1 00:00:01,800 --> 00:00:02,480 Speaker 1: Hey, the Hopes. 2 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:06,480 Speaker 2: It is Monday, June twenty third. This is the seventh 3 00:00:06,720 --> 00:00:10,400 Speaker 2: and now we're told the final week of testimony in 4 00:00:10,440 --> 00:00:13,280 Speaker 2: the Didy trial. Welcome to this Didy Update episode of 5 00:00:13,320 --> 00:00:16,400 Speaker 2: Amy and TJ. We've been keeping you updated throughout. It 6 00:00:16,400 --> 00:00:19,079 Speaker 2: doesn't seem like roads. Now we have much longer to go. 7 00:00:19,200 --> 00:00:22,880 Speaker 2: We got a better idea of the timeline of this trial, 8 00:00:23,680 --> 00:00:27,000 Speaker 2: and your honor, the defense calls. 9 00:00:27,240 --> 00:00:30,400 Speaker 3: No, no one right exactly. So that was the breaking 10 00:00:30,440 --> 00:00:34,120 Speaker 3: news this morning. We were all waiting in anticipation for 11 00:00:34,200 --> 00:00:37,400 Speaker 3: who the defense might call to the witness stand and 12 00:00:37,560 --> 00:00:39,360 Speaker 3: how long they might go. We had heard it could 13 00:00:39,479 --> 00:00:41,440 Speaker 3: take one or two days, so we didn't figure there'd 14 00:00:41,440 --> 00:00:44,040 Speaker 3: be many people who would be testifying. 15 00:00:44,080 --> 00:00:46,239 Speaker 4: But it turns out no one is going to be testifying. 16 00:00:46,280 --> 00:00:48,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, the defense is said it will not call any 17 00:00:49,360 --> 00:00:54,000 Speaker 3: witnesses to this stand, and that means one can assume 18 00:00:54,120 --> 00:00:57,640 Speaker 3: or presume that they believe they have made their case. 19 00:00:58,200 --> 00:01:01,520 Speaker 3: They have made their defense of Sean Ditty Combs in 20 00:01:01,560 --> 00:01:04,200 Speaker 3: their cross examinations of the prosecution's witnesses. 21 00:01:05,440 --> 00:01:07,759 Speaker 2: I'm still blown away by what they're saying they're going 22 00:01:07,800 --> 00:01:09,640 Speaker 2: to do. So the witness is on the stand for 23 00:01:09,680 --> 00:01:14,160 Speaker 2: the prosecution. Their final one, this Homeland Security agent. He 24 00:01:14,520 --> 00:01:16,480 Speaker 2: is going to be up there until the end of 25 00:01:16,520 --> 00:01:19,959 Speaker 2: the day, and they expect him to go ropes into tomorrow. 26 00:01:20,720 --> 00:01:25,280 Speaker 2: The defense says they will then be done tomorrow. They're 27 00:01:25,319 --> 00:01:29,640 Speaker 2: not even taking a full day to defend Diddy. That 28 00:01:30,240 --> 00:01:31,080 Speaker 2: blows my mind. 29 00:01:31,160 --> 00:01:33,000 Speaker 4: It's bold, It's really bold. 30 00:01:33,040 --> 00:01:36,160 Speaker 3: It's super confident, and I can see how perhaps that 31 00:01:36,200 --> 00:01:39,080 Speaker 3: would send a message to the jury because everyone expects 32 00:01:39,080 --> 00:01:42,960 Speaker 3: someone at least to have one witness or a few 33 00:01:43,040 --> 00:01:46,120 Speaker 3: witnesses to testify in your defense. The fact that they're 34 00:01:46,160 --> 00:01:49,280 Speaker 3: not calling anyone actually could be a brilliant move in 35 00:01:49,360 --> 00:01:52,720 Speaker 3: terms of what the jury was expecting, because they're thinking, well, hell, 36 00:01:52,800 --> 00:01:54,880 Speaker 3: if they don't need to call anyone, they must have 37 00:01:54,920 --> 00:01:56,520 Speaker 3: proven their case. I mean, I can see how that 38 00:01:56,560 --> 00:01:59,720 Speaker 3: would create a certain mindset in a jury because it 39 00:01:59,800 --> 00:02:02,960 Speaker 3: is not I mean, it happens, It's not unprecedented by 40 00:02:02,960 --> 00:02:05,760 Speaker 3: any means. I mean, this is something that happens quite often, 41 00:02:05,840 --> 00:02:10,040 Speaker 3: but in a case this big, with the stakes so high, 42 00:02:10,160 --> 00:02:14,720 Speaker 3: I mean, we all remember, Diddy is facing life in prison. 43 00:02:14,919 --> 00:02:17,520 Speaker 3: This is not a couple of years, This isn't just 44 00:02:17,560 --> 00:02:21,600 Speaker 3: a few offenses. This is serious, significant stuff where his 45 00:02:21,639 --> 00:02:24,680 Speaker 3: life is on the line, So to not call any 46 00:02:24,720 --> 00:02:28,960 Speaker 3: witnesses is bold, and I you know, it could be brilliant. 47 00:02:29,040 --> 00:02:31,639 Speaker 3: We'll only know after the jury renders it's verdict. 48 00:02:31,400 --> 00:02:36,680 Speaker 2: Bold, brilliant, it could be the exact right move. Look, 49 00:02:36,720 --> 00:02:39,560 Speaker 2: we are we've watched a bunch of trials, but we 50 00:02:40,919 --> 00:02:43,080 Speaker 2: are not legal experts at all. These folks know what 51 00:02:43,080 --> 00:02:46,000 Speaker 2: they're doing, is what I generally find. And if somebody 52 00:02:46,080 --> 00:02:48,880 Speaker 2: like Diddy, who has his resources, he is he has 53 00:02:48,960 --> 00:02:50,440 Speaker 2: the best lawyers with. 54 00:02:50,440 --> 00:02:52,920 Speaker 4: Names like Garrigos and Shapiro his. 55 00:02:53,480 --> 00:02:55,600 Speaker 2: I mean history makers in this country in a law 56 00:02:55,639 --> 00:02:58,600 Speaker 2: of legal and celebrity cases. They know what they're doing, 57 00:02:58,639 --> 00:03:01,680 Speaker 2: so they're making the right the best and you better 58 00:03:02,320 --> 00:03:05,760 Speaker 2: sure believe did he signs off on this defense? And 59 00:03:05,800 --> 00:03:07,400 Speaker 2: how this is going? But they said they're going to 60 00:03:07,440 --> 00:03:11,920 Speaker 2: present a defense of just a few items of evidence 61 00:03:12,000 --> 00:03:15,600 Speaker 2: and exhibits. I don't know how earth shattering those could be, 62 00:03:15,680 --> 00:03:18,600 Speaker 2: but that's their defense. Here you go, here's our homework, 63 00:03:18,639 --> 00:03:19,080 Speaker 2: and that's it. 64 00:03:19,320 --> 00:03:19,519 Speaker 4: Yeah. 65 00:03:19,520 --> 00:03:23,079 Speaker 3: I mean they did spend days cross examining the star witnesses, 66 00:03:23,120 --> 00:03:26,440 Speaker 3: Cassie Ventura and Jane, so certainly they did. You could 67 00:03:26,440 --> 00:03:30,160 Speaker 3: say spend. They spent days presenting their case through the 68 00:03:30,200 --> 00:03:33,480 Speaker 3: cross examination of the prosecution's witness, and it may be 69 00:03:33,600 --> 00:03:36,280 Speaker 3: that they don't even have a witness to call to 70 00:03:36,320 --> 00:03:38,480 Speaker 3: refute any of the claims. And the people who know 71 00:03:38,600 --> 00:03:40,920 Speaker 3: the people who were there to testify were the people 72 00:03:40,920 --> 00:03:43,440 Speaker 3: that the prosecution already called. So who else would they 73 00:03:43,440 --> 00:03:46,280 Speaker 3: bring on the stand? I mean, people had wondered if 74 00:03:46,440 --> 00:03:49,400 Speaker 3: KK would be coming up, if one of his bodyguards 75 00:03:49,440 --> 00:03:52,440 Speaker 3: would be coming up. But many of them might feel like, 76 00:03:52,880 --> 00:03:54,760 Speaker 3: who knows the reasoning behind it? But they made the 77 00:03:54,840 --> 00:03:57,920 Speaker 3: choice not to bring anyone up to refute anything. 78 00:03:58,040 --> 00:03:59,680 Speaker 4: They feel like they did their job. 79 00:03:59,640 --> 00:04:04,880 Speaker 3: In showing and frankly, they did discredit quite a bit 80 00:04:04,960 --> 00:04:07,840 Speaker 3: of what Jane had to say or even Cassie. When 81 00:04:07,880 --> 00:04:10,120 Speaker 3: you at least it brings a question in the juror's 82 00:04:10,120 --> 00:04:12,560 Speaker 3: mind when you hear them say I didn't want to 83 00:04:12,560 --> 00:04:13,960 Speaker 3: do it, I was coerced to do it. 84 00:04:14,120 --> 00:04:15,920 Speaker 4: I had a financial reason. 85 00:04:15,680 --> 00:04:18,159 Speaker 3: Why I had to do it, And then you have 86 00:04:18,279 --> 00:04:20,880 Speaker 3: text from them saying I can't wait to be with you, 87 00:04:20,960 --> 00:04:22,880 Speaker 3: I can't wait to do some freaky stuff with you. 88 00:04:23,800 --> 00:04:27,960 Speaker 4: It's hard, and that certainly casts doubt in terms of 89 00:04:27,960 --> 00:04:30,240 Speaker 4: what the state are sorry. I always say the state. 90 00:04:30,279 --> 00:04:32,840 Speaker 4: In terms of what the Feds are trying to prove. 91 00:04:33,000 --> 00:04:33,800 Speaker 1: Do moments matter? 92 00:04:34,400 --> 00:04:38,760 Speaker 2: Do moments stand out for a jury that could possibly 93 00:04:38,800 --> 00:04:40,680 Speaker 2: sway them one way or another? And I say moments. 94 00:04:40,680 --> 00:04:42,880 Speaker 2: It seems like the defense had more than the prosecution. 95 00:04:43,400 --> 00:04:48,080 Speaker 2: The Perry Mason moment we will never forget. It seemed 96 00:04:48,120 --> 00:04:52,000 Speaker 2: like they made more headway sometimes. 97 00:04:51,480 --> 00:04:53,760 Speaker 1: Than the prosecution seems to have. Does that matter? 98 00:04:53,800 --> 00:04:56,440 Speaker 2: You think if the margins are that slim, you're just 99 00:04:56,480 --> 00:04:59,960 Speaker 2: talking about the psychology, it might get into their brains. 100 00:05:00,279 --> 00:05:02,560 Speaker 2: They didn't present any witnesses, So in that same vein, 101 00:05:02,680 --> 00:05:06,600 Speaker 2: is it possible that moments matter throughout the trials. 102 00:05:06,279 --> 00:05:06,760 Speaker 1: Of the jury? 103 00:05:06,960 --> 00:05:08,480 Speaker 4: Moments absolutely matter. 104 00:05:08,520 --> 00:05:11,360 Speaker 3: The Perry Mason moment was pivotal, and there were several 105 00:05:12,360 --> 00:05:18,960 Speaker 3: slightly less perhaps like explosive moments in that, but there 106 00:05:18,960 --> 00:05:21,719 Speaker 3: were plenty of them. When they had witnesses go back 107 00:05:21,720 --> 00:05:25,600 Speaker 3: and read texts that were omitted, and the texts actually 108 00:05:26,520 --> 00:05:31,479 Speaker 3: showed a very different vein of motivation for why these 109 00:05:31,480 --> 00:05:35,960 Speaker 3: women might have participated. It was incredibly damning, I believed, 110 00:05:35,960 --> 00:05:39,080 Speaker 3: to the prosecution's case. When the defense had some of 111 00:05:39,120 --> 00:05:43,239 Speaker 3: these other texts read that frankly flew in the face 112 00:05:43,360 --> 00:05:46,080 Speaker 3: of what we heard in testimony from these women. 113 00:05:46,160 --> 00:05:48,360 Speaker 4: So it's this. 114 00:05:48,279 --> 00:05:52,080 Speaker 3: Is you know what, and just the psychology of life. 115 00:05:52,240 --> 00:05:55,400 Speaker 4: Isn't confidence so powerful? 116 00:05:55,600 --> 00:05:58,840 Speaker 3: And by not calling any witnesses that is so confident, 117 00:06:00,400 --> 00:06:01,200 Speaker 3: so confident? 118 00:06:01,480 --> 00:06:03,240 Speaker 2: How did I forget you? I'm sitting here and I'm like, 119 00:06:03,279 --> 00:06:05,400 Speaker 2: oh my goodness, I forgot I had this. I've reached 120 00:06:05,400 --> 00:06:07,920 Speaker 2: out to a prosecutor. 121 00:06:07,360 --> 00:06:07,960 Speaker 1: Friend of ours. 122 00:06:08,040 --> 00:06:10,679 Speaker 2: Okay, That's all I say, just because that was my question. 123 00:06:10,760 --> 00:06:13,320 Speaker 2: Why on guides Earth that please help me understand why 124 00:06:13,360 --> 00:06:17,120 Speaker 2: the defense in the Ditty trial would not call any witnesses. 125 00:06:17,560 --> 00:06:21,880 Speaker 2: The response and I quote because they think they have 126 00:06:22,000 --> 00:06:25,799 Speaker 2: one already and they may have wow. 127 00:06:27,640 --> 00:06:28,000 Speaker 4: Wow. 128 00:06:28,920 --> 00:06:33,240 Speaker 3: You know, the prosecution has called thirty four witnesses to 129 00:06:33,320 --> 00:06:36,760 Speaker 3: the stand and the final one is on the stand today. 130 00:06:37,160 --> 00:06:41,719 Speaker 3: Trying to connect the dots summarizing these freak offs, going 131 00:06:41,800 --> 00:06:47,880 Speaker 3: through explicit videos, going through the paid receipts that Diddy 132 00:06:48,080 --> 00:06:51,279 Speaker 3: has had purchased plane tickets for some of these women 133 00:06:51,279 --> 00:06:54,560 Speaker 3: and some of these male escorts to attend these parties. 134 00:06:55,040 --> 00:06:56,360 Speaker 4: My question is, okay, so. 135 00:06:56,360 --> 00:07:01,880 Speaker 3: He paid for these folks to participate in these freak 136 00:07:01,920 --> 00:07:05,360 Speaker 3: offs around the country, so crossing state lines. But if 137 00:07:05,440 --> 00:07:09,640 Speaker 3: they went there willingly, if they weren't coerced, if you 138 00:07:09,640 --> 00:07:14,200 Speaker 3: can even call into question that they may have wanted 139 00:07:14,240 --> 00:07:16,520 Speaker 3: to do it at the time and regretted it later, 140 00:07:17,560 --> 00:07:22,200 Speaker 3: any seat of doubt about any of that throws the 141 00:07:22,280 --> 00:07:26,240 Speaker 3: prosecution's argument out the window, because they need the jury 142 00:07:26,280 --> 00:07:30,280 Speaker 3: to believe that these women and maybe even these escorts 143 00:07:31,040 --> 00:07:33,800 Speaker 3: didn't really want to be there and felt they had to. 144 00:07:35,240 --> 00:07:36,960 Speaker 1: What is the charge again, I have to look at 145 00:07:37,000 --> 00:07:39,040 Speaker 1: these house in here. 146 00:07:39,080 --> 00:07:39,480 Speaker 4: I've got it. 147 00:07:40,040 --> 00:07:43,440 Speaker 3: Yeah, he's pleaded not guilty to racketeering conspiracy. 148 00:07:42,880 --> 00:07:44,520 Speaker 1: That's the big one. He could get life for that one. 149 00:07:44,560 --> 00:07:49,480 Speaker 3: Correct, two counts of sex trafficking by force, sex trap 150 00:07:49,600 --> 00:07:52,560 Speaker 3: that's what it is, by force. And the interesting thing 151 00:07:52,600 --> 00:07:56,080 Speaker 3: about that is the in fact what they were going 152 00:07:56,160 --> 00:08:02,360 Speaker 3: over today and on Friday with this home security agent. 153 00:08:03,400 --> 00:08:10,520 Speaker 3: He was actually going through the text messages of Cassie 154 00:08:10,760 --> 00:08:16,120 Speaker 3: and Jane where they at first told KK, his chief 155 00:08:16,160 --> 00:08:17,360 Speaker 3: of staff, I don't want to go. 156 00:08:17,480 --> 00:08:18,320 Speaker 4: He's just using me. 157 00:08:19,560 --> 00:08:22,160 Speaker 3: I don't want to be there, But then after talking 158 00:08:22,360 --> 00:08:24,600 Speaker 3: to Diddy, they decided to come. 159 00:08:24,680 --> 00:08:26,480 Speaker 4: They made the choice to come. 160 00:08:26,560 --> 00:08:29,720 Speaker 3: So I'm just confused how that would be force, two 161 00:08:29,760 --> 00:08:33,679 Speaker 3: counts of sex trafficking by force, then fraud or oh 162 00:08:33,720 --> 00:08:37,920 Speaker 3: sorry I skipped it, two counts of sex trafficking by force, 163 00:08:38,240 --> 00:08:40,520 Speaker 3: fraud or coercion. 164 00:08:40,679 --> 00:08:43,120 Speaker 1: Now one of those do carry a fifteen year. 165 00:08:43,000 --> 00:08:47,679 Speaker 3: Minimum, Okay, so force, fraud or coercion. And then he's 166 00:08:47,679 --> 00:08:52,960 Speaker 3: also facing two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. 167 00:08:52,480 --> 00:08:55,520 Speaker 2: And those are only those are a maximum of ten years, 168 00:08:55,559 --> 00:08:57,599 Speaker 2: So I guess that would be the lesser charge it 169 00:08:57,640 --> 00:08:59,320 Speaker 2: he gets convicted of that, But how is he not 170 00:09:00,160 --> 00:09:03,800 Speaker 2: for prostitution? To engage in prostitution? So they have evidence 171 00:09:04,080 --> 00:09:07,679 Speaker 2: that he paid to have a male escort come to. 172 00:09:07,720 --> 00:09:09,160 Speaker 1: New York for a freak off? 173 00:09:09,400 --> 00:09:12,080 Speaker 3: Is that that seems like that's a done deal to me? 174 00:09:12,240 --> 00:09:15,280 Speaker 3: The two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, just 175 00:09:15,320 --> 00:09:18,800 Speaker 3: from my non legal mind and what I've witnessed and 176 00:09:18,840 --> 00:09:21,840 Speaker 3: what I've read, it seems like they kind of nailed 177 00:09:21,880 --> 00:09:24,720 Speaker 3: that one. They have the receipts, they have the proof, 178 00:09:25,280 --> 00:09:30,760 Speaker 3: they have the videos, and clearly the male escorcords who 179 00:09:30,760 --> 00:09:33,960 Speaker 3: were engaged in sex that you could clearly see on 180 00:09:33,960 --> 00:09:38,440 Speaker 3: the videotape were clearly paid. So and many times yes, 181 00:09:38,520 --> 00:09:40,320 Speaker 3: they crossed state lines. 182 00:09:40,440 --> 00:09:54,320 Speaker 2: So what was the name of the one the escort website. 183 00:09:54,920 --> 00:10:00,400 Speaker 4: Wait, oh, it was Cowboys for Angels Aloys eight or Angels. 184 00:10:00,080 --> 00:10:03,240 Speaker 3: For Cowboys, Cowboys for Angel Voice Rangel. 185 00:10:03,280 --> 00:10:06,560 Speaker 2: So that company came out in testimony today the same 186 00:10:06,760 --> 00:10:09,520 Speaker 2: day that he was such a long term customer that 187 00:10:09,600 --> 00:10:12,480 Speaker 2: he wanted a discount, that he was upset with him 188 00:10:12,520 --> 00:10:15,920 Speaker 2: for raising their rates, and they have the communication between 189 00:10:16,040 --> 00:10:20,560 Speaker 2: him and the Cowboys for Angels agency. His line is 190 00:10:20,880 --> 00:10:24,600 Speaker 2: stop raising my rate. I am a long timer. They 191 00:10:24,679 --> 00:10:29,160 Speaker 2: have that from him two Cowboys for Angel Cowboys for Angels. 192 00:10:29,160 --> 00:10:31,440 Speaker 3: Technically, I imagine to be a legal business would have 193 00:10:31,480 --> 00:10:33,600 Speaker 3: to just say, hey, these are just escorts. 194 00:10:33,600 --> 00:10:35,080 Speaker 4: These are just people. 195 00:10:34,880 --> 00:10:38,720 Speaker 3: Who were there for your pleasure, not for sexual pleasure, 196 00:10:38,800 --> 00:10:40,680 Speaker 3: but just to be there and to accompany you and 197 00:10:40,720 --> 00:10:42,760 Speaker 3: wherever you want to go and whatever you want to do. 198 00:10:43,200 --> 00:10:46,679 Speaker 3: But clearly they're not acknowledging that this is for sex. 199 00:10:46,720 --> 00:10:49,040 Speaker 3: But clearly we have the videos that show that is 200 00:10:49,080 --> 00:10:49,960 Speaker 3: in fact what happens. 201 00:10:50,040 --> 00:10:53,160 Speaker 2: Okay, speaking of the legal part of that, So what 202 00:10:53,280 --> 00:10:57,800 Speaker 2: if all he was doing was hiring an escort to 203 00:10:57,920 --> 00:11:01,800 Speaker 2: come to New York and be and escort to escort 204 00:11:01,880 --> 00:11:04,920 Speaker 2: him or someone else around and lo and behold, sex 205 00:11:05,040 --> 00:11:05,880 Speaker 2: ended up happening. 206 00:11:06,160 --> 00:11:07,600 Speaker 1: Is that a legal argument? 207 00:11:07,960 --> 00:11:08,640 Speaker 4: I think it could be. 208 00:11:08,840 --> 00:11:12,000 Speaker 3: Geez, now that you just said that, I thought maybe 209 00:11:12,000 --> 00:11:14,640 Speaker 3: that is possible, because they could say the escort decided, 210 00:11:15,400 --> 00:11:17,240 Speaker 3: after hanging out for a while that just, you know, 211 00:11:17,840 --> 00:11:21,320 Speaker 3: because he liked everybody, he just wow, maybe he was horny, 212 00:11:21,400 --> 00:11:25,120 Speaker 3: Maybe he just wanted to have sex, but the payment 213 00:11:25,960 --> 00:11:29,360 Speaker 3: was specifically for companionship, not for sex. 214 00:11:31,480 --> 00:11:31,720 Speaker 1: You know what. 215 00:11:31,840 --> 00:11:34,040 Speaker 3: Possibly that just was a light bulb that went off 216 00:11:34,040 --> 00:11:37,160 Speaker 3: in your head. And then yes, I concur that does 217 00:11:37,240 --> 00:11:40,480 Speaker 3: sound reasonable in terms of a legal explanation to get 218 00:11:40,520 --> 00:11:42,000 Speaker 3: around the actual charge. 219 00:11:42,240 --> 00:11:45,360 Speaker 4: I think, look, we're not gonna get a witness now for. 220 00:11:45,320 --> 00:11:48,000 Speaker 3: The defense, but we will hear from the defense attorneys, 221 00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:50,480 Speaker 3: and we will hear. We now know closing arguments are 222 00:11:50,559 --> 00:11:54,680 Speaker 3: scheduled for Thursday. Correct, And so this case, this seven 223 00:11:54,760 --> 00:11:58,680 Speaker 3: week long case, with thirty four witnesses and lots of 224 00:11:58,720 --> 00:12:03,680 Speaker 3: graphic videos and a tremendous amount of jaw dropping testimony, 225 00:12:04,040 --> 00:12:05,840 Speaker 3: is all going to be in the hands of the 226 00:12:05,920 --> 00:12:10,720 Speaker 3: jury as early as Thursday afternoon, perhaps. 227 00:12:10,320 --> 00:12:14,160 Speaker 2: Even again, they have a conference on Wednesday. The judge says, 228 00:12:14,200 --> 00:12:16,480 Speaker 2: for the attorneys and the judge to go over the 229 00:12:16,559 --> 00:12:20,600 Speaker 2: jury instructions. I have been a part in seeing jury instructions. 230 00:12:20,080 --> 00:12:20,920 Speaker 1: That go half a day. 231 00:12:21,000 --> 00:12:21,640 Speaker 4: Yeah, that's true. 232 00:12:21,720 --> 00:12:23,920 Speaker 2: It does, it goes, it takes a while, so. 233 00:12:24,080 --> 00:12:27,920 Speaker 3: And in this case, probably definitely going to take a 234 00:12:28,080 --> 00:12:30,720 Speaker 3: very long time. I have you know, we have as 235 00:12:30,800 --> 00:12:35,040 Speaker 3: much as we can sitting in our apartment monitoring everything. 236 00:12:35,600 --> 00:12:40,600 Speaker 3: Still I would need to be redirected and shown what 237 00:12:40,800 --> 00:12:43,480 Speaker 3: is what and what means this and what's the level 238 00:12:43,520 --> 00:12:43,880 Speaker 3: of proof. 239 00:12:43,920 --> 00:12:45,959 Speaker 4: I mean, I it's mind blowing. You're right. 240 00:12:46,000 --> 00:12:48,800 Speaker 3: The judge could have instructions for half a day, and 241 00:12:49,760 --> 00:12:52,880 Speaker 3: I don't know the defense and the prosecution, who knows 242 00:12:52,880 --> 00:12:53,559 Speaker 3: how long they'll take. 243 00:12:54,840 --> 00:12:59,559 Speaker 2: Yeah, they read though, Yeah, they make sure they read 244 00:12:59,800 --> 00:13:04,520 Speaker 2: every single line of the instructions. It's almost a manual 245 00:13:04,600 --> 00:13:07,240 Speaker 2: you get when you buy a new appliance and he's 246 00:13:07,360 --> 00:13:09,880 Speaker 2: reading through and you're trying to follow what all this 247 00:13:09,880 --> 00:13:13,080 Speaker 2: stuff means. Now, I have never robes And tell me 248 00:13:13,120 --> 00:13:16,280 Speaker 2: if you have been a part of jury instructions. 249 00:13:15,720 --> 00:13:16,320 Speaker 1: That were quick. 250 00:13:16,600 --> 00:13:17,360 Speaker 4: No, I have not. 251 00:13:17,640 --> 00:13:19,320 Speaker 1: No, it's never a quick process. 252 00:13:19,520 --> 00:13:19,880 Speaker 4: The jury. 253 00:13:20,120 --> 00:13:22,400 Speaker 3: The truth is well, most of the trials, I would 254 00:13:22,400 --> 00:13:24,360 Speaker 3: imagine all of the trials. I know that I have 255 00:13:24,559 --> 00:13:30,000 Speaker 3: actually personal personally witnessed have been for murder. So people's 256 00:13:30,000 --> 00:13:31,760 Speaker 3: lives are on the line, and they want to make 257 00:13:31,800 --> 00:13:34,520 Speaker 3: sure that all the t'ser crossed, all the eyes are dotted. 258 00:13:34,840 --> 00:13:38,000 Speaker 3: They want to make sure the jury knows exactly what 259 00:13:38,040 --> 00:13:39,840 Speaker 3: they have to do and what. 260 00:13:39,720 --> 00:13:40,760 Speaker 4: The burden of proof is. 261 00:13:40,840 --> 00:13:44,960 Speaker 3: That that is the gray area, what is reasonable doubt. 262 00:13:45,000 --> 00:13:47,240 Speaker 2: And there's gonna be some fighting in between the attorneys 263 00:13:47,480 --> 00:13:51,400 Speaker 2: about the language that goes. They always are so so 264 00:13:51,559 --> 00:13:54,480 Speaker 2: particular about what types of language, type of language can 265 00:13:54,520 --> 00:13:58,040 Speaker 2: go into those things. Because after that that the defense 266 00:13:58,120 --> 00:13:59,960 Speaker 2: all the attorneys have no more say. 267 00:14:00,080 --> 00:14:01,840 Speaker 1: Nobody can do anything. It's over. 268 00:14:02,120 --> 00:14:03,959 Speaker 2: You can't make any other case once they go into 269 00:14:04,000 --> 00:14:06,080 Speaker 2: that jury room. So this is their last chance to 270 00:14:06,120 --> 00:14:07,160 Speaker 2: have some kind of. 271 00:14:07,120 --> 00:14:08,679 Speaker 1: An influence on the jury. 272 00:14:08,880 --> 00:14:11,320 Speaker 2: The closing arguments, is it who goes first? 273 00:14:11,360 --> 00:14:14,000 Speaker 1: I can't remember? Is it prosecution again? 274 00:14:14,080 --> 00:14:17,160 Speaker 4: I think? See, I think I thought the defense had 275 00:14:17,200 --> 00:14:19,720 Speaker 4: the last word. I need to look this option? 276 00:14:19,840 --> 00:14:20,000 Speaker 3: Did? 277 00:14:20,040 --> 00:14:20,480 Speaker 1: I cannot? 278 00:14:20,640 --> 00:14:20,960 Speaker 3: You know what? 279 00:14:21,040 --> 00:14:21,880 Speaker 1: This is embarrassing? 280 00:14:21,880 --> 00:14:22,960 Speaker 4: One of us is correct. 281 00:14:23,760 --> 00:14:26,760 Speaker 2: We should know why because I used to remember thinking 282 00:14:26,760 --> 00:14:30,360 Speaker 2: that it wasn't fair that whoever went last got to 283 00:14:30,360 --> 00:14:30,800 Speaker 2: go last. 284 00:14:30,800 --> 00:14:33,320 Speaker 4: Of course, that's like everyone would want to go last 285 00:14:33,360 --> 00:14:35,640 Speaker 4: in this sason. 286 00:14:35,720 --> 00:14:38,080 Speaker 1: I thought the prosecution got to go last. 287 00:14:38,200 --> 00:14:39,800 Speaker 4: That's she's I'm looking this up right now. 288 00:14:39,880 --> 00:14:42,040 Speaker 3: But in terms of the jury, we ended up only 289 00:14:42,080 --> 00:14:44,080 Speaker 3: losing one juror through we thought at one point we 290 00:14:44,160 --> 00:14:47,080 Speaker 3: might lose three jurors, but we only ended up losing 291 00:14:47,680 --> 00:14:48,200 Speaker 3: one juror. 292 00:14:48,680 --> 00:14:50,000 Speaker 4: And the alternates are still there. 293 00:14:50,080 --> 00:14:52,280 Speaker 3: But that's kind of moot, now, right do they get 294 00:14:52,280 --> 00:14:55,920 Speaker 3: to participate in the actual jury deliberations or be a 295 00:14:55,960 --> 00:14:57,320 Speaker 3: part of it if something were to happen? 296 00:14:57,600 --> 00:14:59,280 Speaker 1: You know what, I actually don't know that. Why are 297 00:14:59,280 --> 00:15:02,080 Speaker 1: you over there Google and stuff? Look that up? 298 00:15:02,120 --> 00:15:08,200 Speaker 2: To do alternates need to be in the deliberating room? 299 00:15:08,320 --> 00:15:11,160 Speaker 2: So I guess it's possible they could start deliberating and 300 00:15:11,240 --> 00:15:12,520 Speaker 2: something happens with a juror. 301 00:15:12,960 --> 00:15:14,360 Speaker 1: Isn't that possible? Did you get the answer? 302 00:15:14,480 --> 00:15:17,720 Speaker 3: I got the answer for the court cases, and you're 303 00:15:17,760 --> 00:15:20,200 Speaker 3: always right? Why do I even try to pretend like 304 00:15:20,280 --> 00:15:24,280 Speaker 3: I might have something that is correct over you? All? 305 00:15:24,320 --> 00:15:24,480 Speaker 4: Right? 306 00:15:24,960 --> 00:15:28,080 Speaker 3: In court cases, the party with the burden of proof 307 00:15:28,600 --> 00:15:32,080 Speaker 3: generally gets the last word. This is usually the prosecution 308 00:15:32,280 --> 00:15:36,280 Speaker 3: in criminal cases and the plaintiff in civil cases. They 309 00:15:36,280 --> 00:15:40,040 Speaker 3: get the opportunity for a closing argument or rebuttal after 310 00:15:40,080 --> 00:15:42,480 Speaker 3: the opposing side has presented its case. 311 00:15:42,640 --> 00:15:46,680 Speaker 1: And I always thought that was unfair. My life was 312 00:15:46,720 --> 00:15:49,200 Speaker 1: on the line. I should get the last word always, 313 00:15:49,400 --> 00:15:52,440 Speaker 1: That's why I remember it. I thought that was wild. 314 00:15:52,520 --> 00:15:54,560 Speaker 1: But yeah, so the prosecution will get the last word 315 00:15:54,600 --> 00:15:56,880 Speaker 1: before they all get to go in. I am reading 316 00:15:56,880 --> 00:15:58,480 Speaker 1: something here. I know you. Did you find it already? 317 00:15:58,680 --> 00:16:01,760 Speaker 3: Yes? Okay, Well about alternature Yes, so there were six 318 00:16:01,840 --> 00:16:04,200 Speaker 3: alternate jurors. I think we're down to five alternate jurors 319 00:16:04,200 --> 00:16:06,880 Speaker 3: because one of the alternate jurors became actually a member 320 00:16:06,920 --> 00:16:11,720 Speaker 3: of the jury, so no. Alternate jurors Generally do not 321 00:16:11,880 --> 00:16:15,840 Speaker 3: participate in jury deliberations unless a regular juror is unable 322 00:16:15,880 --> 00:16:18,760 Speaker 3: to continue serving. If an alternate juror replaces a regular 323 00:16:18,840 --> 00:16:21,920 Speaker 3: juror during deliberations, the court will then instruct the jury 324 00:16:21,920 --> 00:16:26,600 Speaker 3: to begin deliberations unnew So if anything happens during the 325 00:16:26,760 --> 00:16:30,520 Speaker 3: actual deliberation and some juror has to leave, they can 326 00:16:30,560 --> 00:16:32,920 Speaker 3: actually appoint an alternate to come step in, but then 327 00:16:32,920 --> 00:16:36,160 Speaker 3: they have to start all over again. So let's hope 328 00:16:36,200 --> 00:16:38,120 Speaker 3: that doesn't happen. But I'm so happy we were able 329 00:16:38,160 --> 00:16:41,560 Speaker 3: to answer our own questions in this podcast. I'm so 330 00:16:41,680 --> 00:16:43,680 Speaker 3: sure everybody was on the edge of their seats waiting 331 00:16:43,720 --> 00:16:46,320 Speaker 3: for the answer, or they're like, I already know that, dummy. 332 00:16:46,320 --> 00:16:48,880 Speaker 2: Everybody was waiting on the edge of the seat. You 333 00:16:48,920 --> 00:16:52,600 Speaker 2: know that is I only bring it up and it 334 00:16:52,640 --> 00:16:54,360 Speaker 2: shouldn't be a big deal. But the jury has been 335 00:16:54,360 --> 00:16:57,440 Speaker 2: a little weird. Been some wonky stuff going on with 336 00:16:57,480 --> 00:16:59,960 Speaker 2: this jury at times, and some questions. One got kicked off, 337 00:17:00,200 --> 00:17:01,880 Speaker 2: one was about to get kicked off, and of them 338 00:17:01,880 --> 00:17:04,520 Speaker 2: got sick. It's just some stuff. One of them was 339 00:17:04,600 --> 00:17:06,240 Speaker 2: nodding it, and a. 340 00:17:06,200 --> 00:17:08,919 Speaker 4: Black jur was replaced by a white jur. So you know, 341 00:17:08,960 --> 00:17:12,960 Speaker 4: there are all from Westchester, from the Bronx to. 342 00:17:12,880 --> 00:17:15,840 Speaker 2: Westchester, and so it's so that's why I just hold 343 00:17:15,840 --> 00:17:18,119 Speaker 2: my brether when it comes to this particular jury. But 344 00:17:18,160 --> 00:17:21,000 Speaker 2: I just can't believe this is it when I heard 345 00:17:21,000 --> 00:17:24,359 Speaker 2: they were only going to when they said there the 346 00:17:24,359 --> 00:17:27,280 Speaker 2: prose consecution is going to rest on Tuesday. 347 00:17:27,760 --> 00:17:29,360 Speaker 1: The defense is going to rest on Tuesday. 348 00:17:29,680 --> 00:17:33,880 Speaker 4: That's wild again, bold and possibly brilliant. 349 00:17:34,119 --> 00:17:36,680 Speaker 2: The best in the business are defending him, so they 350 00:17:36,720 --> 00:17:38,119 Speaker 2: know what they're doing. He's not going to get a 351 00:17:38,119 --> 00:17:41,360 Speaker 2: better defense than this, or a better strategy. I turn 352 00:17:41,440 --> 00:17:44,119 Speaker 2: on a TV somewhere today and you'll have somebody criticizing this, 353 00:17:44,200 --> 00:17:46,359 Speaker 2: says ah, some legal expert. 354 00:17:46,040 --> 00:17:48,600 Speaker 1: Doing this, and that some legal analysts, da da da da. 355 00:17:48,680 --> 00:17:52,960 Speaker 2: And you know what, when he is found not guilty 356 00:17:53,000 --> 00:17:56,159 Speaker 2: on something, they'll come back on and what will be 357 00:17:56,200 --> 00:17:57,200 Speaker 2: their excuse then. 358 00:17:57,240 --> 00:17:59,400 Speaker 3: Well, you know, perhaps they knew more than we did, 359 00:18:00,080 --> 00:18:02,240 Speaker 3: or they believed something that we didn't realize. 360 00:18:02,440 --> 00:18:04,919 Speaker 4: Who knows, but it will be fascinating. 361 00:18:05,240 --> 00:18:07,400 Speaker 3: And you know, in a weird way, it's we've been 362 00:18:07,480 --> 00:18:11,760 Speaker 3: so glued to every word, every bit of testimony to 363 00:18:11,800 --> 00:18:13,440 Speaker 3: think that it's all coming to an end kind of 364 00:18:13,480 --> 00:18:16,199 Speaker 3: feels strange and like, Okay, here it is. And I 365 00:18:16,280 --> 00:18:18,800 Speaker 3: wonder what Diddy is feeling right now, if he feels confident, 366 00:18:18,840 --> 00:18:21,080 Speaker 3: if he's you know, all of the folks or all 367 00:18:21,080 --> 00:18:23,720 Speaker 3: of the reporters in the courtroom have reported on him 368 00:18:23,760 --> 00:18:29,679 Speaker 3: being actively involved, leaning forward, watching the monitor, reading like 369 00:18:29,720 --> 00:18:32,439 Speaker 3: they get a testimony they have the words of. 370 00:18:32,520 --> 00:18:35,520 Speaker 4: So he doesn't miss anything. I mean, he has been very, very, 371 00:18:35,680 --> 00:18:37,199 Speaker 4: very a huge part of this. 372 00:18:37,280 --> 00:18:39,440 Speaker 3: And to your point, he obviously had to sign off 373 00:18:39,480 --> 00:18:41,200 Speaker 3: on not calling any witnesses. 374 00:18:41,560 --> 00:18:46,120 Speaker 2: Remember he has been in prison since last September. Wow, 375 00:18:46,720 --> 00:18:49,159 Speaker 2: and he could potentially either walk out of there in 376 00:18:49,200 --> 00:18:52,800 Speaker 2: the next week, you could even argue, or he's going 377 00:18:52,840 --> 00:18:54,600 Speaker 2: to find out he's going to prison for a long, 378 00:18:54,680 --> 00:18:57,600 Speaker 2: long time. We should have that answer soon. I even 379 00:18:57,680 --> 00:18:59,960 Speaker 2: thought about the possibility of miss trials and hunger. 380 00:19:01,480 --> 00:19:02,199 Speaker 4: Yeah, who knows that. 381 00:19:02,200 --> 00:19:04,399 Speaker 3: I mean, there are there are a million different not 382 00:19:04,440 --> 00:19:06,840 Speaker 3: a million, but there are several different outcomes that could 383 00:19:06,840 --> 00:19:10,600 Speaker 3: take place here, including he gets convicted on a lesser 384 00:19:10,680 --> 00:19:14,800 Speaker 3: charge and gets credit for time served and isn't in prison. 385 00:19:14,560 --> 00:19:17,080 Speaker 4: For that long, or maybe he has already done his time. 386 00:19:17,160 --> 00:19:17,879 Speaker 4: Who knows. 387 00:19:18,280 --> 00:19:21,639 Speaker 3: But we will continue to watch everything that goes on 388 00:19:21,720 --> 00:19:23,920 Speaker 3: in that Lower Manhattan courtroom and bring you the very 389 00:19:24,000 --> 00:19:27,240 Speaker 3: latest and you know, the big bombshaw today. The defense 390 00:19:27,400 --> 00:19:32,280 Speaker 3: is not calling any witnesses. The defense will rest the same. 391 00:19:32,119 --> 00:19:35,480 Speaker 4: Day the prosecution does. So thank you so much for 392 00:19:35,560 --> 00:19:36,600 Speaker 4: listening to us. Everyone. 393 00:19:36,640 --> 00:19:39,159 Speaker 3: We'll keep the updated but in the meantime, hope you 394 00:19:39,160 --> 00:19:48,000 Speaker 3: have a wonderful day today.