WEBVTT - What's the deal with the Facebook Phone?

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:08.959
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff Works dot com. Well, hello there,

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>welcome to tech stuff. My name is Chris Poulette, and

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I am an editor here and how stuff works dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Sitting across from me as he always does, his senior writer,

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland, What is steel compared to the hand that

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>wields it. Look at the strength in your body, the

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 1>desire in your heart. I gave you this such a waste.

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Contemplate this on the tree of whoa whoa, whoa. Well,

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>we have two quotes for the price of one much

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>shorter than the other, right, right, So you get a

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>bonus point if you you can name the other quote

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a third of a point. I shall I shall go

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>so far as to say that quote has nothing to

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>do with what we will be talking about today. No,

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.399
<v Speaker 1>because we are talking about the Facebook phone, or the

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>rumor I should say, have a Facebook phone right now.

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 1>This rumor first surfaced on the interwebs back on September nineteen. Yes,

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that's when a certain Mr Arrington of tech crunch fame

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>wrote about this, quoting some unnamed sources stating that Facebook

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>was looking into designing a phone, and uh. It was

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>quick to point out even in that piece that Facebook

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>was not necessarily looking at designing the actual hardware, but

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>rather designing some sort of interface or operating system that

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>would rest on that hardware and be deeply integrated in

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the handset, so that Facebook would kind of guide your

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>entire experience on the phone. Yes, and that's really not unusual.

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Um no, no, Apple and Google are both doing that. Yes,

0:01:55.440 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>absolutely sou So the question is are they actually going

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to do that, And the answer is definitively maybe. Yeah.

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing is that Facebook came out very quickly

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>after this report was published on tech Crunch to deny

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the claims, but they denied it in such a way

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that it sounded almost like it was arguing semantics, like

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>like they were saying, no, no, we're not designing an

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>interface for a phone. We're just developing some new interfaces

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to go with smartphones. And you think, wait, that's what

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>we said you were doing, and like no, no, no,

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:34.239
<v Speaker 1>look over here, it's a picture of Chewbacca. Uh yeah,

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it was the Chewbacca defense. It was um uh, it

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely seemed like they were the Facebook executives were trying

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:46.399
<v Speaker 1>to back away from something while not categorically denying it.

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Um and the Arrington had some interesting evidence to to

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 1>point to. I mean evidence in the loosest sense of

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>circumstantial evidence, I guess is what you would call it.

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>And part of that was that he had suspected that

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>who Facebook employees, in particular two very high ranking ones.

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>We're working on this project. Yes, Joe Hewitt and Matthew

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Papas actually have no idea how to say his name

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>because I'm not Greek. Well, but both neither of those

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>two gentlemen are strangers to the smartphone software designing world.

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>That's true. Hewitt actually was one of the people who

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>worked on the Firefox browser and and so he he

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>was developing Facebook applications for iPhone and things like that,

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and then apparently got kind of tired of doing that. Um.

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So Arrington suggests that Hewitt may be working on this

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>new interface for a phone, like a Facebook branded phone.

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh uh, Matthew, because I'm going to say Matthew just

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>because I don't want to ruin the guy's last name.

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I like I said, I'm not exactly certain how to

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>how to pronounce it, because my Greek is terrible. My

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Greek is worse than Shakespeare's and his was pretty darn bad.

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So Matthew was. He came from Google. Actually, he had

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>been working on the Google Chrome operating system, and Facebook

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 1>lured him away. And Errington said, what could possibly lure

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 1>an engineer away from a project as interesting as the

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Google Chrome operating system appears to be? And so Errington's

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>conclusion is that the Facebook phone is really the only

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>thing that makes sense to him. So again, circumstantial evidence. Yeah,

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and at this point, um, at at the point at

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>which we are recording this in late September, um, there's

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing that definitively states that Facebook of the company is

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>going to build a phone for certain, I mean, even

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>with a with a partner, that Facebook will come out

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>with a phone that has Facebook on it, you know,

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>on it as its brand name. Sorry that that didn't

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>come out right. Well no, no, but just just like

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>just like the HTS, the phones and other Android phones,

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>some of them have the Google brand printed on the phone.

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Even though Google did not design the hardware. In some cases,

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Google had a very tight relationship with that hardware provider,

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 1>so that the specs would would be able to support

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the operating system Google was developing, but ultimately that design

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>rests with another company. That's the same sort of thing

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking about here is that, Uh, we don't

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>know if there's going to be a phone that comes

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.239
<v Speaker 1>out that will have Facebook's logo on there as part

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of the phone. But absolutely mobile phones are of different

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>sorts are prime targets for Facebook. Um. That's been proven

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 1>through other applications for Android and iPhone and others, um,

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>BlackBerry and UM. They actually, you know, this is something

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that they really want to do, uh, and they want

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to be available to mobile customers. And I think mobile

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>customers want to have access to Facebook, especially with smartphones

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>that have a more rich experience than than others might

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>um with the hardware. Um. The thing is, why would

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Facebook want to do this other than you know, hey,

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>we just like to make the service convenient for our subscribers, right. Um,

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it's really the same reason that Google and Apple want

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to do it. It's it's really and it's really a

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to define what your mobile online experience will be.

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Right because right now, Facebook is an app that rests

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>on another operating system, as a foundation. So Facebook is

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>just one of those things, or the Facebook apps are

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>just one of those apps you can access along with

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>all the other dozens of apps or hundreds or thousands

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of apps that are available for whatever platform you're using.

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>But once you close out the app, unless you're using

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>other apps that connect to Facebook through Facebook connect, uh,

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you're not. You're no longer really relying on the platform anymore. Right.

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Facebook would like to create just like any other company

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>would like to create a platform where everything is kind

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of integrated through their system. It gives them way more information,

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>which as we know Facebook, for Facebook, information is money. Yes,

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I think that Marguerite Reardon and Caroline McCarthy,

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it, probably have hit the nail on the

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>head on exactly what type of information Facebook would like

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to make available to you. And uh, it's uh, it's

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>not really Farmville, although I think there's an app for that.

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Sure for most phones. There is for the the iPhone,

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I know, Um, but no, it's not that at all.

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>The information that Facebook wants to make available to you

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>is the advertising information. Um. As the they McCarthy and

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>uh Reardon cided the International Telecommunications Union, who said that

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>five billion people worldwide are using some kind of cell phone,

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know, since Google and Apple control the

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>ad markets on their respective platforms, Facebook, it would make

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>sense that Facebook would want to leverage the plus million

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>users who are using their website, um as they already

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>do and with their partners to try to advertise to them.

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>And so this would be a prime opportunity for them

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to do that. And that's a good reason for them

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to actually make the move, right. It's another revenue generator

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>if they if they were able to leverage the mobile

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:42.079
<v Speaker 1>world the way they have the web, just the basic web, Uh,

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>they could you know, you're talking about the potentially doubling

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>or more your revenue. I mean that's and keep in

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>mind this is still a private company. This is that's

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>when you sit there and think about how much money

0:08:55.600 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg is supposedly worse. That's a mark Zuckerberg founder and

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>CEO well some some some dispute the founder part, but

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely ceo Facebook. He um. He was recently valued at

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>some crazy I think it was like twenty four billion dollars.

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>It was a it was a really high amount. Um.

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>You would imagine that number would grow exponentially or at least,

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe not exponentially, but at least linearly from if he

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>were able to leverage the mobile world the way he

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>has the web world. And you were speaking about seen

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:34.079
<v Speaker 1>it Seen It also has reports from hardware manufacturers that

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Facebook has Facebook executives have approached them about creating a

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>device that would allow Facebook to be deeply integrated into

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the phone's features and article. And in fact, they've gone

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>so far seen that actually has gone so far as

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to suggest that, uh, they're working. Facebook's actively working with

0:09:56.240 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I n Q Mobile, Yes, to create two smartphones that

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>will be really heavily Facebook have heavy Facebook integration with

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>them that would launch over in Europe in the first

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>half and in the United States in the second half.

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's funny because uh, and connected to the A,

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>T and T network. I just wanted to finish that. Sorry,

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mean to interrupt at all. Um. Yes, actually,

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>uh that goes also along if if you think about

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:31.319
<v Speaker 1>it with um recent rumors again that Facebook is plotting um,

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's a good word plotting, Yes, well, actually in

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a in a good way for them, um, not in

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a sinister sort of way. Um. Seriously planned making plans

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>again for an initial public offering of stock. Um that

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>would help help them do some um, you know, add

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>some badly needed cash for adventure of that sort of

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>uh scale. I would imagine. However, the number I saw,

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>actually the date I saw on that was when I

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 1>saw that again this morning. So if the phone that

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>would mean that the phones would hit, that would be

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>before the rumored again again again I p o. There

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>are so many rumored I p o s for Facebook

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Yeah, Facebook, pretty much ever since Facebook

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>started taking off, there have been rumors about when they

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>would have a public offering, and you've got to I'm

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>sure that the investors in Facebook are eagerly anticipating that

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>day because it's going to turn them all into even

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>more filthy rich people than they already are, because of course,

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, Facebook is funded by lots of well now

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>it's got revenue, but it was initially funded by by

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>some venture capital investors. So but now it's of course,

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it's actually making money. It's not just an unlike Twitter,

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>which is a you know, a service that still doesn't

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>really have a viable business model, Facebook actually does because

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>they make their money through advertising, and of course, and

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what we were talking about earlier with Facebook

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>using the information you have through your phone, uh as

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>another yet another UH commodity to sell to advertisers. And

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in fact that that kind of leads into a discussion

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>about things that we need to be concerned about. If

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>there is to be a Facebook phone, Yes, and privacy

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 1>is way up there, because Facebook, of course is UH

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>infamous really for the way that it handles privacy or

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't handle privacy, depending upon your perspective on the matter.

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And Zuckerberg himself has been known to say in one

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>way or another that privacy is a it's an outdated concept,

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, and for someone who says that he's actually

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a remarkably private person, but he claims, or he has

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>claimed in the past, at least in a circumcans circumspect way,

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that privacy is on the way out, that it's it's

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>something that is just not really valued anymore, and so

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>UH as a result, you shouldn't have to worry about

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.839
<v Speaker 1>it so much when you're providing services. UM. Now, that's

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>landed him and Facebook into some hot water among consumers

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and consumer groups advocacy advocacy groups in the past. So

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine a Facebook phone would bring even more

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>questions because think of it this way. The idea with

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>integrating the Facebook elements into the phone, It may have

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>things like turning your contact list into a Facebook friends list. Right, So,

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>then you start wondering, well, how much of this information

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>is Facebook really accessing or capable of accessing? Are they

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>able to see who all my friends are? I mean

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>imagine they would be able to because it's so deeply

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>integrated into Facebook. Would they be able to see who

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I call and when? Would they be able to see

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>how long my phone calls last with particular context? How

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>would they use that information? Would they then start to

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>make other connections? Like let's say that they know for

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a fact, because of the of my behavior on Facebook

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that I have a deep interest in football. Let's say,

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:10.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's say I've joined the fan page of

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.559
<v Speaker 1>a couple of football teams, maybe the fan page for

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the NFL itself, and that maybe even some fantasy football leagues.

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Things like that, and Facebook Facebook says, all right, well,

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>clearly this guy's nuts about football. So he's a valuable

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>asset to anyone who would advertise to such a market.

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Right now, let's say that you're making lots and lots

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of phone calls to your buddy Billy, And so Facebook's

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>now got you know you're using a Facebook phone. Facebook

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>looks and says, hey, look this, this guy who's really

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>crazy about football is always calling his buddy Bill. You

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>know what, I bet that they share a lot in

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>common and there's a good chance that Bill is also

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a big football fans. So how about we sell Bill

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>two advertisers as well, and maybe there maybe you have

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>different tiers of people like you have the one tier

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>where you're like, these are the people who are definitely

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>interested in your product because they have demonstrated that on Facebook.

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Here's the next tier down, which are the context of

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>those people who are the really valuable audience. These are

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>people who are likely to also value your product, but

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>we aren't assure. Yeah, like, I mean, that's just an example.

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm just pulling that out of the air. That could

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>be miles away from what anyone's thinking, but it's the

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>source of stuff we have to worry about. You know,

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>how much are the information of ourselves are we giving away?

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>And how much information about the people we know do

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>we give away? Yeah? Yeah, well really that could be

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>anyone though, I mean It's funny because the Facebook aspect

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of it, because there have been so many concerns with

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Facebook dot Com and privacy users privacy in the past.

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>It really the same things could be asked of any

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>carrier or provider of application, because there's there's really no

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>telling what kind of information these applications are sending back.

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>And I wouldn't I wouldn't uh say that we should

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>all go out screaming in the streets and bash our

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>smartphones into you know, lead and glass, inert pieces of

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>uh trash simply because of this. I mean, I don't

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's that kind of thing, is uh rampant or

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. I just think, you know, it's funny

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that Facebook makes us suddenly go, hey, well, how's Facebook

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna you know, if we have a Facebook phone, you know,

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>what will they do with our privacy? But I'm going, well,

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, why couldn't that be said of you know,

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>any of the providers. They have the messages that travel

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>across the network on encrypted um and uh you know,

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>there there's information. I saw somebody recently say, um, you

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>need to be careful when you turn in your old

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>phone because you know, if you don't clear out your

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>address book. What what information is stored in the phone's

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>architecture itself, the memory inside the phone. If you do,

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>do you actually clean it out or do you just

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>turn it back in and hope they're going to to

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>mulch it. Well, you make an ex in point because obviously,

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>uh Android, Google Android, that the way Google Android works

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>is you you give that information over to Google. You

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>create a Google account if you don't have one already.

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Your contact list is stored in the cloud with Google. Yes,

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, all of the apps you buy are stored

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>in the cloud with Google. So ultimately Google has that information.

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>And there there have been people who have brought this

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to light saying this is this should be concern people

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>at least on some level. You should at least ask

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 1>questions like what are you doing with this data? Uh?

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>And some people definitely hold Google under close scrutiny and

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>they are very suspicious of the company and its goals. Right,

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think that even that being said, and

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>despite how pervasive Google is and how a lot of

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>people would say that at this point, we the Internet

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>would not be the same without Google, Like if Google

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>went away, the Internet would really suffer. Um, I still

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>think that people hold Facebook to an even higher level

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>of suspicion, mainly because of its fairly well publicized bouts

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>with privacy issues, particularly the fact that in a Facebook

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>profile you have to opt out of so many things

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>in order to keep them private. You know. It's that

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that a lack of privacy is the standard at Facebook.

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>It's only by going through and tweaking your settings that

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you are able to control your privacy. Otherwise you have

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a very public uh profile out there, including things like

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Facebook Places, which brought up a whole new rash of

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 1>questions and concerns. And I would imagine that Facebook Places

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>would be very heavily integrated into a Facebook phone, almost

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to the point where you could, you know, just ad

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a touch of an app, you would you would automatically

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>update your Facebook profile to explain where you were like that.

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>That would that makes perfect sense to me from a

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 1>the perspective of Facebook. Well, yeah, I mean it's already

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>been um, it's already been noted. Uh Rearan and McCarthy

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>in their article. Uh we're pointing out that over the

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>last little while here they've Facebook has updated its application

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to include all sorts of uh, you know, other bells

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and whistles like geotagging. Um. And it's the the application

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 1>has become more a little bit more like an operating system,

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>they had said. Plus they bought a company called hot Potato,

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>which is uh sort of you know, it's the geolocation

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>checking in uh feature that you see on on so

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>many applications these days. Um. You know, so that that

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>will give advertisers more information about where you are, so

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>they could say, hey, well, if you're down here at

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>this corner, you should come eat at my restaurant. You know,

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>we're right down the block. Um. But I definitely think

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>it's the kind of thing that is that's not kind

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 1>of go away. Now that that Apple and Google have

0:19:56.359 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>embraced it. UM, I did note and Electronista UM that

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Research in Motion, the parent company of BlackBerry, has just

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 1>as of the this recording, just released the BlackBerry Advertising Service,

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>which is they're going to split revenue um sixty forty.

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>The advertisers get the revenue, but they're going to give

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:24.159
<v Speaker 1>more control over the the application of advertising to the

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.719
<v Speaker 1>app developers. UM. Not as much as you know, Apple

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>has control over what can be done over the user experience.

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Course that that will be interesting to see what happens

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>with that. But now that that BlackBerry, Google, and Apple

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>are all into the mobile advertising market, companies such as

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Amazon and other people who are large media

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>companies um, online media companies are probably going to look

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to that as a source of of revenue and find

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>ways to uh gain the presence in there and to

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 1>bolster their things. And I know that people are probably saying,

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, Amazon, where are you talking kind of out

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 1>but I've seen some signs that they are interested in

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 1>developing other kinds of applications for mobile use, So it's

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>not out of the question. I don't think they would

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>be as far you know, I don't think there would

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>be an Amazon phone, at least not before Facebook comes

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>out with one. But I wouldn't imagine that it's out

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of the question. I mean, it's always looking for new

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and innovative ways to make money there. They're hosting service

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>application service, UM. You know, it's not something that I

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't necessarily consider an Amazon core business, but it's something

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that they're in well, and they're already integrated with other

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>operating systems pretty well. I mean the Android system in

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>particular has Amazon integration where you can very quickly with

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>like a one touch thing by Songs off of Amazon,

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:43.959
<v Speaker 1>for example, which is just that that's just a tiny

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>baby step of integration. Uh. Well, they're definitely open minded

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 1>enough to make kindle applications for Android and the iOS.

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>So and that kind of leads into the discussion about

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>why Facebook might be backing away from from these claims,

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>why Facebook might be denying them. It's part of it

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>is just that they're treading a very thin line here, right.

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>They have to be really careful. They want to be

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>able to From a business perspective, it makes sense that

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to be able to integrate your your services

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 1>more tightly into the hardware so that you have you

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>can gather as much information as possible and solid advertisers.

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's just boil it down to that. But on the

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>other hand, you don't want to uh antagonize, right, Apple

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and Android and all of these other providers that are

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>are you know, these other uh smartphone operating system developers.

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that that provide you a platform for your app.

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to alienate them. You don't want to

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>give them a reason to no longer allow your app

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>on their devices. Even though I seriously doubt that would

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>ever happen because Facebook is so popular it would really

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 1>surprise me. I mean, granted, I guess people could always

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>navigate to the website via the mobile browser, but it

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>would really surprised me to see those apps go away.

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>But you don't want to antagonize them, because even if

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:07.239
<v Speaker 1>you come out with your own branded phone, you're going

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 1>to be competing directly with them in the marketplace. And

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 1>they're big boys. Yes, they Android and Apple have a

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>huge head start. Apple in particular has a huge head start. Um.

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Symbion is still the worldwide dominant operating system

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>for mobile phones, but in the United States, Apple and

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Android and to a lesser extent, rim are really they're

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:32.439
<v Speaker 1>the big players for the smartphone space anyway. And of

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>course there's the Windows Mobile seven. You know that that's

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>due out very soon and that may make a big impact.

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.199
<v Speaker 1>I've heard some positive things there. Yeah, I've seen the

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>demos I've seen of it look very good. Whether or

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>not it's going to be good enough to to really

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>go toe to toe with the other big boys that will,

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that will mainly depend upon the hardware. Like really,

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the big advantage Apple has over everyone else is

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that they they've dictated exactly what the hardware and software

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to do, and so they have full control

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>of the package, whereas uh, Android and Windows Phone seven

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>are somewhat slave to whatever the handset manufacturers are able

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to come up with rems. Like Apple, but then rem

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>is more of the enterprise, not the consumer, and they

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>have far more models out to right then than if

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone. Right. So, so one argument I've seen is

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that Facebook might target a more like a messenger phone,

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, a feature phone that's not a full smartphone. Yeah,

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what the the inc information suggests that it is. Specifically,

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's smarter than a dumb phone, but not as

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 1>smart as a smartphone, right exactly, which which might be

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the right target, because then you're hitting people who maybe

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe they don't want to shell out the money for

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 1>a full smartphone where they're not going to use the

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>other applications, right, So it makes sense to to take

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>aim for that market, and then you don't really directly

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>compete with Apple and Android because it's it's a different market.

0:24:56.440 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like, you know, it's like sports cars versus compact cars.

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's two totally different markets. You don't have

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to worry. You're not in direct competition with one another. Yeah,

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 1>you're both vehicles, but you're not aiming at the same market.

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>One's aiming at people in their midlife crisis and the others.

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's smart, same people. Um hey, I'm getting

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>up there. Man, I'm going to be in sports car

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>bode before you know it. But well, okay, there's that,

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>but you know details details, You could buy one and

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>sit in it, right, So I thought I would also

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>quote Zuckerberg. He actually did an interview with tech Crunch

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to kind of clear the air about what was going

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>on here. Did you read about this? No, well I didn't. Yeah,

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about it, but you didn't actually, Yeah.

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>So here's here's what he says. And this is this

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of goes back to the whole contradictory message that

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Facebook is giving. You know, it's one of those things

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>where you use so much jargon and double speak that

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>at the end you're not really sure what exactly was said.

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So here's here's what Zuckerberg had to say. At the

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, when people say building a phone,

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they actually can mean very different things internally, the way

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 1>we talk about our strategy, it's like the opposite of that.

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Our whole strategy is not to build any specific device

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:14.640
<v Speaker 1>or integration or anything like that, because we're not trying

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to compete with Apple or the Droid or any other

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>hardware manufacturer for that matter. Take instant personalization. Our goal

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 1>is to make it so there's as little friction as

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:26.199
<v Speaker 1>possible to having a social experience. So you go to

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>some apps, take Rotten Tomatoes, which we just launched last week.

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 1>If people had to click the blue button to connect,

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>then some percent of them would, but it would take

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it would be the minority because you don't know exactly

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>what you're going to get before you click it. If

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you had to put up some modal dialogue, then that

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>would be crazy from a u X perspective. But the

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 1>fact that they can do that instant integration for the

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>users that want it means that everyone has a good

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>experience as soon as they get there. On phones, we

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 1>can actually do something better. We can do a single

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>sign on if we do a good integration with a phone,

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>rather than just something where you go to an app

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's to Magley Social or having to sign into

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.880
<v Speaker 1>each app individually. Those are the two options on the web.

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Why not for mobile just make it so that you

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>log into your phone once and then everything that you

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>do on your phone is social. Okay, do you spot

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:17.959
<v Speaker 1>the incredible contradiction there? He says at the top of

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it that they are not looking to create any sort

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of integration, but at the end of it, he's talking

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>about having a phone where as soon as you turn

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>your phone on, you're signed into these different apps that

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>normally you would have to sign in individually. I would

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 1>wager that Facebook is hedging its bets. I would wager

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that that's saying two things that are opposite of each other.

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>That is, that is integration. I mean that is what

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that that that's true. But what I'm what I'm thinking

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>is that it's it's entirely possible that uh, Facebook is

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>considering a phone of its own and making the other

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 1>apps so integral into their own environments that really you

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>could do you could be that immersed regardless of what

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.719
<v Speaker 1>platform you're on. That's kind of how I hear it.

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 1>But yes, directly speaking, he was saying that. And by

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the way, u X, for those of you who don't know,

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 1>is user experience because I guess you e sounds kind

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:20.439
<v Speaker 1>of lame. I guess maybe I don't know someone's going

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 1>to write in and explain what you actually means. And

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that's why that's true. It could be taken maybe could

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 1>just be anyway. So that's what that's what Zuckerberg had

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to say to tech Crunch. Um, you can actually read

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>more of it at tech Crunch. They they've got a

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>whole thing on it there. But it's Yeah, it's interesting

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to see the kind of dance that that Facebook is

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>doing right now around the whole mobile phone issue. And Uh,

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>what I'm curious to hear about is whether our listeners

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>would consider buying a Facebook branded phone. Are you concerned

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 1>about the privacy issues? It may be that the privacy

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>issues we've talked about aren't really issues. It may be

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that there is no danger of that. It would surprise me,

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's possible. Uh, would you find that sort of

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>phone interesting? Are you the kind of person who you

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have a smartphone, but you would like your regular

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>phone to do something more than what it already does

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you kind of want something in the middle. Does this

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>actually sound like an interesting device to you? Or are

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you the kind of person who you would just prefer

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to have a Facebook app on your existing phone and

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>not have like a fully integrated phone. Yeah, I think

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>for me it would it would be something like the Ladder.

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm more interested in the multiple functionality of you know,

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 1>as a full on, full fledged smartphone. UM. The idea

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of having Facebook so fully integrated to the point where

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>they can be of more have more control over the experience,

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>UM seems like a good idea if you're really into

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Facebook all that much. But uh, you know, there it's

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be interesting when diaspora or diaspora actually starts

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>up to see if there is the uh an x

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>this or a co joining thing where people are on

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that network too, and if you know, other social networks

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>can start making inroads on Facebook's turf. UM, I think

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>more people would be inclined to buy something on which

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 1>they could use more than one social networking service. It's

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>definitely an uphill battle because the biggest, the biggest draw

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to Facebook is that everybody's on Facebook. Yes, you know,

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>everyone's on everything else too. You would have to you

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>would have to have a mass exodus, really, or at

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>least you would have to have a lot of people

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>change in order for it to really take effect, or

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the other way around it is you could get you

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>could convince new users, people who are not not yet

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>integrated into some online social network to adopt a different

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>model than Facebook. Then you have then you're going to

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>be able to survive. It's just gonna be something that

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to play the waiting game. You essentially wait

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>for all the Facebook users to die out and then

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you become the new thing. But yeah, getting people to

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>move is really tough. Anyway, we have run out of times.

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna wrap this up. It will be interesting to

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>see if Facebook does come out with a branded phone,

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and if it does, how successful or unsuccessful and ultimately

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>will be Uh. Facebook's managed to triumph in the face

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of adversity many times before, so we'll see. And if

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you guys have any questions or comments, especially if you

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>want to tell us about whether or not you would

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>adopt a Facebook phone, let us know on Twitter or

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook. Our handle at both is tech Stuff hs W,

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>or you can email us. Our address is tech Stuff

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff works dot com and Chris and I

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>will talk to you again really soon if you're a

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff and be sure to check us out on

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Twitter Tech Stuff hs WSR handle, and you can also

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>find us on Facebook at Facebook dot com slash tech

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Stuff h s W. For more on this and thousands

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of other topics, visit how Stuff Works dot com and

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>be sure to check out the new tech stuff blog

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>now on the House Stuff Works homepage, brought to you

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 1>by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera. It's ready, are

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you