1 00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:01,960 Speaker 1: I'm so glad to be talking to all of you. 2 00:00:02,040 --> 00:00:06,600 Speaker 1: I've been watching with fascination this game Stop Reddit story. 3 00:00:06,640 --> 00:00:09,240 Speaker 1: I'm not quite sure what to call it. Um and 4 00:00:09,280 --> 00:00:12,200 Speaker 1: as we see sort of this populist wave sweeping into 5 00:00:12,240 --> 00:00:14,520 Speaker 1: Wall Street, want to try to make some sense of that. 6 00:00:14,800 --> 00:00:18,360 Speaker 1: And hearing today from members of the House and the 7 00:00:18,400 --> 00:00:21,240 Speaker 1: Senate who have responded to what's been going on on 8 00:00:21,280 --> 00:00:25,800 Speaker 1: Wall Street. So we heard initially from incoming Senate Banking 9 00:00:25,880 --> 00:00:29,560 Speaker 1: Chairman Committee Shared Brown, who said the committee will hold 10 00:00:29,600 --> 00:00:32,360 Speaker 1: a hearing on the current state of the market and 11 00:00:32,600 --> 00:00:36,280 Speaker 1: a growing number of lawmakers criticized and moves to curb 12 00:00:36,360 --> 00:00:39,920 Speaker 1: Reddit fueled trades and companies like game Stop. We heard 13 00:00:39,920 --> 00:00:44,559 Speaker 1: from Alexander Occasio Cortez. We heard from also Ted Cruz 14 00:00:45,080 --> 00:00:48,400 Speaker 1: and how Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who told reporters that the 15 00:00:48,440 --> 00:00:51,640 Speaker 1: game Stop issue is what she described as quote interesting. 16 00:00:52,000 --> 00:00:55,720 Speaker 1: We have sound on that. I understand that the administration 17 00:00:55,840 --> 00:00:58,800 Speaker 1: is taking a look, the SEC is taking a look 18 00:00:59,240 --> 00:01:03,400 Speaker 1: what that is, um, but we'll all be reviewing it. 19 00:01:03,600 --> 00:01:09,399 Speaker 1: But interesting. Meanwhile, White House Press Secretary Jen Saki refused 20 00:01:09,400 --> 00:01:11,680 Speaker 1: to comment on what was going on in the stock 21 00:01:11,760 --> 00:01:15,480 Speaker 1: market related to game Stop, as some online investors pushed 22 00:01:15,480 --> 00:01:19,280 Speaker 1: the company's stock higher. Um Saki would only say that 23 00:01:19,319 --> 00:01:24,680 Speaker 1: the administration needs their SEC pick Gary Gensler in office soon. 24 00:01:24,880 --> 00:01:28,080 Speaker 1: We have sound on that the President has spoken about 25 00:01:28,319 --> 00:01:31,080 Speaker 1: the urgency of getting his team in place to address 26 00:01:31,400 --> 00:01:33,319 Speaker 1: the range of issues we're facing, and I don't think 27 00:01:33,319 --> 00:01:36,680 Speaker 1: that would be any different from Mr Gensler. So joining 28 00:01:36,680 --> 00:01:39,319 Speaker 1: me to make sense of all of this is Rick Davis, 29 00:01:39,319 --> 00:01:43,039 Speaker 1: Bloomberg contributor and partner at Stone Court Capital, former campaign 30 00:01:43,040 --> 00:01:46,319 Speaker 1: manager for John McCain's two thousand and eight presidential campaign. 31 00:01:46,920 --> 00:01:51,560 Speaker 1: David axel Rod, partner at Ballard spar and former Supervisory 32 00:01:51,600 --> 00:01:55,720 Speaker 1: Trial Council at the SEC. And William Ginley, principal at 33 00:01:55,760 --> 00:01:59,160 Speaker 1: the Vogel Group, former White House Cabinet Press Cabinet Secretary, 34 00:01:59,200 --> 00:02:02,080 Speaker 1: not Press Secretary, and former Deputy Council at the r 35 00:02:02,160 --> 00:02:05,880 Speaker 1: n C. So thank you all for joining us. And David, 36 00:02:06,000 --> 00:02:09,160 Speaker 1: I wanted to go to you and ask you to 37 00:02:09,320 --> 00:02:12,720 Speaker 1: sort of set the stage here in terms of what 38 00:02:12,840 --> 00:02:17,519 Speaker 1: the SEC's response, if anything, to this should be and 39 00:02:17,800 --> 00:02:22,120 Speaker 1: might be if you will well, Ginia, I wish I knew. Um, 40 00:02:22,280 --> 00:02:25,760 Speaker 1: I mean, like Nancy Pelosi said, this is interesting. Um 41 00:02:25,800 --> 00:02:29,000 Speaker 1: it smells like a crime. It smells like manipulation when 42 00:02:29,000 --> 00:02:31,640 Speaker 1: you look at it. It may not be. You've got 43 00:02:31,639 --> 00:02:33,960 Speaker 1: a bunch of people who got together and they're interested 44 00:02:33,960 --> 00:02:37,000 Speaker 1: in trading a stock, and they made the stock go up, 45 00:02:37,639 --> 00:02:40,520 Speaker 1: and it's not clear that this fits into any clearly 46 00:02:40,560 --> 00:02:44,080 Speaker 1: defined type of scheme of manipulation. Um. I know that 47 00:02:44,120 --> 00:02:46,919 Speaker 1: the SEC is concerned, because I talked to people there today, 48 00:02:46,960 --> 00:02:49,560 Speaker 1: friends at the SEC who are concerned about this. It 49 00:02:49,639 --> 00:02:52,320 Speaker 1: certainly doesn't look good for the markets. But with the 50 00:02:52,360 --> 00:02:55,359 Speaker 1: current rules in place, I'm not sure there's anything that 51 00:02:55,400 --> 00:02:58,600 Speaker 1: the SEC can really do besides asking a lot of 52 00:02:58,680 --> 00:03:01,560 Speaker 1: questions and preparing for what to do if this happens again. 53 00:03:02,360 --> 00:03:06,760 Speaker 1: And on that point, what should the should the rules 54 00:03:06,760 --> 00:03:10,600 Speaker 1: do they need now in this you know, this age 55 00:03:10,600 --> 00:03:13,920 Speaker 1: of apps, this democratization of trading, when so many of 56 00:03:14,000 --> 00:03:16,560 Speaker 1: us can get into the game, do they need to 57 00:03:16,560 --> 00:03:19,000 Speaker 1: take a hard look at these rules and rethink and 58 00:03:19,040 --> 00:03:22,560 Speaker 1: rewrite them going forward? Well, I don't know. I mean, 59 00:03:22,600 --> 00:03:25,920 Speaker 1: I think that the rules allowing retail investors to to 60 00:03:25,919 --> 00:03:29,480 Speaker 1: to make complicated trades buy and sell options are are 61 00:03:29,560 --> 00:03:32,799 Speaker 1: are good. I mean, it's it's democracy and action. Um 62 00:03:32,840 --> 00:03:35,040 Speaker 1: So I think those are good, But I mean, when 63 00:03:35,080 --> 00:03:38,200 Speaker 1: you start having people get on social media and start 64 00:03:38,240 --> 00:03:41,720 Speaker 1: doing things that begin to look like market manipulation, I think. 65 00:03:41,760 --> 00:03:44,080 Speaker 1: I think, sure the SEC needs to think really long 66 00:03:44,120 --> 00:03:47,240 Speaker 1: and hard about what to do in those types of circumstances, 67 00:03:47,280 --> 00:03:50,120 Speaker 1: because this one doesn't look like market manipulations. But if 68 00:03:50,160 --> 00:03:53,440 Speaker 1: you have if you have people on Reddit suddenly talking 69 00:03:53,480 --> 00:03:56,120 Speaker 1: about things and maybe going a little bit further, you 70 00:03:56,200 --> 00:03:57,960 Speaker 1: end up in a situation where it starts to look 71 00:03:58,000 --> 00:03:59,920 Speaker 1: like a pump and dump scheme or a little bit 72 00:04:00,000 --> 00:04:04,240 Speaker 1: more like classic manipulation. And Rick Davis, should we be 73 00:04:04,400 --> 00:04:07,800 Speaker 1: surprised by any of this? Um, I've heard some people 74 00:04:07,880 --> 00:04:10,720 Speaker 1: say that they're surprised this took so long for something 75 00:04:10,760 --> 00:04:14,040 Speaker 1: like this to occur. Well, it's kind of like populism 76 00:04:14,080 --> 00:04:16,400 Speaker 1: coming into the stock market, right. We've seen how it 77 00:04:16,440 --> 00:04:18,680 Speaker 1: affects politics in the United States, and this may be 78 00:04:18,800 --> 00:04:22,839 Speaker 1: the first real example of populism on the stock exchange. 79 00:04:23,040 --> 00:04:26,160 Speaker 1: And uh, and so there's been talk about this. I mean, 80 00:04:26,200 --> 00:04:28,640 Speaker 1: these Reddit groups have been around for a while. They've 81 00:04:28,960 --> 00:04:32,359 Speaker 1: been flexing their muscle, although much smaller muscles than what 82 00:04:32,400 --> 00:04:36,159 Speaker 1: they've shown related to game Stop and AMC and some 83 00:04:36,240 --> 00:04:38,880 Speaker 1: of the others that they've been going after, but it's this, 84 00:04:39,279 --> 00:04:42,320 Speaker 1: it's it's kind of like pushback against the establishment. In 85 00:04:42,320 --> 00:04:45,120 Speaker 1: this case, short sellers the establishment, and they're going to 86 00:04:45,240 --> 00:04:48,520 Speaker 1: do something about it. I I do wonder, uh, if 87 00:04:48,560 --> 00:04:50,719 Speaker 1: there's a look at the other side of this. I 88 00:04:50,760 --> 00:04:54,200 Speaker 1: saw that the Massachusetts regulators, the Secretary of the the common 89 00:04:54,279 --> 00:04:57,400 Speaker 1: with Bill gave Lavin, was saying that one of the 90 00:04:57,440 --> 00:05:00,479 Speaker 1: things to look at is the size of these short 91 00:05:00,480 --> 00:05:04,000 Speaker 1: positions and whether or not that structurally is something that 92 00:05:04,080 --> 00:05:06,640 Speaker 1: the exchanges need to look at. And and so I 93 00:05:06,680 --> 00:05:09,479 Speaker 1: think we're going to see a deep dive by regulatory 94 00:05:09,480 --> 00:05:12,080 Speaker 1: authorities in this Whether there's anything they can do about 95 00:05:12,200 --> 00:05:16,600 Speaker 1: is another question. And William McGinley I heard Anthony Scaramucci 96 00:05:16,720 --> 00:05:19,640 Speaker 1: described this UM in his capacity as a hedge fund 97 00:05:19,680 --> 00:05:23,160 Speaker 1: manager as quote the French Revolution on finance. As Rick 98 00:05:23,279 --> 00:05:26,960 Speaker 1: is talking about the sweep of populism UM. Others equated 99 00:05:27,000 --> 00:05:29,400 Speaker 1: this sort of to the financial crisis of two thousand 100 00:05:29,440 --> 00:05:32,400 Speaker 1: and eight in terms of a pushback against the institutional 101 00:05:32,400 --> 00:05:35,440 Speaker 1: Wall Street. How do you see what has happened in 102 00:05:35,480 --> 00:05:37,680 Speaker 1: the last you know, not just the several days, but 103 00:05:38,080 --> 00:05:41,839 Speaker 1: weeks in this case. Look, I think that there's we 104 00:05:41,920 --> 00:05:44,080 Speaker 1: still don't know enough about this to be able to 105 00:05:44,160 --> 00:05:49,440 Speaker 1: render a judgment. The fact that David, UH, Speaker Pelosi, UM, 106 00:05:49,880 --> 00:05:54,120 Speaker 1: Senator Brown, and then UH Representative Maxine Waters, the heads 107 00:05:54,120 --> 00:05:57,839 Speaker 1: of the relevant committees up on Capitol Hill are really 108 00:05:57,880 --> 00:06:01,279 Speaker 1: taken await and see approach, not really coming out and 109 00:06:01,320 --> 00:06:04,239 Speaker 1: locking themselves into any position, but wanting to learn more. 110 00:06:04,360 --> 00:06:07,640 Speaker 1: So I fully anticipate that there's going to be hearings. 111 00:06:07,839 --> 00:06:10,159 Speaker 1: I fully anticipate that the SEC is gonna want to 112 00:06:10,160 --> 00:06:13,000 Speaker 1: take a look at it, UH As David said, But 113 00:06:13,200 --> 00:06:16,720 Speaker 1: I think as anybody who's practiced in a legal capacity 114 00:06:16,800 --> 00:06:21,240 Speaker 1: before the government understands they're always fighting the last war UM. 115 00:06:21,279 --> 00:06:22,960 Speaker 1: And one of the things that I think is going 116 00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:25,320 Speaker 1: to come out of this is if this truly was 117 00:06:25,360 --> 00:06:28,440 Speaker 1: a populist uprising, what is the government going to try 118 00:06:28,480 --> 00:06:31,360 Speaker 1: and do about that? Because both parties have tried to 119 00:06:31,400 --> 00:06:33,960 Speaker 1: take the side UM of the little guy will taken 120 00:06:34,000 --> 00:06:37,120 Speaker 1: the super Pac money from the Wall Street Titans, and 121 00:06:37,160 --> 00:06:41,599 Speaker 1: so it presents a really interesting, complicated political equation for 122 00:06:41,640 --> 00:06:45,560 Speaker 1: a lot of the policy makers UM in Washington, d C. 123 00:06:46,360 --> 00:06:48,560 Speaker 1: The final thing is is always be careful what you 124 00:06:48,600 --> 00:06:50,920 Speaker 1: wish for UM. If you want the government to come 125 00:06:50,920 --> 00:06:53,080 Speaker 1: in and take a look at a situation. The government 126 00:06:53,080 --> 00:06:55,520 Speaker 1: comes in and takes a look at a situation, and 127 00:06:55,920 --> 00:06:57,960 Speaker 1: there is a possibility that they're going to look at 128 00:06:57,960 --> 00:07:00,680 Speaker 1: both sides of these trades. UH. And so some of 129 00:07:00,720 --> 00:07:02,919 Speaker 1: the people who may have been eager for government intervention 130 00:07:02,960 --> 00:07:04,960 Speaker 1: to try and help out or to try and get 131 00:07:05,000 --> 00:07:07,839 Speaker 1: them to do something about it, may ultimately regret it. 132 00:07:09,120 --> 00:07:11,640 Speaker 1: And David, let me follow up on that, because I've 133 00:07:11,680 --> 00:07:15,800 Speaker 1: heard discussion that these brokers like robin Hood and Interactor 134 00:07:15,920 --> 00:07:19,960 Speaker 1: Brokers and others. Obviously we've heard Congress people are frustrated 135 00:07:20,000 --> 00:07:23,600 Speaker 1: that they restricted trading in these cases. But isn't it 136 00:07:23,680 --> 00:07:26,520 Speaker 1: in their defense also the fact that they are the 137 00:07:26,520 --> 00:07:30,160 Speaker 1: ones who will be held legally legally responsible in the 138 00:07:30,320 --> 00:07:33,640 Speaker 1: end when lawsuits fly, as they almost certainly will, and 139 00:07:33,680 --> 00:07:36,960 Speaker 1: when this is over, for not taking a stepan to 140 00:07:37,320 --> 00:07:41,480 Speaker 1: restrict this. Yeah, I mean, it's it's it's really an 141 00:07:41,520 --> 00:07:44,080 Speaker 1: interesting point. I mean, robin Hood was in a really 142 00:07:44,120 --> 00:07:47,200 Speaker 1: bad position. Robin Hood recently reached a settlement with the 143 00:07:47,320 --> 00:07:51,160 Speaker 1: SEC about kind of its marketing UH techniques to to 144 00:07:51,280 --> 00:07:54,600 Speaker 1: learn new retail investors, and so I think it was 145 00:07:54,640 --> 00:07:57,080 Speaker 1: put in a position where it was damned if it 146 00:07:57,160 --> 00:07:59,320 Speaker 1: did and damned if it didn't, and it felt obviously 147 00:07:59,480 --> 00:08:02,640 Speaker 1: it felt like it had to act here. Um uh, 148 00:08:02,680 --> 00:08:05,640 Speaker 1: you know, unless something else bad happened. So, I mean, 149 00:08:05,880 --> 00:08:07,880 Speaker 1: it's a it's a really tough position for for those 150 00:08:07,920 --> 00:08:10,160 Speaker 1: brokers to be in. I mean, you know, they want 151 00:08:10,200 --> 00:08:12,600 Speaker 1: to allow all the customers to make trades, and they've 152 00:08:12,640 --> 00:08:15,120 Speaker 1: made a lot of money by offering options products to 153 00:08:15,280 --> 00:08:18,640 Speaker 1: to retail investors. But what do you do now when 154 00:08:18,720 --> 00:08:21,160 Speaker 1: when things like this happened. I mean, and the one 155 00:08:21,160 --> 00:08:23,080 Speaker 1: thing I just want to add is we shouldn't quite 156 00:08:23,120 --> 00:08:25,240 Speaker 1: feel bad for for the hedge funds on the other 157 00:08:25,240 --> 00:08:27,960 Speaker 1: sides of these trades. I have no doubt that when 158 00:08:28,120 --> 00:08:32,000 Speaker 1: Game Stop went down today, there were plenty of hedge 159 00:08:32,000 --> 00:08:34,960 Speaker 1: funds and institutional investors that that rode that wave and 160 00:08:34,960 --> 00:08:37,120 Speaker 1: made a lot of money today as well. So it's 161 00:08:37,160 --> 00:08:40,680 Speaker 1: it's really complicated, and in all the regulators are gonna 162 00:08:40,720 --> 00:08:42,040 Speaker 1: have to look at both sides of us and see 163 00:08:42,080 --> 00:08:46,280 Speaker 1: what to do. David, after the the you know, big 164 00:08:46,520 --> 00:08:49,360 Speaker 1: two thousand eight meltdown in the financial markets, we saw 165 00:08:49,440 --> 00:08:53,400 Speaker 1: a wave of regulation. Uh. Dodd Frank came in and 166 00:08:53,600 --> 00:08:57,040 Speaker 1: uh and really changed the way the markets reacted. Banks 167 00:08:57,080 --> 00:09:00,360 Speaker 1: were heavily regulated at the time, and only after the 168 00:09:00,400 --> 00:09:03,319 Speaker 1: last few years have we seen a real loosening up 169 00:09:03,360 --> 00:09:06,600 Speaker 1: of that. And and can you imagine a situation now 170 00:09:06,720 --> 00:09:10,439 Speaker 1: based on things like this where in a democratic administration 171 00:09:10,520 --> 00:09:12,880 Speaker 1: you see a lot of new regulation coming back into 172 00:09:12,880 --> 00:09:16,920 Speaker 1: the financial markets. I mean yes and no. I mean, 173 00:09:16,960 --> 00:09:19,520 Speaker 1: you know, people on the policy side have debated for 174 00:09:19,520 --> 00:09:23,040 Speaker 1: for decades what is the benefits of people betting against 175 00:09:23,040 --> 00:09:24,960 Speaker 1: the company? I mean, if you believe the stock markets 176 00:09:24,960 --> 00:09:28,480 Speaker 1: are there for the for the rational allocation of capital 177 00:09:28,520 --> 00:09:31,560 Speaker 1: so businesses can grow, that's great. But you know, it 178 00:09:31,600 --> 00:09:34,200 Speaker 1: seems like put options are are really just gambling in 179 00:09:34,240 --> 00:09:37,280 Speaker 1: the casino. So you know, I do think that there 180 00:09:37,320 --> 00:09:42,040 Speaker 1: may be aggressive democratic, big d democratic policy makers who 181 00:09:42,040 --> 00:09:44,800 Speaker 1: will say, you know, the problem here really is not 182 00:09:44,920 --> 00:09:48,560 Speaker 1: that the democratic traders that small, the democratic traders on Reddit. 183 00:09:48,920 --> 00:09:51,400 Speaker 1: It's the it's the institutional traders who are making these 184 00:09:51,520 --> 00:09:54,880 Speaker 1: very large put option bets and is there a benefit 185 00:09:54,880 --> 00:09:57,520 Speaker 1: to having those in the market. So yeah, you you 186 00:09:57,559 --> 00:09:59,400 Speaker 1: could see you could see a bunch of things happen 187 00:09:59,440 --> 00:10:03,840 Speaker 1: from a regular Tories and William might we in the 188 00:10:03,920 --> 00:10:08,000 Speaker 1: minutes we have remaining. UM, is your view that these 189 00:10:08,360 --> 00:10:10,800 Speaker 1: just to go back to these brokerage firms for a moment, 190 00:10:11,000 --> 00:10:15,000 Speaker 1: that they indeed are caught as as David was just saying, 191 00:10:15,000 --> 00:10:17,240 Speaker 1: between sort of a rock and a hard place on this, 192 00:10:17,360 --> 00:10:22,240 Speaker 1: and perhaps Washington can step in and take steps to 193 00:10:22,280 --> 00:10:26,880 Speaker 1: sort of right the ship as we move into this area. Yeah, 194 00:10:26,920 --> 00:10:29,719 Speaker 1: I think is you know, as more of these platforms 195 00:10:29,720 --> 00:10:33,000 Speaker 1: emerge where retail UH investors are able to get in 196 00:10:33,040 --> 00:10:36,319 Speaker 1: and do the complicated products that David was discussing, UM, 197 00:10:36,360 --> 00:10:39,640 Speaker 1: I think that there is some some risk that there 198 00:10:39,640 --> 00:10:44,319 Speaker 1: will be increased regulatory burdens imposed on them UH that 199 00:10:44,760 --> 00:10:47,760 Speaker 1: could jeopardize some of the platforms. I also think it's 200 00:10:47,800 --> 00:10:50,160 Speaker 1: important to know, as we said, you know, this isn't 201 00:10:50,200 --> 00:10:52,920 Speaker 1: something that we know a lot about yet UM and 202 00:10:53,040 --> 00:10:55,320 Speaker 1: as a result of the congressional hearings as a result 203 00:10:55,360 --> 00:10:58,040 Speaker 1: of the SEC taking a look into this, we don't 204 00:10:58,040 --> 00:10:59,880 Speaker 1: know the full cast of characters that have been in 205 00:11:00,000 --> 00:11:06,079 Speaker 1: evolved both in fueling UM this UH, this populism UH 206 00:11:06,600 --> 00:11:09,439 Speaker 1: invasion of the financial markets, you know, for game Stop 207 00:11:09,520 --> 00:11:12,320 Speaker 1: and Nancy and some of the other equities. So more 208 00:11:12,320 --> 00:11:15,920 Speaker 1: on the populism sweeping Wall Street, game Stop and read 209 00:11:16,000 --> 00:11:20,000 Speaker 1: it and everything else as we look towards what may 210 00:11:20,080 --> 00:11:22,080 Speaker 1: happen in the future and what d C may do. 211 00:11:22,520 --> 00:11:37,719 Speaker 1: I am Genie Schanzano. This is Bloomberg Sound On with 212 00:11:37,800 --> 00:11:46,280 Speaker 1: Kevin Surrel on Bloomberg Radio. Non Genie Schanzano. Here in 213 00:11:46,400 --> 00:11:49,600 Speaker 1: for Kevin Surly today with Rick Davis, partner at stone 214 00:11:49,640 --> 00:11:53,960 Speaker 1: Core Capital, David axel Rod, and William McKinley. And we 215 00:11:54,160 --> 00:11:56,760 Speaker 1: are in the midst of of sort of trying to 216 00:11:56,960 --> 00:12:00,880 Speaker 1: tease out what is happening in this game's top frenzy 217 00:12:00,960 --> 00:12:05,000 Speaker 1: and story. And David, I wanted to ask you, in 218 00:12:05,080 --> 00:12:10,520 Speaker 1: your view, does Wall Street understand the criticism these populist 219 00:12:10,679 --> 00:12:15,120 Speaker 1: arguments that are being made um and do they see 220 00:12:15,640 --> 00:12:19,800 Speaker 1: this sort of other side of this issue. No, I 221 00:12:19,840 --> 00:12:22,760 Speaker 1: mean yes, yes, and no I should say I mean yes, 222 00:12:22,800 --> 00:12:25,160 Speaker 1: I think Wall Street is the issue. But no, I don't. 223 00:12:25,240 --> 00:12:28,440 Speaker 1: I don't think it really cares. I mean people people 224 00:12:28,480 --> 00:12:31,199 Speaker 1: are kind of acting like this is a big surprise 225 00:12:31,320 --> 00:12:34,440 Speaker 1: that these hedge funds have got caught in a losing trade. 226 00:12:34,800 --> 00:12:37,640 Speaker 1: But I mean hedge funds themselves have been scraping social 227 00:12:37,679 --> 00:12:40,760 Speaker 1: media to see what people are saying about different stocks. 228 00:12:40,800 --> 00:12:44,040 Speaker 1: For for years, um, and they're they're way they're they're 229 00:12:44,040 --> 00:12:46,600 Speaker 1: way more advanced than I think that the popular media 230 00:12:46,640 --> 00:12:49,000 Speaker 1: is giving them credit for right now. So I'm sure 231 00:12:49,000 --> 00:12:51,120 Speaker 1: they have seen this coming. I'm sure very smart people 232 00:12:51,160 --> 00:12:54,760 Speaker 1: have thought about this possibility happening before. And this is 233 00:12:54,800 --> 00:12:56,960 Speaker 1: just one example of where you know, have some very 234 00:12:56,960 --> 00:12:59,360 Speaker 1: elite Wall Street traders that have got caught on the 235 00:12:59,360 --> 00:13:01,800 Speaker 1: wrong side of a trade. But yeah, I think they've 236 00:13:01,840 --> 00:13:05,480 Speaker 1: seen this coming for a long time. And Bill, if 237 00:13:05,520 --> 00:13:09,440 Speaker 1: people have, as David said, on Wall Street, seen this coming, um, 238 00:13:10,240 --> 00:13:12,360 Speaker 1: is it is it the media making too much of 239 00:13:12,360 --> 00:13:15,680 Speaker 1: it as as maybe the case, or in fact, is 240 00:13:15,720 --> 00:13:18,400 Speaker 1: there something else going on here that the technology is 241 00:13:18,440 --> 00:13:21,920 Speaker 1: indeed changed to the point that it's democratized. What can 242 00:13:21,960 --> 00:13:24,880 Speaker 1: and can't happen in terms of trading? I think it 243 00:13:24,920 --> 00:13:27,480 Speaker 1: could be both, and that policy makers up on the 244 00:13:27,600 --> 00:13:30,040 Speaker 1: Hill and at the SEC and then the White House 245 00:13:30,080 --> 00:13:31,959 Speaker 1: are going to want to take a serious look at it. 246 00:13:32,360 --> 00:13:34,400 Speaker 1: And so you just had an event, you know, an 247 00:13:34,480 --> 00:13:37,360 Speaker 1: unfolding event on Wall Street that really kind of gives 248 00:13:37,360 --> 00:13:39,959 Speaker 1: them the impetus to maybe come in and try and 249 00:13:40,040 --> 00:13:43,120 Speaker 1: pose some new regulations, um that not only address the 250 00:13:43,120 --> 00:13:46,640 Speaker 1: current issue, but may look back over the last four years, 251 00:13:47,160 --> 00:13:49,319 Speaker 1: UH to see what they can do about Dodd Frank 252 00:13:49,360 --> 00:13:51,480 Speaker 1: and some of the other regulations that are still hand 253 00:13:51,600 --> 00:13:54,839 Speaker 1: hanging out there. It's important to remember that the Democratic 254 00:13:54,880 --> 00:13:58,880 Speaker 1: coalition that elected President Biden has a significant progressive component 255 00:13:58,920 --> 00:14:01,120 Speaker 1: to it. Um. It is not going to be in 256 00:14:01,200 --> 00:14:04,360 Speaker 1: favor of letting Wall Street do what Wall Street does. 257 00:14:04,440 --> 00:14:05,960 Speaker 1: Wall Street is going to come in and tell them 258 00:14:06,000 --> 00:14:08,080 Speaker 1: that they provide the capital to create the jobs that 259 00:14:08,120 --> 00:14:10,800 Speaker 1: everybody has, and so they need to have some freedoms 260 00:14:10,800 --> 00:14:13,120 Speaker 1: to be able to do that, including the investment vehicles 261 00:14:13,640 --> 00:14:16,480 Speaker 1: um that we've been talking about today. But you're also 262 00:14:16,520 --> 00:14:19,640 Speaker 1: seeing the populist uprising saying why is it that they 263 00:14:19,680 --> 00:14:22,400 Speaker 1: always get to do these types of activities and when 264 00:14:22,440 --> 00:14:25,320 Speaker 1: we do it, um, they scream in Yale. So the 265 00:14:25,400 --> 00:14:27,920 Speaker 1: little guy versus big guy argument is going to really 266 00:14:27,960 --> 00:14:30,920 Speaker 1: play into how this proceeds in Washington. Yeah, and we've 267 00:14:30,920 --> 00:14:33,880 Speaker 1: been hearing it described as a David versus Goliath battle. 268 00:14:33,920 --> 00:14:36,600 Speaker 1: And Rick Davis I wanted to get your take on 269 00:14:36,640 --> 00:14:38,720 Speaker 1: some of the back and forth we've heard between strange 270 00:14:38,760 --> 00:14:42,120 Speaker 1: bad fellows like Alexander Rocazio Cortes we mentioned and Ted 271 00:14:42,200 --> 00:14:46,240 Speaker 1: Cruz both agreeing that they should take steps to regulate 272 00:14:46,280 --> 00:14:49,080 Speaker 1: and potentially hold hearings and potentially regulate in this area. 273 00:14:49,400 --> 00:14:52,960 Speaker 1: Although if I understand correctly, she said that she thinks 274 00:14:52,960 --> 00:14:55,000 Speaker 1: he should step back because he tried to murder her 275 00:14:55,040 --> 00:14:56,840 Speaker 1: three weeks ago, but she would be willing to work 276 00:14:56,840 --> 00:14:59,560 Speaker 1: with other Republicans. So what do you think is going 277 00:14:59,640 --> 00:15:01,600 Speaker 1: to have been an in d C at this point? 278 00:15:02,080 --> 00:15:04,000 Speaker 1: You know, look, I think by the comments that you 279 00:15:04,320 --> 00:15:08,600 Speaker 1: played earlier, Genie Uh, most of these people don't understand 280 00:15:09,000 --> 00:15:11,720 Speaker 1: how these trades work. They don't understand short versus long 281 00:15:11,800 --> 00:15:14,360 Speaker 1: by sellers. I mean, you know, you could hear the 282 00:15:14,840 --> 00:15:19,120 Speaker 1: um uh speaker Pelosi stumble around saying, oh, it's very interesting. 283 00:15:19,280 --> 00:15:22,040 Speaker 1: It's it's not interesting. You need to start learning these issues, 284 00:15:22,360 --> 00:15:24,960 Speaker 1: huge amounts of capital and play. You know, I think 285 00:15:25,000 --> 00:15:28,120 Speaker 1: what there were thirty four billion dollars of losses in 286 00:15:28,160 --> 00:15:31,440 Speaker 1: one day. Um. This isn't business as usual, all right, 287 00:15:31,480 --> 00:15:35,040 Speaker 1: this is something entirely different. And and the fact that 288 00:15:35,520 --> 00:15:40,000 Speaker 1: you have people like um uh, Nancy Pelosi and Ted 289 00:15:40,080 --> 00:15:46,080 Speaker 1: Cruz and uh AOC and Elon Musk all basically rallying 290 00:15:46,160 --> 00:15:48,640 Speaker 1: to the side of the Populace movement or at least, 291 00:15:49,080 --> 00:15:51,080 Speaker 1: you know, not knowing where to wind up on it. 292 00:15:51,120 --> 00:15:54,120 Speaker 1: I think AOC knows exactly where she's headed. Uh is 293 00:15:54,320 --> 00:15:57,520 Speaker 1: uh is startling. Uh. This is occupy Wall Street with 294 00:15:57,640 --> 00:16:00,400 Speaker 1: upside and it has been going on for a long time. 295 00:16:00,920 --> 00:16:02,680 Speaker 1: I would say Wall Street could use a lesson in 296 00:16:02,920 --> 00:16:06,520 Speaker 1: public relations. They're not actually doing much to solve this 297 00:16:06,600 --> 00:16:09,720 Speaker 1: problem for themselves. And uh. And now there's a vehicle 298 00:16:10,520 --> 00:16:14,960 Speaker 1: like robin Hood where these populous investors with with some 299 00:16:15,000 --> 00:16:18,400 Speaker 1: money in their pocket can disrupt the system. And I 300 00:16:18,400 --> 00:16:22,080 Speaker 1: think this will inform certainly short sellers in the next 301 00:16:22,120 --> 00:16:26,040 Speaker 1: turnaround is to how how big of positions they want 302 00:16:26,080 --> 00:16:27,920 Speaker 1: to take on. Some of these shorts. I mean, they're 303 00:16:27,960 --> 00:16:30,640 Speaker 1: just really exposed if they go go hard at at 304 00:16:30,680 --> 00:16:34,360 Speaker 1: anyone company at any one time. And David, can I 305 00:16:34,400 --> 00:16:36,520 Speaker 1: ask you, what do you think happens about this at 306 00:16:36,520 --> 00:16:38,720 Speaker 1: the end of the day, What comes of this? If anything? 307 00:16:40,000 --> 00:16:42,680 Speaker 1: You know, it's a great question. I don't know. UM. 308 00:16:42,760 --> 00:16:46,760 Speaker 1: I mean, you know, theoretically, if the Reddit retail small 309 00:16:46,800 --> 00:16:50,760 Speaker 1: traders held together, you know, game Stop stock could could 310 00:16:50,800 --> 00:16:53,960 Speaker 1: stay high forever. I mean I think that's unlikely. I 311 00:16:53,960 --> 00:16:56,760 Speaker 1: think you're going to see people start taking taking profits 312 00:16:57,040 --> 00:16:59,760 Speaker 1: you know, the small guy who invested four thousand box 313 00:16:59,840 --> 00:17:02,280 Speaker 1: and made seventy and in one day, is is going 314 00:17:02,360 --> 00:17:04,840 Speaker 1: to take his money out. And I'm guessing, if I 315 00:17:04,880 --> 00:17:07,160 Speaker 1: had to guess, the game Stop stock will be back 316 00:17:07,160 --> 00:17:10,920 Speaker 1: in the single digits by by the end of next week. Um. 317 00:17:10,920 --> 00:17:14,199 Speaker 1: But we'll probably see this again and and and I 318 00:17:14,240 --> 00:17:16,199 Speaker 1: think that the SEC is going to be smart about it, 319 00:17:16,240 --> 00:17:19,280 Speaker 1: and the SEC Nasdack York Stock Exchange are going to 320 00:17:19,359 --> 00:17:22,879 Speaker 1: start monitoring social media so they'll see this coming and 321 00:17:22,880 --> 00:17:26,119 Speaker 1: it won't sneak up on everyone. Um. But you know, 322 00:17:26,240 --> 00:17:28,280 Speaker 1: I think this is gonna start happening, you know, kind 323 00:17:28,280 --> 00:17:30,760 Speaker 1: of regularly and probably taking a little bit different forms. 324 00:17:30,840 --> 00:17:33,120 Speaker 1: It's going to be interesting to see how it's adults. Yeah, 325 00:17:33,240 --> 00:17:36,359 Speaker 1: David Axel read such a great point, um, and thank 326 00:17:36,359 --> 00:17:38,600 Speaker 1: you so much. Great to get your insights on this. 327 00:17:38,760 --> 00:17:41,679 Speaker 1: David Axel Read a partner at Ballard spar and former 328 00:17:41,760 --> 00:17:46,000 Speaker 1: Supervisory Trial Council at the SEC, and he is predicting 329 00:17:46,080 --> 00:17:48,359 Speaker 1: more of this to come. So we will have to 330 00:17:48,400 --> 00:17:51,840 Speaker 1: wait and see. And this is Bloomberg. This is Sound On. 331 00:17:51,920 --> 00:18:20,680 Speaker 1: I am Jeanie shan Zano. Ya. I am here talking 332 00:18:20,800 --> 00:18:24,560 Speaker 1: with Rick Davis Bloomberg contributor and Bill McGinley, principle of 333 00:18:24,600 --> 00:18:28,320 Speaker 1: the Vocal Group. And Joe Biden was active today. I 334 00:18:28,359 --> 00:18:30,560 Speaker 1: think it's his eighth day, the first day of the 335 00:18:30,640 --> 00:18:34,520 Speaker 1: second week in office, and he signed to executive orders 336 00:18:34,600 --> 00:18:39,280 Speaker 1: on doing healthcare restrictions placed by former President Trump. But 337 00:18:39,440 --> 00:18:43,280 Speaker 1: before hurrying out of the briefing room, he told reporters 338 00:18:43,400 --> 00:18:46,040 Speaker 1: about his long to do list, and he said, on 339 00:18:46,119 --> 00:18:48,200 Speaker 1: the top of that list is, of course, the new 340 00:18:48,240 --> 00:18:51,800 Speaker 1: stimulus bill, and we have sound on that. We've got 341 00:18:51,800 --> 00:18:53,840 Speaker 1: a lot to do, and the first thing I gotta 342 00:18:53,880 --> 00:18:57,159 Speaker 1: do is get this Cohen bats passed. And on the 343 00:18:57,200 --> 00:19:00,920 Speaker 1: Senate floor this morning, Senator Chuck Schumer took on Republicans 344 00:19:00,960 --> 00:19:04,000 Speaker 1: for their reluctance to begin talks on the new stimulus bill. 345 00:19:04,160 --> 00:19:07,359 Speaker 1: The new Senate Majority leader said, Mitch McConnell and others 346 00:19:07,359 --> 00:19:11,000 Speaker 1: in the GOP need to start to take on this 347 00:19:11,080 --> 00:19:13,240 Speaker 1: once in a century crisis, and they need to do 348 00:19:13,280 --> 00:19:16,800 Speaker 1: it quickly. And he threatened that if they don't act quickly, 349 00:19:16,880 --> 00:19:19,760 Speaker 1: Democrats will act alone. And we have sound on that 350 00:19:20,440 --> 00:19:24,000 Speaker 1: if our Republican colleagues decide to oppose this urgent and 351 00:19:24,119 --> 00:19:28,800 Speaker 1: necessary legislation, we will have to move forward without them. 352 00:19:28,880 --> 00:19:32,920 Speaker 1: We have a responsibility to help the American people fast, 353 00:19:33,760 --> 00:19:38,280 Speaker 1: particularly given these new economic numbers. The Senate will begin 354 00:19:38,400 --> 00:19:43,400 Speaker 1: that work next week. So Rick Davis, can they do 355 00:19:43,480 --> 00:19:47,400 Speaker 1: this Democrats? They meeting the Democrats alone, and can they 356 00:19:47,480 --> 00:19:50,040 Speaker 1: do it when less than about two weeks they will 357 00:19:50,080 --> 00:19:54,680 Speaker 1: also be holding a trial of the former president. Yeah. 358 00:19:54,680 --> 00:19:58,320 Speaker 1: I mean the two issues timing and uh and and 359 00:19:58,320 --> 00:20:02,840 Speaker 1: and desire are real going to clash here soon. Um, 360 00:20:03,080 --> 00:20:05,800 Speaker 1: it's pretty clear that there is interest on the part 361 00:20:05,800 --> 00:20:08,359 Speaker 1: of the Republican side to do something. It was a 362 00:20:08,440 --> 00:20:13,400 Speaker 1: bipartisan group of Republican senators and Democratic senators who broke 363 00:20:13,440 --> 00:20:16,880 Speaker 1: loose the stimulus talks um before the end of the year. 364 00:20:17,359 --> 00:20:20,600 Speaker 1: It wasn't the leaders on each of the caucuses. And 365 00:20:20,680 --> 00:20:23,760 Speaker 1: so I think it just depends on what it is. Uh, 366 00:20:23,920 --> 00:20:27,000 Speaker 1: no doubt. Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker, will move forward quickly 367 00:20:27,040 --> 00:20:31,080 Speaker 1: with her own bill that will mirror, if not exactly replicate, 368 00:20:31,200 --> 00:20:34,640 Speaker 1: the Biden administrations one point nine trillion dollar bill, which 369 00:20:34,680 --> 00:20:36,760 Speaker 1: is very similar to the bills she passed last year. 370 00:20:37,480 --> 00:20:39,720 Speaker 1: But she can do that on a party line vote. 371 00:20:39,760 --> 00:20:43,120 Speaker 1: I don't think Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has the votes 372 00:20:43,200 --> 00:20:46,320 Speaker 1: in his caucus with a tiebreaker by the Vice President. 373 00:20:46,640 --> 00:20:49,080 Speaker 1: To get a one point nine trillion dollar package through, 374 00:20:49,200 --> 00:20:52,560 Speaker 1: he'll need Republican support, which means the package will change. 375 00:20:52,680 --> 00:20:55,919 Speaker 1: And Bill McGinley on that point, are we looking at reconciliation? 376 00:20:56,040 --> 00:20:58,239 Speaker 1: Is that the only way Democrats get this done at 377 00:20:58,800 --> 00:21:01,960 Speaker 1: that price. Look, I think even if they had the 378 00:21:01,960 --> 00:21:04,760 Speaker 1: Sweet sixteen, which is the bipartisan caucus and the Senate 379 00:21:05,200 --> 00:21:07,359 Speaker 1: um sign on to any deal, there's still going to 380 00:21:07,480 --> 00:21:11,439 Speaker 1: be um to vote short of getting to sixty without reconciliation. 381 00:21:11,560 --> 00:21:14,120 Speaker 1: So I think reconciliation is going to be the process 382 00:21:14,160 --> 00:21:16,000 Speaker 1: that they're going to use to do it. I do 383 00:21:16,119 --> 00:21:18,959 Speaker 1: think that UH, Speaker Pelosi and Leader Schumer are going 384 00:21:18,960 --> 00:21:21,919 Speaker 1: to start that process with the budget Resolution UH and 385 00:21:22,000 --> 00:21:25,000 Speaker 1: instructions to the committee to try and get some sort 386 00:21:25,000 --> 00:21:27,600 Speaker 1: of deal that they can hold their caucus together. And 387 00:21:27,680 --> 00:21:29,639 Speaker 1: that's even going to be a challenge because you have 388 00:21:29,720 --> 00:21:32,879 Speaker 1: some of the moderate Democrats such a Senator Joe Manchin 389 00:21:33,440 --> 00:21:36,199 Speaker 1: UH and Christian Cinema out of Arizona, who may not 390 00:21:36,240 --> 00:21:38,320 Speaker 1: be willing to sign on to such a big price 391 00:21:38,400 --> 00:21:40,480 Speaker 1: tag UM. So there's going to be a lot of 392 00:21:40,520 --> 00:21:44,640 Speaker 1: negotiations within the Democratic caucus itself to see what sort 393 00:21:44,640 --> 00:21:47,040 Speaker 1: of package is going to get unanimous support in order 394 00:21:47,080 --> 00:21:52,040 Speaker 1: for it to go through on a reconciliation. Yeah, and 395 00:21:52,040 --> 00:21:54,720 Speaker 1: and and so if we're looking at that, I mean 396 00:21:54,800 --> 00:21:57,920 Speaker 1: I have been thinking, Um, if you think about the 397 00:21:57,920 --> 00:22:02,359 Speaker 1: fact that this is so close, how then does you 398 00:22:02,400 --> 00:22:06,520 Speaker 1: know Joe Biden move this forward? Does he pull what 399 00:22:06,640 --> 00:22:09,400 Speaker 1: I think of as sort of a take a back 400 00:22:09,440 --> 00:22:12,240 Speaker 1: seat like maybe Barack Obama did with healthcare and let 401 00:22:12,320 --> 00:22:14,960 Speaker 1: Congress handle this on his own, or do they try 402 00:22:15,000 --> 00:22:17,800 Speaker 1: to push this through and take a stronger sort of 403 00:22:17,840 --> 00:22:20,840 Speaker 1: hand on this whole thing. What do you think, Rick, Well, 404 00:22:20,880 --> 00:22:24,600 Speaker 1: I think it's interesting that um, uh, everyone's sort of 405 00:22:24,600 --> 00:22:27,119 Speaker 1: playing this game of not not putting a number on 406 00:22:27,240 --> 00:22:30,320 Speaker 1: their their bid, right when when we see these stimulus 407 00:22:30,680 --> 00:22:33,200 Speaker 1: debates in the past, it's been pretty easy to sort 408 00:22:33,240 --> 00:22:36,480 Speaker 1: of handicap it. Uh. Nancy Pelosi would always have the 409 00:22:36,480 --> 00:22:39,800 Speaker 1: biggest number, Mitch McConnell will come in with the lowest number. 410 00:22:40,520 --> 00:22:44,680 Speaker 1: President Trump would weigh in all kinds of different numbers before, during, 411 00:22:44,680 --> 00:22:47,879 Speaker 1: and after the debate, and uh, and you'd have a 412 00:22:47,920 --> 00:22:51,040 Speaker 1: trading range. There's no clear trading range. And I think 413 00:22:51,040 --> 00:22:55,280 Speaker 1: it's really important that people recognize that. Um uh, a 414 00:22:55,320 --> 00:22:59,080 Speaker 1: lot of these Republican senators want to do something. Uh, 415 00:22:59,119 --> 00:23:01,480 Speaker 1: they're no longer than jority. So it's not their call. 416 00:23:01,800 --> 00:23:05,000 Speaker 1: There there's there's certainly a group, just like Bill said, 417 00:23:05,080 --> 00:23:09,120 Speaker 1: of moderate Democrats who can match up with more mainstream 418 00:23:09,160 --> 00:23:13,040 Speaker 1: Republicans and and and and short circuit the process. The 419 00:23:13,119 --> 00:23:18,040 Speaker 1: question is who's leading that process, who's talking to their counterparts, 420 00:23:18,080 --> 00:23:20,960 Speaker 1: and how quickly can they move My guess is exactly 421 00:23:21,000 --> 00:23:23,159 Speaker 1: what what what what Bill said, which is you're going 422 00:23:23,240 --> 00:23:26,159 Speaker 1: to have a reconciliation package and that's coming up probably 423 00:23:26,200 --> 00:23:29,359 Speaker 1: around March. And so that's not a lot of time. 424 00:23:29,480 --> 00:23:32,760 Speaker 1: And as you mentioned earlier, Jeannie, you do have a 425 00:23:32,800 --> 00:23:34,880 Speaker 1: lot of work in the Senate right now. You've got 426 00:23:34,920 --> 00:23:38,280 Speaker 1: this impeachment coming up. You've got these appointments that that 427 00:23:38,320 --> 00:23:40,879 Speaker 1: Biden desperately needs in place. We're just talking about the 428 00:23:41,000 --> 00:23:44,359 Speaker 1: SEC head is not in place while all this stuff 429 00:23:44,440 --> 00:23:47,040 Speaker 1: is going on on Wall Street. And and so I 430 00:23:47,080 --> 00:23:50,000 Speaker 1: think that, uh, it's going to be very hard to 431 00:23:50,040 --> 00:23:53,120 Speaker 1: see a lot of public action in the Senate now. 432 00:23:53,240 --> 00:23:55,159 Speaker 1: I think the game will be in the House and 433 00:23:55,160 --> 00:23:58,320 Speaker 1: and you know, they'll pretty much replicate what what the 434 00:23:58,320 --> 00:24:02,360 Speaker 1: Biden administration is pushing and bill. If if Biden does 435 00:24:02,440 --> 00:24:05,000 Speaker 1: get this stimulus bill, and maybe not one point nine, 436 00:24:05,040 --> 00:24:07,880 Speaker 1: but but at some at some cost, is this going 437 00:24:07,920 --> 00:24:11,879 Speaker 1: to be the big bill of his administration, in other words, infrastructure, 438 00:24:12,160 --> 00:24:14,360 Speaker 1: all the other things he wants to tackle. Does this 439 00:24:14,480 --> 00:24:17,240 Speaker 1: make it hard once you get something this big past, 440 00:24:17,680 --> 00:24:21,640 Speaker 1: even if it's not one point nine. Look, uh, you know, President, 441 00:24:21,680 --> 00:24:24,399 Speaker 1: as a famous historian once said, presidential power is the 442 00:24:24,440 --> 00:24:26,960 Speaker 1: power of persuasion. And at the end of the day, 443 00:24:27,000 --> 00:24:29,240 Speaker 1: it's going to depend upon the popularity of the bill 444 00:24:29,320 --> 00:24:32,840 Speaker 1: that makes its way through UM and President Biden's actions 445 00:24:32,880 --> 00:24:35,040 Speaker 1: implementing that bill and the role that he played in 446 00:24:35,119 --> 00:24:38,359 Speaker 1: making it successful. UM, if he's able to do it 447 00:24:38,400 --> 00:24:41,920 Speaker 1: successfully and increases numbers and popularity both on the hill 448 00:24:41,960 --> 00:24:44,320 Speaker 1: and out in the beyond the Beltway, then he's going 449 00:24:44,359 --> 00:24:47,000 Speaker 1: to be able to probably go for something like infrastructure 450 00:24:47,880 --> 00:24:50,439 Speaker 1: or some of the other big ticket items that have 451 00:24:50,480 --> 00:24:54,520 Speaker 1: been discussed. But this UM, this this COVID relief bill 452 00:24:54,560 --> 00:24:58,760 Speaker 1: that they're talking about, is a very complicated matrix. And 453 00:24:58,800 --> 00:25:01,880 Speaker 1: one of the nominations that I would be watching, given 454 00:25:01,920 --> 00:25:04,199 Speaker 1: the amount of money that's going to be spent, is 455 00:25:04,240 --> 00:25:06,800 Speaker 1: going to be o MB the Officer Management and Budget, 456 00:25:06,800 --> 00:25:09,800 Speaker 1: which sits in the Executive Office of the President, because 457 00:25:09,840 --> 00:25:11,960 Speaker 1: that's the agency that's going to have to help these 458 00:25:12,000 --> 00:25:14,720 Speaker 1: cabinets and departments try and get the money through, in 459 00:25:14,760 --> 00:25:17,680 Speaker 1: addition to the Treasury Department. Yeah, and that's a great point, 460 00:25:17,960 --> 00:25:21,399 Speaker 1: William McKinley, And you're mentioning Richard new stat I love it. 461 00:25:21,440 --> 00:25:24,200 Speaker 1: I'm a political scientist, so right up my alley, everybody 462 00:25:24,200 --> 00:25:27,200 Speaker 1: should reread that book. I want to thank William McGinley, 463 00:25:27,240 --> 00:25:30,520 Speaker 1: principal at the Vogel Group, former White House Cabinet Secretary, 464 00:25:30,560 --> 00:25:33,439 Speaker 1: and former Deputy Council at the r n C. And 465 00:25:33,520 --> 00:25:37,200 Speaker 1: coming up, we're going to be speaking with Representative Hulihan 466 00:25:37,280 --> 00:25:41,119 Speaker 1: from Pennsylvania. I am Genie Schanzano and this is Bloomberg. 467 00:25:49,240 --> 00:25:54,280 Speaker 1: This is Bloomberg Sound On with Kevin Surrele on Bloomberg Radio, 468 00:25:56,400 --> 00:25:59,960 Speaker 1: and I'm Genie Sanzano in for Kevin Sirelli. As all 469 00:26:00,000 --> 00:26:03,560 Speaker 1: ways with Rick Davis, Bloomberg contributor. And we are very 470 00:26:03,640 --> 00:26:07,840 Speaker 1: lucky to be speaking with Congresswoman Chrissy Houlihan, Democrat from 471 00:26:07,840 --> 00:26:11,679 Speaker 1: Pennsylvania's six the district, who is elected in two thousand 472 00:26:11,760 --> 00:26:14,520 Speaker 1: and eighteen and she's now in her second term. So 473 00:26:14,640 --> 00:26:18,040 Speaker 1: Representative Houlihan, it's so nice to speak with you, and 474 00:26:18,359 --> 00:26:21,000 Speaker 1: wanted to get first your reaction to this sort of 475 00:26:21,119 --> 00:26:24,440 Speaker 1: wild market we've been watching. We've heard some of your 476 00:26:24,480 --> 00:26:27,760 Speaker 1: colleagues in Congress from both sides of the aisle critical 477 00:26:28,000 --> 00:26:31,280 Speaker 1: of Robin Hood and some of the other brokerage firms. 478 00:26:31,320 --> 00:26:34,240 Speaker 1: What is your view on what's going on and potentially 479 00:26:34,280 --> 00:26:38,280 Speaker 1: what Congress and the federal government can do about it. Hi, 480 00:26:38,440 --> 00:26:40,760 Speaker 1: and thank you very very much for having me today. 481 00:26:40,800 --> 00:26:44,280 Speaker 1: And I've been watching as well the unfolding news about 482 00:26:44,040 --> 00:26:47,240 Speaker 1: the market and about Games Top in particular, and I 483 00:26:47,240 --> 00:26:49,160 Speaker 1: guess what I would say is, you know, my take 484 00:26:49,200 --> 00:26:51,879 Speaker 1: on it is that we've heard for a long time 485 00:26:51,880 --> 00:26:54,600 Speaker 1: that the stock market is a barometer for how our 486 00:26:54,600 --> 00:26:58,560 Speaker 1: economy is doing it large and it's another demonstration today 487 00:26:58,640 --> 00:27:01,400 Speaker 1: that that, for me, is not an indicator of how 488 00:27:01,800 --> 00:27:04,440 Speaker 1: our economy is doing and how working families are doing. 489 00:27:04,920 --> 00:27:07,040 Speaker 1: And I think that it's one of those things where, 490 00:27:07,280 --> 00:27:09,560 Speaker 1: you know, I'm sure the Financial Services committees on both 491 00:27:09,560 --> 00:27:11,159 Speaker 1: the House and the Senate side that will take a 492 00:27:11,160 --> 00:27:14,439 Speaker 1: look at this, but um, I can definitely assure you 493 00:27:14,480 --> 00:27:17,119 Speaker 1: that most people in our communities and this Commonwealth and 494 00:27:17,160 --> 00:27:21,520 Speaker 1: this country are not really terribly engaged in in trading 495 00:27:21,560 --> 00:27:24,239 Speaker 1: in this particular stock or other stocks, and we just 496 00:27:24,280 --> 00:27:26,960 Speaker 1: need to be cognizantive that fact, particularly while we're in 497 00:27:27,000 --> 00:27:30,840 Speaker 1: this very difficult time with the pandemic. Congresswoman this Rick 498 00:27:30,920 --> 00:27:33,320 Speaker 1: Davis and Washington. Good to have you here tonight and 499 00:27:33,359 --> 00:27:36,639 Speaker 1: thank you for joining us. Uh. You've just announced a 500 00:27:36,680 --> 00:27:40,199 Speaker 1: new bill to help try to give a leg up 501 00:27:40,600 --> 00:27:44,840 Speaker 1: to entrepreneurs and small business owners and people who want 502 00:27:44,840 --> 00:27:47,480 Speaker 1: to start small businesses in the midst of what has 503 00:27:47,480 --> 00:27:51,000 Speaker 1: been probably one of the most devastating economic environments for 504 00:27:51,080 --> 00:27:55,760 Speaker 1: small business in history of our countries economy. And so 505 00:27:55,960 --> 00:27:57,680 Speaker 1: I wonder if you could talk a little bit about 506 00:27:57,680 --> 00:28:00,440 Speaker 1: this because as someone who you know, you've founded the 507 00:28:00,520 --> 00:28:04,479 Speaker 1: B Lab that uh you know, went to uh create 508 00:28:04,520 --> 00:28:07,600 Speaker 1: the B Corp movement of you know, putting together purpose 509 00:28:07,640 --> 00:28:10,320 Speaker 1: and profit in the same room, how do you see 510 00:28:10,320 --> 00:28:12,920 Speaker 1: all this evolving? I mean, what can you do legislatively 511 00:28:12,960 --> 00:28:17,680 Speaker 1: to help spur economic growth amongst entrepreneurs who we need 512 00:28:17,720 --> 00:28:20,639 Speaker 1: desperately to get back into launching these businesses when we recover. 513 00:28:21,680 --> 00:28:24,040 Speaker 1: We definitely do and we've you know, I am an 514 00:28:24,160 --> 00:28:28,040 Speaker 1: entrepreneur fundamentally before joining Congress to help grow in scale 515 00:28:28,080 --> 00:28:31,280 Speaker 1: a variety of different businesses and all different kinds of industries. 516 00:28:31,720 --> 00:28:36,479 Speaker 1: And I've been really heartened to see how dynamic and 517 00:28:36,600 --> 00:28:39,800 Speaker 1: innovative and flexible our small business and owners are. But 518 00:28:39,920 --> 00:28:42,760 Speaker 1: of course we've seen hundreds of thousands of them clothes 519 00:28:42,880 --> 00:28:46,320 Speaker 1: and shutter permanently. And so what this bill is is 520 00:28:46,360 --> 00:28:49,880 Speaker 1: actually the second time I've introduced this, uh and we 521 00:28:49,960 --> 00:28:53,320 Speaker 1: are fortunate enough to have a Senate companion bill on 522 00:28:53,360 --> 00:28:56,000 Speaker 1: the other side with Senator Chris Kinson Marco Rubio, and 523 00:28:56,080 --> 00:28:59,320 Speaker 1: this it's called the ramp Act. And basically what this 524 00:28:59,400 --> 00:29:01,760 Speaker 1: is is hope being to be able to create a 525 00:29:01,800 --> 00:29:05,040 Speaker 1: million new businesses, you know, rather than necessarily a million 526 00:29:05,040 --> 00:29:07,240 Speaker 1: new jobs. You know. This is to be able to 527 00:29:08,080 --> 00:29:11,120 Speaker 1: goose the Small Business Innovative Innovation Research or s b 528 00:29:11,200 --> 00:29:13,920 Speaker 1: i R Group and the SBT I'm sorry, the s 529 00:29:13,960 --> 00:29:17,600 Speaker 1: T t R program to allow people to access capital 530 00:29:17,680 --> 00:29:21,520 Speaker 1: for their innovative ideas more rapidly, to allow them to 531 00:29:21,600 --> 00:29:24,760 Speaker 1: be able to commercialize it more efficiently, so that we 532 00:29:24,760 --> 00:29:28,400 Speaker 1: can hopefully create a lot of really cool small businesses 533 00:29:28,440 --> 00:29:31,680 Speaker 1: that become midsized businesses that become large businesses that become 534 00:29:31,800 --> 00:29:34,960 Speaker 1: jobs creators. UH, and the s b i R and 535 00:29:35,040 --> 00:29:36,960 Speaker 1: the s P t R are sort of the seed 536 00:29:37,040 --> 00:29:40,520 Speaker 1: capital America's seed fund, for lack of a better word, 537 00:29:40,520 --> 00:29:43,200 Speaker 1: and this is something that we really need, particularly during 538 00:29:43,200 --> 00:29:48,040 Speaker 1: this very difficult time. And Congresswoman, what has their reaction 539 00:29:48,080 --> 00:29:49,920 Speaker 1: to the bill been? Like, I know that you said 540 00:29:49,960 --> 00:29:53,360 Speaker 1: you re are reintroducing it or have reintroduced it. It 541 00:29:53,520 --> 00:29:57,240 Speaker 1: is a bipartisan bill. What are the prospects for passage 542 00:29:57,320 --> 00:30:01,280 Speaker 1: this this session? I believe it has a very good 543 00:30:01,480 --> 00:30:04,320 Speaker 1: opportunity to be passed because this is exactly the kind 544 00:30:04,320 --> 00:30:06,520 Speaker 1: of thing that we're looking to do in the new 545 00:30:06,600 --> 00:30:09,480 Speaker 1: Congress is to try to, of course, climb our way 546 00:30:09,480 --> 00:30:11,560 Speaker 1: out of a pandemic, and that takes all of the 547 00:30:11,640 --> 00:30:13,959 Speaker 1: kinds of things that we're looking at in terms of 548 00:30:14,000 --> 00:30:17,120 Speaker 1: the next COVID release package, but we're also looking for 549 00:30:17,160 --> 00:30:19,479 Speaker 1: the you know what next? You know, how do we 550 00:30:19,520 --> 00:30:22,320 Speaker 1: make sure that we are not just kind of building 551 00:30:22,400 --> 00:30:25,080 Speaker 1: back to normal, but that we're imagining a different and 552 00:30:25,160 --> 00:30:28,760 Speaker 1: new normal and that we're trying to take advantage of 553 00:30:28,760 --> 00:30:31,840 Speaker 1: of the pain that we've experienced through the pandemic with 554 00:30:31,920 --> 00:30:36,320 Speaker 1: the innovative ideas and the dynamic um nature of our 555 00:30:36,480 --> 00:30:39,880 Speaker 1: entrepreneurial spirit. So I'm hopeful that it will make its 556 00:30:39,880 --> 00:30:42,880 Speaker 1: way through our small business on the side of Congress 557 00:30:42,880 --> 00:30:44,959 Speaker 1: and of course on the Senate side as well, and 558 00:30:44,960 --> 00:30:47,080 Speaker 1: that it will make it either on its own, you know, 559 00:30:47,120 --> 00:30:49,800 Speaker 1: into a law, or hopefully as part of a larger 560 00:30:49,840 --> 00:30:54,239 Speaker 1: package as well. REPRESENTAI and I was curious as you 561 00:30:55,000 --> 00:30:57,840 Speaker 1: put together the legislative strategy to pass this when you were, 562 00:30:58,400 --> 00:31:02,200 Speaker 1: uh re institute the bill, I'm curious if you looked 563 00:31:02,240 --> 00:31:05,480 Speaker 1: into anything special you could do around the minority community. 564 00:31:05,480 --> 00:31:08,200 Speaker 1: We know that small business has taken a hard hit, 565 00:31:08,320 --> 00:31:12,680 Speaker 1: but probably significantly harder in the minority community, especially around 566 00:31:12,760 --> 00:31:16,200 Speaker 1: arts and culture. Uh these businesses have virtually been wiped 567 00:31:16,240 --> 00:31:20,000 Speaker 1: out through the coronavirus period. So was there anything in 568 00:31:20,680 --> 00:31:24,640 Speaker 1: your legislation that would give particular attention to the minority 569 00:31:24,680 --> 00:31:28,160 Speaker 1: community and the challenges they have around the COVID impact 570 00:31:28,200 --> 00:31:31,560 Speaker 1: in the economy. Sure, and I'm certain that a lot 571 00:31:31,600 --> 00:31:35,680 Speaker 1: of businesses that are owned by women, by veterans, as 572 00:31:35,680 --> 00:31:38,560 Speaker 1: you mentioned, by black and brown communities, communities that are 573 00:31:38,680 --> 00:31:42,720 Speaker 1: typically um able to address and access this capital would 574 00:31:42,720 --> 00:31:46,400 Speaker 1: be able to avail themselves of this capital through this program. 575 00:31:46,480 --> 00:31:49,480 Speaker 1: This is there are eleven federal agencies that are part 576 00:31:49,520 --> 00:31:53,280 Speaker 1: of the ramp act um that will be competitively funding 577 00:31:53,320 --> 00:31:57,160 Speaker 1: businesses to meet largely R and D needs. But I'm 578 00:31:57,200 --> 00:31:59,760 Speaker 1: confident that some of those needs could be addressed by 579 00:32:00,320 --> 00:32:03,120 Speaker 1: entrepreneurs of the communities that you're talking about. Um, you 580 00:32:03,120 --> 00:32:06,320 Speaker 1: know you're talking to me. I'm a veteran. Personally, I'm 581 00:32:06,360 --> 00:32:09,240 Speaker 1: also an engineer. Uh. Clearly I'm a woman as well, 582 00:32:09,280 --> 00:32:11,240 Speaker 1: and so some of the things that I'm really focused 583 00:32:11,240 --> 00:32:14,240 Speaker 1: on in this office are making sure that we're finding 584 00:32:14,320 --> 00:32:17,760 Speaker 1: all kinds of innovators of all different persuasions to make 585 00:32:17,800 --> 00:32:21,080 Speaker 1: sure that we are growing a more inclusive economy. Uh. 586 00:32:21,120 --> 00:32:24,120 Speaker 1: And that's definitely part of how we can't find ourselves 587 00:32:24,120 --> 00:32:26,600 Speaker 1: back to normal, but rather to some sort of version 588 00:32:26,640 --> 00:32:29,280 Speaker 1: of a new normal. It's very very important to me 589 00:32:29,360 --> 00:32:32,760 Speaker 1: and I believe to our economy at large and representative. 590 00:32:32,840 --> 00:32:35,320 Speaker 1: You and Rick both just alluded to the fact that 591 00:32:35,360 --> 00:32:37,520 Speaker 1: you have had such a you know, a really diverse 592 00:32:37,640 --> 00:32:40,880 Speaker 1: career a US Air Force veteran, You've been a CEO, 593 00:32:41,040 --> 00:32:44,000 Speaker 1: a CFO, and entrepreneur and engineer. It's hard to go 594 00:32:44,080 --> 00:32:46,400 Speaker 1: through the list. One thing I also know that you've 595 00:32:46,440 --> 00:32:49,840 Speaker 1: done is you have been a teacher in Philadelphia, eleventh 596 00:32:49,840 --> 00:32:52,720 Speaker 1: grade science teacher. So I would be remiss if I 597 00:32:52,760 --> 00:32:56,360 Speaker 1: didn't ask you, should teachers be back in the classroom 598 00:32:56,520 --> 00:32:59,680 Speaker 1: today given COVID? Is it safe for them? What's your 599 00:32:59,760 --> 00:33:04,040 Speaker 1: view on this really really difficult issue. It's such a 600 00:33:04,120 --> 00:33:06,920 Speaker 1: complicated issue, and you've seen I think I saw an 601 00:33:07,000 --> 00:33:09,840 Speaker 1: article that said, you know, thirteen thousand school districts and 602 00:33:09,920 --> 00:33:13,480 Speaker 1: thirteen thousand different solutions. I think that's kind of where 603 00:33:13,480 --> 00:33:16,320 Speaker 1: we are. I'd sure like to see a better national 604 00:33:16,360 --> 00:33:19,200 Speaker 1: guidance and guidelines. I think that the President Biden put 605 00:33:19,240 --> 00:33:23,800 Speaker 1: forward some very important standards ocean standards about safety. I 606 00:33:23,880 --> 00:33:26,880 Speaker 1: know that teachers need to be protected as because they 607 00:33:26,920 --> 00:33:29,920 Speaker 1: are frontline workers. I can tell you that it's the 608 00:33:30,000 --> 00:33:32,400 Speaker 1: hardest job of all of those things that you've outlined, 609 00:33:32,400 --> 00:33:34,480 Speaker 1: that I've ever done was to be in eleventh grade 610 00:33:34,520 --> 00:33:37,560 Speaker 1: chemistry teacher. And so I think that it's really important 611 00:33:37,560 --> 00:33:40,120 Speaker 1: that we found our way to safe schools and safe 612 00:33:40,240 --> 00:33:43,760 Speaker 1: educational opportunities for our kids. Um As we talked about 613 00:33:43,760 --> 00:33:46,920 Speaker 1: earlier in this conversation, we're really focused in our office 614 00:33:46,960 --> 00:33:49,400 Speaker 1: on on women and getting the women back to work. 615 00:33:50,040 --> 00:33:52,760 Speaker 1: December jobs report was just the leaked. I think a 616 00:33:52,840 --> 00:33:55,719 Speaker 1: hundred and forty thousand jobs were lost in According to 617 00:33:56,080 --> 00:33:59,239 Speaker 1: one article I read, it was all all from women. Uh. 618 00:33:59,280 --> 00:34:01,280 Speaker 1: And so we really need to when we're building back 619 00:34:01,320 --> 00:34:04,600 Speaker 1: this economy think about access to schools, making sure our 620 00:34:04,640 --> 00:34:07,560 Speaker 1: kids are going back, making sure that we have good 621 00:34:07,680 --> 00:34:12,560 Speaker 1: and affordable childcare available, family and medical leaves of all forms, 622 00:34:12,600 --> 00:34:16,600 Speaker 1: sick leaves. And so it's a complicated question, um that 623 00:34:16,680 --> 00:34:20,080 Speaker 1: I think we need very rapidly to find a good 624 00:34:20,120 --> 00:34:22,360 Speaker 1: set of answers for to get our kids back in school, 625 00:34:22,400 --> 00:34:24,480 Speaker 1: to get our families back to work, and to get 626 00:34:24,719 --> 00:34:28,239 Speaker 1: our teachers to feel safe in their classrooms. Congresswoman, since 627 00:34:28,239 --> 00:34:31,000 Speaker 1: we're talking about education, I'm dying to ask you about 628 00:34:31,000 --> 00:34:34,799 Speaker 1: the recent appointment announced today that Marjorie Taylor Grain, one 629 00:34:34,840 --> 00:34:39,800 Speaker 1: of the fellow congress women UH in a conspiracy theory 630 00:34:40,680 --> 00:34:44,200 Speaker 1: h adherent of Q and on the Republican, has been 631 00:34:44,200 --> 00:34:47,839 Speaker 1: placed on the Education Committee. And it's caused quite some 632 00:34:47,920 --> 00:34:52,920 Speaker 1: consternation with the chairman of the committee, Bobby Scott from Virginia. 633 00:34:53,480 --> 00:34:57,400 Speaker 1: So I'm curious what's your reaction to that. Today? I mean, uh, 634 00:34:57,440 --> 00:35:00,280 Speaker 1: it's still fresh memories of the attack on the appital 635 00:35:00,320 --> 00:35:07,359 Speaker 1: I'm sure, yeah, that's that's also a hard conversation to have. 636 00:35:07,480 --> 00:35:11,000 Speaker 1: It seems like an unnatural fit, you know, that that 637 00:35:11,320 --> 00:35:13,279 Speaker 1: she would choose to be on that committee, or that 638 00:35:13,560 --> 00:35:16,239 Speaker 1: that committee would be where she would land. You know, 639 00:35:16,400 --> 00:35:18,759 Speaker 1: if you look at, for instance, the committees that I'm on. 640 00:35:19,120 --> 00:35:22,520 Speaker 1: I'm on Foreign Affairs because I'm very interested in diplomacy 641 00:35:22,520 --> 00:35:26,400 Speaker 1: and humanitarian work in uh, because I believe defense is 642 00:35:26,400 --> 00:35:29,120 Speaker 1: the last line of defense. And I'm on Armed Services 643 00:35:29,160 --> 00:35:31,719 Speaker 1: because as you mentioned, I'm a veteran, And I'm on 644 00:35:31,800 --> 00:35:35,560 Speaker 1: Small Business because I'm really passionate about entrepreneurism and small business. 645 00:35:35,640 --> 00:35:39,280 Speaker 1: And so it just seems like a difficult and and 646 00:35:39,280 --> 00:35:43,560 Speaker 1: and uh kind of troublesome fit. And so I would like, 647 00:35:44,080 --> 00:35:45,759 Speaker 1: certainly the chair to take a look at that, and 648 00:35:45,800 --> 00:35:49,520 Speaker 1: I like, um Mr McCarthy, Leader McCarthy also to take 649 00:35:49,520 --> 00:35:53,239 Speaker 1: a look at that choice. So representative, Planet Hulagan has 650 00:35:53,280 --> 00:35:55,520 Speaker 1: been such a pleasure to talk to you. We could 651 00:35:55,560 --> 00:35:57,880 Speaker 1: talk to you forever, but thank you so much for 652 00:35:58,000 --> 00:36:01,080 Speaker 1: joining us, and we will be following your progress on 653 00:36:01,200 --> 00:36:03,520 Speaker 1: that bill and so much else going on in this 654 00:36:03,719 --> 00:36:08,200 Speaker 1: very busy congressional session. Thank you, I appreciate it. And 655 00:36:08,200 --> 00:36:11,200 Speaker 1: you guys be well and be safe you as well. 656 00:36:11,640 --> 00:36:14,440 Speaker 1: And and Rick, I just want to very briefly follow up. 657 00:36:14,719 --> 00:36:18,560 Speaker 1: You raised Marjorie Taylor Green. What is your take on this? 658 00:36:18,800 --> 00:36:21,640 Speaker 1: Should she be in the Education Committee? Is McCarthy going 659 00:36:21,680 --> 00:36:23,799 Speaker 1: to pull her off that? What do you think happens? Look, 660 00:36:23,840 --> 00:36:26,879 Speaker 1: I think it's a it's a it's a it's a 661 00:36:26,920 --> 00:36:29,719 Speaker 1: controversy that didn't need to happen. The reality is there 662 00:36:29,719 --> 00:36:31,760 Speaker 1: are a lot of people in Congress and others outside 663 00:36:31,800 --> 00:36:35,120 Speaker 1: who would actually liked the stripper of her floor privileges 664 00:36:35,239 --> 00:36:38,719 Speaker 1: to deny her her congressional seat, and uh certainly they'll 665 00:36:38,719 --> 00:36:41,200 Speaker 1: have an opportunity that in the midterm elections. But there 666 00:36:41,200 --> 00:36:44,120 Speaker 1: are people who want to censure her. So I don't 667 00:36:44,160 --> 00:36:46,680 Speaker 1: think we've heard the last Marjorie Taylor Green. And it's 668 00:36:46,719 --> 00:36:52,200 Speaker 1: just a problem that this UH minority minority leader, Kevin 669 00:36:52,239 --> 00:36:55,640 Speaker 1: McCarthy doesn't need today, doesn't need today, not the last 670 00:36:55,680 --> 00:36:57,960 Speaker 1: of her, not the last of Rick Davis. Thank you 671 00:36:58,080 --> 00:37:00,560 Speaker 1: so much for joining us. I am Jeanie she Anzano. 672 00:37:00,880 --> 00:37:04,560 Speaker 1: This is sound On on Bloomberg Radio. We will be 673 00:37:04,640 --> 00:37:07,160 Speaker 1: back tomorrow. Filling in for Kevin Sorelli