WEBVTT - Tech IPO Market and Apple's iPad Revamp

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>From Mahart where Innovation, money and power Collie in Silicon

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Vallet Nbon.

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hyde at Bloomberg's World head quarters in New

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 3>York and Ourmed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 5>Coming up from private markets to public.

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 3>We have got you covered data Bricks raising funds at

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 3>are forty three billion dollar valuation, while instacart and of

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 3>course it's filed for its IPO details ahead.

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 6>Class Apple revamping the iPad pro for the first time

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 6>in half a decade. We'll have more on the iPhone

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 6>makers plans to spark growth for the tablet market.

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 3>And SpaceX's Dragons successfully docks with the International Space Station,

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 3>marking its seventh human spaceflight mission to the ISS.

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 5>But what's next EEno Musk's.

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Company will discuss, but first as checking on these public

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 3>markets and they're here. And then now the volumes are

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 3>still thin. It's the end of August. We're down about

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty five percent, but remember how far we've actually fallen

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:13.119
<v Speaker 3>the Mange benchmarks in fact, and that's that on course

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 3>for its worst month since well the beginning of the year,

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 3>we're down about four percent. Today we're just ebbed a

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 3>little bit higher, up about four tens percent. But as

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 3>I say, low volumes at the moment, the two year

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 3>yields stabilizing. We're just down by about one basis point,

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 3>but still above that five percentage point level. How fast

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 3>we have run up in terms of those borrowing costs.

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:31.839
<v Speaker 5>Now, of course, all.

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 3>Eyes and what China is trying to do to stoke

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 3>its economy at the moment, and it managed to fizzle

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 3>out a little bit in terms of Chinese trading. They

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 3>put some emphasis in trying to support the economy, and

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 3>we are seeing that pull over a little bit into

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 3>some of those Chinese names that are traded here in

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 3>the United States. But again it has fallen off hard

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 3>over the last few training days. Today we stabilize and

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 3>the now's that golden dragon. I'm seeing up more than

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 3>two percentage points some of those internet names traded here.

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Let's move on, look what's happening in the world of crypto,

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 3>because remember that took a tumble in the last couple

0:01:57.760 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 3>of weeks, and I want to shine a light in

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 3>the fact that we are actually stayed at a new level.

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 3>It feels like ED and we've come down a lem

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 3>percent from that thirty twenty nine thousand level.

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:07.639
<v Speaker 5>We're nowvo just in a range bound.

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Twenty six thousand seems to be your number at the

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 3>moment as we have all eyes on the macro policy perspective.

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 5>But go into the micro for a moment.

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, no crazy moves for specific names. But there are

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 6>tech stories from all over the world. So x Pong

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 6>Chinese EV maker, nice bit of m and A buying

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 6>DD's smart auto business that seems to be supporting the

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 6>US listed shares or ADRs for that Chinese EV name.

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 6>Apple's basically flat now. But later in the program, Mark

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 6>Gumman's going to bring us his latest power on. He's

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 6>giving us reporting about the next gen iPad pro coming

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty four, some new specs that we're looking out for.

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 6>Two other names moving related largely to analyst calls. But

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 6>I want to bring you a new name we haven't

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 6>discussed on the show, which is Nerdy ticker NRD. Why

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 6>why am I picking out Nerdy? You know why? Because

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 6>I'm nerdy. But it's an education online platform. Raymond James

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 6>reinitiated with an outperformed lots of growth, it thinks because

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:03.959
<v Speaker 6>it's moving to a subscription model powered by guess what

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 6>AI in Nvidia has been resumed by another or initiated

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 6>sorry with another buyer rating at sealand Securities. The story

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 6>last week, remember was that had finally shaken off it's

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 6>our cell rating. We continued to see sales side names

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.799
<v Speaker 6>bullish on Nvidia as the AI leader in semis. Those

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 6>are the public sort of stories and movers that we're

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 6>looking at in.

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 4>The private space.

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 6>Data Bricks, the closely held software maker widely viewed as

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 6>a candidate to go public, is in discussions with tiro

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 6>Price about a new funding round that would value the

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 6>company at forty three billion dollars. That according to Bloomberg sources.

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg's Katie Roof with us she has that story, Katie,

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 6>What other details do we have?

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 4>Sure?

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So, as we reported that tiro Prices and talks

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 7>to potentially lead an investment that would be an up

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 7>round a forty three billion. We don't see a lot

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 7>of those these days. It was last valued around thirty

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 7>eight billion in twenty twenty one. You know, there aren't

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 7>a lot of free IPO companies that can even raise

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 7>at all, let alone at an increase valuation. But you

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 7>know a lot of people are drawing comparisons to Snowflake,

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 7>which is almost a fifty billion dollar company. Data Bricks

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 7>also has been getting more involved in artificial intelligence, which

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 7>is obviously a hot space. They recently acquired Mosaic and

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 7>artificial intelligence business that targets enterprises for over a billion dollars.

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 7>And so what we understand is they've had a lot

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 7>of inbound interest with investors trying to invest, trying to

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 7>get in what could be the last round before they

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 7>go public, and yeah, it's looking like it could fall

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 7>at forty three billion.

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 6>Well let's take into that a bit deeper. This is

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 6>interesting timing because a lot of companies that are now

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 6>in the IPO discussion may have done a down round

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 6>in the last two years, but they're raising or they're

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 6>looking to do something at this interesting valuation pre IPO.

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 6>What do we know about Data bricks near term intentions

0:04:58.760 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 6>to go public?

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 7>So you know, usually I would say if a company

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 7>is raising money, they're not on the verge of IPO

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 7>because you don't want to dilute your ownership right ahead

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 7>of an IPO. So this to me is a signal

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 7>that they might be delaying their IPO further. And now

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 7>Data Bricks obviously is a company at scale. They have

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 7>the kind of revenue that's necessary to go public, but

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 7>they also don't have to go public because they're able

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 7>to keep you know, raising capital in the private markets,

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 7>and so they just haven't. They don't have that impression

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 7>that pressure just yet. But certainly they are a company

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 7>that we expect to go public at some point someday.

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:41.720
<v Speaker 3>And of course we all wait with bated breath as

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 3>to the reopening of the IPO market. We've got Arm,

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 3>of course waiting. We've got the likes of instacar, where

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 3>we've got the details, the devil in the detail and

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 3>coming in their latest numbers in the finding of the

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 3>IPO on Friday.

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 5>What did we learn from that overall?

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 7>Katie Right, So we've got ARM, Instacart, Quavio, all of

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 7>them came out with IPO filings last week. It's going

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 7>to be busy for tech IPOs. Instacart was interesting, you know,

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 7>I had mentioned the other day on Bloomberg TV, I

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 7>was hearing that their financials were better than what people

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 7>were thinking, and it turns out they were profitable. They

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 7>had you know, revenue growth and managed to make money,

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 7>which is pretty rare for tech companies and newly public

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 7>tech companies, so that surprised the folks. But what we

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 7>learned is they're getting a strategic investment from Pepsi COO

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 7>of one hundred and seventy five million, so obviously that's

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 7>a voto confidence in the industry. But we also learned

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 7>that they've made a shift in their business model or

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 7>they've added.

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 5>New lines of business.

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 7>They've really been focusing on e commerce technology, software that

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 7>can help with logistics and other analytics, and also focused

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 7>on advertisers, so they're really expanding beyond just giving you groceries,

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 7>which they absolutely still do.

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Pgcimo already coming into bed when it comes to leadership

0:06:58.279 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 3>that company.

0:06:58.800 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 5>We thank you so much.

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 3>kJ if they're really detailing some of the news we've

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 3>got Friday and then throughout the weekend, let's carry it

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 3>on a little bit in terms of what the IPO

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 3>market's gearing itself for. Rgi Goring when police to say,

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 3>joins us, she's been leading the IPO practice over earned

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 3>some young Americas. You've got twenty years experience and really

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 3>guiding companies at this pivotal moment in their direction or travel.

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 3>I know we won't dwell on individual names and individual

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 3>business models, but ultimately, when we're seeing a company at

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 3>instacrat that's had to put off going public, had to

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:31.559
<v Speaker 3>take cuts to its market valuation, how important is this moment?

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 8>I think it's a really important moment for the broader

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 8>IPO market and particularly the tech IPO market. It's certainly

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 8>a predictable way of having a market reopening occur with

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 8>the anticipated deals that everyone is expecting over the coming weeks.

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 8>And you know, there's three common theme themes that these

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 8>companies are sharing that are coming to market right now.

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 8>One and that you are we're just speaking of this

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 8>profitability scale and then name brand recognition. These are all

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 8>factors that investors are finding important in today's environment and

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 8>placing a premium on.

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:14.119
<v Speaker 4>Rachel.

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 6>Good morning to you from San Francisco. Look from a

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 6>new cycle perspective, a lot seems to have happened since

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 6>ARM made its move. If ARM makes the jump and lists,

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 6>do you think mechanically lots of listings will follow in

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 6>quick succession. It's kind of like a game of brinkmanship.

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 6>Who can jump first and see if the others will follow.

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 8>I don't know that it's one company that's going to

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 8>make a massive reopening, but it's certainly a start that

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 8>we need to have occur. But like I said, what

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 8>investors are really paying close attention to right now and

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 8>are rewarding our companies that are profitable or if not

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 8>yet profitable, a very clear path to profitability. So we're

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 8>not in that growth at all cost environment we were,

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 8>you know, just eighteen twenty four months ago. So it's

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 8>those companies that are going to really lead the way

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 8>in paving the way for the next entrance of IPO aspirants.

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 6>You know, Caroline, there are two sides of the table

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 6>in any transaction, and you and I know quite a

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:20.679
<v Speaker 6>few venture capitalysts that really want this to happen, really

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 6>want this window to open.

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, boy, they've been waiting for these exits. It can't

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 5>all be about M and A.

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 3>And there's not much of that either, And Rachel, to

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 3>that point, we're hearing that there is a lot of

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 3>stress in the bench capital environment and a lot of

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 3>them are raised huge funds that they're now juster really

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 3>trying to allocate in this environment as well. What did

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 3>you make of the fact that Data Brooks, a big

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 3>company in the private market, is also able to raise

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 3>in the private environment at the moment, where do you

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.959
<v Speaker 3>think the real rubber meets the road for some of

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 3>these companies that can still fundraise, perhaps not going for

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 3>an IPO at this moment.

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, I mean a few things that it tells me. One,

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 8>there is money to be deployed out there. But venture

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 8>capitalists investors broadly are being very discerning and where they

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 8>deploy that capital, so investing in companies that they feel

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 8>have a strong growth story. The merits behind the transaction

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 8>are being very much reviewed and and so forth. So

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 8>we're not seeing the volumes of investments that we have

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 8>seen before, but we're seeing very targeted interests, particularly around

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 8>key technologies such as AI and so forth. So there's

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 8>continues to be a strong investor focus.

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 6>In that investors focused on AI. How focused to you

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:44.359
<v Speaker 6>on China and the impacts of the Chinese economy on confidence?

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, the geopolitical tensions are continuing to be there still.

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.719
<v Speaker 8>I can speak more to the US market, and the

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 8>US market is very dominant, continue to be you know,

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 8>the place that most companies want to to lift, and

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 8>companies are going to still continue to navigate the broader

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 8>geopolitical environment as well as many other factors that have

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 8>been impacting companies for the past twenty four months.

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 6>Rachel Garing, IPO leader Ernst and Young America's great insight

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 6>and finally bit of activity in this space. Good to

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 6>have you on the program. Fox con founder Terry Goer

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 6>has joined a crowded race to become Taiwan's next president,

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 6>in the process up ending an election that will have

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 6>wide ranging implications for security in the Western Pacific. The

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 6>tech billionaire denied Beijing could pressure him through his extensive

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 6>operations in the country, which include much of Apple's supply chain.

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 6>Speaking of Apple, the company working on a revamped iPad

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 6>pro for next year. It's first major overhaul of that

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 6>product in half a decade. From all, let's bring in

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:00.719
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg's Mark Gunman. You brought us those details in the

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 6>latest power on the keyp It for me is M

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 6>three chip.

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 4>Right. Every time they have a new generation of chip.

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 6>They have more CPU, cause more graphics, cause more memory.

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 6>But this is a major hardware overhaul.

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 9>This is a major hardware overhaul. I mean, as you know,

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.839
<v Speaker 9>the iPad market, or more generally, the tablet market has

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 9>been in a bit of a funk lately. Right Shipments

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 9>for the overall tablet market were down thirty percent you

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 9>overy year in the second quarter. iPad revenue has been

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 9>down several quarters in a row. Actually, in the third quarter,

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 9>iPad revenue was its lowest since the cusps of the

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 9>pandemic in the beginning of twenty twenty. Apple is really

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.559
<v Speaker 9>hoping that this new iPad Pro, which will come out

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 9>in the first half of next year twenty twenty four,

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 9>will sort of rejuvenate sales with a new design.

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 5>They're going to be moving.

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 9>This is the most significant thing, I think, to OLED

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 9>displays for the first time in an iPad. If you

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 9>remember the move from LCD to OLED in the iPhone

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 9>ten in twenty seventeen, it's a really significant change. So

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 9>now the iPhone of the iPad will use the same

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:08.319
<v Speaker 9>screen technology. That's going to be a really robust upgrade

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 9>of that M three chip you mentioned, but also more

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 9>laptop like capabilities. There's going to be a new magic

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 9>keyboard attachment. They'll probably price it anywhere between three hundred

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 9>and four hundred dollars, But it'll essentially turn your iPad

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 9>into a laptop. This new version will likely have a

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 9>function row at the top like a Mac, and it'll

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 9>also have a.

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:29.319
<v Speaker 4>Bigger track pad.

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 9>So this is clearly going to be aimed at iPad

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 9>power users, and I'm excited to get my hands on

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:35.479
<v Speaker 9>one as well.

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Mark, how many other people are excited to get their

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 3>hands on iPads at the moment because it has been

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 3>an area that just hasn't been firing on all cylinders

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 3>for Apple.

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's a good question.

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 9>Well, anyone who's a big iPad pro user and has

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 9>had an iPad since twenty eighteen, that was the last

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 9>time they redesigned the iPad Pro, We're coming up on

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 9>five years, right, They introduced that in October of twenty eighteen,

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 9>So we'll get this big revamp within five years of

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 9>that window. So I think anyone on a twenty eighteen

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 9>model or even a twenty twenty model like myself could

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 9>be looking to upgrade to this next generation. So I

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 9>think they're going to get a pretty significant upgrade cycle,

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 9>at least for an iPad for this new range.

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 6>If you go on Apple's website and you click on

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 6>the iPad section and you put compare. There is just

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 6>infinite possibilities. Mark, there are so many iPads, they all

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 6>are quite similar and very different, and you write and

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 6>power on that. That's been a bit of a tricky

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 6>situation for Apple.

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 9>Well, when you're a customer, right, and you're not ingrained

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 9>in this ecosystem like I maybe or you twoe might be,

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 9>you really don't know what to buy. And a lot

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 9>of these iPads are very similar or they're very differentiated

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 9>by a couple hundred dollars, but with very minor tweaks

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 9>in between. So it's unclear if you should buy the

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 9>base ten generation iPad, should you buy the eleven inch

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 9>iPad Pro, should you buy the iPad air right, And

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 9>so I'm not sure that this new iPad pro will

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 9>doom much to fix that problem with perhaps too many iPads,

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 9>too many choices, and lack of clarity between the many options.

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 9>But what it will do is it'll help differentiate the

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 9>iPad Pro and make that more of a halo product

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 9>at the top of the line. It maybe push more

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 9>people to the high end, which of course would raise

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 9>overall Apple asps and overall Apple revenue.

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 3>At a time, while we question maybe some costs going

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 3>up for Apple as it has to rejigger mark it's

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 3>entire supply chain. You did a really great deep dive

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg did and its big take about how much this

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 3>is really changing the environment for making this equipment across

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 3>the whole evasion, not just China.

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 9>The interesting thing about what we've discovered based on the

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 9>data is something we've been talking about or I've been

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 9>talking about.

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 4>For a long time.

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 9>Apple is not necessarily moving out of China, but it's

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 9>augmenting its operation outside of China. So you're not seeing

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 9>many new product lines being developed in China. You're seeing

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 9>a lot of status quo in China. So the number

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 9>of supply in China for Apple, the number of production sites,

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 9>it has stayed stagnant, right, It hasn't really gone down.

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 9>But in terms of Apple's growth, all that growth that's

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 9>happening in Vietnam, that's happening in India, the new lower

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 9>en iPhone models. You're seeing a lot of production in

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 9>India as they need additional units for those regions. You're

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 9>seeing production in India. You're seeing Apple Watch production in

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 9>places like Vietnam, you're seeing new types of macs being

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 9>produced in Malaysia. So you're seeing China sort of stays

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 9>stagnant for apple but not growing. Right, So the future

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 9>of apple production and supply chain is in China. It's

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 9>the places around China. It's the Indias of the world, Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand.

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 9>To a lesser extent, there's some work being done in Japan. Right,

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 9>So that's really the story here China, Apple, China that's

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 9>staying the same, but all that growth that's happening elsewhere

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 9>really interesting.

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 5>Mark, thank you so much.

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 3>It's going to have you back, Mark gam And on

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 3>all things Apple and its supply chain now just focusing

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 3>in on supply chain. Of course, all of this amitted

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 3>geopolitical tension of US and China. And we know the

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.360
<v Speaker 3>earlier US Common Secretary Ginia Romando was meeting with her

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Chinese counterpart. It's all part of the Biden administration's effort

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 3>to or try and reduce some of the tensions between

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 3>the world's two largest economies China. It says it was

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 3>a frank meeting, a constructive meeting, talking about tariffs, talking

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 3>about chip policy. Rondo, of course, had been looking to

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 3>stabilize the relations.

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 5>Just take a listen to what she said before.

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 10>We agree to establish a new Commercial Issues Working Group,

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 10>a formal working group which will involve US and Chinese

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 10>government officials and very importantly US and Chinese commercial private

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 10>sector representatives as we seek solutions on trade and investment

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 10>issues and to advance US commercial interests in China.

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Understand, megan to be meeting at least once a year. Now,

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 3>coming up, let's talk bitcoin. So like a teenager in

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 3>need of its sugar high. According to Bloomberg Intelligence, how

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 3>all the details next, there's a room technology.

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 5>Time now for talking tech.

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 3>First up, soft Bang, Well, it's going to take a

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 3>group of its Indian startup founders to Silicon Balley.

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 5>That's next month for an AI tour.

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Now, this is all as the Japanese investor is stepping

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 3>up its efforts to really infuse its portfolio companies with

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 3>the technology. Meanwhile, x Pun shares they sword after it

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 3>agreed to buy DD's smart car development art Now. The

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 3>deal both eliminates a potential competitor in the crowded EV

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 3>market and gives US a tech savvy partner a new venture.

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 5>Plus more on evs.

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Now Japan's advanced electric battery technology company Noko is now

0:18:57.920 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 3>training on the Nasdaq.

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 5>It plans to enter the demestic leasing business with evs

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 5>that use.

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 3>As battery separated technology to help improve longevity and hate resistance.

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 5>And I know that's all of.

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Your focus point in evs, but now we're going to

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 3>some of my focus point, right yeah, And.

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 6>Let me take you back to twenty seventeen. That's when

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 6>Bitcoin first reached its current level relative to the Nasdaq

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 6>one hundred stock index. The question can crypto now outperform?

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 6>A Bloomberg Intelligence note out today says it's unlikely. Federal

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 6>funds futures in one year hovering around five percent and

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 6>deflating producer prices are very different from that past easy

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 6>money day that Bitcoin grew up in. Let's bring in

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 6>Mike mcgloan from BI who wrote this peek and Mike,

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 6>you write your latest note. Bitcoin's a teenager and may

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 6>miss its sugar high.

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 4>What are you talking about?

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 11>Well, Hello, I think I guess you can appreciate. I've

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 11>raised a few teenagers there.

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 4>Are not adults.

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 11>But the bottom line in our marketers is never forget

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 11>from where you're from and what got you there. So

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 11>I look over at that tun your note every day

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 11>and I see it's a giant sucking sound for risk

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 11>assets and bitcoins. When the risky assessets in bitcoins whole premise,

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 11>it's whole lifetime. It's been under a zero or very

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 11>low interest rate environment. Now interest rates are very high

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 11>and attractive. So then I look at performance far. How

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 11>much has bitcoin performed? Well, okay, the best in history.

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 11>If you look at the first time it traded a

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 11>dour that was around twenty eleven, it's up twenty six

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 11>thousands times that. So to me, the risk is greater

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 11>that Bitcoin continues to ververt lower and all indications are

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 11>showing that it's showing divergent weakness versus the stock market,

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 11>particularly in Q three, and then you point it out

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 11>versus the nasdick. It's still at the same level since

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 11>twenty seventeen in the nasdick, and I look at it's

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 11>a much higher vole till the acid and it's showing

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 11>divergent it's showing lack of performance to really take it out,

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 11>it's higher. So I look at it as okay, risks

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 11>are tilt the lower, particularly if we look it at

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 11>what the fed's doing. You don't see any liquidity to

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 11>coming from the FED, and if they keep tightening, what

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 11>stops them from tightening potentially the stock market going down,

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 11>which means most risk asses.

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 5>Another mike that I was speaking to this weekend.

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 3>All about that sucking sound was my Novegrats, of course,

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 3>of Galaxy Digital, and he's been getting more concerned about

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 3>some of the headwinds, even though he himself is in

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 3>line to be getting one of these spottytfs. So too

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 3>was Kathy Wood, and I was on stage with her

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 3>as well. I'm interested as to what, if any tailwinds

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 3>could make you change your.

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 5>Opinion on this.

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 4>Yes, we need some kind of change.

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:27.479
<v Speaker 11>At first, I think I have better hair than mister Novo.

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 11>The significance the first sign of tailwinds is I need

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 11>to see Listen, let's say, at least see some signs

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.120
<v Speaker 11>of strength. So right now, all the big picture moving

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 11>averages are tilting lower, like one hundred week moving average.

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:39.919
<v Speaker 11>The market's bumped up to there and it's heading lower,

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 11>and it's doing for a good reason. It sees that

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 11>FED fun future still tighten in the future. I need

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 11>to see some divergent strength. Maybe versus stock market weakness,

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 11>that would be a good sign. We're not seeing that now.

0:21:50.320 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm a glad BlueBag Intelligence. Welcome back to Room Meg Technology.

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 6>I'm Caroline Hyde in New York and Imed Ludlow in

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 6>San Francisco.

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Quit check in on the market.

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 6>So I think it's important to think about this on

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 6>a weekly basis, right son, as that one hundred is,

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 6>it's a little bit higher two tens to one percent.

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 6>We're coming off a strong week last week where then

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 6>as that one hundred posted a gain of around one

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 6>and a half percent, but it snapped three straight weeks

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 6>of losses and it was the first time this year

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 6>we'd seen that. This week on the weekly basis, we

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 6>just have a flood of economic data from around the

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 6>world here in the US hard data and sort of

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 6>more soft data that we're tracking everything from PCEE, the

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 6>Fed's preferred gauge of inflation, through to other gauges of

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 6>manufacturing confidence and activity, and economic check data out of China,

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 6>and increasingly when we worry about tech, we are worried

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 6>about China as kind of the engine room of the

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 6>global economy. Here's an interesting one for you as well.

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 6>We talked about door Dash and it's AI efforts. A

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 6>new one out this Monday morning, an AI powered voice assistant.

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 6>Now it's really interesting because in the statement door Dash

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 6>is nap right, but saying that so many people still

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.640
<v Speaker 6>phone in their food orders, but the restaurant's too busy

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 6>to answer the phone. Here's their solution, get AI to

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 6>do it. They're saying that fifty percent of all calls

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 6>are missed. So now they're trying in multiple languages in

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 6>AI power syst and you phone up, the AI interacts

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 6>with you. It's just in trial phase right now. It

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 6>had boosted the stock earlier in the session, but was

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 6>software by three tenths a one percent.

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 4>More AI, More AI.

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.360
<v Speaker 5>More on door Dash for a little bit as well.

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Then let's talk about a competitor that's about to go public.

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 5>I'm talking a course of Instacart. We want to get

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:31.880
<v Speaker 5>back to.

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 3>The conversation all around this year's IPOs. We're all bracing

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 3>for them. Greg Martin and Polas a Say, co founder

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 3>and managing director of rain Maker Securities, which specializes in

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 3>pre IPO investing.

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 5>You're also, of course still an active v C.

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 3>Greg and much experience in prior history of working with

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 3>these sort of companies to build them up for this moment.

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested in door Dash, of course what five to

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:56.959
<v Speaker 3>six times overall focus on on in terms of active

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 3>user base compared to instacar. That's what the Bloue meg

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 3>and tell WHI not is telling us today. How are

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 3>you looking at the perspective? How are you looking at

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 3>the filings and thinking, oh, but it's profitable.

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 12>You know, and sahart will most certainly always be compared

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 12>to DoorDash and thank you for having me this morning,

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 12>but it is it is different in a few important ways,

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 12>you know.

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 2>It's it has.

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 12>A pretty significant advertising business, which is very profitable, very

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 12>high margin. In fact, actually even larger than Uber's advertising business.

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 12>So I think that's a big distinguishing factor. They obviously

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 12>they don't have the same kind of order order growths

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 12>as door dash has, which I think is one potential,

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:41.919
<v Speaker 12>you know, low light of the business. But they've been

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:46.360
<v Speaker 12>able to increase transaction fees per user and per order,

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:50.719
<v Speaker 12>which which has enabled them despite flat order growth in

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 12>the first half of twenty twenty three, it's enabled them

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 12>to actually grow their transaction revenues by thirty one percent

0:24:57.200 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 12>you know, if you look at their revenues, they probably

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 12>project to be around three billion in twenty twenty three,

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 12>with better margins than way better margins than door Dash.

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 12>You know, if you look at door Dashes, you know,

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 12>revenue multiple, it's in the three and a half times range.

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:18.439
<v Speaker 12>So it probably portends an IPO offering for Instacart, assuming

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 12>they're able to make it to the finish line in

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 12>the ten to you know, twelve billion valuation range, which

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 12>I think would you be an appropriate level relative to

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 12>where door dash sits.

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Of course, what Instacart did, unlike some currently private companies,

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 3>is they took that bitter pill. They decided to slash

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 3>their overall valuation in the private market and then some

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 3>has that been important? How much a pentop demand is

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 3>there from public investors now for this sort of a name.

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 5>What are you seeing on your platform?

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 12>Well, it was a necessary reduction in evaluation. Their last private

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 12>round was in the thirty nine billion range. You know,

0:25:56.880 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 12>they kind of slash their slash their internal evaluation to

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 12>to around ten billion, which which frankly gives their employees

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 12>who were you know, issued options, any recent investors and

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 12>most likely any public market investors upside, so they you know,

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 12>I think it was important for them to level set,

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 12>and frankly, they didn't have a choice. The market spoke

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:21.199
<v Speaker 12>to them and that's where the valuation is more appropriate.

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 2>I do.

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 12>I do think it bodes well for public offering. I mean,

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:29.199
<v Speaker 12>the company is demonstrating solid growth, solid profitability. You know,

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 12>they've talked about ways in which AI is going to

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 12>help them. And if you look at our platform at

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 12>rain Maker, we handle a very large volume of private

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 12>secondary transactions. We're starting to see orders come in, which

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 12>is reflecting you know, strong demand for you know, a potentially.

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 2>I PO that you know in several weeks.

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 12>People often like to get in now because they think

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 12>there's going to be upside, you know, from the IPO

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 12>price and beyond.

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 3>And of course we wait road shows and I mean

0:26:58.359 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be a busy stot to set ten

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 3>anythink of all these sand companies having to hit the

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 3>road to explain their stories because it's not the only IPO.

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.959
<v Speaker 6>What's astonishing to me is on this program we've been

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 6>talking about how dead, frozen, inactive the market is, and

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 6>all of the news flows happened in just seven days.

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Greg On filed August.

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 6>Twenty First, how much was that starting gun for you

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:23.959
<v Speaker 6>to kick start the rest of the of the window.

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 12>It was a big starting gun, you know, if you

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 12>look at if you take a little bit of a

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.120
<v Speaker 12>step back, I think one of the sort of you know,

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 12>starting guns started with Kava. I think Kava was an

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 12>eye opener for a lot of people. It was a

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:39.479
<v Speaker 12>sort of a quiet company that traded up significantly on

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 12>its IPO and has actually held up pretty well, close

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 12>to one hundred percent since at priced. You know, then

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 12>you had odity technology, and then you had obviously Benpaths,

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 12>which has been on a huge, a huge soar incline

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 12>this last week. So I think people see that there

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 12>is receptivity in the IPO markets, and I think what

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 12>started as a trickle could end.

0:27:58.920 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 2>Up turning into a fly.

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 12>Obviously, last week we had ARM, we had Instacart, we

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 12>had Clavio. Those are much bigger IPOs. I think there'll

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:09.199
<v Speaker 12>be a bigger test of where the market really is.

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 12>You know, ARM is more of a flat company, but

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 12>it's also telling you know, an AI story. You know,

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 12>as you see you know, kind of riding the coattails

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 12>of Nvidia. So you know, I think arm will be interesting.

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.120
<v Speaker 12>Instacart will also be a large IPO. I mean we're

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 12>talking probably built you know, several billion plus of proceeds

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 12>between the two companies. So I think these will be

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 12>real tests for the market. But I think they're both

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 12>strong companies with good stories, and you know, I expect

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 12>if if they if they succeed, and I do think

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 12>bankers will probably still try and be conservative in pricing

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 12>because they want to show that there's an uptick for

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 12>buyers who take the risk of buying an IPO, that

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 12>we might actually start seeing the floodgates open again. Yeah,

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 12>and we have several other companies that are ready to

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 12>go if they see that happen.

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 6>I had a cup of tv O day with a

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 6>tech banker and we talked about Carver and I said,

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 6>that's not a tech company, and the banker made the

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 6>point that it is a growth company though, And so

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 6>you can see how investors treat a growth name interesting signal.

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 6>Caroline made a really excellent point owner in the show

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 6>Data Bricks is raise money, right an interesting valuation? Is

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 6>that a signal that they won't IPO? Why raise and

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 6>negotiate up with your investors?

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Ahead of a listing.

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 12>You know, it's not necessarily an indication you know, they

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 12>have They're one of the few companies that has been

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 12>continually investing even through the downturn.

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 2>They have such a huge market in front of them.

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 12>You know, they are a significant AI company, a significant

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 12>data company similar to Snowflake. They compete with Snowflake. They

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 12>have massive scale, massive growth potential. So I view them

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 12>as a company that, you know, could go public whenever.

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 12>It may portend more likely a direct listing when they

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 12>go public, because they may not need to raise capital,

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 12>but they may just want to create liquidity for their

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 12>investors and shareholders. So I wouldn't necessarily say it means

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 12>they're not going public. I think, you know, they will

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 12>always take the position that we will go public when

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 12>the market is right for us. And if I think

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 12>if they see a really buoyant IPO market with some

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 12>of these IPOs that we've discussed.

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 2>I actually think they might go sooner than later.

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:18.479
<v Speaker 3>Greg, I'm interested as to the hunger for this and

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 3>who it's from. Who is coming to your platform to

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 3>get ahead of the listing, Who is going to be

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 3>there to take down this listing, Which kind of investors

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 3>are interested at this moment.

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 12>You know, we're starting to see all manners. I mean,

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 12>for you know, for eighteen months, everybody kind of retreated

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 12>other than other than the investors that had a pure

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 12>mandate to only do late stage private secondaries. We're now

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 12>starting to see the big IPO buyers and obviously we're

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 12>we're hearing of the data bricks investment. You know, we're

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 12>starting to see them big institutions. We're starting to see

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 12>family offices, We're starting to see frankly high net worth individuals.

0:30:57.640 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 2>We're starting to see a big.

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 12>Flow of people that are are are just there to say, hey,

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 12>I don't want to miss the next KAVA, I don't

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 12>want to miss the next bind pass, I don't want

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 12>to miss the next podity. So I think as investors

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 12>search free yield, and you know, remember the bar is high.

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 12>The risk free yield now is five to six percent

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 12>versus zero. Yes, so it has to be a quality

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 12>IPO to entice investors to come in at this point.

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 3>And Greg, I'm going to go to a sensitive sort

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 3>of topic in the VC space right now, and you

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 3>are still one.

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 5>You've got Archer Venture Capital. Of course, you are at

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 5>red point before.

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 3>There is this really interesting dynamic that's happened is that

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 3>all these VC companies have raised a.

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 5>Ton of money. They need to put that to work.

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 3>They don't want to particularly have to give money back

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 3>to LPs. I'm just interested as to what tensions are

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 3>being felt in the venture community in this space right

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 3>now as they are looking to have these liquidity moments

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 3>and then also try and find where to put money

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 3>to work. We saw two price interested in of course

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 3>data breaks, but that's a crossover my name.

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 12>I mean the biggest tension if you look at you know,

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 12>the pandemic and twenty twenty one, there was a real

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 12>grow grow growth, spend spend spend mentality and so a

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 12>lot of their winners created huge burn rates and we're

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 12>consuming cash at an alarming rate. And so the first

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 12>order of business for venture capitalists is to make sure

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 12>that your big, you know, scaling businesses that are also

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 12>spending a lot of money are well capitalized. And because

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 12>they went through massive burn you're seeing a ton of

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 12>reserve and frankly, you know, a retrenchment on new investments

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 12>for venture capitalists to make sure they're supporting these companies.

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 2>So there's not a lot of.

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 12>New investments into new companies, but there's a lot of

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 12>using this capital to make sure that your big scale

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 12>businesses have the cash, and of course they're also making

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 12>sure they're not spending money at the same rate. But

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 12>obviously there was an expectation that there would be a

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 12>lot of liquidity by now. There is an expectation of

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 12>these companies we the public, and now they're seeing, hey,

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 12>the IPO bar is raised. We need two or three

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 12>more years to get the companies to an exit, and

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 12>we need to make sure we have the capital in

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 12>these businesses to sustain those businesses so they can grow

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 12>frankly into the crazy evaluations that they are raised at.

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 2>In twenty twenty one.

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 6>Greg, you mentioned the attractiveness of the yield on benchmark

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 6>notes impacting IPOs. What's the biggest quickly economic factor that

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 6>you take into account right now?

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 12>Interest rates are always number one when you think about

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 12>growth business and tech businesses are mostly valued as growth businesses.

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 12>So when the tenure goes from one hundred and fifty

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 12>to four hundred and thirty basis points, you know, that's

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 12>really significant that crushes multiples, and we obviously saw it

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 12>in twenty twenty two in terms of the NASTAQ, even

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 12>though it's up a little bit since then.

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 2>So interest rates sensitivity is.

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 12>Very high, and you know, we're at a high point

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 12>on the tenure. So I think people are are really

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 12>focused on are we going to have a declining interest

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 12>rate environment and when? Or you know, we're all obviously

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 12>all paying close attention to the September FED meeting, where

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 12>a lot of us are expecting things are still going up.

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, inflation is.

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 12>Still out there and we're not hearing you know that

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 12>the FAT is ready to start lowering rates.

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 3>And boy if we've got a big week in terms

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 3>of economic data even though we've got thin volumes out

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 3>there still now. Greg Martin Brilliant from macro to Micro,

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 3>the co founder managing director of rain Maker Securities, of course,

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 3>still very active in the venture space with Archiventure Capital too.

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, Look, we'll talk tech investing for the fastest

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 3>growing demographic in the world, the older generation. I mean

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Meller Levy of Primetime Partners joining us. Next, there's a

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 3>bluebog technology.

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 10>I think you have to like healthcare just because of

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:00.240
<v Speaker 10>the generational tree that's going on, the world is getting.

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 3>Sarah hunt Alpine words there and really the focus on

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 3>generational shifts at the moment, it's going to be the

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 3>focus for our VC spotlight today. We're focusing on investing

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 3>in the technology that's driving innovation for that fastest growing

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 3>demographic in the country and in the world, it's the

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 3>aging population. I'm really pleased to welcome to the show.

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Abbi min Alevi, co founder and managing partner of Primetime Partners,

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 3>an early stage bench capital fund that invests in people

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 3>and companies that transferm quality of life for older adults.

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:30.799
<v Speaker 3>And at this moment, when clearly the need is there,

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 3>when clearly big companies are thinking of the benefits to

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 3>support those that are supporting the older generation as well,

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 3>is it okay what are valuations like in that space

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 3>right now to be allocating to Well, I'm so glad you.

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Guys are spending time on this tabic. We do proceed

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:49.799
<v Speaker 1>to Series A investing and one of the best things

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 1>about being an early stage investor is that valuations have

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>stayed sane through the crazy bubble, if you will, of

0:35:56.680 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one. What we're seeing at the later stage

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 1>is that the valuations really are sticking somewhat formulaically to

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 1>what healthcare services and healthcare it typically are, which is

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 1>anywhere from four to ten times, and so within that

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 1>there's quite a wide range, but the valuations haven't yet

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>become so astronomical, largely because most of what we do

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>is invest in healthcare related businesses and there still is

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:25.439
<v Speaker 1>usually a human component to a lot of what we do,

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>because when you're working with an older population with healthcare delivery,

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>we're not talking about robots here, We're talking about human

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to human and so a lot of those valuations stay

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:39.359
<v Speaker 1>within the four to ten times because of that.

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting though, is that there are a number of

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 3>you put photio companies. I'm sure that a colony trying

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 3>to understand how all social intelligence can make them a

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 3>little less dependent on the human or indeed you've already

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:52.880
<v Speaker 3>invested in companies that mo is AI is not becoming

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 3>a theme, even more.

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely becoming a theme. It's not at the point where

0:36:56.719 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 1>AI is replacing medical professionals and clinical decisions, but it's

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:04.280
<v Speaker 1>absolutely an enablement tool. For example, one of our portfolio

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>companies called Duos, they work with health plans to engage

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>their members to understand what benefits they have both within

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the plan as well as the thirty billion dollars of

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:16.319
<v Speaker 1>unused federal government benefits, and they're using AI really from

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a personalization perspective to make sure they're delivering the right recommendations.

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 4>So we see a.

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Lot of AI around personalization. We see AI a ton

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>on diagnostics. One of our portfolio companies, Kinsugi can diagnose

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:34.280
<v Speaker 1>depression in older adults using their voice, not natural language processing,

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 1>but actually voice vibrations, and so AI is helping them

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>there within dementia care and diagnostics there as you know

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that population is about to blossom, we're seeing a lot

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of AI on the diagnostics side. We do not invest

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:52.320
<v Speaker 1>in healthcare discovery drug discovery, but that is huge piece

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:55.359
<v Speaker 1>of innovation in drug discovery, and the speed of drug

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 1>discovery is AI. So we're seeing really AI as an

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:03.400
<v Speaker 1>enablement of the ability to scale healthcare to this population that,

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 1>as the you mentioned before, is doubling in size.

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 6>So the population in the US of people way over

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 6>sixty five is about sixteen percent of our US population,

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 6>and we expect it to jump to twenty two percent

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 6>by twenty forty.

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:21.240
<v Speaker 4>According to the US Department of Health.

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 6>And Human Services, you're a VC with a long time

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 6>horizon to invest.

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 4>How do you ride along the trend?

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:30.760
<v Speaker 6>How do you make sure that you're invested in parts

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 6>that follow it.

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 1>So there's one piece of it, which is you've got

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 1>this doubling of the older population on a global scale,

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and that absolutely creates huge infrastructure challenges for healthcare, for

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:47.399
<v Speaker 1>financial services, for housing, and so you've got these very

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>big issues, almost like climate change, where the data's always

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:53.320
<v Speaker 1>been there. People are finally waking up to this seismic

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 1>shift in the demography.

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:56.359
<v Speaker 5>But what's happening is.

0:38:56.280 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Really the urgent needs of large fortune one hundred healthcare companies,

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:02.320
<v Speaker 1>which is they need to take costs out of the system.

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:05.880
<v Speaker 1>US healthcare spend is eighteen percent of our GDP. We

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:09.320
<v Speaker 1>have the most expensive healthcare system in the entire world.

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:10.320
<v Speaker 4>So what we're.

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Investing in are businesses that help take costs out today.

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 1>So for example, fall prevention number one reason why older

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:19.360
<v Speaker 1>adults go to the hospital. One and four older Americans

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 1>will fall, and that creates fifty billion dollars of cost

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 1>in our healthcare system. You prevent one fall, that's a

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 1>tremendous value. So businesses we invest in like Bold or

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 1>rosarium from home improvement. These are businesses that really help

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 1>take costs out of the system today.

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:37.439
<v Speaker 6>Are there any areas you stay away from you just say,

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 6>don't do that, don't invest.

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>This might be a contrarian point of view, but we

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 1>think when people talk about the tech enabled home, while

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent of Americans want to age in place, the

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 1>answer isn't necessarily to make everything kind of like the Jetsons.

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm displaying my age here. Everything is robots

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and technology and answered by the cloud that we believe

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:09.319
<v Speaker 1>that that is an area where remote patient monitoring and

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:12.240
<v Speaker 1>home care in the home is a great place to invest.

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:16.439
<v Speaker 1>But fully digitize robotic solutions, We're just not there yet,

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's not really the type of care that humans

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:22.280
<v Speaker 1>want for themselves and older adult children want for their parents.

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 5>We love what I'm tiring you Abby. Thank you very much. Adena,

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 5>it's been enjoy having you in.

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 4>All right, Let's head to space.

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 6>The crew Dragon spacecraft launched by SpaceX, successfully docked with

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 6>the International Space Station over the weekend. The docking took

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 6>place while the two spacecrafts were orbiting above Australia as

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:50.240
<v Speaker 6>its crew of four astronauts began their six month mission.

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:53.880
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg News space reporter Lauren Grush here with more. Lauren,

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:56.760
<v Speaker 6>it's getting routine, But tell us about this mission.

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 13>Yes, speaking of routine, it was the seventh operational CREWD

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 13>flight for SpaceX through NASA's Commercial Crew program. They hold

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:09.399
<v Speaker 13>an ongoing contract to send astronauts to the International Space

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 13>Station for the Space Agency, and this crew was a

0:41:12.680 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 13>very international crew. There was a NASA astronaut, a European astronaut,

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 13>a Japanese astronaut, and a Russian cosmonaut. So it really

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 13>just kind of encapsulates what NASA is trying to do

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 13>with these launches by sitting up partner astronauts and NASA astronauts.

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:29.759
<v Speaker 3>Well, space is going to be doing with all of

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 3>this activity as well, Lauren.

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:34.959
<v Speaker 13>Well, now that they've launched their latest crew, it's time

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 13>for the recent crew that they launched up roughly six

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 13>months ago to come home. So and it will be

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 13>Crew six will be returning to Earth in their own

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:46.319
<v Speaker 13>crew Dragon capsule after they greet and make the new

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 13>incoming crew feel right at home.

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:52.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Lauren, you broke some news Friday. The Starship. The

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:56.760
<v Speaker 6>explosion in April had big environmental impact. Quickly summarize your reporting.

0:41:57.360 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so there's quite a lot going in space, but

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 13>plenty going on down here on Earth as well. So

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 13>a lot of people might remember the SpaceX Starship test

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 13>launch in April. Well, we did a Freedom of Information

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:14.279
<v Speaker 13>Act requests looking at, you know, information that we could

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 13>gather between SpaceX officials and the Fish and Wildlife Service

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:22.320
<v Speaker 13>in the aftermath of that launch, because it was quite

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 13>explosive and it was quite destructive, and we got eleven

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 13>hundred pages of emails and photos giving us a really

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 13>candid look at how those officials with the Fish and

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 13>Wildlife Service, you know, were kind of dog at what

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:39.360
<v Speaker 13>happened after that flight.

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:44.280
<v Speaker 3>Almost four ac is a state park burned, Lauren, amazing

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:45.800
<v Speaker 3>piece of reporting, the long Grash.

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:47.239
<v Speaker 5>We thank you that is. Have this edition of Really

0:42:47.320 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 5>Big Technology Ed.

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, huge week ahead recap on the podcast wherever you

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:53.840
<v Speaker 6>get your podcast, This is Bloomberg