WEBVTT - Selects: The Science of Break-Ups

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, it's Josh and for this week's Select, I've

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>chosen our twenty nineteen episode on the science of breakups.

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just a straight ahead, interesting episode about people and

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>what makes us tick. I hope you enjoy it.

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. There's

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Charles w Chuck Bryan over there, there's Jerry Rush Rush Rush, Jerry.

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Stuff you Should Know, the breakup edition.

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, Three people who you've never broken up with one another? No,

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 2>that's true, the last three great point modern triad.

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the tryad.

0:00:56.680 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 2>So I picked this one out because mainly this is

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 2>a refrain. We get an email a lot. We hear

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 2>from heartbroken people a lot, sure more than you would

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 2>think that are just like, that's so sad. Lots of

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 2>broken hearts up and you you guys have helped me

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 2>with this show as a distraction, which we will learn

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 2>as one of the official ways to get over a breakup.

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, look over here, Yeah exactly.

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 2>So it just got me thinking about, like, is there

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 2>any science behind breakups and the emotions that go along

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 2>with it. And it turns out there's a lot, like

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 2>a disturbing amount of study has been done. I know

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 2>when you look at it, you're like, oh, man, maybe

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 2>you should have allocated that money toward research toward other things.

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like cancer. Yeah, although social psychology couldn't do anything

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>about cancer.

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 2>No, And it's you know, it's not like they're like, oh, well,

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 2>we'll just it's all taken from one big pool, so

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 2>we'll just allocate some of this breakup money toward cancer research.

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Sure, it's not. It works, well, you could allocate the money,

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>but the mental energy, I guess, is what I'm talking about.

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but that was just it seemed like study after study.

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 2>And also we should point out too that I think

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 2>there was one case in here of one study where

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 2>they looked at homosexual couples, But most of this study

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 2>is like cisgendered straight couples. Yeah, through that lens only,

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 2>they're not doing a ton of research outside that.

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I found I found one that, uh that that tracks

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>it correlates the likelihood of breaking up to time, and

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>they had it broken out by same sex and straight,

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>married and unmarried. Those are like the four categories. So

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 1>some people are doing it, sure, but yeah, for the

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>most part now. And I think one of the reasons

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>why Chuck is a lot of this is from the

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 1>mid two thousand's, early twenty tens. Yeah, and that was,

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:03.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, was about the last like the tail end

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:07.679
<v Speaker 1>of that. Now I think it's starting to change, fortunately, right,

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>because people of all genders and sexual orientation break up

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and get dumped, and we're here to help all of you.

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>So buckle in, grab a hanky, and let's get through this.

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, let's we should go ahead and start

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 2>out by saying, I guess that in theory, more people

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 2>are breaking up now because people are generally waiting longer

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 2>to get married. So if you could extrapolate that if

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 2>you're not married for ten more years than let's say

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 2>our parents were, right, then maybe you've gone through a

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 2>couple more breakups along the way.

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. We should give a shout out to Kristen Conger

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of Unladylike Media Yeah Kongs, who wrote this article our

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>old pal, and she points out that that typically means

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that you are going to find somebody who you work

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>with rather than rushing into it. But it also, as

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>she puts it, like leaves the window open longer for

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>heartbreak to be dumped. Yeah, one thing I saw, Chuck.

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>This is mind boggling to me. Eighty five percent of people,

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>according to this one study, will be dumped in their lifetime,

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>will experience being a breakup in their lifetime. That means

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent of humanity won't. That is those are some

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:23.239
<v Speaker 1>interesting people.

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Eight fifteen percent have not had a breakup or been

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 2>broken up with.

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Will not in their lifetime. They're just going to either

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>never have a relationship or the first time they're going

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to hit it out of the park.

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 2>But that doesn't mean like or subtle I've never been dumped.

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Like they'll never have gone through a breakup.

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 2>But I've been through breakups. I've been the dumper.

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Right, I know what you're saying. No, I believe that

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>they will not have experienced a breakup in their lifetime.

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Either way, Well that's great.

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 2>That means they sure, yeah, they met the person that

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 2>they love when they're young, probably again.

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Or it means that they decided to of their life

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 1>alone just fine, right, or or both they like I said,

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>they decided like, yeah, I'm just gonna stick with this person. Yeah,

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to I want to be what I

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>don't want to ruin my record, my spotless record.

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:20.359
<v Speaker 2>I think it's very interesting here that supposedly, and this

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 2>is very hinky how they found this out about the

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 2>spikes and breakups from Like, that's.

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>A Facebook data poll, so media doesn't count, social psychology

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't count.

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 2>I agree, But it doesn't make a little bit of sense.

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:38.919
<v Speaker 2>And I could see this being true that generally dumping

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 2>someone or getting broken up with can happen on any

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.119
<v Speaker 2>day of the year, but there are spikes in early

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 2>December and early March, yeah, because of Christmas holidays and

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 2>spring break.

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And technically you could see that being true. There

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>has I'm sure it's true at least on Facebook. And yeah,

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 1>this is a pretty big data pull. But it's like,

0:05:58.000 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that's so lazy.

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 2>It's lazy. But I see it because it's it makes

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of sense that you would not want

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 2>to go through the holidays with someone that And you

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 2>said a thing too, And this is important to point out,

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 2>like when the breakup happens, when that talk or these

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 2>days text message or phone call happens, it's not okay,

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 2>that is the end of something for maybe both of you,

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 2>but definitely one of you.

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sometimes most of the time.

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 2>That that actual act of saying we're breaking up, that's

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 2>at the end of many, many weeks or even months

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 2>or even years of contemplation about whether or not you

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 2>want to still be with this person.

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Right, And that's why being broken up with is almost

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 1>across the board, way harder sure than breaking up because

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>by the time, like you said, by the time the

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>person who initiates the breakup initiates the breakup is this

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>is at the end of a long road of decision making,

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Whereas the other person might have been blissfully unaware or

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>at least wilfully ignorant or not willing to address the issues,

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.919
<v Speaker 1>and so they are one way or another largely caught

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>off guard by being broken up with. So the person

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>who does the breaking up has already gone through all

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>these stages of grief of separation, Whereas now it's this person,

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the person who's just been dumped, it's their time to

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>go through it.

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Right. So, if you're doing the dumping, like the hour

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 2>after you have that conversation, you're like, what a relief,

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm starting over. Let's go get some gin, Whereas

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 2>the dumpy is like, let's go get some gin. That begins,

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 2>that begins their process. Although the only thing I'll take

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 2>issue with that whole line of thought though, is that

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people, even that might get dumped, aren't

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 2>like what like They may have known and just didn't

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 2>want to admit it or weren't brave enough or strong

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 2>enough to do it themselves.

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I agree with you on that. I think

0:07:56.000 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that there's still a thread that they had not been

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>preparing themselves just by being in SAE denial and willing

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to address it face it. Now they have no choice

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>but to face reality, whereas the person who did the

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>breakup was like facing reality and coming to terms with

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it quietly, sure, and then now it's your.

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.239
<v Speaker 2>Turn, right, Which brings me back to my original point,

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 2>which is Christmas and spring break make a little bit

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 2>of sense because the person who was desperate to get

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 2>out of a relationship and break up with somebody, they're

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 2>staring at those Christmas holidays and that first week of

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 2>December rolls around, They're like, I gotta do this now

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 2>because I don't want to travel a lot of time

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 2>with this person and go through the whole gift thing, right,

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 2>and the holidays are just it's tough to be in

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 2>a relationship that's a lie.

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's sure because the holidays, I mean, the holidays

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>are so about like connecting and feeling and warmth and

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>all that, and if you're faking it or have to

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>fake it, you know, some people are like, I'm not

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>going through that, no good. I also saw an explanation

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in Harper's Bizarre of All Places that some people may

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>do that because of the pressure of coming up with

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a really good gift, sure that the relationship is not

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>worth the pressure of coming up with a good gift

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>outweighs the value of the relationship to those people. Or

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>there are some people who don't want to put their

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>significant other through that, so they just break up proactively, right,

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 1>which also means that they didn't value the relationship that

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>much either, But at least in their mind, they're not

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>doing it for themselves. They're doing it for the other

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.199
<v Speaker 1>person because they don't want to put the other person

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>through that pressure of having to get the perfect gift. Yeah.

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I've never had that thing either, where you start dating

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 2>someone and it's like a couple of weeks for their

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 2>birthday or Christmas, and you're and then that pressure of like,

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 2>oh man, how do I play this one?

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, a couple after a couple of weeks, Yeah,

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah.

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 2>This person? But how deep do I go on this

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 2>gift here?

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know you, So I got you a

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 1>basket of socks. Everyone loves socks.

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 2>So here's an Amazon gift card for thirty eight fifty.

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, after a couple of weeks, it's a little

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a little close. Yeah, I come up with a

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>perfect gift, or even be expected to.

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 2>And I did mention breaking up by text or whatever,

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 2>like you would suspect if you were born before nineteen

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 2>seventy five, like myself, you break up in person supposedly

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 2>about seventy four percent of the time. Not bad post

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighty four. If you were born less than fifty

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 2>percent of the time, you're going to do that in person.

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 2>And they say generation, Why whatever that is?

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's millennials, is it? I'm pretty sure.

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 2>When did they name them?

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Do they know what?

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Does my daughter have a generation already? I don't know,

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 2>like a name.

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure somebody out there is name your daughter's generation.

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.839
<v Speaker 2>I annoying, don't box her in right?

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, you got a pigeonhole folks, let her grow.

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Up, be your own person. But if you are jen y,

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 2>you're or likely thirty percent to do it over the phone.

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 2>And of course this says a searing instant message or

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 2>an email. I think these days you would call that

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 2>a text.

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>And email is the lowest percent wise and compassion wise

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>four percent of people. That's the worst break up by email.

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 2>What was this?

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Pretty bad? Email? Is as bad as it gets?

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Was it sex in the city where it was a

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 2>sticky note?

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.719
<v Speaker 1>No? I don't remember. I feel like the movie or

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.439
<v Speaker 1>the show. I didn't see the movie Sticky Note Break,

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 2>So should we take a break?

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's take a break? Man? All right, this is

0:11:37.160 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>going really really well so far. All right, Chuck. So

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about when people break up, how they break up,

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>why do they break up?

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, actually, there's one more, okay, I think pretty important

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 2>thing about the how, which is men and women. Women

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 2>tend to present and this sort of makes sense to

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 2>if you want to be stereotypically, you know, stereotypical about it.

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Women tend to present a list of grievances.

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Here's all the things wrong with you both.

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Pretty much, whereas men it's a little more supposedly a

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 2>little more nebulous.

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Where'd the magic go?

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there you go.

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>That's apparently the difference is as far as like rationale

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>for breaking up.

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 2>And these are so macro level and broad and how

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 2>we talk about it. It's a little embarrassing to even do.

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 1>To talk about this stuff. I know I wouldn't do this.

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Women do this right. No, it's absolutely true. That's but

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like when you talk about this, people can

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>find themselves in the contours of of all if you

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>put all this stuff together, if you just took one

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>study and said that this is definitive, people should should

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>punch you in the kidney, agreed, but not really don't

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>punch anybody. You know, everyone. Over the last almost eleven

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>years of stuff, you should know, I've said a lot

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of things that make it sound like I'm inciting people

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to violence.

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Friendly violence.

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I was joking every single time why someone said something. No,

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I just I just want to make sure that everyone

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>knows that I was never ever actually serious in saying

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>hit somebody in the head with a tag camera or

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:50.479
<v Speaker 1>punch someone in the kidney. Actually, I'm kidding all the time.

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Except for when you recommend that you pants somebody, and.

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I was kidding even then that's psychological abuse.

0:13:57.960 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 2>It is.

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>It's physical, but it's more psychological than anything.

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 2>You ever been pants in front of people?

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes? Really, yes, And I can tell you it's psychological.

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I've ever been pantsed. Boy, I can't

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 2>imagine anything more horrifying than being pantsed. What's underwear on?

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>What? I can confirm that because I can't remember being pantsed.

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I just remember that I have been pants So I

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>think I just immediately blocked out everything.

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so no story, no story there. Okay, So if

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 2>you get broken up with, you will feel and we're

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 2>going to talk about the science of a lot of

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 2>this because it's very similar to overcoming addictions sometimes but

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 2>of course depression and anxiety, sometimes suicidal.

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Thoughts, sometimes homicide. Oh sure, that's a that's an outcome,

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a worst case outcome. That and suicide of breakups, but

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>they are directly related to break That's how bad breakups

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>can be.

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And apparently, you know when people do write in

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 2>about getting dumped and stuff, I always say, you know,

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 2>it's the most trite thing in the world. But like

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 2>time is the only thing that really helps. Yeah, like

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 2>ice cream and stuff like that is good, but like

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 2>it really does decrease over time. However, in studies, eight

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 2>weeks after being dumped in this study, forty percent of

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 2>people still had signs of clinical depression, and twelve percent

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 2>appeared moderately or severely depressed. So it depends on the

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 2>relationship along you're in it, how much it meant to you,

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 2>what kind of person you are. But it can stick

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 2>around for a bit.

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>It can. So the thing is, though, there are things

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you can do to help accelerate the healing process, and

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about those at the end. How about that. Okay,

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll make y'all wait, all right, So where are we at, Chuck?

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Are we at the well?

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 2>The attachment styles I think is interesting because we did

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 2>talk about like gay, straight, cisgendered, you know, on the

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 2>gender spectrum. Maybe none of that matters. Maybe what matters

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 2>is what they call your attachment styles.

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>That's what this says pretty plainly. Tho. Yeah, that's what

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it comes down.

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 2>To, how you attach yourselves to other people.

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>You can be a needy, clingy dude. You can be

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a avoidant woman, yeah, or you can be either one

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of those things. Anywhere on the gender spectrum. That's the thing,

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>like the idea that women are clinging and men are

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>distant is fabled. Yeah, it's at least ham fisted.

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think so. It's sort of that thing in

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 2>social science that bothers me, which is like, you're either

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 2>this or this, right, like one thing or the other.

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And really all you are is a white college student.

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>That's what they really mean.

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, who had a little time on their hands.

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, you needed extra credit.

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 2>But there are two supposedly again two things attachment styles,

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 2>anxious attachment and avoidant well attachment.

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Conger points out, like, that's two ends of a spectrum.

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, and you can fall somewhere on there. There's

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>actually a it's pretty straightforward. It's the OIS, I believe

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>or OSI. It's a scale where you pick how your

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>relationship is best described by a series of ven diagrams,

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and one circles you, and one circle is your significant other,

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>and they're just increasingly together, from just barely touching to

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>almost completely merged into one single circle, and you just

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>circle the one that best describes your sense of what

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 1>your relationships like, and that supposedly gets your spectrum replacement

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>on the spectrum of attachment across. Oh interesting, So it's

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>real subjective and self reported, so that is to say,

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>not scientific, right.

0:17:53.440 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately, Supposedly two thirds of women initiate divorces, and in

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 2>this article it says that might give them a statistical

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 2>edge over getting over a relationship.

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Because they initiated the breakup, so they've been in the

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>process already. Maybe that's what I think she meant.

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 2>I think so, I'm just not so sure that just

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 2>because a woman initiates a divorce, it may have been

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 2>after years of systematic abuse, you know, which may not

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 2>mean like she's so ready to get over this quicker

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 2>than he might be.

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, you know, Yeah, No, I mean you can't just

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>say it like if X, then Y. With this stuff,

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it's relationship, sir as messy as as humans get. It's

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a relationship. Yeah, that's all you need to say.

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk about the brain a little bit, because

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 2>this is where it does get a little more interesting,

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 2>I think, slightly god slightly more scientific.

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 2>There was a study in twenty eleven by neurologist at

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 2>the Einstein College of Medicine which sounded totally fake, totally,

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:02.239
<v Speaker 2>but it's not.

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I have sounds made up written down.

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 2>It's in the bronx.

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's also reputable. There were also anthropologists from Rutgers

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in Sunni to legitimize things.

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh in this study, if Rutgers is legitimizing things, sure,

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 2>we're in trouble.

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh really, is that? Is that? Really? I thought Rutgers

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>was all right? Or am I confusing of its toughs?

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Uh? You're probably thinking Princeton, okay, both New Jersey schools.

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I thought Rutgers was the public ivy. Okay, sorry, Rutgers.

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I tried the check back.

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Then they're gonna be so mad at me. I've hung

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 2>out at Rutgers.

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I've been there people, so you know what you're talking about.

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I know exactly what I'm Is it like the Detroit

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of New Jersey colleges or something.

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 2>That's not untrue?

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, you don't disagree, boy, we're gonna.

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Get killed, that's okay. So this study from Einstein College

0:19:55.840 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 2>of Medicine found that just looking at a photograph of

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 2>an ex partner caused the second somo somatosensory cortex and

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 2>the dorsal posterior insula. Nice geez, and these areas process

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 2>physical discomfort. They start lighting up. The same thing as

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.640
<v Speaker 2>happens is when you get physically injured basically.

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Right like you are in actual, legitimate pain as far

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>as your brain is concerned, in the midst of a breakup,

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>at least when you're stuck in an MRI machine and

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>showing a picture of your recent X.

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Which is a big deal now with social media, because

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 2>every modern article I read about breakups and getting over

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:43.640
<v Speaker 2>them talked about what a deletrious effect social media will

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 2>have on your recovery process.

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Are you taunting me?

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Because the stuff's everywhere now? It used to be easy.

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 2>You could just throw everything in a shoe box and

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 2>set it on fire and send it down a river

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 2>and a little boat made of rage. Sure, but you

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 2>can't do that anymore because they're everywhere.

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>No, but that's that's tip number one from psychologist Guy Wench,

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>author of How to Fix a Broken Heart. Stay the

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>h off of social media. Do not stalk your ex

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>on social do not check in, like just separate.

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 2>I imagine that would be really hard because in the

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 2>old days it was just left to your imagination to

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 2>think about how much fun they were having m with

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, now you can see pictures of the nine

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 2>new boyfriends that she has, right, but yeah, you're right now,

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 2>or you know, maybe it helps.

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm people, I don't know. I think it's imperative that

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you not do that to help to help, Like, it's

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>not like watching them on social media will prevent you

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>from ever getting over it. I think no matter what

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 1>you do, you're going to eventually get past this. Sure,

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 1>but all you're doing is prolonging the process, and that

0:21:58.880 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 1>like unnecessarily.

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And then also when you were on the fMRI

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 2>machine and they did brain scans from people who had

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 2>been broken up with recently, they found that very much

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 2>similar to people overcoming like an addiction to cocaine, and

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 2>that that same circuitry is of overcoming addiction is just

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 2>lighting up. It's that potent.

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So so far with this MRI study from Albert

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Einstein came up with is that you were in physical

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>pain from the breakup. Huh, And you're the same centers

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that are activated by addiction. Cravings withdrawals are activated by

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the breakup as well. That's astounding.

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And this weird mental cycle happens basically when you

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 2>do look at like a photograph of a what they

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 2>say a former lover.

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>You're right, like the burger king laying rug pair skin rug.

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 2>But you will, you'll see the photo. And the weird

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 2>thing is you'll immediately get a reward. You will get

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 2>a dopamine hit, like a pleasurable feeling by seeing this person.

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>And then you realize, oh wait, well then you.

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Get sad all right immediately afterward, and then that sagnus sagnus,

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Where did that come from?

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>It is a little saggy feeling.

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 2>That triggers the brain's ventral tegmental area and the nucleus

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 2>acumen bins acumen bins.

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, so, I know we've run into that before.

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 1>We just talk about the brain a lot more human beins.

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 2>I think we figured out the brain though, right, so

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 2>we stopped.

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we were like done.

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.679
<v Speaker 2>But these two things working together, regardless of how I

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 2>mispronounced them, they trigger the urge to see that person.

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 2>So you get sad, and then your brain lights up

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 2>in two areas and then you go, hey, I remember

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 2>that dopamine hit you get from looking this picture. Why

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 2>don't you just give them a call and see what's

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 2>going on?

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Right? You want the real stuff? Go go get home.

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>They also those two areas apparently also are analytical as

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>well well. So they're responsible for rehashing the relationship, but

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>apparently they're not very realistic because most people, when rehashing

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the relationship, highlight the good parts and forget about all

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>the bad parts.

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 2>I kind of have tended to do that, I think

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 2>everybody does.

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand why. I don't know.

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't agree with that. Like Emily, and we of

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 2>course been married so long the subject never comes up anymore.

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 2>But I was always like, oh, with the old girlfriend,

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 2>what was so bad there? And then if I really

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 2>thought about it, I would remember where She's always like,

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 2>oh that was awful?

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh really? Yeah, gotcha? Well she's smart.

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah maybe so and I'm not dumb dumb so but okay.

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 1>So even and you're not dumb dumb, even if like

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you represent a third of people or a half of

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>people who do when rehashing, only think about the good

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>stuff and forget about all the negative stuff, like what

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is that? Why does that even happen? It's bizarre if

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you think about.

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 2>The personality thing. What if I tend to be optimistic? Maybe?

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Or yeah, yeah, I guess that's a pretty good explanation

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to tell you the truth. What I was going to

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>say is if you look at relationships or romantic love

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>sure as an evolutionary drive to pair and mate sure

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>successfully over and over again, and to stay together, that

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>would bring you back to this person that you've already

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 1>connected with, rather than making you go look for another mate.

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 2>That makes sense.

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>So maybe it's kind of like a backstop or fail

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 1>safe for breakups evolutionarily speaking.

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, Like I was so close to having nine babies,

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Like I really want to start all over again.

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Right right, Which is funny because that means that Emily's

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>more evolved than you in that sense.

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in every sense, that's awesome. But the end of

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 2>that mental cycle, basically, though, is those areas light up

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 2>that say go back and see that person. Then you

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 2>are immediately unsatisfied and about the fact that that's not happening.

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 2>That's when your pre frontal cortex trips into gear and

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 2>that's when you get angry. And it's just that mental

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 2>cycle that starts seeing that photo on a social media

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 2>platform and ending up upset ye in the end.

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>But the same study led by Helen Fisher, found that

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>after over time, the same process is greatly degraded. Sure,

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I think they did a follow up in well months,

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 1>Conger says, found that the whole process and all of

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the neurochemicals and the brain regions are much less active,

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>which again, just time, give it.

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Time, right. But if you don't give it time and

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 2>you do the thing where you do get back together,

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 2>that can be great, you know, it's sometimes you can

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 2>work it out and people can change.

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:57.880
<v Speaker 1>But there's a big caveat there.

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:02.199
<v Speaker 2>Well, right, go ahead, no no, no, no, you say yours okay,

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:04.400
<v Speaker 2>because I think I'm talking about something else.

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>So what I saw was that if you get back together,

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>rather than saying like this is a fresh start, we're

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>going to try this over again, we're going to really

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>make a go of it. If you do that, all

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you're going to do is just walk right back into

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the same pitfalls and pratfalls, because the separation probably did

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>nothing or virtually nothing to your individual personalities, which are

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 1>the source of all of your conflicts. So it's not

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:33.439
<v Speaker 1>like you just magically worked your conflicts out and you're

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 1>getting back together and everything's fine. That's just a charade.

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>But if you get back together and say I decided

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I love you the way you are and I don't

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:46.640
<v Speaker 1>want to be away from you, and I just accept

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you for you, and I accept our relationship with all

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>of its problems. You're probably going to have a successful

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:55.199
<v Speaker 1>reunion if you go into it like all of our

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>problems are solved because we broke up. You're just going

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to do the same thing again down the line. Apparently

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:04.919
<v Speaker 1>a fairly frequent thing that something like sixty percent or

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>some crazy percentage of younger the younger generation generation. Why,

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:15.199
<v Speaker 1>I guess the process of breaking up the majority of

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>them that breakup involves getting back together multiple times, not

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>just once. Yeah, so you're getting back together and just

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 1>going through the same pattern. I think there's a field

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of thought in psychology called scripts. These are scripts that

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>we're playing out one another's scripts, and if you don't

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>alter the script, you're going to go through the same

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 1>script over and over again. You're working out the same

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>things from your past or from your childhood against one another,

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and you're not doing it the right way. So all

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you're doing is creating conflict. And that doesn't just magically

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:47.959
<v Speaker 1>go away because you spend a couple of months apart.

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>You have to just say i'd love you for who

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you are, and we're going to just keep going.

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think what I was going to say was,

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 2>don't they think though that that also depends on just

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 2>what kind of person you are in terms of thinking,

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 2>either people can really make substantial change in their lives

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 2>or they can't.

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>That's how how you deal with a breakup, which we'll

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about in a minute.

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 2>That sounds like a good place for a break I.

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Think so too, all right.

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Before we get to that what we were just talking

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 2>about before the split. This is one piece of data

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 2>from the same sex couple community. Supposedly from studies, they

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 2>do think that same sex couples are better at staying friends.

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 2>I saw that after a breakup, which.

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Particularly lesbian couples. Yeah, and then gay men and then

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>straight couples are.

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Like, forget about it so long. Yeah, it's an interesting thing.

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:15.959
<v Speaker 2>Can you really be friends after? And it all depends

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 2>on how intense and how long and how kind of

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 2>a person you are. But yeah, it's interesting when I

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 2>meet people that legitimately are friends with people that they

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 2>seriously dated years later.

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty rare, I think. Actually I think it's too.

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it seems less rare because you see it

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>on like TV shows, A lot, you know, and it's

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>also almost aspirational, like, oh, look at how like how

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>laid back and like with these people are that they

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 1>can be friends after this, you know. I think it's

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty rare, actually, I think it's an idealized form, right,

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>because people like to you like to think that like

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you're on good terms with everybody in your life.

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 2>I think that's usually the person breaking up though. There

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 2>it's like I'd like to still be friends, right sure,

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 2>whereas the person getting broken up with this, like or

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 2>you could get hit by car, right, yeah, and that

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 2>would solve the problem.

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And then sticking with the whole same sex straight thing,

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>are we saying straight still?

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. That doesn't feel right, does it.

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't, So let's just say same sex and hetero. Yeah, hetero.

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 2>There's a clinical name for it.

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Boy. So the time and marriage seemed to be the

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>two greatest indicators, at least as far as this one

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>study I saw went for the likelihood of staying together

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>over long periods of time. Right, all relationships, same sex

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and hetero man woman, all of them are in at

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the greatest risk of breakup within the first year or two.

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 1>And then it starts to drop precipitously. But I think

0:31:54.800 --> 0:32:02.239
<v Speaker 1>married hetero couples have a fairly low rate of a

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>low chance of breaking up over time. It's pretty much

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>flat the whole time, say, and then with same sex couples,

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the same thing happens. The chance of breakup is pretty

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>high at the beginning, and then it starts to come down,

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and then it's basically tracks with hetero couples. For marriage,

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>So marriage is kind of the factor. Time is the

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>second factor, but then time stops being a factor after

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:30.719
<v Speaker 1>like thirty forty years. For unmarried couples, both hetero and

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>same sex, they start to break up after year like

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty or forty, like, the chance of a breakup increases. Yeah,

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 1>but once you get married, once you get a ring

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>on it, over time, over like you know, decades is

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about. Your chance is almost nil of

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>breaking up, right, like less than I think of percent.

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't sound right because to like half of

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>all marriages into divorce. Yeah, this thing was way off,

0:32:57.360 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>But maybe that's when taking into account, maybe that's front

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>loaded by all the divorces that happened in the first

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>five years or anything like that.

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Okay, that would make a little bit more sense.

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it does.

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 2>They do find that your chances of getting over a

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 2>breakup or adjusting to that new post breakup life really

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 2>centers around regaining your sense of self. That when you

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 2>couple up with someone. It's not saying you can't have

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 2>a sense of self anymore, because it's very healthy too. Sure,

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 2>but there's an inevitable absorption and morphing that happens, and

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of your sense of self goes away

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 2>when you couple.

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all the same friends, the same phone number, yeah,

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and the same madre yes.

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Boy. What about couples that share the email address?

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? You mean I have one? Really?

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Sure, never had one, But you have your own too, well.

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we just have our own, but we have our

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>shared one too.

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm talking about the people that just have

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 2>the shared address. Sure, I've always found that interesting. Yeah,

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm judging. I don't know anybody who just as a

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 2>shared address. I don't get why people would have the

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 2>same one. I guess I just always Emily sells a

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 2>MindSpring address.

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, is it Emily atmindspring dot com.

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 2>No, And that is the truth, because I'm not saying

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 2>that just to keep people from emailing her. But she's

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:17.879
<v Speaker 2>she had it for so long and I make fun

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 2>of her all the time, sure because she still pays

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 2>like twenty dollars a year for this what And she

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 2>was like, I've had it for so long that I

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 2>just can't give it up.

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Well that's why people stay on Facebook.

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like, I'm not changing my email address.

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>There's like so many of your memories there.

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 2>It's like, well even that just her contact list and

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 2>every email, Like, I don't know, I just think it's funny.

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I was like, where's that money going?

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Right? Who owns MindSpring? The air of the mind Spring fortune?

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>He can count on twenty bucks a month.

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Back of cigarettes every month because of Emily yep oh

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 2>Man and then for recovery the whole stress related growth

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:02.239
<v Speaker 2>thing that can happen with which is and I think

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 2>women tend to be more apt to do this than men.

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:08.439
<v Speaker 2>But like, all right, you know what, I'm free now.

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:11.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna do all those things that I lost while

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 2>I was with him. I didn't have time for my

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:16.319
<v Speaker 2>friends anymore. I lost connections with them.

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I didn't do I didn't fly model airplanes or RCA

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:19.879
<v Speaker 1>airplanes anymore.

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna drop some weight. I'm gonna start eating healthier.

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 2>The post breakup weight loss is a huge, huge thing.

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 2>It is, and partially from stress, but partially just because

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 2>like I'm gonna make myself the best I can be

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:32.879
<v Speaker 2>and I'll show her or him.

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's also like just as simple as like

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 1>more free time.

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 2>Sure, you know too, and something to do that is,

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, exercises also stress relieving. You might not be

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 2>eating as much because your stomach is tied up into stress.

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Nots right.

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 2>So there are a bunch of reasons for it.

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>But here is that. Here's where that that part you

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 1>were talking about earlier I said we would get to

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:59.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of kicks in. Is how much of the so

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you identify with does relate to how well you handle

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 1>a breakup? How much of your how much of the

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you is the we in the relationship? Yeah, And what

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>they found is that that's a huge part of it.

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:17.240
<v Speaker 1>But more significant is the amount of growth that happens

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>while you're in a relationship, Like you can share a

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of the same self with your significant other

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and grow as a person as a result. And if

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you do that, you're actually going to have a harder

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 1>breakup because that we that that super attachment that led

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to that personal growth is related to that other person

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 1>who's now gone. Whereas if you were you even if

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you were totally in messed with another person, but you

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't grow much personally. If you experience a burst of

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 1>growth after the breakup, you're going to have the easiest

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 1>breakup of all. Even though you were super in messed

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 1>with the person, you weren't growing, But then you grow afterward.

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Now that period of non growth is related to that

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>person who's gone, and you can be like, so long zero,

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna make myself a hero, yeah, DC, sure did

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>they come across? Yeah, because sometimes I'm not the best

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:16.840
<v Speaker 1>at explaining things.

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Which is pretty funny if you think about it.

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 1>It really is.

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 2>In two thousand, they did a study at Northwestern University

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:29.360
<v Speaker 2>where they did find out though that they ask people,

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 2>I believe, how bad do you think this breakup is

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 2>going to be? If you know you're in a relationship,

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 2>what if you broke up? And then they found out

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:43.839
<v Speaker 2>that they weren't as bad off as they thought they

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 2>would be, which is encouraging.

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:48.360
<v Speaker 1>It is, but also think about this, Chuck, These vultures

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 1>who are running the study where like, you're in a relationship,

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 1>just we're going to study just in case you guys

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 1>break up. Yeah, And so they would get that info,

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that self reporting info about how bad the breakup of be,

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and then they swooped in upon the breakup. They're like,

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 1>how bad is it?

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Tell us And the person was like, well, this is

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:10.720
<v Speaker 1>as bad as it is, And it was almost across

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the board. Yeah, not anywhere near as bad as the

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:18.359
<v Speaker 1>people thought it would be when they were in the relationship. Yeah,

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:20.840
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty surprising. And what was even more surprising

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:24.799
<v Speaker 1>is the more in love you are, the easier it's

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be relative to how bad do you think

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:29.720
<v Speaker 1>it will be during the relationship, right, Which makes sense

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 1>if you stop and think about it.

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I thought the other interesting thing too, when we

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:38.280
<v Speaker 2>were talking about getting over a breakup and your sense

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:42.240
<v Speaker 2>of self, that's closely tied to how you feel about rejection.

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 2>And there are a couple of I mean more than

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 2>a couple of ways. But if your reflection of your

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 2>how you think about rejection is tied heavily into how

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:58.399
<v Speaker 2>you feel about yourself, so there's some people that might

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 2>be rejected and it might devastate them because they start

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 2>to analyze themselves and what did I do wrong? And

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:06.879
<v Speaker 2>what's wrong with me? Right, there's a whole other camp

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 2>out there, And I think this goes into personality and

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:12.960
<v Speaker 2>ego and all that stuff. But you call these people

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 2>healthy or sociopaths, maybe, Oh, it's probably on a range.

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Wow, I just we just put both of our cards

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 1>on the table. Then.

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 2>But the people that are like, yeah, I got broken

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 2>up with and I but and I got rejected. But

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, as happens that happens in life, people get rejected.

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 2>It's not because of me, I just not everyone. You know,

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 2>So you find together, you.

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:39.839
<v Speaker 1>Find this quote sociopathic. I learned that two people can

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>both be quality individuals, but that doesn't mean they belong together.

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 1>That's sociopathic to you.

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 2>That's that was Oh wait, it says you said that

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:48.720
<v Speaker 2>it was Ted.

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Bundy, Patrick Bateman.

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:53.879
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, I don't think it necessarily necessarily means

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 2>you're a sociopath. But I think someone with that is

0:39:56.640 --> 0:39:59.840
<v Speaker 2>a true sociopath would probably be way more apt to

0:39:59.880 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 2>be like, oh yeah, well.

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>It was them, not me.

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, It's like it's fine, your point breakup.

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a sub a subgroup to that sociopath as you

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 1>call it camp, and they are like, well, breakups happen.

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I heard what the other person said, and there's some

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 1>things I feel like I need to work on, Like say,

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I was a terrible communicator, so I'm going to work

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 1>on becoming a better communicator as a result. It's called

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 1>stress related growth is what that's called. Where you're growing

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:32.320
<v Speaker 1>out of this horrific experience. And that's healthy, that's super healthy.

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 1>But they the key is what's unhealthy is to say

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 1>this was all because of some fatal flaw that I have,

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that's part of my personality that I'll never be able

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of. And so all I'm going to

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 1>do is poison every relationship from here on out, and

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to build walls and keep everybody at

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a distance. And that's what some people do as a

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:56.839
<v Speaker 1>result of a breakup. And you can't do that. Even

0:40:56.880 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 1>if your brain starts to go that way. This research says,

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 1>stop it. Don't you have to disassociate yourself become the sociopath.

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess if it need be to say this is

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 1>not because of an inherent flaw in me, that's uncorrectable,

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:15.759
<v Speaker 1>even if the person was right, even if they're like,

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you're a terrible communicator and you have serious mommy issues,

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that you will always be a terrible

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 1>communicator with serious mommy issues. You could work on those

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:32.839
<v Speaker 1>post breakup and become a much better SOO to the

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 1>next person or whatever. The key is not being a

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 1>fatalist like there's nothing you can do to change. And

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:42.720
<v Speaker 1>then also you should evaluate whether the person was saying

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that in anger, how much faith you put in their

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 1>opinion of you. There's a lot of factors that you

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:50.879
<v Speaker 1>need to take into account before you take on that

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:53.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing that just puts you in the bottom

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:57.239
<v Speaker 1>of a well where you could conceivably hang out for

0:41:57.280 --> 0:42:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the rest of your life if you're not careful without

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 1>copious amounts of therapy.

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah agreed, or turning to drugs and alcohol, which is

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 2>a big, gin yeah, big thing that a lot of

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 2>people do.

0:42:08.760 --> 0:42:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Gin cuts both ways.

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Should we talk about some of these tips from.

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:16.600
<v Speaker 1>This guy, the psychologist Guy Wench. Remember number one is

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>don't check up on them on social media.

0:42:19.160 --> 0:42:19.799
<v Speaker 2>Good luck with that.

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Here's why. He says that this will reinforce your ex's

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:25.960
<v Speaker 1>presence in your mind and will make it harder for

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you to stop fantasizing about your broken relationship. You're basically

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:33.440
<v Speaker 1>just like literally keeping them right there in front of

0:42:33.480 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 1>your face, right through social media. Yeah, which is why

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a bad idea.

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Number two, avoid creating mysteries about why the breakup happened.

0:42:44.120 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 2>And again, this is along those same lines of just

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 2>keeping your ex like forefront in your mind, which is hard.

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's gonna take a little while. Sure, he says,

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:57.439
<v Speaker 2>next day to pop up and just be like, well,

0:42:57.520 --> 0:42:58.440
<v Speaker 2>they're out of my mind.

0:42:58.960 --> 0:42:59.960
<v Speaker 1>That's sociopathic.

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:03.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, even if you're the breaker upper, you know, it

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:05.759
<v Speaker 2>doesn't mean that you don't have a process to go

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:06.319
<v Speaker 2>through as well.

0:43:06.400 --> 0:43:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Sure, you know, but that's why he says, avoid creating mysteries,

0:43:09.400 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's probably going to happen, but like be

0:43:11.800 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 1>mindful when it's going on and be like enough, I'm

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 1>going to go work out, yeah, or go drink some

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:18.400
<v Speaker 1>gin or both.

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Number three, Make a list of all the comp Oh,

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 2>this is a good one. Make a list of all

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 2>the compromises that you had to make that you don't

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 2>want to make again. Start to think about like, yeah,

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 2>you know when I was with this person, I felt

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 2>like I could never really have my real sense of

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 2>humor out in public because they thought it was loud.

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 1>That counters that that rehashing that just focuses on the positive. Yeah,

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it cuts the legs out from under that set and legs.

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:47.719
<v Speaker 1>What about Number four?

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Do the things that used to bring you enjoyment? Is

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:52.759
<v Speaker 2>kind of what I was talking about earlier, even if

0:43:52.800 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 2>they don't seem interesting now. That whole thing where like, Jeez,

0:43:55.680 --> 0:44:00.600
<v Speaker 2>I used to really love pottery right and throwing clay, sure,

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:02.440
<v Speaker 2>and I just I quit doing it once I started

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:03.840
<v Speaker 2>dating Josh.

0:44:03.920 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Clay throwing my house.

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 2>H and Josh hated it when Chuck went to the

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:14.839
<v Speaker 2>Potter's Wheel because it reminded him of Ghost And Josh

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:17.200
<v Speaker 2>hated that movie, so he wouldn't allow me to do it.

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 2>But you know what, I'm going to reclaim that pottery wheel.

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, which is ironic because I was always walking around

0:44:23.800 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 1>our house just like Patrick swayzey in that scene. But

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I still hated that movie. Oh that was more like

0:44:32.040 --> 0:44:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the Chris Farley, Chippindale Patrick swayzee version.

0:44:36.920 --> 0:44:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Number five Remove reminders. This is the box that you

0:44:41.040 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 2>will burn, which is now just throw your laptop in

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 2>the fireplace, right in your smartphone.

0:44:46.920 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>And then like reconnect with your friends, Like, yeah, you

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 1>left him in the dusty years ago, but they're still alive.

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:53.920
<v Speaker 1>They probably wouldn't mind hearing from you. Yeah.

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:57.319
<v Speaker 2>The problem here is is if you truly do have

0:44:57.360 --> 0:45:00.400
<v Speaker 2>a mix of friends that you both love, not like

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:03.719
<v Speaker 2>I didn't leave behind all my old friends. Or the

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:06.319
<v Speaker 2>worst case scenario is like all of my friends are

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:08.520
<v Speaker 2>from you. Now what do I do?

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Go down to the YMCA and make some new friends?

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:15.239
<v Speaker 2>I guess. So I found this one last study I

0:45:15.239 --> 0:45:17.880
<v Speaker 2>thought was interesting. The best way to get over a

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:21.000
<v Speaker 2>breakup according to science, And this is actually published in

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 2>the Journal of Experimental Psychology, And they tested a bunch

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:31.080
<v Speaker 2>of strategies for getting over a breakup twenty four heartbroken

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:34.319
<v Speaker 2>people ages twenty to thirty seven that had been in

0:45:34.400 --> 0:45:36.759
<v Speaker 2>at least a two and a half year relationship, so

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 2>pretty significant. Some were dumpies, some were dumpers, and they

0:45:40.680 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 2>said there were three strategies. One is to negatively reappraise

0:45:45.239 --> 0:45:49.880
<v Speaker 2>your ex just think about all the bad things. The

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:55.360
<v Speaker 2>other one was called love reappraisal, which is believe and

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 2>read statements like it's okay to love someone I'm no

0:45:57.719 --> 0:46:01.759
<v Speaker 2>longer with it's all right. And then the third was distraction,

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:07.160
<v Speaker 2>literally the ice cream and look over here movies trick,

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:10.320
<v Speaker 2>the black mirror trick. And then there was the fourth prompt,

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:12.480
<v Speaker 2>which was the control, which was don't think about anything.

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Of course means you're thinking of the stape of March Vela.

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:18.960
<v Speaker 1>You don't think about anything. Really, just undermine the science

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of that clear brain.

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:24.200
<v Speaker 2>So those were the four prompts. Then they showed everyone,

0:46:24.239 --> 0:46:27.440
<v Speaker 2>They hooked everyone up to an EEG machine, showed them

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:30.719
<v Speaker 2>photos of their exes, and they measured the intensity of

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:34.879
<v Speaker 2>emotion in response to that photo, and then had them

0:46:35.239 --> 0:46:37.719
<v Speaker 2>use these different prompts to see which one works best.

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:40.399
<v Speaker 1>When they looked in the people who were not thinking

0:46:40.400 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 1>about anything, they were bleeding out of their eye sockets.

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:47.960
<v Speaker 2>They were and according to the readings, all three, all

0:46:48.000 --> 0:46:51.800
<v Speaker 2>three of the strategies significantly decreased their emotional response to

0:46:51.960 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 2>the photos really relative to the control. If you looked

0:46:57.280 --> 0:47:01.200
<v Speaker 2>at your ex in a negative light that first one,

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:03.760
<v Speaker 2>like there was such a jerk. You had a decrease

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 2>in feelings of love, but you left in a worse

0:47:06.800 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 2>mood like that judged up bad feelings.

0:47:09.120 --> 0:47:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Like you wasted your time or something all that.

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:14.959
<v Speaker 2>Maybe or just like just really took me off thinking

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:15.720
<v Speaker 2>about all that stuff.

0:47:15.800 --> 0:47:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Right? You know?

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 2>So now did dumb study.

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Drove some clay?

0:47:20.480 --> 0:47:25.480
<v Speaker 2>That's right, distraction made feel made you feel better overall,

0:47:27.800 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 2>but didn't that have much of an effect on how

0:47:30.239 --> 0:47:32.960
<v Speaker 2>you really felt about them? Okay, you just didn't leave

0:47:33.000 --> 0:47:35.080
<v Speaker 2>it necessarily a bad mood. You just got ice cream

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:37.560
<v Speaker 2>and watched a funny movie good enough, which is fine.

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:39.680
<v Speaker 2>But they said that that doesn't do anything long term

0:47:39.680 --> 0:47:42.360
<v Speaker 2>to help you recover. Oh okay, just like a temporary whatever.

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Does it prolong it? Though? Do you think? I mean,

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you know as much as the people conducting it said.

0:47:49.040 --> 0:47:51.680
<v Speaker 2>It's a form of avoidance that is shown to reduce

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:52.360
<v Speaker 2>the recovery.

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so it would prolong it. Then, I guess. So

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:58.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody stop eating ice cream and watching Black Mirror.

0:47:58.600 --> 0:48:01.480
<v Speaker 2>And then love Appraisal show no effect on your mood

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 2>or how you feel about them, but it did dull

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:07.520
<v Speaker 2>the emotional response a little bit, So.

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:08.960
<v Speaker 1>There's really nothing to do.

0:48:09.520 --> 0:48:10.479
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't sound like it.

0:48:11.120 --> 0:48:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I saw a couple more tips. One is you could

0:48:14.640 --> 0:48:18.440
<v Speaker 1>write a letter that under no circumstances, will you ever send?

0:48:18.640 --> 0:48:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a good trick actually reship price like anything

0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:23.960
<v Speaker 2>bothering her.

0:48:24.239 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 1>It also really works well for grieving too. You just

0:48:28.080 --> 0:48:30.480
<v Speaker 1>write a letter, sure, and you say whatever you want

0:48:30.480 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 1>because you know for a fact that the other person

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:35.919
<v Speaker 1>will never read it. You could say whatever you want

0:48:36.040 --> 0:48:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's just like a cathartic process that can help

0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>hasten things. And then also, why do sad songs feel

0:48:43.760 --> 0:48:46.360
<v Speaker 1>so good when you're going through a breakup? Why do

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:49.919
<v Speaker 1>people seek out sad songs? And the best explanation I saw,

0:48:50.000 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the best theory is that a song is a little

0:48:53.600 --> 0:48:56.720
<v Speaker 1>capsule of emotion, and when you're seeking out a sad song,

0:48:57.040 --> 0:49:01.399
<v Speaker 1>you're confronting the very emotions that you're probably stifling right then,

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and confronting it in such a raw form forces you

0:49:05.120 --> 0:49:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to express those emotions i e. Cry and that helps

0:49:09.480 --> 0:49:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you process them faster because you're you're not pushing them

0:49:12.960 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 1>off any longer. You're you're you're you're expressing them, you're

0:49:16.200 --> 0:49:19.400
<v Speaker 1>sorting through them. So that's what sad songs make you do.

0:49:19.520 --> 0:49:22.120
<v Speaker 1>That's why people seek out sad songs when they're down,

0:49:22.440 --> 0:49:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and it actually helps hasten recovery Lady in Red. I

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's a sad standing with me.

0:49:32.320 --> 0:49:33.399
<v Speaker 2>That's the saddest song.

0:49:33.480 --> 0:49:36.560
<v Speaker 1>You're like, savely it takes me away?

0:49:36.960 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 2>That uh sailing by Christopher Cross Lady in Red, and

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:45.399
<v Speaker 2>then Dan Fogelberg's saying same old anxione right, three set

0:49:45.440 --> 0:49:45.799
<v Speaker 2>of songs.

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Jerry knows that song. Those were two Christopher Cross songs.

0:49:49.840 --> 0:49:51.040
<v Speaker 1>He's got two of the three sets.

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:52.640
<v Speaker 2>No, Lady in Red's not Christopher Cross.

0:49:52.800 --> 0:49:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it is.

0:49:53.520 --> 0:49:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Now five dollars, Jerry, we're all nodding.

0:49:57.000 --> 0:49:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Now, five dollars is on the table.

0:49:59.520 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'll look it up.

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Well, you guys will find out next episode whether I

0:50:03.320 --> 0:50:03.960
<v Speaker 1>was right or not.

0:50:04.520 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 2>I remember the guy's name.

0:50:06.000 --> 0:50:11.040
<v Speaker 1>It's Christopher Cross. Oh, Jerry's rarely doing one of her

0:50:11.080 --> 0:50:15.960
<v Speaker 1>rare speaking parts. She says, Christoph Waltz. That's the actor.

0:50:16.520 --> 0:50:18.640
<v Speaker 2>You know. What's funny is I mistyped something and it

0:50:18.880 --> 0:50:22.759
<v Speaker 2>changed my search to Lady in Red wings like red

0:50:22.760 --> 0:50:25.200
<v Speaker 2>wing boots. Boot must be a fetish side, I guess.

0:50:25.200 --> 0:50:28.319
<v Speaker 1>So. Yeah. If you want to get in touch with me,

0:50:28.480 --> 0:50:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Chuck or Jerry, you can shoot us an email to

0:50:31.360 --> 0:50:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Podcast how Stuff Works dot.

0:50:33.880 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Com Stuff You Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio.

0:50:40.120 --> 0:50:43.320
<v Speaker 2>For more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:50:43.520 --> 0:50:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.