Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom huge. Trump goes on offense
Speaker 1: against BLM. New York City teachers bring coffins and guillotines
Speaker 1: to protest. Governor Cuomo is begging wealthy New Yorkers to
Speaker 1: come back to NYC updates on the massive explosion in
Speaker 1: Lebanon and kindergarten cop is canceled. This is the bus
Speaker 1: Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode
Speaker 1: what really matters with passionable intelligence. Make no mistake America,
Speaker 1: you're a great American. Again, the buck Sexton Show begins.
Speaker 1: He's a great guy. No, welcome everybody to the buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show. Great to have you here. I cannot believe
Speaker 1: that each passing day now gets us deeper into August
Speaker 1: and closer to this election, which is going to certainly
Speaker 1: be the most intense election cycle I think in memory,
Speaker 1: and the most bizarre for sure, considering there's really no rallies,
Speaker 1: there's no live events, there's no conventions to speak of.
Speaker 1: There's maybe not even gonna be any debates. That's something
Speaker 1: we're gonna have to get ready for. Oh no, they're saying,
Speaker 1: oh Joe Biden's gonna show up. They're telling us that
Speaker 1: I'm I'm not convinced. If I were Joe Biden, I wasn't,
Speaker 1: I wouldn't show up. In fact, I don't understand why
Speaker 1: Biden feels any need to really do much of anything
Speaker 1: other than softball interviews with the Lib media that's desperate
Speaker 1: to help him get elected. Why why take a risk? Right,
Speaker 1: it's just anti Trump voting. They're going forward. No one
Speaker 1: is going to be inspired by Joe Biden. I saw
Speaker 1: a meme making the rounds on the internet last night
Speaker 1: about how about a computer that had I think, you know,
Speaker 1: like eight bits of memory storage or something like that,
Speaker 1: and it looked likes you know, it looked like what
Speaker 1: you might have seen if you're my age when you
Speaker 1: were a very very young kid. And the meme was,
Speaker 1: this is a computer from when Joe Biden started in
Speaker 1: the United States Senate, just to give you a sense
Speaker 1: of how long this dude has been in the Senate
Speaker 1: and doing what he does. But you have Biden who's
Speaker 1: very convinced, at least he seems convinced of his own
Speaker 1: destiny here that he is going to be the present
Speaker 1: the United States. Everyone's also saying that it's going to
Speaker 1: be Rice Susan Rice or Kamala Harris as his VP.
Speaker 1: I don't think it really makes all that much difference.
Speaker 1: Which one of them, quite honestly, is the VP. It
Speaker 1: checks the boxes, It manages to do what the left
Speaker 1: wants putting a younger, female minority individual on the ticket.
Speaker 1: But Biden in a classic moment, I want you to
Speaker 1: hear the whole thing because I want to start off
Speaker 1: today on a little bit of a different, a different vibe. Here.
Speaker 1: Here's Biden when he's doing an interview. It's CBS, and
Speaker 1: if you're a CBS reporter, you know that your job
Speaker 1: hangs in the balance if you make Joe Biden look bad, right,
Speaker 1: I mean you're you're not going to advance at all
Speaker 1: at CBS, NBC, ABC, any of these places unless you
Speaker 1: are giving Joe Biden the equivalent of a verbal Shiatsu
Speaker 1: massage every time that's tough to say, real fast, every
Speaker 1: time you are interviewing him preap with the Swedish massage.
Speaker 1: I don't even know really what the difference is between
Speaker 1: these things. But you have to be very very nice
Speaker 1: to Biden in the interviews. But it doesn't matter because
Speaker 1: he's Joe Biden. He's gonna start, you know, yeah, man,
Speaker 1: he's gonna like start saying things kind of just loud
Speaker 1: and scatter shot and yeah, here he is. When I
Speaker 1: ask the question whether he's taking a cognitive test, he
Speaker 1: lets us know that no, he has not taken the test,
Speaker 1: to which I automatically want to respond, Oh, we know, Joe,
Speaker 1: you have not taken a cognitive test, and we don't
Speaker 1: really need to see the results because we already know them.
Speaker 1: Here he is, play clip. Have you taken a cognitive No,
Speaker 1: I haven't taken a test. Why the hell would I
Speaker 1: take a test? Come on, man, that's like saying you
Speaker 1: before you got in this program, if you take a
Speaker 1: test where you're taking cocaine or not, what do you think? Huh?
Speaker 1: Or are you a Joe? Do you say to President
Speaker 1: Trump who brags about his test and makes your meant
Speaker 1: to say an issue for voters, Well, if you can't
Speaker 1: figure out the difference between an elephant and a lion,
Speaker 1: I don't know what the hell he's talking about. Did
Speaker 1: you watch that? Look? Come on, man, I know you're
Speaker 1: trying to goad me, but I mean, I'm so forward
Speaker 1: looking to have an opportunity to sit with the President
Speaker 1: or stand with the president and debates. There's gonna be
Speaker 1: plenty of time. And by the way, as I joke
Speaker 1: with him, you know, I shouldn't say it. I'm going
Speaker 1: to say something I don't I probably shouldn't say anyway,
Speaker 1: I am. I am very willing to let the American
Speaker 1: public judge my physical and mental film physical as well
Speaker 1: as my mental film fitness. I'm a berber. What look,
Speaker 1: every time the guy gives an interview, there's a pretty
Speaker 1: good chance he's gonna have one of these moments. You know,
Speaker 1: they always say that Trump that they make fun of
Speaker 1: the way that Trump speaks, But that's just that those
Speaker 1: are his mannerisms. That's the way that the president communicates,
Speaker 1: and for a lot of us, we always we understand
Speaker 1: what he's saying. One of the media's favorite games that
Speaker 1: they play is taking every single word that Trump says literally,
Speaker 1: not allowing him any any figurative leeway, not understanding what's
Speaker 1: clear exaggeration. The President said this, and they all freak out.
Speaker 1: And then with Biden they act like, yeah, that gibberish
Speaker 1: that he just spouted, real statesmanlike and they all nod
Speaker 1: their heads like the bleating sheep in unison that they are. Ah,
Speaker 1: so there's that, and then on the other side of things,
Speaker 1: out the President, who's out there, I think now beginning
Speaker 1: more than ever, more than what we've seen so far,
Speaker 1: the counter strike that I've been talking about for a while.
Speaker 1: The left hit him with everything they had in June
Speaker 1: and July. But here's the problem that they're going to
Speaker 1: have going forward. BLM is a political is a political
Speaker 1: liability in states that are purple, where they're independent voters,
Speaker 1: and where the Democrat Party needs to try to convince
Speaker 1: folks in the suburbs, people in areas of the country
Speaker 1: that are de industrialized because of offshoreing all of our
Speaker 1: jobs to China that they need to convince them that
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party is a sane steward of the American economy.
Speaker 1: They're not going to be able to do that when
Speaker 1: they're also telling them, oh, yeah, BLM has been great
Speaker 1: for America. It has not been great for America. That's
Speaker 1: putting them on. They've made everything worse for everyone, as
Speaker 1: I've said, and that's just true. We're seeing all those
Speaker 1: facts and figures come back right now. But they also
Speaker 1: have to deal with the possibility that the numbers are
Speaker 1: going to continue to go down in Florida, Arizona, Texas
Speaker 1: that they are now on the other side of this curve,
Speaker 1: and we may now be getting to a place unless
Speaker 1: you really believe that New York City has magically become
Speaker 1: fantastic in its handling of COVID nineteen, that's I suppose possible.
Speaker 1: Much more likely is that the disease spread through a
Speaker 1: population until there's relative herd immunity, and then it still
Speaker 1: is out there, but it does not have the same
Speaker 1: pandemic exponential spread capability. If we're on the other side
Speaker 1: of that, and Trump is on offense against the left
Speaker 1: and really taking the fight to them. Look, I think
Speaker 1: Joe Biden and the entire Biden campaign, the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: going in to this election cycle, I think they've got
Speaker 1: a glass jaw. It's just a question of are we
Speaker 1: going to take a big swing Trump. I was happy
Speaker 1: to see this morning my buddy Pete Hegseth, host on
Speaker 1: Fox and Friends, Trump called in and spoke some important
Speaker 1: truths about the b LM movement. Play play clip the
Speaker 1: one with Trump and Black Lives Matter. Nobody's done better
Speaker 1: for our black community, I mean nobody, and that is
Speaker 1: with the possible exception of Abraham Lincoln. It's true, criminal
Speaker 1: justice reform, opportunity zones, best employment numbers in history, every
Speaker 1: single what I've done funding the black colleges and universities
Speaker 1: historically they say historically black, but the colleges and universities
Speaker 1: funded it for a long time. They had no funding,
Speaker 1: they had to keep coming back to Washington. I took
Speaker 1: care of them for long term. The role said, nobody's
Speaker 1: done for the black community, African American community, what I've done. Now,
Speaker 1: I understand the Libs are all going to freak out
Speaker 1: about this, and Trump comparing himself to Lincoln is going
Speaker 1: to be considered sacrilege. And as I've said before, the
Speaker 1: President he's a salesman and he exaggerates a bit. But
Speaker 1: here's what he's doing that they hate. And this is
Speaker 1: getting us back into Trump's X factor. The thing that
Speaker 1: he did that other Republicans didn't do or aren't weren't
Speaker 1: willing to do. He does not allow the left to
Speaker 1: dictate the terms of debate instead of you know, a
Speaker 1: month or two ago, it was and this is where
Speaker 1: I think the President was going wrong. He was extending
Speaker 1: his hand to the other side to talk about criminal
Speaker 1: justice reform with an executive order, and they slapped it
Speaker 1: away because it's not about criminal justice reform, it's about power.
Speaker 1: And the President referred to BLM as a bunch of Marxists,
Speaker 1: which is true. The organizers of this movement, the people
Speaker 1: that were behind this from its beginnings, have come out
Speaker 1: and said very openly, very openly, that they are Marxists.
Speaker 1: So why why can't we understand that for what it is.
Speaker 1: Why can't we speak openly about this because they've already
Speaker 1: said it, so now this should be a part of
Speaker 1: the discussion. What are they really trying to do for America.
Speaker 1: The President, though, needs to go back to and I
Speaker 1: think he will because this is who he is, the
Speaker 1: Trump that will not be contained, that will not be told.
Speaker 1: You have to speak about it this way, you have to.
Speaker 1: I don't want the political consultants in his ears. I
Speaker 1: don't want people getting getting in his face to tell
Speaker 1: him we need a more moderate tone. Because of all
Speaker 1: the trouble the country's had right now, the president needs
Speaker 1: to let it rip. He needs to let it rip.
Speaker 1: He needs to go on offense because the other side
Speaker 1: is already firing everything they've got they are, they are
Speaker 1: scorched earth, they are nuclear option. Whatever they can do,
Speaker 1: they're gonna do. So you do not do yourself any
Speaker 1: favors in a political contest like that where you're holding
Speaker 1: back because you think that maybe that will make you
Speaker 1: look a little more magnanimous or statesman or whatever it
Speaker 1: may be. I'm not saying Trump should just fly off
Speaker 1: the handle entirely. Sometimes I think his tweets, you know,
Speaker 1: look the guy. If you're a bar room brawler and
Speaker 1: you're throwing big punches, sometimes you're gonna miss and you
Speaker 1: might hit your fist in the wall and hurt yourself. Right,
Speaker 1: I mean, that can happen too. But I'm happy to
Speaker 1: see the president feels like he's got some of the
Speaker 1: fight back in him, feels like he sees now what
Speaker 1: the pathway forward is against Joe Biden, the Democrats, and
Speaker 1: the whole campaign here. And he's also calling out all
Speaker 1: the stuff going on with these professional sports leagues, which look,
Speaker 1: I wish I could tell you that I'm going to
Speaker 1: boycott them, but as producer Mark rightly points out, I
Speaker 1: mean I haven't watched any of these leagues in a
Speaker 1: long time. But here's the president saying, you know, look,
Speaker 1: it's it's disgraceful what they're doing. Let's just call it
Speaker 1: out play fifteen. A couple of years ago, you were
Speaker 1: very vocal about kneeling for the national anthem. Now it
Speaker 1: seems that standing is the new kneeling in that only
Speaker 1: three players in the NBA, Jonathan Isaac Myers, Leonard and
Speaker 1: a coach, Greg pop which are actually standing for our
Speaker 1: nation's anthem. Your take on the state of the league.
Speaker 1: I think it's disgraceful. We work with them, We work
Speaker 1: with them very hard, trying to get them open. I
Speaker 1: was pushing them to get open. And then I see
Speaker 1: everybody kneeling when they're doing the anthem. We're not. It's
Speaker 1: not acceptable to me. When I see him kneeling, I
Speaker 1: I just turned off the game. I have no interest
Speaker 1: in the game. And let me tell you there's plenty
Speaker 1: of other people out there too. That's the right move.
Speaker 1: The old school GOP would have gone into something about, well,
Speaker 1: they're entitled to their opinions. And I understand the history
Speaker 1: of blellup, no, no, no, no, you're showing disrespect the
Speaker 1: national anthem. It's all started because of that cry baby.
Speaker 1: Colin Kaepernick, who was at the down the downslope of
Speaker 1: his career, reinvented himself as some kind of social justice hero.
Speaker 1: And now this is all just caught on. But I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: We don't have to be okay with this either. We're
Speaker 1: also allowed to have opinions. We're also allowed to express
Speaker 1: thoughts on the patriotic, pro American side of the equation.
Speaker 1: That's allowed too, and that's what we need. The president
Speaker 1: that is taking the fight ideologically to the other side,
Speaker 1: using that tornado of energy that he has. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's like nothing else I've ever seen in somebody his
Speaker 1: age when he gets fired up, when he's really going.
Speaker 1: He's a one man political machine, and we need him
Speaker 1: out there making the case across the board in as
Speaker 1: many venues as he can, given the limitations imposed on
Speaker 1: him by the lockdown Libs and by the panic that
Speaker 1: is still ripping across this country. Unfortunately, you're in the
Speaker 1: Freedom mind. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast.
Speaker 1: There's never been two candidates or two philosophies. Let's say
Speaker 1: that are more different than what we have. I mean,
Speaker 1: we want lord order, we want strong police. We're not
Speaker 1: defunding the police. What probably could say we're doing the
Speaker 1: opposite of defunding the police. You look at Portland, that's all.
Speaker 1: That's all radical left Democrat. They want every city. It'd
Speaker 1: be like a Portland. If we didn't go out to Portland.
Speaker 1: They've done a great job, just a very small group.
Speaker 1: If we didn't go out to Portland, they would have
Speaker 1: knocked down and burned down the post office, which is
Speaker 1: a five hundred million dollars, the federal building, the courthouse
Speaker 1: which is and the post office and anything else federal.
Speaker 1: You know, we didn't go just for the courthouse. We
Speaker 1: went for every federal building there because they weren't protecting it.
Speaker 1: They were unable to protect it. But we got it
Speaker 1: to a point where it's reasonable and if we have
Speaker 1: to do something more, we'll do more. We have to
Speaker 1: straighten down that city. It's it's been a mess for
Speaker 1: years run by radical liberal Democrats. Don't assume that your opponents,
Speaker 1: your enemies, have a brilliant plan and know what they're
Speaker 1: doing right. Don't underestimate them. Don't overestimate them either. The
Speaker 1: Democrats saw an opportunity with BLM to mobilize their base,
Speaker 1: to put the Trump team on defense, to undermine security
Speaker 1: and cities across the country in a way that would
Speaker 1: then be they would try to blame on the Trump administration.
Speaker 1: But it's now looking like it's too obvious. The numbers,
Speaker 1: the homicide numbers, in particular Chicago, New York, many cities
Speaker 1: thirty six out of fifty of the top US cities
Speaker 1: in the country, big spikes at least double digits in homicides,
Speaker 1: and with homicides come all the other violent crimes too.
Speaker 1: So this is now a liability for Democrats. That's what
Speaker 1: the Trump team, that's what Trump himself, I think, is
Speaker 1: focusing in on. And it's going to be very difficult
Speaker 1: for Joe Biden and all these downballot Democrats, to all
Speaker 1: these other Democrats running in the congressional races and for
Speaker 1: Senate races to explain how it's okay that their party
Speaker 1: is the party that supports quote protesters who are really rioters, who,
Speaker 1: as we see here, are responsible for one hundred and
Speaker 1: thirteen eye injuries from lasers shot at them in Portland
Speaker 1: alone in the last few weeks. I'm just gonna say this,
Speaker 1: if somebody messes with my eye, if someone tried to
Speaker 1: blind me, I would use extreme force at my disposal
Speaker 1: to stop that from happening, and I would not feel
Speaker 1: badly about it. Someone's gonna try to blind you for
Speaker 1: the rest of your life. Definitely a baton to the
Speaker 1: head for that, if not more, I wouldn't mess around
Speaker 1: with that. That's really a form of malicious wounding through technology.
Speaker 1: You know, it's it's disgusting that these protesters do it. Remember,
Speaker 1: you fire a laser up at a helicopter or a plane,
Speaker 1: you can go to prison for I think it's five
Speaker 1: it might even be ten years of federal prison. It's
Speaker 1: a federal crime, as it should be, cause a crash
Speaker 1: very easily, to completely disorient the pilot and blind him.
Speaker 1: We think it's it's no big deal to do that
Speaker 1: to federal officers. Absolutely unacceptable. The Democrats are the party
Speaker 1: of the people trying to blind police officers. That should
Speaker 1: be the ad we run across the country. These are
Speaker 1: all Democrats doing it and Democrats supporting it. Let's not
Speaker 1: get too caught up in the terminology ought antifa leftist
Speaker 1: to a socialist. You know, we're not. We're not in
Speaker 1: a philosophy one on one class year, folks. We're in
Speaker 1: a political street fight. These are Democrats who are out
Speaker 1: there trying to burn down courthouses in Portland. They're Democrats
Speaker 1: who are causing these autonomous creating these autonomous zones in
Speaker 1: places like La Seattle, and the people looting and riding
Speaker 1: in the streets of whether it's New York or Fort
Speaker 1: Wayne in Indiana or other smaller cities that people don't
Speaker 1: even think about as being subjectists. Minneapolis. Obviously the beginnings
Speaker 1: of all of this. When you look at who's doing this,
Speaker 1: it's all on Democrat hands, just making everything worse for everyone.
Speaker 1: Instead of being the party of adult thinking and seriousness
Speaker 1: and coming up with solutions to the party of wine,
Speaker 1: cry and trash, whatever you want, just just complain the
Speaker 1: party of childishness that is the Democrat Party. And I
Speaker 1: think the President and his allies are in a strong
Speaker 1: position now to make that case, especially as their favorite
Speaker 1: thing to just terrify everybody about COVID if the numbers
Speaker 1: continue to go down in those states that are the
Speaker 1: hardest hit and by September weren't a place where it's
Speaker 1: clear we're on the other side of that curve. Oh,
Speaker 1: and they're gonna tell you it's masks and mitigation. I
Speaker 1: can tell you that right now, that's what they're gonna say. No,
Speaker 1: it's not, it's just not. But we don't at the
Speaker 1: gin into that argument right now? What is it? What
Speaker 1: is it that the Democrats are willing to say about
Speaker 1: the worst offenders from within their ranks? And I was
Speaker 1: talking about antifo? What would they say about it? Ted
Speaker 1: Cruz held the hearing on this in the Senate. Some
Speaker 1: interesting answers came from it. Thanks for listening to the
Speaker 1: Buss and Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. So
Speaker 1: what do the supposedly serious Democrats in power think about
Speaker 1: their most insane supporters? Do they disavow them? Do they
Speaker 1: criticize them? Do I have any problem with the paramilitary
Speaker 1: wing of the Democrat Party operating as it does? Senator
Speaker 1: Senator Cruz, how are they hearing about this? And at
Speaker 1: first he wanted to know. He asked Ken Cuccinelli, who's
Speaker 1: number two at DHS so we had on the show,
Speaker 1: I don't know a week or two ago. Now asked
Speaker 1: him about what the terminology specific terminology that Democrat politicians.
Speaker 1: I'm not talking about random people living in mom's basement
Speaker 1: right in the comments section of the Huffington Post or
Speaker 1: huff Post as it's called. Now, I'm talking about what
Speaker 1: do the people that are supposed to be leading the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party say about all this stuff? And here's what
Speaker 1: they say, things like stormtroopers and Gestapo when talking about
Speaker 1: our federal law enforcement officers. Remember James Comey the greatest
Speaker 1: man in the history of the world, according to libbs,
Speaker 1: because he was on an insane jihad, you know, a lanky,
Speaker 1: weirdo's jihad against Trump. And now federal officers are stormtroopers
Speaker 1: in Gestapo. Senator Cruz asked Ken Cucinelli about this play
Speaker 1: clip six. Speaker Pelosi and another senior House Democrat have
Speaker 1: referred to federal law enforcement officers working for the Department
Speaker 1: of Homeland Security as stormtroopers and Gestapo. Are there any
Speaker 1: stormtroopers or Gestapo working for DHS right now? No, mister Chairman,
Speaker 1: they're not. And it's an extremely negative and hyperbolic libel
Speaker 1: by those individuals on people who are doing their duty
Speaker 1: as professionally as they can, not just in Portland but
Speaker 1: around the country, protecting including those of us in this building. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that should be pretty straightforward. Right, You've been thinking, how
Speaker 1: does anyone disagree with this? How could anyone have a problem?
Speaker 1: These people are nuts, right, Antifa are lunatics, They're losers.
Speaker 1: They destroy things, they attack people. They'll attack journalists unless
Speaker 1: the journalists does their bidding, which a lot of journalists do.
Speaker 1: They hate Andy No out on the West Coast so
Speaker 1: much because Andy just shows what they're doing. Oh you'd think,
Speaker 1: wouldn't you, that given all the journalistic resources out there
Speaker 1: of these major media organizations, that they'd have a whole
Speaker 1: lot more worthwhile footage to show of the kind of
Speaker 1: stuff that Antifa does. But no, we have to go
Speaker 1: to Andy No to see the truth. Why is that?
Speaker 1: Because the Democrats in the media are running cover for
Speaker 1: their paramilitary wing, which is Antifa. Right, they're most hardcore activists,
Speaker 1: they're most devoted, most devoted peeps. So that's what's going
Speaker 1: on here, right, That's what we see happening. You have
Speaker 1: a representative Ianna Pressley defending Antifa members play seven. As
Speaker 1: we have seen with me, they will try to co
Speaker 1: opt it and undermine it and sanitize it and whitewash it.
Speaker 1: But the Black Lives Matter activists that are today called antifa.
Speaker 1: We're in the nineteen sixties being called communists. Okay, they
Speaker 1: were just as disruptive in agitating the status quo and
Speaker 1: just as impatient. Ah oh so, so we're going to
Speaker 1: we're going to pretend that that antifa really are anti fascists?
Speaker 1: Is that the game? Now? We're going to say that antifa,
Speaker 1: where's the fascist? And they're fighting against the Trump administration, right,
Speaker 1: the Trump administration that keeps saying they want people to
Speaker 1: go back to living their lives and making their own
Speaker 1: decisions and having freedom to move, to open their businesses,
Speaker 1: to visit relatives, to see loved ones, to not be
Speaker 1: choking themselves with a face diaper all the time. Right,
Speaker 1: isn't that? Okay, that's fascism now, No, No, this is
Speaker 1: very This is very George Orwell's nineteen eighty four in
Speaker 1: that it is the inversion of truth for the purposes
Speaker 1: of propaganda. Right, The antifa are the fascists. They want
Speaker 1: to control everything. The people that are running around trying
Speaker 1: to burn down federal courthouses, they just want to undermine
Speaker 1: the system enough that they can take control of it,
Speaker 1: don't you see. That's the point. They're not trying to
Speaker 1: burn it all down to the ground and then have
Speaker 1: a state of total anarchy because their political opponents are
Speaker 1: the ones that have a whole lot of guns. Right,
Speaker 1: they know that they're not going to try to control
Speaker 1: Red State America by bringing down the entire federal government.
Speaker 1: What do they want? They want control of that federal apparatus.
Speaker 1: They attack in it to weaken it for political purposes
Speaker 1: so then they can seize control of it their side,
Speaker 1: their party, Antifa wants Joe Biden to win. They don't
Speaker 1: actually want anarchy, right. That's what I think everyone needs
Speaker 1: to understand. This is the game they're playing. It's intentionally
Speaker 1: separated out. It's intentionally supposed to be confusing. Wait, they're
Speaker 1: they're anarchists, but they're anti fascists, and they say it's
Speaker 1: like World War two all over again, and they're fighting
Speaker 1: Nazi Germany. Now I don't know that they're just they're
Speaker 1: just attacking the the edifice of the state right now,
Speaker 1: to create disunity, to undermine its ability to protect us,
Speaker 1: to make people think that there's no point in voting,
Speaker 1: to make people think there's no point in having Trump
Speaker 1: in charge. Can't defend cities can't defend courthouses, you know,
Speaker 1: demoralize your opponents, and then you bring in the leftist overlords.
Speaker 1: Then you bring in the people that are going to
Speaker 1: tell you what to do all the time. That's that's
Speaker 1: the strategy. This is all, this is all part of
Speaker 1: the Democrat seizure of power that they're planning this fall.
Speaker 1: It's these are these are separate, as separate efforts as
Speaker 1: part of the same overall movement. And if you wanted
Speaker 1: to see just how unwilling they are to speak the
Speaker 1: truth about this or even just to openly criticize the antiva,
Speaker 1: which should be so easy. Why would anyone not do that?
Speaker 1: Here's Maizie Horrono. I do think the dumbest member of Congress,
Speaker 1: and I'm just gonna I think that's fair. I think
Speaker 1: she's the least intellectually capable member of the United States Congress.
Speaker 1: There are some others that are close. I'm not going
Speaker 1: to say that she's far and away, but I certainly
Speaker 1: the dumbest senator. I think Congress is too much the
Speaker 1: dumbest senator. They are dumber people in the Congress, but
Speaker 1: here she is when she's asked about about this and
Speaker 1: Ted Cruiz is having his hearing. She doesn't want the
Speaker 1: hearing to go on. He's want to hear about Antiva
Speaker 1: play clib four. So I hope this is the end
Speaker 1: of this hearing, mister Chairman, and that we don't have
Speaker 1: to listen to any more of your rhetorical speeches. Thank
Speaker 1: you very much. I'm leaving well. I appreciate the as
Speaker 1: always kind and uplifting words of Senator Horona, and I
Speaker 1: would also note that throughout her remark she still did
Speaker 1: not say a negative word about Antifa, nor has any
Speaker 1: Democrat here. They instead engage in a political game where
Speaker 1: they depend. You're welcome to say something negative about Antifa
Speaker 1: right now. I think that I've covered the subject quite well. Okay,
Speaker 1: she declined to speak, so that is the position of
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party. I would note also that of the
Speaker 1: seven Democratic senators who spoke, not a one of them
Speaker 1: apologized for or denounced multiple Democrats calling law enforcement officers Nazis, stormtroopers,
Speaker 1: and Gashapa. To be fair, I don't have not heard
Speaker 1: the word Nazi, but stormtrooper was Nancy Pelosi and Gastapo
Speaker 1: was another Democratic leader. This is really meaningful. I know
Speaker 1: that there's so much that can get lost in the
Speaker 1: political back and forth and oh, is this just partisan gamesmanship?
Speaker 1: And it's meaningful that the Democrats have embraced an anti
Speaker 1: law enforcement position because it's a culmination of their overall
Speaker 1: rejection of objective truth and their moral relativism. They don't
Speaker 1: think that the law can just be enforced as the law.
Speaker 1: The law has to be enforced within a political context
Speaker 1: that they are constantly making and remaking to suit their whims.
Speaker 1: In the moment, right, the law is inherently problematic. Criminal
Speaker 1: law specifically is inherently problematic for the Democrat left wing mentality,
Speaker 1: which we see them distroying it and destroying it and
Speaker 1: undermining basic principles of it. I mean, whether they're pretending
Speaker 1: that the presumptionould of innocence no longer counts for anything
Speaker 1: in the Kavanaugh hearing, or trying to tear down a
Speaker 1: federal courthouse actually destroy the courthouse itself. That they will
Speaker 1: undermine any aspects of the law because the law is
Speaker 1: an impediment to their goals and their designs on this society.
Speaker 1: A law that is equally enforced and that is applicable
Speaker 1: to all of us and that we all have to
Speaker 1: live under and that can be understood as it is written,
Speaker 1: that statutes have real meaning, not just a collection of
Speaker 1: words that to be reinterpreted into meaninglessness or into something
Speaker 1: that they don't say. That's all a problem for the
Speaker 1: Democrat mentality. You remember, they believe in moral relativism, you know,
Speaker 1: break it down, take it to its its philosophical roots.
Speaker 1: They believe in moral relativism. They believe that there is
Speaker 1: no such thing as eternal and universal truth. They reject
Speaker 1: natural law, they reject individual individual rights as divinely endowed. No,
Speaker 1: it's all from the state. Whoever controls the government, controls you,
Speaker 1: controls everything. That's their view, that's their worldview. They're not
Speaker 1: going to back away from this. That's not going to change.
Speaker 1: And if that's how you view things, why would you
Speaker 1: undermine Antifa? They're they're very useful in creating chaos that
Speaker 1: can then be exploited. What could be easier than saying
Speaker 1: people who are rioting night after night two months straight
Speaker 1: in a major American city and are doing so partially
Speaker 1: under the banner of the BLM movement, partially under the
Speaker 1: banner of you know, Antifa and the you know, the Democrats,
Speaker 1: shock troops there are all the oh and then the
Speaker 1: moms against the moms against whatever cops or whatever they're
Speaker 1: calling themselves. Now, all this nonsense, all this nonsense that
Speaker 1: these libs do. It should be so straightforward to condemn
Speaker 1: these this outrageous behavior, but also these violations of law.
Speaker 1: And they won't do it. They will not. Democrats will
Speaker 1: not do this because they know that if they open
Speaker 1: that up, then all of a sudden, there may be requests, well,
Speaker 1: what about this other group that was looting and rioting
Speaker 1: and destroying what about the BLM movement? Up to this point,
Speaker 1: They they allow their their minions, their shock troops to
Speaker 1: go out there and and intimidate people and get all
Speaker 1: angry and put this stuff on social media and make
Speaker 1: it seem like there's a much bigger movement of radical
Speaker 1: leftism in this country when it comes to the average
Speaker 1: American than there really is. All because it benefits the
Speaker 1: benefits the Democrat Party. So they're not going to stop
Speaker 1: any of that. They're not going to have a problem
Speaker 1: with it. They're not going to say a word about it.
Speaker 1: Republicans are the ones who unnecessarily apologize for their team,
Speaker 1: apologize for us, like, oh, you know, we shouldn't have
Speaker 1: done this. Oh, we're so sorry. Democrats never do that,
Speaker 1: never ever do that. And I think we're all starting
Speaker 1: to see more and more why that is, especially in
Speaker 1: this election cycle. Oh there's one more mazy Herono moment
Speaker 1: right before she walked out of the Ted Cruise hearing
Speaker 1: that I want, I want you to hear play Cliff ten.
Speaker 1: And now there are all these attacks about Black Lives
Speaker 1: Matter and what they're saying. I mean, how many of
Speaker 1: us even think that defunding police departments is it should
Speaker 1: be taken literally? I mean I certainly don't. So you know,
Speaker 1: we have this pesky thing called freedom of speech, and
Speaker 1: i'd say the people who support Black Lives Matter, and
Speaker 1: if they're calling for various boycotts and all that, that's
Speaker 1: called freedom of speech. And that's what this hearing title
Speaker 1: is protecting speech. So all I can see is, look,
Speaker 1: we should all join hands and denouncing and whatever words
Speaker 1: you want to use about violent extremism of all stripes.
Speaker 1: And I think we can all agree on that. So
Speaker 1: it's to constantly accuse Democrats of not caring about that
Speaker 1: is really I can only say that you aren't listening
Speaker 1: denounce violent extremism of all stripes. Okay, what about the
Speaker 1: specific violent extremism that has been defining the Democrat Party's
Speaker 1: movement and reelection prospects for twenty twenty. How about that?
Speaker 1: But no, not going to talk about it. Notice how
Speaker 1: Democrats when they want to talk about black lives matter,
Speaker 1: if you bring up blue lives matter, all lives matter,
Speaker 1: you're horrible. We're focused on this. And then when you
Speaker 1: want to talk about Antifa and what they're doing, it's, oh,
Speaker 1: it's everything right, it's all violent extremism. So there's no consistency.
Speaker 1: There never will be any consistency with them because they're frauds.
Speaker 1: They're frauds, and they're they're pushing is what is effectively
Speaker 1: now a morally and intellectually bankrupt ideology on the United States.
Speaker 1: I would not have said that about the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: twenty years ago. That's where the Democratic Party is today.
Speaker 1: It thrives on abortion, racial division, socialism, state control of
Speaker 1: every aspect of your life, climate change, worship, and what
Speaker 1: else do you want to throw it? Nothing good? There's
Speaker 1: nothing the Democrats offer up or I'm like, yeah, you
Speaker 1: know what that would make my life better? Good stuff? Oh,
Speaker 1: the free healthcare that's not really free, that's actually just
Speaker 1: a tax on a lot of working people to give
Speaker 1: to some other people in order to have everybody have subpar,
Speaker 1: mediocre at best healthcare. I'm not looking forward to that,
Speaker 1: not rushing out to get more of that. Nothing. The
Speaker 1: Democrats offer up right now as a as a agor
Speaker 1: part of their platform. They're they're not They're not even
Speaker 1: for putting America first. They're not even for limiting US
Speaker 1: military interventions or continued occupations overseas anymore. You know. They're
Speaker 1: just for whatever Trump is against. That's it. They're just
Speaker 1: an opposition to the party that says, hey, look, life
Speaker 1: is not perfect. Political parties, politicians not perfect. Let's do
Speaker 1: the best we can based on reason, logic, history, and
Speaker 1: the law. That seems pretty pretty good. Loadstar to me,
Speaker 1: right not. The Democrats make it all up as you
Speaker 1: go along. Relativism one hundred. That's the plan. That's what
Speaker 1: they offer you. You're in the freedom hunt. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Oh and just when
Speaker 1: you thought it couldn't get any dumber among the Democrats
Speaker 1: these days. Guests who weighs in Joe's Arboro really among
Speaker 1: the biggest frauds. It's like the Lincoln Project created a
Speaker 1: TV news anchor, right, I mean, it's like that they
Speaker 1: made him in a lab. He weighs in on Trump's
Speaker 1: axeosed interview, which Trump was hammered by the media for this.
Speaker 1: And here's what Scarborough adds in the mix play fourteen.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump cannot even say that John Lewis was impressive man.
Speaker 1: And he brought up repeatedly, this poor, tortured, twisted soul,
Speaker 1: brought up repeatedly that John Lewis did not attend his
Speaker 1: inauguration four years ago. So as this American icon, this
Speaker 1: American angel, our saint is, as John meets him, calls him,
Speaker 1: is lying in state. Donald Trump can't even say anything
Speaker 1: nice about him. Is that because he's extraordinarily small or
Speaker 1: he's still sending signals out to white nationalists like David
Speaker 1: Duke who say that his election was great for America.
Speaker 1: Probably a combination of body all right, all right, all right,
Speaker 1: I just they're gonna start talking about David David Duke
Speaker 1: only exists in the minds of Democrats at election time
Speaker 1: to attack Republicans. It's it's the most consistent thing you
Speaker 1: could ever see in American politics every election cycle Democrats
Speaker 1: and there their lackeys like Scarborough, you know, doing whatever
Speaker 1: the Democrat tell him for a paycheck. They will bring
Speaker 1: up David Duke again. You never hear about this guy
Speaker 1: except at election time to attack Republicans. And now we're
Speaker 1: gonna hear about white nationalists again too, which it's just insane, folks,
Speaker 1: but they're not gonna stop. They're gonna throw everything you've
Speaker 1: thrown a Trump in the past at him again. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the Buses and Show podcast. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. So we're seeing what's really going
Speaker 1: on with the teachers unions now in a way that
Speaker 1: I've got to say, I'm I'm pleased in a sense,
Speaker 1: I'm pleased that there's greater clarity now than there has
Speaker 1: been a long time about what the teachers unions really
Speaker 1: stand for. And if you're wondering in New York, they
Speaker 1: have shown up to protests carrying fake coffins or I
Speaker 1: guess just coffins without bodies of them, and guillotines, and
Speaker 1: they have they have been chanting things. This is this
Speaker 1: is the line. I'm trying to find for you. Children
Speaker 1: cannot learn if they're dead. That's what they're saying in
Speaker 1: this New York Post article. That's right. If they have
Speaker 1: to go to school, they're gonna die. Children are gonna die.
Speaker 1: Everyone's gonna Meanwhile, I know from my grocery store, my neighborhood,
Speaker 1: where I've been going in person to get groceries since
Speaker 1: the beginning of the pandemic, including when New York was
Speaker 1: the worst hit place in the entire world. People have
Speaker 1: been showing up to do their job there for months
Speaker 1: and months and months, interacting with adults in close quarters.
Speaker 1: And they're fine. So I just I want to know,
Speaker 1: is that an unacceptable health hazard? They're doing their jobs.
Speaker 1: The people who work in the building where I live,
Speaker 1: you know, the guys who work in maintenance, and the
Speaker 1: people who work in the package room, they're doing their jobs.
Speaker 1: I'm doing my job. A lot of you are doing
Speaker 1: your jobs, if you're fortunate enough to still have one,
Speaker 1: considering the government has basically shut us down and told
Speaker 1: us that we're not allowed to work. In a lot
Speaker 1: of places, teachers aren't supposed to do their job. Why
Speaker 1: Why don't I haven't seen a good because they might
Speaker 1: get COVID. Everybody might get COVID from walking out of
Speaker 1: their house. But you're also seeing that they know, they
Speaker 1: know that there's an election coming up and that the
Speaker 1: Democrats are a necessary constituency. I'm sorry, the teachers unions
Speaker 1: are necessary constituency for the Democrat party to get elected.
Speaker 1: Right that The power, the money that goes into Democrat
Speaker 1: coffers from Futures Unions, Immense teachers Unions, American Federation of Teachers,
Speaker 1: all these different groups. They're like a giant pack for Democrats,
Speaker 1: a political action committee for them, with enormous donations from
Speaker 1: all over the country, in a tremendous amount of political
Speaker 1: power and ability to mobilize. That's what this is about.
Speaker 1: And it's not about kids, But that just goes to
Speaker 1: show you too. These are people that are going to
Speaker 1: be showing up at lease in New York and trying
Speaker 1: to teach your children. They think it's it's reasonable to
Speaker 1: dress up in skeleton costumes and carry coffins and guillotines
Speaker 1: and say children can't learn if they're dead. When will's
Speaker 1: kids be allowed to go back to school? Oh? This
Speaker 1: is all based on the whim of Democrat politicians. We
Speaker 1: understand that right there is no future in which they're
Speaker 1: is a hundred percent safety that can be guaranteed for
Speaker 1: children in any school anywhere from disease, and not just
Speaker 1: from COVID nineteen. Every year children die from the flu,
Speaker 1: that is what happens. No discussion about this, somehow, no
Speaker 1: discussion about how we never shut down schools in the past,
Speaker 1: even for very bad flu seasons. So why are we
Speaker 1: doing this? You know, Chicago is now the third largest
Speaker 1: school district in the country shutdown. New York may be
Speaker 1: open partially. They're still figuring out the plan. Going back
Speaker 1: and forth on this. What are the chances that Democrats
Speaker 1: sweep to election victories if most school districts in the country,
Speaker 1: most major school districts in the country are shut down.
Speaker 1: I think everyone realizes it's a bit higher. This is
Speaker 1: an intensely political issue. Europe has opened up their schools,
Speaker 1: so why can't we open up our schools. No one
Speaker 1: seems to answer this question. Places that have been worse
Speaker 1: hit by coronavirus than we have as a country have
Speaker 1: schools open and they're fine. I'm not saying there's no cases.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying there's no risk. But since when do
Speaker 1: we run public policy based on a promise of zero risk?
Speaker 1: We've we don't do that. Democrats will try that sometimes
Speaker 1: with gun laws. If it saves one life, they'll say, so,
Speaker 1: we don't do that with anything else in public life.
Speaker 1: If it saves one life, we're going to dramatically change
Speaker 1: a fundamental right, or we're going to make sweeping policy
Speaker 1: based upon this if it could theoretically save one life.
Speaker 1: That's not the way we run a society. It's not
Speaker 1: that we run a country, because there's no end of that.
Speaker 1: There are a lot of things you could do to
Speaker 1: save just one life, all right, at a lot of things.
Speaker 1: You can ban all bicycles or dangers, ban all bicycles
Speaker 1: across the country, not how to ride a bicycle. People
Speaker 1: die every year running on bicycles. You're gonna ban them all? No, right,
Speaker 1: we don't have to go down this road. But it's philosophically,
Speaker 1: this is where the Democrats are. They're making false arguments constantly,
Speaker 1: they're making arguments in bad faith. And if you're wondering
Speaker 1: how that's possible, they have people like the the worst mayor,
Speaker 1: the worst mayor in the United States of America. I
Speaker 1: know some of you are yelling out the mayor from
Speaker 1: your city because if you're in a major city. And
Speaker 1: I know we got we got listeners in San Diego
Speaker 1: and in Austin, and in Minneapolis and in Baltimore, and
Speaker 1: we got a lot of cities, a lot of cities
Speaker 1: with crap mayors. But I still claim I think I'm
Speaker 1: number We're number one. Not I'm we're number one here
Speaker 1: in New York with Bill Deblasio, the worst mayor in America.
Speaker 1: And here is we had this this storm system in
Speaker 1: the Camp three yesterday. I think about half a dozen
Speaker 1: people were killed by falling debris, and you know it's
Speaker 1: it was a very serious storm. Here's what de Blasio
Speaker 1: says was the reason for this play play thirteen. Let's
Speaker 1: talk about the bigger reality. What we're seeing here, and
Speaker 1: what we've been seeing now for years, is the result
Speaker 1: of global warming. We've been seeing more and more pressure
Speaker 1: on coastal areas all around the world. Some of you
Speaker 1: may have been following the horrible flooding in Bangladesh right now.
Speaker 1: We have a big Bangladeshi community here in this city.
Speaker 1: We're seeing problems in cities all over the world because
Speaker 1: of global warming. This is not an abstraction. Ah, We're
Speaker 1: shut down. We're facing the rental and retail apocalypse in
Speaker 1: America's largest city. I've seen it. I mean I've walked
Speaker 1: around streets. I went to the Upper east Side, which
Speaker 1: is the one of the fanciest, most well known neighborhoods
Speaker 1: in all of New York City, and I went there
Speaker 1: to get my hair cut, because they need to get
Speaker 1: a haircut. I walk around. There's store empty storefronts everywhere.
Speaker 1: I've never seen anything like it. I've never seen so
Speaker 1: many empty storefronts in the retail and commercial sector of
Speaker 1: the Upper east Side. And you've got people that are
Speaker 1: going to be getting evicted from that now, probably not
Speaker 1: in the wealth his neighborhoods, but and the rest of
Speaker 1: the city getting evicted from their apartments. And Deblasio wants
Speaker 1: us to worry about flooding in other cities because of
Speaker 1: global warming. This guy's a loon. He is a loon.
Speaker 1: And that's what I think we all need to recognize her.
Speaker 1: That's what I think we all need to understand. The
Speaker 1: people that are in charge, that are calling the shots
Speaker 1: in a lot of places across America, are a bunch
Speaker 1: of irresponsible dumbasses. Let's just say it, let's understand it,
Speaker 1: let's be very clear about it. And then we also
Speaker 1: have the showdown right now over whether we're going to
Speaker 1: get a trillion dollars sent to cities across this country
Speaker 1: courtesy of the federal government, state and local governments. I
Speaker 1: should say, as a result of the shortfalls from COVID nineteen,
Speaker 1: you know, New York feels like it can stay shut
Speaker 1: down and a lot of other cities like this to
Speaker 1: stay in a relative state of shutdown as long as
Speaker 1: they need to, because you know, taxpayer is going to
Speaker 1: backstop all this anyway, so we'll keep all of our
Speaker 1: stuff going. Well. The Republicans are given a little bit
Speaker 1: of fight back on this, not nearly enough fight on
Speaker 1: a whole lot of things, but they are pushing back
Speaker 1: on this a little bit. So you know what de
Speaker 1: Blasio is saying at a time when the city of
Speaker 1: New York has and I'm using this really as the
Speaker 1: canary in the coal mine for the rest of you,
Speaker 1: because you're going to see this happen in your state,
Speaker 1: in your city, especially if it's if either those things
Speaker 1: are blue, which if you're in a city. It definitely
Speaker 1: is blue. Your state maybe, but even places like Texas
Speaker 1: are going to have big problems as a result of this.
Speaker 1: If this continues, you have the threat to fire. At
Speaker 1: a time when New York has skyrocketing murder rate relative
Speaker 1: to what it was last year, you have a threat
Speaker 1: to just completely implode this place. Play play eighty. I'm
Speaker 1: sorry eight. Well, my challenge is where am I going
Speaker 1: to have the people to do this work. I may
Speaker 1: have to do as many as layoffs of twenty two
Speaker 1: thousand city employees from every department by October first if
Speaker 1: I don't get federal help. So I know we can
Speaker 1: handle all these problems. We've proven we can before, but
Speaker 1: we can't do it without the skilled personnel, the cops,
Speaker 1: the firefighters, the healthcare workers, the teachers. That's the biggest
Speaker 1: threat right now. What if that federal aid doesn't come
Speaker 1: and time is a wasting will? Now, the Democrats, as
Speaker 1: you know, philosophically, are committed to spending as much money
Speaker 1: as they want, whenever they want. Right. That's there that
Speaker 1: they think that that the federal government creates wealth, that
Speaker 1: it makes some amount. Now, at some level that is true.
Speaker 1: If the federal government put a million dollars in your
Speaker 1: bank account, you would be a millionaire. Or some of
Speaker 1: you listeners probably are congratulations. But you know, if they
Speaker 1: put a million dollars in your account, you're a millionaire.
Speaker 1: If the government put a million dollars in every American's
Speaker 1: bank account, right, just to work through our thought experiment,
Speaker 1: they would destroy American currency in the US economy. Right,
Speaker 1: it would not The dollar would no longer be worth anything,
Speaker 1: The reserve currency status would go away. We would have
Speaker 1: huge problems. Right. We would effectively to dissolve America in
Speaker 1: real time if they did that. Now they're not saying
Speaker 1: they're going to do that, but they are saying, let's
Speaker 1: spend us into oblivion. A Reuter's piece just from a
Speaker 1: few a few hours ago. As dollars slides, some investors
Speaker 1: fret about its status as world's reserve currency, potentially accelerating
Speaker 1: the green accelerating what has been a slow erosion the
Speaker 1: green back status as the dominant reserve currency. This piece
Speaker 1: says investors and analysts, including billionaire hedge fund manager Ray
Speaker 1: Dalio and Goldman Sachs Group strategists are among those who
Speaker 1: have warned that massive US government spending could really hurt
Speaker 1: the dollar. At the same time, rock bottom US interest
Speaker 1: rates for the foreseeable future and concerns over a potential
Speaker 1: rise in inflation are denting the dollars appeal. These factors
Speaker 1: are already weighing on The dollar stands nine percent below
Speaker 1: it's high of the year and notch the worst monthly
Speaker 1: performance in a decade in July. This is this Reuter's piece.
Speaker 1: It's very important, folks. This affects everything. And if you
Speaker 1: care about the economy or not, the economy cares about you.
Speaker 1: And this is the foundation of our economy that is
Speaker 1: getting chipped at, kicked at, blasted by the reckless spending
Speaker 1: and the government policies that we've seen for a long time.
Speaker 1: But they've gotten a lot worse recently. Changes that they
Speaker 1: affect the dollars reserve currency status have historically been glacial,
Speaker 1: according to the chief strategist at Deutchrich Bank, Lately they
Speaker 1: have been speeding up. The dollars dominance endows the US
Speaker 1: with many benefits, range it from an outsized influence over
Speaker 1: the world's financial system to giving it the power to
Speaker 1: flex its muscle abroad by punishing rivals and bringing errant
Speaker 1: foreign players to heal. For the world central bankers, the
Speaker 1: dollar remains the reserve currency of choice by far. The
Speaker 1: dollars share of global central bank reserve stood at sixty
Speaker 1: two percent the first compared with twenty percent for their
Speaker 1: Euro and one point nine percent for the yawn Let's.
Speaker 1: According the IMF four in holdings of US treasuries, considered
Speaker 1: among the world's safest investments, rose to six point eight
Speaker 1: six trillion in May. The only reason, as I see it,
Speaker 1: that we have not had a much more rapid deceleration
Speaker 1: than dollar is that the whole world is in a
Speaker 1: state of economic difficulty. Right, so we might be still
Speaker 1: better relative to the rest. But if other countries are
Speaker 1: opening up and get going and get their economies, you
Speaker 1: get not just COVID under control, but get their economies
Speaker 1: roaring again. China's the one. We're obviously looking at them
Speaker 1: most closely for this the disparity, that the shift that
Speaker 1: can happen will be sudden and impactful, It will be meaningful.
Speaker 1: And what do we do then? What do we do
Speaker 1: then when people start to say, well, you know, the
Speaker 1: US is still dragging this out, dragging this out, China's
Speaker 1: up and running again. Maybe I got to start thinking
Speaker 1: about buying more Chinese Chinese renman b or Chinese Wan
Speaker 1: going forward. Maybe that's where I want, and maybe maybe
Speaker 1: I want I want the Chinese government to owe me money,
Speaker 1: not the US government. My friends, if that happens, we
Speaker 1: are all, every single person listening to this, everyone in
Speaker 1: America all in a worse financial situation than we are
Speaker 1: right now. If that becomes the global perception, what do
Speaker 1: you think the Chinese are planning with all this? Why
Speaker 1: do you think the Chinese are doing what they're doing
Speaker 1: lately visa vi Us and the rest of the world.
Speaker 1: Why even they didn't try to stop the virus from
Speaker 1: getting outside of their own borders. They're playing a game
Speaker 1: of great power politics, and we have Joe Biden not
Speaker 1: passing the cognitive test of giving an interview where he
Speaker 1: doesn't sound like a moron. You're in the Freedom Money.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. I'm not
Speaker 1: the only one who thinks old man Biden is a
Speaker 1: laughable option for the presidency based just on his current state.
Speaker 1: Joe Rogan, biggest podcaster in the world and a guy
Speaker 1: with a lot of a lot of influence on the
Speaker 1: national conversation without seeming like he's trying too hard to
Speaker 1: have it right. You got Rogan, you got stool President Day,
Speaker 1: Dave Portnoy, These guys, they have far more influence on
Speaker 1: what particularly American males are thinking than CBS Evening News.
Speaker 1: At one of these places, Here's what Rogan said. Rogan
Speaker 1: said he's gonna vote for Bernie Sanders. Now, I'll say this,
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders a crazy commie, but I never heard him
Speaker 1: starts spouting gibberish and everything. You know, so you can
Speaker 1: make a case that Bernie Sanders even though wait, I
Speaker 1: think he's a little older than Biden. I think producer
Speaker 1: Nick check me out, Producer Mark checked me on that one.
Speaker 1: But Sanders that never seemed like he lacked clarity up
Speaker 1: up top, so to speak. Here's what Joe Rogan says
Speaker 1: about bidenleven. I believe there's an also large group of
Speaker 1: people that are very uncomfortable with a man who seems
Speaker 1: to be mentally compromised winning the election and doing so
Speaker 1: by hiding. I mean the guys never he was just
Speaker 1: that another thing the other day and he forgot where
Speaker 1: he was. Why is that okay? I mean the Democrats
Speaker 1: have created this circumstance where they're all just gonna have
Speaker 1: to look you in the eye and say, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, Biden's great. We don't see any decline in
Speaker 1: his cognitive ability. We don't see any problem here whatsoever. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: what they what they'll put Trump through, which is just maddening,
Speaker 1: is no matter what he says, no matter what he says,
Speaker 1: they will trash it. And they well this has always
Speaker 1: been the case, I know that. But no matter, no
Speaker 1: matter what the subject matter is, they'll distort what he
Speaker 1: says just to fit into the Trump is. You know,
Speaker 1: Trump is in ignoramis and he's the worst and all
Speaker 1: this other stuff that they say. Play, here's the president
Speaker 1: trying to differ wrentiate absentee ballots and the systems in
Speaker 1: place for them from a universal mail and voting program
Speaker 1: the Democrats want to institute weeks before a nationwide election
Speaker 1: during a pandemic. Play seventeen absentee is okay because you
Speaker 1: have to go through a process, Brian. And you go
Speaker 1: through a process, and you make a request and they
Speaker 1: send it to you and you get it and you
Speaker 1: fill it out, and it's a process, and it's a
Speaker 1: smaller number. What they're going to do is blanket the state.
Speaker 1: Anybody that ever walked Frankly will get one. And you know,
Speaker 1: the governor's a clubhouse politician. He's somebody that Frankly was
Speaker 1: shocking and shocking what he did, more shocking what he
Speaker 1: did without town halls, without meetings, without the public. They
Speaker 1: went out and they just approved this ridiculous system, and
Speaker 1: the Post office will never be equipped to handle it.
Speaker 1: And you see it in New York in a much
Speaker 1: smaller scale, we have a congressional race. Carolyn Maloney, a congresswoman. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the scale matters here, right, the planning matters. This this
Speaker 1: pretense that oh, it's just so here, we're just gonna
Speaker 1: all the mail. They're gonna be sending ballots in that
Speaker 1: that you know, there's no quality control and this whatsoever.
Speaker 1: They're gonna be sending ballots to people who are either
Speaker 1: dead or don't exist, or are registered or don't live there.
Speaker 1: They'll be balants floating around. They'll allow ballot harvesting. People
Speaker 1: can show up and take a balance to say, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: this was you know John so and So's ballot and
Speaker 1: hand it in. In New York, they're even saying they're
Speaker 1: even counting balances that we're in postmark by the date
Speaker 1: because they said there's a problem with the postmarking system.
Speaker 1: Well imagine that. I mean, now that means you could
Speaker 1: have voted a week late. Yeah, I don't know. It's
Speaker 1: it's just there's no there's no effort whatsoever to be
Speaker 1: fair minded about this. Trump explained the difference, and the
Speaker 1: media flipped out about this always. Now he says that
Speaker 1: Florida can do mail and yeah, well there's some place
Speaker 1: is that I've been doing a mail in program for
Speaker 1: a long time. Enough greater preparation nationwide mail in balloting.
Speaker 1: We all know. We just did this in New York. Okay,
Speaker 1: we just ran this, Karlin Maloney, Member of Congress, Democrat.
Speaker 1: We just saw what happens and it's a disaster. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to The bus Essen Show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Before I begin, it is day forty
Speaker 1: two of the botched New York City primary, where still
Speaker 1: there is no election results in one congressional race. This,
Speaker 1: as the New York Times notes, is due to quote
Speaker 1: the day lose of four hundred thousand mail in ballots.
Speaker 1: Previewing the quote challenges facing the nation as it looks
Speaker 1: towards conducting the November general election with mass mail in voting. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's been a disaster. There you have White House Press
Speaker 1: Secretory Kelly mckinnerny just establishing for anyone listening exactly what
Speaker 1: a mess mail in balloting has been in New York.
Speaker 1: And remember that the Democrat mentality and all of this
Speaker 1: is going to be that they want mail in balloting
Speaker 1: because it'll either help them win or if they lose,
Speaker 1: they'll claim that it was a fraudulent election and the
Speaker 1: Republicans cheated, and they will even I've told you this,
Speaker 1: this has been my prediction. They will even say that
Speaker 1: mail in balloting that they demanded was abused and part
Speaker 1: of the fraud so that they get what they want,
Speaker 1: and then they claim if they lose, then in getting
Speaker 1: what they want, they made the election less secure. Democrats
Speaker 1: have no principles about this stuff. They don't care. They
Speaker 1: don't care, and if you try and speak some sense
Speaker 1: to them about any of this, they get very very snippy.
Speaker 1: CNN anchor just we don't even need to say her name,
Speaker 1: doesn't matter. A CNN anchor, another one one of their
Speaker 1: kind of second tier second team folks or at CNN
Speaker 1: has decided that, yeah, you know, they're just going to
Speaker 1: all be partisans now, even the ones that we're kind
Speaker 1: of pretending that they're just going to read the news
Speaker 1: and oh, I'm a journalist, they're all partisans. And here
Speaker 1: she is with Mercedes Schlap talking about about voter fraud,
Speaker 1: and the claim at the CNN anchor made was that
Speaker 1: there is no voter fraud. Now we can debate how
Speaker 1: much voter fraud there is, but the statement there is
Speaker 1: no voter fraud is incorrect. People go to prison every
Speaker 1: year for voter fraud. Voter fraud exists, and we probably
Speaker 1: catch a very small percentage of what does exist. We
Speaker 1: don't know. There's really no systematic way to gauge something
Speaker 1: that's that. You know, how many are Let me ask
Speaker 1: you this, how many people go to prison every year
Speaker 1: for cheating on their taxes? Not very many people do
Speaker 1: go to prison for it. How many people do you
Speaker 1: think in America are cheating on their taxes? We all
Speaker 1: understand intuitively it's a lot, it's a lot, but very
Speaker 1: people like I should go to prison out. I'm out.
Speaker 1: I'm somebody who believes that really you should just make
Speaker 1: financial restitution and pay a fine. I don't believe that
Speaker 1: people should go to prison, especially at first time offense,
Speaker 1: for tax violations. Maybe if they're like agreed to, you know,
Speaker 1: if you refuse to ever pay income tax or something.
Speaker 1: But I think it should be very very hard to
Speaker 1: get sent to prison for tax fraud. And it's pretty
Speaker 1: that said, there's not that many people that go every year.
Speaker 1: But I'm just using it to illustrate the example. We
Speaker 1: know it exists, we know what happens, and just because
Speaker 1: we don't catch it all the time, that doesn't mean
Speaker 1: that we know what the real scale of it is.
Speaker 1: Same thing can be said or voter fraud. We know
Speaker 1: it exists, we know what happens, people do go to
Speaker 1: prison for it. But the belief that anybody has, that
Speaker 1: any Democrat of course now conveniently would have, that voter
Speaker 1: fraud is not a real concern. This is just based
Speaker 1: on what they think should be true, not what is true.
Speaker 1: And when you try to call them out on this,
Speaker 1: you get stuff like this play three. You're saying, you're
Speaker 1: saying that voter fraud is a thing, and I'm telling
Speaker 1: you that it's not, and you're muddying the waters. And
Speaker 1: I also want isn't that don't you worry that that's
Speaker 1: going to actually hurt you? I mean, isn't that to
Speaker 1: the point why the President has said when they have
Speaker 1: left Mercedes, I'm asking I'm just Mercedes, Mercedes, we can
Speaker 1: have this is like, so this is just pointless. Okay,
Speaker 1: this is pointless. I get it. You're just saying a
Speaker 1: bunch of crap. Okay, you're saying a bunch of crap.
Speaker 1: I tell you what, now talking about what? No, No,
Speaker 1: we're talking about voting in a pandemic. We're talking to Okay,
Speaker 1: you don't let them have a conversation with them. We're
Speaker 1: talking about voting in a pandemic. What you're saying is
Speaker 1: a bunch of crap. What would you ever would you
Speaker 1: ever see anyone on CNN as an anchor, a news
Speaker 1: anchor say to a member of the Biden campaign or
Speaker 1: advisor the Biden campaign or you know whatever, uh, that
Speaker 1: what they're saying is a bunch of crap. After saying
Speaker 1: something as demonstrably stupidly false as voter fraud is not
Speaker 1: a thing, it's not a thing. It is a thing.
Speaker 1: You can say, it's not a big thing. Fine, it
Speaker 1: is a thing. Right, What would you ever say to
Speaker 1: somebody police shooting unarmed police shooting unarmed civilians is not
Speaker 1: a thing, doesn't exist. No, that would be wrong. In fact,
Speaker 1: it's very rare. But Democrats insist we talk about it
Speaker 1: all the time. Right, it's incredibly rare. But we have
Speaker 1: to talk about all the time. But I can't say
Speaker 1: to you and expect not to be criticized for saying
Speaker 1: something untrue. Police never shoot unarmed innocent people. Right, So
Speaker 1: this is what I mean. We all have to play
Speaker 1: by the same rules. Either statement is true or it
Speaker 1: is not. There is no voter fraud. Voter fraud is
Speaker 1: not a thing that exists. Is incorrect, It's a lie.
Speaker 1: We can argue about this severity of it. But you see,
Speaker 1: this is really just jockeying for what will be jockeying
Speaker 1: for position, for what will be best for Democrats win
Speaker 1: the election. Of course, of course, Well, I have to go.
Speaker 1: I wait in line to go to the ups store,
Speaker 1: to go to Goo Goo get groceries. You know, I
Speaker 1: eat at restaurants outdoors. Now I'm doing all these things here,
Speaker 1: and yeah, there's these annoying restrictions. I got the mask
Speaker 1: and a social distancing and all this stuff. I'm not
Speaker 1: going to do this to vote once. Really, I gotta
Speaker 1: tell you, folks, it's it's pretty transparent what they're doing.
Speaker 1: But they don't care that they have no integrity to protect,
Speaker 1: which means that they have they have a lot of leeway,
Speaker 1: a lot of things that they can do here. And
Speaker 1: I'm also wondering what happens when it assuming. And I
Speaker 1: don't know. And I understand some things about COVID nineteen
Speaker 1: in terms of predictions, I've been very correct. On other things,
Speaker 1: I've been wrong, and I will admit that to you.
Speaker 1: A lot of other people will never admit these sorts
Speaker 1: of things, you know. They want to pretend that they're
Speaker 1: perfect and they're all seeing and all this other stuff.
Speaker 1: I did think that in the summer it would go
Speaker 1: down dramatically as the flu does. Didn't have happened. There
Speaker 1: are some reasons that people are theorizing about that, but
Speaker 1: that was a surprise to me. Right, I do think
Speaker 1: that we are in the downward slope. This is just
Speaker 1: based on the data trend right now, I do think
Speaker 1: we're in the downward slope of a lot of these
Speaker 1: major outbreaks across the country in large states with big populations,
Speaker 1: and they're going to mirror what we've seen happen in
Speaker 1: New York and New Jersey, where you had a terrible outbreak.
Speaker 1: And now I think we had four people die in
Speaker 1: New York State from COVID Night four. There are twenty
Speaker 1: million people in New York State. Four of them died
Speaker 1: from COVID nineteen. And we're still we're still like shut
Speaker 1: down pretty much. I mean, you can do some things,
Speaker 1: but no indoor stuff, no large gatherings, masking everywhere, constantly
Speaker 1: being you know, just harassed by the moral busybodies of
Speaker 1: the left. We would all defeat the virus if you
Speaker 1: would just listen to Biden. Sure, sure, that would be
Speaker 1: That seems that seems reasonable if you're an imbecile. But
Speaker 1: what's what's going to happen if we get close to
Speaker 1: the election it turns out that we're far I mean
Speaker 1: in New York right now, to tell everybody you had
Speaker 1: to go vote tomorrow, that would be completely There's there's
Speaker 1: no database reason for us not to do that. Really,
Speaker 1: what happens if we're a lot of other places in
Speaker 1: the same position, but then we also have the mail
Speaker 1: in voting. What was that all for? Well, this is
Speaker 1: why Democrats are pushing so hard for it now, even
Speaker 1: though they don't have the structures in place, they're pushing
Speaker 1: for it. And if they don't get their way, you
Speaker 1: know they're gonna play it both ways. If they get
Speaker 1: enough mail and mail in balloting going and they lose,
Speaker 1: they'll say that they think the mail in balloting was
Speaker 1: actually a place where Republicans were committing fraud, or that
Speaker 1: they were uncounted balances. They'll blame the system. Or if
Speaker 1: they don't get enough mail in balloting, then they'll say, well,
Speaker 1: this was an unfair election because our demands were not considered.
Speaker 1: I know this. It sounds it's like arguing with the
Speaker 1: five year old, Right, it doesn't matter. They're going to
Speaker 1: have a problem with it no matter what you do,
Speaker 1: So just be prepared for. Or that the Presdent spoke
Speaker 1: yesterday about where we are on COVID and gave some
Speaker 1: very important fact in figures I think everybody needs to hear.
Speaker 1: Let's get to that. You're in the freedom. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show. Podcast the knowledge we have gained
Speaker 1: about the disease itself. The recent rise in cases has
Speaker 1: not been accompanied by a significant increase in deaths. Fatalities
Speaker 1: nationwide are that roughly half the level of the April peak,
Speaker 1: So the death, the number of deaths or fatalities are
Speaker 1: at half the level. One is too much one death
Speaker 1: because it should have never happened to us. It should
Speaker 1: have been stopped at very easily by China in Wuhan.
Speaker 1: Thanks to our major advances and treatment, we've seen vast
Speaker 1: improvements in recovery rates across all age groups. Compared to
Speaker 1: April mortality of new rates are eighty five percent lower
Speaker 1: among individuals aged eighteen to sixty nine and seventy percent
Speaker 1: lower among individuals over seventy years old. We've also made
Speaker 1: significant strides in sheltering those at highest risk, especially the elderly.
Speaker 1: Approximately eighty five percent of all current cases are individuals
Speaker 1: under the age of sixty five. Just getting some very
Speaker 1: accurate numbers in this, and these are people who are
Speaker 1: generally at a much lower risk of complications. Under sixty
Speaker 1: five eighty five percent decline in mortality based upon cases
Speaker 1: over seventy I think he said or over sixty five
Speaker 1: or seventy percent decline. So those are very important numbers
Speaker 1: because you keep seeing the case load number go up,
Speaker 1: and we are doing a tremendous amount of testing, and
Speaker 1: so yes, we're finding more cases, including a people that
Speaker 1: beat this very you know, in very reasonable time frame.
Speaker 1: Don't get that sick barely have any symptoms at all.
Speaker 1: But the case number is what is getting people so
Speaker 1: frightened a lot of parts of the country, and that's
Speaker 1: why you have a lot of policies that are that
Speaker 1: are now rolling back reopens and pushing for a return
Speaker 1: to sort of the more the more panicked mindset about
Speaker 1: all of this. But let's remember that there are there
Speaker 1: are They know more about the virus and they did
Speaker 1: six months ago. Doctors and hospitals are more effective at
Speaker 1: dealing with it than they were. There's not a cure,
Speaker 1: but they're more effective at at handling the symptoms and
Speaker 1: knowing what to do. There is really promising data from
Speaker 1: a large study published that just came out today that
Speaker 1: the mortality rate for very ill people in the hospital
Speaker 1: if they're given convalescent plasma is fifty percent lower. So
Speaker 1: and that's a big, big, very well well put together study.
Speaker 1: So that's encouraging. You know, there are reasons for optimism here.
Speaker 1: As I've been saying along, we were gonna get hit
Speaker 1: badly by this virus, you know, And I'm just going
Speaker 1: to point this out too. And a lot of the
Speaker 1: data is showing that, you know, obesity and diabetes are
Speaker 1: the really big comorbidity issues with this virus, alongside with
Speaker 1: with advanced age, but obesity and the comorbidity issue obesity
Speaker 1: and diabetes. And I'm just gonna say this, I think
Speaker 1: it's obvious that, you know, people are much less healthy
Speaker 1: and have gained a lot of people I know have
Speaker 1: gained substantial weight. I mean six months of really not
Speaker 1: being able to leave your house, not being able to
Speaker 1: go to the gym, being constantly told that you know,
Speaker 1: the world is ending, people have gained real weight. This
Speaker 1: is not helping. This is not helping. You know, our
Speaker 1: our immune systems and our ability to fight off disease
Speaker 1: is a critical component of this. And government policy is
Speaker 1: hurting us in that regard. The government policy has made
Speaker 1: it i think a lot more difficult for us to
Speaker 1: stay generally healthy, including to keep our immune systems ready
Speaker 1: for fighting against this Trump continued though, on the declining
Speaker 1: mortality rate on the facts and figures around COVID as
Speaker 1: it stands now or at least yesterday evening play too.
Speaker 1: Since the pandemic began, nearly half of all fatalities have
Speaker 1: been at nursing homes who assisted living centers. It's an
Speaker 1: incredible statistic when you hear that number. This data underscores
Speaker 1: that the best path forward is an aggressive strategy focused
Speaker 1: on protecting Americans at highest risk. As we race toward
Speaker 1: the development of a vaccine, we must continue to take
Speaker 1: extraordinary precautions to shield the elderly, and we're doing that.
Speaker 1: We're doing that at a level that we've never even
Speaker 1: dreapt possible, both with testing and with common sense, and
Speaker 1: those with underlining conditions, especially the elderly, with the underlining
Speaker 1: whether it's hard or diabetes, they seem to be the
Speaker 1: two most predominant conditions that cause tremendous problems. While allowing
Speaker 1: those at lowest risk to carefully return to work and
Speaker 1: to school. Where embers flare up, we must engage immediately.
Speaker 1: So when you look at the numbers and you look
Speaker 1: at what's really happening, it's a different narrative than what
Speaker 1: you're getting you're getting from the mainstream media. I talked
Speaker 1: to Alex Barrenson last night, and you know, he's got
Speaker 1: his book out, Unreported Truths About about COVID, which he's
Speaker 1: sold I think over one hundred thousand copies on Amazon.
Speaker 1: Which to sell that for a book without any publisher
Speaker 1: behind it, and to self publish, it's pretty astonishing. But
Speaker 1: coronavirus positive tests in the last two weeks in Florida,
Speaker 1: Barrenson points out, have fallen sixty percent in the last
Speaker 1: two weeks. Positive tests, I should say, not testing positive
Speaker 1: tests in Florida fallen sixty Hospitalizations are down right now
Speaker 1: twenty percent from the peak in Florida. So you have
Speaker 1: far fewer positive tests and substantially less people in the
Speaker 1: hospital with COVID. Are you seeing that reported anywhere? Are
Speaker 1: you seeing that reported anywhere? And I also like this
Speaker 1: point that Barrenson makes here about you know, we were
Speaker 1: always told that this is that there's another way that
Speaker 1: we could have made this whole thing go away, says
Speaker 1: Japan is a nation of one hundred and thirty million
Speaker 1: that never had a lockdown and never had mass testing,
Speaker 1: and has had the least severe epidemic of any major country.
Speaker 1: But they say that that doesn't really count. But what why,
Speaker 1: you know we should investigate? What is it about Japan
Speaker 1: that no, no mask lockdown? We're gonna say that this
Speaker 1: is all about masks? Is that we're really going to
Speaker 1: fall back on? I just I don't know what to
Speaker 1: tell you, folks, other than people are so dug in
Speaker 1: now on this. They're never They're never going to change.
Speaker 1: They're never going to change. They will refuse to believe
Speaker 1: that they've been wrong on this, like so many other
Speaker 1: areas of their lives. The lockdown libs are it's a
Speaker 1: bit like the climate change thing now, where people couldn't
Speaker 1: deal with. Look, I if I find out that all
Speaker 1: we had to do is if there's real science to
Speaker 1: show that all we had to do is wear masks
Speaker 1: the whole time, and this whole thing would have gone away,
Speaker 1: I'll come on air and say, maya coolba. I've been
Speaker 1: wearing masks though for months, because I have to, because
Speaker 1: I'm in New York. Anywhere I go, I gott to
Speaker 1: wear a mask. I don't wear to my apartment by myself,
Speaker 1: but I don't really do anything else, So we're not
Speaker 1: even having serious conversations about what could have been done differently,
Speaker 1: we're having politicized conversations about it. And people look at
Speaker 1: the data in a very cherry picked fashion. They don't
Speaker 1: want to talk about out the conclusion of the top
Speaker 1: health authorities in Sweden and the Netherlands saying that we
Speaker 1: don't need to wear masks. Instead, it's just Trump is
Speaker 1: basically hitler and everyone's dying because he's the worst person ever.
Speaker 1: That's what you get, including from a lot of public
Speaker 1: health authorities. You know, people that are out there, and
Speaker 1: you know, one moment, Nancy Pelosi and the rest of
Speaker 1: the Democrat gang are saying, where's doctor ware Where, where's
Speaker 1: doctor Burkes? Where the Nancy wants to know? This? Shouted
Speaker 1: a socialist, Where's doctor Burkes? Where's doctor Faucium. Yeah, when
Speaker 1: Nancy wakes up from her nap, now she's saying doctor
Speaker 1: Burkes is bad. I don't know what it will be
Speaker 1: next week. Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Sally Yates You all
Speaker 1: remember her, don't you? She was the acting Attorney General
Speaker 1: before she had to be fired for refusing to do
Speaker 1: her job, a holdover from the Obama minstration, in my mind,
Speaker 1: a very clear Democrat partisan and also quite involved in
Speaker 1: the targeting of General Flynn and oh my, so much more.
Speaker 1: She was down today testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Speaker 1: What are we finding out from her? And also where
Speaker 1: does the effort to get some accountability for the crossfire
Speaker 1: hurricane debacle? Where does that stand? We got a man
Speaker 1: who can answer these questions with us now, Congressman Jim
Speaker 1: Jordan of the great State of Ohio is with us. Congressman,
Speaker 1: thanks for coming back. Get bat buck, could it be
Speaker 1: with you? So what do we see today? What do
Speaker 1: we need to know about Sally Eates as she's testifying
Speaker 1: today her role in this? Yeah, well, remember the big picture.
Speaker 1: Since the Democrats, I said this last weekend hearing with
Speaker 1: the Attorney General, Democrats have been gone after Bill Barr
Speaker 1: because Bill Barr uttered the one word that drove him crazy.
Speaker 1: It was truthful. He called it spine and that's exactly
Speaker 1: what they did. We now know that for sure spied
Speaker 1: on President's campaign. No one else in the Justice Department
Speaker 1: was willing to call it what it was. You know,
Speaker 1: Rod Rosenstein was in Jeff's sessions, wasn't and certainly the
Speaker 1: individual who tests by today in front of Cyndrograham and
Speaker 1: the Judiciary Committee, Sally Gates, wasn't willing to say what
Speaker 1: really happened there. They systematically went after the Trump campaign,
Speaker 1: and then when President Trump won, they systematically went after
Speaker 1: and targeted and actually got him fired and got him prosecuted.
Speaker 1: The guy who was going to be the NFA director
Speaker 1: for the President, General Michael Flynn. So that that to me,
Speaker 1: just in that broad sense, that's what's so wrong about this.
Speaker 1: She knew what went on, she wouldn't pointed out, and
Speaker 1: then she helped him go after Michael Flynn. Do we
Speaker 1: think that we're going to find out anything from the
Speaker 1: you know, the Durham Investigation for everybody listening, appointed by
Speaker 1: Attorney General Barr Drham is the US Attorney for the
Speaker 1: state of Connecticut. We've been hearing about this for many,
Speaker 1: many months. He's looking into the origins and the totality
Speaker 1: of the Russia collusion delusion known as Crossfire Hurricane run
Speaker 1: through the FBI. Cockton Jordan, You've been very involved in
Speaker 1: this all along from your side of things, Are we
Speaker 1: going to find on anything you think? And is there
Speaker 1: going to be accountability? Well, that's that's a more important question.
Speaker 1: We already know everything. We already know most everything. We
Speaker 1: know that that there was no proper credict We know
Speaker 1: that they started the investigation on July thirty first. They
Speaker 1: sent the lady posing as someone else who used the
Speaker 1: name as a Turk. They sent her to spy on Papathopolis.
Speaker 1: They got the fake FISA, the fraudulent FISA, where they
Speaker 1: lied to the court seventeen times to spy on Carter Page.
Speaker 1: They went and tried to spy on the president with
Speaker 1: what we learned just a few weeks ago, with this
Speaker 1: defensive briefing on August seventeenth. So I understand the timeline.
Speaker 1: You opened the investigation July thirty first, seventeen days later,
Speaker 1: you're spying on the president under the guys of giving
Speaker 1: him a defensive briefings, as you know, the Republican candidate
Speaker 1: for president, and you're already spying on his campaign. And
Speaker 1: I always say between the July thirty first in August seventeenth,
Speaker 1: there were two important things that happened. There was the
Speaker 1: now famous text vessage from Struck to Page where he
Speaker 1: talked about the insurance policy. And then there was the
Speaker 1: other text message on the fifteens where she asked him,
Speaker 1: is Trump gonna win? He says no, no, We'll stop it.
Speaker 1: So those two text messages happen in between the day
Speaker 1: they start the investigations, day they starts spying on President
Speaker 1: Trump and and everything else. So we know how bad
Speaker 1: it was, We know all the wrong they did. The
Speaker 1: key question is will people be held accountable? Will there
Speaker 1: be some indictment? Again, I think it goes all the
Speaker 1: way to the top because we know now this January fifth,
Speaker 1: twenty seventeen, meeting in the Oval Office with Obama, Bidenkomey, Yates,
Speaker 1: Samantha excuse me, Susan Rice. We know all the key
Speaker 1: players are there, so someone needs to be held accountable.
Speaker 1: We'll just have to wait and see if that's actually
Speaker 1: Do you think we're speaking to Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio. Congressman,
Speaker 1: do you think that if the Durham investigation uncovers clear
Speaker 1: violations of law that the DOJ as it stands right now,
Speaker 1: has the stomach to indict some of the any of
Speaker 1: the named players from the crossfire, hurricane, ambush and soft
Speaker 1: coup attempt against President Trump. The question is does the
Speaker 1: attorney general, And I think he does. I've been very
Speaker 1: impressed with the Attorney General's work. I was very I
Speaker 1: thought he handled himself extremely well last week in front
Speaker 1: of the Democrats, who you know, the Democrats didn't let
Speaker 1: us finish our video that we had at the top
Speaker 1: of the hearing, didn't let Bill bar answer the questions,
Speaker 1: and they even tried to stop him from going to
Speaker 1: the restroom at one point. So, even in spite of
Speaker 1: how bad they treated him, I thought he handled himself
Speaker 1: very well. I think he has the stomach for doing
Speaker 1: the right thing. I think when he called it spying
Speaker 1: a little over a year ago, the first time he
Speaker 1: testified in front of the Senate, I think he does.
Speaker 1: Let's just hope that's that's what happens, and frankly, it
Speaker 1: should happen now. If you've got the evidence and it's there,
Speaker 1: don't wait. Justice delayed is justice denied. Let's let's let's
Speaker 1: come forward with the conclusion of your investigation and let's
Speaker 1: hold people count on that. On that point about delay,
Speaker 1: are there ways currently that you're seeing that the Democrats
Speaker 1: in Congress are trying to just slow slow processes down
Speaker 1: in order to prevent there from being greater accountability and
Speaker 1: transparency for the spine campaign against the president. I mean,
Speaker 1: other than you know, the mainstream media and all the
Speaker 1: lives and misinformation they put out. And the real effort
Speaker 1: by Democrats in Congress is they're trying to do to
Speaker 1: Bill Barry what they've been trying to do to the
Speaker 1: president for three and a half years. So you know,
Speaker 1: four weeks ago they filed articles of impeachment. A member
Speaker 1: of the Democrat member the Judiciary Committee filed the articles
Speaker 1: of impeachment against the Attorney general. So they're attacking the
Speaker 1: attorney general because he had the courage to state the truth,
Speaker 1: which was the Obama Biden administration spied on the Trump campaign.
Speaker 1: The Obama Biden administration had no predicate for opening the investigation.
Speaker 1: They continued the investigation after they knew there was nothing there.
Speaker 1: They then targeted Michael Flynn forty nine times, thirty eight
Speaker 1: people forty nine times unmasked Michael Flynn's just between election
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen and inauguration day January twenty seventeen. They were
Speaker 1: out to get Flynn because they understood, oh, we can't
Speaker 1: have the guy who was former head of the Defense
Speaker 1: Intelligence Agency. We can't have him coming into the new
Speaker 1: National Security Advisor. We have to ruin him. And that's
Speaker 1: what they set out and actually did. Thank goodness, the
Speaker 1: truth is coming out. So the Democrats have been all
Speaker 1: about trying to slow things down by attacking the Attorney General,
Speaker 1: attacking the investigation. Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio, we're speaking
Speaker 1: to them right now. Congressman, do you get the sense
Speaker 1: from your Democrat colleagues that in the House that they
Speaker 1: still believe Russia collusion. I mean, honestly, they actually believe
Speaker 1: that there's something there or was it just useful for
Speaker 1: them and now they're just playing the hand they were dealt,
Speaker 1: so to speak, by trying to use it in whatever
Speaker 1: way they can against Trump. It's both some of the
Speaker 1: some of them are you know, so left wing they
Speaker 1: believe all this maloney. Some of them is just they're
Speaker 1: so out to get the president. It just this, you know,
Speaker 1: there's different names they have for but they just they
Speaker 1: just go after the president NonStop. It started before the election.
Speaker 1: And it's really sad because instead of ever just trying
Speaker 1: to work together to help the country. It's for them,
Speaker 1: it's all about going after the president. I mean the
Speaker 1: fact that again they filed articles of impeachment against the
Speaker 1: Attorney General just a couple of weeks before he was
Speaker 1: coming in to testify, and then when he comes in
Speaker 1: to testify, they don't let him answer the questions shows
Speaker 1: how ridiculous and crazy they are. So it's a combination
Speaker 1: of both. But I think the American people see it
Speaker 1: for what it is. Other than the most radical leftists
Speaker 1: around the country. They think what the Democrats are posing
Speaker 1: and pushing and policies they are advocating, that's hold deefund
Speaker 1: the police and attacking the rule of law and attacking
Speaker 1: the Attorney General and the president. I think Americans see
Speaker 1: can see how wrong it is. I like to ask
Speaker 1: because I'm here in New York and I end up
Speaker 1: getting a lot of focus on the COVID situation in
Speaker 1: the Northeast and this corroor because that's where I am.
Speaker 1: But obviously it's a nationwide issue, and I want to know.
Speaker 1: We have a lot of listeners and you know that
Speaker 1: that want to know as well, how it's going elsewhere,
Speaker 1: How are things going in your state of Ohio with COVID.
Speaker 1: And also if you can speak specifically to where where
Speaker 1: are you with where is the situation with school reopening? Well,
Speaker 1: the schools are. Schools are going to reopen here in
Speaker 1: Ohio now. The governor has just indicated that he's going
Speaker 1: to require all students to wear a mask. I think
Speaker 1: that's frankly not consistent with science. It's one thing if
Speaker 1: you have workers and teachers and others wear masks, but
Speaker 1: I don't you know, there's not been one single kid
Speaker 1: in the whole state of California, as an example, not
Speaker 1: one kid under eighteen has passed away from COVID. So
Speaker 1: the science is not there for kids wearing them, but
Speaker 1: but certainly for the for the adults. But yeah, schools
Speaker 1: are opening here, businesses are are are home and along.
Speaker 1: The President is going to be in our state, uh
Speaker 1: and on Thursday with at the Whirlpool facility in Clyde
Speaker 1: in our district, and they're they're just having a great,
Speaker 1: a great year. So I think things are good, and
Speaker 1: I think that I think if the whole country would,
Speaker 1: we could just go back to work and do it
Speaker 1: in a safe way, of course, but go back to
Speaker 1: work et the economy. It's already starting. The great American
Speaker 1: comeback in the v shaped recovery is already happening. It
Speaker 1: would really happen if we could just get some of
Speaker 1: these democratic governors. So let let Americans go back to work.
Speaker 1: Congressman Jim Jordan, always good to talk to you, sir,
Speaker 1: Thanks for coming on. Thanks Buck, take care by the
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and Show podcast. I mentioned it yesterday briefly on the show,
Speaker 1: but I'm gonna tell you I've never seen anything like this.
Speaker 1: Blast that was captured from many different angles in real
Speaker 1: time is blast at the Port of Beirut or beiruts
Speaker 1: Port in in Lebanon. It did look a bit like
Speaker 1: what you would see in a movie as a nuclear explosion.
Speaker 1: It was not a nuclear explosion, of course, but the
Speaker 1: mushroom cloud. Everyone's commenting on this and absolutely a devastating explosion.
Speaker 1: Over one hundred people dead, thousands wounded from it. The
Speaker 1: entire port of of Beirut is essentially destroyed in one moment.
Speaker 1: The blast kill this according to BBC, one hundred and
Speaker 1: thirty five people injured, more than four thousand, and there's
Speaker 1: now a two week state of emergency in Lebanon. The President,
Speaker 1: Michelle Ahoun, has said that the blast was caused by
Speaker 1: two thousand, seven hundred and fifty tons of ammonium nitrate
Speaker 1: stored unsafely in a warehouse. The customs chief Badri Daher
Speaker 1: said that his agency called for the chemical to be removed,
Speaker 1: but this did not happen. My friends, Ammonium nitrate is
Speaker 1: used as a homemade explosive, and I believe amodium nitrate
Speaker 1: was used in the Oklahoma City bomb. And you give
Speaker 1: you a sense of the kind of power that this. Now,
Speaker 1: think about that that was one that was like one
Speaker 1: vehicle with amodium nitrate, right, Think about how much ammonium nitrate,
Speaker 1: almost three thousand tons of this is all going up
Speaker 1: at once. I know that we're and most of you
Speaker 1: are just listening this on radio, but I mean, if
Speaker 1: you see the visualization of this, it's it's the craziest
Speaker 1: explosion I've ever seen. And I've I've seen a lot
Speaker 1: of big explosions from you know, Rock and Afghanistan and
Speaker 1: all that footage. I've been near explosions that have happened
Speaker 1: that were pretty sizeable. When I say near, you know,
Speaker 1: mile mile and a half off and felt the shock
Speaker 1: wave or or you know, we're aware the windows rattle
Speaker 1: a little bit. Nothing. I mean that was those would
Speaker 1: be two or three hundred pounds of explosive, which is
Speaker 1: a big boom and really dangerous to be within a
Speaker 1: few hundred yards of it. But t twenty seven hundred
Speaker 1: plus tons of ammonium nitrate. It's like they had the
Speaker 1: world's biggest bomb, not non nuclear, like the world's biggest
Speaker 1: convention o bomb, and decided to just and it just happened.
Speaker 1: I mean that no one did this on purpose, at
Speaker 1: least as far as we know. But it is stunning
Speaker 1: when you see this footage. They had just been storing
Speaker 1: this in the port and there's all this back and forth.
Speaker 1: Here you go this again, BBC, the port general manager
Speaker 1: told the TV station there they were where the mature
Speaker 1: was dangerous. A court ordered it stored in the warehouse,
Speaker 1: but not to this degree. They had been writing back
Speaker 1: and forth in judiciary. They knew this thing was there,
Speaker 1: trying to move it. My friends, what is the lesson here?
Speaker 1: I mean, other than everyone just this is one of
Speaker 1: those things where you've got to see the explosion to
Speaker 1: understand the full force and ferocity there. There's a video
Speaker 1: circulating now of a woman who's having her wedding photos taken,
Speaker 1: wedding video taken, and she's pretty far from the blast
Speaker 1: and you're there watching and it goes from this peaceful,
Speaker 1: beautiful scene where she's in a wedding dress, it just
Speaker 1: the woosh of the the shockwave and it's stunning, it's
Speaker 1: and it's terrifying. I mean a lot of people died,
Speaker 1: a lot of people buried alive, and buildings that were
Speaker 1: that were destroyed because of this. If there's a lesson
Speaker 1: to take from this, and I think it's an important
Speaker 1: one that we all have to remember it, then know, Beirut, Lebanon,
Speaker 1: it's far away. These are fellow human beings here who
Speaker 1: are just going about their lives and now a lot
Speaker 1: of them lost their lives. A lot of them are
Speaker 1: going to be horribly wounded because of this. So while
Speaker 1: it's it's far off geographically, it's something that we can
Speaker 1: all relate to and sympathize with. And the lesson that
Speaker 1: I see from this is just the government is deeply incompetent.
Speaker 1: The government will have and I mean this in a
Speaker 1: general sense, not just in Lebanon. This could have happened
Speaker 1: in any number of places. I mean, maybe America. Our
Speaker 1: regulations are a little better, a little our governments a
Speaker 1: little bit less incompetent. But here they had the equivalent
Speaker 1: of a massive bomb that they were storing four years
Speaker 1: any warehouse, and no one ever stopped to think, hey,
Speaker 1: this is something that is urgent, that there's an urgency
Speaker 1: to dealing with this. We don't have all the time
Speaker 1: in the world. We don't have the ability to sit
Speaker 1: here and wait around and wonder if there's a perfect
Speaker 1: solution to this. The problems of government come from and
Speaker 1: the ineptitude, the incompetence of it comes from a lack
Speaker 1: of initiative and a lack of accountability. Right. In fact,
Speaker 1: initiative in the government is generally generally punished. If you're
Speaker 1: the person that comes forward says I have a solution
Speaker 1: to this and that's not the consensus opinion of that
Speaker 1: government institution, you will be told to sit down and
Speaker 1: shut up and don't damage your career. You know, you'll
Speaker 1: be told not to be the squeaky wheel, you will
Speaker 1: not get the oil, so to speak. And then on
Speaker 1: the accountability side, who's responsible. Oh, the Port director will
Speaker 1: say the court is responsible, and the court will say
Speaker 1: that the Customs Division was responsible, and the Customs Division
Speaker 1: will say the police were. You know, it's just everybody
Speaker 1: says somebody else is the reason why this man made
Speaker 1: catastrophe occurred. It's a man made catastrophe, but from what
Speaker 1: you'll hear, no man is actually responsible for it. This
Speaker 1: is a lesson, a very painful, very lethal lesson once
Speaker 1: again for the whole world, in why government needs to
Speaker 1: have a clear mandate, limited power, and why government accountability
Speaker 1: to the degree you can have it is so important,
Speaker 1: and why you don't want to trust the government with
Speaker 1: anything that you absolutely do not have to. You want
Speaker 1: individual human beings working under their own freely entered into
Speaker 1: agreements and using their own skills, talents and abilities to
Speaker 1: do things. You do not want the government to be
Speaker 1: doing things for you. So that's that's what I take
Speaker 1: from this situation. Anyways, hearts go out to people Lebanon,
Speaker 1: beautiful country, wonderful people, and thoughts and prayers. It's a
Speaker 1: very very difficult situation there, and I'm just if you
Speaker 1: have not seen that video, it's one of those things
Speaker 1: where you actually you should see it, just because it
Speaker 1: is an event unlike any other you've ever seen, and
Speaker 1: it is a reminder of what can happen when a
Speaker 1: government incompetence and stupidity is left completely unchecked, completely unchecked,
Speaker 1: And that's a concern I think for a lot of
Speaker 1: us here as we see our own leadership in America
Speaker 1: at a time when we're going through a pandemic and
Speaker 1: there's more and more control in the hands of these officials.
Speaker 1: But are we really to think that they're much more
Speaker 1: on top of things and they're much more accountable and
Speaker 1: capable than the port director for Beirut? Do I think
Speaker 1: that Bill de Blasio would have done a much better
Speaker 1: job in handling this. Apparently they seized all this stuff
Speaker 1: off a ship off the oceans. They had this in
Speaker 1: a warehouse. But a lot of people are going to
Speaker 1: have theories too. There's a lot of conspiracies out there
Speaker 1: already about this, and people are coming forward with their
Speaker 1: own versions of what they think may have happened, may
Speaker 1: have really happened apart from the official narrative. So I'll
Speaker 1: continue to look for theories that I find compelling, because
Speaker 1: this is almost so stupid and so reckless and devastating
Speaker 1: that it's hard to believe, even for government that it
Speaker 1: could be this bad. So I do leave open the
Speaker 1: possibility that there are certainly things that we have not
Speaker 1: yet been told about this that would explain a lot
Speaker 1: more than what we have already seen that that I
Speaker 1: will I do believe that's something that we should keep
Speaker 1: an open mind too, as well as we continue to
Speaker 1: see reporting on this one. Thanks for listening to the
Speaker 1: Bus Sess and Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcast.
Speaker 1: It's not the best Schwartzenegger movie, but it's a pretty
Speaker 1: solid one. I mean, I'm not sure it's top ten.
Speaker 1: It's definitely not top five. I don't know. Producer Mark
Speaker 1: Kindergarten cop does it make your Schwarzenegger top ten? Yeah? Whynot.
Speaker 1: It's a cute movie, it's watchable, it has some fun.
Speaker 1: It's actually one of Schwarzenegger's funnier movies. It may be
Speaker 1: his funniest role. I mean, he's not really known as
Speaker 1: a comedic actor. Well, he did Twins with Danny DeVito,
Speaker 1: and he did Kindergarten. He went through kind of a comedy.
Speaker 1: If he's like, my name is Schwatzenegger, and I'm here
Speaker 1: and I'm making the funny jokes with the funny accent,
Speaker 1: you know, and he went through a little bit of
Speaker 1: a cop. Yeah, he's an action He's the greatest action
Speaker 1: superstar movie hero of all time. Right, I mean, that's
Speaker 1: that's who Schwarzenegger really is. But here's the thing in Portland, which,
Speaker 1: as we know, is overrun by insane communists, unfortunately, because
Speaker 1: a beautiful place, beautiful place, and there's some great team
Speaker 1: and bucked listeners in Oregon and in Portland specifically. But
Speaker 1: but but the state of Oregon is overrun with leftist loons.
Speaker 1: And I hope that at least this show is a
Speaker 1: little island of sanity for those of you who are
Speaker 1: living in Oregon. I love the Oregon Coast. I think
Speaker 1: it's really beautiful. There's a city in Oregon, I'm not
Speaker 1: even I don't remember which one, which one it is
Speaker 1: where they filmed Kindergarten Cop. Okay, there's a city where
Speaker 1: they filmed Kindergarten Cop in the state of Oregon, and
Speaker 1: they were going to have a film festival the end.
Speaker 1: The Northwest Film Center canceled a screening of the nineteen
Speaker 1: ninety movie Kindergarten Cop because it's been what is it now,
Speaker 1: thirty years since the movie came Wow, I can't believe that.
Speaker 1: Thirty years since the movie came out. I remember I
Speaker 1: saw it in theaters and they got rid of it
Speaker 1: because of a left wing author says quote twet tweting
Speaker 1: about this. I don't even know this person is. It
Speaker 1: was um traumatization of children by police and compared Schwarzenegger's
Speaker 1: Kindergarten Cop to Birth of a Nation and Gone with
Speaker 1: the Wind, which, as we know, was also recently canceled.
Speaker 1: So so Kindergarten Cop at a film festival in a
Speaker 1: place where it was where Kindergarten Cop was filmed thirty
Speaker 1: years ago, has been pulled, has been canceled, even though
Speaker 1: it gave us such great lines as Prucer mark, play
Speaker 1: it play what don't we have them blind? It's not
Speaker 1: a tuma? Yeah we have it now because he just
Speaker 1: said it. Oh okay, I thought we actually had it
Speaker 1: to play. Well. I tried anyway, It's not a tuma.
Speaker 1: Remember that. And also, you know what you lack, oh,
Speaker 1: you lack discipline. You know there was that there was
Speaker 1: the that prank call board that people set up for
Speaker 1: a while where it was just all these different I
Speaker 1: think it was from Total Recall Kindergarten Cop. It was
Speaker 1: Schwarzenegger lines. You Sonova and you could call somebody and
Speaker 1: you'd play the button and have all the Schwarzenegger Do
Speaker 1: you remember this producer mark like a soundboard. It's like
Speaker 1: a soundboard of Schwarzenegger quotes. And you know it's not
Speaker 1: the tumo as one of them, a whole bunch of them.
Speaker 1: There's a long history in sports talk radio playing people's
Speaker 1: clips back at them as if as this player caller.
Speaker 1: Yeah you know what I mean? Yeah, yeah, So you
Speaker 1: can do that with a movie too, Why not that'd
Speaker 1: be funny. That's why we don't take left calls. Indeed,
Speaker 1: so so that they have canceled Kindergarten Cop. The author
Speaker 1: of the Portland author was Lowest Levine. She went on
Speaker 1: a Twitter rant about how the film is Kindergarten Cop
Speaker 1: is exploitative, it has no comedic or redeeming qualities. She
Speaker 1: also referenced. She also referenced the School to Prison pipeline.
Speaker 1: It's a movie about an undercover cop teaching like six
Speaker 1: year olds? What no one who's six? Is it? The
Speaker 1: school to prison pipeline. First of all, there is no
Speaker 1: school in pipeline. This is a mint. There are people
Speaker 1: who commit crimes who go to prison. There's nothing go
Speaker 1: with the school to prison pipeline. Oh my gosh. Quote,
Speaker 1: there's nothing entertaining with the presence of police in schools,
Speaker 1: which feeds the school to prison pipeline, in which African American,
Speaker 1: Latin X and other kids of color are criminalized rather
Speaker 1: than educated. About two one. Oh my gosh, I'm this
Speaker 1: is amazing. So now kindergarten cop is canceled, glorifying cops
Speaker 1: and traumatizing children and comparing it to Birth of a Nation.
Speaker 1: And look, it's definitely not like Gone with the Wind
Speaker 1: in that it's not a timeless classic of a birth
Speaker 1: of a nation. Wow, people are nuts, folks. The libs
Speaker 1: are nuts. In case you were wondering, I thought it
Speaker 1: was worth sharing that. And with that we can go
Speaker 1: to your thoughts in roll call. The show ain't over yet, folks,
Speaker 1: keeping it real. It's time for roll call. All right,
Speaker 1: roll call everybody. UM, So here we are, let's get
Speaker 1: to it. Um. We have first up in the mix. Well, well,
Speaker 1: we want to we want to check into your buddy,
Speaker 1: producer Mark, make sure that he's doing okay. How are
Speaker 1: you doing over their buddy, I'm doing all right. In fact,
Speaker 1: the Rangers got swept in the playoffs and they're out now.
Speaker 1: I'm fine, okay. How's missus Mark? Everything good? She's fine? Yeah, okay, good?
Speaker 1: Just checking all right. Facebook dot com, slash Buck sex
Speaker 1: in at Team Bucket. iHeartMedia dot com. If you want
Speaker 1: to send emails to tell us about all the things
Speaker 1: and let's get right to it. Asher greenings Buck and
Speaker 1: producer Mark. I'm a college student in Mobile, Alabama, Team
Speaker 1: buck Campus, Baby Yeya and thoroughly enjoy the podcast. Bucks
Speaker 1: impersonations are amazing. Aside from the benefits that mail and
Speaker 1: voting would offer the Democrat Party in the form of fraud,
Speaker 1: I've been considering why they fear in person voting so much.
Speaker 1: My theory is that the Democrat Party knows they have
Speaker 1: terrified their voting base with their NonStop COVID hysteria. This
Speaker 1: being the case, their base is much more likely to
Speaker 1: stay home on election day over fears conscious and subconscious
Speaker 1: that they may catch the virus. This is especially true
Speaker 1: since Biden voters are far less enthusiastic and for the
Speaker 1: most part, believe Biden is certain to win. Just some thoughts.
Speaker 1: First of all, Asher, great to have a team Buck campus,
Speaker 1: and please spread the word to your college age friends
Speaker 1: about the Bucks acton show Spotify. Iheartapp easy for them
Speaker 1: to listen to it, so we really appreciate that. And
Speaker 1: as for your point about the COVID hysteria and how
Speaker 1: that affects Democrat perceptions of the election, I think it's
Speaker 1: a very worthy point, and I would just tell you that, yes,
Speaker 1: at some level, I'm sure there are a lot of
Speaker 1: Democrats who truly are too scared to go vote in person.
Speaker 1: So there's that, and Democrats want mail in voting, so
Speaker 1: it's win win for them. It's win win for them
Speaker 1: to make the hysteria even more than it currently it
Speaker 1: currently is. So let's keep all of that in mind,
Speaker 1: my friends. Thank you so much, Rick, Hey, Bucking producer, Mark,
Speaker 1: love your podcast. I listen on my Raycon earbuds while
Speaker 1: I stock Nike groceries. Yes, you see what you see
Speaker 1: what Rick just did? Their producer Mark, He just stepped
Speaker 1: behind the three point line. Nothing but net you know
Speaker 1: he wasn't happy with the two, not only as he
Speaker 1: loved the show, but he's also giving one of our
Speaker 1: wonderful sponsors a shout out and actually bought his Raycon earbuds.
Speaker 1: Isn't that exciting? Yeah, it's well done by Rick. Rick
Speaker 1: step back behind the lineman, three pointer, nothing but net
Speaker 1: right before the buzzer. We appreciate it. And he's one
Speaker 1: of the ones that stands He's one of the what
Speaker 1: he's one of the players that stands Oh yeah, exactly, Yes, yes, indeed,
Speaker 1: he's one of the players who stands up too. I
Speaker 1: was listening to your Thursday podcast when you did your
Speaker 1: montage on mask debaters. I laughed so hard. People from
Speaker 1: several aisles over came over to see what was up.
Speaker 1: You made my night. Thanks, Live long and prosper. I mean,
Speaker 1: she'll tie because if you don't hold your shield high,
Speaker 1: you'll probably do neither. Ps. I have never considered a
Speaker 1: hot dog of sandwich. This man works stocking groceries producer
Speaker 1: Mark and he is with me on the hot dog debate.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna point that out. What do you mean,
Speaker 1: I don't consider a hot dog of sandwich either. He's
Speaker 1: with me you damn it. Yeah, and he's an expert.
Speaker 1: He is an expert exactly, damn it. Our new favorite listener,
Speaker 1: this guy, he's a three pointer and he just stole
Speaker 1: the inbound pass and dunked it for producer Mark all Right,
Speaker 1: fair enough, hey, rick Man Shieldside, thank you so much
Speaker 1: for writing in James Buckshields High from the Shannandoah Valley.
Speaker 1: A clear path to beating libs and our presidential election
Speaker 1: is to have a presidential election holiday. The American working
Speaker 1: force is a majority, and many more would vote if
Speaker 1: they didn't have to work all day. I'm still convinced
Speaker 1: our American family is like minded and what we hold
Speaker 1: near and dear, you guys are simply the best. Well,
Speaker 1: thank you so much, James, you are the best as well,
Speaker 1: and we really appreciate all your support. And yeah, I
Speaker 1: think that I think that I've never heard a good
Speaker 1: explanation of why election Day shouldn't be a federal holiday.
Speaker 1: We got federal holidays that seemed much less necessary to
Speaker 1: me than an election day, right, we got like President's
Speaker 1: Day and stuff, I mean election Day. Everyone should have
Speaker 1: the day off as a federal holiday to get as
Speaker 1: much voting going as possible. Despite what Democrats say and believe,
Speaker 1: I actually do want more people to vote. I just
Speaker 1: want to make sure the people who vote should be voting,
Speaker 1: are legally voting, and are engaged in the political process
Speaker 1: so they have some understanding of what they're doing. That
Speaker 1: last one's a little bit harder, but the first two
Speaker 1: I'm pretty dead set on. So yeah, Rick, oh, no, James,
Speaker 1: thank you so much. We do appreciate it, my man,
Speaker 1: and I agree. I'll look and see. There might be
Speaker 1: some explanation for this that I haven't but I know
Speaker 1: that I've had to go rush to the polls after
Speaker 1: work and wait in line and all this stuff. And
Speaker 1: you know, I'd be nice if I had had the
Speaker 1: day off. Plus we could all sit around and have
Speaker 1: election day parties. Think about that. Yeah, Yeah, a lot
Speaker 1: of gluten free or dervs. You're in the Freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. All right, more
Speaker 1: roll Call coming to us via mkala. Hello Bucking producer Bark,
Speaker 1: Greetings from Lincoln, Nebraska. I recently found your show while
Speaker 1: in Colorado visiting my family and happened upon it on
Speaker 1: Freedom ninety three seven out of Denver. I now mostly
Speaker 1: catch it on iHeart Radio. Wonderful Michaela. We love our
Speaker 1: Fred ninety three seven folks out in Denver, and I'm
Speaker 1: so glad that you have now joined the team. As
Speaker 1: a result, I thoroughly enjoy your new show. The little
Speaker 1: bits of comedy with voices and whatnot helped to make listener,
Speaker 1: help to make listening to what's going on in the
Speaker 1: country a little easier. My first experience with political talk
Speaker 1: show started with being introduced to Rush Limball when I
Speaker 1: was in high school by my dad. Here's to continue
Speaker 1: to try my best to think for myself and not
Speaker 1: trust the mainstream media. Keep up the great work and
Speaker 1: thank you for your insight. Well, Michaela, thank you so much.
Speaker 1: I'm welcome to the team. Great to have you. We're
Speaker 1: honored that you would spend your time listening to us
Speaker 1: and catching up with all the things. And I'm glad
Speaker 1: that you also enjoyed a little fun stuff. We do too,
Speaker 1: you know, we try, we try to use it like
Speaker 1: a spice. You know, you don't want too much a regano, salt, pepper,
Speaker 1: crushed garlic. You know, what are you go the gabbahul?
Speaker 1: I mean, you want a nice amount of spices. But
Speaker 1: come on, yeah, yeah, but you know you want what's
Speaker 1: the bursute? You want enough of pursute? You're just naming
Speaker 1: Italian meats. Yeah, but I'm saying you don't want too
Speaker 1: much of these things. They're delicious, but in a certain capacity.
Speaker 1: I mean, I guess so I love Mortodell. Actually you
Speaker 1: might be right, maybe there is there really, is there
Speaker 1: really such a Vegas too much pursuto? I don't think
Speaker 1: there is. I'm not, you know, too much too much? Jenoa,
Speaker 1: I'm not. I'm not sure that's a that's a thing,
Speaker 1: all right? Well anyway, um. She also writes producer Mark,
Speaker 1: no worries. You're not the only twenty something who sometimes
Speaker 1: is on the grumpy side. One of my best friends
Speaker 1: called me a cranky old cat lady one day before
Speaker 1: telling me to eat a Twinkie instead of a Snicker's
Speaker 1: to make things better. Oh, Producer Mark, Michaela's MICHAELA is
Speaker 1: a fellow grump buddy. One day I'll be the cranky
Speaker 1: old dog guy. I'll never be a cat lady. Yeah, yep, yep, Wow.
Speaker 1: I don't like cats. No, no, no, I'm not talking
Speaker 1: about that. I'm looking at our next. I'm not a
Speaker 1: cat person either. I'm okay with them unless they're totally shaved.
Speaker 1: That that freaks me out. Yea. I saw that recently.
Speaker 1: I think it was on an episode of the show Succession.
Speaker 1: They had a shaped cat walking around and I'm just like,
Speaker 1: I did not understand that. Um, that to me looks
Speaker 1: like some kind of alien life form that's come to
Speaker 1: take over the planet by you know ingesting all human beings.
Speaker 1: All right, Marcus love the show real news with no
Speaker 1: details left out. I heard on a recent podcast you
Speaker 1: were coming to North Carolina. Beautiful place here. We have
Speaker 1: gorgeous mountains and beaches all in one state. Would love
Speaker 1: to know which part I'm what's the occasion? Shield's high, Sheldon, Well, Sheldon,
Speaker 1: I'm coming down to Craven County, North Carolina next Friday
Speaker 1: for the Craven County GOP. I don't know why, you know,
Speaker 1: Craven County GP. I'm giving a speech. People are gonna
Speaker 1: be there, We'll take the precautions necessary to make sure
Speaker 1: everyone's safe and sound. Well, we're gonna do it. We're
Speaker 1: gonna do it. I've I've been told we were clear
Speaker 1: to do it, and it's all fine. So the thing
Speaker 1: that Sheldon really got me. Sheldon has a shields high
Speaker 1: tattoo on his arm, and first of all, it does
Speaker 1: look pretty badass. It's pretty amazing. But wow, Producer Mark,
Speaker 1: you see this, that's that's like a that's a tattoo, tattoo.
Speaker 1: It's on his bicep. That's a different person from Marcus.
Speaker 1: But remember this is Sheldon that wrote in with the
Speaker 1: graphic originally, and he said he was gonna get to
Speaker 1: the tattoo. Now he sensed his picture of it. It's
Speaker 1: kind of awesome. Actually, yeah, I mean that's like pretty amazing.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm just put that on a T shirt.
Speaker 1: M it's pretty fantastic. I've got to tell you, I do.
Speaker 1: Do you like it quite a bit? Hey man, Look, Marcus,
Speaker 1: we are humbled that you would use the rallying cry
Speaker 1: of this show for a tattoo. And I'll just tell
Speaker 1: you know there, I remember a few years ago, I
Speaker 1: believe it was a marine instructor out at I want
Speaker 1: to say twenty nine palms. If I got that wrong, though, apologies,
Speaker 1: but I believe he's out of twenty nine palms and
Speaker 1: when he was training recruits, um, they would they would
Speaker 1: yell shields high. So I thought that was pretty That
Speaker 1: was that was like the most badass thing ever. That
Speaker 1: made this all? Uh that that made it all just fantastic. Um,
Speaker 1: so yeah, this is this is amazing. Um, this is
Speaker 1: pretty much. I'm like, I'm actually speechless, shell that Marcus
Speaker 1: got this. Wait, Sheldon got it. I'm sorry, Sheldon finally
Speaker 1: got the tattoo. Sheldon, you are you are you are
Speaker 1: a badass team buck individual. I don't know what else
Speaker 1: to say. That's amazing, that's amazing. Oh good stuff, man,
Speaker 1: it looks cool too. It's actually a really good tattoo design.
Speaker 1: I'm impressed. Yeah, Producer Mark, how many tattoos? Oh that's right,
Speaker 1: you can't in Jewish cemetery, right, yes, And I wouldn't
Speaker 1: get oney anyway. Look, oh no, we'd make you get
Speaker 1: one on like on like the upper peck region of
Speaker 1: the chest. You definitely have to get one show your
Speaker 1: devotion to the team. But you have a religious, if
Speaker 1: some legious exemption, and we believe in the First Amendment,
Speaker 1: year and all that stuff. So I consider it if
Speaker 1: someone gets my face tattooed on there any part of
Speaker 1: their buddy, Producer Mark, the team is very dedicated. You know,
Speaker 1: I shouldn't say these things. Somebody's gonna do it. Someone's
Speaker 1: gonna have a produiser mark that do in his face,
Speaker 1: Dave Hey Buck listen to the podcast, which is fantastic
Speaker 1: as usual. It might as well be the Producer Bark Show,
Speaker 1: with contributions by Buck. I love it. My boys will
Speaker 1: be back in the classroom the fall because they need
Speaker 1: to be with their buddies, the city in the county's
Speaker 1: cave because the council members are now career politicians. Keep
Speaker 1: up the great work, well, Dave, thank you so much.
Speaker 1: Appreciate it man, and yeah, I'm glad to hear that
Speaker 1: you're gonna have kids back in the classroom. I think
Speaker 1: that's where I move Michelle one last before we got
Speaker 1: to close it out. I wonder whether I'm the only
Speaker 1: person who's seen this plot line and designated survivor and
Speaker 1: is concerned if Joe Biden's elected, the Dems will plan
Speaker 1: it along to deem him incompetent and replace him with
Speaker 1: the VP or Pelosi. Do you think that's possible, Michelle.
Speaker 1: They're gonna have the VP step up if Biden wins
Speaker 1: within two years. That's my predict this VP will take over,
Speaker 1: Biden will be out by the midterms. That's my guests,
Speaker 1: all right, everybody, thanks, as always an honor and a pleasure.
Speaker 1: Till tomorrow, She'll tigh