WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off April 22nd, 2022 (Ep. 495)

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Smooth jazz Let's play Ball. Welcome in everybody to Fantasy Pros.

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Leading Off. It is me and Joey p

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>joe Pi's AP and we come to you every single

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>day here on Fantasy Pros MLB YouTube channel Live so

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you can interact and hang out with us. And of

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>course we're coming to you from our sponsor bet MGM.

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Download the app right now and head over and make

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>your first bet on us using that promo code leading Off.

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>And today the Welsh is celebrating another trip around the Sun.

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>It's his birthday, but I feel like it's really my

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 1>birthday because I get to spend some quality time with

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>my good buddy, our social media director and your friend

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Warmly. Ryan, it's so great to have you on.

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned we've never actually done a show together.

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>You kind of you know, are so great. You give

0:00:57.600 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>me a day off during football season from doing a show,

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>which I love about you, but we never actually get

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>to hang out together, so this is nice, so quality

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>time for you and me.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 3>The first one the baseball shows I did last year

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 3>were with Dan Harris. Like you said, in football, I'm

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:15.839
<v Speaker 3>you're under under under understudy of shorts as the backup host.

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I'm really excited to finally get to be

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 3>on air with the great, the venerable Joey p.

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know what's awesome is the best job in

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the world is always backup quarterback because everybody likes you more.

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Everybody likes Ryan so much more than me. Like that

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>guy is a Ryan host more shows. Joe's a bald moron.

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean that. That's definitely most of the YouTube to

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>be clear. No, also good point. And and also Ryan

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>dressed up for the occasion today if you could see

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it on our YouTube channel. He's wearing his Orioles Hawaiian shirt,

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>which is absolutely glorious. So we got to get some

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>love on that. We've got a lot of baseball to

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>get to, got a lot of things going on. We'll

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>talk a little Waiver Wire today. Also, we'll plug that

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in here. Let's start with the headlines though, Seattle's ty

0:01:58.040 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>France three hits and a home run and a loss

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to Theers. But nice night for ty France. Saw the

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>one bomb two. It was a no doubter. Luis Surius

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>has a quad that is starting the rehab assignment on

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday, so that's good. Jesus Sanchez continues to be

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>hot for the Marlins, selling two hits and a homer

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 1>against the Cards. Noah and Aronado having a fantastic month.

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>He might be Player of the Month at this point.

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Great day for him, three more hits. Pablo Lopez strikes

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>out nine in a win over his Cardinals, though. And

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Paul Blackburn, who I told everybody yesterday go play this

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.519
<v Speaker 1>guy in DFS. I hope you did one run, five innings,

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>another win. I think this guy should be added everywhere.

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Paul Blackburn. I want to start with him because he

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 1>is rostered and I think like thirty percent of formats

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.839
<v Speaker 1>right now, and although the minor league track record does

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>not scream that he has got like sustainability, the increased

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>strikeout rate is appealing to me. So Blackburn is one

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>of these guys. Because he's an A, he flies under

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the radar. So Ryan, I don't know if you've got

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>him in any formats, in any leagues, but Blackburn's a

0:02:57.480 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>guy picked up last week off the good start, just

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to see and now I think it's gonna cost people

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>twice or even three times the amount to pick him

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>up this week.

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't have him anywhere.

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 3>He is still available obviously in plenty of leagues that

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 3>you know, the opportunity is there if I do want

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 3>to decide to go after him. I wouldn't put too

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 3>much stock into yesterday because I mean, first of all,

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe you're starting with me having to talk

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 3>about a negative thing with the Orioles, But it was

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 3>going up against one of the worst offenses in baseball,

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 3>and offense that has been bad, like whether they're at

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 3>the Camden Yards with the extended fence or not, they've

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 3>not been good this year at all. So I wouldn't

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:32.519
<v Speaker 3>put too much value in that. But you're right, there's

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 3>been other signs throughout the.

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Season so far.

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 3>He hasn't gone more than five innings yet in any game,

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 3>so it's not like he's one of these guys going deep.

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 2>But where are those guys anyways? So I like him.

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 2>I think he's.

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Totally worth like a speculative pickup, and maybe even more

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 3>than speculative at this point based on what we've seen.

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 3>But I wouldn't put too much stock into like, oh,

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 3>his price is gonna go up just because he did

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 3>pretty well against like probably a bottom three offense.

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Well you know what, he's doing well and he's healthy

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>right now, which it's a good combination of things to

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>have because it's pitching injuries all over the place as

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>we always see here in baseball, and I think maybe

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>what we can do is get a good run out

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of him and then flip him if he can, in

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a package for somebody better or somebody returning off the

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>eye out in a few weeks. Some injuries. Yesterday, Luis

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Robert did have a couple of hits, but he left

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>with a groin injury and without hitting a home run.

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>So I am sour because he was my pick yesterday

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and again another over night for me, I'm pissed off

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>about it. I'm not happy. I'm not leaving April with

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>one home run. That's just unacceptable. John Gray also headed

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>to the injured list with a mild MCL spraining to

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>his left knee. So more to come with that. So

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>two injuries, the robber one obviously more substantial. We'll keep

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>an eye on that. More information to come. I want

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 1>to play a little. Can we talk about this to

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>start with Jazz Chisholm, who's hitting lead off to the

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Marlins on Thursday. Now, Chisholm off to a very hot start.

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 1>This was a very divisive player heading into the season,

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty four years old. He's slashing two ninety six, three

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>forty four with a seven forty one, slugging two homers,

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:00.559
<v Speaker 1>two doubles, two triples, a partridge in a pear tree RBI,

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and of course the one stolen base, which is why

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you drafted him in the first place. So a very

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>hot start to Chisholm. So, I guess here's my question.

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>We all know this is unsustainable. Is this the perfect

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>time to flip him for something and an asset that

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>might be way more sustainable? Or do you think Chisholm's

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna have some of these more high points in the

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 1>season than we realize. The lows are gonna come, but

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>this is a high point, and if you can have

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of them, that's gonna make for a really

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>good overall rotal player. Your thoughts on Chisholm's hot start.

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I liked Chishm a lot coming into the season.

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 3>He was one of those guys who, yes, he's up

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 3>and down at times, but I really think of him

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 3>as somebody who when I'm playing fantasy, I'll just say

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 3>sort of like philosophically, I want the guys who are

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 3>gonna be up and down because I want to take

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 3>a chance that they're gonna be up for a lot

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 3>more than we sort of expected. And he's a guy

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 3>that I like, I said, I really loved coming into

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 3>the year. His expected batting average based on the batt

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 3>of ball like profile isn't as high as his current

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.799
<v Speaker 3>batting average is, but he has still made a dramatic

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 3>jump in that batterball profile from last year and last

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 3>year he had made a jump from the first year.

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 3>And he's sitting the ball hard on exactly half of

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 3>his at bats. His hard hit rate is fifty percent,

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 3>so I can understand why he's expected slugging would be high.

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 3>His WOBBA is pretty high. He's pulling the ball a lot,

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 3>like I think of his of his ten or eleven

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 3>hits or whatever he has this season, like nine of

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 3>them are are down the line, And frankly, I don't

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 3>care if a player is doing that. You think of

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 3>like the old school baseball thoughts of like, oh, you're

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 3>a good hitter, you use all parts of the field.

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 3>You can drive ball at the middle. If you're hitting

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 3>the ball hard. I don't care where it goes. He's

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 3>sitting the ball hard.

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 2>I really like him.

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 3>And he's also just like electric and so much fun

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 3>to watch and to have on your roster, like I

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 3>enjoy watching. Did you see he had the thing with

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 3>the umpire where he was like like no, no, no, I

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 3>got this, like trying to tell him to get back

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 3>in the box next pitch home run.

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Like the dude's just fun.

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I like the good energy. I like the entertaining guys.

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Everybody knows that now Doctor Glenn sometimes is entertaining. If

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>an r Peanuts and cracker Jack gallery, and he said,

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I gave Jazz Chishom a high five. It's spring training.

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>That's what this hot start is really all about. And

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 1>that's how it started, basically, so doctor Glenn once again

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>taking credit for things that can't possibly be traced back

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to him. But that's good. I like when the Pienza

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>cracker Jacks think that they control the universe, because it

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>feels like they control the show most days. That's for sure.

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I love you, Doc, It's great to see you back

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in the chat today. Garrett Witlock likely to start for

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox on Saturday at Tampa. Now some weird

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>things going on. Rich Hill's on the bereavement list and

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Tanner howckets unvaccinated, so it's like they had to reshuffle

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>everything around. But this is funny because Garrett Winlock is

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>this guy that well Sho and I have been on.

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>We love him as that potential closer he got to

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>save the other night. He started off really good. He's

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>got eleven strikeouts and two walks and nine to two

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>thirds innings. But it's gonna raise his profile if he

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>has a really good start and then beg some more questions.

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>This is another dude that I feel like, as an asset,

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>just add talent to rosters instead of holding onto guys

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that are really just fringe players. Anyway, Witlock is another

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>dude that if he's still floating out there, I think

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it got to add this week. What do you think?

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, definitely talented, and I agree with you fundamentally,

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 3>like ad talent, that's always a good thing. I wouldn't

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 3>put too much stock into this first start. I mean,

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 3>has he thrown more than like forty pitches in a

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 3>game this season?

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so.

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 3>And just with the way the landscape of pitching right

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 3>now across baseball. I certainly wouldn't expect me to go

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 3>deep in the game in his first start. Maybe they

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 3>work him up to that down the line, but I

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 3>think the better value is, like you said, as a

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 3>potential closer, somebody who can be like a multi inning reliever.

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 2>That so like, it's interesting.

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:33.079
<v Speaker 3>I'll certainly be paying close attention to it, but I

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 3>don't know how much stock I would put in whatever

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 3>the stat line.

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Is on this first start.

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, moving on to the next topic here, Bobby Witt.

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about him dropped his seventh in the batting

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>order for the Royals. Look, I think this is an

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>overreaction by the Royals. Maybe they're trying to take more

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>pressure off of him, but I think it's the opposite effect.

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I think what you want to do is you want

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to keep the kid at the top of the order

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in front of more lineup protection, not drop him down

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in the order. So I think this is stupid by

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the Royals and short sighted. The Royals are not going

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to win a World Series. There I said it. Spoiler alert, sorry, everybody.

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>The Royals aren't winning the Pennant this year. And I

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>know it's April and everyone's trying to win games. But

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you've got to get Bobby Wit Junior. Right. I know

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it's been a terrible start. The slash is just abismo

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>f thirty one over his first forty played appearances. But

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>this is your opportunity because I'm sure there's somebody who

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>overpaid for Bobby Wit that's freaking out right now. I

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>would kick the tyres on a trade. He's too good

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of a player. He was red hot in spring training.

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>This is also the ebb and flow of a baseball player.

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>They get red hot and then all of a sudden

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>they get a cold streak. It just so happens. It's

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>cold streak is to start the season. So I would

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>be buying everywhere. What do you think about Bobby Wood

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 1>Junior in this change that they've had in the lineup

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>where he's hitting.

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I really like your point about whoever took him

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 3>probably is overly concerned right now.

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm not.

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's been two weeks into the season. Every

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 3>player is going to go through a two week stretch

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 3>similar to this. Now, the bad of ball profile, like

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm reference four, isn't good. It's not like he's been

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 3>getting unlucky and hitting the ball hard, and then it's

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 3>just being right at defenders. He hasn't been hitting the

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 3>ball well, period, so I get it, but it is

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 3>very early to be tinkering. I don't like when you

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 3>have a top prospect and you say, okay, like we

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 3>believe in you, you're the guy, you're here, end of story,

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 3>and then you change it so quickly, like I don't

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 3>know anything about Bobby witz like personality. I've never met him.

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 3>He probably can handle it. I'm sure he's fine, but

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 3>it's just something I don't like. It seems like unnecessary,

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 3>like pressure and stress to just move move young hitters.

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Around like that.

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 3>And we see this a lot with young hitters too,

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 3>like Alex Bregman was what over twenty eight to start

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 3>his career. You know, Mike Tratt was bad his first

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 3>summer up in the big league, So like, starting slow

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 3>doesn't necessarily mean he's going to.

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Be bad the rest of the season.

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Even he's still they're giving him the green light to

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 3>run a lot if he needs stolen bases. He's playing

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 3>very well in the field, so he's going to continue

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 3>to get at bats and still be playing. It's not

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 3>like I'm worried about them sending him down or anything

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 3>like that. But yeah, to me, it's just a move.

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't get I don't I don't think it makes

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot of sense to move him around, at least

0:10:58.800 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 3>at this point in the season.

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, if you want to know a little bit more

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>about him, he's he's a Gemini born June fourteenth. He's

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>from Colleyville, Texas. Now as a Gemini, he has those

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>two personalities. So this is the bad hitter. I WoT

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the good hitter to show up. See what I did.

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it is. I don't know what

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>his sending sign is. And it says that he enjoys

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>photography projects and DIY stuff, and he also enjoys jazz music,

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>which you wouldn't think that.

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 2>For it to be clear, when you say he's a Gemini,

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 2>that means nothing. I don't know what a gemini.

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I know.

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:31.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm a Leo. I don't know what that means.

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Well that we could do a whole astrological show later on.

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>It means that it means that the universe cares about you,

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:42.719
<v Speaker 1>and that's what it means, and the stars hopefully will

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>align for Bobby Witzee, what I did there? Look at that?

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Look how I just bring it all?

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 2>All? Right?

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Fun facts tied for some fun facts. I saw this

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>tweeting it. It's fun. Through three hundred and fifty career

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 1>games Vladimir Guerrero Senior two hundred and eight runs, four

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.559
<v Speaker 1>hundred and four hits, seventy one homers, two hundred and

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty one our through three hundred and fifty career games

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>from Vladimir Guerrero Junior two hundred and fifteen runs, three

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty one hits, seventy six home runs, two

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty one RBI. Now, no one was ever

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna confuse these two guys in the field of Laddie

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Senior was incredible arm talent, great right fielder. Vlad not

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>so much the defensive genius. But man, it's kind of

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>scary how good these guys are. And if this trajectory holds, Man,

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a Hall of fame kind of

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>career we're seeing for Vlad. I hated that narrative that

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>was out there earlier this year in draft season about

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:35.959
<v Speaker 1>you can't take Vlad as a first round pick. I

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>sure people say this in Rodo to which I think

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you're drunk. Go home. It's the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you know anything about baseball or you just such

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a nerd that you just sit here and look at

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, wOBA and Xip all day until your you know,

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>eyes bleed, Because if you know anything about baseball, this

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is a great player, a guy who can win a

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>triple crown. That matters in Rodo. I don't care if

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it's in the steel bases. He's gonna hit for a

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>high average, dry he's gonna have a four category. This

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is the dumbest narrative I saw out there on Baseball Twitter,

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and Baseball Twitter has a lot of dumb narratives, so

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to point this out there. Vlad Gerrero Junior.

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I have no shares. Wish I had any shares for

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you so far this year that you've been able to enjoy.

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I have only one.

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 3>But it was a keeper and it was a league

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 3>that I took like I'm a co owner with a

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 3>friend that he had had him earlier, so kind of,

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 3>but I can't really take credit for it. I would

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 3>have happily taken him in the first round in any

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 3>draft I was in if I had the opportunity, I

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 3>don't understand that logic at all, Like, if you're going

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 3>to give me a guy who's not just going to

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 3>be a four category contributor, but a four category stud

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean all day, I made a bold prediction before

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 3>he made his major league debut that he would have

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 3>a better career than his dad, even taking into account

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 3>the fact that he will never come He will never

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 3>sniff the defensive value that Lad Senior broad So he

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 3>has to really out hit his dad for that to

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 3>be true. Right now, he's on the same pace as

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 3>his dad, which is still freaking incredible. It's not quite

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 3>out out pacing him yet, but I mean, this is

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.079
<v Speaker 3>one of the five best hitters in baseball in my eyes,

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 3>and I think in a lot of eyes, and I

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 3>think he should.

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Be a first round pick for the next twelve years,

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:10.719
<v Speaker 2>like the.

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Top five talent. I mean, yeah, I mean his top

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>five and first base was exactly a great position this year.

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>People are he's in a great.

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Mind, Well, I mean there's no what only literally the

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 3>only negative you could possibly come up for with him

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 3>is that he doesn't steal bases, which fine, most of

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 3>the league doesn't steal bases anymore.

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Give me the uh. I'll give you forty two home

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>runs this year for Flatti. You're gonna go over under.

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I'll go over, although although the the fence moving back

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 3>at Camden Yards is probably gonna hurt him since he

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 3>loves hitting at Camden Yards.

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 2>But no, I'm going over.

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 3>And there's not a lot of guys I would say

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 3>that about where I would be as bullish as I am.

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 3>But he I mean again, he's a top five talent,

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 3>another guy who's super fun to watch, and he's still

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 3>young and like learning the pitch in this league, He's

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 3>only going to get better. I can't throw enough cliches

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 3>your way about Vladdie Well.

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I love a good cliche. And yesterday was the show

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>where we praised the starting rotation and how good they've been,

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>how oddly good they've been for the Orioles.

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I missed that.

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I missed an Eddie Murray reference in

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 3>the trivia section. I missed talking about the Orioles rotation.

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean it was by the way, Bruce Zimmerman is

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 3>a Marilyn native. You said, who is that guy? When

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 3>you're doing that conversation yesterday. He's been pretty good this year.

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, I just I don't want to acknowledge

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>anyone who names himself Spencer, and it's got.

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 2>An that's harder to defend.

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>It's ridiculous, no respect there. Just kidding Spencer. I know

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>he's a big fan of the show. Let's talk about

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>MLB slugging percentages, because Mike Mayor is gonna yell at

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>me if I don't. He's like, I put this in

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the show sheet. You look at the show sheet. I

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>was like, all right, Mayor, I see it. I'm trying

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to get Ryan all set up. It's very high maintenance

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>this morning, Mayor. I guess that cold medicine is finally

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 1>kicked in for him. Slugging percentages in April over the

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>last ten years are three ninety one, three ninety five,

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>four oh one, three eighty nine, three ninety so kind

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of hovering the same spot last few years four five,

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>four oh seven, four hundred and four to twenty one,

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>three ninety so far three sixty nine. Now, I don't

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>want to take too much out of this because there's

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of games in cold weather environments like

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Colorado this time of year. It's cold, Detroit cold. I

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know why we insist on opening out away or

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>or in home stadiums that are cold. I don't know

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>why this happens, but there's been some really frigid temperatures

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>out here. I know there's been worse at times. But

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not making too much out of this. I know

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we talk about that dead and ball. I know a

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of people want to talk about that, that the

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>ball has been dead, and to me, like one good

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>hot week here from a couple guys. And let's not

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>forget people were behind in spring training. It's gonna change

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>by the time we get to May. I guarantee you

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that three sixty nine is probably closer to that three

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>ninety mark. You think that's true or do you think

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that I'm not paying enough attention to what's going on,

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>which is also possible.

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, first saw that's very possible. I would never take

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 3>that off the table, but I would say, I mean

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 3>to be fair on the cold weather. It's cold every April,

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 3>and this season actually started a week later, so theoretically

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 3>it would be just that marginally less cold.

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 2>You would think I haven't crutched the numbers on the

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 2>weather of the last ten years.

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, you don't work for the Weather channel in

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>your spare time. Let's not pretend years no, of course, but.

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Like, I mean, it's just one of those things where

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:23.159
<v Speaker 3>like I mean, we've been talking about how hitting has

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 3>been getting tougher and tougher for a decade now, and

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 3>usually you see that represented in the batting average going

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 3>down as people are selling out for power.

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 2>So it is a little.

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Interesting to see it being reflected in the slugging percentage.

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 3>But it's just I mean this, it's hard with any

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 3>stat regardless advanced bad ball profile standard stuff, two weeks

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 3>into the season. I mean, I mean, the thing about

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:46.159
<v Speaker 3>baseball that's different from say football, is with football, you

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 3>can tell pretty quickly what's going on two weeks into

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 3>a new season. In baseball, you need there's just too

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 3>much going on, so you need those those advanced analytics.

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 3>That's why we have saber metrics in baseball, is to

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 3>be able to take into account all this information that

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 3>the human brain can possibly do on its own. But

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 3>early in the season that information hasn't stabilized yet, so

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 3>it's really hard to sort of balance the eye test

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 3>and well, anecdotally he looks pretty good or the league

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 3>was pretty powerless this year versus the numbers.

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 2>So I really.

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Struggle to take too much away from pretty much anything

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 3>I see two weeks into the season.

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree it's too soon. Let's talk about our stat

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 1>heroes yesterday. We'll start with the pitchers. Pablo Lopez we

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>mentioned at the top nine k's no earn, big win

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>for him. He's two to zero now with a point

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>five two ERA. Carls Carrasco, he wasn't kidding, he said

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 1>he feels great. He's been pitching pretty well. He's got

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a one four seven RA seven k's yesterday and a

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>win over the Giants. Zach Pleisak was good in his

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>game and just want to earned run. Ten kse through

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>seventeen innings, but obviously plea Szach not a big strikeout guy.

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Gosman with a nice outing against the Red Sox.

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Is important outing for Gosman because you know there's some

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>questions there how would he transition to the American League.

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>So far, so good. Joe Ryan, my dude who I

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>took in every single draft I think when we were

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>doing all those mock draft shows, and I have him

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>on every single team. I love me some Joe Ryan,

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>ariel Con and I could not say enough good things

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>about Joe Ryan in the off season. Six innings, no earn,

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 1>two hits, one walk, five k's and win. I know

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>it's the Royals, I don't care. It's a good start.

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>And Jordan Montgomery good start for him, five k's, two

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>walks and a loss to the Tigers. There but Jordan

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery continuing to pitch well after a good, good run

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>last year in twenty one. Any of these performances in

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.199
<v Speaker 1>particular stick out to you, Ryan, Yeah, I mean a.

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Lot of them were pretty good.

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 3>The thing that sticks out to me most is that, annoyingly,

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I roster any of these guys except

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 3>for Joe Ryan, who actually do have Because I listened.

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>To you there you go. Yeah, but Ryan.

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 3>I will say to me, like, the one that stood

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 3>out though most of them, was Kevin Gossman. Seventy of

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 3>his eighty pitches that he threw yesterday were strikes, which

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 3>is like bonkers. And as a guy again who watched

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.479
<v Speaker 3>him a lot in Baltimore, Like that's even more crazy

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 3>from you. Imagine the guy I saw, you know, five

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 3>years ago, doing that now. He has twenty two strikeouts

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 3>this season in eighteen innings zero walks. He has the

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 3>most swinging strikes induced the season in all Baseball fifty seven.

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 3>Behind him are Rodin Corbyn Burns, Otani, delan Cees. They're

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 3>all behind him. He's number one at fifty seven. I

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.479
<v Speaker 3>was looking this morning. Our rest of season rankings on

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 3>the site have him at pitcher eighteen going forward.

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 2>I actually think that's too low.

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying he should be like top ten or anything,

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 3>but I would have him in the back end of

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 3>the top fifteen. I again, he's on a great team,

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 3>like they're gonna win a lot of games. He looks

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 3>really good to me so far this season. I totally

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 3>bought in on him as a true fantasy ace for

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the season.

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Ryan picks the former oriol By the way,

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Jake Arietta retired this week, did you pour out a

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>little from your old English well for your home?

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 3>When one Jake Arittor retires, he's then replaced by Gossman,

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 3>who's Ariata two point zero And in terms of making

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Orioles fans want to drink for other reasons.

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's fair it's fair. It's just what could have been. Yeah,

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it could have been. All right, Let's go to the hitters.

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Ty France three for four with a dinger. Francisco Lindors

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>just red hot. Four home runs. It took him fifty

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>games to get the four home runs last year. He's

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>got four already and it's only the twenty second of April,

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>actually twenty first, considering yesterday. Franmil Ray is a homer

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>for him. That's great, hist first dinger, he's on the board.

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's go for animal. Robbie Grossman a good night and

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>he's cheap in DFS tonight, So get on that wagon.

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Get on the hot streak. Three for three yesterday with

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a walk. Nathan Lowe three for five, a good day

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>for him. He's up to three ninety six on the year.

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Jesus Sanchez just can't be stopped. Three dingers for him,

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>three fifty six. And Sean Murphy good Irish lad home

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>run for him, three ribies last night. Murphy's my default

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>catcher everywhere, because goodness knows, I never liked to draft catcher.

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>So any of these hitters you want to highlight today, Ryan, Yeah,

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>three names and maybe some underrated ones.

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 3>Briefly on France. I'll just mention it because I keep

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 3>mentioning the bat ball profile. His bat of ball data

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 3>is like top eight percent in baseball. He has been

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 3>on fire in the last week. I love him hitting

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 3>second in America's lineup that is performing better than I

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 3>expected it to coming into the season, even with Julio

0:21:56.920 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Rodriguez not playing so well. But I'm to actually ask

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.880
<v Speaker 3>you about Lindor, who I drafted in a lot of places.

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 3>I love the value this year. I love getting a

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 3>star who's on a new team in year two on

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 3>that team. It's one of my favorite, you know, types

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 3>of players to go after. I just made a trade

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 3>actually this week in one of my leagues where I

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 3>have the best hitting in the league.

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 2>But the worst pitching.

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 3>I made a trade with the best pitching in the

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 3>league who has the worst hitting. I gave up Francisco Lindor,

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 3>maybe selling high a bit. I got Justin Verlander in return.

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious what you think.

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 1>About it, two of my favorites. You know how I

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>know you know I'm a Verlander guy. I think that's

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 1>fair for everybody. I like the fair trade. Look, Lindor

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is at his Zenith right now, there's no doubt about that.

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:41.439
<v Speaker 1>But I do think you're gonna see a guy who's

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>more the thirty home run, you know, fifteen to twenty

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>stolen base like you're gonna see Lindor from his Cleveland

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>days this year. It's clear he's back on track. I

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>think mentally is in a better place. I think Buck

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Showalter goes a long way with all that. And this

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>is why people who say managers don't matter, you're so wrong.

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>They do. These are people, they're not video game characters,

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they're just not And being able to get into a

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>guy's psyche a little bit, get him relax, and get

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>him in the right frame of mind, that goes a

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>long way. And I was with you. Lindor was a

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>player to me that was right for the taking. He

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>was a fringe first round talent going in the fourth

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>round in some drafts. So that's just nuts to me. Like,

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Lindor was there, and this is a Roto league. You

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>made this trade, Yes, in a Roto league, you're good. Look,

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>he's a very valuable player because he's a five category guy.

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:29.919
<v Speaker 1>Potentially maybe not so much in the batting average, but

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>he's had some good batting average years. But Verlander is

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>again four category pitcher. So I think you made a

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>really good trade there. I think you got an ace

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>for a top tier guy. And goodness knows so far

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>justin Verlanders think And he goes on the mounta tonight too,

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>very excited about that one. Some pitching zeros. Let's get

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to the zeros. Deskalfani nine earned runs now in thirteen innings, gross,

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 1>terribles VRA's at six, Tyler Wells also gross. One strikeout.

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>My goodness, gracious, what happened to the Orioles. I don't

0:23:59.200 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>know what's going on.

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 2>We don't need to talk any more about the Oriols.

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we'll move on. We already piled on Bobby with

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Julio Rodriguez, seeing if you get set a Rob Deer

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>like number of strikeouts over five with another four? Oh,

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 1>my goodness. Look, when you're striking out fifty percent of

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the time, something's wrong. I don't think. I don't think

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>he's going to somehow get past a demotion. And I

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>would tell everybody wait, wait for the demotion, because that

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>people want to buy now. Don't buy now in dynasty leagues, sure,

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.399
<v Speaker 1>but in a redraft don't buy now, wait for the demotion.

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna get dropped. I'm telling you right now, people

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>will just straight up drop him. Sa Carlos Stanton Oh

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>for four to two k's of his own three k's

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 1>for tyler O Neil Whit Maryfield continues to struggle a

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>little now. I'm stay to get a little concerned with whit Maryfield.

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought he would have turned it around by now.

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 1>One of the best just pure hitters in baseball. Just

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>an awful start buck thirty six, but he has to

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>have three steals. This is another Bilow candidate for me

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and Paul gold Schmidt. No Homer's eleven games, and he

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>started off slow last year too, So Marryfield and Goal

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>which mean I'm not worried about Are you worried about

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>either of those guys?

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't say long term worried about.

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm with you on Wit where I sort of expected

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 3>him to be showing more signs.

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 2>At this point and you know, in the young season.

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 2>But again it.

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Still is only two weeks in, so I certainly wouldn't say,

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 3>like long term worried. I do want to mention on

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 3>Gian Carlo. His strikeout rate is the highest of his career.

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 3>His walk rate is the lowest of his career, and

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 3>the walk rate usually takes a little longer to stabilize,

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:29.239
<v Speaker 3>so he needs probably about another two weeks to get there,

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 3>maybe even more. But the strikeout rate usually stabilizes pretty quickly,

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:35.239
<v Speaker 3>and he's a few percentage points higher than any other

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 3>season in his career, so that that would be a

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 3>little more concerning to me on him, just because I mean,

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.640
<v Speaker 3>strikeouts and walks are sort of the quintessential like things

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 3>you look for. But and and really the whole Yankees

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 3>lineups struggled. Obviously, I've been very your curial, But yeah,

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 3>on those, on those last uncul Schmid and Meryfield, I

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't be overly worried about them. I'd be paying close attention,

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 3>but not not selling or anything.

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Two days in a row. Good votcab from co host here, mercurial,

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 1>well done. Let's get to the home run leader board.

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>There it is, JP is still at the top with

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 1>six up and at them still at six bot At

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Dela Cardillo and Go Cards both had Francisco Lindor and

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>they were both up to five two hundred and fifteen

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>home runs as a group. Already we had one hundred

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:19.199
<v Speaker 1>and twenty eight people make different home run calls at

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>least one right last season. We're up to one hundred

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and forty eight through two weeks of twenty twenty two.

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 1>That is in fuego, as they say, so, credit to

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>all of you out there who are making these home

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>run calls. And clearly this is fine. And I'm telling

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 1>everybody there's still plenty of time to get in here.

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you We're gonna give away a fantastic prize.

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Is gonna be a really fun thing at the end

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of the year, whoever the winner is. And on top

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of that, we're gonna try to give some monthly prizes

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 1>out too. We'll see what I can shake everybody down for.

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I just realized too. You put us together, we become

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 1>Joe Ryan.

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you see that show?

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Whoa Dude? Let's get to some prop bets. Thanks to

0:26:56.119 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>our friends at bet mgm, the King of sportsbooks, special

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>offer for all you new users. Bet ten dollars win

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>two hundred when you bet on any game, regardless of

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the outcome, it doesn't matter. Sign up today, download the

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>betmgm app, or just go to betmgm dot com. And

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>enter the promo code leading off. It's one word leading off.

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Bet ten dollars, win two hundred. Come on on anything,

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>just go do it. How about on some of these things,

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about my favorite prop bets of the day.

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>CJ crone total bases is set at just point five

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>on DK. Is anybody watching CJ croned? I know he's

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>going to get Schooble. He's pretty good. CJ cron is

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a total base today? Okay to reach Schooble.

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 1>On that same game, we went with the over on

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the strikeouts last time. It's four and a half on FanDuel.

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to go bet that on FanDuel. And again,

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>all of these are coming straight from our prop bet

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 1>cheat sheet, which you can find at bettingpros dot com.

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>We lay it all out there. You literally can look

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 1>at it, find the best ones, click on that and

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>go directly and make your wager. It's glorious Jazz Chishol

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>who's been red hot. His total base prop is point

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>five on DK. What did you not hear all the

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>jazz chism love that we gave here earlier on the show.

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Harper total basis point five on DK as well.

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>So those are some spots to make some wagers today.

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Going to the DFS slate for the day, We've got

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Freddy Peralta potentially on that bounce back, interesting tournament play.

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 1>Roster percentage is gonna be low. If he has a

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>classic vintage Freddy p start, He's gonna win people some money.

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm just telling you you might want to have some exposure.

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>One lineup to Freddy Peralta nine point nine on FanDuel,

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 1>but just eight point nine on DK side. Schooble's just

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>seven point nine on fandle. He's an interesting one. Another

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>potential moneymakers. If Trevor Rodgers bounces back and figures things out,

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>he's just seven to one on FanDuel. That allows you

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to get every big bat you want. Michael Kopek tonight

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>eight point four k on DK A, nine point five

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>on FanDuel. Justin Verlander is my chalk play of the day,

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>ten point five on both sides. Go get him Justin

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Verlander and make Ryan warmly happy because you just got

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>acquired very happy. All right, Any pitchers that you're on

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>tonight in the DFS world from of the names here on.

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 3>The sheet, Yeah, I liked I do like Kyle Wright.

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 3>I wish he was a little cheaper than nine thousand.

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 3>I like Trevor Rodgers a lot. He was the one

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 3>that I highlighted just because I love I love that price,

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 3>and I think that could be pretty He could have

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 3>a pretty impressive outing. I like Scooble too. Peralta I

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 3>might be a little expensive, but I'm with you that

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 3>I think he could certainly have a great outing.

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 2>And I do want to mention because you didn't give me.

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 3>The chance on the ben pros prop bet cheat sheet,

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 3>I did have a couple of picks there.

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's go.

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 3>I like Freddie Freeman over one and a half total bases,

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 3>one of the best sitters in baseball. If you're gonna

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 3>give me a plus number, that's plus one fifteen. I

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 3>like to get two bases tonight, at least. Nick Cassianos,

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 3>this one's a little it's not total bases, it's to

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 3>score at least one run plus one forty. And then

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Hunter Green. He's going up against the Cardinals, who are

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 3>bottom five and strikeout percentage this year. I just love

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Green so much. He's just so much fun to watch,

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 3>he said. A major league record for pitches throwing one

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 3>hundred miles an hour in just his second start ever.

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean the dude again, like gatism, just electric, like

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 3>so much fun over five and a half strikeouts.

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 2>I like that one as well.

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:11.239
<v Speaker 1>I love Hunter Green, That's my dude. Had many an

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>argument about Green over Lodolo me of course, being on

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the Green side in the last year or so, so

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>far looks good. I think Lodole's gonna be a nice

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>pitcher too. Lefties take a little bit longer typically speaking,

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>but those are some good ones too, especially like the

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Green one. Stacks of the night, the Mets, the Dodgers,

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Astros, and the San Francisco Giants. I look

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>for that offense to bounce back. That Giants offense is plucky.

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot of big names or roster Persangezo's gonna

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>be low. But you know now that they've they've moved

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 1>on from the Mets were really annoying. In terms of

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>starting pitching been really good across the board. Me Chris Bassett,

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>his bad start was he gave up a couple runs

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>in the first inning that was like, oh my god,

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the earth has shattered. Here's some lineup builders for you

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to get your pens and papers or I don't know

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever things people write with or type into nowadays. DraftKings

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a kil Bado three one, Josh Low two point eight,

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Marcelo Zuna just three k tonight, Cody Bellinger three point one.

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>These were all on DK Robinson Carona three to six,

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Hummel, who also likes to collect humbles, those little

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>tiny figurines. By the way, people don't know that. I'm

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>just making up hobbies for people today on the show.

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm doing. Christian Pasche, who continues to swing

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a good bat two point four. It's not a great hitter,

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>he's just hot right now and he's cheap. So let's

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>go fan duel Nelson Cruz cheap again. I told you yesterday, Roster,

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>if you did, you got a home run back to

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the well today at two point nine. He's actually less

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>expensive day over day. I don't know why. Christian Pasche

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>two point four over on FanDuel Cano two point six,

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Humble two seven with Meryfield cheap. I'm gonna buy

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in two point seven. Nico Gudrum if he's starting a

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>two k free square Alert for Nico Goudrum if he's

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in the lineup for the Astros and then a kil

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Badoo two point two. So that brings us to our

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 1>home run call of tonight. So Ryan Warmly, I'm gonna

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>give you the boards is your this is your debut

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>for twenty twenty two on the Eating Off Show. Where

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>are you going for your home run call tonight and

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>or this weekend?

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 2>So unsurprisingly, I'm going to pick an Oriole.

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Last year when I made my debut ever on this show,

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.719
<v Speaker 3>I picked an Oriole Santan Dre going up against Shohyo

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Tani of the Angels, and he paid off for me.

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to go again with an Oriole going

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 3>up against the Angels Trey Mancini. His expected batting average

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 3>this year is like one hundred points higher than what

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 3>it's actually been so far. He's been getting hosed, hitting

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 3>the ball hard, and it's just been robbed and robbed

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 3>and robbed all season long.

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 2>He's due for his first homer. They're not in Baltimore

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 2>with that crazy fence.

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Now, not that Los Angeles is an easy place to hit,

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 3>but I'm just saying, this is the night that the

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Oriols offense finally breaks out and I'm going to Trey Mancini.

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 2>I had to do it for the first one this year.

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 2>At least it was going to be.

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>An Oriole And it looks like Mike Maher is holding

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>your hand in solidarity with you. He's going Ryan Mountcastle, shocker,

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 1>so Mountcastle actually, So.

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a good thing, even an Orioles aside.

0:32:58.080 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Now, if you want to make a home run call,

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 1>go to fan slast chat, join our discord, and you

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>will see the home run channel when you be a

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>come up premium subscriber here. So look, if you're running

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of leagues, if you're in a lot of

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 1>leagues already in different places, you can use our Fantasy

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Pros tools to manage all of them, find your free agents,

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>even set your lineups just on Fantasy Pros for all

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 1>those leagues on ESPN, on Yahoo, on this one, on CBS,

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>all of them. Okay, So it's basically going to pay

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>for itself and you might win some stuff. You can

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>have some home run calls with us and have some fun.

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 1>For me today, I'm going to the desert to Arizona

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>where the ball flies out pretty good, and Peede Alonso

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>for the weekend. Give me Pee Alonso for the weekend.

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to watch them hit four home runs so

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I get back into this race. Hot weekend from Peter A.

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Lonzo is all I need, So let's go. Pdie Boy

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is my pick. I am, I am stone cold, I

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 1>am colder than Julio Rodriguez. Right now, let's get Ryan

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>your final eh my god, your final thoughts before heading

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>into the weekend. Ryan, anything out there for you?

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 3>I would say less baseball specific more podcast facinic.

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for having me on for the first.

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Time, and I look forward to to filling in again

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:09.240
<v Speaker 3>as needed whenever I can. And we have finally broken

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 3>the seal of Joe and Ryan hanging out together on

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 3>a show. So I'm very grateful for this opportunity and

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 3>hopefully by next time because apparently I was getting slacks

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 3>from Mayor that my mic was kind of off with

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 3>shocker that I feel like that happened every time I'm

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 3>on the show.

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully it's better next time.

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it's it's perfectly fine. It's all good. It felt

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 1>like we were good, and then who knows this is

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>You can't worry about these things, but I agree, it's

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 1>nice to finally interact with you on air for a change.

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 1>This is a good time. And also keep an eye

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>out new waiver wire video drops on Fantasy Pro's MLB channel.

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's right, we're doing waiver wire stuff. So who

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 1>do I want to add beside some of the names

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that I dropped while I dropped a few more of them.

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:51.359
<v Speaker 1>So go subscribe to Fantasy pros MLB today. I told

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you I want to get those subs to ten thousand

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 1>this year. That's my goal in life. I think it's

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 1>a lofty goal. I think we could do. It will

0:34:57.840 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>help me on the social side, but a worthy goal.

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:02.359
<v Speaker 1>We'll probably all short, but maybe not. Maybe not. Look

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 1>how many people are calling home runs in April, more

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>than we had all year. It's a beautiful thing. Have

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a great weekend, everybody, enjoy your baseball. That'll do it

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>for us. But the story of the game goes on

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:14.919
<v Speaker 1>for Ryan Wrmalley, I'm Joey P. We'll see you next

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>time kids.

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Bye.