Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom. Huge lawsuits amound in the battlegrounds,
Speaker 1: Arizona back in play, Georgia down to the wire, Pennsylvania
Speaker 1: ballot battle rages on, and the National Guard called into Portland.
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton coding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence.
Speaker 1: Make no mistake, You're great American again. This is the
Speaker 1: buck Sexton Show. Former CIA analysts, I can speak to
Speaker 1: three hours without a phone call. Try doing that sometimes. No.
Speaker 1: Welcome friends to the buck Sexton Show. We are in it.
Speaker 1: We are in the fight as expected. Here we are
Speaker 1: trying to figure out who the next president the United
Speaker 1: States will be days after the election. Now, we all
Speaker 1: remember what happened in two thousand that stretched on for
Speaker 1: weeks into January. But this feels quite a bit different,
Speaker 1: doesn't it. Their social media that shows all kinds of
Speaker 1: possible fraud going on. In fact, if you look online,
Speaker 1: you'll see people sharing what seems to be documents evidence
Speaker 1: proving that there are dead people who somehow voted in Michigan,
Speaker 1: or unless you really think there are one hundred and
Speaker 1: twenty one hundred and thirty year olds who are voting
Speaker 1: in that state, that there are ballots that magically appear
Speaker 1: at just the right moment, and a not just majority,
Speaker 1: but eighty ninety, maybe even one hundred percent of them
Speaker 1: go for Joe Biden. It has yet to be the
Speaker 1: case from what I've seen, that there's been a single
Speaker 1: instance of magically found ballots that all go for Trump,
Speaker 1: and we are supposed to believe this is all a coincidence.
Speaker 1: In fact, what we are told now by the Democrats
Speaker 1: is respect the system, Obey what the people in charge
Speaker 1: tell you to do, don't question, don't undermine. This is
Speaker 1: about our sacred democracy. Oh so they're accusing us of
Speaker 1: being conspiracy theorists. What they're saying is that you have
Speaker 1: no evidence for this. The problem is that we do
Speaker 1: have evidence. And the additional problem is that we can
Speaker 1: also deduce, we can also analyze, we can look at
Speaker 1: the trends and see a clear pattern. And it's really
Speaker 1: the other side that is asking conspiracies to be believed.
Speaker 1: This is all just happenstance. This is just always going
Speaker 1: in one direction. Kind of like the polls that we saw,
Speaker 1: they were all skewed toward Joe Biden. Why would that
Speaker 1: be the case, Gee, I don't know, but now you're
Speaker 1: hearing these exhortations. You're having these appeals to good faith
Speaker 1: and decency for the sake of our democracy. That's what
Speaker 1: they're telling us, the Democrats, and to that, I say,
Speaker 1: this is war friends, and we are wartime conservatives. That's
Speaker 1: what they haven't recognized about the Trump movement. We tried
Speaker 1: the other way. We tried the will take the higher road,
Speaker 1: will be gentle in our political battles, and always appeal
Speaker 1: to the other side in the hopes that maybe they'll
Speaker 1: start reading Friedrich Hayek and learn about the road to servedom.
Speaker 1: Maybe they'll start picking up some Milton Freedman or I
Speaker 1: don't know, John Locke, or you name it political philosophy
Speaker 1: that's not Karl Marx. Maybe they'll just open their minds
Speaker 1: a little bit and they'll see the error of their collectivist,
Speaker 1: scorched earth tactics in politics. That was a fantasy. We
Speaker 1: saw it with Trump. We saw it for many of
Speaker 1: us as a result of the effort to destroy Brett Cavanaugh.
Speaker 1: One of the most grotesquely horrific character assassination campaigns I've
Speaker 1: ever seen, and the only people that were a part
Speaker 1: of it were either completely immoral or absolute morons. There
Speaker 1: is no third option. They knew, or they should have known,
Speaker 1: that there was no evidence, no corroboration, and no sane
Speaker 1: reason to believe that Brett Kavanaugh was any of the
Speaker 1: things he was accused of during that confirmation battle in
Speaker 1: twenty eighteen. But we saw that they the left did
Speaker 1: not care. It didn't matter. They engaged in a ritualized
Speaker 1: torture session on live TV in front of millions of Americans,
Speaker 1: all for the benefit of their own power. It didn't
Speaker 1: stop them one bit that they were ruining a good man,
Speaker 1: a husband, a father, a great legal jurist, somebody who
Speaker 1: should be elevated in our society. They try to destroy
Speaker 1: because he stood in the way of what they wanted.
Speaker 1: And then there's Trump. What is Trump's magic power? What's
Speaker 1: his X factor? How is he different than what we've
Speaker 1: seen before? In the Republican Party when they play these games,
Speaker 1: when the media says, these are the rules that we've established,
Speaker 1: I don't mean constitutional rules or laws. I mean rules
Speaker 1: of the road of conduct in politics, of how you
Speaker 1: get to talk to the media, of how you get
Speaker 1: to respond to your critics in the Democrat Party, Trump
Speaker 1: looks at them and says, no, not going to play
Speaker 1: the game by the rules that not only you make,
Speaker 1: but that you constantly change on a whim. Libs. Not
Speaker 1: going to do it. And I'm going to give back
Speaker 1: everything you give to me. And then some you're gonna
Speaker 1: slap me, I'm gonna throw a punch, You're going to
Speaker 1: try to ambush me. I'm going to come around on
Speaker 1: your flank and finish you off. That's the Trump approach
Speaker 1: to politics, and that's why he has started a movement
Speaker 1: because it is the other side. Don't ever forget this.
Speaker 1: It is the left that has broken norms. It is
Speaker 1: the left that for four years lied about the president
Speaker 1: of the United States being a traitor, being a Russian asset,
Speaker 1: upawn of the Kremlin, who stole a US presidential election.
Speaker 1: For four years. They use this as a club against
Speaker 1: Trump and all of his supporters. And they were serious.
Speaker 1: They weren't just saying this in the newspapers. They got
Speaker 1: a special Council investigation. They want in prison sentences for Trump,
Speaker 1: his family members, his advisers based on a lie, a
Speaker 1: lie that again only the dishonest or the dumb as
Speaker 1: dirt could believe. And now they want to talk to
Speaker 1: us about not believing conspiracy theories. Now the left thinks
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party believed they're going to get away with
Speaker 1: lecturing us about good faith. This is laughable. Friends. I
Speaker 1: can't guarantee you that we will achieve victory in this battle.
Speaker 1: I can't tell you what the outcome will be at
Speaker 1: this stage. But I do know that moral appeals from
Speaker 1: our political opponents, who have completely absolved themselves of any
Speaker 1: morality or dignity in the way they conduct their politics
Speaker 1: when the stakes are really high, that should not influence
Speaker 1: your thinking in the least. Do you really believe it's
Speaker 1: an accident that right now the tech giants, the tech
Speaker 1: oligarchs are limiting what you're allowed to see, are throttling
Speaker 1: or shadow banning, or just straight up blocking people like
Speaker 1: me from being able to reach you and share information
Speaker 1: with you. You think that they hadn't thought about this beforehand.
Speaker 1: Remember in twenty sixteen, Google and Facebook, these companies had
Speaker 1: to have adult cry sessions after Trump beat Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: You think they've got a different mentality now now? No,
Speaker 1: in fact, when they would return to you know, the
Speaker 1: Bay Area or Brooklyn or wherever they're online engineers and
Speaker 1: social media influencers and all the rest of them live.
Speaker 1: When they would go among their peer group, they were
Speaker 1: the targets of scorn. Why didn't you do more? Why
Speaker 1: wouldn't you guys block all the fake news? How'd you
Speaker 1: let Russia buy those few ads on Facebook that must
Speaker 1: have thrown the election? You guys didn't do enough. It's
Speaker 1: your fault. Trump won. You don't think that had an impact.
Speaker 1: You really think that the CEOs of any of these
Speaker 1: companies are willing to stand up to the woke, that
Speaker 1: they're willing to stand up to the people in their
Speaker 1: midst who are absolutists and seek the destruction of anybody
Speaker 1: who does not share their every ideal and plan. Friends,
Speaker 1: we are in a battle for control of the presidency,
Speaker 1: but also for the future of this country with a
Speaker 1: Democrat Party that has embraced an ideology of leftist totalitarianism.
Speaker 1: They don't have the power yet to be fully tyrannical,
Speaker 1: and I'm not saying they do, but their ideology leads
Speaker 1: down a pathway to that, and the incrementalism that they
Speaker 1: constantly show us indicates that that's what they're trying to do,
Speaker 1: That's what they want to accomplish. So when they turn
Speaker 1: around with a smile on their face and say, come on, everybody,
Speaker 1: let's let the networks call these races in these battleground states.
Speaker 1: Let's not spread disinformation about the outcome of this election.
Speaker 1: This is about our sacred democracy. The Founding Fathers are
Speaker 1: watching us, and they would want the system to work.
Speaker 1: I look at them, and I want to respond, and
Speaker 1: I do. I thought the Founding Fathers were a bunch
Speaker 1: of old, dead white racists. Now you're going to site
Speaker 1: the Founding Fathers in some kind of emotional appeal to
Speaker 1: make me stand back and not question the obvious fraud.
Speaker 1: That's right, fraud that is occurring in this election. Friends.
Speaker 1: It would be mind blowing if there wasn't fraud going
Speaker 1: on in this election. You really think that a hundred
Speaker 1: and sixty million votes are out there and they're all
Speaker 1: signed by the person that cast the vote, handed in
Speaker 1: by the deadline, somebody who actually lives in the state
Speaker 1: or is registered in the state properly, you really think
Speaker 1: that's the case, of course not. So what's the problem
Speaker 1: with trying to ensure the greatest degree of accuracy and
Speaker 1: veracity of all this voting? Well, we all know the problem.
Speaker 1: Democrats play games and cheat and lie. We see it
Speaker 1: with Russia collusion, We saw it with Kavanaugh. We see
Speaker 1: it with Hunter Biden and the suppression of that laptop
Speaker 1: right before the election. The lies about Trump saying that
Speaker 1: he doesn't respect the military. How many more examples do
Speaker 1: you have to go through? The lie that Trump said
Speaker 1: there were good people on both sides referring to neo Nazis.
Speaker 1: How many times do they have to show you that
Speaker 1: they have the brass knuckles on and have broken the
Speaker 1: glass bottles in half and are coming for you before
Speaker 1: we as conservatives decide it's time for a palm strike
Speaker 1: to the nose metaphorically speaking, How many times friends, we
Speaker 1: know who they are, we know what they're trying to do.
Speaker 1: I can't guarantee you that there will be victory, but
Speaker 1: I can guarantee you then unless we adopt the posture
Speaker 1: of wartime conservatism. That is one of the great gifts
Speaker 1: of the Trump movement, that mentality, that sensibility, that belief
Speaker 1: that we do have to fight, that it's not just
Speaker 1: going to happen, It's not going to be handed to
Speaker 1: us if we play nice with the other side, if
Speaker 1: we abandon that at this juncture, Biden will be the
Speaker 1: next president of the United States that I'm certain of.
Speaker 1: The other option. The other option, friends, is to dig
Speaker 1: in and fight in every way that we can. Shields high.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom life. This is the Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and Show podcast. Only three presidential campaigns in the past
Speaker 1: have defeated an incumbent president. When it's finished, God Willing
Speaker 1: will be the fourth. This is a major achievement. This
Speaker 1: is a major achievement. Hopefully there's still only three. Hopefully
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is not able to be added to that list.
Speaker 1: But as I was saying to you, we better understand
Speaker 1: what the other side's mentality is here, and that's what
Speaker 1: I want. I want to be vocalizing as much as possible,
Speaker 1: because if we fall into this complacency where we think, oh, Conservatives,
Speaker 1: for example, we don't riot, we don't loot, so nobody
Speaker 1: has to worry about conservatives doing that, So maybe the
Speaker 1: other side won't do that either. No, Democrats, Biden voters
Speaker 1: loot and riot and burn things down and do crazy stuff.
Speaker 1: We know this. It's consistent. They won't get rid of it,
Speaker 1: they won't condemn it. So we're not the same our
Speaker 1: approach our mentality is not the same. We're not on
Speaker 1: the on the even level playing field in terms of ethics,
Speaker 1: We're not on an even playing field in terms of
Speaker 1: what I remember. The Democrats love to say that their
Speaker 1: problem is they don't fight hard enough. I think that
Speaker 1: the Trump administration that was completely you know, ambushed with
Speaker 1: the Muller probe would disagree. I think they disagree that
Speaker 1: the lies the media perpetuated to get that probe started
Speaker 1: and then continued on without any evidence, without any real
Speaker 1: support for it. I think that shows that no, they're
Speaker 1: willing to do whatever the heck they have to do
Speaker 1: at any cost, at any price. They want to win,
Speaker 1: they want power. Think about the things that you're hearing
Speaker 1: from Democrats, the rhetoric that they use. Trump is a fascist.
Speaker 1: They say, Trump is trying to destroy our democracy. Trump
Speaker 1: is a threat to the very sanctity of our institutions.
Speaker 1: And this, you know, is not a few people. This
Speaker 1: is not a fallacy of composition. I'm not elevating somebody
Speaker 1: from nowhere and saying, look at what this person they
Speaker 1: do that you know every four years, well there's a
Speaker 1: presidential election. We have to hear that. David Duke is
Speaker 1: voted for the Republican and every Republican I know is
Speaker 1: like the clan is a bunch of abject loser morons
Speaker 1: that barely exists anymore, thank god. And they're disgusting and
Speaker 1: they're worthy of being spit on. Although I don't condone
Speaker 1: assaulting people, but you know what I'm saying, this is nonsense,
Speaker 1: This is nonsense. And yet did you hear that Richard Spencer,
Speaker 1: the noted white nationalists, voted for Joe Biden. Apparently no,
Speaker 1: you didn't hear that. Why because it didn't help the
Speaker 1: media narrative. And I could sit here and say he
Speaker 1: probably did it so that people would talk about him
Speaker 1: and that that guy's a scumbag and who cares, right,
Speaker 1: because it doesn't. It doesn't really mean anything because the
Speaker 1: guy's a loser. But those are the games that they play.
Speaker 1: They elevate that which does not matter if it helps them,
Speaker 1: and they suppress that which could matter. And you saw
Speaker 1: this with the Hunter Biden laptops. Right. They are dishonest, constantly,
Speaker 1: absolutely constantly dishonest. And now I'm warning you, they're going
Speaker 1: to appeal to your honesty. Right, Remember that great quote
Speaker 1: from Frank Herbert Children of Doone from the sci fi novel.
Speaker 1: You know, when I am weak, I ask for freedom
Speaker 1: because it is according to your rules. When I am strong,
Speaker 1: I take your freedom because it is according to my rules.
Speaker 1: That if you're trying to understand the Democrat political mentality
Speaker 1: in one phrase, that's the collectivist democrat authoritarian model. That's
Speaker 1: one of the more brilliant phrases I can think of.
Speaker 1: That's what they're doing right now. Come on, guys, let's
Speaker 1: just let every vote should be counted. Every vote should
Speaker 1: be counted. They keep saying, what about illegal votes? Should
Speaker 1: those votes be counted? Ah? But the slogan just drowns
Speaker 1: out all these questions. What about any voter integrity issues?
Speaker 1: What about ballots that aren't really filled out properly? Or
Speaker 1: you know, they checked my signature against the signature they
Speaker 1: had on file when I went to vote. If people
Speaker 1: didn't sign their ballots, are we to say that that
Speaker 1: doesn't matter anymore? The rules don't matter. You know, there
Speaker 1: are all kinds of rules out there. Why do we
Speaker 1: even just allow voting for citizens other people are human
Speaker 1: beings too well? Because we have laws and because we've
Speaker 1: agreed on these things. But you know, you could make
Speaker 1: the whole system arbitrary if you want to. Why have
Speaker 1: laws at all about voting? You know, free for all?
Speaker 1: Whoever shows up, ten year olds, you know, four nationals,
Speaker 1: who cares show up? Vote right? No, we have age restrictions,
Speaker 1: residency restrictions. We have a system in place, and the
Speaker 1: system does not matter unless the rules are adhered to
Speaker 1: and enforced. And that's the part of it that they
Speaker 1: want to leave off the table. They want this to
Speaker 1: be a free for all because they know in the
Speaker 1: aggregate there are more ideological warriors on the left who
Speaker 1: are willing to go to the mat and do stuff
Speaker 1: that is shady and or illegal to win this election.
Speaker 1: And they're going to keep looking at you and saying,
Speaker 1: hold on, hold on, let's respect the process. Let's not
Speaker 1: get ahead of ourselves. We just want to see that
Speaker 1: every vote is counted. And then the moment that you
Speaker 1: point out that five thousand ballots were found in a dumpster,
Speaker 1: all for Joe Biden, they'll say, suppress that. Block him,
Speaker 1: Come on Twitter, come on Facebook, shut him down, Shut
Speaker 1: him down. Oh I thought this was all about our
Speaker 1: sacred democracy. Thanks for listening to the bus Essen Show. Podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast at the iHeartRadio app
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. So let me be
Speaker 1: abundantly clear, first of all, this is a meritless, frivolous
Speaker 1: lawsuit and really just an attempt to sew seats of
Speaker 1: doubt about the integrity of our well established election process
Speaker 1: and protocols right at the moment when we anticipate that
Speaker 1: a lot of misinformation was going to target our state
Speaker 1: from the minute the polls closed to the minute we
Speaker 1: were about to and get very close to having that
Speaker 1: full tabulation. So recognize it for what it is, an
Speaker 1: attempt to confuse and obsticate what actually is a very transparent,
Speaker 1: secure process in Michigan. That's the Michigan Secretary of State
Speaker 1: Benson on the Trump lawsuit to stop the ballot counting
Speaker 1: currently underway there. And let me just say Michigan, yesterday
Speaker 1: a ballot counting center for absentee ballots board up the windows,
Speaker 1: I mean put barriers on the windows so that nobody
Speaker 1: could look in to see what was going on. Now,
Speaker 1: I'm just going to remind the libs out there of
Speaker 1: some of the arguments that we've had to have in
Speaker 1: the past about these things. Liberals love to talk about transparency, right,
Speaker 1: and they even love to talk about how if you've
Speaker 1: got nothing to hide, what's the problem, you know, why
Speaker 1: not sit down with Muller's team of attack dogs, Democrat
Speaker 1: attack dogs, for hours and hours and hours. You've got
Speaker 1: nothing to hide, right, Afraid of a little transparency, they're
Speaker 1: calling these lawsuits frivolous. They're saying that there's no problem. Okay,
Speaker 1: well let's see, let's see, let's open up the books,
Speaker 1: because as we all know, you can't wait on this
Speaker 1: stuff once you have a presidential declaration, and if it
Speaker 1: seems like it's all said and done, you're gonna go
Speaker 1: back in six months and do a recount then when
Speaker 1: you've already sworn in President Biden. I don't think so.
Speaker 1: It's gotta be now. It's got to be now. And
Speaker 1: in legal terms, you call this injunctive relief, right. You
Speaker 1: got to stop something before the harm happens. And yet
Speaker 1: you have so many people now who are making these
Speaker 1: arguments to suggest that Republicans are doing something terrible and
Speaker 1: wrong by saying that they want to stop the count.
Speaker 1: Stopping the count of illegal votes would be the required
Speaker 1: thing to do for a free and fair election. Stopping
Speaker 1: the count of votes not cast by the election, for example,
Speaker 1: would be another issue. I mean that Pennsylvania thinks it
Speaker 1: can extend the federal election day a few days by
Speaker 1: not having proof of a postmark is probably going to
Speaker 1: go up to the Supreme Court. That's the kind of
Speaker 1: thing that courts exist to decide. Sorry, Pennsylvania, you get
Speaker 1: to make a lot of decisions, but you don't get
Speaker 1: to move federal election day. So we'll see what ends up.
Speaker 1: I remember that was a four or four decision, very
Speaker 1: narrow in the first place. So now we shall see
Speaker 1: how that one shakes out. But there are plenty of
Speaker 1: places where we've already had this was in Philadelphia, it
Speaker 1: was in Atlanta. It's always Democrats strongholds where this is
Speaker 1: the problem and I point this out and oh they
Speaker 1: block my tweets, and there's problem. It's always in those
Speaker 1: places where we have a situation, a situation that they
Speaker 1: can't allow pole watchers in. Right, it's in those states,
Speaker 1: it's in those cities. Why aren't Republican pole watchers allowed
Speaker 1: to be there? If they're misbehaving in some way, if
Speaker 1: they're breaking the law, We'll then call the police. That's
Speaker 1: a separate issue. But why would you want to block
Speaker 1: pole watchers. There's a very clear effort here to prevent
Speaker 1: the transparency that liberals are so fond of talking about
Speaker 1: about whenever it's suiting their interests. You know, where are
Speaker 1: Trump's tax returns are? There's so many things you point to.
Speaker 1: What are you hiding? What are you hiding? Ah? And
Speaker 1: this is the classic. Whenever a Republican or a conservative
Speaker 1: or anybody pleads the fifth on anything, it's all this
Speaker 1: person's guilty, and whenever a Democrat does that same thing,
Speaker 1: it's just exercising their constant rights. We all understand the
Speaker 1: double standard. It's ridiculous. But this legal battle is going
Speaker 1: to escalate. And it is a shame that we didn't
Speaker 1: have a big winner on election night. I think that
Speaker 1: would have been better for the country overall, because understand this,
Speaker 1: whoever wins the other side is not going to accept it.
Speaker 1: They may not be able to stop it, but there's
Speaker 1: not going to be an acceptance of it. Now for conservatives,
Speaker 1: that means it will say, well, we think Biden cheated,
Speaker 1: but if he ends up getting through this process and
Speaker 1: getting getting sworn in as president, of the United States.
Speaker 1: If that ends up happening, well, then there will be
Speaker 1: the issue of trying to stop him and trying to
Speaker 1: limit his ability to ruin the country. If if Trump wins,
Speaker 1: they will go completely insane. I mean, the left will
Speaker 1: make what they've been doing all summer I think look
Speaker 1: like a picnic. I mean, they're gonna just everything that
Speaker 1: they can do because because in their minds, remember they
Speaker 1: think that the president has stolen the election twice. They
Speaker 1: think this would be the second time around that the
Speaker 1: president of the United States, who was a Republican in
Speaker 1: this case, Donald Trump, managed to cheat to have the
Speaker 1: most powerful job, the most powerful position in the whole world.
Speaker 1: They believe that. Now I know you and I can
Speaker 1: sit here and say, oh, come on, is this is
Speaker 1: crazy talk right? Yes, yes it is, But that doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: So was Russia collusion For four years that was insane.
Speaker 1: Russia collusion talk was nuts and we all know it,
Speaker 1: but they believed it. In fact, they still believe it.
Speaker 1: Never forget when I was in the Bill Marshaw and
Speaker 1: I said, as there was there Russia collusion, that people
Speaker 1: at the table, all Democrats and Bill, They'll sneered, Yes,
Speaker 1: there was oh, I'm sorry. So the Muller probe was
Speaker 1: a fixed two because they found no Russia collusion whatsoever, none, zero,
Speaker 1: And they were a bunch of Democrats who were desperate
Speaker 1: to find something to destroy the President of the United
Speaker 1: States with to throw more of his advisers into prison.
Speaker 1: With General Flynn still languishing in our court system because
Speaker 1: of Trump't arrangement syndrome in the form of a judge,
Speaker 1: but also in the prosecutors who initially were part of
Speaker 1: the Muller probe that brought the charge against him. That's
Speaker 1: what they're trying to do. That's the way they play
Speaker 1: the game. And now they turn around and say to us, Hey,
Speaker 1: why are you guys being so rough? Why are you
Speaker 1: trying to fight and bring all these lawsuits? You know
Speaker 1: who brought the lawsuits in two thousand al gore the Democrats,
Speaker 1: And this time around, we're supposed to accept that on
Speaker 1: election night Trump was winning. We wake up the next morning,
Speaker 1: there's all these ballots that are being found that overwhelmingly
Speaker 1: support Biden. And you're not supposed to ask any questions.
Speaker 1: In fact, they won't let you ask the questions. That's
Speaker 1: where we are. It's gone beyond Hey, we have a
Speaker 1: we have an issue here. Can we hash this out too?
Speaker 1: You're not even allowed to write this stuff or they'll
Speaker 1: block you, they'll suppress you. I mean, the people that
Speaker 1: are coming after me with such ferocity, why am I
Speaker 1: not allowed to have my opinion about I mean, they
Speaker 1: hate me because I know who I am. But why
Speaker 1: can't I share an opinion about concerns of voter or
Speaker 1: integrity without my timeline filling up with blue checks, with journos,
Speaker 1: people with platforms, who are you know, making all kinds
Speaker 1: of complaints here about how I'm a terrible person and
Speaker 1: I'm undermining our democracy because I'm pointing out what's obvious
Speaker 1: that there are things that are happening here that at
Speaker 1: least require additional scrutiny. I mean, Arizona was called for
Speaker 1: Biden by Fox News, and now it's clear it absolutely
Speaker 1: should not have been called for Biden on that night.
Speaker 1: If they end up being right in the end about
Speaker 1: that call, they're just lucky. And there's a very real
Speaker 1: possibility that the Republicans will flip Arizona into the red
Speaker 1: column when all the legally cast votes are counted. And
Speaker 1: that is the key phrase it's not count all the votes.
Speaker 1: I will tell you right now. When it comes to
Speaker 1: suppressing the votes of people born in eighteen eighty today,
Speaker 1: suppressing their vote, I'm okay with that. When it comes
Speaker 1: to suppressing the votes of people who have been dead
Speaker 1: for thirty years, I don't think that makes me a
Speaker 1: bad person. Or suppressing the votes of people who somehow
Speaker 1: have voted two three, whoever knows how many times, or
Speaker 1: voted in a state that they don't actually live in.
Speaker 1: I would love to be able to send in a
Speaker 1: ballot to help out my Republicans and sisters in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: But I live in the Communist People's Republic of New
Speaker 1: York City. But I could have voted. I'm a US citizen,
Speaker 1: so why can't I vote in Pennsylvania? Because we have rules,
Speaker 1: and we either believe in all of the rules and
Speaker 1: the enforcement thereof, or we believe in the selective application
Speaker 1: based upon political necessity, which means free for all. So
Speaker 1: the Democrat position is free for all until they win.
Speaker 1: The Republican position is let's actually look at what has happened,
Speaker 1: what the rules are, apply them fairly and evenly, and
Speaker 1: see who won and if at the end of this.
Speaker 1: We do get a full accounting, we do get the
Speaker 1: access we need, and we can't make the case, which
Speaker 1: is a different thing from saying it didn't happen. We
Speaker 1: can make the case that Joe Biden only was ahead
Speaker 1: because of cheating in these places. Well, I'll accept, I'll
Speaker 1: accept the loss if I believe a loss is merited. Here.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that's impossible, but I'm saying I'm not
Speaker 1: accepting it until I know that's what happened. And that's
Speaker 1: the wartime conservative mentality we all have to have. Right now.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom Hud This is the Buck Section
Speaker 1: Show podcast. You Gules, love your evidence free musings, don't you.
Speaker 1: That doesn't belong in the news, That belongs in a
Speaker 1: PennySaver column called Dana's Digressions. There's literally no proof for
Speaker 1: what you're saying. These people are so insane they think
Speaker 1: election officials are finding ballots the way George Costanza found
Speaker 1: that a cleric. It's a good Violet, Jerry, it was
Speaker 1: above the rim. And this morning Fox News went to
Speaker 1: work trying to sustain the deranged conspiracy theory that just
Speaker 1: counting votes mean magically finding votes because they can't do
Speaker 1: basic math. That guy's supposed to be a comedian. You know,
Speaker 1: he's paid millions of dollars by a legacy media network
Speaker 1: to be an unfunny pain in the ass on TV.
Speaker 1: But he's supposed to be a comedian. Yeah, really funny,
Speaker 1: really funny stuff there. Um, I guess we're supposed to
Speaker 1: just accept when Michigan, for example, in the dead of night,
Speaker 1: says they found over one hundred thousand votes and every
Speaker 1: single one on the one for Biden, and then they
Speaker 1: came back later and said, oh, okay, you know, we
Speaker 1: we actually made made an additional, an addition error, so
Speaker 1: it wasn't that we really found a hundred okay. But
Speaker 1: the people that point at that and said, oh, that's
Speaker 1: a problem, aren't aren't They're not the jerks. The people
Speaker 1: that yell at them saying, well, you mean conspiracy theorist,
Speaker 1: they're the jerks. You know, if you're if you're watching
Speaker 1: a sporting event and you know, the two basketball teams
Speaker 1: are tied at sixty and then a minute later one
Speaker 1: of the teams has an additional thirty points. Pointing at
Speaker 1: the board and saying, hey, that's a problem, doesn't make
Speaker 1: you a bad person. It makes you not a moron.
Speaker 1: But they want you to just be insecure. They want
Speaker 1: you to feel like you don't want to be one
Speaker 1: of the bad people that are questioning the dominant narrative because,
Speaker 1: oh yeah, what does the government do without problems? Did
Speaker 1: you realize the government pays out every year sixty to
Speaker 1: eighty billion dollars with a B in Medicare and Medicaid
Speaker 1: fraud every year billion sixty to eighty billion. That's the estimate.
Speaker 1: It could even be higher than that. And that's just
Speaker 1: you know, they just can't track it all down, can't
Speaker 1: find you know, that's just the government writing checks to
Speaker 1: people they're not supposed to be getting them, giving payments
Speaker 1: to doctors for procedures not done, giving reimbursements to people
Speaker 1: for things that never happened. I mean, what part of
Speaker 1: government action at this level isn't going to be fraught
Speaker 1: with problems. All we're really talking about here, all the
Speaker 1: conservatives want, all the Trump campaign is asking for is
Speaker 1: that legally counted ballots are the standard. That's it, that
Speaker 1: the rules be applied. You know, when it was possible
Speaker 1: to try to throw Trump campaign official roles or somebody
Speaker 1: who was a Trump advisor in prison because of a
Speaker 1: process crime. Whatever, you know, lying to the FBI about
Speaker 1: nothing or whatever it was. The laws, the law. You'll
Speaker 1: notice the laws the law when they can use it
Speaker 1: as a weapon. And no deference to men's reel, your
Speaker 1: state of mind when you're committing this crime. Did you
Speaker 1: actually think you're committing a crime? No? No No, No, the
Speaker 1: laws the law. They will they will tell you there
Speaker 1: is no room for nuance or anything else if it
Speaker 1: means that a Republican can get hurt, can get crushed.
Speaker 1: And so if it's a political weapon for them, exactly
Speaker 1: what it says is all that matters about about rules,
Speaker 1: about the law. But in elections, it's more like it's
Speaker 1: kind of like, make this a little bit of a
Speaker 1: more of a creative exercise. Is this ballot really filled out? No?
Speaker 1: But I see I see a you know, in the
Speaker 1: corner here, I see something that looks like it was
Speaker 1: a thing, and it's kind of close to the Biden
Speaker 1: core the I'd encircle. And so I'm just gonna say, yeah,
Speaker 1: let's go with that. Friends, it's absurd. We see what
Speaker 1: they're doing. We're aware of what's happening right now, and
Speaker 1: it's just frankly wrong. It's just wrong. But they've convinced
Speaker 1: themselves they're saving the country. Right if you were you know,
Speaker 1: when you're the basic like one on one ethics class,
Speaker 1: or you know, some of the philosophy class in college,
Speaker 1: you're talking about basic ethics, and people will ask these
Speaker 1: questions like is it is it moral to steal a
Speaker 1: loaf of bread to feed your starving children? Right? I mean,
Speaker 1: the people will ask these things, and these are questions.
Speaker 1: Understand that in Democrats minds, defeating Trump is the proverbial
Speaker 1: stealing the loaf of bread to feed the starving children.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter what they have to do. All that
Speaker 1: matters is that it works. Their actions are inherently justified
Speaker 1: by the righteousness of the cause. That's what's going on
Speaker 1: all around you now in Michigan, in Arizona, in Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: in Nevada, in Georgia. Yeah, if people are so funny too,
Speaker 1: they really I can't even keep up with all the
Speaker 1: idiotic sick burns they give you on social media. You'll
Speaker 1: say this looks weird, and then they'll they'll get all
Speaker 1: these people fled your time and through this election chair
Speaker 1: there where the person running it is a Republican. Yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: that doesn't mean that people who are actually doing the
Speaker 1: ballot counting aren't being handed a stack of ballots that
Speaker 1: all say Joe Biden. There there's nothing that the guy
Speaker 1: who runs the election being a Republican does to champ.
Speaker 1: But people are so dumb and think they're smart. That's
Speaker 1: really I think actually one of the one of the
Speaker 1: I wouldn't say it's a defining characteristic, but one of
Speaker 1: the telltale signs of a liberal is they always think
Speaker 1: they're about twenty IQ points smarter than they really are.
Speaker 1: You know, so wherever they are, So if you've got
Speaker 1: to you know, a lib that's like pretty bright, they
Speaker 1: think they're a genius. You gotta live. That's you know,
Speaker 1: pretty average. They think they're really smart. I mean, that's
Speaker 1: just the way that they are because they're surrounded with
Speaker 1: all these influences that tell them just by believing what
Speaker 1: they believe politically, they're so bright, they're so wise. And
Speaker 1: that comes across in the way they even have these
Speaker 1: kinds of arguments. That comes across and the way they
Speaker 1: approach these political questions. So, friends, like I've been telling you,
Speaker 1: dig in, yes, we are wartime conservatives, and this is
Speaker 1: going to be political trench warfare. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the Bus and Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: And now, after a long night of counting, it's clear
Speaker 1: that we're winning enough states to reach two hundred and
Speaker 1: seventy electoral votes needed to win the presidency. I'm not
Speaker 1: here to declare that we've won, but I am here
Speaker 1: to report when the account is finished, we believe we
Speaker 1: will be the winners. We believe will be the winners. Okay,
Speaker 1: Trump says they think they won, but he said it
Speaker 1: that way, in the Trumpian way, and it's a threat
Speaker 1: to our democracy. It's like he was lighting the Constitution
Speaker 1: on fire. But when Joe Biden says, if when the
Speaker 1: votes are counted, we will have won because of that,
Speaker 1: of that conditional carve out, it's fine. What do he says?
Speaker 1: It's fine, no problem, it's all great. Sure, he's also
Speaker 1: telling us that he's going to be a uniter. And
Speaker 1: I want to address this for a little bit here.
Speaker 1: The notion of Joe Biden as a uniter under the
Speaker 1: circumstances play twelve here. But I also know this as well.
Speaker 1: Make progress, we have to stop treating our opponents as enemies.
Speaker 1: We are not enemies. What brings us together as Americans
Speaker 1: is so much stronger than anything they can tear us apart.
Speaker 1: So let me be clear. I we are campaigning as
Speaker 1: a Democrat, but I will govern as an American president.
Speaker 1: The president, the presidency itself is not a partisan institution.
Speaker 1: It's the one office in this nation that represents everyone,
Speaker 1: and it demands a duty of care for all Americans.
Speaker 1: That is precisely what I will do. Yeah, just like
Speaker 1: the Obama administration was all about all Americans, right, not
Speaker 1: about elections have consequences. Deal with it, Republicans, Sorry, my
Speaker 1: way or the highway. I got a pen on a phone.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna do it the way I want to do it.
Speaker 1: You can't stop me. The media is in my pocket.
Speaker 1: What are you going to say about out it? For
Speaker 1: eight years? And Joe Biden was a part of that administration,
Speaker 1: the vice president. Now he wants to be mister uh,
Speaker 1: you know, jolly old Grandpa that we can all count on,
Speaker 1: wants to bounce us all on his need. Haven't judge
Speaker 1: my blonde leg here from the son and talk to
Speaker 1: corn Pop man. I was no joke man. I was
Speaker 1: out back and I had a I had a chain
Speaker 1: and corn Pop had this rusty you know this thing man,
Speaker 1: And I said, corn Pop, yeah, shooting and I suffer
Speaker 1: pressure share whatever whatever I speak Biden too. Yeah, that's uh,
Speaker 1: that's the way that it is. I mean, I do
Speaker 1: remember getting I feel a few times drunk enough in
Speaker 1: college that I did speak Biden shribe me bed. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's a little bit like what you what you'd hear
Speaker 1: from the old Star Wars with Job of the Hut.
Speaker 1: That's that's a little bit what what Biden. Biden is
Speaker 1: m speaks like battur like. I like that one too.
Speaker 1: But he's gonna govern as an American president. He's gonna
Speaker 1: just kind of yell, you know, all the time, and
Speaker 1: his phrases well kind of just trail off no apparent reason.
Speaker 1: He's gonna have a cadence just like this. You know,
Speaker 1: no joke man, no joke period. Yeah. Sure, that's what's
Speaker 1: gonna happen, folks. The problem that Biden's gonna come up
Speaker 1: against if in fact, he does become the president, which
Speaker 1: is something we do have to take seriously, and it
Speaker 1: is even probable right now, doesn't mean it's done. I'm
Speaker 1: fighting for Trump. I told you we're in the trench.
Speaker 1: But you know, just because you're in the trench doesn't
Speaker 1: mean that the Germans aren't going to overrun the trench.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna tell you the truth. I mean, that's
Speaker 1: the reality. But we're in that trench. We're gonna fight.
Speaker 1: We're a fight till the end. Biden represents a party
Speaker 1: that wants to use the levers of power to the maximum.
Speaker 1: You'll notice that the things the things that Democrats want
Speaker 1: aren't going to be things that I would say in
Speaker 1: any event, oh yeah, that will make my life or
Speaker 1: your life better. It's not as though they want to
Speaker 1: focus on certain things that if they accomplish, it'll make
Speaker 1: life better for you and me, and so we'll be
Speaker 1: the beneficiaries in some ways of a Democrat presidency. No,
Speaker 1: it's not the case at all. In fact, if anything,
Speaker 1: you're more likely to see the kind of international entanglements
Speaker 1: and the interventionist mentality from the elites that's led to
Speaker 1: which Republicans absolutely have been guilty of to in the past,
Speaker 1: but not Trump, but has led to military engagements abroad
Speaker 1: and long and continued and sustained occupations of foreign countries
Speaker 1: that we don't want to be in anymore. You're going
Speaker 1: to have higher taxes. Everybody's gonna have higher taxes, which
Speaker 1: is not going to be a good thing, not gonna
Speaker 1: make you happy. There's a lot of problems here. There's
Speaker 1: really no upside. There's nothing I can point to about
Speaker 1: a Biden presence. Oh mate, maybe maybe for those of
Speaker 1: you that are really into more drugs. I know that
Speaker 1: was it Oregon decriminalize all drugs, cocaine, methamphetamine, heroin, So
Speaker 1: that's really gonna be helpful for that place. They already have.
Speaker 1: I mean this Portland, Oregon has a pandemic of mental
Speaker 1: illness that's happening right now, and that's playing out before
Speaker 1: our eyes with people who are Biden voters and who
Speaker 1: are Antifa. They have they're deranged. I mean, they've got
Speaker 1: a problem they need, they need need clinical medical assistance.
Speaker 1: And you know, it reminds me a little bit of
Speaker 1: like the berserkers from old from old Viking times, and
Speaker 1: the berserkers would get themselves up into a religious inspired
Speaker 1: frenzy and they thought they were doing this on behalf
Speaker 1: of Odin, and that they would go to Valhalla, you know,
Speaker 1: their version of the Great kind of Heaven for heroes,
Speaker 1: and they would run into battle pretty much naked and
Speaker 1: put you know, paint, paint their bodies with different things.
Speaker 1: And they were actually fierce warriors. Because if you run
Speaker 1: in there and you're all all jazzed up and decide
Speaker 1: that you're going to swing that axe around and you
Speaker 1: don't care if you live or die. In fact, you're
Speaker 1: hoping that somebody punches your ticket because you're gonna go
Speaker 1: to Valhalla and get to hang out with all the valkyries.
Speaker 1: Hey Valkyries. Yeah, you're a pretty pretty effective warrior. Antifa
Speaker 1: is also crazed. I mean, these people are nuts. They're
Speaker 1: not as brave or as useful as perserkers, of course,
Speaker 1: but what they do has value to the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: because we know that at any event where there's a
Speaker 1: college where, any college event where there's a conservative speaker,
Speaker 1: you know, any time there's going to be a political
Speaker 1: outcome that the Left doesn't like, they can count out
Speaker 1: on their Antifa berserkers in a sense to take to
Speaker 1: the streets to light things on fire, to throw things
Speaker 1: at cops. I mean, there was a there was a woman.
Speaker 1: This was a New York City in the West Village,
Speaker 1: and there's video of it. There's a woman who I
Speaker 1: think she's from a small town in Pennsylvania, and I
Speaker 1: don't know if she's here studying or you know, who
Speaker 1: knows people come to New York for all kinds of stuff.
Speaker 1: This must be in her twenties. And she right up
Speaker 1: in the face of an NYPD officer who's done nothing
Speaker 1: to her. He's just standing there, observing and making sure
Speaker 1: that laws are laws are respected by this group that
Speaker 1: did not respect laws. They left things on fire, they
Speaker 1: engaged in vandalism, you know, the whole thing, disorderly conduct.
Speaker 1: And she looks at him and call she sort of
Speaker 1: spits out the word fascist in his face. And this
Speaker 1: is right on video. Ian you see it. And then
Speaker 1: I don't want to say it, basically just hawks a lugi,
Speaker 1: I think that's the technical term, right in this CoP's face,
Speaker 1: just spits with you know, really kind of I don't
Speaker 1: want to get too grossing in it, but I mean
Speaker 1: really searches around for a good one and spits right
Speaker 1: in his face on video. If you're gonna tell me
Speaker 1: that that you know, one hundred and thirty pound, twenty
Speaker 1: five year old woman is not out of her mind
Speaker 1: and needs medical assistance for her mental health issues. Apart
Speaker 1: from the fact that she's an ardent Biden voter. I
Speaker 1: don't know what to tell you. This is a it
Speaker 1: is a pandemic of mental illness from these people who
Speaker 1: are radicalized leftists. We're seeing it all over the place.
Speaker 1: I mean, if I knew somebody who had done that
Speaker 1: to a police officer, I would, first of all, that's
Speaker 1: not somebody would spending any time around or near. But
Speaker 1: I would assume that person really needs to be institutionalized honestly,
Speaker 1: and really needs serious psychological theatric assistance. And this is
Speaker 1: like standard operating procedure for thousands and thousands of ardent
Speaker 1: RBG loving Biden voting Kamala Harris worshiping leftists. We're supposed
Speaker 1: to not pay attention to this. This is not an
Speaker 1: observable fact that should put people on edge a little bit.
Speaker 1: What the heck is going on here? My friends, as
Speaker 1: you know, they'd rather you just ignored all of this.
Speaker 1: They'd rather that you think this is on both sides.
Speaker 1: I mean that's of all the lies out there, that's
Speaker 1: among my least favorite. I don't like any of the lies,
Speaker 1: but that's the one that really bothers me in a
Speaker 1: special category. They just lie and lie and lie again
Speaker 1: about so many things. But the pretense that our side
Speaker 1: does what their side does is just beyond I mean,
Speaker 1: this is just beyond the pale. Come one, Where have
Speaker 1: there been any riot? If they had to call in
Speaker 1: the National Guard in Portland and for every person who
Speaker 1: was rioting and every person who was the justification for
Speaker 1: that National Guard being called in, there was not I
Speaker 1: guarantee you not a single Trump supporting registered Republican in
Speaker 1: the group. And a lot of Biden supporters and people
Speaker 1: not only vote for Biden, but who are part of
Speaker 1: the activist community that's working professionally to support Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: You know, they're social workers who are also you know,
Speaker 1: online and active in groups that are trying to elevate
Speaker 1: socialist policies for the Democrat Party to implement in this country. Right.
Speaker 1: These are people, This is a big part of their identity.
Speaker 1: It's who they are. And Joe Biden is going to
Speaker 1: be their president now I know he's going to be
Speaker 1: the president for everybody if he wins. If he wins,
Speaker 1: we're just we're you know, we're looking at the future
Speaker 1: pathways here. But if Joe Biden wins, he is going
Speaker 1: to be a president that is representing the interests of
Speaker 1: the lunatics in Portland more than he's representing the interests
Speaker 1: of people that wear Maga hats and want a country
Speaker 1: run by common sense. I really wish that the Trump administration.
Speaker 1: I mean, now, it's there's a lot of second guessing
Speaker 1: that's going to go on about this campaign, but just
Speaker 1: that notion of of Trump running a common sense presidency.
Speaker 1: We've let the left hijack that that term so they
Speaker 1: can apply to gun control and then and it's not
Speaker 1: common sense at all. The stuff that they're talking about
Speaker 1: on gun control is idiotic, it wouldn't help anybody, and
Speaker 1: it's an infringement on Second Amendment rights. But we've let
Speaker 1: them get away with using that terminology with with you know,
Speaker 1: applying it to their side only when really one of
Speaker 1: the great things about the Trump presidency is the overwhelmingly
Speaker 1: common sense approach that it takes to so many things.
Speaker 1: You know, Yeah, it's it's a rational position to think
Speaker 1: about Americans interests as the American government before the interests
Speaker 1: of the rest of the world. You know that Trump
Speaker 1: came in and thought, what I can do for the
Speaker 1: American people is more important than what the UN General
Speaker 1: Assembly vote would show me. That that's a revolutionary thought
Speaker 1: tells you so much. That that approach is so different
Speaker 1: from what we had had in this country before, under
Speaker 1: particularly under Democrats, but even someone under Republicans. He tells
Speaker 1: you a lot about where we are right now and
Speaker 1: where we're going. If we don't pull out a final
Speaker 1: Trump victory, which I certainly hope we do, you're in
Speaker 1: the Freedom und This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast.
Speaker 1: It will call it a question of legitimacy of the democracy.
Speaker 1: For a lot of people, they'll just say that this
Speaker 1: is bologny. This doesn't work. We keep getting all the
Speaker 1: votes that in a normal majoritarian race you should win
Speaker 1: the presidency with, and this system, which dates from a
Speaker 1: slaveholding constitutional founding, doesn't work for us. It's very difficult
Speaker 1: to change, but I don't. I think it'll deep in cynicism,
Speaker 1: deep and distrust. It is what it is. It is
Speaker 1: how the system works. But you can't say that young
Speaker 1: people coming up people who worked hard to do whatever
Speaker 1: they could to get their guy across the line, got
Speaker 1: them across the line. And then see again that because
Speaker 1: of the system they don't win. That's going to cast
Speaker 1: out on it for them because of the system. You see,
Speaker 1: if we don't get our way, the system is wrong.
Speaker 1: But if the system gives us what we want, I
Speaker 1: actually appreciate what this guy, this guy Terry Moran at
Speaker 1: ABC News again every bit is left wing and bull
Speaker 1: crap at CNN is but just a little better at
Speaker 1: hiding it a little bit better, not much. If we
Speaker 1: get the result we want, then the system is fine.
Speaker 1: You see. This is where you can understand that the
Speaker 1: left has no comprehension of what principle. Its principle is.
Speaker 1: There are things that are true irrespective of who that
Speaker 1: thing being true benefits, and if we build a system
Speaker 1: based upon principles and with rules in place, it should
Speaker 1: be respected by both sides. Then the outcome has nothing
Speaker 1: to do with the legitimacy of the system. But the
Speaker 1: left wing mentality reverses this around and says to you,
Speaker 1: the outcome is all that matters, and therefore, if the
Speaker 1: outcome is not what we want, the system itself is corrupt,
Speaker 1: Decrepit must be overthrown, must be changed. It's a system.
Speaker 1: As the guy he first of all that the tides slavery.
Speaker 1: They always say this, that's actually historic. The historical illiteracy
Speaker 1: of liberals about our constitutional system is amazing. But then again,
Speaker 1: you know, they elevate nonsense history all the time as
Speaker 1: part of the liberal project. So that's not a surprise.
Speaker 1: But I just want you all to hear this on
Speaker 1: them so that we all understand, so we all know
Speaker 1: we're on the same page here that they only will
Speaker 1: accept the outcome they like. I am telling you right now,
Speaker 1: and I hold to this, if if we if we
Speaker 1: bring these lawsuits and we do not have the goods,
Speaker 1: the proof that there were problems here, that there was
Speaker 1: either cheating or even just issues that come up that
Speaker 1: are you know, irregularities. There are mistakes that are made
Speaker 1: an account as well, but those mistakes can result in
Speaker 1: an improper account. But if we can't prove it, if
Speaker 1: we don't have if we get access, which is a
Speaker 1: big question, and can't prove it, and Joe Biden comes
Speaker 1: out with more votes, Joe Biden's the President United States. Friends,
Speaker 1: I'm not going to sit here and say, oh, but
Speaker 1: you know this, we're there are things that happen here
Speaker 1: or the mail in ballots and COVID that the whole
Speaker 1: thing is shady. Yeah, but mail in ballots are not illegal.
Speaker 1: So let's be clear about that. That is part of
Speaker 1: the system. That is part of the rules that we have.
Speaker 1: How their account did now and how they're put out
Speaker 1: on the how the timeline works of when they were
Speaker 1: sent that really matters. But I will accept a loss
Speaker 1: if a loss is something that ends up being the reality,
Speaker 1: which I think is very very possible at this point.
Speaker 1: The one thing that I will not have an easy
Speaker 1: time dealing with is if we lose the Senate. To
Speaker 1: play clip six, well, I'm not sure whether I'll need
Speaker 1: to or not. We don't know who won the presidential ratio.
Speaker 1: Will We'll see what the American people decide they want
Speaker 1: their government to be. I don't know whether I'm going
Speaker 1: to be the majority leader of the minority leaders. I've
Speaker 1: told you I've been both majorities better, and we're awaiting
Speaker 1: the judgment of the American people. So if that happens,
Speaker 1: which I don't think it will, I think we're going
Speaker 1: to hold the Republicans are going to hold the Senate.
Speaker 1: But if Joe Biden wins and Democrats take the Senate,
Speaker 1: it's it is And yeah, I don't say this kind
Speaker 1: of stuff to you, and I didn't say it when
Speaker 1: Bamba one in twenty twelve, But it's break the glass time.
Speaker 1: It's like, Okay, we're in for a rough ride here, friends,
Speaker 1: because they will just the same way. When Obama had
Speaker 1: that supermajority, what do they do They ram through Obamacare
Speaker 1: not a single Republican vote. They thought that they were
Speaker 1: in such a majority position that they could just use
Speaker 1: the system to get everything that they wanted. Now what
Speaker 1: they've realized because of the Trump turnout and the real
Speaker 1: opposition that they're going to have going forward, they will
Speaker 1: view it as a once perhaps in a generation opportunity
Speaker 1: to change the system and get everything that they want
Speaker 1: done in two years with the House, the Senate, and
Speaker 1: the presidency and a bare majority if they get rid
Speaker 1: of the filibuster is all they need. So I'm also
Speaker 1: setting that marker. If we lose in it's fare and square. Fine.
Speaker 1: If we lose both the presidency and the Senate, we're
Speaker 1: gonna have to have a talk team about what we're
Speaker 1: gonna do going forward. Thanks for listening to the Bus
Speaker 1: Sesson Showbot. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Friends, How do we
Speaker 1: win this fight? What does the battle ahead look like
Speaker 1: for us? If victory is going to be in our sights?
Speaker 1: We have Denish Jasuza with us. Now you know him
Speaker 1: from his best selling books. He's an author, filmmaker, conservative commentator, columnist,
Speaker 1: and all the rest of it. Denish, Great to have
Speaker 1: you back, Hey, it's great, good to be on the show.
Speaker 1: Just give me give me your macro thoughts right now
Speaker 1: on where we are. Denish, we would know the Trump
Speaker 1: campaign following these lawsuits. How certain do you think we
Speaker 1: can be at this point that there's the kind of
Speaker 1: cheating underway that would change the election outcome unless it's
Speaker 1: addressed well. Every indication is that the Democrats have unfurled
Speaker 1: a sort of broad scheme, and the scheme can be
Speaker 1: described in three parts. Number one, flood the country with
Speaker 1: mail in ballots. Number two, particularly in democratic states, states
Speaker 1: where the local apparatus is Democratic, block the close observation
Speaker 1: and verification of ballots, so that fraud can't be easily detected,
Speaker 1: and number three basically say there's no evidence of fraud
Speaker 1: and therefore all the fraudulent ballots should be lumped in
Speaker 1: with all the legal ballots under the generic slogan count
Speaker 1: every vote. So in other words, there's no systematic effort
Speaker 1: to count only legal votes. But from the beginning this
Speaker 1: was conceived as a way to ensure that there would
Speaker 1: be a blurring of the line between the legal and
Speaker 1: the illegal votes. Very similar by the way, the way
Speaker 1: the left treats immigrants, legals are lumped in with illegals.
Speaker 1: If you come out against illegals, they say, you're against immigration.
Speaker 1: So the same thing here. If you come out for
Speaker 1: basically fair legal voting, they go, you're against counting the vote.
Speaker 1: They have a very different idea of what counting the
Speaker 1: vote means than we do. You know, Jannis, you touch
Speaker 1: on a few issues here that I've been trying to
Speaker 1: raise for the audience, and one in particular that i'd
Speaker 1: just i'd like to hear. I know, I'm asking you
Speaker 1: to essentially play from across the chessboard from their side
Speaker 1: on this one, But what is the argument that even
Speaker 1: can be made in these cases where I've seen video
Speaker 1: and proof in Philadelphia and that that's been verified reported
Speaker 1: on of blocking Republican poll watchers. I've seen proof in
Speaker 1: video in Michigan of blocking pole watchers. Why poll watchers
Speaker 1: are allowed, They're legal. So what's the you know, what
Speaker 1: are they even saying about this other than shouldn't this
Speaker 1: look shady to people who are just honest observers well
Speaker 1: as in as in so many other cases, they don't
Speaker 1: have to give a reason because their assumption is we've
Speaker 1: got the media in our pocket. Nobody's going to ask
Speaker 1: us tough questions. The Conservative reaches smaller than our reach.
Speaker 1: So saying with you know, with the Bob Lynsky matter
Speaker 1: and with the Biden scandal, they're argument was, let's just
Speaker 1: keep our lips tight on this one. Let's see how
Speaker 1: many people they can notify about it. Probably not enough,
Speaker 1: And so the ordinary guy is going to remain in
Speaker 1: the dark. And therefore when we say things like where's
Speaker 1: the oven and the voter fraud, the ordinary guy goes, well, yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't only see in the evidence of voter fraud.
Speaker 1: And the reason is that this is not really just
Speaker 1: about a dead guy voted here and a dead guy
Speaker 1: voted there. It's about a systemic form of corrupting the
Speaker 1: vote so that it becomes no easy way to separate
Speaker 1: the good from the bad ballots. And the Trump campaign
Speaker 1: is on it, but they're on it sort of late
Speaker 1: in the game. They're on it sort of now. But
Speaker 1: what happens to all the ballots already counted that have
Speaker 1: been sort of tossed into a single pile. How confident
Speaker 1: are you denish that they'll be able to get the
Speaker 1: transparency here the Trump legal team and these challenges that
Speaker 1: they will be able to at least find out the
Speaker 1: degree and scale of the fraud. I hear from people
Speaker 1: who say, even if we know the fixes in I mean,
Speaker 1: they ran the Russia collusion playbook for three years really
Speaker 1: four years in a sense, but three years without any
Speaker 1: real consequences, and even though it didn't have the ultimate
Speaker 1: aim they wanted, it did hurt the administration. So why
Speaker 1: should we think that this time around they'll be able
Speaker 1: to stop it. Not only that, but the Russia collusion
Speaker 1: had sort of no expiration date, and this does. There's
Speaker 1: an expiration date which is essentially inauguration day, and that
Speaker 1: sets a limit on what courts can actually do. Let's
Speaker 1: say there's a court that's convinced that there has been
Speaker 1: widespread cheating. Let's say in Nevada, what are they going
Speaker 1: to do have another vote? Are they going to demand
Speaker 1: that every ballot be verified? Are they, in other words,
Speaker 1: a systematic re check and recount, or as the court
Speaker 1: going to say, well, let's try to frame this kind
Speaker 1: of narrowly throw out some obviously bad ballots, which would
Speaker 1: not change the general picture of things at all. I
Speaker 1: think we have to watch, we have to press and
Speaker 1: watch and fight, and then at the end we have
Speaker 1: to take stock of what's going on in its widest implications,
Speaker 1: because certainly, if the Democrats are able to do widespread
Speaker 1: cheating and get away with it, there is no reason
Speaker 1: to believe that they won't do it all the time
Speaker 1: and consistently. And what's the point of having an election
Speaker 1: or even a country when your basic system is at
Speaker 1: such a level of breakdown that there's not only cheating,
Speaker 1: but then there's the cover of the cheating and there's
Speaker 1: no legal redress to be had. This is a very
Speaker 1: serious problem. We're speaking in Danish. Dasu's a best selling author, filmmaker.
Speaker 1: I'm sure you've read and watched and heard his stuff
Speaker 1: now for many years. Denish the social media blocking you
Speaker 1: mentioned Bobolynsky, the social media blocking that went on there
Speaker 1: where the New York host I believe for over a
Speaker 1: week had its Twitter account locked, and the Facebook throttling
Speaker 1: that went on. Uh, that that I think was a
Speaker 1: pivot point or that that was a breaking point, better
Speaker 1: way to put it for a lot of people where
Speaker 1: they realized, Okay, the fix is absolutely in. From the
Speaker 1: perspective of the of the tech giants, do you do
Speaker 1: you think that there's a better way or are we
Speaker 1: reaching are beginning to reach new ways to get out
Speaker 1: the information? Because I have to say, right now, I
Speaker 1: see stuff that looks real from people that I know
Speaker 1: in our business who are showing they're showing, you know, documents,
Speaker 1: screenshots of documents, they're showing video and then it disappears
Speaker 1: or then I can't click on it. You know, how
Speaker 1: do we fight an information battle when they've got so
Speaker 1: many more battleships than we do. Well, I think what
Speaker 1: this um that is true? I also think that the
Speaker 1: um this is a scheme that was thought about by
Speaker 1: the other side beforehand. This is think about let's look back.
Speaker 1: When Trump kept talking about election sheeting, some of us
Speaker 1: were like, why is he talking about that? There's that
Speaker 1: that we're not there yet, that doesn't see But he
Speaker 1: he anticipated this, and so did they. Sort the other side.
Speaker 1: The reason the media was talking about things like we
Speaker 1: better make sure Trump doesn't declare victory on election night.
Speaker 1: Why was that such a big issue for them beforehand? Um,
Speaker 1: not at the last minute where they might worry about
Speaker 1: the premature declaration, but beforehand, it's almost like they we
Speaker 1: have to ensure that that does not happen. Why because
Speaker 1: that's going to give us time overnight to then draw
Speaker 1: out the process and find the new ballots. Um. I
Speaker 1: mean again, ask any statistician, what is the probability that
Speaker 1: one hundred and thirty eight thousand ballots might appear all
Speaker 1: for Biden, not one for Trump? And what are the
Speaker 1: odds of that? They're essentially zero? There are there are
Speaker 1: a chance of firing an arrow from a bow and
Speaker 1: hitting you know, Bullseyeon mars that that's the kind of
Speaker 1: odds you're talking about. So it seems to me that
Speaker 1: what the left to saying is it's kind of a
Speaker 1: massive show of power they're saying, we can do this.
Speaker 1: We've got the media in our pocket. We're going to
Speaker 1: count on you to be the namby panbies that you
Speaker 1: guys normally are. You'll sulk and scream and shout out
Speaker 1: for a few minutes, and then you'll settle down and
Speaker 1: accept it. This is sort of the Republican way, and
Speaker 1: therefore we'll now ensure that we can keep doing this.
Speaker 1: And now we have you over a barrel. This is
Speaker 1: going to be our game plan going forward. Denish, I
Speaker 1: talk about wartime conservatism to this audience, just meaning that
Speaker 1: we understand the stakes, the way this game is played now,
Speaker 1: the zerosum scorched Earth attitude of the other side. With
Speaker 1: that framework, what do you want to see the Trump
Speaker 1: team and campaign and supporters out there do, or just
Speaker 1: how to view this between now and whenever this mess
Speaker 1: finally ends. We have to we can deal with losing generally, people,
Speaker 1: Do you know you can lose a fair fight if
Speaker 1: the other guy really did knock you out, you can
Speaker 1: lose a fair race as long as you know that
Speaker 1: people started on the same line. A clock went on,
Speaker 1: a gun went off, and you came in seventh. But
Speaker 1: what this shows you is that when you have a
Speaker 1: system of any kind, it is not important for the
Speaker 1: people who win to go, oh, the rules are fair,
Speaker 1: because that's what you expect them to say. The rules
Speaker 1: obviously will be seen as fair by the people who won,
Speaker 1: even if they didn't. Start on the same line, the
Speaker 1: people who run the race, who organize the race, have
Speaker 1: the obligation of defending the integrity of the rules to
Speaker 1: the satisfaction of the people who lost. We have to
Speaker 1: be able to convince the losing side that we know
Speaker 1: you lost, so we understand you're disappointed, but you did
Speaker 1: get a fair shot. You hadn't You had a chance
Speaker 1: to win, you just didn't happen to win. That's not
Speaker 1: what's happening here. The left is basically saying, hey, we
Speaker 1: got it. We want The media is basically saying nothing
Speaker 1: to see here, folks, And we'll have to see what
Speaker 1: the court system has to say. But I think longer term,
Speaker 1: we have to think about Number one, how do we
Speaker 1: deal with the fact that we don't have a media
Speaker 1: outreach not to two or five million people, but to
Speaker 1: thirty or fifty million people. Now, one of the very
Speaker 1: few people in the country who has that kind of
Speaker 1: reach already is Trump, and that's an important just sort
Speaker 1: of data point to keep in mind going forward. The
Speaker 1: second thing is that we've got to just realize that
Speaker 1: we are in a new type of fight with a
Speaker 1: new type of opponent. We need to be a new
Speaker 1: type of party, and that means that the old Republican
Speaker 1: way of sort of decorously losing and acting as if
Speaker 1: our serenity in the face of loss is a virtue.
Speaker 1: This is something we've just got to stop. Even right now,
Speaker 1: I can send some timidity among elected Republicans to run
Speaker 1: to the side of Trump and say, hey, we're with
Speaker 1: him on this. It's almost like they feel like we
Speaker 1: did okay in the Senate. Now let Trump fight his
Speaker 1: own battles. It will see what happens. With some of
Speaker 1: them even slightly thinking, well, it won't be the worst
Speaker 1: thing in the world loses because he won't be you know,
Speaker 1: he won't have the insider track, and maybe we can
Speaker 1: make a better run next time. All this kind of
Speaker 1: machiavellian thinking starts creeping in. But these people are whistling
Speaker 1: in the dark. If they really think that this is
Speaker 1: something that's to their benefit. No, if we allow the
Speaker 1: other side to sort of steal the race. The consequences
Speaker 1: are very, very bad for us over the long haul.
Speaker 1: You think Trump still has a chance of pulling this
Speaker 1: thing off. I do. I wouldn't give him a good
Speaker 1: chance or an over fifty percent chance, just in terms
Speaker 1: of the in terms of the quote declaration of victory.
Speaker 1: I'm worried about what the courts can do. See, the
Speaker 1: media is moving into a situation where they want to
Speaker 1: create a fatal complete He's one, that's it, let's start,
Speaker 1: you know, let's time for a prize day. It's time
Speaker 1: for us, the transition team, it's trying to start worrying
Speaker 1: about the coronavirus stimulus package. So they're gonna want to
Speaker 1: move on really quickly, and they will do a lot
Speaker 1: at this point to appease us, to say, in effect,
Speaker 1: all you know, this is not we're not enemies, and
Speaker 1: you know this is just an election. Your light's gonna
Speaker 1: go on, go on as normal, etc. So there's going
Speaker 1: to be a sort of an attempt to sort of
Speaker 1: drug us into a certain kind of lethargic submission. But
Speaker 1: I think we have to press for every available measure,
Speaker 1: and we have to show some of the same admirable
Speaker 1: kind of determination that the other side consistently shows. Think
Speaker 1: of what the Democrats would do if the situation were
Speaker 1: reversed to the matt no question about it, they would
Speaker 1: go all out. And I think that's very important for
Speaker 1: everybody listening right now to know, because if we don't
Speaker 1: match them in that ferocious determination, at least to get
Speaker 1: to the truth. And I agree with you about losing
Speaker 1: a fair fight, and I've been saying that all along,
Speaker 1: but now we've got to make sure this fight's actually fair.
Speaker 1: Denish to SUSA. Everybody follow them on social media for
Speaker 1: not already on Twitter, on Facebook, and check out his
Speaker 1: latest movie, Denish. Thanks so much, always good to see you, hey,
Speaker 1: it's my pleasure. Thanks. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. You know, I think
Speaker 1: Joe Biden thinks and knows and feels very strongly the
Speaker 1: job number one when he gets back is to expedite
Speaker 1: a vaccine to really rid this country of the virus.
Speaker 1: Isn't that amazing? They're they're already starting with this. And
Speaker 1: I know that we've got this election battle to focus on,
Speaker 1: and I don't want to divert from the primary. The
Speaker 1: primary engagement too much here. But you can be sure
Speaker 1: that was some guy on MSNBC. You can be sure
Speaker 1: that if Biden ends up as the president and guys,
Speaker 1: we we gotta gotta we gotta face the reality of
Speaker 1: that could end up happening here. And it may even
Speaker 1: be fair to say it is a better than fifty
Speaker 1: fifty shot that's going to happen. I think it is.
Speaker 1: I think the odds now are probably sixty forty Biden
Speaker 1: over Trump. I think that's I always tell you the truth,
Speaker 1: and that's where that's where I would say we are
Speaker 1: right now. It might even be seventy thirty. But you
Speaker 1: have weeks to go before what will be the monumental achievement,
Speaker 1: assuming everything goes according to plan, and it looks like
Speaker 1: it is weeks to go before you'll have the emergency
Speaker 1: authorization of a vaccine that will be already produced. Usually
Speaker 1: a vaccine maker goes through the very arduous and intensive
Speaker 1: process of making sure it's safe and then making sure
Speaker 1: it's effective, and you've got huge trials you got to do.
Speaker 1: It's wildly expensive, you know, And in this instance, what
Speaker 1: they were able to do was to build up vaccine
Speaker 1: as they went so they were men. They said, this
Speaker 1: is the vaccine we're going to try. We're confident it's
Speaker 1: going to work. And they were making the product beforehand,
Speaker 1: right So instead of like developing a chocolate chip cookie
Speaker 1: and seeing if people like it and if it sells,
Speaker 1: they were developing the perfect chocolate chip cookie. And we're
Speaker 1: already making warehouses full of that cookie for when they're
Speaker 1: finally go into stores with it. I don't know if
Speaker 1: that analogy was necessary or not, but I'm thinking about
Speaker 1: cookies right now, so I'm kind of hungry. But they
Speaker 1: will take credit, mark my words. Operation Warp Speed will
Speaker 1: just be taken by the Biden administration put in its
Speaker 1: back pocket, and they'll be saying, see we And this
Speaker 1: is the part that's going to annoy me the most.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's so much about this it's going to
Speaker 1: drive me and saying you know this. But they will say,
Speaker 1: there's a national mask mandate, and then they'll distribute the
Speaker 1: vaccine that Trump and his administration and his team and
Speaker 1: all the resources they rate actually handed to them, and
Speaker 1: the Biden team will distribute that vaccine while annoying the
Speaker 1: crap out of us with these idiotic mask mandates and
Speaker 1: these continued closures and all the fear monging around this,
Speaker 1: and as finally the virus does recede because largely of
Speaker 1: vaccine and herd immunity. You know, they'll be saying, see,
Speaker 1: it's because of our it's because of our mask mandate
Speaker 1: that this is happening. We listen to the science, and
Speaker 1: we're the ones that deliver the vaccine. So it's almost
Speaker 1: like the Trump team has run the football up to
Speaker 1: the five yard line and now a different team is
Speaker 1: being handed the ball and they get to just run
Speaker 1: it up the middle and say, see, look, well, look
Speaker 1: at how great we are. I'm just telling you be
Speaker 1: prepared for it. Right now. I see this coming a
Speaker 1: mile away. And anybody who's honest, any observer that understands
Speaker 1: what's happening, we'll say, you guys inherited this vaccine, Like
Speaker 1: what do you mean that you're not really responsible for that?
Speaker 1: They'll be saying, no, how dare you? We listen to
Speaker 1: the science. That's right in between bites of food. Masking
Speaker 1: up and listening to the science. That's what they'll tell you.
Speaker 1: So another, look, there's nothing happy about this. I just
Speaker 1: want you to be prepared for it. They will take
Speaker 1: credit for that vaccine. Thanks for listening to the Buses
Speaker 1: and Show podcast. Remember to subscribe Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Okay, let's take a
Speaker 1: deep dive into what's happening in some of these battleground
Speaker 1: areas and also a little bit of a post mortem
Speaker 1: from election night about the turnout game and any lessons
Speaker 1: learned already. For that, we turned to our friend Ryan Goodusky.
Speaker 1: He is the author of They're Not Listening How the
Speaker 1: Elites Created the National Populist Revolution. Ryan, great to have
Speaker 1: you back, man, Thank you for having me again. So
Speaker 1: let's first start with what are you saying. I know
Speaker 1: you're following this very closely. What are you seeing in
Speaker 1: the specific battleground states where these legal challenges and all
Speaker 1: the alleged ballot shenanigans are going on? Well, what can
Speaker 1: you tell us about Pennsylvania and Georgia? First? Okay, So
Speaker 1: Georgia Trump looked like he had a comfortable margin at first.
Speaker 1: They had. As of six o'clock this morning, they had
Speaker 1: twenty five thousand votes left, only five thousand from Fulton County,
Speaker 1: which is the area of Atlanta. It looked like he
Speaker 1: was going to pull up a narrow victory. And then
Speaker 1: they announced that they have thirty five thousand more a
Speaker 1: ballads statewide, So they have between fifty and sixty some
Speaker 1: countants counties under reported by one hundred percent of how
Speaker 1: many Appstey balls they are, it's not all terrible. A
Speaker 1: large portion of those are in Trump from the counties,
Speaker 1: A lot do come from Savannah. Savannah is I think
Speaker 1: it's called Chetworth County. That is the county where they
Speaker 1: told Republican poll watchers that they were going to stop
Speaker 1: counting votes and to go home, and then they continue
Speaker 1: counting them, and that's where the state of Georgia is
Speaker 1: currently suing that county for their shanigans on election night.
Speaker 1: So it's not looking great for the President Georgia, but
Speaker 1: it's not as terrible as if they were all coming
Speaker 1: out of out of Atlanta. Over in Pennsylvania, the court
Speaker 1: is ruled the ballad watchers. I've been speaking to poll
Speaker 1: watchers inside Philadelphia for the last twenty four to forty
Speaker 1: eight hours. They are now forced to stand behind a
Speaker 1: barricade ten to fifteen feet from where the ballots are
Speaker 1: being actually counted and tabulated and sorted. Their fear and
Speaker 1: I don't have any evidence, so I don't want anyone
Speaker 1: getting ahead of themselves. But their fear is they don't
Speaker 1: know and they can't tell if any of these votes
Speaker 1: are being counted twice that there's over counting going on.
Speaker 1: And usually in every other case, they have watchers looking
Speaker 1: over the shoulders the people sorting the polls. They're fifteen feetback,
Speaker 1: they can't see them. They were also in certain pulse
Speaker 1: as they were kicked out of the voting, of watching
Speaker 1: the voting, of watching the voting tally happen a court.
Speaker 1: I think it was the appellate court in Pennsylvania rule
Speaker 1: that they are they have to be allowed, and then
Speaker 1: I think they want on a lunch break right after that.
Speaker 1: Here's the essential problem right now, Biden staff. Biden has
Speaker 1: lawyered up, and he lawyered up way before election day.
Speaker 1: The Trump campaign did not have enough lawyers on the
Speaker 1: ground in any major state. They just didn't. It was
Speaker 1: a lot of inexperienced people and a lot of people
Speaker 1: who did not, you know, prepare for a twenty four
Speaker 1: hour you know fight where they were gonna be up
Speaker 1: all night long sitting there and doing this. This is
Speaker 1: the problem. Happened Wisconsin. Wisconsin came out and all the
Speaker 1: night and three to thirty in the morning and counted
Speaker 1: one hundred thousand votes, almost all four Joe Biden. This
Speaker 1: was after the announced they had stopped counting. So these numbers,
Speaker 1: I don't want to sit there and say they're legitimate.
Speaker 1: They could be completely valid, valid votes. I don't know.
Speaker 1: No one knows. And the problem is they're not letting
Speaker 1: Republican polsters in there at pole watchers in there. And
Speaker 1: there they were on the Trump campaign at the very beginning,
Speaker 1: did not have enough lawyers there to sit there and
Speaker 1: make challenges immediately as it was going on. Now it's
Speaker 1: it's not contested that at this point, or rather it's
Speaker 1: a matter of reported fact. What you said about places
Speaker 1: that for example in Savannah, that part of Georgia, they
Speaker 1: shed go home, and then they counted, and then they
Speaker 1: counted more ballots after So then that happened. That did
Speaker 1: one hundred percent happen? Yes, And now they're suing over
Speaker 1: those ballots, but we don't know. We don't know because
Speaker 1: there was no one there. We don't know if a
Speaker 1: ballot was destroyed, if extra ballots were brought in, we
Speaker 1: do not know, and the poll watchers are told to
Speaker 1: go home to stop counting. Usually, in my experience, and
Speaker 1: I've been on campaign stubbs nineteen years old, I'm thirty
Speaker 1: four now or thirty three now, or you don't leave
Speaker 1: until they leave, until the lights are out, until the
Speaker 1: doors locked, and you sit in your car for an
Speaker 1: extra hour. There was not There was really no game
Speaker 1: plan or training. Also, the Georgia Goop has made a
Speaker 1: serious error in how they were handling COVID. In New
Speaker 1: York City, in New York State, state of similar size
Speaker 1: to Georgia, we all had to sign. We don't have
Speaker 1: voter ideals, but we have to sign to sit there
Speaker 1: and validate our vote. If the signature doesn't match and
Speaker 1: it's off by a lot, that can be fought out
Speaker 1: in the courts if it needs being a tight election
Speaker 1: of being invalidated signatures and people voting that don't match
Speaker 1: the signatures. Georgia decided this year because of COVID, they
Speaker 1: didn't want to have to have people sign, so no
Speaker 1: one signed. People just showed up with an ID. That
Speaker 1: is extremely, extremely, extremely problematic. In the case of a
Speaker 1: tight fight, we don't know whether or not people were
Speaker 1: signing going from both for other people, what the situation
Speaker 1: was at all by not having a signature to at
Speaker 1: least back up the ID, it's extremely problematic and it
Speaker 1: was a major flow on behalf of the Georgia g O.
Speaker 1: Speaking of Ryan Grdusky, and he is an author and
Speaker 1: a guy who understands the political game and how this
Speaker 1: stuff all goes about the issue here of the Midwest.
Speaker 1: You have some thoughts on what's gone on in Michigan
Speaker 1: Wisconsin first, and is it your belief that those states,
Speaker 1: even with the legal challenges that are underway or that
Speaker 1: may still come, those states are lost and that there's
Speaker 1: something it seems like Michigan has lost. Wisconsin is going
Speaker 1: to be a very, very, very hard fought fight to
Speaker 1: sit there and do it, because, as I said, these
Speaker 1: hundred thousand ballots came at three thirty in the morning
Speaker 1: and there was a huge uptick all of a sudden voting.
Speaker 1: I will see this of Wisconsin because that is the
Speaker 1: state I paid attention to the most. Wisconsin had a
Speaker 1: nearly ninety percent turnout statewide. It is close to unprecedented,
Speaker 1: if not unprecedented itself. Huge turnout not just in the
Speaker 1: inner cities, but also in Trump counties. Out of the
Speaker 1: twenty three counties that Trump flipped from Obama in twenty
Speaker 1: twelve to Trump in twenty sixteen, he improved in twenty
Speaker 1: two of those twenty three counties. He improved remarkably, and
Speaker 1: they had ninety percent turnout or above in twenty two
Speaker 1: of the twenty three. Tremendous. I mean they could not
Speaker 1: have hold more. Here's where the entire campaign that Jared
Speaker 1: Kushner put together was ill fought out in the Midwest.
Speaker 1: In the nation as a whole, there are forty four
Speaker 1: million non college educated white Americans who are not registered
Speaker 1: to vote. In the state of Wisconsin alone, it is
Speaker 1: nine hundred thousand. In Pennsylvania it's two point six million,
Speaker 1: Ohio has two point five million, and Michigan has two million.
Speaker 1: That is the Trump base. Those are Trump voters. If
Speaker 1: they were registered to vote in those twenty three counties
Speaker 1: that Trump got, human a much larger vote turnout those
Speaker 1: Obama counties. Voter registration declined by eight thousand. There was
Speaker 1: eight thousand fewer voters in those twenty three counties, even
Speaker 1: though population went up. So Jared ran this very aggressive
Speaker 1: and successful mind you campaign on Hispanic and black voters,
Speaker 1: and that paid off big time in Florida, big time
Speaker 1: in Texas, and we'll see in Nevada or Arizona. But
Speaker 1: he had an amazing get out the vote effort on
Speaker 1: the part of reaching out to Hispanics, not trying to
Speaker 1: register ten percent of non college educated whites who are
Speaker 1: not registered vote forty four million nationwide, and in the
Speaker 1: important Midwestern states it's eight million. By not trying to
Speaker 1: register ten percent of them, that is what's going to
Speaker 1: cost them this election because there's no amount of voter fraud,
Speaker 1: no amount of Shenadigans, nothing that would have competed. If
Speaker 1: he would have registered ten percent of the nine hundred
Speaker 1: thousand woul it wouldn't have mattered what happened. And that
Speaker 1: is the ultimate flow right now of the entire Trump
Speaker 1: reelection campaign. Not focusing enough on the working white class.
Speaker 1: Tell me about the ongoing rolling absentee ballot issue. So
Speaker 1: it depends on what states. Every state is different right
Speaker 1: on what their absentee ballot the laws are. Some have
Speaker 1: to be delivered by the day after election days, some
Speaker 1: are allowed two days, some are allowed three dates. Some
Speaker 1: of these. I live in New York City. I spoke
Speaker 1: to people you know in the know in New York yesterday.
Speaker 1: I asked him how many ballots are you getting day
Speaker 1: after election? And they said very few. For some reason,
Speaker 1: in these states, we are seeing a large amount in
Speaker 1: the number of tens of thousands coming in day after election.
Speaker 1: Once again, could be completely legitimate ballots one hundred percent,
Speaker 1: I don't know, but they are having rolling high turnout
Speaker 1: absentee ballots out of these places. I'll say one more
Speaker 1: thing about Milwaukee. There's been a lot of people talking
Speaker 1: about how Milwaukee had higher turnout than they had voter registration.
Speaker 1: That is true in several precincts. But people need to
Speaker 1: remember that Wisconsin has day of voter registration, so people
Speaker 1: could go to the polls that day and just register.
Speaker 1: And it looks like they probably did in Milwaukee. Still
Speaker 1: having one hundred and twenty percent turnout and some of
Speaker 1: these precincts is incredibly high, and it is a little suspicious,
Speaker 1: and the dj should look into that. The only chance
Speaker 1: they have in really looking at these states right now
Speaker 1: is looking for double voting and looking to sit there
Speaker 1: and see if the signatures match. I know in Nevada,
Speaker 1: it should be a huge issue. In Wisconsin should be
Speaker 1: a huge issue. They should go there and say, did
Speaker 1: the signature's actually max a person? In Michigan, there's been
Speaker 1: several cases now documented cases of dead people voting and
Speaker 1: dead people on the registration. I was about to ask
Speaker 1: you about that. There are definitely dead person votes that
Speaker 1: have happened, right, There's definitely dead person votes, primarily in Michigan,
Speaker 1: because Michigan you can look up if a ballot was
Speaker 1: cast by the name, and so far they've looked up
Speaker 1: one guy was born in the eighteen hundreds, Several other
Speaker 1: people are long dead. There are votes coming out of it.
Speaker 1: Even Dave Wasserman, who is a liberal and he's generally
Speaker 1: wrong about everything, Even Dave Wasserman said he finds it
Speaker 1: incredibly strange that Detroit, a city that is declining in
Speaker 1: population every single year and did not have automatic voter
Speaker 1: mailer's coming to them, had an eleven percent increase in
Speaker 1: the number of raw votes coming from twenty sixteen declining population,
Speaker 1: and they had an eleven percent increasing overall voting. That
Speaker 1: is quite that's that's a large, large, large number of
Speaker 1: out of Wayne County in Detroit. If somebody was going
Speaker 1: to cheat, let me just ask you this, based on
Speaker 1: what we've seen here, what would be the most effective
Speaker 1: way to cheat in this cycle if somebody was doing that,
Speaker 1: you know, war game it for me from the bad
Speaker 1: guy perspective. Well, I mean, the easiest way to cheat
Speaker 1: is to sit there and get an absentee ballot and
Speaker 1: fill it out for somebody and nail it in for them.
Speaker 1: Signatures don't have to if you if if no one's
Speaker 1: checking the signatures and they don't match, doesn't really matter.
Speaker 1: You can effectively collect people's absentee ballots and vote for it.
Speaker 1: So ballot harve like, So you could have somebody who
Speaker 1: ballot harvests absentee No, no, I know, but I'm saying
Speaker 1: you could have somebody who goes around and takes a
Speaker 1: bunch of absentee ballots, harvesting those ballots and then sends
Speaker 1: them in. Yeah, one hundred percent. I mean, that's that's
Speaker 1: easy because there's no evidence. There's no proof. There's also
Speaker 1: if you wanted to cheat, if somebody was ballot harvesting,
Speaker 1: taking ballots from people before they get into the poll sites.
Speaker 1: This is all before they enter the poll sits when
Speaker 1: they get in once they get into them. And also
Speaker 1: voting for somebody if you don't have a secure form
Speaker 1: of voting ID, voting for somebody absolutely an easy way
Speaker 1: to sit there in cheat the process. The big fear
Speaker 1: in a lot of these places. And it's not like
Speaker 1: we have never had, you know, people see elections before.
Speaker 1: In nineteen sixty Kennedy stole the election from Nixon, so
Speaker 1: it's not like we've never seen this before. The old
Speaker 1: machine way of politics is really kind of outdated, that
Speaker 1: doesn't really exist anymore. But the idea, the fact that
Speaker 1: they are not allowing Republican poll watchers in any of
Speaker 1: these deeply democratic areas is troublesome and they're the DOJ
Speaker 1: should amreily look into it. And these rolling apps and
Speaker 1: these people need to double check on who's voting, how
Speaker 1: they're voting, if they are even living in the states.
Speaker 1: The Trump's administrations, the Trump administration sat there and said
Speaker 1: that ten percent of the Nevada votes are people who
Speaker 1: don't live in the state anymore. We saw with automatic
Speaker 1: voter registration, voted registration, automatic absentee ballots being delivered to
Speaker 1: people that people were getting ballots for people who had
Speaker 1: not lived at the residency for some time. So that
Speaker 1: could absolutely be the case that should one be checked
Speaker 1: out right now in any state that did automatic absentees,
Speaker 1: all those things need to be looked at immediately because
Speaker 1: that would be the absolute easiest way to sit there
Speaker 1: and swing an election for against the president. Ryan Gruduski, Everybody,
Speaker 1: this guy knows his stuff. Check out his book. I
Speaker 1: highly recommend you pick it up now. It's available on Amazon.
Speaker 1: They're not listening how the elites created the National Populace Revolution. Ryan,
Speaker 1: thanks so much for your time. Man, We'll talk to
Speaker 1: you soon. You're welcome. You're in the Freedom Mud. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. I was sitting here
Speaker 1: thinking Arizona and thinking John McCain and Sydney McCain and
Speaker 1: Frankly uh now former Senator Jeff Flake, who endorsed Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: But much more, it's much more of the McCain legacy.
Speaker 1: And I mean, I'm sure you're talking to people who
Speaker 1: are close to John McCain that it's John McCain's last laugh.
Speaker 1: If in fact his state, his beloved adopted state of Arizona,
Speaker 1: goes for Joe Biden. His old friend who spoke at
Speaker 1: his at his funeral, who eulogized him, whom he met
Speaker 1: when he when he John McCain was an aid to
Speaker 1: then Senator Biden and other members of the Senate Form
Speaker 1: Relations Committee. I mean, can you imagine the poetry of
Speaker 1: that if it happened. You can almost tell that there's
Speaker 1: a real love that Democrats have for Republicans who stab
Speaker 1: other Republicans in the back. I mean, there's there's a
Speaker 1: particular delight that Democrats take in talking about figures within
Speaker 1: the GOP GOP elite circles who, because they put country first,
Speaker 1: decide to light the Republican Party on fire. You know,
Speaker 1: that tells you a lot, I think about what we
Speaker 1: should how we should view such actions, and tells you
Speaker 1: a lot about are what our perspective and all that
Speaker 1: should be. But speaking about Arizona specifically, Rachel Mattaw got
Speaker 1: a bit of a surprise last night when there's some
Speaker 1: new news about Arizona. Play it. Of the new votes
Speaker 1: that were just reported out, Donald Trump won forty three thousand,
Speaker 1: nine hundred and sixty six of them. Joe Biden won
Speaker 1: thirty thousand, three hundred and twenty two of them. Donald
Speaker 1: Trump is getting around fifty nine percent of these votes. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so that is remember three buckets here, yeah, oh like that?
Speaker 1: Oh god? Yeah, and and over yet folks, eighty eight
Speaker 1: percent reporting in Arizona. But remember there also can be
Speaker 1: recount scenarios. They're illegal challenges. That is on a knife's
Speaker 1: edge that election. And I don't care what ends up happening.
Speaker 1: It was it was irresponsible of Fox News to call
Speaker 1: that the night that they did. They could end up
Speaker 1: still being right, but they're just lucky. If they end
Speaker 1: up being right. There is no way that they could
Speaker 1: have known how tight this would be. I mean this
Speaker 1: race is going to end up determined. I mean the
Speaker 1: race in Arizona specifically, it's going to be forty or
Speaker 1: fifty thousand votes. Friends, you think they could see that
Speaker 1: with over three million ballots cast that they could have
Speaker 1: they knew with so few votes in that it would
Speaker 1: come down to forty fifty thousand votes. No, it's a
Speaker 1: coin flip situation, a binary one or the other. And
Speaker 1: so if they end up being right, they're gonna say, oh,
Speaker 1: look we're right. But the truth is, if they're right,
Speaker 1: they were just lucky, lucky. But I will not forget
Speaker 1: I've been saying this to you. I know there are
Speaker 1: some GOP figures, some establishment rhino types in Arizona. And look,
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna say it, John McCain's tenure as a
Speaker 1: Republican politician, there's a lot that we now know about
Speaker 1: what's really best for the country. And you know, John
Speaker 1: McCain was the guy who was saying, if we had
Speaker 1: to stay in Afghanistan another fifty years, that's fine. John
Speaker 1: McCain was a guy who at one point was saying,
Speaker 1: build the dang fence, and when he was trying to
Speaker 1: get elected, and then later on was mister, you know,
Speaker 1: let's talk about an amnesty John McCain. You know there
Speaker 1: we'd go on and on here. But this is a
Speaker 1: guy who, as a politician, I'm sorry that we got.
Speaker 1: We got a lot of problems with what he never
Speaker 1: mind the spiteful decision and to turn his back on
Speaker 1: the GOP when they were trying to do even as
Speaker 1: skinny repeal as it was called, of Obamacare. But Romney, McCain,
Speaker 1: Jeff Flake, I mean, these these kinds of interview. I know,
Speaker 1: you know, John McCain's passed away, But Romney and McKay, Sorry,
Speaker 1: Romney and Flake. They think the GOP is going back
Speaker 1: to them and what they haven't yet figured out is
Speaker 1: based on even just what we saw in this election.
Speaker 1: It's Trump's GOP, whether he's president or not, for the
Speaker 1: next four years. Thanks for listening to the buses and
Speaker 1: show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Team Buck, it's time
Speaker 1: for roll Call. Roll Call everybody, facebooked Com, slash Buck Sexton,
Speaker 1: Team Buck at iHeartMedia dot com if you want to
Speaker 1: email us, and always remember you can listen to the
Speaker 1: Bucks Exton podcast, which is going up plenty plenty plenty
Speaker 1: of time to listen on your way home from work
Speaker 1: and listen to Bucks Exton podcast on the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1: You can subscribe in the Apple Podcast Store or on Spotify.
Speaker 1: You will love it. It is fantastic. I highly recommend it,
Speaker 1: and it's the easiest way to share it directly with
Speaker 1: friends who spread that podcast around. Past the Buck and uh,
Speaker 1: you know, things like the Dracula podcast. We got Malta
Speaker 1: coming up that'll be before Thanksgiving. We'll do a two
Speaker 1: siege of Malta episodes that then that's at least the schedule.
Speaker 1: That's the plan. So we got all we got a
Speaker 1: lot a lot happening, my friends, and you should be
Speaker 1: a part of it. And oh, you can also send
Speaker 1: us roll call messages on Instagram. Just direct message us
Speaker 1: on Instagram and we'll we'll sift through all of them,
Speaker 1: all of the bots that are like, I want to
Speaker 1: marry you, give me bank account, And I'm like, hmm,
Speaker 1: I don't think so. I think I'm gonna skip that one,
Speaker 1: all right, Diane rights Buck. I'm asking this out of
Speaker 1: ignorance and hope you can answer. Is there a mechanism
Speaker 1: which could hit a giant pause on the election process
Speaker 1: to stop inauguration until lawsuits are resolved? I simply ask
Speaker 1: because I'm old enough to remember when LBJ had dead
Speaker 1: people voting for him and looking at it as an
Speaker 1: oldie but goody strategy. Apparently there's been at least one
Speaker 1: such a such instance in Michigan. Shield till. Thanks for
Speaker 1: all you continue to do, Diane. I don't know of
Speaker 1: such a mechanism. I don't think it exists. I believe
Speaker 1: constitutionally a president will be and there's this very intricate
Speaker 1: process the president will be determined by inauguration day. I mean,
Speaker 1: they've got a lot of eventualities and possibilities, and it
Speaker 1: could get even more complicated. Here is just the pathway
Speaker 1: to a two sixty nine two sixty nine tie in
Speaker 1: the electoral college. Mark play clip three without without in Georgia.
Speaker 1: If Biden is able to hold on in Georgia, is
Speaker 1: there a path for Trump that includes Arizona and Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: Oh boy, look what you just did. If if Georgia
Speaker 1: comes off the board and goes to Joe Biden and
Speaker 1: Nevada goes to Donald Trump, we're in a two sixty
Speaker 1: nine two sixty nine time. That's what would happen. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: I said I was not trying to renu Yeah, two
Speaker 1: sixty nine, two sixty nine time, that would be nice.
Speaker 1: Then it reverts. Oh yeah, everyone's gonna be really cool
Speaker 1: and mellow about that. Then, you know not, no one's
Speaker 1: going to completely freak out if we rereach a straight
Speaker 1: up electoral college tie. But then Brouser mark, it goes
Speaker 1: to the House of Representatives, and then by state delegation,
Speaker 1: not by electoral college numbers, the state itself determines which
Speaker 1: president that go for and Republicans actually have an advantage there.
Speaker 1: But Mark, do you think that if if that ended
Speaker 1: up happening, we got to a tie scenario and then
Speaker 1: the House of Representatives, the Democrats actually lost through that process,
Speaker 1: you think they'd say, well, that's the system we have,
Speaker 1: and the founding fathers were geniuses, so let's respect that.
Speaker 1: I think no matter who wins in that scenario, nobody
Speaker 1: who the other side will not accept you know that. Yep,
Speaker 1: not gonna happen. No one's gonna be like, oh yeah,
Speaker 1: oh of course the old the classic reverted to the
Speaker 1: House and you know, zippity dude, Ah, there we go.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, Nope, that's not gonna be not
Speaker 1: gonna be the way that it goes. That's not gonna
Speaker 1: be the way that it happens. Next up here, Evan
Speaker 1: Buck loved the show Original Saturday Squad, Safe and Warm
Speaker 1: at Night, et cetera, et cetera. Evan, of course you
Speaker 1: are Original Saturday Squad because you know that we keep
Speaker 1: you safe and warm at night. If you're thinking about
Speaker 1: having conservatives to move to swing states to shore of
Speaker 1: red majorities, allah Californians exporting their nonsense to other states
Speaker 1: consider moving to Michigan. Detroit has had its population over
Speaker 1: the last few decades, and it wouldn't take too many
Speaker 1: conservatives to turn Detroit purple and flip Michigan solid red. Well, Evan,
Speaker 1: I really appreciate the thought, and thank you for bringing
Speaker 1: this to my attention. I've seen there's a lot of old,
Speaker 1: beautiful buildings in Detroit you can actually buy for very
Speaker 1: little money, but you have to agree to put a
Speaker 1: lot of money into them to rehab them, and that
Speaker 1: would be very interesting to me. The problem I have
Speaker 1: with moving in Detroit is my understanding is that the
Speaker 1: winters there are brutal, very very very cold, and I'm
Speaker 1: not somebody that really gets excited about about that. So, Producer, Mark,
Speaker 1: do you want you think you're going to relocate to
Speaker 1: Michigan or is Florida still top of the list. If
Speaker 1: I relocate somewhere, it's certainly not going to be somewhere
Speaker 1: colder than where I live now. Yeah, I'm not. I'm
Speaker 1: not really a cold weather you know. The snow princess come.
Speaker 1: That's why I call it. This snow princess from a
Speaker 1: very very cold part of the country, and she's like
Speaker 1: already equipped and ready to go. Whenever it's a cold day,
Speaker 1: she just she can just handle it. I'm I get
Speaker 1: cold and I don't like that. I like to be warm. Uh, Sarah.
Speaker 1: I'm here in Washington drowning my sorrows and tonic water,
Speaker 1: just straight tonic sadness water. M As I write this,
Speaker 1: things are looking grim for President Trump, the House, and
Speaker 1: the Senate. Add to that, we voted in Jay Insley again,
Speaker 1: and icing on the cake, we voted in comprehensive sex education.
Speaker 1: What has become of my beautiful home state. The moving
Speaker 1: truck is booked, my family and I are leaving my
Speaker 1: home of nearly fifty years. Well, Sarah, first of all,
Speaker 1: I understand your frustration with the political outcomes here. But
Speaker 1: where are you going? Producer Mark and I are curious? Yeah,
Speaker 1: so that that would be very interesting to me. I
Speaker 1: gotta say the Pacific Northwest. I just think that's one
Speaker 1: of the most beautiful parts of the whole country. Cannon
Speaker 1: Beach in Oregon is an amazing place. I spent some
Speaker 1: time there. I've never been to Washington State. It's a
Speaker 1: place I really want to go. I'd probably go to Seattle,
Speaker 1: which I think is very commy, didn't they. Yeah, they
Speaker 1: set up the autonomous zone this past year, which did
Speaker 1: not end well, which every person who was not an
Speaker 1: idiot knew the moment they said they were setting up
Speaker 1: an autonomous zone. But apparently some lessons have to be learned.
Speaker 1: The hardware, Producer Mark, you know what, they gave it
Speaker 1: to college try. They did give it a shot. You know,
Speaker 1: I get I'd say that they were like, you know what,
Speaker 1: let's create a little Marxist utopia. But you know, Producer Mark,
Speaker 1: when you run out of toilet paper and there's no police,
Speaker 1: when people start getting robbed in the Marxist utopia, it's
Speaker 1: not good. Yeah, it doesn't sound like a fun place
Speaker 1: to live. I'm not gonna make the top of America
Speaker 1: in places to move. Did you ever see the movie
Speaker 1: The Beach with Leonardo DiCaprio. It doesn't ring a bell?
Speaker 1: You would like that when you and missus Marker watch
Speaker 1: that one together. It's he's on vacation in Thailand and
Speaker 1: he manages to find a secret map to take him
Speaker 1: to a beach. I believe the beach is actually at
Speaker 1: a place called like the film with the filming took
Speaker 1: place at Ppee island, which that's what it's called. Uh,
Speaker 1: and it's you have to take a boat to get there.
Speaker 1: Obviously it's an island, and uh, it's very very beautiful.
Speaker 1: But they film this movie there and it's you would
Speaker 1: enjoy it. I mean it's like it's like life is
Speaker 1: perfect and then human beings mess it all up in
Speaker 1: their perfect place. I would do anything to get to
Speaker 1: a beach sometime this year, but I know it's not
Speaker 1: going to happen because of King Cuomo. Yeah I know. No, no,
Speaker 1: no beaches in my future either, my man. Anyway, Huh,
Speaker 1: it would be nice. I don't know. I might try
Speaker 1: to book something. I don't even know if I'm allowed to.
Speaker 1: Are we gonna be allowed to leave the country, like
Speaker 1: if you were if you and I wanted to go
Speaker 1: down and bring our respective ladies to a Jamaica for
Speaker 1: the weekend in in December, you know, after the holidays.
Speaker 1: Could we even do that? See that's even that's the problem.
Speaker 1: Me and you probably could because we can quarantine. We
Speaker 1: can do the shows from our houses. But my wife cannot.
Speaker 1: She works in healthcare, so she's not gonna She would
Speaker 1: have taken extra two weeks off. Wait, so we if
Speaker 1: we leave, we're supposed to quarantine we come back. I
Speaker 1: believe they change the rules now. It's basically every state
Speaker 1: other than Jersey, Connecticut, and Pennsylvania that you have to
Speaker 1: now be tested before you start your travel to New York.
Speaker 1: Quarantine for three days and be tested on the fourth
Speaker 1: day and have to test negative. Then you can stop quarantining.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's that's just wild. Yeah, this is this
Speaker 1: is and that's technically loosening the restrictions. Buck. We're living
Speaker 1: in crazytown. We're living in crazytown. I don't know what
Speaker 1: else to say. People. You know, they've they've over they've overtaken,
Speaker 1: they've overtaken the airwaves, and they've they've managed to brainwash
Speaker 1: so many people. It's it's just said. Anyway, Sarah, right
Speaker 1: back and tell us where you're moving after fifty years,
Speaker 1: we're curious to see where you're gonna go. I mean,
Speaker 1: if you're in Washington. You know what I would say
Speaker 1: would be a great move. Idaho, great state, love Idaho,
Speaker 1: great people, nice weather, potatoes. Potatoes, which honestly one of
Speaker 1: my favorite foods, much to the chagrin of my efforts
Speaker 1: to fit into my custom suits. You know, but yeah, potatoes,
Speaker 1: a lot of good thing. You can like buy all
Speaker 1: the guns you want. You know, you spend for the
Speaker 1: amount of money that you can get a and I'm
Speaker 1: not even exaggerating, being serious, for the amount of money
Speaker 1: you could get a four hundred square foot studio apartment
Speaker 1: in Manhattan. You move you know around Boise, Idaho. You
Speaker 1: get a beautiful four bedroom house, four bedroom house or
Speaker 1: a four hundred square foot studio apartment in Manhattan. Your choice, folks,
Speaker 1: your choice. Oh and I think Idaho has very low
Speaker 1: state taxes. I don't know what the taxes are. They're not.
Speaker 1: I don't think it's zero. I think it's low. But anyway,
Speaker 1: as producer marks already, he's already picked out Delray, Florida.
Speaker 1: So you know, I get it. I get it all right, Alice,
Speaker 1: Hey Buck, thanks for all your great coverage of this
Speaker 1: crazy election. I've had a bad feeling about the Biden
Speaker 1: campaign's lack of actual campaigning for a while. Are we
Speaker 1: seeing the answer as in coordinated fix in his favor? Buck?
Speaker 1: Nothing makes sense in this election. I'm not generally one
Speaker 1: who engages in conspiracy theories, but the evidence is overwhelming.
Speaker 1: If you consider the DEM's behavior for the past four years.
Speaker 1: Your thoughts. You know, Look, Alice, I think there's plenty
Speaker 1: of reason to be worried about tampering and cheating in
Speaker 1: the election. But you know, I don't know. I mean,
Speaker 1: I don't I don't know that we have proof that
Speaker 1: it's been I'm at the phase now, so everyone listening,
Speaker 1: this is very clear. I just want proof that everything
Speaker 1: is going the way it's supposed to go, given the
Speaker 1: stakes and some of the irregularities and some of the
Speaker 1: early that's all I'm asking for. But that's going to
Speaker 1: require access. Then it might require some court some court
Speaker 1: ordered changes to you know, the current procedure as it's
Speaker 1: being done in some places. So, but that's all I want.
Speaker 1: I think that's totally fair and legitimate. If we find
Speaker 1: out there's actual cheating going on, that we got a
Speaker 1: whole other problem, right, But we're not going to know
Speaker 1: unless we look. So that's what I would That's where
Speaker 1: i'd say I am. And as for yeah, the Democrats, Yeah,
Speaker 1: you can't trust them and you just can't trust them.
Speaker 1: That's the problem with Democrats. You're in the freedom hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Next up, we
Speaker 1: got David. The sorry thing about all this is that
Speaker 1: if Biden actually does win, all the investigations into him
Speaker 1: and his family and Hillary and the rest of the
Speaker 1: clowns will go away because we still have a corrupt
Speaker 1: deep state, Adam. That is true. If biddn't win, the
Speaker 1: getting to the bottom of the Hunter bidens, the chance
Speaker 1: of that happening becomes effectively zero. It will not happen.
Speaker 1: It will not occur. So I just want to I
Speaker 1: want to every be very clear on that. Right, if
Speaker 1: in fact Biden wins the election, you will never find
Speaker 1: out if ten percent for the big guy actually happened.
Speaker 1: Do you think for one second anybody in a Biden
Speaker 1: administration DJ, which includes then the FBI, THEO you wanted
Speaker 1: a miracle, I gave you the FBI. Do you think
Speaker 1: that anybody inside the FBI would bring any kind of
Speaker 1: investigation whatsoever against a member of the first family or
Speaker 1: or against the president himself. No, that only happens to Republicans. Why,
Speaker 1: because we just don't have the same insane stop at nothing,
Speaker 1: burned down the republic to save it mentality that they do.
Speaker 1: I don't know what else to tell you. Only Republicans
Speaker 1: get that kind of treatment. You know, you're if you're
Speaker 1: a Democrat, you're not gonna you're gonna be immune. A
Speaker 1: Democrat president is immune from the kinds of investigations we've
Speaker 1: seen against the Trump administration. And people are gonna say, oh,
Speaker 1: but Buck, what about Clinton? Bill Clinton was involved in
Speaker 1: activity that was in fact highly suspicious, that was confirmed.
Speaker 1: He did lie under oath, He was actually harassing women,
Speaker 1: he was engaged in an inappropriate behavior. And the Whitewater
Speaker 1: Land deals, you know, they just made that whole thing
Speaker 1: go away now, and that was based on the lying
Speaker 1: and the way the media covered up from them back then.
Speaker 1: So nothing happened to him. Even though he lied under oath,
Speaker 1: nothing happened to him. So you know that was kind
Speaker 1: of like, Okay, well, I guess our side, you know,
Speaker 1: our side has to worry, but the Democrats don't. David.
Speaker 1: The sorry thing about all this is if Biden actually
Speaker 1: does win all the investigations into him and oh that
Speaker 1: we already did that one, Adam Bock, Trump has an
Speaker 1: extremely short window to expose the ballot irregularities. Once Biden
Speaker 1: is in absolutely everything and everyone will disappear down the
Speaker 1: memory hole shields High Adams same same idea, and you
Speaker 1: are correct. If Biden, if Biden becomes the president, it's over.
Speaker 1: You're never gonna get answers about what happened with Russia,
Speaker 1: Hunter collusion with Ukraine, stuff with Hunter, Biden with China.
Speaker 1: You'll never find out if there was election cheating because
Speaker 1: the people in positions to look into it, we'll all
Speaker 1: be taken orders from the big guy, Joe Biden himself.
Speaker 1: And you think they're gonna want to mess with that, No,
Speaker 1: they will not. There will be no accountability. There will
Speaker 1: be no way to stop the Biden stuff from continuing
Speaker 1: on in the way that it had. So it's where
Speaker 1: we are, Zippy, Hey Buck, with what looks like Biden
Speaker 1: winning and the Republicans keeping a Senate. How much damage
Speaker 1: can Biden do through executive order? The Senate will obviously
Speaker 1: block his observed policies about the Green New Deal in taxes.
Speaker 1: Just wasn't sure how much a president can do through
Speaker 1: executive order, Zippy. That's a good question. And there's what
Speaker 1: the president should be able to do, what a president
Speaker 1: Biden will try to do, and what a president Biden
Speaker 1: tries to do and gets away with even with court
Speaker 1: challenges to it, and those are all different things. I
Speaker 1: think that there's not that much to be worried about,
Speaker 1: but there will be stuff. I'd have to think more
Speaker 1: about what he's going to try to do. They'll try
Speaker 1: to push some of the amnesty stuff, you know, Doc Adoppa,
Speaker 1: those kinds of things through executive order, saying it's a
Speaker 1: law enforcement issue, that's for sure, Dennis, Uncle Buck, I
Speaker 1: also became an uncle recently. It's the best, all the
Speaker 1: fun parts, all the fun parts of parenting, with none
Speaker 1: of the crappy ones pun intended. Just notice today the
Speaker 1: CNN COVID death toll tracker has been removed as they
Speaker 1: cover the election. Maybe it will go back up some day.
Speaker 1: But just an interesting note, passing the buck every day.
Speaker 1: Shields higher than ever, Dennis, thank you so much for
Speaker 1: passing the buck. And yeah, all of a sudden, you know,
Speaker 1: COVID is not going to be the constant source of
Speaker 1: crippling fear if Biden wins in courting the media, because
Speaker 1: Biden's leading us out of it. Oh who's been predicting
Speaker 1: that all along? Yours truly, But that's what we got.
Speaker 1: Team more on all this tomorrow, get ready for it.
Speaker 1: Shields high