WEBVTT - All Eyes on Japan and China Tensions After Taiwan Remark

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Tensions between Japan and China are escalating sharply over Taiwan

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Biden risk. This diplomatic spat shows no signs afe cancy

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 2>of easing and this back and forth.

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 3>Relations between China and Japan have never been easy, but

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 3>right now they're in the dumps.

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 2>China had canceled this trilateral meeting between the culture ministers,

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 2>and in the meantime, Japan's Defense minister is saying that

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Japan will plan to deploy some missiles from Yunaguni, which

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 2>is an island just one hundred kilometers to the east

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 2>of Taiwan, a very strategic location.

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 3>The cause of all this tension are remarked by Japan's

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 3>new Prime Minister Sanai Takichi. In response to a question

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 3>in the parliament earlier this month, Takiichi linked Japan's security

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 3>with the territorial integrity of Taiwan.

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Takaichi is probably the first prim start to actually explicitly

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 2>say that an attack on Taiwan could be an existential

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 2>crisis for Japan, which gives in the legal justification to

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 2>lean in militarily.

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Japan and China have a long and tense history, often

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 3>marked by disputes over wartime grievances and territorial claims. But

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 3>James Mager, Bloomberg Senior reporter based in Beijing, and Isabelle Reynolds,

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 3>our Tokyo buer chief, say this dispute is different.

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 4>Taiwan is the red line. There's a series of different

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 4>issues between Japan and China. Those are all important, but

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 4>when it revolves around Taiwan, there is no leeway in

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:39.279
<v Speaker 4>the system for just accepting that maybe someone said something

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 4>and it wasn't a threat.

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>That's right. I think what's happened is she said the

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:45.639
<v Speaker 1>quiet part that aloud, the things that people would normally

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>only talk about and plan for behind the scenes. She's

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>publicly acknowledged that we have to think about that.

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to the Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm Wanha.

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Every week we take you inside some of the world's

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 3>biggest and most powerful economies in the markets, tycoons and

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 3>businesses that drive this ever shifting region. Today on the show,

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 3>China and Japan clash again, but this time the point

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 3>of contention is Taiwan. We find out why Japan's new

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Prime Minister has put Taiwan on the table and what

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:31.959
<v Speaker 3>it could mean for both sides. Following Takeiichi's comments on Taiwan,

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 3>Beijing has stepped up its protest and retaliation. The Chinese

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 3>government has warned its citizens against traveling to Japan and

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 3>instructed its airlines to reduce the number of flights to

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 3>the country. Beijing's also suspended imports of Japanese seafood and

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 3>halted approvals for movies too. China's Foreign ministry has repeatedly

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:59.399
<v Speaker 3>demanded Takichi retract her comments on Taiwan. Isabel says Takiichi

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 3>has refused used to do so, saying there was no

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 3>change to Tokyo's stance on how it would respond to

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 3>a major security crisis in the region.

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>So what happened was on November seventh, in parliament, Takeichi

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>said that a conflict in which Beijing was trying to

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.519
<v Speaker 1>take over Taiwan and was using armed force and was

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>using warships could potentially amount to an existential crisis for Japan.

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>And now that is significant because under Japan's pacifist constitution

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:33.679
<v Speaker 1>and the laws it passed subsequently in twenty fifteen, an

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>existential crisis would allow Japan potentially to send in its

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>own military to the defense of a friendly nation.

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 3>And is that a big shift in Japanese politics for

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 3>her to say that.

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>There was a huge amount of discussion leading up to

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the twenty to fifteen legislation. Everyone's been very careful not

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to point out exactly what sort of situation where which

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>countries might be involved, were where Japan might send an

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>ex military. So to come out and say this very boldly,

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>very frankly, and not really mincing her words in any

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>way is a big step away from how Japan has

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>approached this issue in the past.

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 3>So certainly other Japanese leaders have been known to stay

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:18.679
<v Speaker 3>away from the issue of Taiwan.

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's absolutely true. They expressed friendliness towards it, but

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>they've had this formal set of words that they want

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>any conflict between the two sides to be resolved peacefully.

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 4>And I think on that it is important to note

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 4>that people outside the government, or people who used to

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 4>be ministers or MPs like Takh before she became the

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 4>Prime Minister, has said similar things. What's really different here

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 4>is that the Prime Minister, in her official capacity in

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 4>parliament made these comments, and I think part of The

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 4>reaction from China was they were expecting her to do

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 4>something like this. They did know that she had these

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 4>views because she has expressed them in the past, and

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 4>I think for them it was their expectations or their

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 4>fears about what she would do as prime minister were

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 4>confirmed and then they reacted to that. So it really

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 4>is what you can say as a private citizen, what

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 4>you can say as a very minor MP, and what

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 4>you can say as the Prime minister tend to be different.

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 3>And of course we know that Takyishi made history last

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 3>month when she was sworn in as a country's first

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 3>woman prime minister. She's barely unpacked her bags right in

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 3>the PM's office. To your point, why pick this fight now?

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there are some doubts about whether she said

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>this on purpose. She is very new to the job

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and she's talked about how she only gets two to

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>four hours of sleep at night, so I mean, you know,

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>maybe she was sleep deprived and felt corded into it.

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>And I don't forget this was not something she came

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in and read out as a prepared statement. This was

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>part of a long session of being grilled by an

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>opposition MP about what exactly would constitute an existential crisis,

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and at the end of it, she came up with this.

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:51.919
<v Speaker 3>How did her comments land in Japan.

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 1>It's been a very mixed reaction. I mean, we've seen

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of public commentators sort of on both sides saying,

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 1>of course she should not have said that, you should

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 1>have withdrawn it, and the opposition urged her to withdraw

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>those comments. But Herst's public support rate is still enormously high.

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>It's probably the highest for any prime minister in more

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>than two decades. And if you look at the opinion polls,

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they're also a bit mixed, as you would probably expect.

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's also an interesting point that what

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 4>she's saying isn't unexpected for people in Japan. There has

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 4>been this debate now since twenty fifteen or a decade

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:26.359
<v Speaker 4>on what would happen if China did try to invade Taiwan.

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 4>Japan is right next door. Obviously Japan is going to

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 4>be affected by that. If nothing else. There are thousands

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 4>of Japanese citizens in Taiwan who would need to be

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 4>helped in some way, assisted out of Taiwan, evacuated, and

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 4>so there's a public recognition that this is a very

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 4>important question and the government will have to do something

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 4>or decide to do something if there is a war

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 4>in the Strait. You know, it's not like this came

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 4>out of nowhere, and Japanese people have never thought about this.

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Now we know the two leaders, President she Jinmping and

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 3>the Prime ministers in Aataki Uchi just shook hands about

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 3>a month ago at the APEX summit in South Korea.

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.679
<v Speaker 3>Are there any warning signs that anyone saw.

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 4>Then that meaning went pretty well? I was there at

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 4>the venue, not having the meeting itself, but everyone I

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 4>spoke to you afterwards, the Japanese side, they seem to

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 4>think the meeting had gone pretty well and there any

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 4>real hiccup or wrinklin That was Takachi sound tweeted that

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 4>she had met the Taiwanese representative to APEX, and the

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 4>Chinese reacted to that quite badly, so they said she

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 4>was flaunting it and hyping it up on Twitter, which

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 4>kind of speaks to how I what I said earlier

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 4>that they were primed for her to do something that

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 4>they see is being provocative, and when she did that,

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 4>I think they were like, we knew it. She's exactly

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 4>what we thought she was going to be, and now

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 4>we have to react.

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 3>And what's interesting, though, is the reaction. Even if they

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 3>were expecting that at some point she would say these things,

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 3>the reaction from Beijing hasn't been your standard diplomatic speak

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 3>at all. Right, it's gotten actually quite hostile and personal,

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 3>including a rather shocking post from China's consule general there

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 3>in Osaka, Isabelle. I wonder if you can tell us

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 3>about that and what the reaction to that was.

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So the concert general in Osaka, Shuri Jian. Forgive

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>my Chinese, I don't speak at all. So the very

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>day after this debate in parliament, he started posting messages

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>on x on Twitter saying things about the dirty neck

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that sticks in where it's not wanted, will we sliced

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>off with no hesitation. He's known for that kind of rhetoric,

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>so it wasn't all that surprising from him, and he

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:25.679
<v Speaker 1>did delete it, but by that time it had already

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>been reported by the Japanese media, and of course there

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>was a complete Twitter storm about it, and it seemed

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>as though it was only after that the mainline government

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>in Beijing started to really weigh in and follow his

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>lead as to how they should deal with this issue.

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 3>And what do you think that indicates? Does China then

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 3>take this threat quite seriously?

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 4>Taiwan is the red line when it revolves around Taiwan.

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 4>There is no leeway in the system for just accepting

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 4>that maybe someone said something and it wasn't a threat.

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 4>They have to react the way they think about Taiwan

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 4>that it is and they will get it back, and

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 4>everyone is trying to keep them from getting it. Means

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 4>that they have to react and stamp down on these

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 4>things immediately, Otherwise if they don't, then six months later

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 4>someone else's They think someone else is going to get

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 4>bright ideas about saying something else about Taiwan. And there

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.959
<v Speaker 4>may also be a calculation that Tokayi sign Is knew

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 4>she's weak. She doesn't have a majority in either house

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 4>of parliament. The last couple of prime ministers haven't lasted

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 4>that long. There may be an expectation that she's not

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 4>going to last, and it may will be that kind

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 4>of thinking as driving the Chinese reaction to Tokhan as well,

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 4>that if we push, then she'll be gone and we'll

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:36.719
<v Speaker 4>have someone less hawkish.

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>To deal with that sounds very likely to me as well.

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, whether she actually is weak or not, that

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>remains to be seen. Obviously, her position at the moment

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.319
<v Speaker 1>isn't all that strong, but some people say she could

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>call an election pretty soon. She's got massive public support,

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and she could even manage to grab back a majority

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 1>for her LDP on its own without any coalition partners

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>if her support rate stays how it is. And honestly,

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the things that China's saying, it's hard to say right

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>now because the economic effects have not filtered through yet,

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 1>but just that kind of rhetoric I think is much

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>more likely to add to support for Takeitu than the

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>other way around.

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 3>After the break the historical beefs between China and Japan,

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 3>and how the legacy of World War two underpins the

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 3>current tensions between Beijing and Tokyo, I wonder if we

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:39.719
<v Speaker 3>can step back a little and James, you kind of

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 3>preface this a little before us, but I wonder if

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.439
<v Speaker 3>we can talk a little bit about the historical beefs

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 3>between the two countries, because that obviously underpins perhaps a

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 3>lot of the reactions on both sides. What are the

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 3>old scabs, the old wounds in this relationship that might

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 3>be now being bloodied right now.

0:10:56.320 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, the biggest issue between Johanna and China is left

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 4>over from World War Two. And by World War two,

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean not ninety thirty nine to ninety forty five.

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 4>The Chinese definition of World War two, or they're fight

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:11.079
<v Speaker 4>against the Japanese now is nineteen thirty one to ninety

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 4>forty five. Because Japan was a colonial power. Japan held Korea,

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 4>Japan held Taiwan, Japan took over a large chunk of

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 4>northern China, and then they gradually took more and more,

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 4>and then they've invaded Shanghai and Nanjing and southern China

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 4>in ninety thirty seven. And so that history of being

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 4>invaded by Japan over decades and millions and millions of

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 4>Chinese people being killed by the Japanese or dying because

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 4>of the effects of those wars at that conflict. So

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 4>there's this resentment and hatred because of the events of

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 4>that period to ninety forty five. And then there is

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 4>this belief that Japan is now trying to not take

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 4>back Taiwan as a colony, but it's trying to separate

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 4>Taiwan from its rightful place on the mainland, and also

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 4>this idea that the Japanese government, the Japanese people haven't

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 4>really repented sincerely on their actions during those various conflicts,

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 4>and so all that is bound together. It can be

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 4>incredibly angry, resentful attitude towards Japan. The historical question at

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 4>this story of a match live and it's made much

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 4>worse with the Chinese because of this. Status of Taiwan

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 4>is still very much contested.

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and Isabelle I wonder how does Japan see this?

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Even within Japan, this is a hugely divisive issue. I

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>think going back to when ties were restored in nineteen

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>seventy two, from there on, Japan contributed huge amounts of

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>aid and there was lots of technological transfer, and I

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>think the feeling behind that for a lot of people

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>was we want to try and make up for the

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>things that we did wrong in the past. But there's

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>also a part of the population who feels like there

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>was nothing wrong. We waged a war. All countries wage wars.

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>We shouldn't be single alert for criticism just because we lost.

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think nowadays, to be honest, people are not

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>looking so much at history in Japan. They're just thinking

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>we have this giant economic and military might right next

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>door to us, How are we going to manage to

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>sort of get along with them getting the economic benefits?

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 1>However we can without fooling under their sort of influence

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>too far.

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 3>Now it is about this back comes at a time

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 3>when Japan's economy is WOBBLI. We've seen GDP shrink, the

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 3>yen is weak, there's persistent inflation. China issued a travel

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 3>advisory warning its citizens not to travel to Japan. Is

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 3>there a risk there to the Japanese economy?

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.959
<v Speaker 1>To a certain extent, there certainly is. Chinese people make

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>up a quarter of visitors to Japan at least so

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>far this year, and that's just really started to recover

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>in the last year or two from the pandemic period,

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:43.199
<v Speaker 1>So yes, that could be quite damaging. On the other hand,

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>there have been a lot of complaints in Tapan about

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>over tourism and about poor manners on the part of

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Chinese tourists in particular, so that might not damage take

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:53.719
<v Speaker 1>support rates in particular.

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 4>And also tourism is an important source of foreign currency

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 4>revenue for the country, but a slight reduction in tourist

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 4>revenue isn't going to be as damaging as the risk

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 4>or the possibility of Japanese companies in China being targeted

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 4>or seeing boycotts. Japanese car companies still have billions of

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 4>dollars of investments here. Other Japanese companies have billions and

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 4>billions of dollars of investment here, seven to eleven, Uniclo Family, Panasonic,

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 4>Canon Fujitsu. You know, these are huge companies that do

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 4>a lot of revenue here. And if you start to

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 4>see real consumer boycotts, if you start to see businesses

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 4>pulling back from doing business with Japanese companies, then the

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 4>hit to Japan Inc. Could be substantial. While tourism is

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 4>very vivid in your face, the bigger thread is going

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 4>to be if this goes on for a long time

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 4>and Toyota sales in China crater even more than they've

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 4>already been falling. They're already falling because of competition from

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 4>Chinese companies. If those crater, then the effect of that

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 4>is going to be quite big for Japan's economy and

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 4>for those companies.

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 3>James, what's been the public mood in China over this?

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 4>Obviously the press and the government reactions is one thing.

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 4>But I think the thing that sticks out for me

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 4>so far at least, is there hasn't really been a

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 4>public reaction. Japanese restaurants are still full, and unlike previous times.

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 4>I was speaking to someone who's lived here for more

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 4>than twenty years, and they were saying, in two thousand

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 4>and five or in twenty ten, you saw Japanese restaurants

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 4>putting up signs in that windows saying where are in

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 4>by Chinese people? This is a Chinese restaurant. We just

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 4>sell Japanese food, and I haven't seen any sign of

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 4>that yet.

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 3>President Donald Trump has now entered the conversation as well,

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 3>speaking directly with both she and Takeichi. This week, Trump

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 3>and she held the first talk since agreeing to a

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 3>tariff truce, and Trump's readout of the phone call, they

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 3>discussed trade and Russia's war in Ukraine, but he made

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 3>no mention of Taiwan. Meanwhile, China's Foreign Ministry says she

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 3>told Trump on the call that Taiwan's return to China

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 3>is essential a cornerstone of the post World War two

0:15:55.640 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 3>international order. Hours after that conversation wrapped, spoke with Takeichi.

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 3>She said the US president reached out to reaffirm ties

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 3>with Tokyo and said she could call him any time.

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 3>The back to back calls show the US is tricky

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 3>balancing act managing tensions between a key US ally and

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 3>its biggest rival for most Japanese people, Though Isabelle says

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 3>they'd rather move past this issue altogether, I.

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Think from the japan side, they will just continue making

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>these very sort of low key and modest but steady

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>efforts to try and smooth things over.

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 4>I do think it matters how well Takaichi San does

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 4>in any election that she calls. There's talk that election

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 4>might happen in January next year, and if that happens,

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 4>as she does win a majority, especially if she wins

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 4>a majority with her own party, that puts her in

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 4>a really good position to be the prime minister for

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 4>three years or more. And so if she can show

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 4>that she has domestic political stability or there is domestic stability,

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 4>she has domestic political strength, and couple that with not

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 4>saying things like this again or being vague when you

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 4>need to be vague, and that continued low key kind

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 4>of work by diplomats. Maybe over time there can be

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 4>an improvement in this, but I think if I don't

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 4>see any prospects of real improvement or change this year.

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 3>This is The Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm wanha.

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 3>To get more from The Big Take and unlimited access

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 3>to all of Bloomberg dot Com, subscribe today at Bloomberg

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 3>dot com slash podcast Offer. If you liked the episode,

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 3>make sure to subscribe and review The Big Take Asia

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 3>wherever you listen to podcasts. It really helps people find

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 3>the show. Thanks for listening and see you next time.