WEBVTT - Criminal Records: No Thanks!

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of I

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh,

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and there's Chuck and there's Jerry over there, and this

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>is the podcast known as Stuff You Should Know Podcast podcast.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>We all three on our group teleconferencing thing here, had

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>our cameras on for the first time. Yeah. It was

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>great for about I don't know forty five seconds before

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I turned mine off. Yeah, and then it was like, well,

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to just be observed. I'm no goldfish.

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Then you turn yours off. I like Jerry's long here,

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 1>though I know Jerry just looks like I just don't

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>quite know how to put it, just like a wealthy,

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>middle aged person who could buy and sell your sorry

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>ass if she wanted to. So we're cussing now. I

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>think so you said you said the D word, not

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>too long and go. So I feel like I'm I'm

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>allowed at least one. Uh well, we'll probably bleep that

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>out for fun D word? Which D word? Uh d

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>A m N. No, I didn't you did, and I

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>don't remember when, but you said or no, the P word.

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry you said the P word? What what's the

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>P word? You know the P word. I can think

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of a few bad words. It was P I, S, S,

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>E D. Period. That's not a cuss word. Yes it is.

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>And you because you didn't mean it like drunk. You

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>meant it like p od. Oh goodness, you don't even

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>know what a cuss word is. And you're in your

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>mid forties. This has become one of the most juvenile

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>introductions we've we've come up with so far, and we've

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>we've said some pretty juvenile stuff over the course of

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the years. Chuck, but I think it's trying shake it off. Okay,

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>get serious and prepare to re record an episode. No no,

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and actually, so I hit you you you decided we

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>were going to do this one, this EPISO st on

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>criminal records, and um I hit you back and said, hey,

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we've actually done one. We did an episode back in

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twelve called why you Probably have a criminal record,

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>And there's gonna be some overlap when we were talking

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>about criminal records, but this is definitely different, and even

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>more to the point, this is an important enough thing

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that people don't really think about or know about unless

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you're suffering from it, that it's worth like restating every

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>ten years basically as long as it's a problem. Yeah,

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and this is this is a little more robust. But

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and I know we talked back then. You know, I

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I did not have a criminal record ten years ago.

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to say I still don't have not been

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>arrested in the last ten years. But that was something

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.519
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember. I'm sure we talked about it, but

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember the first time. Is that like, you know,

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>this is sort of getting ahead. But you can have

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a criminal record if you just get arrested and they're like, oh, sorry,

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you didn't do anything after all, but you still have

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a criminal record. That's nicely right, man. As a result

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of that, that rule, um, something like one in three

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Americans have a criminal record. I saw one in three.

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I also saw one in four. And if it's one

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>in four, that means that as many Americans have a

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>criminal record as have a four year diploma. Yeah. That's

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that was pretty mind boggling. And it's kind of like, okay, well,

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>so like I have a criminal record. I was arrested once. Um,

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>it's part of my checkered past and I don't like

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it, but you know, it's not really

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>stood in my way. Well, I was kind of I

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>got a little bit of the birth lottery in a

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways, and I was able to navigate and

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>make my way through life having a criminal record without

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>it actually proving a problem. That is not necessarily the

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>case for a lot of people, including people who have

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>only been arrested but haven't um in, weren't even convicted

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of a crime. They just happened to be of a

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>different race or a different sexual orientation or something like that.

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>But we're having a criminal record can prove to be

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a real problem for you if you're especially if the

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>deck is already stacked against you, almost as if employers

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>are looking for a reason not to hire you. They

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>can legally not hire you because you have a criminal record.

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of problems with it, and we'll get

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>into all of that, but um, I feel like we

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>need to just generally explain the whole thing first, to

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole process of what they are and how they're

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>dealt with. Right, unless you live under a rock, you

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 1>know what a criminal record is, right, That's right. A

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>criminal record, like you said, is it's it's very simple.

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>It's it's literally just government uh like information that the

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>government in the United States keeps about you. That says

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it's data, and it says I mean, I guess we

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>can go like what's on the literal criminal record, Like,

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>once you get arrested, you've they've got your name, they've

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>got your data, birth if you have any known aliases,

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>which I wish I did, but I don't. I'm not

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>nearly cool enough to have aliases, Johnny tight lips. Uh.

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Physical description of me, Yeah, that's funny. Physical description a

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>little known fact that usually includes looks on a scale

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:18.239
<v Speaker 1>of one to ten. Yeah, mine just says Harry Loaf

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>And they're like, is that his name? Description? That should

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>be an alias of yours h A R l O

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>A p h A. While I don't think your alias

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 1>should also describe you though. That's probably about aliens. Yeah,

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to be forgettable and make you more forgettable.

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>That's true. That's like rule number one of aliases, right. Uh,

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>current address, the type of crime you committed, allegedly, outstanding arrestaurrants,

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 1>dates and arrest of your conviction, fingerprint data, and oh

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that mug shot. I know, it's weird to feel like

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 1>I wanted a mug shot at one point in my life.

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>But it's a weird thing in this country because mug

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>shots are kind of one of two things. It's either

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>really embarrassing or it's kind of like this weird badge

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of honor. I'm not sure it happened how that happened,

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, but I mean that's how you that's how

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you might view it from from society, right, Yeah, well,

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but from from society in general, it's a stigma.

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And there's the entire businesses basically like patent trolls, but

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>with mug shots that just accumulate these things because they're

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a matter of public record and publish them online and

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to pay them to take them down, which

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>is a problem. But it does go to show like, yeah,

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a it's it's like, um, it is.

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a social stigma to have a mug shot of you.

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>And even beyond the social stigma, it can be really

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>problematic and prevent you from a lot of getting a

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of normal things in life. Well, and you know,

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of kidding when I said I don't

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 1>know how that happened in America, but I do know

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>how that happened, And that's the Internet when they started

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 1>just publishing, like, oh, look at Nick Nolty and look

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>how awful this person and looks on their worst night.

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's how it became, you know, a cultural sort

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of and badge of honor was probably the wrong thing

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to say, but you know, something to be shared, Well,

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like owning it, you know, where if

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody everybody's gonna judge you, you might as well own

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>it and be like, yeah, I've got a mug shot.

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>What are you gonna do about it? Square? You got

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a mug shot? Well, that makes you square if you don't. Yeah.

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>My favorite ones are when the celebrity is super smiley,

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>they like, I defy you to I'm not gonna look

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>like Nick Nalty here. Yes, those are funny enough, We're fine.

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>But the ones where the person like really actually committed

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a terrible crime and they're still smiling, those are enraged. Well,

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>those are disturbing. Yeah, but poor Nicknolty. You know. Riff

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>tracks the the fine people um who who basically made

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the second iteration of Mry Science Theater three thousand and

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>now carried on and make perhaps an even better version

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of that as Riff tracks. Yeah, stuff, you should know listeners. Yeah,

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I think so. Them are um friends of the show.

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>They they perennially, especially Mike Nelson, picks on Nicknolty every

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>chance they get, kind of painting a sketch of him

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>as a really unsavory and grizzled and in terrible person.

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>But it's it's hilarious, but also it's like, what what

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>did Nicknolty ever do? And I genuinely don't know. Yeah,

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what that much shots even from inside

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>from probably drugs, but I know the one you're talking about.

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>He's wearing like a Hawaiian shirt that's like ruffled and

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>rum old and like the collar sticking up on one side.

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not a Einstein here. Yeah, it's not a good

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>picture for sure, But here's the good news. In the

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 1>United States. And by the way, this doesn't include traffic violation.

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you've talked about, you know, having speeding tickets

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>still on your record quote unquote, that's it's not your

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>criminal record. That's something different, which we'll get to. It

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:55.319
<v Speaker 1>depends though, if it was a really big like it

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:57.559
<v Speaker 1>was a crime committed with your car, like you I

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:02.719
<v Speaker 1>vehicular homicide. It's wrong, right those would be on there.

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, speeding ticket or something I think even like

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a suspended license due to points or something like that,

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that that's on a different database. But ye wouldn't be

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>your criminal record, right. But if you do have a

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>criminal record, you can and you've heard this on on

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>TV shows plenty of times, I want to have that expunged.

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 1>You can have your record expunged sometimes. Um, this means

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>all it means is it's not active anymore. It's not

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>like they just they take your file and they burn

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it with a torchlighter and they say, have a great life.

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>The government still has all that data, like that record

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 1>is still there, but it's just and it varies from

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>state to state, like how you go about it. But

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that that just means that your record is now sealed. Uh,

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and you have you know, if you want to do this,

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you go you the best place to start is where

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you got pinched to begin with, and they will help

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you from that point forward. You may have to hire

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>an attorney, but um you may not well so um yeah,

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 1>even and if you don't hire any training, if you

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>do it yourself. There's a lot of court fees and

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:06.359
<v Speaker 1>court costs associated with it's a really long, hard, difficult,

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>um process, which you know makes sense in in a

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of cases, but in other cases you're like, this

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>is unjust. You know, we need to make this easier.

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 1>But the I I actually saw, and I think the

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>reason is because different states called different things expunging or ceiling.

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>But I saw in a lot of cases those are

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>two different things. And in the case of expunction and

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>then a terrible word, um, they they actually do destroy

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the case. Yeah, like it's gone, Like it's like it

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't happen, like the crime happened. But as far as

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>you're concerned that that your case file is destroyed, so

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you're not in the database anymore, and that point, no,

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 1>it's gone. But and then ceiling is more like what

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you described, where they actually keep the records. They might

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>destroy the things like the evidence that they gathered from me,

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>like DNA evidence and um, all that stuff might be destroyed,

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 1>but the record, your criminal record associated with the case itself,

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that will remain. But it's just really hard to get

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to and usually you need a court order and a

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 1>judge will have to weigh the benefits or the pros

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:17.319
<v Speaker 1>and the cons of unsealing it. For whatever it is.

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:19.679
<v Speaker 1>And usually it's like, I mean, anybody who's watching enough

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>law in order knows this. If they have you on

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a crime and they suspect that you've committed this crime before,

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>they'll go to the judge and ask to unseal that

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>criminal record to just kind of find out, oh, this

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>guy's a repeat offender or whatever. Yeah, And as far

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>as whether or not they will either expunge or seal

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to begin with, they're going to consider, obviously sort of

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the no brainer stuff like what it was you did,

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>whether you were convicted, how long it's been, what you have,

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>what you've been like since then. Uh, he looks on

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a scale of one to ten, the Harry Loaf, no,

0:11:52.240 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you, No expungement. Uh, expunkment, expungement, expunction. I'm serious,

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Like you can't help but kind of like drag up

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of flim from the back of your

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>your throat when you say that word. All right, I

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>think we should take a break because I'm thoroughly grossed

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.079
<v Speaker 1>out right now. I'm gonna go check my privilege and

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>then we'll talk about juve juvenile criminal records right after this. Well,

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>now we're on the road, driving in your truck. Want

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to learn a thing or two from Josh Camp Chuck.

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>It's stuff you should know, all right, and things jo stop. Alright,

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>So you're talking about juvie records that are coming up.

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Now we're we're coming up on criminal records for kids

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>and they which I think, by the way, I think

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>we should do a whole episode. I kind of thought

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Crime and Punishment our series was over. Now there's this,

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think I think we should do one on

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.719
<v Speaker 1>the juvenile I think we should do one on Juby.

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>It'll be over, Chuck, when we do an episode that's

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>actually about the dustvs. Key book. When we do that,

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 1>that will be that will be the final seal on that. OK.

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I need to get started now. We will seal the

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Crime and Punishment suite with that one. But we were

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about juvenile criminal records, UM, not Juby itself, but

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>you were saying you want to do an episode on that.

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I think so for sure, I'm down with that. But

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the pretty much at least in the United States, and

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I assume in plenty of other countries as well that

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>share um similar sentiments about crime and punishment and justice.

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>UM that if you're a kid, the crimes you commit,

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>especially non violent crimes, especially if you've only committed say

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>like one crime. UM, that's typically treated differently than if

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>an adult commits a crime. And one of the major

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>ways that it's treated differently, well, one of the first

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>ways is treated differently is it's tried in a different court,

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the juvenile court. UM. And one of the things that

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>UH seems to be pretty much agreed upon across the

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 1>board is um, you shouldn't you shouldn't have this criminal

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>record follow you around for the rest of your life

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>because of some mistake you made as a kid. UM

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>And as a result. I don't know if it's automatic,

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's at least so common you could

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>almost call it automatic that the juvenile's records will be

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>sealed when they turn eighteen, so that after long as

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>they've kept their nose clean, right, there's a lot of

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the Yeah, there's a lot of qualifiers with that, and

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a big one that you you need to it

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>needs to have been number one, a small enough crime

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>or a non violent crime so that you know it

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>makes sense to to basically protect you from society's judgment

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>rather than protect society from you, which is I don't

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>know if we really said. One of the big reasons

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>criminal records exist or are searchable, say like in the

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>case of a job search or a landlord or something

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>like that, UM is to basically is basically saying like

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you're not really trustworthy. You gave up the base trust

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that everyone has walking around when you committed a crime.

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>We need to let other people know that you're not

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>trustworthy in that sense, so you know your criminal records

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>can be accessed like that. This is the opposite of that.

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>This is saying like, you're screwed up once as a kid,

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and we don't want to to just ruin the rest

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of your life because of that, So we're gonna just

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>make it like you're not even like you never even

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>had a criminal record. It's not going to be searchable,

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to pop up, and you can legally

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:44.239
<v Speaker 1>say when your record is sealed or expunged in particular,

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that you don't have a criminal history from that point on, right,

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>And we should point out that this all means that

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you are a juvenile who has tried as a juvenile

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, as someone under eighteen, you can

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>still be tried as in a alt if and this

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is obviously something they do when it's much more serious crimes,

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely serious serious felonies, sometimes the more serious misdemeanors. But

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in this case, it's just this as far as your

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>criminal record goes in expungement and ceiling and everything. Uh,

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>this is just the same as you are an adult,

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>as is with the case with registering as a sex offender.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>If you are a minor who is a convicted sex offender,

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to be on that sex offender registry just

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>like uh an adult would be, and that is on

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>your criminal record, and uh you you know, maybe at

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>some point we should do one on the sex I

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>know we've talked about it a couple of times, but

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>we should probably do a full episode on the sex

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>offender Registry. I mean, it's just it needs to be

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>discussed because it makes a lot of sense in a

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways, and then there's a lot of problems

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>with it that ruined people's lives. It's it needs Yeah,

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>we definitely need to do one on that, agreed. Yeah,

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>because that's one where are uh that database is open

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 1>to the public. You can you can go online and

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you can search your neighborhood or search specific people or addresses,

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know it's so parents and in the

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 1>public at large can track the whereabouts are registered sex offenders.

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Like you said many many times, that is a great

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>thing to happen. But I know in a recent episode

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the fact that I think if you

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 1>get arrested for public your nation, you have to register.

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that right? Yeah? Another big one that can be

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>really really life ruining is um, consensual sex with a

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>minor when you're like one year over the line, like

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>if if the line is seventeen and you're seventeen and

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 1>she's sixteen, or vice versa, that can Yeah, you can

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>end up on the sex register, UM, sex offender registry

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>for life. Um. And that's a like again, it's like

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>needed and necessary. The sex crimes are just treated differently,

0:17:57.720 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 1>and I think rightfully so I think most people agreed

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>these are special kinds of things. One of the reasons

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>why they're treated differently is because sex offenders have been

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>shown to have the highest recitativism rates of any criminal. Um.

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you're through an extra d in there. Recitativism.

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I know I nailed it, is that right. It's a

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>bone head word, admittedly, but I think I nailed recidivism.

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 1>No recitativism. Man, I'm pretty sure I this is deletrious

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to my self confidence. You made that joke before, the

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>same reasoning, don't joke. There's only one. There's only one.

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>D Well, we you have to make that joke every

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>time you say that word. It just comes as a

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 1>bone frequently in that movie is so good. But the

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>but the point is is that sex offenders have a

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>reoccurrence they commit crime. Um, they're more likely to recommit

0:18:55.359 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>sexual offenses than the average criminal is occur. It's you

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>got me on that one. It's true. And also I've

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>noticed I've been saying like shut up lately, and I

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>am sorry. I don't know where it's coming in. But no, no,

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't mean it. That is, I'm not supposed to

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 1>say the S word, I know, and you know I

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:18.120
<v Speaker 1>won't do it anyway, So what no, I know, it's

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a it's a few point. Uh So, as far as

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>storing these things, you know, in the old days, it

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 1>was exactly like you probably think it was, which is,

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>these things were kept at local police stations and that

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>was kind of the end of it. Maybe they would

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 1>share things between counties, which meant um, probably somebody driving

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 1>over and looking in their file cabinet and then saying

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>thanks a lot, and then shutting that, putting the file

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>back and shutting that foul cabinet and leaving again. But

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>these days, of course, this is all going to be

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 1>done on databases. But it's still really kind of I

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 1>don't want to say willy nilly, because I feel like

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that's uh a little too critical, but there's it's definitely

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>not some national really codified thing where this happens than this,

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>than this. The you know, that first database is at

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the state and local level, and then if you're convicted,

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you you may have that uploaded into a larger state

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>repository or you may not. And then that state repository

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>may be linked to the National Crime Information Centers, Interstate

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Identification Index or the Triple I, but maybe not. You like,

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:37.959
<v Speaker 1>it's it's hard to tell unless you really do all

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>this investigating about your own criminal record where it lies. Yeah,

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it's there is a federal database, like you're saying, that

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>does exist, but it's just not compulsory among the states

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 1>or among the localities to submit it to that. And

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>some people are like, this is ridiculous. Is the dumbest

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>thing ever, Like every crime committed, every maybe arrest, every made,

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly every conviction ever made in any locality in any

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>state on on the federal level, should all go into

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the Interstate Identification Index UM, which is by the way

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 1>open or available for searching only to law enforcement and

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>like the courts, Like it's not no one else, no

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>private background check company could get their hands on it,

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. So it's just on state, yes,

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Like if you're a state, if you're a cop and

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>like you know, um, Atlanta, you could go onto the

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>II and UM and search it. But you know, like

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 1>if if I were an employer and I hired a

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 1>company to conduct a background check, they couldn't gain access

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to that. No, no no, no, I meant on the state level,

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>like if you're convicted on the state level, regular citizen

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>can search public records. Like that's viewable by anyone, right now,

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>that's correct, That is true, um, when there's really no

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>distinction between the criminal record you would have in that

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>state repository and that criminal same criminal record that state

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>repository uploads to the Interstate Identification and so yeah, you

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>could you could conceivably have that same criminal record checked.

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just that particular data. It makes you wonder what

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.959
<v Speaker 1>they got in there that isn't that isn't elsewhere, or

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>they just don't want to give out the password to

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 1>any schmo, you know, I don't. I don't know. But

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the the whole thing starts in the responsibility for keeping

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the record begins at the local level, and that local

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement agency or if a state trooper arrested you,

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>the state, or if the FBI arrested you, the FEDS

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>whoever arrested you, or whatever court convicted you, I should say,

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and or because you can have multiple criminal records from

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>different you know, from the the cops and from the court. Um,

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>they're they're responsible for maintaining, creating and maintaining that. And

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>then they're also the ones that uploaded or don't upload,

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 1>depending on the state laws. Right uh. And you know

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned the traffic stuff earlier that is on the

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>National driver Register if you have that d u I

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>or a suspended license. I think failure to help someone

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:08.199
<v Speaker 1>at the scene of an accident is a pretty serious offense,

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>any kind of fatal accident, or even lying a perjury

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>about driving um or operating a motor vehicle. All of

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that stuff can be on the National Driver Register, and

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that can be accessed by an employer if your job,

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>like if you want to go drive for UPS or something,

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're they're sure, you're going to probably look into

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. Yeah, but but that kind of again, that

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff is not going to come up on

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a criminal background check, and the average employer for a

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>non driving job is not going to bother to to

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>look into the National Driver database from what I could

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>tell right, Um, but an employer might ask you that

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.959
<v Speaker 1>it's actually very frequent. I think something I saw like

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>eighties something percent of employers ask for or do background

0:23:54.680 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>searches on potential applicants, and something like seventy three per

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>cent of employers in the United States have like a

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>stated background check policy. Um, so it happens a lot, um,

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and employers are are perspective. Employers are one of the

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>few groups that you can say, yes, you may access

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 1>my criminal background records, Like I couldn't give you permission, Chuck,

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and you go off and access my criminal record or

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>vice versa. I've asked no, and I've given you permission.

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>But when you went to the Sheriff's office. They were like,

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>beat it loaf. I was like, how did they know

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 1>my alias? Right? Yeah, that is true. Uh, but you also,

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 1>as an employer have to have permission for them to

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>go through a firm or a credit agency or something.

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>They can't just do that on their own. You can say, um, no,

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>don't go look at my criminal record, but you're probably

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>not going to get that job. If you are getting

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>interviewed and you do have a criminal record and arrest

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>for something, Uh, it's you know, it's best to own

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>up to that in the moment and don't try and

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>fool them because they can probably find out and uh,

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, you probably have a good excuse or a

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 1>good reason. Um, if you're trying to put your life

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>back together and it was something when you were younger,

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>or maybe a really minor offense, just best to be

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>honest about all that stuff because it will probably come

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>out in the end one way or another. Right, Um, yeah,

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>especially if they if they end up doing the background check.

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there's like two boxes like have you ever

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>been arrested? Which is way different from have you ever

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>been convicted? Which is you know, what I've always seen

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is have you ever been convicted of a crime. But

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>apparently on some job applications they ask if you've ever

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>been arrested. So if you say no and you have

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>complete but then you give them the authority to do

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 1>your background check and it comes back and you lied

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>on your application, they're just gonna turn you down. I

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>saw even if you say yes and they they come

0:25:57.400 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>back with a UM, you know, with and find out

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that you have a criminal record. UM. I think something

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 1>like fifty percent of employers said like that would be it,

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>like they would just move on to the next candidate.

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>But that's really high. But that also means that fifty

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 1>percent of employers would not say that that disqualifies you.

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:17.959
<v Speaker 1>So if you're truthful and honest, and especially especially if

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 1>you have an explanation for what what you know, what

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the crime was, then you know, you're there's a really

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 1>good chance that among that of employers, you're gonna move

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:29.160
<v Speaker 1>on and and like that will be sorted and you'll

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>just continue on an application process or even possibly get

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the job. So I don't I didn't see anywhere that

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>said you know, you should totally just lie on the

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 1>application that they will never find out. Nothing like that

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>like everything I saw is like what you said. You

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:45.919
<v Speaker 1>should just be upfront and honest about it and have

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a have an explanation at the ready to not just

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:52.439
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, I know anyway, you were asking me, you

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 1>know what my greatest fault is, and I would say

0:26:54.440 --> 0:27:00.199
<v Speaker 1>perfectionism and working too much and that arrest. Uh you

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier. You can be discriminated against because of the

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>job because you're not you're no longer what's called being

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>in a protected class. UM, you can be discriminated against.

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>You can be refused that job, you can be refused

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>public housing. UM. Many many things can say an agencies

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 1>can say no, no, thank you because of your arrest record.

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:28.679
<v Speaker 1>I think if you have a felony drug use convention

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>convention conviction of a convention I know, man underrest Thompson

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>sit right in exactly. Uh, that means that they cannot

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>in most cases discriminate against you because of that conviction.

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 1>So they've made a little bit of headway. And we

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>may have talked about that in our Drug Courts episode,

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>but I can't remember, but we did. UM. So there

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of things that, like, UM, that we'll

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 1>talk about. I guess that reformers are basically saying, like,

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:01.239
<v Speaker 1>we need to we need to do something about this.

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>But one of the first kind of band aids that

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the federal government came up with to help people who

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>have a criminal record get a job despite having a

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>criminal record is something called fidelity bonding, which I didn't

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>even know existed, did you. I had heard of that

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>because of um, the film industry. Uh and I don't

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>know that they called it fidelity bonding. But it's sort

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>of like back when you know, Robert Downey Jr. Was

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 1>having all his troubles years ago. Yeah, that was fidelity bonding. Yeah,

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>they would these insurance these movie companies would have to

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>put up these really big insurance bonds to ensure that.

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're spending a ton of money on this movie.

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>You can't have Robert Downey Jr. And you know he's

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>turned everything around, which is a testament to him and

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>he really has and his wife's help. But uh, yeah,

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that that like he's got to show up to work

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's a real risk hiring him in the state

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>or any you know, this this goes across the board.

0:28:57.520 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not just movie stars. But yeah, you can put

0:28:59.880 --> 0:29:02.479
<v Speaker 1>up and pay for a fidelity bond to kind of

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>cut their risks. Yeah, so I saw it here that

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you can, but it looks like it's pretty common, um

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that the federal government will actually issue them free of

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>charge to the to the worker, where the federal government

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>is basically saying, give this person a chance. Um if

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>they if they steal all your whole stock room, uh,

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>if they rob you, uh if if if you suffer

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a loss because you hired them, we will compensate you.

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>That's what that that fidelity bonds dos, which I think

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>is really cool. You know, it's like a good I

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know, there's just something I didn't know it existed,

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and it made me think the world's a slightly nicer

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>place than I realized it was before I realized there

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:48.239
<v Speaker 1>was federal bonding. Yeah, or fidelity bonding or any kind

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of bonding coupling is what you're thinking of. Okay, So, um,

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a kind of a push among um

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>legal legal types to standardize um uh criminal records. And

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>if you take all of the information on a criminal

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>record together, UM, it's called criminal criminal history record information.

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>That's like what all the details are. If you're a researcher.

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>That's what you would refer to it as everybody else

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>calls criminal records or wrap sheets or whatever. But um,

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a pusheet two people among certain people to say, hey,

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>we need to standardize this. It needs to be compulsory

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to report crimes to the to the federal database that

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you know law enforcement can search. Um, we just need

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to make this a better, more robust thing. And there

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is another group, there's a whole other camp that says

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>these are really ruining people's lives unjustly, and we need

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to take another look at this. And they don't necessarily

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>disagree with the people who say this needs to be

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>standardized and compulsory, but they do say we need there's

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it's being left to hang far too long, And I

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>say we take our our last break and then come

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>back and talk about the pros and the cons of

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>criminal records. What about you? Let's do it. Well, now

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>we're on the road, driving in your truck. Want to

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>learn a thing or two from Josh Camp Chuck. It's

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff you should know, all right, Lening things with Chuck,

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>all right? So, uh, you know, if you're a fine

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>upstanding citizen out there and you've never been arrested, you

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>might think, well, there's no downside at all to keeping

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 1>these robust records. Um, anytime you think there's no downside

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to something, you should right there and just reflect on

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>it a little further. Yeah. Absolutely, it doesn't matter what

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it is. There's a downside too, sugar cookies with icing.

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:04.719
<v Speaker 1>There's a downside to Teddy Bears. Somewhere, there's a downside.

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>That's my new Mottel Chuck that just came up with

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a new model. Somewhere there's a downside. What's the Teddy

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Bear downside? I haven't researched him enough. Probably choking hazard

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>from the eyeballs. All right, good point, Yeah, thank you.

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I just came up with that. I'll come up and

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>say more things if you give me a few minutes.

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>So some of the some of the pros of keeping

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>good track of criminal records is you have a robust

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>data set and it's not just like, look how many

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 1>bad people there are in the world, because I think

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>we've hopefully already gotten across that. That doesn't necessarily mean

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you're a bad person. But you can use this data

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>for recidivism research. It's a really valuable source of data

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>instead of having to go to all these different agencies.

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>It is nice to be able to go to one place,

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a one stop shop to find out if, um,

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>some of these programs are effective to keep people from

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 1>recommitting crimes are going back into the criminal justice system. Yeah,

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:04.239
<v Speaker 1>that's a really important thing to know and to have

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>like actual data on you know. Oh, absolutely another thing,

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's not just recidivism, but redemption. There are people

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:18.719
<v Speaker 1>that do research on on redemption. And it's not just like,

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's sort of a broad word to call it,

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>but that's really what what it is. These researchers, Alfred

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomstein and uh Kim Hoori Nakamura have done a lot

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of research trying to find out basically, like if you're

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to get a job, what is where is the

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>reasonable point in your life after you haven't done something

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:44.479
<v Speaker 1>like done something wrong again that it's null and void

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and that an employer shouldn't even have to ask you anymore.

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Basically like when are you fully rehabilitated as far as

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the law enforcement goes, Yeah, like what's the point where

0:33:55.720 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>criminal stops being a criminal when they stopped committing time?

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>How long after that, and they actually studied something like

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight thousand criminal records from New York State, Yeah,

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and then followed them for twenty five years. So this

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>is a really robust study. And what they found was

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that there actually is a point, a quantifiable point, where

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 1>somebody stops being a criminal UM. And they found that

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're UM, if if you committed a serious offense

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>as your first offense, typically it was about eight years

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 1>UM where you were no more likely to be arrested

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>than the average citizen, which is a really huge Yes. Exactly,

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the key because every time you commit another crime,

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 1>you're like still a criminal, still a criminal, right, But

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 1>if you commit like say just one crime, that's the

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 1>easiest way to do it. But ostensibly it would work

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:51.839
<v Speaker 1>for people who commit multiple crimes and then stop, which

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 1>is something called dessistance. It's where criminal stops committing crimes

0:34:56.000 --> 0:35:00.080
<v Speaker 1>UM at some point. If you care about rehabilitation and

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 1>reintroduction in society, you have to say, Okay, you're no

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:06.800
<v Speaker 1>longer a criminal. And these these two researchers, Bloomstein and Nakamura,

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>quantified it eight years for a serious offense with no

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 1>other offenses in between, and then three years for a

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>less serious crime. I didn't see what they were takes

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>about three years before that. That person who was once

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a criminal is now statistically no more likely to be

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:24.439
<v Speaker 1>arrest of her crime than the average person who has

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 1>never committed one before. And I think that's fantastic. The

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>thing is, in this case, criminal records are a paradox.

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>You need to um have criminal records to study them

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to figure out when a criminal record is no longer

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>needed and it's in fact actually harmful to the person.

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not serving any benefits for society. Person is no

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 1>longer a criminal. Now it's actively harming this person who's

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 1>no longer a criminal by keeping them from getting jobs. Yes,

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's uh. I think the last part

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of that quantification for that study is the most important part,

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 1>which is, after a certain time, they're just like everybody else. Yeah,

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 1>like someone who's never been arrested before. They are no

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>more likely to commit a crime than you aren't just

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>because they did it one time eight years ago or

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:14.760
<v Speaker 1>three years ago. Yeah, And that is not the way

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that society, at least as far as as in practice goes,

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>is set up. It's now the way it is now generally,

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 1>although the minds are changing, as we'll see. Um, the

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:29.040
<v Speaker 1>if once you're criminal, you're criminal, that's it. You're criminal

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 1>for life. And these research like this is saying like

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:34.919
<v Speaker 1>that's just not true and this is really unjust after

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a certain period of chime. Yeah, obviously the cons we've

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of dabbled in that through most of this episode.

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, we have a mass incarceration problem in this country,

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and we're not saying like, oh, just don't police and

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:53.439
<v Speaker 1>let people do what they want. It's no big deal.

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 1>But that's different than mass incarceration when one, like you

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>said at the beginning, one and through adults has been

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 1>arrested by the age of twenty three in this country.

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And not only that, but if you include jail along

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 1>with prison, Um, the number of people behind bars in

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the US, and I think this is pretty accurate right now,

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is about two point two million. Yeah, that was that

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>was the latest I could find. I think it was

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 1>in an article from one So that's pretty pretty accurate.

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:28.799
<v Speaker 1>And it's just did you say it's quintupled since no,

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 1>but that's a pretty staggering number. You should see a

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 1>graph of it. It's just shoots up starting in like

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.839
<v Speaker 1>like starting around the nineteen eighties. Crazy enough. I can't

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 1>quite put my finger on why that would have happened,

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:46.279
<v Speaker 1>but it just goes through the roof, right U. And

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of course this is no surprise, I suspect, even to

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 1>people who don't want critical race theory taught in schools.

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:57.719
<v Speaker 1>But if you are of color, or if you are UM,

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>l G B, t q UH, if you are transgender

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 1>although I said tea in there, didn't I, if you

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 1>UM have mental illness, you're way more at risk of

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:12.800
<v Speaker 1>being incarcerated than somebody who doesn't check those same boxes.

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 1>And UM, in America, black men are six times more

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:18.879
<v Speaker 1>likely to be incarcerated than white men, and Hispanic men

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>or two and a half times more likely to be

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:25.240
<v Speaker 1>incarcerated than white men. And so it kind of starts

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to become clear, especially when you realize that UM having

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a criminal record is a big driver of poverty. That

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 1>this is that's disproportionately affecting communities of color and other minorities, UM,

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:41.760
<v Speaker 1>which makes it so much easier for society at large

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to just ignore this problem. Yeah, for sure, I mean

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the obstacles in your way. It's not just getting a job,

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it's building credit, it's getting housing, any kind of public assistance, education, um,

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 1>getting back together with your family. UM. It's it really

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 1>creates sort of a wall around you and the rest

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:04.279
<v Speaker 1>of the world, even if you were trying to get

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 1>back into society and be a good citizen and you

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:11.240
<v Speaker 1>want that job. I think more than six of people

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:15.280
<v Speaker 1>who are formally incarcerated are unemployed a year after being released.

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's like an open invitation to recidivism. Trying to yeah,

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:24.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean not trying to excuse saying, oh, right, well,

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you should just go out and commit crimes. Then if

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you can't get a job, We're not saying that at all,

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:30.719
<v Speaker 1>but it's certainly a barrier if you can't get a

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>job and you're trying to reintegrate into society and sixty

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:36.799
<v Speaker 1>of them a year later can't get those jobs. And

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:38.600
<v Speaker 1>then if you do get a job, those who do

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 1>have the jobs, you're getting less pay annually. UM. And

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I guess over the years you can build

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that back up, and it's good that they get that

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:51.399
<v Speaker 1>one job at least, But there's an imbalance here, uh,

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:55.880
<v Speaker 1>in this country as far as trying to genuinely rehabilitate people.

0:39:56.239 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 1>And that doesn't just mean well, you got out of

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:00.919
<v Speaker 1>jail or you got out of prison, and we feel

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>like you're a pretty good person now and you're on

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:05.359
<v Speaker 1>your own good luck like getting a job or getting

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 1>housing or anything like that. Right. So there, UM, and

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 1>even if you're the kind of person who's like I

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 1>only vote on the economy, that's all I care about,

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:15.720
<v Speaker 1>there's actually something here for you too to be interested

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:21.320
<v Speaker 1>in in um, making criminal records less of a lifetime stigma. UM.

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:24.760
<v Speaker 1>They found that there was a Center for Economic Policy

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and Research study from two sixteen. They looked at two

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand fourteen, just to confuse things a little bit, and

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:35.479
<v Speaker 1>they said that, UM, the people who are shut out

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of legitimate work due to having a criminal records represents

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>an overall reduction in the American workforce by point nine

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to one percent of the workforce, which is something like

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:51.040
<v Speaker 1>one point seven to one point nine million people. And

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 1>they concluded that that means that the gross domestic product

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>lost out that year, just in that year on between

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight and eight se than billion dollars just because

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>these people have been shut out of work just because

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 1>they had a criminal record in some cases for an

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:13.240
<v Speaker 1>arrest that they weren't even convicted for, and that that

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that that is a big problem, and it's also a

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 1>problem for employers too, and that if you just go

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:21.840
<v Speaker 1>by criminal records, because you're legally allowed to, if you

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:23.799
<v Speaker 1>just say you've got a criminal record, we're not gonna

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 1>hire you. Some some UM companies even advertise that like basically,

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:30.280
<v Speaker 1>if you have a criminal record, you need not apply.

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 1>They're they're they're saying that that in some cases or

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that sets the company up to go hire a less

0:41:38.160 --> 0:41:43.360
<v Speaker 1>qualified and possibly less competent candidate UM who doesn't have

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a criminal record. So the whole point, the whole push

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 1>to all this is like, Okay, there's nobody, including me,

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:53.240
<v Speaker 1>who's saying we should do a way with criminal records.

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 1>There are indeed very bad people out there in the world.

0:41:56.680 --> 0:42:00.800
<v Speaker 1>They do exist, right, But there's also in this dragnet

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:03.279
<v Speaker 1>that we create to catch as many people as of

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:07.360
<v Speaker 1>those bad people as possible. Other people who aren't necessarily bad,

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:10.440
<v Speaker 1>or maybe even we're bad once and aren't bad anymore,

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 1>get caught up in that. And that there are things

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>we can do without doing away with the criminal record system.

0:42:17.080 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>And one of the big ones seems to be like

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 1>putting a finite time on that, like after you've kept

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:24.399
<v Speaker 1>your nose clean next number of years, Like maybe these

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 1>things should just get sealed automatically. Um, That's that's a

0:42:28.000 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 1>really big one. Another one is looking at employers and

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>being like, we don't really know if you should be

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 1>asking about this for some professions, Like some professions it

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really matter, Like if you're Starbucks, does it matter

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that that this person had an arrest? You know, exactly

0:42:45.640 --> 0:42:48.000
<v Speaker 1>should they really be denied a job? And so there's

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:50.239
<v Speaker 1>some laws that are called banned the box laws that

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 1>people have been thinking of. Yeah, those boxes is like

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:55.719
<v Speaker 1>you were kind of talking about earlier. When you fill

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 1>out applications for jobs, there's always that little box says

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:02.319
<v Speaker 1>have you been convicted of a crime. It's also called

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>fair chance legislation in some states, and it's basically what

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about is, you know, maybe you should

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:12.799
<v Speaker 1>at least have a limit on what you can ask

0:43:12.880 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in that initial interview. Maybe you should have a time

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 1>limit on how far back into somebody's past you can dig. Uh,

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe in the application process it's at least, um, there

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 1>is a place spelled out where you may be allowed

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to ask that if it's the kind of job that

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you should ask that. Yeah, because there definitely are jobs

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 1>like that, like were ones that work with vulnerable populations

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 1>like the elderly or and they cut those out of

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 1>this legislation. You know, you can't get a job working

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:42.799
<v Speaker 1>with kids or something like you said in a in

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a nursing home or something like that. But I mean,

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's like if you need to be a

0:43:49.160 --> 0:43:51.400
<v Speaker 1>barber or something like that, like do you have to

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:54.640
<v Speaker 1>have a clean record, and you don't necessarily, And actually

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:58.120
<v Speaker 1>barber is one of the problem um professions because you

0:43:58.160 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 1>need a license to be a barber, which we're going

0:44:00.600 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to do short stuff about that. Somebody wrote in wants

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to tell us, like we should look into that. Um.

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 1>But in any any profession, almost any profession that requires

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a license, and there's a lot of them, and barber

0:44:11.000 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is one of them, that licensing board will almost always

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:16.279
<v Speaker 1>say if you have a criminal record, you're you're you

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 1>don't qualify, So you can't get that job. Despite being

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:23.760
<v Speaker 1>born wanting to be a barber. Yeah, some one mistake,

0:44:24.960 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you're you're out. I can't do it by cutting heads.

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, that's different, different kind of cutting heads.

0:44:32.120 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 1>In that case, you got anything else? I got nothing else?

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:38.440
<v Speaker 1>A good one, Chuck, I like this one. Will we

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:40.440
<v Speaker 1>do it in ten more years of unless there's been

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:43.280
<v Speaker 1>some real reform. Yeah, we got a chance to soapbox

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:48.239
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit. Um. Well, if you want to

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 1>know more about criminal records and criminal record reform in particularly,

0:44:52.200 --> 0:44:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to start reading about it on the internet. Um or

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>turn to two other of your friends, because there's a

0:44:57.680 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 1>really good chance that one of them is a criminal

0:44:59.680 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 1>record and they might tell you that things have been

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of hard because of it. And you can trite

0:45:04.200 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a story. And since I said you can hear the story,

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it's time for listener mail. Uh. This is I'm gonna

0:45:11.640 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 1>call this m r I follow up from a professional.

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:17.200
<v Speaker 1>It's always good to hear from the pros that say

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we did a decent job. It's never a great job,

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:22.279
<v Speaker 1>but I'll take decent. I'll take decent too, when we're

0:45:22.280 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 1>explaining things like m R I. Uh, let me see here. Hey, guys,

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:28.880
<v Speaker 1>big fan, longtime listener listen on a daily basis. I'm

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:33.880
<v Speaker 1>an m R I radiographer or radio graphic technologists in

0:45:33.960 --> 0:45:36.000
<v Speaker 1>your country, and I work with m r I s

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:38.880
<v Speaker 1>every day. I wanted to commend you on the accuracy. Overall,

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the m r I physics can be confusing, if not

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 1>near impossible to understand, especially to someone who doesn't have

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 1>experience in the field. I myself went to university for

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>three years to become a radiographer. You gave a really

0:45:50.520 --> 0:45:53.719
<v Speaker 1>good summary of the physics involved, so hats off. A

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of things to add. It's true that a lower

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:59.360
<v Speaker 1>power magnet can produce decent images comparable to a higher

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 1>strength magnet it but you usually do so with a

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:04.759
<v Speaker 1>trade off of an extended scan time. What takes me

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:08.520
<v Speaker 1>ten minutes on my three Tesla machine might take twenty

0:46:08.600 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 1>and at one point five, and as you rightly said,

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to stay completely still because if you don't,

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it'll be blurry and then you have to repeat the scans.

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I drive a three Tesla machine, which is the highest

0:46:19.719 --> 0:46:23.399
<v Speaker 1>strength magnet widely available for clinical use. Seven Tesla MRI

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:26.480
<v Speaker 1>machines have been approved by the FDA for clinical use,

0:46:26.520 --> 0:46:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and tin Tesla machines you're referring to our for research

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 1>purposes only and have some interesting effects, such as being

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 1>able to levitate a frog awesome or causing the mercury

0:46:37.680 --> 0:46:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and dental feelings to leach out. Oh my god, man

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:46.880
<v Speaker 1>uh And then Russell here in Sydney, Australia goes on

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:50.359
<v Speaker 1>to say point out that I got a CT scan

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 1>for the diverticuli search, not an m R I. So

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. I was not an m R I.

0:46:57.320 --> 0:47:00.239
<v Speaker 1>So have you had an m R I? Then I have.

0:47:01.400 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 1>And again it was years ago. And I want to

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:08.520
<v Speaker 1>say it was my back, which is now fine, but

0:47:08.680 --> 0:47:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a back deal. I'm glad your

0:47:10.440 --> 0:47:14.919
<v Speaker 1>back is fine. It's been fine. I mean I knew

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it was. You complain, Yeah, but there was a big

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that your back is fine, that you have a nice beard.

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:24.840
<v Speaker 1>You know what. There was a brief time where I

0:47:24.880 --> 0:47:28.560
<v Speaker 1>had some back issues, but it was pretty brief. It

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 1>was a few months. I think. Gotcha, Well, is that it?

0:47:32.920 --> 0:47:35.840
<v Speaker 1>That's it? It was from Did I say? That is

0:47:35.960 --> 0:47:40.520
<v Speaker 1>from Russell in Sydney? Russell? You can use my name

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in Sydney. That's awesome. Thanks, Russell. You can use my

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 1>name in Sydney. That's a great name. Very odd one,

0:47:46.160 --> 0:47:49.439
<v Speaker 1>but good. Um. And I really feel like we need

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to put more cadavers into ten Tesla m r I's

0:47:53.880 --> 0:47:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and watch the Mercury come out because that must be amazing.

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:01.439
<v Speaker 1>If you want to get into the video, yeah me too.

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:03.279
<v Speaker 1>If you want to get in touch with this, like

0:48:03.360 --> 0:48:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Russell did, we love hearing from experts who say we

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 1>did a so so job. You can send us an

0:48:08.560 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 1>email to Stuff podcast at iHeart radio dot com. Stuff

0:48:15.600 --> 0:48:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you Should Know is a production of I heart Radio.

0:48:18.080 --> 0:48:21.239
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app,

0:48:21.440 --> 0:48:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.