WEBVTT - Postseason Possibilities

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal.

0:00:04.880 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Hull that for me.

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm a man, I'm for I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to be happy. You want to be happy

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>for a day? Edo state is that? Woof woof?

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 3>And them and Tye, welcome back to the solid rebel

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 3>boys and girls. My name is Psi Hildebrand, Johnny me

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 3>as always somewhere out there on this big blue marble.

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>The one and only Dan Rubinstein, Sir, how you doing.

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty good, ty I'm surviving. The sleep is a

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 2>little bit strange, but can't fully complain. I'm currently in

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 2>a home office. I think we've broadcast one show from here,

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 2>and I just before we hit record, I looked at

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 2>the books available to me, and I see a gigantic

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 2>book on the band Fish, Anthony Bourdain's Kitchen Confidential, Alternative

0:00:56.480 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Energy for Dummies, and Birds of Illinois. So you can

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 2>take your pick of any of those. If you're ever here, Tye,

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 2>you will be educated thusly. So I'm good, Tie, I'm

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 2>very encouraged by my options. That's a lifetime of entertainment

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 2>right there, Dan. We hope that everyone out there is

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 2>equally as entertained listening to this show again.

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:23.320
<v Speaker 1>We are the soliverbal On tie. He's Dan.

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Going out to our website at solidverbal dot com. You

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 3>can find all of our old stuff there and subscribe

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 3>to the show. Of course, wherever you get your podcasts, right,

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 3>get at Spotify, go Apple, Google, anywhere anywhere you get

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 3>your shows, you can find our show. We're going to

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 3>be going for as long as this offseason goes, and

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 3>then eventually once the season starts up. I promise you

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 3>we will be back talking about college football. We'll get

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 3>to that portion of the show in a little bit.

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Don't forget to follow along on Instagram, on Twitter, on Facebook,

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 3>and also if you like the show, going out to

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 3>our subreddit at soliverbal dot reddit dot com. I'm sign

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 3>up for the subreddit. Continue the conversation long after the

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 3>final bell And what did I forget the newsletter? Yes,

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 3>while you're on our website, because I know everyone out

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 3>there is staking out our website. There's a sign up

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 3>form for the newsletter. Sign up for that five star reviews.

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Let's just empty the clip here, Dan, anything else that

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 3>we need to get out of the way.

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 2>In terms of housekeeping, I've got a new shirt ready

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 2>to go. Ty you tell me, do you I've got

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 2>a new Solid Verbal shirt that has been approved by

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 2>the powers that be.

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Wait, did I see this one? This one is?

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you did see this shirt and you liked it

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot.

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Cool.

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 2>You said it's pretty risk and we've never gone here

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 2>conceptually in terms of what this shirt shows and bears.

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:48.959
<v Speaker 2>But you said it's a new time for the Solid Verbal,

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 2>especially now that we signed with WME, that we really

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 2>have to put ourselves out there, and this shirt literally

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 2>does that. That's what I think your words were. So

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm ready to roll.

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>All right. Well, with that being said, let's just jump

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>right in.

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's do it. We have bricking news. Oh my god,

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 2>you really went for it. There is this the the

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 2>cal thing.

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 3>This is this is the many cups of coffee thing

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 3>first and foremost. But okay, let's start with the cal thing.

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 3>California has announced your your native homeland, Daniel.

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, are you talking state or Berkeley? Because there's a

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Berkeley news story too that they're going fully online this fall.

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't have that one I was talking about.

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that just broke the California Interscholastic Federation. But do

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 3>we want to start with Berkeley instead? What's going on

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 3>up there.

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 2>No, they're just they are regretful, but they're going to

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 2>online learning only this fall, and an announcement that comes

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 2>on the heels of some other schools. You know, we

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 2>saw the cal State announcement a few weeks back. USC

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 2>having that announcement, I guess a couple of weeks ago now,

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, more and more, I guess big schools as

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Berkeley is. Berkeley is a Power five school going to

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 2>online learning only, which doesn't mean that there isn't necessarily

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 2>going to be an on field product this fall for

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 2>the cal Bears, but it certainly is not a movement

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 2>in the right direction. We talked about that a little bit.

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Optics wise with Nicole auerback house school can go from

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 2>saying we don't feel like students in classrooms is the

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 2>way to go from a public health perspective, but we're

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 2>still cool with football players. That's a tough optic cell.

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 2>But there still will be an optic cell if there

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 2>is that continued desire to play a season on the

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Berkeley campus.

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right.

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So the story that I had previously listed atop

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 3>our news sheet is that the California Interscholastic Federation cif

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 3>CIF it's the governing body for the state of high

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 3>school sports in California. They announced on Monday the earliest

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 3>their football season and the remainder of their fall sports

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 3>will start is December twenty twenty. The move, as you

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 3>might expect, could have a major impact on college football recruiting.

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 3>It could set a precedent not just in the state

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 3>of California, but other states. Amid the coronavirus pandemic. I

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 3>saw also that they might push it off to twenty

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty one. The earliest they would consider again is December

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 3>or January. So, in light of this news and light

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 3>of the Berkeley news, I don't know if there's a

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 3>drum beat. I don't know if there's momentum. I don't

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 3>know what you want to call it or classify it as.

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 3>But I feel like we are very quickly coming to

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 3>that point of, Hey, the spring's got so bad, we

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 3>could find a way to make the spring work.

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Potentially, Yeah, I mean a move like this, which is

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 2>certainly not going isn't the first and won't be the

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 2>last in terms of major state high school systems postponing

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 2>football and fall sports. US just enormous ramifications. When you

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 2>think about the players who might decide to forego their

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 2>senior year of high school football if they're committed somewhere

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:13.679
<v Speaker 2>or anticipate committing somewhere and enrolling early instead of playing

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 2>in a December or January season or starting in December

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 2>or January, we're talking about players getting fewer reps, less experience,

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 2>less coaching. In terms of players who would have made

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 2>a jump recruiting wise because of a strong senior year,

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 2>either because you know, maybe they had to sit out

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 2>their junior year because they were in the midst of

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 2>a transfer and weird academic shuffling occurred, or they were

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 2>hurt their junior year. It's going to affect the depth

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 2>of classes on the Power five level. It might actually

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 2>improve classes on the G five level. You know, if

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 2>we're going to specifically look at California, you know, schools

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 2>like San Jose State, Nevada, Boise State, you know, thinking

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 2>about San Diego State, whatever, Mountain West schools specifically closer

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 2>to the West Coast, they're the ones that might not

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 2>have their best players poached after having huge senior years

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 2>by Oregon, Oregon State, cal Stamford, whatever, and so those

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 2>schools might be fortifying their classes a little bit better.

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 2>But in the end, I think it's it's a big

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 2>negative in terms of how it affects college football and

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 2>high school football. I mean, it's a California high school

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 2>football is It's not I suppose Texas or Florida or

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Georgia or Ohio in terms of cultural importance, But in

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 2>terms of the numbers that it states into major college football,

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 2>it's hut big state.

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, all right, what else?

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 3>So, the Southwestern Athletic Conference the SWACK yeah, has postponed

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 3>fall sports and championships because of the pandemic. They have

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 3>begun plans to push the fall schedule to the spring semester.

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 3>According to a statement that was provided to ESPN on Monday,

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 3>the plans for football include a seven game conference schedule

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 3>that begins with an eight week training period in January.

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Commissioner Charles McClellan said games would begin near the end

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 3>of February or beginning of March. Each school will play

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 3>six conference games for Divisional, two non Divisional, with the

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 3>option to play one non con game. So again, perhaps

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a trickle up effect, maybe starting at

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 3>the high school level, working all the way up to

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 3>major college football. But Southwestern Athletic Conference jumping on in

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 3>to my knowledge of the first athletic conference to sort

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:34.959
<v Speaker 3>of just go all out and say we're going to

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 3>try and do this in the spring. I don't think

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 3>maybe this I have tried to do that yet. Meanwhile,

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 3>in the great state of Texas, clinging to hope, I

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 3>think that we might have something this fall. There's a

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 3>headline here on ESPN that Texas is aiming for fifty

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 3>percent capacity at football games. The University of Texas says

0:08:55.320 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 3>it anticipates hosting football games fifty percent capacity in the Sands.

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Chris del Conti, their ad emailed season ticket holders on Monday,

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 3>told in that school's working closely with the governor's office

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 3>following state guidelines on social distancing amid the pandemic. This

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 3>strikes me as extremely wishful thinking, but the kind of

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 3>communications that at this juncture you need to send out

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 3>because we've got the SEC, we've got the ACC, we've

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 3>got the Big Twelve. None of them have formally committed

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:30.679
<v Speaker 3>to the whole conference only games thing. Certainly there hasn't

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.839
<v Speaker 3>There hasn't been much public in the way of moving

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 3>the season altogether to a different semester. I understand why

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 3>they send this out, but again, given recent circumstances and

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 3>the news of the world, it does feel a little

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 3>bit like wishful thinking.

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not exactly a plan. Not exactly a plan. It's

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 2>more of optimism. I'm aiming to have an eight pack

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 2>and toss down windmill dunks by the end of the year.

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:56.719
<v Speaker 2>But that's just something I'm aiming for. That doesn't necessarily

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 2>mean it's based in reality. In Texas right now is

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 2>not one of the better states in terms of public

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 2>health and the ability to not just flatten, but really

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 2>put a dent in COVID nineteen. If you look at

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, the hospitalization rate and the infection rates as

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 2>it relates to testing, Texas is not in a fantastic place.

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 2>And I know, you know, Austin's obviously a bigger city

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:23.839
<v Speaker 2>within Texas, and it's just it's rough. Houston's in a

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 2>bad place. It's hard to imagine with how Texas specifically

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of major college football states have done

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 2>a pretty poor job and are seeing pretty big spikes.

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 2>You look at the per capita numbers throughout the South California, Arizona,

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 2>now Nevada. It's I think your term of wishful thinking

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 2>is probably the accurate one. This is not a state

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 2>that has made sound decisions along the way. And it's

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 2>very hard to make sound decisions, I know, because this

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 2>is such a new thing. But of all the states

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 2>that are being optimistic about getting live action in front

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 2>of people, even a fifty capacity situation, this feels a

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 2>bit out of reality to.

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Our earlier point from a show or two a go.

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 3>If a school like Texas decides, ah, we can't do this,

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 3>then you'll see some real dominoes. But for now, fifty

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 3>percent capacity, we'll we'll stick to that company line, and hey,

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 3>we'll hope for the best. I want to see football

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 3>sooner than later, but well, time will tell elsewhere. Amid

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 3>this seemingly weird time for scheduling in college football, we

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 3>had the Alabama athletic director shooting down Notre Dame as

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 3>a twenty twenty opponent BYU is reportedly targeted as a

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 3>Week one replacement. So you might recall Alabama had USC

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 3>on the schedule Week one. That game is not going

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 3>to happen because of the Pac twelves announcement, and so

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Alabama's basically out there trying to figure out, right, well.

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Who else will we play?

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 3>BYU, as it stands is look for games as well,

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 3>and so the reports are that that could be your

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 3>opener because BYU I think had Utah for the Holy

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 3>War week one, and now that they're both looking for

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 3>some action, BYU could obviously fill fill that gap.

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Correct, Yeah, I mean BYU, as an independent school, has

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 2>to be pretty terrified of what their schedule could look

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 2>like the more and more, especially with the PAC twelve

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:29.839
<v Speaker 2>going conference only slate this fall. It's they're in a

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 2>tough spot and it makes sense for Alabama, and Alabama

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 2>I believe has a home and home on the books

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 2>with Notre Dame already. Correct.

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, in twenty twenty eight and twenty twenty nine, so

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 3>a bit off, a bit off in the future. I know.

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 3>We talked to Pete Sampson last week. He I think

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 3>mentioned that to Brian Kelly and he said, Brian Kelly's

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 3>eyes got real big.

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 2>And good for Alabama for not just you know, if

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 2>the USC game is officially off the books. Good for

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Alabama for finding a team that just beat USC and

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 2>scheduling up.

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 3>I like it, Yeah, and the final news bullet here

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 3>again something just to keep your eyes on. Iowa's coach,

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Kirk ference was apparently aware of racial bias within the

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 3>program after a twenty eighteen internal investigation. That is, per

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:20.319
<v Speaker 3>a document acquired by Hawkeye Nation. They filed a Foyer

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 3>request to see that internal report. Iowa had created a

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 3>diversity task force. They found that black players were targeted

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 3>for more drug testing, they weren't informed of resources available

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 3>to student athletes, more harshly punished, expected to conform to culture,

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 3>that the white players set a lot of bad stuff

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 3>in their verbal harassment by coaches. The report was supposedly

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 3>read by Kirk Farence in twenty nineteen, according to Hawkeye Nation,

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 3>but he only made some minor changes to the culture

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 3>of the program prior to last season.

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 2>Not fully shocking given the comments that we've seen recently.

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>And it was all sort of set off by James

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Daniels and a Moni hooker and talking about the culture

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 2>of Iowa football and how you know, one of the

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 2>things in the report that comes up a term a lot,

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 2>and they interviewed a number of players. It was double

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 2>standard and the desire from those in charge at Iowa

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 2>to as you mentioned, conform black players to white culture

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 2>and to Iowa culture. And there is there is a

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 2>certain degree of Yes, you enroll at a school, you

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 2>become part of a college football program. You tried to

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 2>become a part of that program's culture. But when it's

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 2>drawn along racial lines, it's tough tie. It was a

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 2>tough read, and I'm sure Kirk Farens sort of adjusted

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 2>the way Iowa's football program did things when he knew

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 2>only he and a select fewer reading this report, And

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 2>now that many people have seen this report, it seems

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 2>like he's taking on a different tone. I just don't

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 2>know how many chances Kirk Farence gets. I understand that

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 2>when you win football games and you have prolonged success

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 2>like Ioways had in a very tough Big ten, that

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 2>you're afforded more opportunity and more leeway. But geez, I

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 2>know he's he's had a chance over what twenty years

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 2>to sort of become more inclusive and get to know

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 2>the players and is within his program and to sort

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 2>of build the culture around the people he brings into

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 2>it instead of just how he believes, you know, nineteen

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 2>year old should behave. I don't know, ty this just

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 2>it feels increasingly tone deaf from Kirk Farence and so

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what's going to happen because he has

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 2>certainly accumulated a good amount of power there. But the

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Iowa football program is under a magnifying glass like they've

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 2>never been. And this is it's not a pretty read

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 2>at all.

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>That's what I say.

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 3>Keep your eyes peeled here. This feels like feels like

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 3>there's more to come. Okay, So look, if you've got

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 3>news that you want to discuss again, it's soliverble at Gmail.

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 3>We read all the messages. We want to do our

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 3>part to keep the conversation going here in the long cold,

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 3>the longest night of college football as we wait for

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 3>the next season to arrive. On our show a week ago,

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 3>we talked about some stuff, didn't we do?

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>We did?

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we always talk about some stuff, but you

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 2>put a pin in a certain topic and said, okay,

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 2>this is something that we can discuss for at least

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven to thirty eight minutes next week. And I

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 2>agreed with you, and so here we are.

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 3>What we did a week ago was we did our

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 3>college Football Bangers episode, And essentially what that was was

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 3>us looking at schedules, as they say in right Now,

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 3>conference schedules and putting together like the most baller five

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 3>games slate for a number of teams. And at the

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 3>very end of that conversation you started kicking around ideas

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 3>for the postseason.

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>What happened in the postseason?

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 3>If you've got an abbreviated season, how do you determine

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 3>a champion? How do you even think about determining that champion?

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 3>And we decided then and there live on the air.

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's always going to be pit. It's just going

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 2>to be pit no matter what. That's what we settled on.

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 3>The question de jore is what do we do with

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 3>bowls and the whole process of finding a champion in

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:30.479
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of different scenarios. So why let's start here? Okay,

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 3>let's start with a scenario in which we've got a

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 3>full twelve game season for some and so I guess

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.479
<v Speaker 3>what the SEC, the ACC and the Big Twelve.

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>They filled some gaps.

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 2>We talked about Alabama BYU and they're turning two other

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 2>conferences and to each other to fill in gaps left

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 2>by potentially the PAC twelve and Big ten.

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 3>So we got a full twelve game season for three

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Power five conferences, and then we have an adjusted season

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 3>for some of the other ones. So I'm assuming our

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 3>first scenario here is like an asymmetrical season. Some teams

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 3>play twelve, some teams play ten. Maybe some teams don't

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:15.959
<v Speaker 3>even get to ten. Yes, how do we determine a champion?

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Dan? Have you thought about this? Do we do bowls?

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>What does that look like?

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 2>What if I told you that some conferences play eight

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 2>conference games and some play nine in an ordinary season.

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes teams play FCS school sometimes teams don't. What if

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I told you college football is an already asymmetrically scheduled sport.

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 1>What if I told you that.

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 3>I would tell you that you're pretty close here, Dan,

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 3>this is this is probably the best of the best

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 3>case scenarios.

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 2>Yes, the best of the best.

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.199
<v Speaker 3>I have not heard much of anyone talking about a

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 3>full twelve games slate if they're able to pull off

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 3>a season this fall. It seems like ten is the number.

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 3>When I talked to Pete last week, he said ten.

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Been reading a lot.

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Of articles out there talking about how ten games might

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 3>be an appropriate target. I don't know if it's a

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 3>realistic target. I just it seems like twelve is probably

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 3>too many at this point. But for the purposes of

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 3>conversation and this thought exercise, if that were the case,

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it would look.

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>All that different than it does right now. Right Like,

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you could still do most of the same stuff.

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.360
<v Speaker 3>Schedules might be a little bit different, and I'm sure

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 3>logistically that would be a headache for athletic directors and

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 3>the powers that be, But ultimately, a little bit of

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 3>an asymmetrical season isn't the end of the world. That

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:38.160
<v Speaker 3>would be pretty good.

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:44.360
<v Speaker 2>So, as we've now learned, the point of college football

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 2>happening at all is largely going to be the money.

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 2>It's more of the season being more important financially than

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 2>the postseason, or the idea of not necessarily the postseason,

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 2>because obviously there's a lot of money in the postseason.

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 2>There's bowl money and College Football Playoff money and all

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 2>sorts of TV money tied up in that. But the

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 2>point of college football in twenty twenty specifically is not

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 2>to name a champion. Can we agree? It's more of

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 2>the season just unfolding at all. That's the big goal.

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 2>As we stand in late July. Does that make sense?

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense to me.

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, so a champion would be amazing. It would

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 2>be incredible to figure out a way to have a champion,

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 2>But the first step is just figuring out if there's

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a season. If a season can happen at all,

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 2>that's the actual big win. The national champion, I think

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 2>is sort of despite the fact at this point, because

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 2>we don't know if it's going to be moved to spring,

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 2>canceled altogether. So if we can have a full on season,

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 2>that's already the win. So I'm not as concerned about

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 2>naming a national champion, but I guess I've never been

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 2>as concerned about naming a national champion what I would

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 2>probably do in terms off I'm thinking about public health.

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 2>If I'm thinking about bowl games and saying, okay, well,

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 2>this is a big financial hit if we don't have

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 2>bowl games, let's figure out a way to have them

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 2>in a safe and responsible way. I suppose it's just

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 2>taking a week after the regular season, taking that week

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 2>off an additional bye week after, and I don't think

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 2>we need conference championship games either. Tie to me, that

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 2>just seems especially when you look at recent results. Sure,

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna have some years where you have Alabama Georgia

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:12.880
<v Speaker 2>and it's a huge deal and they haven't played each

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 2>other during the regular season.

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>But even when you.

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Look at last year, it was not a particularly exciting

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 2>slate of conference championship games. It didn't really prove all

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 2>that much. I know Oregon Utah was the big one

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 2>in terms of Okay, these are two teams that are

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 2>highly ranked, and we don't have a clear sense of

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 2>who's better going in. Whereas Ohio State had already beaten Wisconsin,

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:37.679
<v Speaker 2>Clemson Virginia was sort of a clear foregone conclusion. LSU Georgia,

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 2>I suppose on a certain level. But Georgia had lost

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 2>to South Carolina. Oklahoma Baylor had already played each other.

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 2>So I just get rid of that and we just

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 2>rely on rankings. In terms of bowl games, take a

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 2>week off, and then my inclination, because fans won't be

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 2>traveling to the Bahamas or Tampa or Texas or Tempe

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 2>or anything like that, I guess Glendale is you just

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 2>have home site bowl games in whichever state is better

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 2>off from a public health perspective about that site.

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>The Duke's Male Bowl in Eugene, Oregon would be that

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>would be something.

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that the Pac twelve is a tie

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 2>into the Duke's Game, but yeah, that'd be fine by me.

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 2>You keep uh, you keep fifty percent of travel completely

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 2>off the table. And in terms of safety, there's going

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 2>to be hotels available for these teams to come in

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 2>and you're gonna get some a lot of northern sites

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 2>hosting Bowl games, which is not ideal. But again, we're

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.199
<v Speaker 2>not doing this for commerce and travel and tourism. So

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 2>if we're doing this purely for TV, we know that

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 2>the stadiums, the home stadiums are outfitted for TV. That

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 2>would be my Bowl proposal. And sorry, you know Orlando. Sorry,

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean in the case of UCF, they'll be the

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 2>hosting a game before with Florida is fine, but sorry,

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 2>all of these bull sites, it's not your year. You'll

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 2>there'll be TV cash, but no, you're not hosting it

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 2>in any of these places where two teams have to travel.

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 2>And then in terms of a college football playoff tie,

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking Rose bul Bubble, Rose Bowl Bubble, yep, yep,

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking we have enough hotels to house four potential teams.

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we could talk about Vegas. Obviously, Vegas has

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 2>the hotel availability. I'd rather have it be outside if

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 2>given the choice, in mid December, in a warm place outside,

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 2>so hotels and outdoors, I think. I think the Rose

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 2>bowls obvious, even though it's going to be very strange

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 2>to watch a Rose Bowl with limited to no fans.

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 2>That would be my pitch for the playoff. If there's

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 2>going to be a four team playoffs, That's why I

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 2>think where I'm at, or we could go four team

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 2>playoff with the semis, as I mentioned, with bowl games

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 2>at home sites, which I'm always in favor of, but

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 2>that's a pretty distinct advantage for if the national champion. Yes,

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 2>for a team, that's a pretty distinct advantage. If all

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 2>of the sudden, Clemson has to travel to Norman or

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Alabama has to travel to Eugene or something like.

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 1>That, it's first of hold on, hold on, hold on,

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>first off. Yeah, yeah, I'm ready.

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 3>This is sort of like a fever dream for you.

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay phrasing, but yes, just from this standpoint, we could

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 3>in effect throw out the current ranking system, the current

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 3>committee ranking system for a year. Sure, and I think

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 3>That's one of the things that I wanted to discuss

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 3>here as we get into that, I have.

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:34.640
<v Speaker 1>That down as a bullet point.

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think I at college football did this

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 3>for a long time. There are still many folks, such

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 3>as yourself who actually prefer that methodology.

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm.

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 3>It is interesting to me that we might revert back

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 3>to it for a year in a season where we've

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 3>got teams playing different numbers of games, a postseason that

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 3>feels maybe you know, sketchy at best, where we don't

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 3>really have it flesh. We're maybe playing those extra three

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 3>playoff games in total. It is not feasible. We don't

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 3>have a bubble site that we can do it in,

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 3>we can't logistically do the bubble that. There's a lot

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 3>of stuff that we don't know at this point, but

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 3>I do think that is potentially the most feasible option

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 3>to revert back to where we used to be, maybe

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 3>not even play a bowl game at all, and then

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 3>just have folks vote on it. Maybe you can expand

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 3>the pool of eligible voters, maybe we get a vote

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 3>on the show. I don't know, but if you really

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 3>want to engage the fan base, open up the number

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 3>of folks who can vote, and let's just take a

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 3>good old fashioned vote on this thing. Let's make it

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 3>a one time, one time only, and then twenty twenty one,

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 3>hopefully we revert back to back to normal circumstances.

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's got to be on the table.

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Can I give you my mini bubble idea mini bubble

0:25:56.960 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 2>A you're going back to VA mini bubble? Nope, We're

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 2>still a bubble in either La Vegas. I think Vegas

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.239
<v Speaker 2>is a dome. It's not a retractable roof. I might

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 2>be mistaken, though, and I definitely am not playing in

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 2>the NFL stadium in LA that looks like molten American cheese.

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 2>Wednesday Night because we don't want to keep players. You know,

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 2>two weeks is a long time to try and quarantine players.

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 2>You know, you start getting into a tricky territory with

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 2>how professionalized it all seems. Wednesday Night, four teams, double header.

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:35.159
<v Speaker 2>Each of the games listen to this. Each of the

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 2>games is only a half they only play. Each game

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:42.160
<v Speaker 2>is only two quarters long, and then Sunday or Monday

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 2>shortened week, so it's like a five or six day situation.

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.880
<v Speaker 2>We have a national Championship game that's I mean, that's

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 2>so we're not playing eight quarters and four days. We're

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 2>playing six quarters and four days.

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 3>So you're talking like a minor league baseball scenario where

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 3>they play two seven inning games as part of a

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 3>double head instead of tonight.

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, I mean think about the importance of every

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 2>snap instead of four quarters.

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>That changes the game a little too much for my

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>for my.

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh tie, come on, it's a different world.

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 3>So the first scenario was a full twelve game season

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 3>for some adjusted non conference opponents, obviously, and then a

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 3>different number of games for others.

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 2>In terms of your idea for just naming a champion,

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 2>how about this, I'm saying, just staying with nine or

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 2>ten games for some full twelve for others. What about

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 2>we do a BCS pop up here.

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Who's running the computer? Jerry Palm?

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we got we got Massy, we got Peabody, we

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 2>got all sorts of people that are spitting into the

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 2>computer formula. What we bring it back for one last

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 2>go round, Tye. Just like where we're finding we're finding

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 2>born Jason Bourne in very rural Indonesia. They find them,

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:58.120
<v Speaker 2>they pull them back for one last job, Tie, one last.

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Job calling to the wearing him. They have no idea

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>why they.

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:06.199
<v Speaker 2>For one last job? All right, this is this is

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 2>what I'm thinking. So you have BCS pop up, or

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 2>we have a BCS pop up via the college Football

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 2>playoff rankings. So we keep how we get the top

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 2>two in place, but we're not going full top four.

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 3>Let me move on to a different scenario. Okay, all right,

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 3>something that something that maybe is a little bit more feasible.

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 3>I don't I kind of say that tongue in cheek. Okay,

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 3>a ten game fall season for everybody goes off without

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 3>any real hitches. It ends in December as usual. So

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 3>let's assume for a second that maybe the worst case

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 3>scenario doesn't happen. Maybe teams can find a way to

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 3>play a ten games slate in the fall. Maybe it

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 3>starts a little late, maybe it ends a little early,

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 3>but you know, buy and large ten games at more

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 3>bye weeks. Sure ten games ain't bad. You can do

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 3>with that. So well, we get ten games. I don't

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 3>know if that really changes the equation. We just discussed

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 3>the the whole uh, you know, rekindling of the BCS

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 3>or allowing some of our friends in the media to

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 3>vote again. Like, I don't know if that changes anything

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 3>in terms of a postseason, but at a minimum, it

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 3>does kind of put teams on more of a level

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.479
<v Speaker 3>playing field if they're all playing the same number of games,

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 3>And I think it probably makes it easier to determine

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 3>who a top four would be just because of that.

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it makes it easier if we're if we're

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 2>presupposing ten games, are we assuming conference games only because

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 2>other than the Big Twelve, who can only play nine

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 2>unless they like add BYU as a probationary member of

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 2>some kind for this fall, other than BYU or some

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 2>other team, some other independent I don't know if it's

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame assuming a full Big twelve slate something like that.

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 2>We're assuming it's just full conference.

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I think half games to haf to do at this point.

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So with that in mind, we will actually have

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 2>more data on at least Power five teams, but also

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Group of five teams because they're exclusively playing teams that

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 2>are on their same talent level, schedule level, resource level, whatever.

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 2>So we will actually have more data. We will know

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 2>more about UTAH, we will know more about TCU, we

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 2>will know more about West Virginia. Well, I guess not

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 2>West Virginia. I guess if they play BYU. Sure, but

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 2>we will know more about these teams than normal. So

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 2>it actually makes more sense to say, let's just pick two,

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 2>pick two me So, okay, Well, because if we want

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 2>to minimize the number of tea because okay, if we

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 2>want to minimize the number of games for public health reasons,

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 2>then it makes sense to go from four teams to

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 2>two at the end of the year, and everybody else

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 2>just plays Bowl games. But we're talking about a very

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 2>limited number of teams. But because we have more data points,

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 2>it's easier to say Clemson is definitely deserving or undeserving

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 2>as we see the rest, as we see more ACC

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 2>games played than normal, or Washington State is definitely undeserving,

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 2>or Washington State is more deserving because of what they

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 2>did playing against ten PAC twelve teams, whereas they normally

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 2>play against nine and they're you know, they're not inflating

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 2>themselves by playing you know, Sacramento State or Northern Arizona

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 2>or something like that.

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think I think this would be the target. Honestly,

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 3>if they're going to try and shoot for anything in

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 3>the fall ten games slate, minimal hitches, mostly conference games.

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you can find some way to squeeze in a

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 3>non conference opponent. I don't know that to me represents

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 3>the best possible case scenario here. Again, I think it's

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 3>wishful thinking, but you know, I think that would be

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 3>the target because financially, again, ten is that number you

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:56.239
<v Speaker 3>keep hearing, right, they would try for ten if at

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 3>all possible.

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 2>But more bye weeks. So it's two more bye weeks

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 2>and maybe altered beginning and end. What does Notre Dame

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 2>do in this situation. They're just going acc and G five.

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 3>I guess they're going to see who they can bolt on. Yeah, yeah, okay,

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 3>you know again, go and listen to the conversation with

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Pete from a week ago, and I think he's right.

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't think Notre Dame's going to find much difficulty

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to seeking out new opponents. Someone from

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 3>the group of five as will want to play Notre Dame.

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 3>They'll find opponents, but it's just a matter of, you know,

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 3>how does it work with the rest of their schedule

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 3>and does it help or hurt them?

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>If and when there's a postseason. A lot of variables there.

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 2>How many ACC teams do they generally play in a

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 2>season six? They play six. So if we're talking about

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 2>an ACC slate in which Notre Dame goes six and oh,

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 2>and then they fill in everything else with Ball State

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 2>and Nevada and whoever, and they go ten and oh

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 2>with four G five schools on their schedule. And we're

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 2>talking about a crazy hypothetical here, but it's tough to

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 2>put them into anything given that scheduling advantage.

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 3>But if they go ten and oh, they will have

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 3>beaten Clemson. Okay, so that's probably the singular best win

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 3>of the season by any team if they knock off Clemson.

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:20.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Maybe, I mean, there's other very very good teams in

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 2>college football, and the weekend week out grind of playing

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 2>in the Big twelve Pac twelve SEC as opposed to

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 2>playing sixty percent of a Power five schedule, I don't know.

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 2>I think I think you probably keep them out.

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 3>So here here are two of the odd scenarios that

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 3>I think could be very realistic as well. They start

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 3>the season expecting a ten games slate, but because of

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 3>case spiking or because of who knows really what's going

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 3>to happen, you have a more of a mixed season,

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 3>so this is a little bit like the first scenario,

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 3>or you've got an asymmetrical season, some teams playing more

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 3>games than others. But what if that number of games

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 3>is more akin to what we discussed a week ago.

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:11.240
<v Speaker 3>What if it's like five games.

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>What if it's seven games.

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:15.879
<v Speaker 3>What if one team plays five games, another team plays ten?

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 3>How I don't see how you could have an actual

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 3>postseason in that scenario. I think it would have to

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.760
<v Speaker 3>come down to a vote. It would be a season

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 3>with an asterisk, and they'd have to figure out some

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 3>way to kind of denote this one in the record books.

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Because five games or ten, it's it's almost impossible to compare.

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:38.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if we're having five versus ten, you just name

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 2>a champ and we argue about it for however many months,

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 2>just because five and seven game seasons for teams means

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 2>something probably went pretty wrong health wise. And so to say,

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:55.240
<v Speaker 2>how do we get around this and say, Okay, Texas

0:34:55.280 --> 0:35:00.439
<v Speaker 2>Tech only played six games, Alabama played ten, Wisconsin play eight,

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:05.800
<v Speaker 2>there's been a big outbreak in West Texas. But because

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Texas Tech is pretty promising, let's figure out if we

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 2>can get them in a big bowl game. It just

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 2>it feels is I don't know if ikey is the

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 2>coolest word to use here, but it doesn't feel like

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 2>it's going in the right direction in terms of the

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 2>spirit of finding a college football champion.

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:24.279
<v Speaker 3>Now, from the standpoint of the fan, Okay, you know,

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 3>I've been saying that the spring season, to me, is

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 3>the most interesting possibility. Okay, if we are keeping this

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 3>though at least the first part of this conversation in

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 3>the fall, I think the next most interesting scenario would

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 3>be a revised and shortened fall season. Maybe it is

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 3>truly like we discussed a week ago, five to seven

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 3>games slate, it ends in early December, you got more

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 3>bye weeks. Maybe there's delay in there.

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a very.

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:57.840
<v Speaker 3>Weird season, very weird season. But with each team playing

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 3>only five games, that is a lot of lively college

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:07.879
<v Speaker 3>football conversation out on the subreddit, on every message board

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 3>known to man. Every college football writer is going to

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 3>be jumping to, you know, unsupported conclusions after watching one

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 3>or two games of a particular team that from you know,

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 3>college football is so tribal. What makes it great is

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 3>that argument, And I think that's why folks again, such

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:29.400
<v Speaker 3>as yourself, prefer that argument at the end of the

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 3>year as opposed to you know, some body voting on

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:35.400
<v Speaker 3>it and putting a couple of teams in the playoff

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 3>to duke it out. That argument would certainly be rekindled

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 3>if each team only played five games.

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 2>It's very hard to go undefeated over twelve games.

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:50.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not that hard to go undefeated over five.

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:52.880
<v Speaker 2>And I understand that the quality of the competition, and

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 2>we discussed this on our Banger show, is going to

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 2>be heightened without having a couple of tune up games

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:02.399
<v Speaker 2>or the ability to to navigate with bye weeks and

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 2>having you know, penciled in bye weeks if you're the

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 2>SEC and scheduling teams from the Southern Conference later in

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 2>the season to just sort of even out the schedule.

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:13.920
<v Speaker 2>I understand it's a more difficult five game stretch than

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 2>it normally would be, but we could have a lot

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:26.839
<v Speaker 2>of self congratulatory national championship declarations if we're selecting two

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:28.959
<v Speaker 2>teams at the end of a five to seven game

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 2>season to go and play in a national championship game,

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 2>or four teams to play in a playoff and a

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 2>five and zero team is not named in that Power five,

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 2>G five whatever. Think about how many teams are going

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:43.800
<v Speaker 2>to name themselves national champs. Oh yeah, here for it, Tye.

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 2>I am absolutely positively here for because everybody's going to

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 2>be left out.

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 1>It's great. What happens if there is no season at all?

0:37:54.400 --> 0:38:00.839
<v Speaker 2>Well you still Pit, It's still Pitt National champ. If

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 2>there's no season, then we just move forward. I don't

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 2>know what you do in terms of if there's no season,

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 2>there's gonna be a draft and we're gonna lose promising

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 2>junior's red shirt sophomores to the NFL Draft without playing

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 2>a final season, which is a pretty significant bummer. Sure,

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:22.320
<v Speaker 2>But in terms of a postseason, I could see, okay,

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 2>I could see perhaps rivals scheduling a one off in

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 2>the late spring as just a crazy out and out

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 2>maybe for an it's a one game season. Essentially, we

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 2>have the Apple Cup, we have Oregon Oregon State, we

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 2>have the Iron Bowl, we have and maybe it's a

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 2>chance to rekindle. Maybe it's just like, okay, one off,

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 2>we have Texas, Texas, A and M we revisit some

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:48.400
<v Speaker 2>of that. It's not a season, but we say okay

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:50.880
<v Speaker 2>with schools that were within and I know I screwed

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 2>up my driving distances and times before I think I

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 2>looked up two schools that were probably in the middle

0:38:57.200 --> 0:38:59.479
<v Speaker 2>of a traffic zone. You know, it was probably backing

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:03.840
<v Speaker 2>up against Atlanta traffic or something. But I would my

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 2>solution be, no season, Let's just play a every and

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 2>everything on the line, pride filled rivalry weekend Sinco to

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Mayo weekend or something like that, or all of may No.

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 3>I I like the idea teams have scheduled scrimmages with

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 3>one another in the spring before that. That's not unheard of.

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:30.920
<v Speaker 3>So I was hoping you would bring that up because

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 3>I have seen some conjecture that that could be a

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 3>potential avenue if things really go sideways, that that could

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 3>potentially be an option to just have to think about

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 3>game season against a rival.

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Think about teams that have a lot of not a lot,

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 2>but multiple legitimate rivals. So okay, so if we're going

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:56.279
<v Speaker 2>to go through the biggest rivalries in the sport, we're

0:39:56.280 --> 0:40:00.959
<v Speaker 2>obviously going to say Alabama Auburn a no brainer. Play

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:03.400
<v Speaker 2>the Iron Bowl on this Sinko to Mayo weekend, Sinkle

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 2>to Tyo. If I may sure single to Tyo weekend.

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 2>We have the Iron Bowl, But then where does that

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:12.280
<v Speaker 2>leave Georgia. They don't get the Auburn Games. So Georgia

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:17.359
<v Speaker 2>Georgia Tech. I suppose you have Clemson South Florirolina, Georgia Florida. Yeah,

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:19.879
<v Speaker 2>Georgia Florida makes sense, You're right, Georgia Florida. They play

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 2>in Jacksonville wherever. Okay, So we have Georgia Florida, and

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:30.919
<v Speaker 2>then Clemson South Carolina, but then Florida State Miami because

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 2>we're not gonna have Florida Florida State. So I'm just

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:38.319
<v Speaker 2>saying there's a number of really interesting dominoes having in

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 2>the Northwest. I would rather see. As an Oregon fan,

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:43.320
<v Speaker 2>I'd rather see Oregon Washington. I think there's more bad

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 2>blood there than either Oregon Oregon State or the Apple Cup.

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know.

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 2>It's probably safer to keep any I know, Washington State

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:54.360
<v Speaker 2>is pretty far east. We have the big Game Stanford

0:40:54.400 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Cali of UCLA USC no travel there, Texas, Oklahoma. I

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:03.239
<v Speaker 2>would suppose after the last couple of years, if we're

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 2>taking away Alabama from LSU, the last couple of years,

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:08.399
<v Speaker 2>at least two years ago. It was a crazy game.

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 2>So I guess LSU A and m No. I know

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:15.720
<v Speaker 2>there's LSU Ole miss history, but I think that's probably

0:41:15.760 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 2>the way to go there. Big ten, you have Michigan,

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State. I suppose Wisconsin, Minnesota you play for the acts. Yeah,

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 2>so Penn State, Michigan State, Grant.

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I guess Penn.

0:41:31.640 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 2>State, Michigan State. Who else in the ACC? What else

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 2>is movie like Pitt?

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:41.840
<v Speaker 2>I would love for it to be Pitt West Virginia

0:41:42.080 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 2>and just do it based on proximity.

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 1>You got options.

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 3>I hope it doesn't come to that, but I've I've

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 3>seen a lot written about that lately that potentially that

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 3>would be on the table.

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Everything state.

0:41:54.440 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Who'd Oklahoma State play Iowa State? I mean, you have

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:01.800
<v Speaker 2>you have at least history there recently within the last decade.

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:04.919
<v Speaker 3>Oklahoma would have to pick between Texas and Oklahoma State,

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 3>and they'd.

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Probably pick you gotta pick t wh would you rather be?

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>If you got gotta be Texas, you gotta be Texas.

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:18.919
<v Speaker 2>Uh, all right, So then you have TCU Baylor. Can

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 2>you imagine? I mean you'd probably have to space it

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 2>over the month. It couldn't be Synco to TiO, but

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 2>that'd be a hell of a may which is already

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 2>an amazing sports month in normal times.

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 3>It could be Mayo to TiO, Mayo to TiO. There

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 3>you go, that's actually getting me pretty worked up. Tie,

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 3>I like, well, well, let's work on a helmet schedule

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 3>for that sixty five games.

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Let's figure it out. Yea.

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 3>So now we're fully on the spring side of things here.

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:51.959
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 3>I have made no bones about the fact that I

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:55.920
<v Speaker 3>think this is where it is headed.

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmmm.

0:42:57.560 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 3>A couple scenarios here they actually close mostly mimic what

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 3>we are or what we've already discussed in the fall. Right,

0:43:05.880 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 3>What if there's a ten game spring schedule or a

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:13.719
<v Speaker 3>five to seven game spring schedule. So what I've heard

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:15.920
<v Speaker 3>a lot of lately is that if they do it

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 3>in the spring, they would probably shoot for a ten

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:22.799
<v Speaker 3>game slate, that the twelve game thing would probably be

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:25.400
<v Speaker 3>out of the picture.

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, each team would shoot for ten games. I have

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 1>seen some.

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:34.759
<v Speaker 3>Difference of opinion when it comes to when they would

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 3>start that season, but basically sometime after the super Bowl.

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:41.759
<v Speaker 3>It might end at some point in like early May,

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:43.919
<v Speaker 3>at which point they would try to stage some sort

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 3>of some sort of regular, quote unquote regular postseason. I

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 3>saw that the gentleman who runs the Liberty Bowl made

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 3>a comment saying, in effect, if the season moved, the

0:43:57.000 --> 0:43:59.319
<v Speaker 3>Liberty Bowl would try to move with it and try

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 3>to come up with some way.

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:02.840
<v Speaker 1>The Liberty Bowl wants that, sure, of course.

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I mean, who knows if other Bowl games

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 3>would follow suit, but it it would present a logistical challenge.

0:44:09.080 --> 0:44:11.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure. All I know is that's at least one

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Bowl chairman who says, yeah, sure, we'd be interested in

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:17.480
<v Speaker 3>it if it if it made sense. So you play

0:44:17.520 --> 0:44:21.839
<v Speaker 3>a full ten game slate, presumably in the springtime, and

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:23.919
<v Speaker 3>I hope in the springtime we have this thing better

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:27.720
<v Speaker 3>under control. Maybe you can get more fans in the stands,

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 3>and more fans in the stands at home sites. Probably

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 3>means more fans in the stands or at least some

0:44:33.680 --> 0:44:37.360
<v Speaker 3>fans in the stands at bowl games as well. So

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:39.840
<v Speaker 3>I think if you've got a ten game spring season,

0:44:40.800 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 3>the most likely scenario here would be that they try

0:44:44.080 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 3>to try to pull this thing off like they normally would.

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Maybe there aren't like forty eight bowl games or however

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 3>many we're up to now. But I got to believe

0:44:51.680 --> 0:44:53.800
<v Speaker 3>they would try to do a playoff. I got to

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 3>believe that they would try to do some semblance of

0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:59.359
<v Speaker 3>a modified Bowl season as well.

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I see that. My concern would be packing airports

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 2>and planes for games that ultimately mean even less than usual. Why,

0:45:10.120 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, why do Notre Dame fans need to be

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:14.960
<v Speaker 2>traveling to New York from the Midwest for the pin

0:45:15.080 --> 0:45:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Straight Bowl, even if it's a half empty Yankee Stadium.

0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Why are we traveling to the Liberty Bowl from Louisiana?

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:20.839
<v Speaker 1>Why?

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if it's if we have drivable sites and

0:45:24.120 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 2>it's drivable bowl tie ins, and we just moved the

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Liberty Bowl for a year to I don't know, we

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:34.960
<v Speaker 2>move the Liberty Bowl to Miami, we move the Liberty

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Bowl to you know, in a place where we can

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:40.360
<v Speaker 2>have a number of Bowl games in the same stadium

0:45:40.800 --> 0:45:43.960
<v Speaker 2>over a given amount of time. I still, I don't know.

0:45:44.440 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 2>It still strikes me as the actual least important thing

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:52.000
<v Speaker 2>here is making sure and I understand from a school

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 2>payout perspective it's important, but a lot, you know, having

0:45:55.040 --> 0:45:58.520
<v Speaker 2>the New Mexico Bowl, having the the I know, some

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 2>of these the Bowls about thet you all don't exist, sorry,

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 2>New Mexico having you know, having minic Care, having you know,

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:09.960
<v Speaker 2>minu Key, having all of these Bowl games which sort

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:13.880
<v Speaker 2>of exists because their TV shows go off happen. I

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 2>don't know. It strikes me as not keeping with the

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 2>spirit of trying to modify the season for the better.

0:46:22.760 --> 0:46:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Tony the Tiger would like a word, sir, Sorry, Duke's mayo.

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:29.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think if we get a ten games slate,

0:46:29.160 --> 0:46:33.680
<v Speaker 3>they're going to try it, but it will be modified.

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to have to be modified.

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't think every Bowl game can can't afford to

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:41.799
<v Speaker 3>make that move. And you know, we already dressed sort

0:46:41.800 --> 0:46:44.040
<v Speaker 3>of this scenario in which we've got a five to

0:46:44.080 --> 0:46:44.840
<v Speaker 3>seven games slate.

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they can't get ten in.

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Maybe there's more virus to deal with, maybe there's delays

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 3>along the way. Five to seven games slate again, it

0:46:53.480 --> 0:46:58.360
<v Speaker 3>ends like late spring something something akin to that. If

0:46:58.440 --> 0:46:59.800
<v Speaker 3>you have a five games slate and then it just

0:46:59.840 --> 0:47:00.960
<v Speaker 3>come back to this point for a.

0:47:00.920 --> 0:47:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Second, Yeah, are you able to stage playoff?

0:47:04.560 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Probably a minimum nine games to have a full fledged

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 2>playoff where it's just like, okay, we were able to

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:13.320
<v Speaker 2>play nine college football games in the fall or the spring.

0:47:13.800 --> 0:47:16.360
<v Speaker 2>So we've done something right in terms of protection, and

0:47:16.400 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 2>we haven't had to shut down the season because of

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:24.759
<v Speaker 2>anything catastrophic. We've earned a playoff five games. I mean,

0:47:25.760 --> 0:47:31.239
<v Speaker 2>I am now grating, gravitating much towards just anarchy, chaos

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 2>of only playing the season in October, playing two games

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:40.279
<v Speaker 2>a week, two quarters each game. That's what I want, Ty,

0:47:40.920 --> 0:47:46.080
<v Speaker 2>I want express rules. I want personal pan college football.

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, the trans perfect Music City Bowl or a tropical

0:47:51.840 --> 0:47:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Smoothie Cafe Frisco Bowl.

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:55.920
<v Speaker 1>YEP, would be sorely disappointed.

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Dan.

0:47:56.400 --> 0:47:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I read good friends over at at Duke's Mayo.

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:02.360
<v Speaker 2>But do you have a Mayo preference?

0:48:02.520 --> 0:48:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Brand wise? I'm not a big Mayo guy. We talked

0:48:05.520 --> 0:48:05.840
<v Speaker 1>about this.

0:48:06.360 --> 0:48:09.439
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's too bad. Just good males out there. Yeah,

0:48:09.480 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 2>you've got Japanese mayo qupi. I think it's how it's

0:48:11.719 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 2>pronounced Mayo. Helman's Duke's is pretty good.

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:17.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to get a palette of Duke's Mayo ship

0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 3>to my house, aren't I.

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:21.799
<v Speaker 2>That's fine secret weapon for grilled cheese tie. If you

0:48:21.880 --> 0:48:24.160
<v Speaker 2>like a good grilled cheese spread some mao on each

0:48:24.320 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 2>on each of those uh oh pieces of bread. Stop

0:48:27.040 --> 0:48:30.439
<v Speaker 2>oh stop it caramelizes real nicely got the oil in there.

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:32.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't care what it moliza is whipped egg whites

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:34.200
<v Speaker 2>and oil tie.

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Come on, no no, no, no, no, no no.

0:48:37.200 --> 0:48:40.319
<v Speaker 3>Right in cellverbal at gmail dot com, let us know

0:48:40.360 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 3>your thoughts on the matter.

0:48:41.719 --> 0:48:43.360
<v Speaker 1>What would you like to see in a postseason in

0:48:43.440 --> 0:48:46.799
<v Speaker 1>any of these scenarios? Again, we're talking maybe some wish

0:48:46.920 --> 0:48:50.359
<v Speaker 1>wishful thinking, but full twelve games slate, maybe a ten

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:53.480
<v Speaker 1>games slate, maybe only five to seven games, different teams

0:48:53.520 --> 0:48:58.000
<v Speaker 1>playing different amounts of games. You know, we've had weird

0:48:58.040 --> 0:49:00.480
<v Speaker 1>suggestions that have come into the inbox.

0:49:00.680 --> 0:49:04.000
<v Speaker 3>I'd love to read more. I'm just so fascinated by

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 3>this scenario. I am with you ultimately. You know, just

0:49:08.120 --> 0:49:13.759
<v Speaker 3>from a fan interest standpoint, anything different is at least interesting.

0:49:14.160 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 3>We always see a little bit of a drop off

0:49:16.200 --> 0:49:18.800
<v Speaker 3>towards the end of the year, and presumably that's because

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:21.560
<v Speaker 3>folks they root for a team and then they're out

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:23.480
<v Speaker 3>of it and then they stop paying attention.

0:49:23.680 --> 0:49:27.600
<v Speaker 1>That happens to a lot of us, right and we

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:27.960
<v Speaker 1>see it.

0:49:28.000 --> 0:49:30.560
<v Speaker 3>We don't get as many downloads towards the latter half

0:49:30.600 --> 0:49:33.520
<v Speaker 3>of the season. That's just the normal course of doing

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:38.200
<v Speaker 3>business here on a podcast. But you introduce a quirk

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:43.719
<v Speaker 3>like an asymmetrical season, like a really asymmetrical season, or

0:49:44.239 --> 0:49:47.960
<v Speaker 3>move it to the spring, or some sort of flex

0:49:48.120 --> 0:49:49.360
<v Speaker 3>scheduling scenario.

0:49:50.160 --> 0:49:51.759
<v Speaker 1>That to me is very interesting.

0:49:52.400 --> 0:49:55.520
<v Speaker 3>And I don't want to speak for all of our listeners,

0:49:55.560 --> 0:49:57.040
<v Speaker 3>but I think I can speak for most of them

0:49:57.040 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 3>when I say that that is worth tuning in to

0:50:00.160 --> 0:50:03.319
<v Speaker 3>to listen to more of and hopefully to call the

0:50:03.360 --> 0:50:07.880
<v Speaker 3>reverb line about, just because it's so different, it's so unprecedented.

0:50:08.400 --> 0:50:11.400
<v Speaker 3>We'll never have it again, hopefully, and you know, it

0:50:11.400 --> 0:50:13.680
<v Speaker 3>could make for a very interesting outcome with a lot

0:50:13.680 --> 0:50:14.080
<v Speaker 3>of debate.

0:50:14.320 --> 0:50:16.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm not po you can correct me on this, because

0:50:16.280 --> 0:50:17.960
<v Speaker 2>this I think is in your home state, the Little

0:50:18.000 --> 0:50:21.719
<v Speaker 2>League World Series Williamsport, Pennsylvania. Of course, we have some

0:50:21.800 --> 0:50:24.960
<v Speaker 2>sort of pseudo Little League World Series rule where we

0:50:25.040 --> 0:50:29.480
<v Speaker 2>have five conference games and then whoever is determined to

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:31.640
<v Speaker 2>be the champion, and maybe it's like a World Cup

0:50:31.640 --> 0:50:34.200
<v Speaker 2>element to it, so it's like points four points against,

0:50:34.200 --> 0:50:37.480
<v Speaker 2>and you get more points for road winds and road scoring.

0:50:37.560 --> 0:50:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Whatever.

0:50:39.360 --> 0:50:43.279
<v Speaker 2>We sort of come up with a traveling team scenario.

0:50:43.680 --> 0:50:46.759
<v Speaker 2>I assume you're familiar with how you know sometimes in

0:50:46.840 --> 0:50:49.279
<v Speaker 2>local sports leagues. You know, it'll be a little league,

0:50:49.280 --> 0:50:53.120
<v Speaker 2>baseball league, I guess, just little league, and we have

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:55.439
<v Speaker 2>all these teams playing, and then at the end of

0:50:55.280 --> 0:50:57.439
<v Speaker 2>the season, there's an all Star game and all Star team,

0:50:57.440 --> 0:50:59.600
<v Speaker 2>and then that all Star team becomes the traveling team

0:51:00.200 --> 0:51:02.040
<v Speaker 2>you take on other little leagues, right, you know you

0:51:02.160 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 2>probably did that with basketball, and so at the end

0:51:06.320 --> 0:51:09.279
<v Speaker 2>of the season in the way that we have and

0:51:09.320 --> 0:51:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I know it's like, you know, the team from Tom's

0:51:11.239 --> 0:51:13.960
<v Speaker 2>River is the Northeast, right, It's it's the same team.

0:51:14.000 --> 0:51:17.360
<v Speaker 2>It's not like they've drafted the best players from upstate

0:51:17.400 --> 0:51:19.400
<v Speaker 2>New York and New Jersey and Connecticut whatever.

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But what if we get that, what if at the

0:51:22.120 --> 0:51:25.800
<v Speaker 1>end of the year it's a AU all over again.

0:51:25.840 --> 0:51:28.839
<v Speaker 2>Correct, we have AAU college football where okay, let's say

0:51:29.120 --> 0:51:31.719
<v Speaker 2>Mario cristaball and Oregon go five and oh nobody else

0:51:31.760 --> 0:51:34.560
<v Speaker 2>is undefeated. The Pac twelve beats itself up. But then

0:51:35.239 --> 0:51:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Mario Christibaal says, okay, I'm I'm now the coach, and

0:51:39.120 --> 0:51:41.360
<v Speaker 2>I have a limit to the number of Oregon players

0:51:41.360 --> 0:51:45.280
<v Speaker 2>I can select for the West team. So he selects

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:50.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, Pinay Sewl and CJ. Verdell and whoever on

0:51:50.600 --> 0:51:53.359
<v Speaker 2>their defense, cave On Thibadeau, and that's that. You can't

0:51:53.400 --> 0:51:56.960
<v Speaker 2>select more than eight players from any team, you know,

0:51:57.040 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 2>and they set a geographical boundary. So this is how

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:04.480
<v Speaker 2>you get to go from five standard season games and

0:52:04.520 --> 0:52:07.279
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, we then have an eight team

0:52:07.440 --> 0:52:11.440
<v Speaker 2>regional playoff, an eight team regional playoff that's inclusive. So

0:52:11.480 --> 0:52:13.480
<v Speaker 2>then you get buy in because Okay, maybe there's a

0:52:13.480 --> 0:52:15.399
<v Speaker 2>couple of Fresno State players on this team. Maybe there's

0:52:15.400 --> 0:52:17.520
<v Speaker 2>a couple of San Diego State players, maybe there's a

0:52:17.560 --> 0:52:20.440
<v Speaker 2>couple of you have ASU players, you have Utah players,

0:52:20.600 --> 0:52:22.960
<v Speaker 2>and then they're taking on and there's some sort of

0:52:23.080 --> 0:52:26.759
<v Speaker 2>G five minimum that you have to take a certain

0:52:26.800 --> 0:52:29.719
<v Speaker 2>number of G five players from your region as well.

0:52:29.800 --> 0:52:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Right in, celiverbo at gmail dot com, did you see

0:52:35.480 --> 0:52:36.600
<v Speaker 3>that Trevor Lawrence got again it?

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it seems early. Yeah, it's a little early.

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:46.279
<v Speaker 2>But best of luck. I mean this genuinely best of

0:52:46.320 --> 0:52:49.840
<v Speaker 2>luck to him. But I speak for myself when I

0:52:49.880 --> 0:52:54.720
<v Speaker 2>say Trevor, that's it. That's my full solid verbal.

0:52:55.239 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Gmail dot COM's the email celiverbal dot com is the website.

0:52:58.480 --> 0:53:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Don't forget to subscribe, don't forget get to rate and

0:53:01.680 --> 0:53:04.719
<v Speaker 3>like and review and follow us on social media at Instagram,

0:53:04.800 --> 0:53:09.800
<v Speaker 3>on Facebook, on on where else, YouTube, got a Twitter,

0:53:09.920 --> 0:53:13.560
<v Speaker 3>got all sorts of stuff. Also, when you're at the website,

0:53:13.640 --> 0:53:16.400
<v Speaker 3>sign up for the newsletter Dan. We'll be back on

0:53:16.520 --> 0:53:21.279
<v Speaker 3>Friday talking more college football with all y'all fun show

0:53:21.360 --> 0:53:24.680
<v Speaker 3>tonight talking about postseason possibilities again. Write in let us

0:53:24.719 --> 0:53:26.239
<v Speaker 3>know your thoughts. We'd love to hear more.

0:53:26.480 --> 0:53:28.480
<v Speaker 2>I think we're probably gonna go to a more reality

0:53:28.560 --> 0:53:30.120
<v Speaker 2>based writ I think so.

0:53:30.360 --> 0:53:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I think so, I think yeah, I think that's probably

0:53:33.120 --> 0:53:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the move. But I enjoyed this.

0:53:35.560 --> 0:53:38.640
<v Speaker 3>That guy over there, my good friend Dan Rubinstein, for myself,

0:53:38.680 --> 0:53:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Ti Hillebred.

0:53:39.360 --> 0:53:41.960
<v Speaker 1>We will be back in a few days. In the meantime,

0:53:42.080 --> 0:53:44.560
<v Speaker 1>stay safe, stay solid, Peace,