WEBVTT - The Way The West Was Won

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from my Heart Radio,

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation,

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and whatever stupid stuff they decided to drop into the show. Now,

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>here's your host. Welcome to the show. It's Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>We are back for another edition. In this the fourth

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and final set of division by division tours around the NFL.

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>My co host this week are Brian Johnson and Matt Harrison. Hello, guys, Hello,

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Wild Wild West. Let's finish this cross

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 1>country tour, this grueling cross country I think it's spent

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a month of breaking down offenses. What how these up?

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Mostly about what these offenses are going to be different

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>this year? Because everybody wants to just replay last year?

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Why do most of the cheap that you see at

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>this time of year, especially, they're basically just well, what

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>ordered they finish in last year? That'll be my starting point.

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>So unoriginal, But that's not what we do here, do

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you hear? Do it would be more fun for us

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to take a cross country road trip as a Fantasy

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly crew or do these divisions over a four

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>week span, which is more fun. I would rather have

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the cross country road trip and I want to be

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>in Somebody sent me like I started. I did a

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>radio show last about it three weeks ago about r

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.559
<v Speaker 1>ving because I was thinking that might be the summer

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>trip would be in an r V where I don't

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>have to fly, I don't have to be in hotels.

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I just like clean the RV one time. You rent it, right,

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:43.199
<v Speaker 1>you clean it one time, and you go have fun.

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Somebody sent me the Mercedes benz Um wind Star something.

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a few of those Mercedes RVs around. Oh

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>my god, the things I'm amazing. But it was three

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand dollars and it's leaps too two. Now, what

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>are the advantages of this thing is it's it's just

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>like the size of a large van. So you're not

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>taking this enormous contraption right, But it has all of

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the it has all the appointments of what you would

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>imagine a Mercedes r V would have, unbelievable granted countertops. Yes, yes,

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that it was fantastic bathroom. That'd be you. So if

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>we can get that thing, you can you can be

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the bubbler brand, can be the driver well, it won't

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>sleep meer, you can sleep in the bathroom, Stanning out,

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>No problem, let's go to the probably rather hang out

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the bathroom and drive the RV. At least you get

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the bathroom. A f C West and NFC West this week,

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>which if you missed any of the other other divisions,

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you can go back through our previous podcast. We encourage

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it to do that. And not only we gonna break

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>down how these offenses work, which is sort of the

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>main focus, just how does this offense feel like it's

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 1>going to come together fit all? And then we're also

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>identifying the riskiest player to draft compared to ADP for

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that team and the player with the most upside compared

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to ADP. So that's the premise. We begin with the

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a f C West and your reigning champions, the Kansas

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>City Chiefs. Matt, Yeah, you know that Chief's offense. It's

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. I'm familiar. Um, it's kind of why they

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 1>have ten players going in the top three a DP

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's actually eleven if you include uh kicker Harrison

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Butker I think almost universally the number one ranked fantasy kicker. Yeah,

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>he's he's in there too. So let's start with the

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>big arm of Patrick Mahomes. He threw nine touchdowns last season.

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>There it is nine that went forty plus yards. He

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>led the league in that category. So you think as

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>receivers are just flying downfield and he's hitting people open

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty yards downfield, that's not the case. Average depth of

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>target for his wide receivers and tight ends ranged between

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>nine point four to thirteen point four, with Tyreek Hill,

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>who's kind of the most notable receiver, slotting in at

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>twelve point five. So the cool thing about Mahomes is

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>he throws his receivers open because get this, yards after

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>catch per reception. Travis Kelsey gained another four yards after

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the catch, Hill another four point eight, Watkins five point eight.

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 1>Nicole Harder one of my favorite sleepers this year. So

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally not worried about the passing game. And you

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>could consider each of the top three players in Hill, Kelsey,

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and Mahomes as a pretty safe in my fact, the

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.239
<v Speaker 1>upside In fact, I was going to say the upside

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>play is Nicole Hardman. Um, it was only a year

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>ago that Hardman was looking like the guy who would

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.919
<v Speaker 1>just slot into the offenses. The Tyreek Hill replacement, and

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>they're similarly built speed receivers. Hill had the fastest clocked

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>time in the NFL last year at twenty two point

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>eight miles per hour when he was chasing down Damien

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Williams on a touchdown. That's funny, didn't it was just yes?

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>But Hardman had the fastest speed in the league on

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 1>a scoring play last year at twenty one point seven

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>miles per hour. So these guys get drunk and go

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>out running UI when they're that fast, almost it's kind

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of dangerous. Could hurt people. Hardman tied for the league

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>lead in twenty five plus yard touchdown receptions with five

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>last year. He's entering a year two in a Patrick

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes offense. You don't have to draft him till round nine.

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>He only finished as the forty nine wide receiver in fantasy,

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>but he only had twenty six receptions to get to

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to forty nine in Fantasy points. At your position, that's

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>like two per game. That's less than two per game.

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Is now Hardman killed you in the games in which

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>he didn't score, basically because his the volume was so low.

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>When you're getting a catch and a half per game

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>on average, you better score and so that was why

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I think people are going to be nervous about hardening,

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and especially in like a guillotine format where he's super

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>super dangerous. But if you think those twenty six are

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>going to turn into right, which is what Sammy Watkins

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>had last year, two receptions, Um, I think Hardman with

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty two receptions, which is not a lot, which is

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>like it was about forty seven among wide receivers in

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the NFL last year, he'd easily go over a thousand yards.

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 1>And he had six touchdowns last year and he'd easily

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>approved improved on that. So, um, I think that he's

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the uh, the best upside there. The biggest risk but

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 1>also maybe the highest reward is Clyde Edwards Hilaire don't yes,

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is it like? No, it's not like that at all, actually,

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>but you're correct and not saying the age he's going

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>off the board in the third round. Um. The problem

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is is it's a little murky on the running back

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>depth chart. Last year, players with seven or more touches

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>from the running back position on the Chiefs Damian Williams

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>did it eleven times, McCoy did it ten, Darryl Williams

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>did it four, Darwin Thompson did it three times. Now

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Shady McCoy's gone, but both the Williams, Darwin Thompson and

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Washington are now on the depth chart as well

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>as c H. And I know Andy Reid has deployed

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>workhorse backs in the past, most recently Kareem Hunt in

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen season, and I know talent wins out, and

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>he's the most talented back on the roster, and I'm

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>probably drafting him with the first overall pick in our

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>rookie trap coming up in the Empire. But I was

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>asked to come up with a risky player and he's

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the roster real danger here because he may only get

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the snaps. Yeah, that's that's the bit. That's the only

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>danger here. And I think talent wins out. But I'm

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>probably in a redraft league, gonna take this one year

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>off and look at him probably next year. Let's go

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Denver Broncos. Brian, this is a team with

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a couple of notable new faces in Melvin Gordon, Jerry Judy,

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and everybody thinks Drew lock is ready to make the

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>next move here and really add some passing balance to

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>this offense. How do you feel about it? Yeah, Denver

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>last year fifty seven point one percent passing plays that

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>was twenty four the most. They ran the ball forty

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>three percent of the time. I was the ninth most.

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>So they were a little run heavy last year. Only

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>one point seven offensive touchdowns per game. That was the

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that's bad. And Pat Shurner though, who has a very

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>nice track record outside of the Giants mess a couple

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of years ago, but no one was going to thrive

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in that Gettleman environment. So I'm gonna give him a

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>pass on that one. Um, So I want to note

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>how Brian gets a Gettleman dig in. It doesn't matter

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>what team it is, He's gonna figure out the way

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 1>to bring it. Back to how Ghettle pretty sure I've

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>mumbling my sleep like, but hey, I'm a Bengals fan now.

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, no one is allowed on the

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Bengals fanwagon this year. That's the last year I'm holding

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the gates. And everyone was laughing, so you're holding the

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 1>door shot, screw you all. Anyway back to Drew lock

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh right now going out in the late thirteenth round

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>his quarterback twenty three. I've got him quite a bit

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>higher than that. A lot of people do that. The

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.199
<v Speaker 1>hype is real. Hype is building around Drew only five

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>starts last year, he did go four and one. Came

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>out on fire with five touchdown passes across his first

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>two starts, but that was against a depleted Chargers secondary

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and then a brutal Houston secondary struggled in Kansas City

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in the blizzard, and they didn't really put up numbers

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in the last two. But Denver wants Lock to be

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the guy. Uh, well, yeah, I mean, look at the

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>look what they've done at the quarterback position since Manning left.

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's all about he He looks like he has

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>what it takes. He's got the build, he's got the arm,

0:09:57.640 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 1>he looks like he's got the mental game. So it's

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>all about the additions to the arsenal only off season. Um,

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>before we get to those, I want to talk about

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Courtland Sutton really quick. Obviously, the wide receiver one on

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos right now in redraft going in the fifth round,

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 1>his wide receiver twenty four going way higher in Dynasty

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, uh Sutton was a top twelve wide receiver

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>in the first half, often with Joe Flacco and Brandon

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Allen as his quarterback. His second half was actually torpedoed

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>by his final four weeks. I remember having a monster

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>second half, but Uh in his final four games finished

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>no higher than wide receiver Fortyes, so that really put

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a damper on his numbers. But regardless, he made a

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 1>huge leap in his second year as a rookie. In

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen, Sutton was eighty second out of a hundred

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and twenty six wide receivers and yards after the catch.

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Last year he finished twenty nine. UM. He shows all

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the trades of an elite wide receiver. The main concern

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>is there's more competition for targets. Now, let's get to

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that than there was last year, and that starts with

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Judy, UH first round pick. UH twenty four touchdowns

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>across his last two seasons in Alabama. He looked amazing

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in Alabama, spread offense so productive. The concerns are he

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>might struggle a little gets a little bit against the

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>more physical corners in the NFL and press coverage. UH,

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't have he's tall, he's six to He's

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a little wiry at two hundred, doesn't have a massive wingspan.

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Those seventy six inches is kind of dinosaur arms for

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a guy that tall. Um. But again, I just can't

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>get with the fact that they took Jerry Judy over

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Ceedee Lamb. I'm never gonna get over that a lot

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of people would have though you know it's it's not criminal.

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>You and I both think Ceedee Lamb was the right pick.

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just stuck on are there any dinosaurs with

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>long arms that? That's what I'm thinking about right now.

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I know t Rex kind of pterodactyl, right because those

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>are wings, but those are pretty I mean, who had

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>long arms? I don't know. I was there a dinosaur

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>with long arms? You've got google right, long Armasaurus? Yes,

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>But so Judy going in the late ninth right now

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and Redraft wide receiver forty one that that seems about right.

0:11:56.360 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>But uh, he doesn't threaten Sutton as the alpha dog.

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna be the compmentary number two. So there's no

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>for Judy. But I don't expect him to pop off

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>entirely in his rookie year. And there's one more rookie

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>they did added wide receiver that's kJ Hamler for Redraft purposes.

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna have much of an impact, so we

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>won't we won't go there. But he is an intriguing

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>dynasty prospect, and I'm not a fan. Okay, long arm

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>dinosaurs dinosaur is the dino kai Res. Okay, I know

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Kiris tell us about the dino Cyrus. It's a genus

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of large or the mimosaur that lived in the Late

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Cretaceous around seventy million years ago in a pair of

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 1>large arm, shoulder girdles and a few other girdles. Bones

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of the dinosaur were first discovered in Mongolia. I think

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>they might introduce that one in like the sho coming

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>installment of the Jurassic Park Garbage series. They might throw

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's a it's a very strange looking dinosaur. Looks

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>like it has looks like they're dinosaur with with like

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>some weird wings. That is weird. That is, the arms

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>don't look that long. It looks it does look more

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>like a duck than of Oh now there's oh, there's

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the long arms. Some of the versions are long arms,

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>look like they just have like a paddle. I mean,

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>if Jerry Judy's got arms and hands like that, we've

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>got no issues at all. Well, the problem is he doesn't.

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>He's got the short arm, like can he can he

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>mix it up with the t rex. You think he

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>looks like he's got a lot of times they show

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you these pictures, but you don't realize that thin only

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>like four ft tall. Not all of the dinosaurs were gigantic.

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>They weren't dressed park that's realistic, all right. Anyway, back

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 1>to a non dinosaur in the young Noah Fanse the

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>one more past catcher. We have to talk about, of

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>course right now going in the ninth round tight end

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>eleven eight point three yards after the catch last year

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that led all tight ends second among tight ends and

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>yards per reception top seven and tight end end zone targets.

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 1>And he really only started coming on in the second

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>half of the years, so a lot of excitement around fans.

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, tight end of leven probably his four really,

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the ceiling is a little higher for fans.

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>And then, um, we got to talk about the running

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>backs of course, charts you alluded to Melvin Gordon, the

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>new arrival. He's going in the mid third round right

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>now at RB nineteen. Philip Lindsay is still in town,

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, right now he's going round eight around RBT.

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So last year for Denver, Lindsay and Royce Freeman had

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the same number of carries inside the ten yard line,

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>but Lindsay had twice as many inside the five. So

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>he was the guy for Denver inside the stripe and

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>inside the five eight carries, fourteen yards, five touchdowns, very

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>impressive um for those who don't remember, Gordon was a

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>charger last year. He held out the first four games,

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>but he ended up with the fifth most carries inside

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the five in the league with thirteen, and his fifteen

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>yards inside the five was the third most, so he

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>did pretty well inside the five. Two. Gordon scores many

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns inside the five as sa Kwan Barkley, Nick Chubb

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and Levian Bell combined last year, So we're looking at

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>his serious competition right now. It's pretty much like a

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty five the virtual split. But the one difference is

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys has passed the eye test multiple times, right,

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and one has failed. Well, I would tell you it's Philip.

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay was passed the eye test. That's what I

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>would tell you to charge. That's what I was trying

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to get us, because we talked about this before Lindsay

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>passes the eye test. Gordon really never has. He's never

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>looks just elite. He's produced. He didn't score touchdown in

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>his rookie year. I'll never let him live that down, won't.

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>So for that reason, Gordon in the mid third at

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>RB nineteen, with the competition that probably is a better

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>running back right behind him is the biggest downside for

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>his ADP and then Drew Lock. If everything comes together

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>with these added weapons and he continues to progress to

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>your team top twelve quarterback, he is the easy upside

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>player on this Denver Broncos team. Let's go to Las Vegas.

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>The constant in the Raiders offense is Josh Jacobs. He's

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>presumed to be one of the league's few true workhorse backs,

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think that is the case here. DeVante Booker

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't a threat. Rookie Lynn Bowden likely as a utility

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>or gadget guy. Um. You know, he's he played primarily

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>running back, but they're already talking about making him just

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver or he's just gonna do whatever. He's

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a sketch back up up Minie the moocher right here.

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Nice year, Jacobs had two hundred sixty two touches last year.

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he gets no fewer than that here, and

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>possibly up to three hundred touches, in part because you

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>should be more involved in the passing game. Who says

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>so his general manager, Mike Mayock says, we're going to

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>get him more involved in the passing game. So let's

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>hope that's the case. He averaged almost five yards per carry,

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and he's running behind Pro Football focuses number seven run

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>blocking line from last year, and that run blocking line

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>returns all five of their starters. So I don't see

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>any role downside for for Josh Jacobs. He's going right

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>now at pick nine. Overall, I think he's very safe

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>at that spot, and so I think there's still plenty

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty of reason to think that Jacobs will be

0:16:58.040 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>as good as he was last year, if not better.

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>And ye two now charts, Are you taking a guy

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>like Josh Jacobs in the tail end of the first

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>round or will you be doing the opposite this year? Well,

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm almost certainly going to be doing the opus, Okay,

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 1>so I can probably not Unfortunately, and the first round

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>is notoriously dangerous for running backs, but this one feels

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty safe. Let's go to the passing game. A variety

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of new faces here. The first wide receiver taken in

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the draft was Henry Ruggs, insanely fast from Alabama, should

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>be a Day one starter. His modest production in college

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>suggests a slightly longer learning curve than guys like Jerry Judy,

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>who we just talked about um, But his crazy speed

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>and athleticism means that he's gonna roast some secondaries and

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna want to play him in matchups, in specific

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>matchups early and then maybe later, then don't forget. In

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 1>the third round, they took rookie Brian Edwards. Rewrote the

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina record book. Incredibly productive, amazing body control, high

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>character guy. He had a knee injury that knocked him

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>out of the end of twenty nineteen, wasn't able to

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>participate in the combine. We're gonna watch the status of

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>that knee and training camp, but he's somebody's gonna threaten

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>for time to do you ever recall quite the disparity

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and rookie wide receivers where they went in the actual

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:08.479
<v Speaker 1>draft and then where they're going in terms of fantasy

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>football with Rugs, the first wide receiver taken. He's like

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>six when it comes to a rookie wide receiver, especially

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>where these boys being drafted, and we're gonna talk about

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that and just about um so keep an eye and

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Brian Edwards as well throughout the preseason. We'll want to

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>see if his knee is healthy enough to make him

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a competitor for starting time against Tyrolle Williams right off

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 1>the bat, who I don't like. By the way, I

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>thought Tyrone Williams was relatively pedestrian. Last year, he got

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 1>dinged up, didn't produce in big numbers despite the fact

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:43.199
<v Speaker 1>that they really needed him a lot. So I'm not

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>terribly interested in him, and I don't I think there's

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a scenario here where Edwards by the end of the

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>year just beats him out. So I expect Derek Carter

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>roll into the season as the starter, but he might

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>be on a short lease because Marcus Mariotte is there,

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and if Mariota looks good in training camp, maybe there's

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 1>more of a battle here. Um. As I tweeted yesterday,

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr finished last year's quarterback fifteen and that brings

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 1>us to our upside player Derek Carr who is currently

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>going off the board at quarterback twenty seven. Carbage time,

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>carbage time, he's going off the board and seventh round seventeen.

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>He's got all these new weapons right that we already

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>talked about. Um, Las Vegas defense is going to be

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>bad again. There's gonna be a lot of passing, a

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of carbage, a lot of carbage time potentially. I

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>think the riskiest player here is Bryan Darren wall Or yep,

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>going off the board at tight end five right now. Yeah,

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you look at all these new receivers that are gonna

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>eat into his targets, and he had just the three

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns last year on all the it's like target a

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>hundred times he turned into three touchdowns. Shaking fist at

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Foster Moreau still um and then so just too many

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>new faces here. I think that you know, we didn't

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>even mention uh um um Witten there as well. Now,

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna maybe eat into some of that production as well?

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>For Darren Waller, I just especially in the red zone

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and Nelson Aguilar is gonna infect everyone with the drop

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 1>seas it's bad. Yeah, no, not just by proximity. That

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>could be the case we'll take a break. When we

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.959
<v Speaker 1>come back, we'll talk about the Chargers briefly. This is

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>not an offense that is exciting by any means, I

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think. And then turn our attention to the n

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:26.479
<v Speaker 1>f C West Seattle, San Francisco, the Rams Zona plenty

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to get to on Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back to

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul Georgie and Matt Harrison. Brian Johnson

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:35.440
<v Speaker 1>with you. I don't mean to take the wind out

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of your sales by suggesting that your Chargers analysis, Matt

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>is going to be anything other than stellar, but just

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>the reality from a fantasy standpoint, this might be the

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:48.919
<v Speaker 1>least compelling offense in the NFL. So last week I

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>got to do the Carolina offense. This looks like the

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 1>a f C version of the Carolina Panthers. Chargers passed

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>on six of their plays last season, that was fifth

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>most in the league. Lock, of course, they lost their quarterback,

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Phil Rivers uh He went to India with his seventeen kids,

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>leaving Tyrod Taylor and Justin Herbert to man the backfield. Now,

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Tye Taylor started a few games for the Browns at

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of before Baker took over the Taylor Yeah,

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>but does uh last real starting gig where his three

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>years in Buffalo where UM he had a high completion percentage,

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>he was a low risk, low mistake kind of guy.

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>In three full seasons of starting, he never threw more

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>than six interceptions in a year. Wow. So he's which,

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>by the way, keeps you in the league a long time.

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>That's how you stay as a backup quarterback in this league.

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 1>And he is aged thirty this year. So I look

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>at this offense to run similar to Carolina's UM Taylor's

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 1>career average depth of targets in the nines, which should

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>allow the Chargers to be a little bit more functional

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>than Teddy Bridgewater, who's in like the seventh's Uh. So

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be a safe offense, high percentage throws

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>than a lot of them, a little bit of rushing

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>from your thirty year old quarterback who still has some wheels,

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and a heavy dose of Austin Ekeler, and this is

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:10.199
<v Speaker 1>setting up to be really really nice for him this

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>year while he was in Buffalo. UM. While Taylor was

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>in Buffalo, Shawn McCoy was seventh in the league and

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>running back receptions seen tenth and twenty sixteen, and he

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>was injured for most So outside of Christian McCaffrey's other

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 1>worldly receiving stats, Austin Ekeler had the second most targets

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in the league um with and he had a hundred

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and four targets last year. Melvin Gordon had fifty two

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>targets last year. Those should probably all roll um. Ekeler

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>led running backs in the league with forty plus yard

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>receptions with three. He trailed McCaffrey by only twelve receiving

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 1>yards He had nine nine three, and he topped McCaffrey's

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>eight receiving touchdowns. His average depth of target was one

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>point to one yards. That's not much. His average yards

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>per catch was ten point eight, So let's that's uh,

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that's some impressive work after the catch right there. Yeah.

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>So the thing that really hurt him was his red

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>zone touches. He only had seventeen carries in the twenty

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and only nine inside the five and Ran already talked

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>about Melvin Gordon is gone, So does he automatically get those?

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Can he increase the rushing value without Melvin Gordon there?

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:25.199
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer is yes, Um, Melvin Gordon had

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>more rushing attempts in twelve games than Ekeler did in sixteen.

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you take half of A Gordon's a hundred

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and sixty two rushing attempts last year, Okay, give him

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to one more, it's another three forty rushing yards and

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>at least a handful of touchdowns if they give it

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to him inside the five. And so, by the way,

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Ekeler is mistakenly viewed as a scat back

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>because he's a past catching back. People think that he's

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that he's a slighter build than he is house. He's

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a muscular dude. He can run inside and he could

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 1>be a goal line back. Uh, well, they let him

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>there are there are at least two other running backs

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>on roster that could end up being goal line factor. Yeah,

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's Joshua Kelly and Justin Jackson. Both are going

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 1>off way late in drafts. And I know that. Uh.

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I know, Brian on the show has been a big

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jackson fan. But man, I think Austin Ekeler is

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>just that good and I think that they're gonna roll

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>with him this year. Um. Lastly on Eckler, uh, let

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>me see it. I had to move around in my

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>little sheet tibboo. Right now I'm scatting um. So basically,

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's Carolina all over again. It's a it's a

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>quarterback with mid range average depth of target. He liked

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to feature his multitool running back in the past and

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the third round. Eckler's probably one of the safer picks

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 1>and Fantasy I actually like him a lot. He's my

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>safety play. Uh. In Taylor's three years in Buffalo, he

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:53.719
<v Speaker 1>only had one wide receiver crack the top fifty in

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy points scored in that position. That was Sammy Watkins.

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>He did not have a top fifty recent eve in

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>sixteen or seventeen, and he had Robert Woods there for

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the for at least part, if not all, of those years.

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>So my riskiest player. You may think it's Keenan Allen.

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I would it's not. He's going out in the fourth

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>round and he's getting a new quarterback. You're close. It's

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams. Williams is a deep threat and a touchdown

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>guy who only scored twice last year. By the way,

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.919
<v Speaker 1>his average depth of target was eighteen point three compared

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to Alan, who runs primarily safe routes from the slot

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:31.919
<v Speaker 1>at ten point three yards downfield. That's right tyrods range.

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>So I I like, I like Allen to continue to

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.199
<v Speaker 1>get the targets and the receptions. I think Williams is

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.679
<v Speaker 1>just a don't touch kind of guy, similar to Curtis

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Samuel and the Panthers. So that that's the guy I'm avoiding.

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about Hunter Henry because obviously you

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 1>know he's still widely viewed as a top five fantasy yeah,

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and off at tight end number seven right now, seventy

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>two overall, so the end of the sixth round. Um,

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the dude is just produced every time time when he's healthy,

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and and he by all accounts he's healthy right now,

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 1>hasn't done anything in a while. So I think I

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 1>think Hunter Henry, who's in that same range down field

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>at with the high percentage throws, I think he's in

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>for for some fine play as well. So Mike Williams

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>is the guy I'm avoiding. By the way, he's going

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>off the board at nine seven overall wide receiver forty

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 1>That seems really early for a guy who scored two

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:28.479
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns last year. All right, let's go to San Francisco. Brian.

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>This is obviously a super Bowl caliber team, but we've

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>got a number of new faces in this offense and

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>changes in the offense with uh the the additions at

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, we've got where he most are walking in

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>as your probable starter. This is a different offense than

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the one that we the one that we've saw, especially

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>at this time last year. Yeah, and for fantasy purposes,

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a very exciting offense last year. San fran

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 1>ran Or passed the ball forty eight point six percent

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of the time. That was thirty first. They ran the

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 1>ball fifty one four percent. That was the second most

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:02.160
<v Speaker 1>rushing plays by percent. Did score three point two offensive

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns per game, though that was fourth most, one of

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>four teams to average more than three touchdowns per game

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>offensive touchdowns that is. Joe Staley retired at left tackle.

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a big loss, but just bringing Trent Williams all

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>world left assuming he's still all world we have, yeah years,

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>he's still in his twenties, late twenties, al Right, I

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>think he should be just fine. But uh so, Yeah,

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy G's got a pretty solid line in front of him.

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Not elite, but definitely very solid. Uh, speaking of Jimmy

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 1>g going off the board in the early twelfth right now,

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:36.880
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback twenty a little high for me. Only four

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>top ten finishes at quarterback last year for Jimmy, three

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of them came in the first ten games, and two

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of those three were against the Cardinals. You will face

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals twice again this year. Of course, it has

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 1>every year as long as he's a forty niner. But really,

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:51.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, San Francisco just needs him to be a

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>system quarterback. They want a playoff game when he had

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven passing yards and zero touchdowns. Yeah, so they

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>want to play a good defense, They want to run

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:03.919
<v Speaker 1>the ball for fantasy purposes. I'm not loving Garoppolo a

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>whole lot, but I will say this. I will say

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 1>this one stat and it's very interesting from Ian Hartet's

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of Pro Football Focus. The most yards per pass attempt

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in excluding screen passes with a minimum of a hundred attempts,

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.159
<v Speaker 1>so basically a hundred a minimum a hundred attempts that

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>weren't screen passes. The average yards per attempt Ryan Tannehill

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.360
<v Speaker 1>nine point seven. And then Jimmy Garoppolo and Patrick Mahomes

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>retired at eight point eight. So if San Fran reverts

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 1>back to a couple of years ago when the defense

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 1>was crap, Yeah, well I don't think that's quite gonna happen,

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>right Well, probably not, but they were very bad not

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>long ago. But yes, there are much better, they're more improved.

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>If the team I'm from the defensive side takes one

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>per se, there is some hope for Garoppolo. But I

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>still think there's more hope than you're giving him because

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of the improvements at the wide receiver position compared especially

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>covert to where they were rolling into last season, where

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>they were banking on our Key's Goodwin always banged up,

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>heard her was heard every you know, all the problems

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>they had at receiver last year. They roll into this

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>year with a first round pick, a receiver Deebo Samuel

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>coming off that great second half and playoff run that

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>he had. I just feel like this is a this

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>is an opportunity now for Garoppolo to be materially better

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>because the receivers are Yeah. Well, let's just let's not

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>kiddle out of the way real quick. All I'll say

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>about George Kittle final year of rookie deal. Wants money

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>motivation is there tight end two right now though, and

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>by a DP, you're taking Kiddle or Kelsey if you

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 1>want on a tight end. I'm I'm still taking Kelsey

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>fair enough. I'm all part of that Chief's offense. Um.

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>So Deebo Samuel, let's talk about the wide receivers. Unfortunately

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>suffered this Jones fracture not long ago. Timetable twelve to

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 1>sixteen weeks. He probably not going to be full go

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>until second third week of the season if all goes

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>well for him. The interesting thing about Deebo is he

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>did have a strong second half, but his big games

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>where he was like top twelve and in side at

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, there's a handful he had a rushing touchdown

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>each one of those games that. Seriously, he's an amazing

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>real life football player. He really is. He's a great athlete,

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>he is. And yeah, he can run the ball catch

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the ball, of course, and it doesn't I know, running

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you can never predict a wide receiver rushing touchdowns, but

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>he could. I mean, it's not like a total flute.

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna if you're gonna predict the best chance

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 1>for what wide receiver, he's gonna be one of them

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>for sure, but I don't. For me, it's been a

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm fading the forty Niners past tack and this one.

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>The forty Niners wide receivers average nine and a half

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>catches per game as a whole last year, and I

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>know they're better, and they are better, but I don't

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>know you can. Let's get to him right now, sixteenth

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 1>round and redraft wide receiver sixty. Uh probably going to

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>be the top wide receiver option going into the season

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>with Samuel dinged up. UM, I'm worried about rookie wide

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>receivers this year with no no mini camps and uh

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>nine point five catches a game game, I'm fading on you.

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm still fading Samuel even though he was going off

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the board cheaper. If you're looking for a fill in

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>for Samuel, people are going to Jalen Heard right now,

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 1>rookie wide out at a Baylor draft in the third round,

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>six thirty. He's a beast, but he's he's raw. But

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Kendrick Kendrick Born is the guy I target

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>out of any wide receiver for the forty Niners only

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 1>two games with six targets last year, but in both

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>those games. He caught uh touchdown and went over forty yards.

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>We saw six targets, so I saw they're trying to

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>extend him right now the um and I think they will.

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And then um, so I don't know the receiving corps

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:34.959
<v Speaker 1>of mess. You really need to see what's happen, what's

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:36.959
<v Speaker 1>up with debot as we need closer to the season.

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not super optimistic from a fantasy standpoint for

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>any of them. Um, we do have to talk to

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>running backs to very cool. I'll go as quickly as possible.

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>This is a sticky team. Raheem Mostert going off in

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the mid sixth as RB twenty three, what a perfect

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>do the opposite running back is perfect for the opposite

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And then there's still Tevin Coleman of course going in

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the mid ninth. Right now, is we just talk about

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Tvin Coleman for a minute. How about he sucks? He's

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>just not good. So you know, I just don't think,

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, as great as this offense can be, especially

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>for any running back, seems to be able to produce

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in it where he most starts better by any criteria,

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I think than Tevin Coleman, just as a running back

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and so I think I think most are gets the

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>absolutely gets the first crack at the majority of work.

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, no doubt most are. It's last six games

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>last year finished inside the top twenty among running backs,

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and all of them. Four of those six were inside

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the top ten. You're not even talking about the playoffs

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>where he regular they did was just run him. Tevin Coleman,

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Mostart each carried the ball a hundred thirty seven times

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>last year. Mostart finished with two twenty eight more rushing yards,

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>also finished with more receiving yards ont less catches and Coleman.

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, most are. It's the guy, and he is

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 1>your high upside play. If he can get the bell

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>cow usage, you know, the workhorse back all year long

0:32:56.000 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>on this team. UH, top ten RB potential you forget easily.

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Mike Shanahan's kid. Shannahannikins Man hated Mike Shanahan.

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>We we love him. We love Kyle, though Kyle styles

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>us he is as predictable as he's so predictive. I

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>love him. I I love his offenses. They've been great.

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to see you're done right. I

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>don't talk about Jack McKinnon. No, Okay, well, all right,

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>who is so wait? Let me let me class by

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>high upside most and really the downside for me, now,

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's gotta be iook because his ADP is gonna climb.

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>With Deebo Samuel injured, I think you'll creep into the

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>mid thirties, which puts him in starter potential in terms

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of fantasy football. And he's a rookie and there's gonna

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>be growing pains and that's gonna be a frustrating process

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to pick which weeks to plug him in. So I'm

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm fading all the white outs for San Fran personally.

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Seattle, and this one take very long

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 1>because I think this year's version looks just like last year,

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>which looked us like the year before it. You know,

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 1>we know what Seattle is all about here, and there's

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of new parts. They were third in

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts last year. They were second in rushing attempts

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the year before that. You know this is gonna be

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a run first offense. Chris Carson returns as the starter.

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 1>There is Carlos Hyde there, but he stinks, and Rashade

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Penny is trying to recover from his second major knee injury,

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:22.280
<v Speaker 1>so he's not really a factor either. So Chris Carson

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:24.840
<v Speaker 1>um it should be the focal point of much of

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.240
<v Speaker 1>this offense. Was there some talk about Marshawn Lynch possibly

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:31.760
<v Speaker 1>rejoining the team again? You know, I thought Lynch looked

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:35.399
<v Speaker 1>pretty bad, very bad. I just don't think there's anything

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:37.800
<v Speaker 1>left in the tank. Uh. The offensive line, I'm a

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit nervous about. Let's talk about all the changes here.

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:44.240
<v Speaker 1>It always changes in Seattle's offensive line, always at center.

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>B J. Finney was signed from Pittsburgh to compete with

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Joey Hunt. Right guard Damian Lewis was a third round

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>pick from l s U. Who's gonna step in for

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 1>d J. Fluker? And then the team signed a new

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 1>right tackle, Brandon Shell from the Jets, to replace Jermaine Effetti.

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that any of those guys are better

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>than the guys they're replacing. And Sella finished with Profo

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>ball Focus is ranked pass blocking unit from last year.

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>There were sixteen in run blocking. I'm nervous about this

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 1>offensive line, and I think there there's going to be

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:18.320
<v Speaker 1>some problems with all these changes. And I don't know

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>if these players are going to be any better. Who

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 1>needs an offensive line when you have Russell Wilson, Well,

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 1>there's that. Let's and let's first, by the way, let's

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:27.280
<v Speaker 1>just dispel the notion that Russell Wilson's a rushing quarterback.

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>You're living in if you think that's the case. The

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>last two years he has averaged he's put together as

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>two worst rushing seasons, averaging about three fifty rushing yards

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>per year, and he has averaged one and a half

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:43.800
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdowns. I wonder how much rushing he's actually just

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 1>doing in the backfield, scrambling around more. If you could

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 1>get points for that Russell Wilson, then I'm in DJ

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 1>sits DJ excuse me. Dk Metcalf stunned almost everybody with

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 1>his productivity last year. One hundred targets, nine yards, seven touchdowns.

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Clearly has the body to be a red zone threat um.

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>And maybe if they, you know, in his second year,

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:11.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe if they you know, maybe those seven touchdowns turns

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 1>in double digit touchdowns. You know, I think there's a

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of optimism on dk metcap Tyler Lockett just straight

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 1>solid back to back season's top fifteen Fantasy production. Each

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of the last two years. I think he'll be a

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 1>factor here too. But the bigger story I think is

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>his team just doesn't pass enough to elevate any of

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>these guys into like top ten level territory. That's just

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 1>not how this offense is built. And we just don't

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 1>have the volume from the passing game. Now. Did you

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:40.399
<v Speaker 1>see on Twitter? I think it was this just this week,

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson was working out with Antonio Brown. I did

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>see that. Yes, Um, a little interesting tidbit there that

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 1>would be interesting. Antonio Brown is getting now, and to

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:52.800
<v Speaker 1>know Brown's getting drafted everywhere. I mean, you know, he

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know he's not surviving through drafts undrafted anymore. And

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it seems like that kind of locker room with you know,

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 1>strong head coach Pete Carroll could could probably help keep

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown a little more subdued. This This is like

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:08.239
<v Speaker 1>a very NBA like off season almost for some of

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>these teams, like these super teams like the Bucks are

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 1>countering the Patriots counter with cam. Yeah, there's a little

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 1>something to that, and uh it's you would think you

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>need ring cred I think to shut down Antonio Brown,

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and they got it, you know, And so maybe this

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the right spot. Probably would have

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:28.879
<v Speaker 1>been a good citizen in New England last year too,

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 1>had that played out, Yeah, probably would have been, but

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that got short circuited, mostly by himself. Greg Olsen is

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the new starting tight end and this offense is tight

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 1>end friendly. Remember last year how people were pivoting to

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Nick Venette and will dis Lee and Jacob Hollister and

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>mostly those guys that actually produced was the wild thing. Yes,

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 1>you have to keep because they kept getting hurt. Well,

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>mostly all those guys are gone, and for whatever part

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of sixteen games that Olsen gives you, he'll get the

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>majority of of what has been a productive tight end offense.

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Um only will diste returns from last year. So the

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 1>riskiest player based on a DP I think his DK

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Metcalf going off the board two picks after Tyler Lockett. Um.

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>We assume he's gonna be a lot better in year two,

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:08.319
<v Speaker 1>and he probably will be, but will be better than

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Lockett in year two? I don't know. I'm not

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 1>ready to go there yet. And the player with the

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>most upside is Greg Olsen going off the board at

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>tight end twenty three. So you know, is your second

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>tight end he'll probably give you tight end one returns

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 1>while he's healthy, so he fits right in there with

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle good tight ends who get hurt a lot. Yes, perfect, Yes, he'll, he'll, he'll,

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 1>he'll do his thing and that means getting hurt and

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 1>that will um. You know, at round twenty, if you

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:39.959
<v Speaker 1>have if you've got Greg Olsen starting it for six weeks,

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 1>fine and you can come to the curve. I think

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:43.799
<v Speaker 1>we might have some more tight ends to talk about

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 1>in the next segment. I bet we do. As we

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 1>go to the Rams, that is a tight end, a

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 1>friendly offense. Man, there's a lot of people banking on

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the two tight ends really emerging. We'll talk

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>about the Rams and their tight end situation when we

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 1>come back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Fantasy Football Weekly Paul

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Charchy and Matt Harrison Brian Johnson with you got two

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 1>teams left to break down as we analyze the a

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 1>f C and NFC West. We go to the Rams,

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>an offense that obviously underproduced a lot last year, with

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 1>many people including me, are optimistic they're gonna make the

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:21.439
<v Speaker 1>bounce back this year. Returned to a tour to better

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:25.879
<v Speaker 1>form what a weird offense that was last year, wasn't it. Yeah,

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 1>they passed sixty one two percent at the time, seventh

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>highest rate in the league. Uh. They lost Todd Gurley

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and Brandon Cooks in the off season. Uh. Offensive tackle

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Whitworth did resign for three years. That's good. And

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>then they drafted Cam Akers and Van Jefferson as the

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Girley and Cooks replacements. Uh. What kind of offense is

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:49.839
<v Speaker 1>this one? It's actually a very safe one. They don't

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of risk to them. Uh. They're tied

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 1>to Jared Goff for the next half decade, and Sean

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:57.400
<v Speaker 1>McVeigh is trying to scheme away to put Golf in

0:39:57.480 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the best position because it's very possible that got just

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 1>not a very good quarterback. Um. What that means is

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna run the ball and it's gonna be a

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:09.359
<v Speaker 1>short passing game. Goff's average depth target eight yards tied

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 1>for twenty six in the league last year. That was

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 1>lower than Mason Rudolph, Mitch true Bisky. Uh, here it

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 1>is Jacoby Bursette, Kyle Allen, David Bloch, lower than all

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:25.959
<v Speaker 1>of those guys. Goff was only sacked twenty two times

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:28.359
<v Speaker 1>in sixteen games, though, which puts him in the top ten.

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh as far as least time sacked, that's good for

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that offensive line. He did fumble ten times last season

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:39.839
<v Speaker 1>and through sixteen picks, So they're gonna try to make

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 1>him safer and safer and get the ball out of

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>his hands as quick as possible. So how will the

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 1>short passing offense work? Pretty good for most of the

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>guys you're interested in on this offense, Cooper Cup, especially

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Cups average depth of target seven point to Robert

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Woods eight point four, Tyler Higbee six point five. Guests

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:02.359
<v Speaker 1>who didn't belong in that offense last year, Brandon, Yeah,

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:07.400
<v Speaker 1>at fourteen point five. That's gone. So Cup and Woods

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 1>each clocked in at right around the same amount of targets, receptions,

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and yards literally give or take a few digits up

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 1>or down on this but one thirty targets, ninety receptions yards,

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 1>both almost identical. Yeah, the difference was Cup had ten touchdowns,

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Woods had to. Yeah that you figure everybody including me

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:29.720
<v Speaker 1>thinks that that too number for touchdowns on Robert Woods

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:31.759
<v Speaker 1>is gonna look, We're gonna look back. Well, that was

0:41:31.800 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 1>an anomalous Yeah, two is a little bit ridiculous. In

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 1>his other two years at the Rams, he scored five

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 1>and six. He's never been a high touchdown guy. Six

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:42.239
<v Speaker 1>is his record in a year. But he'll probably get

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 1>closer to five or six than to stay at two. Well,

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:47.240
<v Speaker 1>but with Brandon Cooks out, I just feel like Woods

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:50.279
<v Speaker 1>is gonna get you know, add ten percent to to

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:53.320
<v Speaker 1>his looks and you know, I want to believe that

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:57.239
<v Speaker 1>he's capable of a nine touchdown season. Yeah. Well, unfortunately

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the early drafters haven't depressed st Robert Woods is a

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:03.759
<v Speaker 1>DP quite enough for me? Um No, in fact that

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:05.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people, a lot of people see it

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:07.399
<v Speaker 1>like I do. Robert Woods, a good receiver is gonna

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 1>have a better season. You have to take him at

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the end of the fourth round. That feels about right

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to me. That's not quite low enough for him to

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 1>be my value pick. Um. My value pick is Tyler Higby.

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 1>His his a DP is low enough. He's going off

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the board in the ninth round. Is tight end number

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:25.960
<v Speaker 1>twelve right now. The Rams finally figured something out at

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the end of the season, with Higby listened to his

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 1>last five games of the year when the Rams were

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:33.360
<v Speaker 1>still fighting for a wild card spot. Yeah, eight targets,

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 1>seven receptions, one oh seven and a score. Okay, that's

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a very good game. Eleven targets seven for one sixteen,

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 1>fourteen targets, twelve for one, eleven, eleven targets, nine for

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 1>one oh four, twelve targets, eight for eighty four and

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a score. Now let's extrapolate those now you got uh.

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>He averaged eight point six catches, a hundred and four

0:42:56.680 --> 0:42:58.919
<v Speaker 1>yards and point four scores in those last five games.

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>He was Kindler Kelsey for the last month of the year.

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 1>So I I like him a lot at that level

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:07.319
<v Speaker 1>because it seems like they figured something out with him

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and how to utilize him properly. He was really splitting

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:12.880
<v Speaker 1>time with Gerald Everett earlier in the year, whole career,

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and they figured out, oh, this guy is pretty good,

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:18.719
<v Speaker 1>let's toss him the ball. So uh, higbie is my

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:22.960
<v Speaker 1>uh my upside play. The riskiest play is anyone in

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the running game, and the highest draft of those as

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 1>cam Akers, who's going off the board in the middle

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of the eighth, So it's not even that risky. Um.

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Darrell Henderson Truthers are all butt hurt because the Rams

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 1>drafted Acres, But don't sleep on Malcolm Brown continuing to

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:43.360
<v Speaker 1>be part of this offense, probably actually especially near the

0:43:43.520 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 1>end zone. Girley took fifteen carries from inside the five

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 1>last year and converted eight touchdowns. That was, and those

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 1>numbers are gone. Brown had eight carries from inside to

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:59.800
<v Speaker 1>five that he took for five touchdowns, so that's very productive.

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Acres could end up being the between the twenties runner.

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Brown could be the goal line guy, Henderson the change

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 1>of pace back. So the sneaky bonus value I think

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 1>is Malcolm Brown here, Who's the guy that you can

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:15.879
<v Speaker 1>get very last out of all these running back for sure,

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 1>last two twenty three running back sixty five, So that's

0:44:21.080 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 1>insanely low for a guy who might be sitting on

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 1>between five to nine touchdowns possibly just there just from

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the goal line carries and carries from inside the five.

0:44:34.960 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Cam Akers isn't ready to take that role. I think

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Makers is built to be a goal line guy though,

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and so it's not clear that Malcolm Brown will get

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:47.359
<v Speaker 1>those carries. But the fact that he's been successful, yeah,

0:44:47.719 --> 0:44:50.200
<v Speaker 1>with the carries they've given him at the stripe and

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:54.359
<v Speaker 1>so many carries that are gone, Yes, you might be right.

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 1>About that, because Malcolm Brown is gonna be He's I

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna be a havan to ten touch per game. Guy.

0:45:02.560 --> 0:45:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Probably doesn't score, he's gonna kill you, but he's gonna

0:45:05.920 --> 0:45:08.319
<v Speaker 1>have these games or he's gonna get touchdowns maybe two

0:45:08.360 --> 0:45:10.719
<v Speaker 1>in a game. And for best ball, I like Malcolm Brown.

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:14.160
<v Speaker 1>He's definitely a best ball guy there. Let's go to

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Kyler Murray. Everybody expecting a big uptick and production

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and Kyler Murray, he's uh said, where's is ADP right now?

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:27.280
<v Speaker 1>On quarterbacks last night? Yeah, that's that's a massive, massive

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>jump from where he was last year. Absolutely, Ah yeah,

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray. Last year most completions of fifty plus yards.

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins had six that led the NFL. Kyler Murray

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 1>was tied with him with six completions of fifty plus yards.

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Here's the list of rookie quarterbacks with a top twelve

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:48.239
<v Speaker 1>fantasy finish since Kyler Murray, Dak Prescott, Russell Wilson, Andrew Look,

0:45:48.440 --> 0:45:50.760
<v Speaker 1>r G three, Cam Newton, All those guys are pretty

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 1>good from a fantasy perspective. RG three You can give

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:56.840
<v Speaker 1>your take what you want there, sou Yeah, the sky

0:45:57.160 --> 0:46:00.840
<v Speaker 1>is the limit for Murray in his second season. He

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:03.360
<v Speaker 1>was third in rushing attempts last year and second in

0:46:03.480 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>yard yards among quarterbacks, averaging five point nine yards per

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 1>catch four touchdowns. So he's a weapon. He's going right

0:46:11.160 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 1>about in the right spot. He I think that's man.

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 1>It's high, it's a it's a high flying offense. And uh,

0:46:18.719 --> 0:46:21.240
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a lot of excitement with Cliff Kingsbury

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and second year. So before I get to Murray's pass catchers,

0:46:24.040 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I just want to talk about Kenyan Drake. Um probably

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:30.279
<v Speaker 1>might be the safest running back going in the first

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:33.919
<v Speaker 1>two rounds, and that includes everyone. Uh. Starting week nine,

0:46:34.280 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Drake started getting about twenty touches per game with Arizona

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 1>he came over from Miami. Of course, from week nine

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 1>on he only finished behind McCaffrey, Derrick Henry and Zeke

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and PPR formats and and from week nine to seventeen

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:51.479
<v Speaker 1>he finished Drake. That is seventy percent of his games

0:46:51.520 --> 0:46:54.799
<v Speaker 1>as an RB two and nearly as an RB one.

0:46:56.440 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 1>That's incredibly say floor with a ridiculous upside for comparison

0:47:01.040 --> 0:47:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to say, you have guys like Alvin Kamara, Aaron Jones,

0:47:03.640 --> 0:47:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon. We're finishing more than twenty their games outside

0:47:06.880 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the top thirty, and those guys can certainly win you

0:47:10.200 --> 0:47:11.839
<v Speaker 1>be releague, but they can lose it for you if

0:47:11.840 --> 0:47:14.319
<v Speaker 1>you drafted in the first round. So I'm loving Drake

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 1>He's going. It depends on the league. But you can

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:20.279
<v Speaker 1>say mid second as RB like ten to twelve. But uh,

0:47:20.320 --> 0:47:22.959
<v Speaker 1>I think that might be a little too late for Drake.

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 1>But he's not my upside guy. Get to him in

0:47:25.560 --> 0:47:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. He's your safe guy. You already you

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 1>already said he's super safe. He's super safe, super safe guy. Uh.

0:47:30.800 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Now to the the weapons for Kyler Murray in the

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:35.479
<v Speaker 1>passing game, and of course we'll start with the Andre

0:47:35.560 --> 0:47:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins coming over from Houston. Um going in the late first,

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:42.839
<v Speaker 1>right now or early second around wide receiver for you're

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:46.200
<v Speaker 1>generally seeing Michael Thomas, of course, Davante Adams and Tyree

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Hill going before Hopkins, and you know what, they will

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:51.319
<v Speaker 1>probably be going before Hopkins if he was in Houston. Still,

0:47:51.520 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like so the main concern is really see

0:47:54.600 --> 0:47:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the targets he saw in Houston with Arizona. I was

0:47:57.520 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 1>shocked to see this Arizona's wide receivers told the third

0:48:00.600 --> 0:48:04.480
<v Speaker 1>most catches last year. Two. That's nearly fifteen a game.

0:48:04.600 --> 0:48:07.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot. Remember I said forty nine at nine

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half, so that that's that's a big difference.

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:12.200
<v Speaker 1>UM And for reference, the Texans actually finished fourth with two.

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:16.120
<v Speaker 1>So last year Arizona, it's sounding like they lost any

0:48:16.200 --> 0:48:18.719
<v Speaker 1>key member of their wide receiver corps. It was it

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:21.680
<v Speaker 1>was Christian Kirk and Larry Fitzgerald and then it was

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:26.800
<v Speaker 1>like Demere Bird and Andy Isabella. So the volume is

0:48:26.800 --> 0:48:31.480
<v Speaker 1>still there for Hopkins. So despite that though, he's still

0:48:31.560 --> 0:48:34.880
<v Speaker 1>my biggest downside risk based on the ADP just because

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:38.719
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver is so deep, you could argue taking a

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 1>couple other white outs instead of him where he's at. UM,

0:48:42.400 --> 0:48:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know first round. I think any wide receiver

0:48:44.680 --> 0:48:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is risky in the first round this year. DeShawn Watson

0:48:47.480 --> 0:48:50.880
<v Speaker 1>is awesome. He's a better cort Tayler. Murray wants to

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:53.880
<v Speaker 1>someday be Deshaun Watson. Awesome, he's not. You know, we

0:48:53.960 --> 0:48:56.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know that he's there yet and we'll ever be there,

0:48:57.080 --> 0:49:01.080
<v Speaker 1>so you know, there there's we're still afting Hopkins as

0:49:01.160 --> 0:49:03.960
<v Speaker 1>though he's got an elite quarterback when we don't know

0:49:04.120 --> 0:49:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that he's got an elite quarterback. And if he just

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:07.759
<v Speaker 1>had to choose, would you say he's gonna have a

0:49:07.840 --> 0:49:10.320
<v Speaker 1>better year than he's ever had or probably come in

0:49:10.360 --> 0:49:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a little under than his normal numbers. It just feel

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to me, it feels like it's I'm expeking about the same.

0:49:16.239 --> 0:49:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Still too risky for me with this a DV. This

0:49:18.400 --> 0:49:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is a team too. It's tough to find risk on

0:49:20.280 --> 0:49:22.440
<v Speaker 1>this team really outside of Murray. And if you're that

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:25.120
<v Speaker 1>worried about Murray and Hopkins, Um a couple more wide

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:27.360
<v Speaker 1>outs to talk about. Christian Kirk right now, going in

0:49:27.400 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the late eighth round wide receiver thirty seven. Only played

0:49:30.560 --> 0:49:34.399
<v Speaker 1>thirteen games last year, but Um had at least seven

0:49:34.480 --> 0:49:40.000
<v Speaker 1>targets nine times, nine times, double digit targets five times,

0:49:40.520 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and at least six catches seven times as well. And

0:49:43.160 --> 0:49:44.920
<v Speaker 1>like I said, he missed those three games. If he

0:49:44.960 --> 0:49:48.000
<v Speaker 1>played a full sixteen game season, he's easily inside the

0:49:48.040 --> 0:49:51.680
<v Speaker 1>top twenty four wide receiver. And you think of Kirk,

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and you just think of defense. Is keen in on

0:49:53.680 --> 0:49:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Drake and DeAndre Hopkins and this kid might just go

0:49:58.239 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 1>crazy running free in single cover. Ridge all season long, so,

0:50:02.280 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 1>but he is not my highest the Arizona Cardinals. I know,

0:50:06.239 --> 0:50:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I know what's coming. Our listeners don't, but I do.

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Some might. Uh, So I have to talk about Larry Fitzgerald,

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:16.160
<v Speaker 1>probably the greatest to ever do it. I'm gonna say,

0:50:16.160 --> 0:50:20.080
<v Speaker 1>even better than Jerry Royce considering the awful quarterbacking that

0:50:20.200 --> 0:50:22.280
<v Speaker 1>fits his head in his career, and Rice had Montana

0:50:22.360 --> 0:50:26.239
<v Speaker 1>and Steve Young. But Larry a brutal year last year.

0:50:26.280 --> 0:50:28.319
<v Speaker 1>A great start, top the hundred yards in his first

0:50:28.360 --> 0:50:31.600
<v Speaker 1>two games, his one top twelve finish game in Week one,

0:50:31.920 --> 0:50:34.239
<v Speaker 1>but after a sort of Week three and on, he

0:50:34.320 --> 0:50:37.960
<v Speaker 1>only topped sixty yards twice. And don't forget Keem Butler,

0:50:38.480 --> 0:50:40.959
<v Speaker 1>Andy is Abella and needs some reps, and I feel

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:46.360
<v Speaker 1>like he's gonna forego some of his snaps for those guys. So, actually,

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Fitzgerald's my downside guy. I'm saying you can't draft Larry

0:50:49.200 --> 0:50:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Fitzgerald in fantasy football. This here, I'm not gonna do it.

0:50:52.080 --> 0:50:54.320
<v Speaker 1>It breaks my heart. I'm pulling for him in reality,

0:50:54.400 --> 0:50:56.799
<v Speaker 1>but people will still draft him. But don't waste your

0:50:56.840 --> 0:50:59.759
<v Speaker 1>draft pick on chasing fits of bold. All right, who's

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:02.600
<v Speaker 1>your side, guy, let's let's get it all the way. Upside.

0:51:02.680 --> 0:51:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Guy doesn't really have an ADP yet hard I'm trying.

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:17.000
<v Speaker 1>There's upside and that is Dan Arnold, ard player without

0:51:17.040 --> 0:51:20.759
<v Speaker 1>any not a lot of numbers or tape on Dan

0:51:21.560 --> 0:51:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Now a tight end in the in the on the

0:51:24.600 --> 0:51:28.200
<v Speaker 1>team that featured the fewest tight ends snaps last year.

0:51:28.840 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Something's got I'm gonna kindly ask you to shut up. Now,

0:51:31.680 --> 0:51:33.879
<v Speaker 1>let's break down what we got for dan Arnold. Look

0:51:33.880 --> 0:51:35.400
<v Speaker 1>at this guy going right to last year. Don't we

0:51:35.440 --> 0:51:39.040
<v Speaker 1>say not to do that. It's our it's our only

0:51:39.640 --> 0:51:45.960
<v Speaker 1>amateur amateurs right here. Anyway. Dan Arnold went undrafted out

0:51:46.040 --> 0:51:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of Wisconsin Platteville in seventeen, but was signed by the

0:51:49.280 --> 0:51:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Saints as a wide receiver converted tight end year later. Yeah,

0:51:59.520 --> 0:52:01.520
<v Speaker 1>played one year with the Saints. Really in one with

0:52:01.600 --> 0:52:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Arizona last year. Only twenty career receptions, not a lot,

0:52:05.040 --> 0:52:07.640
<v Speaker 1>not a lot, But he's averaging fourteen yards to catch.

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Fifteen of those twenty receptions have gone for first downs.

0:52:11.840 --> 0:52:15.080
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty impressive. Okay, did not see real game action

0:52:15.200 --> 0:52:18.040
<v Speaker 1>until the last four games of twenty nineteen with the Cardinals,

0:52:18.160 --> 0:52:21.560
<v Speaker 1>but in those four games saw thirteen targets turned him

0:52:21.560 --> 0:52:24.560
<v Speaker 1>into eight catches, one and twenty seven yards and two

0:52:24.640 --> 0:52:29.279
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in four games. That's still like averaging five yards

0:52:29.320 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a game. You guys are more on anyway, he started

0:52:33.280 --> 0:52:35.640
<v Speaker 1>just one of those games. You didn't see full game

0:52:35.680 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 1>match and think of the thirdteen targets. If he gets

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 1>thirteen targets in the game, well is he? Is he

0:52:40.040 --> 0:52:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the starter? He started week seventeen? Okay, one start? Okay?

0:52:44.680 --> 0:52:47.439
<v Speaker 1>So is he the starter this year? Dan Arnold the starter?

0:52:47.520 --> 0:52:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Cliff Kingsbury wants him to be the starter. In his

0:52:49.360 --> 0:52:52.480
<v Speaker 1>one start last year, six targets, four catches, seventy six

0:52:52.560 --> 0:52:55.239
<v Speaker 1>yards in a touchdown. He's gonna get full run in

0:52:55.640 --> 0:53:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in an offense that plays soft tight end defenses. No,

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:02.360
<v Speaker 1>put your finger down, put it up your nose. What

0:53:02.440 --> 0:53:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you got? I was gonna say, DeAndre Hopkins hundred and

0:53:08.000 --> 0:53:12.200
<v Speaker 1>two targets, hundred and eleven receptions, yards, eleven touchdowns. Who

0:53:12.239 --> 0:53:16.200
<v Speaker 1>are his quarterbacks? You ask? Yeah, Brian Hoyer and Ryan Mallett.

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he can produce anybody With Kyler Murray, I

0:53:20.520 --> 0:53:22.920
<v Speaker 1>think it'll be okay, You'll be fine, all right, Dan

0:53:23.040 --> 0:53:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Arnold relevance, Damn Dan Arnold a DP is an infinity similar,

0:53:33.280 --> 0:53:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Dan Arnold would somebody should get that. You should go

0:53:39.560 --> 0:53:41.839
<v Speaker 1>to the Jets or the Jets. The Jets won't trade

0:53:41.880 --> 0:53:45.120
<v Speaker 1>for Sam Donald. Imagine that Sam Donald to Dan Arnold connection.

0:53:46.040 --> 0:53:49.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're gonna have these expanded, these expanded rosters

0:53:49.520 --> 0:53:52.160
<v Speaker 1>due to COVID this year. There they might have a

0:53:52.239 --> 0:53:56.759
<v Speaker 1>real problem where teams can't have you know, like linebackers

0:53:56.840 --> 0:54:00.560
<v Speaker 1>have to wear between whatever forty and fifty or something, right,

0:54:00.600 --> 0:54:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to, you know, but if you're if you're

0:54:02.600 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers, you've already retired like four numbers of linebackers

0:54:06.760 --> 0:54:09.799
<v Speaker 1>and you've also got a bunch of linebackers, they might

0:54:09.880 --> 0:54:12.319
<v Speaker 1>run out of numbers for some of these guys. They

0:54:12.400 --> 0:54:15.600
<v Speaker 1>might need the infinity symbol or a half like Hi

0:54:16.000 --> 0:54:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Hi Hi. Yeah. Maybe, um it's getting nerdy, that's getting nerdy. Uh.

0:54:21.160 --> 0:54:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of COVID. Next show, I want to talk about

0:54:24.920 --> 0:54:29.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the COVID prevention measures your league needs to take. Now,

0:54:29.760 --> 0:54:31.879
<v Speaker 1>get your you know, get your league squared away. Now

0:54:32.280 --> 0:54:34.280
<v Speaker 1>for some of the things that might happen COVID related

0:54:34.600 --> 0:54:37.640
<v Speaker 1>That will come next week as one of several topics.

0:54:37.719 --> 0:54:39.480
<v Speaker 1>So and and and I can I can bring up

0:54:39.480 --> 0:54:42.439
<v Speaker 1>an early one where we're in an Empire baseball league,

0:54:42.520 --> 0:54:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Brian and I and we don't know what to do

0:54:45.280 --> 0:54:47.680
<v Speaker 1>with our Empire baseball league this year. If they play

0:54:47.719 --> 0:54:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a sixty game baseball season, do you treat it as

0:54:50.960 --> 0:54:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a full year? Do you do you just treat it

0:54:53.440 --> 0:54:55.200
<v Speaker 1>as a one off? Some of things are gonna talk

0:54:55.239 --> 0:54:57.480
<v Speaker 1>about what happens if what happens if it's a a

0:54:57.760 --> 0:55:00.640
<v Speaker 1>an abbreviated season. What if it you know a little

0:55:00.640 --> 0:55:03.279
<v Speaker 1>bit like baseball last year where they just have to

0:55:03.440 --> 0:55:05.880
<v Speaker 1>not basic like basketball or hockey, or they just basically

0:55:06.520 --> 0:55:09.120
<v Speaker 1>stop it then what so you know, we're gonna talk

0:55:09.120 --> 0:55:10.920
<v Speaker 1>about some of those things. Also, we'll talk about Cam

0:55:10.960 --> 0:55:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Newton going to the Patriots, which we didn't cover in

0:55:12.840 --> 0:55:16.600
<v Speaker 1>this one. We'll talk about his fantasy value specifically with

0:55:16.719 --> 0:55:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots. It's not gonna be anything because Jared Stidham

0:55:19.360 --> 0:55:22.960
<v Speaker 1>is the starter. Well maybe you know, they don't have

0:55:23.040 --> 0:55:25.759
<v Speaker 1>a monetary demand to have to pay Cam, make Cam

0:55:25.840 --> 0:55:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the starters they paid him because they didn't pay him anything.

0:55:28.000 --> 0:55:30.000
<v Speaker 1>They could cut him. They could cut him out right

0:55:30.320 --> 0:55:32.279
<v Speaker 1>by the way. As a side note, for those people

0:55:32.320 --> 0:55:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that have made it to the fifty six minute mark

0:55:34.520 --> 0:55:41.040
<v Speaker 1>of this podcast. The Jets, the Bills, and the Dolphins,

0:55:41.160 --> 0:55:44.040
<v Speaker 1>they all could have blocked this move. If you're the Bills,

0:55:44.840 --> 0:55:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you're the Bill right there, the Bill. Let's take the

0:55:47.680 --> 0:55:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins out of it. Who I still think, aren't you

0:55:49.400 --> 0:55:51.960
<v Speaker 1>know they're not necessarily thinking about winning the division this year?

0:55:52.000 --> 0:55:55.560
<v Speaker 1>But maybe who knows? The Bills really are for sure,

0:55:55.640 --> 0:55:57.799
<v Speaker 1>and the Jets might be too. They were sitting at

0:55:57.840 --> 0:56:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I believe two and twenty five million dollars of cap space,

0:56:01.320 --> 0:56:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and I know that Cam would have had to come

0:56:03.560 --> 0:56:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to those teams as the backup behind a young starter

0:56:07.000 --> 0:56:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to give up that job. But instead

0:56:09.280 --> 0:56:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of making one and a half million dollars, they could

0:56:11.080 --> 0:56:14.279
<v Speaker 1>have gone, here, take ten million dollars. We'll have the

0:56:14.320 --> 0:56:15.960
<v Speaker 1>best backup in the league, or one of the best

0:56:16.000 --> 0:56:19.520
<v Speaker 1>backups in the league. And also we play keep away

0:56:19.560 --> 0:56:22.200
<v Speaker 1>from the Patriots and the Bills and the Jets didn't

0:56:22.239 --> 0:56:25.760
<v Speaker 1>do it. Maybe Cam wasn't interested in being a backup

0:56:25.800 --> 0:56:28.560
<v Speaker 1>at all. Have they made public the ten million dollars

0:56:28.560 --> 0:56:32.840
<v Speaker 1>incentives baked into his contract? You got like that, You

0:56:33.000 --> 0:56:36.759
<v Speaker 1>like when guys are playing for stats. If he can

0:56:36.840 --> 0:56:40.800
<v Speaker 1>make up to six or seven million with incentives, but

0:56:41.080 --> 0:56:43.680
<v Speaker 1>he's not even guaranteed to be the starter right in

0:56:44.000 --> 0:56:48.040
<v Speaker 1>with although he's the problem, Come on, he'll be the starter.

0:56:48.600 --> 0:56:51.320
<v Speaker 1>He'll be all right. Thanks for making it to the

0:56:51.480 --> 0:56:53.279
<v Speaker 1>very end of this podcast. We're grateful for all of

0:56:53.360 --> 0:56:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you listening. If you missed any of the previous team

0:56:55.640 --> 0:56:57.839
<v Speaker 1>by team breakdowns, we encourage you to go back through

0:56:57.920 --> 0:57:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the previous podcast learn all about all the thirty two

0:57:00.960 --> 0:57:03.800
<v Speaker 1>teams in the NFL fantasy style. We'll give the minute

0:57:03.800 --> 0:57:05.520
<v Speaker 1>work for Dan Arnold two on the tweet right so

0:57:05.680 --> 0:57:11.840
<v Speaker 1>people mark for everything you ever want to know about

0:57:11.960 --> 0:57:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Dan Arnold, a boy Everybody. Fantasy Football Weekly is a

0:57:14.880 --> 0:57:17.560
<v Speaker 1>production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts from my

0:57:17.640 --> 0:57:20.720
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:57:20.920 --> 0:57:22.880
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.