker 2: miles is what we were translating. 641 00:35:25,480 --> 00:35:26,879 Speaker 6: They are lost in translations. 642 00:35:26,920 --> 00:35:29,799 Speaker 2: Jumana Bitteci, thank you as so much, particularly for those 643 00:35:29,840 --> 00:35:33,799 Speaker 2: comments on your levin and she, of course delivers Horizon 644 00:35:33,960 --> 00:35:48,040 Speaker 2: each and every day in Dubai. Joining us now Wendy 645 00:35:48,080 --> 00:35:50,239 Speaker 2: Schiller with the history of this of course at Brown 646 00:35:50,360 --> 00:35:53,880 Speaker 2: University in the tub and Center. Wendy, I think I 647 00:35:53,920 --> 00:35:56,520 Speaker 2: said to you an hour or two ago. I can't 648 00:35:56,560 --> 00:36:00,279 Speaker 2: remember you know what Tom Hanks. Tom Hanks moved in 649 00:36:00,320 --> 00:36:04,560 Speaker 2: a prisoner's swap. But as I see the names leaking out, 650 00:36:04,800 --> 00:36:09,400 Speaker 2: speculation of who these names are, what is the difference 651 00:36:09,440 --> 00:36:15,160 Speaker 2: between the prisoners America and the Allies are getting versus 652 00:36:15,719 --> 00:36:17,920 Speaker 2: the prisoners that Russia is getting. 653 00:36:19,480 --> 00:36:21,560 Speaker 10: Well, the only thing we can interpret right now with 654 00:36:21,600 --> 00:36:24,760 Speaker 10: the knowledge we have, is that Putent values the release 655 00:36:24,800 --> 00:36:27,960 Speaker 10: of these prisoners. 656 00:36:26,840 --> 00:36:28,280 Speaker 8: Either for domestic reasons. 657 00:36:28,320 --> 00:36:32,759 Speaker 10: It could be internal politics within his own government. He 658 00:36:32,840 --> 00:36:35,879 Speaker 10: wants to show a that he can still be a 659 00:36:35,920 --> 00:36:40,880 Speaker 10: partner with other nations in reasonable negotiations in his mind, 660 00:36:41,719 --> 00:36:44,640 Speaker 10: and you can say that people were unduly detained in Russia, 661 00:36:44,960 --> 00:36:49,040 Speaker 10: the American hostages in particular. But nonetheless he is portraying 662 00:36:49,160 --> 00:36:52,120 Speaker 10: the image of somebody that people can work with. And 663 00:36:52,200 --> 00:36:55,920 Speaker 10: I don't think the timing is accidental. I think it's 664 00:36:55,920 --> 00:36:58,200 Speaker 10: an adjustment to what's going on in the American political 665 00:36:58,200 --> 00:37:01,319 Speaker 10: scene right now at the presidential level. And also, you know, 666 00:37:01,520 --> 00:37:03,600 Speaker 10: I think it reflects a little bit of the stalemate 667 00:37:03,680 --> 00:37:04,160 Speaker 10: in Ukraine. 668 00:37:04,239 --> 00:37:05,960 Speaker 2: Okay, I'm going to go there, because you went there, 669 00:37:06,080 --> 00:37:10,719 Speaker 2: Professor Schiller. Are you suggesting that this was sped up 670 00:37:10,880 --> 00:37:14,560 Speaker 2: because of the advent of Vice President Harris into our 671 00:37:14,600 --> 00:37:15,600 Speaker 2: presidential race. 672 00:37:17,000 --> 00:37:23,960 Speaker 10: I think that Putin recognizes he wants to be in 673 00:37:24,000 --> 00:37:28,160 Speaker 10: the mix with whoever wins the selection, and he doesn't 674 00:37:28,239 --> 00:37:31,880 Speaker 10: really gain from being demonized by the Democrats. 675 00:37:32,160 --> 00:37:36,160 Speaker 8: Biden, certainly, being what we call old school in terms of. 676 00:37:36,280 --> 00:37:38,120 Speaker 10: Sort of a Cold War and a product of the 677 00:37:38,120 --> 00:37:40,600 Speaker 10: Cold War, was doing quite a bit of that. I 678 00:37:40,600 --> 00:37:43,160 Speaker 10: don't think Harris will focus as much on that, and 679 00:37:43,200 --> 00:37:45,120 Speaker 10: certainly Trump doesn't do it at all. 680 00:37:45,480 --> 00:37:47,640 Speaker 8: So Poten wants to end up somewhere in. 681 00:37:47,560 --> 00:37:50,920 Speaker 10: The middle of that of that intellectual framing on what 682 00:37:51,000 --> 00:37:53,000 Speaker 10: kind of partner he can be and what really plays 683 00:37:53,000 --> 00:37:53,440 Speaker 10: in the world. 684 00:37:54,160 --> 00:37:56,680 Speaker 5: Tommy, have a read headline across the Bloomberg terminal correct 685 00:37:57,239 --> 00:38:00,880 Speaker 5: Wall Street Journal reporter to be really by Russia in 686 00:38:00,960 --> 00:38:03,440 Speaker 5: prisoner swap. So again, as you highlighted, tom this is 687 00:38:03,440 --> 00:38:04,480 Speaker 5: a fluid situation. 688 00:38:04,560 --> 00:38:07,000 Speaker 6: It's a fluid situation. I really want to emphasize this. 689 00:38:07,080 --> 00:38:09,759 Speaker 2: We believe in Bloomberg we don't do rumor, we don't 690 00:38:09,760 --> 00:38:13,760 Speaker 2: do speculation, but we're going to aggregate in legitimate news sources, 691 00:38:13,800 --> 00:38:16,319 Speaker 2: and we're doing that right now with the leadership of 692 00:38:16,320 --> 00:38:18,560 Speaker 2: our Jennifer Jacobs at Bloomberg News. 693 00:38:18,560 --> 00:38:19,960 Speaker 6: Incredibly fluid situation. 694 00:38:20,400 --> 00:38:23,680 Speaker 5: All right, let's move on Wendy, we're right smack in 695 00:38:23,680 --> 00:38:27,560 Speaker 5: the middle of this very contentious presidential election race. The 696 00:38:27,600 --> 00:38:31,480 Speaker 5: next issue I guess for VP Harris is to pick 697 00:38:31,480 --> 00:38:33,880 Speaker 5: a vice presidential candidate. What's the latest on that. 698 00:38:35,160 --> 00:38:38,520 Speaker 10: Well, we've heard that the governor of Pennsylvania, Joshapiro, I believe, 699 00:38:38,560 --> 00:38:39,520 Speaker 10: is meeting or talking. 700 00:38:39,600 --> 00:38:41,920 Speaker 8: You reported that onto her team. 701 00:38:43,000 --> 00:38:45,200 Speaker 10: If I had to guess, it's it's down to Mark 702 00:38:45,280 --> 00:38:46,800 Speaker 10: Kelly and Josh Shapiro. 703 00:38:47,719 --> 00:38:50,080 Speaker 8: It's easier to take a senator out of a state. 704 00:38:50,200 --> 00:38:53,240 Speaker 8: Arizona has a law that says the governor has to replace. 705 00:38:53,560 --> 00:38:56,920 Speaker 10: A senator with the same party person, so the Democrats 706 00:38:56,920 --> 00:38:59,759 Speaker 10: don't lose a seat and a special election or general 707 00:38:59,760 --> 00:39:01,879 Speaker 10: election and won't be helpful two more years for that seat. 708 00:39:02,080 --> 00:39:06,880 Speaker 10: So the Democrats actually are okay if Kelly leaves Arizona. 709 00:39:06,920 --> 00:39:09,600 Speaker 10: But Pennsylvania is I think a little trickier to estimate. 710 00:39:09,880 --> 00:39:11,879 Speaker 8: Is Josh Bureau stronger for Kamala. 711 00:39:11,600 --> 00:39:14,520 Speaker 10: Harris in Pennsylvania as governor with the machine that he's 712 00:39:14,520 --> 00:39:16,920 Speaker 10: built to win the governorship two years ago, or is 713 00:39:16,920 --> 00:39:20,239 Speaker 10: he better on a ticket to bring Pennsylvania but also 714 00:39:20,360 --> 00:39:23,640 Speaker 10: other states like Pennsylvania, And I think he's also an 715 00:39:23,680 --> 00:39:25,000 Speaker 10: observant Jewish person. 716 00:39:25,280 --> 00:39:27,440 Speaker 8: He has made that part of his persona. 717 00:39:28,080 --> 00:39:30,520 Speaker 10: It is resonated not only with Jewish munny, but also 718 00:39:30,560 --> 00:39:33,080 Speaker 10: with religious people have different religious backgrounds. 719 00:39:33,080 --> 00:39:35,759 Speaker 8: He talks about his faith a lot. So whether that's 720 00:39:35,760 --> 00:39:38,200 Speaker 8: good for Harris or not, We're not sure. 721 00:39:38,600 --> 00:39:41,560 Speaker 2: I have never written a song about this, but I'm 722 00:39:41,560 --> 00:39:44,840 Speaker 2: going to go there, Professor Schuler. In nineteen sixty, my 723 00:39:44,920 --> 00:39:47,160 Speaker 2: mother took me out to see Richard Nixon with a 724 00:39:47,200 --> 00:39:53,040 Speaker 2: three day beard will Republicans cigars, and there were a 725 00:39:53,120 --> 00:39:57,080 Speaker 2: beautiful spring morning with jfk in a lovely blue silk 726 00:39:57,160 --> 00:40:00,600 Speaker 2: suit and Missus Kennedy next to him. And guess what. 727 00:40:00,800 --> 00:40:03,080 Speaker 2: The entire uproar where I lived was. 728 00:40:03,880 --> 00:40:06,000 Speaker 6: Omg, he's Catholic. 729 00:40:06,760 --> 00:40:10,240 Speaker 2: And to speak to you in Providence and Brown University, folks, 730 00:40:10,520 --> 00:40:13,040 Speaker 2: I hate to say that was a huge deal. Then, 731 00:40:13,880 --> 00:40:16,600 Speaker 2: with great respect, Wendy Schiller, are we going to have 732 00:40:16,640 --> 00:40:19,920 Speaker 2: a huge deal if it's a Harris Shapiro ticket? 733 00:40:20,600 --> 00:40:22,000 Speaker 8: Yeah, I mean I think that's a factor. 734 00:40:22,000 --> 00:40:23,480 Speaker 10: I mean, nobody should put their head in the sand 735 00:40:23,560 --> 00:40:26,280 Speaker 10: and say, you know someone who's a woman of color 736 00:40:26,560 --> 00:40:28,400 Speaker 10: and a Jewish candidate. 737 00:40:28,440 --> 00:40:30,120 Speaker 8: Now Lieberman was Jewish ram. 738 00:40:29,880 --> 00:40:32,160 Speaker 2: With Gore Goodtories, thank you. 739 00:40:32,360 --> 00:40:34,960 Speaker 10: Right, you know, so we've had that before, and you 740 00:40:35,040 --> 00:40:37,160 Speaker 10: are not only time, you're right about nineteen sixty, but 741 00:40:37,239 --> 00:40:39,839 Speaker 10: certainly the primaries, the very few primaries that they had 742 00:40:39,880 --> 00:40:43,640 Speaker 10: the Democrats before that, Hubert Humphrey made an issue of 743 00:40:43,960 --> 00:40:47,000 Speaker 10: JFK's Catholicism, So you know, it wasn't just an issue 744 00:40:47,040 --> 00:40:48,880 Speaker 10: in America, was an issue in the Democratic Party at 745 00:40:48,920 --> 00:40:49,320 Speaker 10: that time. 746 00:40:49,600 --> 00:40:50,719 Speaker 8: So yes, I think. 747 00:40:50,800 --> 00:40:54,360 Speaker 10: And also let's not forget Israel, Gaza and the disaffected 748 00:40:54,840 --> 00:40:58,400 Speaker 10: younger voters and also people in Michigan of Palstinian and arascent. 749 00:40:58,800 --> 00:41:01,480 Speaker 10: You know, how will that play. Josh Burou is a 750 00:41:01,520 --> 00:41:03,719 Speaker 10: strong about sport of Israel. You know, if you have 751 00:41:03,800 --> 00:41:05,840 Speaker 10: to weigh who's going to bring you votes, who's going 752 00:41:05,920 --> 00:41:07,600 Speaker 10: to lose your votes? You know, if you have to 753 00:41:07,600 --> 00:41:09,960 Speaker 10: think about neutrality, I think Mark Kelly is a more 754 00:41:10,040 --> 00:41:12,239 Speaker 10: neutral choice than Joshapiro. 755 00:41:12,440 --> 00:41:15,720 Speaker 8: And Joshapiro himself may be thinking of running in twenty 756 00:41:15,760 --> 00:41:17,680 Speaker 8: eight Can he win through election in twenty six? So 757 00:41:18,200 --> 00:41:19,360 Speaker 8: very complicated calculating. 758 00:41:19,400 --> 00:41:21,480 Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, I gotta be quick here. Paul Strenia, how 759 00:41:21,520 --> 00:41:23,480 Speaker 2: many times have you seen top gun? Oh? 760 00:41:23,520 --> 00:41:24,240 Speaker 5: Too many accounts? 761 00:41:24,280 --> 00:41:26,920 Speaker 6: Come on? How many a dozen forty. 762 00:41:27,160 --> 00:41:29,760 Speaker 2: Professor Shuler, how many times have you seen Top Gun? 763 00:41:30,920 --> 00:41:33,320 Speaker 10: I've seen the Top Gun on and also Top Gun Maverick. 764 00:41:33,400 --> 00:41:35,680 Speaker 10: I think actually might be better than Top Gun. 765 00:41:35,760 --> 00:41:39,879 Speaker 2: Okay, you're telling me the Vice President's going to turn 766 00:41:39,920 --> 00:41:42,080 Speaker 2: down Top Gun from Arizona. 767 00:41:43,600 --> 00:41:46,239 Speaker 10: I'm saying that I think it's the same as you know. 768 00:41:46,280 --> 00:41:49,000 Speaker 10: It's a more neutral and I think a slightly safer 769 00:41:49,120 --> 00:41:51,920 Speaker 10: choice for lots of different reasons to pick Mark Kelly 770 00:41:52,080 --> 00:41:53,040 Speaker 10: over Joshear. 771 00:41:53,560 --> 00:41:56,160 Speaker 2: This has been wonderful. Professor Schuler is such a trooper 772 00:41:56,760 --> 00:42:01,319 Speaker 2: usually valuators. Civics textbook is defending, and we're thrilled to 773 00:42:01,360 --> 00:42:04,160 Speaker 2: have her on to give you a historical perspective. 774 00:42:04,040 --> 00:42:06,080 Speaker 6: Of these moments as well. 775 00:42:06,400 --> 00:42:09,600 Speaker 2: This is a Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, bringing you the best 776 00:42:09,600 --> 00:42:14,319 Speaker 2: in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. You can also 777 00:42:14,440 --> 00:42:18,480 Speaker 2: watch the show live on YouTube. Visit the Bloomberg Podcast 778 00:42:18,600 --> 00:42:22,640 Speaker 2: channel on YouTube to see the show weekday mornings from 779 00:42:22,680 --> 00:42:25,920 Speaker 2: seven to ten am Eastern from our global headquarters in 780 00:42:26,040 --> 00:42:29,719 Speaker 2: New York City. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, 781 00:42:30,080 --> 00:42:33,640 Speaker 2: or anywhere else you listen, and always on Bloomberg Radio. 782 00:42:33,800 --> 00:42:37,000 Speaker 2: The Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app,