WEBVTT - Tech Earnings: Google’s Spending, Arm’s AI Data Center Push

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and ever Low in Sent Francisco.

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up, Qualcom and arm out

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 2>with their earnings. Will break them down with the two CEOs,

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Christiano Amon and Rene haass.

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Plas Alphabet's capex mic drop record spending plans hit the

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 3>stock despite strong earnings.

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 2>And Bitcoin falls below seventy thousand US dollars for the

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 2>first time since late twenty twenty four. Will break down

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 2>the negative momentum impacting crypto.

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 3>Markets and that negative momentum is affecting markets more broadly.

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 3>At the moment, check out the nasak off by one

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 3>point four percent. We are training the lowest since November.

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Right now at the moment ed we are seeing pain

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 3>across the board. And that's why we've got to go

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 3>to our Bloombost Cross Asset reporter to say we can

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 3>dig into all of these moves across asset classes with

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Alexander Zamaneva, who's with us now, I don't know where

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 3>to look at the moment, everything is in the red.

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 4>It has been a really ugly week, Caroline. We have

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 4>obviously seen corrections in tech over the last three years

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 4>since the launch of chat GPT, but nothing has rivaled

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 4>the sheer magnitude of this sell off that we're seeing

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 4>in the sector across various assets, hitting both stock and

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 4>credit market. Software stocks, of course, have been at the

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 4>forefront of this. They are down about fifteen percent this

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 4>week and twenty nine percent from their all time highs

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 4>in September. It's also important to note that this selloff

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 4>has triggered a number of extreme levels. From a technical perspective.

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 4>The share of software stocks at over sold levels eclipsed

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 4>seventy percent yesterday. That is an all time high. In

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 4>the broader tech sector that shares about forty five percent,

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 4>also a record and another barometer of how painful it

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 4>has been. The I Shares Expanded Tech Software ETV that

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 4>is ticker IGV compared to the S and P five

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 4>hundred is the most over sold that it has ever been,

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 4>and of course that risk off sentiment is spreading today.

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 4>What we've seen so far is that it has really

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 4>been focused on tech, so up until today, it's really

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:11.799
<v Speaker 4>been a rotation out of tech and in two other

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 4>pockets of the market, and now we're really seeing the

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 4>sell off broad and out. Looking at the S and

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 4>P five hundred, it is down one point two percent

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 4>right now. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, which up until

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 4>today has been kind of shielded from this, is now

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 4>down one point two percent. Also, the SNP equal weight yesterday,

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 4>for example, was up zero point nine percent even as

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.399
<v Speaker 4>the broader market sold off. It is down again today,

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 4>So really risk off across the board. And we have

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 4>to talk of course about Bitcoin. It fell below sixty

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 4>eight thousand today, which is the lowest since November twenty

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 4>twenty four, down about forty five percent from it's October high.

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 4>Also big news today that crypto exchange Gemini plans to

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 4>cut about twenty five percent of its workforce, so really

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 4>seeing the pain of that.

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Alexandre just Semonova with the macro picture at the

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 2>index level, this is what matters when it comes to

0:02:58.680 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 2>technology earnings.

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 5>Caroline called it the mic drop moment.

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Alphabet parent of Google with a Capex forecast for the

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 2>fiscal year of one hundred and eighty five billion dollars.

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 2>The street had forecast just shy of one hundred and

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.239
<v Speaker 2>twenty billion dollars. That's a bit of a delta. The

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 2>stockdown almost five percent, on track for its biggest drop

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 2>since May of last year, a big number to digest earnings.

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 2>Also in the chip sector, Qualcomm down almost eight percent.

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 2>It gave a forecast for the current period eleven billion

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.679
<v Speaker 2>dollars in sales at the top end. How much better

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 2>would that have been were it not for the impact

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 2>of what's happening in memory chips right now?

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 5>In the memory market, ARMED.

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Similarly, but actually it is up five percentage points and

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 2>it's accelerated throughout the session. Sales and fiscal fourth quarter

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 2>will be about one point four to seven billion dollars,

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 2>just ahead of consensus. How are they managing what's happening

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 2>in the memory shortage and when is they going to

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 2>transition from the handset story to the data center story.

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk through it. ARM CEO Rene Husk joins us. Now, Rene,

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 2>good morning, thank you for joining us. That there is

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot going on. Let's get the sort of handset,

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 2>smartphone and memory situation out of the way. If that's okay,

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 2>You know clearly this is impacting outlook for the smartphone

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 2>market across this calendar year.

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 5>How do you think it showed.

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Up in the earnings that you posted and would it

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 2>have been slightly better if the situation were different?

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, good morning, Good morning, ed. So, first off, the

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 6>quarter was amazing for us. We had not only record revenue,

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 6>but record royalties one point two to four billion in revenue,

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 6>nearly seven hundred and forty million dollars in royalties, and

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 6>if you just stack that up, that's twenty seven percent

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 6>year on year. Our data center business is exploding. We

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 6>were up one hundred percent year on year, probably north

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 6>of one hundred percent year on year. So to your question, no,

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 6>the memory situation isn't really impacting arms so directly. And

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 6>you might ask, well why is that? Well, Number one,

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 6>we are a spread across a lot of different businesses.

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 6>As I said, the data center business is increasingly growing

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 6>for us, and we think in a few years it'll

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 6>be our largest business.

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 7>Secondly, our products are used across the.

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 6>Board, so we tend to see in memory shortages is

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 6>the bottom end of the stack starts to get impacted,

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 6>and that's actually lower royalty rates for us.

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 7>So as a result, we don't get impacted very much.

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 6>So no, short answer is no impact this quarter, and

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 6>we raised our guidance for the next quarter because, as

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 6>I said, we're just not seeing that kind of impact,

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 6>but I'm not denying that it's there. But for the

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 6>ARMED business, the impact is quite minimal.

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 5>Renee, thank you for that.

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Data center royalty revenue grown one hundred percent year on year,

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 2>As you outlined, I get the same question for you

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 2>from everyone's sell side through the buyside, which has give

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 2>me a specific year.

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 5>Market on the calendar.

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 2>When ARM goes from being handset to data center and

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 2>it accounts for more of your business, is that selection

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 2>points clear on your calendar?

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 6>At least it's very clear, And that's why in the

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 6>earnings call, I said in a few years. As you know,

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 6>we don't typically provide forward guidance on an annual basis,

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 6>but we have a line of a site that says

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 6>we see it coming and it's probably coming sooner than

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 6>we had thought. And the reason for that is the

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 6>data center growth. But if you click below that, why

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 6>is data center growing so rapidly, it is the a

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 6>presence of ARM CPUs in the data center. We're now

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 6>over fifty percent market share with the hyperscalers. Secondly, the

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 6>CPUs that are being used are using more arm CPUs

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 6>inside the chip one hundred and ninety two cores for

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 6>example inside a graviton chip going from ninety six VERA

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 6>and video VERA going from seventy two cores on grace

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 6>now to eighty eight. So what does that mean. That

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 6>means more cores, means more royalties and high growth rate. Well,

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.679
<v Speaker 6>why are there more cores? When you think about agentic

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 6>AI and everything associated with agents moving workloads across systems,

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 6>managing workflows, et cetera, et cetera. That's the kind of

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 6>work only CPUs can do. So to your question, while

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 6>we're not giving a date, we can see it and

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 6>it's coming sooner than we had thought, even probably six

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 6>to nine months ago.

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 3>And probably on the back of when you look at

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 3>an alphabet increasing its capital expenditure by another well potentially

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and eighty five billion dollars renee. Is the

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 3>AI bubble this worry about AI infrastructure build out a

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 3>thing of the past to you, or there are still

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 3>somewhat bottleneck issues that you're concerned about.

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so it's a great observation, Caroline, and yes, there's

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 6>huge growth in Google's capex not all of that one

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 6>hundred and eighty billion dollars as coming does of course,

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 6>but what does that say. We continue to see investments

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 6>in the data center, whether it's what Meta had announced

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 6>or Microsoft announced and now Google Alphabet that exceed what

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 6>people had originally thought was even possible even a couple

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 6>of years ago. If you go back to when we

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 6>announced the Stargate initiative in January of twenty twenty four,

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 6>five hundred billion dollars over a number of years, people

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 6>looked at those numbers and said, how is that even possible?

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 6>Now eighteen months later, it looks quite quite credible. So

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 6>bottom line is we are seeing such an investment because

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 6>the AI opportunity, the way I like to think about it,

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 6>is kind of the final frontier relative technology. When you

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 6>think about what could be on beyond AI, it's really

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 6>hard to imagine. So also the fact that AI has

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 6>really had very little penetration, let's say, into large enterprise

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 6>or into our health systems or things around drug discovery.

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 7>So there's a long, long runway.

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 6>I think people are a little nervous about it as

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 6>decidedly so because we've not seen it before, right we've

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 6>not seen the order of magnitude we're talking about, so

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 6>it's somewhat natural for you to look at it and say, well,

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.319
<v Speaker 6>gravity's got to hit it sometime. But then if you're

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 6>a little intellectually look at it and say, my gosh,

0:08:57.840 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 6>is AI going to be something that will change and

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 6>trainansform how everything is done well? Of course, and then

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 6>there's going to be an investment to support that. And

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 6>that's what we're saying, investment.

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 3>To support that. We don't mention stargate. That immediately makes

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 3>me think of Massa. And you were clear on the

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 3>call yesterday that you've spoken to him. You don't think

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:18.839
<v Speaker 3>Soft bangk is in any way going to sell down

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 3>at stake in ARM. But how much is that an

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 3>overhang in the longer term and how much actually do

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 3>you want to see more free float of your stock?

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, I have one very large shareholder who I talked

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 6>to quite frequently who loves ARM and he's very long

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 6>on ARM. So he has no intention to sell at all.

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 6>And I shouldn't even say anytime soon. I don't know

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 6>when that would be. Quite frankly, we do talk about it.

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 6>He said he's got no interest in selling how that

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 6>impacts the float and etc. You know, that's not something

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 6>candidly I spend a whole lot of bandwidth thinking about.

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 6>But he's very, very long on ARM because he sees

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 6>the enormous opportunity that we have. And if you think

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:00.040
<v Speaker 6>about what we've done since we've gone public, Carol, and

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 6>in the Flaw of twenty twenty three, we told the

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 6>world we'd be growing at twenty five percent year on

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 6>year for two three years, and people didn't believe it

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 6>was possible. Here we are now a couple of years later,

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.439
<v Speaker 6>and we're beyond what we told investors during our roadshow,

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 6>and things are even stronger than they were at their time.

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 7>So as a result, he sees it.

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 6>He sees probably more of the data than anyone does,

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 6>and that's why he's not selling RAN now.

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 5>I want to go back to CPU.

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 2>January twenty sixth, Bloomberg speaks to Nvidia CEO Jensen Wang,

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 2>and he speaks for the first time about selling to

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 2>the market via CPU as a standalone. And that seems

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 2>critically important because if you think about the pipeline for

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Blackwell and Rubin, right, those are GPUs coded in on

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 2>based architecture and those building they don't want to sort

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 2>of have to cross pollinate x eighty six based platforms

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 2>with their ARM based GPUs. It seemed to be really substantive.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 2>You explain how much of a boost that was for

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 2>ARM and whether this idea that the VIA CPU goes

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 2>into the market as a standalone product changes the trajectory

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 2>at all, because at the same time a video talks

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 2>up about how much content it owns proportionally in the

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 2>overall system.

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 6>Just take it and run with it, please, Yeah, you know, so,

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 6>first off, thrilled to see Jensen say that they're a

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 6>great partner and Vera is a great product.

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 7>And as I mentioned earlier, VERA has gone from.

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 6>Has gone now eighty eight CPUs inside it CPU cores

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 6>from seventy two. So why is that a really good

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 6>thing for us going forward? Well, primarily because when you

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 6>think about the data centers and how they're evolving to

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 6>from what is general purpose compute moving to AI compute

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 6>a mix of training and inference, and those inference workloads

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 6>are urgentic. That's right down the center of the plate

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 6>for what the CPU not only is good at, but

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 6>can only do, can only do. So what that means

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 6>is inside the data center. You're going to start to

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 6>see movement towards a homogeneous type of structure where people

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 6>would love to have the ARM stack running almost everything.

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 6>It's just easier from a maintenance standpoint, it's easier from

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 6>an upgrade standpoint, it's easier from a cost standpoint. So

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 6>and also the flexibility it can affords you can build

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 6>a tremendously efficient custom system based on ARM. The Vera

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 6>Reuben platform AD compared to Grace Blackwell uses six x

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 6>the number of CPUs and that's when you look at

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 6>the storage, the DPU, the offload. That's a huge increase.

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 6>So yes, selling loose veras that's a great thing. We're

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 6>super happy to see that.

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Briefly, Renee, you have such a bird side perspective because

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.439
<v Speaker 3>you're working with Nvidia, but also you're working with open Ai.

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 3>It was reported potentially was looking with you at your

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 3>technology to be working with its own custom ship with Broadcom.

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 3>You've got Meta looking at custom chips you of course,

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:58.199
<v Speaker 3>how do you see this evolving?

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I have a lucky job.

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 6>I get to work with just about everybody in the

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 6>industry across the planet, whether it's in the fab foundry area,

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 6>whether it is a chip company, whether it's an OEM,

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 6>whether it's a software provider. We work and talk to

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 6>everyone because ARM is just so pervasive. The common theme

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 6>we see is continued investment in AI, and not just

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 6>at the data center. It's trying to figure out how

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 6>do you run those AI workloads everywhere?

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 7>How do you run them in wearables, how.

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 6>Do you continue to make them more efficient in a

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 6>smartphone or a PC, or in physical AI, whether it's

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 6>autonomous driving and or robotics. So we're involved in all

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 6>the conversations and the common theme is heavy, heavy investment.

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 6>And one of the challenges that we see in the

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 6>chip world around this is, as you know, it takes

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 6>a couple of years to build a chip, the IP

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 6>that we developed that goes into the chips a couple

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 6>maybe a couple of years in before it. Trying to

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 6>predict what the architectures look like four years after the

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 6>chip has been designed where the AI models are going

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 6>is really very tricky. That lends itself also though, very

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.839
<v Speaker 6>well to ARM because we are programmable, we are flexible,

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 6>and we are low power, meaning that wherever the chips

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 6>drop no pun intended, we should be in a very

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 6>good position to be able to drive those workloads.

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm cia n A has with the broader perspective. We

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 3>thank you for it. Now coming up, we got more

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 3>earnings to talk about. Alphabet's results. Expectations for Amazon just

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 3>coming thick and fast, folks.

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 8>As a bitty bag tech.

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Record spending by cloud providers, Well, it's raining on the parade.

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 8>Of big tech earnings.

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Following Alphabet's results last night, Let's talk it through with

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Ioko Yoshioka, who say with Wealth Enhancement Group. Ioko, it

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 3>looked at one point after the announcement yesterday that we

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 3>were going the way of Meta that even though Capex

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 3>was going up, we were celebrating the AI rewards and

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 3>the revenue boost, and then we went more the way

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 3>of Microsoft and we were worrying about the said to

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 3>the Kapex are you selling on this?

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 9>No, Caroline, We're not selling on this. You know, these

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 9>companies are still high quality companies and they're still growing

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 9>very quickly. I think it's just an adjustment from a

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 9>valuation standpoint in terms of what are these companies worth

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 9>over the long term, how much longer are they going

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 9>to be spending at these levels, because the issue for

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 9>investors is really just the sort of collapse in free

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 9>cash flow that we, you know, have been just grown

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 9>accustomed to. These these companies used to return so much

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 9>of that free cash flow to shareholders and now it's

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 9>being spent for investment for good reason, and over the

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 9>long term this should.

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 5>Help them grow.

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 9>However, it just means that the investor kind of gets

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 9>put to the to the side for a little bit.

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 3>Are you worried in any way about the free cash

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 3>flow the alphabet is perhaps taking a hit on because

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 3>from what we could understand from the numbers, in fact,

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 3>the becoming ever more efficient. The marginison is being supported

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 3>because they're to be integrated. They're able to cash in

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 3>on growing cloud and focus on compute much more than

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 3>rivals per se.

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, I mean with you know, the cloud business growing

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 9>forty eight percent, well beyond what investors were expecting at

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 9>around thirty percent. If that continues, the investment that they're

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 9>doing is justified, and I think investors will eventually reward

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 9>them for that. It's just in the meantime. Meantime just

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 9>recalibrating really what you want to pay. And the momentum

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 9>had been so strong for Alphabet going into earnings that

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 9>there's just a little bit of a you know, take

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 9>profit attitude going on in marketing.

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Right, Okay, let's bring back the capital expended. Just chart,

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 2>wait for some TV magic. It's going to appear any second.

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 2>And then you look at that and you go, my goodness,

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 2>you know it is Caro called it mic drop moment.

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 5>It is shocking.

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 2>But what you said a moment ago, Google Cloud growing

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 2>at forty eight percent, Like the whole Microsoft anxiety was

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 2>that Azure was off by a percentage point? Why is

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Alphabet not getting the credit for the Google Cloud growth?

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 2>And everyone's just staring at that chart.

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:16.479
<v Speaker 5>It's a great question.

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 9>I mean, you know, Microsoft missed by zero point four percent.

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 9>You know they posted thirty nine percent instead of thirty

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 9>nine point four, and you know, yet Google really sort

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 9>of blew it out of the water. And you know,

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 9>I really feel like it's that focus on that CAPAC

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 9>spend in twenty twenty six more so than anything else.

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 9>It's great that we're seeing that growth on the cloud

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 9>for both Microsoft and for Alphabet, but really it's that

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 9>spend in order to get those growth numbers, I think

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 9>is what is giving investors a little pause.

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:53.479
<v Speaker 5>Amazon's down four percent.

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 2>How much is that just anxiety about what they will

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 2>won't need to say tonight?

0:17:58.920 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely?

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:01.199
<v Speaker 9>I think I'll lot of it has to do with

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 9>the anxiety about what they'll say tonight and how much

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 9>investors might be off or the street might be off.

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 9>In terms of the estimate for twenty twenty six CAPEX

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 9>for Amazon, I think investors are anticipating about one hundred

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.400
<v Speaker 9>and twenty five billion in spend, which is up twenty

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 9>two percent or so from twenty twenty five. And so

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 9>we'll have to see if Amazon decides to spend a

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 9>little bit more.

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Yoka Yoshoka, Wealth Enhancement Group, really good summary of what's

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 2>going on in the mag seven.

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 5>Thank you so much for coming up.

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 2>AI tools keep coming for the enterprise software market, But

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 2>will they be the existential threat that investors fit?

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 5>We've got more on that next. This is been Big Tech.

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 3>And it's introducing a new platform to help companies deploy

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 3>AI agents more easily and pave the way for broader

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 3>adoption among corporate customers. The new product called Frontier, and

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 3>iizations to build and manage those AI tools so that

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 3>each agent has appropriate guardrails and data access ed.

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 8>What have you got?

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of the enterprise shakeup caused by AI anthropics, legal

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 2>plug in, for its clawed cowork, may not be as

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 2>devastating a blow to legal solutions providers as according to

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 2>research from John Davies at Bloomberg Intelligence, who joins us

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 2>now at John as someone that's suffered through years of

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 2>law school and was born to two attorneys.

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:28.719
<v Speaker 5>I enjoyed reading it.

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Your conclusion is that Claude Legal is insufficiently expert to

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 2>mount a challenge. Just dig a bit deeper into your thesis.

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, and hello.

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 11>I think the key thing is that all these generic

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 11>tools don't have access to the vast googles of data

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 11>which the very specialized tools which the established companies have

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 11>access to, which it built up really over many decades,

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 11>even centuries. In some cases, they're not easily replicable sets

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 11>of data. It's a lot of shoe leather involved. You've

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 11>got to visit vast numbers of courthouses, and it's not

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 11>simply a question of digitizing the information.

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 10>You've also got to put it in context.

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 11>So the companies we're talking about here are West Law

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 11>and Lexus and Nexus each employ many hundreds of legal

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 11>professionals and have done for a very long time, and

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 11>all that information is caught up inside their products. And

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 11>that's the thing which I think the generic tools won't

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 11>have access to don't have access to, and therefore they're

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 11>more likely to make mistakes, to hallucinate and to lead

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 11>people astray. And you can't really work this stuff out

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 11>from first principles because sometimes the law defies logic.

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 10>It's not really like a science problem.

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 5>Here defies logic.

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 8>It's interesting John that in many ways.

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Look Claude Cowork had said that in a statement, they said, look,

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 3>you still need a human in the loop. We're not

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 3>suggesting this to just run wildly free. And particularly we

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 3>had an investor on yesterday, Ude Charuvu who's from Harding Loafner,

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 3>who is saying the thing with the Lexus and Nexus though,

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 3>is that it is a point solution, it's not a

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 3>platform solution. And that's why people have the anxiety that

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 3>might be knocked out in such a way. What more

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 3>could we see from these AI developments that might give

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 3>you pause about Alexus, Nexus or whoever's being competed against.

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 11>I think if they, if they do somehow manage to

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 11>gain access to the data, and clearly, you know, while

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 11>it's expensive to replicate, these companies have a vast amount

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 11>of money, so that could be could be one angle,

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 11>and I guess I guess the other one is if

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 11>in some way it's a bit like proving a negative

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 11>but if they can somehow prove that they're no longer hallucinating,

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 11>then and they can they can point to where they

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 11>don't have the knowledge and say, okay, beyond this point

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 11>you need as a lawyer to go and do the

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 11>work yourself. But here is the kind of basic tool

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 11>set that could become quite a useful product which could

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 11>be sold, perhaps at a much lower cost than the

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 11>number of providers have at the moment. But it really

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 11>seems like quite a stretch, and there's an enormous amount

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 11>of experience built into the use of the existing products

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 11>people have been using in the decades, much.

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 10>Like they have various tools in financial markets.

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 3>And your notes point out they've also been enthusiastic adoptors

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 3>of AI themselves, so have been major innovating too. John Davies,

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence is a great note. Thanks for bringing it

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 3>to us. Meanwhile, coming up, put it all about crypto

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 3>increasingly under pressure. We'll break down what's behind these moves. Next,

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 3>this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 2>In the last thirty minutes or so, actually markets have

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 2>come off session lows and as that one hundred is

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 2>down nine tenths of a percent, had been down about

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 2>one point eight percent and trading at its lowest level

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 2>since November. We'll keep an eye out on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:22:57.600 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm not really sure what the news flow is. Maybe

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 2>this is just to kind of market sentiment thing that's

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 2>going on. Earnings though, of course, are a big factor

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 2>in it. We talked about Alphabet, which itself is on

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 2>track for its worst day since May. After the bell,

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 2>we get Amazon, and Amazon's down four percent. Right, you

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 2>don't usually see a name that's going to report earnings

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 2>after the bell decline with that conviction, usually you're treading water.

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.959
<v Speaker 2>But because Alphabet, the parent of Google, posted such a

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 2>monster capital expenditures forecast for this year one hundred and

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.880
<v Speaker 2>eighty five billion dollars, maybe there's some read through their cara.

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Maybe the market's like, oh wow, what's Amazon going to say?

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Like what do we thinks coming here? And of course

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 2>we're bracing.

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're bracing. Meanwhile, well, if you're bracing for crypto

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:44.880
<v Speaker 3>to be falling further, you got that delivered. We're off

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 3>by six percent today, we're below the important seventy thousand

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 3>dollars level, and that negative momentum is just accelerating across

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 3>cryptocurrency is written large.

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 8>Look, it's driven maybe.

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 3>In part by vanishing marginal demand amid this week's volatility

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:00.719
<v Speaker 3>in other areas tech equities, precious metals. The most cryptove

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 3>reporter Ioshan joins us, Now we are is this people

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 3>selling crypto to cover losses elsewhere?

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 8>Is it more fundamental than that?

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 12>Right now, it feels like there's some more fundamental issues

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 12>within the cryptoal industry style based on what I'm talking

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 12>like everyone I'm talking to in the crypto industry, there's

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 12>a crisis face right, Like you know digital digital currencies

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 12>like promise of like we build this like internet like

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 12>Internet money, and that's kind of disappearing because like when

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 12>prices are going down of assi class that's supposed to

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 12>be going up, that's like really hard to sell the moment.

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 8>It's a store of value.

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 5>It yes, losing faith.

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, not just not just bicoin as a digital goal.

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 12>Also other cryptocurrencies, right, like you see like Etherian Solana.

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 12>All these blockchains and crypto are supposed to sort of

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 12>build like rebuild a Wall Street and rebuild fintech and

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 12>Neil Bank and whatsoever. But that's not really happen right now.

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 12>Even if they're happening, as we're seeing some adoption from

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 12>Wall Street for example, right we start institutes are getting

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 12>into the space, but that's also not affecting prices. I

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 12>think that's a bigger puzzle for the industry to resolve

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 12>at the moment.

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 2>I think you wrote a really excellent summary using data

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 2>in the chart that actually, for all the hype around bitcoin,

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 2>if you compare to other asset classes, it has lagged,

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 2>not just in the short term but on a longer

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 2>term basis.

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 5>Just explain the reporting.

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 12>I think the issue is that, like you know, Bitcoin

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 12>is supposed to be like the digital gold, but what's

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 12>happening again, as I just mentioned to Caroline, that is like,

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 12>you know, we have this digital gold that's price is

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 12>supposed to go up, but we are seeing that gold

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 12>and solar prices are going up, but meanwhile Bitcoin is selling.

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:45.199
<v Speaker 12>That's the issue of crypto right, like you don't have

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 12>a fundamental happening right now. That's like proving what like

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 12>all the bitcoin fans are trying to sell to the

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 12>market at the moment.

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 5>Right the most motion, thank you very much.

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Another source of pain right now software debt, and just

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 2>for weeks, nearly eighteen billion dollars in loans has been

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 2>pushed into distressed territory, the highest level since October twenty

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty two. For more, Bloomberg Americans finance edits a Sally

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Bakeworld joins a Sally. There's enough anxiety and concern in

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 2>the market right now as software before we even started

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 2>writing about the debt pile. But it's the smart thing

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 2>to do explain what's at issue here, right and in

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 2>that kind of milestone that I just read out.

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 13>So I think the big question here for debt investors,

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 13>for the market more broadly, is how much of this

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 13>sell off in loans that are tied to software is justified. Now,

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 13>that's the big question that we can get to. But

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 13>in the meantime, it is providing a lot of potential

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 13>opportunities for investors who are scaring the market looking for

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 13>companies that are sort of good software loans I that

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 13>can withstand and maybe even benefit from AI, versus those

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 13>that are likely to be made obsolete or have their

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 13>revenue severely stressed by AI.

0:26:58.160 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 8>So that's sort of the big question.

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 13>And what is interesting is the sort of spirited defense

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 13>that some of the loan buying community, some of the

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 13>biggest loan buyers, have come out with. Aries said some

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 13>interesting things on its earnings call that you know, there

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 13>are different kinds of kinds of companies and a lot

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 13>of them will benefit from AI, and that AI cannot

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:22.679
<v Speaker 13>actually replicate replicate a database, It cannot replicate proprietary data,

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 13>and so if you build a software portfolio around elements

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 13>like that, you can actually build a portfolio that's resistant

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 13>to AI and actually will benefit from it.

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 3>In fact, Mike Arraghetti join previous earlier shows. Today the

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 3>CEO of ARES talking about people are not really understanding

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.880
<v Speaker 3>how senior and safe a lot of these loans are

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 3>as well. Is this a case of sort of throwing

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:46.719
<v Speaker 3>the baby out with the bath water, or when are

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 3>we starting to potentially see people getting more nuanced on

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:54.679
<v Speaker 3>which loans are exposed, which software names aren't adopting AI

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 3>fast enough sally.

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 13>Companies like aries like blue Al, They've all and tom O, Bravo,

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 13>who you know who buy in the space or borrow

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 13>heavily to fund in this space. They're probably all going

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 13>through all of their portfolios right now to look at this.

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 13>You know that there are AI companies, there are software

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 13>companies out there that generate billions of dollars of revenue,

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 13>and they're actually showing earnings that are accelerating, not declining,

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 13>So you know, they're using words sort of like it's

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 13>not monolithic. You don't just have this sort of very

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 13>binary situation, and you do have to look at the

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 13>nuances of some of the companies there. But there's some

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:33.360
<v Speaker 13>really interesting dynamics going on in the loan market. For example,

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 13>clos collateralized loan obligations. They're big buyers of these loans

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 13>and they're only they have limits on what they can hold,

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 13>so they may become sort of fource sellers of loans

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 13>that do slip into distress set territory based on this

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 13>sell off, and again that could pose a lot of

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 13>buying opportunities which investors have to look through and sort

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 13>of sort out the good from the bad as.

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 3>It were, So interesting how John Z's however, Apollos sort

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 3>of talked about questioning if the real risk is if

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 3>software is dead, and they'd cut their exposure by half.

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 3>In twenty twenty five, we'll see how this continues to

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 3>ripple through the market. Sally Beekwell with the cross asset

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 3>AI read across. Let's talk about now SpaceX holding meetings

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 3>with banks from outside the US for its IPO, including

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 3>from Europe and other regions, and that's what According to sources,

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 3>the meetings took place before SpaceX announced that it would

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 3>acquire Xai, but the combined company is still expected to

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 3>hold the IPO later this year.

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 5>Ed Okay, coming up.

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Snap Paid subscribers rise, but the company sees a dip

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 2>in daily active users, particularly in America. The more in

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 2>those numbers. Next down nine percent. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 7>Time.

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Now for talking tech. Let's go through some more of

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 2>the earnings. First up, Sony reporting a twenty two percent

0:29:57.560 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 2>rise in profit over the holiday quarter, and it said

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 2>it secured sufficient memory supply for its key PlayStation five

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 2>business this year.

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 5>The company did caution, however.

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 2>The profitability of the wider games and networking division worsened

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 2>due to rising hardware costs, plus a video partner on

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Hi saw revenue time thirty five point five percent in

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 2>January to the equivalent of twenty three billion US dollars.

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 2>The tai One based company is one of the key

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 2>players in the AI hardware industry and is benefiting from

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 2>the billions being spent on the gear needed to train

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 2>and operate the models. And shares of Peloton a down

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 2>after the fitness company provided a weaker than expected revenue.

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 5>Forecast for the fiscal third quarter.

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Investors have been hoping the release of AI powered treadmills, bikes,

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 2>and other new products would put some muscle into Peloton's

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 2>turnaround efforts.

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 5>Like that character pardon your puns.

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, let's continue this theme of earnings and those that

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 3>are falling on the back of it. Snap down more

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 3>than eight percent amid a drop in daily active users

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 3>here in the United States. Still, the company actually posted

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 3>better than expected holiday quarter sales and actually paid subscrires.

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 3>We're rising twenty four million, So let's break it down.

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Mitter Smiley Emake to senior analysts with us, it's many

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 3>pronged conversation we can have about Snap, But first and

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 3>foremost why are we seeing a decline in users in

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 3>the United States.

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's a great question.

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 14>I mean, I think Snapchat definitely has kind of a

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 14>stickiness problem. I feel like we see people often age

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 14>out of it as they grow older, and then we're

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 14>also seeing reports that younger people are not adopting it.

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 14>You know, I'm talking jen now for really young people

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 14>aren't adopting it at the same rate that gen z

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 14>might have.

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 8>So they're kind of in this tough spot.

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 14>It's interesting we see a lot of the other social

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 14>platforms like Facebook, for instance, they're really trying to court

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 14>young users, and I feel like Snapchat in some ways

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 14>has the opposite issue, where it sort of has a

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 14>hold on this specific generation of young people, but when

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 14>you go above and below that, it is struggling a

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 14>bit more and I think that is why we're seeing

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 14>some of those falls.

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 3>And interestingly, you go back to November when we had

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 3>the previous earnings numbers and the shares skyrocketed, not just

0:31:57.440 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 3>a back of numbers, but on the back of a

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 3>deal they were meant to be had four hundred million

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 3>dollars in Mikestro cash and Acty with Perplexity, a partnership

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 3>to AI.

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 8>Any news on.

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 14>That, Yeah, I think everyone was kind of hoping this

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 14>earnings call, which shed a bit more late on this

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 14>deal and what's going on there. Of course, they ended

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 14>up saying that it's been delayed. They didn't provide a

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 14>ton of detail. And it's interesting because when the deal

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 14>was first announced, it was certainly welcomed by investors. I

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 14>think they were excited to kind of see a new

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 14>revenue stream for Snapchat and also just see how snap

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 14>is kind of looking into how it wants to compete

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 14>in the broader AI race, and so to see not

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 14>really any updates there is concerning and it also just

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 14>raises a lot of questions people already had around, you know,

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 14>sort of why Perplexity in the first place, Why was

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 14>the deal only for one year, How is it going

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 14>to fit into you know, how is Perplexity going to

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 14>fit into Snapchat's broader interface and whatnot.

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 8>So more questions and answers at this point. For sure, I'm.

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Trying to understand where Snap fits in the world. It's

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 2>the first time he uses decline since twenty eighteen. I

0:32:57.120 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 2>haven't been on Snap for a very long time, and

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen I certainly wasn't that.

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 5>Sounds like a worrying signal.

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Right, you know, you're talking about the different revenue streams,

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 2>But at the end of the day, what is snap

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 2>and what does the shrinking user base suggest to you

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 2>MINDA Yeah.

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 14>I mean I think it's a fair question, and I

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 14>think that partly explains why we are seeing the shrinking

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 14>user base. I think a lot of users just aren't

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 14>seeing the value in it that they used to, especially

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 14>as we see Instagram, TikTok now YouTube really really gains

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 14>team and just really take a chip away a time spent.

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 8>That's something we see in our own forecast at E Marketer.

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 14>I mean, we are seeing time spent on Snapchat decline

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 14>year over year, at least in the US, and we're seeing.

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 8>Them try to, you know, try to fix that. Really.

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 14>That's why they're investing in things like games, and we're

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 14>seeing they introduced other features last year that are really

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 14>just meant to get people keep people on the app longer.

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 8>But it is tricky, you know.

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 14>Snapchat is really distinct and the social media landscape, which

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 14>in some ways I think has worked to its advantage,

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 14>but also has heard it because it really kind of

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 14>seems to struggle to keep up with the broader trends

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:00.959
<v Speaker 14>unfolding in the broader landscape.

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's easy to try and compare and contrast

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 2>with Meta, right, particularly in the glasses context. You know,

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Meta has a generative AI tool, Meta AI and the

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 2>glasses have been the surprise package, the modus operandi by

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 2>which people interface with that with that AI tool. Can

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 2>you see the same story as snap with the glasses

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 2>and what the point of them will be ultimately?

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I think, you know, personally, I'm pretty I'm pretty

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 14>much a skeptic when it comes to the smart glasses

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 14>space in general. I just think it's you know, it

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 14>still remains really niche, and I think there's still a

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 14>lot of uncertainty around to what extent it will ever

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:40.399
<v Speaker 14>hit mass adoption. And I think, but you know, even

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 14>say it does take off, people do end up wanting

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 14>these glasses. Snapchat is still in a tough position. I mean,

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 14>it is competing with pretty much all the all the

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 14>major tech giants who are investing in this space, who

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:52.319
<v Speaker 14>are pouring tons of resources in this space. They all

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 14>have a lot more money than Snapchat. So yeah, it's

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:57.359
<v Speaker 14>interesting to see them. Bet on it. It makes sense

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 14>with their history of augmented reality and whatnot, but I

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 14>think they're in a tough position going forward in that space.

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 2>Minder Smiley a v marketer, Thank you very much. Now

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 2>coming up, we speak with Qualcomm CEO Christiano Amon. That

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 2>conversation's next. This is Bloomberg Tech. Let's focus in on

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 2>Qualcom shares right now down about eight percent, on track

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:27.280
<v Speaker 2>for their biggest drop since last summer. At one point

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:30.399
<v Speaker 2>in the session, we were down eleven percent, on track

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:32.800
<v Speaker 2>for the biggest drop since March of twenty twenty. The

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 2>world's largest maker of smartphone processors issued a lackluster revenue forecast,

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 2>raising some concerns that memory supply constraints could push prices higher,

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 2>which in turn with weigh on the handset demand. Joining

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 2>us to discuss is Christiana Ammon quil Comco. Christiano A

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 2>good morning. Thank you for becoming a morning bow Tech.

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 2>That I give you that what's happening in memory is

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 2>completely outside of your control, right, but the forecast of

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 2>the current period of sales up to eleven billion dollars,

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I suppose one way of looking at it is how

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 2>much better would that have been were the market not

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 2>so constrained by the supply of memory right now, but

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 2>also the pricing pressure that that supply deficit puts in place.

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:23.400
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, look, it's a very interesting situation. You know, in

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 15>one hand, I'm incredibly happy with the business, like everything

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 15>is going well. Demand, the strong macroeconomic indicators are good.

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 15>Demand for HANC it is strong. We have seen we

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:37.359
<v Speaker 15>had like a record quarter in Q one. We saw

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:42.440
<v Speaker 15>all of our customers reporting sell true data better than expectations.

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 15>But then the industry is now defined by the availability

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 15>the memory that is is going to be available for

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 15>consumer electronics, and it creates, you know, a sudden change

0:36:56.160 --> 0:37:00.399
<v Speaker 15>in how OEMs look at their build plan and they say, look,

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 15>I have to size the size of the market not

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 15>based on demand, but the memory that I can get

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 15>for consumer electronics. And that one makes it like this

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 15>unique period there's a go ahead.

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 5>Let me drop it.

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 2>But you know, within that market there are some specific

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 2>interesting case studies. Right the premium segment is good, like

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 2>from a demand side, particularly in China. So usually like

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:29.600
<v Speaker 2>in any hardware environment where your supply constrained but demand

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 2>is high, like that's a good thing. And increasingly, like

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 2>think about the content in the phone that you provide.

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 2>How can you kind of navigate this to your advantage?

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 16>Yes, and that's a great observation.

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 15>That's why I think there's a lot of I think

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 15>a lot of unnecessary I think speculation. Right now, here's

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 15>what's going to happen. We saw this with Covid. OEM

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 15>is the first thing they're going to do. They're going

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:58.359
<v Speaker 15>to prioritize premium and high tier, you know, because those

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 15>are more resilient I think.

0:37:59.840 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 16>To price increases.

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 15>They are we are going to see probably adjustment in

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 15>prices on hences and because you know demand it's strong,

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 15>it is very likely that the premium and the high

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 15>tier is going to be less impacted than the mass

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 15>tier on phones. And we have seen that the premi

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:22.800
<v Speaker 15>teer continue to expand regardless, regardless over the several years,

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:27.239
<v Speaker 15>the premi teer is expanding, and we're more concentrated on

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:28.319
<v Speaker 15>the premium and the high tier.

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:31.280
<v Speaker 16>So your your theory is one hundred percent correct.

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:37.400
<v Speaker 15>All that happened is OEM's had thinking about a particular

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:41.280
<v Speaker 15>size of the year that got resized by the memory availability.

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:43.399
<v Speaker 15>They're adjusting their build plans and we're going to see

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 15>how this is going to play out in the next

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 15>few quarters. That's that's really the story. The good thing

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 15>is demand as high.

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.720
<v Speaker 3>So the second quarter chip sales guidance was what worried people,

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:56.279
<v Speaker 3>But third quarter, fourth quarter, it's going to play out

0:38:56.280 --> 0:38:57.239
<v Speaker 3>over that time frame.

0:38:57.280 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 15>Do you think it's one thing that I carefully worded.

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 15>I think during our earnings call, I said the memory

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 15>availability in pricing will be the defining factor for the

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:13.280
<v Speaker 15>size of the hands and market. And we talk about

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 15>the size of hands and market because we have visibility

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 15>whole market because of our licensing business. But now we're

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 15>going to see how this play out. And I'm a

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:25.919
<v Speaker 15>little hesitant to make a very definitive prediction on how

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 15>this is going to play out in Q three and Q.

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 16>Four, But the pandemic was a good proxy.

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 15>When we have something like that and we have a

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 15>semiconductor shortage, we saw the PREMI teer has been more resilient,

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 15>and you know, we're going to be working with our

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:43.799
<v Speaker 15>customers as they move the roadmap to kind of those

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 15>type of devices.

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 3>And now you control the controllables, and those controllables have

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 3>been diversification in many ways. This speaks to why you've

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 3>been focusing in on new areas of growth, whether it

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:56.360
<v Speaker 3>be autos or we connected devices, whether it be the

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 3>future of robotics, whether of course of BAI Christiana, how

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:01.759
<v Speaker 3>much can you accelerate that to make up for the

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:02.720
<v Speaker 3>handset issues.

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 15>Look, we we you know, it's not hopefully it's not

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:11.279
<v Speaker 15>lost on people that we had another record in automotive.

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 15>We had actually a record in the company in Q one,

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 15>and not only we continue to be satisfied with the

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 15>direction the company is going on diversification, we had a

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 15>new things like robotics, for example, we had a record

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 15>in automotive. A couple of things that happen in the

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 15>quarter that are very very important. One is we announce

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 15>a broad partnership of Volkswagen Group across all the brands

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 15>to build you know, the Snapdragon digital chassis for Volkswagen.

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 15>We saw the launch of the Raw four or one

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 15>of the top selling cars in the world for digital cockpit,

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:51.799
<v Speaker 15>and IoT is growing. We we enter robotics in a

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:54.879
<v Speaker 15>short period of time with some major customers, so we're

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 15>excited about that. The fundamentals of the company are actually incredible,

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 15>and we just navigate to another phone cycle.

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Christiano second consecutive quarter where automotive is above a billion dollars.

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 2>And I remember over years us discussing what was a

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 2>backlog in automotive. Right, apply that story and that experience

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:20.360
<v Speaker 2>to your hopes in data center. You know, you've told

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:22.360
<v Speaker 2>us when this will happen and who it will happen

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 2>with first, But how do you see that translating from

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:29.360
<v Speaker 2>your order backlog to revenue growth and hitting milestones like

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:30.440
<v Speaker 2>a billion dollar quarter.

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:33.279
<v Speaker 16>Yes, we we.

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:38.759
<v Speaker 15>We restated the data center will start showing up in

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:44.520
<v Speaker 15>fiscal twenty seven. We have been talking for a while

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:47.799
<v Speaker 15>that the data center is going to change. It's going

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:50.800
<v Speaker 15>to go from the current focus on training into inference.

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 15>We have been saying, I think before what's popular, that

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 15>a different architecture will be required. I think the post

0:41:57.560 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 15>GPU architecture interesting. That the Grock development is kind of

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 15>validating that, and we're getting a lot of good feedback.

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:09.839
<v Speaker 15>We have a new architecture, including for memory. We don't

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 15>need HBM, which is causing all of this memory situation,

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:20.280
<v Speaker 15>and it's we have been very encouraged by the traction

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 15>we're getting. So it's going to be material in twenty seven,

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 15>and you know, we're going to provide a lot of

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:28.959
<v Speaker 15>details in ourcoming investor event.

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Just broadly, how are you thinking about the actual consumer

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 3>right now as well, Christiana?

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:41.799
<v Speaker 15>Just briefly, yes, so phone is a great proxy for

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 15>consumer microeconomic indicators are strong. Consumer demand very strong. And

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 15>one of the things I said in the earnings called

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:55.319
<v Speaker 15>sell true data on phones, and we have visibility because

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 15>of our licensing business exceeded all expectations.

0:42:58.239 --> 0:42:59.680
<v Speaker 16>Phones are getting off the shelf.

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.880
<v Speaker 15>Well, it's not a demand issue, it's just a memory

0:43:02.880 --> 0:43:03.920
<v Speaker 15>supply issue.

0:43:04.320 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 3>We'll come Seo, Cristiano Aman, We so appreciate you joining

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:09.240
<v Speaker 3>on this day after the earnings.

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 8>Stay well.

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:13.399
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, that does it for another extraordinary edition at Bloomberg Tech.

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 3>There is so much market volatility for earnings coming think

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 3>and fast. We've got Amazon for tomorrow ed.

0:43:19.920 --> 0:43:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so Alphabet has the mic drop of one hundred

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:25.440
<v Speaker 2>and eighty five billion dollar CAPEX forecast. Is Amazon judged

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 2>by the same metric and they communicate that differently. Recap

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:32.440
<v Speaker 2>those conversations on podcasts, two important CEO interviews.

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:33.279
<v Speaker 5>A lot going on.

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:36.320
<v Speaker 2>You know where to find it online, Apple, Spotify, iHeart

0:43:36.520 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 2>and of course on all the Bloomberg platforms from San

0:43:39.680 --> 0:43:40.959
<v Speaker 2>Francisco and New York.

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:42.359
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg Tech