WEBVTT - Jay Powell, Polestar, Markets, and Veterans

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg is now on your dashboard with Apple CarPlay and

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto. It gives you access to every Bloomberg podcast,

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>live audio feeds from Bloomberg Radio, print stories from Bloomberg

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>News in audio form, and the latest headlines of the

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>click of a button with Bloomberg News. Now it's free

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>with the latest version of the Bloomberg Business App. That's

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. Get it on your phone in

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the Apple App Store or on Google Play. Just download

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the app, connect your phone to your car and get started.

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's all presented by our sponsor, Interactive Brokers.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 2>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market Moven News.

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm the Bloomberg Markets podcast called Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 2>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com Slash podcast.

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's get over to Washington, DC right now.

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot going on there as the government, as the

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>as Congress you know, runs closer and closer to a shutdown.

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 3>We have a serious upset.

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say for Democrats in West Virginia. Nathan Dean

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>joins us. He covers all things politics out of the

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Washington d C Bureau. So mister Manchin is not running

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>for reelection. What does this mean for the Senate, Nathan.

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, it means pretty much the Democrats have a really steep,

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 4>uphill battle to keep the Senate in the twenty twenty

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 4>four elections. Look, it was going to be a challenge

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 4>to begin with, but with Senator Mansion announcing his retirement,

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 4>that essentially flips the state to the Republicans. And so

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, this election is very bad for those members

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 4>in the Senate. There aren't many Republicans out there running

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 4>for reelection that the Democrats potentially have a chance, and

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 4>that actually could play into what the Democrats do for

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the year before the election. We may

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 4>see them focus more on confirming judges and confirming appointments

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 4>and trying to get a lot of the cleanup work

0:01:57.720 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 4>that they can do when you control the Senate. Before

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, they anticipate to lose it in the twenty

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 4>twenty four election.

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 5>I was actually I wanted to ask you about that, Nathan,

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 5>because I think you know a lot of us. Know,

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.799
<v Speaker 5>Joe mansioned to be I guess a moderate Democrat is

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 5>how he would describe himself, and on a lot of issues,

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 5>probably leans a little bit more right than left. And

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 5>what a thought, maybe, you know, if the Democrats could

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 5>hold on to that seat, this would maybe be viewed

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 5>more opportunistically, perhaps if you could get somebody who's like

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 5>a little bit more in line with the agenda that

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 5>you're trying to push.

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but I mean you also have to answer the

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 4>question of what would he do if he were to

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 4>actually win reelection. I mean, then you know the makeup

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 4>of the Senate could be if the Republicans were to

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 4>take the Senate without Senator or with Senator Mansion there,

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, he would lose a lot of that power

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 4>as being that one kingmaker individual that can sort of

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 4>go back and forth between the parties and try and appeal.

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 4>So I think this is sort of also maybe and

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 4>this is just my own view, that maybe this is

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 4>Senator Mansion trying to prepare for the future. You know,

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 4>he made that statement yesterday online how he wants to

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 4>travel the country and see if there's a way to

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 4>mobilize a centrist third party run. I don't think that's

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 4>going to happen. Again, that's just my own personal view.

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 4>So I just think that he saw the future and

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 4>was like, you know what, maybe the future is better

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 4>for me working outside of Congress than being inside, because

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 4>if the Republicans do take the Senate, you know, he

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 4>may actually not may not have all that much stuff

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 4>to do.

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk about the Congress here. Mike Johnson

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>has let's see, seven days left before a government shutdown.

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:30.959
<v Speaker 3>Does he have any plan to stop that?

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 4>So, you know what we've just heard is, you know,

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 4>there's really two options on the table. One is a

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 4>clean continuing resolution. This other idea, and this is the

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 4>one that I think he's going to go with initially,

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 4>is this idea of a laddered continuing resolution, so that

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 4>he would extend funding for certain agencies to say January fifteenth,

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 4>and then funding for other agencies to February fifteenth. So

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 4>then you would have a rolling set of potential government

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 4>shutdowns depending on which agency you're impacted by. You know,

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 4>we are actually telling our clients that we still think

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 4>it's around a forty percent ants of a shutdown next week.

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 4>I know that doesn't sound like in line with the

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 4>news headlines that are coming out there. But you know,

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 4>there are just too many political cakes that are being

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 4>baked around, you know, Ukraine, Israel, House GOP ideas, border security,

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 4>and none of these ideas are actually close to fruition,

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 4>and they need more time for negotiation. And so ultimately

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 4>I think what will happen is is that next week

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 4>Speaker Johnson will pursue this letter at CR. It won't

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 4>go anywhere with the Senate, and then they'll entertain this

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 4>idea of maybe kicking the can down the road another

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 4>four weeks or eight weeks to give those ideas more

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 4>time to fight or to go to be closer to finalization,

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 4>and then kick the can on the bigger fight because

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 4>there's really no strategy yet of why you would shut

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 4>the government down. Most government shutdowns, a party goes in

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 4>there and says, we will want we want to close

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 4>the government and get this in return, and that just

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 4>doesn't exist. So I think the Republicans need a little

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 4>bit more time to figure out what that is, and

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 4>so I think ultimately they'll just kick the can down

0:04:57.880 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 4>the road.

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:00.679
<v Speaker 5>Kick the can down the road, isn't that the famous

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 5>phrase of this whole exercise that we've been going through.

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 5>For man, when was the first one now or the

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 5>potential one?

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Was it end of I mean in this in this Congress.

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 5>In this or the beginning of October? Right, that's when

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 5>that was potentially getting going y.

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and we the debt ceiling.

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 5>Debate, right, Okay, so we've kicked the can to now. Okay,

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 5>all right, just had to catch up on the timeline

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 5>there a little bit, Nathan. It's been a lot to

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 5>keep track of. When Mike Johnson emerged as the Speaker

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 5>of the House, were any of these proposals on the

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 5>table at the time. Did people potentially like catapult him

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.119
<v Speaker 5>into this position because they had confidence that he could

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 5>avert a shutdown?

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 4>No, I think it's just more Look the way it

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 4>works in Washington is in this my view is is

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 4>that it's almost like water taking the path of least resistance,

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, until they get back into political walls. Politicians

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 4>on both sides of the aisle will try and figure

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 4>out flexible ways of moving around. And I think that's

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 4>what Speaker Johnson is trying to do here, is just

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:01.799
<v Speaker 4>trying to figure out a way to keep the momentum

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 4>going without being backed into a political wall. And so

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 4>you know, obviously he's got members of his caucus that

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 4>want him to, you know, try and get all these

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 4>policy goals. It will never happen if you have the

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 4>Senate or you know, the Democratic control, and obviously President

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 4>Biden would have to sign off on it. So the

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 4>odds of all that happening are almost nil. So how

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 4>do you get out of that, Well, you kick the

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 4>can down the road and you say you, rather than

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 4>making the tough decision today, we're going to make the

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 4>tough decision the next time. Now, I think Spiker Johnson

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 4>has a mulligan here because this is the first time

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 4>he's done this and it was such a quick time

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 4>between the election of his speakership to today. I think

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 4>after he pursues this latter a cr he can go

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 4>to his caucus and say, look, we tried. There's still

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 4>a lot of ideas out there that we you know,

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 4>we have some issues on border security that we're negotiating

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 4>with the White House on. Let's just move this fight

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 4>in either next year or later in December, and then

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 4>we'll have our fight then. You know. The other thing

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 4>to just point out is that you know, the election

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.559
<v Speaker 4>that happened in Virginia and in Kentucky and so forth.

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 4>This wasn't exactly a good night for you know, in Ohio.

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 4>You know, wasn't a good night for the Republicans. Why

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 4>would you, if you're the party of the scene is

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 4>shutting the government down, want to have two bad whammies

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 4>over a series of two weeks. I think it's more

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 4>sense to just kick the can again down the road.

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah exactly.

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe Johnson gets the mulligan, but the Republicans

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>don't because they already kicked the can once and then

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>fired McCarthy for it. He is the one who took

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>us through the debt sealing deal in which was way

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>back in May. So they've been you know, kind of

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>stuttering and starting all year long without getting a lot done.

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>By the way, speaking of getting little done, it seems

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>in a recent poll that American voters are more concerned

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>about border security than they are about you know, Israel,

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Hamas and Ukraine Russia. What's the Biden administration going to

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>do about it? I mean, they've arguably had years to

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>deal with it and haven't.

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you know, so obviously the Ukraine Israel issue is

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 4>something that's a little bit more by partisan at least

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 4>in the Senate, and so I think they're going to

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 4>be trying to work that out. You know, there are

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 4>negotiations going on in the Senate Overboard of Security. President

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 4>by Neven just said a couple of days ago that

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 4>they're open to it. You know, the reason why I

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 4>think he's saying they're open to it is this is

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 4>one of those issues, like you pointed out that you know,

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 4>voters may not be too thrilled with his position going

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 4>into an election year, so why wouldn't they do something?

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 4>So you know, but ultimately, what we're telling our clients

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 4>is if you look at what has to happen between

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 4>now and the twenty twenty four elections, once we get

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 4>through this funding fight, there's really not a left a

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 4>lot left on the table. The debt ceiling isn't all

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 4>that much, you know, isn't there until after the election.

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 4>So there's nothing really scary for markets outside of the

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 4>geopolitical issues. So you know, markets could have some clarity

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 4>once this funding in Ukraine and Israel issues goes through,

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 4>because twenty twenty four, a lot more focus is just

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 4>going to be running for reelection.

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Nathan, thanks so much for joining us.

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Pleasure having you as always Nathan Dean from Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>where he is senior policy analysts for US government.

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:06.959
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the teenth Kenser Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 6>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 6>iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen on

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 6>demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe mulroy knows. He's the co founder of the Lobo Institute.

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>We love to get his insight on what's going on

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.839
<v Speaker 1>in geopolitics, especially in the Middle East because his senior

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>fellow at the Middle East Institute. But he is a marine.

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>What you don't say former marine, do you, Mick? Isn't

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it one a marine, always a marine?

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 7>That's right. The Commandade actually passed a rule that once

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 7>a marine is always a marine. So we're just marines,

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 7>all right.

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, we thank you for your service and congratulate you

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and your your brothers and sisters on this the two

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty eighth birthday of the United States Marines. Absolutely,

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about, first off, the situation

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Middle East and how it's developing now, because

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you know on October seventh.

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Nearly everyone was shocked and horrified by the attacks of

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Hamas on the Israeli people, and it seems that many

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>people since then, or or or or the voices that

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>support the Palestinian cause and even support Hamas have grown

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>louder and louder. What do you think the national feeling

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>is now about this Israeli Palestinian war?

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 7>So I just simply don't understand that people who support

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 7>Hamas that would be the equivalent, at least the way

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 7>I see it as supporting isis essentially deprave terrorist organization

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 7>now being concerned about the Palestinian people. I think is

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 7>is not only understandable, I think it should be the case.

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 7>So I think there is the balance because war is ugly,

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 7>but it has to be fought within certain bounds, and

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 7>we've set that internationally. And I do think, you know,

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 7>everybody's jumping to the conclusion that the Israelis perhaps went

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 7>too far. I think that's to be determined, But certainly

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 7>the level of civilian casualties is unacceptable, As Secretary of

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 7>Blincoln said, I would share that. But now we're seeing

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 7>a lot of things done to move civilians to the

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 7>south to get out of the area of the most

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 7>significant fighting, which is important. I think they should be

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 7>set up a safe zone where people can receive food

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 7>and water, and it's monitored so that the AMAS fighters

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 7>can't hide amongst those folks. But we're going to see

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 7>an increasingly violent fight in Gaza City. It's already started,

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 7>but it's far from over. And that objective of the

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 7>Israeli defense forces is to destroy the moss and that

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 7>can only be done close and personal.

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 5>I do want to come back to Secretary blink In in

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 5>a moment, but first, Mick would love it if you

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 5>could tell us a bit more the perspective that you

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 5>were coming at this from. I see that you were.

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 5>You were to the Department of Defense. So you were

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 5>the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Defense in the Middle East

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 5>at the in the federal government, and now you're a

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 5>senior fellow at the Middle East Institute. Can you just

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 5>tell us what that means and like what your role

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 5>is right now?

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 7>So I started for the most part as a practitioner

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 7>of uh you know, irregular warfare warfare in general, as

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 7>a marine, and then as a well it's called a

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 7>part military officer in the CIA, which is our version

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 7>of the Special Operations in the Agency. So I spent

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 7>most of my time in conflict zones, as did most

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 7>of my colleagues, and I fought many times in urban

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 7>environments and it is the by far the worst. It's

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 7>very disoriented, it's very violent, and it's you just never

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 7>know what's coming at you. So that's that's what I

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 7>brought into being a policy person for Secretary Madis and

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 7>then Secretary Esper. Was mostly a practitioner's point of view,

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 7>but then I got obviously school up pretty quick on policy,

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 7>so I view it from both lenses when I look

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 7>and analyze these type of conflicts.

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for that, Yeah, I think I was definitely want

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 5>to know a bit more about your background here. Very impressive.

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 5>So you're also a former coach at USA Boxing in

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 5>the Marines for a few years, so very impressive pedigree.

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 5>And wanted to echo Madden thanking you for your service

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 5>as well.

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 1>A few years Marines from nineteen eighty eight twenty fourteen.

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's taller than a few Yeah, so you certainly

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 5>have a lot more to bring to the table than

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 5>we do in this perspective, So I did want to

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 5>come back yeah to Secretary Blinken's visit then and what

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 5>you made of his time in the Middle East, and

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 5>how his reaction was and where basically the US's role

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 5>is in this conflict right now.

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 7>So I think one of the roles that the US

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 7>is attempting to play is to talk about the day

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 7>after this is going to happen. I believe Hamas will

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 7>be destroyed, as they should be. What's going to come next?

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 7>A long term occupation of the IDF of Gaza would

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 7>be unacceptable to many, and I don't think it would

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 7>be in their interest. So what's going to fill the gap?

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 7>I think Secretary of Blinket's been talking to all our

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 7>partners in the region saying, you know, rhetorically, you know,

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 7>having opinions on this is fine, but what are we

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 7>actually going to do? So is there going to be

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 7>an international peacekeeping force? What's going to be the political

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 7>way ahead for the people in Gaza, the Palestinians? What

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 7>are we going to do to make sure that this

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 7>never happens again, both for the sake of Israel, of course,

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 7>and for the sake of the Palestinian people. And I

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 7>think everything that I've seen Secretary blink and saying is

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 7>indicating that that is really where he wants to focus

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 7>this how to reduce this human tragedy that's happening in

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 7>Gaza and eliminate Hamas and also look at what's going

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 7>to come next to make sure this is it doesn't

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 7>happen again.

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Now, I make a lot of people would say Israel

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>has occupied Gaza for quite a long time and continue

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to do to do so through October seventh. They certainly

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>have occupied the West Bank in a large part and

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't honored any of the attempts at a two state solution,

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>not under net in Yahoo, right, So is there any

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>hope that they're going to do that now? Because everyone

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>else in the world backs a two state solution, even

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the countries like the US that back Israel and send

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Israel billions of dollars every year, and yet the Israelis

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>refused to allow the Palestinians to have their own state.

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 7>And the only way I could see this ever working

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 7>where you don't have this happen again and again is

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 7>a two state solution. They have essentially to your point,

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 7>they have direct access into the West Bank and therefore

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 7>occupy it. They control in and out access in Gaza.

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 7>They would say they didn't occupy it, which is one

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 7>of the reasons why they didn't know what was going.

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 3>On on settlements. They have checkpoints, they absolutely do.

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 7>Yes, I'm not disagreeing with you, but they would say

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 7>that they want to have troops on the ground now

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 7>because they don't want hamas to get reconstituted. I think

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 7>that would be a bad idea. That's why I think

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 7>Secretary of blancoln State Department of the White House is

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 7>rightfully talking about, well, what's the alternative is AI is

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 7>a caretaker type group, an international peacekeeping force that could

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 7>stay there until the Palestinian people select a government that

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 7>sets up its security, it sets up its basic life support,

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 7>and then of course there should be large investments from

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 7>a lot of the wealthy countries in the region and

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 7>out of the region that help rebuild Goza and turn

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 7>it into a place that has a future, including an

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 7>economic one. And I think that's what the US is

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 7>pushing now, and I think they should be because this

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 7>situation I don't see changing unless there is a two

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 7>state solution in which the international community is heavily involved

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 7>in setting up.

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Are we losing sight of what's going on in Ukraine

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>through all this, because if the Russians win, they're push

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>up into NATO borders.

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 7>They absolutely are. And the fights still raging on in Ukraine,

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 7>even though it's not the first thing on the news,

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 7>it's still happening, and they are making incremental gains. And

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 7>it's really clear now that a lot of the weapons

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 7>systems that we provided them recently, especially the attackers the

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 7>long range artillery system, is having a major effect on

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 7>the Russian's ability to resupply both its front line troops

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 7>and they can reach anywhere in Ukraine now with those systems,

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 7>so there's no place off limits, including the Crimean peninsula,

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 7>so that is super important. It's also really important that

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 7>we get more funding to them to purchase and buy

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 7>ammunition because as this gets into the winter, it's going

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 7>to be somewhat of a war of attrition, particularly on

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 7>the logistical side, and the US needs to help them

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 7>keep up with a much larger, much broader enemy in Russia.

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, Nick, thanks so much for joining us.

0:17:56.400 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I always love talking to you and I really appreciate you,

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>know your service. I think, especially at times like this,

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 1>we should all be thankful that marines like yourself and

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>soldiers that defend the freedom of America are doing what

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>they do so that we can sleep safely. Mick Malroy

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>there is co founder of the Lobo Institute and a

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:16.919
<v Speaker 1>senior Fellow at the Middle East Institute.

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape Catcher live program Bloomberg Markets

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 6>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 6>in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller here with Molly Smith and the Bloomberg Interactive

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Brokers Studio.

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 3>I want to bring in Margie Patel.

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>She is a senior portfolio manager at all Spring Global

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Investments and we love to talk to her because she

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>has a great view of the stock market and also of.

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 3>The bond market.

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Right. She was twice nominated Morning Stars Fixed Income Manager

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Year.

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's right, and Margy is nice to talk to

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 5>you again to talk when I covered the credit markets,

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 5>I think you were back at Wells Fargo at the time,

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 5>so good to see you.

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's ask let's get your take on what happened yesterday, Margie,

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and what we've seen in yields and how it's affecting stocks.

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean after the auction, I mean it didn't go wrong,

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>but it didn't go great. Right yesterday of the thirty years,

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:28.199
<v Speaker 1>we saw the yields spike up and then the stock

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 1>market sell off. I think Powell kind of confirmed what

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the market was thinking that maybe they're not quite done yet.

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 3>How do you see it?

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think the Fed is saying a lot of

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 8>different things because in their whole tightening program of the

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 8>last year and a half, nothing is real had played

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 8>out the way they thought according to their playbook. As

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 8>far as raising rates, we haven't seen economy slow down.

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 8>We actually had a very nice score just reported probably

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 8>thinking was we would have a recession, lower stock prices.

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 8>It really hasn't worked out. So I think the Fed

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 8>is a little bit lummox because what they thought would

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 8>happen just hasn't happened. And I think it shows you

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 8>that the economy really isn't that sensitive to what the

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 8>fedist with interest rates.

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think that was also a big point of

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 5>what Powell was saying yesterday. That he had mentioned. You know,

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:20.679
<v Speaker 5>there's so many people right now in the US that

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:23.959
<v Speaker 5>are just so more or less interest rate agnostic, especially

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 5>if you're a homeowner who's already locked in a mortgage

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 5>rate under four percent or so. So that was definitely

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 5>part of what he mentioned. And I think otherwise, I mean,

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 5>my take on what he said yesterday, I'd love to

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 5>hear your perspective on this. It seemed like he just

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:39.479
<v Speaker 5>kind of like flip the script a little bit on

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 5>what he had said at last week's meeting. But last

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 5>week's meeting was more we're probably done, but we could

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 5>hike again, and yesterday was more, we could hike again,

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 5>but we're probably done.

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think he's just trying to cover a broad

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 8>spoke of what they might do and really the market

0:20:59.880 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 8>is and giving them the guidance that they wanted. So

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 8>I think that's why they sort of sound as if

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 8>they're all over the map about well, maybe we'll be more,

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 8>maybe we're done, maybe we're not. And that really reflects

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 8>the fact that their playbook hasn't worked out. The economy

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 8>is too strong, and inflation has come down maybe more.

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 9>Than they expected.

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 8>The economies very stronger than they expected, and so we

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 8>haven't really seen much happen, and we haven't had interest

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 8>rates to really break out yesterday where it's we're up

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 8>today they're down, and you can see the market is

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 8>just not taking you might say all that talk seriously.

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 8>So we still have a very good stock market and

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 8>I think that's what we're going to see for the

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 8>rest of the year.

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>So what about the FED and it's fight against inflation?

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've heard an interesting thesis in the last

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of days that we were dealing with inflation that

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>had a two percent ceiling and now we're looking at

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>an inflation environment with a two percent floor. Of course,

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>we're not near that floor yet. If you take if

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you're looking any of the data that the FED looks at,

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>how do you view the fight against inflation?

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 8>Well, honestly, looking at the inflation data you're seeing which

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 8>basically we had some short term things from COVID supply glitches,

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 8>but really I can't see much connection between what the

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 8>FED has done and what's happened to inflation. Inflation went

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 8>up as they began to tighten, it's come down. And

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 8>if you look at the factors that have caused inflation

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 8>to come down. I can't see very much of a

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 8>connection with the fed's activities.

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 9>So I think that the economy is going on.

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 8>The FED is doing their thing of raising rates, and

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 8>it's almost as if it's a random effect on the economy.

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 9>May be slight negative because there's a little.

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Uncertain Well, but that sounds like that sounds like bad

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>news ready to happen, because the FED has raised rades

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and fifty basis points. And I guess you know,

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>those long and variable lags are starting to hit home

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>right as inflation is coming down. I guess, fortunately, But

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>aren't we going to see a slow down in the economy.

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 9>Well, we really haven't.

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:12.959
<v Speaker 8>Seen it yet, and we've had an economy it looks okay,

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:14.919
<v Speaker 8>and it looks like the fourth quarter is going to

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 8>be modestly positive again. And so I think if you

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 8>had asked the FED, where do you think the economy

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 8>would be?

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 9>I think they were looking for unemployment to.

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 8>Have jumped up by several million people, not to be

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 8>where it is, you know, the under four percent, So

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 8>that was their whole key in bringing down inflation. So

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 8>we've had very low unemployment rates, we've had inflation come down.

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 8>So I just conclude other factors in the world have

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 8>pulled inflation down. The basic strength of the US economy

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 8>isn't that sense of interest rates, because business and consumers

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 8>have taken out long term fixed rate loans and so

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 8>they aren't sensitive, and so the FED is really just

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.880
<v Speaker 8>almost a bystander to what's happening in.

0:23:57.840 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 9>The real economy.

0:23:59.000 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 5>Couldn't you say that, I.

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 8>In the inflation, I don't see what they've done to fight,

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 8>and I think they just sort of hope if they're

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 8>very short rates, inflation would come down.

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 9>It's come down up because the.

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 8>Short rates, but all these other factors that have come

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 8>into the marketplace.

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, couldn't you say, then, Marget, it sounds like some

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 5>of the things that you've just mentioned right here between,

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 5>like the consumers still staying pretty strong, Like inflation is

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 5>coming down, granted not as fast as we might hope,

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 5>economy is still doing okay. Couldn't you say that that's

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 5>maybe the making of a soft landing. Is that how

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 5>you're positioning this right now?

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think it looks like the economy. I don't

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 8>see anything way out of Kilder that would precipitate a recession.

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 8>People have been looking for recession for a long time.

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 8>It hasn't come. I do think though, that we've had

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 8>a huge lift of the economy that's come from federal spending.

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 8>We had the COVID money, which is still out there

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 8>being dispersed.

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 9>Being dispensed right now.

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 8>We've had a big increase in state and local government spending,

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 8>and so I think that's added a little floor to

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 8>what mayo seniors come down. So as we get into

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 8>twenty four, we may see the economy dislerat a little

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 8>bit because some of these money flows, particularly leftover COVID

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 8>Moody that spent really a big boost for consumers, may

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 8>stop and that may cause e Connor you slow down

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 8>a little. But I just don't see your recession in

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:20.640
<v Speaker 8>the cars eaven for twenty four.

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 3>Margie.

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Great to get your take. Thanks so much for joining us.

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Margie Bettel there. She is a senior portfolio manager at

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>all Spring Global Investments, and she does not see a

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>recession on the horizon, even if the economy will slow

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 1>down in twenty twenty four.

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape. Can's our live program Bloomberg

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 6>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 10>Were welcome now on TV on radio listens, TV audience

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 10>and radio listeners. We need to talk about what's happening

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 10>in the EV space. EV maker Polestar, fresh off its

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 10>investor day, a day that showcased its business strategy and

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 10>future EV prototypes. We now welcome Thomas Ingola, Postar CEO

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 10>and Bloomberg's resident. It says gearhead, but electric cars don't

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 10>have gears, so we'll maybe part that name for now.

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 10>But Matt Miller joins us. Thomas, great to see you,

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 10>Thanks for joining us. What's the message that you are

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 10>sending to investors? What do you want to convey about

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 10>where this business goes next?

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, good morning guy.

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 6>Hi Matt.

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 11>Well, our message here from our poster day are we

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 11>call it he in La. It's I think a very positive,

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 11>good one.

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 6>We have.

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 11>Two major parts here, one of course, the great news

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:58.679
<v Speaker 11>about the product rollout, and the other part about what

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:02.199
<v Speaker 11>work we have done over the last summer about the

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 11>business plan, obviously making that a strong resilient business plan,

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 11>which means clear view on the break even cashlow break

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 11>even twenty twenty five, So what I would call, in

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 11>a very short distance very much insight twenty twenty five

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:28.439
<v Speaker 11>cash flow break even and the funding need that is

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 11>needed from today to this break even, a very clear

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 11>defined amount of one point three billion, which you know

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.160
<v Speaker 11>we want to cover with a mix of debt inequity,

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 11>so what I would call a very manageable funding need.

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 11>These two are the key cornerstones of this business plan,

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 11>which I think everybody would acknowledge is not based on

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 11>dreamy fancy production numbership but really a very realistic and

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 11>achievabile volume.

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Thomas, let me jump in and ask you about those

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>production numbers, because you've scaled back your twenty twenty three

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 1>production forecast a couple of times already. Now you expect

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:12.919
<v Speaker 1>to make sixty thousand vehicles in total this year, but

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you need to get up to I think one hundred

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>and fifty five thousand by twenty twenty five.

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 3>How are you going to make it?

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Make that leap from sixty to one to fifty five

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 1>in the next couple of years.

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 11>Well, yesterday people were queuing to get it right along

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 11>in our Post three suv and and the suv coupee

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 11>the Post A four. Both cars are ready to go

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 11>out to Post A four actually has production start next week.

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 11>The Post for three will start production early twenty twenty four.

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 11>So twenty twenty four we will get these two cars

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 11>in our hands. Twenty five will be a year where

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 11>they will be fully for in the in customer delivery,

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 11>plus the Post of five joining so three grade coasts

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 11>in exclusive secment. So these two, this product lineup. Of course,

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 11>there's a big, big reason for our increase of volume

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 11>in this period.

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 10>Thomas, you just called your your products exclusive. What we've

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 10>seen today is Richemont, the owner of Cartier, warning that

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 10>they are seeing a significant consumer slow down at the

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 10>upper end. You've got the Agio warning that its premium

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 10>products are starting to hit price resistance. We're seeing it

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 10>all across the luxury sector at the moment that the

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 10>consumer is saying I can't afford that anymore, even the

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 10>upper end consumer.

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 3>Are you seeing any.

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 10>Evidence of that? Our exclusive ev product's going to face

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 10>the same headwinds that the rest of the luxury sector

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 10>might be seeing at the moment.

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 11>I think it's very important to that in perspective. I

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 11>think there's no doubt that the long term success of

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 11>electrification is given the only way of C two emission

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 11>reduction is via EV's transition from combustion engine to evs

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 11>IS is a clear pass forward short term economic fluctuations.

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 11>The industry has seen that over decades. I think the

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 11>real question is how resilient are you as a business

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 11>to go through those And I think us having presented

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 11>this business plan is a clear testimony of poster being

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 11>on the side of the winners to go through those

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 11>downsides and to simply be resilient enough to get out

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 11>as a winner in that. So for that reason, I

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 11>don't think there's any any question about the EV success

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 11>in the long term.

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Thomas, You've just.

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Talked to us about your new business plan that you

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>presented and said you need one point three billion dollars.

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>You're very specific about what you need to be cash

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>flow break even in twenty twenty five. You need that

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>externally that funding. Are you in talks with any external investors?

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>What kind of outside investors do you wanna Do you

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>want to hook up with and has anyone expressed interest.

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 11>Well, look, we were always very clear about the openness

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 11>to attract outside investors. Our two main share holders, who

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 11>have been and will be very supportive in in our business,

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 11>of course, will stay with us, but they're very willingful

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 11>to have others participating in the ownership of Posstoff, and

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 11>that's how we how we plan at.

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 3>So Volvo and Jilie.

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you think the other investors could they come from China?

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Are you even talks with Chinese? Other Chinese investors?

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 11>No real world blide pitching for this, so there's certainly

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 11>no preference in any regional destination where these people should

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 11>come from. Now we are here obviously today in the

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 11>US we have yours production with supposs restarting. I think

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 11>that is as well a very clear sign that we

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 11>are an international business open to international investment.

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 10>Thomas, you flank the fact that you have US production.

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 10>President Biden has within the last couple of days signaled

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 10>his support for the UAW to start targeting businesses like Tesla.

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 10>He thinks that maybe that's the next place that they

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:45.479
<v Speaker 10>should be looking. What do you think about your labor

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 10>Do you think you could be facing strikes. Do you

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 10>think you could be facing a union push. Do you

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 10>think this is going to be something that pulls in

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 10>the whole of the automotive sector in the United States.

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 11>Well, not really that much a question to us, because

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 11>we have a very simple way of having basically no

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 11>manufacturing footprint on our own. We have contact manufacturing with

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 11>our big partners in that obviously the Volvo factory in

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 11>Ritual we have production together with Chili and this is where,

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 11>of course this question you have now should be targeted.

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 11>We are very well familiar with with factories with unions.

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 11>We have obviously in Sweden a very strong base as

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 11>well with manufacturing in Volvo. So I think that's really

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 11>no question mark from our site onto that.

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>What is the pull star, you know, the unique selling

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>point because you know some brands Porsche is about you know,

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>speed in sports cars, Mercedes is about kind of luxury

0:33:56.680 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and status. Volvo is about you know, safety and family.

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>At least for me, what is pole Star about.

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 11>Post Our main differentiator clearly is our design focus. It's

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 11>a brand with strongest design design as advanced as its technology.

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.880
<v Speaker 11>That's our slogan and I think yesterday at our Post

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:24.439
<v Speaker 11>day when you see the lineup of the beautiful cast

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 11>and how innovation is brought to the customer through our

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:32.359
<v Speaker 11>design made it really desirable. I mean that is how

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:36.479
<v Speaker 11>we think electrification will succeed cars that really makes people

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 11>are passionate about And what is the greatest driver for

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 11>passion is clearly the design aspect of it. So if

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 11>you ask us to narrow it down to that one aspect,

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:47.280
<v Speaker 11>it's designed.

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 10>Tom's great to catch up. Really appreciate you joining us

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 10>from Los Angeles to think of that of Polstar and

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 10>of course our thanks to Bloomberg's Matt Miller.

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 5>All right, well, if you just us here, you are

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 5>just listening to Matt Miller and Guy Johnson, they were

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 5>interviewing the CEO of pole Star and bad. I believe

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:12.879
<v Speaker 5>that you've driven a Polestar recently show us two.

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So, I mean I drove the Polestar.

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:18.839
<v Speaker 1>One was I think, really amazing from a design perspective.

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>It checked every box and it was cool in that

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 1>it was a hybrid and it had manually adjustable Olan's suspension.

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 3>That's something you don't see in cars these days. Two.

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't really it's not terribly luxurious, It's not over engineered,

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's fifty thousand dollars in white, so it's a concern.

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 5>Does it have that car play feature that you were

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 5>asking our good John Tucker about it.

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 1>You can use car play, but you have to plug

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 1>it in, so it doesn't have wireless car play. And

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:50.360
<v Speaker 1>it's made in China, so I think they're going to

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>have difficulty selling that vehicle in this country. You know,

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Chinese cars that come in here are subject to a

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven and a half percent tariff, so they can't

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 1>beat anybody on pricing. But it'll be interesting to see

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the three that'll be built here in the US and

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina. As he's saying, the Pollstar four is going

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to be built in Korea, and then they're going to

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 1>have another car, so it'll be interesting to see how

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>they do with the Swedish slash Chinese ownership.

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah all right, well that's something fun to consider going forward.

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 5>So thanks you and guy for talking and for bringing

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 5>us that interview.

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer.

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:42.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm Matt Miller.

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three and

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I Fall Sweeney.

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney before the podcast. You

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 2>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio