WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off August 4th, 2022 (Ep. 567)

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Leading Off, brought to you by

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>bet MGM right here on Fantasy Pros. I am Chris

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Welsh and joining me today for a magnificent episode of

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Leading Off for all you Penis and cracker Jacks people

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>watching live or of course people listening on the podcast

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>is the great and powerful Nick Pollock. Pitch your list.

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:38.319
<v Speaker 1>What's up, my friend? What's up? Nick?

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 2>What is happening? So good to see you, Chris, Thanks

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 2>so much for having me today.

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I always love talking with you. One of the perennial

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>names in all of the baseball space. Obviously, you guys

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>know him. You get all of his breakdowns. You know

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>what the best part of today is too, I get

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to potentially throw hitter things at Oh no, that's always

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the problem because Nick, the number one thing we're gonna

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>be talking about, of course, is going to be over

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>on the padres. But I want to remind everybody you

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>can follow mister Nick Pollock over at picture List. You

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>can check out their incredibly, incredibly awesome website. What is

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the version are we on on pictures at seven point?

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh? I don't recall, it's it's pl seven When Stack

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 3>cast that on our player pages.

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 2>It's wonderful.

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.960
<v Speaker 1>It is crazy crazy. If you want to do any

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>research on players, you've got to make sure you go

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.479
<v Speaker 1>over there. They've got a litany of incredible podcasts, and

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>really Nick is the one of the biggest must follows

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter that I possibly know, and a wonderful person,

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.559
<v Speaker 1>one of just my favorite, like genuinely great people, whether

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it's on a podcast, whether it's in person, whether it's

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>giving advice. Nick has literally never said no to me,

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and I say.

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Of course, how could I not? And I can't thank

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 3>you enough for giving advice like this. I'm excited to

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 3>talk about everything baseball, yes, including the cardboard cutouts that

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 3>are hitters.

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Yes, there are a few. And there were a couple

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that were traded. I know it's not a exciting pictures Nick,

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>but there were a couple that were traded and made

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>their debuts Yesterdays. They came out with an absolute bang

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>with a nine to one victory with all their new guys,

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Drury first inning grand slam, Soto and Bell both

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>on base. Soto ended up going one for three with

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>two walks in the debut. Josh Bell oh for two,

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>but he had two walks and two runs, Brandon Drury

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>one for three with a grand Slam for RBI, and

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>it was a polaroid moment. It was a huge, huge

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>build up to what had the chance to disappoint, and

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it did not. Like I know, they are stinky hitters

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 1>and everything like that, but I mean we've been talking

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the fantasy uptick on players and going

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to new destinations. Soto's a kind of no brainer, Josh Bell,

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I think is a relatively good no brainer. What about

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Drury? What were your thoughts on Brandon Drury and

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>having that big output.

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So, Brandon Drury when we moved to San Diego padrics,

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 3>you definitely know how you fit in with so many

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 3>options there. But it's so good to see him right

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 3>away making an impact for San Diego. And you gotta

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 3>think that they'll find a way to game his line

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 3>because he's such a good hitter this year inside of

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 3>Cincinnati and I'm just really excited to see him thrive

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.399
<v Speaker 3>in Sandy U now in such a good lineup, grand

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 3>jury shoot succeed there.

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, Nick's got to run, go go do. I'm

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.959
<v Speaker 1>not joking you. Nick is literally burning His food is

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>food burning his whole place might burn down, so he

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:26.839
<v Speaker 1>had to run. Here's what I thought was interesting. Here's

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things. Juan Soto hit two in the lineup,

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>major check. That is exactly what we wanted to see.

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So think when Tatis comes back. If Tatis leaves off

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and then you go Sodo Machado, it will be the

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>greatest one through three I can imagine. And I mentioned

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it yesterday. The no run first inning bets on the

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>run scored should be really fascinating for the Padres because

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna want to ever take it on the under.

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Josh Bell hitting behind the major guys proves the incredible

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>RBI opportunity that's gonna be out there, even though he

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't really do a whole bunch a couple walks in

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>their couple runs. And Brandon Drury dh in his first appearance,

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>which I think was really important to see because at

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, you're gonna see him just

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>play all across the board, and they played him right

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>off the bat against righty's not that they wouldn't have,

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>but if you were to pretend something nick Brandon Drury

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.359
<v Speaker 1>is one of the better left handed hitters in I

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>mean hitting left lefties in baseball right now. I mean

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>he think he's like still top ten. Is not Paul Goldschmid,

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>but you know he is a guy where if he's

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>up against a lefty and you're a better you want

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.359
<v Speaker 1>to go probably take a goal total base proper you

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>can feel comfortable with the homer. So they played him

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>up against righty's as well. He could DH, he could

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>play second, he could play outfield. His versatility really showed out,

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and really everything we guessed that this lineup would do happen.

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Bell Rbi opportunity, Soto to Drury hitting in a pretty

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 1>solid spot and coming through and probably gonna get regular

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>playing time, which is what we need definitely.

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 3>And it's also kind of interesting to see the Pieris

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 3>and the Mets maybe do this thing of game platwo

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 3>similit guys. You have Darren Roff now and Bogo back

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 3>with the Mets too. It might be what the Pyres

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 3>are doing, So it might not be in every thing

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 3>for brand juries, it might be need a little bit

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 3>more on lefties.

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, and they got Kim and they've got Profar and

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 1>Grishan was hitten out a little bit by the way

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>did your food.

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 2>Burn It's all right.

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 3>I just all of a sudden smelled it and I

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 3>was like, oh my god, I put it on too high,

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 3>and I realized for thirty minutes, I'm gonna start a fire,

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 3>so I needed to.

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm glad. What I'm really glad about is I

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't bring Nick Pollock on and his whole house burned

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 1>down when he's I got enough of my personal life

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that's burning down. I don't need to burn down your life.

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 1>So I'm glad we didn't burn down.

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 3>The moment of oh my god, I'm thirty minutes and

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna burned down.

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right, lord. So it was magnificent on the

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Padres front. Sandy al Contra through his third complete game

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of the season. Nick, you are the picture guy. Actually

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>have two picture things I want to break down here.

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>Talk to me about Sandy o Contra and how have

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you dealt with him from fantasy As far as value,

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I know, it's not the most important thing in the world.

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>He might be the most reliable, trustworthy picture of the

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>entire season. He doesn't have the best you know, like

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>percentage to Kate for nine or anything like that. But

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>as he goes so deep, he puts up stats. What

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>level of elite is al Contra through this entire season

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for you compared to other guys like especially here's here's

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a perfect example. Garrett Cole just got lit up yesterday

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and he's really shown inconsistency throughout the board. Do you

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>think al Contra is no question more valuable than Garrett

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Cole for the rest of the season.

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I have him ranked above of Garrett Cole since

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 3>I believe two weeks ago on my weekly edition of

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 3>the list. And Sandale Katara does such a good job

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 3>of getting fastballs inside, getting awkward swings that create outs

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 3>in the field quickly. He makes it such a tough

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 3>at bat every time, doesn't waste many pitches, and when

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 3>we saw yesterday those three strikeouts not the best changeup.

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Insider that we've seen from him.

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 3>But when you have three pitches actually really four if

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 3>you want to say, the Forestings sinc Are being two

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 3>distinct ones. Al Kantara just makes such difficult bats all

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 3>the time with the most ridiculous stuff, and we're talking

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:01.799
<v Speaker 3>like ninety nine mile per hour fastballs and then amazing

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 3>drop on the change up Inslider two and because of

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 3>that constant pounding of the zone, tough swing decisions, al

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Kantar is able to go deep into games consistently.

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 2>And keep in mind, because he's going so long into

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 2>the games that.

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Earray and whip are higher expressed than guys going you know,

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 3>thirty percent fewer frames because that's in the array. Yes,

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 3>but if you're in a roto league, that means so

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 3>much more that he's doing over eight innings than six innings.

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 3>So do not undervalue that from a Sandi al Kaintara.

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 3>It's been an amazing season. I don't really see it

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 3>slowing down at all.

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, is he number three overall? He's number three.

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 3>For me, it's carbon Burns, It's see McClanahan and all cantar.

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 3>But then de Grama's back and how do you deal

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 3>with that? But that's another story.

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that's a whole other thing that I would dive into.

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>But I saw mich McClanahan was on that list on

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the other side, boy, I mean, I can't be any

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>colder betting right now. We can talk about that later.

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>But Freddy Praulta did make his debut back from injury,

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>going three and two thirds he ended up giving up

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to he walked to struck out three. He only went

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven pitches. Looked like he was really moving and

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>shaking in that bottom of the fourth inning, gave up

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>those runs and then they pretty much immediately yanked him

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and didn't look like that strikeout prop was going to

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>go great. Eight swing and misses on the day. Change

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>up I think was at like a fifty percent with rate.

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Fastball wasn't really doing a whole bunch slider low slider stuff.

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it was all in like twenty five plus

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>csw What were your thoughts on the return of Freddy Perlta?

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.559
<v Speaker 1>Did this look like the guy that everybody was trying

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to push as a top ten sp Do you think

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>he is going to need some time to work back?

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Are you back into ultimate trust of Freddy perult especially

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>if people like in a fantasy trade deadline might be

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>looking to maybe acchoir Freddy Peralta. You know, if they

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>want to make a push, is that a guy people

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>should be trading for with short innings coming off of

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the injury? And I don't know, did his stuff look

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>good enough for you? Right?

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 2>It didn't for me? What you want to see from

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Freddy Peralta is just strikes.

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.479
<v Speaker 3>You want to see him pounding the zone with fastballs

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 3>and hopefully the slider gets strikes as well on top

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 3>of them. As long as this heater inside the zone constantly,

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 3>and I'm talking upper third of the zone, we're just

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 3>anywhere really inside that box, but hopefully upper third for

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 3>Alta will have a great start yesterday, very volatile, very

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 3>erratic in a bad way with that heater. I call

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 3>him Professor Chaos because of how much is strikes imply

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 3>just normally looks like just an array, but normally inside

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 3>of that zone. And if who wasn't there yesterday, it

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 3>could be a product of injury, it could be product

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 3>of jitters. You just came back for so long and

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 3>you're really excited and that can affect you too. So

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 3>it's really hard to tell at this moment if Peralta

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 3>is going to make those adjustments to get back into

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 3>any sort of rhythm as that sp two that we've seen.

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.079
<v Speaker 3>I want to believe he will because he has done

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:45.199
<v Speaker 3>it for a decent amount of time. He does pitch

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 3>cross body, though, and that's something that requires a lot

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 3>of rhythm to get back into the zone constantly with

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 3>a timing on on release, so it might take a

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 3>couple starts to get there. Interesting to maybe wait if

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 3>you're looking to trade for him for another week, wait

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 3>for another bats art, because I don't think a manager

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 3>would be willing to give him up for cheap at

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 3>the moment.

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, okay, so that's interesting because you turned it

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>back into kind of like a buy and I wasn't

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>sure if it was going to be a buy or

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe a sell off. If you don't want to wait.

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Trade deadlines are not created equal in fantasy. I've had

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>some that just hit on the first you get some

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that will be usually mid August. You might

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>have some push even a little bit further, maybe even

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 1>to the end of August. So if you can get

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>one more bad start in, that might be the time

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>if you believe there's going to be a tick back.

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>But maybe if there is no discount required off of

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the bad start and you can still get full value,

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you could even look at maybe not playing. You know,

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you could move off of him for the rest of

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>your year if you don't want to play it through,

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>because unfortunately, it's going to have to be game time

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and Freddy Brot has never been a big innings guy,

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and he already won sixty seven pitches only through four,

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>So you do have to question long term, if the

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff is just a little bit shaky over the next

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>three or four starts, how comfortable will they ultimately be

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>just pushing him in in to win opportunities. And he's

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the polar opposite of Sandy al Contrac where Sanuel Contrac like,

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>if he doesn't go seven, We're like, is he injured?

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>What's going on here?

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.839
<v Speaker 3>No, with Freddy Peerlte, We'll say the only true by

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 3>lows are where it's not a guarantee that he's gonna

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 3>do well again. Right, So, if you are really buying

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 3>on Freddy Perlze, you're kind of hoping that it does

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 3>go poorly the next two starts and then having that

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 3>faith that it'll come back up.

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. One of the top prospects in baseball did

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>make his major league debut, but probably the most boring

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of names for many people just don't know him, Miguel Vargas.

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>He ended up going two for four two RBIs. I

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>think he also stole third if I remember correctly, not

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>on the ear Miguel Vargas. This is one of those guys.

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm having these moments and I don't want to make

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>everything about me, even though it can be. But like

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I have this shlew of these players that I saw

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>as the lowest levels, Like I remember Miguel Vargus in

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>like twenty eighteen or seventeen on the backfields of Camelback

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:55.959
<v Speaker 1>Rants watching him, being like, man, this kid is really impressive.

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Not showing crazy stuff, but he's really impressive watching him

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>as this kid, and he's now up in the major

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>leagues right now, and he is successful, and he one

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of the best prospects in baseball. Fifteen homers, twelve stolen

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>base is hitting two ninety one with a three eighty

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>two OBP in the minor league season and now stolen

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>base a couple hits in his major league debut. Can

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of move around. As soon as I saw he

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>was actually called up, immediately tweeted out for everybody, go

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 1>pick him up. If he's still out there, go pick

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>him up. This is one of those prospects that you

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>know in the Dodger system. I don't know how long

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that they'll let things hang around, but if he's successful

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and he's here. He could play multiple positions. He's got

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 1>incredible hit tool, and he's always been patient, doesn't strike out, walks,

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 1>has a high OBP OBP leagues is a good one.

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>This is definitely a hitter that you guys want to

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>go and pick up if he is looming around and

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to play the young guy game in redraft,

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>which I usually don't like to do. Over on the

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>injury front, Michael Harris will scratched yesterday day to day

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>with a foot injury. This is blasphemous. I know he's

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a cardboard, stinky hitter, but Michael Harris one of my

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>favorite players of the entire year, and really also Nick.

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 1>I have to continue root and cheer for Michael Harris

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:06.199
<v Speaker 1>because as oneal Cruz goes out and hits his eighth

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>homer and has a higher and fourteen EV and everybody

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>tweets me about it because I'm critical of I'm only

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>critical of onneal Cruz because the guy hits sub two

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty and he was anointed the Rookie of the Year

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>through seven at bats through this season. That's why I'm

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>critical Michael Harris. I think the best guy in baseball

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 1>got to continuously root for are you a big Michael

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Harris guy.

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 3>I sure, I I'm I'm the one who will watch

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 3>every single thing that O'Neal Cruz does. So I feel

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 3>like I need to just say, Okay, I believe you, Chris,

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 3>I believe you.

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like it's it's the most difficult situation for

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>me because it feels like everybody thinks I hate O'Neal

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Cruz and I don't. I've talked about oneo Cruz in

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>like the week and a half or so. I don't

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>hate O'Neill Cruz. He's an insane video game challenge. I

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>got nine homers and five stolen bases on the year, right.

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>He's great, but he's thaking two twenty five. He has

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a sub two seventy OBP, which sucks, and he strikes

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:05.319
<v Speaker 1>out a bunch. So he's a big He's like Javier Bias.

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>He's like he's a bigger physical piece of hobbyer buyers,

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>where how your buyers would be like, man, you're singing

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>things through a lot of stuff. But he does video

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>game stuff. That's what o'neol Cruiz is. He's a monster

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and beast. And I turned Michael Harrison to oneo Cruise.

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 3>It's like a it's like a picture, like a Matt

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Brash kind of thing where you see the amazing breaking balls,

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 3>but it's like, okay, what was the final line kind

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 3>of thing is what you're trying to say, and Michael

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Hyris is just your Hey guys, I'm I'm Luis Garcia

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 3>and I'm just doing really good things.

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 2>It's okay.

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah. Maybe also like like a Freddy Peralta, Like

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Freddy Peralta has just absolutely bonker stuff, but he just

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go deep into games a ton. I mean, it's

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a word. It's not a great comp but it's like

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that idea, like it's flash, it's got top end type

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. That's who on'eal Cruz absolutely is. Next year

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>will be more fun. I'll be a lot more into it.

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know, like I don't get excited about two

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty here.

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 3>I can't wait for the the blind mock draft where

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 3>you yell at your co manag for taking O'Neal Cruz

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 3>in the third round.

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I catch such a blast with that nick and picture

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>con he runs. They did these blind drafts and right

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>now yeah, yeah, exact pitch con and I did this

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>last one didn't.

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 2>I yeah, yeah, your back. It was great, you and

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 2>you and Bagman.

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen the result. I don't know where the

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>results are that you're gonna do a mid season results.

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh, we we're gonna post them. Don't worry. Okay, good,

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure I did terribly.

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I will scream a little bit if they do something

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>bonkers like you know, take two years ago, Dalton var

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>show who didn't make the roster.

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh that was so fun. That was fun.

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Burned through the other injuries, Austin Hayes Island with an

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>oblique Brian Baiyo out with a groin injury, Gavin Sheet's

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>got a bruised ankle, Joey Bart left the game with

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>growing tightness. Ross Strippling placed on the al with a

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>leg injury. Creats some rotational stuff, and George Springer remains

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>out of lineup with an elbow problem. And as does

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>what mayorfield you know, at least in Toronto. So will

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>he lead off potentially when you get there. Here's a

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>fun fact by Sarah Langs that's slang on sports. Brandon

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Jury is the first player with the grand in his

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>first played appearance with a team after changing mid season

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>with teams. He's the first player with the team that

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Rip Ripulski of the Red Sox on May tenth, nineteen sixty,

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>was I guess the next? Oh yeah? So since so

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>since nineteen sixty this is an oddly worded tweet, or

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'm just reading it weird, but since nineteen a

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>better way to be with Since nineteen sixty, Branjurie is

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the first player with the Grand Slam in his first

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>played appearance within a team after changing teams mid season.

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Sarah Langs for the tongue twister. Two more

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and then we're going to get into some of the stats.

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>This day in baseball nineteen ninety three, Tony gwyn had

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>six hits against the Giants. It is the Patter's outfielders

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>fourth game of the nineteen ninety three season with five

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>or more hits. He becomes only the third person to

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>get five hits or better that many times in a

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>single season. Very ironic that won so Wan Soto might

0:16:55.880 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>actually be okay, This might be contros on soda, the

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>best version of like a Tony Gwinn we've had since

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Tony Gwinn, Is there any player that has been more

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.239
<v Speaker 1>representative of like Tony Gunn is always unique in his

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>game and his contact. Do you think that's like a

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Juan Soto.

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:19.239
<v Speaker 2>Like I think one SODA's too patient for that.

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Like Tony Gwinn to get as many hits as he

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 3>did is because he did not accept walks as much,

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 3>I imagine as Wan Soda. I don't have the career

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 3>numbers of Tony Gwinn, but I assure you it's not

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 3>the same patience that has been instilled in the game

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 3>now still as far as overall hit tool goes, and

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 3>just like all right, I'm just gonna get Smiths today

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 3>or be amazing at the play.

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 2>I can understand where you're coming from, and.

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Like you just prove it right there, like two walks

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in his major league debut, like the hype, like players

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 1>will be swinging through their shoes like Brandon Jury. Here's

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a trivia question for today. Edwin Diaz is eight point

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:56.120
<v Speaker 1>one strikeouts per nine this season would set a record

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>for a pitcher with at least twenty saves in baseball.

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>This is for the chat or anybody listening who holds

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the current record. Nick cannot answer this because if the

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>answer is staring us right.

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 3>In the face.

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 1>It's not looking at the sheet. Have you looked at

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the sheet?

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 2>I looked at the sheet. I'm not gonna be that guy.

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So you know so the chat, So I'm gonna

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>repeat it one more time, Edwind. He has eight point

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>one Kate per nine this season would set a record

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>for any picture with at least twenty saves. That is

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a bonkers video game number. But who holds the current record.

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's see if the chat gets it name and extra points.

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>If you can actually get what that number is, you know,

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>eight point one would be the record. And we'll come

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>back to that in a little bit. Some stat heroes

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Jose orkeaty seven innings, ten k's are you were you

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>an a arkady guy? I always get every time I

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>think of Urkidi, I think of Eno and ENO's love

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of some of the stuff. Or Katy has really struggled,

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I think in just being an ultimate consistent guy. And

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the strikeout pictures in Houston in general have been a

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit wonky. But give up only two hits ten strikeouts?

0:18:57.640 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 1>How big are we on our KTI rest of season?

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And trustworthy?

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 3>So, entering the season, I was hoping that we'd see

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 3>the kitchen sink Hosey or Keaty, and I thought, yeah,

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 3>he was just getting undervalued in that way. Did not

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 3>have it the first couple months of this year, or

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Kety just could not find any sort of rhythm whatsoever. However,

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 3>the last about six to seven starts for Rose or

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 3>Kety have been phenomenal. Sure, you could point at the

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 3>sub two hundred babbit that he's had in the same time, however,

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 3>you watch this star which I did. Fastball command has

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 3>been unreal and the change of down and away armside,

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 3>so he avoided all of the play, just dotted the

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 3>corners with those two pitches constantly. Good slider in there

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 3>for some free real estate that is getting early strikes

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.360
<v Speaker 3>in the zone. Or Keaty is in rhythm right now,

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 3>and we see this a lot. I mean, look at

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Martin Perez. This entire season has been in rhythm. Joseier

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Keaty has been in one for about six weeks now.

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 3>And I hope it doesn't end. I mean, as of

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 3>this moment, jose Orkety could do this forever. It seems

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 3>like I hope he does. Hope he's nothing that interrupts

0:19:58.200 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 3>this great groove.

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>He's in Yeah, and that was always something you know

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>loved and we would talk about. Was you had, like,

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, four pitches and he could command all of them.

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Whether you're getting strikeouts or not, the results will end

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 1>up being there. It is not Rivera and is not

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>gon Ye. For the trivia question of what ed who

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Edwin Diaz would pass for the most K per nine

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>in a single season with at least twenty saves, very

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>good guesses, but those are not from the chat where

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>we were on set here Sanuel Contra, we talked about

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>win a perfect nine and well went nine only struck

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>out three, So that strikeout under Charlie Morton six and

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>two thirds, eight strikeouts, giving up only three hits. Zach

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Wheeler seven and seven h seven innings, seven strikeouts, five hits,

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>also a pretty solid drink. Blake Snell six innings, four hits,

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>nine strikeouts. Oh Man Nick Nick Snell or Blake Snell

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Nick Snell. Blake Snell been consistent on the back half

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of the year. I have I have trouble buying it,

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>but how critical and how trustworthy Isla Blake Snell the

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>rest of the year, because I feel like he has

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 1>really shown out some inconsistencies though, like you talked about

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>with her, Katie, he's just him and Darvish have just

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>stepped up, especially with the run sport they're going to

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>have now. Has Blake Snell moved up pretty dramatically in

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>your ranks over the last let's say two months.

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 2>I mean he's gone back and forth.

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 3>When he came back from injury, we were hoping to

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 3>find some rhythm and replicate what he did the end

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 3>of twenty twenty one.

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:24.199
<v Speaker 2>We didn't quite see that.

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 3>And I remember the off season I asked Blake Snell

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 3>on his twitch chat, is the change up still in

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 3>time out? Because he put in time out last year

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 3>and had so much success. He goes, no, I'm really

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:35.719
<v Speaker 3>excited to show it off. And so I lowered him

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 3>in my ranks and then and then he still had

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 3>his change it for a while. But guess what, last night,

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.679
<v Speaker 3>one change up thrown. And he's been really reducing that

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 3>change up in the past four weeks. And this is

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 3>the kind of success that we see. Yet, as long

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 3>as you have four seamers for strikes with Blake Snell

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 3>sixty seven percent yesterday, which is great, he's going to

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 3>get with on the secondary stuff. He had ten whists

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 3>across the slider and curveball.

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 2>That's it.

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 3>There you go, that is Blake Snell having success. He's

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 3>in that rhythm right now. I don't believe he would

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 3>interrupt it as far as going back to the change

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 3>up one random night.

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 2>So I feel good about Blake's now at the moment.

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 3>It's exactly what we saw last year, and hopefully he

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have the same injury that halted his progression in

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty one.

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:18.199
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any of those moments And you're very

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>humble guy, but do you have any of those moments

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>where it's like you know how much you study and

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.360
<v Speaker 1>your experience, Yeah, there's a picture and everything, and then

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you see what needs to be changed and you see

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Blake's now be like no, I'm still

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>gonna go at it, and then you see it fail,

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and then you see them stop doing it and succeed.

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to just be like could you just

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>listen to me? Like no, could you just listen to me?

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, sure, but there are other times when like this

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 3>guy needs to do this, and like they say no

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 3>and they do something else and they're incredibly successful.

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm happy it worked out this way. There

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 3>are a lot of other times that it doesn't.

0:22:57.280 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I'm sure. Let's just get Blakes now to listen

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:02.719
<v Speaker 1>to n Pollague please. By the way, Brian did get it.

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>A rold As Chapman was the answer to the trivia

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>question seventeen point seven k per nine in twenty fourteen.

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 1>That is the leader. Edwin Diaz currently looking to break

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that record, which is pretty cool stuff. Over on the

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>big hitters. On the stat side, Brian Reynolds three for

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>four with a homer, did not get traded. Must be happy.

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Three runs. Luke Williams with Miami three stolen bases on

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>my bench yesterday too, got Manny Machado three for four

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.439
<v Speaker 1>with a homer in the Big and Cronaworth also had

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>a homer with three RBI in the Big padres output

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Im ed Rosario had a bomb with three RBIs. I

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>couldn't have been more wrong about franmil Reyis, but you know,

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm pretty right about Amed Rosario. In the

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 1>preseason guesses, Robinson Trinos had a homer, Hikashoka had a homer,

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>vogel Bach with the big bomb, Dury with the grand

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>slam Oscar Gonzalez. The reason franmill Is gone two for

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 1>four with a home run. Some stat zero's cool Chad,

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the Chad cool nine earned runs with four strikeouts and

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>five innings amazing. You can get to nine earned runs

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>in five innings. Michael Gibbons got blown up with five

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>urn Rich Hill only went three with foreignern and Garrett

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Cole six innings six eurned runs did have eight k's Nick,

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>What is wrong with Garrett Cole?

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, first of all, he's replicating the cool whip, which

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 3>you don't want whatsoever. But I with Garrett Cole, it's

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 3>just the first inning, and I've heard a lot of

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 3>people say, like, oh, the sticky stuff. Since then, he

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 3>hasn't been this ace for the Yankees. All this I

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 3>keep in mind, yesterday Garrett Cole had what I call

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 3>a golden goal. That is, he had the highest the

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 3>CSW of any pitcher, and he had the most whiffs

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 3>of any pitcher yesterday.

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 2>The stuff is not bad.

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 3>This is not all of a sudden a degradation of

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 3>the old Garrett Cole. As far as ability goes, it's

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 3>just consistency a little and really the first inning he

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Leeds three home runs to the Mariners in that first frame,

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 3>and then I'll had two hits across the next five

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:56.360
<v Speaker 3>and dominated I think it's something maybe mental. I think

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 3>it's just something being in confidence wise, I don't know,

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 3>maybe this something about his pre game routine. He blamed

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Billy Crystal if you remember an opening day, So there's

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 3>something there about the first name with the Garrett Cole.

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 3>I think as far as fancy majors go, he's not

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 3>going to have this I any rate by the end

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 3>of the year. I believe his stuff is just too

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 3>good where you just have to keep shrugging it off.

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:19.679
<v Speaker 2>And it's tough to do that, but you gotta do it.

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I could, Honestly, I'm probably one of the few I

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>could just sit and I would love to just be

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>inside of his brain, like.

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Just that is his voice.

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 3>Actually, yeah, I'm pretty sure that's it.

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 2>The thing, remember Family Davis Junior, almost what you're doing?

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, Like you remember that family guy bit where it's like,

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>oh god, it's like Kermit the Frog and I'm forgetting

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the Ray Romano out there. You put Garrett Cole at

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>the same table with him. His excuses. I like that

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:50.479
<v Speaker 1>he's just like every time it's like, you know, it

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>was this same bit of crystal. It's like always something else,

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Like I actually love Garrett Cauley. I think he's fantastic

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>for baseball. Blame everybody else and just I don't know

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the zero hitters, Eric Ajas four strikeouts, oh for four,

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>bunch of three strikeout performances, all no hits, Hoskins, Scope, Bashett, Luke, Chapman, Devers, Perez,

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and Turner, all with the big old zeros for everybody

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>on the stat side, Hey, guess what, everybody two homer

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>calls this week. I have been very slow going and

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it would be a miracle, miracle if I could catch up. Really,

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in any regard, we have to give a hat tip

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to our guy, Matt mayor Mike Mayer. Got my name's today,

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Mike Mayer, who has been dominating the board. We did

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:40.439
<v Speaker 1>not have an updated home run board, but yes, I

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>did call Pete Alonzo. I'm two for three this week

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>last week, but a lot of other people called Pete

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Alonzo so much so I really wish we had the board.

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 1>Is unfortunate because the home run leaderboard is tied now.

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>It is tied for everybody high Cubby Hadwan Soto yesterday

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>like Wonky, and d Blum had Peter Lonzo like me.

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>So they are tied at thirty seven night King of

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the North on the heels, Mike Mayer's got thirty five,

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and a bunch of us are just further down. I

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>have no idea where I'm at. I'm probably twenty five

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>or twenty six on the air of nowhere close to

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the home run board. But I am two for three

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna put Nick Pollock on the hot seat

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 1>here in just a couple of minutes to make a

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>choice for the guests, as Mike Curlin was the only

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>one that was able to jump in. Hey friends, this

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 1>episode brought to you by our friends over at bet MGM.

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you use the promo code that you see

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>right under you leading off. When you do, you get

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a one thousand dollars risk free bet. Just go over

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to bet mgm right now, pick it up, get rock

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and make some bets over on the bettingpros dot com

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>prop cheat sheet. The top two bets for well the

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>number one strikeout and the number one total base prop.

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 1>You want to take today Jeffrey Springs, which I think

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>is coming up here very shortly. The number is four

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half on the over, projected almost seven from

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy pros. That is on fan Duel. It's pretty juiced

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.400
<v Speaker 1>up though. That's the number one strikeout bet on their

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>value board, and the number one total base is Ralphael Devers,

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.239
<v Speaker 1>who's even money at one and a half over. They

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>project him at three versus Kansas City two. That I

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of dig today. Oh, didn't I see? Did the

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals game get Did it get rained out today?

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Did it did?

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 2>Is it today?

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>That's that's Let me take a look. I saw on

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>cards saying that it got today. I don't see it.

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't see anything suspended. So you guys tell me

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in the chat do you? Does anybody know any different?

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Because I'm gonna take Paul Goldschmidt Paul gold Schmidt as

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a total base over if he's actually playing. But I

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>see no rainout so far. He is plus money at

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>one and a half on DK and hitting four to

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>sixty against lefties, and I don't see anybody correcting me.

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Does that sound about right now?

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Ye?

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't see anything saying postponement for the Cardinals quite yet.

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So Cardinals Paul Goldschmidt, that's my pick as far

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>as a total base prop and Brandon Woodruff strikeouts six

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half it's plus money against Pittsburgh today. Hit

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that in the last couple Yes, thank you very much.

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I will take Brandon Woodrriff on the strikeouts, Goldie on

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the total basis, DK just running real quick, not a

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>whole lot. Here some interesting prices from fandul Woodriff ten

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half today, Springs is seven and point four

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and Kintana seven point seven. Actually, like, do you like

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>hose Kingtana today in the debut?

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 3>I think it's interesting and the Cardinals defense should help him.

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 3>He's been in a lot of good rhythm with his

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 3>with his stuff. I like that a decent amount. Seven

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 3>point seven sounds good.

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like really really cheap in that same range. I

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>think he could be a huge value today. If you're

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 1>looking for implied run totals, your stacks Milwaukee, Chicago, Tampa.

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Now Milwaukee and Tampa were both I believe five. Chicago wasn't,

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>but I really like the matchup. So those are three

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>teams you might target on stacks. Go probably in the

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>top three or four and Nick that leads us to

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the very end of our home run call. So all

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you gotta do it's super simple. Their cardboard cutout stinky hitters,

0:29:55.840 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>but you can pick one. You know, really, it would

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>be great for you to have like this strike out prop.

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>It would just be like the strikeout of the day

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>if you were if you and me were doing the show,

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>we'd have to have the homer and the strikeout monster

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of the day to lead. But you do got to

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>pick a homer. All you gotta do is what do

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to put on the board for the guests.

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, how am I supposed to make a bet

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 3>without using bets? It's gonna be It's gonna be MOOKI

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 3>bets today, Jacob Junis, I don't think it's actually gonna

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 3>go too long against the Dodgers. I would actually consider

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 3>them as a stack here because Jacob Junis isn't quite

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 3>where he needs to be, and these they're gonna get

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 3>to that bullpen pretty quickly.

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I like that one. I like to call him yakup

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Jon this. It's a yakup this out there on the mound,

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the yacap j yeah, and go cards. I just got

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>confused when I saw him saying in the chat this

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>was talking about. Yeah, yesterday it was a rain, so

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>it completely fried my brain on what you guys can

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>tell is a pretty quick, fast moving leading off, so

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it completely fried my brain. So put Paul Goldschman on

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:54.239
<v Speaker 1>the board for me. Yes, I'm gonna try to go

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>three for four his huge, huge run versus lefties hitting

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>force it with bonkers numbers he's putting up this year.

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with gold Schmid. We know Joe just

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>as Judge. Moving forward, I don't know if anything else

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>has been updated. I do see Mayor with Luis Roberts,

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>so I think he might have a new pick. I

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>don't see a new Wonky pick. But those are ours

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>for today, Nick, what is going on over a picture

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>list that our wonderful crowd needs to know about because

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you guys have a plethora of amazing things.

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 3>We do a lot of things, mainly just come hang

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 3>out on Twitch. If he enjoy his live streams nine

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 3>am to eleven am every single weekday morning, I'm there.

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 3>It's my office hours. Ask all the questions that you have.

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, check out our player pages. They are stack casts,

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 3>the based we have stack cast data and they are

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 3>absurdly detailed, amazing game logs, all the repertoire stuff, gifts

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 3>of every single pitch.

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Go check them out. The best place see do your

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 2>player research.

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>You know it's amazing. If you want to, just like

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 1>really just throw it out here for your job. If

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you want, go out and watch Nick's stream for two hours,

0:31:56.800 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 1>then you come over here, and then after here a

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>half an hour, then go over and watch us over

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>at twitch dot tv slash in this league.

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 2>That there you go.

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:09.479
<v Speaker 1>So I'm getting yelled at in the chat. I can't

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>call Goldie today because it's a double header. Well let

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>me call the game. I need confirmation, Wonky, please get

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>me confirmations. This is true that I can't call Goldie.

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>What if I pick the game? What if I pick

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the exact one? I want the full I want the

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>second of the double header. That is what I'm coming

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you know what foot down second?

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 2>I will I have rule in favor. Yeah, that works.

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 2>You can't get game one.

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And if I get yelled at too much, I'm taking

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt Olsen because that is the other person I was

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>going to pick today. So I'm having backup calls here.

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Nick Pollock at picture List, go and check him out,

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 1>check out the streams. It's twitched, Twitch, dot tv, slash

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.479
<v Speaker 1>picture list that should be it, right, amazing stuff over there,

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>go to picture list dot com, awesome player pages, just

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>awesome stuff in general. You can get always updated ranks

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>for pictures and there's just a gagillion other things, so

0:32:57.160 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's it. And Frindos, that is everything that

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>we have for you. Thank you so much for hanging

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>out with us today. Bet MGM. You can check out

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>with the promo code leading off, hang out with the

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>awesome chat and thank you guys for hanging out with me.

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I will be back again tomorrow right here and leading off,

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>if I don't hit my microphone, it's Welsh and Nick

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Pollock my friends,