WEBVTT - China's Growth Forecast, US House Passes Spending Bill to End Shutdown

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Doug Krisner. In

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 2>the States, the House of Representatives passed a Senate measure

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:22.159
<v Speaker 2>to end the government shutdown. The President signed it and

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 2>the government will resume operations on Thursday. In a moment,

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 2>we'll look at US markets with Mike Dixon of Horizon Investments.

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>We began though in Hong Kong, where we had the

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.919
<v Speaker 2>chance to catch up with Hifan Hu, chief investment officer

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 2>and head of APAC macro Economics at UBS Wealth Management.

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 2>She spoke with Bloomberg TV, host of aon Men and

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:42.919
<v Speaker 2>Annabel Droolers.

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 2>The conversation began with a question on the outlook for

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese economy.

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about twenty twenty six. I mean, I feel

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 4>like the year has just sort of flown by and

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 4>we're already forecasting. So so what are you talking with

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 4>with clients about right now?

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think sus some most interesting question. Now, I

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 5>think that for twenty twenty five, if we see the

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 5>China's GDP growth like we think, we will end up

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 5>with like a four point nine percent to five percent,

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 5>So for the next year, we think the government could

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 5>set up the target between like a four point five

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 5>percent to five percent. So in our view, if without

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 5>like a major stimulus, so the GDP could reach around

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 5>a four point five percent, so we will have probably

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 5>lower for the first half the high for the second half.

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 6>How significant would that be lowering at least or at

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 6>least that range when it comes to that growth target

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 6>for next year.

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 5>I think this year is around the five percent, so

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 5>I think that if it's end up is a four

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 5>point nine percent, so it's also hits the target. So

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 5>it's possible for them to give a range rather than

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 5>say around a five percent. Again, so because like the

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 5>next year could be lower unless the government like I

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 5>wants to put the major stimilus, but we think the

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 5>chance is not very high, so I think they would

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 5>rather put like our range, maybe more comfortable like her

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 5>for like everyone.

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 4>So not major similars. That's more of the physical side.

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 4>What about the monetary policy side.

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 5>Monetary party side, I think we'll still keep easy and

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 5>keep accommodative, and we still expect like a fifty two

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 5>hundred BIPs of the cut by the end of the

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty six and also maybe twenty to thirty BIPs

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 5>of the interest rate cuts. Because given or CPI infreation

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:32.679
<v Speaker 5>is still pretty low.

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 6>What are you expecting to be kind of the bigger

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 6>drags next year? Is it the exports side of things

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 6>are going to be a bit softer than this year

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 6>that has been quite resilient, And are we just not

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 6>expecting any sort of meaningful recovering the consumer For.

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 5>The consumer side, I think the yeah, we think it

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 5>still will be like at between three to five percent.

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 5>We didn't see like how too much highlights about that,

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 5>I think, But the major driver should be still for

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 5>the industry autoput side, industry product because like AI AI

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 5>driven applications and also with like this kind of advanced

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 5>manufacturing and possibly like we call the new productivity growth.

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 5>So I think that will probably lead the driver. On

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 5>the other side. For the energy side, I think that

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 5>especially this year, we say for the energy reserves like

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 5>a new energy and also for this kind of the

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 5>high voltage like our elacricity, like our transmission. That's all

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 5>could become like our new highlights. But for the consumption side,

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 5>I think as will be uh in my view, will

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 5>be I could quite civil, but will not be like

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 5>very strong. Our property will still be the drag, but

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 5>we don't think the government will put too much efforts

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 5>of that, so we'll just let it go unless this

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 5>have the cliff that job, but that's the chance also small.

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 4>Picking up on that theme around increasing automation you're just

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 4>referencing there, how does that also impact the jobs outlook

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 4>and the employment outlook as well?

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 5>In this sense, I think for AI application, so like

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 5>how one side of course, like more jobs may be

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 5>taken by the machine, But at the same time, we

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 5>think maybe service sectors still have the chances. And also

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:24.239
<v Speaker 5>withs like a new applied like a services sector, maybe

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 5>there's something like a more like how we call the

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 5>experience exposure like a services sector come out, like how

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 5>that's more like a digitized and also with like this

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 5>kind of more entertaining or like how even with more

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 5>creative like a more service oriented like actual opportunities. But

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 5>still I think there is still of pressure.

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 6>And you guys upgraded Chinese Tech just a few weeks

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 6>ago and saying it's probably the most preferred, right, most

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 6>attractive here right now, how are you looking at this

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 6>rally around AI and the light now and how do

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 6>you position around it for next year.

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 5>I think the this year AI already rallied for two

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 5>years like last year. This year, especially for this year

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 5>almost over thirty percent. But I think the think about

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 5>it for this all these kind of a big platforms

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 5>very similar to the US like Meganique since seven. I

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 5>think they just started because like one side, I think

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 5>that their valuation is still relatively low, like thirty to

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 5>thirty percent of discount comparing with the US PS. And

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.919
<v Speaker 5>the second I think for the China, the AI investment

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 5>is still like a capex is still increasing like a

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 5>similar to the US. And also certain I think it's

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 5>a very a little bit different from the US side.

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 5>I think the China is more like an ecosystem. So

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 5>I think that with this kind of an ecosystem with

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 5>the basic research like then the AI, then the AI

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 5>application with this ecosystem could like the spillover effect, we

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 5>think it could be bigger.

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 4>One of tho sort of issues I guess around the

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 4>AI application side is sometimes low barriers to entry, What

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 4>are the what are the sectors that you look at

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 4>in terms that AI theme in particular is being a

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 4>bit more resilient.

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 5>I guess I think the AI, say, will range you

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 5>from the lower end to the high end. So if

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 5>the we can like AI applic applied like an advance

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 5>of manufacturing and new materials and also healthcare, I think

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 5>he's booming because of the AI like how the application,

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 5>and we also say because say AI applied to maybe

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 5>like era space and also uh some like how many

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 5>like a new fields. I think it's just like feed

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 5>up the exploration and also like innovation.

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 6>What are some of the key themes you're watching out?

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 6>I mean for the fourth part, because I think there's

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 6>been a lot of allocation into domestic tech already, especially

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 6>you take a look how institutional investors are kind of positioning.

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 6>Do you think that this is extreme levels when you

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 6>talk about fund concentration now and we've already sort of

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 6>seen some rotation out of tech cannot continue in the

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 6>fourth quarter.

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I think that it's started with the tech and

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 5>also like uh yeah, the concentration set. We think the

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 5>text still have the loom, but we also see it's

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 5>applied to other sectors as well, like gradually. For example,

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 5>we think that this year it's also very shiny. Section

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 5>is for the energy reserves because now by now for

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 5>the new energy already surprise thirty five percent of the

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 5>China's like a total energy surprise, So I think that's

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 5>like a very like a significant number. And we'll also

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 5>say like maybe the healthcare will benefit because their price

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 5>has been low and I could benefit like maybe with

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 5>this kind of plakichi. And for the consumption side, yeah,

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.119
<v Speaker 5>that side is ah, it's we have the new const

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 5>new consumption, but too high and it's it's it's not easy.

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 5>But I think that we still have this kind of

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 5>the like the new materials. And we also say for

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 5>the sector like booming out and also the AI is

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 5>not only the SOT to wear and also have the hardwares,

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 5>but of course most sectors, most companies are in the

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 5>A listed, so that's really we also think the issuers

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 5>and could also could slightly better perform than h year

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 5>next year because with all these kind of the like hardwares.

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 4>So that's that's the equity side. What about the fixed

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 4>income side? What are your preferences there?

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 5>Uh, for the fixed income side, because we still expect,

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 5>like for the interest rate will go down, so I

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 5>think the like for the bond side, I think it's

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 5>not very attractive. But the existing bound of course, like

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 5>I think I still like have the uh the game.

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 6>Is buying bonds again, right, Yeah, that's is that likely

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 6>to be more measured this time around?

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 5>I think the yeah, PBOC and also I think the

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 5>PBOC also, I think that this year we also say

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:57.719
<v Speaker 5>for the company's actually issue like Chinese, like for the

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 5>c N y bounds like in Hong Kong. So I

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 5>think the government like pbios by bonds. I think it's

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 5>more like I'll keep the mandatory. They don't call it

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 5>a quantitative easy, but I think it's more like I'll

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 5>provide the liquidity adjustment of the liquidity like a provision

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 5>in the market.

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 2>That was ifan Who from UBS Wealth Management speaking with

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.439
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg TV host Von Mann and Anabel Droolers on the

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Daybreak Asia podcast. Welcome back to the Daybreak Asia podcast.

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm Doug Prisner. As mentioned earlier, the House of Representatives

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 2>passed a Senate measure to end the longest government shutdown

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 2>in US history.

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 2>In anticipation of this development, the Dow climbed for a

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 2>fourth straight day, breaking above forty eight thousand for the

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 2>first time and closing at a record high. Financials led

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 2>the way for a closer look. I'm joined by Mike Dixon.

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 2>He is head of research and quantitative Strategies at Horizon Investments. Mike,

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 2>thank you for making time to chat with me. If

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 2>you don't mind, I'd like to start with Cisco Systems.

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 2>We heard from the company after the bill an upbeat

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 2>sales forecast, which is likely a reflection of the progress

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Cisco is making and capturing more spending on AI. The

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.839
<v Speaker 2>stock was up eight percent in late US trading to

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 2>around eighty dollars. Now that is the closest Cisco's shares

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 2>have come to eighty two. They're all time high, set

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 2>back on March twenty seventh, two thousand rights the dot

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 2>com bubble burst. It's interesting timing. Maybe with all the

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 2>talk we've heard about bubbles.

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I certainly love the history throwback, and yeah, I mean

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>we are right on the cusp of reclaiming that high.

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I would say, you know, at least on a dividend

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>adjusted basis, that has been reclaimed within the past several months.

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>But nonetheless, look, this is not this AI trade is

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 1>not the Internet bubble of the nineties. When we look

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>at the underlying fundamental at the top of the market,

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you have had extremely strong earnings growth and revenue growth,

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and this earning season is no exception. When you look

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>at the Magnificent seven and the NASDAC, you've actually had

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>an inflection higher and revenue growth year every year of

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent for the Nasdaq and that's up from ten

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>percent about a year ago. So we've had an inflection

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:25.079
<v Speaker 1>higher in revenue growth. Obviously, earnings have been absolutely stellar.

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 1>We have seen cash flows come down a good bit

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>because of a lot of the cap x, but these

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing significant plans to make the power demand

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and the deals needed to get that infrastructure build and

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>make that stuff happen. So really strong fundamentals here supporting

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the top of the market, which is not what we

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>had back in the late nineties.

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Even so, over the last couple of days, we've seen

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 2>a rotation away from big cap tech. Yesterday that would

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 2>be the Tuesday session in the States, it was healthcare.

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Today it was the financials. Is it prudent now to

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of maybe take a little bit of risk off

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 2>the table.

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, we have seen a little bit of rotation, but

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the market overall we tend to forget that

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:06.319
<v Speaker 1>some of these stocks actually can be flat for a day,

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's completely normal, and in fact it's very healthy,

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, zooming out when you look at the more

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, equal weight version of the SMP or you know,

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I believe that the Dow right cross its forty eight

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand today, that of course does not have a lot

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Max seven you know, top of the tech

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and AI trade really embedded in there. It's healthy to

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>see some of that, you know, certainly with what we've

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>had this year, because market concentration has been has been growing,

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and it is good to see a broader participation even

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:40.359
<v Speaker 1>some of the defensives you mentioned healthcare. I mean that

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 1>that to me is a really good kind of contrarian

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 1>sector play, and I think it's good to see participation there.

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 3>We've had a stellar rally in the top of the.

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Market, and I do believe right now it might be

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>prudent to think of.

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 3>That as more of a hold and not necessarily an ad.

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>We do have Nvidia next week, which is a macro

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>event in al so we're going to need to see

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that what that holds, whether this Santa claus rally is

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be, you know, what we get through the

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>end of the year. But there are other opportunities other

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 1>than AI out there, and I do think it's wise

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to be looking at what some of those may be.

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Earlier today, the White House said that the October reports

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 2>on unemployment and consumer prices will unlikely be released. Obviously,

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 2>these numbers have been delayed by the shutdown. This is

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 2>only going to add to a little bit more of

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 2>the difficulty engaging the outlook, especially for the FED. Right now,

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 2>I think FED fun Future suggests a sixty three percent

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 2>chance of a rate cut next month of twenty five

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 2>basis points. Although we're hearing more and more from a

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 2>number of FED members about the concern over inflation it

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 2>being sticky and perhaps a bigger risk than the unemployment story.

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Where do you come down when it comes to the

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 2>FED and the outlook.

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, seeing that the headline today about the

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>delay in those reports is not great timing, right. I

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>think we are at a point where we have had

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a pretty steady decline in labor market data heading into

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the shutdown. But at the same time, inflation it hasn't

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>necessarily been a problem, but it hasn't been improving at

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.719
<v Speaker 1>the rate that folks would like. And so you know

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>what has happened with this shutdown is a lot of

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>these surveys just didn't get completed and as a result

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>may not be for at least what I was reading

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the first time. Ever, that's not great because the December

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>meeting as well, is a little bit earlier this year

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>than it typically is, and so we're going to be

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of running up against the wire to get a

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of this data collected and get a fresh view

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>on the market. But you know, overall, I do think

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>what we saw at the end of October was a

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a surprise from Powell and the Committee

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>as a whole. You know, he mentioned a number of

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>times that the December cut was not a foregone conclusion

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>for me and I think the rest of the market.

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 3>That was a good bit of a surprise to hear that.

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>On the inflation side of things, though, and I hear

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the arguments out there, but if we also zoom out

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, the FED has been above their inflation

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>target for you know, the better part of four nearly

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>five years, and in their recent statement of economic projections,

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>they don't have us getting back down to two percent

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>until the end of twenty twenty seven. I mean, Look,

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that's almost eight years that they're going to be spending

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>above a two percent, and to me, I'm not so sure.

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Their target practically is two percent, and so we'll see

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>what the Committee committee thinks here in December. But I,

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>for one, do believe that in the mid two they're

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>probably perfectly comfortable with that so long as they get

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>stability in the labor market. So that's what that's the

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>side I'm on. I think we're going to get some

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>get a cut, but we're going to have to see.

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be highly dependent on what the missing

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>information tells us.

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 2>So I'd like to get your take on whether or

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 2>not there is a great degree of bifurcation in the economy.

0:15:56.600 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 2>It was very interesting today we heard from Fitch Ratings

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 2>and the company said the share of some prime borrowers

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 2>at least sixty days past too on their auto loans

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 2>rose by more than six percent of the month of October.

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 2>I think we're now at the highest level since about

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 2>nineteen ninety four. Now you and I both know what

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 2>the wealth effect has done this move higher in the

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 2>equity market, and how higher income earners that own stocks

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 2>have been able to power a lot of consumer spending.

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Maybe there's a little bit more concern about lower and

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 2>middle income households. Do you think this has the potential

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 2>really to hold back a lot of growth the way

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 2>in which we were kind of divided.

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, I don't think we're really there yet.

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that the economy, as we're seeing in the

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>stock market, you know, has become more concentrated because not

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody is you know, participating in a lot of the

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>equity market wealth that has been created. But you know,

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned on the debt side of things. The New

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>York Fed puts out their quarter debton credit report that

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>comes out. It was just last week the for the

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>for the third quarter, reporting on a lot of these statistics,

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, across loan types and across the different you know,

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>age and other demographic areas. And you know, we really

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't see many headlines around that in Bloomberger otherwise. And

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the reason is because nothing really got that worse or alarming.

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>And I hear you on that data point on the

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.360
<v Speaker 1>auto loans, but you know, it didn't really show up

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>in a screaming manner on a change basis, you know,

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 1>in that major.

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 3>Quarter we report.

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I don't think that I think that

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>was good that we didn't see that tick up there.

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think we're quite at a trouble area yet,

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, as it relates to that.

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 3>And overall, the consumer is in a.

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Really, really healthy pace, and we've seen that when we

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 1>used to get economic data, we saw that broadly, and

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll hope to see that see that again here once

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the floodgates open back up and we get some information.

0:17:58.359 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Even so, if you look at the results of the

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 2>election last week, we're talking New Jersey, we're talking Virginia,

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 2>even here in New York City, this issue of affordability,

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 2>it's front and center, you know.

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 3>It is.

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I think one thing on affordability that that's going to

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>be an underappreciated boost to economic activity is really on

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the housing side. And I think you can see that

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>through the fall in mortgage rates. You know, we are

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>still in you know, the low sixes, but a good

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>bit down from where things were. And one of the

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the metrics that we look at and have

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>been tracking closely is you know, interest rate volatility and

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>how that's been falling, and that's playing a pretty big

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>role in where mortgage rates are relative to the ten year,

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, with as we get closer and closer

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to the end of this FED easing cycle, you know,

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 1>we're going to continue to see that interest rate volatility

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>fall and even without a change in the ten year,

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>mortgage rates can still come down. I think some Mesma said,

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll looking, you know, we could see you know, in

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 1>the five and a half range with no change in

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the tenure, just simply through this volatility reduction channel with

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. This is going to be a really big

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>boost to just housing affordability overall because the activity has

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>been just completely on the floor there, and I think

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that can be a really big boom when it comes

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to consumer confidence, labor, mobility, home equity, lines of credit.

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>There's there's a lot of I think booming economic activity.

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>We can get through that mortgage channel, and I think

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that that is something it's a little bit underappreciated, but

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>things have been moving in the right direction to make

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>at least the housing side there with existing homes, you know,

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot more affordable, and as time passes, I think

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that that's gonna be alleviated a little bit through that channel,

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's a really good thing.

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 2>So, Mike, where are you finding opportunity domestically.

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, one of my favorite areas right now,

0:19:56.359 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll give I'll give two things that that really have

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 1>my attention lately. One of them is the small and

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.719
<v Speaker 1>MidCap space in US markets. Now, this has been a

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>trade that has had its fits and starts, right. You've

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 1>seen numerous very short lived kind of rallies in the

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>smaller cap segments of the market, but it's really failed

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to sustain a rally, you know, in the last several years.

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.239
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's a couple of things working in

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>favor of that trade right now for more of a

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>longer term hold.

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 3>You know. One of them is this rate channel.

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Right, the high level of rates overall have been you know,

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>difficult and weighing in a disproportionate manner on the small

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and midcaps space, right, Microsoft and Video. These folks don't

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>really care too much about the level.

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Of interest rates.

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>They have plenty of cash flow and balance sheet. So

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that rate hikes are definitely off the table

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and whether we get a cut in December is one thing,

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>but the direction of travel is down. That's a really

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:56.360
<v Speaker 1>good thing for small caps overall. The second thing I'll

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>point out too, is we've seen earning's breadth really pick

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 1>up materially in that space. You saw it this quarter

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>with earnings for the S and P six hundred coming

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in about twelve percent year every year. That's the same

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>as we got in the S and P five hundred.

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>You also saw a pretty solid near ten percent earnings

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>per share surprise, So just beats with the S and

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>P six hundred, those smaller cap names. That's a second

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>quarter in a row where it was, you know, a

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>stellar beat. And most importantly, evaluations have actually come down

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on a forward looking basis for small cap stocks, so

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got really a good entry point there they have

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.160
<v Speaker 1>not participated with the top of the market rally.

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 3>And then on the longer term.

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 1>View, just you know, overall domestic focused policies, deregulation potentially

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>m and A activity picking up, I think is a

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>really good entry point. And I'll add a really good

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>seasonality kind of time a year to kind of enter

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that trade and carry that in your portfolio through twenty six.

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 3>So that's one area I really like.

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>And then healthcare as well is a kind of a

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 1>sector contrarian play I like for similar reasons in the

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>sense that healthcare used to be a kind of crowded,

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 1>secular growth trade. It's now very firmly on the value

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>side of the market, with lower valuations only in energy

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and financials, and you still see really strong strength on

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>the top lines there. And it also hasn't rallied. I

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>think that's poised to be a winter as we had

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in next year too.

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious about how you're feeling about markets outside the US,

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 2>particularly in Asia. Any interest there, maybe Japan.

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:29.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, overall, I think international diversification in general is a

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>great place to be of certainly with hindsight this year, right,

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>international markets have done exceptionally well. But you know, one

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I think is not just think

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I firmly believe is going to be critical for you know,

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>this AI trade and the AI cap X to really

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 1>be put to work, is you know, just the infrastructure

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>being built out. And when you look at the international block,

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you have a sector composition that's primarily made up more

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>so of industrials and energy material those type companies. These

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>sectors not only are they underrepresented in the US economy,

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>they're also poised to participate in a you know, kind

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>of industrial type rallying industrial type build out, and I

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's going to be a really good sector composition

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to look to as a diversification from the you know,

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>tech centered US markets, but also as you get a

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of that infrastructure build out. And then you know,

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 1>of course, there's also the policy side of things from

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a central bank perspective. I think with the FED, you know,

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>still in the cutting cycle, where a lot of other

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:36.239
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, global markets are kind of near the

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>end of theirs, You're going to continue to see this

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of narrowing interest rate deferment differential that should weigh

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>on the dollar uh more, and that should be a

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>tailwind for those kind of foreign markets uh here in

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>US dollars.

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 3>So you know, a couple of reasons there.

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the international block as a whole U is

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of a great place to be and provide some

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>diversification from the US.

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Very quickly, Mike, do you want to be exposed China

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 2>right now?

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I think China does have some interesting prospects to it

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:11.439
<v Speaker 1>along those similar lines, most acutely just from you know,

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>just a policy response standpoint.

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I think China.

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I think China is going to be critical to you know,

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this kind of cyclical build out theme

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that I'm talking about. So yes, I think that would

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>be a good, you know, emerging market area of focus

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 1>in the international block.

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Mike, we'll leave it there. Thank you so very much.

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 2>Mike Dixon there. He is head of Research and Quantitative

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Strategies at Horizon Investments. Joining us here on the Daybreak

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Asia Podcast. Thanks for listening to today's episode of the

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Daybreak Asia Edition podcast. Each weekday, we look at

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 2>the story shaping markets, finance, and geopolitics in the Asia Pacific.

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 2>You can find us on Apple, Spotify, the Bloomberg Podcast

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 2>YouTube channel, or anywhere else you listen. Join us again

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow for insight on the market moves from Hong Kong

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 2>to Singapore and Australia. I'm Doug Prisoner and this is

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg