WEBVTT - Surveillance: U.S. Jobs Report With Kudlow

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, and I'm Tom Keene

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Jay Leie. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg from

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>New York City for our audience worldwide. For the White

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>House is gear on the jobs report, I'm very pleased

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to say. On Bloomberg TV and Bloomberg Radio. We're joined

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>by Larry Cardlo, National Economic Council Director Larry fantastic to

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>catch up with you. Sir. You're looking well, let's get

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>straight to it. Payrolls looking good. What does that payrolls

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>report mean for the talks that you guys are having

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:51.480
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hill on the next steps of the fiscal policy. Well, look,

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the continued rise in payrolls and and bear

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in mind, Jonathan, you know this is a hotspot par

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Row report. This is July twining it to eighteen, and

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the surging hotspots in the South and West and some

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:08.119
<v Speaker 1>other places began in the back end of June and

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>lasted through July. You know, there was some pullback of

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>reopenings and so forth, and yet, and yet we still

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>got one point eight million with a big decline, almost

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a full percentage point drop in the unemployment rate, which

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>will move to single digits easily in the summer and fall.

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's a very key point just in

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of the economy. Now, how that reacts, how that

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 1>reflects on the talks. The talks are rather stalemated right now.

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>It was a better tone earlier this week, but through

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>last evening there hadn't been any breakthroughs. That's unfortunate. However,

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the President has said several times in the last forty

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>eight hours, and I can attest to it because I'm

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>working on it. He's going to use executive orders, administrative discretion,

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the full powers of the fellow government in order to

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>get certain priorities through, for example, a payroll tax cut,

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>which will incentivize work returning to work, uh and also

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>give a bonus to those stalwarts who stayed on the job.

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>We'd like to reform unemployment. We'd like to put in

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>benefits for reemployment or some kind of business retention credits.

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>We want to make sure the eviction moratorium continues a pace.

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>We think the executive branch can do that. We think

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>he has the authority to do that. We are exploring

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and drafting documents as you and I speak this morning,

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and people should take it very, very seriously. If the

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Democrats side don't want to get it done certain essentials,

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>we will get it done to make sure that folks

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>go back to work, to make sure that kids can

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 1>go back to school, and to make sure that this

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>V shaped recovery continues well through this year. Well, Arry,

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>I'll stay away from the V shape predictions. Let's stick

0:02:57.919 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to policy and what you kind suprupt to with the money.

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>For a threat to be credible, we have to test

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the credibility of that threat. Now I'm trying to understand

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>if you can do this, why haven't you done it?

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>If you can do something with executive powers, what are

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 1>you waiting for? Well, stay tuned. I mean, look, we've

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>been in a negotiation that has to come first. I'll

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>say is stay tuned. The President, I'm sure we'll be

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>weighing in with his own views as the day goes on.

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Would you have a deadline, Larry, is at the end

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.519
<v Speaker 1>of the day the talk scheduled for today. If they're

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>not successful, I need some color hit do you have

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>talk scheduled for today on Capitol Hill. I'm sure there

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>will be talks, whether formally or informally. I have no

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>doubt about that. Uh, Chief Mark Meadows. So the other day,

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>if we didn't get it done by Friday, we may

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>not get it done at all. Um, I think he's

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>just being realistic about that. Secretary Manuchtion is in their

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>pitching away. But you know a lot of the other

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>teams asks are just not realistic. They lack common sense

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and um a lot of it. You know, probably as

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>much as a trillion dollars was obligated that unspent through

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the March Cares Act. So we've been able to repurpose that.

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>So look, we're you know, there's a process here understud

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>sesses negotiations. But the President is said with great clarity

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 1>in the last two days, if need be, he is

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>more than happy. Indeed, I think he would like to

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>use executive authority to get things done. Look, we stand

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for lower taxes and rollback of regulations and fair loves.

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>There our principles I'm going to get He is not

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>going to give that back because of the Calcagant House

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of Representatives. Executive authority, executive authority. If you don't have

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.599
<v Speaker 1>a successful breakthrough by the end of today, are you

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>going to do it or not? Are we're going to

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>carry on having this conversation through to next week? Well, Jonathan,

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>we might. You know, I'm always willing to talk to

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you if you want to talk next week. I'd love

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:58.799
<v Speaker 1>to talk next week. I don't want to second guess

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>what the President is going to do. Uh, he's a

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>very good communicator, and you can be assured he will

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>be out and about today and probably tomorrow talking about this.

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>It will beyond his time. I'm not here to announce anything.

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>It's up to him. Well, it's not in our time,

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>is it. And to be fair, it's not on the

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>presidency either, Larry, because the real deadline was last week

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>when the enhanced unemployment benefits expired. This south impost Friday

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>deadline was about politicians too scared to go home and

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 1>face the embarrassment of not getting a deal done on

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Capitol Hill. So we can talk about the scope for

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>compromising now. So let's do that. As far as I understand,

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans in the White House has offered four hundred

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars per week. It enhanced unemployment benefits. Democrats are a

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:40.359
<v Speaker 1>six hundred. They're pushing back. As far as I understand,

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you're offering two hundred billion for state aid. The Democrats

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 1>want a trilliant they're pushing back. The spread right now

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 1>is still two trillion dollars. Where's the scope for compromise?

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Larry Well, Jonathan, much as I might like to, um,

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm really not here this morning to negotiate with you.

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm gonna let the negotiators fully understood, but

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>send a message to the American You guys are going

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to do the right thing. And while you're willing to

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>get something done instead of nothing. Uh well, it looks

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that something has to be good. It has to be smart,

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it has to be efficient, and it has to have

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>job and economic growth incentives. That's something. And again, the

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>President has a clear set of growth principles and he

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>is more than willing to help where help is necessary.

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Throughout the economy, there's still hardship. You know, good jobs

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>numbers Today we have a lot of numbers. I s

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>m s are booming, inventories are falling, car sales are surging.

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>That tells you this is a self sustaining recovery. We

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>want to keep it that way. His message is gonna

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>be lower taxes, smart spending, and uh continued deregulation as

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>well as fair trade deals. So that's his principles, and

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>we could use a lot of executive authority. As I said,

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it's being drafted right now. I'm not going to negotiate here.

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, if you just want to, that's what

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to understand. The balance of risk is is

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>one of those amorphous phrases about let me put it

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>better way, then what's the biggest risk for you? Now?

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>The risk? Please let me finish my sense. I'm just saying,

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>if if the Congress does not act, if there's no deal,

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and right now it doesn't look that great, then the

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>president will take his own actions. The solution here is

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to come to a pro growth, the common sense, pragmatic compromise.

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Thus far that has been elusive, And in that case,

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the president, who is a great leader and makes good

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>on his promises, will exercise his leadership and all of

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>his executive federal authorities. You can count on that. You

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>can take that to the bank. The one thing you

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't though, Larry, was what you guys would do with

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>executive powers on state aid. I've spoken to New York State.

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>They've told me, if they don't get the aid, the

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>austerity begins immediately. Now, you're an economisty, it's got way

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>more experience than Night on Wall Street going back decades.

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>You know that the federal government is the only one

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>right now that cann act countercyclically. States do not have

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that benefit. They do not have that option. And you

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>also know if they don't get that aid, the austerity

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>starts immediately. So as the administration of the government, we've

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>got to understand what's the federal strategy when the state

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>level austerity kicks in because we can't find an agreement

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>on state aid. You know, it's hard to say, Jonathan,

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that the Cares Bill and other bills in the last

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>three or four months is austerity. I mean, we've put

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>out right three and a half trillion dollars of fiscal

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>assistance in many forms. The Federal Reserve all in has

0:08:56.240 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>put out over seven trillion dollars through the any supply

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.079
<v Speaker 1>and their lending facilities. This is not austerity. I mean,

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:06.959
<v Speaker 1>that's what from the federal government. Larry, I'm not suggesting

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it will be I'm saying from states, they will have

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to come the states. The states, I will say this

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>because of the pandemic contraction. The income statements of state

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and local governments and the federal government have deteriorated absolutely. Now,

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>what is the solution. Some of the solution is an aid.

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Some of the solution is economic growth, where the revenues

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>will start pouring in and more people go back to

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:40.680
<v Speaker 1>work and they pay taxes and so do businesses. We

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>have given the states, through prior deals, literally hundreds and

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of billions of dollars. Now I don't want to

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>second guess. I'm not here to negotiate. We are looking

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>at all of these asks from our friends across the aisle.

0:09:56.040 --> 0:10:00.079
<v Speaker 1>I know the President is especially interested in make be

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>sure there are sufficient resources to get the kids back

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to school. If we apply the guidelines of distancing and

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>masking and testing and good hygiene, the kids can get

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>back to school. If the school need more equipment, if

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>there's COVID related expenses, I think there's a chance to

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>President would be happy to pitch in. But the bill

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that we have been given from the other team goes way,

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>way way beyond that, and there's a lot of Democrat

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>asks that simply don't make sense. Uh, certainly not in

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the present context, and so we have to separate that out.

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not so simple to just say there's fiscal austerity

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>in the states. Hundreds and hundreds of billions trillions of

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars have now passed from federal to states. So let's

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>try to be smart and efficient, and let's target again.

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to target people getting back to work, target

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.719
<v Speaker 1>kids going back to school. I want to target and

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>o woymen incentives, not unemploying incentives. I want to target

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>reemployment incentives. I want to make sure that people do

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>not get evicted from their apartments or their homes. These

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>are things we may be able to do through executive

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>authority because the Congress can seem to get together for

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a Bible. Let's let's see if it happen to get

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>it done, grows, grows, schools, jobs, kids. Let me make

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>this real simple, and we will do whatever federal levels

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>we have at our disposal. That is the President's pledge,

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and you'll hear plenty from him. Larry coming hours and

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>days I've set across from you. I know you're a

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>good man. I know that you want the best for

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the American people. I've also watched what it's like to

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:42.719
<v Speaker 1>watch your dad come home because the business has got

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to close. I've watched what happened when the house has

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to be sold and your family has got to move in,

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and moving with the relevant with a relative. I know

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that feels like the economic pain that people are going

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>through in this country at the moment. And Larry, what

0:11:56.400 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 1>really upsets me, and I think it's borderline embarrassing, is

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that this equity market was lower. I think you and

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>i'd have a different conversation, wouldn't we There'd be much

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>more urgency. And what I don't understand is the lack

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of urgency right now, Larry, I just don't understand it.

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>If you can do these things to make the lives

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of people better, why weren't they done yesterday? Jonathan, let

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>me say this. Look, Uh, I'm a bleeding hard to Okay,

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:30.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm a Jack Kemp bleading hard conservative on the supply side.

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>You can't measure these things and just dollars spent. I mean,

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>we know this, we know this. You put in three

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half trillion dollars already. The other team wants

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>another three or four trillion dollars. Is that the answer?

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 1>There are other better targeted ways. I want everybody to

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>go back to work. You know, we've created over nine

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>million jobs. We're clawed back about of the terrible laws

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>from the pandemic to Larry if you wanted to go

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and eat with me, to like we can't even inside

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a restaurant in New York City. Come on, you gotta

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the only ask I have right now? Sure you let

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>me finish my car. You had a little you had

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a little sermon at and I enjoyed it very much.

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>And I respectfully that wasn't a sermon. That was meeting person.

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And you understand, Please, can are many other ways to

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>deal with these problems. Okay, throwing money at them is

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>not only the answer. You have to create economic growth incentives.

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>But look, we are willing to spend money. I mean,

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that's not the point. The President himself has endorsed another

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>round of direct mail checks. He has endorsed that. He

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>has also endorsed continued unemployment assistance. The question is what

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>is the overall policy to make sure that it makes

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>sense that there are incentives to go back to work.

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And we have a very full fledged plan to do

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>exactly that. We want to reward people and the businesses

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that work for to go back to work. We will

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>extend the p P P. That is part of our package. Again,

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to negotiate, but that's in our mix.

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>We have retention credits for new jobs, we have benefits

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>for reemployment. We want to cut the payroll tax, which

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>would give existing workers a tremendous boosting income. I think

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>with even in five months it would still be twelve

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year or more. All Right, people who are

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>not working can go back to work and realize they're

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>after tax wage is higher than the unemployment. That's a

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>good thing. So we gotta be smart. It's not just

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a question. You know, I'm not gonna seed the ground

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of compassion. We are all compassion, We all want everybody.

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>We all know people, families, cousins, kids, neighbors who have

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>been damaged by this terrible pandemic. Correction, Uh, that's we

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>know that. And we've been working on this now for

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>five months at warp speed. We are even at the

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>point now where six or seven companies aided by federal money,

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>large chunks of it, are in phase three of vaccination testing.

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Which is a huge part of the story. And as

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>far as getting the kids back to school, in addition

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to the masking and the distancing and the hygiene and

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>so forth, we are willing. We have it in our

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>negotiating position, a good deal of money, well over a

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollars to happen got to school. So we're

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to target things, but we're not going to allow

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a transformation of the economy whereby the government and its

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>planners run everything, healthcare, energy, you name. We are not

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>going to go down that road. We've tried that in

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the past and it does not work. You have to

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>be smart. You have to focus on the incentive model

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of growth, and then we will see the successes. We've

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>had plenty of economic comebacks in this country. Throwing money

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>at every problem of them is not the best course

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of action. Let's be smart, let's be efficient, and let's

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>provide incentives. And again, if we can't get a compromise

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the way we did last March, then the President will

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>act with his own executive powers. And let me tell

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you it's not a bluff funny question, because I'm gonna

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>get in trouble with the White House for keeping you

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>too long, Glarry. What am I going to see first

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>executive action on all the things you describe or sanctions

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>on Carrie Lamb Jonathan, those are completely disconnected. I'm not

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>going to respond to that to expect annotment on that

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later. Jonathan, I'm not here to talk

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>about those. We have already UH done an executive order

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>with respect to UM sanctions on Hong Kong and China

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>for their many misdeeds, not only taking away the freedom

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of Hong Kong and breaking a fifty year deal. But

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Chinese have to be held accountable on their bad behavior

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic. They're bad human rights records, what they're

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>doing militarily in the China in the South China Sea. Uh.

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 1>And we are putting out as you probably know, we

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 1>are going to protect American investors with a much tougher

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>approach with respect to the auditing of Chinese public companies

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and the Public Accounting Board and the SEC. We had

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a treasury or we're a financial working group. We just

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:28.919
<v Speaker 1>published this stuff. We're gonna give one year to shape

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>up on the audits and on the working papers behind

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the audits to see if they deserve a listing on

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>American exchanges. We have to protect our own investors, we

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>have to protect our national security. Those are tough, gritty issues,

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and we're making progress. Those are separate issues, however, from

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>these fiscal negotiations. Larry, I know you remand with a

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>good hop and I appreciate your time every First Friday

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>whenever we get the pay rolls report. I'm ready to

0:17:57.760 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a good sport. Thanks for you wanting us, and I

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>hope for the best a little bit like to as well.

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Larry caldlaf nationally Canomy Council's director. Right now linking much

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of this report back into the financial Marcus Jeffrey Rosenberg

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 1>joins US portfolio manager of the Systematic Multi Strategy Fund. Jeff,

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 1>let's get systematic right now. And that I see higher yields.

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Is it a modest adjustment or can you say that

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>we will pull back from those lower nominal yields of

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the last number of days. I think it's a really

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>modest adjustment, Tom, and I think earlier you really nailed

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:38.400
<v Speaker 1>it when you linked the report not to the implications

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>for monetary policy, but to the implications for fiscal policy.

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>So when you're looking at the bond market, and the

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>yield reaction. You really got to go out a lot

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of decimal points to see a reaction to this report,

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>because this isn't really about influencing monetary policy, because monetary

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>policy has been very clear that it is going to

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>be highly accommodated, that they're going back to trying to

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:04.239
<v Speaker 1>get the economy to run hot. So you needed to

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>have a very very big number here, and even if

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you had a big number, I'm not sure that would

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>have changed the monetary policy outlook. This is much more

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>about influencing the market direction is taking its direction from

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>fiscal policy and and to what you talked about earlier.

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:21.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think this is a little bit more

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of a positive report that makes it a little bit

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 1>harder to argue for the really big project, the really

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>big program, Well we'll see where that plays out, but

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it is much more about fiscal policy. We welcome all

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of you on Bloomberg Radio, Bloomberg Television. It is Bloomberg Surveillance.

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.360
<v Speaker 1>It's about conversation. Jeffrey Rosenberg with us with black Rock.

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>David blanche Flower of Dartmouth College will join us here.

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Really looking forward to talking to blanch Flower about the

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>quality of these jobs. Lisa, Yeah, I gotta say, Jeff,

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about the idea of Washington, d C

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>And the need for fiscal stimulus and time. We've been

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>talking about that all morning. But Jeff, right now, it

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>seems like there isn't a ton of urgency based in

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Republicans are going home and there might

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>be some sort of executive order. This report isn't going

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to light of fire. Is the market to sanguine about

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea of another round of fiscal support? Well, I

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of uncertainty now, and I think

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 1>if anything, you look at the report and it adds

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to that uncertainty. You know, the market is expecting some

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of compromise, some kind of deal. Perhaps they were

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>leaning towards the higher end. I think that's going to

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>challenge this. I think eventually the market is expecting some

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of next round program to come through. And today's

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>payroll report, you know, it still gives a bit of ammunition.

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talked about the ten point to percent

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate. You know, we're making progress, but it also

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>highlights just the significant amount of damage that has been

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>done and continues to impact people. That is the argument

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>for another program here, how do you use the economic

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 1>data that we get to decide how to trade? So,

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's been a big challenge because the economic

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>data is just so dramatic. Let's just take the payroll

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>report itself here. You know, we came in kind of

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:10.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty close to the expectations, but the range of those

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>expectations is greater than than anything you've seen in any time.

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>That the inflows and outflows are orders of magnitude greater,

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 1>and the variability around the expectations ranged from you know,

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>minus six over three million. So what it means is

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>that when you look at economic data relative you know,

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 1>what we what we emphasize is the surprise. Well, what

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>what the uncertainty means is it's much harder to gauge

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 1>what is that surprise level? And so your your impact

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of any economic data relative to expectations because you don't

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>know how to anchor those expectations all have to be

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>very dampened relative to two kind of more normal periods, Jeff.

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Within the mathematics of all this is a point where

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 1>you shift from a yield study to a price study.

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 1>And certainly in the tension this week, I've seen that

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 1>are we now at a point where people are just

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>buying full faith and credit just because they're buying it

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and they'll take it at any price, and price matters up,

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Up we go in the bid well in terms of

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the safe assets. When you talk about you know, full

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 1>faith and credit is really about treasuries and treasury yields,

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's about monetary policy and monetary policy expectations.

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>We we've really changed the functioning of fixed income markets.

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>How we set prices is a lot less about you know,

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>what do these economic numbers mean about expected inflation and

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>short term movements. It's much more first about what does

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.479
<v Speaker 1>it mean to the policy response, because the policy today

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 1>is moving towards a contemplation of full outright control called

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 1>yield curve control of the bond market, and so it's

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 1>really much more about our assessment of what does this

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 1>do about the change in policy, less about the economic

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 1>data a directly impacting trading, and so it's it's a

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>very different kind of environment for setting of interest rates

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 1>by the bond market. Is that where are you on

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a call on the bonds? I mean you're running a

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>systematic portfolio and there's the Carnegie Mellon matthewist to it.

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>I get all that, but what is your call on

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the full faith and credit market, Jeff Well, the call

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is that the policy is very clear, and the policy

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is maintain market fund functioning and then pivoting towards accommodation.

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>And so what that means is we're going to have

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>very low interest rates for a very long time. Zero

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>interest rate policy is going to be with us for

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a very long time. I don't think we're going to

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>go and see negative interest rates, but the control of

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the long term interest rates is very much part of

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the policy. And so you're looking at a period of

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>very low interest rates front and interest rates basically pegged

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and functioning like a surrogate for cash, and long term

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 1>interest rates really under of the thumb of monetary policy

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>until we can start to see some real progress on inflation.

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.439
<v Speaker 1>And until then it's it's a it's a low and

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>stable interest rate environment. If you just joined us. We're

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>speaking with Jeff Rosenberg of black Rock following a better

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>than expected jobs report. Initially there was a pop inequity futures.

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>There is a roll over at this point as people

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>dig a little bit further, a little bit deeper down

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>into the negative and tenure yields initially popped up, but

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 1>are little change, just a tiny bit. Jeff, talking about inflation,

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 1>we've been really focused on real rates in the United

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>States at negative one point one percent all time lows. Question,

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>how low can they go? What's the answer? Well, you know,

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the movement in the real interest rates

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>is pricing in a recovery in inflation and inflation expectations,

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 1>while at the same time, the FED is basically pegging

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.640
<v Speaker 1>nominal interest rates, you know, so we we could see

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that move a little bit more, but it's very unlikely

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to see significant increases in inflation exp

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>dictations absent significant increases in actual or perceived inflation pressures,

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and we're very far away from that. The COVID shock

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>is a massive disinflationary shock, and so what we're seeing

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of those negative real interest rates is really

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a recovery off of those extremes and a little bit

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>fueled by some of the short term recovery in terms

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of commodity prices. But we are still in a very

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>low interest, low inflationary environment, and until we break that environment,

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 1>which I don't think it's happening anytime. In the short run,

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to see significant changes there. Jeffrey Rosenberg,

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. With black Rock. Right now we

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 1>go to Hanover, New Hampshire. David blanch Flower, is it

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>with Dartmouth College. David blanch Flower is definitive on wages.

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>David blanch Flower is definitive on the nuances of our

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>employment and are underemployment as well? Danny blanch Flower. Wonderful

0:25:56.280 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to have you with us today. How underemployed is America? Well,

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>it certainly is, although we've seen a decline in that

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.479
<v Speaker 1>in the data now. I mean, the reality is that

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment numbers have really come down. Under employment, which

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>is reflected in U six has come down a little bit.

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 1>But what we're going to see is we just don't

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 1>have very great measures of that. So the question is

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.199
<v Speaker 1>if people go back to work, are they going to

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:25.479
<v Speaker 1>get the same hours and the same income as they

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>had in the past, or are they going to have

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>less hours and less income? And that looks to be

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:32.199
<v Speaker 1>the thing we're going to need to look at. You know,

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're a restaurant work over, the restaurant opens, are

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 1>you going to get the same amount of work as

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>you had in the past, So I think the underemployment

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>story is something we need to watch. But this is

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>definitively a good a good report better than probably I expected,

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>on every on every component, so that establishment that data

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:54.719
<v Speaker 1>is good. The household data is good, employment, population rates up,

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the label force participations up. So so these are good numbers.

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>But the question obviously is what and state by state

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 1>and what happens down the road when and if the

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>stimulus and payments run out Within your study at the

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England, and granted the United Kingdom is a

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>different economy, what is the risk of a one month

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of a better report? Can you extrapolate it out or

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>do you just simply have to wait for the first

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>week of September. Well, I think this is this is

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented territory. We've never seen anything, any dip of the

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>kind that we saw, not even so much necessarily the

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>scale of the dip, but the speed. So there's really

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>no precedent. And Mike was talking about what happens state

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>by state, We yet to know that. But I think

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I do think you're right that what we have to

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>very carefully do is watch things month by month um

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and see where we go. I mean, I have nothing

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.439
<v Speaker 1>in the past really to help me with this, but

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>this is this is encouraging and the government is going

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to be able to say, look, you know, recovery, recovery

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>is coming. The question is, you know, are we headed

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:11.159
<v Speaker 1>towards a cliff? That's the question. We don't know, and

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have to watch and wait and see

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:15.400
<v Speaker 1>if there is a second Is there a second round

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of the virus? Is there a second round of layoffs

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>from firms? I mean, we're still at the point of

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>ten unemployment rate plus, which people haven't talked about. Plus

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>another point for that misclassification this month. It's not as

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 1>big as it was, but my reading is that you

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 1>had another percentage point because people wrongly were classified as

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>as employed was really they were unemployed. Denny. One idea

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of yours that I absolutely love is this idea of

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>walk about economics. This idea that you get away from

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the charts, you get away from the formulas, and you

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:48.719
<v Speaker 1>walk around and you take a look at how it

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>feels and what it looks like. And you said back

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight, if policymakers have been able

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:54.479
<v Speaker 1>to do that, they would have come up with a

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>very different result. Right now, what is walk about economics

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>telling you? The first thing walk about Economics tells you

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>is that we're not doing much walking about. I call

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it now the economics are walking about the Internet. Right.

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>But I think the answer is that we're hearing I mean,

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it's really important to get too deep within the numbers.

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>We are hearing recovery, but actually we're hearing slowing coming

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in big states like Arizona and Texas and Florida. And

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the question is does our sense of what's happening the

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:30.719
<v Speaker 1>reports the Pulse survey that the census is doing and

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that report was rather more weak if you like them this,

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think we have to look and do what

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Blumberg is fantastic at. Talk to people, talk to people

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>on the ground, talk to employers, and say to them

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. I mean, I've heard stories saying big

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 1>firms are doing okay, small firms are doing okay. The

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>story is about mid sized firms. How are they doing?

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that back to back to Tom's question,

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>do we know what's going on the answer is we don't.

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>But the right thing to do listen Bloomer, because oh

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>my goodness, we did not pay him. I promised a

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>job advert But but it's really very good at this

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And certainly in two thousand and eight, if people have

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>done the economics are walking about, they would have seen

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the recession much more than economists who were playing with

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>their silly models are missed it entirely. But it was

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely clear when you talk to employers and you talked

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to people, they saw this thing coming. So I think

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>we have to be very mindful of using that market

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>intelligence to tell us where we're going. And this report

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I think is a little more positive than the market intelligences.

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>But let's see where we go. And there's a question

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>also of something Tom keeps talking about rightly so, which

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>is the income inequality. And initially during the pandemic, people

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 1>were saying this was going to be exacerbated dramatically by

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the COVID era. Do we still feel that way based

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that a lot of the lower wage

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 1>jobs are coming back as the economy comes back online. Well,

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>we are. I mean, we we're seeing across the board

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>change ages and I was just looking at this, but

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>but we're certainly still seeing very much higher rates for

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>U African Americans, for Hispanics, for less less less educated.

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>First two points. First of all those folks are the

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>ones who also disproportionately have this error, which means you

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>top the numbers up. There are also the people who

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>disproportionately are impacted by by under employment, and you see

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>this big inequality. But one story I think we all

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>have to get to is in a period of lockdown

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>where people have been temporarily laid off and furloughed, what

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>about young people? What about the youngsters who left school

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in June's going to hire those and they're missing out

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>on these numbers. We're going to start to see them

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>coming through. But the story about minority unemployment, less skilled

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>on what are those kids going to be doing? And general?

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>In some sense, I think the social unrest we've seen

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>is a function of young people have nothing to do.

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>And literally a new history is from Blanchard in summers

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 1>there as well, Danny, I want to take the time

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>here and rip up the script and I want to

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>talk to you. I I've had the privileged folks of

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 1>standing with Mr Blanche Flower in his lecture halls at

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Dartmouth and Warble and gaily to the assembled Danny does

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>virtual learning work not only at the Dartmouth level but

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>down to kindergarten. Do you think this nation can actually

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 1>virtually teach art students? Well, I can talk to the

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>classes that I taught in the in the spring, and

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm about to go and teach again. I think they

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>went extremely well. We put a lot of resources into it. Um.

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it was very really pretty successful. I'm not

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 1>so sure about how you're going to deal with eight

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>year olds and ten year olds, UM, But I think

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>on the model for the university student, I think has

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>changed the world. It's changed the campus experience. I mean,

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it was very active. And I've got a class of

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty fifty students who are coming to in the in

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the full and I'm going to teach them about you

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>know what, what Bloomberg does the economics is walking about

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and we can do it pretty well. And there's there's

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>people in China, there's people in Argentina. So I think

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's pretty good. But it's it goes because it's

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>been successful. It's going to challenge this higher education model.

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 1>The question is down down the line, what are you

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna do for for the young ones, and I think

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a greater challenge. David was they need more hand holding.

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think our students, certainly at the Darmoud level,

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>we've done pretty down well, I think, and it's gone well.

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Now we've got to leave it there. David Blanchwards, thank

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you so much for Darmouth's perspective, and of course on

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>this historic job stake, Tiffany wildly demands that you only

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>come on at so she is a full hour to

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>digest what has been row Tifficty. In the hour that

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you've had since the jobs report out at PIMCO, what

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>could you slice? What can you dice here? What is

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the observation you have? Well, thanks for having me on, Tom.

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. I'm not sure about the demands, but um,

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think in terms of the report today,

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, clearly it was a it was a stronger

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 1>than expected report. Um, but I think we have to

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind here that the state is lagging in

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of when it says that July report, it really

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>means halfway through July because that's when the survey has taken.

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's really capturing halfway through June to halfway through July.

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>And there was still some momentum in the labor market

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>at that time. But what we've seen, you know, we

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>look at a lot of what we call higher frequency

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 1>data now because this virus crisis has been so fast moving,

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and what we see across a range of that data

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>is that momentum has slowed, you know, quite dramatically flattened out,

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>quite dramatically. Um. You know, in July as the whole month.

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:50.359
<v Speaker 1>So I think in August you're gonna see, um, you're

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna see even more slowly you know, report for for

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 1>jobs most sort of inside baseball, but I'll go there.

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:01.839
<v Speaker 1>The next report obviously will be what it will be.

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>But are you suggesting we could see substantial revisions to

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:12.839
<v Speaker 1>this good report? Um? I mean, certainly revisions are are possible. Um.

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think I think it's you know, we

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>did see in the high frequency data though there was

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:20.879
<v Speaker 1>still some momentum in jobs at the end of June. Um.

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe we could have seen a little bit

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 1>of noise as a result of of the uh the

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>July fourth holiday. Um. But I think in August what's

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>clear is that labor market momentum has has has very

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>much slowed. I mean, we could see a you know,

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of net zero job gains there, you know. But

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe what's more important about this report, unfortunately,

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is about how it impacts negotiations for the ongo you know,

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:45.840
<v Speaker 1>for the stimulus bill that we could see at a

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Washington you know. And although you know, we currently expect

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, around one and a half to two trillion bill,

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I certainly think that this report was stronger probably at

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a minimum, gives those thirty or so Republicans who kind

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of opposed any deal it to them sort of a

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>stronger position to stand on, you know. But again, it's

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 1>we have to revert as a lagging report, so it

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't change the fact that things have slowed down even

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>since uh this data was captured. So given that it's

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a lagging report, Tiffany, and given that we have a

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty good feel when we look at the high frequency

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 1>data that the momentum is slowing across the economy, including

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the jobs market. Um, what do you think this fiscal

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 1>stimulus bill needs to include? Does it need to include

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, state and look, municipal support. Um? I mean

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, certainly, um so many state and you know,

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 1>virtually all states require uh you know, balanced budgets, so

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not like the federal government where they can issue

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:45.240
<v Speaker 1>debt to fund to deficit. So all of that means

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that the massive hole that's been blown in state budgets

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 1>as a result of lower revenues because businesses are closed,

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, that just means that they have to reduce spending.

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 1>And what do states reduce spending on. It's things like services,

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:59.800
<v Speaker 1>so education, um, you know, a garbage pickup, fire and

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 1>leaves and things like that. So ultimately, unless uh, you know,

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the government, the federal government steps in with some funding

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>for states, you know, there they are going to have

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to slash those budgets. That's going to be a drag

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 1>on the broader economy, uh you know, and so of

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>course we want to see that. I think the other

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 1>thing that's really important about you know, getting in this

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>bill is a continuation of the unemployment that the kind

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of booster, if you will, emergency unemployment insurance benefits which

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 1>were six hundred dollars a week. You know, they probably

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:27.879
<v Speaker 1>do go down a little bit, but I think it's

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:30.359
<v Speaker 1>really important that we see those that we're already seeing

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a lapse in coverage of that six D six hundred

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 1>dollars a week because it expired at the end of July.

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So it'll be really interesting to see how consumers, you know,

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 1>start to react with their spending not getting that extra

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>six dollars a week. What what would be the jump

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 1>if August colors like you're saying, what would be the

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:53.360
<v Speaker 1>jump of the unemployment rate? Are we talking about, you know,

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 1>nuancing tenths of a percentage point? Are you talking, antiffany

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:02.279
<v Speaker 1>about a real reversal to a more grim unemployment rate?

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 1>You know now that the high frequency of data that

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 1>we look at is again a slowing of momentum. So

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not that it's employment is outright falling yet at

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>least we're not seeing that. We're basically seeing kind of

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>flat I think. Yeah, So if you if you think

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>about just the change of employment, I think it very

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 1>well could be something closer to flat um. And then

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 1>that would suggest, you know, nuances in the participation rate

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever the unemployment. This is well said, brilliant, maybe

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:32.279
<v Speaker 1>the smartest thing I've heard all the morning from a

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of smart people. Flat isn't acceptable, right, Yeah, I

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>mean we need to see continued improvement. I mean, even

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 1>with this report it was better than many expected, but

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 1>we've only seen of the jobs lost in August and

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>April recouped, and that's not you know, and we're the

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate right now is still above where you know

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 1>where kind of the highest that it got after the

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eight financial crisis. So ultimately, we want to

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>road to recovery here and we're we're not We're still

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 1>not close to being fully recovered. Um, you know, so

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>at this point, flat is not acceptable. All right, So Tiffany,

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:14.400
<v Speaker 1>as you put all this into your Pimpco economic model,

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:16.800
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense of how you think the economy

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is gonna kind of, you know, kind of recover in

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:24.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of you know, the remainder this year going into well,

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, ultimately, we had always expected, you know, kind

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of a boost of activity right as the economy reopened,

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and we got that, and that was actually stronger than

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:35.799
<v Speaker 1>we had hoped because of the fiscal stimulus measures that

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 1>really amped that up. And after that we thought, you know,

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:40.480
<v Speaker 1>things will flatten off, but we still will get growth.

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 1>It will be a longer recovery. Um. You know, I

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:47.359
<v Speaker 1>think that broad baseline is still intact. I think one

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:50.360
<v Speaker 1>thing that is good news though, is because we've you know,

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 1>seen some flattening out or um, you know, even a

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit more weakness and the high frequency data, you know,

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that has moved our congressional leaders to provide

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 1>more stimulus for I'm Washington and from the federal government.

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 1>The question is the timing on that, so that will

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:07.279
<v Speaker 1>help growth in the fourth quarter, I think, um, you know,

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>but we continue to expect it to see a long

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 1>road from here with you know, the unemployment rate not

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 1>getting back to kind of where we pre crisis levels,

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:16.359
<v Speaker 1>to where we were, you know, until I think at

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the early use at the earliest, maybe even a little

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:23.240
<v Speaker 1>bit after that. So it's still a long road unfortunately. Tiffany,

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:25.319
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Tiffany welding with us week him.

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:39.800
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keene before

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.