WEBVTT - Apple to Add Satellite Features to IPhones for Emergencies

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanobek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on the Bloomberg Radio or watch us

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Uh. Do you want

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to talk a little bit about Apple? We talked about

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>it yesterday, hitting or going beyond the two and a

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>half trillion dollar market cap range. At rallied about three

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>percent yesterday. It's down a little bit, just pulling back

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>about half a percent. And Uh. On the Bloomber Journal,

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you might have noticed a Bloomberg exclusive about Apple adding

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>satellite features to iPhones for emergencies. We talked about that

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>yesterday as well. Getting to that story, Bloomberg News technology

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>reporter Mark German covers Apple for us with us now

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>on the phone in l A. So, Mark, what's up

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>with this? Thanks for having me. I mean, the end

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of August also means that we're getting pretty close to

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the lung to the next iPhones and lawn to the

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>next Apple products. And what I was discussing yesterday is

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a slate of new features for emergencies and crisis and

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>s OS calls that Apple is planning to add to

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone next year. These features would allow you if

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you're in eight plane crash, god forbid, or a boating accident,

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>or a car crash or a wildfire in areas without

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>selling other connectivity, you'd be able to reach out to

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>emergency services over satellite infrastructure. UH. This would also allow

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you to text emergency contexts as well as emergency services

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>over the satellite network through the messages app. And this

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>is a bit less involved. It's not as big of

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a deal, I would say, as some of the dreams

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>people had about the iPhone turning to, you know, a

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>sat phone like you've seen in the classic Michael Douglas movie.

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Uh, this is more about emergencies I was

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>thinking about. And I have to say in the newsroom,

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>we well, like, wait a minute, you're talking about like

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>those big phones used by the military that we always

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>see up on the big screen, or the mobile phones

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>we saw the movie Wall Street. You know, coming back

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to we're not talking about that. We're not talking about that.

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about if you're in a plane crash or

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 1>you fall off a mountain. Basically, there's this device called

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the garment in reach and a lot of times people

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>who do extreme sports or hikers and such, they buy

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>this device because if something God forbid happens to them,

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>this is how they save their lives. You can reach

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.959
<v Speaker 1>emergency services via text or call through this device that

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>connect to Global Star satellite network. This is what Apple

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>wants to integrate into the phone. Obviously, there are a

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>lot there's a lot at stake when you integrate this

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>tech into a phone, meaning Apple can't really turn this

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>into a satphone. They can't afford to basically kill the

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>carriers right now the technology in order to make a

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>true statphone, like you said in the movie Wall Street.

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>In the military, there's a reason the phones are ethic.

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 1>They require special intent as a special infrastructure that is

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>just not feasible to fit into an iPhone. At this

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>point that the battery life necessary. Something with that type

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of functionality is likely five to ten years away, but

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>at this point we're talking about emergencies, and of course

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a very handy feature and it will make

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone more useful to additional sets of people. First

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of all, what you said something, Uh, Apple can't afford

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to kill the carriers at this point. If they could,

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and if they could offer something that wasn't gigantic in

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 1>your hand, um, it sounds like they would, and that

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:33.679
<v Speaker 1>that's where eventually this is all going. Is that fair? Eventually? Right,

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>But that's gonna be well well down the road. Right.

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>What Apple wants to do is they want to own

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the entire stack. They want to own the phone, they

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>want to own the network, and they want to own

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>as much as possible. But there's a lot of stake here.

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Apple can't just go around killing carriers that have helped

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>them build the iPhone. This this long, right, Getting this

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure in place could take decades if you want to

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>hit this globally, right, They can't just knock out one

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>carrier in the US and expect all the other carriers

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>internationally play ball with them, right. It's something that really

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>would require threading the needle. It might never completely happen,

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>It might be an option in some circumstances, But I

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>think this emergency functionality is a very happy medium because

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you're doing something that the wireless carriers don't have coverage for.

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>This is basically mitigating the lost space on the planet

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>without cellular connection. Hey, Mark. So then I am curious

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>for our audience because I actually talked about this a

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>little bit yesterday because there was some satellite companies moving

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on this news, and there was a lot of not

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of, but there were alice weighing in and saying,

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, a Ridium might be the likely you know,

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>satellite company that partners partners up anything like this, as

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>you said, five to ten years approximately away. So if

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>someone is trying to make an investment play on this

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the satellite play, it's probably too early.

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to people who would know, and uh, this

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>report from an analyst at William Blair would said Apple

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>is likely to work with a Ridium is simply not

0:04:56.360 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>true my understanding. If they're not talking to a Ridium

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:03.679
<v Speaker 1>about this, they held brief discussions with them just to gauge,

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, knowledge about the satellite networks maybe a year

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 1>or two or three ago, but since then there hasn't

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>been any talks with them. Global Star put on an

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>sec Finally in February indicated that another company paid them

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I believe around sixty million dollars to develop some infrastructure

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>for some sort of product or service they can't talk about.

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>To me. That screams Apple, but it's hard to know

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>for sure. If anyone's network was able to do this,

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>it would be Global Star. But I will tell you

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 1>that from my understanding, Global Star's network is not great.

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I have words to describe it that I can't say

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>on the radio. Um, it's not really suitable for anything

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>other than emergency text and such. And again this is

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be in very limited areas. You need to

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>call emergency services from the phone. You're gonna get a

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>prompt on the iPhone. It tells you you need to

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>walk around until you find a proper satellite. You're gonna

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>get air messages. Right, this is no perfect technology. Global

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Star has not nailed it. And that takes me to

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>something I wrote a out a couple of years ago

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>where Apple's Ultimate bowls his deploy its own infrastructure. That's

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be five to ten years away, but it's certainly

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>something to working on. I love talking with you. Global

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Star was the one I was thinking about because it

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>was up sixty yesterday. Dropped back another sevent though, uh today,

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>but great to get the clarification thirty seconds left. Uh,

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a story to Apple's new Watch likely to be

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>delayed over production snags. What do we need to know?

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Just quickly? Yeah, so we're hearing the Apple is facing

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>some last minute, eleven hour production issues on the Watch

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>series seven because the new larger screen. It's unclear if

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>this means a delayed release date or supply constraints. I

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>still say that a new Watch will be announced in

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the next six weeks. Alright, good stuff is always Thank

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you so much covered it all that is, of course

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>our Markerman. He's a must read here at Bloomberg. He's

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg News technology reporter, uh, and he covers all

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>things Apple. Check him out at Bloomberg dot com, also

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal, and always on his Twitter feed

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>at Mark German Crick. Check on Apples shares. We know

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 1>hitting two and after tally and market cap just yesterday,

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>stop giving back just about a half a percent, one

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty two thirty five the last trade. You're listening to

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week right here on Bloomberg Radio. This is

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well, a lot of headlines,

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, when it comes to COVID and the vaccine.

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Today we had the European Union coming out reaching a

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>goal of fully vaccinating sevent its adult population. Israel reported

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a record number of daily infections, and some news from

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Maderna about its vaccine being more effective in terms of immunity,

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>potentially against FISER. So a lot to get through, uh,

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and I believe that's pertaining to a booster shop specifically.

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Back with us as Dr Mario Ramirez, he's managing director

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>at the national nonprofit organization Opportunity Lab. They work with healthcare, education, housing,

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it's all about improving outcomes for low income Americans. He

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>also served as the Acting Director for the Office of

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Pandemic and Emergency Threats at h h S during the administration.

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Great void for a great voice, I should say, for us.

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>He joins us on the phone from Washington, d C.

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Dr Ramire is good to have you back. Um. There

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is a debate over booster shots, whether or not we

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>should get it doesn't make sense, how do you see it?

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And why so? I am fully in favor of vaccine

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>boosters for all Americans at this point, Carol Um, And

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I think this may stand in contrast a little bit

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to what the CDC's Advisory Committee issued yesterday. But the

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>reason that I think it's a good idea for us

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to roll boosters out to everyone here in the United

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>States is primarily based on what we're seeing in data

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>coming out of Israel, where they had a significant surge

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>related to DELTA. They coincided with a significant drop in

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the immunity provided by the visor vaccine in that country

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>between the six and eight month mark. In the United

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>States is at a position right now where we can

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of blunt the ongoing surge that we have here

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and prevent a worsening surge similar to what they experienced

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>in Israel. And there's enough evidence, there's enough medical evidence

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>out there that the booster makes sense to have. Well,

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't agree ongoing debate, And unfortunately, one of the things

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that we know during the pandemic right is that the

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>speed of information that we can get from our gold

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:18.439
<v Speaker 1>standard randomized controlled trial, for instance, oftentimes takes too long

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>relative to the speed of an outbreak. And in this instance,

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to depend on what we're seeing

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>from other countries around the world that have served as

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:27.839
<v Speaker 1>good indicators for what we should expect here in the

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>United States. We saw what happened in the UK, We've

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>seen what happened in Israel over the last few weeks,

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think, unfortunately we're unlikely to get that level

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of data here in the United States in time to

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>blunt this worsening surge. I've also never seen in situation

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>like this, of course, we haven't lived for most of

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>us during a health pandemic where it's kind of like,

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>what vaccine did you get? Oh? Well, I got this one.

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And I say that because today we had news that

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>murder Maderna's COVID vaccine generated more than double the antibodies

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of a similar shot made by Fiser and by in Tech. Uh.

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>And this is in those initial two doses, not a booster,

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>which I think I said incorrectly before. So in that

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>initial two doses, how are we as a general public

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>supposed to kind of interpret that. Yeah, you know, I

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>think this is really interesting from the basic science perspective, Carroll, right.

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think what we saw from both BISER

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and majournals at the five to six month mark was

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that these vaccines were between the two of them between

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>nine effective at present preventing significant enough illness to put

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>someone in the hospital, which is really ultimately what matters

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the number of antibodies that are produced

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>with either one of these vaccines. The more important determinant

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>would be how long lasting that immunity is, and that

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>might make or impart some ability to sort of make

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a relative quality judgment between those two. But at this point,

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>we have seen evidence that shows that the efficacy for

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>each of those vaccines is dropping off between the six

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and eight month mark, and so that's really what's more

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.959
<v Speaker 1>important here, rather than the number of antibodies to get produced.

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's a question I've often put to our medical community,

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>what should I be marking on my calendar as a

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>date to get my booster shot? Is it six months?

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Is it eight months? I know we haven't gotten necessarily

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the final guidance on this, but what would you suggest?

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's an area of ongoing guidance. I suspect that

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>when all of a sudden done, we're going to land

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>closer to the six month mark. Um. You know, the

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Biden administrations put out the September twentieth date as their

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>original sort of line in the sand, and that was

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>at the eight month mark, uh, and then we heard

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>from the President that maybe they were thinking about moving

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:32.959
<v Speaker 1>that back to five months. And I think a lot

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.319
<v Speaker 1>of that is based on data that we're seeing from overseas,

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, somewhat uncertain and not being conducted

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to in the United States, which makes interpretation more difficult.

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's a little bit of a moving target. But

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in my own opinion, based on what I've seen from

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>overseas data, I think the six month mark for this

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of third shot or booster is probably where we're

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:52.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna land. All right, Gonna leave it on that note.

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>We really do always appreciate your time. Dr Mario Ramirez,

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Managing director of our Opportunity Labs. As I mentioned to

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>he was uh former acting director at the Office of

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Pandemic and Emergency Threats. That was during the Obama administration.

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stenovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well, not

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>sure if you've noticed with everything going on in our world,

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>but jury's election underway. In the trial of Elizabeth Holmes,

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>remember her, founder of the blood testing startup Theara Nos.

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>She is facing charges that she defrauded investors and patients

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>by making false claims about our company's blood tests, as

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>well as about the Thoro Nos financial position. Tracking all

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of this for us here at Bloomberg Bloomberg News Legal

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Alice June grass So, she's also host of Bloomberg Law

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 1>weeknights at ten pm Wall Street Time on Bloomberg Radio.

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>She's here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio. Good to

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>have you here. So tell us what's the timeline. I mean,

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>this gonna be a long trial. It's going to be

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>three to four months. So as they're sitting these jurors,

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a consideration that they're telling them it's gonna be

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>three to four months. And also they asked them about

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>COVID by the way, one of the questions whether they

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>would sit in a courtroom for that long with COVID

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and what the have been vaccinated among a questionnaire of

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>about twenty eight questions that went into their hobbies, how

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>much they knew about this case, which has been all

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>over and if you know, it's HBO documentaries the movies

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>made about it, So they asked them that and they

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>all there was a question about whether they were venture

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>capitalism capitalists, what their experience with venture capitalists was. So

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:24.079
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be interesting. Well, that's one of the

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>things I want to get to. I mean, the Charles

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:29.679
<v Speaker 1>and Silicon Valley, right, I mean, so in terms of

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>getting a jury that hasn't heard a lot of information

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>about her and the company, Uh, is that going to

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>be difficult? And is that something that maybe weighs in

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>her favor and argument that they can put out there. Well,

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>so far there were about two hundred in the potential

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>pool that filled out that jury questionnaire, and according to

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the lawyers, about half of them knew about the case.

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>But the judge has said that that is not going

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to stop a person for being on the jury because,

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>let's face it, in the George Floyd case, in the

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Marathon bomber case, people know about this. It's something that

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to find someone and you don't want

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>someone who doesn't know anything about a case like this,

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>But what they have to do is make sure that

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>despite what they know, that they can be fair, that

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>they can judge it on what they see and hear

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>in the courtroom and not what they know from you know,

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>from a movie that they saw, from an article that

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>they read. Well, and I do wonder if having some

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>understanding of kind of the VC world and understanding how

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>startups go right, We cover it a lot here and

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>there are often a lot of claims made. There's a

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of money that gets involved, even in the early

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>stages that can go on for years, and then companies

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that just don't pan out here. How might that actually

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>help her well? I think that one of the things,

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and experts agree on this that that the defense would

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>like to have. There are two kinds of jurors. I

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>think one is a juror that is savvy about Silicon

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Valley startups and sort of knows that a lot of

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>this is puffery and what you have to do in

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>order to get investors to come in and against that

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the prosecution, which is going to say,

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>we want to a line between puffery and between actual fraud.

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>We don't want this. This is the biggest fraud in

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley history. We don't want this to happen again.

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>So here's the line. The other jury they're going to

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>want is someone that's going to be sympathetic to her defense.

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>She has over the weekend less Thursday, Let's say the

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>judge released documents that had been undersealed, so he unsealed them,

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and in that it shows that the defense is going

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to try to show that she was physically, psychologically, and

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>emotionally abused by Sonny Bell Wannie, her former lover and

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the president of the company Profound Company. Right, Yes, that

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>he controlled everything from what she ate to what she wore,

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and that she so the process here is that alone

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>is not a defense, But the defense would be dress

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that she didn't know what she was doing. She had

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 1>no choice in what she was doing because he was

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>controlling or sort of like the mastermind and the puppet

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that he was controlling her, and that's so she did

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>what he said. It's it reminds me of the gun

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to the head defense. I had to do it because

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that person had a gun to my head. So she

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>had no choice, and that would take away the intent

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>element which is the key element here. They have to

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>show that she intended to deceive investors about this, investors

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and patience about this. Soon. You've covered a lot of trials,

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of legal situations, and I think about this

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>when in particular, almost everybody in the media I know,

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>we have Bloomberg have done stories on her. I mean,

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>for such a long time she was a get everybody

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to have a conversation with her because she was really, uh,

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of up ending a big part of the testing

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>world in terms of how things are. How will that

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I mean, this goes back. How do

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>people kind of get their head around that. It's it's

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>such a tough sell to me because you have this

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>image of her as being confident and self for sure

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>for real Steve Jobs, she was kind of exactly and

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>also she cultivated that she wore the turtlenecks, she had

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the deep voice that some people say was a little

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>bit put on and so, and also the way she

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>handled interviews and the way she answered questions. It's very

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>hard to reconcile that with a woman who is being,

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, a puppet for someone else. The other thing, though,

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>that she has on Her side, though, is that Balwani

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>is not in the courtroom because he's going to be

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>tried separately because of this defense. He's going to be

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 1>tried separately next year, and they can't call him as

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a witness because that would be against his Fifth Amendment rights.

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>So he emphatically denies this in court papers, but he's

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>not going to be able to come in and say

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that's not true. Does that help Elizabeth? That helps her,

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>But still I think it's overwhelming for the defense to

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 1>to try to show this there there is a there.

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 1>She's been examined by a psychologist for the defense who's

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>going to testify, and also psychologists of the prosecution. So

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you're going to hear a psychological you know, a lot

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of psychological expert testimony, and that will come out both ways.

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>One side will say, oh, yes, she was order that. Well,

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>is she acted to testify? She is? And I find

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>this hard to believe, but she is expected to testify.

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Her lawyers have said that it's more likely than not.

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>They told the judge that she'll testify, and in order

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.679
<v Speaker 1>to establish this defense, it seems like it would make

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>sense that the best would be to have her saying

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>this rather than to have a psychologist saying she told

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>me this. But the problem is then the cross examination.

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's always a gamble to put someone on

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the stand, but here you can imagine some of the

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>questions that you've been raising that the prosecutor is going

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>to raise. Also, she was did a deposition with the

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 1>SEC because she was charged by the SEC and settled

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>those charges, and she six hundred times said I don't know,

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>So now is she going to say I know? And

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>she never told the SEC that she was involved with

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Sonny about wanting and that she was under his control.

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 1>So you understand the legal world, who do you think

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>has the tougher cases at the prosecution of the defense?

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Prosecution has the burden of proof, so they had to

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:59.959
<v Speaker 1>prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. The defense only has

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to get one juror to hang it up. But I

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>still think the defense has the tougher case to make here,

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>just case for case, okay, And is it like if

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>she loses what then what's the impact on her? Well,

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 1>the biggest I mean the longest sentence would be twenty years,

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>but she'll probably the jail time. Yes, absolutely absolutely, She's

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>she's charged with multiple conspiracy counts and fraud counts. So

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>this is very it's very serious, and also the prosecutors

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>want to make I think they want to make an

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>example out of her that you know, for Silicon Valley,

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>because there's been a lot of startups, you know that

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>just they're wild, they're great, and then they just fail miserably.

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Why did they pick on her? A lot of people

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.199
<v Speaker 1>have been asking that question, so they really want to

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>prove their case, and they want to prove that you

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>can't do this. There's a line and you can't cross

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that line. Well, fascinated to watch and I know you'll

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>be covering it big time for us and looking forward

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to all your coverage. June, Thanks so much. June Grosso.

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>She's Bloomberg News legal analyst and you can catch her

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>week night. It's at ten pm Wall Street Time on

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. She is host of Bloomberg Law. Thanks for

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:09.159
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com. And you can also listen to

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News