WEBVTT -  BI Weekend: Netflix Earnings, Energy Outlook (Podcast) 

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>with Alex Steel and Paul Sweeney.

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 2>The real ap performance has been the US corporate high yield.

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the facts?

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 2>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical business.

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 2>These are two big time blue chip companies.

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Window between the peak and cunt changing super fast.

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steele and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 2>On Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 2>business stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 3>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Today, we'll look at a new joint venture to fund

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 2>artificial intelligence infrastructure in the US.

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Plus we'll discuss how the energy say will be impacted

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 3>under the new Donald Trump administration.

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 2>But first we begin with a streaming space.

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Netflix shares swored to a record high this week after

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 3>streaming Giant reported its biggest quarterly subscriber gain in history.

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 2>For more, we were joined by Keitha Rong Andathen Bloomberg,

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:15.639
<v Speaker 2>intelligence analyst on US Media.

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Etha what stood out most in Netflix's earnings?

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 4>Everything, Alex So, I mean, you know, it was not

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 4>just I mean, we knew they were going to have

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 4>a strong quarter, It was just the magnitude of outperformance,

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 4>which was simply stunning. I mean, they added forty one

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 4>million subscribers throughout the year. Just for some context, that's

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 4>more than the total number of subscribers that some of

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 4>the streaming services even have out their peak for instance,

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 4>has less than forty million subscribers. So, I mean, just

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 4>the scale of the business is absolutely astounding. And it's

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 4>that scale which is now on display in every possible area, right,

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 4>whether it's revenue growth, whether it's you know, content cost

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 4>growth and you know cost per subscriber, which is going

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 4>to be significantly less than you know, the revenue growth

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 4>per subscriber. All of that is just you know, execution

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 4>at the highest level.

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 2>So, Keitha, this kind of raises the question to me,

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 2>yet again, how do you think this industry is going

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 2>to shake out? It just seems like there's Netflix. I'll

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 2>give you Disney because it's Disney, but everybody else. Is

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 2>there any room left for any of these other traditional

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 2>media players that are trying to get into the streaming business?

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Paul, it's going to become more and more difficult.

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, with Netflix getting to that three hundred million

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 4>subscriber milestone, I would say very much built an insurmountable

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 4>lead in in streaming. There's absolutely no doubt about it.

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 4>They are expecting twenty nine percent operating margins. I mean

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 4>we have always you've always posed this question, I mean,

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 4>can Netflix get to that thirty thirty five percent operating margin?

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 4>And it looks like they're going to be able to

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 4>do that very very comfortably. That, you know, leaves us

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 4>to the all important question, can anybody else replicate this playbook?

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:54.839
<v Speaker 4>Maybe they can, but it's going to take a very

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 4>long time, and I think by that time, Netflix is

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 4>going to be far ahead of you know, rivals, with

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 4>probably you know, forty percent operating margins, tons of free

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 4>cash flow, and maybe even like five hundred million subscribers.

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 3>So what is your question now? So say, we have

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 3>to be discerning and we have to say okay, well,

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 3>well if it's at a record, but you know, it's

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 3>not all amazing and flowers and sunshine and stuff.

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 2>What's that question.

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 5>Except it is all amazing?

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 3>You know, you'll help me, yeah, I mean you It

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 3>is so hard to find something wrong with this report.

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if you were looking for Okay, is subscriber

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 4>growth going to slow down? Yeah, probably it's going to

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 4>slow down a little bit. But again they've said that

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 4>subscriber growth is going to be the main driver of

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 4>revenue growth in twenty twenty five. Is operating income momentum

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 4>slowing down?

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 5>No, it's not. Are we getting double digit revenue growth?

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 5>Yes we are. Is free cash flow there?

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 6>Oh?

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 5>Yes it is?

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 4>So I mean, okay, yes, I guess the big question

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 4>is what are going to be twenty twenty five is

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 4>all set because you do have that subscriber momentum, you

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 4>do have those price increases that are going to feed

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 4>that revenue growth. So the big question then is, okay,

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 4>but what about twenty twenty six? What about twenty twenty seven?

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 4>So twenty twenty six and twenty twenty seven, I think

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 4>the levers are really going to be the ad growth story,

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 4>and they're putting everything in place this year so that

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 4>advertising becomes a really big, bigger part of the revenue

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 4>equation starting in twenty twenty six, and they have everything

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 4>set to do that. So yes, they did raise their

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 4>prices on the ad tier a little bit just to smidge,

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 4>but again, remember it's only costing you eight dollars a month.

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 4>That's the same as Disney Plus. So again they have

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 4>a lot more I think, cushion to raise prices and

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 4>then to also increase their ad targeting capabilities and to

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 4>really be able to charge advertisers a premium. So I

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 4>think there's just so many different catalysts out there on

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 4>the Horizon Alyx. It's really hard to find any fault

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 4>with their report here.

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Because now, Paul, I feel like it's not about can

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 3>you get streaming stuff for cheaper than you went on cable.

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 3>It's about the contents more interesting and better. And I

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 3>feel like that's a different thing than when I cut

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 3>the cord and say whatever.

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And it's what Ethan her research calls virtuous circle.

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 2>The more subscribers you have, the more money you can

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 2>spend on content, which then gets you more subscribers, and

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 2>it goes and goes and goes, so Gith, I think

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 2>the last big area for them to conquer from my perspective,

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 2>and it goes to your point about advertising being longer

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 2>term growth driver is live sports. When are they going

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 2>to step up and jump into the deep end of

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 2>the pool and take a big NFL package, not just

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 2>a couple of days on Christmas, but a season package

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 2>from the NFL, from the NBA, from English Premier soccer.

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 2>There's really no area they can't go. When do you

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 2>think they're going to do that?

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 5>I think that's still a couple of years out, Paul.

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 4>So they obviously know that the live sports strategy is

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 4>working for them, there's no doubt about it. They had

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 4>the two of their biggest events with which were live

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 4>sports events, and you had those records subscriber gains, So

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 4>obviously sports can be a big subscriber acquisition tool. It

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 4>can also turn into a big subscriber attention tool.

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 5>They do have a.

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 4>Couple of things that they've signed up for, so you know,

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 4>WWE is something that they already have for the next

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 4>five years or so. But the next time huge NFL

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 4>package or an NBA package is really going to become

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 4>available it's probably going to be only in another four

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 4>or five years time. In the meantime, you do have,

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, a couple of the smaller rights packages. You

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 4>do have UFC, which is coming up for renewal by

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 4>the end of this year. You do have you know,

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 4>Formula one, which is something that they already have a

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 4>pretty deep relationship with kind of given their success with

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 4>Drive to Survive. So again they could go after that.

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 4>They have the Women's World Cup. They already have got

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 4>the rights to that, So it's going to be smaller investments,

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 4>I would think before they really go after that big,

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 4>splashy package, which and by that time they're advertising what

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 4>they all said sorry.

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Which no, I was gonna say. It's interesting. I was

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 3>talking to somebody that were like, I've never watched wrestling

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 3>in my entire life, but or boxing, but I did

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 3>when Mike Tyson was doing it because it was on Netflix.

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Why not? So I also wonder if you're bringing in

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 3>like a whole ye, you're gonna want the really sexy

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 3>NFL package, but do you actually need that in order

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 3>to continue to grow that momentum. It's kind of amazing.

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 3>So just record high after record high, here is that

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 3>what I'm looking at.

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 4>Pre much definitely a very very strong growth trajectory. Obviously,

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 4>we don't have a lot of visibility now going into

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 4>the subscriber numbers because that was the last time that

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 4>they disclosed that, but I think we're still going to

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 4>continue to see. I think what what's going to be

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 4>really interesting is when they start disclosing more advertising related metrics,

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 4>right that is where we need some visibility now. So

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 4>whether they give us a more updated monthly active user

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 4>number the last number that they disclosed was seventy million,

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 4>or whether they actually give us an actual, you know,

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 4>advertising revenue number, those are going to become the goalposts

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 4>I think in the near term our.

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.559
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to KEITHA. Roungnathan, Bloomberg Intelligence analyst on US media.

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 3>We move next to some news in the banking industry.

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 3>We heard the Goldman Sacks is promoting a slate of

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 3>star executives to run its biggest Wall Street business lines

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 3>as part of the firm's revamp.

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 2>For more, we were joined by Todd Gillespie, Bloomberg Finance reporter.

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 3>We first asked taba Goldman Sachs revamp actually means and

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 3>who is.

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 7>Involved to MA see what they weren't necessarily know the

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 7>names outside of the finance industry either. But these are

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 7>big people rising stuff up and comers, many of whom

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 7>have held senior posts at Goldman Sacks for a long

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 7>time already. But the idea of this is creating a

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 7>new layer of management basically and promoting a lot more people.

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 7>Fifteen new names are going to be sitting on Goldman

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 7>Sacks's management committee. That's up from twenty four, so in

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 7>totally talking about a thirty nine person management committee, which

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 7>which is quite an expansion here and now equities will

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 7>have three of its own heads, fixed income business will

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 7>have three of its own heads, and the banking business

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 7>at Goldman Sachs will also have three heads as well.

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 7>And those people will report into heads of each of

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 7>the overarching umbrellas at Goldman Sacks, who then obviously report

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 7>into the c suite there. So you know, it's quite

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 7>a big shift.

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't like it. It just layers on another layer

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 2>of management. Where is the value added here is this?

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 2>I read this story which is a great story about

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:54.319
<v Speaker 2>by the way, and I feel like they're just rewarding

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 2>people with titles.

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 7>That is certainly one of the concerns. But right here,

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 7>you've got to look at the context of the industry, right,

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 7>what is Goldman trying to do with doing this? They're

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 7>trying to rest off, you know, competition from the alternative

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 7>asset management industry there. You know who's already been trying

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 7>to poach top executives from Goldman Sachs. We've had John

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 7>Woldron just last week handed an eighty million dollar retention

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 7>bonus to stay on for another five years, alongside David Solomon,

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 7>who's looking very comfortable in his seat as CEO. So

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 7>you know, the bank is trying to fend off this

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 7>kind of competition from across the street. We all know

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 7>right now that banks are not in as lucrative shape

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 7>right now as private equity firms like Carlisle, like Apollo

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 7>for instance, who have been reported to have approached people

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 7>like Waldron already. So the bank is trying to you know,

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:40.959
<v Speaker 7>this is a defensive move as much as a promotional

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 7>move for the people inside.

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Does it work, like, does it say shade people enough

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 3>when they're promoted and stuff like it? Find out eighty

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 3>million in Waldron's a different story. But like this class

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 3>coming up, Yeah.

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 7>I mean this is certainly. I mean, this has been

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 7>in the works for a long time. I mean, this

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 7>is a result of a year long or so set

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 7>of discussions right where people know, you know, that they're

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 7>as a restless, very talented, up and coming group of

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 7>executives who want to be recognized. They want to see

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 7>a path forward, and they hope, obviously the Bank hopes

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 7>by doing this they're going to give them that path forward.

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 7>It certainly doesn't end the internal politics, if anything, also

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 7>creates you know, the potential for new tensions and you know,

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 7>new fiefdoms. But we'll see later down the road how

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 7>this plays out.

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.199
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting for a positive for Goldman Sachs is, you know,

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 2>I think early in his tenure CEO Solomon some shaky ground,

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 2>some missteps, and people were, you know, even suggesting maybe

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 2>he's not the right person for the job. The boys,

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.839
<v Speaker 2>he turned that narrative around. He seems he seems from

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the outside very secure in his position.

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 7>Certainly. Paul, Yeah, I mean the past two years have

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 7>been a real turn around for him. I mean we've

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 7>you know, there was a lot of criticism from early

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 7>on for you know, missteps in the you know, the

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 7>retail adventure that Goldman Sachs was was going on with

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 7>Marcus with you know, with this you know JV with

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 7>with Apple. It now has this cards business that it's

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 7>trying to sell off. Now there's a lot of you know,

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 7>speculation about what's going to happen to that. Now, who's

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 7>going to pick up that portfolio? But certainly David Solomon,

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 7>thanks to you know, a bumper cropper earning his results

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 7>that have come out the past year or so, the

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 7>bank is looking on much steadier ground and he's kind

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 7>of consolidated his grip you could say, perhaps over this bank,

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 7>and you know, and he's but he's also you know,

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 7>he's aware that him being in the seat for longer

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 7>will make other people unsettled, you know this, and the

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 7>board is aware of that as well. And that's partly

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 7>the reason for the John Walter in eighty million dollar

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 7>attention bonus that we saw last week, and it could

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 7>explain some of the moves that we're seeing as well.

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, thanks to Todd Gillespie, Bloomberg Finance reporter.

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:38.959
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, we'll discuss Donald Trump's second term as US

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 3>president and what it may end up meaning for his legacy.

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies in one

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industuries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via Beat.

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I go on the terminal on Paul Swinging.

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 3>And a Malex Steel and this is Bloomberg.

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 8>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 8>weekdays at ten am Easter on Apple car Play and

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 8>the Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 8>demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 8>on YouTube.

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 3>We move now to some big news in the tech space.

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 2>This week, President Donald Trump announced SoftBank, Open Ai and

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Oracle performing a joint venture to fund artificial intelligence infrastructure.

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 3>This includes an initial investment of one hundred million dollars

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 3>and the goal is to speed up the development of

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 3>AI technology for more.

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 2>We're joined by An rag Rana, Bloomberg Intelligence technology analysts.

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 3>We started off by asking the aniog what this announcement

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 3>means for building AI infrastructure in the US.

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 6>We know the funding is going to come, and there's

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 6>a lot of funding coming into AI data centers. Now.

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 6>It has the blessing of the US government. It's going

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 6>to be funded by private equity or private investors. Oracle's

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 6>going to be the biggest cloud provider here, and open

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 6>the I models are going to run on it or

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:55.839
<v Speaker 6>train on it. So it's a good thing for all

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 6>three of them obviously, but it's also good for AI advancements.

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 6>The interesting part is Oracle is not even the top

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 6>three cloud providers that's out there. You know, it's led

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 6>by Amazon Web Services and then Microsoft and then Google.

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 6>So you know, them getting a piece of this spy

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:14.959
<v Speaker 6>is a very big deal for them because it's a

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 6>very small business for them right now compared to what

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 6>AWS generates in revenue.

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 2>So how about the other big cloud players, what are

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:25.079
<v Speaker 2>they thinking not being.

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think the I think if you see the

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 6>when the rumor first came out that this is happening,

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 6>you saw that Microsoft started to you know, trickle down

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 6>a little bit. Because right now, Microsoft is the exclusive

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 6>partner for open AI. Microsoft has outsourced some work to

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 6>Oracle because they can't take care of the whole capacity. Then,

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 6>after the announcement was made, open Ai and Microsoft issued

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 6>a joint press release saying that you know, they're renegotiating

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 6>their own contracts in between and currently their joint venture

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 6>or partnership will be extended into till twenty thirty. Now,

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 6>there are two parts of why open ai uses Microsoft Cloud.

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 6>One is to train their models. Now that's the expensive

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 6>that really where a lot of the capex is going

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 6>in that area. Microsoft will give, you know, allow other

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 6>cloud providers, but they have the right of first refusals,

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 6>which means they will figure out whether they are okay

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 6>with Oracle doing it or not. It seems to me

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 6>that they are doing they're okay with Oracle because they've

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 6>already outsourced some work to Oracle. I don't know if

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 6>it's going to happen or if they're going to share

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 6>that with AWS. We'll see that. But the biggest piece

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 6>of it, the revenue sharing, is if you use open

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 6>ai technology to develop an enterprise application, what we call

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 6>as inferencing revenue from APIs, Microsoft still controls that that's

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 6>going to run on Microsoft Cloud. So Microsoft also got

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 6>the best of it, which is the reason why Microsoft

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 6>is up three percent also in this game today.

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 3>So here's my really dumb question. What are some hurdles here?

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Aka power and permits?

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, but that's where the government is saying they will

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 6>help you out or help these companies out and taking

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 6>care of it. You know, that is that's not entailed.

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 3>That means like speeding up a permit process, or like

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 3>allowing coal plants to run, Like what does that really entail?

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 6>I think coal plants must be tough because frankly speaking,

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 6>it is very difficult for a cloud provider not to

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 6>use renewable energy. I think there's going to be a

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 6>lot more talk about nuclear. For example, what we heard

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 6>with Microsoft going through, they will build they may build

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 6>their own smaller you know, you could say capacity to

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 6>run some of these things. They have the money to

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 6>fund it obviously. So you know, if it's one hundred

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 6>billion spending, we think maybe twenty twenty five percent of

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 6>that goes towards you know, more tech oriented stuff, whether

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 6>it's chip, whether it's servers, whether it's you know, pipeline

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 6>I mean connecting networking devices and or cloud computing, and

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 6>the rest of that is probably going to go to

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 6>more the building of the data center and you know,

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 6>the cooling units, all that stuff that goes with it.

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 2>So on our When I think of the electric vehicle business,

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 2>I think of a business that China is actually leading

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 2>the way. They are ahead of the US and European

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 2>automakers for AI, which is arguably a much bigger business

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 2>opportunity in a longer term one. Perhaps where is the

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 2>US in terms of a leadership position. It feels like

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 2>we're putting the resources behind it.

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 6>Well, we have in video chips, so that really makes

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 6>a very big difference at this point. One of the

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 6>things we don't know about China is what are they

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 6>doing on the AI side and the government. That's not

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 6>publicly available anywhere, So it's a difficult guess for somebody.

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 6>But one thing is for sure. If you have a

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 6>lot of private money coming in and we have the capacity.

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 6>I mean, as I said, Microsoft itself this year is

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 6>going to spend eighty billion dollars in CAPEX. You know,

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 6>we think it's going to be closer to eighty five.

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 6>So if you look at all these large companies with

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 6>a trillion plus or two three trillion dollar market gap,

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 6>they can raise funds and you know, get a lot

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 6>more AI investments. And now the government is getting involved

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 6>in it. So I mean it's I would say, in

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 6>all directions, seems that US will not let this one slip,

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 6>and it's going to make sure that, you know, we

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 6>remain the dominant force out there.

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 3>Well then speaking of in terms of say Microsoft and

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 3>their capax, maybe hitting eighty five billion, is this it

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 3>was this money that everyone was already planning to spend.

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 3>It was just now packaging a nice little wrapper to everybody.

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 6>Not from Microsoft point of view, because Microsoft is not

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 6>part of this you know, spending ecosystem. So Microsoft is

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 6>going to spend this, but now good part is going

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 6>to be Microsoft may not have to spend this much

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 6>going forward because, as I said, the biggest bulk of

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 6>that spending was going towards helping some of these large

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 6>language model providers train their models on it. Now, if

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 6>that's done with external money, the likes of private equity

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 6>or SoftBank, then Microsoft is not going to take that

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 6>margin head or investors are not going to ask them,

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 6>you know, you're spending eighty billion dollars whereas the corresponding

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 6>eighty billion revenue in it. So I think it really

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 6>helps Microsoft also down the road.

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 2>And to come back a little bit for SoftBank's Masasan here,

0:17:58.600 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 2>he's back on the think state.

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:04.239
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's been you know, missing hits for him for

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 6>some time. But one thing is for sure. You know,

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 6>the addressable market of everything AI related is going to

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 6>be so large. They specifically mentioned a lot of healthcare initiative.

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 6>If you remember when you look at Larry Allison's acquisition

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 6>of Serner, you know he's spending a lot of his

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 6>personal time trying to fix that healthcare system, which, to

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 6>be very honest, is probably the biggest burden on us

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 6>GDP right now because of the high amount of healthcare

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 6>spending we do as a country.

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Anna rog Rana, Bloomberg Intelligence senior technology analysts.

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 3>This week, we also focus on a Bloomberg Big Take

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 3>story titled Trump Shows he is on competing quests for

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 3>legacy and revenge. You can find this on the Bloomberg

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 3>terminal as well as Bloomberg dot com.

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 2>The story looks at how President Donald Trump's attention is

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 2>divided between policy victories and exacting revenge on those he

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 2>considers his enemies.

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 3>For more, we spoke to the stories author and Nancy Cook,

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.199
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Senior national political correspondent. We first asked her to

0:18:58.200 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 3>walk us through what that story is.

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's really about sort of these two impulses that

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 9>he has and that his aids are really thinking about

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 9>as he you know, begins his second term in the

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 9>White House, and the first impulse is really to you know,

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 9>govern well, leave a legacy. You know, some of his

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 9>aids for the last few months have been talking about

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 9>sort of wanting him to have as big of a

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 9>legacy as Ronald Reagan.

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 9>They want him to preside over a booming economy, energy exploration,

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 9>you know, getting what they see is immigration under control,

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 9>and they really want, you know, his success to be

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:35.719
<v Speaker 9>built around governing. But there's a whole other crew of

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 9>Trump Maga people who really also want retribution and revenge

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 9>to be a part of that. They want people to

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 9>pay for the investigations that they say Trump endured, They

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 9>want people to pay for, you know, coming after him

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 9>with legal challenges, the Jack Smith investigation, the New York

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 9>hush money case. They want people to pay, and also

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 9>just critics, you know, career government official who maybe raise

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 9>questions about Trump's first term. This crew wants Trump to pay.

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 9>And so the story just really talks about how the

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 9>competing impulses of Trump's first term is going to be

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 9>between sort of wanting to govern well but also wanting

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 9>to get revenge. And I think that a central theme

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 9>of his presidency the second time around will be what

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 9>the balance of that looks like.

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 2>Nancy, do we have any idea who President Trump really

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 2>listens to in the second administration? Seemed like in the

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 2>first administration he had Jared Kushner and Ivanka there. Who's

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 2>got his ear these days?

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 9>Do you think, well, it's a different crew than last time.

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 9>I would say Susie Wiles, who is his chief of

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 9>staff and the first female chief of staff at the

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 9>White House ever, really is hugely respected. You know, he

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 9>really listens to her and really takes her counsel. She's

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 9>worked for him, you know, on and off since twenty sixteen.

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.400
<v Speaker 9>She ran his Florida political operations about the twenty sixteen

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:57.959
<v Speaker 9>campaign and twenty twenty and then joined him, you know,

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 9>his campaign full time when he, you know, decided to

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.360
<v Speaker 9>run for a third time. They are very close and

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 9>she he does listen to her, and then she has

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 9>a group of very loyal aids around her who worked

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 9>on the campaign. And I feel like, you know, it's

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 9>a pretty well oiled machine, and a lot of those

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 9>people were Florida based, and I would say, it's a

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 9>really different staff than it was for his first administration.

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 3>What kind of legacy do you think President Trump is

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 3>after right now?

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 9>I think right now he's feeling good and he's not

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 9>feeling under attack, and so I think right now he

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 9>you know, is probably a little bit more drawn to

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 9>the Ronald Reagan model. But you have to remember he

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 9>also pardoned fifteen hundred January sixth people, including people who

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 9>violently assaulted police officers that day, and that is also

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:46.919
<v Speaker 9>part of the revenge. And so I think, you know,

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 9>it's going to vacillate between one and the other. I

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 9>do think that he thinks that he could be a

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 9>better president than people give him credit for. Biden thought

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 9>the same thing, and so we'll have to see what,

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 9>you know, happens over the next four years. He and

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 9>his team are riding high right now. You know, they

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 9>feel like they won all seven battleground states. They put

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 9>together a new coalition, brought some new people into the

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 9>Republican Party, and so I will be curious to see,

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 9>you know, what happens a year from now or two

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 9>years from now when they're not riding as high, or

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 9>when he feels under attack, and what that looks like

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 9>at that point.

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Nancy, what do you think are kind of the to

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 2>do list for the first hundred days. Is this a

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 2>president that views these first hundred days, as other presidents do,

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 2>as a time to really get stuff done.

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:35.439
<v Speaker 9>He signed a ton of executive orders, everything related to immigration, energy,

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 9>the federal workforce. He's really hitting the ground running. Susie

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 9>Wiles's chief of staff, has told people that she views

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 9>the first one hundred days as kind of an artificial metric.

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 9>They are really looking at the first two years as

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 9>the key time to get things done. That's when we

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 9>know that Republicans will control both the House and Senate.

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 9>You know, the Republicans have total control right now in Washington,

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 9>and I think that they view the two years as

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 9>the key time to get things done.

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Right, So, I was wondering, like, it's really until the midterms,

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 3>right when women things may change. Also, any leverage that

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 3>President Trump may have over individual members that are up

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 3>for reelection that might change as well.

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, that's absolutely right. And you have to remember he's

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 9>a lame duck president too, you know, he can't serve again,

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 9>and so I think that they view that too as

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 9>part of this calculus of the first two years of

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 9>being very important. But we were already seeing them move

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 9>at a very dizzying pace. And I think that that's

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 9>going to continue immigration deportation.

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 2>How aggressive do you think the president can be here?

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 9>Well, he's already trying. I mean, he's signed executive orders

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 9>to change the asylum process to you know, shut down

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 9>the border via se via you know, national emergency. They

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 9>were canceling immigration appointments that people had already that were

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 9>you know, legal immigration people trying to come here legally.

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 9>And so I think that, you know, Stephen Miller, who

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 9>is sort of the architect of his immigration policy, is

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 9>a deputy chief of Staff in the White House. He

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 9>has a huge amount of power, just like last time,

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 9>and I think that you know, he is telling both

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 9>members of Congress, but also he's telling Trump himself that

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 9>you know, you need to move quickly on immigration. This

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 9>is a quote unquote quick win for US. And so

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 9>I think that they are going to spend a lot

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 9>of time in the first six weeks to two months

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 9>on immigration.

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Nancy Cook, Bloomberg's senior national political correspondent.

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Coming up on the program, a look at corporate earnings

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 3>in the aerospace industry.

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 2>b I go on the terminal on Paul.

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 3>Sweeney and amlex Steel and this is Bloomberg.

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 8>You were listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch the

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:58.719
<v Speaker 8>program live weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 8>Play and the Android Audio with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.479
<v Speaker 8>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 8>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 3>We moved next to the aerospace industry this week. We

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 3>got earnings from American Airlines and GE Aerospace.

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 2>American Airlines forecast at a surprise first quarter loss as

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 2>a carrier works to win back corporate travel after a

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 2>strategic blunder last year.

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 3>Meantime, Genmal Electric Aerospace GE Aerospace exceeded Wallstreet expectations for

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 3>profit and sales in the fourth quarter.

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 2>This comes as the jet engine maker works through supply

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 2>chain limitations and capitalized on a strong maintenance backlog.

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 3>For more We are joined by George Ferguson Bloomberg Intelligence

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 3>senior Aerospace, Defense and Airlines analyst.

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 2>We first asked George for his take on results from

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 2>American Airlines.

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so, I mean on an adjusted basis, though, American

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 10>fine and four Q is all about their one Q

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 10>guide and that was guided at a loss compared to

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 10>their peers United in Delta. So I mean, American looks

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 10>like they're just going to add less capacity in the

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:02.360
<v Speaker 10>first quarter and that's going to make it more difficult

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 10>to manage expenses. Expenses will be higher than peers, and

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 10>so their performance just won't be as good.

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>But I guess what I.

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 10>Would say though, is Americans four Q earnings, you know,

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 10>their their revenue growth in all markets looked better than

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:23.399
<v Speaker 10>their peers on par or better.

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 10>So, American a couple of years ago decided on a

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 10>new strategy where they were going to try to do

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 10>less agency ticketing, you know, through travel agencies and such,

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 10>and more direct That kind of backfired. They've they've turned

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.880
<v Speaker 10>that around and they're going back towards a more traditional

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 10>distribution of tickets, and I think it's starting to show

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 10>up in the financials now again. I think four Q

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 10>looked pretty good from a revenue performance, and so I

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 10>would expect that one Q is probably a bit of

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 10>a glitch, as they're just not going to put as

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:56.880
<v Speaker 10>much capacity in the marketplace manage a little bit higher expenses.

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 10>But I really think that they're closing the gap, and

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 10>we'll get to close the gap with the United and

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 10>Delta as they roll through twenty twenty five.

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 3>So when do they expect them to catch up and

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 3>sort of reverse the mistake that they made, Like when

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 3>does that resolve itself completely?

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 10>So, I mean I was looking, you know, to some

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.479
<v Speaker 10>of the differential and yields, price paid per mile flown

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 10>at the carriers. Delta is still the top dog, but

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 10>Americans only sort of three percent behind. It's always hard

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 10>to figure out exactly when the catchup's.

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 5>Going to occur.

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 10>Is it going to occur in the next couple of quarters.

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 10>Probably not. I think it'll take a while, But I

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 10>bet you they make a lot of progress during twenty

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.640
<v Speaker 10>twenty five. I mean, it's a pretty competitive marketplace.

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 2>There's a fair.

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 10>Amount of overlap. I don't think, you know, Americans hubs

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 10>probably aren't as great as Deltas and United, but I

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 10>would expect they're going to close a good portion of

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 10>that gap this year.

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm just looking an evaluation on a pe basis.

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 2>American you know, got an eight handle, United's around ten times,

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 2>Delta is the premium at eleven twelve times. What drives

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 2>the differential evaluation for these three companies. I kind of

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 2>think of them as kind of all kind of the same.

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 2>But the market doesn't, does it?

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 10>It doesn't look I think Delta does have you know,

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 10>as you just pointed out, has the best reputation in

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 10>the group. Again there you know, they're the market leader

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 10>in revenue per mile flown. I think they've done a

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 10>really good job on their loyalty program. I think that's

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:27.399
<v Speaker 10>probably generating the most revenue of those big three as well,

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 10>and that's really nice, high powered revenue, right, A lot

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 10>of it flows to the bottom line. So Delta is

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 10>clearly the market leader. And again I think it's that loyalty.

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 10>I think there's a real desire to fly Delta. There's

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 10>sort of this Delta cult out there. United has been

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 10>kind of closing that ground. The United has a very

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 10>strong international network and I think we've really seen that

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 10>recently with you know there's very good demand, very strong

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 10>demand to go transatlantic right now Americans. The dollars strong.

0:28:57.200 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 10>Americans apparently want to go there in the depths of

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 10>winter now, even because we just can't get enough Europe

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 10>after the pandemic. I don't know how long this lasts,

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 10>maybe as long as the dollar is this strong. But

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 10>I think that's been really shining through and United and

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 10>helping them close some of the gap. They still have

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 10>work to do on the loyalty side, and I think

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 10>the domestic side of their network, and America has kind

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 10>of been the laggard. And again I think you know,

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 10>their internationals, especially international indo Europe isn't as good I think,

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 10>and into Asia is much less than those two carriers,

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 10>And America just doesn't have the loyalty program as strong.

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 10>So I think they've been more highly levered than the

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 10>other two because they have gone through fleet refreshes earlier.

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 10>So that's sort of why they're the laggard. But again,

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 10>they all operate in the same marketplace. There are some

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 10>nuances to their hubs, but it's hard to see any

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 10>one of them walking away too far from the others,

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 10>and I think that's why we're seeing this convergence in

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 10>the full service.

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 5>We'll see it.

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 3>George, we have a little over a minute, luck, but

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 3>I didn't want to let you go before we talked

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 3>about GE and what that read through A and their

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 3>aerospace division men for Boeing so strong.

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 10>GE's got, you know, the maintenance business really powering cash

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 10>flow and margins. They guided to next year they show

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 10>cash flow and profit not growing as fast as revenue.

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 10>Story there is. I think you're going to see more

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 10>deliveries out of Boeing and Airbus. We're calling for that.

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 10>New engines are diluted to margins and so that'll take

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 10>a little bit of the shine off that business. But

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 10>everybody's flying everything as long as they can because it's

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 10>hard to get new airplanes because of the supply chain problems.

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 10>And that's really helping to boost that margin income at GE,

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 10>which is you know, well into double digits kind of stuff.

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 2>It's great stuff, all right.

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to George Ferguson, Bloomberg Intelligence, Senior Aerospace, Defense and

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Airlines analyst. Each week we take a look at research

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 3>from Bloomberg n EF previously known as New Energy Finance.

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 2>They're the team at Bloomberg that tracks and analyzes the

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 2>energy transition from commodities to power, transport, industries, buildings, and

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 2>agricultural sects.

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 3>This week we took a look at what a Trump

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 3>administration means for the energy transition from where we are

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 3>joined by Derek Flackole Bloomberg bn EF's lead US policy analyst.

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 2>We first asked Derek, what's the substance of Trump's recent

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 2>executive orders on energy and if we're in need of

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 2>an energy emergency?

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 11>From a sort of market perspective, the answer would arguably

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 11>be no. Certainly from a supply amount, the US is

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 11>the world's largest producer of oil and gas, there is

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 11>an argument to be made about price, which is certainly

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 11>the basis of the Trump administration's order. But more to

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 11>the point, declaring an emergency doesn't have a sort of

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 11>clear legal basis of restriction. It's a thing that's more

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 11>or less the discretion of the president, so he does

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 11>have the power to declare this. The substantive implications, of course,

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 11>might be somewhat different. There's not a lot of precedent

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 11>for a national energy emergency to close would be the

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 11>nineteen seventies, where there was a large amount of regional

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 11>emergencies declared, there might be some ability to ignore or

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 11>look past normal environmental rules or restrictions that could slow

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 11>the construction of energy project. But of course this would

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 11>require a lot of cooperation with perhaps state and local

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 11>authorities and certainly the private sector to really build anything out,

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 11>and the implications on prices remained to be seen. It

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 11>takes a long time to build anything, and that means

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 11>a long time to have an impact on prices.

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Derek, just from at that thirty thousand foot level,

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 2>what does a Prince president Trump presidency meet for just

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 2>alternative energy in general, maybe wind in particular.

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 11>Sure, so zooming in on wind there's a bit more

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 11>vulnerability than a lot of other energy sectors because in

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 11>offshore wind there's reliance on federal permits. Everything is basically

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 11>on the federally owned seabed as well as federal leases.

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:42.719
<v Speaker 11>So those are two different areas where the president has

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 11>a lot of leverage to halt leasing or new construction.

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 11>Trump has already done that with one specific executive order.

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 11>Onshore wind is a little bit different. Unless it's on

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 11>federal land or impacts certain federally regulated waters or endangered species,

0:32:57.400 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 11>you're not going to need a federal permit for that,

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 11>so that's a bit more limited there. And then when

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 11>you're looking at solar and storage and other factors like that,

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 11>it's not really as affected by Trump's orders. He did

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 11>pause certain forms of funding from the Inflation Reduction Act,

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 11>the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. Those are the sort

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 11>of Biden era signature clean energy subsidy laws. But by

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 11>my understanding, that shouldn't really be affecting the tax credits,

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 11>which are driving a lot of deployment, and state level

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 11>regulation in the power sector, which is a major driver continues.

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 11>You're still going to see demands for clean power for

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 11>utilities in California, Michigan, a wide variety of states, and

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 11>in places that don't have those standards, like Texas, there's

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 11>still a really substantial amount of solar and storage build

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 11>not because of not because of regulations, because of market demand,

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 11>because it's quick to build and provides meets load growth

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 11>pretty quickly. So he can't really stop it, but he

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 11>can slow or complicate it in various ways.

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 3>And I hear you on the tax credits that has

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 3>to take an Act of Congress, but that would be

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 3>pivotal for a lot of these companies. Part though, has

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 3>to do with the deployment of cash. So the Department

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 3>of Loans issued a boatload of money right before. I mean,

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 3>they've been trying to get rid of this money like

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 3>crazy for the last four years. Where is that money now, Like,

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 3>is it just like dry up and go away? Can

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Trump recall any of these loans?

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 11>So recalling that will be pretty tricky. A large amount

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 11>of those loans have now been committed from the Department

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 11>Energy's Loan Program's office. Both an active loan and a

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 11>conditional commitment are considered obligated as I as far as

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 11>my research told me, which means it's basically contractually assigned

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 11>to a private company. That means that it's pretty difficult

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 11>to claw that back. The active loans, of course, are

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 11>even more difficult because once a business is actually enjoying

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 11>the benefits of that you're building a factory or opening

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 11>a mine, it becomes both legally and politically trickier to

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 11>pull that away.

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:57.799
<v Speaker 2>So when we sit back, Derek, what's the reality here?

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 2>You know you mentioned when where there is some some

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 2>opportunity for the federal government to slow things down, But

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 2>how about other areas of alternatives. Is that going to

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 2>need cooperation of Congress, private sector. How do you think

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 2>that might play out?

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 11>Well, It definitely requires a lot of cooperation on both ends. Firstly,

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:20.280
<v Speaker 11>from the sort of utility scale deployment side of things, again,

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 11>you're still looking at a lot of state driven demand

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 11>for a build out, either regulatory or market. Secondly, if

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 11>you're trying to really cut the tax credits or slow

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 11>deployment that way, you do need Congress's approval to really

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 11>substantially change the rates. Over the longer term, maybe two

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 11>to three years, you could see Trump reversing some of

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 11>the finalized Biden administration regulations in a way that might

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 11>make these credits harder to access, but that's going to

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 11>take time. And on top of that, in terms of

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:54.280
<v Speaker 11>other parts of things like you know, oil and gas access,

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 11>things like that, that's going to be driven heavily by

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 11>private sector decision making. Right, lower a bunch of barriers,

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 11>But you can't really say to energy producers, Okay, we're

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 11>going to make you produce at an amount that basically

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 11>reduces your profitability. And one last point, I'll make something

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 11>that ties into all this fossil and non fossil infrastructure

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 11>is permitting reform, and that is mostly going to take

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 11>an Act of Congress. In particular, it's probably going to

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 11>take a sixty votes in the Senate, which means seven

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.319
<v Speaker 11>Democrats coming alongside. You can't really easily fit that into

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 11>a reconciliation bill, which is primarily about tax and spending,

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 11>and it can get you a fifty votes passage in

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 11>the Senate.

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 5>All right.

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to Derek Flackhole, Bloomberg b Any Apps, Lead US

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 3>policy analyst.

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 8>This is a Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:48.279
<v Speaker 8>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 8>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 8>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 8>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 8>and always on the Bloomberg terminal