WEBVTT - Younger Generations Rethinking Work

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on the Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Well, the earliest studies in

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>amicron are giving cause for cautious optimism. We've certainly seen

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that play out in the financial market trade, the equity

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>trade in particular. Well, vaccines may be less powerful against

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the new variant. Protection can be fortified with boosters, and

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that's certainly something we're hearing from the company's fist in BioNTech,

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>saying initial lab studies showed a third dose of their

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen vaccine neutralizes amicron, results that will accelerate global

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>booster drives in the U S. I've certainly seen it

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>as you try to sign up that it's now you've

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>got to wait a couple of weeks to get that boostered.

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:02.639
<v Speaker 1>It's it's really step a lot of momentum. I've heard

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 1>that from colleagues. I got mine on Monday. Um, but

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I know, talk about a catalyst to get you know,

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>thoughts over to shots. People are noticing it in a

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>big way. Well back with us to talk about the

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>latest day's headlines when it comes to the pandemic. Dr

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Harris work Care's Chief Innovation Officer and associated or

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>an associate medical director of the onside clinical operations for

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the company. Work here. If you're not familiar, there are

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a physician directed occupational health services company. Dr Harris also

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>leads the company's COVID nineteam clinical response team. He is

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>back with us UH from Chicago where they're based. Dr Harris,

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>nice to have you back with Tim and myself. How

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>are you How are things in Chicago when it comes

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to the pandemic. Well, thank you Carol, thank you Tim

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>for having me back. And things are Things are okay.

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>When I say okay, you know people aren't running around

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>with their hair on fire here. Um, but certainly we're

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>seeing the effects of this amicron scare, you know, recently,

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and so we're seeing more masks compliance potentially, and certainly

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about going to shows and whatnot. We're seeing

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>more requirements that you have to be vaccinated to get in.

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>How much does that actually help people? Like, what is

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the thing that actually prompts people to get shots the

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>people who are sitting on the sidelines right now? Is

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it something like what Carol was talking about with people

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>going to get boosters because the amicron? What's me at

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 1>somebody get the first shot? Sure? Yeah, yeah. We saw

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>early on right the early movers, kind of the third

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of the population roughly that had been fully vaccinated go

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>ahead and sign up to get their boosters. And if

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you look at the statistics now in the US we're

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 1>looking at I'm just thirty percent though as of two

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago received their booth boosters, and we saw an

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>acceleration of that just last week with the scare of armoricrons.

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we had one of the highest boostered days

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>on record. I believe it was two point seven million

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>boosters administered in one twenty four hour periods, which again

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>points back towards what motivates people to get boosters. Certainly

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>fear is one of them, right, It's like a logically Unfortunately,

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 1>we know fear only last roughly about two weeks as

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a motivating factor. So um, the other factors, I believe

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to a minor extent are gaining access to different venues.

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.119
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see how it continues to play out. I

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>think mandates, right, we've seen put in place, uh increase

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>booster participation, but I think we've already kind of topped

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>out the effectiveness of that approach at this point. Okay,

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I am curious since the pandemic has started, and I

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>think we're about you know, twenty months or so in

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>since the pandemic took hold in the US, depending on

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>how you count it, but roughly, so, how is your

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking and strategy evolved in terms of managing pandemic up

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and managing the pandemic? Dr Harris? Sure it really is,

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, going with classic um public health approaches right

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and by far in the way, the biggest approach is education, right,

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and educating the public in today's time dreft stically different

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>than educating the public back in smallpox time. Right, Um,

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>where And I'm just speaking anecdotally as a physician. Uh

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>here in the US. You know, when when I started

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>my career a decade ago, um, you know, I would

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>approach my patients and begin to educate, and I would

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>have some good dialogue around what the best approaches. But

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly today it's more of hey, doc, here's what I've

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>researched on my own, guide me towards and navigate me

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 1>towards the data so that I can make my best

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>informed decision, whereas days of antiquity was more so Hey doc,

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you're the expert. I'm gonna do what you recommend. So

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that dynamically see playing out from a public

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>health education standpoint, not a bad thing, right. We want

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>people to be accountable for their own health and wellness. Um.

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 1>But with today's information and the prevalence of misinformation, it

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>is perhaps becoming more difficult to do. Hey, Dr Harris,

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>help us understand what expectations should be as far as

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>booster shots go. Uh, as we do, you know, get

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to the other side. I use the term get to

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:02.919
<v Speaker 1>the other side of this pandemic. But it just seems

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>like every few months there's a new variant that's not

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>getting us to the other side. So wondering is there

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>is it realistic for us to think that we're gonna

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>have to get a booster every six months or so? Unfortunately, Uh,

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the estimate is yes, right, we see wane of the

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>booster after about six months even now, right, I know

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>anecdotally again position partners of mine that are planning to

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 1>get their fourth shop. Right, so they've been fully vacid

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>to receive a booster, and they're already planning to get

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>their next booster come early next year to keep their

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>immunity level high. And the science behind that is straightforward.

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>You have a building of immune UH, antibodies and immune cells.

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>These are called plasma cells that remember what the virus is,

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>what it looks like, right Uh, And those we know

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>diminish over time both antibodies and B sales B cells

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to a lesser extent um. But when we're talking about

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:00.040
<v Speaker 1>new variants, even if you have a decent level of

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>antibodies against one type of virus, doesn't necessarily mean it's

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>going to bind well to the new virus. I e.

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 1>Amicron that has thirty mutations over thirty mutations in the

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>binding site for our antibody. So the the basic sciences.

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 1>The more antibodies you have in your system, the better

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 1>off you are are going to be in terms of

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>varying against historic variants as well as new variants. Unfortunately,

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>we know clearly antibody levels diminished over time. Dr Harris,

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty seconds left. How are you advising your team in

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of maybe where we will be in a year's time?

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Just quickly, please, I always say, plain and simple, you know,

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>follow the finances and the pharmacy. We are very estimating

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to ramp up their production, both Feiser and mcdania murth

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>uh in all through tween twenty two. So in a

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>year's time we're gonna still be in listica phones. All right,

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>good to know, I guess. Dr Anthony Harris, chief Innovation

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Officer at work Care, on the phone from Chicago. You're

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week. You're listening to Bloomberg Business

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol mat Sir and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. It's Bloomberg Big Take. It's among

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>our most read on the Bloomberg Today. It's all spelled

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>out in the upcoming new issue of Bloomberg Business Week.

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Got tomorrow on newsstands at business Week Dot comment on

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg the story one of the great rethings. I

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's safe to say of this time, the great resignation.

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Why are workers saying but by two jobs? Tens of

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>millions of people around the number alone just kind of

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>blue with their jobs. Twenty four million between April and

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>September this year. That's the US. That's US. That's crazy.

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>That is an absolutely wild number. Hey, let's talk about

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>this with Joel Webber, editor at Bloomberg business Week. He's

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.239
<v Speaker 1>with us in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. Also joining

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>us is the economics editor of Bloomberg Business Week, Christina

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Lynn Blad. Hey, Joel, Um, we're talking about this. We

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>talked about this a lot from the U. S. Perspective,

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>But what is so great about this story as it

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>brings together a really really global perspective by talking about

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in the U S. And China and even

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>other places as well. Yeah, So, I think the Great

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Resignation here in the US. We can throw around that

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty four million number if we want. It's been a thing.

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>But what's interesting about this is that there's like other

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>forces and other things that aren't called the great resignation

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>in the life flat being really uh, the embodiment of this.

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>So it has created this sort of global thing that's

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>happening of people basically just opting out of work. And

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>for those for those of us who haven't done that,

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like a great mystery about like what what're you

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 1>doing here? And like how are you? Um? But yet

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>there are massive implications for this, not only from um economics,

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>but um also just like what a labor force starts

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to look like when you lose this many workers. But Christina,

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>what's what's behind it all? What's happening? And what is

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>if you haven't heard of life flat yet, what where

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>did it all come from? Life Flat in China came

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>from a social media post in which um, this young

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>guy I admitted that it was almost kind of embarrassed

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the beginning. It's like I haven't worked for a couple

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of years. He used to be a factory worker and

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 1>and basically he said, this is like a philosophical choice

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that I'm making. Um, and uh, it became it went

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>viral and uh and and to to just get a

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>feeling for how big it was, she Shaane Ping and

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>other members of China's leadership responded to that language directly

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>saying you should not lie flat. And you know, I

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>think the thread that runs through all these countries is

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that people are responding to the feeling that they're working

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>really hard, but they don't feel like they're getting ahead.

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>And one of the reasons is if they're living in

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>big cities, all these other prices are going up faster

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>than their than their wages, their salaries, right, so they

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>feel like their incomes are actually stagnant. And I think

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was a really interesting thing that made

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>it different from behind, you know, other sort of burnout

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.559
<v Speaker 1>moments that like we've captured in culture. I do think

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>about what you all said to like the great implications.

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>We were just talking about, um a Goldman Sack story

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that's saying young U S workers are plotting early retirements,

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, well, how the heck are they going

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to do it? Because probably a lot of folks are

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>not like my dad who got pensions, right, and so

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>those were young people in that survey. I now tend

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 1>to think that we need personal finance courses in school miscalculation.

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I think about the economic implications, like so if people

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>are not going back to work, they're not having babies. Like,

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>how like, what does this mean globally? Well, and we

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>have there are some case studies out there, like Japan

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>comes up in the story because there's a statory generation,

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>right Christina, Like, there's other places that we can kind

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:48.959
<v Speaker 1>of look to how this has played out before happening. Well,

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean it definitely in Japan. It's almost like the

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>statory generation emerged after the country was already in decline.

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>It was almost a response to this the the economic

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>things that have already happened. I mean in China, what there,

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>what leadership is concerned is that if enough people sort

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of change their thinking that way, because you know, in

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>order to live that way, you really have to pare

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>down your lifestyle, which can be found this one guy

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like four shirts for shirts, eight long sleeve. I

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh man, that's like four four T shirts. Yeah.

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I was like post working from home, you know, that's

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 1>exactly sweatpants money. But right, no, it I mean, if

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>if it really took off worldwide, it would definitely have

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>economic implications, you know, or as President gian to something

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of this whole idea, we all talk about

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>this wealth gap and if workers get to feel like

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>they're making more money, able to live in cities more easily,

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>get to share in the wealth, could that put an

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>end to some of this or is it more than that? Well,

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that it could. You know, the

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>pandemic lies on top of all of this is sort

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>of this extra kind of anxiety that people are feeling.

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that maybe like what China is doing or

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>what employers on their own can do, can sap some

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of the energy from this these movements by addressing these concerns.

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 1>But one of the issues though, is that um, young

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 1>people haven't truly verbalized their demands about what they want,

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, from from It's not like they're saying to

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>their bosses, do this for me and I will stay,

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you know. They're just kind of like saying no, I can't. Yeah.

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess I have so much to This

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:34.959
<v Speaker 1>brought up so much plus the Goldman Sack story that

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>we saw earlier today, and it just had me thinking

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>about where we are as a society globally and how

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>much this has to do with the pandemic versus how

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>much it has to do with the idea that you know,

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe for the last thirty or forty years in China

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and the idea of worked and they don't need that

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>anymore because China has grown so quickly, and you know,

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the rise of leisure here in the United States. It's

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>really some product of the twentieth century and the idea

0:12:58.360 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of the five day work week, like the idea of

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>pulling back or we at that point in history where

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>productivity is has gotten to a place where we can

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we can step back a little bit. Well, and another

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>thing we haven't talked about here is just the role

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of techness of being able to maybe have a gig

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>job where you just work a little bit when you

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>want to. And you know, there's a quote in the

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>story of like I play three days and then I

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>work one day, you know, and and that idea, you know,

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.199
<v Speaker 1>we just in the hit when you think about how

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the week is structured, you work five days, you take

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>two days off. That was also that we could basically

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>like make factories work suddenly when you throw in variables,

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>like we're beginning to see and compensate people differently, incentivize

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>them differently. Maybe that looks like a radically new world,

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's sort of what this starts to glimp what

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>this starts to glimpse? Right, And I think about some

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:48.679
<v Speaker 1>of the like I just remember doing a story and

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Pixar like years ago, and they just if people wanted

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to work in the morning, they wanted to work a lot,

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>like a full day, and they maybe take some time off.

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Nobody cared as long as things got done. And I

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>do wonder are we are we getting closer that we

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>just got about thirty sex. I think that um for

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>creative types, especially this kind of flexible arrangements, you know

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.199
<v Speaker 1>may work, but you know, like you're staying business week

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to bed with that work. We're on the clock right now,

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>no lying flat of business. It's a big story. We

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>have David Rubinstein coming up of the Carlisle Group, and

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it's something we want to talk about with him and

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>how he's how he's thinking about that as well. I

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>want to know too. Yeah, right, did he get it?

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, is he is? He? Like no, he's

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>working all the time. Incredible story, incredible reporting. Christina Linblad,

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, Economics editor, Bloomberg business Week. It's

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in the upcoming issue of the magazine. Chill Weber editor

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week. Um, no lying flat for us,

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>not yet. You're listening to Bloomberg Radio. You're listening to

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes.

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovik on Bloomber Radio. So in his latest episode

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of the upcoming Peer to Peer Conversations on Bloomberg the

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Carlisle Group co founder and co chairman David Rubinstein catching

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>up the presidency of Hilton Worldwide, Christmas said, a David,

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, the author of a series How to Lead

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>on Leadership, The American Story, those conversations he's had with

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>so many of his storians, and his third in that

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>series about the arc of the U. S as a

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>young country as it invented and really reinvented itself. That book,

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>The American Experiment, Dialogues on a Dream. David Rubinstein back

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>with us on the phone in New York City. David,

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>how are you all right? How are you doing okay?

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Doing okay? Um? Christmas Satti loved talking with him. You

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>had a really deep dive of a conversation with him. Um,

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>what stands out from you in that conversation and how

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the hotel industry Hilton specifically is doing. The hotel industry

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>suffered probably as much as any industry, perhaps with the

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>sole exception of the cruise industry, which pretty much shut

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>down completely. The hotel industry dramatically UH saw occupancy go down. However,

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>occupy and see is now coming back mostly from travel

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and leisure, not as much from business, though business is

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>coming back a bit. They stocks though of the travel

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>lodging companies are done quite well. I mean right now

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Hilton is an all time high. I think Marriott US

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>near an all time high as well. So the market

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is anticipating future growth and the real challenge that they

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the hotel companies have, in Christens said, I talked about

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>this is where do you get employees? UM, A lot

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of employees went away and now they got to hire

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>them back and probably higher wages, and as a result,

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you're probably going to have some increases in in UH

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in the cost of rooms. In addition, should you provide

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>all the services that you were providing before? People are

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>used to having daily towel service and daily makeup service

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and their beds. Do you have to do that? Do

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to get free breakfasts every morning to some

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of your patrons to some of these things are going

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to be looked at by companies like Hilton and others.

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think, David about the potential permanent

0:16:57.840 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>shifts that we see on the other side of the

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>pandemic when we when we do get to the other

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>side of the pandemic when it comes to travel, leisure,

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.959
<v Speaker 1>in hospitality. Well, I know from the business community, from

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>my point of view, if I had to fly across

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the country for one hour meeting, I used to do it.

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm happy to do a Zoom, So I'm not

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 1>traveling quite as much as I used to. I suspect

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it will come back at some point. But in the

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>in the know, pre pandemic, I would go to the

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Middle East or go to the Far East UH for

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a day or two and now come back. And now

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>I just I'm a little more reluctant do because you

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>can do so many things on on zoom. Obviously you

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>can't do everything on zoom, and you have to have

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>personal contact at some point. But I do think that

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>business and business travel will will slower, be much more

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 1>slow to come back, much slower to come back. Hey, David,

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>did Christ say anything about well, you know, because we

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>talk a lot more about more automation coming in robotics.

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot more things we can do online with

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 1>a hotel industry that we couldn't before. Does he say

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that they're making investments or helping you know, at some

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of their team members by really introducing automation that maybe

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>sticks with us going forward, Well, sure they are doing

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that right now. For example, rarely do people uh you know,

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 1>need to check in anymore. You can just get your

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>ticket online more or less work. Now they're going to

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>use face identification to some extent to check in. So

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I think technology is going to dramatically change the industry.

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>And and clearly the industry, uh you know, is a

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>global industry. I mean, Hilton is all over the world

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and they have thousands of hotels and and they have

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in different categories. That's a big change in the last

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty or thirty years. Used to be there was Hilton,

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>there was Marriott. Now Hilton has about fifteen different brands.

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Mary has probably something similar. So you can have something

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>for every different price point that you want. Hey, one

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>thing we were dying to ask you, David Rubinstein, and

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it has to do the couple of stories that are

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>among the most red on the Bloomberg. One has to

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>do with Goldman talking about young U S workers are

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 1>plotting early retirements. They're, you know, thinking about getting out

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot earlier. And then we've got another one on

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Big Tickets about the great resignation, about how

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>we've had more than twenty four million from Aple to

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>September here in the US alone witting their jobs. We're

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing it. There was a global phenomenon, and in some

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>countries we've already seen it happening, even pre pandemic. What's

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>going on? Why is everybody quitting? Why are younger folks

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 1>saying I've had it? Are we missing something? What do

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you make of this trend? Well, my generation basically you

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>after college or graduate school, you went to work, and

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you worked until you're sixty or seventy, and maybe some

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>cases even longer than that. Younger people are saying, well,

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I can work out of my home a bit, Why

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 1>do I need to work in the traditional way? And secondly,

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe I don't need to work quite as long. I

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>can make a fair amount of money if I do

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>well and retire at fifty five or sixty or even fifty.

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>So the world is changing. The world always changes. I'm

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>not surprised the pandemic has really changed the way people

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>look at the world. I know my own generation has

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>looked at the world much differently because we're worried more

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>about getting the COVID and getting UM to the point

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>where we can survive this because of the age group,

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>and more and more people who are older than me,

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 1>even uh there are in my early seventies are saying

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.199
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to work anymore either because they just

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>want to retire and and recognize that life might be

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>easier if they just retired. Are there concerns though about productivity?

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>If we see this, well, productivity it generally increases because

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of technology. So technology tends to make productivity get much better,

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>some countries better than others. Yeah, product productivity is always

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a challenge, but as a general rule of thumb, productivity

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>does increase even when you have fewer employees. Well, what

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>about them an economic or market rethink? David, Like I do,

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>wonder if you're tiring early or maybe you're saying, you

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>know what, I don't need so much in my wardrobe,

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>even if you've done well, like you just pair back? Um,

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>are there implications that we need to be thinking about. Well, sure,

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people probably don't need to buy I used

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:43.959
<v Speaker 1>to buy a lot of business suits, probably don't need

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>as many of them. I don't used to buy a

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of ties. Probably don't need a lot of them. Um,

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and people probably are going to just change their life

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit. You know. It's interesting that the Industrial revolution

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>changed the way we live or work over about a

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred year period of time. The Internet maybe over twenty

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>five year period of time, the smartphone or for seven

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>years or so, and now over just one and a

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>half years, we're changing the way we live and work

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>because of a pandemic that was never anticipated. And whether

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a good thing or not, it's clearly here and

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a reality. And people are much different in the

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>way they look at work. They don't view it as

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>an obligation so much. If they don't enjoy it, they're

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to do it. I wonder if technological innovation, though,

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 1>has kept up with the worker attitudes. We're not we're

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>not seeing uh, we're having a hard time in the

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 1>United States finding long haul truckers, but we're not seeing

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>self driving trucks at this point on roads Um, not yet.

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Not yet. It's a challenge for Amazon to keep employees

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>incredibly high turnover, but you know they're not being replaced

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 1>by robots at this point. So isn't there some concern

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>we're trepidation about the idea that that productivity hasn't in

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>technology hasn't caught up to worker attitudes. Well, workers are

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>higher ambitions of what they want to do, and then

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the kind of jobs you might get by working in

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a warehouse and and fulfilling orders for Amazon may not

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>be as intellectually challenging. Is what some people really wanted

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 1>to do when they went to college or or some

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of vocational training. Uh. Clearly things are going to

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>have to adjust, But in the end, I think the

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 1>American workforces is pretty resilient. I think we'll come back.

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 1>We can't compete with the workforce in terms of costs

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>in China or Asia, but we can, uh, I think

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>do a pretty good job in making productivity better than

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 1>it has been. Clearly, technological leaders UH usually come from

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:24.919
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Hey, David, you know your series of books,

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>your trilogy you know on leadership historians really looking at uh,

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>the growth of this nation and how it's evolved and

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>really talking with leaders as we constantly, as you say,

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>these invention innovative cycles seem to be happening in less

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 1>time here. Um, how do you see, you know, in

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of the next trends or the people that you

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>think we really have got to keep an eye on

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>that that really are going to be determining maybe the

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 1>future trajectory. And it can be politically as well as

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>on a business and market front. Well, in the business world,

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>chain is usually made, as it is in the political world,

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>by people who are younger. Revolutions are not usually led

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>by seven to year old people, and as a general

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>rule of thumb, business change is usually led by demand

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.880
<v Speaker 1>from people who in their twenties or thirties. So how

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.679
<v Speaker 1>many people have now caught on with the kind of

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.959
<v Speaker 1>social media devices that really the young people really focused

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 1>on and really helped generate. Same with computers, and the

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>same with other kinds of services that we now rely on.

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Many of these came from younger people. So I think

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 1>it's a very good thing if boards of directors and

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>companies would get younger people on them. I think it's

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a good idea for boards of trustees as well. Nonprofits

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>have more and more people on them who are younger.

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I rarely see on the words that I serve people

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 1>under the age of forty. But really that's where the

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>change is coming from. And probably it's not a bad

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.159
<v Speaker 1>idea to have younger people on these boards or in

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>senior positions, advising boards of directors or trustees. So why

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>do they resist? What happens? Like if you bring that

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:54.439
<v Speaker 1>up and you're on a board and you say, hey, guys,

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I love you all, but we need to ascue younger.

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>We've certainly see the implication since the benefits of having

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:05.880
<v Speaker 1>diversity on boards. But but what's the response. Well, sometimes

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>people are always willing to nod and say yes, let's

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>take that up, or we should think about it, and

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>then if you're not persistent, you won't get very far.

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>So persistence is a real hallmark of leadership, as I've

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>said in my book. So you've got to be persistent,

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and I probably should be more persistent in pushing the

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>idea of having younger people advise boards of directors and

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>boards of trustees or being more senior positions, because the

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>consumers in the world, the people are changing things, are

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>really younger people. Hey, David let's talk markets here, because

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you've seen lots of market cycles throughout your career, help

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>us understand and put into context the one that we're

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.679
<v Speaker 1>seeing right now with the s and just continuing to

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to grind higher, and you know, the COVID variants still

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>making their way around the world, and concerns about growth.

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>If the markets have got anything wrong. Initially when COVID

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 1>came about, it was that the markets we're going to

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>be more resilient than they turned out than the then,

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:58.959
<v Speaker 1>than than people thought. In other words, when we went

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>through COVID, people thought, Okay, the economy is going to collapse,

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden, the market will collapse. But

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 1>if it turns out maybe because of federal intervention for sure,

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 1>but because of federal support and other factors, the stock

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 1>market actually has gone up. And in the private equity

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>world that I operate in, markets have never been better.

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>People are making staggering sums of money compared to what

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>they did before. So it's very difficult to predict right now.

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:21.919
<v Speaker 1>I would say that the federal government is probably going

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to increase interest rates next year. That should have a

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>somewhat impact on the market of probably reducing prices a bit,

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and I suspect inflation won't go away, so that might

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>impede the market a bit. But I don't see any

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>collapse in the near term. I don't see any kind

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of UH correction of any consequence. Who might have a

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:41.719
<v Speaker 1>one day to day blip because of something that happens,

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>but a ten or fifteen percent market correction, I don't

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>see that for an enduring period of time in the

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 1>next year or so. David, what is the productive conversation?

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:50.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I here at Bloomberg we talk

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the FED, We talk about inflation. You

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 1>guys were just touching on it. But I mean, what

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 1>is the productive conversation to have about that right now?

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I think people should recognize that inflation um was artificially low. Historically,

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>throughout most of the twentieth century, inflation was three or

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>four percent, but for the last twenty years or so,

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it was the two percent or less that was abnormally low. Uh.

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>For a number of reasons, inflation got to the double

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>digit arrange when I was in the White House in

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the President Carter. We're not likely to see that again.

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>For a number of reasons that our economy is much

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>more global than it used to be. We don't have

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a percentage of the of the workforce being unionized as before.

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 1>And and the Federal Reserve is I think more sensitive

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>to interest rates increases than they might have been many

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 1>years ago. So I don't really think we're going to

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>have that problem again in terms of high inflation. But

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I do think we'll have inflation probably above two percent

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>and maybe for a while, maybe somewhere between three and

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>three and a half percent. That might happen for the

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>year or so, But it's not a calamity. Yeah, No,

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a good thing to kind of remind everybody on that.

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>He last question, David I mentioned to three books How

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to Lead the American Story, The American Experiment, American Experiments,

0:26:56.920 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>some just great conversations about our country and as it

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>changed and evolved. Uh, if you look for infspiration, is

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 1>there one particular interview that you might suggest to our

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>audience at this point? Well, disappointing one to me was

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the interview with Ken Burns. I lived through the Vietnam War,

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 1>not as a combatant, but as a as a civilian,

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.360
<v Speaker 1>as a student, and and and he said that actually

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it's clear from the documentary evidence that the presidents of

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the United States who lived for the Vietnam War knew

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>we could never win that war militarily. They knew it.

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 1>It was just a question of the politics of it.

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>They didn't want to admit that they were going to

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>withdraw and be seen as a loser. So we fought

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a war when shifty eight thousand Americans died and hundreds

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of Vietnamese died, really for a political reason

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and not for a military reason. All right, we're gonna

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 1>leave it on that note, David, Thank you so much.

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>As always, David Rubinstein, Happy holidays, b Well b Safe,

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>founder and co executive chairman of the Carlisle Group and

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>host of The David Rubinstein Show, Peer to peer Conversations.

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>As mentioned his latest book out, The American Experiment, Dialogues

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 1>and a Dream. It's a great holiday gift. I'm just

0:27:58.160 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna put it out there. It is. It's just a

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>great versations. Yeah. Features conversation with Metel and Albright ken Burns.

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>He mentioned John Mitcham, Walter Isaacson. Uh, the list goes on.

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm roam, Yeah, I bet you let me drive. Oh no, no, no, no,

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>this is not a toy. All right, please, I'll go.

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:27.199
<v Speaker 1>I want to drive. It's a good question. This is

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the drive to the closed on Bluebird Radio. All right,

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>just about ten minutes to the closing bell on Wall

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.479
<v Speaker 1>Street on this Wednesday. And you know what we've been

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about. It does feel like we're taking a little

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>bit of a breather here, but a little bit of

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>an uptick here in the last few minutes. So we

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>are now green on the screen when it comes to

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the SMP down and the NASDAC, but just a little

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>bit higher on the SMP five hundreds to call it

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a fractional game there as well. Let's get to it

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>with Lisa Erickson. She senior vice president co had at

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Public Markets Group at US Bank. Lisa, thanks so much

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>for joining us on the phone from Minneapolis, Minnesota. How

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>do you make sense of the volatility that we've seen

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>over the last week, really since sun i'd say Black Friday,

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>UM and the trading day that we saw there the

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>first one the markets had a chance to digest the

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>news about Omicron and really the rip higher that we've

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>seen since then, the recovery. Yeah, well, first of all,

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>him and Carol, thanks so much for having me. But

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to your point, it really has been very volatile over

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the last week or so, and I think what you

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>see is that we've had really a very good fundamental

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>picture with an uptick strongly across all of our major

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>US equity indices. And so when you get some new

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>news like what has happened with the development of the

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Omnikron variant, um markets really have to price into that uncertainty,

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and then as additional news flow comes, there is going

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a positive rally as people perceive that risk softening.

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, from our vantage point, it really remains to

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>be seen where this settles out. You know, it's probably

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>going to take another week or two really to get

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>more sense fully of the severity and the transmissibility of

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>this variant. But in the meantime, it is somewhat encouraging

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that we've gotten some you know, early news of perhaps

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a milder variant than was initially expected. All right, so

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>help me at Justina Lee Bloomberg wrote this out in

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>our Five Things to Watch earlier this morning, and she said,

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>just last week everyone was worried, um Lisa about the

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>impact of faster FED tightening on risky assets with high valuations.

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>That make them more susceptible to rising rates. Now, concerns

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>over the variant being a dragon the economic recovery have faded,

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's less clear whether the FED story has changed.

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's interesting that we've eased concerns about Amkron. But

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>are we comfortable then if the FED, you know, ends

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>up moving faster than we all anticipated, because that was

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>our big worry last week. Absolutely, Carol, that's a great point,

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and FED really is another big near term as well

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is longer term in blunt on what's going on with

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the markets, And to your point, really some of the

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>concerns were magnified initially by the fact that chair Pal

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 1>really mentioned the possibility of a faster tapering. Um, we

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>do think that's really a key development going forward. I

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>think the market expectation in our base cases that that

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>will happen next week when the FED meats. But certainly

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the language around that announcement is going

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to be key and seeing whether some of the balance

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of risk are both to the upside and downside on

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>inflation are mentioned, or if it really is more of

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a hawkish tone repeat that, what do you think is

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 1>going to happen next week. What are you looking for? Well,

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>our base case again is that the Fed is incented

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and has spoken to really continuing to move forward the

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>tapering pace, possibly to thirty billion a month from fifteen

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 1>billion a month. But again, I think the devil's really

0:31:57.760 --> 0:31:59.719
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the details and are main concern

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 1>right now is again a more hawkish tone around that pronouncement,

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 1>really just focusing on the upside risk UH to inflation

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and what that means is the possibility of too hot

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy, especially when we look into next year and

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>we see that the comparisons for inflation are going to

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>get tougher, so they could actually be pivoting into an

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>upswing just right when some of those numbers come down

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly and you know, we've definitely seen that with a

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>flattening of the yield curve, you know, or some of

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the conversations we've had over the last week about you know,

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>whether you know, treasury investors are warning us Lisa that hey, folks,

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, as we get into the next year, we're

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>going to see maybe growth slow down, and there's some

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>concerns and could the Fed be making a misstep perhaps,

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I hate to say, you know, could we head into

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a recession. It's hard to even get your head around

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that at this point, but you do wonder, especially since

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>FED policy takes a while to actually have its impact.

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, the timing of all of this is just

0:32:56.920 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>so key. Absolutely to your point. Again, the the based

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>comparisons for growth next year are tough too, so you know,

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>just at the start growth is likely to come down

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to some extent going into the next year. So the

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>FED really is in a tough position because we have

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 1>had some elevated inflation and it is not completely clear

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>how long that will continue to laugh And yet on

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, we know there's a possibility that it

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>could come down a little bit as well as you know,

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be some pressure on the growth number.

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>So they're in a tough spot. And that's why, really

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 1>what we're hoping for is that there's some more balanced

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>language around you know, the possibility of faster tapering. But

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 1>again it remains to be seen how they come out

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>next week. Least. The narrative has been throughout the pandemic

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>from the FED, you know, maximizing making sure that they're

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>maximizing the ability for people to get back to work,

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder what you think now is more of

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a focus for FED share Powell is it? Is it

0:33:55.520 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>price stability or maximum employment. Well, as he set out

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>really earlier UM several months ago, in terms of what

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 1>it would take to begin the reduction of all of

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the stimulus that's been in place, it really was around both.

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 1>It was around price pressures as well as well as

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 1>maximum employment. And so I think what you're seeing is

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>now both are more sharply coming into focus. On the

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>employment side, we have gotten some recent strong prince even

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>just today with some of the indicators on UM labor force.

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:34.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, again, I think those are strengthening the case

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:39.479
<v Speaker 1>that we're approaching that full employment picture. But again, since

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>those are both key, we expect the FED to continue

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to look at both of those as they move forward. Hey, Lisa,

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>so the SMP is this year you've got the nastack.

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.880
<v Speaker 1>You still guys like large caps. That's where you you

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>say investors should focus, and that includes include large cap tech.

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:01.839
<v Speaker 1>It certainly does, and we're really seeing a balanced opportunity

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>among large cat stocks in terms of both interest in

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>secular growth types of industries like technology as well as piplicals.

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>And really the reason behind that is we've got, despite

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.319
<v Speaker 1>some of the potential risks we're talking about right now,

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a pretty nice economy. If you look at the macro indicators,

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:24.280
<v Speaker 1>they're really primarily on solid footing, and so that gives

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 1>with the reopening activity, both the opportunity for some of

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.359
<v Speaker 1>those secular growth trends to continue as well as some

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 1>of the reopening companies to do well. So that's really

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the focus on large cap. It really gives you a

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>nice balanced, diversified exposure across both types of sectors. All right,

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 1>good to get your thoughts, Lisa. Thank you so much.

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Ericson. She's senior vice president and co head of

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the Public Markets Group over at US Bank, on the

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:51.879
<v Speaker 1>phone from Minneapolis. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com,

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 1>and you can also listen to our radio show at

0:35:57.320 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:35:59.880 --> 0:36:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you you to search Bloomberg Global News m