WEBVTT - Week 5 Waiver Wire recap, and who should I trade? 0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640 Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you 0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160 want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app, 0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080 download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy 0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760 Sports Radio Network and you can listen to this program live. Also, 0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360 if you want to watch the video of this podcast, 0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000 check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on periscope 0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840 and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll 0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200 find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. 0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.800 You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network Fantasy best 0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:53.760 Friends Forever. Do to to Do Din Do to to Do? 0:00:53.800 --> 0:01:00.920 Dinit do to do? Do? Didnit do? Yeah? This is 0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:05.559 the Fantasy Best Friends Forever here on the Fantasy Sports 0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:10.520 Radio Network alongside Frankie Standfall. I am Greg. So what's 0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:15.959 going on money? Greg? Week five? Getting ready? Obviously got 0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:17.760 some news that just came out in the past hours. 0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.720 Will go over that. Oh nothing crazy? Something you said 0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:25.160 that we talked about. I don't remember us talking about Okay, No, 0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:29.560 I was editing. Ah, you are right anyway, Well we'll 0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.160 talk a lot about trades today too, by low so Hi. 0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.920 If you have trades call in four four, four, three, six, 0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:37.520 seven nine. It's a very pivotal time in the fantasy season, 0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:39.720 because if you're one in three and oh and four, 0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:42.200 you might not have any choice but to try and 0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:46.440 make trades. But before we get into all that, I 0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.720 want to ask you a fantasy philosophy question, just a 0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.480 life philosophy question, but it kind of ties into fantasy. 0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.960 Do you think I'm a bad person? That's a little question. 0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:00.240 I think you're a bad person. On Wednesday at noon, 0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:05.640 you're even a bad person, Greg, No, the fact that 0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:07.440 you have to think that long, I wasn't. I was 0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:10.480 back by the question why why do you? Why were you? 0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:12.680 Do you think you could be a bad person? Well, 0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:14.600 then why do bad things keep happening to me in 0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.840 fantasy football? You want to flex those things tied together? 0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:19.760 You want to flex last year? You have the last year, 0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.400 So we're live in the past. I'm not. I'm not 0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.960 like those Yankee fans quarter seven, not like Tallas Cowboys fans. 0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.200 Just call that Corey now. No, I mean that's what 0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:32.000 a lot of Yankee fans and Tallas Cowboy fans saying. 0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:33.560 I'm not living in the past, Greg, I'm trying to 0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:35.720 win this year, right, I don't care about last year anymore? 0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:40.119 What did bad things keep happening to me? What's happening, Frank? 0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.920 I lost Kiki Kuta in my home league where my 0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:46.080 team is bad. We just went through it's bad like 0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:49.320 I'm one in three. My three best players are Kareem Hunt, 0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:53.000 Mike Evans, and Zach Ertz. I basically need to trade 0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:54.720 two of those guys this week to try and get 0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:58.080 death because as of now, I'm starting guys like Kenny Stills, 0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.880 Chris Hogan. How do you think he wanted for Mike Williams? 0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.800 Can you drinking my lineup? It's a it's a bad team. 0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.880 I needed Kiki Kote. Yesterday I said on the show, 0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:10.679 I'm gonna be thirteen dollars in my home league on 0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:15.160 Kiki right. I started bumping it up pretty much every hour. 0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.240 Last night, I bumped it up a dollar, like, you 0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.760 know what, someone might have been listening to this show. 0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.520 They might put thirteen, I'll put fourteen. And I was like, 0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.240 you know what, someone who was listening might also have 0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:27.840 that logic and put fourteen. I'm gonna put fifteen, And 0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:29.760 I was like, I don't want a round number. You 0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.200 don't bet on a five, so I'm gonna put sixteen. 0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.040 That was the final bid was there midnight, ready to go. 0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:39.240 I'm like, I'm gonna get Kiki sixteen bucks. I didn't 0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:43.160 get Kiki. He went for seventeen bucks. You know who. 0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:47.920 He went to, Michael Floria, Michael F. Ben Florio, and 0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.680 I text him this morning. You know what he says, Sorry, 0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:54.560 my starting bid was twelve dollars. I bumped it up 0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.839 all throughout the days. I'm like, are you serious? Are 0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:03.040 you serious? I don't deserve this Greek. I'm sorry, Frankie. 0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:05.880 From the look of your face, it looks like something 0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:07.960 bad just happened your waivers. So my waivers just went. 0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.680 And you know, I have been kind of pounding the table, 0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:15.880 but that thirteen dollars bid for Kiki and this league. 0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.600 I got Brandon Marshall with eleven dollars in week one, 0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.880 and I realized, I'm sorry. I feel like I helped 0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.680 influence that you did, for sure. But but this league 0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:31.400 in general, it tends to be conservative with their fab 0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:33.640 Like I found like one league that I'm in is 0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.240 pretty loose with the fab and one league is pretty conservative. 0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:42.000 This one happens to be conservative. So for Kiki, I've 0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.360 been nine dollars rather than my normal thirteen, and we're 0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.159 talking downstairs, like, you know, what should I up that bid? 0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:49.640 I think we're gonna leave it at nine. Do you 0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:53.560 know what he went for? Thirteen, same exact number we said. 0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:55.080 He went to the first place team, So I would 0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:59.720 have been thirteen. I would have gotten There's one thing 0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.360 that I do with bids. Once I put my first 0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:04.640 bid in or have a bit idea, I'll never lower it. 0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.320 My first bid was thirteen, because if you do and 0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.480 this happens, you just can't do that. Greg, you can't 0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:15.480 lower the fab bids like I did. And I's got screwed. 0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.520 I'm sorry about that stink spam. Oh I want this 0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:23.159 player for sure. Well I'm putting waivers of tomorrow now. 0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:29.479 Lenny four Net already ruled out Week five. Done, Oh 0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:33.760 and even get that guy anyway. Leonard Fournett has been 0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.479 ruled out for week five already. We have people on 0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:41.240 Twitter saying, very knowledgeable people, sports medicine, sports doctor ish 0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.560 people saying that he could be out through the week nine. 0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:48.960 By Greg, Week five, week six, week seven, week eight. 0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.320 In week nine, you potentially will not have him back. 0:05:55.200 --> 0:06:00.200 So week ten Leonard Fournett because apparently him returning this week. Okay, 0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:02.839 he should have set out another week and then instead 0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.080 he actually injured himself. Now he re injured himself and 0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.960 it's more severe than it was before. So before when 0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.839 it was like a two to three week injury, it's 0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:14.680 now like a three to four week injury. And again, 0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:16.640 the Jaguars have Super Bowl aspirations, So why are you 0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:18.919 rush them back? That's reminds me email a doctor right 0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.400 right now, because we're giving the players to pick two 0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.360 players we want to talk about. Letter for Nett certainly 0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.920 will be on this list. It's as should DeVonta Freeman. 0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:30.720 Quinn expects to play this week coming to really, I 0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.320 mean I know that he leaves kind of set it, yeah, coming. 0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.400 I saw Inside Injuries tweeting today that they also expected 0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.719 DeVonta Freeman to be back this week. This is his 0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:45.560 optimal recovery time healthy to perform in week five. So this, uh, 0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.039 this seems like the week that that makes sense. And 0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:50.760 I was actually on I was on the Angle of 0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:54.760 Pursuit podcast last night. Gree with Kyle Robert was very 0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:58.000 nice and we were kind of talking about what do 0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.760 we expect the breakdown to be moving full in terms 0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.159 of touches for DeVonta Freeman and Tevin Coleman. He's a 0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.120 great question. I don't know that it's the sixty five 0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:09.800 split that were used to seeing. I still think that 0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.360 red zone job is locked up for DeVante Freeman. I 0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:14.080 just might be true, but I think overall we might 0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.600 be closer to people realize in GST we should trade 0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.960 Devon Freeman today. There's no trading in that league. Just tine, 0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:22.960 there's no trade in her car and there's no trading. Oh, 0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:27.640 that's right, they get rid of trading disaster. Wow. So 0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:31.080 so you're saying drafting DeVonta Freeman in the second round 0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:32.840 was not a good idea, Greg seems like a mistake 0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:34.400 at this point. But it's crazy because the guy I wired, 0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:36.120 Keenan Allen was the guy I wanted, and he hasn't 0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:37.600 been Grady And the other guy that I really wanted 0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.920 was Kareem Hunt, who you hate in the first round, 0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.160 don't hate him, you do in a full point PPR league. 0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:48.480 He hasn't been. He He was touchdown dependent coming into 0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:49.920 this week, and he had a great week this week. 0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:51.800 He absolutely did, no doubt about it. She is on 0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.080 a trade show. Why you should sell him. I disagree, 0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:57.000 it's why you should buy him. Would you really have 0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.200 the rest of the way Kareem Hunter? David Johnson still 0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.160 Kareem Hunt because he plays and a much more explosive offense. 0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:06.280 Who would you rather have going forward? Freeman? David Johnson 0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:09.560 just because I don't think Chase Edmonds is going to 0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:11.600 do as much as Tevin Coleman does. We just saw 0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.040 David Johnson have his highest carry total of the year 0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.640 at twenty two UM, so he's actually had two very 0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.000 solid games in a row. He scored two games in 0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:21.920 a row, and I like the fact that his usage 0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.680 is increasing. So I'll take David Johnson. He doesn't really 0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:26.920 have a thorn in the side like devonsa Freeman does. 0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:29.000 Who would you rather have? Do? Do a bunch of these? 0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:30.840 I think these are popular trade jargets. You don't if 0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:34.640 you don't mind, No, I have David Johnson as a 0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:36.680 cell right now. If you look on the rundown, danaging 0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:38.200 three point three yards for carry this I looked at 0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:39.840 the run now, which is how I got to David Johnson, 0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.560 who appreciate it. Of course, Who would you rather have 0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:50.920 David Johnson or Jordan Howard? This might be schedule dependent. 0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.160 I'm gonna pull up Jordan Howard's upcoming schedules as a 0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.360 seat on the by this week. Remember, I know David 0:08:56.440 --> 0:09:00.320 Johnson I wrote in he has San Frand this week, 0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.679 which is probably okay, uh, and then Minnesota and Denver 0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.800 the two weeks after that. So those are not great matchups. 0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.079 So this could be especially the Minnesota game could be 0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.320 a game where you know, they just actually get destroyed 0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.920 and he doesn't get much work upcoming schedule four Jordan 0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:20.600 Howard coming out of the break, Miami Patriots, Jets, Bills, 0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:27.320 Allions later on season. That helps. It's fine, it's schedule. Yeah, 0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:32.320 that's a good question, man. I think I would take 0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:36.480 Jordan Howard's interesting. I was gonna say, David Johnson, maybe 0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:40.680 that's reactionary. That's close. Yeah, because again, like David Johnson 0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.280 is trending in the right direction, getting more carries, saying 0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:46.880 more usage, Jordan Howard in that department is actually training downwards. 0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.440 He had fifteen carries in fourteen twenty four and week 0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.280 three were like, all right, the big game is coming, 0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.640 which is what we all expected against Tampa Bay. Then 0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.640 eleven carries. You know he It's twenty five yards in 0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.920 a game where the Bear score for already eight points. 0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.320 So I understand the trepidation here, Greg, but you have 0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:05.079 to look at it like this is bye week is 0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.640 already now out of the way. He has a pretty 0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.719 good schedule coming out of the bye I expect to 0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:12.360 touch his too, bounce back, and he plays in a 0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.720 much better offense overall with the Chicago Bears UM and 0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:19.600 a better offensive line too, So it's very close. I 0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:22.480 think for those reasons though, the offensive line, the offense overall, 0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.200 the fact that his boy is gonna be behind him, UM, 0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.959 and just the upcoming schedule is not that scary. Elean 0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.760 Jordan Howard, that's a great question. Ultimately, maybe I'm being 0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:35.040 reactionary when it comes to this, but I'll tell you 0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.080 I want David Johnson, and it's just what you mentioned earlier. 0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:42.120 With Chase Evans not being a major factor the season 0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:44.800 twenty two carries your touches as week for David Johnson 0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.400 carries carries. He also had an additional like three or 0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.559 four receptions, So I think touches that's what you need 0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.720 and want from David Johnson. Terek Cohen was too good 0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:55.600 in my opinion in this past week to not be 0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.600 a factor. They saw the electricity that he brought to 0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.960 this offense. Jordan Howard in a thirty eight nothing game 0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:07.199 couldn't do anything and that was that gainela dependent. Well 0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:13.200 it's weird, but maybe is that opponent dependent potentially in 0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:18.800 that scenario, give me David Johnson over Jordan Howard do 0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:23.120 you worry about? Obviously, the offense overall is going to 0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.240 be better with Josh Rosen. I think we all saw that. 0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:27.480 Like Josh Rosen was pretty damn impressive. While I know 0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:30.400 he didn't put up huge numbers, just his ability to 0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.240 you know, fit balls into tight windows and push the 0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.760 ball down the field just obviously better than Sam Bradford. Uh, 0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:38.240 you have to feel a little bit better about the 0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.720 Cardinals offense. But I worry about the games where because 0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:42.319 I still feel like this is gonna happen where the 0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:44.560 Cardinals are just getting blown out and he just has 0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:47.760 to abandon the run, and those are you know what 0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.400 is David Johnson can give you in those matchups. I 0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:52.640 don't know that the Bears are ever going to be 0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.040 getting blown out in games because their defense is so good, 0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:56.559 so they're gonna be in a lot of games, a 0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.800 lot of you know, solid game script games for Jordan Howard. 0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.040 And I know, you know, we're saying that after a 0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:04.199 game where they were blowing them out and it was 0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:06.040 a good game to perform and he didn't do anything. 0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.920 But while you maybe two reactionary the other way for 0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:14.800 David Johnson, I'm reacting in Jordan Howard in that I'm not. 0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:16.760 I don't think this like I don't want to react 0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.240 too far the other way from Jordan Howard. Will you 0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:23.040 try to buy low this week on Jordan Howard? Sure, 0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.440 I think that makes sense. Um, if I own David Johnson, 0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:27.920 I think he might be people to get Jordan Howard 0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:31.120 in like another piece, like another complimentary peale, because I 0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:34.040 think Jordan Howard owners are like really on him now 0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:36.640 because you look at the yards per carry, it's at 0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:38.960 three points too. They were expecting that monster game. Like 0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.880 a lot of Fantasy owners are frustrated with Jordan Howard 0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:43.800 right now. It's the same way that they viewed David 0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:45.319 Johnson after week. To remember, you have to have a 0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:47.480 terrible game and everyone's like, oh my god, you know, 0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:49.600 trade David Johnson for whatever you can get. I have 0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:51.400 a feeling that Jordan Howard owners might be feeling that 0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.520 way about him right now. Okay, so there you go. 0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:57.280 That's the Jordan Howard and David Johnson, especially if you're 0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:58.640 like three and one or four and oh, and you 0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:02.120 can afford to get him on the bye week because 0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.840 you have that luxury because you're sitting pretty I think 0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:09.319 that makes sense. Obviously, we talked about LEVI four and 0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:13.600 now with David Johnson, that's probably tough. No. I just 0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:15.880 meant in general, if you're trying to acquire Jordan Howard, 0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.680 like not if you're not just being a David Johnson owner, 0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.400 like you can be a whatever owner and just try 0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:23.880 and acquire Jordan Howard because I think better days are ahead. 0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:34.240 Would you rather have DeVante Freeman or Joe Mixon? Wow? 0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:41.120 Um a'leen, And you know what, I'm not a DeVante 0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.520 Freeman guy, but I'm I'm worried about Joe Mixon too. 0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:48.480 I'll go with the youth. I'll go with the youth 0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.400 and Joe Mixon. Obviously, both offenses look very very good 0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:54.120 right now. Both offenses are clicking. I think the Falcons 0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:55.719 are gonna be in a lot of shootouts that might 0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.920 lend them more so towards passing the ball. Uh, it's 0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:01.319 a very good question. Honestly, I wouldn't want to actively 0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.680 acquire either one right now, and you know that about me, Greg, 0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.040 I don't like trading for injured players. I don't have 0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.160 injury optimism, especially when it comes to running backs who 0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.840 are coming off injuries with involving their knees. And DeVante Freeman, 0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.400 you know, he's another guy who he had multiple concussions 0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.920 last year. So I would lean Joe Mixon, but I'll 0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:22.160 say this, I think Jioe Bernard what he's done in 0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.200 Joe Mixon's absence, I don't know that Joe Mixon comes 0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.920 back and is instantly getting ad plus percent of the 0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.120 snaps again and is seeing the majority of the work. 0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:33.400 I think Giovanni Bernard has earned himself a role in 0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.320 this offense again. So to answer your question, I would 0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.040 lean Joe Mixon over Devon Freeman. But honestly, I don't 0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.680 want to actively trade for either one. So neither one 0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:46.600 is a Bye low high whatever is a BY, I 0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:48.680 wouldn't want to buy either one. Do you agree that 0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.840 you think Giovanni Bernard is worked in more with Joe 0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:53.880 Mixon throw as the season goes on. UM, I think 0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:58.160 Giovanni More's interesting word. He wasn't being used at all 0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.120 the first two weeks of the season, like it is 0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:03.720 all Joe Mixon, like he was getting twenty plus touches 0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.800 per game. I don't think it's gonna happen anymore. I 0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:08.640 think for the reason of Jeo looking as good as 0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:11.800 he has and wanting to preserve Joe Mixon like he can't. 0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:13.800 He's not gonna come back and just instantly get that 0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:17.880 big workload again. At least that's how I feel. I think. 0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:19.800 I think I would think the shot on Joe Mixon. 0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.240 They they said in the preseason and early on they 0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:24.240 showed it they want him to be the man that 0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.200 they absolutely want it, and yes they need to keep 0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:28.840 him healthy, and yes, Giovanni Bernard has looked good. But 0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:30.640 I thought what we saw at times a couple of 0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.960 weeks ago was electric Joe Mixon, and I think that 0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:38.000 can come back. Ultimately, I would buy Joe Mixon right now, 0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:39.640 like this is a guy that's gonna have fresh legs 0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:40.920 a second half of the year. I don't know what 0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.040 it costs, obviously, UM, the owner of Joe Mixon, it's 0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.320 going to cost in his mind, he doesn't want to 0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:52.720 sell him low. He doesn't want to He's not gonna 0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:55.520 sell him for the discount that you probably want to pay. 0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.560 It's tough. Again. The only way that I could trade 0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:00.240 for Joe Mixon, if I were going to try too, 0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:01.720 I have to be three and one or four O, 0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.760 because you're two and two or less. You're trading for 0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:07.480 a guy that is absolutely going to help you this week. 0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:09.600 And there's still a chance that Joe Mixon plays this week. 0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:11.560 I just don't know how useful he's going to be 0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.720 for fantasy because again, even if he plays, remember the 0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:16.760 timetable that Dr A gave us was more like four 0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.240 to six weeks for Joe Mixon, which pushes him more 0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:23.160 so towards like week six weeks seven. And if he's 0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:26.200 back this week again, that would be a week early 0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.200 because the chance for ree injury. I don't think he 0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:30.360 gets the full workload right away out of the gate. 0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.120 So if I'm trading him, I have to be over 0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.440 five D and fantasy I agree that two or two 0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:38.280 or less because I don't think that he contributes all 0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:40.520 that much this week. I completely agree with you I'm 0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.280 not training for him for this week. I'm trading him 0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.120 for that second half of the year. We talked yesterday 0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.640 about a championship move, a lady on Belt everything. That's 0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:50.320 what I think Joe Mixon can be. I don't know 0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:52.320 what his playoff schedule is. Like that in my head 0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.160 is obviously I mean, maybe this isn't the obvious sense, 0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:57.960 Like I would rather trade for Levy on Belt if 0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.120 I were three and one to four. There's risking all 0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:01.800 with both. I would agree with that. Well, het you 0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.080 some of the running backs you're buying high, selling low 0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:06.919 on and vice versa. When we come back, I want 0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:08.520 to do the same with the wide receivers. That's cool 0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:10.040 with you, Frankie. We gotta stand of the day. I 0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:11.879 want to get to and we have a whole lot 0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:13.399 of wide receivers and we wanted to let you know 0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:15.280 what you should be doing with them. This is the 0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:19.000 Fantasy best Friends Forever. I'm a fantasy sports radio network 0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:29.400 Daily Rodo dot com learned from the game's best DFS players. 0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:34.080 We don't just give you premier advice. We play every day, 0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:38.560 all major sports, all year round. We never stop. Industry 0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:42.560 leading DFS tools and custom projections and now the Daily 0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:46.560 Rodo dot Com Optimizer in minutes, building optimized line up 0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.800 for cash games and turneys learned from the game's best 0:17:49.880 --> 0:18:02.159 DFS players joined Daily Rodo dot com. I knew it 0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:09.320 was a Frankie and Gun music. Bet ds I is 0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.760 celebrating twenty years of the industry's biggest and safest betting site. 0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.960 They have great customer service and fast, easy payment of winnings. 0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:17.879 You can play virtually every sport at bet ds i 0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.760 with hundreds of wagering options, including liven game wagering on 0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:22.920 all major sporting events, where you can make your play 0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:24.879 and any time during the game. Bet d s I 0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:26.720 is now offering up to a thousand dollar bonus on 0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:28.600 your first deposit if you use the promo code f 0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.560 and T s Y that's bet ds i dot Com. 0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:36.520 The promo code is f n T s Y. Hand 0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:40.280 on over to bet d s I and start winning today. 0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.520 All right, Frankie's get back to ours or trade show, right, 0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.639 So we're going over some of these players that we 0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.080 want you to sell, and certainly the players that we 0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.120 want you to buy. Let me get today's Saturday before 0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.480 we continue on. What is Today's State of the day, 0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.159 the Tyler Boyd stat. Yeah, that was yesterday's stat of 0:18:58.160 --> 0:18:59.800 the day. Give it me again because we're talking about 0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:04.200 Tyler would Tyler Boyd's last six gamest seven targets, thirty 0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:08.920 six receptions, seventy six point six catch rate four nine yards. 0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.560 It's thirteen point six yards per catch, three touchdowns, a 0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:15.200 hundred and thirty point five quarterback rating when being targeted 0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.000 over a full season, that would be ninety six catches 0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:22.320 and four yards and eight touchdowns. Greggy first two hundred 0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.639 yard games of his career back to back weeks for 0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:28.080 Cincinnati this I understand the matchup was great for Cincinnati 0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:29.560 over the past couple of weeks, so he wanted to 0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.240 use Andy Dalton. It's the same this week. It's a 0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:34.200 very good matchup for Cincinnati this week, I believe. Is 0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:38.480 that direct Frank. It's against the Miami It's a pretty 0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:40.480 good rushing matchup. I know they have some injuries in 0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.840 the secondary right now. Xavier Howard has been very, very 0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.360 good this year, but he's probably going to be shadowing 0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.080 a Green. So with Tyler Boyd in the slot, I 0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:56.679 think he should be just just fine. The the Tyler 0:19:56.800 --> 0:20:00.239 Boyd thing is is real in my opinion, and we've 0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.320 spoken about him and he's the one guy Frank I 0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.520 believe has been the waiver wire pick up that matter 0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.760 thus far. But how long will continue? Is this something 0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.040 we should sell high? Is this or is this something 0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:16.640 we should buy high? Is what Tyler Boyd's doing sustainable? Yeah, 0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:19.920 I'm absolutely in on Tyler Boyd. Um just the way 0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:24.560 he's being used, the targets. He's playing the slot basically 0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:27.000 all the time now for the Cincinnati Bengals, and I'm 0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.280 going to continue to talk about this. Slot receivers in 0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:30.919 the NFL are the ones that you want to target, 0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:34.359 especially for fantasy purposes. We're seeing this now, Adam feeling 0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.560 guys like Tyler Boyd. Even Sterling Shepherd has, you know, 0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.960 kind of turned a new page in the fantasy season 0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:44.800 for this season. So Tyler Boyd, I absolutely think that 0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:48.000 it's sustainable. And look, I'm buying high Parsley due to 0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:51.280 the schedule, Like if someone is not ranking him the 0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:53.560 way that I view him right now, because I view 0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:55.800 him as like a low end wide receiver two, which 0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.000 might be crazy. The guy that we just picked up 0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:00.240 he is a week ago, but he faces my Emmy 0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:04.800 this week and then he gets Pittsburgh Casey and Tampa Bay. 0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:07.680