WEBVTT - Ray Dalio on the Coming Crisis in US Debt

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Authoughts podcast.

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Allaway.

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe Wisenthal.

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 4>Joe, have you.

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Ever seen those visuals of a trillion dollars where it's like,

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 2>here's one hundred, here's one hundred dollar bill, here's a

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 2>stack of ten thousand dollars, here's a million dollars, and

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 2>eventually you get to one trillion, and it's just all

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 2>these palettes of notes that are worth a billion each

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 2>and they're like covering the size of a football field

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 2>or something, and they're double stacked.

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 3>I love that. I never really know what they mean.

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 3>It's like, oh, this is as big as the Statue

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 3>of Liberty or something like that, and it's like, okay,

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 3>like I mean that is objectively big.

0:00:57.440 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 4>I get.

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Is that a good way to visualize mine in terms

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 3>of what it means? I don't know, but yes, money,

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 3>especially your small denomination bills, can really pile up before

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 3>you get to real value.

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, okay, speaking of big numbers, the US budget deficit

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 2>was about one point eight trillion in twenty twenty four,

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 2>so if we stick with the visual, almost almost two

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 2>football fields of double stacked palettes of one billion dollars each.

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 2>So okay, quite a lot. But I think this ill

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 2>we saws, I know, but we didn't see a trillion dollars.

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 2>We saw billions. And I think this kind of illustrates

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 2>one of the really difficult things about finance and debt,

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 2>which is all of us, as you mentioned earlier, kind

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 2>of struggle to grasp the scale of these numbers that

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 2>are involved here, and one point eight trillions seems so

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 2>abstract that we have to describe it using football field

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 2>analogies or whatever else. And if we can't really grasp

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the scale of the debt because it's just this number

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 2>that no one really understands or even takes seriously, then

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 2>it feels like it's difficult to tackle to solve.

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'll say two things on that. I mean, I

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 3>think a you have to question, like, at any given point,

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 3>what isn't a called economy solving for right? And so

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 3>people have anxiety about the size of the debt and

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 3>the deficit. And then it's like, but you know a time,

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's also.

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 2>A high and they also have anxiety about social services, yeah.

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 3>And things like that, And then there is also the

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 3>question of you know, we think of a household or

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 3>any entity as like you have to have money to

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 3>pay your bills. Are there other dynamics besides numbers that

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 3>cause a financial crisis. So, for example, you could have

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 3>a country with very high debt to GDP and it's

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 3>fine because you know, it goes on for longer than

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 3>people expect. And you can have countries with low debts

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 3>and deficits, but because they have an internal political crisis

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 3>because people no longer have confidence in the government of

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 3>this to pay it back. You can have a crisis

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 3>even at low levels. And so even thinking about what

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 3>does it mean to solve a debt, talk about debt

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 3>at the national level is simultaneously a financial discussion and

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 3>one about political confidence.

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 2>A social conversation. All right, Well, on that note, I

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 2>am very happy to say that I think we have

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 2>the perfect guest to talk about all of these things,

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 2>someone who has consistently had some very big thoughts about

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 2>these very big numbers. We're going to be speaking with

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Ray Dallio, the legendary founder of Bridgewater, the author of

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 2>numerous books, including a new one titled How Countries Go Broke,

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 2>principles for navigating the big debt cycle, and most importantly,

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 2>a key player in the invention of the chicken nugget.

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 2>I am very excited. Ray, Welcome to the show.

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 4>Wow, what an introduction. Thank you.

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Tracy's good at introductions. If it had been me, I'd

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 3>just been like Ray Dalio, you all know his name,

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 3>let's break it in. But Tracy does it properly, especially

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 3>for a guest of your stature.

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 4>You do pretty good too, Joe, thank you for having me.

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 2>So I want to start with the really important stuff.

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 2>So first, let me just thank you on behalf of

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 2>millions of Americans for your contribution to the chicken nugget.

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 2>What did you do exactly when it comes to chicken nuggets?

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 4>What was your role? Well, when I was pretty young,

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 4>I started trading commodities because they had the lowest margin requirements.

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 4>So I figured if I was going to be right

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 4>and I wouldn't do it, if I wasn't going to

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 4>be right, that I would be able to get the

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 4>most amount of leverage out of these and so I

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 4>started trading commodities before most people started to trade commodities,

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 4>and then that led me in nineteen seventy three when

0:04:52.960 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 4>I graduated from business school to become a commodity investor

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 4>sort of. And what I did was I was in

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 4>charge of institutional futures at one of these brokerage houses,

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 4>and that brought me in contact with the mechanics of

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 4>how hedging and how chickens and grain and everything worked.

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 4>So fast forward, I got to meet the biggest chicken

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 4>producers in the world, and McDonald's hired me as a

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 4>consultant of sorts to advise them on how they were

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 4>going to safely price the chicken McNugget. You see. Their

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 4>worry was that if they this was very volatile times

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 4>then and their worry was if they bought the chicken

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 4>and they put it on the menu and the prices changed,

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 4>like went up a lot, they'd have to change the

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 4>menu price. So they needed to know that they could

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 4>have stable prices. And we walked and I knew that

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 4>the mechanics of chicken. He had you produce it. There

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 4>were little chicks and they didn't cost much. And what

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 4>cost most of the money to make a chicken was

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 4>the corn and soyed meal that they produce as feed

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 4>to feed them to get them to be big chickens

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 4>and so on. And so I went to one of

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 4>my chicken producing clients and McDonald's, and I showed how

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 4>this chicken producing client could hedge the price and give

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 4>them a stable price, and because of that, they were

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 4>able to put chicken McNuggets on the menu.

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 3>I love this story for multiple I love the idea

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 3>of creating a sort of synthetic financial chicken McNugget price

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 3>through the inputs. You know, I want to say, you know,

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 3>for a long time, I probably bought into this view

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 3>that the real creators in an economy are the farmers

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 3>and the growers and the entrepreneurs who you know, come

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 3>up with a distribution mechanism, and it always sort of

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 3>the people in finance are thinking, you know, is seen

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 3>as like, oh, they're just sort of speculating or betting

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 3>on that. And I've changed my mind over the years.

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 3>And you know, there are many good ideas in the

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 3>world that people have on paper and labs and so

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 3>forth that never exist because the financing mechanisms to bring

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 3>them to place don't exist. And so I would say

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 3>that if you like, especially in nineteen seventy five, when

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 3>I imagine we didn't in the mid nineteen seventies, when

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 3>we didn't have the same level of easy running computing

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 3>power in as liquid markets, et cetera. That someone who

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 3>figures out how to create a synthetic McNugget price is

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 3>as much the inventor of the McNugget as the person

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 3>who figured out how to, you know, ball and fry

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 3>the chicken.

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 4>Do you think I can claim being the inventor the

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 4>chicken nugget?

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 4>I think that I think that'd be overreach.

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, anyway, I love that.

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 2>I love that story, all right, So I want to

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 2>get to debt the actual important things. So the thrust

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 2>of the new book, it kind of reminds me of

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 2>one of my all time financial favorites, which is a

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 2>history of interest rates by Homer and Sydney. And you're

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of taking a similar approach, although maybe you're not

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 2>going all the way back to ancient Babylon or something

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 2>like that. But why did you decide to focus on

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 2>debt cycles? What's the allure for you? And what do

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 2>you learn from history?

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 4>In nineteen seventy one, before after I graduated college and

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 4>before I went to business school, I clerked on the

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 4>floor of the New York Stock Exchange on and I

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 4>filed the markets. I filed the market since I was

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 4>a kid. I first got involved in markets when I

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 4>was twelve. I used to caddy and then it was

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 4>the time of the stock market, and the stock market

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 4>was very hot, and I took my cadding money and

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 4>I did that. But anyway, that led me to be

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 4>on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange and

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 4>follow markets. And on August fifteenth, nineteen seventy one, Richard

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 4>Nixon Sunday Night, got on the television and told people

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 4>that the monetary system was going to change, that the

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 4>money that they thought they could get gold was thought

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 4>of as money then, and paper money was like checks

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 4>in a checkbook, didn't have any intrinsic value, no value

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 4>that they would not get because there was a fixed

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 4>exchange ring. And he gave some sort of BS story

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 4>about why that was, which it was really because they

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 4>didn't have enough gold to back up their money claims.

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 4>And I walked on the floor of the New York

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 4>Stock Exchange. I thought, this is a big crisis. This

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 4>is going to be terrible, and I thought the stock

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 4>market I was going to go down a lot and

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 4>I went on the floor and it went up the

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 4>most in years. And I didn't understand that. I didn't

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 4>understand why, And so I started to do research, and

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 4>I found that on March fifteenth, nineteen thirty three, President

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 4>Roosevelt got on the radio and made the exact same

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 4>announcement for the exact same reason. And I studied, then,

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 4>why is it that they went up a lot? Okay,

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 4>you devalue money. When you devalue money and you make

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 4>money very easy, things go up. And so I learned

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 4>not just the nature of that mechanic, but I learned

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 4>that things that surprised me in my life often were

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 4>things that never happened in my lifetime, but they happened

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 4>in times in history. So I studied the Great Depression.

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 4>I figured, okay, I should study all big things that happened,

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 4>and I studied that Great Depression. And as a result

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 4>of doing that, in two thousand and eight, I was

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 4>able to anticipate the global financial crisis ahead of it.

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 4>And the reason is is because when you have a

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 4>debt crisis and interest rates go down and hit zero,

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 4>so they can't go down anymore. Cutting interest rates anymore

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 4>is no longer going to work. And what I learned

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 4>from studying this event in nineteen thirty three is that

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 4>when that happens, the government prints money and buys the bonds.

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:56.439
<v Speaker 4>So what happened in two thousand and eight was exactly that,

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 4>and I wouldn't have understood it if I didn't study

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 4>what happened back then. So that changed my whole approach

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 4>to decision making, which is also why I did this

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 4>study recently, and that came out as the book that

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 4>you're referred to, you know, Principles for dealing with the

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 4>Changing World Order. I needed to study things that hadn't

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 4>happened in my lifetime. So we'll get into it. Yeah,

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 4>there are things that are happening to us in our

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 4>lifetimes that haven't happened before that you have to go

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 4>back to the thirties or other periods of time to understand.

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 4>And related to that is this money debt thing.

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about the present tense And obviously Tracy and

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 3>her fantastic intro talked about the size of the deficit

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 3>life year, and you know, you see so much about

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 3>the debt. You know, there's two things in the story.

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 3>You're told there's sort of two things that struck me

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 3>right now, Which is one is, obviously we don't have

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 3>a form of currency that's quote backed by anything. There's

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 3>nothing to quote run out of that we couldn't mate it.

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 3>It's the sort of fiat currency in the truest sense

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 3>of the word. There's also the other thing is you

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 3>know you mentioned stock surged because of these moves represented

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 3>this big fiscal loosening. We are in an era in

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 3>which inflation has been high for several years. Inflation is

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 3>still above target, and many people would say this still

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 3>most persistent issue right now is this issue of too

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 3>much money and that there's still things are too expensive,

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 3>et cetera, and so there's still this impulse to titan

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 3>So when you think about these lessons that you're talking about,

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 3>then when you look at our fiscal position in twenty

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty five, what do you think about what? When you

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 3>look at our fiscal position, what do you see?

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 4>Again? I think you can tell from the way that

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 4>I talk. I think about the mechanics and how does

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 4>it work. And in answer to your prior question, the

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 4>reason I'm writing this book is because I think that

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 4>we're at an inflection point and I think that people

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 4>do not economists and people and everybody. Policy makers don't

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 4>adequately understand the big debt cycle. They understand the shorter

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 4>term debt cycles. You know things economies, we inflation goes down,

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 4>they make credit available, things go up, stocks and everything

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 4>goes up until you get too much and you get inflation.

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 4>Then they tighten credit and so on. But the big

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 4>debt cycle isn't understood. And yet we're there, We're at

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 4>the brink of one of these. And so what I

0:14:55.040 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 4>think about this is that there are really three factors

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 4>that drive the big debt cycle, and I want to

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 4>convey those. I'm a part of my life that I'm

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 4>trying to convey those. And so, okay, most people think

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 4>interest rates go up because of inflation tightness or ease

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 4>of monetary policy, but they don't realize that there are

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 4>limits to dick growth. And here's how it happens. One

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 4>man's debts or another man's financial assets. So when you're

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 4>holding a lot of bonds, that's a large percentage of

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 4>the portfolio, that's also a large debt. And think of

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 4>the credit system like a circulatory system that brings nutrients

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 4>to all of the parts of the body. So you

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 4>give mind power. And if that buying power is used

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 4>to create productivity, then what it does is it produces

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 4>incomes that are large enough to pay the debts back

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 4>and give you productivity and everybody's app But if the

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 4>debts are too large and don't produce the productivity, you

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 4>don't have the income that's necessary to service those debts.

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 4>And so in this circulatory system, if it's healthy, you're

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 4>seeing incomes rise with the debts, and you're seeing the

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 4>system work well. When debts rise relative to incomes that

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 4>are needed to service the debt, it's like plaque in

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 4>the system, building up in the circulatory system because it

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 4>means that first of all, you have a debt service

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 4>problem that you have to pay the debt service, and

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 4>that's like plaque in that it leaves less room for spending. So,

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 4>for example, the US government has an interest bill that's

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 4>about a trillion dollars a year, and if they didn't

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 4>have a trillion that didn't have that interest bill, they'd

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 4>have a trillion dollars more spending, and that process gets

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 4>worse and worse over time. In addition, one has to

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 4>roll over the debt that was last accumulating, so we

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 4>have to roll over this year about nine trillion, a

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 4>little over nine trillion dollars of debt. That means the

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 4>new you know, they get it runs out, then you

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 4>have to sell it again. And when they have a

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 4>lot of that debt, that's a problem. And when you're

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:48.360
<v Speaker 4>doing putting a lot more debt on top of that

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 4>pile of debt, so it's not just the existing debt

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 4>that's a problem, but you have to add more debt sales,

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 4>which equals essentially the budget deficit, which now is going

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 4>to be about seven and a half percent of GDP.

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 4>You've got to sell those. You have to sell those

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 4>to people or institutions or central banks or sovereign funds

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 4>that hold these bonds while they're already holding too many

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 4>bonds and now they have to roll them over, and

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 4>you have to sell these new bonds that are coming on,

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 4>and that can be a problem, and it can be

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 4>worse than that, because if they don't have if they say, hey,

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 4>there are too many of these bonds and i've got

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 4>enough and I don't want to buy it, or worse,

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 4>there could be some reasons that they don't want to

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 4>buy it, like for example, sanctions. Okay, we're living in

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 4>a world similar to the nineteen thirties, and if I

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 4>was the Chinese, I would worry that what would happen

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:01.399
<v Speaker 4>to me might happen what happened to the Japanese in

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 4>the nineteen thirties, which is that we froze their bonds,

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 4>a meaning they didn't get their money. And so nowadays,

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 4>with sanctions and too many bonds and so on, when

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 4>I calculate who are the buyers and how much do

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 4>we have to sell, I find a big imbalance, and

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 4>I know how that works. You know what happens is

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 4>central banks buy these bonds, They print money and buy

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 4>the bonds, and then they lose money on the bonds,

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 4>and you get a negative network at the central bank,

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 4>and you get this spiral when you reach the part

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 4>of the cycle that you have to borrow money to

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 4>pay debt service, and then the holders of those bonds say, okay,

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 4>it's a risky situation. In the private credit market, we

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 4>call that the debt spiral, the debt debt spiral, because

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 4>when you have to to roll over the debts but

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 4>it's risky, the credit spreads go up. And when the

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 4>credit spreads go up, then it adds to the debt

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.239
<v Speaker 4>service and it becomes a spiral. That's a problem. So

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 4>the way I calculate it is that we're quite near

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 4>that point.

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Can I just press you on the inflection idea, because

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 2>I think this is one of the things that people

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 2>really struggle with, because it is true the US has

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot of debt, and it's true that it's issuing

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 2>more debt in order to pay down interest. But at

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 2>the same time, nothing really bad has happened quite yet,

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 2>and I think there's a sense of call it maybe

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 2>debt doom fatigue. We've had warnings over the deficit for decades. Now,

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.400
<v Speaker 2>how do you actually go about figuring out when the

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 2>cycle will turn or what specific things do you look

0:20:55.480 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 2>for as the proximate catalyst for that inflection point?

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's why I wrote my book How Countries Will

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 4>Go Broke that by the way, when I say it's

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 4>a book, it'll come out as a book, but I

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 4>made it free online for anybody who wants to read it,

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 4>and what I wanted to show was the actual mechanics

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 4>of how that happens. So I hope your listeners will

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 4>get it and you know it's free, it's there for

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 4>you to start to consider, and what it is is

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 4>look at that mechanics and the signs that you can

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 4>see that happening. In other words, first start to do

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 4>the supplied demand analysis. Simple when that dynamic I describe

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:48.719
<v Speaker 4>starts happening, you can see it because the amount that

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 4>is sold is not bought by the private sector anymore

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 4>of those other buyers, and then the central bank has

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 4>to come in and then print money and make up

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 4>that difference, and then that the value is money. So

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 4>we saw let's call it a palpitation. I give this example.

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 4>It's like a heart attack. We saw that when in

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty, in twenty twenty one, when the government needed

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twenty to send out a lot of money,

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 4>it actually sent out about twice the amount of money

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 4>that people in their incomes lost or businesses lost. They

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 4>sent out twice as much amount of money then and

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 4>then in twenty twenty one they did it again without

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 4>the need. But there was a move from a right

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:49.640
<v Speaker 4>of center policy to a left of center policy in

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 4>which universal basic income and the desire to do that

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 4>put out that money. And so where did the government

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 4>get the money from. They got it from the central

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 4>bank that produced the money and sent it out, and

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 4>so everybody's getting all this money and they're surprised that

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 4>prices went up so okay, So you have that wave

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:21.479
<v Speaker 4>of inflation that was like a warning heart attack. So

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 4>what I'm trying to do in that book is show

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 4>the dynamics and the mechanics that show how you can

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 4>calculate what the supplied demand is and what will happen

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 4>at what's likely to happen, and what has happened through time.

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 4>So I go back through time and I show these many,

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 4>many cases of it so that you can distinguish it,

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 4>because I'm with you the alternative, which has been a problem.

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's like somebody who's built up their cholesterol

0:23:57.200 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 4>and lived this way and they say, I haven't had

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 4>a heart attack, and they get that as positive reinforcement, and.

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 2>I guess the nuggets, and there we are.

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 4>So the question I have for everybody, for those in

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 4>the administration and for others, is that dynamic which you

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 4>can see we're played out in there. You could see

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 4>the moment by moment, literally month by month changes that

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 4>are the symptoms and the indicators that you're having a

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 4>heart attack, an economic heart attack at that crisis. It's

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 4>shown in that book. And the only thing I want

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 4>to do is, first of all, say is that logical?

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:44.239
<v Speaker 4>Do you see it? And so in our conversation, I

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 4>can't show you the charts and numbers and so on,

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 4>but I can tell you. And so we should be

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:55.479
<v Speaker 4>asking ourselves is that logical? Has it happened before? And

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 4>then what do we do about it? Rather than say

0:24:58.359 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 4>we don't have to worry about it?

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 3>What does it look like? Specifically? Okay, you walk through

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 3>the math and you talk about you know, at some

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 3>point you could talk about supply and demand and is

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 3>the demand actually there? And there have been warnings, as

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 3>both you and Tracy acknowledged for years, and you know

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 3>you have these little tremors or maybe heart attacks and

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 3>so forth. Let's say it happens, and I don't know

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 3>what it is, but what is the equivalent in twenty

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 3>twenty five or twenty twenty six or twenty twenty seven

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 3>of Nixon suddenly taking us off the gold standard?

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 4>Is it?

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 3>And you sort of hinted at it, do you see

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 3>plausibly mixing up with geopolitics from the trade wars? An

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 3>equivalent of saying we don't acknowledge China's debt, that that's

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 3>not real debt. We're freezing it, we're paying it off.

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 3>They have no claims to it. Is that something that

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 3>you could see happen? What does that day look like?

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 3>In your view?

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 4>That day looks like what happened on August fifteenth, nineteen

0:25:56.560 --> 0:26:01.400
<v Speaker 4>seventy one, but just much bigger. You'll see you'll see

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 4>the supply demand problem. You will see a spike in

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 4>interest rates, a tightening very much by the way these

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 4>always happen, that happened in twenty twenty. There'll be a

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 4>spike in interest rates. It will show up as interest

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 4>rates rising and the value of money going down, particularly

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:30.239
<v Speaker 4>in relation to gold or other currencies. Perhaps, although this

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 4>is something that will affect all currencies because they'll all

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 4>be in the same they'll all depreciate it get together,

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 4>and you'll see the rates rising, even though the Federal

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:45.880
<v Speaker 4>reserve is easy. Then you will see the Federal Reserve

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 4>come in and buy and do another QE, and then

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.880
<v Speaker 4>you're going to see the kind of reaction that you

0:26:56.960 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 4>saw back in twenty twenty and twenty one on where

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:06.439
<v Speaker 4>not only the inflation component but gold and other asset

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:09.360
<v Speaker 4>prices in the scent going up, it'll look like that.

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:11.199
<v Speaker 3>But just to be clear, I want to press on

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 3>this point. When that what is the equivalent announcement of

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 3>a Nixon going off the gold standard in nineteen in

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 3>August nineteen seventy one, what is that thing today? Is it?

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Do you?

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:30.879
<v Speaker 4>They won't. They won't because because we have a Fiat monetary.

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so we can't do it can't be the same.

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't require an announcement, But do.

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 3>You expect there to be a policy announcement of we

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 3>are no longer paying the debt, say owned by China.

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 4>I'll tell you what you will certainly see, and then

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 4>I'll tell you what you will possibly see. What you

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:53.719
<v Speaker 4>will certainly see is the Federal Reserve coming in and

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 4>buying a lot like it did. And it doesn't have

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 4>to say an announcement, but it'll come in like that

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 4>like they did in two thousand and eight, or like

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 4>they did in twenty twenty, except in a bigger way.

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 4>But what you might have in preparation for that, like

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:16.400
<v Speaker 4>in nineteen seventy one, is certain actions taken to deal

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 4>with that issue, such as extending the maturity of the debt.

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 4>These are possibilities.

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:24.439
<v Speaker 3>Can you say you're not like a default on some

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:25.120
<v Speaker 3>people's debt.

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but I think the government would do it such

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 4>as that country is going to be sanctioned, and therefore

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 4>to sanction them, we are not going to pay the debt.

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 4>That would be a very classic and certainly fireworks should

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 4>go off in your mind about that signal. I'm not

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 4>saying it's going to happen, but that is one of

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 4>those things. And you could see then the government saying

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 4>that they're going to restructure the debt. They won't say

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 4>it's a default. They will say under this policy, we're

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 4>going to be better off if we don't vault the fault.

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 4>We won't change what you're going to get paid, but

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 4>we're going to spread it out over more years. That'll

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 4>be a restructuring of the debt combined with some monetization

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 4>of the debt, in other words, a central bank policy

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 4>where they're buying some of that debt. That'll look like that.

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 4>If it gets bad, then you could have more extreme

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 4>things happened.

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Since we're on the topic of major events in the

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 2>financial system, wonder if you've been following any of the

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 2>papers or thought pieces coming out of parts of the

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration, and specifically this hypothetical situation of a Mara

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 2>a Lago accord where the US basically gets a weaker

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 2>dollar and also gets to maintain its special status in

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 2>the global financial system. What do you think about the

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 2>possibility of the US restructuring the entire system so as

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 2>to further benefit itself.

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 4>I think that that's a real possibility, and it's done

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 4>semi secretively. But I want to be clear what that's like.

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it's a depreciation of the dollar in

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 4>relationship to all other currencies. I think all other currencies

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 4>will depreciate with the dollar. In other words, it's up

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 4>to each central bank, and pretty much in terms of

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 4>other currencies, it's an ugly content. You know, there's the

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 4>Euro and the European situation, which is terrible. There's the

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 4>Japanese yen. They have a huge amount of debt which

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 4>they're monetizing and so on. There's China's REMMB and that's

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 4>not going to be a safe soorehold of wealth. And

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 4>none of those currencies are going to sort of be

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 4>what you'd call strong. So I think it would be

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 4>very much like the nineteen seventies, which is very much

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 4>like the nineteen thirties in which they all go down

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 4>in relation to gold or other hard assets like that.

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 4>And you know, what is the alternative money? Will be

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 4>the question, what's the alternative money that is stable and

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 4>supply But bitcoin might be a bit part of that,

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 4>could be a big part of that. But what is

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 4>the alternative money? Because debt is money and money is debt.

0:31:56.200 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 4>When I say debt is money, debt is money. Cop

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 4>you're holding this and you're people are going to give

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 4>you money, and money is stored in a debt instrument.

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 4>When you're holding your money, you're putting it in a

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 4>debt instrument, So they're one and the same. When you

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 4>have too much debt, it goes down. So I would

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 4>think it's more like gold bitcoin. What is the alternative money?

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 4>Money has two purposes, right, a medium of exchange and

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 4>a storehold of wealth. As far as a medium of exchange,

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 4>it can keep working as a medium of exchange. In

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Germany's Ymar Republic or Argentina recently, you can you know,

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 4>you can carry back barrels of wheelbarrows of money and

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 4>it's you can still exchange it. They had so much

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 4>that they couldn't count it, so they waited. This is

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 4>literally the case. So the money will can be used

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 4>for medium exchange, but as a storehold of wealth, it's

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 4>not going to be used, and people will look for

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 4>other storeholds of wealth that are movable and tradeable. So

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 4>like in the thirties and then the forties, what did

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 4>countries do with each other. They're not going to trust

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 4>that the other country is not going to print the

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 4>money or do that, So they exchanged gold. Because gold

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 4>has the attributes, it's limited in supply, it's not easy

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 4>to manufacture, and throughout history it's been held by central banks.

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 4>It's used today. Gold is the third largest reserve currency.

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 4>It's the dollar, then the euro, then gold, and then

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 4>the Japanese in and so that's why I'm saying I

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 4>think that in that particular dynamic, you say, well, what

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 4>is it that's the storehold of wealth, and you see

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 4>and I emphasize gold, but bitcoin two has elements of that.

0:33:54.520 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 4>It's not real estate because real estate is down. You

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 4>have a problem with real estate. Real estate is nailed down.

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 4>You can't move it around, you can't. It doesn't work

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 4>that way. It's very interest rate sensitive, so when interest

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 4>rates go up, it hurts it. It's also very easily

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 4>taxed because it's not moved, you can easily tax it,

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 4>so it's not like it could be exchanged. So there's

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 4>a very limited number of alternative moneies.

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 3>So you know when people say something like a mar

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Lago chord and they harken back to the Plaza coord

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 3>that was clearly about we want a weaker dollar because

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 3>we want it weaker against other FIAT currencies for the

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 3>virtue of strengthening American manufacturing. What you're saying then is

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 3>that it couldn't work that way this time. We can't

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 3>think it's such a tight analog because it's not going

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:49.800
<v Speaker 3>to weaken just against other currencies, it'll weaken against heart assets.

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Just real quickly, if we were if we had you

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 3>on the if we had had you on the podcast

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 3>in twenty fifteen, we were talking about something else. Are

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:00.760
<v Speaker 3>you more exposed in some way more bullish on gold

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 3>today in twenty twenty five due to this, then you

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 3>were say, if we had been talking to you ten

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:06.800
<v Speaker 3>years ago.

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 4>Oh yes, I think the gold and I'm not trying

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 4>to harp on gold, and I don't want to be

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 4>run out and go buy it.

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 3>They will, but you can going okay, so.

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 4>Let me let me restrain them. Okay, I want to

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 4>restrain them. I want to say, what you don't know

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 4>about the future is far greater than anything that anyone

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 4>knows about the future. So we always have to be humble. Well,

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:40.359
<v Speaker 4>what you need is a proper diversification to create a portfolio.

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 4>And what that means is if you look at gold,

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 4>gold does well when those other assets that you're typically

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 4>holding in your portfolio don't do well in such a crisis. Okay,

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:56.359
<v Speaker 4>So if you're holding a lot, let's say, a lot

0:35:56.360 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 4>of odds or those types of things, the optimal mount

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 4>in a typical portfolio is in the vicinity of a

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 4>little bit bet less than fifteen percent, like if you

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 4>didn't know you would hold but let's say it's ten percent, Okay.

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 4>A prudent amount of that kind of little bit of

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 4>gold serves as a protection and diversifies the portfolio. And

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 4>what I think the most important thing is that you

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 4>don't have much of an exposure. I'm not on this

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:35.760
<v Speaker 4>show to tut gold, and I want to restrain people,

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 4>but it's also keep in mind and investing what happens

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:44.399
<v Speaker 4>is the biggest problem with most investors is that they

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 4>believe that whatever has been the best investment over the

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 4>recent past is the best investment, not that it's become

0:36:55.680 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 4>expensive and become too expensive and go down. And so

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:07.319
<v Speaker 4>there's a tendency of portfolios to investors to hunt to

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:12.880
<v Speaker 4>invest when things become terrific. So, by way of example,

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:19.399
<v Speaker 4>let's say AI companies and you know companies like that. Well,

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:23.359
<v Speaker 4>the thing I want to convey to investors is that

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 4>the idea that what's been going on is a good

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 4>what's gone up a lot and really done well is

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 4>a good investment, rather than it's become expensive is something

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 4>they have to watch out for, and that the best

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 4>company is no more the best investment. Right then, the

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 4>best horse in a horse race is the best thing

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 4>to bet on because there are odds and hurdles that

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 4>are bay into the price. So if you're going to

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 4>bet on a horse and a horse race, you have

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 4>an equal likelihood of betting on the worst horse to

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 4>do the best to win on because the odds are

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 4>shifted the discounting. You know that might be the fifty

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 4>to one shot, and so the markets are like that.

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 4>It's like a football game, you have to beat the spread.

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:31.319
<v Speaker 4>So that dynamic means that you should balance most. The

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 4>thing I will really convey to your listeners is that

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:41.359
<v Speaker 4>knowing how to balance your portfolio well is a very

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 4>important thing. This is the most important thing because what

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 4>you know is you know you can't be certain about

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 4>and you can reduce your risks without reducing your expected

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:58.520
<v Speaker 4>returns if you do that well. And that gold is

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:02.799
<v Speaker 4>a part of a portfolio. So if I'm giving some

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 4>thoughts about a portfolio, I would say diversify well. Gold

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:12.280
<v Speaker 4>is an effective diversifier. And at a time when there's

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 4>an X, you know, let's say too much debt. You

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:21.799
<v Speaker 4>can also rephrase that and say too many bonds and

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 4>they're going to be a lot more coming. Might be considerations,

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 4>but I don't want to start giving portfolio advice. What

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 4>I want to do is let people know, and let

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:39.320
<v Speaker 4>really the policy makers know that there's a solution here.

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there's a right thing to do. We're talking

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:45.839
<v Speaker 4>about all the difficult things, and I want to emphasize

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 4>that this can be doable. Okay, you can lower that

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 4>deficit to go to three percent of GDP frump tax

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 4>cuts come in, the projected deficit will be about seven

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 4>and a half percent of GDP, and you have to

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 4>cut that to about three percent of GDP because that'll

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 4>mean that that's won't rise relative to incomes and it

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:14.120
<v Speaker 4>will greatly improve the supply demand. So what I want

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 4>to do is contribute by showing what can be done.

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 4>And in fact, that was done from nineteen ninety two

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 4>to nineteen ninety eight. There was a five percent in

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 4>GDP cut in the budget deficit. So that's what I'm

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:36.359
<v Speaker 4>talking about. Going from a four percent you know, let's

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 4>say seven seven and a half down to three is

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:43.319
<v Speaker 4>a four or five percent cut of this percentage of

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 4>GDP that happened from nineteen ninety two to nineteen ninety

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:52.239
<v Speaker 4>eight and can be done, And so I want to

0:40:52.320 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 4>talk about those things that can make a big difference.

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 2>So on this note, how do you actually go about

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:04.320
<v Speaker 2>building consensus for all these moves, because it does feel

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 2>like part of the problem here is there is a

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:10.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of disagreement about what debt should be used for.

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:13.479
<v Speaker 2>You know, should it fund more defense, should it fund

0:41:13.520 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 2>tax cuts, Should it be used for more social programs

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 2>or infrastructure or something like that, and then there's an

0:41:19.920 --> 0:41:24.720
<v Speaker 2>added layer of disagreement about how debt dynamics actually work

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 2>and when they matter. And I appreciate that part of

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:32.839
<v Speaker 2>your book is this effort to show how debt actually operates,

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 2>but there's still so much disagreement. How do you actually

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 2>go about, you know, getting people to agree on what

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:44.399
<v Speaker 2>debt is, how it works, and then do something about it.

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 4>How I'm trying to do that is, first of all,

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 4>show people the three percent solution and make them aware,

0:41:56.200 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 4>make those in Congress and President awar that they need

0:42:02.280 --> 0:42:04.839
<v Speaker 4>to get the down to that three percent, and that

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:13.319
<v Speaker 4>arguing about how they do it leading to them not

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:20.439
<v Speaker 4>doing it. Is very much like taking somebody who has

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:25.320
<v Speaker 4>a serious heart problem and so on, and you could say, Okay,

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:30.319
<v Speaker 4>you can exercise, you can eat this different way, you

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 4>can do this, and so on, and this is the way,

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:36.799
<v Speaker 4>and you can do it. And in fact, if you

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 4>do it, if you get the deficit down, you will

0:42:41.160 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 4>get also lower interest rates, and because your interest expenses

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 4>are so high, those lower interest rates will also contribute

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 4>to your better health. And in fact, those lower interest

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:03.160
<v Speaker 4>rates will help to cause asset prices to go up

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 4>and the economy to be better, which will also give

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:11.719
<v Speaker 4>you tax revenue. So that you can do this, but

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:17.440
<v Speaker 4>you're arguing about which way to do it will probably

0:43:17.560 --> 0:43:20.720
<v Speaker 4>prevent you from doing it. So you should start off

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 4>and take the three percent pledge first happen in your mind?

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 4>What is the goal? Three percent of GDP the budget deficit? Okay,

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:34.919
<v Speaker 4>we all agree? Can we all agree that we need

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:39.239
<v Speaker 4>to do that? Okay? Or if we can't agree, look

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 4>at the numbers, look at the story. And I'm telling you,

0:43:42.600 --> 0:43:46.920
<v Speaker 4>but please, you know, agree that at least if you

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:49.799
<v Speaker 4>can say I agree on the number, will take the

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 4>three percent of GDP pledge. And then what you have

0:43:55.840 --> 0:43:59.279
<v Speaker 4>is don't let the particular arguments. I don't care if

0:43:59.280 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 4>you do it portionately across things. If you took every

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 4>item that you can change that contributes to that increase

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:16.280
<v Speaker 4>in taxes, cut spending. If you just did everything proportionately

0:44:16.960 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 4>and you use that as your backup if we can't

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:24.960
<v Speaker 4>reach agreement, we will do it all proportionally across the everything. Great.

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 4>That's I mean, there are better ways to do it,

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 4>but at least you did it. But if you don't

0:44:30.360 --> 0:44:33.279
<v Speaker 4>do it, so you're going to be in trouble. So

0:44:34.200 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 4>that's the reality because it will be public conflict and

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 4>it probably won't happen. So that's that's a choice. And

0:44:44.080 --> 0:44:49.680
<v Speaker 4>if you don't do it, then take the responsibility. Say

0:44:49.800 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 4>to yourself, if you don't do it, and there's the

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:59.160
<v Speaker 4>crisis that I'm saying is will come, and I can't

0:44:59.160 --> 0:45:01.840
<v Speaker 4>tell you exactly when it'll come. It's like the heart attack.

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Can't you exactly? I get it, you're getting closer. My

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 4>guess would be three years, give or take a year,

0:45:09.400 --> 0:45:12.880
<v Speaker 4>something like that. Okay, if you don't do that, and

0:45:12.920 --> 0:45:16.120
<v Speaker 4>then you own it, Okay, that you have to take

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:20.200
<v Speaker 4>responsibility for the consequences. And if you say, okay, I

0:45:20.239 --> 0:45:24.799
<v Speaker 4>got three percent solution, I'll find it, and yes, own

0:45:24.840 --> 0:45:28.600
<v Speaker 4>it because you will own it. I mean when the

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 4>economy and this heart attack of sorts comes along, then

0:45:33.480 --> 0:45:36.000
<v Speaker 4>you're going to find yourself that the voters are not

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:38.680
<v Speaker 4>going to be very happy. So you own it.

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:42.799
<v Speaker 3>Treasury Secretary Scott Vessant is verbally on board with what

0:45:42.840 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 3>you call the three percent pledge. He also talked about

0:45:45.560 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 3>three percent GDP growth. I think a three percent increase

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 3>or maybe more oil. Extending the tax cuts permanently, is

0:45:53.520 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 3>that consistent at all with a three percent pledge, or

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 3>do the extending the tax cuts permanently increase the chance

0:46:02.120 --> 0:46:03.400
<v Speaker 3>of this economic heart attach.

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:09.440
<v Speaker 4>It depends on the whole dynamic of whatever is done.

0:46:09.600 --> 0:46:13.120
<v Speaker 4>And I mean this in the following way. You can

0:46:13.200 --> 0:46:18.560
<v Speaker 4>get tax revenue. That's what matters. It's not necessarily that

0:46:18.719 --> 0:46:24.480
<v Speaker 4>tax rates. Raising tax rates is going to get you

0:46:24.840 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 4>the same tax revenues because if the economy is healthy,

0:46:31.560 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 4>and then it depends, there's an all mechanical thing how

0:46:35.239 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 4>interest rates operate and so on, the whole mechanics, you

0:46:39.280 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 4>can bring in more tax revenue. A good model to

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:46.880
<v Speaker 4>look at was nineteen ninety two to nineteen ninety eight,

0:46:47.200 --> 0:46:50.319
<v Speaker 4>in which there's a mix of things that happened. You

0:46:50.360 --> 0:46:54.720
<v Speaker 4>can see the ripe mix. The ripe mix is going

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:59.040
<v Speaker 4>to include those things that will naturally, in a healthy

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:04.080
<v Speaker 4>way lower interest rates and help the economy and so on.

0:47:04.280 --> 0:47:07.120
<v Speaker 4>It's not a perfect solution, but it's go to that

0:47:07.200 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 4>nineteen ninety two to ninety eight period as an example.

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:14.760
<v Speaker 4>In my book gives I give many examples. The best

0:47:14.880 --> 0:47:23.760
<v Speaker 4>mix is to properly mix depressing moves with stimulative moves.

0:47:24.120 --> 0:47:27.439
<v Speaker 4>What I call a beautiful deleveraging. And what I mean

0:47:27.560 --> 0:47:32.239
<v Speaker 4>by that is that if you raise taxes or lower spending,

0:47:33.000 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 4>that's depressing on the economy. However, if you do that

0:47:39.239 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 4>with an easing of monetary policy, which is stimulative on

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:50.000
<v Speaker 4>the economy, those two things can balance, and they either

0:47:50.080 --> 0:47:54.680
<v Speaker 4>of them lowers the debt to income ratio, but they

0:47:54.680 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 4>can balance each other, and that's a well engineered move.

0:47:59.080 --> 0:48:01.760
<v Speaker 2>So I want to go go back to the question

0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:04.560
<v Speaker 2>that Joe was asking a little bit earlier, and perhaps

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:07.480
<v Speaker 2>ask it in a slightly different way. But when it

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 2>comes to taking action on this specific risk, you said

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:14.399
<v Speaker 2>earlier that you have made a lot of money by

0:48:14.440 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 2>being able to understand debt cycles specifically in two thousand

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:21.800
<v Speaker 2>and eight, can you give us some examples of trades

0:48:21.840 --> 0:48:25.880
<v Speaker 2>that you have undertaken in your, you know, very long

0:48:26.280 --> 0:48:31.600
<v Speaker 2>financial career that have been successful and get really specific

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:33.360
<v Speaker 2>into it, because I think this is one of the

0:48:33.920 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 2>things that people struggle with. We can talk about diversification

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 2>and managing your risk, but it's very hard to come

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:42.920
<v Speaker 2>up with the specifics of the trade.

0:48:43.040 --> 0:48:47.279
<v Speaker 4>Before twenty eleven, what I saw was it was a

0:48:47.360 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 4>leveraging up. So a big sign is debt is increasing

0:48:52.719 --> 0:49:00.399
<v Speaker 4>much faster than incomes and that's not sustainable and what

0:49:00.560 --> 0:49:06.640
<v Speaker 4>limits it? And back then I calculated that who was

0:49:06.680 --> 0:49:10.840
<v Speaker 4>buying the debt that was increasing in a fast trade,

0:49:11.440 --> 0:49:14.200
<v Speaker 4>and that was the number of entities, but most importantly

0:49:14.440 --> 0:49:20.160
<v Speaker 4>European banks that were leveraging up to buy the debt.

0:49:21.480 --> 0:49:25.279
<v Speaker 4>And as they leveraged up, I saw that they were

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 4>going their capital requirements and their capital limitations would mean

0:49:31.320 --> 0:49:34.560
<v Speaker 4>that they could not buy. Once they were leveraged up,

0:49:34.800 --> 0:49:38.640
<v Speaker 4>they could not continue to buy at that same pace,

0:49:39.520 --> 0:49:44.799
<v Speaker 4>and therefore their purchases were going to go down. Their

0:49:44.840 --> 0:49:48.279
<v Speaker 4>holdings would be the same, but their purchases were going

0:49:48.320 --> 0:49:51.959
<v Speaker 4>to go down. At the same time. As I saw

0:49:52.040 --> 0:49:58.200
<v Speaker 4>that budget deficits would be large and therefore bond sales

0:49:58.239 --> 0:50:05.279
<v Speaker 4>would be large, I saw the mismatch. So okay, it's

0:50:05.320 --> 0:50:11.000
<v Speaker 4>a mismatch. So now what is the mechanics of that

0:50:11.080 --> 0:50:15.359
<v Speaker 4>mismatch That means, you know, get out of credit risk,

0:50:16.160 --> 0:50:21.239
<v Speaker 4>get out of credit risk, equity risk, and so on.

0:50:21.520 --> 0:50:22.279
<v Speaker 4>And that's an.

0:50:22.239 --> 0:50:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Example, Ray Dahalio, such a pleasure to uh have your time.

0:50:27.280 --> 0:50:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you're not the creator of the chicken nugget. Maybe

0:50:30.239 --> 0:50:33.759
<v Speaker 3>the father or the uncle of the chicken nugget, but

0:50:33.880 --> 0:50:38.360
<v Speaker 3>also Bridgewater and numerous books. Thank you so much for

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:39.200
<v Speaker 3>coming on the outline.

0:50:39.320 --> 0:50:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for having Thank you Ray. That was an

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:42.920
<v Speaker 2>absolute pleasure.

0:50:43.080 --> 0:50:46.480
<v Speaker 4>You guys know what you're doing. You It was a

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:47.239
<v Speaker 4>pleasure for me.

0:50:47.719 --> 0:51:05.879
<v Speaker 2>Producers. Keep that in, Yeah, keep that in, Joe. That

0:51:06.040 --> 0:51:08.160
<v Speaker 2>was that was so much fun. I'm glad we finally

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:09.600
<v Speaker 2>got to interview Ray Dalio.

0:51:10.360 --> 0:51:12.600
<v Speaker 3>I swear I could have we could have done an hour.

0:51:12.680 --> 0:51:14.680
<v Speaker 2>On the Oh, we could have done like five hours.

0:51:14.680 --> 0:51:16.960
<v Speaker 3>No, I mean we could have done anug Yeah. Usually

0:51:17.080 --> 0:51:19.880
<v Speaker 3>because I just think about that. You know, it's not

0:51:20.120 --> 0:51:23.000
<v Speaker 3>a time when everyone had like tons of access to

0:51:23.040 --> 0:51:26.200
<v Speaker 3>computing power, and so even the idea of how you

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:28.799
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's so silly, right. We just talked about

0:51:28.920 --> 0:51:31.400
<v Speaker 3>the US might have this economic heart attack in the

0:51:31.400 --> 0:51:35.040
<v Speaker 3>next three years by golden by bitcoin. But I still

0:51:35.160 --> 0:51:37.600
<v Speaker 3>am thinking about the chicken nugget and how it would

0:51:37.600 --> 0:51:40.440
<v Speaker 3>not have been trivial to come up with a synthetic

0:51:40.800 --> 0:51:44.200
<v Speaker 3>chicken nugget future in nineteen seventy five. And I do

0:51:44.280 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 3>think that we should remember that financial engineering is a

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:51.560
<v Speaker 3>form of engineering to bring physical things into the real world.

0:51:51.800 --> 0:51:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, and also insurance is a big thing here as well.

0:51:55.600 --> 0:51:57.440
<v Speaker 2>And I would argue more.

0:51:57.320 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Thought for me on the chicken nugget real quick, no, keep.

0:51:59.480 --> 0:52:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Going, And I would argue that insurers are becoming a

0:52:03.480 --> 0:52:08.919
<v Speaker 2>more important, I guess, a shaper of worldwide norms, right,

0:52:09.000 --> 0:52:11.320
<v Speaker 2>like they are the ones that are making decisions about

0:52:11.320 --> 0:52:14.720
<v Speaker 2>what is acceptable. But anyway, these are all big picture

0:52:14.800 --> 0:52:17.440
<v Speaker 2>thoughts on other things we should talk about det yes.

0:52:17.520 --> 0:52:19.880
<v Speaker 3>And you know, look, I think, I mean, there's a

0:52:19.920 --> 0:52:23.520
<v Speaker 3>few quick thoughts that I have, you know, getting a

0:52:23.520 --> 0:52:26.520
<v Speaker 3>bunch of people to say, we believe that a healthy

0:52:26.880 --> 0:52:31.480
<v Speaker 3>level of deficit to GDP is three percent, that you

0:52:31.480 --> 0:52:34.400
<v Speaker 3>know loan doesn't sound hard, you know, but then it's like,

0:52:34.760 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, but we're very reluctant to cut anything of substance,

0:52:40.080 --> 0:52:42.800
<v Speaker 3>and we're also want to make the tax cuts permanently.

0:52:43.280 --> 0:52:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Seems kind of hard to square, but you know, we'll see.

0:52:46.520 --> 0:52:49.800
<v Speaker 3>And then just this idea, like it seems very clear

0:52:50.400 --> 0:52:53.839
<v Speaker 3>that Ray is you know, he didn't give us an

0:52:53.880 --> 0:52:57.720
<v Speaker 3>exact number, but the gold and also he mentioned bitcoin

0:52:57.800 --> 0:52:58.560
<v Speaker 3>multiple times.

0:52:59.440 --> 0:53:02.080
<v Speaker 2>The other thing I'd say on his point about this

0:53:02.200 --> 0:53:06.319
<v Speaker 2>question of who will buy all the US debt, there

0:53:06.360 --> 0:53:09.840
<v Speaker 2>are plenty of people who have pointed out this problem before,

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:13.719
<v Speaker 2>and I'm thinking back specifically to JP Morgan, and they

0:53:13.719 --> 0:53:17.360
<v Speaker 2>did a research note back in twenty twenty two basically

0:53:17.400 --> 0:53:19.640
<v Speaker 2>all about this, and they pointed out that in twenty

0:53:19.680 --> 0:53:23.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty two something really unusual happened, which is we had

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:27.480
<v Speaker 2>all three major buyers for US debt, so commercial banks,

0:53:27.600 --> 0:53:32.800
<v Speaker 2>foreign governments and obviously the Federal Reserve itself all step

0:53:32.880 --> 0:53:36.799
<v Speaker 2>back from that market at the same time. So it

0:53:36.920 --> 0:53:39.719
<v Speaker 2>seems like an issue. On the other hand, you know,

0:53:40.239 --> 0:53:44.719
<v Speaker 2>the US can in theory force banks to buy more

0:53:44.960 --> 0:53:48.279
<v Speaker 2>US debt. They can change the regulations and do it

0:53:48.320 --> 0:53:51.040
<v Speaker 2>that way, that sort of financial repression way.

0:53:51.400 --> 0:53:54.960
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know, re mentioned restructuring. So it's like

0:53:55.000 --> 0:53:57.480
<v Speaker 3>you have a five year note and then it's like, oh,

0:53:57.560 --> 0:53:59.160
<v Speaker 3>suddenly it's a ten year note. But we're not going

0:53:59.200 --> 0:54:01.080
<v Speaker 3>to call it a dew fall. But of course, you know,

0:54:01.239 --> 0:54:04.000
<v Speaker 3>these sort of these artifaults, we might not call them

0:54:04.040 --> 0:54:05.680
<v Speaker 3>as such. But if you expect to be paid back

0:54:05.719 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 3>over five years and it's ten years, if you're functionally defaulting,

0:54:09.040 --> 0:54:10.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, I will say, look, if you have a

0:54:10.600 --> 0:54:13.680
<v Speaker 3>huge tax cut, that's a bunch of rich people who

0:54:13.719 --> 0:54:16.400
<v Speaker 3>have more cash in the bank, and one place that

0:54:16.480 --> 0:54:19.440
<v Speaker 3>cash in the bank goes to is investments in One

0:54:19.480 --> 0:54:22.200
<v Speaker 3>form of investment is bond, so you increase the amount

0:54:22.239 --> 0:54:24.800
<v Speaker 3>of money that's in the household sector, et cetera. I

0:54:24.800 --> 0:54:29.560
<v Speaker 3>don't like I like these types of conversations. And you know,

0:54:29.640 --> 0:54:33.480
<v Speaker 3>he said one to three years if there's no meaningful

0:54:33.520 --> 0:54:36.280
<v Speaker 3>reduction in the deficit for this timing of the heart attack.

0:54:36.680 --> 0:54:41.000
<v Speaker 3>So maybe we'll have ray on again in twenty thirty

0:54:41.000 --> 0:54:43.560
<v Speaker 3>one and say what happened?

0:54:43.840 --> 0:54:45.680
<v Speaker 2>We'll do it all right? Shall we leave it there?

0:54:45.760 --> 0:54:46.399
<v Speaker 3>Let's leave it there.

0:54:46.480 --> 0:54:49.160
<v Speaker 2>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:54:49.239 --> 0:54:52.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:54:52.280 --> 0:54:55.160
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:54:55.320 --> 0:54:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Follow our guest Ray Dalio. He's at Ray Dalio. And

0:54:58.120 --> 0:55:00.200
<v Speaker 3>of course check out his new book, which you can

0:55:00.280 --> 0:55:02.239
<v Speaker 3>find for free if you want to buy it, How

0:55:02.320 --> 0:55:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Countries Go Broke. Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen

0:55:06.640 --> 0:55:09.920
<v Speaker 3>armand dash Ol Bennett at Dashbot and Kilbrooks at Kalebrooks.

0:55:10.080 --> 0:55:12.319
<v Speaker 3>From our Odd Lots content, go to bloomberg dot com

0:55:12.360 --> 0:55:14.560
<v Speaker 3>slash odd Lot, where we have a daily newsletter that

0:55:14.600 --> 0:55:17.680
<v Speaker 3>you can sign up to, and check out our discord

0:55:17.920 --> 0:55:20.520
<v Speaker 3>where you could chat about all of these topics, including macro,

0:55:20.640 --> 0:55:25.360
<v Speaker 3>including gold, including bitcoin, discord, dot gg, slash, od loots.

0:55:25.480 --> 0:55:27.759
<v Speaker 2>And if you enjoy all lots. If you like it

0:55:27.800 --> 0:55:31.000
<v Speaker 2>when we get really philosophical on debt, then please leave

0:55:31.080 --> 0:55:35.200
<v Speaker 2>us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember,

0:55:35.280 --> 0:55:37.960
<v Speaker 2>if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to

0:55:38.160 --> 0:55:41.399
<v Speaker 2>all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All you need

0:55:41.440 --> 0:55:44.200
<v Speaker 2>to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts

0:55:44.200 --> 0:56:00.719
<v Speaker 2>and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.

0:56:06.480 --> 0:56:07.440
<v Speaker 4>In eight