WEBVTT - Spring Training Takeaways: Risers And Fallers (EP. 777)

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Fantasy Pros. This is the Fantasy

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Baseball Podcast is V Joey, P Joe Pi Zapia and

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>we are almost there, folks, opening Day, just days away,

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>hours away, minutes even if you can count that high,

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Welsh and I will be there live leading

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>off for you twelve thirty Eastern right here. Of course,

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:25.799
<v Speaker 1>you can always listen back or watch it back on

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>our YouTube channel, Fantasy Pros MLB every Monday through Thursday,

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>though we excuse me, Monday through Friday, and I don't

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>know who's taking Friday off. Monday through Friday, we're gonna

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>be live here on the show doing leading off, giving

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you the best there is in fantasy headlines, the best

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>there is in fantasy content, of course, a little betting

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 1>content to to wet your whistle with. And if you

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>have enjoyed all of our draft coverage leading up to

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>the baseball season, well make sure you go ahead and

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>leave a nice review Fantasypros dot com slash MLB review

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and subscribe to the YouTube channel. That's the best way

0:00:57.800 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to thank us for all the support we've seen you

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>screen shotting all of your many drafts. Welsh, I'm sure

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>you're getting a ton of grade my drafts. It is

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>like I have in the last couple of weeks and

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>so far, I have to say our audience is pretty smart.

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I had somebody hit me up.

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 3>It's like, I was gonna ask you to grade my draft,

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 3>and then I wondered, how much do you get asked that?

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 3>And I haven't answered him yet, be like, oh, it's

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 3>all you would think. I am my own product right now.

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.559
<v Speaker 3>As far as the Welsh Wizard of giving you guys

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 3>a grade, you can do that here at Fantasy Pros

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 3>with the Draft Wizard and the Draft Assistant, you can

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 3>get grades and we can tell you how you did.

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 3>That would actually, by the way, be the best suggestion

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:36.479
<v Speaker 3>for all you guys that are asking us to grade.

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Go and do your drafts. Make sure they're attached to

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 3>the Fantasy Pros product, because you will literally get approval

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 3>from us.

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, it's definitely a lot.

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 3>The grades are interesting, and sometimes you get those people

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 3>that you're like, are you in a three person league?

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 2>How did you dominate?

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 3>How you did? But people are doing it. I am

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 3>still drafting all the way up until opening day. By

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 3>the way, I'm going to do another DC. I got

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 3>the home league on Wednesday, all the way up until

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 3>leading off and opening Day, which I will be at

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Bogman flying out here to Phoenix. We'll be going to

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Diamondbacks opening Day on Thursday.

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>So how fun. The Mets opening Day I think is

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna get rained out. So that's a win that's appropriate

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>for US Mets fans. But again, if you've enjoyed everything,

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it takes two seconds to leave a review wherever you

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>listen to your podcast or of course go to Fancybros

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash MLB review and please subscribe and ring

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that bell till it goes dang. And you love when

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you ring that bell. We love when you ring the

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>bell because when you subscribe and do that and you

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>drop a comment below on a video, you might win

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>our new prize, which is the Trophy Smack Ultimate Fantasy

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Baseball Championship give Away. We're giving away the trophy. Make

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>sure you get in there and get it sooner than later. Again,

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>it's from Trophy Smack. It is incredible. We're giving that

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.959
<v Speaker 1>away for one of the lucky leagues, So make sure

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:48.119
<v Speaker 1>you take advantage of this opportunity to go ahead right

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>now and subscribe to the channel, drop your comments below,

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and ring the bell so you know if you're the

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 1>big winner of the trophy Smack Prize. Today's show is

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be about the end of spring training, the

0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>things we are taking away where some guys are going

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>on the upsosse maybe some guys that are going on

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the downswing at the very end. Spring training, I always

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>say doesn't mean much except for the people that it

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 1>means everything for and for some guys it just means

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more in terms of proving you're healthy,

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>proving you are back on track, or also whether or

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>not you're coming away in the spring into the regular

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>season with a job that's very important. So Welsh, give

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 1>me three guys that are actually on the rise after

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>spring training that you feel really good about where their

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>directions going as we head into the regular season.

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I just want to like add on to

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 3>what you're saying. Spring training is tough because like the

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 3>teaching moment for all of us is like, don't fall

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 3>into what happens in spring positively or negatively. But spring

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 3>does become narrative based, and I would totally acknowledge that,

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 3>like everybody, like the joke meme going on right now

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.119
<v Speaker 3>in the fantasy baseball space is like, you know, hey,

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 3>spring stats don't mean anything except when it improves my

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 3>narrative except for this guy that it does, so like

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 3>I acknowledge that, but listen, it does go both ways.

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 3>There are guys that are gonna show with signs in

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 3>spring that carry over and amazing things happen. There are

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 3>guys that are going to struggle in spring that's gonna

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 3>be like completely out of our brains once the season starts.

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 3>So this is tough. This is narrative base I completely

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 3>acknowledge it. So here were three players I kind of

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 3>painstakingly was trying to pick between because, like I said,

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 3>there are plenty of guys that put up just insane numbers.

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 3>So who do you pick from? So my number one,

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm going over to Pittsburgh Pirates starting pitcher who just

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 3>made the team, Jared Jones. These are the type of

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 3>guys that I'm really hyper focused on. I got Lucky

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 3>bog Me and I are doing the Shares episode coming

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 3>up here soon on itl and he said one of

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 3>my highest shares was Jared Jones. And he's like, you're

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 3>gonna look pretty smart because I got him in very

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 3>early drafts, and Jared Jones is coming off of what

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 3>is a pretty great spring. The greatness is he did

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 3>not give up a single run in spring over sixteen innings.

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty crazy.

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 3>What's not great the strikeout numbers, based on where he

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 3>usually is, seemed to be a little bit lower under

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 3>nine K pro nine. He was kind of wid and

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 3>that's gonna be something I'm a little worried could come

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 3>back to haunt him. But he made the opening day roster.

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 3>And this is a guy that has popped really in

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 3>their minor league system for quite a long time.

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 2>He's gonna be in the rotation. This is huge.

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 3>There are big strikeout numbers, He's got a good arsenal

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 3>of pitches. I think this is a guy that's got

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:19.919
<v Speaker 3>to be picked up pretty much everywhere. Maybe not in

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 3>ten team leagues, but I'm putting him on the back

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 3>end of my bench. Your drafts are over, okay, maybe

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 3>you can try to slide him through on some some

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 3>free you know, waiver claim or maybe really low fab

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 3>or something like that. I'd like to get him.

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Spring did Jared.

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Jones really really well, and he's gonna be on the

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 3>rotation number two, Colton Kowser with the Baltimore Orioles. How

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 3>disappointed was I when Jackson Holiday did not make the

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 3>team a lot?

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 2>So much so I'm gonna put the I'm gonna put

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 2>the excuse.

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna go print the excuse out all the nonsense

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 3>they said, I'm gonna put it behind me for leading off,

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 3>and we're gonna just keep that there until.

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 2>He gets up there. They're like, oh, you know, he's

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 2>got to learn.

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 3>He left, he's a little bit more and little lack

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 3>of pro experience and okay, learning a new position. He's fine,

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 3>he's great in spring. But the guy that was able

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 3>to kind of push all of that, it wasn't Kobe Mayo,

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 3>wasn't Jackson Holiday, it wasn't Heston Kershed. It was Colton Kowser,

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 3>who lost prospect eligibility I.

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 2>Think last year, but had six homers.

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 3>This spring. He hit three h four and he made

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 3>the team. Do we want to read too much into

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 3>those home run numbers? No, not necessarily, But here was

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 3>the deal. He was a really good contact hitter in

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 3>the miners leading up to last season, and then the

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 3>power just kind of dissipated.

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 2>We're like, oh, Oh, who is this guy? He is

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 2>a home run a hitter.

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 3>He's a twenty five plus home run guy, and he

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 3>now made the roster and he's gonna get time. Colton

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Kowser with the Baltimore Ools is another one of those

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 3>players I would try to be picking up and Spring

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 3>did him well the spring numbers and pushed him into

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 3>the starting roster. It's something you should be paying attention to.

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 2>I know I was.

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 3>And then the final one, I got a picture for you.

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 3>How about aj puck aj pukright, phenomenal thirteen innings with

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 3>a one three to two Spring Era, fifteen strikeouts, which

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 3>equated to a forty one percent K percentage. Why else

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 3>do we like this? Well, they're kind of a mess.

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 3>That Marlin's rotation is just kind of disastrous. He gets

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 3>a longer lease, he added in. Everyone talked about it.

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 3>He's got that sweeper slider, he add in, kind of

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 3>a more bullet slider, which is just more of a

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 3>like it's kind of cutterish. It's just like the sweeper

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 3>is coming across his zone. This one has got easy bite,

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 3>having two versions of that slider to go along with

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 3>that fastball. He's being a little bit more consistent, not

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 3>walking at bad rates that he did before, and a

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 3>forty one percent k percentage in Spring. Let's not not

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 3>pay attention to that. Let's pay attention to the added

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 3>repertoire to his arsenal. Let's pay attention to the strikeout numbers.

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 3>And now let's throw him in to a team where

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 3>he is going to have a longer leash, really because

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 3>they have to. Ajpuck is a huge riser from Spring,

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 3>So Colton kwser Aj Puck and throw Jerry Jones. Those

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 3>are three guys that were on my Spring rises.

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>And another guy too who you know. I mean, we're

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at him now. Puck is going to be twenty

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>nine years old this year, which is kind of stunning

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to think of that. I feel like there's so many

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>years there. We were waiting on him to pop with

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the Oakland A's all these years, it just never really

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>came to fruition. Injuries derailed him. The A's organization itself,

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you could probably argue derailed him too. But

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>he's also a bigger guy. He's a six to seven

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>pitcher Welsh and sometimes those guys take a little bit longer.

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Randy Johnson was a bigger picture. Took him

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a long time to really kind of harness mechanics and

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>all that. There's been a lot of guys in that

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>ILK that you could say that about, and maybe it's

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a late bloomer situation, but you're right, man, Miami needs

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>him in the worst way, especially with that Perez injury.

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Max Meyers another guy is who's eventually we're gonna, you know,

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>see him. I think too, and we'll see you know.

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 1>The Marlins certainly were more competitive last year than people realized,

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>but Puck could be a huge addition to this rotation.

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 1>They desperately need somebody to step up. Let's take a

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>quick break in the action and tell you about Underdog Fantasy.

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>MLB draft season is here and the easiest play to

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>play fantasy baseball is it Underdog Fantasy. We've already been

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>active in their best ball format fantasy drafts, where you

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>draft your team over twenty rounds at The best score

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>from your team that you drafted becomes your score for

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>each week in the MLB season. Drafts are constantly filling

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>each and every day, So go to Underdog Fantasy right

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>now and draft in the dinger for your share for

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars in prizes, with first

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>place being a cool one hundred k. It's only ten

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars a draft, and the tournament closes on opening Day,

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>March twenty eighth. So jump in now, sign up for

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:40.199
<v Speaker 1>Underdog and use that promo code fp MLB. That's FP

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>MLB to get your first deposit match up to one

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars. That's ten free dinger drafts. And that promo

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>code is fp MLB. And join the Underdog today and

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>get drafting in the upcoming MLB season. And now back

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 1>to the action. My three guys on the way up.

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>As spring training came to a close, Johnny Brido of

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the San Diego Padre is gonna be the fifth starter

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in that Padres rotation, which is deep, folks. I mean

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:08.599
<v Speaker 1>that is a good rotation. I keep saying it's the

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>best rotation in that division, and that's saying something I think.

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>But top to bottom, I think it's the deepest one.

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be very good so far.

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:18.079
<v Speaker 1>Johnny Brito in spring got enough's a really good start

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>thirteen innings, pitched a one point two to three whip,

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a two point zero eight Era sixteen strikeouts, just three walks.

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.559
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing. It really stock out to me when

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Brito too, and he's got this spot here,

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's going anywhere. I think he's gonna

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>have a decent leash here in this rotation. So you know,

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Michael King's gonna be the fourth starter. Then he got Darvish,

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Cec and Joe Musgrove at the top of it.

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 1>That is a formidable group. I think the Padres are

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be very competitive. I think we saw a little

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>snippet of that last week in the Korean series, and

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the Padres are going to be something you have to

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>deal with. Machado is gonna be fine and everything else

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>either without Sodo, that lineup still has enough in it

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>between Tatise and Machado in the middle of it and

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Away Kim played last year and of course Versusandre Bogart's

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>second half very encouraging. So Brio's a guy that I'd

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>be picking up everywhere, stashing on my bench two start weeks.

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Brio would absolutely early on if he can continue this pace,

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>be a guy that I'd throw out there. Frankie Montas

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>closed Spring very well, I know you look at the

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.839
<v Speaker 1>era when it comes to Mantas, but even though it

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>was a little high in the fives in spring, I

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>think the thing you take away is over the sixteen innings,

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>sixteen strikeouts, five walks, it's a good ratio for him.

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>The last start he had was very good. He feels healthy.

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not that long ago. It's a few years ago.

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>This guy had two hundred strikeouts in the season. Right.

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 1>It's health when it comes to Montas, not talent. I

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>think we can all agree on that. We were all

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>very excited about him back in twenty twenty one in

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy community, but unfortunately injuries kind of took its toll.

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>We know last year was a lost season for Montas.

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:44.439
<v Speaker 1>We all knew it was a bad idea with the

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Yankees trade for him. We said it on the show,

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and of course is exactly what happened on leading off

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>is exactly what we predicted, which is things we're going

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to go south. But now a guy who qualifies Welsh

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in some spots at RP and SP that gives you

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of flexibility. I think Montas is a guy

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>worth taking. I took him for a buck in my

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>last draft, and you know what, it's looking pretty good

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>right now because that Reds team also has a chance

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to be very good and could even challenge for that

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Division two. And the last one is another Cincinnati read

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Christian Incarnassion Strand, who why everyone's talking about White Langford

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and they should. But Strand is also a guy who

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>had a phenomenal Spring five homers, fourteen RBI hit three

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 1>point thirty three with a three eighty two OVP and

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a seven eighty four slugging and eleven sixty six ops.

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>The guy was tremendous. Now, look, we all know that,

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, every young player is always going to have

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>ups and downs. He's still a young player. But Welsh

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>coming out of Spring the way the Wyatt Langford ADP

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and price just has skyrocketed. I mean, he went for

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 1>thirty five dollars in a last salary cap, but we

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>got it was crazy thirty five dollars, right. Strand is

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>not going for that. Strand is not going to be

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that same kind of thing. He is kind of floating

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>under the radar, underneath guys on his own team, guys

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>like Elie de la Cruz, guys like Matt McLain. You know,

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>he is still kind of floating in relative and they

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>by comparison, and I don't think you should be I

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>think you should take advantage of that while you can.

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>So those are three guys going in the right direction, Welsh.

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Give me some guys that maybe are going in the

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>wrong direction, or maybe you have concerns about as we

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>enter the season because spring trading was not necessarily kind

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 1>to them for one reason or another.

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Now you know, And I think here's a great question

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:19.959
<v Speaker 3>to throw out too, because I am I'm gonna pick

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 3>on myself for this one, my first one. But you

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 3>know what are you more prone to focus on with spring?

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:27.839
<v Speaker 3>Are you more prone to focus on the ups? Or

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 3>are you more prone to focus.

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:30.319
<v Speaker 2>On the downs?

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 3>I feel like me I tend to put a little

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 3>bit more focus on the positives. I feel like publicly

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 3>we put more focus on the negatives. I could be

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 3>wrong about that, of course, and you know people disagree,

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 3>but I feel.

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Like negatives in spring are tough because you have those

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>moments where a picture is just working on a pity.

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm just throwing fastballs today. Kids sure like they don't

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>care about results. That's the danger of it. It's the

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>little ballparks. It's the uh, you know guys that I've

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>never faced before, and you know I can't throw you know,

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>high fastballs to you know these guys because they're gonna

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>hit out of ballparks or the wind is blowing out

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that day. I mean, there's so many weird variables in

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>spring it makes the negatives difficult to gauge. I think, well,

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the hardest part for me anyway.

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I kind of agree, especially when it's like two talent.

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 3>So again, this is the here's the balance. You guys

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 3>figure out your own balance, so here's mine. So here's

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 3>the way I'm picking on myself while also giving a

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 3>slight caveat.

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 2>I talked a lot about.

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Jared Kelnick early on when we were doing early draft

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 3>videos that I think he's a guy.

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 2>That can break out.

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 3>But Jared Kelnick had a poor Spring, and that's saying

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 3>it lightly. So number one on this list is going

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 3>to be Jared Kelnick, because let's not deny that he

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 3>is a faller as far as Spring goes from a

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 3>performance standpoint, he hit one thirty five gross, He had

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 3>one extra base hit the whole time he was hitting

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 3>everything into the ground.

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>He had a.

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 3>I think it was sixty percent pull rate within over

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 3>fifty percent ground ball, So he was just seeing everything

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 3>get bad and putting everything on the ground.

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Can that balance back?

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I think again the ballpark factor for left handed

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 3>hitters is beneficial for Atlanta. Kelnick started to come on

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 3>right towards the end of spring. He's gonna steal He's

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 3>just got a hit for average. That's a big thing.

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 3>But so why if I'm caveating being like, hey, he

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 3>could still be kind of good, why am I putting

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 3>him on this list? The biggest negative is they brought

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 3>in Adam de vall and I think that one stands

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 3>out to me of some form of platoon. There's no

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 3>longer the DH spot for a guy like Devaal to

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 3>go to. That's Marcelo Zuna's, so they're legit could be

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 3>platoon situations. This also might not be the worst situation

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 3>for Kelnick. If you can get Keelnick away from his

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 3>from whatever bad split platoon situations are going on, and

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 3>you can just put him in the right one. Maybe

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 3>he gets less at bats, but categorically he can put

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 3>up big numbers. But I'm not gonna deny that he

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 3>didn't have a bad, bad spot down.

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I think all the guys we're going to talk about.

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Down doesn't mean done, It just means down. So understand that.

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean you're avoiding these players all together. It

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>just means, hey, you got to be aware of the

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>downside of spring training, as you mentioned, filtering into organization's

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>minds too, as they and to make roster moves based

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>on how guys were before me in the spring, because

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>they need insurance too, just like your fantasy team needs insurance.

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 3>And ADP's are going down too. That's the other thing.

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Like this spring, here's another one we're not going to deny.

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 3>This spring has moved Jared Kelnick's value down dramatically. Yes,

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 3>but I'm still taking him now because he's even he's

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 3>becoming like free. Before he was like, oh okay, he's in

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 3>like the two hundreds twenty twenty.

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Now he's becoming free.

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 3>I just did a dinger draft and I took him

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 3>as like my seventh outfielder because I'm still gonna take

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 3>the shots, because I don't want to say spring is everything.

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 3>But on the down here's another one. This is like

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 3>one of the most popular last pick sleepers. For so

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 3>many people. But it's been a spring for him. Matt Walner.

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Matt Wallner because he had you know, huge hard hit numbers.

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 3>It can barrel the ball. If given the opportunity, he

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 3>could be a thirty home run hitter and you're getting

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 3>him for free.

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 2>All of these things can still be into play.

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 3>But he has had a piss poor spring, hitting one

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 3>oh seven with a forty percent strikeout rate, which is

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 3>so here's the big thing I want to throw out

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 3>to this because it's not that Matt Waldner can't not

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 3>be good. But they've got other guys. They've got Willie Castro,

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 3>who's a player that stole a ton of bases in

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 3>short sample sizes, that can play the infield.

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 2>In the outfield, You've got keer Lof still dealing with

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 2>the DH spot.

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 3>You've got brooks Lee who got sent down and probably

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 3>deserved to stay on this team. I'm not saying all

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 3>these guys are outfielder's. What I'm saying is is there

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 3>are other players ready to snatch up potential opportunities here,

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 3>and Matt Waldner may have put himself into a situation

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 3>where he did not take the job and run away

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 3>with it.

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 2>You could see him get into platoons.

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it was always going to be there where Willie

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 3>Castro takes that so really really bad spring.

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 2>He's on the down. And my final one, I'm going to.

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 3>Take it to a pitcher in Eric Fetti, who was

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 3>again a very popular sleeper. Scott White, me and him

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 3>talk about it a bunch. He was like a Muss

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 3>draft guy. Started moving down the list first off the spring,

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.360
<v Speaker 3>pretty bad five over five era x FIP was right

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 3>into the mid fours. Strikeouts looked really low. Fourteen innings,

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 3>he only struck out eight, which is not really what

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 3>everybody wanted. Everyone thought he was going to come over

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 3>with advanced splitter and everything is going to be amazing.

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Here's the other deal. The team did pull the trigger

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 3>on getting Dylan Ceeze off of this team. So they're

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 3>now going to war with guys like Garrett Crochet, who's

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 3>the opening day starter, and you've got Eric Fetti and

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 3>you've got Mike Soroka. The rotation doesn't look great. The

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 3>offense is still kind of stuttered. Defensively, they're not that great,

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 3>and Fetti banged himself up the other day. I think

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if he's going to start the season

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 3>on the il, but he's already showing some injury stuff.

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 2>This is a plus thirty year old.

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Guy whose stuff hasn't looked fantastic in spring, who's getting

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 3>a little bit banged up on a horrifically bad team.

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm picking on low guys, so it's.

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 3>Like, who cares about these players that are going up

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 3>and down and rising and falling. But Fetti was a

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 3>guy who's drafting everywhere. I'm a little tenuous about it now,

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 3>and I think we have to consider that the spring

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 3>has moved him to maybe not a must draft, to

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 3>maybe a player that you're looking to stream if he

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 3>gets off to a hot start.

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's definitely U Again, you gotta understand the context.

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>We're not saying these guys are completely avoidable, but we're

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>saying that spring does matter sometimes for certain guys. I

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>think it means a little bit for DJ Lemayhew. That's

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the way I'm going to start here with my guys

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>moving down. Not just the injury unfortunately to him, but

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>also if you look at what he's done this spring,

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:28.160
<v Speaker 1>or should I say hasn't done this spring? A five

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>point thirty five ops and a two twenty two batting

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 1>average spring before the injury. That's not making me feel

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:34.719
<v Speaker 1>warm and fuzzy. I know he's going to hit at

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the top of the Yankee lineup. Theoretically when he's there,

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it's healthy. Yeah, but again it's theoretical at this point.

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>And then conversely, we've talked a lot about the possibility

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of Vulpi taking that spot from him sooner than later,

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.479
<v Speaker 1>and I continue to beat that drumwells because I think

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it's going to happen to Vulpy. Conversely, had a very

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 1>nice spring showing you all the things you got excited

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>about Anthony Volpey. I mean, I remember having Eric Cross

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>on last year and the year before, and he kept

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and this is a Red Sox guy, just continuing to

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about how great Anthony Volpi was, and he would

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:07.880
<v Speaker 1>just go on and on out of and he was right.

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 1>And I think that d J. L. Mayhew is a

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>player that a lot of people thought, Hey, I'm gonna

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>take him a He's gonna be the top of the

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>orders again to score one hundred runs. I don't know.

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to think that we might be at the

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 1>end of the road here, but possibly with DJ Lemayhew

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>like this, the guy's gonna get dropped in the order.

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a guy that could even get replaced at some

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>point at his position as the Yankees continue to struggle

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>with health right now, between Cole and Rizzo now le Mayhew.

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is a lot going on here for

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees, and I think le may is a player

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 1>going the wrong direction. Age is not his friend. Previous

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>performance the last couple of years is not his friend.

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I think this is kind of a fork in the road,

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and if the Yankees were smart, they wouldn't dwell in

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 1>the past year. If it's not working out. I understand

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>wanted to give the guy as benefit of doubt. You

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 1>give him a month in that spot when he's healthy,

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. But if it's not working out and

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Volpi's hitting, you have to make that change. Next on

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:53.959
<v Speaker 1>this list again kind of like one of Welsh's here

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 1>with kell Nick and Duval Mark Vientos. So the New

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>York Mets qualifies at first third d h kind of guy, right,

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I think with Viento's basically it comes down to this.

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>He did flash power. He had five home runs in

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the spring, but the problem is he had nineteen strikeouts,

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>too way too much swing and miss, two thirty two

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:13.120
<v Speaker 1>batting average, a two fifty nine OVP. Those things aren't good.

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 1>So what did the Mets do? They signed Jad Martinez,

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>which is very very smart here because the Mets are

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>probably not going to be competing. In my opinion, I

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think that pitching staff is good enough to compete

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 1>for a playoff spot. We'll see, maybe I'll be wrong.

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Typically I'm right when it comes to the Mets, which

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>is unfortunate because usually it's a negative. But at the

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>same time, Jady Martinez probably not going to spend the

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>whole year with the Mets if things do go south,

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>so Biento's will get a shot eventually. It makes him

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a really fascinating by low in dynasty leagues right now, Welsh,

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>because the market's kind of gone the other way on him.

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a player that has twenty five home

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:46.239
<v Speaker 1>run power at the big league level. He does need

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to fix the strikeouts, he does need to make more contact.

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I think those are things that he could work on.

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 1>But my goodness, that interview that he gave after when

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>they realized that they signed Jad Martinez. Vento's clearly was

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>not happy about this and clearly new I'm going back

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to the league's things are not going to work out

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>for me here, at least not yet. And sometimes players

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>respond very well to that, They respond with a chip

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 1>on their shoulder, and I think that's a good thing,

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>possibly for Vento's, so keep that in mind. Interesting by

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Lowen dynasty not a guy right now in redraft circles

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 1>need to pay attention to. But the JD. Martinez thing,

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>He's an older player. It's not gonna last all year.

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Vento's at some point will get another shot, so this

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 1>is more of a long term thing. But certainly a

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.239
<v Speaker 1>guy going the opposite direction this spring is not going

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to start twenty twenty four in a good spot here,

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:30.719
<v Speaker 1>but hopefully in the minor leagues he produces, and if

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>he does, put him on that watch list because you

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>might want to add him sooner than later, because there's

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>always going to be injuries and opportunities at some point

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in the season. Third one is a big name Welsh

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not saying I'm not drafting this guy. And

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I remember some spring trainings in fact one in particular

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>years ago it was Zach Greenk's first cy young actual

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 1>season where I think as ERA was like nineteen. In

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the spring, it was terrible. I'm exaggerating only slightly. That's

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>how bad Granky was that spring. He ended up winning

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 1>the cy Young that year, and people were fading him

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 1>and freaking out because it was such a terror. Oh

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>my god, what's wrong with Cranky. I don't want to say,

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, what's wrong with logan Web, but Welsh,

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, what's wrong with logan Web. He's a

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 1>ten nine to six ERA over twenty one innings this spring.

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>He whip is at one eight seven. Now, the strikeout

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>rate's still pure goal twenty two strikeouts, just three walks.

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of my safe haven when it comes

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to logan Web. But he has given up thirty seven

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 1>hits in those twenty one innings. Now I assume this

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is a guy just working the kinks out. Logan Web

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>has been so consistent. He's kind of like my safe

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>word in fantasy logan Web. Like when I don't like

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:34.719
<v Speaker 1>how the pitching looks on the board or things are

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>getting uncomfortable, I'll just scream out logan Web and draft

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>logan Web. But all of a sudden, it feels a

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 1>little less safe this spring after this last couple rounds here.

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna put this to you. Is this the

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.239
<v Speaker 1>classic case of you overreacting to spring with a guy

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 1>who's got nothing but good track record. Is he hiding

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>an injury? Is there something more brewing here when it

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 1>comes to Logan Web or what? Because these numbers are

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>not great when it comes to Logan Web, and this

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is another picture we're counting on to anchor fantasy rotations.

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 3>This is an ear muff situation. I'm just put my

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 3>ear mus on. I'm not listening to any of it.

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 3>These are all bad words, not doing this. This is

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:16.479
<v Speaker 3>the example, and by the way, this will be what

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 3>we look back on if Logan Web like starts off

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 3>really rough and then maybe he picks.

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 2>It back up blah blah blah.

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 3>But this is the prime like spring example of I

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 3>don't care to your point, though he's given up the

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 3>most earned runs of any single picture in all of

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 3>spring training, he is getting demolished. There's not a lot

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 3>of that stack cast data is just not like available

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 3>unless he's gone to Salt River, which is the bummer.

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 3>You'd like to see more of it, you'd like to

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 3>assume there's a lot of work. But this is like

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 3>the safety there's a safety net to this. Here's a positive.

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 3>By the way, some of these pictures you go and

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 3>look at, and this is what worries me.

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 2>I pick and choose some of the things.

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 3>One thing that worries me with pictures is when I

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 3>see walk numbers get out of control, like era is

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 3>whatever and whatever. But like when I see walk numbers

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 3>that look at normal or walk numbers that are carrying somebody, listen,

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Jerry Jones ten percent walk rate. I don't love that.

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 3>And I picked him as a as an up. Logan

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 3>web is three walks, all spring pitching to a ton

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 3>of contact. Unfortunately a lot of contact.

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Maybe, so I mentioned earlier. I was like, I'm, uh,

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>walk rates low, strikeout rates high. I don't care about

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the five VRA. Yeah, And that's how about Logan Webs

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the RA because he's getting hit all over the ballpark,

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and that to me is a little troubling here.

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm just you know, yeah, I'm I'm I'm ignoring all

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 2>of it.

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 3>If if he had really bad like walk numbers and

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 3>we had reports of like really bad v LO decreases

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 3>and stuff like that I'd be more worried push comes

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 3>to shove into season. It's a great, uh pitcher friendly ballpark.

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 3>You heard JD Martinez. I don't know if everybody saw this.

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 3>JD Martinez talked about why he didn't sign with San Francisco.

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 3>He literally cited how not hit or friendly that ballpark is,

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:50.919
<v Speaker 3>and how if he were to go there and his

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 3>power numbers were to struggle, people would think he's done

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 3>and he might not be able to earn some more money.

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 3>He literally went to Mets because it's more friendly and avoided.

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 3>That's a good pitcher thing. So he you know, the

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 3>stuff is about the same. He's not abnormally walking guys.

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 3>It's just bad spring numbers. Right now, I am not

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 3>paying attention to any of it, and I am drafting him,

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 3>but we will go back and cite this if he

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 3>does start to struggle early in April.

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Or if there's an injury or something else is wrong.

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what's going on. Look, and sometimes there's

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>personal things going on. These are not just you know,

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 1>numbers on a page or people. There could be a

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>lot going on this guy's personal life for all we know.

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>All I know is that's not the Logan Web we

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 1>signed up for. It's not the guy we're seeing in

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>the Spring so far, and it probably means nothing, like

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Welsh's saying, I'm ninety percent sure it means nothing, but

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>there's that ten percent where I'm just a little concerned.

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 1>And when I have to pay that kind of price

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>for a picture, it gives me pause because he is

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>now even higher up on that trope.

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 3>If you were in a draft right now, I feel

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 3>like that would be in your head and I'm trying

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 3>to think of who the guy you like are between.

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 2>But I feel like the.

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Other tyler Glass now or you know, Logan Web right now,

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:59.199
<v Speaker 1>I think I would doe tyler Glass now, like.

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Are you a Curby guy? I don't know if you're

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 2>a Kurby guy.

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 1>I would take Kirby Overweb right now. I wasn't before

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the Spring.

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I could tell you about this, How about this Yamamoto

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 2>or Web struggle.

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll take Web, but it's for different reasons. But again,

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>like I think the Web track record, he's earned that

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>respect a little bit, and it's not a disrespect Yamamoto,

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 1>and it's not because of what he did in the

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>first start. You throw these things out the window. I

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 1>think sometimes with the travel and all the pressure on

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>the weirdness going on there. But there's a question for

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you too. In a time when we're trying to evaluate

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>players the most, it seems like, don't you think it's

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 1>weird that stack cast isn't available for every ballpark?

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I think there's, uh, there's financial components.

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>There might be You're right, MEMLB doesn't make a lot

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of money.

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 3>Right, No, But I'm saying, like teams committee, okay, well,

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean there's a lot of things we could cite to,

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 3>but it just took like you know, lawyers and public

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:52.400
<v Speaker 3>outrage for years for them to like, you know, pay

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 3>four hundred extra dollars a month to minor leaguers so

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, to put in the bat. There's also advantages

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 3>if you remember when there was like bubbly type of

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 3>things going on, teams were allowed to tell other teams, oh,

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 3>you can't come scout our prospects.

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 2>They weren't allowed to go do it. So like people

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 2>will take.

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 3>The advantage of hiding certain things or you know sometimes that.

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Crazy like how do you how do you you know,

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>if I want to scout your prospects, I have this

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>thing called the Internet. I can look up pretty much

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>every app bad.

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 3>But they weren't allowing people to come back to backfields

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.120
<v Speaker 3>and see guys in live looks, which hurts the scouting

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:29.360
<v Speaker 3>departments and stuff like that.

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, listen, it's all goofy uh there are.

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 1>It just feels weird. This is the time of year

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>where we're trying to evaluate guys. I agree to get

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>into the season to make sure number one they're healthy.

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Number two who were sending down who we're calling up.

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, oh, well, that one ballpark you know

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>has it?

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 2>No, I know, it's stupid.

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 3>It should be a unanimous thing across all parks to

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 3>have stack cast data so we could see it. But

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 3>it is available on true media has like all the

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 3>stuff I think.

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>You know what, go fund me, Go fund me. It

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>is stack cast. Go fundme. Sure we can get support

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>for it. We'll create the link it, we'll send it,

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>or we're gonna have one of those sad Sarah McLaughlin

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>commercials where you know, like I do a sad sort

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of you know, do you realize that almost none of

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the minor.

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 2>League ms of the pitch.

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Fastballs away understand their hard hit rates in.

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Their barrels of the split.

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>You can help if you donate right now. Drops away

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>funny MLB. That was beautiful. That was really good, and

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>this is why you're gonna be with us every single

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Monday through Friday. Thursday too, but Monday through Friday. If

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>we're leading off right here on Fantasy Bros. MLB, and

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 1>don't forget, and make sure you drop a review of

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the show too, because we appreciate It's literally like the

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>least you could do. It takes two seconds, but we

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate it. Fantasypros dot com slash MLB review. If

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you've been watching the shows, listening to the shows, or both,

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate you being part of it, and clearly are

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>because subscriber numbers just keep ongoing up and up and up.

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>And remember that trophy smack giveaway is not gonna give

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>itself away, So drop your comments below. Ring the belt

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to that goes ding and we will see you Thursday

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>for opening day where Welsh and I are gonna wig out. Baby.

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>That's right, we hit eighteen thousand subs. We will be

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>wearing wigs on the program. What kind of wigs? Yes

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and stashes? What kind of wigs, well, that's to be determined,

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:29.479
<v Speaker 1>but wigs nonetheless, so that'll do it for us. However,

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the story of the game goes on for the Welsh.

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time. Kids, We'll

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>see you on opening day.