WEBVTT - Why the 2008 Crash Was So Different | Raoul Pal

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Why was it different in two thousand and eight. I mean,

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:05.040
<v Speaker 1>they seemingly did let the market fall, and we did

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>see the markets crashed by sixty five percent, and so

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:09.959
<v Speaker 1>now you're kind of saying that they can't really do that.

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Two thousand was less of a debt cycle and more

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 2>of an equity cycle. The debt cycle in two thousand

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 2>and eight really was the kind of end of the

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 2>financial system. It was the point that we all knew

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 2>was coming, which is like, you can't have this much leverage.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Look at what's happening. We're decentralizing power. So now people

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 2>can have the source of power at the houses. So

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:34.279
<v Speaker 2>therefore you don't need the huge storage. People say, well,

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 2>you can't scale solo, Well you can at a house level.

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 2>You can do it probably at a village level.

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>You know. Sam Martman said that we might see the

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>first single person billion dollar company.

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:42.919
<v Speaker 3>So I think of it.

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.919
<v Speaker 1>There's both, right, the centralizing of the programming, but then

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it's decentralizing in a sense. It turns one big company

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>into one hundred or one thousand companies. There's no future

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>in this world where humans don't have problems, And as

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>long as there's problems, we'll need solutions to those problems,

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and entrepreneurs will always be able to figure that out.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 2>So Nyture's going to traded a huge premium in a

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.119
<v Speaker 2>world of robots and AI when you can just kind

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 2>of leave that all behind. If you ask a young

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 2>kid now and say what do you want to be

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 2>when you grow up, they will say, I want to

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 2>be an influencer, and we think, are you crazy? But

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 2>what is an influencer apart from a community leader where

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 2>they have a community of people. It's actually maybe they're

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 2>being adapted to already. They've done it in Fortnite, they've

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 2>done it in the gaming world as well. But in

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 2>the end, people want the human to human experience.

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Rapaul from Real Vision, you have been a man. You've

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>been laying out some really good research. I've been waiting

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you. It's been going on for like

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a month waiting for this. So anyway, thanks for joining

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>me today.

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 3>I read again.

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, sorry, I've been so avoiding, but I was on

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 2>holiday and it all got a bit screen. But we're

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 2>here now, finally.

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>We're here now, We're here now, so that everything code

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the Banana zone. Man, You've been putting out some really

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>really good research that I'm excited to Again. I was

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>just telling you, I just came back from the big conference,

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm starting to see this big shift in the industry.

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>It seems like where we're seeing, you know, all this

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>institutional adoption that's just coming in and it seems like

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 1>it's changing sort of the makeup of that industry. We'll

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>come back to that, but let's go ahead and just

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>set the stage here and Everything code. I've been loving it,

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>this this phenomenon where you have like these metronomes that

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>keep perfect time for playing music, and this phenomenon where

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>if you set all these metronomes on a table and

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>start them at different times over time, they all get

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to the same beat. And I think that sort of

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe sums up the everything code.

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and what's weird about the everything code, And I'll

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 2>explain what it is. What's weird is it makes everything

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 2>so simple too, so that most people think, well, this

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 2>can't be possible.

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:48.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 2>We kind of knew it in bitcoin world because we

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 2>could see a cycle forming, and we've been following this

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 2>cycle kind of dumbly like, well, it's kind of maybe

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 2>just the harving cycle. We don't really know and then

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 2>I started digging in and realized that the business cycle

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.519
<v Speaker 2>was perfect. So the business cycle I used the Ism

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 2>survey and it was a perfect cycle. I'm like, that's

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 2>weird because if you remember, go back prior to two

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 2>thousand and eight, we'd have these long periods of no recession,

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 2>short periods and it was not it was variable. But

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 2>suddenly it's like a metronome as you say, I'm like, huh,

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 2>what's that all about? And eventually it led me to

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 2>realize that two thousand and eight I think was the

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 2>great reset, the one that people keep expecting happened. What

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 2>they did is they basically four They told everybody they

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 2>can fore go paying interest on all their debts, which

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 2>was zero interest rates, and then they tried the new

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 2>trick of printing money via quantata easing. Now, what that

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 2>did is allow every single major government in the world

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 2>to refinance all of their debts on this three to

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 2>five year sector. And so they all did it, and

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 2>what it did was force the business cycle into this

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 2>four year cycle. And then all the asset prices are

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 2>all correlated, whether it's tech, whether it's bitcoin, whether it's

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:18.559
<v Speaker 2>the economy itself, it's all driven by the same cycle,

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 2>which happens to be the presidential election cycle, which happens

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 2>to be the bitcoin harving cycle. It's all the same thing,

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 2>and so when you understand that, it makes the game

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot easier. Now, this is not going to last forever,

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 2>but for the period of time that we've got it

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 2>seems to you playing out perfectly. And you can break

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 2>these cycles down to four phases, which I call the seasons.

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 2>So we have call it crypto or macro Winter. Well,

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 2>that was twenty twenty two, that was twenty eighteen, that

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 2>was twenty fourteen. There is four years. The next part

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 2>of that is spring, where nobody quite believes that something

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 2>is changing, but prices start moving higher. You know, bitcoin

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 2>had a great year in twenty twenty three against most

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 2>people's expectations, because spring is the time the shoots come up.

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Then you start transitioning into summer, which is this year,

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 2>which happens to be the election year, which is when

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 2>really the debt starts getting refinanced and they have to

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 2>start using liquidity to finance it because there's not enough

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 2>GDP growth to pay for the interest on the debts,

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 2>and so they keep rolling forwards. These debts and they

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 2>keep monetizing the interest payments, which is this debasement of

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 2>currency that happens at about on a globalized level, eight

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 2>percent a year their debasing currency and so and then

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 2>next year will be macro full and then eventually the

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 2>cycle tops out and we repeat it again, because it's

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 2>based on the debt refi cycle, that this debasement of

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 2>currency of eight percent. There's two ways of looking at it.

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 2>You can say, rightly, so we're being robbed of our

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 2>few your wealth because your future self is getting poorer

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 2>because you're going to afford less assets with your income

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 2>because income doesn't go up the assets do because of

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 2>the debasement. Or the other way is you can say,

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm paying an eight percent put option fee on the

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 2>entire system not breaking, because that's also what they're doing

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 2>because they need to refinance the debt. They need to

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 2>not let asset prices go too far down. So we

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 2>can talk about that, but it's another way of looking

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 2>at it, and you're like, would you pay eight percent

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 2>a year to have the entire system not break?

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>Maybe if you have assets, for sure, If you don't

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>have assets, that's a different conversation, exactly right, right, depends

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>on how much you have to lose, so to kind

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of just maybe rewind the clock just a little bit.

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Because we're in a debt based monetary system, then we

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>have to have this debt expansion, and so then we

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>have this debt that has then been become collateral for

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>more debt, which means the debt always has to be

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>ruled over. And as President Biden told us on the

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>last debt cilliing debate, that the US has never defaulted,

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 1>and so we have to raise the debt ceilion so

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't default on the previous debt, right, which is

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>basically what you're saying. We have to raise more debt

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to pay out the existing debt.

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and then pay the interest on that debt, because

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 2>it compounds every time by the interest payments, so you

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 2>keep adding debts just to pay the interest payments on

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 2>the old debt. Now, why is that phenomena there? It's

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 2>pretty straightforward when you understand it. The US government and

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 2>all the major Western governments, plus Japan plus a few

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 2>others are about one hundred percent plus of GDP and debt. Now,

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 2>let's say theoretically interest rates a three percent, Well, if

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 2>GDP growth is at three percent, then all GDP growth

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 2>goes to pay those interest payments. Okay, but the problem

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 2>is is the private sector is over one hundred percent

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 2>of GDP and debt as well, and it's got interest payments.

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 2>So if they both have it, there's not enough GDP

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 2>to cover it. So what they've essentially done is removed

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 2>the government debt payments out by printing money, and that

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 2>stops the whole system becoming illiquid. Because if you think

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 2>about it, you talked about collateral. Collateral is the money

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 2>pledged against the loan. If the colateral falls too fast

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 2>or too far, then you break the covenant on the

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 2>loan and it gets called on you, and that's the

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 2>whole system. That's what happened in two thousand and eight.

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 2>So the best thing to do is not let the

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 2>colateral fall by debasing the currency, and optically it goes up,

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 2>so it kind of stops the system imploding.

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:33.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, now, you talked about this the phenomenon where it

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>all got synced up in two thousand and eight. We'll

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>get into that, but just going backwards, why was it

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>different in two thousand and eight. I mean, they seemingly

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>did let the market fall and we did see the

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>markets crashed by sixty five percent.

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 3>And so they did.

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>And we started in two thousand, right, we started in two thousands.

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>On two thousand and eight. But now you're kind of

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>saying that they can't really do that.

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 2>That's right. Two thousand was less of a debt cycle

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 2>and more of an equity cycle. The debts cycle in

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and eight really was the kind of end

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 2>of the financial system. It was the point that we

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 2>all knew was coming, which is like, you can't have

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 2>this much leverage. And if the collateral, which happened to

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 2>be house prices, which is not a volatile collateral, once

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 2>that starts, it put a colateral call on the entire system,

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 2>and faced with the entire blowing up of everything, they

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 2>decided to stop it. Now, I don't think they quite

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.319
<v Speaker 2>understood what they were doing at that point. But then

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.079
<v Speaker 2>Europe had the same issue in twenty twelve, four years later,

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 2>this four year cycle. Then Europe, the governments couldn't pay

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 2>the debt. Okay, Now, this was a sovereign crisis of

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:45.199
<v Speaker 2>giant nations, and Draggy said I'll do whatever it takes.

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 2>What that was was, I will debase the currency to

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 2>stop the collateral falling so we can shure up the system.

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 2>That then magnified the whole thing.

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>So was it a change in their willingness to do

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>whatever it takes to the point drive he said, you know,

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>whatever it takes. Was it a change sort of in

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>their willingness to intercede or was it a fact of

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that the system has gotten so over leveraged they have

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>no choice now?

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I this is the time I got into

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin back in twenty twelve because I was living in

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Europe and you know, it got so bad that I

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.839
<v Speaker 2>was buying tin food and a generator because I thought,

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 2>we're going to lose our banking system. Wow, because everyone

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, I was living in Spain. Spain was forced

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 2>to take a bail out of nineteen billion dollars. They

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 2>didn't want to take it, and we thought we're going

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 2>to lose the banks. Cyprus obviously lost its banking system.

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 2>They took the money out of everybody's accounts. But what

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 2>was interesting at that point, I went around the world

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 2>trying to start the world's safest bank with a bunch

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 2>of friends of mine and family offices and stuff like that.

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 2>And we had had a private meeting with the DTCC

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 2>and Euroclear and the New York Fed. Now the DTCC

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 2>in Euroclear, they're the custodians of the entire system. And Euroclear,

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 2>I'd read somewhere had had to lend emergency money when

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:12.679
<v Speaker 2>Lehman went under fifty billion dollars, and so I asked them,

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 2>I said, what was the collateral for that loan? And

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 2>they said, oh, we had to use the positions from

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 2>all of the members of Euroclear. And I'm like, is

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 2>that customer or house account? Is it mingled? And they're like, oh,

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 2>it's all mingled at our level. We have a claim

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 2>in all assets. I'm like, okay. And then I spoke

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 2>to the DTCC and I said, well, oh no. I

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 2>spoke to Euroclear and said, what happens if Spain or

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 2>Italy went bust? They said, then the entire colateral of

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 2>the system is gone and it's a total wipeout of everything.

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 2>That's when I realized how important the government debt was.

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 2>I asked the DTCC and the New York Fed the

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 2>same question, and they said, yes, they would lend if

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 2>JP Morgan went under or something, they would lend money

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 2>to the system and they would take customer positions as collateral.

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, okay, so you don't actually own anything. And

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 2>I asked the New York feder said what is the

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 2>leverage in US treasuries? And they said, we think treasuries

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 2>are levered up to forty two times. Wow, So there's

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 2>forty two claims on the same asset. If shit hits

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 2>the fan, that's what they're scared of. And that I

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 2>think they had the realization in twenty twelve, and I

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 2>think they all understood the game, which was, Okay, we're

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 2>going to have to continue to monetize this until we

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 2>can grow our way out of it if we can.

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>So I remember two thousand and eight is when I

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of woke up to the macro world. I had

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>been a real estate investor coming out of the two

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand crash, and then you know, I got woken up

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight. I said, Wow, I need

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to go figure out this macro picture because it has

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>all this ConTroll over my life I've been paying attention to.

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's when I really remember hearing the first you know,

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:55.199
<v Speaker 1>too big to fail sort of narrative coming out of it.

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 3>And so they bailed out a lot of.

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>These institutions AIG that were too big fail, but by

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>doing that, they made even bigger institutions that are too

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:04.199
<v Speaker 1>big to fail.

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like, so there's a really important point. I

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 2>asked them directly why they let Leman go but they

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 2>didn't let AIG go, and they're like, nobody was using

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Leman bonds as collateral. AIG were triple A and they

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 2>were going to go to zero, and triple A bonds

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 2>get used massively as collateral, and they thought there was

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 2>thirty two times leverage in AIG bonds. They're like, we

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 2>could not allow it to go. Leman wasn't as existential

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.959
<v Speaker 2>a problem as AIG. I was like, wow, that's fascinating.

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>And so now the system has gotten so levered up

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 1>and it's there's so much collateral staking the other collateral

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that now we're sort of in this position that's gotten bigger, bigger,

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>bigger and bigger worse that they just can't let it

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>go now, which is what we saw in twenty twenty.

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 2>And we saw it in twenty twenty two as well.

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 2>So the moment the markets go down a certain amount,

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 2>the liquidity comes back, even though the FED was still

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 2>tightening and they were doing contains of tightening. The actual

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 2>liquidity started picking up at the back end of twenty

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty two because they're like, enough, we don't want the

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 2>S and P to full more than let's say, twenty

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 2>five percent. And that's kind of a line in the

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 2>sand that we've seen repeatedly that every time it starts

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 2>to get a bit wobbly, magic of liquidity comes back,

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 2>they debase the currency and everybody's okay again because if

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 2>you think of the other big liability out there we

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 2>talked about ordinary people. Ordinary people do have a pension

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 2>and those pensions are in these assets too, and you've

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 2>got this massive cohort of people that if you let

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the pensioners lose fifty percent of their wealth at what

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 2>average age of baby boomer's average age is, what's seventy one,

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 2>seventy two, Well, that's going to destroy consumption because there's

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 2>seventy six million of these people. So then don't want

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 2>to do that too. So that between a rock and

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 2>a hard place. And I ask a lot of people

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 2>who complain about what's going on rightly, so is what

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 2>would you do different? Are you going to default on

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 2>all of the baby boomers? And destroy their pensions and

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 2>then destroy the entire economy, or do you let all

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 2>of the system go under because you don't have any assets.

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 2>It's very difficult to actually come up with an answer

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 2>that is reasonable. They're all shits, they're all shit answers.

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 2>So maybe the least shit is eight percent a year.

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>The other problem is I've talked about her, whereas the

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>government can't really afford a recession either or a market crash, right,

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean a large percent of their revenues come from

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>cap gains and just income overall.

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 3>If the stock market crashes.

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Through a recession, would typically see what a twelve to

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent drop in tax receipts, and when we're already

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>running deficits like we are, that would also be catastrophic.

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, particularly if a bear market lasts longer than a year.

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 2>So a year they can pretty much buffer as long

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 2>as it's not too big. But if it grinds on

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 2>for two or three years, you're right, the tax revenues

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 2>don't add up. People get tipped out of jobs, so

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 2>there's less other revenues coming. So it's cap gains, it's earnings,

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 2>it's household income, the whole lot and then before you

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 2>know it again exactly the same isshow I hadn't really

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 2>thought of it that way, but that makes total sense.

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Is you just can't have a long term recession right

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 2>now because everything is resting on it.

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Right Okay, So that sort of sets the stage for

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the everything code, so we understand the mechanisms of why

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the leverage is there and why they can't really let

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>their crash and they have to continue to inject liquidity

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to keep it going. Then, as you said in two

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight, that metronome moment sort of happened when,

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, if the bank is going to give you

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>zero percent loans, you're going to refinance. So to the

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>point that you made everybody refinanced at that time. Now,

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that was most of the debt. I mean, that was

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>corporate debt, household debt, business debt, everything, and that was

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>also global.

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, corporates actually did longer term debt. It was the

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 2>governments that really did. Households didn't get access to debt ever. Again,

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 2>so you know, household debt to GDPs falling for a

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 2>long time, and corporate debt to GDP has been generally

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 2>falling because tech stocks have become more dominant and they

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 2>don't have debts old economy stocks do it all shifted.

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 2>That shrinkage of household debt and corporate debt is exactly

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 2>the same amount of the increase of government debt. So

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 2>it's just going from one balance sheet to the other,

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 2>got it. Because on the government balance sheet, you can

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 2>debase currency. On the corporate balance you or the household

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 2>balance sheet you can't do anything.

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>And then there's a mechanism also that you've talked about

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>that sort of in place because of the demographics and

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>with falling demographics that we're seeing sort of through the

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>developed world, that's also forcing the government to continue to

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>do debase or continue to do sort of add stimulus

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>into the GDP.

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So if you think about an aging population, if

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 2>you think about your parents, the older they get, the

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 2>less they spend. So aging populations tend to have lower

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 2>trend rates of GDP they all do. It's happened observable everywhere.

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Because old populations spend less, they also tend to not

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 2>know how long they're going to live for after they retire.

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 2>So when my dad retired, his spending must have fallen

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 2>sixty or seventy percent because he's like, well, I've got

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 2>this much money, I don't know how I'm going to

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 2>live for is my wife's going to be taken care of?

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 2>And so they change their habits, and so that drags

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 2>down GDP growth, as does debt, and so it keeps compounding.

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 2>This whole thing is right now. For example, interest rates

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 2>are at five and a half percent, but trend rate

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 2>of GDP over the last five six years is about

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 2>one point seventy five percent. So you've got this big

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.360
<v Speaker 2>gap and you need to get interest rates down so

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 2>you can refire them. But all the time, GDP keeps

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 2>falling over time, and you can forecast it into the future.

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 2>It's just the birth's deaths, and it gives you thirty

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 2>years of understanding, and it's just telling us unless something

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 2>dramatic change, which is technology, we're just going to keep

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 2>dragging down GDP forever. And we're seeing it worse older populations, Japan, China,

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 2>most of Europe. They're older than the US because they

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 2>had less immigration. What you find is their GDP keeps shrinking. Australia,

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 2>on the other hand, has a high immigration rate, as

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 2>has Canada, and they tended to do better because of

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 2>the immigration rate, because really GDP growth is driven by

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 2>population growth, productivity growth, and debt growth.

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Right now, you know, I've read into the demographics quite

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a bit. I remember Harry Dent Junior wrote a book,

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>The Demographic Cliff, that sort of kind of showed these

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>predictable spending patterns as you age through life. But another

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that I've heard, though, is that the baber boomers

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>have so much money. They're sitting in so much wealth

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, and a lot of them they're like, well,

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>we're going to die, so let's just spend it all.

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I hear this a lot. There was a paper written

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 2>the BIS or somewhere about this, but it's not provable

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 2>in any country anywhere. So I've gone through all the

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:08.719
<v Speaker 2>demographic data and there was this whole thing said, well

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 2>it's inflationary. I'm like, well, show me some fucking evidence,

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 2>and I went through every single country. There is no

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 2>evidence of inflation. They tend to be hoarders. Now. What

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 2>happened in Japan was that aging japan cohort their kids

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 2>retired by the time they passed it onto them. So

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot of them actually passed it on to their kids.

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 2>But in Japan it was so bad that it went

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 2>from retiree to retiree, so it never recycled into the economy.

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:40.199
<v Speaker 2>So I don't see evidence of baby boomers saying, well,

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to spend it all because you know, that's okay.

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 2>When you take the average pension or retirement savings. When

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:52.239
<v Speaker 2>you take the median, the medium baby boomer is one

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty grand saved and they need to live

0:20:56.080 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 2>for fifteen twenty years post retirement, can't. Yeah, how they're

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 2>just going to blow it on you know, cruises, they're not. Yeah.

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean in the US, I believe about half of

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.719
<v Speaker 1>them have no savings. And then I think the median

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that do have savings is about one hundred and fifty

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>so it's even worse.

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is terrible. But when you look at the average,

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 2>it's like a million bucks. Yeah, sure, because Jeff Bezos

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 2>is in it, right, But you know that skew is

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 2>hides a lot of bad stuff.

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:24.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Now, when you're looking at this, you've gone back and

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>forth seeming we were talking about the US, but then

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you pull in sort of the West, so Japan, China,

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and Europe, et cetera. So it's important to sort of

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>look at this from a global perspective, especially when we're

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>looking at like global assets like bitcoin.

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 2>It is very important because I believe all of these

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 2>central banks and governments understand the game that they're in,

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:48.479
<v Speaker 2>and I think the Japanese figured it out first. They

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 2>were the first two quant stats of easing, and I

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 2>believe that somewhere around twenty twelve, with the rescue of

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 2>the European system, they all got together and said, we

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 2>will all have to run a liquidity cycle to do this,

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 2>and that there is a game that they play because

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 2>they kind of know. What's interesting is people always assume

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 2>central banks are stupid. I find that a bit hubristic

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 2>to think that they are. Maybe they just don't want

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 2>to acknowledge what they're trying to do, but it would

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 2>make total sense. And the more you think about that,

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 2>the more you see it how they're also connected in

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 2>what they do and how they do it, and it's

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 2>all like a tacit agreement. Is okay, time to go,

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 2>and they all go again.

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Now, so we have these problems and now we're in

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>this SYNCD up cycle. You mentioned that it's probably not

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>going to stay that way forever, but that's where we're

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>at right now. What would cause it to get out

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of sync?

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, most people tend to err towards the well it's

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 2>all going to blow up. I'm like, show me how

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 2>if you can debase the currency, a global reserve currency,

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 2>how's the assets going to collapse? You can't. It's like

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 2>the Venezuelan stock market goes a lot in Bolivard terms,

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 2>in dollar terms, it goes down. That's debasement. So I'm like,

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that is the outcome. What I actually

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 2>think of the outcome is remember that magic formula GDP

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 2>growth plus productivity, growth plus debt growth. Right, debt growth

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 2>is stopped, it's just servicing of old debts. Population growth

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 2>we know is negative out for thirty years. And what

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 2>is the answer? AI and robots they're infinite humans. And productivity?

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 2>What is productivity? Productivity really is how much output per

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 2>kilo jowl of energy. Now, think of that as electricity costs.

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 2>If you then think about and a lot of people

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 2>like the Europeans their nuts. Look what they're doing with

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 2>this green energy. They're wasting money. They're not Their entire

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 2>job is to lower the cost of electricity, because that

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 2>is the only way, they can pick up GDP because

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 2>it creates the multiplier to productivity. They don't have the

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 2>tech industry in the same way, but they have them

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:11.719
<v Speaker 2>and China are the big pushes of renewables. So the

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 2>cost of renewables has been collapsing over time. It's down

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 2>ninety nine percent over the last fifteen years. So as

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 2>it's getting cheaper and cheaper, eventually you can scale it

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 2>enough that you will change productivity. On the other hand,

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 2>you've got Japan, China, the US using AI and robotics,

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:37.719
<v Speaker 2>which creates infinite people. Now, if you've got infinite people,

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 2>you kind of break GDP. I call it the economic singerlarity.

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 2>You get to some point where GDP doesn't mean anything anymore.

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 2>What does any of this mean? So if you've got

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 2>productivity going up because of energy costs and you've got

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 2>infinite humans or humans in inverted commas, then that changes everything.

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Now people are going to say, oh, rarely smoking crack,

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 2>this is all weird. This is exactly what happened after

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 2>World War two. So let me talk you through that,

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:08.479
<v Speaker 2>because really important for people to understand World War II.

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 2>So the crash of twenty nine was the system failure

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 2>same as two thousand and eight. World War II finished

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 2>nineteen forty five. This was roughly like the pandemic because

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 2>the global economy had stopped. Everybody was out of the

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 2>economy because they were locked up at home or they

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 2>were in the services back in the forties. They all

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 2>come back into the labor force by stuff because they've

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 2>been out of the consumption for ages. The factories aren't ready,

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 2>They're not able to deal with it. It's no supply chains.

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Prices rocket in both equations twenty percent back then, nine

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 2>and a half percent this time around. Okay, Then what

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 2>happens is inflation fell, actually went negative soon after the

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 2>first inflation re push. Then what the central banks did

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 2>then the FED was yield curve control, which is money

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 2>printing to service the debt, and they ran that policy

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 2>plus fiscal spending to generate new cars, new factories. Knew

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.640
<v Speaker 2>all of that boom of the fifties that went into

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 2>the sixties. Now, the other problem they had is much

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 2>like now, we'd lost like twenty percent of the entire

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:27.479
<v Speaker 2>male population of the Western world from warfare to wars,

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 2>So you had to replenish population or GDP couldn't grow

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 2>what happened the baby boomers. So by the time they

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 2>got into their twenties it was nineteen seventies, they all

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 2>go into the labor force at the same time, start

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 2>buying a house, a car, a suit, a tie, everything.

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 2>It creates a huge inflation because we had all of

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 2>this consumption. But that over that period from about nineteen

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 2>forty seven to about nineteen seventy it was perfectly four

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 2>year cyclical. It was exactly the same thing the stock

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 2>market did nine hundred percent.

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 1>So the productivity was led by the return of the

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>people at that point and the demand that they had,

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and the rebuilding of the world and the rebuilding of

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the world, reindustrialization, especially over in Europe there was completely destroyed.

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but the US too. You know all the factories

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:23.359
<v Speaker 2>you think of, you know, all of the famous goods

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 2>of you know, washing machines, cars, TVs. That's all that period, right,

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 2>So it was a huge productivity game.

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>And it was also an explosion of debt because we

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of went off like an equity based system to

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 1>rebuild the world at that time.

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 2>But that didn't happen un till later. And why that

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 2>happened was the baby boomers starting hitting there by the

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 2>early eighties, when Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan kind of

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 2>opened the debt's bigots to households. What had happened because

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 2>you had the largest cohort of people ever at the

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 2>same time into the labor well, guess what, their wages

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 2>didn't go up because they're competing. Then as you go

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 2>out further, obviously we had the World Trade Organization Agreement

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 2>and China, so now you're competing. So these people's wages

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:16.640
<v Speaker 2>in real terms never really went up. So the American

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 2>dream was shot in the head somewhere in the you know,

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 2>once their parents had them in the nineteen fifties, and

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 2>they didn't nobody realized what was going on. So what

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 2>they started to do as asset prices started to rise,

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 2>they borrowed. And you can pretty much measure the difference

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 2>in the rise of asset prices and the need to

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 2>fund a future retirement by debt. And so they were

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 2>doing a logical thing, which is I need to get

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 2>on this ladder. But what happens is it just kind

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 2>of got out of control. And then the governments did

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 2>the same because you have to fund the pensions of

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 2>this older group, you know, the corporates got screwed with

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 2>defined benefit pension plans for the same group. So it

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 2>was the baby boomers were to blame. But they were

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 2>all rational actors. They weren't evil people. If you want

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 2>to blame anybody, blame their parents for having too many

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 2>kids at the same time. And you can blame that

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 2>on Adolf Hitler. And before that, you can blame it

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 2>on the Treaty of Versailles for trying to force the

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Germans after World War One to pay for the debts

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 2>of World War One, and they had the hyperinflation. Hitler

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 2>comes into power world War two, a bunch of kids.

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 2>The kids spend too much money, caused the great inflation.

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 2>They're all funcked because there's too many of them. They

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 2>don't earn enough wages, they start borrowing money and there

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 2>it goes.

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>And we blame the Treaty of Versailles on the war

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>World War One, and really the War of England, which

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>was really which was really to blame because of the

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>creation of the Bank of England. They created a fiat

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:44.719
<v Speaker 1>monetary system that allowed these endless wars to go on.

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and just you know, I guess the UK Navy

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 2>is the other one, but.

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, but came from the monetary system that was created, yeah.

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Which probably came from John Law, from the friend very much.

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's all connected. And that's what people don't see.

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 2>People get angry with each other. We see the polarization

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 2>of politics, right, but people don't realize that this is

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 2>this was set off, as you're rightly saying, two hundred

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 2>years ago, maybe even longer. I don't even know where

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 2>this thread begins. I haven't bothered to go back that far,

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 2>but it probably goes back further and further and further.

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 2>And it's just the mascinations of this whole thing. And

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, we have these various blow ups. Nineteen twenty

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 2>nine was one of them too.

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean you can go back.

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>It's more like the volatility of life, right, the volatility

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of humanity and the pendulum that swings too far one

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>way and over correct the other way. I mean, you

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>go back to their fourteen hundreds when Spain went and

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>found all the silver in Peru, brought all the silver back,

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and then you had massive inflation because you increased the

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>minitary base too much.

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 2>It's exactly right, so you know, it's all the same

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 2>it's all the same thing. And you know, I actually

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 2>don't I'm not actually a gold standard guy either, because

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 2>we had the same problems then too. So I don't

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 2>think we found an easy answer because humans a greedy

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 2>and they want leverage, and we've never solved that. You

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 2>go back several thousand years and humans had leverage then

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 2>as well as if there's something about humans and leverage

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 2>that we'd like to bring our future forward that is

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 2>just like inherent in humanity.

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's our ingenuity, right, So we are trying to

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 1>get leverage, if you will, trying to get more output

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>for the less input, So create a willbear out to

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>carry eight rocks at a time as opposed to carying

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:36.719
<v Speaker 1>one at a time. And so the problem is our

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>ingenuity maybe takes it too far, where then we start

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to steal from the future as opposed to just like

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to improve the future.

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Maybe that's right.

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean a lot of people say that, you know,

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of human GDP per capita and standard of living

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 2>increases came from the ability to use debt to borrow

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 2>a bit from the future to leverage it to create

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 2>better outcomes. But then, yes, we always go too far right,

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 2>just what we do.

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the difference what misis broke down is the

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>difference of commodity credit versus circulating credit. So if I

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>grow eight bushels of wheat and I consume six, I

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 1>could loan you one of those bushels of wheat on credit.

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>But that came from my supply, right, versus being able

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to create the debt out of thin air. I think

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that's maybe where we sort of jumped the across the

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 1>rub of glass.

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 2>But no, because if we think about the gold standard,

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 2>we had nineteen twenty nine. You know, we had plenty

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 2>of those debt crises.

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't nineteen twenty nine because England left the gold standard.

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>And when Churchill tried to go back to the gold standard,

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Keen said, hang on, hang on, you've inflated the currency

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>too much. You need to now reprice it at sixty

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>bucks an ounce. Churchill said no, went to thirty, which

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>then caused a massive deflation.

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's possibly right. It was possibly the increasing the

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 2>value of the dollar over the time versus the pound

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 2>as we shifted from one economic system to the other.

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 1>So that frank So it was leaving the gold standard

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and trying to come back to a manipulated standard that

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe caused that whole thing.

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Possibly, Yeah, who's to say so.

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Back to the GDP plus productivity plus debt growth.

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 3>You talked about the rate of wage growth.

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>And so the rate of wage growth is going up

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 1>with the GDP growth, which is, to your point, about

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>one and a half percent. But the problem is that

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>asset growth or price growth. Let maybe the inflation isn't

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>really the CPI we've been sold, it's the rate of debasement,

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>which since twenty nineteen has been averaging about ten percent.

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 3>That's the real hurt rate.

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 2>What you've got to understand is for each one and

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 2>a half percent of earnings growth, assets are growing up,

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 2>going up by ten percent, so each year you can

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 2>buy less and less assets. Now, what is an asset.

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 2>An asset is future deferred consumption, whether it's for use

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 2>yourself in retirement or your kids or whatever it is.

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 2>But it's a saving of wealth that needs to be

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 2>to grow to compensate for the how long it's locked

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 2>up for, and therefore your future self is protected. It's

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 2>your wealth, and if it grows enough, you make a

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 2>lot of money. But the issue is your everybody's future

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 2>self is getting poorer because every year you can't afford

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:34.839
<v Speaker 2>as much assets. And so therefore all of these millennials

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:38.760
<v Speaker 2>are just finding this in front of them that they

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 2>can't buy a house anymore, they can buy less of

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:46.800
<v Speaker 2>the S and P. It's just a really messy, ugly situation.

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I have two daughters and here I live in

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a little beach down here in southern California. That the

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>average home price in this little town is like one

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 1>point six million dollars, And it's like, how are my

0:34:58.440 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>daughters ever going to be able to live in this

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>town like that they grew up in?

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 3>It's incredible, that's right.

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 2>It's like when I was when I was in my twenties,

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 2>I bought an apartment in London, and yeah, I was

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 2>working finance. I had a relatively high salary, but the

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 2>apartment cost me three time salary, four time salary. There

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Now the same thing would be ten, twelve, fourteen times.

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 2>How can anybody afford that?

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So now we have the tech explosion, so cheap energy,

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, China's building the one hundred and fifty nuclear

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>power plants right now. That's cheap energy for sure. Cheap

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:38.479
<v Speaker 1>energy plus you know AI robotics that you're talking about,

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>which increases productivity. But I would assume that would also

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 1>put downward pressure on wages as well.

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:48.839
<v Speaker 2>Oh for sure. That's the biggest, single, most deflationary thing

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 2>that has ever happened to humanity.

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>But if they if the productivity is pushing GDP up,

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 1>then you would think they would also if wages are

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>growing at the rate of GDP, and GDP is growing

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 1>now because productivity increased, wouldn't bring wages up with it.

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, wages are, yes, but don't forget the population shrinking,

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 2>the human population, right, so net aggregate demand actually doesn't

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 2>increase as much because you're going to have all of

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 2>these seventy six million boomers dying off and that's a

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 2>huge dropping population because the replacement rates of population is

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 2>so low.

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Got it?

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:26.799
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, so that's that's sort of this liquidity sort

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 1>of fin refinance cycle sets the stage for that. Now

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the next thing that that's the everything code sort of

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>summed up one thing I've been studying. I had Michael

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Howell on the show, and I've been studying his work,

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and he was showing how basically, when you get global liquidity.

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure.

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't really break down exactly how he measures global liquidity,

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and you guys have your own proprietary I don't. I'm

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 1>not sure how much those correspond with each other. But

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the S and P five hundred is basically moving up

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>almost I think ninety to ninety five percent correlated to

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the global liquidity. But then we have other assets like

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 1>gold with a sensitiv ratio of like one point five

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and bitcoint with like a sensitivy ratio of like nine.

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 1>So how do you look at the global liquidity in

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:12.360
<v Speaker 1>relation to like the types of assets we should be buying.

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, this was the this is what got me

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 2>on the journey. I got to this bit before I

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 2>actually got to the everything code is. They're all correlated,

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 2>some lead, some lag a bit, but they're basically all

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 2>correlated to the business cycle. We always have been. But

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:31.800
<v Speaker 2>if everything is being driven by this one dominant factor,

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 2>which is debasement of currency, and your hurdle rate is

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 2>let's say eight percent debasement plus three percent inflation or

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 2>something eleven percent twelve percent for easy maths on a

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 2>globalized level, So unless you're making twelve percent returns, you're

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 2>not going anywhere. Then at Exponential Age Asset Management, the

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 2>asset management firm that I co founded, we have this

0:37:55.360 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 2>table of all of the different assets, and basically the

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 2>SMP is about twelve percent so owning equities, which is

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 2>why all of the millennials who have four to one

0:38:09.760 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 2>k's and they put it in the SMP still can't

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:14.879
<v Speaker 2>afford a house because they're just matching the debasement. They're

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 2>not beating it right, so they're not getting paid for

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 2>locking up money for extended periods of time. The Nasdaq

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:25.319
<v Speaker 2>about seventeen percent a year since twenty eleven. Okay, so

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:30.320
<v Speaker 2>the NASDAK, because it's a secular technology trend outperforms makes sense.

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 2>And then you've got the bizarro world of bitcoin, which

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 2>is one hundred and fifty percent. Gold actually doesn't beat

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 2>it gold about eight or seven, so it's actually actually

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 2>worse off in gold than you are. Only the S

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:45.880
<v Speaker 2>and P five hundred, which is why that ratio keeps moving.

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 2>So bitcoin makes such a dramatic difference. So all I

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 2>started doing was then dividing every chart by the total

0:38:56.560 --> 0:38:58.840
<v Speaker 2>global liquidity or even the FED balance sheet or M

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:01.880
<v Speaker 2>two whatever you want to use us, right, and you

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 2>found that the S and P go sideways, Gold go sideways,

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 2>real estate go sideways. Roughly, the NASDAK goes up, and

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:14.960
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin does that. Okay, So now you've got two assets,

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 2>only two assets in the world that outperform the debasement.

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Tech stocks we get it tomorrow is more digital than today.

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Of course they're going to do well over time. And

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:26.439
<v Speaker 2>second is bitcoin. So you divide one by the other,

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:30.040
<v Speaker 2>and the nasdak's down ninety nine point nine seven percent

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 2>versus bitcoin. And once you see it like that and

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 2>you realize it's all driven by one cycle, which is

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 2>one dominant factor of debasement, then it makes it really easy,

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 2>which is just on the one asset that outperforms. Yeah,

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:52.439
<v Speaker 2>and because they're all correlated and risk adjusted, it's by

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:54.840
<v Speaker 2>far the most superior asset we've ever been given on

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:57.399
<v Speaker 2>a risk adjusted basis. So just do that.

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Something I talk a lot about is a lot of

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 1>different cycles on different different types of cycles, mainly political

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:07.880
<v Speaker 1>revolution cycles, financial cycles, and then tech cycles.

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:10.360
<v Speaker 3>And you have like this conjoinit and wave, like this

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:11.240
<v Speaker 3>K wave cycle.

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Right, it's like a forty to sixty year I just

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:14.839
<v Speaker 1>call it a fifty year sort of like a tech

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 1>revolution cycle, and you know, there's been five. I say

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're entering our sixth one now. So the last

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:25.399
<v Speaker 1>one started nineteen seventy one, which was the microprocessor, which

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 1>brought telecommunications, personal computers, and the Internet. Before that, it

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 1>was nineteen oh eight, which was you know, the automobile,

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 1>oil futures, but also mass production.

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 3>You can keep going back, but the key pat and

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 3>then before that it was like steel, right. But it

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 3>looks like.

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 1>During these financial technology revolutions, it's not just the technology

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that changes the course humanity, but that's the only place

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 1>to invest. So the last fifty years, the markets have

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 1>been dominated by telecom, personal computers, and Internet, and the

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 1>markets previous to that were dominated by Ford GMGE and

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 1>so then if that continues forward, then the only place

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to invest over the next fifty years would be into

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sort of thinking of it as like a decentralized revolution.

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 1>So bitcoin, the bitcoin technologies, and even AI I think

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 1>is decentralized in a way, and so it's sort of

0:41:13.160 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 1>like maybe that's the only place to invest over the

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 1>next fifty years.

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 2>So I tend to agree there's this bundling unbundling that

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:22.680
<v Speaker 2>goes on with the world economy as well centralization decentralization.

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 2>So I think decentralization is one of the most important waves.

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 2>We've got this gigantic technology wave, it's by far the

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 2>largest the world has ever seen in the fastest period

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 2>of time. That's upon US. Blockchains part of it, but

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:38.959
<v Speaker 2>it's AI, it's robotics, it's ev it's space, it's everything, right,

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:46.760
<v Speaker 2>genetic science is the whole thing. So the decentralized element

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:49.239
<v Speaker 2>you raise it with AI, there is a fight. You know,

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 2>we've seen the fight between centralized money and decentralized money

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 2>that both you and I have been part of. But

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:58.919
<v Speaker 2>that fight is about is happening again in AI. It's

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 2>like you cannot simply give It's the same argument as money.

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 2>You can't give the power to one superpower for all

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 2>of money, which is what the US has with the

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 2>World reserve currency. It's too powerful. What you're going to

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:12.799
<v Speaker 2>do is, if you're not careful, you're going to give

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the world's most intelligent thing. It's like intelligence squared by

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 2>a thousand. I mean it'slightly, not squared by one thousand,

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 2>and you know, a thousand times the intelligence of humanity

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:29.480
<v Speaker 2>and give it to a company. Fucking crazy. So we

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 2>have to fight for decentralization because this thing is not

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 2>going away. We're not going to put the genie back

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:36.799
<v Speaker 2>in the bottle. We're not going to uninvent it, like

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:39.759
<v Speaker 2>we can't uninvent the nuclear bomb. Which can't do it

0:42:40.360 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 2>because the game theory will suggest that somebody's always going

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:47.759
<v Speaker 2>to scale it. So we need to have that decentralization. Now,

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:52.360
<v Speaker 2>what is going on with electricity and what is ev Again,

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm not interested in people's political narratives. Look at what's happening.

0:42:56.360 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 2>We're decentralizing power. So now people can have the power,

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:06.280
<v Speaker 2>can some the power source of power at their houses,

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:09.719
<v Speaker 2>so therefore you don't need the huge storage. People say, well,

0:43:09.760 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 2>you can't scale solar, Well you can at a house level.

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:15.400
<v Speaker 2>You can do it probably at a village level. So

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:19.359
<v Speaker 2>what you're doing is decentralizing the entire grid. Now look

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:24.799
<v Speaker 2>what Microsoft and Amazon are doing with nuclear and open AI.

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:29.319
<v Speaker 2>They're going to scale small nuclear plants next to these

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:33.840
<v Speaker 2>very important massive GPU clusters. So I think we're seeing

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 2>decentralized power, decentralized AI. What are robotics, they'll probably end

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 2>up being some sort of decentralized labor force, centralized and

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 2>then decentralized. I don't know how that works, decentralized money,

0:43:46.880 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 2>so I think you're dead right. So that's that's where

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:50.399
<v Speaker 2>we're going.

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I think of AI Obviously there's the centralization of who

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 1>programs the LM, but I think of it also as

0:43:57.080 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 1>decentralizing in a sense where I don't need a big

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 1>company more. I could just work by myself with my

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:03.919
<v Speaker 1>laptop and do the work. And so, you know, Sam

0:44:03.920 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Altman said that we might see the first single person

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:10.080
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar company. So I think of it there's there's both, right,

0:44:10.120 --> 0:44:12.439
<v Speaker 1>the centralizing of the of the programming, but then it's

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:15.080
<v Speaker 1>decentralizing in a sense it turns one big company into

0:44:15.080 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 1>one hundred or a thousand companies sort of a thing.

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 1>On the programming side. I mean, we are seeing a

0:44:22.120 --> 0:44:25.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty good movement towards decentralization there. So I'm pretty hopeful

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of that. At least I'm an optimist as an entrepreneur.

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg seems to have taken that fight on maybe just

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to spite open Aye, you know, maybe he just decided

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to decentralize to take them out of out of a

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 1>position we don't know, but so we're seeing that.

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:44.279
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, back to sort of just kind of decentralizing that.

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:48.000
<v Speaker 3>What do you think about the the blend?

0:44:48.360 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, So these these these industrial or technological revolutions aren't

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:54.719
<v Speaker 1>just a single technology, but it's a cluster of these technologies, right,

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:57.000
<v Speaker 1>And so back to you. You rattled off a few

0:44:57.040 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 1>of these clusters when you look at like bitcoin, right,

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:02.719
<v Speaker 1>So there's border list, permission list, censitsive resistant, et cetera.

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:08.839
<v Speaker 1>Andrea San Topolos talked about years ago that it's also personless, right,

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:11.239
<v Speaker 1>and so only a person can get a bank account,

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and of course the banking system we have today also

0:45:14.040 --> 0:45:17.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, prohibits or it doesn't really allow for micropayments.

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:19.439
<v Speaker 3>But when you think about the you know.

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 1>AI plus the robot plus you know whatever, autonomous cars, whatever,

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and then it'd been like personless ability to you know,

0:45:27.040 --> 0:45:29.759
<v Speaker 1>have a wallet and transact and where does that take us?

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean we're starting to get into you know,

0:45:32.719 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 2>all of this economics singularity parts of how much the

0:45:36.520 --> 0:45:38.719
<v Speaker 2>world economy is going to change. But listen, you're going

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:40.960
<v Speaker 2>to see the next version of chat GPT is probably

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:44.480
<v Speaker 2>going to be agentic So what agents in AI mean

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 2>is you're starting a business. Mark, you go on to

0:45:47.840 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 2>fiver and say, hey, you build me a deck, you

0:45:50.160 --> 0:45:53.240
<v Speaker 2>do me some brand design, you do me some copy.

0:45:53.480 --> 0:45:55.880
<v Speaker 2>You pay these guys small amounts of money. They're agents.

0:45:57.000 --> 0:46:00.400
<v Speaker 2>But AI can do agents now at scale and speed,

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 2>and it will create its own agents because AI is

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 2>smart enough to build this stuff. So you get this

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 2>multiple agent world where AI asks the agent to do something.

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:13.719
<v Speaker 2>So Mark now instead goes to chat GPT five and says, hey, listen,

0:46:13.760 --> 0:46:16.239
<v Speaker 2>I want to build a business that does xyz and

0:46:16.280 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to need to get registered. I need to

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:22.200
<v Speaker 2>have my deck prepared, need blah blah blah, and chat

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:25.160
<v Speaker 2>GBT will do it all using other agents. Now to

0:46:25.239 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 2>your point, last time I checked, an AI can't get

0:46:28.200 --> 0:46:30.960
<v Speaker 2>a utility bill, and therefore it can't open a bank account.

0:46:31.680 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Now it's going to have to pay because people don't

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 2>yet understand that all AI has a cost, and it

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 2>has two costs. It has compute and it has electricity.

0:46:45.080 --> 0:46:48.080
<v Speaker 2>So if you're going to call much like a Fiver person,

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 2>you're going to and you might go to the Philippines

0:46:50.400 --> 0:46:52.719
<v Speaker 2>because it's a lower cost. You're going to have to

0:46:52.800 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 2>pay the one AI is going to have to pay

0:46:55.000 --> 0:46:57.439
<v Speaker 2>the other AI for the cost of compute and maybe

0:46:57.480 --> 0:47:01.239
<v Speaker 2>a profit margin. Maybe it's a profitable agent. In fact,

0:47:01.239 --> 0:47:03.400
<v Speaker 2>it should be. Why would it not be, because it

0:47:03.440 --> 0:47:06.600
<v Speaker 2>can accumulate more. It's the game that humanity has always played.

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:09.560
<v Speaker 2>So in that case, the only way of doing this

0:47:09.640 --> 0:47:12.640
<v Speaker 2>is crypto rails. There's no other way apart from using

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 2>blockchain for micro payments, fast transaction, recorded ownership. Who has what?

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:22.320
<v Speaker 2>You know? You need smart contracts to have contractual terms

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 2>between stuff. So yes, I mean, I don't think people

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:31.759
<v Speaker 2>yet understand how because we all think of blockchain technology

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:32.879
<v Speaker 2>in the ways that we.

0:47:32.880 --> 0:47:33.439
<v Speaker 3>Know it now.

0:47:34.400 --> 0:47:37.279
<v Speaker 2>But in the end, nothing can run without it.

0:47:38.640 --> 0:47:41.320
<v Speaker 1>The thing with these technological revolutions is that, you know,

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:43.720
<v Speaker 1>humans aren't really good at imagining in the future, because

0:47:43.760 --> 0:47:46.360
<v Speaker 1>we can only imagine better versions of what we have today.

0:47:46.880 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 1>But these revolutions they give us a new set of

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:50.880
<v Speaker 1>building blocks, and then all of a sudden we can

0:47:50.920 --> 0:47:53.839
<v Speaker 1>build things that we hadn't thought of. And so even

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:57.120
<v Speaker 1>our own dot experiments are you most likely very small

0:47:57.160 --> 0:47:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to what.

0:47:57.440 --> 0:47:59.720
<v Speaker 3>We'll see in the future coming. It's pretty exciting.

0:48:00.960 --> 0:48:02.759
<v Speaker 1>I want to I know we're kind of running here

0:48:02.760 --> 0:48:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to the end of time. I want to just transition

0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:09.719
<v Speaker 1>this two things. One, you know, the headlines are still

0:48:09.800 --> 0:48:12.560
<v Speaker 1>rampant everywhere, you know, the big crash coming. Harry Dent's

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:14.759
<v Speaker 1>still calling for a ninety percent crash, you know this year.

0:48:14.920 --> 0:48:17.600
<v Speaker 2>I was laughing about that today on Twitter. It's just think, God,

0:48:17.640 --> 0:48:19.840
<v Speaker 2>how many times can people call this but and carry on?

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And you know I've seen you on Tom Bailou

0:48:23.000 --> 0:48:25.960
<v Speaker 1>with a you know recently with Schiff and you know,

0:48:26.200 --> 0:48:29.239
<v Speaker 1>the big crash that's coming. That's not my base case,

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and it sounds like it's not yours. So I'd like

0:48:31.040 --> 0:48:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to just have you just kind of chime in on

0:48:33.239 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 1>what you think your base case is over the next uh,

0:48:36.040 --> 0:48:37.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the rest of the decade. Let's just say,

0:48:38.040 --> 0:48:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and then number two sort of break down the banana

0:48:42.120 --> 0:48:43.919
<v Speaker 1>zone and you say, don't f this up.

0:48:46.040 --> 0:48:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the rest of the decade. The reason I

0:48:49.400 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 2>don't believe we can have a crash is what we

0:48:51.080 --> 0:48:54.120
<v Speaker 2>talked about, Right, You're going to nuke the entire pension system,

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:58.080
<v Speaker 2>the banking system, and the economy because there's too much debt,

0:48:58.280 --> 0:49:01.360
<v Speaker 2>So we debase the currency. It will not be allowed

0:49:01.920 --> 0:49:03.960
<v Speaker 2>and I know people might not like that, but it

0:49:04.000 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 2>is what it is. That's what Once you learn to

0:49:06.080 --> 0:49:09.240
<v Speaker 2>accept something as it is, it's much easier to operate

0:49:09.320 --> 0:49:12.640
<v Speaker 2>or invest around it whatever. But then we've got the

0:49:12.680 --> 0:49:15.840
<v Speaker 2>technological revolution that I call the exponential age. All of

0:49:15.840 --> 0:49:19.120
<v Speaker 2>these technologies that are intertwined going exponential at the same time. Right,

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:22.640
<v Speaker 2>this is going to be a renaissance. We're going to

0:49:22.760 --> 0:49:27.120
<v Speaker 2>change what humans do for their existence. We're going to

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:30.719
<v Speaker 2>change the very structure of economies, even money. We don't

0:49:30.719 --> 0:49:32.239
<v Speaker 2>even know what money is going to mean in a

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:36.279
<v Speaker 2>world of abundance. We're so used to scarcity. Lawyer gets

0:49:36.320 --> 0:49:38.320
<v Speaker 2>paid a lot of money because he has scarce knowledge.

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:40.840
<v Speaker 2>There's only x number of lawyers qualified. You know, we

0:49:40.920 --> 0:49:43.000
<v Speaker 2>know this scarcy thing because once you've dealt with bitcoin,

0:49:43.040 --> 0:49:45.879
<v Speaker 2>you kind of understand the whole thing. So they charge

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:50.680
<v Speaker 2>a premium because they're scarce gone, all gone, All knowledge

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:53.200
<v Speaker 2>premiums are gone because we're going to scale knowledge infinitely.

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:57.239
<v Speaker 2>It's like people don't understand certain things. Like you see

0:49:57.320 --> 0:50:00.600
<v Speaker 2>written down AI has an IQ of one hundred. Okay,

0:50:00.600 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 2>well that's yeah, that's an average human being. It has

0:50:04.640 --> 0:50:08.680
<v Speaker 2>an IQ of one hundred on every single topic that

0:50:08.840 --> 0:50:13.759
<v Speaker 2>all of humanity knows. It's a polymath. People don't think that.

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:16.440
<v Speaker 2>And this is the dumbest the AI will ever be.

0:50:17.520 --> 0:50:23.239
<v Speaker 2>I actually think AI is gaining consciousness or has consciousness.

0:50:23.280 --> 0:50:26.359
<v Speaker 2>But that's a whole different topic for another day. But

0:50:26.440 --> 0:50:29.319
<v Speaker 2>so this decade, in fact, I don't even call it

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:32.319
<v Speaker 2>a decade. I think we've got six years. We've got

0:50:32.360 --> 0:50:35.600
<v Speaker 2>six years before twenty thirty twenty thirty two when the

0:50:35.640 --> 0:50:39.480
<v Speaker 2>economic system starts becoming not understandable to us because we

0:50:39.520 --> 0:50:42.759
<v Speaker 2>don't need humans, we find different purposes, different ways of

0:50:42.760 --> 0:50:45.279
<v Speaker 2>doing stuff. I'm not negative on humanity, like we're all

0:50:45.320 --> 0:50:47.879
<v Speaker 2>going to be displaced, but there's going to be such

0:50:47.920 --> 0:50:50.480
<v Speaker 2>big shifts. And what an economy is when a robot,

0:50:50.719 --> 0:50:52.840
<v Speaker 2>when a robot's paying an AI paying an AI and

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:56.799
<v Speaker 2>there's no humans involved, what is that that. I think

0:50:56.800 --> 0:51:00.960
<v Speaker 2>we've got six years before that happens. So I think

0:51:01.000 --> 0:51:04.080
<v Speaker 2>we've got two cycles of the everything code to make

0:51:04.120 --> 0:51:07.279
<v Speaker 2>as much money as possible, to not have to worry

0:51:07.280 --> 0:51:10.600
<v Speaker 2>about what happens. So if you go to twenty thirty

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:13.919
<v Speaker 2>two and we're going to start a no, you start

0:51:13.960 --> 0:51:17.160
<v Speaker 2>a great business. I see you or my AI sees

0:51:17.200 --> 0:51:19.359
<v Speaker 2>your business and says, hey, I can copy that and

0:51:19.400 --> 0:51:21.719
<v Speaker 2>turn it into Hindi and sell it to India. It

0:51:21.800 --> 0:51:25.839
<v Speaker 2>can do it in a minute. So how can we

0:51:26.280 --> 0:51:29.200
<v Speaker 2>create products? How do we compete with each other when

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:34.120
<v Speaker 2>everything can be instantaneously replicated, even with three D printing.

0:51:34.120 --> 0:51:37.560
<v Speaker 2>As it comes in, it becomes even hardware manufacturing everything.

0:51:37.719 --> 0:51:41.200
<v Speaker 2>So I worry about what economic value is in stuff

0:51:41.239 --> 0:51:44.000
<v Speaker 2>like that. So my view is we have six years

0:51:44.000 --> 0:51:48.319
<v Speaker 2>make as much money as possible. So the main case,

0:51:48.360 --> 0:51:50.560
<v Speaker 2>which is the which is the other thing is you

0:51:50.600 --> 0:51:54.880
<v Speaker 2>hear me talking about, which is how to unfuck your future? Yea.

0:51:55.840 --> 0:51:59.000
<v Speaker 2>And everybody knows they're screwed right now. They can't get

0:51:59.040 --> 0:52:01.480
<v Speaker 2>up the ladder, you know, like your kids. It's like

0:52:01.560 --> 0:52:03.319
<v Speaker 2>how they're ever going to buy a house, right, So

0:52:03.360 --> 0:52:06.120
<v Speaker 2>they're going to have to either be genius entrepreneurs and

0:52:06.160 --> 0:52:08.760
<v Speaker 2>take huge amounts of risk with their entire thing. Fine,

0:52:09.719 --> 0:52:11.600
<v Speaker 2>but it may not suit them, or they're going to

0:52:11.640 --> 0:52:14.320
<v Speaker 2>have to make some investments that make up for that gap.

0:52:14.760 --> 0:52:17.920
<v Speaker 2>There's no other way around it without being poorer than

0:52:17.960 --> 0:52:18.319
<v Speaker 2>you were.

0:52:18.920 --> 0:52:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So the base case is no big crash coming

0:52:23.840 --> 0:52:25.799
<v Speaker 1>because we can't afford it. And that's the system of

0:52:25.840 --> 0:52:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the function that we have today, as we've already broken down.

0:52:28.920 --> 0:52:32.279
<v Speaker 1>But the explosion and of the cluster of technologies is

0:52:32.320 --> 0:52:35.120
<v Speaker 1>going to transform the world, and we have about probably

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:38.840
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight years before that massive shift happens. And during

0:52:38.920 --> 0:52:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that shift, the markets the assets around those that are

0:52:43.560 --> 0:52:43.920
<v Speaker 1>making the.

0:52:43.840 --> 0:52:45.399
<v Speaker 3>Shift should exponentially go up.

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:48.360
<v Speaker 1>So if you invest properly through this next six years,

0:52:48.920 --> 0:52:49.839
<v Speaker 1>you might have a chance.

0:52:50.840 --> 0:52:53.080
<v Speaker 2>That's that's my kind of thing. That's how I'm basing

0:52:53.080 --> 0:52:55.920
<v Speaker 2>my entire life on. Yeah, I'm slightly the oldest, I

0:52:56.080 --> 0:52:59.920
<v Speaker 2>further down the journey, but basically, it's like six years,

0:53:00.880 --> 0:53:03.520
<v Speaker 2>I have clarity. I've never said this sort of stuff before.

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:06.000
<v Speaker 2>It's not like, you know, I think the whole system

0:53:06.040 --> 0:53:07.520
<v Speaker 2>is going to end. I'm just like, I don't know

0:53:07.560 --> 0:53:09.880
<v Speaker 2>what it looks like, and I don't want to be

0:53:10.000 --> 0:53:12.520
<v Speaker 2>then trying to compete for assets or wealth in an

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:15.560
<v Speaker 2>environment where I don't know if I've even got an advantage.

0:53:15.840 --> 0:53:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Because you know, I'm building an ai ROWL right now

0:53:18.440 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 2>that it will be out next month or something, and

0:53:20.719 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 2>it'll be a one on one experience where you'll be

0:53:23.120 --> 0:53:26.880
<v Speaker 2>talking to me. Okay, you know, what does any of

0:53:26.920 --> 0:53:28.480
<v Speaker 2>this mean? To us in the end. We don't know,

0:53:28.560 --> 0:53:32.000
<v Speaker 2>so I take it very seriously. The six years and

0:53:32.040 --> 0:53:36.200
<v Speaker 2>these cycles. I'm I'm not a believer in trading the cycle.

0:53:36.239 --> 0:53:38.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm a believer in you know, when we have

0:53:38.760 --> 0:53:40.880
<v Speaker 2>the big drawdowns, I actually prefer I look forward to

0:53:40.880 --> 0:53:42.759
<v Speaker 2>them because you can add as much as possible and

0:53:42.840 --> 0:53:45.160
<v Speaker 2>compound because you don't have much time and if you

0:53:45.360 --> 0:53:47.920
<v Speaker 2>mess it up and you're out of the cycle or whatever,

0:53:48.480 --> 0:53:50.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, this is the don't fuck this up thesis.

0:53:51.400 --> 0:53:54.120
<v Speaker 2>You're going to miss this opportunity. So yes, there is

0:53:54.280 --> 0:53:58.560
<v Speaker 2>time pressure here get it right, and that leads us

0:53:58.600 --> 0:54:02.520
<v Speaker 2>into the bananas zone. The majority of this wealth happens

0:54:03.640 --> 0:54:08.000
<v Speaker 2>in crypto or macro Summer and fall. Fall is tricky

0:54:08.040 --> 0:54:11.799
<v Speaker 2>because we don't know where the type cycle peaks. But

0:54:11.840 --> 0:54:15.040
<v Speaker 2>it's this point here around the US election and for

0:54:15.080 --> 0:54:19.719
<v Speaker 2>about twelve months afterwards that things go bananas. And you

0:54:19.760 --> 0:54:22.160
<v Speaker 2>see it every time on the bitcoin chart. It just

0:54:22.200 --> 0:54:25.400
<v Speaker 2>does the same thing. So I know a lot of

0:54:25.440 --> 0:54:28.439
<v Speaker 2>people dolo cost average great. This is not the time

0:54:28.480 --> 0:54:30.600
<v Speaker 2>to dollar cost average. This is the last chance saloon

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:33.719
<v Speaker 2>before it gets crazy. That's when you need to have

0:54:33.800 --> 0:54:38.160
<v Speaker 2>your money in the market. Fully. The other thing, then,

0:54:39.200 --> 0:54:43.560
<v Speaker 2>is to not do stupid things when it starts going crazy.

0:54:43.640 --> 0:54:45.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, we've seen that in the past people lose

0:54:45.719 --> 0:54:48.399
<v Speaker 2>their minds, which has got to not lose your mind.

0:54:48.440 --> 0:54:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Don't do stuff that gets greedy, use excess leverage, don't

0:54:52.760 --> 0:54:56.200
<v Speaker 2>do stuff with your wallet and compromise losing your bitcoin.

0:54:56.520 --> 0:54:59.319
<v Speaker 2>Don't do any of that stuff. Just sit, let it

0:54:59.400 --> 0:55:02.080
<v Speaker 2>play out and enjoy it, and don't try and time

0:55:02.120 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 2>it too much.

0:55:02.800 --> 0:55:05.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I love that. Well.

0:55:05.320 --> 0:55:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a good place for us to drop off.

0:55:07.600 --> 0:55:10.080
<v Speaker 1>What a good sort of warning, I know. You know

0:55:10.120 --> 0:55:12.400
<v Speaker 1>from my own journey started buying bitcoin at twenty fifteen.

0:55:13.400 --> 0:55:15.839
<v Speaker 1>If I could just do over, and if I could

0:55:15.880 --> 0:55:17.200
<v Speaker 1>just go back to have all the bitcoin that I

0:55:17.280 --> 0:55:19.720
<v Speaker 1>had when I started, my life would be so much different.

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:23.359
<v Speaker 1>But to your point, all the stupid things I've done.

0:55:23.640 --> 0:55:26.200
<v Speaker 2>I've done the same. I mean, I've bought bitcoin at

0:55:26.200 --> 0:55:26.840
<v Speaker 2>two hundred.

0:55:26.920 --> 0:55:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:29.160
<v Speaker 2>And if I just kept my original investment, which was

0:55:29.400 --> 0:55:32.680
<v Speaker 2>decent size but nothing big, yeah, I'd have done like

0:55:32.719 --> 0:55:35.759
<v Speaker 2>five times better than a half now. Yeah, And that's

0:55:35.800 --> 0:55:38.200
<v Speaker 2>with timing and doing pretty well in it and leveraging

0:55:38.239 --> 0:55:41.640
<v Speaker 2>up massively, not leveraging up, but increasing my positions sives massively.

0:55:41.719 --> 0:55:43.640
<v Speaker 2>I wud have just held the bet and done nothing.

0:55:43.719 --> 0:55:43.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:55:44.920 --> 0:55:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Same, Yeah, So I just I can't redo it, but

0:55:47.400 --> 0:55:50.319
<v Speaker 1>we cannot mess this up moving forward. I will just

0:55:50.320 --> 0:55:53.760
<v Speaker 1>say a little bit of hope for everybody I believe,

0:55:54.080 --> 0:55:57.520
<v Speaker 1>back to the human ingenuity piece, there's no future in

0:55:57.560 --> 0:55:59.320
<v Speaker 1>this world where humans don't have problems.

0:56:00.480 --> 0:56:01.920
<v Speaker 3>We're always going to have some sort of a problem.

0:56:02.160 --> 0:56:03.120
<v Speaker 3>And as long as there's.

0:56:03.000 --> 0:56:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Problems, will need solutions to those problems, and entrepreneurs will

0:56:06.160 --> 0:56:07.319
<v Speaker 1>always be able to figure that out.

0:56:08.120 --> 0:56:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Also, Mark, Look, we're going to this very technological world

0:56:12.520 --> 0:56:14.319
<v Speaker 2>where a lot of things we currently do we don't

0:56:14.360 --> 0:56:19.360
<v Speaker 2>need to do. But humans are social creatures. They like

0:56:19.440 --> 0:56:22.200
<v Speaker 2>other humans. They also hate other humans, but they generally

0:56:22.200 --> 0:56:25.640
<v Speaker 2>we like to be together with humans. So that human

0:56:25.680 --> 0:56:30.400
<v Speaker 2>to human experience. Whether it's digital network states that Largeie

0:56:30.440 --> 0:56:35.840
<v Speaker 2>talks about, or whether it's in person gatherings, or whether

0:56:35.920 --> 0:56:38.520
<v Speaker 2>it's you know, digital network states, could be Taylor Swift,

0:56:38.560 --> 0:56:40.920
<v Speaker 2>it could be Manchester United Football Club, could be anything

0:56:41.040 --> 0:56:43.359
<v Speaker 2>where we share a commonality of interest. The other thing

0:56:43.400 --> 0:56:47.719
<v Speaker 2>is nature. Nature's going to trade a huge premium in

0:56:47.800 --> 0:56:50.640
<v Speaker 2>a world of robots and AI when you can just

0:56:50.719 --> 0:56:53.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of leave that all behind. So I have a lot.

0:56:54.080 --> 0:56:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Humans are super adapt adaptive creatures, so we will adapt.

0:56:58.320 --> 0:57:00.560
<v Speaker 2>If you ask a young kid now and say what

0:57:00.560 --> 0:57:03.040
<v Speaker 2>do you want to be when you grow up, they

0:57:03.080 --> 0:57:05.759
<v Speaker 2>will say, I want to be an influencer. Yeah, and

0:57:05.800 --> 0:57:08.960
<v Speaker 2>we think, are you crazy? But what is an influencer

0:57:09.080 --> 0:57:12.600
<v Speaker 2>apart from a community leader where they have a community

0:57:12.640 --> 0:57:15.600
<v Speaker 2>of people. It's actually maybe they're being adapted to already.

0:57:16.080 --> 0:57:18.200
<v Speaker 2>They've done it in Fortnite, They've done it in the

0:57:18.240 --> 0:57:20.800
<v Speaker 2>gaming world as well, but we just judge it from

0:57:20.800 --> 0:57:23.959
<v Speaker 2>the world that we understand, and that doesn't make sense.

0:57:23.960 --> 0:57:29.200
<v Speaker 2>But you're not being aspirational. But actually, content creators in

0:57:29.240 --> 0:57:31.960
<v Speaker 2>certain elements can't go away. Yes you can use an AI,

0:57:32.520 --> 0:57:35.280
<v Speaker 2>but in the end, people want the human to human.

0:57:35.320 --> 0:57:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Experience when information is abundant. To your point, people, and

0:57:40.280 --> 0:57:43.880
<v Speaker 1>even today, people don't pay for information. They pay for implementation.

0:57:44.920 --> 0:57:47.720
<v Speaker 1>So they'll pay a coach or somebody to help them

0:57:47.800 --> 0:57:51.680
<v Speaker 1>implement the free information they've already received. I'm going to

0:57:51.720 --> 0:57:55.400
<v Speaker 1>link to the everything code you did like a two

0:57:55.480 --> 0:57:58.400
<v Speaker 1>hour presentation as amazing. I'm going to link to that

0:57:58.440 --> 0:57:59.440
<v Speaker 1>in the show notes down below.

0:57:59.480 --> 0:58:01.360
<v Speaker 2>That's on Ralph how the journey Man, which is my

0:58:02.240 --> 0:58:04.080
<v Speaker 2>YouTube channel, so people go there. There's a lot of

0:58:04.080 --> 0:58:04.760
<v Speaker 2>stuff there, So.

0:58:04.680 --> 0:58:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna link that. Everyone should go watch that. If

0:58:06.720 --> 0:58:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you like this subject, anything else you want to point

0:58:08.400 --> 0:58:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to raw that they should be go and check it out.

0:58:10.440 --> 0:58:13.160
<v Speaker 2>No, look, we as you know, we cover a lot

0:58:13.160 --> 0:58:15.200
<v Speaker 2>of this on Real Vision. It's free to join, so

0:58:15.240 --> 0:58:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Realvision dot Com is another thing, and you can always

0:58:17.680 --> 0:58:19.240
<v Speaker 2>find me on Twitter. I think most people have found

0:58:19.280 --> 0:58:23.800
<v Speaker 2>me already at Raoul GMI. But you know, I do

0:58:23.840 --> 0:58:26.360
<v Speaker 2>take it seriously, the six year thing. I think most

0:58:26.400 --> 0:58:29.240
<v Speaker 2>people realize it as well. I think people realize it's

0:58:29.280 --> 0:58:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the one chance. It's why the society is getting more speculative,

0:58:32.640 --> 0:58:35.560
<v Speaker 2>because people are realizing that they're going to have to

0:58:36.200 --> 0:58:39.760
<v Speaker 2>take risk. That's okay as long as they do it intelligently.

0:58:39.840 --> 0:58:41.920
<v Speaker 2>So that whole don't fuck this up thesis, I think

0:58:42.000 --> 0:58:44.160
<v Speaker 2>is a very important one as well, because it's okay

0:58:44.240 --> 0:58:47.080
<v Speaker 2>to take risk, don't lose your tokens.

0:58:47.640 --> 0:58:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Got it all right? Well we're going to sign it

0:58:49.240 --> 0:58:49.560
<v Speaker 3>off with that.

0:58:49.560 --> 0:58:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much, Ral, thank you, Marp