WEBVTT - Changes at the Top

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tech Stuff from how

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff What's dot Com? Hello everybody, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>My name is Chris Polettin. I'm an editor at how

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Stuff works dot com. Sitting across from me as usual

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>as senior writer Jonathan Strickland. Hey there, so, um so,

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>there's been some interesting news in technology towards the end

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand twelve. We're seeing some some big changes

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>coming along at the executive level with a couple of

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>notable companies. Those notable companies being Apple and Microsoft. Of course,

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing changes at other companies as well, but we

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>wanted to specifically talk about those two companies and uh

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>two of the executives that have been playing a very

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>large role in products at those companies and and what

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>their departure might mean. Yeah, that that's correct. As a

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>matter of fact, there are more than just on the surface.

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>It appears that there are surf this m I walked

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>into that one. Uh yeah, yeah, there are some quite

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a few similarities between the two the two main people

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>were going to talk about um today and uh in

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in kind of striking ways because the proximity or the

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the time, the closeness and time between the two departure

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>has led a lot of UH analysts to look at

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the similarities and differences between them and it's and it's

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>really kind of amazing. Yeah. The two people were speaking

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of specifically are Scott Forstall, formerly of Apple and Steven

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Snowski formerly of Microsoft. Actually, I should say Forestall currently

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>is still with Apple, but in an advisory capacity, not

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>an executive capacity. But at any rate, both of these

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>these gentlemen were high level executives with their respective companies.

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Both of them had had not long before the announced

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>parture of the of each of them had been on

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>stage revealing products, big, big products for their respective companies.

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Both men had been with their respective companies for many years. Uh.

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>In the case, well, well let's start with Scott Forestall.

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Then he was the one who was announced that he'd

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>be leaving Apple earlier. I mean that was in the

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.239
<v Speaker 1>end of October two thousand twelve when that announcement came out.

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>That's right, he and John Browitt both at the same

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>time Apple announced that the two would be leaving the company. Now,

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Mr Browitt is or uh you know, known for the

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple retail presence, right, and he had not been in

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that position for very long. Tim Cook apparently felt that

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it was just a bad fit. That it was, it

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>was a bad higher and for that particular role. And

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>so that was Browitt leaving. But whereas Brown had not

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>been with a company for very long, Forrestall had been

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>with the company. Actually had been. Steve Jobs is on.

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Steve was his team way back in the Next Incorporated days,

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and his role at Apple. I don't think I actually

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it was senior vice president of iOS software. So

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the big big stuff mobile iPhone, iPad,

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing that I bod touch and is

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the operating system and and those mobile devices account for

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>about seventy percent of Apple's revenue. So that's that's like, yeah,

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it is hard to exaggerate that that how important that is,

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>especially when you start looking at those sales figures. Well,

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Forrestall had been with Apple since Apple acquired Next Incorporated.

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>And I guess we can do just a real quick

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>summary of that for those who have not listened to

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>our episodes about Steve Jobs. Um. So, Steve Jobs had

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>left Apple after having some friction with the top level

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>executives at that time, and went on to found a

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>different company called Next in Core Rated, mainly trying to

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>develop computers for educational purposes. Uh. And then Apple once

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it started to really suffer financially. I mean Apple was

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>in dire straits and not the band. Yeah, they were.

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>They were frequently mentioned with the word beleaguered in front

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 1>of their name. They suggested that they were on a

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>sinking ship. Yes, they certainly did not have money for nothing,

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>but they ended up acquiring They purchased the company Next Incorporated,

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people said at the time that

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 1>they were really buying Steve Jobs back. They weren't buying

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the company so much as they were trying to get

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs back into the fold at Apple, and Steve

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Jobs ended up taking over as a an inter rom

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>CEO and then eventually became this the full time CEO

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of Apple and on his team at Next Incorporated with

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Scott Forstall, who had worked for Next Incorporated straight out

0:04:55.720 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>of college. So Uh Forrestall joined Next Incorporate and he

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 1>came over with Apple UH to Apple when Apple purchased

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Next Incorporated and began to work at various departments and

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 1>was was known for being a passionate member of the

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>executive team. UM. He was the youngest executive over at

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple at the time that he was asked to leave,

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and um, yeah, it was an interesting he was an

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting personality over an Apple. One of the things that

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I read, one of the reasons I read that he

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>had been asked to leave, uh, had more to do

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>with personality issues than anything else. Um. Now we can

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>say that this year two thousand twelve, when they did

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>announce a lot of the changes to iOS as well

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>as the new iPhone, there were some some hiccups in that,

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the main one being I have no idea where I

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>am right now because my Maps app tells me that

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.679
<v Speaker 1>the bridge I'm looking at is actually two miles away. Yeah.

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>The nice um. Yeah. The the the maps application for

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the iOS devices has been uh, to to put it, bluntly,

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>picked on for its inaccuracies. There there are many problems

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>with it. Um. And Apple has um you know, and

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>its typical fashion sort of at first pretended that that

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the case and then basically saying, well, we goofed

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>it like your first it was you're traveling wrong, yeah,

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 1>And then it was okay, maybe this isn't as fully

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>baked as we had hoped. And in fact I mean,

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>this was This was big news when it happened. Happened

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cook. When it happened, Uh, yeah, someone needs some coffee.

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>CEO Tim Cook issued an apology for the Maps app

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>for for how it was not performing up to their standards.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>This was a big deal because Apple never apologizes, Um,

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 1>very rarely apologizes. Yeah, it's when I say never. It

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>is an exaggeration, but it lightly yeah only yeah, just barely.

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Well anyway, One of the things I read, which may

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>or may not be true, was from the Wall Street Journal,

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:26.239
<v Speaker 1>which suggested that Tim Cook wanted for Stall to sign

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the apology letter because Forrestall was the guy who was

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>in charge of iOS, and Forstall said nothing doing ain't

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it. That's not how Steve Jobs do it.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>That's not how I'm going to do it. And um,

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and that might have been one of the flags raised

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>at the executive level with Forstall was that, you know,

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>he he was unwilling to sign his name to an apology,

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and Tim Cook ended up signing his own name to

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the apology and issuing it out. Now whether or not

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that's true is impossible for us to say, because this

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>is all based on what various Apple employees have said

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to the press, but there's never been an official statement,

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and you wouldn't expect one to come out like you

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't expect Tim Cook to say, well, I wanted him

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to sign us and he didn't, so I fired him.

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>That that probably would never, in any sane world ever

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>be said. Yeah, although the New York Times did UH

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>did also make that argument. Yes, um yeah, And in

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>an article on the bits blog, Nick Wingfield and Nick

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Bilton UH said that that had also been told to

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>them as well. Um, and I haven't heard, for that matter,

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I haven't heard an Apple executive deny it formally. Um. So,

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, there may be there may be some fire

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>with that smoke. Well, and and it's possible to that

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that it could be a combination of all of these factors. Yeah.

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to suggest that one flubbed app was

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>enough to you to oust an executive who had been

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>with the company for so long. In fact, there were

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>other issues. There was one that apparently there was a

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>philosophical debate that centers around the idea of design at Apple,

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and there were two sides, two main sides to this battle.

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>On one side, you had people like Scott Forstall, who

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>were advocating the use of a design philosophy called skew morphism, Yes,

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>which is basically making digital stuff look like uh, real

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>world things. He wondered why and eyebooks the the covers

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of the books appear on a set of wooden shelves,

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>or or the calendar appears to be made out of

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>stitched leather. If you swipe a page and the page

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>turns like that, skew morphism. Or if you were to

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>ever use any kind of it's not just Apple that

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>does this, all sorts of companies, but if you were

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to use say digital music service, and it presented it

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>as if they were vinyl albums kids ask your parents

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>on turntables, well, that would be an example of skew

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>morphism there. There there's some part of that aesthetic philosophy

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that says people are familiar with certain form factors and

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>they find that reassuring or they find it satisfying when

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it's involved. Um. There was an example where they showed

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>off a uh An app where they were deleting a

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>file and the deleting portion ended up looking like a

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>piece of paper going through a paper shredder, and the

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>critic I read said, how many people in that audience

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>have never seen a paper shredder? And I'm thinking, aren't

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>those still things? I mean, I never mind anyway, but

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that that's that's skew morphism. And that was that was

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of four stalls, uh philosophy. He's he liked including

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:00.439
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff in design. Well, we have a

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>trash cans or recycled bins on our desktops or or

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the desktop period to think of it as the top

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of your desk with a stack of documents on it

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>or documents on it. Um. So yeah, I mean this

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>is but but the skei morphism that that we're talking

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>about sort of it it has a range and on

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>on one hand it's sort of a you know, just

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.559
<v Speaker 1>an idea, and at the other end, it's actually going

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>so far as to add the stitching or you know,

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the grain of the leather or something like that. And um,

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>some people that really rubs the wrong way. For example,

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Sir Jonathan I've yes, Sir Jonathan, I've is a designer

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>at Apple, famous, famous designer obviously, and he's got a knighthood,

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>so clearly he's got some fame going on. Um. But anyway,

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it's because you know, hey, if you're a night, you're

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty famous. That's true, at least in certain circles. Look,

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I am just saying I haven't reached the hall of

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>fame where I've been knighted yet, But your majesty, I'm

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 1>here and I'm waiting. You know, I'm just as an aside.

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I've never figured out how he designs stuff with the

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>visor on his helmet down because it little flips. You know,

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to see the screen. All of Apple's stuff

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:20.239
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's meant for jousters. Um no, he he.

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>He's famous for designing a lot of the form factors

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that make Apple what it is today. Like when you

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>look at a lot of Apple's products, the reason they

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>look the way they do is in part due to

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan I've. And that's that's why a lot of them look.

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>They have a similarity to one another. Yeah, it's got

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>got sort of a cohesion along their product line. So

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan I've does not so well, let me not put

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>words into his mouth from what from Yeah, well, you

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>know me, it's probably you know, I just pick up

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>dictionaries lying anywhere. Know. According to a lot of the

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>news reports, I read I've is not a fan of

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>this design philosophy. He prefers to leave those elements out

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and to not have that clutter up his design, and

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't necessarily think that it's relevant or that it

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>adds anything to the experience. And so you have these

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>fundamental differences in philosophy, and uh, something's got to give.

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>And eventually it turned out that it was going to

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>be for Stall. For for stalls position that would give

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:36.559
<v Speaker 1>um he was essentially there was an announcement that was

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 1>said that he was going to leave his role move

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>into an advisory capacity, and then sometime in the year

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>he would actually leave Apple entirely. Now um I've is

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>taking over the human Interface team, which is part of

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.079
<v Speaker 1>what for Stall was seeing. So that pretty much answers

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that question about that whole design philosophy argument. Yeah, well,

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>they're our sources that have been quoted, um indirectly again

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>because they don't want to be uh, you know, have

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>their names attached to these things. But there are there

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>are sources who have told different news outlets and I've

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>because I've seen it in more than one place that uh,

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I've and forced all had stopped getting along so well. Um,

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I get the sense that they were they were pretty

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>compatible at one point, but that it had they had

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>been growing apart in philosophy to the point where I've

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>seen more than one news article that suggested that they

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't even attend each other's meetings anymore because they had

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>become so distant. Um, at least in the workplace. I

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Yeah, and and yeah, I've I've read similar things.

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>And there's also been quite a few reports saying that

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Forrestall was a pretty demanding and sometimes abrasive person to

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>work with, and that that also may have played a

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>part in it. Um, So I read I read one

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>very exhaustive profile on for Stall. It actually was written

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>before for Stall was leaving, and in that report it

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>was essentially said that he was um kind of kind

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of the person who would say that's not how Steve

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>would have wanted it done, and that and that some

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>people that Apple feel like that ends up holding the

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>company back if you just keep parroting out you know,

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Steve would not have done it this way, And you know,

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>there's their arguments be made, is Apple, should Apple remain

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the Steve Jobs company should strike out and to have

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>its own identity where it was obviously evolved from what

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs wanted. There are arguments to be made on

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>both sides. I've seen the same sort of arguments applied

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to the Walt Disney company, where you would have certain

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>executives say, you can't just say Walt wouldn't have done

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>it that way, because if you keep doing that, then

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>nothing new happened, whereas other people say, that's you're twisting

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>our words. What we're saying is well, would would have

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>focused on this sort of thing as opposed to the

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>thing you are focused on. And so these kind of

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>arguments happen in lots of different companies, particularly you have

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a very centralized, iconic kind of founder or leader and

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that person leaves the company, then we see this happen

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>over and over. Oh sure, sure, And of course, um,

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult to know what somebody like Walt Disney or

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs would do in a given situation, because especially

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the longer that goes on, because um, you know, for example,

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>with with Disney, you don't know what he would have

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do with some of the technologies that are

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>available now that weren't during his lifetime, and so there

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>might those factors would obviously change. Of course, Um, Mr

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Jobs has not been gone for as long, so it's

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a little easier to hew closer to his his visions. Um.

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>People of course, have pointed to the iPad many as

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>an example of something that Steve was quoted as saying

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 1>he didn't want, and hey, look there it is saying

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that he would never ever do that, and then it happened.

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So um, you know, I I think it's uh trying

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to hit that middle ground. I mean, that's my personal

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>feeling on it is you know you kind of look

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>at that and say, Okay, well maybe he wouldn't necessarily,

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:27.239
<v Speaker 1>but taking these things into an account, maybe I don't know.

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 1>So Um. Yeah. As a matter of fact, I've seen

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>um Forstall's name suggested as the quote unquote closest thing

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>to Steve Jobs that Apple still had. Um. Actually the

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>same has been said for Mr Sonofsky for Microsoft, which

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 1>is one of the similarities. But yeah, apparently he was. Uh.

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>People on the outside the media have been saying, you know,

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>this is not good. He was, you know for Stall

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 1>as a leader. Uh, he has somebody that that has

0:17:57.200 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot to do with the Apple d NA and

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people ding dong the witch is dead right, Well,

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>he was. He was a guy who was very passionate

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>about arguing to adapt the mac os so that that

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:16.199
<v Speaker 1>would serve as the foundation for iOS as opposed to

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>creating an embedded uh OS just for mobile devices. He

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to he wanted to have a more robust operating

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>system that was related to the desktop system. He did

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>not want it to go the iPod route, not iPod Touch,

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>but the other iPods which have you know, an embedded

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>specific operating system just for those devices that doesn't really

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>have much of a relationship with the desktop version. Yeah,

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>there's there's no shared look and feel yea. So he

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 1>he was one of those people who really argued for

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that uh and his his responsibilities will go to more

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>than just Jonathan. I've Eddie Q will take on some

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of the responsibility. He's going to be heading up departments

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that are overseeing things like Siri and Maps, which those

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>are two of the products that had some criticisms directed

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>at them. Siri when it first came out, everyone I thought,

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>everyone I knew who played with Siri was initially very

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>much impressed, and it became less so the more they

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:24.160
<v Speaker 1>used it until about a few months ago in twelve,

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>like sometime around September October twelve, when siries started to

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>seem to improve. Uh. And then of course maps had

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that same sort of initial problem. UH. And then you've

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>also got Craig fed Federighi, which I could be totally

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>mispronouncing his name in case I do apologize, But he

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>will be leading both the iOS and O S X

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>side of the R S ten I know, I if

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>they don't use Roman numerals, people call I X I,

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I call I x I. Um they yeah, so OS

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>ten um. But yeah, he'll be overseeing both of those departments. Um.

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>So that's where four stalls responsibilities are going to go

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to while he is what are you just doing the math?

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I was just wondering. I was wondering where that came from.

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:21.959
<v Speaker 1>What I X I I hercules anyway, disneys hercules? Um.

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>So so yeah, that wasn't That wasn't just I wish

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I were witty enough to have come up with that

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 1>on the fly. So anyway, Yeah, there are people who

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of experience at Apple who will be

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>picking up his duties. Now, the question is how smooth

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>the transition is it going to be. You know, it

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>may very well be that we won't see a huge change,

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>But it is kind of interesting that this happened shortly

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>after Apple had had its big event unveiling things like

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone five and the iPad, the new the new

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 1>iPad and also the iPad Mini. For all of that

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to happen, and then for the guy who's essentially in

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 1>charge of all that stuff get kind of pushed off,

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 1>that was a big story, which then brings us to

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>our second person we're chatting about today, Steven Snowsky. Yeah,

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to make one point, but we can

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>still use this as a transition because both this is

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>another way in which these two guys are similar. UM. Now,

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, uh Mr Sinofsky has his UM has had

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the same kinds of things. He's the the Steve, the

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>closest thing they have to Steve jobs, etcetera, etcetera. And

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and they had similar personalities and that there are conflicts

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 1>between different groups. But UM, one of the things the

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>media has said again about both of these guys is that,

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>uh they had UM, they had a devoted group of

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>followers within their company. UM. And UH, I think that

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in in the case of again both of these guys,

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>this could prove to be a problem because while there

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:03.880
<v Speaker 1>are people who are saying, holy cow, this is great.

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 1>I am so glad that he's not going to be

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>here anymore, there are a lot of people are saying, dude,

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>this guy, are you gotta be kidding me? He was

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>a visionary and in both cases, In both cases I

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:22.400
<v Speaker 1>read about how the people working directly for these two

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>men were often the ones who felt like they were

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>working the hardest of the whole company. But some people

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>thrive on that. So there are folks, well, we don't

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>mean to suggest that both of these guys or either

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of them were you reviled within their own companies. There

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>were people who were very much supporters of of what

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>they did, and there's their work style, saying, look, these

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 1>guys get results. So and in fact, you know, you

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>can if you look at the revenues for Apple and

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.959
<v Speaker 1>you look at how well those mobile devices did, you

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>can't argue that. I mean, for Stall clearly had a

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>big you know, he had a lot to do with that,

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and so uh, it's clear that he had a very

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>important role at the company. Sonofsky, same thing he was

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>he was the president of the Windows Division at Microsoft

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 1>until mid November two thousand and twelve. Now he uh,

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>he came in before I guess, in between Vista and

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Windows seven, so as the president of Windows. Yes, right,

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>so he had a lot to do with the Windows

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>seven yes improvements. Yeah, yeah, he came in. Uh, he

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.880
<v Speaker 1>came in as the leader of the Windows division right

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 1>when Microsoft was really struggling. Because if you don't remember

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>when Windows Vista came out, it initially had a lot

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of problems and mostly things like driver compatibility, device driver compatibility,

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 1>software compatibility. Uh. There were also some just some user

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>interface stuff that was rubbing people the wrong way. Plus uh,

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the Windows user interface stuff. The new stuff

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>was a real processor suck. It was using a lot

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of computing power and people were complaining about that, right,

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>people saying like, well, why do I need all these

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>bells and whistles. I just want an operating system that

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>gives me access to the applications I actually want to run.

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't want my operating system to be taking up

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 1>all the computer assets so that my processes don't run anymore.

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>That's very irritating. The ironic thing for me is that,

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, that the design was one of one of

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 1>the things that they were trying to make it look nicer,

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and people were complaining about the design. It's like, who

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>are they trying to be Apple? Yeah, yeah, we see

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff all the time. Well, Snowski came

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in to head the Windows division. He had actually been

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>working for Microsoft since he started as a software design engineer.

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh he came he had a master's degree in computer

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:52.479
<v Speaker 1>science from the University of Massachusetts and uh then he

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.199
<v Speaker 1>went from being a software design engineer to becoming the

0:24:55.280 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>technical assistant for Bill Gates. You may have heard of him.

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Name sounds familiar. So that's ten years after he joined.

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>He became the senior vice president of the Office division.

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Not the Microsoft office as in the physical place where

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>they work, but rather the software suite office like word,

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 1>power point, that kind of stuff. I figured. He was

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>in charge of making sure that you could watch reruns

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of the office the Office. So he became a head

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of dunder Mifflin in nineteen No. In two thousand and

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>six he became the senior vice president of Windows and

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the Windows Life Group, And in two thousand nine that's

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:34.120
<v Speaker 1>when became the president of the Windows Division. Well, he

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>helped turn around this perception problem that Microsoft had with

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Windows Vista. Now we should also say Microsoft did a

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of work trying to patch and fix Windows Vista,

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:49.959
<v Speaker 1>and by the end of that cycle of patches, Windows

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Vista was actually not a bad operating system. But the

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the early word, all of those criticisms that were directed

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>towards Microsoft really hurt the adoption rate for Vista. Yeah,

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>anybody who follows tech, and that's probably just about everybody

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>listening to us right now, we all know that there's

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:13.919
<v Speaker 1>this thing about getting whatever it is, a gadget, an

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>operating system, whatever, right after it comes out, because hey,

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you know it's cool, we want a new we want

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the newest, we want the best stuff. It's just a thing.

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Um And uh yeah, I mean all the people who

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>rushed out to buy Vista, it wasn't quite baked enough.

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>It was kind of soft and squishy in the middle.

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 1>And even Microsoft has said pretty much the same thing.

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>They said that, you know, they the part of the

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 1>problems were the fact that it was rushed through development

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and it was rushed into production, and that it probably

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>could have waited a while longer before launching. But I mean,

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>they had a lot of pressures on them at the

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>same time. I mean, XP was really starting to show

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>its age. Yeah, and then the early adopters too, are

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 1>the ones who a lot of the other people listened to.

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh hey, Bill, I know you buy stuff right after

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>it comes out. How is it? It's no, it's not good, Ted,

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's really not that great. So I know, I

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>just did I just did that in my head. Um,

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, he said, you know dude, Um whoa. But yeah,

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean that word of mouth spread and UH and

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and damaged the relief of Vista, and they had a

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>real problem. They they found themselves going, well, how are

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>we going to generate the right word of mouth? And

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>they said, well, let's let's do this with the next release.

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>So Sunofski, you know, he's the head of Windows at

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>this point, and he starts to spearhead the development for

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Windows seven and really pushes for UH to to address

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>all the problems that Vista had and to kind of

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 1>head those off and Windows seven. Some people say that

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Windows seven is the upbringting system that Vista was supposed

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to be. Um, that's probably an oversimplification, I think so.

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I think so because there were a lot of things

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:55.719
<v Speaker 1>that changed between Vista and seven. We had a lot

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 1>more developments going on, even just on the Internet side

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of things. But uh so Windows seven comes out and

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it has it receives much more positive reviews on its

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>initial release and has a far faster rate of adoption

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>than Invested did UM. In fact, as of the recording

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of this podcast, it hasn't been that long since Windows

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 1>seven surpassed Windows XP out in the market share, which

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>was a big deal because XP was something that a

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies were depending upon for you know, a decade, yes,

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and so to make that switch is a big that's

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a that's a big commitment now and um upon the

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 1>announcement that Sinofsky made and and here's one of the differences.

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>While Apple itself said that that Forstall would be leaving

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the company, uh, Mr Sinofsky actually said, Hey, I'm leaving

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the company. And uh the uh you know, Steve Balmer,

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Microsoft, has said very positive things about

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Mr Sinoff Geeson. You know, hey, he's he's the man,

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>he knows what he's doing. This is this is he's

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:08.719
<v Speaker 1>had such a great uh series of accomplishments with the company.

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Were very sorry to see him go. Yeah, there's uh.

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>But there's more going on under the surface here, folks.

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>For one thing, the timing of his announcement one thing,

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh sorry, did I steal that? No? No, No, that's

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a great that's a great way of going into this.

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft unveils Windows eight and the Surface, so the Surface tablet.

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Both of these are big, big products for Microsoft. The

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Surface tablet, Microsoft might say, is not as important a

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in the grand scheme of things, because they've been positioning

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that as an example of hardware that could run Windows

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>eighty and that other manufacturers could build tablets that could

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>equal or or exceed the Surface. Yes, it was. It

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>was more about a proof of concept. This is a

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>scratching the surface. Yes, it's the company line. That's the

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>company line. Now. Whether or not that's oh, the genuine

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>feeling Microsoft has behind the service tablet, I don't know.

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>It could be that they're hoping that this will become

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>their version of the iPad um. I can't say, because

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not in those meetings. They won't let me in.

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>There was that, and there was the actual unveiling of

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Windows eight and the launch of Windows eight, and then

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Sonofsky and Microsoft cut ties shortly thereafter, and that raised

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions. Again, just like Forestall leaving shortly

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>after the iPad miny and and iPhone five announcements and

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>all that, the timing question comes into play now. Snofsky

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>says that during any lull in a product development cycle,

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you tend to stop and take measure of where you

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>are and try and decide what you want to do next,

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>so that it's a natural thing when a product launches

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and you're at that lull to really think about what

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you're doing. Other people are saying, well, this kind of

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>seems weird, because you would think that you would need

0:30:56.040 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to really nurture and support wind Os eight because it's

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>such a huge change for Microsoft. I mean, the the

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>user interface of this operating system is an enormous change

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 1>from previous versions of Windows. Yes that you know, even

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>even if someone is absolutely loves the Windows eight interface

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>as soon as they pick it up, it's communicating that

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to your potential audience and and teaching them about the

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>user interface and explaining how it can be used across

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>various platforms. That becomes an important role of getting that

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Windows version of Windows adopted wide spread. Right yep, yep, um. So,

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>while we talked about Scott Forestall's devotion to Skew morphic design.

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Um the probably the big change in Windows eight from

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>previous versions of Windows that Zinowski is uh uh, I

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know credited with, but he's associated with the disappearance

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of the start menu option in Windows eight. And I've

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>actually seen, Hey, if he's gone, does that mean we

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>can have the start menu button back there? There have

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 1>been against I've read some reporters who have you know,

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 1>their work, and I've seen that according to the reporters,

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it seems like Sonofsky's philosophy was if this wasn't a

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>feature that I introduced, I don't want it in Windows

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>all the way down to perhaps even the structure of

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>their file management system, which is huge. That's that's a

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>key part of an operating system is how does it

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>manage and organize files? And so whether that's true or not,

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't say. Again, this is stuff that I've read

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and and you know it's on the internet, so it

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>must be true, right, But anyway, the that that's again

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>like for Stall Sinofsky, a lot of the reports about

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>him have said that he was kind of he was

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of difficult to work with at times, that he

0:32:55.720 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 1>was very demanding, that he could be abrasive. Also, one

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>report I read in Bloomberg said that, uh, you know,

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft was trying to get to this point where they

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to have a a kind of an aligned approach

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>with their products so that you would get a similar

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>experience going from one thing to another, so Windows Phone

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to Xbox to Windows eight device or whatever. This way,

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>he would have a lot of the same features that

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>were supported across these platforms, and that you could you

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>could support your experience from one platform to the next

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>as seamlessly as possible. But that Snofsky was not as

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>keen on working with other departments, and that he was

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 1>very focused on his department, but he didn't want to

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 1>necessarily work with anyone else. And in fact, Bloomberg went

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 1>so far as to say that, uh, the environment and

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft's executive suite resembled something out of Game of Thrones,

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>with division heads poaching talent from one another and thwarting

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>attempts from other groups to collaborate on products. As an aside,

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I hope it's considerably less bloody than Game of Thrones,

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I hope. So, you know, in the literal sense here,

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 1>what's the iron price for Windows eight? Um? Yeah, it's

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:14.399
<v Speaker 1>a but, but it made it sound pretty grim that

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the idea that these different divisions were actively trying to

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>get talent from other departments for their own benefit and

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>at the detriment of the other departments within Microsoft. So

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like each division is acting as a competing company

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:33.280
<v Speaker 1>with the other divisions, which is not a great message

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to give when you are talking about an entire company.

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>H Q four is coming nice, nice, Uh, it's stark contrast.

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I would say, Uh, I gotta work a Tyrian Lanister

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>joke in there somewhere. It'll be a short joke, I promise.

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, Um, yeah, hey I did it, didn't I? So?

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:02.359
<v Speaker 1>So yeah. Sinofski again very much an important player at Microsoft,

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and and it's it'll be interesting to see where Microsoft

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 1>goes from this point forward, because you know, Windows eight

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>is a baby out there in the upgrading system world,

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and uh, it'll be it'll be interesting to see how

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>how the company continues to develop and uh and present

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 1>the Windows eight to the market with Sinofsky gone. And

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>whether or not that I've seen some questions from people

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:36.879
<v Speaker 1>asking like, well, does this mean that Microsoft is going

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to do a one eight and move away from the

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Windows eight tiled interface and uh and go back to

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 1>something more traditional with the next release of Windows. And personally,

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that that might not be the right message

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:55.399
<v Speaker 1>to say, wow, you know, because I think Windows eight

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is truly an innovative product. I think I think, I

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 1>think there are a lot of great ideas there, and

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I do think that there is a need to create

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>an operating system that can work across multiple platforms because

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 1>more and more of us are using mobile devices for

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 1>our computing, and yet we'll still need to use desktops

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and laptops on occasion. And the more we can meld

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 1>those worlds together so that we could easily work on

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 1>the same stuff no matter which form factor we happen

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 1>to have at our access right then and there, I think,

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the better wealth we are. Yeah, well, there are definitely

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>some some similarities in strategy there. The way that Windows

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 1>and the Apple operating systems have been converging, you know,

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>between the the computer world and the mobile device world.

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Similarities in the operating systems um that's been increasing over

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the last few years. I think it's a testament to

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the design philosophies of both of these men. Um and

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and Yeah, I mean it's it's going to have an

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 1>impact both on the comp any UH strategies and on

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the company the relations within the departments, whether or not

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be turf wars and things like that. Um.

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little too early to tell that,

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>but it could have very you know, very well effected

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the UH corporate culture as well. Definitely, it'll be uh

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:22.799
<v Speaker 1>probably a little while before we know for sure. But

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 1>and And these are big companies. This is not the

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:31.239
<v Speaker 1>first time that either company has lost a an executive

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that people thought was you know what was an iconic

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 1>person at that company. Or Jobs and Gates right right,

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Because Gates and Jobs of course are no longer really

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:45.319
<v Speaker 1>the influence on these companies. I mean there they still

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>have influence even though they're no longer directly involved in them,

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>because everyone says, well, these companies were founded upon the

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>philosophies of their founders, so we want to stay true

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to that to a point, but not to the detriment

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of the success of the company, right right. Well, they proved,

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 1>both of them proved so integral to the success at

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the company. UM that you know it. They're legend has

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot to do with you know, the way people think,

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:14.240
<v Speaker 1>what am I gonna you know, how would this work

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>if he were going to be telling me what to do?

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, so it'll be interesting to see the the

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 1>next few months how they unfold for both Apple and Microsoft.

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine both companies will will you know, have

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a couple of bumps, but they'll get back on track. Uh.

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 1>It'll really be interesting to see a year from now,

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:36.359
<v Speaker 1>or in the case of Microsoft, maybe a few years

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 1>from now when we see the next generation of products

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that would the likely still have quite a few uh

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 1>fingerprints from these guys on them, because you know, they're

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 1>not only phobic from ye. By the development cycles do

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 1>tend to extend well, like by the time a product

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>is released, then the succeeding product is already well in

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to develop of it. So you like, when you get

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 1>Windows eight, you can be sure that Microsoft has been

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>working on Windows nine for some time. So yeah, same

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:13.320
<v Speaker 1>thing with iOS and get iOS you get the launch

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 1>of iOS six. You know io S seven has been

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in development for a while as well. It's just the

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:21.320
<v Speaker 1>way that it works, because if they waited then it

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>would take even longer between generations, and that tends to

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 1>not be great for sales. Yeah, and of course, like

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I said, all of us are waiting for the next

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:33.359
<v Speaker 1>big thing. Yeah, we've kind of, we've kind of It's

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:36.759
<v Speaker 1>a it's a feedback loop, right, because the companies come

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>out with a new thing, we get all excited, We

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 1>go out and we buy the new thing, which then

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>pushes the companies to develop the next new things that

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:45.760
<v Speaker 1>will come out. We'll buy the next new thing, and

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>as a cyclogue, it's integral to the company's bottom line. Yep.

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, we'll see what happens. Guys, if you have

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 1>any suggestions for future topics for tech Stuff podcasts, you

0:39:57.880 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 1>should let us know. Send us an email all addresses

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 1>tech stuffs at Discovery dot com, or send us a

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>message via Twitter or Facebook. You can find us at

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 1>those locations with the handled tech Stuff H S. W

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and Chris and I will talk to you again releasing.

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:15.759
<v Speaker 1>For more on this and thousands of other topics, visit

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 1>how staff works dot com.