WEBVTT - The Fed, ECB, M&A, And Rising Prices

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Matt, I have no

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>idea where we're gonna do with this next segment, so

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm thrown it. Well. I have been waiting for at

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>least a week um to get Neil Grossman back in

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>here since the fed UM decision. He has worn many

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>hats on Wall Street as a prop trader at JP Morgan.

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>He took risk for the No August Bank, the Central

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Bank of Norway. Um he ran a hedge fund. Yeah,

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>for sure, Well he was. I told you he was

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a road road for Cambridge. I saw a gretty picture

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>from must have been the seventies over the weekend. But um,

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>now he is a vintner and an historical fiction author.

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Neil Grossman joins us in the Interactive Broker Studio. Neil,

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to get your take first on UM, the

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>FEDS inflationary goals because they already were aiming for two percent.

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people have a problem with that to

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>begin with. But now we've well overshot that, and if

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>we ever want to get the average back to two percent,

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna take years. Well, let's start with why you

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>should get the average back. Mr Powell and before him

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Mr Bernankey spent a lot of years explained to us

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that having inflation a little under two percent was not

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>really good. Um, despite the fact, of course that their

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 1>statutory mandate is actually zero price stability. That's just what

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Congress says. But they can do whatever they want, right.

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>That's well, we can argue that too. That's not yes,

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:44.119
<v Speaker 1>they do whatever they want. That's not really the idea.

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>But they spent a lot of time and then arguing

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that they wanted to let the economy run a little

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>hot to push up inflation over to so you could

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>average it. So let's using that as a baseline. Now

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that the fact is is that they let it run

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a mock to get it back to a two percent average,

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>let's use a reasonable time frame like ten years. You're

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna end up this year probably about twelve to four

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>over what the two percent trajectory was which means you're

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.679
<v Speaker 1>going to really have to have inflation average like one

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>percent for eight years or something like that to get

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>you even close to the two percent. And that's, let's

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>face it, kind of a pipe dream. Well they're not

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about that. Mr Powell has said I want to

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>get inflation just back to two percent, and let's talk

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 1>about the probability of what that takes. I mean, Paul

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Valker got rates into the twenties and it took twenty

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>five years pretty much to get a stable two percent

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>ambient environment. I mean, you had your moments down, but

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>for the nineties we were still averaging three to three

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent. If let's not anybody's business other

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>than than Congress is they're the ones who have to

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>just say that's not right. I I actually think that

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a legitimate reason for having low inflation. It creates

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:57.239
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinarily healthy environment. Done right, it minimizes volatively Matt.

0:02:57.400 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Matt and I were doing some calculus this morning about

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>how to maximize the area inside of a fixed geometrical

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>This is interesting if you take if you I can

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>see doing that any any four sided shape, right, I

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:15.399
<v Speaker 1>would have thought the area. Um. You know, if if

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the total uhs around the perimeters, say thirty six inches,

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:22.239
<v Speaker 1>I would have thought, it doesn't matter. You can stretch

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a rectangle out, make it a square. It's all gonna

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>be the same area. It's not a square. Is the

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>maximal area and and and and any end gone, you know,

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>cube or whatever else you want. The maximual area is

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>equal size, which applies to returns on your investments, and

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it also applies to things like compounding of inflation. So,

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>for example, if if I say to you, over a

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>ten year period, you can choose either ten percent returns

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>each year, or you can have eleven percent this year,

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>nine percent next year, eleven percent the year after that,

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>nine percent the year after that, eleven year after that nine.

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>You're much better off choosing ten percent each year. In fact,

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>is an RB. I would take the ten in short,

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the eleven nine for for eternity, and I walk away

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>richer than Bill Gates. Um. But but the point is

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that this applies to things like what the FED should

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>be doing to manage the economy. The FED should find

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>reasonable trajectories of g d P inflation and everything else,

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and that and even the stock market and you want

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to find a sustainable trajectory where you're minimizing the variability,

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>minimizing the volatility. That's actually how you get the maximum

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 1>long term. But in the I don't I don't think that. Well,

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that that their mind. Well, two percent an interesting issue.

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Two percent is a two factor optimization, right. They have

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to mandates employment, full employment, and price stability, and they're

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>not totally consistent. So two percent has become their sort

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of maximum of both. At the same time they beat that.

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>That was the sad thing they were. They were ahead

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 1>of that about eight six, seven years ago. They didn't

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>like that right. As my first sales manager, Pain Webber

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>would say, after I went through my big pitch about

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>what I wanted to do with Meatia stocks, he would

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>just interrupt me and say, Paul, are we buying him

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.799
<v Speaker 1>or we selling him? What are we doing here? I'm well,

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>last time, two times ago I was on, I was short,

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I went a little long, and yesterday I started going

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>short again. I think the market's got a lot more downstays.

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I think this is also quite healthy.

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>You need sort of a washout to equilibrate, and that

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>without that, I think we're gonna have a lot more

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 1>volatility going forward. I think you need to just get

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>some of the energy out of this system, and then

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I think, at least for a while, you can be

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you can be quite positive. Remember yesterday I was telling

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>you Neil Neil's target for the SMP at the end

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>of the year seventeen No, no no, no, that's my that's

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>my target probably next year, next year or whatever. Seventeen

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>seventy six. We're trading at four thousand. Think about it,

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and I am a patriot, I get it, But you

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>do honestly think that we're going down. I think we're

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>going down, and I think we're gonna go down a

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>larger than people, partially because once you start to go down,

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>because the arkets are still functionally long and over invested.

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 1>The fact is that people have to be forced out

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and to reduce their exposure. And when that process happens,

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 1>markets extend and over extend, so you can pick what

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you want. I think the earnings are too high estimates.

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>I think that that the bottom line is that, um,

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>the pees are too high. And again, going back to

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>one last thing, interest rates at the long end have

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to go higher, all right, That's good stuff. Here's what

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to do if you get Neil and Adam

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in together, John, because they are also friends, but they

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally disagree because Adams yes, Okay, there we go. Neil Grossman,

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>co founder, former CIO t k n G Capital, Thanks

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. You know, Matt, here's the

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>theme of the day. People you know, like Neil Grossman

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and our next guest, Ted Smith. They get all these

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>fancy degrees in engineering, but I don't see anybody building

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 1>anything or like, you know, building that's true. Both of

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>them are vintners. Well, I don't know. I think it's

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a scanner. I've watched Neil put together his vineyard over

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the last ten years, and it takes a ton of

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>work and planning and forethought, and I think these are

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>just misspent educations. So he gets Ted Smith, co founder

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and president of Union Square Advisors. He gets his engineering

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:23.559
<v Speaker 1>stuff from Notre Dame, and then he goes to Wall Street.

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, go figure that, Ted, Thanks so much for joining.

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>You're in our bloom Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. We appreciate

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that you're based on the West Coast, but you're here

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in New York. Talk to us about M and A here,

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>because before we get to that, let's let's talk about

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>this engineer, like what did you do when you first

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>got to the street, Because if you're putting together analytical

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>models or if you're trading derivatives, I feel like that's

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>really helpful to have an engineering degree. It was very

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>helpful for me. Carter McClellan, who had started the tech

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>group at Morgan Stanley, had the bright idea of hiring

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>more engineers into the new tech investment banking group to

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>understand what our clients actually did. I thought I was

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be a two year stop and then go

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>back and finish my PhD. In thirty three years later,

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I haven't gone back. Still. You still have time building

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and just you know, kind of making some wine. M

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and A boy, we look at the equity markets, of

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>fixing the markets here, just brutal, brutal, brutal. How about

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the M and A market? What do you see out there?

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>We're certainly down from last year. We're off a little

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>over a third from where we were this time last year.

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Last year a little bit, yeah, But but I think

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the key is deals are still getting done, right. I

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>think you have to look through the headlines as you

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>guys do. That's the whole point of the show. Uh,

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>And understand that even though the markets on both the

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>equity and the dead side are volatile, deals are getting done.

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>The big strategics want to do deals. The large private

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 1>equity firms are awash and capital, they're continuing to look

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>for transactions and we're still very busy advising on transaction.

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>So so things are happening, they're just taking a little

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>bit longer. And you know, certainly things that were at

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the margin that could have gotten done six to twelve

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:52.319
<v Speaker 1>months ago won't get done. Now, what's the rising rate environment?

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>What kind of effect does that have or does it

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>not have an effect? I mean, if you're company looking

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to a fairly sizeable acquisition, you know, maybe you got

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>all your ducks in a row financially already and you're

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>not worried about rates today rather rates six months ago. Right, So,

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're one of the large acquirers, you probably in

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>tech at least you're a wash in cash. You know,

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>whether whether you're earning you know, fifty basis points or

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, on that cash that you let go out

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:20.199
<v Speaker 1>the door to do an acquisition, probably not going to

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>change your P and L too much. Where it does

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>have an impact or will over the long haul have

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>an impact is on private equity when they're doing buyouts

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and they're using some of the you know, some debt

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to ultimately finance those. But again, we haven't seen a

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>slowdown yet. They're taking this interest rate in stride or

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>this interest rate environment, I should say in stride, and

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>they're continuing to do deals. That could change if we see,

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, continue to see seventy five BIPs changes as

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the norm here through the end of the year, maybe

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll see some slowdown, but so far hasn't happened, I guess.

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Also it depends on your view of the path of

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>interest rate increases into the future, right. I mean so

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>many people come on and say, I remember in the

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>eighties I was paying a seventeen percent mortgage or I

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>bought tried is yielding. Um, if you think that we're

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>headed there, yeah, then what we're saying for mortgages before

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>take that out right, lock it in right? And and

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>what what do you see is where do you see

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>rates going? Um, we certainly see it's gonna it's gonna

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>get more challenging, even this year, you know, a couple

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>more times at least, we think the Fed is going

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to be pragmatic about not overreaching. But there's still obviously

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of debate amongst the governors about where this

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>should go and what they want to see with it.

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.079
<v Speaker 1>But again to your point, man, I think we see

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>relatively still quite cheap. Capital is available from a broad

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>range of sour if it's particularly in the direct lender market,

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:41.959
<v Speaker 1>which is now a multi trillion dollar asset class. Um.

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>So deals, deals are getting done, and those big buyout firms, look,

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>if they have to do a little more equity and

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a little less debt to make their deals work, they

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>have the capital to do it. That's what I was

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna say. There's so much money in the pe space.

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Matt and I we just read stories day

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>after day after day about another big fund being raised.

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>There's always stories about they have like one point seven

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars in dry powder. I mean, it's just to

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the point where it doesn't make any sense anymore. So,

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>but if they have dollars, think about how many yen

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>they have. Now they have dollars, think about how many

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>euros or pounds. We saw the pound go to the

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.199
<v Speaker 1>loan of nineteen eighty five. Um, you probably hadn't even

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>got your degree at that point. So what is that?

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Is that? A is that a tailwind for m and

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>at first for American companies? Certainly it must be. If

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to buy something in Japan, it's at a discount,

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>right well, and just the general valuation environment. Things are

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a discount relative to where we were six or twelve

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>months ago, right, So slightly more expensive debt capital, but

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>offset by cheaper valuations generally and the very strong dollar.

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the age where American pe firms

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>are looking to go shopping around the world. I know,

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I just I mean, we talked about what's a pint

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of beer cost in London? These guys will talk about

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>what's a company costs? Uh in London? Ted Smith, thanks

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us, too short a time. We'll

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>get you back. Ted Smith, he's a co founder and

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.599
<v Speaker 1>president of Union Square Advisors. Talking about some M and

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>A and tech space. A misspent education, no doubt about it.

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Electrical engineering from Notre Dame and it goes to be

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>an investment banker. Go figure that. But what would you

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what would you do? With an electrical engineering degree.

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>You learn to look at systems, you learn to analyze things.

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know, go to like a defense contract there,

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, and make I don't know whatever they make

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>submarines or something like that. That that that that would

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>be cool. That would be pretty cool too. That's jewelry.

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean I I'm not a jewelry guy, per se

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.439
<v Speaker 1>are you you're not? Really? Well, you've got a class ring. Well,

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I have a Signet ring because my dad always had one,

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>because his dad always had one because his dad had one.

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>So just like a thing when you're a little kid,

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you see your dad having it and then you want it.

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>But no, I don't wear other jewelry, all right, a

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of but apparently it's a great category within retail.

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Jennet Drosos joins us. She's a CEO of Signet Jewelers.

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Signet is a public company trades upon the Big Board

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of the New York Stock Exchange. S I G is

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:55.719
<v Speaker 1>a symbol to put it, do you you buy a lot

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of jewelry? Yeah? I'm with you on that, you know,

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:00.839
<v Speaker 1>because my my wife loves to wear. Her family is

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>in the jewelry business in Spain. Really, but h I

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>still like stuff for her over here? Sure? Why not? Jenna,

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for joining us here in our Bloomberg

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Broker studio. Matt, something is to change, man. People

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>are coming into the studio like it's an exciting day.

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>It's an exciting day, saying Jenna, thanks so much for

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>joining us here. University of Georgia alum NBA from some

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>school down in Philadelphia. UM talked about the jewelry business.

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>How did it fare during the pandemic? Well, thanks for

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>having me and it is great to be in person.

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, if I dial back to last year on

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>our record growth in the jewelry category, we think the

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>category was up about last calendar year, UM Signet was

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>grew our revenues about fifty so we gained significant market share.

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>We went from uh six and change to nine point

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>three percent share of the category and continue to be

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 1>overdeveloped in the bridle part of the category, where we

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>have about a thirty percent share. And that's a big

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>competitive And what does that mean engagement ring swdding rings exactly.

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is the year of the wedding. Two point

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>five million weddings this year the highest and forty years

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's gotta be the biggest spend, right, because yes,

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I got married last year, yes, in October, and I

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>bought my wife, uh, you know, another engagement ring and um,

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>fortunately her parents made us the engagement rings. But are

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>there are the wedding rings? But uh, that's got to

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>be the biggest spend that a typical family, a typical

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>household does in the jewelry category, right it is. By

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the way, I got married last year in October two. Congratulations,

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and my team made me a beautiful that is gorgeous. Wow,

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those times I wish were on TV.

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>That's beautiful. Thanks, Yes, the craftsmanship was really excellent. And

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>so why do you think the revenue growth was so

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>strong last year? Is it because, um, you know, we

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>had household savings built up, we got stimulus checks, etcetera.

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Or is it because the market rallied so hard and

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>went to an all time high? What what drove that?

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>All of those things impact category growth and jewelry. So

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>number one was pent up demand for getting engaged. Uh,

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>couples who had chosen to live together, a quarantine together

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>during COVID, um, you know, became closer wanted to get engaged.

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of people postponed the engagement until they

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>can have a view towards when they might have a wedding,

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and with COVID still going on, they couldn't invite families,

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>So pent up demand for engagements was one. Second, with stimulus,

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that really impacted primarily the lower end of the market. Uh.

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Three big journeys that customers go on in jewelry. One

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>is the bridal journey. You're exactly right. Uh, Buying an

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>engagement ring is often the most expensive purchase a couple

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>has made together. It's very considered purchase. It's a wonderful

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>time to build a lifetime relationships with a couple, exactly. Fantastic. Second,

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>romantic gifting. Uh, couples who were living together couldn't go

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>out and celebrate, you know, with dinner, or you know,

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>couldn't go to a concert. We're buying jewelry for each other,

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>which was great. And then stimulus really contributed to the

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>self purchased journey, especially at the lower end. So all

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>those things came together to drive record market growth. So

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that Met and I talked about

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>when we have CEOs here in the studio is it

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>seems like every business every sector has supply chain issues.

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that true in the jewelry business? I mean, don't

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you guys get a lot of diamonds from Russia and

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>other places like that, so it's not free for Signet UM.

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>We were a scale player where the world's largest specialty

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>retailer of diamond jewelry were vertically integrated. So we buy

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>um a portion of our rough diamonds directly from the

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>beers from the mind we cut and polish those ourselves.

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Responsible sourcing UM is something that Signet has pioneered for

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>more than a decade. Uh and as soon as in fact,

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>even before the war broke out in Ukraine, we stopped

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:57.119
<v Speaker 1>purchasing any diamonds that have Russian origin, and we've maintained

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that all the way through the conflicts. So customers can

0:16:59.920 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>be very comfortable buying diamonds at Signet and knowing that

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>those UM you know, have in no way been part

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of the conflict that's going on. What does your dealership

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 1>network look like? And I only say that because I

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>think in cars and motors, sure, but I mean it's

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, right, You've got retail outlets all over

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>the place, You've got an online presence how does that

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.679
<v Speaker 1>break down? Yes, so we have UM. We we have

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>banners retail banners that exist here in the US market.

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>For example, we just purchased Blue Nile a couple of

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, and we also have James Allen. Those sit

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>at the top of our portfolio more of an accessible

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>luxury online pure play and a big online play exactly

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>our biggest banners. K We also have Zails and Jared,

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>so those sitting in the mid market, and then UM

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.679
<v Speaker 1>at our our more value end of the spectrum. We

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>have Banter by Piercing, Pagoda, and we also last year

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>bought rocks Box, which is the leader in rental jewelry.

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>So we have quite a wide range, and we've differentiated

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>those banners. They're carrying different merchandise, targeting different customers. That's

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the success stories behind our share growth. So

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 1>online somebody will pop down five or ten dollars for

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>a diamond ring without actually seeing it. Interestingly, in the

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>second quarter price points above ten thousand dollars worth of

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>fastest growing for all of our banners. So okay, sales shared, Yes,

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.199
<v Speaker 1>I'd say James Allen the website, I have spent some

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>time on it, and it's beautiful, and it's it's it's

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.199
<v Speaker 1>so user friendly, and it pulls you deeper into it.

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So once you go on there and start looking at things,

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you actually spend more time than you may have planned

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 1>to do in the first place. You do spend a

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 1>lot on marketing as well, because I see K's Zales

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>ads all over the place where I hear them on radio.

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>So how important is that? Which outlets do you choose? Well,

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's interesting. We've been on a five

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 1>year transformation plan and so I think the cumulative impact

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of that is really putting us in a great position. Now.

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>One of the areas we've transformed as marketing. So historically

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the company has been on TV advertising, mostly in November December,

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>mostly on the NFL, targeting guys who were, you know,

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>buying buying a holiday gifts. We did we make the

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame ranks, which is great. Yes, so so

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>really exciting. But been anyway, we've really changed that marketing model,

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>so we're always on We're talking to our customers all

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>year long, more and more personalized and targeted, influencer marketing

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and social media, online video, educational videos and YouTube. So

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>we've considerably broadened that mix, and as a result, our

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>return on advertising spend has grown significantly over the last

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>number of years. So it's a competitive advantage to us

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to have a large portfolio and be a leading marketer.

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>But we've we've done that in a way that's highly personalized. Jennet,

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>great stuff. Thanks for coming into the Bloomberg Interactive workers.

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Due to Jenna Dress, she is the CEATO of Signet Jewelers. Again,

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the symbol the trade on New York Stock Exchange. You

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>popped this into your Bloomberg Professional terminal s I G

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>is the symbol to get that there. So good stuff

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 1>on the jewelry business. Pretty solid business. I mean, yeah,

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>we've been digging into it, so I think it's really

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>fascinating and um, we didn't get to it, but uh,

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it'd be great to get. Next time we have Jenna on,

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:25.479
<v Speaker 1>we can ask her about prices for um gold and

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the other uh commodities. Yea, absolutely have some good stuff.

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>We heard from Christine Legard ECB president earlier this morning

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:45.959
<v Speaker 1>taking down GDP growth forecast for Europe and not forecasting recession,

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>also adjusting some of the inflation concerns because that is

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the number one concern for not just the Federal Reserve,

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>but for the e c B as well. But let's

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>get some thoughts on what we heard from miss uh

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Leguard from Morgan del Down, head of investment Strategy for

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Europe at Global x E t F s UM, again,

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. We heard from

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 1>Christine Legard this morning. Do you think the ECB is

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>doing enough here to flight to fight inflation across the continent? Well,

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I think the ECB has delivered the amount of akishness

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the market was expecting, so UM. That's why I think

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>we have had like some muted reaction plast meeting. UM.

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>But what is unclear, and I think it's unclear for

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>food markets as well, because we see no clear direction

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>for for the year of versus dollar for example, is

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that in the same statement, UM, Christine mcgard said that

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the inflation and the risk of inflation becoming embedded in

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 1>more domestic prices and invlation expectations made warrant a several

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>other other other hikes. But at the same time they're

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>saying that they stayed data data dependent and they will

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>have a meeting by meeting EPPLE. So all of this

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:04.199
<v Speaker 1>is quite it's quite confusing in these two opposite statesments

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of con saw each other out. So I think

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>overall the market took these press conference as a more

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>natural tone that what it was expecting. So not providing

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>more support to the euro from from from the strengthening

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>we so pre meeting, you take a look, I mean normally,

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 1>I imagine you take a look at the ECB president's

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 1>dashboard and you see a ton of different data. Can

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you wipe all of that off right now and just

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>put the Fed right there? I mean, don't they have

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to do this as long as the Fed is doing

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>it well. Actually, the weakening of the euro we saw

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>about the past few months is definitely an uncomfortable um

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>situation for for for for the Eurozone and the e

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 1>c B M. I think we can't really compare like

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>for like these two regions because the fundamental are becoming

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>more divergent um with But if they morgan, if they

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>if they didn't raise by fifty or seventy five, I

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>mean if they only did twenty five, that would put

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>them in a in an even weaker position. Are the

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>euro right? So I mean they have to do these

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>jumbo rate hikes as long as the FED they had

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to keep up. It's like they're tagging along. That's actually

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>what the market is expecting so um and it's interesting

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the years, market expects us like

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>about the same amount of hikes um in the FED

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 1>and for the FED and the ECB. So it's definitely

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>showing kind of a reverse currency wa there where the

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>e CP is trying to support the region. But I

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>think what is very important for the region is to

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 1>get back to inflation because this is the sole moderate

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>mandate for for the ECB compared to the FED. UM.

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>So inflation is everything. And there is one takeaway from

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Prisidon by God is when she stressed that inflation forecast

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>for the end of the projecting period, which is twenty

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>four will not get back to two percent inflation, but

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:10.439
<v Speaker 1>exceeding it by by thirty business points. So this is

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>actually a signal that the ECP will continue to to

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 1>provide a several large rate highs. In my opinion, Morgan

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is it is it consensus in Europe that Europe will,

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>if it isn't already in will be in a recession

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>sooner rather than later. I think the across Europe now

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you see a lot of divergence between countries. If you

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>take the countries that are really UM dependent on Russian

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>gas like Germany. Obviously the outlook for German, for the

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>German economy is not looking great. But all the major

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 1>economies like France, Spain, they are doing quite well because

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 1>they are not dependent on on gas supply from from Russia.

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>So there is some silver lining in what we heard

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>from Christinagam today and from what we see from the

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>economic data is um. First, the projections they the gross

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>projections for the real GDP across the region does not

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>signal an imminent recession UH and not no recision across

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the protecting period, but instead more of a statflations denio UM.

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:22.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think what what we are going to see

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>across the region is more economic fragmentation UM and that

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>could be actually some of it could be reduced by

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:34.120
<v Speaker 1>cooperation between countries, and this is what we are starting

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to see more soliarity around UM energy supply across major

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>economies like France and Germany, agreeing on France exporting some

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 1>of their gas fly to Germany if needs be so.

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>All of these solidarity might just reduce the economic risk

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that the region is facing in the in this crisis.

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think um, we have reached potentially that the

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>big pessimist and put for the Eurozone because definitely we

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>are saying, um, the energy prices um and the leverage

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>from from rosha um probably exhausted now. So I'm pick

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>pessimson probably behind her all right. Margane, thank you so

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Really appreciate getting your perspective on Europe.

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>More Gaine Della Down, head of Investment Strategy for Europe

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>for Global x et f S based in London. There

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 1>So maybe maybe peak pessimism is past for the Eurozone.

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 1>We have to see the tough, tough winter from an

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>energy perspective is expected across the continent in the UK UM,

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.360
<v Speaker 1>so I have to see how that plays out over

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 1>the next six to eight months. We did hear from

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:51.120
<v Speaker 1>FED chairman j Pal this morning and make some comments

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>uh in a presentation at the Cato Institute. We brought

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you that live this morning. I want to break it

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>down a little bit here with Janelle Marte Economics and

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve your order for Bloomberg News. Thanks so much

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:04.919
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. I guess that you know the

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>messaging if nothing else since Jackson Hole has been consistent,

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>which is, we're really serious about fighting inflation and we

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>know what that means, higher rates. What are thoughts? So

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that's right. I mean what we heard again from how

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 1>today is that the FED is going to do what

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it has to do is acting fourth rightly, he said

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to bring inflation down. So even though he didn't specify

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 1>what they're likely to do in September, I think he

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:37.640
<v Speaker 1>really delivered his message pretty strongly at Jackson Hole, right,

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>which is and he did allude to that today, which

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>is that he wanted to send the morning out there

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:47.919
<v Speaker 1>that the FED is not going to stop until inflation

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>is coming down, and that they're more concerned, are very

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>concerned about stopping their battle too early, declaring victory too soon.

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:02.360
<v Speaker 1>We heard that from President Cleveland FED President Loretta Mesters. Well.

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's just a message that they're all delivering

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>right now, which is that they're they're they're not going

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to stop too soon. They're really taking this very seriously.

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I did hear yesterday from Brainerd and I'm trying to

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>find my note to myself because I wrote it down.

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Um a comment that I thought sounded a little bit

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:27.400
<v Speaker 1>more debbish. Um. She said, here's I've taken the verbatim,

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>but I dropped out the middle part because it was

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>too worthy. The rapidity of the tightening cycle creates risks

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>associated with overtightening, and it's been a while since I've

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>heard of FED speaker talk about those risks. Um. The

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>market seemed to take notice. Do you think we're gonna

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>start hearing more about that? So? I think you're right.

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>She she did make some comments on the risks of

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>going too far. UM. We'll see with time if we

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>if we hear more remarks along those lines. But we

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't hear much pushback from Powell today. Uh uh. You know,

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the market right now is leaning towards expecting another seventy

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>five basis point increase. These were Powell's last remarks UM,

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>or last scheduled remarks before the Fed goes into black

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>app period tomorrow, UM night, So you know he didn't

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>he didn't close the door to another. Of course, we

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>have another big report coming next week next Tuesday, and

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>update on consumer the Consumer Price Index, and that is

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be very closely watched by Fed officials and

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>economists as to UM, what's really going on? With inflation.

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a lot of folks out there that's saying, hey,

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe the Fed doesn't need to be that aggressive, or

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 1>or artist seeing inflation start to really roll over when

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>they look at the energy prices Gasoline coming down, oil

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>now trading just above eighty dollars barrel. W t I.

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I've got the housing market rolling over, really impacted by

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>higher mortgage race. Um, maybe they don't need to do

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>much more after the seventy five basis point hike. What

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>are you hearing? So one thing that will be very

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:12.959
<v Speaker 1>important in the next CPI update is what happens with

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>core inflation. So you make a good point that we

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>are now expecting headline maybe to come down a little

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>bit more because of what you're we're seeing with gas

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>prices easing in that relief that households are feeling. But

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>officials wants to see inflation come down across the board.

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>So they're going to be looking at shelter and they're

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be looking at the report, um to see

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>what happened for inflation, because, um, even if we're seeing

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>some relief in some aspects, they needed to come down

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>across the board. I wonder we were talking Neil Grossman

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>about this earlier. Now, if we're gonna see the Fed

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:59.239
<v Speaker 1>try and bring the average over say this decade to two,

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:01.719
<v Speaker 1>or if they're just going to give up on you know,

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>this year and next and restart the clock once they

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>get there. They haven't specified, you know what time frame

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>they're aiming for two percent inflation over time for that

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>average target. But I mean, one thing that they're saying

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is they want to see inflation come down for several

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>months in a row before they ease on their um

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>significantly or pause on the rate increases and um. Even

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>if it takes some time for them to bring inflation down,

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll see, you know, how how they eventually

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>respond or how long it actually takes. But they're they're

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty serious so far aiming for two percent and not

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>lifting that target. Alright, Janelle, very good stuff. Appreciate getting

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>your reporting there. Janelle marte Um Economics and Federal Reserve

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>reporter for Bloomberg DUS breaking down kind of comments we

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>heard from FED Chairman j Pal this morning, which we

0:31:56.080 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>brought to you live on Bloomberg Radio from the Cato Institute. Again,

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the message, if nothing else from this fellow reserve over

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the past several weeks has been very clear. We are

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>here to fight inflation and that means raising rates. Thanks

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller vent three. On Fall Sweeney, I'm on Twitter

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast. You can always catch

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.