WEBVTT - Shutting Off the Internet

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello again, everyone,

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff. My name is Chris Pullett. I'm

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>an editor at how stuff works dot com and as usual,

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.440
<v Speaker 1>sitting across from me is senior writer Jonathan Strickland. Change

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the scheme, al to the mood, electrify the boys and girls,

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>if you'd be so kind, all right, then I have

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to say he's got the presentation down at least I

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>think so. Thank you. You can't see it, so there

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of arm gestures in there that was

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a little there's a little flailing, um. But I

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>was not. I was not all lit up for that

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>particular quote. So if you know where that quote comes from,

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you know why I said that. But we're gonna talk

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>about something actually a little serious, actually quite a bit

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>serious today, um, something that has been in the news

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 1>recently at the time of the recording of this podcast,

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>which is very early February two eleven, and that is

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the idea of an Internet kill switch, some sort of

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>ability for a person or government or organization to shut

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>down the Internet or at least are access to the

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Internet right now. What spurred this was the events in

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Egypt that are going on. As Jonathan and I are

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>actually recording this. Um, I'm sure by the time you

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>are will be listening to this, the the fallout will

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>still be uh relevant to what's going on. Sure, but

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>one of the things if you are not paying attention

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to current events in the world right now, you may

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>be unaware that there have been in late January and

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>early February two thousand eleven, series of protests by people

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>who have have been asking the Egyptian president Hostni Mubarak

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to step down from office. Um. He he has as

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of this point been in office for more than thirty years,

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I believe, took office after the president Onwar Sadat was assassinated,

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>which I remember from my grade school days. Um so um.

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, he may be saying, what does this have

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to do with technology? Well, in an order in order

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to prevent uh the ability of people who are protesting

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the governments really really protesting and asking Mubarak to step

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>down from organizing using Internet based tools such as social

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>networking sites Twitter, Facebook, etcetera. Um, the Egyptian government basically

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>shut off access to the internet, um two people within

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>the country. Now there was one network that stayed up

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a little longer um than the rest I believe it

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>was the NOR group was able to uh provide Internet

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 1>access a little bit after that, but they eventually went

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>dark as well, and the the the Internet was down

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>for about five days within within Egypt. UM. And UH.

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>The reason this is uh, the reason this is valid

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to many of us who are listening in the United States. UM,

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>it had been proposed I guess really two thousand ten,

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the possibility that to prevent uh cyber attacks on certain

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure electronic infrastructure in the United States, that the President

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of the United States would be given the ability to

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>shut down parts of the Internet within the company the country. Theoretically.

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Now the question is can that really be done? Right?

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's clear up a couple of things, because

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously the case in Egypt got a lot of people

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>worried because the thought was, well, what if our government,

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>what if the United States government? Of course, Chris and

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I are in the United States, so that's why when

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I say our government, I'm talking about them. Uh. What

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>if what if the government for some reason wanted to

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>try and suppress civilian communication. Uh, would this give them

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 1>give the government the power, specifically the president, the power

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to to make communication lines go dark? And it You know,

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a scary thought because so much of what we

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 1>do now depends upon the Internet in one way or another.

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>It may not even directly depend on it, but indirectly

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:45.559
<v Speaker 1>it will. And so people have gotten really sensitive about

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 1>the subject. Uh. The government, for its part, has said

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of the fear is based upon misinterpretations

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of the The proposed act, which is called the Protecting

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Cyberspace as a National Asset Act. It was introduced by

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Joseph Lieberman. Yes, and it was introduced originally in June

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of It has since undergone revisions which somewhat define some

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of the terms to a greater extent because the original

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 1>act had some loose language that definitely had people scared. Yeah,

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>But like Chris was saying, that the intent of the Act,

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>at least as it is worded, is not to you

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to manipulate the Internet in order to hamper

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>communication among citizens or to infringe upon First Amendment rights.

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>It is, as he was saying, to protect our infrastructure

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 1>in the case of a cyber attack, right. I think

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>people have interpreted that to mean that, uh, citizens living

0:05:56.400 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>within the United States would not be able to access

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the Internet at all anymore. And I think the if

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 1>I have read the Act correctly, what the uh the

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 1>intent is actually to shut down links to certain infrastructure

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>items from the Internet. So wouldn't keep people off the Internet.

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>It would say, if you had an electric you know,

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>electric station that were connected to the Internet, it would

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 1>shut access off between the electric and the electric generating

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>station and the Internet so that it could not be reached.

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>UM that way, now, I mean, that's that's the way

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I've I've read it as a matter of fact. Um. UH.

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>Senator Lieberman and ranking Member Susan Collins and Senator Tom

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Carper actually released a statement on February first about, uh,

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, drawing the parallel between the situation in Egypt

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and this act, and they denounced the the Mubart government's

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>actions in shutting down all Internet communications in Egypt UM

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and attempted to clarify on that and for for instance,

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>they mentioned that the Communications Act of four UM does

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>give the president some control over radio communications providers, wire providers,

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the wire people don't use it that way. But yeah, yeah,

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that Their point was that the that act um Act

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>was would give the president such broad powers as to

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>in effect allow the president to do what we're talking

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>about right now is control or shut down sections of

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, um under certain situations and so communications channels, right,

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and and part of that depends upon you interpreting the

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Act to extend to Internet communication. I mean, it's it's

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>not as clearly when the when it was written in

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it was not about the Internet, right, I mean, it

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>was about telegraphs and telephone lines mainly. UM. The to

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to to extend it to the Internet now would require

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of interpretation, and I'm sure you would

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>have people challenging saying this goes beyond the intent of

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the original Act. But intent and letter sometimes get a

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>little muddied in these situations. So Lieberman's point was that

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the the Asset Act was really to to define the

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>limitations and the specific situations in which the president could

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>use this power, as opposed to one which was much

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>more broad. Yes, specifically the bill, at least according to

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the statement in the clarification that was speaking of just

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a moment ago um. They they issued a series of clarifications,

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>one being that it supposed to be the most critical

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>assets available to the Internet, including infrastructure to run the

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 1>country and the economy. Also, it has to be I'm

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>sering no, no, I was gonna say, I actually have

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the definition for that because it comes from the US

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Patriot Act. The critical infrastructure is defined in this UH way.

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 1>It says the term critical infrastructure means systems and assets,

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>whether physical or virtual, so vital to the United States

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that the incapacity or destruction of such systems and assets

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>would have a debilitating impact on security, national economic security,

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>national public health, or safety, or any combination of those matters. Now, UH,

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the the Asset Act that Lieberman introduced further defines it

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and actually adds in some stuff that made some people nervous,

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>including UH information providers, which could essentially be I s

0:09:55.960 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>s um he he went on in the state meant

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to say that it would require the president to if

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>there was an ongoing or imminent attack that's a quote,

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>um that could cause national or regional catastrophic events. That's

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the kind of thing that would have to be going

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>on for the President to use this power. And UH

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>he or she the president UM in this case President Obama,

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but whomever after later on down the road, assuming this

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>stays in in place, would have to use the least

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>disruptive means feasible again a quote UM. They would have

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to notify Congress UM and wouldn't be able to be

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>continued for more than a hundred twenty days without approval

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>from Congress thirty day blocks up to a hundred twenty days,

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and then at that point you must have Congressional approval

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:51.559
<v Speaker 1>to continue it. And the bill also they, according to

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>statement UH, specifically forbids actions that would violate the First

0:10:56.120 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Amendment and would not prevent in net traffic, email, and

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>other forms of communication unless they're involved with critical infrastructure.

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>So if you were you were I am ing a

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>friend on you know, a social typical social network that

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>would not be considered critical infrastructure, you should theoretically um

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>be able to continue to do that. Yeah, you should

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 1>still be able to use things like Facebook or Twitter

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to to organize groups and to you know, do whatever

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:27.319
<v Speaker 1>it is you want to do to have those those

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>peaceable uh public gatherings, that kind of thing. The another

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>element I remember reading about was that when we're telling

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>critical infrastructure that The example they use was Hoover Dam. Yes, right, yes,

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, that's what we're really talking about. What we're

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about critical infrastructure. We're talking about things like power grids,

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>water supply, water supply, nuclear power plants, the military infrasture,

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>military infrastructures, Yes, stuff that were it to be compromised,

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>would mean a terrible, terrible outcome for the citizens in

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the United States of America. Right, I assume they o.

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Also when they mentioned economy, we're talking about things like

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street, the stock exchanges and things like that, they

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>would want to be careful to protect that infrastructure as well.

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>And if we apply a little critical thinking to this

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>situation and really think about, you know, is is this

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 1>is what the government is telling us? Is that really

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>what they mean? Like, in other words, does it really

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you know? Because of course we should be skeptical, we

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>should question our government, but not blindingly, right, we shouldn't

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>just assume that what they're telling us is a fib

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>but we should definitely look into it, look into it, right,

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:48.959
<v Speaker 1>And so part of the looking into it means, all, right, well,

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>do what do I believe that the government would not

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>abuse this power in such a way to somehow like

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>let's say let's say the wiki leaks. Sure, let's say

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that the government is as, hey, you know what wiki

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:07.719
<v Speaker 1>leaks is, uh is creating a true danger to national security.

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>So what we're going to do is now command all

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I s I s p s in the United States

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to block wiki leaks so that people in the United

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>States can no longer access it. That's that's something that

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 1>people were worried about. Well, under this Act, at least

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>in theory, you would not be able to do that

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>unless there were a real perceived threat, like an actual

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>cybersecurity attack going on that involved wiki leaks in some way.

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise you would not be allowed to just tell all

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the ice pas to block it. That doesn't mean that

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>an I s P couldn't choose to block it, right,

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean they can because those are private companies. Right.

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>One of the criticisms I've seen of this had nothing

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to do with, um the the potential violation of First

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Amendment rights. It had more to do with why is

0:13:56.480 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>it the government telling private businesses how to protect themselves

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>when private businesses are decades ahead of the government as

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>far as cybersecurity is concerned, Which that that's a viable question.

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, the the the kind of extreme

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>case that I've seen is saying, how can the lawyers

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and the politicians who are part of homeland security, who

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>have no experience in I T security at all, how

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>can they expect to improve our practices? When we do

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>this for a living. This is how we build our business,

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>this is how we provide our services. We know how

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to do this. How is someone else who has no

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>experience in this going to help? That's a that's a

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>legitimate question. You could ask, well, why does the president

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>need this power in the first place? Because let's say

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that you are an engineer at Hoover Dawn and you

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>detect that there is some sort of cyber intruder or

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a threat to the infrastructure, the computer infrastructure at Hoover down.

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>There's a a good chance that engineer is going to say,

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we need to shut this down. We

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>have to close off our our our ports portals to

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the outside world as far as the virtual port portals

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>are concerned, and and take care of this problem. Why

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is there a need for a government intervention? And that's

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a good question to ask, you know, that's that's probably

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a more appropriate question to ask rather than is the

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>government going to shut down Facebook, because that's less likely

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to happen. And I think that again, when you think

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>about this critically, the government taking strides to say shut

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>down the Internet. Let's let's take the most extreme case

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that the government for some reason has decided to shut

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>down our access to the Internet so that no one

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>in the United States can now get on any sort

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of Internet service. UM, there would be chaos and there

0:15:55.600 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>would be there. You would not solve it problems that way, right, right,

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that would just create even more anger and distrust in

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the public. I don't I can't imagine any sane government

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>official saying this is a good idea, because there's very

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>little chance that a positive outcome will will happen as

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a result of it, right, And I think I think

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to some degree, we've seen that in what happened in Egypt. UM.

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Not only that, but people in Egypt found unique ways

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to continue getting their message across UM. I was doing

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>some reading in preparation for the podcast about some of

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the things that they were doing. UM. You know, they

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>were using. They were initially using the tools that that

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>so many of us use, different messaging UM and social

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>networking tools. But when the Internet blockage came down. UM.

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, I was reading on our

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>recaled by Ellen or Mills who wrote that on in

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>January twenty six, one of the c net writers and UM.

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>She said that people were using you know, regular phones,

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>fax machines, Ham radio. Remember we did our our podcast

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>on on Ham Radio sometime ago. Now, UM, you know,

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 1>even dial up modem usage started to go up again,

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>so so people had had access to those tools. UM.

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, they didn't shut down the phone networks, just

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, at least I didn't read anything that indicated

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that they shut down the traditional phone networks. And in addition,

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Google on Twitter UM started a service for posting tweets

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:46.159
<v Speaker 1>without an Internet connection. Basically, uh speak to tweet allowed

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>people to say what they wanted to say, and it

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>would it would transfer it to a Twitter message with

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the hashtag Egypt added on to the end of it.

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:02.360
<v Speaker 1>So it you know, outside organizations were actually helping protesters

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>get the word out. So I mean, I think it

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>would be very difficult UM to shut it down completely.

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>And in some cases too, I believe they were using

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>mash networks UM, which I can't remember if we've ever

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that on the podcast, but we definitely need to

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>do something on that because I think it's really cool.

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>One laptop per child also uses mash networks. Um, they're

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of ad hoc UH networks, usually wireless networks, if

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm not mistaken. UM, and uh, they don't use the

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>typical infrastructure on a lot of cases, places like well

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in places where they use the one laptop per child

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.719
<v Speaker 1>uh product. Um, we're talking about places that don't have

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>that infrastructure in place. They don't have hard wired phone

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>lines and cable connections. UM, so they use these local networks,

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>local internet network networks that aren't actually connect to the Internet,

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>but they are a small wireless network. UM. I shouldn't

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>have used internet in net case it. But yeah, I

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>mean people would were communicating using those as well. So

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think even if the government shut everything down,

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it would the traditional infrastructure. I don't

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>think it would take long before people found new ways

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to get in touch with one another, especially considering the

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>tools we've been given. And further another point, I would

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I would suggest that says the government would be very

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>uh reticent to to take such an extreme action as

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>to shut down the Internet. So you've already got the

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 1>one case where you know you would infuriate your citizens

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and you don't really want to do that. There's really yeah,

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>how would you make things better after that? Right, especially

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 1>if ostensibly your goal is eventually to come out of

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 1>this with a peaceful resolution, you would you would essentially

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 1>end up losing the trust of the citizens and in

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.479
<v Speaker 1>a representative government, that means that your government is no

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>longer valid if the citizens no longer trust in the

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 1>government that represents them. Um. You know, assuming that you

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>continue to be a democracy, that pretty much means you

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>have guaranteed you are out the door, um as soon

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>as possible, in fact, probably before even elections would roll around.

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's one part. But another part is the fact

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that so many businesses rely upon the Internet, particularly in

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States, but all around the world. And of course,

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Internet has made the world a you know,

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 1>a global a true global economy. So you've got businesses

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that are centered in America that would be deeply affected.

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:42.679
<v Speaker 1>But you've got businesses in other countries as well that

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>have interests in America, they have um, they have infrastructure

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 1>in America that would be very much affected by the

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Internet being shut down within the borders of the United

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>States of America. You're talking about losing billions of dollars

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>worth of revenue and and doing intense economic damage. In fact,

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>one might be able to argue that shutting down the

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Internet would cause more damage economically than if you had

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:15.199
<v Speaker 1>let the Internet stay up right like that, you know,

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the guidelines to this act is that you

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>would only invoke it if there were an imminent threat

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to national economic security. Well, if you were to shut

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>down the whole Internet, you would create that threat. Actually,

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:33.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's the other reason I don't think it's very

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.360
<v Speaker 1>likely to happen in the United States. That doesn't mean

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 1>that we wouldn't see this act UH put into place,

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>or even take an advantage of It's just that I

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>think we would be more likely to see it the

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>way that we're told it's intended, right, so that if

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>there were a concentrated attacks, say on the Pentagon, that

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>the President would have the authority to tell Pentagon officials,

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>all right, close off all routes to the Internet until

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>we resolve this. Again, you could argue, why does this

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 1>even need to be a presidential thing? But you could

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>also argue, while there, what if you have some company

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that is or or some person, some organization there's in

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>some way UH partnering with these attacks that you know,

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's not that they're the victim, but are rather

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a conspirator, you know, a co conspirator. Well, in that case,

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you do have to maybe rely on a higher authority

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>than just the company head to take UH, to take

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>take control of the situation and to to try and

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>limit whatever harm could come of it. Um. It's still scary. Yeah,

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, you see, we've seen this happen before, not

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>just in Egypt, we also in Iran. We saw it

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>um a couple of years ago where there were the

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:57.199
<v Speaker 1>Iranian protests. Also a lot of people were trying to

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 1>um UH organized through Twitter and Facebook, and we saw

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that the Iranian government tried to UM confuse the issue

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>as much as possible, or at least those are the allegations, right.

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's hard for me to say, I don't

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't understand the language, so I have to rely

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>upon the reports I'm seeing, and some of the reports

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 1>were not necessarily the most unbiased, so it's hard for

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>me to draw my conclusions. But that's based upon the

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>information that I encountered. Yeah, it's um, it definitely shows

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 1>how dependent we are on the Internet for all kinds

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of things. The the outcry over something like this would

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 1>not have been nearly as serious in say, as it

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 1>is now because so many people are are you know,

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>used the Internet for communication, keeping up with friends and

0:23:53.240 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>family um and uh and for commerce um that you know,

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>we've we've come to expect that it's you know, I've

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>actually heard the the the idea thrown out in the

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>last few days that Internet access may be considered a

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>human right, which is a wow, that's that's sort of

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a topic for another podcast really, but you know, I again,

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this would have even been considered a

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>few years ago. And now the idea that you might

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>have a right to access this you know, amazing communications

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:35.400
<v Speaker 1>tool that we all use now. Um. You know it's

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>funny because I wouldn't have necessarily thought of that just

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago, but now so many people are

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>relying on it that that it is a reasonable debate

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>to have whether or not it's a um, a human

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 1>right to have that kind of access. But these tools

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>have also made it possible for protesters and demonstrators, whether

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>they are peaceful or violent, organize in ways that they

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>had haven't been before. So it's scary for governments too.

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Iranian government had a hard time because

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:08.959
<v Speaker 1>the mobs or it wasn't it wasn't an Iran, it

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>was where it was Belarus. That was even before that,

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>where mobs would gather by text message they would say okay,

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>be at the square at twelve oh seven. It was

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a flash mob. It was a flash mob. People would

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>show up, they would start to protest, the authorities would

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:25.719
<v Speaker 1>come to crack them, crack down on them, and they

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>would have already disseminated the location of the next gathering.

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>So by the time that the authorities converged on the area,

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>they were gone. The protesters had gone, They had converged

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>on a new area, and they were they were able

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>to stay one or maybe even five steps of the

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 1>authorities by using these tools. It makes sense that a

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 1>government would want to be able to do that in

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>those instances. So that I think two is why it

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>seems scary, because people go, yeah, you know what, they

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>might want to do that, and what if they do

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>it to me. I don't want that to happen. Yeah,

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.880
<v Speaker 1>we we've seen the president, which is what makes it scary.

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>But you see, I could see the other side why

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 1>they would want to. Certainly, it is definitely a scary threat.

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>It's one of those that the more you think about,

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the more you realize it's less likely to have in

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Now, I will never say it's impossible. No,

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's impossible anywhere it would be. It

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>would be monumentally surprising to me if it did happen

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the United States, simply for the reasons I stated before,

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>which is that I think essentially you would have to

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>have a president who was saying, you know what we're

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I'm going to discard the entire American system

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>of government for this to work, because otherwise, you're, like

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I said, you're gonna end up voting everyone out as

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>soon as possible if you felt like you've been betrayed. Right, So,

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in a democracy, this kind of approach doesn't really work.

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.400
<v Speaker 1>If you want to read the bill, it's actually available online.

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:52.679
<v Speaker 1>Um it is four and ten pages long. Yeah, the

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:56.640
<v Speaker 1>first hundred pages of that have been struck through. I

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>do think that, um, yeah, I think that in light

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of recent events in Egypt and some of the other

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>countries in the Middle East, where I mean that the

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Tunisian UH protests I think have sort of helped uh

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>some momentum in that regard. I think that it may

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:22.440
<v Speaker 1>cause people to give this bill another look, either you know,

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>go through and revise it again or strike it down

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and start over from scratch. But UM, I I think

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things where an actual real life

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>event or series of events may add some perspective. Yeah,

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 1>if you want to read it, it's uh, it's s

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:47.400
<v Speaker 1>period three for eight zero. That is the number associated

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 1>with this particular act um and it's a it's long,

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, and it's and it's full of legal ease

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>because I mean it's you know, you gotta remember, we

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 1>got lawyers running this country, so that'll happen at any rate.

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.919
<v Speaker 1>But it's it's good to actually be aware of what's happening.

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>And like Chris said, there have been a UM there's

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>actually been a couple of documents that have come out

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to um clear up matters about this act and

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>what is covered versus what isn't covered. Uh, you were

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about one that was released in February. Correct. Yes,

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the one I have it was actually released back in

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>in June of it's called myth versus Reality exactly. They

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>keep having to clear up a lot of the issues.

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they use a lot of the same verbiage

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>because it's the same questions over and over, I'm sure,

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and that I mean, it's a very emotionally charged topic,

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>so it's understandable, yes, and yeah, whether whether or not

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you necessarily feel that having access to the Internet as

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a human right, you can. It's hard to deny that

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a seriously emotional issue. People want at least they

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>want access to the internet, is not need access to

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. So it's definitely something that's going to concern people.

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>And I wanted to add if I may, if you're

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>looking for this UH, you'll have an easy time finding

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and if you go to the Library of Congress is

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>UM website, you can also look for all kinds of

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>UM legislation United States legislation. It's called Thomas UH in

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the spirit of Thomas Jefferson goes the the quote at

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the top of the page, but it's UM. You know,

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>HTTP call and slash last. There's no WS here, so

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just Thomas th H O M A S dot

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>l o C. That's Library of Congress dot gov, Thomas

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>dot l oc, dot GOVN you can look up the

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>status of different bills. You could see which legislators have

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>introduced what legislation. It's actually a pretty interesting tool. It's

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>very very useful. Uh. And it's an easy way to

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>track this one down if you're interested in doing it.

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Eve unless the top five weekly pieces of legislation people

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you're looking up, and I would imagine that this one

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>is one of them. Yeah, I'm sure we'll ranked pretty

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>high up there. But this week, let's let's conclude just

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>by saying, remember, according to the Act, this isn't about

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>shutting off the Internet. It's about protecting various parts of

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure from cyber attacks. Uh. It's debatable about whether

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>or not that could be extended to the point that

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>it would affect all Americans across the United States. Uh. So,

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm not saying that those worries are completely unfounded.

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying that I think it unlikely to see

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that scenario happen, right right, And I think now that

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it's become something more in the public eye, people are

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>going to take note and you'll see people writing their

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>legislators and saying, you know, what is going on with

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>this bill. So I think it'll probably be in the

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>news and we'll be seeing more clarification or movement on it.

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Thirty page version of the Act to read next time

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>we talk about this, Yes, because that's the way we work.

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you guys have any opinions, I'm sure are

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you have opinions on this subject, I

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>have no doubt. Please let us know. You can let

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>us know on Facebook and Twitter are handled. There is

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff h s W. Or you can send us

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>an email. That address is tech stuff at how stuff

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>works dot com and Chris and I will talk to

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you again, assuming the government lets us really soon, all right.

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>For moral nos and thousands of other topics, visit how

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. So learn more about the podcast,

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 1>click on the podcast icon in the upper right corner

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of our homepage. The How Stuff Works iPhone app has arrived.

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Download it today on iTunes. Brought to you by the

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>reinvented two thousand twelve camera. It's ready, are you