WEBVTT - Institutions Won't Save Us

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, peeps, and welcome to Okay f Daily with

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Meet your Girl, Danielle Moody, recording from the Home Bunker. Folks,

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>there is not often that there are things that are

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in the news that are good. Right, we marinate and

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of misery up in these parts, and so

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>when something good finally happens, I want to elevate it

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>and I want to start with it, which is that

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 1>finally there seems to be somebody that is awake at

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice. Why do I say that, because

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the four officers that were involved in the murder of

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>Brianna Taylor are being charged with federal crimes. It is

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>taken way too fucking long to get to this place

0:00:56.360 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to arrest the officers that would storm into Brianna Taylor's home.

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I have so many I got Brittany Grinder coming up

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>in my mind. I got Brianna Taylor in my head.

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>But with Brianna, people were in the streets. People have

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:17.479
<v Speaker 1>been in the streets, people have been asking, begging, fighting

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 1>for those officers that would barge into her home, break

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>into her home in the middle of the night while

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>she was sleeping, and kill her in her sleep. Right,

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>we watch the trial where it was, oh, no one's

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>at fault here. Police just get to walk in, kill somebody,

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>walk out, and no one is held accountable. Yes, the

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>family did receive millions of dollars in her settlement, but

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>what does that do when your twenty something year old

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>daughter is murdered in her sleep for no other reason

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>than what being in the right place at the wrong time,

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and again, no fucking accountability. Well, the Department of Justice

0:01:56.440 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>has finally stepped in and the Department of Justice has

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>finally brought charges against the four officers that were involved

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>in her murder. Several of them were dismissed, and they

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>were dismissed back in twenty twenty and twenty twenty one

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>from the force. But we know what happens in this

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>blue fraternity is that you know, you can kill somebody

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>in one town, one state, and get to go and

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>move over to the next place and kill some more people. Right,

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>That's how it works. And so the federal government finally

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>deciding to bring charges after a long, long aggravated weight

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is something that I will applaud and we will continue

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to watch and see what happens. But this is what

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>accountability looks like, I just wish it came quicker speaking

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of accountability Alex Jones's piece of shit ass and his

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>stupid fucking lawyers. But I don't know if they're stupid

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>or they were just sending over all of the contents

0:02:57.639 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of his phone over the last two years to a

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>posting counsel because they were then going to try and

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>push for a mistrial, or they are really that dumb.

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>But after about I think a little over an hour

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of deliberation, they the jury has come back with four

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>million dollars so far in damages for the family that

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>brought Alex Jones to trial. And let me say this,

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Sandy Hook happened ten years ago, so I just like

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>their child that Alex Jones and all of the children

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of Sandy Hook would be teenagers now, They would be

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>in high school now, and this man is only now

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>going to trial for years of fucking lies, conspiracy theories

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>putting their lives at steak because of his rabid, fucking

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>hopped up KKK bullshit white supremacy, white frail male base

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that would take his words and go and try and

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>attack those families. So far, four million dollars they're asking

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred and fifty million, and we will see

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>what this sum total comes out to. But I gotta

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>say this, and I said this on Twitter the other day.

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you know that that motherfucker is making eight hundred

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars a day selling tubs of survival food and

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>like gun paraphernalia. Who knew that white supremacy and male

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>fragility were so fucking lucrative? My god, did I go

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>into the wrong line of work when all I had

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to do was slap a sticker on this on a

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>tub of Kraft macaroni and cheese and say that it's

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>survival food and sell it to a bunch of idiots

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 1>hunkered down in their like gun sheds. I had no idea.

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 1>Now to terrible news, which is that of Britney Griner.

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Britney Griner was found guilty in the sham trial that

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Russia put together and sentenced her to nine years in

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>prison with criminal intent because sure, you have remnants of

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>marijuana in a vape that you have a prescription for

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>from a doctor, and that's criminal intent. I mean, Russia

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>is a fucking terrorist state, and I just wish that

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>they were pulled out of every single fucking G seven,

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>G eight, every single type of group, like, can we

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>just stop legitimizing the country of Russia? Can we stop

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>legitimizing Putin? Can we just give them whatever fucking criminals

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>they want back so that we can get our people home?

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Can we stop with the bullshit like we think that

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>we're punishing Russia for something and just give them whatever

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>prisoners they want in exchange for the Americans that they're

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>holding hostage. Right, And you know, I'll say this that

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>there was an artist who said after they heard the

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>sentencing come down, that said, you know, I guarantee you

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that if this were Taylor fucking Swift, if this were

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, any white NFL star, or white NBA star

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>or a white superstar, that America would have done more

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>right from the fucking jump. There would have been campaigns,

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and there would have been this, that and the other thing.

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>But for Brittany Griner, for some reason, we were all

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>told not to march, to stay silent, and that oh

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:48.919
<v Speaker 1>America was going to do the work. But it wasn't

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 1>until people got in the streets and kept putting her

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>name in their mouths. Did this federal government, did this

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>administration decide to act so you know what I will

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 1>tell people is that like this is not fucking done right.

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>And I heeded the initial warnings of you know, we'll

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>do more harm than good than bring attention to this

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>fuck that Britney Grinder should be home, right, Britney Griner

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>should not be a fucking hostage of Russia on some

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>trumped up bullshit. As a matter of fact, Britney Grinder

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>should have never had to go to Russia in the

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>first fucking place to play ball in the offseason to

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>be able to provide for her family because the w

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>NBA should be paying on par what the fucking NBA pays.

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>How about women deserve to be paid the same. And

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I know that the Women Soccer League just fucking won

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>their case, right, the same case that Serena Williams and

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Venus Williams brought against Tennis. If Britty Griner had been

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>treated like the NBA players, she wouldn't have been fucking abroad.

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>This case makes me sick. It makes me sick to

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>my stomach to think about a black, queer woman being

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>held in fucking Russia, in a country that hates black

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>people and hates gay people, and she embodies both. So

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>if you are a praying person, please pray for her.

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>If you are a person that will call your representatives

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and say that you want pressure right on this fucking

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>administration to do everything and anything that they can, please

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>do that this should have never come to pass. My

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>heart is broken for her and her family, and I

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>hope that years will not pass before Brittany's body and

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>mind is broken by this barbaric, fucking country, before she's

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>able to come home. Coming up next, my Dear friends,

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is a conversation that I think is really interesting with

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 1>a Kaivan Stroff, who we've had on the show before

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and has done a capstone research project at Harvard on

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>what he deems as the trifecta that is happening in

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>journalism and modern media right now and where the breakdown

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>has come in terms of the Fourth Estate turning into

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>nothing more than reality TV filled with stars that want

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to line their own pockets. So we get in to

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that conversation with our friend Kaivan Stroff. Coming up next, Hey,

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm David. Plots of Slaves Political Gabfest. As another election

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>season accelerates, it can be tricky to sort through all

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the noise and the news Each week on The gap Fest,

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>John Dickerson, Emily Bathlon and I decipher the headlines, break

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>down the races, and tell you what issues really matter.

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>We do not always agree, We definitely do not always agree,

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>but we always deliver thoughtful debate and we always have

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a good time. So subscribe to Slate's Political Gapfest. New

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>episodes every Thursday. Get up behind the scenes look at

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Comedy Central's The Daily Show on Beyond the Scenes, an

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>original podcast from the Daily Show with Trevor Noah. Every week,

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.959
<v Speaker 1>host Roy Wood Junior goes deeper with the notable guests

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and experts from the Emmy Award winning series. Together, they

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>use comedy to tackle current topics from gentrification to gun

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>laws and take a closer look at how and why

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>these topics matter. Listen to Beyond the Scenes from The

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Daily Show with Trevor Noah on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast,

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcast. New episodes every Tuesday. Folks.

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I am very happy to welcome back to Woke f

0:10:55.840 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Daily Kivan Schroff, who is a Democratic commentator and has

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>done an amazing Capstone. I believe it's at Harvard, so

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>no dummy here on the trifecta of bad incentives facing

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>modern journalism. And I think that it's such a wonderful

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>time to have this conversation because the question that I

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>keep asking is has anybody learned anything over the last

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>four years? Did anybody learn anything during the Trump era?

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>So Kivan talked to talk to us about this capstone

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and why you decided to make this the topic. Absolutely So.

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I was in on a joint law and policy program

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>at Harvard, and our challenge was to pick an extensive

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 1>research topic that posed a public problem today, and I

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>couldn't think of a more appropriate topic. I personally do

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot on social media on Twitter, getting into TikTok

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>as I know you are as well, Yes, And I

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>think one thing that we've seen just as sort of

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>there's been public backlash in the market when certain businesses,

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, engage in unethical, inappropriate behaviors, because consumers have

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>finally learned the power that they have together when they

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>organize like that on Twitter to boycott or something like that.

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 1>There's also been similar backlash two journalists who have really

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>dropped the ball in these recent years, again and again

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and again. And I think at first there was this

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>question of whether it was out of incompetence or a

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>lack of ability. I mean, I do think there's a

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>people problem, for sure, but I think that there's also

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a structural problem where the incentives facing journalists today have

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>totally shifted priorities away from truthtelling and informing the American

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 1>people and to these three you know, overarching incentives that

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I call it the trifecta of bad incentives, and that

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>is social media, fame, cable news hits, and book deals,

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and all three of those incentives work together to sort

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of push first of all, to draw people into the

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>profession that are more interested in being an influencer and

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a journalist, and then to in really problematic behaviors, I think,

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to achieve those ends at the cost of truth telling

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and sort of maintaining a reputation with the public. Um.

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>So that is sort of the you know, the project,

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's all, you know, because when you think

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>about journalism, right, like the advent of journalism and the

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>importance behind it is that it was considered the fourth estate, right,

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>it was considered you know, this this um this through

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:36.359
<v Speaker 1>way for the American people to be able to understand

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>better the world around them, how their government works, how

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>society works, and their function within and what has happened

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>right by virtue And I remember doing a podcast about this,

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>like I would say probably eight years ago where I was,

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I would know maybe ten years ago. I was watching

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the rise of reality TV and at the same time

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>watching the shift that was happening with news, right, and

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.319
<v Speaker 1>I said, there is there isn't going to be this

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>clear divide anymore between this reality TV antics, right, and

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>what is supposed to be actual news, what is supposed

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to be journalism. And so did you see that confluence

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>as well, like with how how we see TV these

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>days and caricatures of people one hundred percent? And I

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>think last time I was on the show, I was mentioning,

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think like I looked to platforms like

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>RuPaul's Drag Race and The Housewives and all those reality

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>shows are absolutely sort of leading on how to effectively

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>build an audience and communicate and you can use those

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>tools for good and evil, And we're seeing it done,

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, for evil by a lot on sort certainly

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the right. But I think also we're seeing journalists engage

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>like this and Taylor Lawrence, who's like a prominent reporter

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>at the Washington Post that covers influencers has said, you

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>know that her she sees media headed to be much

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>more distributed personalities instead of sort of these mainstream networks

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that we're so used to. But what comes with that

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>is a whole lot of subjectivity that you know, sort

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of obscures objective fact and truthfulness. And I think what

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing from mainstream prominent journalists is that they are

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>accelerating us to that outcome way before we are ready

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>for it, you know, And I think so on social

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>media prong of this trifecta, there's three behaviors that I

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>think we see, and you know, anyone that's online, I

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>think can identify at least one or two prominent reporters

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that stand out. But there's hundreds of people engaging this way, right,

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>So there's the blurring of lines between professional and personal

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>social media, which makes sense because a lot of times

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>these reporters are verified because they're a New York Times reporter,

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>they have hundreds of thousand followers because of their role,

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and then they're pivoting to tweet every take that would

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>never get by an editor that they have no experience

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>or background to be commenting on, but it's sort of

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>elevated because it's on this larger platform with hundreds of

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>thousands of followers that people are following for the news,

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>not for Dave Whitegel's you know, racist jokes or you know,

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>bad food takes, those types of things. I think, you know,

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that was one episode that stands out, but everybody seeing

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that every week we're seeing, whether it's a Maggie Habermid

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>episode or Dave white Gel or you know, I'm sure

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you know more conservative people felt that way about Jim Acosta,

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>but every day we're seeing these media figures center themselves

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>instead of just focus on communicating important information to the

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>American people. That's one. Then two right, there's this direct

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>backlash between journalists that get called out then by people

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>like you and me and regular news consumers, and then

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>they're fighting in public suddenly with people that are supposed to,

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the next day read their recording and feel

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>its subjective and trustworthy and truthful, and it's it's incredibly unprofessional.

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>But again it's it's moving us faster on that timeline

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>towards partisan news. And then finally, you know, I think

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>we all see different reporters try to go viral. I

0:16:57.200 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know if this has happened to you, but I've

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of people, you know, try to DM

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>me their stories and things like that, which, again, like,

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 1>if it's good work, I'm happy to amplify it. I'm

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter all days, so I'm seeing it. But there

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is that sort of questionable issue of blake. Why are

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>journalists in the dms of you know, social media people

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.199
<v Speaker 1>asking them to plug their reporting it again, it creates

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a perverse incentive there when you're then going to cover

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that person or something like that. So you know, it's

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>funny because for me, you know, people have always confused

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>me and said that I was a journalist and I'm not, right, Like,

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually very clear about the fact that I did

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 1>not go to school for journalism. I'm not a journalist.

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually an opinionator. And there is a difference, right

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Like I come from a place that is not neutral,

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>right Like, I come from a place that is and

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>I and I try for the people that listen to me,

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:51.959
<v Speaker 1>that read, you know, my work, like I try and

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>make that very clear, like um, because I want folks

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to understand that there is a line there was a

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 1>line anyway between what it was considered opinions, right, like

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you being asked to write a piece from your vantage

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>point versus somebody who is employed by a Washington Post

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>in New York Times where they're not employed as an

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.919
<v Speaker 1>opinion writer, they're employed as a reporter. And that you know,

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>so I just want you again for folks who are

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily in the minutia to understand the distinctions between

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>those things. Yeah, and then you know, sort of so

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the next player, of course, and these all sort of

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 1>operate together, but the order doesn't really matter. Is you

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>want to have a lot of social media followers because

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that's going to get you on cable news and get

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 1>you a book deal, which a lot of these journalists

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>want a book deal. That's like considered sort of like

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a major career goal. And especially when you

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>go to the White House Press Corps and you know,

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you're sort of immediately incentivized to create this reality television

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>as you noted, because the minute you do that, you're

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be covered across network news. They might invite

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you on a show to talk about the viral moment.

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And so again, you know what in the Trump era,

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a little hard to disaggregate what was appropriate journalism

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>standing up to a really corrupt leader. And there were

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 1>some great moments, really brave moments from journalists. But you know,

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>then we see under Biden somebody like you know, do

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Sye there, who's literally just exists to troll, create viral moments,

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>get Twitter traction, and I saw, like really concerning there's

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of buy it, I think across the industry

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 1>from this approach. Eric Wempel, who's you know again, a

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 1>prominent media critic for The Washington Post, basically said of

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Doucy's trolling, you know, that's his job to get, you know,

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to elicit sort of anger and reaction from President Biden.

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And I actually just fundamentally disagree. I don't think that

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the American people are sitting there watching these sort of

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>exchanges hoping for drama that you have reality TV if

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to watch that. People want rectation, and so

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the incentive to go fight with Biden or catch him

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>off guard, or you know, any leader that's not actually

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>prioritizing truth, you know, asking those follow up questions they

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 1>never seem to ask to any buddy when they come

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>on their show that's about truth seeking, you know, So

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's another incentive. And then, of course the

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>book deals as we've all seen, not only is there

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the issue of self promotion, where if I'm following Jake

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Chapper because I want to know breaking news because he

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>has special access, then I got to see him plug

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>his book every fifth tweet, like or plug a Collie's book, right,

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Like that's like, that's sort of a perverse incentive because

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 1>we know, as we just default know that salespeople are

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>not objective, and we want our journalists to be objective.

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you're hawking a book to me every five seconds,

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of course I'm going to think, well, maybe you're, you know,

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>positioning yourself whether on what you cover or how you

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:40.719
<v Speaker 1>cover it, to sell this book more than you know,

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to tell the truth to the American people. And because

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>again these things are all interrelated, we see people saving

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>those scoops, whether it's Maggie Haberman or Bob Woodwork or

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you know those two New York Times. Oh yeah, Mark right, right,

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Bob Boardward couldn't let us all know about COVID, right,

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And what Donald Trump had said about COVID in December

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen when he was interviewing him for his book Fear,

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>but he would hold that information when Donald Trump told him, oh,

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>this is some really bad stuff. It's worse than the flu.

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>It's airborne, and he would hold that until he was

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>ready to release his book months. I mean literally, it's

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>not too dramatic to say life's gonna you know, been

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 1>saved because of that. Yeah. Absolutely, And again like why

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>are they doing that? Because you need to have something

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>newsworthy so that when you go on cable news months

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 1>later after you submitted your book, you have something that

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you know is going to drive the news cycle because

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 1>even though not that many people are watching cable news relatively,

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that is still what drives a lot of book sales.

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's all related, and again it's not part of

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that puzzle is informing the American people, you know, at

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>this crisis moment for democracy and a crisis moment of

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>course relatedly for the media industry, which you know, I

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>think is sort of imploding. We're seeing. So so let

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>me let me ask you this because it's something that

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I find that I have found very troubling throughout my

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>career in media, which is, you know, we look at

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the types of stories, and I'm particularly talking about cable

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>news right now, So we look at the type of

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>stories that make it into segments, that make it into shows,

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I know by virtue of being inside

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>these places that these newsrooms do not look like me right,

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that they are filled still still just sprinklings of people

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of color and sprinkling of women or non binary folks

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>like as sprinkling, it is mostly still white men that

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:35.880
<v Speaker 1>get to make new decisions. And because they come from

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>this vantage point though of quote unquote neutrality, there has

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:46.399
<v Speaker 1>been this discrimination towards people of color, towards queer people,

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>towards women, about us not being able to be quote

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>unquote neutral or objective because we embody some of the

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>same demographics as the stories that we're covering. What do

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 1>you say to that, Because to me, I'm like, there's

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a difference between being objective, being neutral, right, and also

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>just being honest. And the fact that white men have

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>always been the ones to have been said are the

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 1>ones that can be neutral absolutely, So it's such a

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>good point, and I think, like to your point, you know,

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>people that defend the status quo often like to you know,

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of do that under the guise of being neutral.

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>But the status quo is not neutral. It has all

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the history behind it, right that led up to that moment,

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to all the points you just made. I think one

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing. So in my research, I sort of started

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>off with a deep dive into the history of journalism

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>in America and you know, trace it to how we

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.159
<v Speaker 1>got to this moment, and what you bring up comes

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>up in sort of you know, recent decades of journalists

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>understanding the pitfalls of you know, it's impossible to actually

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 1>be objective, and of course you're coming from a perspective,

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and often that perspective we know is you know, disproportionately

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>white and male. Um. But that doesn't mean that we

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>throw out the project of objective truth telling all together,

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 1>because I think the added value the journalists should be

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>bringing is not They're sort of subjective. This is my

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>background experience that I'm sort of super imposing on the news,

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 1>but it should be. I'm somebody that's spent ten years

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>covering Capitol Hill. I know, within the bounds of reason,

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>this is normal behavior. And I'm using that objective experience

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that's personal too, because it's my experience to say this

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:30.239
<v Speaker 1>was outrageous or to say this was a huge deviation, right, Like,

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 1>those are the types of ways that you can sort

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of still be objective and of course bring that experience in,

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's the useful, relevant experience and not you know,

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>random and appropriate experience. So I think that's a huge issue.

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 1>And I think again, like not solving that diversity issue

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>is so huge because it's been years now, and you know,

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I still still people complaining about like, oh I can't

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>get like a a young white man's never going to

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>get a book published again. It's like I don't right,

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't know if you've seen those viral tweets

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>from people but like this, like crying about how their

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>editors are like, oh, yeah, we'll never give this a chance. Like,

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's objectively true. If you go look

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>at the New York Times bestseller lists, right, I think

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of invasion first. Yeah, yeah, that white

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 1>men are hurting same in journalism, you know, Like I

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:21.919
<v Speaker 1>was able to speak with some prominent reporters for this work,

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>and they say that they care a lot about the

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>issues of diversity and inclusion. Everything we see going forward

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to match that. If you ask those people

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 1>to follow up and say, okay, so what procedures do

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you have in place? They don't have the answer that

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at it with that in mind, I guess,

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>but they don't have the lived experience necessarily to do

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a good job. And we've seen that over and over

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in the coverage of Vice President Harris, who I think

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>has been extraordinarily disrespected, treated much a double standard, and

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it's almost just normal. And again, because you have this

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:56.479
<v Speaker 1>critical mass of media leadership that is not diverse, they

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:59.400
<v Speaker 1>all defend each other. So they're never gonna say, yes,

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>we mistreat did Paumala Harris. They're never gonna say, yes,

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>we mistreated Hillary Clinton. You know, five years later, you'll

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>get one or two hot takes that nobody reads that

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:10.479
<v Speaker 1>are like, oh, you know, actually, I was a journalist

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times and I covered the Clinton campaign,

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and if we did a terrible drop, that never has

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the same effect as you know, the initial coverage and mistreatment.

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 1>So I'd look to you know, places like the Griot

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>for example, even just Brittney Griner right like, we're follow

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>up on that story for every week that you know,

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>we've been waiting. Now that they you know, had the

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 1>sentencing and trial and everything. It's getting coverage today, But

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I find it hard to believe that, you know, somebody

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of a different identity that was in a similar situation

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>would not have been driving totally different, much more persistent

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>media narratives up until this moment. And do we know

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 1>if that affects the outcome? You know, I mean hard

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to say. You know. One of the things that too,

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I find really troubling is, I mean, we we always

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>will see a double standard, a triple standard, depending on

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>who is being covered and who is doing the covering

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of that story. But what I find really troubling now, um,

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>which I think is the purpose of your work, is

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that we are in crisis. You said it earlier, like

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:19.360
<v Speaker 1>this country, this world is in crisis, and the media

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>is not doing anything to educate people to use their

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 1>their their their mouthpieces to be able to inform the

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>public at these times of crisis, whether we're talking about

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>climate change, our democracy and the rise of authoritarianism in

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>this country, we're talking about abortion, any of these things.

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>And so what do you think, like, is there an

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>answer here or is this just going to, honestly cavan

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>continue to just get worse you know. So so I

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>do address you know, a couple of different solutions in

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the paper, and obviously one is more public funding of journalism,

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>which I think the idea of, you know, it's a

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>hard thing to execute, but internationally there's some successful models,

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:04.679
<v Speaker 1>and I think the idea there would be to have

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a credible competitor to CNN and these other outlets that

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>are engaging in reckless behavior, whether that's an MPR or

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>something like that, which you know doesn't get a whole

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of funding MPR compared to things like that the

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>way its structure, but I think actually something that's even

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>more necessary and more structural, so of course harder to do,

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:27.399
<v Speaker 1>is every important industry we have, whether it's you know,

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>being a lawyer, being a doctor, and I would put

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of course being a journalist. You know, at that level,

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, these are people that should have a skill set.

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 1>There are people that I should know, right Like, I

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>know you took chemistry if you are a doctor, but

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that you ethics or sociology or history

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>or any of those things. If you're a New York

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Times journalist, and I think you know one of those issues.

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>There's this sort of catchway two of Okay, so is

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the answer more credentialing and more school and should people

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>go to journalism school? But of course all those institutions

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>are historically exclusionary and offensive and hard to access. And

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, does that mean we should just

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 1>not regulate this hugely important industry, you know, like the

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>law is a self regulating industry. Essentially you have the

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>bar association, right, Like, what if there was a sort

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of more formal structure where you had, you know, some

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>type of counsel that thought through policies and put out

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>best practices, whether they were actionable or not. And what if,

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was more mainstream to go to journalism school.

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>And maybe these are hard topics. So I'm not saying

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a right or wrong answer. How should journalists behave online?

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we've seen some bad examples of what not

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to do, but at least give people that are going

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to be in this important profession the chance to debate that.

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>And here's maybe one theory of age online. Here's another.

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>At least I'm more thoughtful and not just tweeting out

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>every meme that I see on Reddit, you know, with

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the platform of the Washington post political news desk behind

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>me and often you know, contributing to misinformation when I'm

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>doing that because you know, as funny as these little

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>hipster jokes are among you know, maybe people like us

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that follow like the you know, minutia of media whatever,

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>most people have no idea what those people are talking

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>about or what the joke is, you know, like they're

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>not getting it right, just confusing people that want to

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>learn and want information. So yeah, well, Kivan, I think

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that the work that you have done is really important.

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's conversations that we just are not having,

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and I don't you know, I hope that now, but

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>again I'm still not sure. I hope that now though,

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>people realize the importance of the media and what it

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be and what it has become, and

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>at the very least, by our eyeballs, which provide the

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>ratings and the money, you know, begin to show these

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>networks and outlets what it is that we actually want,

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:47.959
<v Speaker 1>because it is going to be viewer based and reader based,

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>right like, it isn't going to be these people deciding,

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I don't want that six figure book deal,

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I don't want all these hundred thousand followers.

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>It is going to be about people demanding the type

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of information and news that they need, otherwise they're going

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to lose viewers absolutely. And I think, like, you know,

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>how I end sort of my research because I'm like,

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>these are a bunch of solutions that are really hard

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and probably won't happen. But the one thing we can

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 1>do right now is what you just said, which is

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>educate people about this problem, call out and frame. That's

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>why I thought this project was important to me because

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:23.479
<v Speaker 1>I think so much of education has been you know,

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 1>just adding terms and codifying and you know, creating a

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>body that people can like reference and build off of,

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>even if it's so intuitive that you know, as a consumer,

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I think so many of your listeners will have already

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>identified themselves a lot of these issues, but sort of

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>adding vocabulary and creating a framework by which I want

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>people to recognize, you know, like that is a journalist

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>right now who's talking to me something, or that is

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a journalist right now who's just designed this tweet to

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>try to get you know, engagement and go viral. Or

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I just saw this journalist like you know, saving a

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 1>scoop while they're on their cable news hit I should

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>have known this three months ago, and call it out

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and don't reward that behavior, and don't buy that book

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and tell your friends yep yep Kaivan, trev I hope

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that you will come back and join us again soon.

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate you, Thank you so much, and I will keep

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>following along on by from TikTok. That is it for

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>me today. Dear friends, on woke app as always, Power

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to the people and to all the people. Power, Get woke,

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Dear Dear God, get woke and stay woke as fuck.

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Get up. Behind the scenes. Look at Comedy Central's The

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Daily Show on Beyond the Scenes, an original podcast from

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>The Daily Show with Trevor Noah. Every week, host Roy

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Wood Junior goes deeper with the notable guests and experts

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>from the Emmy Award winning series. Together, they use comedy

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to tackle current topics from gentrification to gun laws and

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>take a closer look at how and why these topics matter.

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Listen to Beyond the Scenes from the Daily Show with

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Noah on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts. New episodes every Tuesday