WEBVTT - The Holy Black Stone of Mecca

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to step to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe mcma. Today

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be talking a little bit about religion, a

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit about geology, a little bit about about space

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and science. But I wanted to start off thinking about

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the idea of sacred places. For some reason, they're there

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>are always central places that people want to go to

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and experience personally and stand in awe. I think about

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the in the secular version, they're like, you know, museums

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like this. Oh yeah, when I went to

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>the American Museum of Natural History in New York, I

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>remember feeling a kind of church like sensation, even though

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>those bonkers of people running all over and making all

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>kinds of noise. Uh, I had this sense of like

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm in a special place place. Oh yeah, this is

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a different place. Yes, well, I think I think museums

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>are a great example, because I feel the same way

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>about the MET and absolutely like it's it's so phil

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like just you just as a place. It's very

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>much the place of pilgrimage for individuals who are interested

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>in history, and art and religion, and and then you

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>go in and you have all of these pieces that

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>themselves are from all of these distant sacred places and

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 1>sacred times. Oh totally. Yeah. It's great. Like you get

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to go to the it's almost like the catch net

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>for for sacred places throughout history. But when you go

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to a sacred place like this that you know, these

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 1>places that have a history, I almost feel like you

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>are you're playing on the same kind of awe that

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you might experience if you went to and believed in

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a haunted house that like that, that some somehow a

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of energy has collected there over time, and it

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it gives you this sense of the sense of being

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>part of history to be there. Yeah. I mean, we

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>we sort of map out our worlds with these with

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>these pinpoints, uh that that all the energy seems to

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>converge around. Uh. And then when we visit those places,

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>we're we're taking part in that energy. We have all

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>these expectations and then we're engaging in sort of the

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>collective expectations of that place. Now, this is certainly something

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>we've covered on stuff to blow your mind in the past,

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that being a stin Dolf syndrome or Jerusalem syndrome. The

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>idea where when someone finally visits one of these places

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that means a lot to them personally. Be it Jerusalem, uh,

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 1>be it in the case of today's episode of Mecca,

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>or be it just a museum, or to stand before

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a particular piece of art that that carries a lot

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of weight with you. You enter into it with all

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>these expectations. Then you're finally there, and it can be overwhelming.

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>It can be mentally overwhelming and physically overwhelming to actually

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>be there at this linchpin of your life. Yeah, despite

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>having lived in the world your whole life, suddenly you

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>feel that you have connected with with again this sense

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.919
<v Speaker 1>of history, Like here's a place that that will continue

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to be visited and written about, and now I'm here.

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>And it could be an historical cathedral, it could be Stonehenge,

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it could be a restaurant that was used as a

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>filming location from movie you like, but whatever it is, like,

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a place that that has value that seems

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to extend beyond your life. Now. Of course we've been

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about, you know, our our favorite secular examples museums

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:39.839
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. But I'd say you probably have to amplify

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>this feeling of importance connected to place, even more so

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>for religious believers and the sites that are sacred to

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>their personal religious beliefs. And of course one of the

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>sites that is sacred to millions of people around the

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>world will be found in Mecca in Saudi Arabia. That's right,

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>as far as sacred places go, and the and the

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>collective capital of belief that goes into attributing them as such,

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the Haram Mosque or the Grand Mosque in Mecca is

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>easily one of the most sacred places on earth, is

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the five Pillars of Islam. Every able bodied

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>Muslim has to embark on a pilgrimage to Mecca and

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>this is known as the Hodge. On the way, you

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>conduct a series of rituals, including the stoning of the

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>devil in Mina, and finally you conduct seven revolutions within

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:31.039
<v Speaker 1>the Haram Mosque circling the Holy Kabba building, which is

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>this essentially, this this dark cube. It's featured in the

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>art for this episode, and I'm sure everyone out there

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing the images of it. Of course, if you haven't,

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you should go look it up because you should have

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>this in mind. This this dark stone building with the

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>with the tapestries draped on it versus from the Koran,

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and then at one corner of the building something very special. Yeah,

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the eastern exterior corner includes something that is known as

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the black Stone or the al hudge year al ha

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>swad uh. This uh, this, it's this is going to

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>be the object that we're talking about here. As you

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>pass it, you touch, you touch it if you can,

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you kiss it if you can. If you can't reach it,

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you you point at it. But to touch the stone,

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it is said, is to enter into a contract with God.

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And I've seen translations that indicate that the black Stone

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>itself is the right hand of God on Earth. Now,

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>later in this episode, we're going to be exploring what

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the black Stone might be from a geological standpoint, what

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's history and significance is within the religion. But

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess first maybe we should just take a look

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>at the site itself at large, the Kabba. Yeah, the

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Caba itself is a very holy place in Islamic tradition,

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's uh. We're gonna in all of this,

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 1>as we do with any religion, We're gonna we discuss

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're gonna sort of divide between the mythic history,

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the religious ideas of what this is and where it

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>came from, as well as what we actually know from history.

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>But according to you, uh, to tradition, the Kaba was

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>constructed by Abraham, and its four corners a line with

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the four compass points. It's made of great blocks of granite.

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>But the the holy black stone itself burns with an

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>even greater mysticism. So this black stone here, that's uh,

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that's that's set in this in cement and surrounded by

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>silver here and again the eastern corner of the Coppa stone.

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not a single stone, or at least it's not

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 1>actually a single stone anymore. Rather, it consists of eight

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 1>pieces of various size, seemingly the same rock, seemingly of

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the same origin, and they're submitted together surrounded by a

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>silver frame. And the largest fragment is said to be

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 1>about the size of a date. So that's not very big, right, Yeah,

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>it's these things go. So sometimes you just hear about

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the black stone eaters to match with something larger. I

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>must say that I always thought, before reading about this

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>for for the episode today, that it was a single stone,

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and I thought it was sort of like one very

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>large jet black stone. And the reason for that is

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that there are not very good pictures of it out there,

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Uh So you you know, generally this is

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>not something that people photograph very much. The photographs of

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it that do exist or kind of sometimes grainy or

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>low quality or from a distance. Uh, it's just not

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>ideal documentation conditions. But which is crazy considering this is

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>probably one of the most viewed objects on the planet. Yeah,

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing. It's it's something that you know, millions and

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>millions of people have personally laid eyes on. But but

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to find a good picture of it. Um.

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, so what you see in most of these

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>pictures is there is this silver It almost looks like

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a like a like a basin turned sideways or something.

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>It's this silver collar that's built into the corner of

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the building. And then inside this silver bowl there is

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>just this dark abyss. Generally is all you can see

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>from the outside. So if I had to guess before

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I started reading the research on it what this was,

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I would think it was like a large piece of

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>obsidian or something like that, just a large flat black

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>surface that is is smooth and dark and people, uh,

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, people pass by and and touch it

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and kiss it. But no, it turns out that there's

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>actually a good bit more texture going on inside, which

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>makes identifying the geology of the of the black stone

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>all the more interesting. Yeah. So the pieces that are

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>set in the cement, they've been touched so many times

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.839
<v Speaker 1>they have there's a smoothness to them. Um, and uh,

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>it's all the worth worth noting, like these are pieces

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of something that was once whole. And we'll get into

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that in a bit. Various authors have commented on it

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and tried to you know, they're they're varying figures that

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>have come out over the years, over the centuries. Really

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Westerner is getting a glimpse of it, looking at it,

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:58.719
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out how how big it is the

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:00.719
<v Speaker 1>pieces are now and how big might have been when

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>it was a one piece. Um. There is a paper

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 1>by Elizabeth Thompson which we're gonna refer to several times here.

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>She was from the University of Copenhagen. She wrote a

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>paper in in Meteoritics in nine eighty titled New Light

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Origin of the Holy black stone of the Kabba,

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and she did some some figuring here, and she says

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that the the possible original size of the stone would

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>have been by twenty centimeters or nine point eight inches

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>by seven point eight by seven point eight, which would

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>have made it what possibly about the size of a

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>cantaloupe originally basically candle. And I rough estimate estimate here.

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I've never measured a candle. Ope, Robert Well, I did

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>some I was at home when I was doing this

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>portion of the notes, and I was like, all right, well,

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>how big is that? Let me think is that? What

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>fruit does that align with? And the best I can

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>tell possibly candiloup uh fruit or um Islamic history experts

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>may have may differ on that. Now, as for the color,

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>this is another interesting thing because again you look at it,

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you just see darkness called the black stone. So what

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>color is it? That is actually kind of difficult to

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>decide on as well, because various accounts have described it

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>as brownish black or blackish brown, or reddish black or

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>deep reddish brown, and some accounts also speak to a

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>coal like matrix to it. I think I've read that

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that was only one account that actually said that at

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>least one account they oh then said coal like matrix,

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>but most accounts point out that they're yellow spots pointed

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>white crystals. There's also an impossible interior that is described

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>as gray. So it's not just this obsidian or charcoal

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>like stone, but rather something that has flex of other

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>color in them. Right there there are these little pieces

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of yellow or white. And then there are also some

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 1>reports that inside the stone it is white, or that

0:10:57.520 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>like covered parts of the stone that are not at

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>supposed in the in the cemented, cemented, paved surface are white.

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.839
<v Speaker 1>Another claim we should probably deal with because it does

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>figure big into scientists trying to figure out what type

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of rock or mineral this is is that it allegedly,

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>according to very old reports, floats in water. Yes, this

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>is this is something that comes up a time or

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>two in the actually the the historical record of the

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>stone where supposedly this was used to authenticated after it

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.199
<v Speaker 1>had been stolen in return, and we'll get into that

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>story in a bit that wasn't like the tenth century. Yes, yeah,

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:37.959
<v Speaker 1>so the idea that they could tell it's the stone

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>by placing it in water and seeing it would float, well,

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>not many stones float so that would be a unique identifier.

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>But I guess that that does just depend on taking

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that story as accurate, right, And that's one of the

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:56.239
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the problems, the challenges, the tantalizing aspects

0:11:56.240 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of this whole exercise and discussing what the stone actually

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>consists of from a scientific standpoint, because you're you're left

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to draw on all these varying accounts and a very limited, uh,

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>observational data about the stone. Yeah, I mean one of

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the features of the stone. So one of the things

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>about observing the stone that you have to understand is

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that it is sort of the mechanics of how the

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>ritual at the Kaba works. People are constantly circling this

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>and there, you know, there might be thousands of people

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in there, all trying to get up to the stone

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 1>to kiss it, or to point at it, or to

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 1>touch it. And so you are not in a situation

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>where you can sit there and look at it and

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 1>take notes. Right. This is not a museum, right. Uh. No,

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it might be more like in the louver where you

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>try to get a good look at the Mona Lisa,

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>but there's just people cramming in from all sides and

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>pushing you. I mean, I've read reports about people trying

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to get a good look at the stone and and

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>they're they're always reports mentioning just the crowd pushing you along,

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>not being able to get up close to it, or

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>they are also guards there, and sometimes guards will push

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you along, move you out of the way. Uh, you

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>can sort of understand why, I mean that they don't

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>want to have a case of crowd crush or something

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>like that with other people there. Yeah, I mean, so

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you have and and on top of all of this,

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you have your you're sort of religious expectations. You have

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.199
<v Speaker 1>the whole Stendall syndrome coming into play here as you're

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>beholding it now, Robert, I think you had a couple

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of accounts you were reading of people talking about visiting

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the Kabba, right, Yeah. I just I tend to find

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea of early Westerners visiting Mecca and seeing the

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Cobba on the stone. I find those really fascinating. And

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>so I just had had had mainly two here I

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted to to highlight. And there's a third one that

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that we end up referencing later. So the first one

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that to reference here Swiss traveler and Arabic speaker Johan

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Ludwig Burkhardt visited Mecca in eighteen fourteen, so he was

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>very much an Arabic speaker enthusiast. He was. He converted

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to Islam. This is also the guy who rediscovered the

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>ruins of Petra, which if you're if you're if you're

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>still foggy on what Petra is, think to what Indiana

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Jones and the Last Year say, is that the treasury

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>building of Petra, that's the one set in the cliff full. Yeah,

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the tomb of the grail there, they're not the tomb,

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the resting place, the booby trap place, Yes, the booby

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 1>trap place with the with the with all the grail stuff.

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>In reality, of course that is Petra and does not

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>have booby traps, does not have boot traps. Now, one

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of the most notable individuals, one of one of my

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>favorites to visit Mecca in early times as a Westerner

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>is Captain Sir Richard Francis Burton. He visited in eighteen

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty three, and Burton was also allegedly a convert to

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Islam and earlier or a possible convert to Hinduism. He's

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a difficult guy. To pin down and it sounds like

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm being vague here. So he spoke twenty five distinct languages,

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>not counting dialects. Uh. He was something of a bisexual, hedonist,

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a spy and explore. He was endlessly fascinated with other cultures, languages,

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>modes of human sexuality. And he's probably some commentators classify

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>him more as an atheist, but his explorations into Hinduism

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and Islam are are often referred to his conversions, Like

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>he didn't just study them, he became them. Yeah, like

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that that's kind of my my my read on him,

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Like here's a guy who learned all these languages, and

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>in using these languages, you kind of have to change

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the way your brain operates. And even to fake, like

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>even just to us, if you were to assume, okay,

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>someone like Burton um they just faked Islamic belief in

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>order to go on the Hodge, like to fake that,

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you would still have to be so versed in a

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>deep understanding or of the cult. Sure the rights entailed there,

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>like your cover would be so deep. How would you

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>keep it from overcoming you? I mean, in one sense,

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it almost you almost want to say that to fully

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>understand someone else's religion, you almost have to be able

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to mentally convert to it, and kind of hypothetical sense

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to like to try to see what it looks like

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>from the inside, right, And then at the same time,

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>like Burton, again a fascinating character. We can't get into

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>everything he did here, but he wrote a lot about

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>his his travels, and his ideas and his his observations.

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>And at times too he kind of waffles back and forth.

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes he sounds, you know, very much uh, you know,

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>at one with Islam and and and intrigued by it.

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Other times you still still see some of that the

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>English colonial um mentality rising to the surface, and he

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>sounds a bit dismissive. Like I said, very very fascinating guy.

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Difficult guy to to nail down. But here's a quick

0:16:56.040 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>quote from his writings about beholding the stone. He said,

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>after thus reaching the stone, despite popular indignation, testified by

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>impatient shouts, we monopolize the use of it for at

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>least ten minutes, which is quite a lot. When you

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>see the CROUPD pictures right, whilst kissing it and rubbing

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>hands and forehead upon it, I narrowly observed it and

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>came away persuaded that it is an aerial light. Other travelers,

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>including Burkhardt, had thought it volcanic in origin. Right, So

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>here we're starting to get to the question of what

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>the stone is geologically. A lot of commentators throughout the

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>years have assumed that it was that it was lava

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of some kind of basalt, things like that. But here's

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea that it's an aero light, that it is

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a type of meteorite, a space rock. Right. And to

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>understand why this idea is so appealing, we have to

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 1>discuss the mythic the religious history of the stone a

0:17:55.920 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>little bit. So if you if you dive into Islamic tradition.

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>In Islamic belief, there's a basic kind of a damic

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>origin story and play here. So depending on how you

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 1>interpret this origin story, the Black Stone dates back to

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 1>either Abraham or Adam, the first created human. So one

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>interpretation is that Adam built the first kava on Earth

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and here he sat on a white stone, okay, a

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>stone that turned black with the fall of man, and

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the first Kaba was then destroyed in the Great Flood,

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't until later that Abraham was tasked with

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>rebuilding it or building the first cabin, depending on on

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:39.199
<v Speaker 1>the telling. Another idea here is that this was a

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>meteorite brought to Abraham by the archangel Gabriel from the

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>mountain side where it had fallen, or that it originally

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>was one of the stars of Paradise. Now, one of

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the reasons they're they're kind of varying takes on this

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>is because the black Stone, as I understand it, is

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>not actually mentioned in the Koran. It is uh, it

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>comes from a adational Islamic sources and just sort of traditions.

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 1>To me, that's always some of the most interesting things

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you find in any religion is the stuff that's not

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>necessarily straight in the middle of the cannon, but but

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily out of the mainstream cannon either. It's sort

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>of like it comes from additional traditional material, the the

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you might you know, the metadata of the religion. Right.

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we've touched on this before, discussions of heaven, hell,

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and purgatory in Christian and Catholic traditions and where those

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>ideas come from, because certainly, if you're looking for a

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>strict definition of those things within the Older New Testament, uh,

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>those details are not really forthcoming. No, you get a

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>few hints, but you're not going to find Dante in

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bible right now. In terms of what the stone does,

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>already mentioned that it's it's it's considered the right hand

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>of God. To touch it is to enter into a

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>contract with God, and there are additional powers that have

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>been attributed to it. Oh, and I believe this comes

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>from the wings of one Heinrich von Maltzen. We visited

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 1>this Mecca as well in eighteen fifty eight, coming after

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the two individuals we already mentioned. Yeah, supposedly so so

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 1>von Maltzen. Um. I want to be careful about citing

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>him because he strikes me as perhaps unreliable and definitely unsympathetic.

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Like he wrote this eighteen sixty five book in German

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 1>called minah walfartnck Mecha, which means my Pilgrimage to Mecca

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the books in German. I've not found an official published translation,

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>but using Google Translate, I did a little uh looking

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>through this book and he um, he strikes me as

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>an sort of unsympathetic and perhaps uncomprehending outsider, So I

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't use him as a as a very reliable account

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of what the people on the Hajj in in the

0:20:56.680 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century we're actually believing. But he at least claimed aims,

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:04.199
<v Speaker 1>possibly wrongly, that the Pilgrims at the time believed that

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it was impossible to destroy the Kaaba and that and

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>impossible to destroy the Black Stone itself. Uh So he

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>said that, you know, they were attributing these miraculous powers

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 1>to it. Now, I know, um, you know, within every

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>religion there's always going to be plenty of diversity of

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>opinion and different ideas. But I know one strong tradition

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>in Islam, probably not adhered to by all Muslims, is

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea that you know that that there aren't miraculous objects.

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>You know that that that essentially people aren't going to

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>do miracles for you, objects aren't going to be miraculous.

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>But if this account of is correct, there are at

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>least some slightly miraculous uh properties attributed to the stone

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>at some points in history. But then again, as I say,

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>this guy seems like a jerk and like he's maybe

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>not understanding things correctly, Like he seems disgusted by the rituals.

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't. At one point, he's like, I had to

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>go and kiss the stone and he calls it the monster.

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So he's is perhaps not looking at the stone from

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the perspective of of an outsider who has converted to

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it to Islam and is fully uh fully accepting any

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of the ideas and traditions around it. Yeah, or even

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>just trying for the sake of understanding to get into

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that headspace. What what does this mean to the insider

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to the believer? And then as far as the future

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is concerned, there are tales that on the day of judgment, Uh,

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it is said that the stone will grow eyes, mouth,

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>and tongue, and that will see and speak, and it

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>will witness in favor of all those who touched it

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>with sincere hearts, which I think is wow, quite a

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>visual that one kind of gives me a chill bumps.

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 1>The idea of the stone sort of becoming this floating

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>face that then speaks on behalf to God. Uh, of

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 1>those who actually touched it entered into that con tracked

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>with with with it not just a mouth but a tongue.

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>That's good. Well, maybe we should take a break, yeah,

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and then when we do, we can discuss a little

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>bit more about the supposed history of this stone. And

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>then get into some of the geological ideas about what

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it is and where it came from. Alright, we're back.

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So the stone, the black Stone here it actually predates Islam.

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>So it was it was there when Mohammed the Prophet

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>came into Mecca. And this is a fact that's acknowledged

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>by Islamic tradition, not contrary to it. Right right, Yeah,

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 1>this is this is pretty settled as far as I

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>understand it. So in Persian legend it was supposedly a

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 1>symbol of the planet Saturn. That was a tip that

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 1>I read in a Brewer's dictionary, phrase and fable. Now,

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>according to Oliver C. Farrington's writings, in nineteen hundred, he

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>wrote an article the Worship and Folklore of Meteorites. He

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 1>says that the worship of the stone by Arabian tribes

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>is first spoken spoken of by Greek writers of early times,

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and that the Kabba definitely existed as a as a

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>shrine as early as two hundred c E. And the

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>black Stone was part of it. So this would have been,

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, a shrine that entailed venerated objects devoted to

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>different deities, and among them was the black Stone. And

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 1>so like having idols there. Like I know, part of

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the Islamic tradition is the idea of removing the idols

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>from the kaba right right, And that's exactly what happened

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in UH six thirty C. That's when when the prophet

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>entered Mecca purged the Kabba of idols, reportedly destroying something

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>like three three hundred and sixty idols. But as often

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.159
<v Speaker 1>is the case with holy places in history, the Kabba

0:24:56.240 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>and the stone retained their sacred aspects. We see this

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 1>in Islamic history all the time as well, such as

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the function of the Greek Parthenon as a mosque during

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Ottoman occupation. This was something I really didn't know a

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of a lot about until recently when I attended

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a talk at at Emory University. How they you had

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the you had it was converted into a mosque, the Parthenon,

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>and then when the Parthenon was put was partially destroyed,

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you had sort of the gutted Parthenon, and in the

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>middle they had this, uh, this this kind of cubicle

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:33.640
<v Speaker 1>mosque that actually reminds one a little bit of the Kabba. Yeah,

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that's fascinating. I've never heard that before. Now, there was

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of turmoil even during Mohammed's life. Mohammed lived

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>five seventies through six thirty two, and the Kabo was

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:49.360
<v Speaker 1>was burnt during this time, and this may have caused

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the fragmentation that we see. That's the thing.

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>We don't know exactly when this fragmentation of the of

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the stone occurred. Yeah, this history of the uh, the

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:02.680
<v Speaker 1>stone as an object becoming many objects does seem kind

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 1>of fuzzy. Like there's this general idea that it was

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>once a single stone or fewer number of stones, and

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>then broke into smaller parts. And then now there are

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:17.640
<v Speaker 1>apparently fewer visible pebbles in the stone than there were,

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>say in the nineteenth century, right, And one of the

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>ideas here is that that the pieces could either have

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>been removed or lost, or they could still be there.

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>We just can't see them all that well because a

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 1>we can't really see the stone fragments all that well anyway,

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>where they might be partially obscured by the by the

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>senent and the silver and repeated attempts to you know,

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>hold everything together. Right, So what were the circumstances under

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>which it was burned? So this was during the civil

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>war between the caliph Abdal Malik and Ian Zubar, who

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>controlled Mecca at the time the Kabba was set on fire.

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 1>This would have been six eighty three and report by

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>some accounts, the black stone broken of three pieces and

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>then was reassembled with silver. So that's a that's an opportunity,

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>let's say, for the stone to have been broken, certainly. Um.

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 1>Now another opportunity that comes up is in nine thirty

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's when Mecca was sacked by the Carmathians led

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>by Abu ter al Janabi, who apparently used the hodge

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>as an excuse UH to demand entry into the city

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 1>with his troops. Now, a number of you probably wanting, well,

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>who are the Carmathians. Uh. They were an heretical sect

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of Islam that considered the Koran allegory. They refuted various

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>rights and entailed a mix of uh of of of

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Islamic and Persian mysticism. They sacked and looted Mecca. They

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>desecrated holy sites. They mascuard pilgrims around the Kaba and

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 1>removed the black Stone and took it out of Mecca,

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:02.400
<v Speaker 1>apparently in hopes of moving the destination of the Hodge

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:06.719
<v Speaker 1>to Hajar in what we now call the rain. So

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to get everybody to come to them

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>from now on. That that is the that that is

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>how I understand it. Yeah, based on the material I

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>was reading, Um, this ended up not working all that well,

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I mean it's worth it's also worth noting

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>here that of course history is written by the victors,

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So you know, to what extent is some of this

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:29.479
<v Speaker 1>color by the fact that the that even though the

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Carmathians were very powerful at the time, they ended up

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:38.720
<v Speaker 1>fading into history. So they tried to change the point

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of the hodge didn't work. The black Stone is a

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>return to Mecca around or nine fifty two, but for

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a hefty ransom fee. Well, now, hold on a second.

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>How do you know it's really the stone when you

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>return it. Well, you've got to test its buoyancy, right,

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>You've got to see if it floats and water, and

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>apparently it did. So that's where this idea comes from.

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Right in the tenth century that that this was returned,

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and one thing that was known about the stone somehow

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>was that it would float in water. Yes, and some

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>accounts indicate that it was returned and of shattered into pieces.

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>So whether it was whether it was shattered during extraction

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>or during the return, that's kind of you know, up

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in the air. Now, there's an additional account that is

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>sometimes brought up as a as a possible uh incident

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>in which it was shattered, and that's around ten fifty

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the caliph Al Hakim by am Allah allegedly sent an

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>agent to smash the stone, but this only inflicted slight

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>damage and the agent was killed on the spot. Who's

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to say. I only found one account where someone was

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>speculating on the nature of the stone, who thought that

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>this might have been an incident that could have resulted

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in serious damage. And the details on these accounts were

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>from Mecca, a literary history of the Muslim Holy Land

0:29:56.640 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>by Francis E. Peters. So if any of these didn't

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to the trick, though, there was also a six flood

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that toppled three of the cabal walls, so that also

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>could have contributed to the fracturing of the black Stone. Right, So,

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>if you have a you have an object that is

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>susceptible to damage and it plays such a vital role

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>for such a long period of time, um, it's it's

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it's there's there's a high possibility it's gonna result in damage.

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>You know. One of the other things we should mention

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>is that this is a stone that you can quite

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>well expect to be undergoing a certain amount of wear

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and tear, with millions of people from around the world

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>coming to this stone and trying to touch it and

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>kiss it. Um, I mean, there is, there's all. There's

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>all manner of which, uh, you know, handling of things

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 1>leads to their deterioration over time, even if you think

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you're being gentle. I mean, there's a reason museums don't

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>let you touch stuff, right Like what if what if

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the statue of David? What if everyone got to touch David? Yeah, um,

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you know that would that would erode the statue over time.

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>And certains and certainly accounts of the black Stone indicate

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:10.239
<v Speaker 1>that there is a certain amount of erosion that has

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>taken place, a smoothing of the stones from all of that,

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>all of those human touches, all of those kisses, all

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of that, you know, the oil from from human skin. Yeah,

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>but one can imagine that, I don't know, all manner

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of various handling, touching and stuff like that could also

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe have contributed to fracturing. I mean, it would have

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to be a highly destructive event. Uh, even even gentle

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>caresses over the centuries can add up. Indeed. All right,

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and that basically brings us up to modern times. So

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a quick break, and when we come back,

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>we're going to discuss the possible scientific origins of the stone.

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>What is it? Where did it come from? And how

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>how limited are we in our ability to answer that question?

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're back. So we're to be talking about

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>scientific inquiry into the geologic nature of the black Stone

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Kappa What what kind of rock is it?

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Did it come from space, did it come from Earth?

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>What's it made of? And there's one thing we should

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>note at the outset here, which is that it is

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 1>hard to know the answer to this question because the

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>rock has not been removed to a scientific lab where

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you can do tests on it. This is one of

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>these strange situations where people are trying to do science

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>from a distance, sort of through the intermediary of people's

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>subjective accounts. Right, you have, scientists have not examined the

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:42.959
<v Speaker 1>black Stone, and really scientists are probably not going to

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>get to analyze the black Stone at any point in

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the foreseeable future. Uh, Like I kind of have to

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 1>think of sci fi scenarios in which the black Stone

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 1>could possibly be analyzed. It's uh, it's it's simply like,

0:32:57.400 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>why would you do it, Why would you allow it,

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>why why would you submit it for scientific analysis? Because

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>because there's really nothing quite like the black Stone in

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>any other religious tradition that I can think of. I mean, yeah,

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>an object that is so central, like literally central to

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the belief system. Like the closest thing I can think

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of in Christian and specifically Catholic traditions is the shroud

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of Turin. But even that is not you know, I

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>would not say the shroud of Turin as an article

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of faith or or you know, in any way associated

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>with a pillar of Christianity. Yeah, there are definitely in

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>other religions holy objects, holy sites, but I feel like

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>nothing as central as this and as as hard to

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 1>get at, because because as hard to get out in

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a in a scrutinizing way, obviously it's not hard to

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>get at just in general, and that like we said,

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>millions of people go in touch and look at this thing,

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 1>but you can't remove it. You can't take it away

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>with you, and you can't spend some time screwt noizing it, right,

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 1>so we end up with it was generally intellectuals geologists

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:10.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at a pictures such as they are looking at sketches,

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>analyzing descriptions of it, and then using their knowledge of

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>material science is to try and figure out what it

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>could be, which can be very interesting. So one of

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the standard things this is probably not a very interesting hypothesis,

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>but for you know, years people have said, well, it's

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>probably some kind of lava or basalt something like that. Uh.

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Generally now people don't think that's the answer. Uh. So

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:41.839
<v Speaker 1>another one of the main theories that's been offered over

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the years is that the Blackstone is meteoritic in origin,

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that it came from space. And you know, it makes sense,

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>right because this this aligns with the cosmic origins that

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>are presented in the mythic history as a gift of

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 1>a primordial god, better origin than outer space. Right. And

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>there's also a long history of two important factors here,

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 1>one the worship or at least veneration of meteorites and

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to the use of meteor media meteoric iron. Now I

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of Muslims would probably want to emphasize

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the distinction that the Kabba stone is not something that

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 1>is worshiped, but it's a more like symbolic object that is, uh,

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that is playing a role in what they would describe

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>as their relationship with God. But even if the object

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.720
<v Speaker 1>is not itself a point of worship, you can easily

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 1>see how objects that fall from space would take on

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:43.839
<v Speaker 1>some kind of sacred or venerable dimension. Yeah. Like, one

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>cool example of this is that the Native Americans from

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Roamed Community of Oregon

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>continue to make annual ceremonial visits to the famous Willamette

0:35:56.560 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>meteorite at the American Museum of Natural History. Back to that. Yeah,

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 1>so while scientists believe the rock is the iron core

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of a shattered planet, uh, the Clackamas tribes people knew

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 1>it as tommin Owa's a representative of the sky people

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:14.359
<v Speaker 1>and a source of healing and cleansing. I mean, if

0:36:14.400 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you look at a picture of this meteorite, and you should, Yeah,

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:22.399
<v Speaker 1>it looks like something that was sent by the gods.

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Of course it does. This thing looks insane. It's got

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 1>these caverns in it. Robert, do you know what it

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>looks like. I've seen pictures. Yes, yeah, it looks like

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you get a sense of topography, like it's a maze

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>or even like a lit of former living thing. There

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 1>are like coral aspects to it. Yes, it looks like

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a large piece of iron. Uh, parts of which have

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:52.719
<v Speaker 1>come alive and slithered away. Now the the iron is

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.399
<v Speaker 1>interesting too, because that comes back to this, this use

0:36:55.560 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of meteoric iron. So, before mining technology allowed for the

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 1>ready harvesting of iron ore, one of the few sources

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of this durable metal was the was bits of it

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 1>that plummeted from the sky in the form of meteorites. Uh.

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 1>The ancient Egyptians knew about it. They dubbed black copper.

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 1>That's a cool name it is. It's very very very cool.

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh and uh. And you know it's generally spread then

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>across vast distances. You're gonna find little bits of it

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 1>here and there. So it was a rare commodity. You

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 1>could not cannot arm an army with it, correct, you could. Yeah,

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't make enough swords for an army, but you

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:34.320
<v Speaker 1>could make if you scratch scratch enough of it together,

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 1>you could make a single sword and it would have

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously would have holier or at least um,

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, ceremonial significance. Um. So this this relegated most

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 1>meteoric iron creations to the realm of decorative or significance

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>or ceremony. In fact that in Islamic history, the seventh

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 1>century Caliphs were said to have brandish swords made from

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>meteoric iron, while such iconic figures as a Till of

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the Hun and tamar Lane reportedly wielded other cosmic blades

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:12.280
<v Speaker 1>against their enemies. And you know also their bowls, plows,

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:14.399
<v Speaker 1>and stirrups that have been observed they've been made from

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:17.359
<v Speaker 1>it as well. So maybe sometimes you just ended up

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 1>making what you needed out of the iron, but for

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 1>the most part it tended to take on a sacred significance.

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Weapons from space, Yeah, that should be a whole episode

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:27.839
<v Speaker 1>on its own. Sometimes could be is there enough there

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 1>could we do? Weapons from space? I mean, has anybody

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 1>ever tried to make like a like a I don't Oh,

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 1>what do you call it? A morning star? I don't know.

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Why would you make a morning star out of it?

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 1>When you could make a sword. Terry Pratchett, by the way,

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 1>before he died, I believe had obtained a sword made

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 1>from hero o'kirn. Know what I meant was make a

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>morning star with a moon rock? Oh yeah, I like

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the idea. Yeah, who does that? You mean, if you

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:59.320
<v Speaker 1>have to be brained to death with a medieval blunt weapon,

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 1>why not? Why not? Moon rock makes it a little special.

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:06.759
<v Speaker 1>So it's easy to fall into this thinking, all right,

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:10.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a meteorite. Maybe it's it's it's it's meteoric iron,

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's why all this, uh this, uh, the significance

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 1>is given to it. However, as Thompson points out, we

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 1>mentioned her, We mentioned her earlier, Elizabeth Thompson. Yes, As

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>she points out, this isn't necessarily a slam dunk theory.

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:29.439
<v Speaker 1>An iron meteorite, she wrote, would not break into fragments,

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 1>nor would it float in water because it is a

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 1>piece of iron and so, but that doesn't alull out

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:38.399
<v Speaker 1>all meteorites. There's also the idea that it's a stony meteorite.

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>But it would a stony meteorite float in water? Would

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it be able to withstand the centuries of human erosion? Um?

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Probably not. Yeah. So here I think we should actually

0:39:50.800 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 1>get into a few of the papers that have been

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 1>published on this subject. And the first big one and

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:01.479
<v Speaker 1>that tried to get at the after the meteorite theory

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:04.240
<v Speaker 1>had been dominant for a long time in the twentieth century.

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>The first one that I think really tried to dig

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in and and look at the descriptions and figure out

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:13.320
<v Speaker 1>what it would what it could be was in four

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 1>in the journal Meteoritics. And so they're looking at it

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and saying, okay, pretty much everybody thinks this thing is

0:40:19.000 --> 0:40:22.479
<v Speaker 1>a meteor rte. Are they onto something or are they wrong?

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 1>And this was by Robert Dietz and John McCone. And

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:31.480
<v Speaker 1>in this paper, Dietz and McCone argued that the Kabba Stone,

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the blackstone, is probably not a meteorite but an agate.

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So why do they get to age it. Well, let's

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 1>follow them through their reasoning. So first of all, they say,

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it appears to have been cracked and fractured,

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:49.759
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned earlier, Robert sort of rules out the

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>possibility that it's a nickel iron media. Right, you you've

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 1>seen these types of media writes before that are that

0:40:55.080 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 1>are essentially like a big metal sponge. You know, if

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you have tripped to phobia, these things really should set

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you off with these patterns of holes. But a nickel

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>iron meteorite, it's not brittle like most earth rocks. It's

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:11.359
<v Speaker 1>more like a piece of metal, and thus we would

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 1>not expect to see a meteorite like this with a

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 1>crack or cracked into multiple pieces. But they say, okay,

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>well maybe it could be a stony meteorite. There is

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a different kind of meteorite. It's more like earth rocks.

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 1>And from descriptions, the stone they say is quote hummocky

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and muscled. So what does this mean and why is

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it relevant? Well, hummocky that's not just like a cute

0:41:35.239 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 1>British word or something that does kind of sound like,

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, lord hummocky twizzled, And I was thinking it

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a great description for for a wine. It's like,

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:46.800
<v Speaker 1>what do you what do you think of this particular Wine's? Okay,

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>well it's it's it's hummocky and and muscled, well muscled wine, yeah,

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>with notes of elderberry. Uh yeah, So hummocky actually means

0:41:56.000 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 1>something in geology. It means highly uneven or irregular and surface.

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 1>So they say, you know, literally millions of people have

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:08.880
<v Speaker 1>touched this thing over the centuries, and yet they haven't

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:13.239
<v Speaker 1>worn away these apparent irregular features of the surface of

0:42:13.280 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the stone. So for that to be the case, the

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:18.920
<v Speaker 1>author suggests that the stone needs to have a pretty

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:22.719
<v Speaker 1>good Mose scale rating, which they estimate should be a

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 1>minimum of a seven. So you know about the Mose scale, right,

0:42:26.320 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>That's that's how you an mo m O H. The

0:42:30.560 --> 0:42:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Mose scale geological hardness scale. It's how you rate how

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:37.040
<v Speaker 1>hard is it? You want to know how hard it is,

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you'd give a Most scale rating um and at ten

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:42.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Most scale is a diamond that's super hard.

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:46.479
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think talc is like a one or two.

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 1>A seven is courtz. So they think for this thing

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:55.279
<v Speaker 1>to have withstood all of the touching and kissing over

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:59.319
<v Speaker 1>the years and still have this uneven, hummocky surface, it

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:01.960
<v Speaker 1>needs to be at least a seven on the Most scale,

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>So that gives them one clue to work with. Another

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:09.399
<v Speaker 1>conclusion from the descriptions is that the black stone supposedly

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:13.839
<v Speaker 1>has this highly reflective almost mirror like polish. You know,

0:43:14.040 --> 0:43:16.399
<v Speaker 1>you can you can put your makeup on in it.

0:43:16.800 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I would advise against doing that. Now. I don't know,

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 1>people probably would not have the patience for that. Uh no,

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and you probably actually couldn't. It's uh it's but they

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:29.319
<v Speaker 1>say that it is almost mirror like, it's highly reflective.

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:33.279
<v Speaker 1>Um and they claim that this indicates the stone must

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>be a phanitic and monomineralic. Oh God, more terminology, So

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean? A phonitic is a geology term

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that means very fine grained minerals. So a phanitic rocks

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:50.799
<v Speaker 1>are those where you can't see the individual mineral crystals

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:54.840
<v Speaker 1>with the naked eye. And this usually happens in igneous rocks,

0:43:54.920 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, fire formed rocks that are formed from molten

0:43:58.160 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 1>rock cooling and solidifying pretty quickly. You know that often

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:07.719
<v Speaker 1>happens near the surface. One common example would be basalt. Uh.

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 1>The other word was monomineralic. That means exactly what it

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 1>sounds like, rocks that are made of just one type

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of mineral. If the rock is a fanitic and monomineralic,

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:19.440
<v Speaker 1>they think it's more likely that it could be polished

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:22.359
<v Speaker 1>down to this reflective surface by people touching it over

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the years. Already, though, I think we should Note this

0:44:26.280 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>is something we we sort of warned about earlier, the

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 1>awkwardness of doing science this way because listen to what's

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>going on. They're having to work from secondhand descriptions of

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the features of the stone without examining it themselves. So

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:44.439
<v Speaker 1>there's just a lot of room for problems to creep

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:46.799
<v Speaker 1>into this kind of analysis. So we should definitely take

0:44:46.840 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 1>their conclusions with a large grain, large crystal grain of salt. Anyway,

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:55.799
<v Speaker 1>to continue, how about the color of the stone? Can

0:44:55.800 --> 0:44:58.719
<v Speaker 1>that tell us anything about it? Well, their description says,

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's called the blacks Stone. The stones black,

0:45:02.239 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe even jet black. Now they don't know whether black

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:08.600
<v Speaker 1>is the original color of the stone or whether it

0:45:08.640 --> 0:45:12.360
<v Speaker 1>has turned black through handling, because again the mythic idea

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 1>here is that it was originally white and human sin

0:45:15.120 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 1>has turned it black or mostly black. And this this

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 1>on top of the differing opinions of just how black

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:26.719
<v Speaker 1>it actually is now right referenced earlier. Yeah, and so

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:29.120
<v Speaker 1>back when this article was first published, the author has

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:32.720
<v Speaker 1>managed to get in contact with the keeper of the Kaba,

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:36.880
<v Speaker 1>who in turn got a Muslim scholar named Mohammed alui

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh to offer a sort of concurrently published reply that

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:45.399
<v Speaker 1>gives some theological and historical context to their article. And uh,

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and this scholar had the among his claims, I guess,

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is the idea that the stone was originally white. He

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:54.880
<v Speaker 1>goes with that idea, and he says, various descriptions have

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:58.280
<v Speaker 1>called it quote whiter than snow, as white as silver,

0:45:58.600 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 1>or charmingly as white as a yogurt. And I guess

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:04.680
<v Speaker 1>they what they have in mind is not that gray

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:08.879
<v Speaker 1>purple tricks yogurt that Oh goodness, I forgot about tricks

0:46:09.120 --> 0:46:14.560
<v Speaker 1>tricks yogurt yogurt in name only. Why would you make

0:46:14.600 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 1>gray yogurt? That is a crime against nature? Yeah, yeah,

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean the fruit needs to stay on the bottom

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 1>or is added after the fact. It should It should

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:29.240
<v Speaker 1>not come pre mixed tricks tricks are for kids, I guess. Anyway,

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:32.400
<v Speaker 1>one explanation for the change in color, if in fact

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:34.920
<v Speaker 1>what happened is that it was originally white and it

0:46:35.360 --> 0:46:38.880
<v Speaker 1>darkened over time, is that whenever the pieces of the

0:46:38.920 --> 0:46:43.720
<v Speaker 1>stone become loosened or dislodged from the inset over the years,

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, they start to come out of the cement

0:46:45.840 --> 0:46:49.600
<v Speaker 1>they were reattached with. This kind of putty or cement

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:56.520
<v Speaker 1>made by kneading together wax, musk and amber grease. Yeah,

0:46:56.600 --> 0:46:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and so exposure to this putty is said to have

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:02.799
<v Speaker 1>turned the stone black over the time over time, and

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 1>supposedly the historian Ibn Nafi al Kazi, while writing a

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:10.440
<v Speaker 1>history of the Kabba, got to see the stone inset

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:13.960
<v Speaker 1>completely exposed while the Kabba was being rebuilt, so out

0:47:14.040 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of the frame where it's usually kept, and he reported

0:47:17.160 --> 0:47:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that the part of the stone usually kept covered by

0:47:19.520 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the wall, the part that's usually hidden is white. So

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:26.919
<v Speaker 1>if he's correct about that, um, then it's not just

0:47:27.080 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a jet black stone, but a white stone that is

0:47:30.000 --> 0:47:33.280
<v Speaker 1>either black on one part that's exposed, or has turned

0:47:33.320 --> 0:47:37.920
<v Speaker 1>black over time due to possibly multiple factors. But in

0:47:37.960 --> 0:47:41.239
<v Speaker 1>any case, if the stone were originally black, it could

0:47:41.280 --> 0:47:44.560
<v Speaker 1>be a type of stony meteorites, such as condrite. Condrite

0:47:44.640 --> 0:47:47.840
<v Speaker 1>is a stony meteorite. Um. And remember that the stony

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:51.719
<v Speaker 1>meteorites different from that that solid metal sponge meteorite, the

0:47:51.760 --> 0:47:57.400
<v Speaker 1>iron nickel meteorite. But then again, a chondrite meteorite probably

0:47:57.400 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 1>would not have been able to maintain it's out hummocky

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:03.879
<v Speaker 1>character with all those years of rubbing. So you put

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:06.279
<v Speaker 1>a stony meteorite in there, people touch it for a

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:10.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand years, it would get ground down. And the authors

0:48:10.320 --> 0:48:12.960
<v Speaker 1>also say that a chondrite meteorite probably would not be

0:48:13.080 --> 0:48:17.240
<v Speaker 1>described as having a mirror like reflective polish. Now here's

0:48:17.280 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 1>one other option, how about a Howardite meteorite. Good name again, um,

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:25.279
<v Speaker 1>howard It's. The authors don't think it's going to be

0:48:25.280 --> 0:48:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that because howard It's are very rare. They think it's

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 1>an unlikely candidate. Also, howard it tends to be light colored,

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and this would not fit in with an originally black

0:48:33.680 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 1>cobba stone. But then it might fit if the original

0:48:37.640 --> 0:48:41.440
<v Speaker 1>stories of original whiteness are true. Uh So a little

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:43.759
<v Speaker 1>bit more, some legends about the stone point to the

0:48:43.760 --> 0:48:47.839
<v Speaker 1>possibility of it being a sapphire or an amethyst, which

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:51.280
<v Speaker 1>is interesting, but the authors think neither of those minerals

0:48:51.320 --> 0:48:54.440
<v Speaker 1>really fit. Sapphires are not big enough to be you know,

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the date sized pebbles we see now, and uh and

0:48:58.880 --> 0:49:03.160
<v Speaker 1>amethysts are they quote they say, quote too readily cleaved.

0:49:03.760 --> 0:49:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not quite sure I understand why that would disqualify.

0:49:07.000 --> 0:49:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they're saying that that doesn't meet the hardness characteristics

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:12.600
<v Speaker 1>had just come apart. Yeah, because because again have to

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:15.640
<v Speaker 1>have a sweet spot here between something that is hard

0:49:15.760 --> 0:49:21.920
<v Speaker 1>enough to withstand all that human erosion. But also yeah, uh,

0:49:21.960 --> 0:49:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and so I I don't know. It sounds like what

0:49:24.680 --> 0:49:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you would want is something that is readily cleaved but

0:49:27.680 --> 0:49:30.359
<v Speaker 1>is not ground down by touching. Yeah, maybe they mean

0:49:30.360 --> 0:49:33.799
<v Speaker 1>it would have just it's just just too fragile. Maybe yeah,

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:36.960
<v Speaker 1>it could be. So what do they conclude, Well, the

0:49:37.000 --> 0:49:40.040
<v Speaker 1>authors suggest the simplest explanation would be to think of

0:49:40.360 --> 0:49:45.080
<v Speaker 1>visually attractive stones that are somewhat unusual, but also not

0:49:45.320 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 1>things that are considered precious gems. So they say obsidian

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 1>might fit, but they say it's too brittle and delicate

0:49:52.480 --> 0:49:54.799
<v Speaker 1>to have survived the years of handling and abuse that

0:49:54.840 --> 0:49:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the Cobba stone has, And in the end they settle

0:49:57.760 --> 0:50:00.880
<v Speaker 1>on agate. They think aga is the most slightly candidate,

0:50:00.960 --> 0:50:05.520
<v Speaker 1>especially black ag it Why well, it's monomenteralic. Uh, it's

0:50:05.680 --> 0:50:11.040
<v Speaker 1>hard a Mose scale seven, it's tough, and it's fine grained,

0:50:11.120 --> 0:50:14.960
<v Speaker 1>meeting a fanitic in a fun word from earlier. So age,

0:50:15.160 --> 0:50:17.880
<v Speaker 1>when polished by years of rubbing, should also show a

0:50:17.960 --> 0:50:22.279
<v Speaker 1>fairly reflective surface. You know, kind of mirror. Like one

0:50:22.360 --> 0:50:24.279
<v Speaker 1>last thing that they sit in their favor. They sit

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:27.880
<v Speaker 1>an anonymous Arab geologist who went to view the stone

0:50:27.920 --> 0:50:30.560
<v Speaker 1>for himself while he was on the Hajj, and the

0:50:30.600 --> 0:50:35.240
<v Speaker 1>scholar said that he observed what's called diffusion banding within

0:50:35.280 --> 0:50:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the Kabba stone. If you've ever looked inside a cross

0:50:39.040 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 1>section of an aggot, you see these things that are

0:50:41.200 --> 0:50:44.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like tree rings, you know what I'm talking about,

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:48.800
<v Speaker 1>And these are the band's diffusion banding. And the authors

0:50:48.800 --> 0:50:51.279
<v Speaker 1>claimed that this would be consistent with the stone being

0:50:51.280 --> 0:50:56.200
<v Speaker 1>an aggat um. One note is they seem absolutely unconcerned

0:50:56.239 --> 0:50:58.959
<v Speaker 1>with or unaware of the idea that the stone maybe

0:50:58.960 --> 0:51:03.520
<v Speaker 1>should float. Yes, and that's that's something that Elizabeth Thompson

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:07.360
<v Speaker 1>commented on when in her paper which came afterwards, she

0:51:07.560 --> 0:51:11.840
<v Speaker 1>argued that that this choice, uh, the wouldn't wouldn't float,

0:51:12.520 --> 0:51:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and it also lacked a cosmic origin story. Now now, personally,

0:51:16.320 --> 0:51:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that last bit especially is shortsighted, because I

0:51:19.760 --> 0:51:22.400
<v Speaker 1>think human history shows is that an object or place

0:51:22.560 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 1>need not be verifiably heaven touched to resonate with with

0:51:26.200 --> 0:51:29.560
<v Speaker 1>cosmic potency. Yeah, I'm not very convinced by that, either,

0:51:29.960 --> 0:51:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't see why you couldn't conclude that a regular

0:51:33.400 --> 0:51:36.799
<v Speaker 1>earth rock was a supernatural gift from heaven, Like it

0:51:36.840 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't literally have to come from space for people to

0:51:39.680 --> 0:51:43.120
<v Speaker 1>venerate it as a gift from heaven. Yeah, Because I mean, essentially,

0:51:43.120 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you could boil it down to two different ways of

0:51:45.040 --> 0:51:47.479
<v Speaker 1>looking at this stone and it's in its origin. Either

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it was a really cool looking stone that someone came

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:54.400
<v Speaker 1>across and and it kind of went from there, or

0:51:54.480 --> 0:51:57.600
<v Speaker 1>it was a perfectly normal stone, but there was enough

0:51:57.640 --> 0:52:00.360
<v Speaker 1>capital wolf belief that was put into it, be it

0:52:00.520 --> 0:52:04.480
<v Speaker 1>something situational or just the right people saying this is

0:52:04.600 --> 0:52:07.680
<v Speaker 1>this is it, this is tied to to some something

0:52:07.800 --> 0:52:11.080
<v Speaker 1>larger than ourselves. I mean, you can just look around

0:52:11.080 --> 0:52:12.960
<v Speaker 1>your house and you can find examples of two of

0:52:12.960 --> 0:52:16.239
<v Speaker 1>those things in action. Right. Um, I have. I'm on

0:52:16.560 --> 0:52:18.680
<v Speaker 1>my desk right now, I have just a normal like

0:52:18.760 --> 0:52:22.600
<v Speaker 1>gravel pete rock. I don't know, probably came from from

0:52:22.680 --> 0:52:25.360
<v Speaker 1>asphalt or something. But my son brought it to me

0:52:25.400 --> 0:52:27.040
<v Speaker 1>one day and sit and to and wanted me to

0:52:27.120 --> 0:52:29.480
<v Speaker 1>keep it because it was special. It's not special, it

0:52:29.520 --> 0:52:31.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look special at all, but the fact that he

0:52:31.640 --> 0:52:35.000
<v Speaker 1>gave you tell that No, No, I took it in.

0:52:35.280 --> 0:52:37.200
<v Speaker 1>For the life of me, I can't quite get rid

0:52:37.200 --> 0:52:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of it because because I have this small attachment to it,

0:52:41.160 --> 0:52:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and likewise, we all have various do dads around where

0:52:44.200 --> 0:52:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that we have, be it a stone or some minor

0:52:47.440 --> 0:52:50.759
<v Speaker 1>decoration where we just it just looks too interesting to

0:52:50.840 --> 0:52:54.640
<v Speaker 1>get rid of. Well, I think maybe now we should

0:52:54.960 --> 0:52:57.280
<v Speaker 1>go to the next paper, the one we've been talking

0:52:57.280 --> 0:53:01.120
<v Speaker 1>about several times already, that of Elizabeth Thompson, who has

0:53:01.160 --> 0:53:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a different theory about where this stone comes from. And

0:53:05.320 --> 0:53:07.960
<v Speaker 1>her theory is an interesting hybrid, I think, or I

0:53:08.000 --> 0:53:10.360
<v Speaker 1>guess we should say it's a hypothesis. It's an interesting

0:53:10.440 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 1>hybrid of the meteoric uh or the meteoritic origin story

0:53:15.960 --> 0:53:20.759
<v Speaker 1>and UH and dealing with some of the problems with that. Right.

0:53:20.840 --> 0:53:23.320
<v Speaker 1>So as as you can tell by that that earlier

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:25.960
<v Speaker 1>criticism she had, she puts a lot of stock in

0:53:25.960 --> 0:53:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the cosmic origin aspect that this is somehow connected to

0:53:30.680 --> 0:53:35.319
<v Speaker 1>to a meteorite. Uh. However it need not be an

0:53:35.360 --> 0:53:39.360
<v Speaker 1>actual meteorite according to her theory, it could be uh

0:53:39.520 --> 0:53:43.920
<v Speaker 1>what is known as impact type glass. So I've attached

0:53:44.120 --> 0:53:46.160
<v Speaker 1>for Robert for you to look at here a couple

0:53:46.160 --> 0:53:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of pictures of of wabar impact type glass so cool looking. Yeah,

0:53:53.680 --> 0:53:55.600
<v Speaker 1>these wish I had some of this. These look these

0:53:55.600 --> 0:53:58.240
<v Speaker 1>look super cool. Yeah, and and there are there are examples.

0:53:58.560 --> 0:54:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we'll try to include some links to these images

0:54:01.200 --> 0:54:02.880
<v Speaker 1>on the landing page for this episode of Stuff to

0:54:02.880 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind dot com um, because they are kind

0:54:06.080 --> 0:54:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of how would you describe them? I actually I was

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:10.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to think of the best way to put this.

0:54:10.600 --> 0:54:13.200
<v Speaker 1>They don't look like normal rocks. That do look again,

0:54:13.320 --> 0:54:15.799
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the iron meteorite. They look like something

0:54:15.840 --> 0:54:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that could plausibly have come from a supernatural realm. It

0:54:19.000 --> 0:54:23.319
<v Speaker 1>looks sort of like a fistful of cottage cheese was

0:54:23.400 --> 0:54:27.600
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up in a bunch of seaweed, in a wad

0:54:27.640 --> 0:54:31.719
<v Speaker 1>of seaweed, and then turned into stone, by which that

0:54:31.840 --> 0:54:36.120
<v Speaker 1>sounds about right. Yeah, essentially the idea here. I'll get

0:54:36.160 --> 0:54:39.279
<v Speaker 1>into it more. But imagine what happens when a meteorite

0:54:39.840 --> 0:54:43.400
<v Speaker 1>uh impact occurs in a sandy region. All right, Okay,

0:54:43.440 --> 0:54:46.160
<v Speaker 1>so there's silica sand, and what happens when sand is

0:54:46.200 --> 0:54:50.200
<v Speaker 1>heated up turns to glass? Yeah, So Thompson points to

0:54:50.600 --> 0:54:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the meteorite impact craters of a region known as Wabar.

0:54:55.280 --> 0:54:59.759
<v Speaker 1>This is six four miles or kilometers from Mecca, so

0:54:59.800 --> 0:55:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it's reasonably close. It's in the Ruble Collie Desert and

0:55:04.280 --> 0:55:07.960
<v Speaker 1>here several iron meteorites have turned up. But the bedrock

0:55:08.080 --> 0:55:13.360
<v Speaker 1>here is pure pale sandstone composed mostly of quartz. Crater

0:55:13.440 --> 0:55:16.799
<v Speaker 1>walls are composed of block glass that are formed from

0:55:16.880 --> 0:55:21.880
<v Speaker 1>fuse silica and infused with billions of sphere ules of

0:55:21.880 --> 0:55:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of nickel and iron. So this is impact tight glass. Yeah,

0:55:26.239 --> 0:55:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and it occurs in in what they call porous bombs

0:55:30.320 --> 0:55:32.920
<v Speaker 1>uh so, and often with a white interior and a

0:55:32.920 --> 0:55:37.719
<v Speaker 1>glossy black shell, sometimes as black droplets. So she theorizes

0:55:37.920 --> 0:55:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that the observed yellow white specks in the stone are

0:55:40.719 --> 0:55:43.920
<v Speaker 1>remnants of glass and or sandstone, and then the hardness

0:55:44.000 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of the glass would make it resistant to all of

0:55:46.200 --> 0:55:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that human erosion. Meanwhile, the porous nature of the glass

0:55:49.600 --> 0:55:52.759
<v Speaker 1>would make it would would make it float, and that

0:55:52.840 --> 0:55:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the black color would be due to the nicoliferous iron

0:55:55.560 --> 0:55:59.440
<v Speaker 1>sphere rules captured from an explosion of nickel and iron.

0:55:59.600 --> 0:56:02.439
<v Speaker 1>And she adds that these qualities match up with other

0:56:02.440 --> 0:56:05.719
<v Speaker 1>examples of Wabar glass, as well as reports of meteorites.

0:56:06.160 --> 0:56:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Used as memorials to the prophet. Now, I think this

0:56:08.680 --> 0:56:11.920
<v Speaker 1>is a really interesting theory. Uh may I might be

0:56:12.400 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of favoring it just because I love the pictures

0:56:15.719 --> 0:56:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of this impact type glass so much. It looks really cool.

0:56:19.360 --> 0:56:22.439
<v Speaker 1>It looks so cool. I want this to be the answer. Yes,

0:56:22.520 --> 0:56:25.399
<v Speaker 1>it it's It very much matches up with that classification

0:56:25.520 --> 0:56:28.279
<v Speaker 1>of I mean, you can imagine somebody coming across the

0:56:28.400 --> 0:56:32.080
<v Speaker 1>stone and realizing, this looks really cool. What's the story

0:56:32.120 --> 0:56:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of this. It's also I'm I'm persuaded by not persuaded,

0:56:36.400 --> 0:56:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't say that, I'm I'm unfairly biased by this

0:56:39.640 --> 0:56:44.160
<v Speaker 1>being a very geologically cool origin story that an object

0:56:44.280 --> 0:56:48.360
<v Speaker 1>from the heavens came down and literally melted the earth

0:56:48.880 --> 0:56:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to form these these objects that later become objects of reverence.

0:56:54.280 --> 0:56:57.839
<v Speaker 1>One thing that's probably not necessarily h I don't know,

0:56:57.880 --> 0:57:01.239
<v Speaker 1>an influence, but just a very interesting agendary parallel is

0:57:01.320 --> 0:57:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the idea of the destruction of the city of Iram

0:57:04.280 --> 0:57:08.479
<v Speaker 1>of the Pillars by fire from heaven. Yeah. I've seen

0:57:08.480 --> 0:57:12.920
<v Speaker 1>this referred to as the Atlantis of the Sands Iram. Yeah,

0:57:12.960 --> 0:57:15.360
<v Speaker 1>because it's you know, it's a lost city, and I

0:57:15.440 --> 0:57:17.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's also called is it ubar? Is that right?

0:57:18.200 --> 0:57:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure I've seen it referred to it either

0:57:20.640 --> 0:57:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I I ram with an eye or a ram with

0:57:23.160 --> 0:57:26.440
<v Speaker 1>an a at least in the copy of the Koran

0:57:26.480 --> 0:57:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that I was looking at, because it is mentioned in

0:57:28.240 --> 0:57:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the Koran, chapter eighty nine, verse six to fourteen. It reads,

0:57:34.280 --> 0:57:37.400
<v Speaker 1>hast thou not considered how thy Lord dealt with ad

0:57:37.400 --> 0:57:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of Aram, having lofty buildings, the like of which are

0:57:40.800 --> 0:57:43.920
<v Speaker 1>not created in the land, And of Thamid, who hewed

0:57:44.000 --> 0:57:46.480
<v Speaker 1>up rocks in the valley, and the Pharaoh, the lord

0:57:46.520 --> 0:57:49.280
<v Speaker 1>of Hosts, who exceeded limits in the cities and made

0:57:49.320 --> 0:57:52.720
<v Speaker 1>great mischief therein so thy Lord poured on them a

0:57:52.800 --> 0:57:58.320
<v Speaker 1>portion of chastisement. Surely thy Lord is watchful. WHOA yeah, alright.

0:57:58.360 --> 0:58:03.280
<v Speaker 1>So Thompson has made an interesting uh speculation here that

0:58:03.280 --> 0:58:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that it could be this impact type glass. But there

0:58:05.160 --> 0:58:08.800
<v Speaker 1>was another scientific paper on it by H. J. Acson

0:58:08.920 --> 0:58:12.040
<v Speaker 1>published in the Journal of Materials Science Letters in n

0:58:12.760 --> 0:58:16.160
<v Speaker 1>two called the black Stone of Kabba Suggestions as to

0:58:16.240 --> 0:58:19.520
<v Speaker 1>its constitution, And he looks at the research we've already

0:58:19.520 --> 0:58:23.000
<v Speaker 1>talked about and tries to draw some conclusions from it,

0:58:23.160 --> 0:58:25.640
<v Speaker 1>critique it and then offers some ideas of his own.

0:58:26.400 --> 0:58:30.120
<v Speaker 1>So he reacts to to that original discussion of Dietz

0:58:30.200 --> 0:58:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and McCone who said it was an agate and so

0:58:33.320 --> 0:58:36.480
<v Speaker 1>he says, Okay, their reasoning rests on some assumptions that

0:58:36.600 --> 0:58:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the stone is jet black, that it's mirror like in

0:58:39.440 --> 0:58:43.520
<v Speaker 1>reflective power. Uh, and that it's got these apparent banded

0:58:43.640 --> 0:58:47.400
<v Speaker 1>regions that there that their friend the geologists saw when

0:58:47.400 --> 0:58:50.160
<v Speaker 1>he went and visited it, uh, that they attribute to

0:58:50.240 --> 0:58:55.280
<v Speaker 1>diffusion banding. So it makes them think age on this basis.

0:58:55.360 --> 0:58:58.040
<v Speaker 1>They say that it's not a stony meteorite of the

0:58:58.120 --> 0:59:01.840
<v Speaker 1>chondrite variety, be cause those crumble too easily. And the

0:59:01.840 --> 0:59:05.600
<v Speaker 1>word here is friable. They're too easily friable. Uh. So

0:59:05.640 --> 0:59:08.920
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for something that's a fantic and monomineralic you

0:59:08.960 --> 0:59:12.160
<v Speaker 1>remember that, And they conclude that it's ago. But accon

0:59:12.240 --> 0:59:15.880
<v Speaker 1>claims that even though agat is readily available in the

0:59:15.920 --> 0:59:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Middle East, he thinks the authors overlooked the importance of

0:59:19.520 --> 0:59:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the stone is a collection of pebble

0:59:23.240 --> 0:59:27.840
<v Speaker 1>like fragments cemented together, rather than a single stone with

0:59:27.960 --> 0:59:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a well preserved hummocky surface. So he he thinks that

0:59:31.920 --> 0:59:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they may be sort of um mistaking the the textured

0:59:37.120 --> 0:59:42.120
<v Speaker 1>appearance of this cemented together piece of pavement essentially for

0:59:42.320 --> 0:59:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the surface of what a stone itself should look like.

0:59:47.200 --> 0:59:51.280
<v Speaker 1>And in defense of stony meteorites, he says, okay, chondrites,

0:59:51.320 --> 0:59:54.720
<v Speaker 1>those are stony meteorites actually vary a whole lot and

0:59:54.800 --> 0:59:58.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly how crumbly they are, you know, some of them

0:59:58.080 --> 1:00:01.720
<v Speaker 1>might be more crumbly than others. How friable they are. Also,

1:00:01.840 --> 1:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Accon says, you know, condrites that have been subjected to

1:00:05.120 --> 1:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>what he calls extraterrestrial shock, which is also the medical

1:00:10.440 --> 1:00:14.439
<v Speaker 1>condition induced by watching the movie Mac and Me. He says,

1:00:14.440 --> 1:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>they quote tend to be compacted and contain dark veins

1:00:18.920 --> 1:00:24.480
<v Speaker 1>which might be mistaken for banding under unfavorable conditions of observation.

1:00:24.560 --> 1:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>So he says, you know, if you're just coming up

1:00:26.920 --> 1:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>at this thing in the middle of the day and

1:00:28.400 --> 1:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to peek in at it, you might mistake

1:00:31.680 --> 1:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>these these veins that we would often see in certain

1:00:35.320 --> 1:00:38.520
<v Speaker 1>types of condrites for the kind of banding you'd see

1:00:38.560 --> 1:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in an agate. So that's in defense of it being

1:00:41.080 --> 1:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a meteorite. On the other hand, against the condrite hypothesis.

1:00:45.600 --> 1:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Accent says, Uh, it's common for chondrites to have these

1:00:49.360 --> 1:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>metallic iron nickel pieces distributed evenly throughout, which should be

1:00:55.080 --> 1:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>obvious when you look at this thing. Uh, this is

1:00:57.840 --> 1:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>something that people would have observed about it it. On

1:01:00.640 --> 1:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, he says that metal can disappear by

1:01:03.720 --> 1:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>way of oxidation i e. Rusting if exposed to your

1:01:07.760 --> 1:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>earth weather for long periods of time. So maybe maybe

1:01:11.400 --> 1:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just rusting. But if this were the case, you'd

1:01:13.720 --> 1:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>expect to see rust. You'd expect to see like a

1:01:16.280 --> 1:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>reddish you. Now that being said, there are some accounts

1:01:20.680 --> 1:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>have said brownish or reddish. Yeah, and here we get

1:01:23.640 --> 1:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>back to the problem with like combining all these different

1:01:26.120 --> 1:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>accounts that seem to differ from one another. Uh, it's

1:01:29.080 --> 1:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>hard to know which one to go on if you're

1:01:31.000 --> 1:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to draw the best conclusions. But yeah, I have

1:01:34.040 --> 1:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>seen that too. Some people say reddish brown, others say black.

1:01:37.520 --> 1:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's a little confusing. Um. But also he says,

1:01:42.080 --> 1:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>we would expect to see in a chondrite quote light

1:01:45.160 --> 1:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>colored con drools of silicate, So what is that? Well,

1:01:49.480 --> 1:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>con drools are these visually striking, colorful spherical minerals that

1:01:55.000 --> 1:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>are found in some meteorites. You should look this up.

1:01:58.080 --> 1:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>We could go Google search condrouls. They have a distinctive

1:02:02.200 --> 1:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>appearance and people would probably have noticed and reported them

1:02:05.640 --> 1:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>if they'd been present in the stone because they're these

1:02:08.160 --> 1:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>like colored spheres. You would see them. So Accent says, Okay, okay,

1:02:14.600 --> 1:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>what about a carbonaceous meteorite. These are rare condrites that

1:02:19.200 --> 1:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>are low in density, they're free of obvious medical medical

1:02:23.240 --> 1:02:27.800
<v Speaker 1>metal particles, and sometimes they don't have these big cond

1:02:27.840 --> 1:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>rules that are really obvious. But these are rare meteorites.

1:02:31.880 --> 1:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>They're not a major candidate, and Accent thinks maybe we

1:02:34.720 --> 1:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>should just keep them in the back of the mind,

1:02:36.840 --> 1:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you know. And we've had a to two different authors

1:02:39.320 --> 1:02:43.479
<v Speaker 1>here discussed like rarity being an issue. I keep thinking, though,

1:02:44.360 --> 1:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a rare stone, like you no, in

1:02:47.680 --> 1:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>no classification. It's not like black stone. Yeah, like this

1:02:52.160 --> 1:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>is a singular stone. So can we really count out

1:02:57.320 --> 1:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of rare meteorites. Well, I mean, they just

1:03:00.240 --> 1:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it lowers the probability that anybody in history would have

1:03:04.240 --> 1:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>found trace things, but it maybe increases the probability that

1:03:08.600 --> 1:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>if they had found it they would have kept it

1:03:10.440 --> 1:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and revered it. UM. So you're just sort of like

1:03:14.240 --> 1:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>adjusting the selection dials in two different ways. Um. What

1:03:19.880 --> 1:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>about Thompson's hypothesis, he comes to that, you know that

1:03:22.600 --> 1:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>it's this fused silical glass. There's an impact event in

1:03:26.280 --> 1:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the sand in the desert, a bunch of sand gets melted,

1:03:29.440 --> 1:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>along with some pieces of the meteorite into these crazy

1:03:33.400 --> 1:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>wads of spinach and cottage cheese, uh, turned into stone. Well, Thompson, obviously,

1:03:40.360 --> 1:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>as we said, likes this hypothesis because it means the

1:03:42.880 --> 1:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>stone could feasibly float, and there are those stories from

1:03:46.400 --> 1:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the past of it floating in brine or water or

1:03:49.600 --> 1:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>even concentrated brine, and this would this would also explain

1:03:53.640 --> 1:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the white stone inside the black stone. UM. But Accon says,

1:03:59.320 --> 1:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to see see how a large peat piece

1:04:02.120 --> 1:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of this impact type glass would form the smooth pebble

1:04:06.200 --> 1:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>shapes that are described by observers. Again back to what

1:04:09.200 --> 1:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>people say. You see these smooth pebbles, you know, no

1:04:12.480 --> 1:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>bigger than a date in in the cement. If you

1:04:15.680 --> 1:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>look at these things, Accident says, if the black stone

1:04:18.000 --> 1:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>fragments really are this fused silical glass, from an impact,

1:04:21.920 --> 1:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>they shouldn't look like these smooth pebbles. They should uh,

1:04:25.480 --> 1:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>they should have different surface features, including things like bubbles

1:04:29.320 --> 1:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and vesicles um. And so one last thought he offers is,

1:04:34.720 --> 1:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, perhaps the original body was what he calls

1:04:37.240 --> 1:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a concreteation of pebbles. And so this originally, this original stone,

1:04:43.120 --> 1:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>when when it fractured, what it was was a bunch

1:04:45.640 --> 1:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of pebbles stuck together, and it was just the pebbles

1:04:48.360 --> 1:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>coming off, if that makes any sense. So if you

1:04:51.320 --> 1:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>imagine the original stone was not like a solid stone

1:04:54.560 --> 1:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that broke into pieces and then the pieces got smoothed down,

1:04:58.440 --> 1:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>what if it was a solid a stone that was

1:05:00.760 --> 1:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>more like a cluster of grapes in shape. And he

1:05:04.800 --> 1:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>cites one example of a piece of lunar material that

1:05:08.000 --> 1:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>had been hit by a shock media write bombardment that

1:05:11.200 --> 1:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>actually showed this type of this shape that it looked

1:05:14.600 --> 1:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a cluster of grapes. And so that's

1:05:17.720 --> 1:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>one possibility in his mind. But ultimately he concludes, you

1:05:22.280 --> 1:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>know what, we don't know, and even though we've got

1:05:25.280 --> 1:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>better scientific knowledge to work with, we really need better

1:05:28.840 --> 1:05:31.919
<v Speaker 1>access if we're going to make a conclusion. Just better

1:05:31.960 --> 1:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>access to the primary data. We'd have to be able

1:05:34.240 --> 1:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to look at this thing closely and make some measurements. Yeah.

1:05:37.360 --> 1:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I really like that point that he made in the paper,

1:05:39.360 --> 1:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>saying that even at the time it was this ad two,

1:05:42.040 --> 1:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that the material sciences had advanced so much, uh, even

1:05:46.440 --> 1:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>from some of the previous studies in the prior decades,

1:05:49.800 --> 1:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and yet our information about the black Stone itself has

1:05:53.720 --> 1:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>remained relatively the same. Uh, just you know, a few

1:05:59.640 --> 1:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>more objective observations of what it consists of. But but

1:06:04.240 --> 1:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately no new information, certainly no scientific, scientifically analytic information. Yeah.

1:06:10.800 --> 1:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>That that is a good point. And I think one

1:06:13.400 --> 1:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>thing that I come away from this discussion with is

1:06:16.360 --> 1:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>um this attempt to investigate the material or geological character

1:06:22.040 --> 1:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of of the black Stone strikes me as kind of

1:06:24.600 --> 1:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>similar to our episode from a couple of years ago,

1:06:28.400 --> 1:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>or I guess, let yeah, almost a couple of year

1:06:30.560 --> 1:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and a half ago, maybe on the will of the wisp. Uh.

1:06:34.040 --> 1:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>In the same way, it encapsulates some of the difficulties

1:06:37.280 --> 1:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of doing what you might call second hand science. In

1:06:40.920 --> 1:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>both cases, you've got scientists trying to apply their knowledge

1:06:44.120 --> 1:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of natural phenomena to match this wide range of disparate

1:06:49.160 --> 1:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>subjective reports. Now I think the reports of the black

1:06:53.800 --> 1:06:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Stone of the Kabba are much more substantive than those

1:06:57.440 --> 1:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Will of the Whisp. Obviously, in the case

1:06:59.200 --> 1:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of the black Stone, it actually exists, and we know

1:07:01.760 --> 1:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>for a fact that it actually exists. It's not something

1:07:05.040 --> 1:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that maybe people are just imagining. We know millions of

1:07:08.920 --> 1:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>people see it all the time. It's not an ephemeral phenomenon.

1:07:12.320 --> 1:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like a thing that's there. It's widely observed, and

1:07:15.920 --> 1:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>we know that it's one unified phenomenon and not like

1:07:19.160 --> 1:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>different phenomena being reported under the same name. So these

1:07:23.720 --> 1:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>are all not the case for the Will of the Whisp,

1:07:25.800 --> 1:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>But like the Will of the Whisp, we have to

1:07:27.920 --> 1:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>make judgments based on a host of variable descriptions and characteristics.

1:07:33.480 --> 1:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>What color is it? Different reports and different things. Are

1:07:37.080 --> 1:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>there flecks of other colors within it? What color was

1:07:39.840 --> 1:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it originally? Does it float in water? How reflective is it?

1:07:43.600 --> 1:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Even in the cases where there's only one major answer

1:07:46.320 --> 1:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to these, sometimes we don't know if we should trust

1:07:48.760 --> 1:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that answer or just throughout the question entirely. You know

1:07:51.760 --> 1:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it does it float in water? Are our evidence that

1:07:54.520 --> 1:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the stone floats in water is some report from a

1:07:57.040 --> 1:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand years ago, like should we give it? Give that

1:08:00.080 --> 1:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>more weight than the question, well, could it conceivably you know,

1:08:03.760 --> 1:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>spout a mouth and start talking. You know, uh, you

1:08:07.160 --> 1:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>know at what point you just cut off and say,

1:08:08.920 --> 1:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, we're only gonna we're only gonna look at

1:08:11.720 --> 1:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>these three qualities. What class of meteorite most commonly sprouts

1:08:15.880 --> 1:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a tongue? I can't, I I can't think think of

1:08:21.200 --> 1:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>one offhand. We'll have to what we'll have to have

1:08:24.200 --> 1:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to have to reach out to our audience on that one.

1:08:26.120 --> 1:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the in meteorites. Yeah, well, I mean, even if

1:08:29.040 --> 1:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you do make a distinction between um, you know, subjective

1:08:32.640 --> 1:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>religious beliefs and just subjective direct observational reports, even the

1:08:37.000 --> 1:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>direct observational reports, they're giving us all this conflicting info

1:08:41.280 --> 1:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and and none of it's very solid. Like you you're

1:08:43.800 --> 1:08:46.439
<v Speaker 1>you're not taking a measurement of it. You're just saying like, yeah,

1:08:46.479 --> 1:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>here's generally what I saw. But then there's one other

1:08:50.120 --> 1:08:53.479
<v Speaker 1>interesting parallel, at least it seemed interesting to me. Uh

1:08:53.640 --> 1:08:58.519
<v Speaker 1>here in talking about a religious object is that I

1:08:58.840 --> 1:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's kind of funny how the practice of trying

1:09:01.200 --> 1:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to do a geological or material science analysis on the

1:09:04.920 --> 1:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>black Stone based on these subjective descriptions almost reminds me

1:09:11.000 --> 1:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of something that often happens in our faith traditions, which

1:09:14.880 --> 1:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is the process of trying to draw clarity of theology

1:09:19.120 --> 1:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>from just what amounts to a large collection of stories.

1:09:23.200 --> 1:09:26.519
<v Speaker 1>You know. So when theologians of almost any religion try

1:09:26.600 --> 1:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>to come up with the systematic theology of that religion,

1:09:29.439 --> 1:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the systematic theology being here are beliefs, here are the rules,

1:09:33.080 --> 1:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>here's what happens in the metaphysics of our religion, essentially

1:09:36.360 --> 1:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the science of the religion. Uh, they often have to

1:09:40.320 --> 1:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>draw these conclusions based on sources that are not originally

1:09:43.920 --> 1:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>written to be clear and systematic descriptions of rules and

1:09:47.360 --> 1:09:52.519
<v Speaker 1>theological principles. But they're based on stories, and so you

1:09:52.560 --> 1:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>have to sift through the stories to try to pull

1:09:54.920 --> 1:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>out this clear, systematic understanding of it all. Anyway, I

1:09:58.680 --> 1:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>thought that was kind of interesting. No, No, I think, yeah,

1:10:01.040 --> 1:10:04.599
<v Speaker 1>that's that's that's fair. It has a yeah, the idea

1:10:04.640 --> 1:10:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of of taking all of these either tales or these

1:10:07.720 --> 1:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>accounts and trying to build something concrete out of it,

1:10:11.560 --> 1:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>or just to say what does it mean? Yeah, yeah,

1:10:14.080 --> 1:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>what is the what is the shape of this or indeed,

1:10:16.280 --> 1:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>what is the meaning of this? Well? What am I

1:10:17.680 --> 1:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>supposed to take home from this? But it's but again,

1:10:22.160 --> 1:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>so it's fascinating to to look at these different scientific

1:10:27.080 --> 1:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>hypotheses about the black Stone. It's also interesting just to

1:10:31.360 --> 1:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the history and in mythology surrounding it and

1:10:36.360 --> 1:10:38.559
<v Speaker 1>try and figure out what that means as well. It's uh,

1:10:38.800 --> 1:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>it's really an enigma on several different levels. And I

1:10:42.280 --> 1:10:44.439
<v Speaker 1>hope that we've been able to relate some of that

1:10:44.760 --> 1:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to you today. And on that note, Hey, we're thinking

1:10:48.120 --> 1:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>about doing more episodes in this series looking at sacred

1:10:52.439 --> 1:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>places or objects, so we should throw out the question

1:10:56.880 --> 1:10:59.559
<v Speaker 1>what sacred objects or places would you like us to

1:10:59.680 --> 1:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>cover in the future. We already have a few ideas

1:11:01.479 --> 1:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>kicking around, obviously, especially if there's some interesting scientific angle

1:11:05.439 --> 1:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>we can be discussed about it. One of the things

1:11:07.840 --> 1:11:09.479
<v Speaker 1>that I might want to talk about in the future

1:11:09.640 --> 1:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>is is the Ganges. Oh, yes, that's a good one. Uh.

1:11:14.600 --> 1:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>More of an object than a place that comes to

1:11:17.320 --> 1:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>my mind is, of course, the Ark of the Covenant. Um,

1:11:20.080 --> 1:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it's like nothing we've gone after before. We should at

1:11:23.880 --> 1:11:27.559
<v Speaker 1>least consider it Uh, but I'm sure there are some

1:11:27.600 --> 1:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>other examples out there that our listeners can think of,

1:11:29.880 --> 1:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and certainly you can get in touch with us about those.

1:11:33.560 --> 1:11:37.519
<v Speaker 1>And finally, you know, we've covered Islamic history, Islamic myth,

1:11:37.760 --> 1:11:41.759
<v Speaker 1>Islamic scientific contributions on the show before and will again,

1:11:42.280 --> 1:11:44.719
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it's all part of our shared global culture.

1:11:44.760 --> 1:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>And at the same time, we recognize that discussions of

1:11:47.400 --> 1:11:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Islamic culture continue to resonate with particular potency in today's

1:11:50.680 --> 1:11:54.519
<v Speaker 1>political climate. So we encourage everyone out there to expand

1:11:54.560 --> 1:11:56.799
<v Speaker 1>their understanding of what it means to be a muzzlement

1:11:56.840 --> 1:11:59.679
<v Speaker 1>today's society. And as the starting point, we just wanted

1:11:59.680 --> 1:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to high two organizations you might want to check out.

1:12:02.560 --> 1:12:06.719
<v Speaker 1>First off, there's Muslims for Progressive Values at www dot

1:12:06.840 --> 1:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>mp V USA dot org. This is a um a

1:12:09.880 --> 1:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>faith based, grassroots international human rights organization organization that embodies

1:12:14.080 --> 1:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and advocates for the traditional chronic values of social justice

1:12:18.320 --> 1:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and equality for all. In the twenty one century, SPAKE

1:12:20.920 --> 1:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>champions such values as separation of religious and state authorities,

1:12:24.040 --> 1:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>freedom of speech, universal human rights, and gender equality. And

1:12:27.800 --> 1:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>another group is the Muslim Alliance for Sexual Engender Diversity

1:12:31.760 --> 1:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's at Muslim Alliance dot org. Uh So they

1:12:36.680 --> 1:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>work to support, empower and connect lgb t Q Muslims.

1:12:40.320 --> 1:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>They seek to challenge root causes of oppression, including misogyny

1:12:43.840 --> 1:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and xenophobia, and aim to increase the acceptance of gender

1:12:46.920 --> 1:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and sexual diversity within Muslim communities and to promote a

1:12:50.479 --> 1:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>progressive understanding of Islam that is centered on inclusion, justice

1:12:54.240 --> 1:12:56.519
<v Speaker 1>and equality. Yeah. And one of the things that I

1:12:56.560 --> 1:13:00.639
<v Speaker 1>hope always comes through, um whenever we talk out religions

1:13:00.640 --> 1:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast, as we do fairly often because I

1:13:03.080 --> 1:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>think we all sort of find them very interesting, uh,

1:13:06.920 --> 1:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>is it can be very easy to talk about religions,

1:13:09.400 --> 1:13:12.799
<v Speaker 1>especially a religion that you don't personally hold, in ways

1:13:12.880 --> 1:13:17.479
<v Speaker 1>that are sort of over generalized and overdetermined. Uh. And

1:13:17.520 --> 1:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>So one thing I hope you always take away from

1:13:19.760 --> 1:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>our discussions is is the the incredible room for diversity

1:13:23.920 --> 1:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>of opinion that exists within all these faith traditions around

1:13:27.720 --> 1:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the world. Uh. There are a lot of ways to

1:13:29.720 --> 1:13:31.639
<v Speaker 1>be a Christian, a lot of ways to be a Muslim,

1:13:31.680 --> 1:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways to be a Hindu or a

1:13:33.320 --> 1:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Jew or anything. Indeed, and you know, I know we

1:13:37.320 --> 1:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>have some Muslim listeners out there, So I'd love to

1:13:39.160 --> 1:13:41.519
<v Speaker 1>hear your thoughts on this, and certainly if you have

1:13:41.640 --> 1:13:44.479
<v Speaker 1>gone on the Hodge and you have seen the black

1:13:44.520 --> 1:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Stone with your own eyes or touched it with your

1:13:47.200 --> 1:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>with your own body, uh, we would love to hear

1:13:50.600 --> 1:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>your account of that. Yeah, what was it like? What? What?

1:13:53.120 --> 1:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>What do you think? And what color is it? Really? Yeah? Yeah,

1:13:55.840 --> 1:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>what are your thoughts on that? You can find its

1:13:58.439 --> 1:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>online as always, It's stuffed Blow your Mind dot com.

1:14:01.600 --> 1:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>That is the mother ship. That's where we'll find all

1:14:03.160 --> 1:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the podcast episodes, videos, blog posts, and links out to

1:14:06.320 --> 1:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>our various social media accounts, which is Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler,

1:14:09.720 --> 1:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Instagram except and if you want to get in touch

1:14:13.000 --> 1:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>with us directly, as always, you can email us at

1:14:15.840 --> 1:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>blow the Mind at how stuff works dot com for

1:14:28.439 --> 1:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>more on this and thousands of other topics. Is that

1:14:30.840 --> 1:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>how stuff Works dot com