WEBVTT - Why Morgan Stanley Is Revising Its GDP Outlook

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Ye. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>with David Gura. Daily we bring you insight from the

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>best of economics, finance, investment, and international relations. Find Bloomberg

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, and of course,

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg Good Morning everyone, David Geran, Tom Keene,

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance, Our studios in New York, Mr gurl Off,

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:41.959
<v Speaker 1>Francie Aqua in our studios in London, Francine, Prime Minister May.

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Is she in Japan on her way? What's that? So?

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I think she just landed in Japan. We just spoke

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to Alex Moraless on TV. He's traveling with the Prime Minister. Tom.

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>This is actually quite significant. She's gone to Japan in

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the hope of some kind of commitment for a free

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>trade deal. Of course they can't actually sign anything, but

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>if she comes back a failure, that's not gonna look

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>very great. I mean, this is a massive Brexit theme.

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Am I going to suggest? Mr Johnson? Boris Johnson's theme

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that we are going to become a trading empire again?

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>And I agree it starts with Japan, doesn't it. Yeah?

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't know about the trading empire. Certainly

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in his mind and maybe a couple of people that

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>voted for breaks it, that's certainly what they aim for.

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>But if you think about it, Look, it's going to

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:26.479
<v Speaker 1>be quite difficult to pull this thing off. I think

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>negotiations with the EU lost it for almost a decade

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>before they could actually, you know, be in these final

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>stages of this free trade agreement. Okay, here's what we're

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna do. One question with YenS Nordvig on the business

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>at hand, the dollar, and then we want to talk

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to him about global Wall Street dollar dynamics, the massive

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>miscall of the summer strong dollar euro parity, all of

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it was reversed. Let's start with why why did everybody

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>get the strong dollar call wrong? Well, I think that

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the hope about what the administration could do was just

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>two elevations. It's linked to Trump the election. The just

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>think there's a part of that, and I think there

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>was there's too much concern about the European political risk, right,

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>So it was something that focused everybody minds around the

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>French election, and they were worried about the downside risk.

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>But in fact, now we have upside rice in terms

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of politics and Europe. Maybe mccollan Mentel can actually get

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 1>a deal together in coming months, so that would be

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a positive thing. Francine has led our coverage on mithid

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>my fed How how do you pronounce the chase mythic method? Method?

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>One another method you've lived in. You've gone from major

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>firms Coleman, Saxon number to where you've got to shingle out.

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>You're hugely successful talking to elites. There can only be

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>so many Yen's nordvigs. What are the mere mortals of

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>research in intellectual content? What are the mere mortals do

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 1>in the city and in New York? Well, so I

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>can talk a little bit about what what we are

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to do, right, because you're it that if it's

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 1>based on a single individual, then you can't scale a

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>business that's just going to stop there, right, So you

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 1>need to have some kind of infrastructure that gives you

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>an edge. Right. So what we're trying to do is

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.399
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to really build unique data. You need models

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that we can show to people and that gives them

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>an edge. So that's what we're trying to scale the business.

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 1>But I think you're right. If you are a pretty

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>good analysis that sits in a bank or independent research

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>into choosing pretty good is not going to cut it.

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 1>You have to be among the very best to get

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>paid specific before your research, and that's the competition that

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody is going to be in. Now. Yes, I can't

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>really make sense of it. So I understand these are

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>very important rules to make everything more transparent. But then

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>we speak to Danskin Bank and they say they're trying

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to figure out whether research on this need to charge

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>for routine phone calls. Why do we not know yet?

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.119
<v Speaker 1>We're what August or twenty nine? This you know goes

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>in place January three. I think one major problem is

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that the banks setting prices now for their research, and

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you can see that they're coming down down, down, deut

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>your bank without announcement the other day exactly, and they

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't know where the floor is. We don't know

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>where regulators going to say, Okay, that price is just

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>actually it doesn't match any any of the cost you having.

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just a fake price. So the regulators have to

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>come out and give some guidance as to what pricing

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.799
<v Speaker 1>they would would accept, and we just don't have that yet. Okay,

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>do we have any idea of where that accepted prices?

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Because if you if you low ball it, right, if

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you say, well, I'm hardly going to pay anything at all,

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>not only the regulators saying that's not good enough, but

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>they could also do an investigation on it. Yeah. No,

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's the core of a problem. That

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>guidance has not been given and we're only a couple

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of months away from when they're supposed to come to

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 1>into effect, and it's kind of paralyzing everybody because we

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>just don't know how research is going to be a price.

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>It's away from your world of foreign exchange. But in equities,

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Collins Rockwell Collins, the merger with ut X Collins, and

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg has an analysts following it. From where you sit,

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>are those days over well, I think you can already

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>see it in the equity space that there are more

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and more players withdrawing from like traditional equity research, and

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>therefore we have less analysts covering certain stocks, and we

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>have also less stocks overall being covered. So in a way, this,

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this is the regulation is going to mean that there's

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>less information available to trade on. Okay, does that mean

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>for example, that if you're a great you know, if

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you bring your research in house so you stop paying

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>for it from others, that actually will give you the

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>real advantage. How much is the financial landscape really going

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to change because you'll see the people that are really

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>good out of their own research actually making the trades. Yeah,

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I think you're seeing that that there's more

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and more by side firms that says, Okay, it's going

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to be too expensive, we have to do it internally.

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>So there's certainly players that are doing it that way.

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>They're doing it very quickly. I know you've got to

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>go to a client call right now, but yes, this

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>is critical. Have you seen any evidence that anyone's going

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to quote unquote take foreign exchange coverage internally? So the

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>foreign exchange market was special in that it's not about

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>thousands of companies. Is like a couple of key crosses.

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 1>So I think in general, the big currency traders in

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the world, they will have a mix of internal research

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and they also pay for the best they can get outside.

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>They're still gonna send people to the New York Rangers,

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Montreal Canadians game all that rack. It's gonna still continue

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>against nord Vig. Thank you so much with Elexante data

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 1>here and I'm an important call for those of you

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>interested in the energy assets of a Beliger Golf of Mexico.

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>This is, without question the interview of the day. Jacques

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Roussou is with clear view energy partners, but barely describes

0:06:56.000 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>decades of work on the pipelines the refineries of our

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>American energy infrastructure. Jack an open question first, our our

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:09.679
<v Speaker 1>assets at risk? Do we thirty days from now, sixty

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>days from now, ninety days from now, move on with

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Harvey as a memory. That's a difficult question to answer.

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I think one way to think about it is during Katrina,

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.679
<v Speaker 1>it took about three months for these refineries to get

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>back up to a full production level. So that is

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>one marker to think about. But you just never know.

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned uh earlier this morning when we spoke on

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>television about the unique place of electricity to oil into

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>gas in the region. Explain that. Give us a Lehigh

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>University exclamation. Exclamation of explanation, I'll get it out, explanation

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of how electricity folds into hydrocarbons. Sure, I think what

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to think about is refineries, pumping stations, for pipelines,

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>chemical plants. Uh, there's a lot of electricity that powers

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the plants, and if that has gotten flooded and knocked out,

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, there can be a lengthy recovery time to

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>repair that. Alright, I'm looking at some of the refineries

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and there's a great function on the Bloomberg terminal for

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>those that have one, Jack talk to me about what

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>is more concerning. Is it refineries shutting or the pipeline

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>being blocked off? Well, right now we're looking on the

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>refinery side. If you think about the United States, about

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent of refining capacity is in the Gulf Coast,

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of that in Louisiana, of that in Texas. From what

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>we've seen now, there's been reported eighteen percent or so

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:41.079
<v Speaker 1>of US refining capacity is either down or working at

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 1>restricted rates. So that is kind of the key thing

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to focus on right now because if those refineries stay

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>down for an extended period of time, that is what

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:53.199
<v Speaker 1>the market is thinking with gasoline going up. How much

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.959
<v Speaker 1>does a hurricane actually impact the demands, not the supply side,

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>but the demand side of things. That's a great question,

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think you can see that in oil price

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>because what we're seeing for w T I is that

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States is down roughly eight hundred thousand barrels

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>per day of oil supply due to the hurricane. But

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>oil demand to the hurricane is a bigger number because

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the refining side of the equation. Is that we're

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing over three million barrels per day of refining capacity

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>down and so that's cutting um the gasoline, which is

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 1>the way the government calculates it in terms of products supplied,

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is what they call demand. I mean, flooding is not

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the only Flooding seems to be a jack the primary

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>problem for refineries, right, but it's not the only one, sure,

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean you have a lot of Do you have

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:47.479
<v Speaker 1>ability to get oil? Do you have ability to access pipelines?

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's there's definitely a lot of infrastructure issues

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that need to be worked out, and I think we

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>will see this over the next few days. We will

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>get reports from the different companies on the status um

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>As I recall from the Trina days, you know, there

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of information flow once companies could actually

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>get back into the assets. Brian Mound, Big Hill, West

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Heckberry and buy you Chuck Taw. That's where our strategic

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>oil reserve. Is is our strategic oil reserve up to

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>its eyeballs and water this morning? Uh, that's a hard

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>one to say. I mean, I think what you want

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to think about is do we need that oil? And um,

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you know that's not what this This hurricane has caused

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a shortage of oil. So we're we're not in a

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>situation where we need oil, but it may get to

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the point where companies need to borrow some oil. And

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 1>during Katrina, companies actually borrowed ten million barrels of oil

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and then actually returned it in the subsequent months. Many

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>more questions. Let's continue with a chuck or so were

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>this with clear view energy partners, we are being smarter

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>on hydrocarbons today, for instance the quart in London. I'm

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Tom keenan New York chacker. So with this with clear

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>view energy partners, as we could continue to look at

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>what has become a tropical storm. What is the the

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure need of our pipelines and refineries? Is it as

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>ugly as our many bridges worn out across this nation? Oh,

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say that. You know, these assets are taken

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>care of very well. Obviously if they weren't there would

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 1>be a lot more significant problems to that. So, um,

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just a matter of dealing with, um the flooding

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and figuring out what actually happened. I mean, are the

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>new facilities we think of all the stereotypes of refineries

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>built after World War Two that are being pieced together

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>with duct tape. Is that's not the case down there,

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>is it? Well, there's not too many new refineries. Marathon

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Petroleum had built one near New Orleans a few years back,

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.359
<v Speaker 1>but most of them have been around for a while. Obviously,

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>there's there's maintenance that occurs on routine bases. What is

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the things are that we understand or misunderstand about shale

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>production from the U S. If you look at you know,

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the I guess the break even price, I'm hearing everything

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>from thirty to sixty. Yeah. Obviously we've seen a big

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>move up in shale production, UM with the move up

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>an oil price since the OPEQ announcement to start cutting production,

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 1>and that is becoming a marginal supply out there. I mean,

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I think what you need to look at going forward

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in the back half of the year is that the

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>world uses a lot more oil in the second half

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of the year, just seasonally, and this is opex big

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>chance to reduce inventories, supply and demands very close. So

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of wild cards out there that

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>could go either way, and we've got a new one

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>with the hurricane because, as we're mentioning before, this is

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>going to uh clip demand in the US some If

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you if you look at Libya's oil production right it's

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>dropped I think by around three sixty one thousand barrels

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a day. That's thirty five percent of output lost month.

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>How much does that help OPAQUE and it's struggled to

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>reduce this global glut. That's a great question, and Libya

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:07.439
<v Speaker 1>is one of the wild cards. You've got Libya, You've

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>got Nigeria, You've got Venezuela. Iraq has not come close

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to to meeting their production cuts. So this is what

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:16.679
<v Speaker 1>OPEC needs, is they need a few of these countries

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.439
<v Speaker 1>to for their oil to move down UM to offset

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:22.839
<v Speaker 1>any sort of demand loss that we might get because

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of the hurricane. Jacque. One final question, is America energy independent? Oh?

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>On the way for sure, but there's still a significant

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>amount of imported oil that we need every day to

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>UM to keep the gasoline and keep our cars going.

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Very good, Jack on short nose, Thank you so much,

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.239
<v Speaker 1>jacqu Roussou with clear view energy partners, with great perspective,

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>particularly of a troubled Gulf of Mexico coastline. And again

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>all of our reports, folks, seriousness of the hurricane and

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>no tropical Storm Harvey. The rescue efforts continue across much

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of Houston and to the eastern clients. For our global audience,

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>this is Houston and the Gulf of Mexico over to

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the Louisiana border on the way to New Orleans. Not

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 1>to get to New Orleans, that would be a misstatement.

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>So here's the theme, folks, with all the news slow

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that's going on, you know, the hunch like two weeks ago,

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>as you know, we're gonna reset September. It's supposed to

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>be Labor Day, you know, five days after Labor Day. No,

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>it's starting now with the amazing news flow that we've gotten,

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>not only out of Washington and London, with the Prime

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Minister traveling to Japan, but now with Hurricane Harvey and

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>all that, we need reset in one way to do

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that in a decade financial crisis is without exaggeration, I

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>will say one of the five most important books of

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the last decade on what we do with surveillance, and

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that is the Age of Oversupply. There was at some

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>point forty seven books on my desk, and the world

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>changed when Martin Wolf of the Ft said, shut up

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and read Dan Albert's Age of Oversupply. Dan, you've retired

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>off of the royalties of Age of Oversupply, right, I

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>just wish. I don't think I've earned back the advantage.

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>When's the movie out? This is the is the is

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>a movie come out? Here? Like Memorial Day two thousand twenty?

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Kit Harrington? What is what? Where'd you get the title?

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>What is the Age of Oversupply? Is very funny. The

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the original title was supposed to be managed Capitalism. It

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>was basically looking back and saying, you know, we pursued

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>free market strategies for thirty years and there needs to

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>be a new look taken a capitalism. Everybody basically said

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to me, that's an really insidious title. Don't do that.

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>The first chapter was called the Age of Oversupply, and

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the publisher came back to me and said, it's a

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>great title for the book. That's what we did, right,

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>so so what is it being oversupplied? Oh? Well, the

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>whole concept is that that the emergence of the post

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>socialist states after beginning nineteen and thereafter h really created

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>this massive oversupply of labor relative to aggregate demand globally uh.

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>And that in turn created a huge, huge oversupply production

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and therefore capital excess. Capital UH defined as I guess

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>by Bernanke as the savings glatt. And then we came

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to understand it a little bit better, which you know,

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>basically flowed back into markets seeking risk free returns in

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>bonds and mortgage backed securities in such there any way,

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>there's any number of ways to go with us. I'm

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>going to go to the brain power of chapter eight,

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>which is bad values. Why sticky wages and prices block

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a real recovery? Now, that can go either way, depression, advance, etcetera.

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>But when you wrote the Age of Oversupply, did you

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>predict or think about the lack of wage growth we

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>see right now? Well, wage growth, you know, really this

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>is the big debate because we've had such an enormous

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>expansion and service jobs relative to goods producing jobs. If

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you actually net it out, going back to the previous

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>height two thousand and seven, we've only added net net

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>about a million something in UH in goods producing jobs

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>or high wage high hours jobs, i should say. And

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>the rest of it, for plus million has been low wage,

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>low hour jobs, really crappy jobs. Um and and so

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>all of that is a is a manifestation of the

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>lack of demand for UH labor in all but the

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>most high tech sectors of the economy. And and it's

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it's all of this is a global phenomenon. You have

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to go back to what what happened, you know, in

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the age of oversupply, which is just this enormous amount

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of productive labor that is willing to work relatively and expensively.

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>And you know, people have for years said, oh, the

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Chinese thing is over. It's it's now, you know, they're

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 1>going to have to find cheaper labor somewhere else. But

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 1>China isn't over. Neither is India. And the reason for

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that is there urbanized population is still a fraction of

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>its total population. China is still only about half urbanized,

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and now the rest of the people are not really

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>part of the global economy UM and India is only

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 1>about sixty urbanize I'm sorry urbanized. So you know, you

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 1>have this mess of bench strength that can continue to

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.479
<v Speaker 1>add labor to the problem, which tamps down the value

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>of labor in the developed world. But don how do

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you fix it? Do you bring jobs American jobs abroad

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>or you do you bring foreigners to America. I'm looking

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>at a group great Bloomberg chart, right, and it's what

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about. So the difference between unfilled job

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>openings and workers highed. There were six point one million

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>unfilled job openings on June. I think that's, you know,

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the most since data was compiled in two thousands, and

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a massive myth. The myth is that there are

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>all these job openings, but their job openings at a wage.

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>And that is the key to understand the old statistics. Uh,

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't have this massive unfilled inventory when you have

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a huge unemployed labor base that's going into jobs at

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>low wages and low hours just to make ends meet. Um.

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 1>These these jolt statistics are very grossly misleadings and unfortunately

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the federalize a lot on them. I will editorialize your

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>fencing anecdotally. Mr Alpert is correct. It is absolutely unreal

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>disinterest people have in those skilled jobs at the wage offered.

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, you see it anecdotally every single day, Frenzy. Yeah.

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>But what I'm asking done is how do you fix this? Right?

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>So you're you're saying this is not true, but again

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you still have the the unemployment or the labor forces conundrum,

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>let's call it that. So this is the big issue

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>going into the fall. Right, We're going to be talking

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 1>about tax reform in the United States, the issue of

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 1>whether or not the economic nationalist agenda is going to

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 1>prevail or continue to prevail under I don't know if

0:19:57.880 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 1>it ever prevailed, but I mean I'm going to prevail

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>under under under the Trump administration. These big issues are

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>all oriented at what he had promised in his campaign

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and what the American electorate apparently seems to to to want,

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>or at least a good chunk of them, which is

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>better jobs. And the notion that trickle down tax reform

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to help, I think is highly specious. Uh.

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>And of course when it comes to tariffs and other

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>protectionist measures, I favor some measures because we can't go

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 1>on like this forever in the United States. Uh. And

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and there are some very good things that we could

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>be doing. But at the end of the day, you

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>have to ask yourself the quintessential question, which is can

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>the private sector in the United States actually shift people

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>back into more gainful, higher paying jobs when there is

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 1>this massive exogenous labor force offshore um And at my conclusion,

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the conclusion that I reached in the book and my

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>conclusion today, especially looking at the last ten years, is

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult. You have terrific power points. I'll steal

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>any number of these charts folks, in of course take

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 1>credit for them myself. But it does go back then

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to what can government policymakers do. Now you mentioned the

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>FED earlier, and they're struggling against Nordvig talking about one

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>uh one uh uh FED increase out to the end

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of next year. What does Dan Elpert demand from the

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 1>legislative branch or from the executive office? Now, I mean,

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:30.199
<v Speaker 1>is it just as simple as targeted investment tax credits? No,

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not. And and uh you know this, this gets

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>down to the big debate. We have a huge number

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of people who found it politically expedient to use uh,

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>the national debt as a whipping boy. We have and

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at the bond today. I don't I'm not

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at it on the screen in front of me.

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>But my recollections the ten years back down to two, one,

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>three or something two, and you can tell that the

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:59.360
<v Speaker 1>relentless UH, lack of inflationary pressures and the the enormous

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 1>demand for for bonds makes the government extremely cheap to finance.

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>And so the government really needs to step in and

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and actually go back rebuild our infrastructure, spend trillions of dollars,

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and put people back to work and gainful jobs. Here

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>we go back to infrastructure and the mystery of why

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that can occur. Dan Olpert, is there a beach read

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>on this book? Are you're doing, you know with a

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 1>movie rights sold? Are you're doing an afterward where, you know,

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>for the holiday purchase? One of the things is is

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I've done a lot of work recently with the Coalition

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>for American Prosperity, which is UH trade group that that

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>is very focused on this issue. I've determined that you know,

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that people communicate today, including the President

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>United States, through tweet tweet storms UH, and people are

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>far more graphically oriented that I that I really devoted

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>myself to writing more decks than reports. Very good. Dan

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 1>olport Uh with us the Age of Oversupply. It's not dated.

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I really it is a book where every chapter will

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 1>force you to think differently. That is, I can't say

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>enough about it. Daniel Alpert with us in the studios

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.880
<v Speaker 1>off the Age of Oversupply, and we will continue on

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>where is the wage growth? Which in celebration of you know,

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you think about the five books of the crisis. The

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Age of Oversupply is clearly when Daniel output where this.

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there's like r Ryin Art and Rogue off and

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh Andrew Ross Sorkin is wonderful, too Big to Fail,

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and there's other books this, that and the other. But

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 1>The Age of Oversupply really deserves a second read if

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you've read it before, and if you haven't read it,

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>you're missing something on some of the great changes. Dan Alpert.

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>The most frightening chart for me and Francine and mostly

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>for our children, Francy, our grandchildren. I'm sorry, is your

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>debt expansion? It's three lines. We know corporate debts up,

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah, government debts up. But I think a

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of people don't realize where private debt is. It's

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>becoming what Katlacoff of Boston Universe and he talks about,

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't it? Yeah? It is, I mean the the at

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>this point we're back into a debt cycle. The real

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>question is to what extent is debt being taken on

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>because of optimism on the part of consumers? Uh? And

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to what extent is it just merely filling the gap

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>between what they desire and what they earned? And uh.

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of the one of the histories of

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the crisis or the bubble that preceded it, is that

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>so much of g d P was being supported by

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>people pulling debt out of their homes for the most part,

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>but credit cards also counted. Uh and uh. And this

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>this vicious cycle of continuing to um uh, continuing to

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to borrow in order to consume. That is that is

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>re emerging. And we look back for instine on you know,

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>age of oversupply. A major shout out to the work

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>of Jannatis who was younger then in his wonderful work

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>on mortgage equity withdrawal at Goldben Sacks. That was path

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 1>breaking well over ten years ago. Yes, and that that

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>was amazing word done. Can you I don't know if

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>how much you look at debt in the UK, but

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I imagine there's a trend in Western worlds that actually

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>debt is becoming more and more sustainable. Unsustainable for the

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:18.719
<v Speaker 1>younger generation. How will it affect their consumer behavior? Well,

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the it's very very clear that we brought

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>forward demand for housing, and housing is certainly one of

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:28.919
<v Speaker 1>the largest consumables in in any developed country. So we

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 1>brought brought forward enormous demand. And we have left um,

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the young people with with two things. One is, uh,

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>less expectations of intergenerational wealth transfer because so much of

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>wealth was eradicated during this crisis. Some has come back,

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>but people, you know, the previous generation is going to

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>live a long time, so they're not going to get

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the intergenerational wealth transfer except at the very very top

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of the pyramid. Um. You know that that I think

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>people were counting on. There's been some really great work

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>done on that over the last few years. Uh. And

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>then secondly, of course, they are burdened by education expenses

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:05.719
<v Speaker 1>in the form of continued student loans. I mean, one

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>of the great horrors of the post post crisis period

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>was watching the amount of student debt in the United

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>States go up from four or five billion to one

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>point two trillion in almost the blink of an eye. Um,

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that does not affect the UK as much as it

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>does in the US, but it is it is certainly

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a factor in the Western world. We we have effectively

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>eradicated UH and and put and put very highly educated

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>people into underproducing jobs as well. UH. You know, a

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>huge amount of demand. We will there be less appetite

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to own homes and rent. Well. It's very interesting because

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing in the United States over the last six

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>months sort of a peaking of the rental market, and

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that is due to overbuilding, and a

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of it is due to UH an enormous amount

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of or sale housing that has been built, specifically in

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the condominium sector. These deals are starting to crash. Rents

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of decline in the high end over the last in

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in cities like New York over the last several months,

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and look like they are accelerating in that respect. Workouts

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>are beginning. There's a good piece in the Wall Street

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Journal today on on condominium workouts. Um, this is going

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to trickle you. So you saw what happened in London

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 1>when when the London luxury market peaked um. These things

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>are are effectively in disha of cheap money having flowed

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 1>into enormous amounts of construction. Damn Francine commutes from Cornwall. Uh,

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the last chapter of your book in pursuit of pragmatism,

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>where's the pragmatism forward? Well, to a certain extent, right,

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the Trump revolt was uh, sort of a proxy for

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, torches and in the street. Not to talk

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 1>about what happened, but but you know people people really

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>getting out there and and and getting angry. They expressed themselves,

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I think unwisely in the way they did in the

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>ballot box. But at the end of the day, the

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the key, the key issue is to is to service

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the very disgruntled people. We wait for round two. Dan

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Elpert with one of the classics of the last ten years,

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 1>the age of oversupplyed with Westwood Capital the the my

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>message screen has been a fire with GDP analysis. We're

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>honored to bring you in her working day, Allan Zentner

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of Morgan Stanley Ellen, you have been exceptionally prescient on

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a quieter economy. Is today a sea change or is

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it a nuance of upgrade of g d P? Ah,

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a good one, Tom. I don't get the sense

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's a sea change it. I think that it's

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>been some time, uh that we haven't really been focused

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>on just what's going on on the private investment side

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of the economy. UM. And so what we did with

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>today's data was if you look under the hood at

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>just you know the fact that that not onally was

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>consumer spending and business investment, the two sources of upside

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>revision and biggest contributors to GDP in this in this report, um,

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>they have been the source of upside revision all year UM.

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>And so if you look at just the private final

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>domestic demand, right, think the economist fancy way of saying,

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>let's take exports, let's take inventories out of it, and

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>just look at what's going on domestically. It's been tracking

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>on average over the past four quarters about two point nine.

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So you know, oftentimes that's that's what lost in the

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>phrase that's pretty robust domestic economy. Eleanor Carl Ricka Donna

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>mentions the end of the corporate profits recession. That's dear

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to the I is of Megden to say at the

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>London School of Economics can you say the corporate profit

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>recession is over, and does that fold into boosted productivity

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>which makes Cherry Yellin's job easier. Yeah, and if only

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that were her job for the next four years, we

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>should all be so lucky. Uh. You know, I would

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>say that that that I would concur and and uh,

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Mike Wilson, our chiefdeose equity strategist, certainly sees that the

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>profits recession uh is over. I mean, one thing that

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in the data is that labor costs, which

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is this typical later in the cycle, labor costs have

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>risen to a point that you start to incentivize capex

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>over labor and that's when corporates in the US turned

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>back to investing growing their bottom line. And that's when

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you can get the product into increase in productivity. And

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>some of that is just simply cyclical where we are

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in the cycle, and we do see that that's underway,

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and absolutely it would make uh the chair's job easier

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>if they want to continue along with gradual rate hikes,

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>because rising productivity also means you can get a lift

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>in wage growth without pressuring margins and pressuring profits, but

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>raising the standards of living of of people in your economy,

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and given what we've seen today, is it necessary Is

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it needed for the FED disse inflation moving higher to

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:26.239
<v Speaker 1>have the confidence that it will, you know, in the end,

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>move higher or is this enough? Yeah? So that's um,

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the question of the day. Right Inflation is the

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>only place where they are missing on their forecast. Growth

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>is above potential and around their forecast. The unemployment rate

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is below where they think full employment is. Financial conditions

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>are easy. All of that for monetary policy theory, All

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of that is a powerful stew that that would tell

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you surely inflationary pressures will build some time over the outlook.

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>And so they remain confident just as they marked market,

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>there are marked where their inflation forecast. Every single month

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and another week of print comes out, you'll see that

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>in their forecast beyond this year, they don't budge. They

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>just still have full faith and confidence that we get

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to that two percent inflation goal. So I think right

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>now the bar is low enough for a December high

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that I do think if we just simply get a

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>pick up off the bottom, and I don't think we've

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>seen the worst yet for inflation this year. But if

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we just see a pick up off the bottom is

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>we go in to that Simmer meeting. I think that

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>will be enough for them, but I think it's going

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to become increasingly difficult for them to fight for additional

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>rate heights and less inflation really does cooperate next year,

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and how different or how important it is going to

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>be that wage growth on Friday. So, uh, Friday's report,

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>we expect another tick up in wage growth to two

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>point six percent. It's been a pretty sluggish but slow

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>climb upward. Uh. You know, I think that I hate

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to say it, but I think that Hurricane Harvey, because

0:32:57.400 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>we know it's not going to have a bearing on

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>this employment sport, but will start to have a bearing

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>on the data by the next employment report. I think

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that that will turn eyes away from this employment report

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's like, oh yeah, but that was before the disaster.

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Ellen Sner, thank you for joining us on Bloomberg Surveillance

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Zenter's with Morgan Stanley and they're out with

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a more enthusiastic view here forward, and of course all

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that tying into FED coverage. Thanks for listening to the

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene. David Gura is at David Gura. Before the podcast,

0:33:48.640 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio Ey