WEBVTT - 06/14/21 DPS Best Of

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Dan Patrick Show on Fox

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio. One of the great nicknames in NBA history.

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>He is a three D. Dennis Scott, one of the

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>great deep shooters in NBA history. Part of Turners Sports

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>NBA analysts. Who who gave you that nickname? Three d? Uh?

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Down in Orlando, Paul Porter, the PA announcer, We're playing

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>against the San Antonio Spurs in the preseason game. I

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>came down hit the three in a corner. He said,

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 1>great Scott. I said, well, that's what they called me,

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a Georgia Tech. And I came down and get hit

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>another three, he said, Thinness Scott, and then I made

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>three three, And I think in a minute and a half,

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 1>who goes, wait a minute, three D. I kind of

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>looked over, I said, as the history. But when you

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>missed those shots in the game, did you ever get

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody to say, oh, yeah, three D. Of course you

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>hit a You get that from a few fans on

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the road, and you love it. But but but then

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you've been on me a long time. All of us

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>great shoes in a mindset, if he missed two or three,

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:06.119
<v Speaker 1>we always believe the next one's going in, all right,

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>let's look at some of this action here. How much

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>pressure is on Kevin Durant now, given Kyrie's availability and

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 1>ne James Harden. I don't know if it's pressure. I

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's desperation, because we all know now

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're not healthy in the playoffs and you don't

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>have your best players, it's hard to beat people. And Durant,

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>we know how he wears his emotions on his sleeve,

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>so he's gonna try to do everything possible to try

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to carry this team, which I think you need to

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>take a step back and empower his teammates around him

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>with leadership and say, hey, guys, I'm not going to

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>try to get sixty, Yes, maybe forty, but I need

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to get ten fifteen assists like James Harden does. Get

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you guys involved. Let's play good team defense and maybe

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>we can hold on to Kyrie or James Harden get healthy.

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of the Buck's defensive strategy? Are

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>they going over the top with their physicality here? No,

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>they're not. You have to take offensive players out of

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>their comfort zone. We know Kyle Reid's a great player,

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>we know James Hardens a great player, we know Kady's

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the best scores we ever see it. But

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to be physical with them and take them

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>out of their comfort zone and take them and make

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>them do things they're not used to. Kevin Durant is

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>not used to. A guy named PJ. Tucker just all

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in his face. He's smaller, but he's stronger, And that's

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the physicality you're talking about. Dan, How do they let

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Durant's bodyguard on the court? I think the whole

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>situation with the fans personal security, they're not on the

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>same page. Then I don't mind players having extra security.

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>They deserve it. I don't mind the arena's beefing up

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>extra security for the playoffs, but we all have to

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>be on the same page and know who is who.

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Come to find out, some people didn't know that that

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>was the rant security with that James Harden security. We

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't know who it was. We just know was a

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>guy that was dressed up real big, trying to do

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the right thing. But he didn't. I'm glad he didn't

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>go over. Did you ever have an incident like that

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.959
<v Speaker 1>where somebody's on the floor and you don't know who

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.519
<v Speaker 1>it is and why they're on the floor. It was

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>one time in Phoenix because you know, obviously playing with Shaq,

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>everywhere we went something crazy would happen. And then this

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you know this guy Ram Shack, Shack, I love you,

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and of course security said get out of here. Shack

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>was crazy. The stories I hear about Shack young Shack

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>at practice like he would he would run out with

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>just his shoes on. Is that? Is that true? Just

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>his shoes and his birthday suit. You're not gonna take

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a charge from him. No, you're like, guy, I'm not

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>taking the jar of your birthday. Oh what a goofball?

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Um should would you have tossed the joker? I would

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>have not have tossed the joker. I understand the rules.

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I understand what Adam Silver and the brain Trust is

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to do is to keep the game come. But

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>we know the Joker was not trying to aim for

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>cam face. We know he was trying to do a

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>hard foul. If he gets the ball, gets the steel,

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>where where you go? Oh my god, great steel? About

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the joker and he's trying to get back in the

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>ball game. It's an unfortunate situation. I don't want fans

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to put a you know, a smear over his MVP

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>season off one little small instent that it wasn't that

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>serious in about opinion, Yeah, I think it was how

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it looked though, Dennis. Yes, and he was frustrated. You

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>got his coach who's calling out his own teams, saying

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>they quit, and I think it's probably the joker is saying,

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>let me, let me try to make something happen. My

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>point is, you're the MVP. You can't be in a

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>position to all of a sudden to have a hard

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>foul on somebody. You can't risk that, and that's my

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>problem with it. And what I have tossed him? No,

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>but he put himself in a position where he got

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>tossed and I blamed him for that. Yeah. I think

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>that's a great learning the experience for him. Now he's

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>turned that corn to be a true superstar because the

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years, so many people didn't want to

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 1>give him his flow, his flowers as we say, excuse me,

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>his roses as they stay why he live. But he's

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 1>proven he's the true superstar, the true MVP. He had

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 1>learned from his incident and move on and still be

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.919
<v Speaker 1>a great player. If you watch him how about this.

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>If you were just going to explain why the Joker

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>is so effective and nobody and somebody didn't see him,

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>how would you explain what he does? Because he can't jump,

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>he's not quick, he's strong, he's got great eyes, great hands,

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>But how do you explain somebody who does what he does?

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>But there I said, the gaven know me a long time.

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>You know, back in the day when you come to

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.559
<v Speaker 1>our game and it's just like now, music right, everyone

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>listening to music and get hyped up. Well, I tell people,

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:49.239
<v Speaker 1>when you're watching the joker turned the music down because

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the music is low. For him, it's between the ears.

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>He understands where he wants to get on the floor,

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>he knows the offense, he knows all four players were

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>on the floor, or where they liked the ball, where

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>they want to cut, and where they need the ball.

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.359
<v Speaker 1>So the defense is, oh, you're gonna pressure up on me.

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll take my time and use my body, use my

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>methodical dribble and let my players cut. And if you

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 1>make a mistake on defense, I'll find it. And that's

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the best way to explain it. Because to your point,

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>he's not living on the rim. He's not sprinting down

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the court, but the shots go in. He make smart passes,

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and he's always in the right spot on defense to

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>help his teammates. He's Dennis Scott Turners sports NBA analysts.

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>The coverage continues tonight on T and T Sixers, Hawks,

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and then it'll be Jazz and the Clippers. You know

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:41.160
<v Speaker 1>what to expect out of the Clippers, Dennis, No, I don't,

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>because I was on that series with the Mavericks and

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:46.679
<v Speaker 1>I saw what Luca Dodgers was doing too the Clippers,

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>so I was a little nervous for them, and I

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.799
<v Speaker 1>was saying to myself, if the Dallas Mavericks front office

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>where it made a few better moves, they'd be in

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the second round. They need another shooter or two to

0:06:57.320 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>make a few more shots, and the Clippers will be

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>on vacation. On the flip side of that, ty Lou,

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>because we know he didn't panic, he went to Luke Canard,

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and we always like Luke Canard, Luke, what are you doing?

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>He's not going to help you. Oh wait a minute,

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>three three three three energy, next thing, you know, the advance.

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>So with that being said, I agree with you. Earlier

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>before I came on. I don't know if Reggie Jackson

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>can continue to make shots because he is shooting the

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>blood out of the basketball. Very happy for him if

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>he can continue that along with playoff peak pandemic peak,

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that I think Clipper Nation could be excited possibly going forward.

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>You have the seventy sixers in the Hawks and with

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Joe ellen bead Is, you know gonna be

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna be limited a little bit, although it hadn't

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>really shown that much, but that that mentality that Trey

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Young has, You're not You're not supposed to have that

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>at this age, but he's not afraid. No Dad. I

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>just love this generation. Very similar Devin book. What we're

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>saying that, oh, you gotta get in the playoffs, you

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>gotta lose around or you gotta be like we were

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Lando you gotta get swept your first time

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you go to the playoffs. These guys said, no, we

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in that narrative. I want to win now.

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>In the front office in Atlanta, in my opinion, has

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>done a better job putting better players around Trey Young

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>versus Dallas with Luca and that's why you see the

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Hawks story sharing the basketball, like Donald Is shooting threes

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and telling the crowd shoot, almost kicking his nose, all

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that fun stuff. The Hawks have had this much fun

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 1>even when they won the sixty game a season. They'll

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>have more fun now back when they had sixty games.

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned this earlier about Anthony Davis. Anthony Davis has

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to reinvest in his body the way Lebron has, because

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Anthony Davis came into this season in

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 1>shape and it caught up to him. Do you see

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a correlation between he's sort of always banged up and

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean at this age, you're not supposed to be

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>as banged up as he is. So what would you have?

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I would take a page right out of your your

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you know locker made right there with Lebron. Like you said, well,

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I think Lebron spent one point five million dollars a

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>year between the nutritionists and the acupuncture and the training.

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>So yes, you have to do that at this point

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in your career. And you may give him a pass

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Lebron Miami or even dinner for a certain extent, because

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>all those guys were in the bubble deep into last season.

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>They had to come right back. But bigger picture to

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>your narrative, No, a d they brought you there for

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a reason. You're trying to extend Lebron's career a couple

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of extra years. You have to be top notch, explain

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to me. Chris Paul special, as Charles likes to say,

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 1>and most people say, one of the best leaders that

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>ever put on a pair of tennis shoes. And I'm

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>just happy for him that this point in his career

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that they staying healthy. Last night, I must admit, we're

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>all setting here saying to your up eight or nine,

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>do you want to get him out of the game

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>before he bumps a pinky toe or pinky finger or something.

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>But to Chris Paul's credit, He's like, no, leave me

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:11.839
<v Speaker 1>in the game. I want to make sure we win

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>because I get a whole week off to continue all

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the treatment I've been going through this playoffs to keep

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>my body right. But he's been on multiple teams here,

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So when he says after the game, hey, people thought

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I was washed you know a year ago, Well yeah,

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as great as he is, and he deserved

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a top three MVP candidate, he hasn't won.

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>And then you have Michael Malone the Nuggets head coach

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>who says he's arguably the best point guard of all time,

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>And I went, Michael, hey, did you ever see Magic?

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's no argument here, right right, No, I

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. I think Michael Malone throughout the playoffs

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that has admitted that sometimes his emotions gets the best

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of him after games through his press conference. So we

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>both known Michael Malone a long time. I think he'd

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>wake up in the morning over a couple of coffee say, okay, guys,

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:06.559
<v Speaker 1>I was a little in my feelings. We know Magic

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>still the best point guard ever lived. But okay, is

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Chris Paul better than Russell Westbrook on the all time

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>list as a player? Yes? And stat numbers no, Because

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.839
<v Speaker 1>we've seen Chris Paul go to multiple teams and make

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the team better. And I think that's where the minutia

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of confuses people. Are we talking about explosive Russell Westbrook?

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Are we talking about better athletes Russell Westborough? Are we

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about obviously the most triple doubles in our in

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>our era, Russell Westbrook? When we're talking about what Chris

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Paul didn't, okay see with that young team and made

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.599
<v Speaker 1>them better? Those are the things I think most of

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.359
<v Speaker 1>us would give Chris Paul to not as an overall

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>better point guard, numbers Russell Westbrook point guard, Chris Paul

0:11:55.559 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>better than John Stockton. Oh I still I still at

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 1>John Stocking. I mean, when you look at that assists record,

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that alone, I don't think one of the few records

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in sports. I don't think nobody get even though what

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Russell's doing, I don't think nobody get Cerebal, the screen setting,

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the leadership. And I think Dan, we're all trying to

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>figure out, is how come guys like John stock and

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the car Malone of the world, with all the great play,

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>they don't have a ring. Now, I think that's to

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>this question we're going If Chris Paul gets a ring,

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>as we know in the media, his narrative will change

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot. Nineteen ninety five Playoffs, you were with Orlando,

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 1>you beat the Bulls. Did you think you'd won the

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.959
<v Speaker 1>championship by beating the Bulls because you went on or

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you guys lost to the Rockets, But did that kind

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.439
<v Speaker 1>of like we beat Jordan and now we got the

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:48.559
<v Speaker 1>Rockets And you remember that same year, Dan, we had

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Game seven at home against the Indiana Pacers, who had

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>just swept us the year before. So we had two

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 1>like like roller coach is like, yes, we just beat Mike.

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness, we just beat Gradgi. Yes we got

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 1>the Rockets. Oh we beat them both times in the

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>regular season. We should be Okay, we're young, we're zoo

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>oh smack smack smack smacks. But you can say you

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>beat the Bulls in the playoffs there, Dennis. And when

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the Jordan series came out, everyone's texting, oh, man,

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, whenever beat the Bulls back in the day. Yeah,

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>we gotta got up a few weeks later, how mad

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>was Jordan after Orlando beat the Bulls? He was hot?

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was. It was well known, you know

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>when Nick Adams, you know, made the comment, you know,

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>forty five knock back like twenty like no, but we

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>knew Mike was going to come back and change his

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>body right after come back from baseball. We knew that.

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>We know what type of competitor he was. And then

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you got swept by the Bulls the next year. The

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>very next year was Rolling having a great year. I

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 1>think we're second in the East, and we're like, oh,

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>he's got that look at his eye. We've seen that look.

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>We've we've seen that. Yeah, that's a different look. And

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Kobe had it. And I think watching Devin

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Booker and the little stage with him and Lebron with

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>with with the jersey and Lebron was honest. Devin's different.

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Devin's ready. Devin's not just happy to be here. He's

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>not just happy to possibly get this new match contract.

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>He wants to win and be the next guy we

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about every day. I was wondering about this, Dennis

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Devin Booker owns the last game warn Jersey of Lebron

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>James wearing number twenty three because he's switching back to six.

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>So this is can you imagine with all of these

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>prices for trading cards and memorabilia, what is the last

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>game warn Lebron Jersey where he had number twenty three

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be worth ten years, fifteen years, twenty years.

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Lebron stays healthy, stay say Lebron come back. We know

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Lebron's gonna do whatever it gets body right and hopefully,

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and I know Rod Flincoln, so I can go ahead

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and say this for your far viewers. Pressure is on

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Rod Lincoln now, you let Rondo go for Dennis Shrewder.

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>It didn't work. You let JaVale McGee and Dwight Howard walked,

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>You bought in Montrez, Harold and Dassoul. It did not work.

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Lebron is not twenty one anymore. As much as we

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>love what he's doing his age, we know father time

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>it's too undefeated. We just talked about a d take

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>care of his body. Rod the Lincoln has to put

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the right vets in the right shot makers around both

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of these guys. Otherwise Laker Nastion is gonna be in

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>trouble the next couple of years. Great to catch up

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>with you as always there, Dennis. Thanks for Jonius. Come on,

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I got the phone call, I said, Dan, I said,

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>no problem, bab I love my guy. Thank you, buddy.

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>That's uh, Dennis Scott one of the few guests who's

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a better shooter than me, the attorney sports NBA playoff coverage.

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Can sen Us tonight on TNT with Sixers Hawks at

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>seven thirty, Jazz Clippers at ten thirty, He's likely better

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>than That's a major honor. Yeah, that's a hell of

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a statement for you to make, um, Dennis Scott had

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful shot, beautiful shot, sort of a Dell Curry

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>set shot, a little bit beautiful. If checking his notes

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to see if you've ever said that before, I'm checking

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>better shooter than me has never been said in the

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>history of this show. Way you and I give it

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to Reggie. I Reggie's a better shooter than No, he is.

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>You didn't give it to ray Allen. I did, um.

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I just questioned where the ball was on his hand.

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>He told him he was doing it wrong. I think

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that that's enough. I questioned ray Allen's form. That's all.

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>That's great. If you could have seen the Danet's faces

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>when I said to ray Allen, because he I said,

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>hold the ball, and I always say, you know you

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>want it. Do you want to put a finger underneath

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>the ball on your hand so you could slip a

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>finger in there, and you want it on your fingertips?

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 1>And Ray put it there, and I said, the balls

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>on your palm. I said, you're holding it wrong, not

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>holding it weird, holding it oddly, holding it wrong, holding

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>it wrong, which means if he had done a different way,

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>he'd been a better shot. Yes, yes, yes, you know

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you're doing that wrong. Yeah, And He's like, he's excuse me,

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>what what hey, DaVinci give me the paint press. I

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>gotta show you what you're doing. Yeah. Thanks for listening

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to The Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be sure to catch

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 1>us live every weekday morning nine to noon Eastern or

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>six to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio. Find your

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>local station for The Dan Patrick Show at Fox Sports

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Radio dot com, or stream us live every day on

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app by searching f s R. You had

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>some tennis yesterday that I was watching and I was

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of going in and out. You've got Djokovic who

0:17:56.760 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>won the French Open his nineteenth major, and that's one

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the old time record that's currently shared by Roger Federer

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and Rafa Nadal and Jokovic or Djokovic is thirty four

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and has a great chance to surpass his two long

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>time foes. You know, we spent a lot of time

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about Tiger Woods, chasing Jack Nicholas and that major,

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>but in America, men's tennis majors aren't a topic. That's

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>because none of the big three are American and we've

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>invested in Serena Williams. But it's a tricky record to

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 1>wrap your head around. Is Djokovic better than Pete Sampras

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>or Rod Labor or Bjorn Board. The sport they play

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>today is a whole lot different than it was thirty

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 1>or forty years ago. Health medicine allowed these players to

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>compete for a longer period of time, and the rackets

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly help as well. We all know for sure that

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Jokovic or Djokovic is an all time player and all

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.640
<v Speaker 1>time athlete, no matter how much we do or don't

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 1>talk about tennis, and him also to be able to

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>do it in the era where you have Nadal and

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Federer who have won thirty nine majors between them, and

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>then you get Djokovic, who, I mean, it's pretty incredible

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that you're able to win. It'd be like if somebody

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>played in the Tiger Woods era and they won nine majors,

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't, you know, because Tiger just dominated everybody.

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>These are two of the greatest players of all time.

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>You can make a case that Federer is the greatest

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>player of all time, but in his era, Djokovic has

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>nineteen Grand Slams. Having rivals helps didn't feel like Pete

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Sampras had a rival there. Connors McEnroe bjorn Borg van Lendel.

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, having that rivalry, that's what you want. Chris

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Everett with Martina. I don't know if Serena's really had

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a rival but to be able to have that rivalry

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>makes those victories stand and on even more. And you

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>have Nadal, who's the greatest clay court player of all time,

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:12.719
<v Speaker 1>and you dust him off in four sets. Federer, to me,

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>is still the greatest player, although you could make a

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>case in a different era Rod Labor was the greatest

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>player of all time, but with what Federer and I

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the reason why I go back to Federer is when

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I asked Pete Sampras about this years ago, I said,

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, what do you think of Federer? And he said,

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>he will attempt shots that I can't even think about,

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't even have that in my imagination, and

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:42.719
<v Speaker 1>he's he's attempting those shots and pulling those off. That

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>says an awful lot about you know, here's Sampras, with

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:49.199
<v Speaker 1>what sixteen Grand Slam events, looking at Roger Federer and

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>just the fact that what he does, how he does it,

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>He's doing things that I wouldn't even think of doing.

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>As far as a shot there but Djokovic is incredible.

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean really, that's it didn't look like he was

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>working up a sweat, and he always looks like he's

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>he's visiting a country club. He's going in to play

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>tennis at the club. You know, his shorts are perfectly starched,

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 1>increases in his shirt that he was wearing, his hair,

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't look out of swords at all, whereas Nadal did.

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Nadal looked like he had played, you know, ten sets.

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's pretty impressive. That's nineteen majors. He's thirty four

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:35.199
<v Speaker 1>years of age. But to have these three, that's remarkable.

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Now you go back to boxing where you had Sugar Ray,

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Tommy Hearns, you had marvelous Marvin Hagler, like to win

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 1>titles in that era because that's who you had to

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 1>go through. That's pretty incredible. Now they don't face each

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>other as many times as you do in tennis. But

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>what Djokovic did yesterday was pretty pretty impressive. Yeah, Pa,

0:21:57.560 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you're right about Djokovic. He doesn't seem to be a

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.119
<v Speaker 1>big swim and he remember early in his career he

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>wore he went top button. He used to have like

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the polo shirt and he was so h composed, he

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>would go top button like, I don't even need the

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 1>unbuttoned twice to get you take it out. He look

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at pictures of him. He looks like he's

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a fifth sent. He looks he's just starting the match.

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Don't make me unbuttoned this next button. I don't want

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>to do that too. You no time? Yeah, yeah, spink Levin.

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think this is appropriate impossible to rate athlete,

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 1>like if we put a poll as he overrated, underrated,

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>properly rated, or impossible to rate because if he passes

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Federer in the major record, do we have to say

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 1>he's better than Federer? Or and you said, you said it,

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you can't compare him to Rod Labor. I don't. I

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>think he's impossible to rate. Yeah, I think I would

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.360
<v Speaker 1>say Federer is still the best player that I've I've

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>seen on all the surfaces, his athleticism, but Nadal fascinates me, uh,

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>probably more one dimensional with clay, and that that's what

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>stood out even more is that he lost on clay.

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't lose on clay, And the fact that Djokovic

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>was able to beat him in four sets was really

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:16.719
<v Speaker 1>remarkable and Djokovic was down two sets yesterday, so you're

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 1>down O two and then all of a sudden, it's like, um, yeah,

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 1>all right, I gave the crowd. You know. It's almost

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.360
<v Speaker 1>like when Floyd Mayweather carried one of the Paul brothers,

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Like you're just like, yeah, all right, I think it's

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.199
<v Speaker 1>time to end this. Now we're done. And he just

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>went boom, boom boom, and that was it. All right.

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll get phone calls best and worst to the weekend.

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>What we saw that we liked, we didn't like. The

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Packers continue to make things worse. Oh. I saw this

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>with Mark Murphus, the CEO of the Packers, and he's

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>at some fan event. You know a lot of times

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 1>when you go to these things, you got to a luncheon,

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>there's no cameras, you get a little loose. Sometimes yeah,

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you're playing into a hometown crowd. This is Mark Murphy's

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 1>already said that Aaron Rodgers, what's going on is dividing

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 1>our fan base. If somebody has his cell phone, they

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>start to record this and then he's quoting the late

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>GM Ted Thompson, where Ted Thompson referred to Aaron Rodgers

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>as complicated that's not a compliment. When you say somebody

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>is complicated and you're quoting somebody who's not around to

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>even put it into context, how do you think Aaron

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers is going to take that? Like you've already said,

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what, and he's dividing our fan base. Okay,

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>now you're quoting Ted Thompson saying Aaron Rodgers is complicated, complicated,

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>is unique? Is a compliment? Hey man, he's unique, complex

0:24:54.320 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>is almost a complimate, like he's complex. But when you say,

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, quoting Ted Thompson here, he's complicated, that's not

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a compliment. Yes, Ton, to me, that's annoying or stranger.

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I just don't get that guy all again in the

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:19.360
<v Speaker 1>negative vein, Maybe so, but don't say it like it

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 1>feels like these are really there's there should be trepidation

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 1>with what you say anywhere to anybody about this situation here.

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Do I think he's going to be traded? I don't do.

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he's with the Packers next season, probably not.

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>But I've said all along, I don't think he's going

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to be traded because he can't trade himself and the

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Packers are not going to trade Aaron Rodgers but we're

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>going to get to the point in a couple of

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>weeks now where we're going to find out how awkward

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>this is really going to be. But don't quote anybody,

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>don't say anything. How about you keep it generic and

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>he's you know it's Ted Thompson said, he's complicated. Okay, yeah,

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Paul I just checked the chart. He's complicated is just

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:11.199
<v Speaker 1>one above he's a handful. He's a handful is the

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>next step down from He's complicated. He's complex is a

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 1>step up because it made you think that he's cerebral

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and smart. He's a handful is on the negative side.

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if he rolled his eyes when he said

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 1>it he's complicated. Yes, if you roll the eyes, that

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>exacerbates he's a handful. Yes, he's close to being known

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 1>as a piece of work. Yeah, he's a piece of work. Right,

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>A piece of work is down from he's a handful. Yes,

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't make it okay, But it's easy to get

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>loose in these things, as opposed to when you're at

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a press conference and you've got Mike flags in front

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of you and everything, and you're maybe more garden or

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>what you're gonna say because it's obvious that every little

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>facial expression and where you're gonna say, it's gonna be

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>all over the radio and TV in the newspapers. When

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you're at some sports bar, at some convention or a

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>speaking engagement, you don't realize that all of a sudden,

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:52.959
<v Speaker 1>this same thing could get picked up by a lot

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of people. Well, if he doesn't realize that, then very naive.

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And everybody's got a cell phone, and you know somebody's

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna tell somebody. Oh yeah, he referred to Aaron Rodgers

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>said he's complicated. Maybe they didn't even get the quoting

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the former GM Ted Thompson with the Packers putting it

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 1>in context, It doesn't matter you call him complicated. But

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:20.679
<v Speaker 1>if you say he's complicated, and uh but I mean

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that in a positive way because there's so many facets

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to him and he's got so many interest and he's

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>such a thought provoking guy like you could you could

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>spin it. Call your wife complicated. See how that works, Hey, honey,

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you know what, you're complicated? How about your caller high maintenance?

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>While you're at it. Yeah, Paul, thank you all for

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>coming to the Packers booster event. We're gonna have a

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 1>great season. Everyone put their phones away. It's just us

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 1>chatting here. Can't wait to get rid of that old

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 1>guy getting Jordan Love into the lineup, and don't tell anybody,

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:54.120
<v Speaker 1>just us talk. Hey, you know what he is. Com

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>r is open. Yeah. Uh, get some phone calls here.

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>By the way, don't miss the Peacock original, The Greatest Race.

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 1>Discover the teammates who pulled off an astonishing comeback in

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the four by one hundred relay the two thousand and

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:14.439
<v Speaker 1>eight Beijing Olympics. It's the greatest race and it's streaming now.

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Only a Peacocks sign up at Peacock tv dot com

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 1>to get started. Let's see Jeremy and Alabama leads this

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>off this hour. Hi Jeremy, Hi Dan, thank you for

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>taking the call. I am six two and a half

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>in a lane two hundred pounds. I've got two best

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 1>and I want to pay tribute to Todd Fritz with

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a mock headline. Okay, my best one is the Sun's winning.

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I am when the Lakers went out, I'm all in.

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm watching the playoffs pull him for the Suns because

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I used to thunder. Dan Marley was my man back

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in the day. And I always loved the signs. My

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>second best was I got a chance to hang out

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>this weekend in Nashville where Bradley Constant, he plays the

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>high school aged rock on Young Rock super cool dude.

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>That was awesome, And uh my mock headline is medi

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>yoker nuggets get sway up by the sun. Okay, yoker media,

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>yokerk Okay. I like that? All right? Nicely done? Uh

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>turn any response? I just had the one. I think

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I said, you guys out last that. As soon as

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it happened, I thought of a joke, did as opposed

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to be ejected. It's got mixed reviews. I like it.

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>It made me laugh. I'm gonna say thumbs down. Yeah

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was proud of that for a little while,

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and then I still And then you start, instead of

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>reading the positive ones, do you look on you know,

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Facebook or Twitter, and then you read the negative ones

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and those are the ones that eat you up, and

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you forget about anybody that said it was anything good?

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Can you let it eat you up that you just

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>put out a mock headline unfortunately for me and my sensitivity,

0:29:57.680 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>but you want everyone to like it and give you

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>smiley faces and roses, but it doesn't work that way.

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Rather get no reaction or you know that that clever

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>or I like that one, or a good job. But

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>once you get the you know, different gifts of gifts

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and images and it gets a little mean out there

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>in the social media landscape. I know you were pounding

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>on Friday due to your your limericks. I was a

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit because I think we egged that on a

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit someting. I believe sometimes our reaction is that,

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the trolls on social media are

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>waiting to They don't know what they're supposed to think,

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and they look to us. So if they like it,

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess I like it too. If they get stupid

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>or annoying or overdone, then I'm going to just jump

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>on that. I told you I like your limericks. Okay,

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not trying. I'm just saying in general, either

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 1>they read the room and they're like, yeah, I guess

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that was bad. Yeah. But if I'm the one saying

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I like your limericks, if they're reading the room, I

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 1>say I like it. And I thought that mark headline

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>was awesome, Todd, thank you. Yeah, it was a really

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>good one. A great way to start out the Monday.

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>But here it is on a Friday, it's a meat Friday.

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>And then you know Todd's and in the early stages

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of well, that's hard to tell, but I said, oh

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>my god, are you are you what are you reacting

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to your your limerick? And he goes, yeah, yeah, there's

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>trolls out there, and you know, they read the room

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and if you guys don't like it, I said, Tom,

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>do I say I like your limericks? Yeah? Yeah, But

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I was a baby a little bit on that. How

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>do you think they feel though they're being hall called

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>trolls instead of people who just don't think it's funny?

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, some people just don't think. Do you think

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the people called being called trolls are like moping right now?

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Paul has a good point. If it's anything that's like

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>contrary to the reaction I want, then they fall into

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the troll Yes, seton. I feel like, you know, this

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>may be a little narcissistic of me or paranoid or something,

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like Todd is sort of speaking around

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>me while being in the same room as being the

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, they read the room about people who don't

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>like the limericks. Well, it's not just you. Everybody mixed

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>comments or roll their eyes or whatever, because they're very

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>specific on social media. It's true, it's not just him. Yeah,

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>if there's a lot of other people that was almost

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>starting to feel bad, but now I don't. Thanks for

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>listening to The Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be sure to

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>catch us live every weekday morning nine until noon eastern

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>six to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio, and you

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>can find us on the iHeartRadio app at FSR or

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:19.959
<v Speaker 1>stream us live every day at YouTube dot com slash

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the Dan Patrick Show. Hey, this is Jason McIntyre. Join

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>me every weekday morning on my podcast, Straight Fire with

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Jason McIntyre. This isn't your typical sportspod pushing the same

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>tired narratives down your throat every day. Straight Fire gives

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you honest opinions on all the biggest sports headlines, accurate

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>stats to help you win big at the sports book,

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and all the best guests. Do yourself a favor and

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>listen to Straight Fire with Jason McIntyre on the iHeartRadio app,

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Mark Jackson

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>was on the call yesterday game four of the Nets

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and the Bucks in Milwaukee and the great Mark Jackson

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the program. Good morning, Mark, thanks for

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>joining us. How are you. I'm doing well. Thanks for

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 1>having It's been a long time. How would you sum

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>up the Bucks Nets yesterday game four? I think the

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Bucks ultimately, you know, was committed to being a lot

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>more physical getting into the bodies of not just Kevin Durramp,

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 1>but the Nets in general had tremendous success doing it.

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Took him out of rhythm and they were in attack

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>mode Offensively, Jannis wasn't messing around, and he was more

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of a playmaker and mixing it up, getting guys involved

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and attacking. The remedy allowed other guys to get going,

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and it allowed him to get going. So it was

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a perfect day for the Milwaukee Bucks yesterday. What should

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the game plan be for Yannis and his approached And

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly he's a different player, it feels like in the

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>playoffs than he is the regular season. But how would

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 1>you have him attack the nets? Well, Jeff and I

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Vangunny and I agree, but we disagree. He thinks

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>he should shoot zero three points. Oh, he should shoot

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a hundred. It should be because he can get that

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 1>shot anytime, and I understand that mentality, But my feeling

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>is I don't have a problem with him shooting you know,

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 1>two or three three points in the rhythm of the game.

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 1>So he's attacking the rim, he gets a dunk, he

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 1>gets a lay up, he gets nd one, and all

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, the next time down the floor, he

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>thinks he's got to go in and he feels comfortable

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and confident and he steps into a rhythm three. I'm

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>fine with that. I think he's got to ultimately not

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>take a bunch of them unless he's knocking him down

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:40.879
<v Speaker 1>because you're doing the nets of favor. You're playing into

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that hand. So he's got to be an attack mode.

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 1>But the mentality of not settling on the offensive end,

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 1>especially early, setting a tone, and then he's got to

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>be a willing pass to take the double team and

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>hit guys in rhythm long point where those guys got

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to be confident and knock down shots also. So it's

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>got to be a mixture of boat. In my mindset,

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 1>what is it with some of these players at the

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>free throw line? And the honest is there and it

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:10.879
<v Speaker 1>seems like analysis, you know, paralysis by analysis. And then

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you got Ben Simmons as well, and are these all fixable,

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>coachable things? To me? They are And it's it's it's

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>um minimizing the movement, is minimizing the amount of time.

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you stand you standing at the free throw line,

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, over ten seconds and you're sitting there for

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>what you know. I had a routine, but I didn't

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 1>do a routine when I practiced, and I just be

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>quite honest, I just did it just so I could

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 1>be remembered one day by the guy that held his

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>hand up at the free throw line. I don't I

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's I don't think it's a uh it

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 1>would be harming him. Well, I know it wouldn't be

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:51.320
<v Speaker 1>harming him. If he cut the routine short and stepped

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>up to the free throw line and maybe five seconds

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 1>took a shot, he couldn't be any worse. So I

0:35:56.000 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 1>think he's it is paralysis by analysis, overthinking it. And

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 1>they can be much better free throw shooters that they

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Obviously they put the time in, but you get a

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 1>shooting coach with them and you develop routines and habits

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and they would become better. I don't know. There would

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:12.879
<v Speaker 1>be ninety and ninety five, but they certainly would be better.

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 1>But it's hard to be the guy at the end

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of the game if I can't have you handle the

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>ball because I don't want to put you on the

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>free throw line, or I can't have you go to

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the free throw line, and you know, with Ben Simmons,

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 1>and you know with the Greek Freak, these are more

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 1>key players. I understand what you're saying, but I disagree

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 1>because I played with a guy like like let's say

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Dale Davis, a tremendous powerful that I played with that

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>was a historically bad free throw shooter. But as a team,

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:44.320
<v Speaker 1>we didn't care whether he got fouled down to stretch

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:46.880
<v Speaker 1>because one thing we knew, he wasn't afraid to shoot

0:36:46.920 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 1>the free thro He was gonna step up and they

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>won't if he made a missus, it wasn't gonna be

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:53.719
<v Speaker 1>because he was afraid. So you don't want guys that's

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be afraid of the moment like Ben Simmons.

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't see. I don't see man a janis afraid

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to shoot the free thos. So you develop the right

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:04.840
<v Speaker 1>habits and then you make sure as a coach I

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:07.840
<v Speaker 1>put them in position where okay, we're in the bonus.

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm not putting the ball in Ben's Simmons hands. Understanding

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:13.319
<v Speaker 1>you know that they're going to foul them and send

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:15.240
<v Speaker 1>them to the freedom line. Unless you've got a rhythm

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 1>and we got a comftable lead, then okay, you want

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:19.399
<v Speaker 1>to play that game, we can play it, but I'll

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:21.839
<v Speaker 1>develop some things to keep my best players on the floor.

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>If you're Steve Nash and I said you can have

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>your choice, you could either have Hardened back with Durant

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 1>or Kyrie back. Who would you take? I want to both? No,

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 1>you can't both. Well, well, the games tomorrow. I want

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>James hard because I don't think that Kyrie urbans Uh

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>physically would be able to play tomorrow, but I think it.

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's say they're both helping. Here you go. You know

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>when I when I said I was gonna do that,

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>this guy's gonna ask me a question and forced me

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 1>to answer something. I don't know what it is, but

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I'm like Scottie Pippen guarding you. Okay, no,

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 1>you're worse, And that's saying, wow, Scott, do you still

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>see Scottie Pippen in your nightmares. I see him all

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>bit long. What are you talking about my nightmare? When

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna wake, I see him. I look back from

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:14.839
<v Speaker 1>times to just swade his hands off of me. What's

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 1>he the best defender? Um? He was an incredible defender.

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I think when you look at a guy like Gary Payton,

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:25.440
<v Speaker 1>when you look at Michael Jordan, when you look at

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 1>when you look at Hakimalaja Want, I mean, those those

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:32.239
<v Speaker 1>guys were elite all time great defenders. Alvin Robinson was

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a great defender. Would you rather have a Jordan guard

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 1>you were pipping? I would rather have Jordan guard me

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 1>if you told him, if you said he had to

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:45.279
<v Speaker 1>guard me the whole game. And it's not a knock

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 1>on his defensive you know mentality and how great he

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is defensively, Shatti Pipman, couldn't you know dog me to

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:53.840
<v Speaker 1>falling into the court and dog me for whatever amount

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 1>of time I was on the court because he didn't

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:58.520
<v Speaker 1>have any any pressure on him to carry the load offensively.

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:00.840
<v Speaker 1>If you ask Michael to do it, just like Phil

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 1>asked Kobe to do it in the finals in two thousand.

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Kobe was great at it, but he wasn't Scottie Pippen

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 1>because he was trying to, you know, get forty on

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the other end. So it was it's a different mentality

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 1>and it's a different commitment when you know, this is

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 1>what I have to do to win this game. He's

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Mark Jackson ESPN, NBC or NBA analysts on ABC? Are

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you third and all time assists right now? I'm fourth?

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Nashes won ahead of me. But and you say, oh,

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:34.319
<v Speaker 1>I say, oh wow, you know I wanted to look

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 1>at the list of guys that surround me. I pinched myself.

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>That's when I get, you know, like it really is unbelievable.

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I've got no business on that list. Do you think

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that Nash wanted to get one more than you and

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 1>then retire? No, I don't think it. I don't think

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it at all. I know it. I got Chris paul

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:58.359
<v Speaker 1>at fifty assists behind you. I think he's gonna catch Oh.

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Way to go out on a limb. But Lebron is

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:07.439
<v Speaker 1>three hundred behind you. I think he's gonna catch you. Wow.

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>You you are really feeling yourself today with the predictions

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you like Charles Barkley with the guarantee Paulie is there

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 1>anybody else who can catch Mark Jackson here before he

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 1>gets kicked out of the top ten. I didn't want

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:21.359
<v Speaker 1>to pile on but Russell Westbrook is about a year away,

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:25.359
<v Speaker 1>year in half, oh man. I mean, but think about

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the name everybody that's surrounds me. The Hall of Famers,

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:32.719
<v Speaker 1>a first dollar Hall of Famers. I'm already in. So

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 1>it's it's absolutely remarkable. Like I said, I'm honored to

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>be in that position and to be discussed with those guys.

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Are you a Hall of Famer? I'm not in the

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame, But do you think you should be

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Hall of Fame? That's not up for me

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to the screen, No, No, it's you do you think?

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Like if you ask me, do you think you're better

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>than Bob Constance and wouldn't? I can't go, well, that's

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 1>up for others. You just ask me, what's your answer?

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>You as you answer mine, then I'll answer, well, I

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 1>finished my career at second all time and assists i'mly

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 1>submit okay, And and and to think about all the

0:41:12.560 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 1>great players that have played in the history of this game.

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 1>To be second all time in a main category says

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 1>says a lot. Yeah, And there's an incredible feat for me.

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm fine with where I am in history, and

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm at peace with it. And then answer you

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:34.399
<v Speaker 1>a question, Now, what about you and Bob costs? Bob

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 1>is better at certain things? Oh my goodness, I don't

0:41:38.160 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 1>need all of that. Do I think I'm better than Bob.

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm different than Bob. It'd be like me comparing you

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to Steph Curry. You both play point guard, but you

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:52.799
<v Speaker 1>do it differently. Hold on, let me let me give

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you adress I'm gonna send. You're a free I'm a

0:41:54.440 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 1>friend of your free dog with a leash. I mean

0:41:57.320 --> 0:41:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you're scared. Come on, man, Oh I'm not. I I

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I own a dog, I got a puppy, Mark, I

0:42:02.760 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>bought a dog. I did. I gotta rescue. Who would you?

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Would you take anybody's answer, well, he's better than me

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 1>in certain things, in certain areas, I'm stronger than him. No,

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't. I thought that, Dan Patrick, I know one

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>love I thoughtout listening it to view. So what I

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:23.920
<v Speaker 1>got your back? I'm trying humility. It's something new for me. Okay.

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>That is that's true. That's true. Okay, because when we

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:28.919
<v Speaker 1>will when we would go out, you'd be like, yeah, Bob,

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:30.879
<v Speaker 1>I can't all my jocks having no way to the worrow.

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm better than you, who question? I know that is true.

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean, I don't mean to tell your business.

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 1>You just did. You just did, and you said I

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 1>should that you should be coaching the Knicks, that you're

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:51.279
<v Speaker 1>far better than nothing. But don't do that. Oh now,

0:42:51.360 --> 0:42:55.279
<v Speaker 1>I can't talk out of school? Okay? With me saying that,

0:42:55.360 --> 0:42:57.600
<v Speaker 1>they'd be like, oh, that's Mark throwing a bad, you know,

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:00.360
<v Speaker 1>good joke at Dan. With you saying it run be

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a headlines? What do you expect to happen with the

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Jazz and the Clippers? Because I have no idea how

0:43:09.120 --> 0:43:12.279
<v Speaker 1>to handicap the Clippers right now. It is it is

0:43:12.360 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 1>tough to handicap the Clippers, and that's the worst thing

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to have as a coach. I'll player on

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:20.279
<v Speaker 1>the team. Who can I trust? Who can I go to,

0:43:20.600 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Who's going to show up? How are we gonna play?

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 1>It's unpredictable. They can very well win the championship and

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 1>they can very well lose in this round. Is unfortunate,

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:31.239
<v Speaker 1>but this is a team. I will say this. They

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 1>don't lay down. I mean they got down the previous series.

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 1>They bounced back against Dallas. They're down against Utah, bounced

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:42.360
<v Speaker 1>back with a big win and another win you know

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in the next game, really changes things. But the Jazz,

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it's an outstanding team that I say that a second team,

0:43:50.400 --> 0:43:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously the Warriors with Steph Curry and Clay

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Thompson in ability to shoot. So many teams are shooting threes,

0:43:57.080 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>but there's only two teams in my mindset that have

0:43:59.760 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the ability to have shooters on the floor and they're

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:05.400
<v Speaker 1>great shots every time. The Utah Jazz are loaded with

0:44:05.800 --> 0:44:07.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, four or five six shooters on the court,

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and the Jazz and the Warriors obviously have to two

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the best, if not the best ever do it. Chris

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Paul and Kevin Durant. Certainly Chris Paul bringing back the

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:20.239
<v Speaker 1>mid range jumper. Mark, do you think the mid range

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 1>jumper will make a comeback? I don't think it should

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:25.320
<v Speaker 1>have went anywhere in the first place. I understand the

0:44:25.360 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 1>analytics and what it says about the three point shot,

0:44:27.960 --> 0:44:30.719
<v Speaker 1>but give me a basket, give me give me Chris

0:44:30.800 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Paul shooting the mid range jump shot as opposed to

0:44:34.239 --> 0:44:37.279
<v Speaker 1>you know Mark Jackson shooting a three pointer. He's gonna

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:39.239
<v Speaker 1>make those at a high clip and he's going to

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 1>punish the defense and they're gonna have to make the

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:45.839
<v Speaker 1>proper adjustments. Yeah, I like it. If they're gonna give

0:44:45.880 --> 0:44:48.399
<v Speaker 1>it to you, then take it. Kade takes that mid

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 1>range jumper, and it's either somebody taking it to the

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:56.360
<v Speaker 1>hoop or somebody shooting the three. And I like that logic.

0:44:57.120 --> 0:45:00.359
<v Speaker 1>And even though you know the guy's not name Chris

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Paul and Kevin Durant, if the teams are going to

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:05.279
<v Speaker 1>back up off of you like Joanness, if the teams

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 1>are going to back up off the end the day

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to shoot the three, Okay, establish a rhythm, step two

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:11.080
<v Speaker 1>feet in. Take a mid range jump shot is the

0:45:11.200 --> 0:45:13.359
<v Speaker 1>easiest shot and it allows you to gain a rhythm.

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's no coincidence. Why you know, those two

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 1>guys and those these TIS teams that embrace you know,

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:22.480
<v Speaker 1>shooting mid range like feeting times. I have a legitimate

0:45:22.560 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 1>chance of winning at all because partly of Chris Paul's

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:28.879
<v Speaker 1>mid range game. Michael Malone, the Nuggets head coach, said

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that Chris Paul arguably the best point guard of all time.

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:37.719
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if Michael has done a lot

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of research here on great point guards in the game,

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:43.239
<v Speaker 1>but it seems like a recency bias there, Mark that

0:45:43.360 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you just lost to Chris Paul and his sons. Magic

0:45:47.840 --> 0:45:52.399
<v Speaker 1>was pretty good, right, Yeah, it's and it's it's I laugh,

0:45:52.560 --> 0:45:54.480
<v Speaker 1>but I don't laugh at the greatness of Chris Paul.

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:57.439
<v Speaker 1>He's a first ballot Hall of Famer and he's he's

0:45:57.520 --> 0:46:01.239
<v Speaker 1>he's had an incredible career and he's certainly amongst the

0:46:01.640 --> 0:46:03.680
<v Speaker 1>list of the top point guards ever played this game.

0:46:04.160 --> 0:46:07.080
<v Speaker 1>But he's not. He doesn't won. He doesn't won, like

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that has anything to do with it,

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 1>because we don't. We don't say that when we throw

0:46:13.120 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 1>John Stockton his name, and then he's certainly an all

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:18.359
<v Speaker 1>time great point guard and he's on the list also,

0:46:18.640 --> 0:46:20.680
<v Speaker 1>but we don't hold that against him, and we shouldn't. Well,

0:46:20.719 --> 0:46:24.200
<v Speaker 1>he went to two finals, he lost against Jordan. So

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 1>see how we see how we tape of the argument

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:29.520
<v Speaker 1>he didn't win. He didn't win a championship. He didn't

0:46:29.560 --> 0:46:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the argument that's Chris Paul winning a championship will not

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:34.879
<v Speaker 1>make him the greatest point guard ever. Played the game.

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 1>In my mind, and again we're talking about great, great

0:46:37.800 --> 0:46:41.480
<v Speaker 1>talent and great, great historically great players. Magic Johnson is

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 1>the greatest point guard has ever played this game, all right,

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and mind too, in my mind it's Isaiah Thomas, okay,

0:46:49.719 --> 0:46:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and not I mean the guy. Think about what he did.

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:56.399
<v Speaker 1>He was and I faced him. So that's that's part

0:46:56.440 --> 0:46:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of the reason I can say it. I watched everybody

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and I faced them, and he was absolutely, absolutely great,

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:05.960
<v Speaker 1>great greed. Yeah, but you made him successful by guarding him.

0:47:06.719 --> 0:47:10.640
<v Speaker 1>We don't need to go to the question, wasn't how

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:14.000
<v Speaker 1>did he get? Okay, my bad? Is Steph Curry a

0:47:14.080 --> 0:47:17.000
<v Speaker 1>point guard? Yes he is, and he's on the list.

0:47:17.120 --> 0:47:19.480
<v Speaker 1>He's in the discussion. He's a first ballot Hall of

0:47:19.520 --> 0:47:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Famer and he's an absolute, you know, franchise superstar talent.

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:27.000
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't lead his team and assist. He is a

0:47:27.080 --> 0:47:29.320
<v Speaker 1>point guard. I coached him and I put next to

0:47:29.440 --> 0:47:34.080
<v Speaker 1>point guard Steph Curry. Okay, okay, So you got magic

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:37.439
<v Speaker 1>and Isaiah is Steph Curry the third greatest point guard

0:47:37.480 --> 0:47:40.799
<v Speaker 1>of all time. He's in the discussion. Then you got

0:47:40.880 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you got a list of guys that completely fit into discussion.

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Where you can play them three through ten? All right? Where? Okay,

0:47:47.320 --> 0:47:50.600
<v Speaker 1>who's third? I don't know who's third. I haven't looked

0:47:50.680 --> 0:47:52.760
<v Speaker 1>through the list yet. But you got guys you played

0:47:52.800 --> 0:47:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the position. You know, you know who's that, Guys like Stockton,

0:47:56.600 --> 0:48:04.680
<v Speaker 1>kid Nash, Curry. Am I forgetting anybody Westbrook Russell Westbrook

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to give me? Chris Paul, I mean you got to

0:48:06.640 --> 0:48:09.360
<v Speaker 1>throw those guys in the discussion, and then it's which

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:12.560
<v Speaker 1>which flavor do you like? They're all to me, they're

0:48:12.560 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 1>all in the same area, and they're all historically great talents.

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Now who else you putting in there? Charlie Ward, uh,

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Mugsy bogus, anybody else? Say you're putting in there more bad?

0:48:25.960 --> 0:48:29.480
<v Speaker 1>But I'm firm. I'm bad, but I'm firm. You have

0:48:29.600 --> 0:48:31.839
<v Speaker 1>the disease of greed. I gave you the top two

0:48:31.920 --> 0:48:34.120
<v Speaker 1>without Waveland. Now you want to go through the list

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of top ten. I'm just we just enjoyed. How about

0:48:37.719 --> 0:48:41.239
<v Speaker 1>top five? Is that asking a whole line? No, no, no, no, no,

0:48:41.360 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I said, I gave you my answer. When you talk

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:45.800
<v Speaker 1>about the first two, I got a clear cut answer.

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:48.879
<v Speaker 1>It's soft, man. I know who's not in that? Dan

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Patrick is not in that point guard of all time.

0:48:51.840 --> 0:48:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm a shooting your game. No, I saw your game.

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm amazing free because because you're knocked down freeto shooter.

0:48:57.920 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 1>We're well aware of that. We're well aware that. Yeah,

0:49:01.600 --> 0:49:03.759
<v Speaker 1>should I be able to shoot better from the line

0:49:03.760 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 1>than the Greek freak or Ben Simmons? Yes, because you

0:49:08.080 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 1>had a full court hoop in your backyard since you've

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:13.920
<v Speaker 1>been one years old, you lived in the suburbs, you've

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:20.719
<v Speaker 1>been you know, you had a good life. All right,

0:49:20.719 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you're right about that. Okay, yeah, Hey, it's great to

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:26.920
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again, and I'll talk to you in

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:29.799
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years. Okay, No, don't do that. Great

0:49:29.840 --> 0:49:33.839
<v Speaker 1>talking to you. Man, Say, well, that's Mark Jackson, third

0:49:33.960 --> 0:49:35.640
<v Speaker 1>on the all time or fourth on the all time

0:49:35.719 --> 0:49:41.239
<v Speaker 1>assist list. You know, Mark's a Hall of Famer. He

0:49:41.320 --> 0:49:44.320
<v Speaker 1>won't say it, but he was second all time, second

0:49:44.400 --> 0:49:48.040
<v Speaker 1>all time and assist when he retired. Yeah, and now

0:49:48.239 --> 0:49:51.040
<v Speaker 1>he didn't average double figures. But if we're gonna argue

0:49:51.160 --> 0:49:54.799
<v Speaker 1>Robert Ory with what he did and winning those championships,

0:49:55.200 --> 0:50:00.319
<v Speaker 1>and Mark marks second all time to John Stockton. No there,

0:50:00.880 --> 0:50:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm just presenting facts here because I like Mark Jackson.

0:50:04.320 --> 0:50:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Mark Jackson played on a lot of teams. He did

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:09.480
<v Speaker 1>like three or four or five years and two years

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and four years and two years. He made one All

0:50:12.160 --> 0:50:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Star Game in his career, which really hurts. He lacked

0:50:16.040 --> 0:50:20.200
<v Speaker 1>consistently for one team continuity. I guess he do five

0:50:20.320 --> 0:50:22.480
<v Speaker 1>years for the Knicks, then two years for the Clippers,

0:50:22.520 --> 0:50:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and five years for Indiana Indiana. He had a really

0:50:25.600 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 1>good run in Indiana, really relevant run.