WEBVTT - Grading TechStuff’s 2012 Predictions

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tech Stuff from how

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff What's dot Com? Hello again, everyone, and welcome to

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff. My name is Chris Poulette and I'm an

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>editor at how Stuff works dot com. Sitting across from

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>me as usual as senior writer Jonathan Strickland. Hey there, Hey, Chris. Yeah, Jonathan.

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:23.319
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember back at the the late days of

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven when you and I sat down and

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>we made some sweeping predictions about what would happen in

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the world of technology for two thousand twelve. Well, which

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>is which is good? Why you reminded me of these things?

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Luckily I took notes? Um. Yeah, So we made predictions,

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 1>and of course every year when we make predictions, we

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>hold ourselves accountable by taking our predictions and looking and

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing how we did. So let's, um, let's take a

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.480
<v Speaker 1>look at some of these. Uh, should I go first?

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to go first? Oh? Why don't you

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>give it a shot? All right? So my first prediction

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>was that economic uncertainty would cause companies to fail or

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>get acquired or to scale back, which was such a

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>gimme at the end of two thousand eleven that it's

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>almost embarrassing to call that a hit, but I am

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 1>telling it as a hit. That was um. I mean

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>we saw that happen. We saw lots of companies start

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>to cut back. I mean we had everything from the

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>uh Yahoo CEO at the time, Scott Thompson talking about

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>how he was going to have to cut back on

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a few thousand jobs at Yahoo or all the way

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>up to Zinga laying off employees. And I mean we've

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of that throughout the tech sector. And

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>again it's not a huge surprise. Now, of course, there

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>have been some successes in technology, there's been some companies

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>have done very well in two thousand twelve. But I

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>think I think it's safe for me to call that

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>one a hit, all right, So I suppose I should

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>give my my first one and go here. Um. Yes,

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I predicted that Yahoo would be purchased by another company,

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>possibly the Chinese search giant Ali Baba. Yeah, that would

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>be a myth. Well, I also predicted the same thing.

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>That was one of my predictions as well. I said

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that they would either be acquired or break up into

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>separate companies, and the separate companies would be acquired. So

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>that is also a miss. We both at the time

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.959
<v Speaker 1>thought Yahoo was kind of kind of really struggling. I

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>mean it really was struggling. And that's that was before

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Scott Thompson came on. And of course Scott Thompson didn't

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 1>last that long. So for a while it looked like

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that prediction might come true. And then they brought on

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Marissa Meyer and uh, and that kind of gave Yahoo

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a boost in the eye of public opinion. Yeah,

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that's at the end of UM that had that those moves,

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>especially the the um. They've also struck some content deals

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and things, um, and some high profile people have come

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>on to the board of directors. Um. But these things

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>are starting to make people think that Yahoo may have

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>some life in it yet. UM. And in fact, Meyer, Um,

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>well she inspired our our Women of Tech podcast, so

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>we did a little while ago. Um. She Uh, she

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 1>has made some some pretty substantial changes even in the

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>short time she's been there so far. So people are

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>starting to think there there might be a future for y'all.

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Who after all, yeah, and uh, do you want me

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>to go again? Are you? Because that was yell who

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>was both of us. Yeah, I predicted that the the

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>famed A T and T and T Mobile deal would

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:32.119
<v Speaker 1>fail miserably. And boy were you right? Well yes, despite despite,

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>well I was, I was really looking at the uh

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>indicators there and I felt like that was a pretty

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>sure deal that it was gonna the deal was off.

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>That was strange. Um but uh but yeah, I mean

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>government regulators felt like it was going to be in

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the United States here, um, where the merger was supposed

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to take place. Um, felt like it just wasn't going

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to help competition after all. No matter what a T

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and T was saying, now, T Mobile didn't and managed

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to uh the thing. As you know, t Bone will

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>as the fourth largest carrier in the United States. I mean,

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Deutsche Telecom has a pretty substantial share over in in Europe,

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>but in the United States they are their fourth largest.

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>People were saying, hey, they can't keep this up, especially

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>since they don't have the iPhone. They didn't manage to

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to do some pretty big things this year. They divested

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>themselves of their towers, the actual infrastructure for their network.

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Um and uh. They did a couple other small things

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>like um, oh, yeah, they decided they would merge with

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Metro PCs, which is I don't know that the fifth

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>largest carrier they're they're one of the players that is

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>behind the top four and not terribly far one of

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the largest small carriers UM. And by merging that infrastructure,

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>which looks like it might happen UM, it looks like

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>they might be able to to build out the network

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>take it to lte UM. And they've even struck a

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>deal with Apple to bring on Apple products, including apparently

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>the next version the iPhone later on, which they would

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>not have been able to do as efficiently on their own.

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>So big deals happening, but not with a T and T,

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 1>so total hit for you. I said that REM would

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>experience a change in executives at the topmost layer. Uh,

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and this was you know again, it was I think

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it was either late November or early December when we

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>made these predictions, because we we do record ahead of time. Well, Uh,

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>we learned early on in these prediction episodes that if

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>we didn't make these predictions by what we saw at

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the very end of the year, there may be a

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>very good chance that we would be completely off. Yeah,

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>but it turned out January two, thou twelve, that's is

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>exactly what happened. REM. The the co C e O

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>S resigned there's a new CEO at REM, and uh,

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, this again was sort of a gimme because

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 1>REM was really struggling as well, having having a real

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>rough time with the uh the the the added pressures

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of iPhone and Android and even you know a new

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>players like Windows Phone eight coming onto the smartphone scene.

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>RIM was really struggling, and uh, there were there was

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pressure from from shareholders for some big

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 1>changes to happen, and failures like the playbook didn't help,

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and that all kind of contributed to it. And so

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>now we've seen a changeover at RIM. So I count

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>as a hit, yep, yep. And uh I predicted that

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Facebook would have an I p O. UM that was

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a hit, although uh, you know again that was a

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>semi gime gimme because they were sort of required to.

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>But the science had been pointing. I didn't actually know

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that at the time that we predicted this UM, and

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it looked like everything was pointing that way that they

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>were they were getting to the point where they were

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>going to try to raise money with their I p O.

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Of course, uh that hasn't been a huge success for them,

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>but may still pan out in the end. Of course, yeah.

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I predicted that Facebook would hit one billion users before

0:06:58.080 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the end of two thousand twelve, which was a hit.

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, based upon the number of users that

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Facebook had at the end of two thousand eleven and

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the traditional growth trend for Facebook, that was a pretty

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>safe bet to make and it turned out to pay off.

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>So there we go. Facebook has over one billion users. Uh,

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of people. That's that's amazing to think about. Technically,

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess I should say one billion active accounts because

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>some of those accounts may in fact be held by

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, a single individual. Yeah, yeah, like of them. Um,

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to keep track of all those Oh, speaking

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of speaking of social networking, Um, I predicted that Google

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Plus would not fold. People were saying last year. I

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>remember people saying, look Google Plus. At first it was

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a Facebook killer, and then it wasn't. Oh look at this,

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>this is terrible people, it's just Google blew it again

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>on social networking. But I said, no, it's to stick around,

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think it will slowly grow, and it slowly has. Yeah,

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not been dramatic, but that's exactly what you predicted.

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And I remember the early days of Google Plus it

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>felt like it was a playground for all the tech

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>journalists and tech industry folks, because that's all the people

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I saw on Google Plus. We were the ones who

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>got the UH the invites in pretty early, and I

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>had mine within the first week that it had launched.

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>UH that came out of beta, and and for me

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that was a blast. It was like, oh, I get

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to play with all my friends. And then I realized, hey,

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what, this is not so great for anybody else.

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>But but it has, you know, very slowly grown, and

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it'll be interesting to see if it will continue to grow.

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I know that there's a lot of I don't know

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>if animosity is the right word, but um, dissatisfaction with

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>certain Facebook users at the direction that Facebook has been taking.

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>And it could give opportunity to to UH to a

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>social network like Google Plus to really take advantage of that.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Or we might even see and this will be a

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>shock or if it happens, but we might even see

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>something like my Space take advantage of that and become

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a player in that in that arena. Again. I would

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>be interested to see that simply because I have written

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 1>my Space off and they are clinging to life and actually,

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>from what I've read, making some pretty reasonably decent improvements. Yeah,

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I haven't. I haven't checked it recently. I remember the

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.199
<v Speaker 1>last time I looked at definitely was a dramatic departure

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>from the previous version of my Space, which was nothing

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 1>but good because the old MySpace got way too cluttered

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and wait, everyone seemed to have an animated background image

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 1>that was designed to make my eyes bleed, and they

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>also had the music scientifically generated to make me want

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to punch people. So I'm glad that that has started

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to change some of the punching people part. I just

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>kind of ingrained at this point. Uh, good times, good times.

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh we I predicted that Facebook would make a huge

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:16.439
<v Speaker 1>acquisition that would make people wonder what might be happening

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes. Yeah, this is this is kind of common.

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>This was kind of a a uh, well, if anybody's

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>going to do this kind of thing, it would probably

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>be Facebook cause they got a lot of money. So

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.599
<v Speaker 1>I predicted this was going to happen, and uh, it

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of didn't like if you could argue the Instagram

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 1>was one of those except that made a lot of

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>sense because Facebook was really struggling in the mobile platform,

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>especially things with like mobile photos sharing and Instagram, was

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, really taking off there? But you know, I

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know, because the way you worded it in the

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Predictions episode was it sounded like it was going to

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>be a company that would be so out of left

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>field that make us all scratch our heads and say,

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 1>why would Facebook even want that? So I put a

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>question and mark by this instead of hit or missed,

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>because I think I think you hit it more than

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you missed it. But it wasn't completely within the spirit

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of the prediction. Yeah, I think I think Twitter did

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that more, yeah, than than Facebook did this year because

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>they they yeah, they had that sort of acquisition. But well,

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>speaking of acquisitions, here's a big miss on my part.

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I predicted this was this is one. Even as I

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>made the prediction, I said, I didn't really think it

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>was going to happen, but I wanted to have some

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty crazy predictions in my list. I said that Google

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>would purchase Twitter, and that did not happen. I have

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>seen some people suggested that could still happen, like they

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>could still see Google make a run of Twitter. I

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>honestly think that that's that that ship is sailed. Twitter

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>has kind of established itself at this point. I don't

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>see it becoming a part of a larger corporation anytime

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 1>really soon. Of course, that probably means that that's going

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:55.199
<v Speaker 1>to happen next week. But anyway, Uh yeah, I totally

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>missed on that one, although again I was purposefully sticking

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>my neck out. Yeah. Yeah, well, I mean it's fun

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to do those and see what what actually happens. Um,

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 1>let's see, let's see. Uh oh, yeah, I said that

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>we you would be a minor hit, which it kind

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of is. Yeah, it's you know, again minor hit that

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>since you said minor that was that was a good call.

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>It's been selling, but it hasn't been selling like the

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>original we did. Yeah. Yeah, And you know, the reviews

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>are kind of all over the place. You know. Some

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>people absolutely love it and love the game pad. Other

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>people find it very large and clunky, and and they

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily think that it's a huge improvement over the

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 1>previous generation, although it does support HD which the old

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>one did not. But yeah, I mean it's no, it's

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's the runaway success that Nintendo kind

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of needs, but at least it's not a total flop. Yeah, Um,

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I had another I had another Nintendo one, uh,

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that Nintendo would cut the price of the three D

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>S again. And I was basing that on the sales

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>numbers because the three D S has had done something similar.

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>They were selling, but they weren't selling like hotcakes. So

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought, well, they'll they'll cut the price before the

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 1>end of the year. And I thought, especially around uh

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:17.719
<v Speaker 1>this time of year, we're recording this, right before the

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>holidays here in the United States. I thought, oh, yeah,

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that's that's they're gonna have to. Actually, something else happened.

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>They actually started selling more of them. Yeah, Nintendo had

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>when they launched the three dsh It wasn't but a

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of months later that they cut the price pretty drastically.

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>And uh, and that was a pretty big news story

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>because it was it was a dramatic move on Nintendo's part.

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, they launched a new product and then to

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>cut the price of that product within the same year

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of its launch was a big deal. But but yeah,

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you had said that it was probably gonna undergo yet

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>another price cut. But as it turns out, I think Nintendo, Uh,

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the price cut they made was at a point that

0:13:56.640 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it no longer gave gamers pause um or or or

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>or hoofs for that matter, to pick up a Nintendo

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>three DS. And so they ended up the sales figures

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 1>ended up spiking. They ended up getting a good lift

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>from that, and in fact, the the the portable console

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>became a bit of a success or, at least much

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>more so than it had been at its original price.

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Um Plus more games came out for it too, so

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that kind of helped. So I'm gonna I have these

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>numbered in my notes, but I'm gonna actually jump down

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit because I have a Nintendo prediction too.

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I just got to make sure that I go back

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>up when we're when we move off on this right,

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I said that Nintendo would begin to work on a smartphone,

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and as far as we know, that has not happened.

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So that that was one of those things where I

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>just looked at the market that Nintendo is in, that

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>casual gamer market, and that many casual gamers have turned

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to things like smartphones and tablets uh to be the

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>source of their casual games. That's that's their go to

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>device to play games on, which means that those devices

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>are competing with Nintendo's products. So to me, it made

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense for Nintendo to look into creating

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>some sort of smartphone, either uh, partnering with another company

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and then just sort of having a co branded product

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>or striking out on their own and trying to make

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a Nintendo smartphone from the ground up. That did not happen. So, yeah,

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>let's a miss on my part. Uh, sad, it would

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>have been interesting to see. Um, let's see oh uh

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple TV. We were we were talking last year about

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple TV UM, which is not the the little device

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>um that you you plug into your TV. I was

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about an Apple television. Yeah, an actual

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>TV running Apple software. Because some people were saying, any

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>minute now, we're going to see the Apple TV. The

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>same people are still saying that, Yes, you were one

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of them. Yeah, uh and uh and um. Yeah. This

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>this happened with the iPad and a couple of the

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>other products that we've seen with them, the iPhone. It's

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>coming any day now. Yeah, it's still coming any day now.

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Although it looks as the end of twenty twelve that

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>it really isn't just a rumor that they really are

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to perfect a television. Yeah, I don't know if

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it will be hit or not, but it looks like

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it will come out. I predicted that it would not

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>be out by the end of twelve, and therefore it's

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a hit and I and I disagreed. I went ahead

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and said, you know what we're going to We're gonna

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>have this be a hit or a miss one way

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>or the other. I will go ahead and predict that

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple will come out with Apple TV before the end

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand twelve. So that was a miss for me. Um.

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>But then that was again another one of those where

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it was like, I feel confident that one of these

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>two outcomes will happen, so I will take the other side.

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh As for one of my official predictions, I said

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that Netflix would get its act together and that possibly

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Read Hastings might even leave the company, because you know,

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven was a rough year for Netflix. There

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>were some some very public missteps made by the company.

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean the I don't think I've ever seen a

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>CEO apologize to consumers as frequently as Read Hastings was

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>appeared appeared to be doing in two thousand eleven. However,

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Read the hasting and read like like a Mr. Hastings

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>did not leave the company. Yes, Uh, Hastings is still there.

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 1>And but I would say, you know, at least Netflix

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>hasn't made any other big mistakes like two thousand eleven,

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, seemed to have a rash of them. Two

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand twelve, there wasn't really as much of that, so

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess getting its act together, it's more or less true.

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And also Netflix did strike some high profile deals, although

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>those deals are not going to come to fruition for

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a few years. Of the deal with Disney to run

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>UH movies that the Disney features. Um, you know, Netflix

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>struck that deal with Disney, and it was a that's

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:57.719
<v Speaker 1>a big deal, but it's something we're not going to

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.959
<v Speaker 1>actually get to enjoy for a few more years. Actually, Uh.

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 1>They to be clear, they struck a couple of deals

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>with Disney, and there is another deal with Disney that

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>did go through UH to show older Disney content, but

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a separate as opposed to the stuff that's most

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>recently been in theaters. That's that's the big deal that's

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>not going to UH to take effect for another couple

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 1>of years. So that is that is a different animal.

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Just just for clarifications, to um, let's see, let's see, Um,

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I have a new Google TV. Products will come out

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and no one will care. Wow, what a hit that was. Well,

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>Google has the wherewithal to throw its weight behind products

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and Google TV uh while critically pretty well, critically acclaimed. Hey,

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>this is a good product, let's see more of it. Actually,

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of what happened with Apple's product to Hey,

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>this is really neat, but nobody's buying. I think it's

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it's not quite ready like they're there, and

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>there's several features that are uh, they're not fully integrated

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>with Google TV yet. And a lot of that is

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>due to content creators resisting and so everything that the

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Google TV should be able to do, it cannot do.

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's more to do with business deals and and

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>non existent deals like things that need to happen to

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>have not happened. Uh. And so Google TV is a

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>product that's not as good as it could be, as

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 1>it as it was engineered to be. But but that's

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not the fall of the technology. That's

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>more of a business side thing. But it's still true.

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I call that a hit. Um. I mean, we saw

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Google at the Google Io event there was a lot

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:47.719
<v Speaker 1>about Google TV, and and still it is not really

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>uh launched to any any kind of of real success

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in the marketplace. Yeah. Well, part of the reason is

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that the initial launch partner, I mean, there was a

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>big um content or not content. There's a big hardware

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 1>deal with Logitech that they were going to partner and

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>apparently most people liked it that had tried it, but

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you know those fifteen people I'm teasing. Uh, The thing

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>is that it was an expensive product. It was i

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I think when it first launched, and they ended up

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>dropping it um inn to um and they had, you know,

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 1>some pretty stiff competition from people like roku um. So

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, they they you know, ended up shelving that.

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Logitech said nope, we're done, We're out. Uh, And I

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>figured somebody else will will launt in on this because

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've got Android, you've got the h the

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>possibility of apps moving over. And it uh still didn't

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the beat the devils that they have made this year

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>have not sold like you know one might expect. Google

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Fiber might help that that whole process. I mean the

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 1>fact that the fiber hoods well Yeah, and then you

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, as part of your deal of getting depending

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>on what tear you subscribe to for a Google Fiber,

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>if you happen to be in in one of the

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>two Kansas cities in the United States, uh, you get

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>things like a next to seven tablet that can act

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>as a controller. So you're starting to get some of

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that Google TV functionality there in the Google Fiber service.

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>And that might even be enough to start getting kind

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of a word of mouth campaign going and and maybe

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>we'll see an improvement in the next year. But but

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twelve is not Google TVs year. So that

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>was a hit for you. I said that at E

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>three we would see at least get a sneak peak

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>of the next generation consoles from Sony and Microsoft, and

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 1>that was a miss. We did not see that. However,

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we'd have seen, uh some leaked reports about what those

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>next consoles might be with the PS four or orbists

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and the Xbox seven twenty or code named Durango. Uh,

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>what those specs might be for those those consoles and

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>what features they might support. But we did not see

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:00.439
<v Speaker 1>anything at E three. It will absolutely stocked me if

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>we don't see anything into the yeah yeah, sigence signs

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 1>suggests that you will start to see something come out

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>despite rumors that that all of them want to just

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>get out of the console business entirely. That would shock

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>me about Microsoft, mostly because the Xbox division for Microsoft

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>has historically performed really really well. And uh, and I

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>think Microsoft kind of should hold onto that. But then

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I also want, you know, predictions to come true. So anyway,

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>your next one, yes, Apple, uh new iPhone will have

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>uh a near field communication Yes, And I said, no,

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to and that that was a hit.

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>That was a hit. Yeah. No, No, n f C

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in the in the latest iPhone, which that's what you predicted.

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, you gave some very intelligent reasons

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>why you thought it wasn't gonna happen, And those are

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>exactly the reasons why Apple sites you know, they're not

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>pursuing NFC technology at the moment. So well done. Um,

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>which is it's going to be interesting going forward because

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Google has included NFC technology and tablet devices not just phones. Google, Yes, Google,

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Google is betting on its wallet technology going forward. UM.

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I have never used it. The square, the square folks, um,

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the mobile payment folks. They're not actually square like they

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>came out from Minecraft, and they won't the drapes and

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the squares baby, but yeah, I mean the mobile payment

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>technology is coming up, so it will be you know,

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it's becoming more and more popular. So let's I don't

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>know if if Apple will do it this next year,

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>if when if, assuming it will release a new iPhone,

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it might. It was the same sort of thing with

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:51.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, supporting lt and stuff like that, right, Apple

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>prefers for technologies to be somewhat mature before they start

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to incorporate them into their products. So uh, I think

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it's at least another year for that, just because I

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think NFC is near the maturity level that Apple

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>would feel comfortable including it. You know, I could be surprised.

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm not not soul either way. Us continuing

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the theme of things that Apple products will not have,

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I said that the this was a thing at the time.

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>At the end of two thousand eleven, one of the

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>rumors about the next iPad was that it would it

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>could have a three D screen built in screen that

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 1>would allow you to view things in three D, kind

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of like the Nintendo three D S And I said,

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>ain't no way, that's gonna happen, because it doesn't really

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>make sense for a touch screen device to have this

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 1>three D capability built into it because you you interact

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>with it in a two D interface, So why would

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a three D view? And that was a hit.

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of no brainer as far as I was concerned.

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Although there were a lot of people who were saying

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that was going to happen. Now, I wish I had

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>predicted that Apple was going to launch two updates to

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the iPad in a single year, because no, what was

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>saying that and that's what happened. Yeah, Norton, Nor did

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>we mention the iPad mini. Um, let's see, let's see. Oh,

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>but but we did talk about web os on that podcast. Uh.

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking that, you know, once HP acquired Palm,

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that it was going to get into the uh the

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>web os business. Um, not yet. You gave me a

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 1>question mark in this Jonathan put Together went back because

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't have the patience to listen, and I went

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:33.400
<v Speaker 1>back and listened to last year's predictions, and he gave

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>me a question mark here I would give me a miss. Well,

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the reason because they're not gonna do it. Uh. It

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>looks like I've said, I've read reports that they are

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.199
<v Speaker 1>thinking about some things that they'd like to do with it,

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think they're going to do it by

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year. The reason I put a

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>question mark was just because the fact that they did

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>make it open source and open it up to people,

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>but that was kind of happening at the end of

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven anyway. So I put a question mark

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 1>there because you could argue that by making it open source,

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that is something useful. That was essentially that you your

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>prediction was that HP HP would do something that was

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.640
<v Speaker 1>useful with webbos. Uh. So that's why the question mark

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>is there. I think it's more of a miss than

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a hit, too, But you know I was I think

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking, it's hard to see. Uh yeah, it's

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 1>been a year, But I think I was thinking that

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that HP itself would come out with a product and

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 1>that did not happen. That did not happen. So my

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>here's another miss for me. Although I think it was

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>a good guess, it just didn't happen, which was that

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.120
<v Speaker 1>at least one of the big daily deal sites would

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 1>go under, and so things like living Social or group

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>on these coupon sites, because there's been a lot of

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 1>news about how these sites have uh shown to not

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>be profitable. They're they're struggling with revenue that um that

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of a losing proposition as far as

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 1>these companies are set up right now. Maybe there is

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a way of doing this that isn't a revenue loss.

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>But at the moment, there's some big news stories about

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 1>layoffs at these various companies or executive shuffles at some

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of these companies, but none of them, to my knowledge

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>as of the recording of this podcast, have officially gone under.

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>So that is a miss yep, yep. Although you could

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>probably make that prediction again for next year, I probably

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>can just write that down. Um, I've predicted that Canonical

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>would ditch Unity as its interface for Ubuntu because people

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>were complaining about it. Yes, and they are still complaining

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>about it because I'm still there. But of course one

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I'm neglected to think about. By

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the way, if you're clueless as to what I'm talking about,

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:42.679
<v Speaker 1>Aubuntu is a a version of Linux, often called a

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>flavor of Linux, which is an operating system which is

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>an operating system that is not Windows or Macintosh or

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 1>many other systems. But you know, UM, if you don't

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm talking about, you probably would consider Windows

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and mac os to be the too big and you'd

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.360
<v Speaker 1>be right. Um, but uh, one two is a very

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>popular version of Lennox. Uh, and it irritated a couple

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 1>of people, A couple of people, many people. I'm sorry,

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it's getting close to lunch time in my blood suggars

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>two people, two people and some people like uh the

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Unity interface, UM, but many people do not. It's been

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.640
<v Speaker 1>They've been pretty vocal, and uh, you know, I thought, well,

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe Canonical, which is the organization that that releases one

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>two and other versions that are similar. Um, you know,

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought maybe that that pressure would would get them

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to discontinue it. I didn't count on the simplicity with

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>which you can switch interfaces, which I had experienced. But

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking, oh no, no, no, people are just

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna get them to beg off and leave well enough alone.

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>They didn't, and you can. It's easy if you installed

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>one to to put another interface on top of it

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that isn't Unity like Gnome or you know, Katie, So

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>people just do that. My next prediction, Uh, it's a

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of a hit. I mean, this is

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a debatable hit. I should have put a question mark

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>next to this one, really, which was Microsoft Windows Tablets

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>will debut to modest results. And I guess, I guess

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Moss results is a fair way of saying it. I

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, from the sales figures I've seen, it certainly

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>isn't a runaway success. Um. But you know, there they

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>have sold some. It's not a total flop either, So

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess Moss results is fair enough. But I think

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it's too early to call. Yeah, but it's definitely it's

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>definitely not a runaway hit, which is kind of what

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I was going for, was that the Windows tablets would

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>come out. It's not that no one would care, it's

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>just that they wouldn't become like a uh, you know,

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't just fly off the shelves. Now that being said,

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I personally think the Windows A Tablet interface

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>is pretty interesting and um, and I still am curious

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>about getting my hands on on a full the professional surface. Um.

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>The Windows are T version I'm not as interested in

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>because again I'm not I'm not a great tablet person.

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I own a tablet, and I barely use it. And

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it's an Android tablet, um, but I barely use it.

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 1>So even though it's an operating system, I love with Android,

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's and it's you know, the next of seven,

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>so it's got the latest version of Android on it.

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:24.719
<v Speaker 1>I still use it that frequently, which to me just

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>tells me that I'm not a tablet person. But still

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I kind of want to get my hands on one

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of the professional Windows eight tablets service tablets. Yeah, anyway,

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>so that was my my next one. Well, speaking of

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Android based tablets, I predicted that the Kindle Fire would

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>be a hit. It is, in fact, well it was

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of a gimme uh. In fact, um, it's such

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a hit that Amazon has released more than one Kindle

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Fire and updated it so you know, now they have

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the HD, they have a competitive larger sized tablet. Um.

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So I I don't know, oh that now that the

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the Nexus seven and Nexus Tender out, Um, I don't

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>think that the Kindle Fire is running away as fast

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>as it was, but it is still it's got legs,

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>it knows how to use them, and it's so so

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 1>tightly integrated with Amazon's you know, uh catalog and and

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and systems that anyone who really uses Amazon a lot,

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it has a huge appeal to it. It's just like

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.959
<v Speaker 1>for me again, the Android tablet has a big appeal

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>because so much of my stuff is in the Google

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure already, like Google Cloud stuff and you know, Google

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Docs and Gmail and all that kind of thing. Uh,

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that it just made sense for me to go with

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Android because it was already so tightly integrated. Same sort

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of thing with Amazon. I mean, if you do a

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of shopping on Amazon, or you get a lot

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of your music from Amazon, it makes sense because it's

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>just it's designed to work with that system. So it's

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the best. I would say it's the best interface for

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>those systems, hands down. It's not that no, the Android

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>or iOS versions of that are are bad. They're just

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>not designed from the ground up to work with them,

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>so it's a little different. My next one, this was

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>another big one that I was kind of sticking my

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>neck out on, but I actually felt pretty good about it.

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>It turned out to be a miss, so it shows

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>what I know. But I said it was gonna be

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the swan song for the CD that CDs were essentially

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be phased out, and we wouldn't really see

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>them in things like retail establishments or being sold online

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>as much anymore. Uh. That really the move would be

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to really focus on digital delivery, and that just hasn't

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>quite happened yet. I still think it's I mean, the

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>day is coming, it's just not here. It didn't happen

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>this year, it didn't happen in two thousand twelve. So

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a miss. Yep, yep, um, let's see, Apple will

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>not lower I've had prices. Uh. That was also a

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>semi guinea. It was a hit they have in in

0:32:56.560 --> 0:33:00.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're speaking literally, because they released a new i

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>pet oh wait, two new iPad lines, keeping the new

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>iPad and the new new iPad, keeping the series more

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>or less intactics. Honestly, you can't buy the new iPad anymore,

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>buy an iPad two, but not the new iPad. Yeah,

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that that was the interesting part, now that that actually

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 1>was true when they released the iPad three, if we're talking,

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 1>let's just stop. Um. They they kept the iPad two

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>on because it was still fairly recent and it was

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>it offered them another price point at lower price point

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 1>at which they could offer the iPad. So so technically

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the price dropped, but if you want to talk about

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:41.479
<v Speaker 1>what is the latest version of that product on the

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>market at the time, the price stayed steady. Yeah. So

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>so previous versions of the iPad the price would drop

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>if they remained available in the Apple Store, but the

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>current version of whatever that product was was still the

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 1>same price. So that's why this is a hit. What

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, we might have people right and say, well,

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Apple two is cheaper now, like, yeah, us,

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>but we're talking about if you were to go in

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and buy the latest version of that. They never despite

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the pressures of things like Android tablets and even the

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Windows tablets coming out, that they did not uh you know,

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>bow to those pressures and change the price point for

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the entry level iPad. Did you say the Apple too?

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Did I the iPad? The iPad? Whatever? Last night, I

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 1>was just I was just picking. No, No, that's good,

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 1>all right. Well, um, this is my last prediction until

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the very very last prediction of the show. So Chris

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 1>is actually gonna have a couple back to back. But

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>here's here's mine. Um. I said that tech will play

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the largest role ever in election history, which was such

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:45.319
<v Speaker 1>a GIMMEI that it was pathetic and it was a hit.

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:49.280
<v Speaker 1>We saw technology play a huge role, particularly social media,

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>which again not a big surprise. We had started to

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>see that in the previous election that I'm talking about

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 1>the United States elections, although technically elections around the world

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>really saw a lot of involvement in technolo pology, and

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 1>sometimes regime changes that didn't have anything to do with

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>elections saw a lot to do with technology. So so

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:12.240
<v Speaker 1>technology and politics continue to be a big deal, and

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:15.760
<v Speaker 1>we see tighter and tighter integration. We're seeing we're starting

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to see generations of politicians who grew up using at

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>least some form of technology. You know, if you go

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 1>back just a couple of years, a few years, not

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:30.319
<v Speaker 1>even that many. A lot of the politicians were an

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>age where they they didn't have things like computers and

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 1>smartphones and and things at their back and call when

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>they were uh, when they were young enough for that

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to be a formative part of their their experience, right,

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't something that they were you know, they might

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:51.240
<v Speaker 1>become familiar with it, but it was after those years

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and so uh, they weren't necessarily as comfortable with it.

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 1>In many cases now something they are definitely exceptions to

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>this rule, but in general they were not as a

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 1>as as a savvy. But that's starting to change now,

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think it will be really interesting to see

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in the next few years when we start seeing people

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:13.400
<v Speaker 1>who have grown up in the digital age taking positions

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of power and politics. How that's going to unfold for

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>technology in general. That would be really interesting to see. Yeah. Um,

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:25.360
<v Speaker 1>so let's see Windows eight will debut to lackluster adoption.

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:29.879
<v Speaker 1>That was a hit, particularly in the enterprise. In fact,

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a lot of of people say that they

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>think enterprises are are going to pull the same thing

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 1>they did with Vista and skip Windows eight at least

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 1>for the short term, uh, and stick with either XP

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>or Windows seven. Yeah. And if I'm if I'm not mistaken,

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:47.359
<v Speaker 1>what I was thinking then was not that Windows eight

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 1>was going to stink, which I don't get the impression

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that it stinks other than the fact that the interface,

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>uh is different enough that it throws some people. I

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's a stink. I think that's more of

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a wait, yeah, it's so radically but wait, there's a

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a steep learning curve at first, but

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 1>then it levels off pretty quickly once once you get

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the tricks down, it's it's pretty easy to navigate. But

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it is so radically different from previous versions of Windows

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 1>that that can be a turn off for someone. You know,

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:20.319
<v Speaker 1>like you turn on your computer and you immediately don't

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>know where anything is because it looks so different from

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>everything else you've ever used. That that can that can

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 1>definitely give people pause to adoption. Yeah, and what I

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:32.319
<v Speaker 1>what I was really thinking was that the the the

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>cost and the effort for for companies was gonna be

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:39.840
<v Speaker 1>so great that they it wasn't just gonna fly off shelves. Um.

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 1>And then I figured that uh Diabolo three was coming

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>because we had heard that it was going to and

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I figured it would be a massive hit. And again

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a gimme because it's a Blizzard title that

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.839
<v Speaker 1>everybody had been anticipating for a very long time. Yeah,

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>so it was a really big hit, although it was

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 1>the kind of hit that you know, didn't it wasn't

0:37:57.760 --> 0:38:01.479
<v Speaker 1>really sticky, you know, No, it stick right right after

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>like initially after the release. There was a huge amount

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 1>of excitement. There were also problems, I mean, there were

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:11.320
<v Speaker 1>some server issues that people had. There was some uh

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 1>digital rights management issues that people had. Uh. So there were,

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, there were some legitimate problems with the game,

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 1>or at least with the way the public accepted the game.

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:24.439
<v Speaker 1>But but the really interesting thing to me was that

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>within a couple of months, no one was no one

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:29.799
<v Speaker 1>I knew anyway. And these were gamers who were really

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>excited about Diabow three when it first came out. No

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 1>one was talking about that game anymore, whereas some of

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the games that I play right now came out early

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand twelve, and I still have friends who

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:42.440
<v Speaker 1>chat about those games quite a bit. So, uh, it

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:45.279
<v Speaker 1>just didn't have that that stickiness. All right. So here

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 1>is my final prediction. We have gotten down to the

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:49.720
<v Speaker 1>end of the show, and this is a big one, folks.

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:52.759
<v Speaker 1>So my prediction was that Chris and I would be

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:55.600
<v Speaker 1>making a prediction show for two thousand thirteen around the

0:38:55.640 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 1>same time of the year as we were doing the

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Prediction Show for two thousand twelve. Way that should have

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:03.400
<v Speaker 1>been a gimme. Should have been a gimme, should have

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 1>been a gimme hit. Uh, it's a miss. And the

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 1>reason for that is that we must announce that Chris

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:15.879
<v Speaker 1>is leaving Tech Stuff. Yes, uh, he has one more

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 1>episode to go, so it's not he's not gone yet,

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>but we have one more episode we're going to do

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's an episode that that Chris has picked the

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:27.799
<v Speaker 1>topic for specifically because it was something that he really

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk about. And uh, I expect that episode

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:34.320
<v Speaker 1>will be amazing. But yes, uh that is a miss

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:38.840
<v Speaker 1>because uh the tex Stuff is going to be a

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:43.280
<v Speaker 1>different show. Yeah. Mostly I just wanted to throw Jonathan's

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 1>predictions off. Yeah, you wanted to get more hits than

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>misses and have me have more or less an even number.

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 1>And uh, boy, that that was a heck of a

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 1>way of doing it. I guess it was either that.

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:56.879
<v Speaker 1>It was It was either that or to somehow get

0:39:56.920 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 1>all politicians to stop using technology so that one. Yeah,

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and I figured this one would be the easier one.

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Now it's just one of those things where uh, um,

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff is going to go through some changes, and

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:11.239
<v Speaker 1>I figured this was sort of a good time. I

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>have other stuff that I've been working on that's not

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:16.800
<v Speaker 1>podcast or blog related, and I thought, you know, maybe

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the time is uh has come for me to to

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:22.320
<v Speaker 1>leave the show. So um uh the I I predict.

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't have predictions for next year, but I predict

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the next episode will be a very special episode of

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:32.399
<v Speaker 1>text Stuff. So guys, if if you want to let

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 1>us know what you think about our how we did

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 1>on our predictions. If you have any predictions for two

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:38.719
<v Speaker 1>thousand thirteen, do you have any messages you would like

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to send Chris, you should definitely contact us. No profanity, please, no, no, no,

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's keep these professional people. You can, you can,

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 1>you can shed some tears if you want. You wouldn't

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>be the only one, um, But yeah, send us a message.

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Our email is tex Stuff at Discovery dot com or

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:58.319
<v Speaker 1>find us on Twitter or Facebook are handle there is

0:40:58.400 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 1>text stuff HS the you and Chris and I will

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again one last time with both of

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 1>us really soon. For more on this and thousands of

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 1>other topics. Is it how staff works dot com