WEBVTT - Who Will Blink First in the US-China Trade War?

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 2>The standoff between the US and China continues to escalate,

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 2>which is leading to economic uncertainty worldwide. Bloomberg News now

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 2>reporting China is expanding the ongoing trade war.

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>It does not seem like we're getting any kind of

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>state visit or to tant anytime soon, or even high

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>level talks.

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 2>In the last two weeks, the US has placed tariffs

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 2>of one hundred and forty five percent on Chinese exports,

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 2>and China has retaliated with tariffs of one hundred and

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty five percent and export restrictions on critical rare earth minerals.

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 3>China wants to make a deal, they just don't know

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 3>how quite to go about it.

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 2>It's one of those things that.

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 3>Are not quite proud people, and President She's a proud man.

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>At the moment, it doesn't seem to be working out,

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.279
<v Speaker 1>I think in the way in which President Trump may

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>have anticipated or hoped that it would.

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Jennifer Welch helped lead China policy at the National Security

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Council during the first Trump administration and also under President Biden. Today,

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 2>she's chief geoeconomics analyst for Bloomberg economics.

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>They think President Trump's mo is to build pressure. There's

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a real contrast of approaches here. President Trump prides himself

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>on his unpredictability as well as his hardball tactics right

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>whereas Beijing, in particular Chinese President She Jumping, is a

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>very methodical player when it comes to negotiations. They like structure,

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>having a clear idea of what the agenda's going to

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:34.119
<v Speaker 1>be so they can prepare for it. And I think

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>President Trump's unpredictability really puts them on the back heel

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of ways.

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.680
<v Speaker 2>For its part, China has signaled its open to talks.

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 2>On Wednesday, Beijing appointed a point person for negotiations, but

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 2>sources close to China's government have told Bloomberg that President

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 2>She wants to see the White House approach talks with

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 2>more respect, and it wants the Trump administration to adopt

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 2>a more consistent position on tariffs. It begs the question,

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 2>with the world's two largest economies in a standoff, which

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 2>leader President Trump or President She will blink first.

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 3>China is not going to engage in negotiations until it

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.959
<v Speaker 3>feels the United States has shown some sincerity.

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 2>John lou Is Bloomberg's executive editor for Greater China. He's

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 2>based in Beijing.

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 3>I think the main concern for the Chinese side is

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 3>that they go into some sort of back and forth

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 3>with Washington and that whatever agreements they reach are either

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 3>scuttled or the US goes back on them. The US,

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 3>the Trump administration does something to embarrass not only the

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 3>Chinese government but also she and so that I think

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:44.959
<v Speaker 3>is the number one concern for the Chinese side, and

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 3>they want to make sure that does not happen.

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm David Gera, and this is the big take from

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News today on the show. What it will take

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 2>for President's Trump and She to come to the negotiating table,

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 2>How the current state of China, this economy, impacts its

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 2>positioning in the trade war, and why hardball tactics are

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 2>unlikely to work this time around. When preston Trump anoun's

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 2>sweeping tariffs on about sixty trading partners earlier this month,

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 2>he made good on a big campaign promise on day one.

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 3>We will throw out Bidenomics and we will reinstate Maganomics. Maganomics.

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 3>We will go right after China. We will not rely

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 3>on them one bit.

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 2>And while China has long been a target of Trump's ire,

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 2>the size and scope of these tariffs caught Beijing by surprise,

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 2>but Bloomberg' John lou says it shouldn't have come as

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 2>a shock.

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 3>I was surprised that there was surprise because I think

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 3>what Donald Trump did was exactly what he said he

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 3>was going to do. Right he said on the campaign trail,

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 3>He's going to take tariffs on China to sixty some percent.

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 3>After he took I think there was a bit of

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 3>optimism here in China that that would not happen, but

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 3>that's exactly what he did. The Chinese, for their part,

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 3>made very clear that if tariffs came into effect that

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 3>they would hit back. And from what I can gleanm

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 3>the US was itself relatively surprised that the Chinese retaliated

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 3>as proactively and aggressively as they did.

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Here in the US. This is all over the place,

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 2>in newspapers and on television. They're in China. How much

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 2>is this a subject of conversation? Is it everywhere as well?

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 3>It's everywhere. It is the thing everybody is talking about.

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 3>There's an overwhelming country wide consensus or sort of broad

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 3>support for China to fight this, and so these tariffs

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 3>have made you know, Shiji being very popular for retaliating.

0:04:56.040 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 3>It's seen, I think, a broad swelling of patriotic sentiment,

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 3>support for the government, and there is this feeling on

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 3>the ground here amongst ordinary people, business owners that China

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 3>is being wrong by these turriffs. I think the additional

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 3>thing here, though, is there is a sense of foreboding.

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 3>I think there is a sense of what does it

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 3>mean for China economically and could this get even worse?

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 2>John? On Wednesday, China's National Bureau of Statistics reported that

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 2>the country's gross domestic product grew five point four percent

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 2>in the first quarter from a year ago. That's more

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 2>than was expected. How does China's economic position play into

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 2>how it's approaching this trade war.

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 3>I think the longer China can keep the economy ticking along,

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 3>the longer China can hold out. And I think ultimately

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 3>this is sort of a game of chicken, if you will,

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 3>but also I think a game of endurance, and so

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 3>whether or not economically China can keep growth up, I

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 3>think that'll be a determining factor in how this trade

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 3>war unfolds. And you mentioned the GDP data was better

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 3>than expected for the first quarter. I don't know that

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 3>that is super telling of the actual economic conditions here

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 3>on the ground. There was actually a lot of exports

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 3>in the first quarter that will pull ahead that companies

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 3>in the US. Buyers in the US actually moved their

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 3>orders ahead and sort of built up their inventories in

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 3>anticipation that there would be higher tariffs on Chinese goods,

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 3>and so that might be actually hiding some of the

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 3>underlying weakness in the Chinese economy. We've had a terrible

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 3>property crisis that has yet to be resolved. We've had

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 3>weak consumer sentiment, weak consumer spending. The government has promised

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 3>and has already started to roll out lots of stimulus

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 3>measures to try and get households spending again, get companies

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 3>investing again. And I would expect that the government will

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 3>do more of that and at a greater magnitude as

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 3>we go forward, as the impact of these tariffs are

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 3>felt more broadly.

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 2>That's going to determine how negotiations between the US and

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 2>China play out. But another factor will be personality. Bloomberg's

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Jennifer Welch, who worked in the first Trump administration, thinks

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Trump's long standing emphasis on the art of the deal

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 2>will play a huge role.

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>From his perspective. He is the deal maker, right, He

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>plays hardball. He is very much empowered at home, and

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he's trying to leverage that to bring a

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:32.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of confidence into these negotiations as sort of coming

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in with a mandate from the American people and really

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to utilize the fullest extent of America's comprehensive national

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>power here and sort of going further than most presidents

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>have in the past to challenge the limits of that.

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>That's how I think he is approaching not just China,

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>but negotiations with all these partners.

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 2>What role does pride play in these conversations? You have

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 2>two leaders here who are extremely proud individuals. I think

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 2>it's fair to say, how does that affect or shape

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 2>talks of this magnitude.

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's one of the main hurdles to talks

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>really taking off in a serious way at this point

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>in time. Obviously, there's a lot of pain on both sides.

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>There's the potential for even deeper pain as these terrorsts

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>start to bite, and yet we're not really seeing a

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of progress in terms of negotiations, and in fact,

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>each side still seems to be saying that the ball

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>is in the other side's court, and I think a

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>main reason for that is because neither of them wants

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to look weak, right. President Trump, especially after pausing on

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>reciprocal terarifts and then even on the electronics exemptions, has

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>been kind of pushing back in other ways to demonstrate

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>he's still very strong on trade. And I think that's

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>especially important for him when it comes to China because

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:42.599
<v Speaker 1>of the legacy of his campaign promises there and the

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>legacy of his first term of wanting to appear tough

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 1>on Beijing. I think likewise, for President She Jim Paying

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 1>he feels as the leader of the second largest economy

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in the world, they need to demonstrate that they can't

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>be pushed around by the United States anymore. They took

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>those prior tariff hikes on the Chin and have to

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>demonstrating their willingness to stand up for China.

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 2>I think we're familiar with President Trump's personality, but President

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 2>she is much more of an enigma for American audiences

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 2>and John, I wonder if you could paint a picture

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 2>for us of him as a leader, how he's responded,

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 2>and what that tells us just about the way he

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 2>approaches leading his country.

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 3>I think he is a leader that projects stability, that

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 3>projects forthrightness and standing his place, not making sudden turns

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 3>in policy. But at the same time, I think when

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:36.319
<v Speaker 3>push comes to shove, he will make dramatic changes. During

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 3>COVID China had this COVID zero policy. It put a

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 3>tremendous burden on the economy, on the average citizen. And

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 3>then at the end of twenty twenty two, we started

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 3>seeing protests, people going on the street wanting the government

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 3>to end the COVID zero policy. And because of that,

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 3>he did almost overnight, just did away with that policy.

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 3>And he is a man who is willing to make changes.

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 3>But before that, I think he's shown that he's going

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 3>to project strength and he's going to project stability, and

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:09.719
<v Speaker 3>that he knows where he's going and it's the right

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 3>direction forward.

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Jennifer Welch says what President Trump may have been betting

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 2>on is that China's economic situation, in particular the size

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 2>of its debt, along with the housing and youth unemployment

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 2>crises John mentioned, would make she bend.

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 1>This is me reading the tea leaves a little bit.

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>He may have not fully anticipated the extent to which

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Beijing was going to push back on this, so I

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>think he engaged in kind of this tip for tat

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>with Beijing to try and back them down by escalating

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to de escalate again. But the de escalation never happened,

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and now we have these extremely high terrorf rates on

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:43.719
<v Speaker 1>both sides.

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 2>After the break where the US China trade war goes

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 2>from here and the weapons Beijing has at its disposal

0:10:51.320 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 2>to counter additional tariffs. Tensions between the US and China

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 2>are fraught right now, and from the rhetoric coming out

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 2>of the White House, you'd think the two have never

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 2>been further apart on trade, but Bloomberg Economics, as Jennifer

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Welch says, Presidents Trump and She half broke her to

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 2>deal before.

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>It was inked in January twenty twenty. It's called the

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Phase one trade deal, and that was meant to be

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the starting point for what we're called Phase two negotiations

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>that were supposed to deal with much more contentious issues

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>around structural or forums in China that never really took off,

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in part because of the pandemic and in part because

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of deepening US China tensions. The question now is are

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the negotiations that may emerge out of this current round

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of tensions geared towards a Phase one redux where it's

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>just going to be addressing the kind of current trade

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>imbalance and through purchase agreements, or is it going to

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>be trying to attack what those Phase two talks that

0:11:56.559 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 1>never started were geared towards these larger structural issues. And

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 1>I think different members of the administration probably have different

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>perspectives on that. And the key question is going to

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>be what's President Trump's view, right, And some of this

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>may depend a little bit on the timeline to be

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>frank right. I think one of the major incentives for

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>him on the Phase one deal was it was inked

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in an election year and he probably wanted to put

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the US China trade war to the side and get

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that resolved before heading into a presidential election.

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Jennifer says it's important to remember that while President Trump

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 2>isn't up for reelection and doesn't seem too worried about

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 2>the fallout from a trade war, many of his allies

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 2>in Congress are, and the midterms are right around the corner.

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>That could be an incentive for him where maybe the ambition,

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>so to speak, is lowered to something more like a

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Phase one Redux deal. But I think that's a million

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.959
<v Speaker 1>dollar question at this point, and it's also another reason

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>why talks probably have nim progressed all that far as.

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 2>The stalemate continues, both the US and China are eyeing

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 2>other trade partners. The Trump administration has been lining up

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 2>potential deals with some of China's biggest economic rivals. Some

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 2>of the President's economic advisors met with leaders from Japan yesterday,

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 2>and the administration has talks scheduled with South Korea and

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 2>India in the coming weeks. For his part, President She

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 2>has made trips to Vietnam, Cambodia, and Malaysia, and John

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 2>lu says she is looking to improve China's trade relationship

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 2>with the EU.

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Not only has Trump put these tariffs on China, but

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 3>he's also put them on lots of American allies, Europe,

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 3>many Southeast Asian countries, and so that gives China an

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to step in and to have itself be seen

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 3>as a stabilizing force in the global economy as opposed

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 3>to Washington d C, which Beijing will project as being

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 3>unpredictable and as being not so caring about the rest

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 3>of the world and concerned mostly about itself. Xijiping is

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:01.319
<v Speaker 3>in Southeast Asia this week. He's visiting Vietnam, He's visiting Malaysia.

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 3>In Vietnam, he called on the Vietnamese to partner with

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 3>China to resist the unilateral bullying that's happening in the world,

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 3>which is of course availed reference to the United States.

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 3>There's been reports that we're going to get many European

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 3>leaders visiting Beijing later this year for a summit. That

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 3>would suggest another opportunity for China to enhance its relationship

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 3>with Europe. Whether or not other countries wholeheartedly embrace China,

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 3>I think, is a different question. In Asia, for example,

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 3>you have places like Japan, India, the Philippines, other Southeast

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Asian countries that have territorial disputes with China, and so

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 3>they are not going to be embracing China that quickly.

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 3>There's going to be suspicion in those relationships. Same with Europe.

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 3>China has supported Russia and its war invasion of Ukraine diplomatically, rhetorically, economically,

0:14:55.520 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 3>and so that is put many European countries off, and

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 3>so there's going to be suspicion as China tries to

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 3>strengthen these relationships.

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 2>You characterize this as a game of chicken, and I'm

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 2>wondering sort of how long China has here, how long

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 2>the runway is for President She to hold out on

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 2>negotiating before the situation becomes difficult for China economically, any

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 2>sense of that At this point.

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 3>I would say the runway for She in terms of

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 3>that game of chicken is very long. Without a doubt,

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 3>there is broad public support for China to fight back,

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 3>and I think that means people are willing to take

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more pain if it means that that's

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 3>what they need to do to contribute to the fight

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 3>against the United States. And the other thing I would

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 3>say is the Chinese government has a history of enduring

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 3>difficult periods where they've placed additional burdens on local companies'

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 3>local households. COVID is a great example of that. You know,

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't know of many countries where the government could

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 3>have imposed lockdowns like they did here in China, and

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 3>so I do think those points suggest that they can

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 3>play this game for quite a while.

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Meaning President Trump might not get that phone call anytime soon.

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 3>And the reason for that is there's a very different

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 3>cultural dynamic at work, where the Chinese believe very strongly

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 3>that at a working level that she will appoint somebody,

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 3>that Trump will appoint somebody, and those two individuals will

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 3>go back and forth and back and forth and back

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 3>and forth and work out all the details of a deal.

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 3>And only after that deal has been finalized and everybody's

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 3>happy with it, only then will Hijinping appear to shake

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 3>hands and sign something. President Trump really just wants to

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 3>get she on the phone and try and work something

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 3>out person to person, one on one, and it's just

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 3>not the way the Chinese system works. It's not the

0:16:57.720 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 3>way that Chijinping works.

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 2>So that big question who's going to blink first? I

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 2>put it to both Jennifer Welch in Washington and John

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Lou in Beijing.

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 3>The first person to blink is going to immediately get

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 3>a quick response from the other side. So if President

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 3>Trump blinks first, you're going to get something affirmative from

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese side because they want out of this just

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 3>as badly. If the Chinese blink, I think you probably

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 3>will hear this great sigh of relief from Washington, DC.

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>My bet would be that it is going to be

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>neither side overtly obviously blinking. I think conversations are going

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to start in a quieter way at more working levels,

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 1>to set this stage eventually for a leader level conversation

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>because of sort of their mutual interest in guarding their

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 1>respective pride. So that's my prediction. We'll see when it's

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>upe actually occurring.

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 2>This is the Big Take from bloom News. I'm David Gura.

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 2>This episode was produced by David Fox, Rachel Lewis Chrisky,

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 2>and our deputy executive producer, Julia Weaver. It was edited

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 2>by Patty Hirsch, John Low, Jennifer Welch, and Chris Antsy.

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 2>It was fact checked by Andreana Tapia and mixed and

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 2>sound designed by Alex Sagura. Our senior producer is Naomi Shaven,

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 2>Our senior editor is Elizabeth Ponso. Our executive producer is

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Nicole Beemster Boor. Sage Bauman is Bloomberg's head of Podcasts.

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 2>If you liked this episode, make sure to subscribe and

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 2>review The Big Take wherever you listen to podcasts. It

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 2>helps people find the show, thanks for listening. We'll be

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 2>back tomorrow.