WEBVTT - The Insidious Abuse of Stalking

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know from how Stuff Works

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark,

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and there's Charles w Chuck Bryant, and there's Jerry and

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 1>this is Stuff you should Know. Jerry creepily in the background, right,

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>she just has stopped working in this staring at us

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>right now, that's right, which is not at all funny. No,

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not. It's like we can get around about this stuff,

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.599
<v Speaker 1>but nothing about it. It's funny. No, it's really like,

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>but we just try to make light of things that

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>are uncomfortable. That's what we do. Yeah, we did one

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>on Coma's once, remember, that's right. That was hysterical question

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>with a laugh. Right. It was like Leslie Nielsen and

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>Priscilla Presley coming out from Platoon on Naked Gun. You remember,

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>just laughing, all right, watch Naked Gun two and a half.

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>The other days hold up, holds up and then some Yeah,

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>especially once you've met the director personally, right, that's right. Man,

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>we met him a thousand years ago, maybe maybe five

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand years ago. It was a while. So, Chuck, we

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>have a good hundred and fifty pages on stalking here.

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>It's at um and you say, like, no, it's not funny. Absolutely,

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not funny. And it's really tough to put yourself

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 1>in the situation of a person who's being stalked. But

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>there are there's a lot of quotes from people who

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>um compare it to what's a form of abuse. It

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>might not be physical, although if it frequently can turn

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>into something physical or violent. There's a lot of blurred

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>lines here. Um. But even if it never gets physical

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>at all, it is a form of abuse. It's a

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>form of psychological abuse, protracted torment wherein you the victim,

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like your life has been infected. It affects every

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>part of your life and you're constantly you feel like

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you're certently being watched. And as one victim to put it,

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>like not in any sort of flattering way. Yeah, I

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>had the most minimal form of stalking happened to me

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>in college, and I cannot imagine what like a serious

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>stalking situation might feel like considering how that made me feel.

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Really yeah, and not, you know, very minimal. Trust me,

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying like I know how it feels, man,

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>but like, you know, a girl that I was dating

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in college and didn't date anymore. I couldn't get enough chuck.

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean a few times, like banging on my bedroom

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>window in the middle of the night kind of thing,

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>like come out here and talk to me, that kind

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of thing. Well, I mean that is that is stalking,

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>especially if it happens repeatedly, if especially if she had

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>like escalated over time. Yeah, this didn't really escalate, and

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 1>it was only a couple of times. I think then

0:02:55.960 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that would probably qualify as what's called harassment. Yeah, her asthmate.

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>But I will say this, I moved to New Jersey, uh,

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>just a few months after that, because that was the

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>end of college and that's what I did. Um, and

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't go because of that. But it was definitely like, well,

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>there's also the benefit of moving to New Jersey. And

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>one week into being in New Jersey, we lived out

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>in the woods. I had a dream that a bear

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>came out of the woods and pounded on my windows

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and like pounded on my door until it fell down

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and the bear came in. It was one of those

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>where I woke up and I was like, well, I

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>know what that means. Yeah, the Blair the bear. Her

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>name is not Blair, by the way, that wasn't a

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Freudian slop right, the bear definitely like resembled her in

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>some way. It was her name wasn't Blair, but she

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>looked exactly like Blair from Facts of Life. Oh wish. Yeah,

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't have broken up with her now, To be fair, also,

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>this was I was young and immature and probably wasn't

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the best breaker rupper. Oh, it's not to say I

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>deserved it, but well, I really think that that's a

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>really that's a good point. You've made like seventeen good

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>points in there. Okay, So number one, men get stalked

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to UM, and depending on where you live, it can

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>happen pretty close to UM in equal frequencies women being stalked,

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 1>although I don't think anywhere it's equal. I think almost

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>across the board, if not totally across the board. Women

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>are stalked more frequently than men are. But men can

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>be stalked pretty much evenly by women and other men. UM.

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.559
<v Speaker 1>Not just in the realm of like ex lovers, whether

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>you're hetero or straight, but also like you might be stalked,

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and if you're a woman, you might be stalked by

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>another woman to someone who's jealous angry or resentful of

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you or your arrival or something. Single white female, right exactly,

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's just going to become obsessed with you. So

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that was one thing. Men can be stalked, and that's

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>very important. But um, but also you said like that

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you weren't the us to break her upper and there's

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of um. There's a lot of perceptions, like

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>misconceptions and misperceptions about what stalking is, what the victims

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of stalking do or don't deserve, what they did or

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't do wrong, and from everything that's kind of emerging

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>over study of this for the last few decades. If

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you're a stalking victim, you basically did nothing wrong, but

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody assumed you did something wrong, Like you didn't break

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>up with them properly. Yeah, mixed signals or yeah, maybe

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.239
<v Speaker 1>you flirted or you were too nice or whatever. Um

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>or maybe you're making a big deal out of all

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>this one Really it's not the guy just likes you

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:40.119
<v Speaker 1>or something. Maybe you're just seeing at Yeah, yeah, maybe

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you got it in your head from watching Sally Jesse

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Raphael or something like. We're not saying these things. By

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 1>the way, this is like a lot of the misconceptions

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 1>that that people who are victims of stalking run into

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>even from law enforcement. Luckily, it's changed dramatically and the

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>laws and law enforcement are taking it far more seriously

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>than they did before. But it's definitely still not automatically like, oh,

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you're being stuck. Great, let me here's how they help you. Well,

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and especially I think of a certain age group, like

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>your grandparents may think it's romantic. There's this great Hampton

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>youw um joke. Yeah, remember him, he was at her Okay,

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>so Hampton youw was saying, um, he was like our

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>grandparents generation were nuts. It was like my granddad said,

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, for three and eight days in a row,

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I went to your grandmother's work and I asked her

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to marry me. And finally on days and yes, it's funny,

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 1>like uh, yeah, I mean, stalking is a and we'll

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and tell you straight up, it's it's a

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>new term that's only been around for a few decades,

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's an old behavior. It's an old yes, it's

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>just we're finally waking up to the impact that Yeah, yeah,

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks granddad. So so um, let's talk about kind of

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 1>the history of the understanding of stalking. It was actually

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>not until the late eighties that the world really started

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to kind of wake up to this whole thing after

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple of high profile killings. Uh. Yeah, celebrity obviously.

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 1>If you know, if you want to get something sadly

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>in the news, if you want to get something in

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the news, it's having a celebrity undergo that or be

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a victim to that is the best way. Uh. And

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that did happen a few times. Um. Well, first of all,

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of movies over the years, like

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and Robert de Niro was in a lot

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of them. Yeah, victim and uh taxi driver no wait,

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and and the fan he was he was also he

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>was the stalker in there. I think it was Wesley

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Snipes was baseball player, he was a fan. I was thinking,

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>was he the baseball player? But that was banged the

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>drum slowly. Oh yeah, he's a baseball player in that. Yeah,

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>he played catcher Thurman monthson of the Yankees who died young. Um,

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, Taxi Driver, Stalker, Cape fear Stalker. What was

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.239
<v Speaker 1>the other one with the fan? Not a very good movie,

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>but I remember the two were good. I remember reading

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>he hung out with knife salesman to understand his character better. Uh,

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>fatal attraction, of course, of course. Um the crush single

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>white female one our photo. Do you see that, Robin Williams. Yeah,

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>but I forgot all about it. Was that that was

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of family obsessed, like they have the perfect family.

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to be that husband. Um, so what do

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you do? Well, I'm not going to ruin it. Was

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>he like scary Robin Williams in it. Yeah, he was

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a photo processor, like a photo booth guy, and so

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>he would look at his pictures of the family and

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>sup unnerving in that. Yeah, it's always portrayed the same way. Um,

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>The King of Comedy Classic. These are just a few

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of my favorites in that he was. That's what I'm

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that that's four. I think he likes these roles. Boy,

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I had never thought about that. And then there was

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>one I want to shout out from a few years

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>ago called The Gift that was really good. Jason Bateman. Oh,

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see that one. It's good. And I saw

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that as well. I thought you were talking about the

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>one with that Billy Bob Thornton directed with Kate Blanchet

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>as a psychic and oh no, that was good too, though,

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>was he was just I don't think he directed that

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>though he did? Did he? I thought that was Sam

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Rami Now I've always positive did he write it then?

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know he did something for it. Well.

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting though, to look at these movies. I like

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>so many of them, and there are a lot of them,

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>considering that stalking hasn't been around that long. Well, I

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>also thought, like, there's also comedies too. There's something about

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Mary stalking through and through. Oh yeah, say anything standing

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>outside with the boom box. That's romantic stalk, right, That's

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying, all right, Grandpa, I just wonder what this.

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting, though, the obsession with entertainment about stalking, Like

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>people are into these movies, right, and dozens and dozens

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of them. We know it's creepy and weird to stalk

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>before we even called it stalking, though, is I mean

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>based on this this body of movies, Yeah, and I

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:04.599
<v Speaker 1>think not. Actually a lot of these are post like nine,

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>but not all of them. But not all of them,

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>You're right? Uh? The Grabster wrote this though, and he

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>points out Peter Lawford from The rat Pack Um was.

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>He talked about it in his book Without There wasn't

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a name for it though, that shows just how new

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>it is, because this was and he said, they are

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 1>crazies who become so obsessed with celebrity that their fantasies

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>are lived as though they're a reality. They can walk

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>your streets, follow you everywhere, telephone you, send you letters,

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.839
<v Speaker 1>generally harass you. They can threaten you, discuss the scene

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>X they're planning to perform on your body. Can do

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>almost anything they wish, but as long as they do

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>not physically hurt you, the police have limited power and

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>elaborate rules to follow. Yeah, because that's a that's a

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>confounding factor for years, was that you know, you've got

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>like First Amendment protection, you can say weird things and

0:10:56.400 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you can be in public places. But after the death

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>of well first actually, the first taste of stalking in

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>real life that that America at least had was with

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>an actress named Teresa Seal Donna who was in Raging

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Bowl with de Niro. Yeah, pet played Petci's wife. Huh

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and um, she was very publicly stabbed in front of

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>her apartments like I think ten times, very violently, like

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the knife bent even it was really horrific. Fortunately she

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>survived and she actually became a victim's advocate for stalkers

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of her life. But that was like

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of a big whoa, whoa what what was that? Like?

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>The guy the guy was a drifter, had become obsessed

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>with her. Yeah, he was mentally ill, and we'll talk

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot about mental illness throughout this this show. But um,

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:52.199
<v Speaker 1>he eventually was extradited to the UK on another murder charge. Uh,

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and they found him not guilty. I guess whatever they

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>call reasons of insanity as different wording over there. But

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>he was committed and died in a hospital in two

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand four. But she went on to you know, I

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>think she made a TV movie about it. Yes, it

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>was scary stuff. Yeah, but Rebecca Schaeffer was the one

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:15.079
<v Speaker 1>seven years later that really hit the news. My sister

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Sam that that was. I mean, these are all equally

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>horrifying and sad, but this she was stalked for three

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>years by this man who um again an obsessed fan

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>yeah who who did the same thing to other famous women,

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Like she wasn't the only one, but he is, She's

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the one, um who he killed and Marcia Clark actually

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>tried that case. A little known fact. Huh yeah, yeah,

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>he's he's still in prison actually, um and he was

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>shanked in prison like ten years ago eleven times. Yeah,

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>so he's still in jail. So um they they actually

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the guy who stalked Rebecca Schaefer took a lot of

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.559
<v Speaker 1>his cues from the playbook of the guy who uh

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>stalked Teresa Seldana actually use things like um, something called pretexting,

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>which is a really uh pretty common way that stalkers

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>will get information about their victims is pretending there's somebody

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.839
<v Speaker 1>either not and then get it get info from unsuspecting

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>like family members or whatever. UM. Hiring a private detective

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to get info used to be a lot easier way easier,

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>like you could go to the d n B and

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>be like, hey, where does this person live? Right, it

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>might tell you up until it wasn't your information wasn't

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>federally protected at the UM. And then there was actually

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a website, one of the early websites, and I think

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the nineties UM helped you stalk people easily, Like I

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>cannot remember the name of the site, but they would

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:54.079
<v Speaker 1>basically socially engineer a chance meeting with whoever you wanted,

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and they would give you all this information on them

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and teach you how to strike up a conversation and

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about all the stuff that you knew they already knew,

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>they liked. And it was a website that was dedicated

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to helping stalking. It almost sounds like a dating app

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>social media, right. And then Letterman also really shined a

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:18.439
<v Speaker 1>light on this with his stalker, who was a woman

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>who used to break into his house pretty frequently. Yeah,

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that was a very sad case. Um, and we'll get

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>into where she fits in the modern definitions, but uh,

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>she was afflicted with schizophrenia and he was he was.

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>He often didn't press charges, and he was pretty like

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>cool about it. He joked about it here and there

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>on the show. I think too. She made his top

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>ten lists a lot. Yeah, just to try and make

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>light of it, I guess. But um, she went on

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to stalk and Astronaut as well. Yeah, and they both expressed, um,

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>just sort of a general condolence and sadness when she

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>took her own life, like I think Letterman knew, uh,

0:14:57.280 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know she would they would wake up with

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>her on her pretty she stole his car one time,

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>like serious stuff, but as we'll learn later, she falls

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>into a category that generally is not physically dangerous to

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>her victim, but still like it's just unnerving. So all

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>these celebrities being stalked kind of shine a light on

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>stalking in general, although not necessarily the most the correct

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>light initially, but they definitely brought it to everyone's attention

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of brought it under the jurisdiction of

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the law. That the law got much more involved after that.

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>And um, let's take a break and then we'll get

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>into that. You want to, Yeah, okay, we'll be right back,

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, Chuck. So the America said Letterman's being stalked,

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Schaefer's killed, Teresa s al Donna went through this,

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>let's do something about this finally. Yeah, And and it's

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>tough to get good statistics because you know, it depends

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>on what states you're in, what the definition of stalking is,

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>whether or not. And this is one of the big

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>problems is the actual crimes committed. Like now stalking is

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a crime, but before that it was it's like, you know,

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily crime, like you said, to be waiting

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>for someone in a parking lot. Right, it's creepy, but

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a law isn't broken, or if laws are broken, they're

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>little misdemeanors usually. Yeah, So it was always a sort

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of legal gray area until you know, like you said,

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the high profile incidents happened. Um, and that's when the

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>d O G A U d O G, the d

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>double ghg uh, the d O J went um got

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 1>serious and they created a legal definition of engaging in

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>a course of conduct directed at a specific person that

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>would cause a reasonable person to fear for his or

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>her safety or the safety of others, or suffer substantial

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 1>emotional distress. And that definition is really important because it

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>says cause a reasonable person to fear. And while that's

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>open to inter interpretation, it's not a It doesn't say

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:34.919
<v Speaker 1>like there has to be a literal, vocalized threat to

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to count, you know, like they don't have to say

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>like I'm gonna get you in in you know where

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you for a raincoat, Like you can just feel that

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>threat if you're a reasonable person. Um, And that and

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that counts, thank god, because that's that really opens opens

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it up, you know, right. Um, And it doesn't even

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>have to be The threat doesn't even have to be um,

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a physical threat. Either could be like I'm going to

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>make up lies about you on the internet or I'm

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>going to go tell your parents. Um, you know, all

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the all the like stuff we did together, like we

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>did drugs. Like, there's all sorts of different ways you

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 1>can threaten somebody beyond violence. I'm going to trample your

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>flower bed exactly. Um, there's a lot of like ways

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you can threaten and intimidate somebody, and all of these things,

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>each of these acts is considered harassment. I was looking

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>up to try to figure out what is the distinction

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>between harassment and stalking, and it's really tough to find

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>an obvious distinction. But from what I could get, harassment

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>are the individual acts that people do when they're stalking,

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and stalking is a pattern of harassment frequently escalates over time. Yeah,

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>and it also obviously blurs lines with domestic violence, like

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>it is. Yeah, and I think you can you can

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>even say it as a form of domestic violence. Um,

0:18:56.560 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>depending on you know the person at all, right, then

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't count. Yeah, there's a lot of categories of stalking.

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into him in a second, but um, domestic

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>violence is definitely one of the cradles that stalking is

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>born from. Yeah, And one of the really sad things

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>about it is there's a a lot of times it

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it just there's no possible uh good result, Like oftentimes

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a start a stalker might stop but then start back up,

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>like too often the end result is like someone's death

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>or a physical attack. It can be or there's just

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>no closure resolution, right, Like even if the stalker stops,

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that the victim is like, oh good,

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I can have my life back. I don't worry about

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that guy anymore. Like that that the trust, the security,

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>all of those things that that most of us just

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>take for granted on a daily basis have been lost

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're not just immediately regained, because it's like you said,

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>with stalkers, the behavior can just be discontinued and then

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it can start back up, get out of the blue,

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and so you never know when they're going to pop

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>back by, or it probably freaks you out even more

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>when they stop communicating, because what are they doing? Right? Yeah,

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and even if they get even if your stalker gets

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>thrown in prison or gets hit by a bus, like

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>there can be irreparable psychological damage done to you. You

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>may never be able to trust another man or woman again,

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and and have a hard time finding a love relationship

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that you can trust, you know. And this happens so

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>much more to women. And it's not I think these

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>statistics you can kind of just flush down the john

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 1>because so many of it, so much of it goes unreported,

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and so much of it is stuff that women have

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>just dealt with since you know, the beginning of time,

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Like the guy who's a little too handy or a

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>little too creepy, or a little too forward, or doesn't

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>take Noah on a you know, ask me out for

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:59.199
<v Speaker 1>a date, like Grandpa showed up every day. You know.

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's just sad. I mean, I think things

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>are starting to change. But um, as far as stats go,

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to even take those seriously sometimes, and before

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 1>these incidences in the early nineties, it was hard to

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.959
<v Speaker 1>even get cops sometimes to investigate or like either they

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:19.199
<v Speaker 1>didn't have power, they didn't take it seriously. UM in

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Violence Against Women Act really broadened um well like training, advocacy, counseling,

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:30.679
<v Speaker 1>but really like law enforcement, giving them broader powers to

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>investigate and arrest um was a big deal, and Joe

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Biden was actually one of the the champions and big

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 1>supporters of and drafting that violence. Yeah. Yeah, So part

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of our national shame from the shutdown is that that

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>law was allowed to expire in the um Stalking Awareness Month,

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>which is January. Yeah, everything about that sucked. Yeah, but

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it has been signed immediately like after Like that was

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the first things that happened was they they

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>re up to that Act as soon as the government

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>went back to work, which I mean, it is a

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 1>big deal that there is. I mean, that's a larger

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Umbrella Act, but it does include all sorts of funding

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 1>for stalking support and resources. And as we'll see, if

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you're being stalked, there's a lot of places for you

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to turn, but those places need to get federal funding

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>because they're usually pretty small nonprofits that can't float themselves. Yeah.

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Two thousand eighteen, you want to talk about another feel

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>good act, the Pause act Um, which had you know this,

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't just about this, but under that Umbrella act

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 1>Um it included threats to your pets, because that's a

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>big one. People. A lot of times part of the

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>pattern of stalking is you know, you come home and

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 1>you find your animal dead, fatal attraction, that bunny got boiled.

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>UM and not only protecting the pets, but UM grants

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and funding for shelters to allow you to bring your pet,

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>because that's some people rightfully won't leave their pets behind.

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's a decision you shouldn't have to make.

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>But you like, I can't go to that that home

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that can protect me because they won't take my dog.

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Right And it's not just with UM, with people who

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>are being stalked. Homeless shelters have the same problems too.

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>There's there's very few homeless shelters that have accommodations for

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>pets as well. UM. So one of the other, UH,

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>one of the other big laws came in that Clinton

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>signed in UM which basically made stalking a federal crime.

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 1>It extended UM protection like UM restraining orders. Basically they

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed nationwide protection, like no matter where you were, if

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>you had a restraining order, it was good across the

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>United States. UM. If you went to stalk somebody across

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 1>state lines, it was now a federal crime and the

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>FBI was on you. If you use the mail to

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>stalk somebody just sending lighters. It was now a federal crime.

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>So it became a big deal. And we're talking like seriously, um,

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nine, Rebecca Schaeffer was kind of when it really started.

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>By ninety four, Um, California had the first law. Six

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the Feds had a law, and I believe um, within

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years after that, every state in the

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Union had a law. So no, I'm sorry, California had

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a law that same year in nine and by every

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>state in America had anti stalking law. It happened like

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 1>that fast. Yeah, And in nine nine the l a

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>p D actually started the Threaten Management Unit, which was

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a big deal because now you have an actual unit

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of dedicated officers that will study behavior and trying to

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 1>determine risk and things like that, whereas before it was

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:51.360
<v Speaker 1>just like yeah, like we'll get to it. Yeah, we'll

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>send We'll send a couple of our heavy hitter cops

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>over to to tell them to leave you alone. Send over,

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Russell Crowe remember, like of an a job that's a

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:06.360
<v Speaker 1>great character, so that I advocate for Vendetta's and like

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>extra judicial I think, like beating down. But you said

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:11.919
<v Speaker 1>it's a great character. It was pretty great in that

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>movie when he would stick up for the abused women

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>and go beat down those jerks. Um, there's a good character.

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I agree, So, Chuck, we kind of we kind of

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of defined um stalking here there, but let's talk

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>about like what some of the behaviors of that stalkers have.

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Like there are there are some set things that just

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 1>about any stalker will engage in that it's basically a

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 1>pattern of stalking behavior, which is really surprising because when

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 1>we talk about stalker psychology and a little bit, you'll

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:45.959
<v Speaker 1>see there's a lot of different people and a lot

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 1>of different personality types that engage in stalking, but they

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>all kind of tend to do the same stuff. And

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the first things that they'll do is just

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:59.959
<v Speaker 1>show up where you are. Yeah, showing up now obvious

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>slee um calling and texting, like texting is a big one, um,

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and social media harassment and stuff like that. But I

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 1>mean that falls, I guess under cyberstalking. It does, so

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>cyberstalking kind of deserves its own episode, but it so

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>it's its own thing where you might just be targeted

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:23.919
<v Speaker 1>by someone you've never met before and just found you

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>on the internet, and they're using the internet exclusively to

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 1>stalk you and harass you and maybe even extort you.

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>That's cyberstalking. But also using email or um, you know,

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>location tracking or spyware to stalk under the traditional definition,

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that's also technically cyberstalking. It's like two things. Yeah, it's

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>scary though with all those personal things that people have

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>online now, it's certainly not like the old days. People

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:52.959
<v Speaker 1>can see so much about your life. Um, even if

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you think you've protected yourself in that way. Yeah, we'll

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>do a whole episode on cyberstalking. Okay, so they're showing up.

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:04.400
<v Speaker 1>There's um non consensual communication. You kind of hit on emails, texts,

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>letters that can be UM and apparently a lot of

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>stalkers will communicate in ways that they think is totally

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>obvious to their victim, but their victim has no idea

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>what they're saying. Like some examples I saw in real life,

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>or like fingernail clippings, a stack of Texas monthly magazines,

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 1>a rat, a dead rat wrapped in cell What did

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that stack of magazines? Had no idea what that meant.

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>It was like it was like a message. No one

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>knows what it meant except for the stalker is the

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>only person that made sense to But the stalker felt

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>like they were communicating in their opecial stack of magazines. Yeah,

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>or left him outside of their house, gotcha, gotcha. Um.

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Obviously you don't even have to, like like if you

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>there could be a coworker that you see every day

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in the office and they can stalk you at work

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.360
<v Speaker 1>even though they're also supposed to be in the same

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>office as you. Like the line is very fine. They

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 1>can someone can stop by your desk too much and

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 1>pay you too many compliments. Uh. Again, that overlaps with

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.880
<v Speaker 1>harassment too. But like if you go to your bosses

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, hey, I want to be in a

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>different part of the building, because this guy's really giving

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>me the creeps, then he starts showing up over there

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>every day. Like that's stalking, right absolutely, you know. Um.

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 1>There's also threatening family members, friends, anybody that the person

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>cares about, pets, making threats, whether explicit or otherwise. Um,

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>And all of these combined. They can be separate. They

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>can be um. They can be repeating the same one

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>over and over again. They can be a random assortment.

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>There's also very frequently like trespassing, breaking into your house,

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>breaking into your car, um, just basically getting into your stuff,

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and then sometimes making it so like you can't tell

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>how they got in there, but you just know they

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>were there. Like I read one account of a woman

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>who was being stalked, and like she went and unlocked

0:28:59.880 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>her car and there was a rose on the seat,

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:05.239
<v Speaker 1>like the passenger seat, and she's like, how did this

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>even get in here? She had no idea how the

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>guy got in there, but he got in there. So

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>just just knowing that this person is watching you, could

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>could show up wherever you are um and can get

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to you. Is all of these things that combine that

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>makes stalking so insidious. Yeah, and it's and like the

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>effect goes beyond just psychological harm, of which that's obviously

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the worst part of it. But like financially, you can

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you can have missed work and lost wages and you

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>might have to move, uh, Like people have picked up

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and moved house at great loss, changed jobs, changed jobs

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>at you know, salary loss, Like it has like a

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>real financial impact as well. Yeah, and you were saying,

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>like how technology enables people to stalk so so much

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>more easily now, Um, that's a big one. Like if

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you especially if you m we're already if you had

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a relationship with your stalker previously, um, and they had

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 1>access to your computer or your phone. Most stalking advocate

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>groups say, if you can afford it, get a new computer,

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>get a new phone, because those are compromised, and that's

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that's too expensive for a lot of people. So there's

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>some tricks and stuff you can deal with or work

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>with if you can't replace it, which we'll get to.

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to research this without feeling a sense of

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>unease for sure, you know, and just the injustice of it,

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>like like considered you just were nothing but but passingly

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>friendly to a stranger and all of a sudden they're

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>doing all of this to you and disrupting your life

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>like this and robbing you of your security and you

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what they're going to do next. That's

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>about as unfair as it gets. Yeah, and uh, I

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>think we'll probably take a break now, but and come

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>back and talk about the different types. But you know,

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the types specifically is like the photo matt guy,

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>or you know, the casual acquaintance, the bank teller or

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>or you're the bank customer, and the bank teller is

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the victim. Like these these short little communications that someone

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>who uh has mental illness maybe and is prone to this,

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>you get a too nice of a have a great

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>day and a smile and yeah, and that sends them

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>down the road. Scary man, because you don't want to

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>like stop being friendly to people, or should we all?

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we should. It's the only way to protect ourselves.

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we're gonna take a break and we're gonna

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>talk more specifically about the different types um of stalkers

0:31:36.360 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 1>right after this, So Chuck, remember we said like California

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>was like the first state to really take this seriously. Well,

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>l A was the first city to take it seriously

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>because at first people thought, oh my god, celebrities are

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in trouble. And now that we've done more research, we

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>know like, actually celebrities are the least stocked group and

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 1>they're actually the probably the safest of all the stocked groups.

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>But initially l A really went a whole hog on

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>studying stalking and that's where we got some of our

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>earliest data and understanding of the stalking mentality. They created

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the Threat Management Unit with some forensic psychiatrists and some

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>security guys, and they came up with basically some early

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>stalker profiles, And one of the first things they figured

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>out is you can roughly categorize stalkers into three different

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>pigeon holes. Basically, all right is the first one arato mania? Yes, right,

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>which is uh. If you just sound that word out,

0:32:57.120 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you probably have a pretty good idea what that means, um,

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and that is uh. That is someone who feels like

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>are those the ones who feel like they're in love?

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Those are the with the person. Those are the ones

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:13.959
<v Speaker 1>who who feel like they're in love but also that

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the other person loves them, right, Like Letterman's stalker was

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>an erotomaniac, a person with a rotomania, but she also

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 1>was someone with schizophrenia. Right, Yeah, there's all these are

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>co morbid. I guess there's a lot of overlap with

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>mental illness. But from what I've seen, um, depending on

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the type of stalking you're engaged in. When when an

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 1>actual diagnosable mental illness comes into play, the stalking kind

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of takes a back seat to that diagnosable mental illness.

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>It's it's like it's it's a byproduct of it or

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a symptom of the mental illness, rather than the stalking

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>being the main part, you know what I mean. Yeah, Like,

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>if she didn't have schizophrenia, she probably wouldn't have been

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>stalking Letterman exactly. But it's it's characterized by a deep,

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>profound illusion that that the stalker and the celebrity victim

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>who has no idea that the stalker exists, at least

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>at first, are are basically bound souls, that they have

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>their soul mates. It's rarely sexual, very rarely sexual. It's

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's not even necessarily romantic, but it's so hyper

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 1>romantic it it transcends romance. It's just complete and utter

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>delusional obsession. That's erato mania. Yeah, and this is the

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>one that I mentioned early on, which I think very

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>interestingly has an inverse proportion of danger. So the more

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:39.840
<v Speaker 1>distant or unattainable the relationship, like this woman and David Letterman,

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 1>or really any any of the celebrity cases, um, the

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>less likely they are to actually injure the victim, and

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the less likely they are to ever even meet them

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 1>face to face. Right. It's usually like in Letterman's case,

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, like I don't think he ever met her

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 1>face to face in an incident. No, but I mean, like,

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:00.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure she would have liked to have him face

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to face, but um, like her, his in her case

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>is very much an outlier. Although because of the medium,

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>because it's celebrities, we think, like that's very common. That

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 1>is extremely rare, first of all, in a rodomania's stalking

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 1>situation with the celebrity, but one where the person actually

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>tries to physically get in touch with the victim, that's

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty rare. Yeah. Yeah, so a rodomania is one. And

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that's also the that's the smallest group from what I understand, Yeah,

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>but the most probably press Grabby Yeah, and movie Mackey Yeah,

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 1>movie Mackey. Um, like De Narro's got It cornered. Love obsessional, Yeah,

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that's another one. Uh, And that is one that I

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 1>was talking about with Like, could be a fleeting acquaintance,

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 1>could be a co worker, um yeah, those are like

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 1>two types. Yeah, Like it's either someone like you work

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>with every day, or it could be the bank teller

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>right or again and you could be the bank I

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:06.840
<v Speaker 1>saw that the healthcare worker UM is very frequently the

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 1>victim of love love obsessional stalking because the UM, like

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the experience of being in the hospital or whatever and

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 1>having somebody, some stranger take care of you. It is

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>they're healing you. So they're very frequently a target of that,

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 1>but it can be something like a grocery store clerk

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>or a bank teller or something like that, anybody, Um,

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 1>just this the most fleeting casual acquaintance ship can turn

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 1>into a full blown stalk, and in that case, the

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 1>person who is doing the stalking is aware that the

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>other person isn't in love with them yet, but has

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>seen basically too many rom coms and believes that that

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>if they diligently pursue this person and show up at

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 1>their work and send them all these unwanted gifts, that

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 1>that the person will eventually their heart will melt as

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>they see how wonderful they are, and um, they will

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 1>be together forever. The problem is, first of all, it's obnoxious, annoying, well,

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's also a real like narcissistic personality disorder totally,

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 1>but it can also once once you reach people have

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a breaking point, and if you become obsessed with somebody

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and it finally becomes clear to you that they're not

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>going to reciprocate you, already feel like you're entitled to

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:23.239
<v Speaker 1>their attention, to their love, and now they're they're withholding

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it from you, So that might turn into rage, which

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is extremely dangerous in a stalking situation. And that's almost

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 1>every movie the way it goes down. Yeah, it wasn't

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 1>there one with like Marky Mark or Donnie Fear Market. Yeah,

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Fear Fear with Reese Witherspoon, Markey Marker, Donny Mark. You

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>know the Marks? Did you know Reese Witherspoon listens to

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Did I know that? I don't know. I read it somewhere. Yeah,

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember. She listens in the car. She said

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:58.399
<v Speaker 1>in some magazine art. Well, we think you're great. Yes,

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:02.439
<v Speaker 1>come on movie crush and come on into the world.

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 1>You could work her in there somehow. I think her

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 1>son also, she said, her son makes like music or whatever.

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>He should make like jingles for stuff you should know.

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, totally play this um so uh oh. The

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 1>other interesting thing I thought about the love obsessional, uh,

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:21.239
<v Speaker 1>is that it says oftentimes they are affluent and well

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 1>educated and they are high strung professionals who have no

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:30.240
<v Speaker 1>personal life except for this obsession. Right. Basically, Patrick Bateman

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>types who are interested in a relationship, yep. But who

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:36.320
<v Speaker 1>were just like, yeah, this is in this this article,

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 1>this is that that was kind of old, but they

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 1>were basically saying like, yeah, they we could tell when

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it said, uh, they're usually like the next door type,

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 1>like Olivia Newton John, not like Joan Collins. And I

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 1>was like, wait, years I read a victim's handbook that

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:54.759
<v Speaker 1>was written clearly by a victim who like wrote a

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>book on what to do if you're being stalked, and

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:00.799
<v Speaker 1>it was from I think, and she had advice on

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>what to do if like they were blowing up your

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:06.800
<v Speaker 1>page or this is dated, dated information. She's not a

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Joan Colin stype. But but they made a really good

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 1>point and it's still going on today that the distinction

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>between work and social life is so blurred because everybody

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 1>works so much that it's like, yeah, I mean the people.

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>You spend all your time with the people at work.

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:26.320
<v Speaker 1>So if you um are already, as they put it,

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 1>high strung neurotic narcissist types, you may feel entitled to

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:33.720
<v Speaker 1>this person's affection or attention, and that so that becomes

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the coworker stalking situation of love obsessional Yeah, in the

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 1>movie version, that's the well, let's just work late and

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:45.279
<v Speaker 1>like order some Chinese in the office, and then they

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 1>have this like kind of funny exchange candles and that's

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 1>an Act one, and then you know, Act two is

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 1>all the hey, this is getting out of hand, and

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 1>then Act three is she rejects, rejects them, and then

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it gets violent and angry. I think she'd reject

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:04.399
<v Speaker 1>him in act two, and then Act three is all

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 1>the oh god, and then the resolution. Yeah, I think

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of the first the first plot point that

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the end of act one is probably the rejection, You're right,

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and then that would set up the act to action,

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the building of the tension, and then act three is

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the yeah. But something always kicks off Act three, like

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:23.839
<v Speaker 1>and I guess in Cape Fear it was I think

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the kickoff Tact three might have been them getting out

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 1>of town and going to Cape Fear. That's what would

0:40:29.719 --> 0:40:31.800
<v Speaker 1>be my guess. It's so funny movies, you can almost

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you check your watch next time you're watching a movie

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:38.359
<v Speaker 1>and everything happens in thirty minute increments. Almost it's funny. Uh.

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:40.239
<v Speaker 1>And then the last one, I think of the three

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that we were talking about is um is this one

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 1>simple obsessional and this is this is the worst. I mean,

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 1>they're all bad, but most typically violent. Yeah. This is

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:55.800
<v Speaker 1>like the someone who you generally had an intimate relationship

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 1>at some point and you don't want to be with

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 1>him anymore, and they harass you and stalk you, and

0:41:02.320 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 1>it seems like almost always it ends in violence. Well, no,

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that's not necessarily true, but it's at the highest risk

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of all of the types. Like if there's some dud

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 1>who comes into your bank every day and has a

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:17.920
<v Speaker 1>crush on you, he's far less likely to become violent then.

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And but that's not a former intimate, is it. No,

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm saying. That's a different category. The former

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:27.319
<v Speaker 1>intimate is more likely to perpetrate violence, But that doesn't

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>mean that every time it's going to resolve in violence.

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 1>That granted, though. One of the first tips I've seen

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:39.440
<v Speaker 1>for um stalking, like advocacy groups like their their lists

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of stuff you should be doing, one of the first

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 1>ones is take yourself seriously, trust your gut than your instincts.

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Very frequently family and friends will just kind of blow

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 1>off this all these signs. If you feel insecurely nervous

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 1>about it. Go with that. But that is that you

0:41:56.680 --> 0:41:59.760
<v Speaker 1>should take this seriously because it can turn into something

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:03.120
<v Speaker 1>dangerous for you, and you should treat it that way

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 1>and take it seriously. Yeah, because I'll say this, if

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:11.439
<v Speaker 1>let's say you me quote and not you, let's say

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:18.719
<v Speaker 1>one quote unquote overreacts. Um, fine, that's okay, sure overreact

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:22.800
<v Speaker 1>do it, because if this person is not a stalker,

0:42:23.480 --> 0:42:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it would just be just like, I'm really sorry. Things

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:31.719
<v Speaker 1>obviously you got out of hand and you'll never hear

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 1>from me again. Um. The only person that would really

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 1>get super rag about that is probably a stalker. Yeah,

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that's true. You know, so air on the side of

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:46.759
<v Speaker 1>caution because um, I mean, a restraining order is one

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:50.719
<v Speaker 1>thing I wrote in here. They are worthless. They're not worthless.

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:53.360
<v Speaker 1>They're worthless in that it doesn't stop anyone from doing anything.

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:56.759
<v Speaker 1>But I think the main juice of a restraining order

0:42:56.920 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 1>is so you officially have legal precedent that person has

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:03.920
<v Speaker 1>done something. You're documenting it. Although I did see I

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:07.440
<v Speaker 1>read a guardian Um article about a woman who was

0:43:07.520 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 1>stalked by like an ex boyfriend from high school or

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:13.640
<v Speaker 1>college or something, and he stalked her for nine years,

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and um, I think he broke fifty six restraining orders

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 1>over that time. So it's like, yeah, that's and then

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:25.799
<v Speaker 1>he finally got two years in prison at the end

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of this nine years after the restraining I'm not sure

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly what he finally did that landed him in prison,

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:35.600
<v Speaker 1>but the idea that you can break fifty six restraining

0:43:35.680 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 1>orders and still not go to prison or jail is

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 1>is it's got to be extremely discouraging for the victims

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of stalking. Yeah, here's the saddest stat of this whole

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast to me is that, uh, seventies six percent of

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 1>women who are murdered by an intimate partner, we're also

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:59.279
<v Speaker 1>stalked by that partner and half of them or have

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>been reported as stalker. So they they half of the

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:07.279
<v Speaker 1>murdered women were reported that they were being stalked before

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:10.400
<v Speaker 1>they were murdered. Yeah, so yes, you should take it

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 1>seriously and cops. And that's with cops taking it seriously supposedly.

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, So there's a So we were saying, like,

0:44:22.120 --> 0:44:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the um, what's what's it called, the significant not significant

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:28.920
<v Speaker 1>other stalker, the simple obsessional. Yeah, the simple obsessional one

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 1>where like you've had a relationship with this person and

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:33.720
<v Speaker 1>they didn't basically take the breakup very well. You belong

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:37.719
<v Speaker 1>to them very frequently if you are a victim of

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:41.279
<v Speaker 1>domestic abuse, that will turn into that. But it that

0:44:41.360 --> 0:44:44.359
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily jibe with that. It can be it can

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:47.759
<v Speaker 1>also kind of just come out of what you would

0:44:47.760 --> 0:44:51.360
<v Speaker 1>call a bad breakup. Um, but it's still like the same,

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 1>roughly the same. But I think if the abuser was

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:58.480
<v Speaker 1>already a domestic abuser, the chances of which of violence

0:44:58.960 --> 0:45:02.520
<v Speaker 1>are much greater. That's the group that is the greatest

0:45:02.920 --> 0:45:08.319
<v Speaker 1>at the greatest risk of violence. Our domestic abusers turn stalkers. Yeah,

0:45:08.360 --> 0:45:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it says of women who are murdered were murdered by

0:45:13.560 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>boyfriends and husbands. Yeah, that's why they always look at

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the husband and the boyfriend first. I'm surprised. Thirty percent.

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:24.720
<v Speaker 1>That seems low even you know. Yeah, I mean that's stats,

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:28.319
<v Speaker 1>so it's super old. But um, I bet it's somewhere

0:45:28.320 --> 0:45:30.840
<v Speaker 1>in that wheelhouse now, you know. Yeah, that's two different

0:45:30.960 --> 0:45:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and just real quick, it's um. You know, this is

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 1>not just an American issue. There are countries around the

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:41.040
<v Speaker 1>world that have stalking um stalking laws, anti stalking laws.

0:45:41.040 --> 0:45:43.399
<v Speaker 1>I should say, it's much easier to list ones that

0:45:43.480 --> 0:45:46.719
<v Speaker 1>don't have it than the ones that do, because just

0:45:46.800 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 1>in the last like couple of decades, countries have really

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:55.279
<v Speaker 1>started to take this seriously, which is heartening because it says, oh, okay, good,

0:45:55.320 --> 0:45:58.319
<v Speaker 1>we value women, the women in our society, and we

0:45:58.400 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 1>want to them to feel protected. Um. There's some that

0:46:01.640 --> 0:46:06.479
<v Speaker 1>just absolutely don't, like Cypress, Greece, Namibia, Spain, they don't

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:09.359
<v Speaker 1>have anti stalking laws, but for the most part, most

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:13.680
<v Speaker 1>countries do, and very frequently they follow like a high

0:46:13.680 --> 0:46:17.520
<v Speaker 1>profile murder at the hands of a stalker. UM. Japan

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 1>started to take it very seriously since I think like

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:24.560
<v Speaker 1>two thousand or two thousand one. Um, Great Britain's like

0:46:24.640 --> 0:46:27.520
<v Speaker 1>really well aware of its stalking problem, and they have

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:30.799
<v Speaker 1>a really high incidence of men being stalked too. And

0:46:30.800 --> 0:46:35.959
<v Speaker 1>then I read an article that France, Sweden, and Luxembourg

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:38.759
<v Speaker 1>have the highest rates of stalking and I was like,

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that seems a little weird, and then the article pointed out, well,

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:45.800
<v Speaker 1>these are these are also probably countries where women feel

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:50.480
<v Speaker 1>empowered to report stalking, whereas some of these other countries

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:53.719
<v Speaker 1>that have very like artificially low rates of stalking and

0:46:53.719 --> 0:46:57.479
<v Speaker 1>the EU are probably um countries that are a little

0:46:57.480 --> 0:47:00.160
<v Speaker 1>more macho and where women feel like the cops are

0:47:00.160 --> 0:47:02.440
<v Speaker 1>going to just tell them to like feel flattered for

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the attention, which happens actually sadly, and so are like that,

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:10.640
<v Speaker 1>like you said originally, like the data and the stats

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:14.600
<v Speaker 1>on stalking are are really hard to come by, but

0:47:14.719 --> 0:47:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's basically a universal thing. Well, and it's hard

0:47:17.960 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to come by too because not everyone can agree on

0:47:22.200 --> 0:47:28.560
<v Speaker 1>what behaviors even qualifies stalking. Um, there's this one interesting

0:47:28.600 --> 0:47:31.160
<v Speaker 1>thing that Ed put in here about incompetence. Did you

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:34.840
<v Speaker 1>see that? Yeah? Yeah, not incompetence with the ce butt

0:47:35.160 --> 0:47:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah e n T s uh. This is a category

0:47:38.480 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of stalker. And this is someone who is so awkward

0:47:42.520 --> 0:47:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and unaware of social cues and norms that they're clumsy

0:47:46.400 --> 0:47:51.319
<v Speaker 1>attempts at initiating relationships feel like stalking. They might have

0:47:51.360 --> 0:47:54.520
<v Speaker 1>some sort of cognitive disability or something like that, or

0:47:54.760 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 1>just made not pick up on social cues and not

0:47:58.280 --> 0:48:01.840
<v Speaker 1>realize that you don't stopped by and compliment the ladies

0:48:02.239 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 1>dress every day right, like don't do it right? And

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the guy's like, what, I'm just being nice? Sure, or

0:48:11.040 --> 0:48:13.480
<v Speaker 1>it might be like, uh, you know, or he may

0:48:13.520 --> 0:48:16.360
<v Speaker 1>be a legit stalker. Sure, but I think in that

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:19.120
<v Speaker 1>case he wouldn't be an incompetent. He would be a stalker.

0:48:19.480 --> 0:48:21.479
<v Speaker 1>Well right, but that's what I'm saying. The guy who's

0:48:21.480 --> 0:48:25.319
<v Speaker 1>an incompetent is just like, oh, and then he never

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:27.320
<v Speaker 1>speaks to her again. But that's so that's that seems

0:48:27.360 --> 0:48:30.919
<v Speaker 1>to be another whole, the other class of stalker. There's

0:48:30.960 --> 0:48:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the incompetent, there's the aratomaniac, there's a love obsessional. And

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 1>then there's even like subtypes to those larger types, like

0:48:38.120 --> 0:48:43.239
<v Speaker 1>there's the um scorned lover, there's UM, the the the

0:48:43.360 --> 0:48:48.640
<v Speaker 1>guy who UM is experiencing rage because he's not getting

0:48:48.680 --> 0:48:52.680
<v Speaker 1>his affection reciprocated. There's all these different little sub types,

0:48:53.200 --> 0:48:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and all of them, to one degree or another, have

0:48:56.200 --> 0:49:00.960
<v Speaker 1>some sort of mental illness associated with them. It's not

0:49:01.040 --> 0:49:04.840
<v Speaker 1>necessarily like diagnosable mental illness. And that's what makes stalking

0:49:05.040 --> 0:49:10.040
<v Speaker 1>so weird, is that a lot of stalkers are otherwise

0:49:10.440 --> 0:49:16.600
<v Speaker 1>utterly saying sure, or narcissism or something like that. But

0:49:16.680 --> 0:49:20.439
<v Speaker 1>you can diagnose that um, and yes you maybe we'll

0:49:20.520 --> 0:49:23.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll study them enough in the future that will be like, Oh, well,

0:49:23.640 --> 0:49:26.160
<v Speaker 1>when you put this this degree of narcissism with this

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 1>degree of sociopathy together and UM, mix in a little

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:33.759
<v Speaker 1>bit of of an overly critical mother, you've got a

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:41.759
<v Speaker 1>stalker situation. Right. But but socially speaking, especially UM, coworker

0:49:41.840 --> 0:49:48.120
<v Speaker 1>love obsessionals and um, the simple obsessional ones, those very

0:49:48.120 --> 0:49:50.879
<v Speaker 1>frequently seem to be people who have become obsessed with

0:49:50.880 --> 0:49:54.760
<v Speaker 1>somebody and have become so obsessed with that person they've

0:49:54.800 --> 0:49:59.720
<v Speaker 1>lost their their marbles basically in that in that respect,

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:01.759
<v Speaker 1>in every other respect, they can kind of keep their

0:50:01.800 --> 0:50:04.399
<v Speaker 1>life together until the obsession leads them down the path

0:50:04.440 --> 0:50:07.239
<v Speaker 1>to where they're full time stalking and they like will

0:50:07.280 --> 0:50:11.360
<v Speaker 1>lose their job or whatever something. So we should probably

0:50:11.400 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 1>give a few tips, um before we go in case

0:50:14.600 --> 0:50:17.319
<v Speaker 1>you are being stalked, First and foremost that I've seen

0:50:17.719 --> 0:50:20.640
<v Speaker 1>is number one, take it seriously. But number two, if

0:50:20.680 --> 0:50:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you believe you're being stalked, or you feel like you're

0:50:22.560 --> 0:50:26.800
<v Speaker 1>being stalked, like go find a local stalking advocacy group.

0:50:26.920 --> 0:50:29.480
<v Speaker 1>They have them all over the place and they are

0:50:29.600 --> 0:50:33.440
<v Speaker 1>experts at what you need to do things like, Um,

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:37.600
<v Speaker 1>if you are being stalked by a former intimate. Um,

0:50:37.719 --> 0:50:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you should assume that your computer and your phone are

0:50:40.040 --> 0:50:42.759
<v Speaker 1>being spy or spying on you. Um, you want to

0:50:42.840 --> 0:50:45.160
<v Speaker 1>change the passwords to your accounts, don't use your computer,

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:47.440
<v Speaker 1>don't use your phone, Go use a computer at a

0:50:47.520 --> 0:50:50.440
<v Speaker 1>church or a library, and then change your past codes

0:50:50.480 --> 0:50:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and then don't log in on your phone or computer

0:50:53.280 --> 0:50:57.400
<v Speaker 1>until you can get a new one. From the get go,

0:50:57.600 --> 0:51:01.319
<v Speaker 1>you should log all activity, just say you can. When

0:51:01.320 --> 0:51:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you go to the cops, they're not like, oh, well,

0:51:04.360 --> 0:51:06.359
<v Speaker 1>this guy just came by your house once, Like let's

0:51:06.360 --> 0:51:08.680
<v Speaker 1>just see where this heads. You can hand over piece

0:51:08.680 --> 0:51:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of paper that says that these seventeen things happened in

0:51:11.880 --> 0:51:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the past four days. Uh, so you just have a

0:51:14.880 --> 0:51:17.640
<v Speaker 1>good log of activity. You also want to engage in

0:51:17.680 --> 0:51:22.320
<v Speaker 1>what's called like safety planning, where you, um, you don't

0:51:22.360 --> 0:51:24.759
<v Speaker 1>just think about what the socker just did. You have

0:51:24.920 --> 0:51:26.839
<v Speaker 1>to think about what your stocker is going to do.

0:51:27.360 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 1>And that really kind of gets to the heart of

0:51:29.120 --> 0:51:31.759
<v Speaker 1>how again unfair this is? Well, yeah, because then all

0:51:31.840 --> 0:51:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden you're obsessed with trying to figure out, yeah,

0:51:35.719 --> 0:51:37.680
<v Speaker 1>something that's going to happen in the future or may

0:51:37.680 --> 0:51:40.040
<v Speaker 1>not happen in the future. That's like how they bruin

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:43.239
<v Speaker 1>your life, right Exactly. You're constantly thinking about them and

0:51:43.280 --> 0:51:45.759
<v Speaker 1>where they're going to show up or whatever. But you

0:51:45.800 --> 0:51:49.000
<v Speaker 1>want to um tell people at your school, at work, um,

0:51:49.040 --> 0:51:52.359
<v Speaker 1>at at at home, like here's a picture of this person.

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:55.000
<v Speaker 1>If they show up, call the police. Do not give

0:51:55.000 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 1>out personal information to anybody because again they might be pretexting. Um.

0:51:59.760 --> 0:52:03.799
<v Speaker 1>There's all sorts of stuff that you wouldn't normally think

0:52:03.840 --> 0:52:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of to where if you're being stalk go find a

0:52:06.600 --> 0:52:10.280
<v Speaker 1>group that that helps people like this. They would probably

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:13.600
<v Speaker 1>say get off social media. Now, yeah, that's I think

0:52:13.600 --> 0:52:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that's another one. But also I think it has an

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:18.360
<v Speaker 1>effect where like not only do you get off social media,

0:52:18.480 --> 0:52:20.719
<v Speaker 1>you like stop going out because you're afraid they're going

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:23.479
<v Speaker 1>to show up. You stop, so you like you lose

0:52:23.520 --> 0:52:26.799
<v Speaker 1>contact with friends, you lose your life, you know. So

0:52:26.960 --> 0:52:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the group that I found that I thought was pretty great,

0:52:29.680 --> 0:52:33.320
<v Speaker 1>it's called SPARK s p a r C. Stalking Prevention

0:52:33.440 --> 0:52:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Awareness and Resource Center. They have a lot of good

0:52:36.520 --> 0:52:39.640
<v Speaker 1>like starter tips, but they'll tell you, just like I did,

0:52:39.719 --> 0:52:42.440
<v Speaker 1>go find a local group to help you like come

0:52:42.520 --> 0:52:45.120
<v Speaker 1>up with a safety plan to be safe. Yeah, because

0:52:45.280 --> 0:52:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that won't happen there is they won't

0:52:48.320 --> 0:52:52.719
<v Speaker 1>disregard your fears and not take you seriously. And sometimes,

0:52:52.880 --> 0:52:57.000
<v Speaker 1>especially in those early moments, that's exactly what you need

0:52:57.040 --> 0:53:01.759
<v Speaker 1>is some support and someone to say like, you're not crazy, Uh,

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:04.960
<v Speaker 1>this might actually be happening to you, and then um

0:53:05.040 --> 0:53:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to end on kind of a hopeful note, as distasteful

0:53:08.160 --> 0:53:13.399
<v Speaker 1>as it sounds. There's a growing awareness, um that stalkers need,

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that they're, in a weird way victims too, and that

0:53:16.040 --> 0:53:18.360
<v Speaker 1>they need to be treated, that they need to be

0:53:18.440 --> 0:53:21.160
<v Speaker 1>pulled out of there this life that they've built for

0:53:21.200 --> 0:53:26.920
<v Speaker 1>themselves and basically, over the course of some very intense therapy,

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:30.759
<v Speaker 1>be brought back to reality and to have pointed out

0:53:30.760 --> 0:53:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to them what they're doing and just how off their

0:53:33.760 --> 0:53:37.239
<v Speaker 1>views of this other person are, because very frequently stalkers

0:53:37.440 --> 0:53:40.320
<v Speaker 1>are found to be giving their victims tons of power

0:53:40.719 --> 0:53:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that the victim doesn't even know they have. And um,

0:53:44.880 --> 0:53:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and when they're reminded like, no, this person isn't doing

0:53:47.560 --> 0:53:49.439
<v Speaker 1>this to your No, they're not getting what you're saying

0:53:49.560 --> 0:53:53.040
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that, UM, it can there. It's starting

0:53:53.040 --> 0:53:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to look like stalking can be treated, and that that's

0:53:56.280 --> 0:53:59.319
<v Speaker 1>part and parcel with saving a victim is treating the

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:02.279
<v Speaker 1>stalker to you? Yeah, sure, then the victim can have

0:54:02.360 --> 0:54:05.759
<v Speaker 1>resolution at some point without the stalker having to die

0:54:05.880 --> 0:54:08.960
<v Speaker 1>or spend the rest of their life in prison, you know. Yeah,

0:54:09.120 --> 0:54:11.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's kind of a growing thing, is treating

0:54:11.640 --> 0:54:14.920
<v Speaker 1>stalkers as well. Yeah, I could see it being something

0:54:14.960 --> 0:54:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that could be rehabilitated, you would hope, and then hopefully

0:54:18.120 --> 0:54:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you just don't bum into one another two years later. Yeah,

0:54:21.200 --> 0:54:27.160
<v Speaker 1>they'd be I swear I'm feeling better. Usually don't shop here.

0:54:27.280 --> 0:54:30.000
<v Speaker 1>This is just I'm gonna just go right, in which

0:54:30.040 --> 0:54:32.680
<v Speaker 1>case the victim would what I don't know, back slowly

0:54:32.680 --> 0:54:35.759
<v Speaker 1>out of the grocery stores. Yes, and never stopped there again.

0:54:36.920 --> 0:54:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's it for stalking. If you're being stalked, hanging

0:54:40.200 --> 0:54:42.279
<v Speaker 1>there and get in touch with this let us know

0:54:42.360 --> 0:54:44.560
<v Speaker 1>how it's going. Since I said that, it's time for

0:54:44.640 --> 0:54:49.320
<v Speaker 1>listener now. Hey, guys, love the show just started listening

0:54:50.000 --> 0:54:52.279
<v Speaker 1>into my surprise, one of the first episodes I listened

0:54:52.320 --> 0:54:56.239
<v Speaker 1>to was about the biggest misconception in my industry, bread

0:54:56.320 --> 0:54:59.320
<v Speaker 1>count the softness of betting. This is from a short stuff.

0:55:00.040 --> 0:55:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Softness of bedding comes down to the quality of the

0:55:02.000 --> 0:55:07.080
<v Speaker 1>material that's being used, not necessarily how many threads, which

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we said that right. This person's just restating

0:55:10.480 --> 0:55:13.839
<v Speaker 1>everything we said. Long staple cotton only makes up three

0:55:13.880 --> 0:55:16.320
<v Speaker 1>percent of the global cotton production, yet it's best kept.

0:55:16.800 --> 0:55:19.600
<v Speaker 1>It's the best option for betting. The longer threads provided

0:55:19.640 --> 0:55:22.560
<v Speaker 1>smooth surface for sleepers to enjoy. It's also more durable

0:55:23.000 --> 0:55:25.359
<v Speaker 1>short staple cotton threads. This is what we said, isn't it.

0:55:25.920 --> 0:55:29.120
<v Speaker 1>The more popular and cheaper option are rougher and scratchier

0:55:29.480 --> 0:55:32.239
<v Speaker 1>because the shorter threads are tied together throughout the weave

0:55:32.280 --> 0:55:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of the bedding. In order to get the softest, best

0:55:34.640 --> 0:55:38.560
<v Speaker 1>performing sheet, a long staple cotton, preferably one that is

0:55:38.840 --> 0:55:42.000
<v Speaker 1>responsibly sourced, is necessary. Anyway, I just wanted to say

0:55:42.040 --> 0:55:44.960
<v Speaker 1>what you guys already said. Thanks for thanks for being

0:55:45.040 --> 0:55:48.720
<v Speaker 1>what you are. Uh, congratulations on the billion downloads guys.

0:55:48.800 --> 0:55:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh nice, there you go. Here's to another billion. That's

0:55:51.440 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 1>how you get your email read And that's from Ed.

0:55:53.800 --> 0:55:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Ed. We're glad you joined us. Um, welcome to

0:55:57.719 --> 0:56:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the family. That was a baptism by fire right. If

0:56:00.960 --> 0:56:03.279
<v Speaker 1>you want to be like Ed and get baptized by

0:56:03.360 --> 0:56:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Reverend Josh and Reverend Chuck and Cardinal Jerry. You can

0:56:08.400 --> 0:56:11.520
<v Speaker 1>send us an email to Stuff Podcast at how stuff

0:56:11.560 --> 0:56:18.600
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. For more on this and thousands of

0:56:18.600 --> 0:56:31.319
<v Speaker 1>other topics, is it how stuff works dot com