WEBVTT - Vinyl Records: Black Magic at Work

0:00:00.480 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, big special announcement at long last, we are

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>going back on the road to do live shows. And

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I could not be more excited. I too, am fairly excited.

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I could tell it's gonna be great. Chuck. We're gonna

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>be back live on stage for the first time in

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:26.079
<v Speaker 1>to three years. Uh. We were on stage in but

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>at the very beginning of and we're going to yeah three, Yeah,

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>three years since we've trod the boards and we're about

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to trod them boards again, Chuck. On February first, second,

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and third, we're going to Seattle in Portland, or Portland

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.959
<v Speaker 1>and Seattle, and then for sure on February three, we're

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.599
<v Speaker 1>going to wind the whole thing up in San Francisco. Right,

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that's right, We're going back to sketch Fest are usually

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>January home, but early February home this year, for my money,

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the best uh comedy festival in the world, and we're

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna be going to sketch Us. And again, we're not

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>sure the order yet. We don't have ticket links yet,

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>but we do have a little bit more information. We

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>just couldn't wait to tell you guys. So tickets are

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>actually going to be on sale very soon. October six,

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a pre sale with a password

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>UH and we will probably put those out on our

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>social links. I'm not sure how you'll find out, but

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you'll find out, and then on October seven there will

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>be general sale. We'll give you more information as we

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>get it. But again, we just couldn't wait to tell you, guys,

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>because we're too excited. That's right, and you know what

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>we're doing. We've got a great uh working with some

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>great new people with our social media stuff. So you

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>might have noticed that our Instagram and our Facebook have

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.119
<v Speaker 1>some new and exciting things happening. So that's a great

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>place to find information about the tours. Very nice. So

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 1>we'll see you guys in the Northwest coast this February

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of you, who knows, could be a

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>wild year. Welcome to Stuff you should know, a production

0:01:55.640 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio. Y hey, and welcome to the podcast.

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh, There's Chuck, Jerry's here, and Jack Black's lurking around,

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>which makes this stuff you should know. We got the

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>facts on wax w s y s K. That's pretty great. Sorry,

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty you should have been a radio personality. I used

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to want to be I wanted to be a DJ.

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 1>You came awfully close. Man. I have to say that

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>was a pretty pretty close to a realized dream if

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you ask me. Uh well, and what's funny is is

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the saying wax and like are one of our local

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>record stores. Here's wax and facts and old DJ saying wax.

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>In this episode you will find out why they say wax. Yeah,

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it's hopelessly outdated, but yeah, it's still still applies to

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.679
<v Speaker 1>us the next time. Let's do this. This is pretty fun.

0:02:57.680 --> 0:02:59.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited. Do you collect final, Lenny? I think you

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.239
<v Speaker 1>do a little bit right, Yeah, a little bit. Um.

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't like collected. I just buy stuff that I want.

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I'm vinyl, but I'm not just like, look, everybody,

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>check out my collection. I just have a selection of records.

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>How about that? Yeah? My deal is I have my records,

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:20.839
<v Speaker 1>most of my records that I had growing up. Never

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>got rid of him, moved him every time like a dummy.

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I got uh inherited while still alive my um stepfather's

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>record collection. He didn't pass away, but he just said here,

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm done with these. I'm so sick of music. It's ridiculous.

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>But that's where I got all that good Like he

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>has all the all that prog rock from the seventies.

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>He was way into that stuff. Uh. And then I

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>started buying just sort of classic favorites of mine, basically

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of filling out newer classic favorites from when I

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>stopped buying records up to this point. So I'm kind

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of running out of room on my little three banger shelf,

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>so I'm slowing down the rate of purchase. But it's

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>it's good, and through the miracle of modern technology, I

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>can play a record through a Bluetooth set of Bluetooth speakers.

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>That is amazing, but it's also a tragedy. Well, yeah,

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I wish I had a plugged in what hi fi

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>system I've got them. I've got some like just Rockford

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>or rock File or whatever shelf speakers that are plugged

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>into an UM I guess a post amp or preamp,

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, one of the amps, but it's not

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:37.679
<v Speaker 1>part of the record player and the record players plugged

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>into that. And it seems clugy enough that I'm like, Okay,

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>this seems pretty authentic. Yeah, I mean, you can tell

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>we're experts here with our use of Rockford Files and

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>pre post SAMP, right, so, I but I mean still,

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to be a total expert to to

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about vinyl, although there will certainly be um record

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>store guys, the music equivalent of com book guy, who

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>will right in and tell us how how much we

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>just totally suck forever and like just got every single

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>thing wrong. But this is not for those people. It's

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>for everybody else who just wants to know how vinyl

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>records work. How about that? I think that's great? Uh,

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 1>And I think a few of these stats before we

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>dive into the history or in order thanks to Dave

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Rouse who pointed out that obviously in the uh fifties, sixties, seventies,

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and into the eighties some um, certainly into the eighties,

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 1>vinyl records were sort of the thing, uh, and their

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>peak in the seventies there were more than fifth, sorry

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and thirty million records bought each year each year, which

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is about six with eight track making up for the rest.

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Because of course you had to play something in your

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>conversion van, right, you couldn't really, most most cars weren't

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>outfitted with record players, that's right. But then the cassette

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>came along and the c D and all but killed Vinyl. Uh.

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>They accounted for point one percent of music sales at

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>some point in the nineties, which is a pretty big drop,

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I would say, but then made a comeback in the

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>two thousand's because of nostalgia and because of hipsters and

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>audio files and certain movies and Record Store Day and

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>all other reasons. Yes, But I mean like if you

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 1>if you could rewind back to seven and you asked

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:33.799
<v Speaker 1>somebody if if they would ever, you know, see Vinyl

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>albums again, they would just laugh in your face like

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>they were done. They were goners, right, And so the

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>idea that it came back is pretty it's pretty remarkable

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>as far as comebacks go. And then in twenty I

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>believe Vinyl Records outsold CDs for the first time since

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Night six. That's a check of a comeback. And that's

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>not even to say that CDs were doing that poorly.

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>CDs actually had increased in sales over the past few

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>years as well, So it wasn't like CDs were just

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>tumbling downward while Vinyl was kind of slowly creeping upward.

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>They were both creeping up and Vinyl just overtook CDs.

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I think in the year that vinyl overtook CDs UM,

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven and a half million Vinyl records were sold

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>around the world. One it jumped up to forty one

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>point seven million. Yeah, baby, So yeah, Vinyl is definitely back,

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of reasons why it's back, And um,

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I say we start with the history of the whole

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>thing to maybe explain why people like vinyl. I think

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that's where you kind of find the birth of the

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. Uh, totally some other good news by the way,

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.119
<v Speaker 1>just to drag that out a bit, is that cool

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>video I sent you from how It's made? Uh? They

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>went to that music record that record pressing plant in Nashville,

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>which is, as thinks, still one of the biggest ones,

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and they had to re expand and they were like, hey, everybody,

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>remember when we shut down almost Well we're we have

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>open up a bigger place now, which is awesome and

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a great comeback story. Yeah. And I would guess

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the people who were buying the point one percent of

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>music sales as vinyl in the eighties and nineties, I

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>had to just be exclusively DJs, right, Oh No, I

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>mean there were always Vinyl collectors. Um, they were just

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>not nearly as many. For a while. It wasn't exclusively

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>DJs because did DJ and they didn't even use records anymore,

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>did they. I mean, that's a pretty recent phenomenon. They

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>were using vinyl like throughout the eighties and nineties for sure.

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 1>When I guess we should look into that, like when

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>they switched to the carts, Um, I would say in

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:47.079
<v Speaker 1>the tens maybe, really, I'm just guessing. But if it

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 1>gets a response like that out if you all guess

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>every time, I don't think so. I think they've had

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the carts for a while. So the two thousand odds,

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think before that someone will know and

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>tell us. Whatever I do work for a major radio company,

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>we should just ask somebody. We'll ask somebody, We'll get

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>him on the phone, we'll call in will be the caller.

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I love it. So we're talking the history now, Chuck,

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, um, and we're talking vinyl records. But you

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 1>can't really talk about vinyl records without like the beginning

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of records a recorded sound in general. Um, And most

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>people say, who came up with recorded and played back sound?

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Edison, Of course it was you know, the last

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>quarter of the nineteenth century, I think, And you're right, like, yes,

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Edison definitely gave us what we kind of understand

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>is recorded and played back sound. But um, there was

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a guy who came a good twenty years before him,

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>although apparently Edison wasn't aware of his work. But he

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>was a guy from France, Edward Leon Scott de martin Ville. Yes,

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and um, I've seen him referred to as Scott apparently

0:09:57.440 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>that's his last name, and I guess he's from Martinville.

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Frank Okay, oh, that would makes sense. So, um, Scott

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>was tinkering around with something called a phone autograph and

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>if you um look into it and we'll talk about

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>how how vinyl records are made later, but like he

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 1>basically said, here's how we're going to make records from

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>here on out. Here's the at least the rough contours

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 1>of the whole thing. Yeah, and it's it's very rudimentary.

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>But as you will see when we describe it compared

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to what they did later on, it's sort of the

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>same idea, which is, and we'll get into how he

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>did it, but which is basically using a vibrating tool

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to cut and it vibrates because of sound, and it

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>makes a vibrating representation of whatever sound you're making and

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>cuts that into something. Yeah, what's astounding. This is the

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>most astounding thing that I've learned in a really long time,

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>is what is captured on record is a natural language

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of sound that humans stumbled upon. And one of the

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>first people, possibly the first person to stumble upon it

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>is is edwardley On Scott to Martinville and like, like,

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>this is this has always existed, we just never tried

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to capture it. It It just didn't occur to us. But

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>when you look at a record, you are you are

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>holding in your hands a captured, encoded representation of a

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>sound that was made at some point in time. And

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Scott was the first person to figure out how to

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>capture this. Yeah, And it's funny, even after having learned this,

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>watched all the videos, being able to regurgitate how it's done,

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it's still a bit like black magic to me. How

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 1>you say something into a microphone and it ends up

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:48.439
<v Speaker 1>being cut into a vinyl record and a needle can

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>bring that sound back out. It's it's still just sort

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of mind blowing to me. Yeah, there is like definitely

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount of black magic to it. And it's

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool. Like it's the cool kind, you know what

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. It's not the kind where like somebody breaks

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a leg because of it. All right, So should we

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about the phone autograph? Yeah, So what Scott did

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>was he took a um and I'm not quite sure

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>what inspired him to do this, but he took an

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>acoustic trumpet, you know, like the old gramphone the crank

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>record players that had like the big horn coming out

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 1>of it. Why did you say, Sonny? Exactly, that's an

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>acoustic trumpet. And he put a little membrane over the

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>small and the narrow end of it, and he attached

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a boar's hair, one single boar's hair to that membrane,

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and then, uh, the boar's hair was touching a glass plate,

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>i think. And on the glass plate he had put

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>something called um lampblack, which is like soot basically, just

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>put a nice coating of it. And then he spoke

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>into the large end of that acoustic trumpet and that

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>black magic started, That's right. And so what happened is

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that boar's hair bristle would uh wiggle and vibrate along,

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, to match whatever sound he was making, and

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it drew basically what Dave refers to I think astuteley

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>as a sonic fingerprint. Uh. Through that soot, it drew

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of the visual representation of sound for the first time. Um.

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:20.319
<v Speaker 1>At the time, I think he called it a natural stenography,

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>is what Scott called it. But at the time he

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>was like so great. Um, I promised that this thing

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe one day we'll be able to make a sound,

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>but we don't know how to do that, and everyone went,

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 1>what are you even talking about, dude? Um. But through

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the miracle of science, they actually got a computer to

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>uh virtually play virtually as in you know, not like

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>virtually like it actually did, but they use a virtual

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>digital stylists to actually be able to play these early

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>recordings of this dude like singing French songs and saying things,

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah frera jacka and all that. It wasn't far

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 1>a jacka, it was well then who cares? Now I've

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.719
<v Speaker 1>got the song in here somewhere. But uh, I mean,

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's kind of creepy sounding, but it is.

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>And then some of it is just sort of hums

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and noises, but it is a human being. Uh, it's

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>all Claire de la loun. Uh. It is a actual

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>human being speaking words and singing words. And long before

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Edison did so. Yeah, it's a good twenty years before Edison.

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>And there was one other thing that Scott figured out,

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>UM that was really important, and he figured it out

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>right out of the gate. Is that when you um

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>are are etching on that um, that glass plate covered

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in lamp black with the boar's hair, the boar's hair

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is just kind of wiggling right. The sound vibrations are

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>making it wiggle, and that wiggle is transferring acoustic waves

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>into mechanical energy that's being captured in those etchings. But

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>since the boy as um the boar's hair is just

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in one place, you have to move that glass plate

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and you can't just move it at any rate. It

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>has to be a specified rate. And he figured out

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>how to move that glass plate and I think one

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>m a second, which is really fast, UM. And that

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>means that if you read, if you put that thing

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the other direction, UM at one m a second, then

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it would play. And what he figured out was that

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>RPMs rotations per minute what would come to to be

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a huge part of record playing was essential because if

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you do it too fast, you have the same amount

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of information, it's just compressed time wise, because you're moving

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that glass plate faster than one meter a second, so

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>it comes out sounding like Alvin and the Chipmunks. If

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you move it too slow, less than one meter a second,

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it's that same amount of information, but it takes up

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a longer amount of time and you come out sounding

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>like us on you know, half speed or something like that,

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>which people like to do when they marijuana cigarettes. I here,

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>although to be clear, he was not using revolutions because

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't spinning yet know what as RPMs, But it

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>has to do with adjusting like a set frequency. It's

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily important that the playback and the recording are done

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>at the same frequency. And Scott figured that out out

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>of the gate. That's right, so put a pin in that. Uh.

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Edison comes along and um wasn't really working from Scott's work,

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>but was arrival of Alexander Graham Bell and was working

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>on telephone products and decided to try and record phone calls.

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>And he had a big breakthrough when he attached the

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>stylust to a diaphragm, a lot like Scott did. And

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I keep wanting to call him Martinville. I know Scott

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>from Martinville. Sure, um, And then the you know, exactly

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>in the same way the vibrations of the diaphragm were

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>etched in this case onto a sheet of paraffin wax

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>with a needle. And he was basically like, wait a minute,

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>we can record. It doesn't just have to be phone calls.

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.199
<v Speaker 1>We can record all kinds of things, like one day

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>there shall be rock and roll. And he figured that out.

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>He was like, yeah, no, forget the phone. I'm doing

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>something else with this. So he moved from that paraffin

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>wax sheet to metal cylinders wrapped in aluminum floor right. Yeah.

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's almost like the I mean sort of

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in a way, it's almost like the inverse of how

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a music box works. Like it's a metal cylinder, but

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>with a music box they're little nubs that uh prick

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>metal combs of different pitches. In this case, you're you're

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>cutting a groove. Uh. And you know, if you had

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a sheet of tinfoil at home and got a toothpick,

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>you know you can drag it along and make an impression.

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>That's essentially what he was doing, right, So the fact

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that he moved over to cylinders was pretty progressive. That

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:59.199
<v Speaker 1>actually was um, the way that music was captured and

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>played back for a while, UM was on these cylinders.

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>And Alexander Graham Bell was the one who took these

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>cylinders and changed them from aluminum foil into wax. Yeah,

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>so wax cylinders were really popular. That was how you

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>listen to music back then, how you recorded music and

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>listened to it. And UM, I have a little anecdote

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>from you me. Actually she found out that when she's

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>she I'm gonna tell it on her behalf, but I'll

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>put on a wig and try to tell him a

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>higher pitch before. So, Um, she found out that this

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>some guy who had like the best record collection in

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>the country, possibly the world, lived like thirty minutes away

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>from her. So she and some friends went and visited.

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>This guy's name is Joe Bussard, and he's still around

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 1>and he still has this fantastic record collection, um, and

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>most of it is pre nineteen fifties stuff, but he

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>has original whax cylinders, like from the nineteenth century that

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>he played for them, and she said they were like

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>African American spiritual. She's like, it was clearly people sitting

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>on a porch singing this stuff. And it was like,

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>did they these people had sung this in one take

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>on a porch in like the eighteen nineties or something

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>like that. And there she wasn't you know, two thousand

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>whatever listening to it played back, which is pretty sweet,

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and she said, this is lame. I want to hear

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>some rock indoor rule. Uh, that's an awesome story we had.

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 1>It made me think, or remember rather that we had

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a a hand crank phonograph growing up in my house.

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>My I guess my dad got it at some point

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and it was cool. You know, we had old records

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and we didn't sit around and listen to him, but

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>my brother and I would put on one of those

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>old records and crank it up every now and then,

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, it's cool. It sounds kind of

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>like a horror movie, but it's like it's just it's

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a neat experience to see sort of the early technology

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>at work. There is something really unsettling about a nineteen

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>twenties record being played. There's just something about it. It's like,

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, it always seems like the singer wants

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 1>to harm you, but it's pretending they don't, I know,

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>even especially because they're they're always singing about times a

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>little like warble and you're like, no, no no, no, you

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:22.360
<v Speaker 1>got a knife in your hand exactly, slick back hair

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and some crazy huge smile. Um. Alright, so Edison uh

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and Bell are both working on this stuff. Bell has

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>got his wax cylinder going. Um. He played it back

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:38.959
<v Speaker 1>on something called a graphophone. This was an eight seven.

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>You crank that handle, it rotates that wax cylinder and

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>it plays it back through an acoustic trumpet um which

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 1>I think we had one on ours. That was just

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>for show, but there was an actual kind of rudimentary

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>speaker underneath, and that's what amplified the sound. And then

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>of course later on the hand crank was replaced with

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 1>a motor. And just to explain the hand crank too,

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to keep cranking it. You would crank

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 1>it a bunch and then kind of hit go and

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 1>then it would store up that mechanical energy and rotate

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the player. Right, But that was still cylinder, right, That

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>was still the wax cylinder. Not obviously at my house,

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have those but yeah, but still we're working

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>not even necessarily just wax, but we're working with cylinder.

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>That was how you played back or recorded sound. And

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it was like that until a guy came along, I

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>think in the eight nineties named Emil Berliner. He was

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>German American and he came up with the gramma phone,

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>which probably sounds familiar because Berlinard's invention, which was shellac records,

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>he was the first one to say, forget these cylinders,

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>let's put let's put the stuff on disks and come

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.360
<v Speaker 1>up with rotations per minute and just he made all

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 1>these innovations. Um, his invention was the standard from the

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>nineties to nineteen fifty. That was how you listen to music.

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Was this guy's invention, the gramaphone, Yeah, which you know.

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 1>The main reason why is because you could actually reproduce

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>these on mass You could create like thousands of copies

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of disc records, which was not something you could really

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 1>do with the wax cylinders. It was very expensive, it

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>took a lot of time to reproduce them. Uh. He

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>figured out how to make these molds of a master

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>recording and press them into records. Which is it really

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>set the stage. I mean things have changed a little bit,

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>but it really set the stage for how we still

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>do it today. Yeah, I mean it's it's virtually the same.

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>It's just you know, a little more advanced today. But

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the principles are were certainly the same. The big difference though,

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 1>is this was not vinyl that this guy was making.

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, it's shelack, and shelac is a natural substance.

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>That was basically, uh, it's a natural polymer. It's like

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>natural plastic. Basically it comes out of the lack bug,

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>which I think is native to Southeast Asia, if I'm

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:55.479
<v Speaker 1>not mistaken. So it was expensive to produce to shelack

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>enough shellack to make a record, because again, the stuff's

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>coming out of a bug, not gen on that it

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:03.640
<v Speaker 1>was from the female lack. Is that why it's called

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>she lack? Maybe? I think it is. That's pretty great.

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>If it is, that's wonderful. That's a great old timey

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>play on words. Well I'm gonna say that's fact. Okay,

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 1>that's all you have to do these days, right, just

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>say something. Yeah. Anybody who could contradict that as long

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>dead anyway, So it's all good. Well, I think you know,

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>we put a pin in this whole revolutions per minute?

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Should we go ahead and explain that, yes, because Scott

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>was the one who figured that out, and uh it

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>just became a it's it's essential to reproducing or recording sound,

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>right like you have to have it um recorded at

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a set frequency because the frequency effects is that the

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>pitch where it goes really high or really low? Is

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that pitch? Sure? Okay, all right, I forgot yourself taught. Yeah, okay,

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:58.959
<v Speaker 1>So it affects somehow because again, the like a sound

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>wave makes a way, even if you compress it, it's

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>still the same amount of information, it's just over a

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>shorter amount of time, and that makes it again sound

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 1>like Alvin and the Chipmunks. That's right. Uh So what

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the old records from kind of up into the nineteen

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>fifties I think, or maybe it was later than that.

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>When did they changed, you know, from seventy eight to

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty three and the third uh well, the first one

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:27.239
<v Speaker 1>came out in like nineteen so okay, I'm sure they

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>were still selling those shellac seventy eight into the fifties.

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, So seventy eight RPMs was the standard for

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 1>a while, and if you're wondering how they came up

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 1>with this RPMs, It's very easy. It's because the motors

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that they used at the time ran at thirty six

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred revolutions per minute. If you tried to think about

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>either manufacturing a record or playing a record at thirty

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>six d revolutions per minute, that's pretty funny to think about.

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 1>It's impossible, basically. So that's where gears, your old and

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>gears come in because the purpose of a gear is

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 1>to step down the speed of a motor. Uh and

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>in this case, they had a gear with So when

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 1>you divide those revolutions, you step it down with a gear,

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:20.479
<v Speaker 1>and you eventually get down to uh eight technically seventy

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>eight point to six rpm. S. Yeah, I still don't

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>understand all that, but I accepted as as real. Well,

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, it's it's what we should do something. No,

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>never mind, I don't want to do how gears work

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's way more complicated than it seems on the surface. Okay,

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 1>well that sounds like right up our alley. We can

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we can confuse everyone further with that one. But at

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>any rate, it steps down that motor via a gear,

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and we just do simple division and that's how you

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>got the seventy eight. So seventy eight is pretty fast.

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's more than twice as fast as a

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>normal like uh LP album today spins and it's shell

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty hard and brittle. So you can imagine

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 1>if that thing flew off, it could take great Aunt

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Edgar's head clean off in the in the conservatory. Sure

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>like the recording artist intended, right, that was an abandoned clue,

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>uh murder weapon. Yeah, he did it. He did it

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>with a record, right, So the RPM is really important,

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Chuck um for a couple of reasons. One, Um, it

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>was really fast in it, so it was dangerous at

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>least in my opinion. But more importantly, because they were

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>spending so fast, you had less time to get the

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>information across. So that meant that you had you know,

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe I think a twelve inch record could hold four

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to five minutes of music or of sound on each side. Right,

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it's only like nine songs back then, right, So, um,

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of problems with these shellack seventy

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:59.919
<v Speaker 1>eight but um, they were a huge advance, hugely forward.

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 1>But when vinyl came along, it changed everything and Chuck

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>we are almost thirty minutes into this episode. I say,

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>we take our first commercial break. Wow wa wow, let's

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>do it, okays skul Alright, So we are moving into

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth century and finally vinyl comes along. Um. It

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 1>is called polyvinyl chloride or PBC. So those white PBC

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>pipes you see in the big box, uh hardware store,

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 1>it's the same same thing. It's a type of plastic.

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>And in the nineteen thirties is when record companies started

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to kind of experiment with this because I'll the aforementioned

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>problems with shellac being very breakable and being very brittle.

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:02.719
<v Speaker 1>And I believe Victor, which was a division of our

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>c A, was the first producer of vinyl records in

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirty. But it did not go well because it

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>took a little while before they had they had all

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the playback equipment sort of SYNCD up working well together.

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>So in this case, uh, the pickups used to amplify

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to send the signal to the amplifier. It's sort of

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>like a guitar pickup. They were too heavy and it

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>cut through the vinyl because it was uh not shelack.

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 1>It was used as shelack, so they had to sort

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of rejigger everything, and it wasn't until after World War

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Two that they really put in like a kind of

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>all their efforts stored making vinyl work. Yeah, because there

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>was a shelak shortage during World War two, so everybody's like, Okay,

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>we need to figure out this vinyl stuff for a

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>bunch of different reasons. But one of those things that

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>came out of it was the vinyl record. And most

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>people credit a guy at CBS named Peter Goldmark for

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>inventing the vinyl record that we know and love today.

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Uh, He basically said, he figured out how

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to make it stronger. Uh, he figured out how to

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>etch the grooves smaller so you could fit more stuff.

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>So he got it down to point zero zero three inches.

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I think she lax maxed out at point o one inches,

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>so a lot more music basically per record. Yeah, because

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in addition to more grooves, which means more information, which

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>means more length of time of recorded sound on one side,

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>it also played at a slower RPM, so it had

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>more time to play all that information too, So you

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>could just pack I think twenty two and a half

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>minutes per side on a on a thirty three and

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a third RPM UM LP, which is what they're called

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 1>long play albums, the basically the vinyl record that gold

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Mark invented. That's right. And here's a fun little tidbit

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that Day found. I never realized, but UM album actually

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>pre dates the invention of the vinyl LP because when

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>people only had the seventy eights, they stored them in

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>sleeves called albums, and I think when the LPs finally

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>came out, it held about the same amount as an

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>album worth of seventy eight, so they called them albums. Yeah,

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>like one record, one vinyl record could hold probably five

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>or six UM shellac records worth. Yeah, so that's kind

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of a boast. I guess this this one records an album,

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you sucker. But now we get to UM. You know,

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>basically what Dave called the War of speeds. Uh. You

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the UM seventy eights finally came down to thirty

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>three and the third. Uh So Columbia Records reduces the

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>first LP and UM and our Cia is who released

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the forty five, which you know people collect forty five two.

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:55.239
<v Speaker 1>They're the smaller ones that only have a song on

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>each side. It's like thick a single. Yeah, that's just

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>exactly what it is. So our c a victor in Columbia,

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>had that that war of the speeds that you mentioned

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to try to say, you know, the thirty three LP

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>is um our p MLP is better. No, the forty

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>five RPM single is better, and the public just said

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>peace everyone piece, Well, let's let's have them all. Yeah.

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean all you needed to do was have a

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>machine that can vary its playback speed, and you can't

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 1>have both. There didn't need to be one of the other.

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>And they they did realize that there are some people

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>who who just want the single version. Like I guess

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>since there's been music, there have been people that like singles.

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I remember my first forty five? Do you remember what

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>yours was? I didn't collect forty five, so I actually

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>got into forty five. I was never a big time

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>into them, but I got into him because I just

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted one single song. Uh. It was Sweet Georgia Brown

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:57.239
<v Speaker 1>because my family had gone to a Globetrotters game and

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I really like that song. So my

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>parents took me to Peaches Records and I got Sweet

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>George Brown, and I must have driven my family crazy

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>without realizing it played Sweet Georgia Brown over and over.

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>That's adorable. And then do you remember what your first

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>LP was? Absolutely Billy Joel's Glasshouses. Oh that's a good one.

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>How old were you? Well, it was whenever that came out.

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I was tennish, but I'd have to

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>look at the date. My brother and I adorably split

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the cost, so it was like five bucks and each

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 1>threw into fifty and got glass houses. That's awesome. Um

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>My first LP was seven in The Ragged Tiger, the

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Duran Duran right, good record. Um, I think I got

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it around second grade. I was always I think I

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>mentioned this too. I was always a late adopter, so

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:51.239
<v Speaker 1>I was buying records long into the cassette run. I

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>was always like no, I didn't want to believe it.

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>It was like taking over. And then I was buying

0:32:56.680 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 1>cassettes far into c d s, and I was buying CDs.

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean I have CDs that are four or five

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 1>years old. Wow, from now, I didn't even know you

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>could get those anymore. Yeah. Well the problem was to

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>have a probably older than that, because my pickup truck

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>that I will never sell is now just sort of

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>our work in camping truck. It has a CD player

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in it, So yeah, I was buying CDs for that. Yeah,

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I can see like not giving up the ghost because

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>number one, you're very loyal person, so I could see

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you being loyal to records. And then also at the time,

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you didn't know you were ever going to have a

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>choice again, so you were fighting against the death of

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the LP vinyl record because that's what it seemed like

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>when cassettes and then CDs came out. Yeah, I have

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 1>no cassettes and in fact made my switch to CD

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 1>s because someone stole my one cassette carrier out of

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>my friends trunk of my car and little five points

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 1>when I went to a show at the Variety Playhouse

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>where you and I performed, yeah and sold out. If

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not mistaken, that's right. So they stole that and

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I was like, all right, I guess I gotta buy

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>CDs now. So yeah, that's it for me, everybody, I'm

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 1>done with his sense. So one other thing that kind

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of came out of vinyl records too, is because you

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 1>could put more information into one, they figured out how

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:21.399
<v Speaker 1>to actually create stereo records starting in ninety and I

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine what this must have seemed like to the

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>people back in ninety eight, because up to that point

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>everything was mono. It was one channel, so all of

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 1>the sound came through one channel, and you could have

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 1>two speakers, five speakers, ten speakers, it wouldn't matter because

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>they were all playing the exact same information, and it

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't it just what You could just sit in front

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of one speaker and get the same experience. With stereo,

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you have two different channels coming out, usually right and left,

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and rights going to the right speaker, less going to

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the left speaker, and when you sit between them, you

0:34:56.560 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 1>don't get the sensation that the sound is coming out

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 1>of either speaker. It seems to be coming out of

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the space between the speaker in front of you and

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>gives you this much more immersive, rich experience. And they

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 1>figured out how to do that on a vinyl record, which,

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about black magic to begin with, just

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 1>just for creating a record, creating a stereo record is

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 1>even more impressive if you ask me, Yeah, they did it.

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 1>They figured out how to etch the walls of the groove.

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 1>One side of the wall, the outside wall was the

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>right channel, the inside wall was the left and when

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you play it back, that needle reads both sides at once.

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 1>The Beatles were one of the first Uh well, yeah,

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I could safely say one of the first bands to

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>really experiment with stereo recording. And all of a sudden

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you had like Paul in one ear, John and the

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>other singing harmonies. Um, and you know when headphones became

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 1>more and more the norm. This is when this really

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>paid dividends. Yeah, like Mitch Kramer listening to music in

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>his room at the end of the night and dazed

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and confused that guy Wiley Wiggins works in podcasts some

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, hey, Wiley Wiggins, how are you doing? I know.

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I was listening to the Great Great podcast you must

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>remember this from Karina Longworth the movie podcast and at

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:14.839
<v Speaker 1>the end of one of the episodes, actually sat through

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>the credits and it said additional research and transcription by

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Wiley Wiggins. That's awesome, man, that's super cool. I don't

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 1>know if he's still doing that, but hello to both

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of you. It's so um. I watched yeah for real,

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I watched. Um have you ever seen Waking Life? Yeah? Yeah,

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 1>he started now that was he did creating that, but

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 1>also just in Days and Confused, He's always going to

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:40.800
<v Speaker 1>be much Cramer to me. But I watched Days and

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Confused the other day I was like, this movie still

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>holds up. And then I was like, there was no

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 1>reason for Matthew McConaughey to do any other character ever,

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 1>because everything he does is Waterson. Is Waterson in space

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 1>for Interstellar, it's Waterson, like as a lawyer and the

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:02.399
<v Speaker 1>Lincoln lawyer. Like it just Waterson all the time. And

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>like you, if you go back and watch Stays and Confused,

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 1>you're like, yeah, he and Waterson are one and the

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 1>same person. Basically, it's Waterson selling Cadillacs or whatever that is,

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:15.160
<v Speaker 1>which one doesn't he Is it Cadillacs or is it

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Lincoln that he does the commercials for. Oh yeah, yeah,

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Lincoln where he just drives around and waxes philosophical exactly. Totally.

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:25.879
<v Speaker 1>I forgot about the ag campaign. That was all right,

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it was alright, alright, alright, alright, well let's take our

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:33.240
<v Speaker 1>final break and we're gonna come back and no doubt

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>stumble through how records are actually made. Right after this

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that's watched, sk should know. Okay, record store guys, this

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 1>is the point where you can just leave us and

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll say thank you for listening up to this point. Yeah,

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is gonna be a little clumsy because

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>it's a little black magic e and it's um. They're

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:15.360
<v Speaker 1>also made different ways depending on who's producing the record.

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:18.879
<v Speaker 1>It's generally the same process, but uh, you know every

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 1>cook has their own recipe. Yeah, so the essential process,

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess is you you it's ridiculously similar to what

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Scott and Edison and Alexander Graham Bell were doing, which

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is you basically put sound or music into some sort

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of amplifying device, no longer an acoustic trumpet instead some

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 1>again amplifier that that makes a little needle wiggle. And

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 1>as that needle wiggles, it's etching that transcription of that

0:38:54.640 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 1>sound wave into a mechanical record of it. That's why

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.280
<v Speaker 1>records are called records. It's a record of that sound ound.

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 1>And they do this with basically a turntable called the

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>cutting lathe. And that now I understand why they call

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it cutting a record. I had no idea until I

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 1>guess yesterday, Um, why they call it that. Yes, Impressing

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 1>makes sense too, and it will in a second. But

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just like this turntable, but it looks like a

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:23.359
<v Speaker 1>turntable and like an industrial, an industrial turntable, and that's

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:28.359
<v Speaker 1>exactly what it is. Yeah, it's just a a large machine. Uh.

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 1>The one that the video I saw was the one

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 1>in Nashville. I don't know if they're different chisels, but

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>they use an actual ruby gemstone chisel at their factory. Uh,

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:45.799
<v Speaker 1>and that vibrating ruby chisel cuts that groove and a uh.

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 1>They still use lacquer, at least at this place, and

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:52.320
<v Speaker 1>use a lacquer disc and this is called the mother disc. Um.

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of cool. In the end you end up

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:57.319
<v Speaker 1>with or you can end up with as much as

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 1>feet of groove lines, which is seven football fields. I

0:40:03.000 --> 0:40:05.799
<v Speaker 1>don't know how many big max. But if you took

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 1>like the lines of an LP, uh and I don't

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's both sides or one side,

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 1>is that just one side, that would be seven football

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>fields long, which is pretty amazing. Okay, So so no,

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, on the Shellac record, the mother record,

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>they fit way more information. And from what I saw,

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I saw that an LP, the average LP like twenty

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:29.359
<v Speaker 1>two minutes is like um about one and a half

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 1>football fields long. Really, that's what I saw. But I

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>saw what you were talking about in that video, and

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, where's the distinction here? And I couldn't figure

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it out. So anywhere between one and a half to

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:42.760
<v Speaker 1>seven football fields that one groove. And by the way,

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:45.760
<v Speaker 1>if you look at a record those grooves, that's one long,

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 1>concentric groove that you could stretch out as a single line.

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Had never occurred to me. Did you realize that before? Yeah? Sure,

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>because where would it end? It's a spiral. I don't know.

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:01.479
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't really thought it through. But that's a great

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 1>trivia question. Then you could get a lot of people

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>on how many grooves are on the average LP record

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and the answers to one for each side. Yeah, although

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 1>what about the little space? I didn't really look up

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 1>how they did that, the little space between the songs.

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:19.720
<v Speaker 1>It's still yes, but it must have just a blank.

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 1>There must not be any etchings in that groove. It's

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:27.839
<v Speaker 1>still tell all the musicians like, shut up, Yeah, what's

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:30.799
<v Speaker 1>it called room tone? Yeah? Room tone? And by the way,

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 1>this is this is how records are mass produced. Like

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 1>if you go to Third Man Records in Nashville, and

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 1>sit in the little booth like it literally cuts the

0:41:39.160 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>sound you make directly onto a record that you take home.

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, I think that guy that you me visited

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:46.720
<v Speaker 1>head is on like you could if you have dollars

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to spend to mess around with, like you can get

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:52.239
<v Speaker 1>yourself a cutting life. But so you've got that mother

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:56.360
<v Speaker 1>record that's made from shellac, you said, right, right, And

0:41:56.400 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 1>then they take that and they coat it with some

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:00.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of metal. I don't know if it's platinum. I

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>think they said Nickel was involved, but they use electrolysis

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and they make a negative of that record, so they

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 1>get the metal in all of the grooves. And when

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>they pop the metal off of that mother shellac record

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:16.759
<v Speaker 1>they have they have the mirror no, yeah, a mirror

0:42:16.800 --> 0:42:20.280
<v Speaker 1>opposite image of it. Rather than grooves and and etchings

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and valleys, it's bumps and ridges and mountains. And that's

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 1>what they use to press records from. Right. Yeah, that's

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 1>called the master stamp. Uh. And that master stamp can

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 1>make about a hundred thousand records. I think it is

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Nickel or at least what they use it. This one

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:41.359
<v Speaker 1>company that I saw, the largest one, uh, and that

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:44.280
<v Speaker 1>will harden up into silver, and you peel it away

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and then you kind of cut it and trim it

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 1>up so it's actually round. And then when you go

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to press the actual vinyl, they dump and we'll get

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to why they're black in a second, because that's super interesting.

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:57.399
<v Speaker 1>But you get these black polyvinyl pellets, you melt them down,

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 1>uh in a hopper basically, and what plops out is

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a little puck shaped like a little biscuit basically of vinyl. Uh.

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:09.479
<v Speaker 1>You put the label on it because that helps center

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:12.879
<v Speaker 1>things apparently, and then you have, you know, the one

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 1>side of the record on top and the other side

0:43:14.719 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 1>on the bottom these silver stamps and you apply about

0:43:18.960 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 1>sixty tons of pressure and it just squishes it out

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and presses it into thin vinyl. Uh. If you think

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 1>it might be a little messy around the edges, you

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 1>were absolutely right. Um. They trim that off with a

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 1>machine so it's perfectly round, and that excess stuff is

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>called flash, and they actually just throw that back to

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 1>use later on it's recentled They re melt it right,

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 1>which is awesome. Totally. There are I saw I saw

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 1>people online who say that records made from that reused

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>flashing do not sound as good as other records. I'm like, dude, really,

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 1>yes on man, you need another a second hobby. It

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:02.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't just w record collection. And they didn't use the

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 1>word actually at all, right, no, not at all. They

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 1>were just daring you to say something. So um, so

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 1>that's it, like that's what, that's how one record is made.

0:44:11.760 --> 0:44:13.759
<v Speaker 1>And you said you can use one of those um

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>uh master uh negatives for a hundred thousand records. So

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I guess they make a few of those and they

0:44:20.719 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 1>have a run and that's that you have your your

0:44:23.080 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>whole run of records created. Um. And you mentioned something

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 1>about records being black, like they don't have to be black.

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I have at least one or two that

0:44:32.200 --> 0:44:37.319
<v Speaker 1>are colored um like red. Yeah, yeah, it is cool.

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:41.480
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely different. But um black is the color of

0:44:41.560 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>choice for a couple of reasons. One PVC uh is

0:44:46.400 --> 0:44:50.399
<v Speaker 1>some is like a natural insulator, so static electricity can

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:53.240
<v Speaker 1>build up in it, which is nay good because static

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>electricity attracts dust, and dust messes up your records. It

0:44:56.719 --> 0:44:58.400
<v Speaker 1>can cause them to skip and do all sorts of

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 1>terrible stuff. It can clug up your needle. Um. And

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 1>then so they add this stuff called carbon black. I

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:07.320
<v Speaker 1>think half of a percent of your records material is

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:10.359
<v Speaker 1>carbon black, and that actually makes it a little better

0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of a conductor, so it repels dust a little better. Yeah,

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 1>so that'll that'll help him. And apparently and I never

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 1>thought of this either, but you just you see dust

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:21.839
<v Speaker 1>better on a black record. Uh, so you're you know,

0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:25.239
<v Speaker 1>you're more apt to keep your records cleaner probably, uh

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:27.400
<v Speaker 1>And I never really noticed that. But yeah, on my

0:45:27.440 --> 0:45:30.839
<v Speaker 1>clear records, I can't see any dust. I have to say. Um,

0:45:30.880 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the records that I have, I I got

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:37.480
<v Speaker 1>from our buddy. Van Nostrin has always been very in

0:45:37.560 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 1>sending records that most people would not want to hear. Um,

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Engelbert Humperdink I have thanks to him. Um, I've got

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a one about Jimmy Carter, a comedy record, Um the

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:56.280
<v Speaker 1>disco duck. But get this, there's no disco duck anywhere,

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's just like a kind of a jazzy upbeat

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 1>um covers of disco songs without the duck. I don't

0:46:03.200 --> 0:46:06.120
<v Speaker 1>know where Van Nostrom found this, but it's pretty astounding.

0:46:06.120 --> 0:46:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Where the records that he comes up with in sinse

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:12.279
<v Speaker 1>So thanks. I used to listen to comedy records going

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 1>up to as a kid, I would get George Carlin's

0:46:15.920 --> 0:46:18.839
<v Speaker 1>class Clown or how I and I'm still not good

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:22.160
<v Speaker 1>at impressions, but how I got interested was the rich

0:46:22.239 --> 0:46:25.799
<v Speaker 1>little records The First Family Rides again, and you know,

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:28.359
<v Speaker 1>it was a big thing, like comedy albums, And some

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 1>comedians today are are getting vinyl pressed of their specials

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and stuff, which is kind of cool. It is cool

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:36.839
<v Speaker 1>because those comedians are flushed with Netflix money, so all

0:46:36.840 --> 0:46:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of them can afford a fifty dollar cuttingly. So we

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:43.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of explained, I think, in our own way, how

0:46:43.400 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 1>they're made. But then there's the black magic of actually

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 1>hearing these things. Uh, you sit around and look at

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:52.440
<v Speaker 1>those grooves all day, but you wanted what you want

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:55.279
<v Speaker 1>to do, get up and dance right pretty much, and

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that's that, and that's records, um chuck. If you could

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 1>also afford not to to cutting lathe but an electron microscope, um,

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you could do worse than putting a record underneath it,

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:09.759
<v Speaker 1>because you would see some freaky stuff going on in

0:47:09.760 --> 0:47:14.560
<v Speaker 1>those grooves. That groove itself holds a bunch of different

0:47:14.600 --> 0:47:18.120
<v Speaker 1>little etchings and each sound has its own etching. In

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:20.879
<v Speaker 1>this groove. And again these grooves are sometimes like an

0:47:20.880 --> 0:47:24.840
<v Speaker 1>eighth of a millimeter UM thick, like they've gotten way

0:47:24.880 --> 0:47:28.560
<v Speaker 1>thinner than when Peter Goldmark first invented vinyl records, and

0:47:28.640 --> 0:47:31.600
<v Speaker 1>they hold so much information that you can actually physically

0:47:31.600 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 1>see just like Um Edward ley On Scott of Martinville

0:47:36.440 --> 0:47:39.479
<v Speaker 1>Um saw himself on that class plate. If you look

0:47:39.560 --> 0:47:42.719
<v Speaker 1>really really closely through an electron microscope, you can see

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, and you are literally looking at a

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:50.600
<v Speaker 1>physical encoding of sound. The sound wave has been transferred

0:47:50.600 --> 0:47:54.600
<v Speaker 1>mechanically through that that ruby, um what do you call it,

0:47:54.880 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the carving thing chisel onto a record. And now if

0:47:59.680 --> 0:48:02.439
<v Speaker 1>you put your record on your turntable, play it back

0:48:02.480 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 1>at the appropriate rotations per minute, very important, and you

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 1>put the arm down. What you're doing is you're putting

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:12.160
<v Speaker 1>down a needle or a stylus that is a very

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:16.920
<v Speaker 1>sensitive usually industrial gemstone like sapphire maybe ruby I saw

0:48:16.960 --> 0:48:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a diamond most most frequently, and that that actually reads

0:48:21.320 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 1>every single one of those little tiny squiggles in that

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in those grooves from start to finish, and it retranslates

0:48:29.120 --> 0:48:33.799
<v Speaker 1>that mechanical encoding through to the cartridge, which translates that

0:48:33.840 --> 0:48:38.120
<v Speaker 1>into electricity, which creates an audible sound that has to

0:48:38.160 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 1>be amplified and run through speakers. And when you do

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 1>all that, you're listening to a record. That's right, And

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:45.719
<v Speaker 1>I kind of compared it to a guitar pick up

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:48.719
<v Speaker 1>if uh, which one do we explain that? And was

0:48:48.719 --> 0:48:51.759
<v Speaker 1>that in the les Paul, Yeah, it had to be.

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:54.319
<v Speaker 1>But it's just sort of the same idea as a

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:58.760
<v Speaker 1>guitar pickup. It's it uses copper wire and magnets um

0:48:58.840 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to create this, you know, electric current, and in this

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:05.440
<v Speaker 1>case it's induced at the same frequency as that little

0:49:06.239 --> 0:49:09.920
<v Speaker 1>needle wiggling through the grooves. And then you have to

0:49:10.000 --> 0:49:12.399
<v Speaker 1>obviously that you still don't hear anything unless you feed

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that through an amplifier and then eventually speakers. If you

0:49:15.560 --> 0:49:18.359
<v Speaker 1>listen really closely, you can hear the faintest bit of it,

0:49:18.400 --> 0:49:21.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's nothing to dance to your right, um. Dave,

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Dave helped us with us, right, this was a Dave jam.

0:49:24.880 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 1>It was Dave. So Dave kind of drove something home

0:49:28.200 --> 0:49:30.560
<v Speaker 1>for me when he talked about how the middle c

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:35.840
<v Speaker 1>on a piano is um vibrates at an amplitude of

0:49:36.160 --> 0:49:39.359
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and sixty one point six three hurts, which

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:42.520
<v Speaker 1>means that that it vibrates to create that sound that

0:49:42.560 --> 0:49:45.680
<v Speaker 1>middle cyano piano. It vibrates a two hundred and sixty

0:49:45.680 --> 0:49:49.320
<v Speaker 1>one point six three vibrations per second. That's just one

0:49:49.600 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 1>note on a piano, and that is encoded in a record.

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:55.040
<v Speaker 1>When you play a middle C on a piano and

0:49:55.080 --> 0:49:58.319
<v Speaker 1>you capture it on a record. Um, you, that's just

0:49:58.400 --> 0:50:01.480
<v Speaker 1>one thing. Now consider all of the different notes, all

0:50:01.480 --> 0:50:04.959
<v Speaker 1>the different sounds, all the different instruments that are are

0:50:05.560 --> 0:50:08.400
<v Speaker 1>encoded onto a record, and it's there. Each one is

0:50:08.480 --> 0:50:12.200
<v Speaker 1>physically encoded in the right proper time, the right spot

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:16.919
<v Speaker 1>on that groove in that record, playback on that particular RPM.

0:50:17.000 --> 0:50:19.480
<v Speaker 1>And when you start to put all this together and

0:50:19.520 --> 0:50:23.000
<v Speaker 1>realize how complicated it is, it really gives you an

0:50:23.000 --> 0:50:26.720
<v Speaker 1>appreciation for what's going on with vinyl and why people

0:50:26.800 --> 0:50:29.799
<v Speaker 1>love it so much. Yeah, I mean, it's it's sort

0:50:29.800 --> 0:50:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of easy to wrap your head around someone plucking a

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:38.640
<v Speaker 1>piano string or loot rather hammering a piano string that

0:50:38.640 --> 0:50:40.880
<v Speaker 1>would be a harpsichord if it was plucked in a

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:43.239
<v Speaker 1>middle C like ding ding ding ding, and how that

0:50:43.320 --> 0:50:45.720
<v Speaker 1>might be translated. But when you think about a groove

0:50:45.800 --> 0:50:50.560
<v Speaker 1>being cut that represents like guitar feedback from Jimmy Hendrix,

0:50:51.320 --> 0:50:54.200
<v Speaker 1>which is a sound, but it's not like a U.

0:50:54.480 --> 0:50:56.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not like you think of a familiar note being

0:50:56.600 --> 0:51:00.280
<v Speaker 1>plucked or something, or the sound of distorted guitar. It's

0:51:00.360 --> 0:51:04.799
<v Speaker 1>just it's amazing. It is black magic. I'm with you. So.

0:51:04.920 --> 0:51:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Um A lot of people chuck say vinyl is the

0:51:07.239 --> 0:51:09.839
<v Speaker 1>only way to go, and other people say take your

0:51:09.920 --> 0:51:13.480
<v Speaker 1>vinyl and shove it because digital music is the only

0:51:13.520 --> 0:51:16.440
<v Speaker 1>way to go. And there's apparently a pretty big argument

0:51:16.440 --> 0:51:19.560
<v Speaker 1>about all this. Yeah, I mean, you know, your vinyl

0:51:19.640 --> 0:51:22.919
<v Speaker 1>enthusiasts will say it has a warmer sound. Uh, they'll

0:51:22.920 --> 0:51:26.279
<v Speaker 1>say that's as close to the original way form as

0:51:26.320 --> 0:51:29.719
<v Speaker 1>you can get because it's directly from a master recording

0:51:30.280 --> 0:51:35.279
<v Speaker 1>and it's not digitized and compressed. Um I and Day

0:51:35.280 --> 0:51:37.080
<v Speaker 1>points out, and I fully agree that part of this.

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:39.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm sure there are audio files who have

0:51:39.600 --> 0:51:45.080
<v Speaker 1>an ear that can really differentiate, differentiate um sounds on

0:51:45.280 --> 0:51:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a really minute level. I'm not one of them. Um

0:51:49.239 --> 0:51:52.040
<v Speaker 1>So for me, part of it is the the ritual

0:51:52.080 --> 0:51:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of the record album. Aren't liner notes? Holding an album

0:51:56.640 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and looking at it while you're playing it, Like all

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that was Law Austwin records shrunk to cassettes

0:52:02.640 --> 0:52:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and you could still sort of do it then, and

0:52:04.600 --> 0:52:06.799
<v Speaker 1>you can kind of do it with CD cases and

0:52:07.120 --> 0:52:10.400
<v Speaker 1>liner notes. But the record was really like it was.

0:52:10.480 --> 0:52:12.920
<v Speaker 1>It was a part of the whole experience large format art.

0:52:14.239 --> 0:52:16.960
<v Speaker 1>But there are people who say that, you know, like

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you said that digital gets rid of those pops and

0:52:20.640 --> 0:52:24.040
<v Speaker 1>clicks that a lot of people like from records. Um

0:52:24.080 --> 0:52:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it has a wider frequency range than vinyl does, so

0:52:27.880 --> 0:52:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it can hit the highs and the lows more accurately.

0:52:30.760 --> 0:52:33.399
<v Speaker 1>UM I mean, I like it all. I don't think

0:52:33.400 --> 0:52:35.759
<v Speaker 1>you have to choose. I don't think you have to

0:52:35.840 --> 0:52:38.399
<v Speaker 1>choose either. But um I I saw a really good

0:52:38.440 --> 0:52:43.080
<v Speaker 1>description of the difference between digital recordings and analog recordings,

0:52:43.080 --> 0:52:45.720
<v Speaker 1>which is what is meant to be captured on a record.

0:52:46.080 --> 0:52:48.840
<v Speaker 1>There was a guy, a recording engineer named Michael Connolly

0:52:49.280 --> 0:52:52.160
<v Speaker 1>who um said, Let's say that you want to measure

0:52:52.239 --> 0:52:55.440
<v Speaker 1>your height, and you stand next to a door jam,

0:52:55.520 --> 0:52:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and you put a pencil along the top of your

0:52:57.520 --> 0:52:59.920
<v Speaker 1>head and you mark the door jam. What you've just

0:53:00.120 --> 0:53:04.200
<v Speaker 1>done is created an analog of your height that mark

0:53:04.400 --> 0:53:07.480
<v Speaker 1>stands in for your height. Right. Another way you could

0:53:07.480 --> 0:53:10.200
<v Speaker 1>do it is stand still and hold the measuring tape

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:13.359
<v Speaker 1>and then see what your height actually is. And then

0:53:13.400 --> 0:53:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you take that measurement and you transcribe it to another medium,

0:53:16.360 --> 0:53:18.799
<v Speaker 1>like you write it down in a notebook. And the

0:53:18.800 --> 0:53:22.680
<v Speaker 1>thing is is your analog is truer, it's more faithful

0:53:22.960 --> 0:53:27.960
<v Speaker 1>because it's an actual representation of your actual height. But um,

0:53:28.120 --> 0:53:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the measurement can be reproduced much more easily. You can

0:53:32.160 --> 0:53:34.440
<v Speaker 1>go from notebook to notebook and just write down that

0:53:34.520 --> 0:53:37.920
<v Speaker 1>same measurement every time without any loss of information. And

0:53:38.000 --> 0:53:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not true from that door jam pencil mark, because

0:53:41.200 --> 0:53:42.919
<v Speaker 1>let's say you move, you want to take a door

0:53:42.960 --> 0:53:45.600
<v Speaker 1>jam with you to remember how tall you were, and

0:53:45.640 --> 0:53:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you install it at your next house, it might not

0:53:48.040 --> 0:53:51.000
<v Speaker 1>be quite the same, you know, height off the floor

0:53:51.000 --> 0:53:53.480
<v Speaker 1>as it was before. So those are those pops and

0:53:53.480 --> 0:53:57.120
<v Speaker 1>clicks that get added into it when you reproduce a sound,

0:53:57.440 --> 0:54:00.719
<v Speaker 1>an analog sound, whereas with digital, yes, it's not the

0:54:00.920 --> 0:54:03.960
<v Speaker 1>entire waveform of the whole thing, it's measurements of it.

0:54:04.120 --> 0:54:07.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's such a mind boggling number of measurements with

0:54:07.440 --> 0:54:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a mind boggling amount of information that most people say,

0:54:11.280 --> 0:54:13.759
<v Speaker 1>not only can you not tell what's lost in a

0:54:13.800 --> 0:54:18.399
<v Speaker 1>digital recording, some people say digital recordings are actually better, right,

0:54:18.480 --> 0:54:20.760
<v Speaker 1>But to be clear, we are talking about a digital

0:54:20.800 --> 0:54:25.080
<v Speaker 1>recording as in a c D, which has about for

0:54:25.400 --> 0:54:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a little more than four kill a bits per second

0:54:29.560 --> 0:54:33.279
<v Speaker 1>UH worth of information, which is super high. UM. If

0:54:33.320 --> 0:54:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you're talking, you know, streaming something from a streaming service,

0:54:37.760 --> 0:54:39.319
<v Speaker 1>there is a difference, and you don't have to be

0:54:39.360 --> 0:54:42.480
<v Speaker 1>an audio file to tell UH it is a thinner sound.

0:54:42.600 --> 0:54:45.880
<v Speaker 1>It's ten ear UH. It is compressed down from the

0:54:45.920 --> 0:54:48.680
<v Speaker 1>CD size, which is a little over fourteen hundred two

0:54:48.760 --> 0:54:52.080
<v Speaker 1>between ninety and a hundred and sixty uh kill a

0:54:52.120 --> 0:54:55.759
<v Speaker 1>bits per second. So that's a lot of compression going on.

0:54:56.000 --> 0:55:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And Dave points out that you um like you're probably

0:55:00.600 --> 0:55:04.239
<v Speaker 1>playing that through like in a bluetooth speaker maybe or earbuds,

0:55:05.000 --> 0:55:08.080
<v Speaker 1>not very good quality. If you if you do think

0:55:08.080 --> 0:55:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the records sound better, it's probably because you're at your

0:55:10.440 --> 0:55:14.160
<v Speaker 1>audio file friend's house who collects records and who also

0:55:14.200 --> 0:55:18.400
<v Speaker 1>places it through a really high quality amplifier instead of speakers.

0:55:18.440 --> 0:55:21.920
<v Speaker 1>So you know the sound between the difference between that

0:55:22.000 --> 0:55:25.239
<v Speaker 1>and UH streaming something through a bluetooth speaker earbuds is

0:55:25.280 --> 0:55:28.400
<v Speaker 1>just nine and day. Yeah, because so that the the stamp,

0:55:28.480 --> 0:55:31.239
<v Speaker 1>the bit rate is just the number of measurements taken, right,

0:55:31.320 --> 0:55:33.239
<v Speaker 1>and measurements are not exact. It's the kind of a

0:55:33.280 --> 0:55:36.319
<v Speaker 1>snapshot of the thing. It's not the whole thing, like

0:55:36.360 --> 0:55:39.239
<v Speaker 1>a record is the whole sound wave. But I ran

0:55:39.280 --> 0:55:41.239
<v Speaker 1>across something, Chuck that just kind of puts the whole

0:55:41.360 --> 0:55:44.480
<v Speaker 1>argument to bed. And I noticed it in that video

0:55:44.560 --> 0:55:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you said about how records are made at that record

0:55:47.320 --> 0:55:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Um manufacturer in Nashville. Did you notice that they started

0:55:51.239 --> 0:55:56.200
<v Speaker 1>out with a digital file. Well, yeah, I mean yeah,

0:55:56.280 --> 0:55:59.239
<v Speaker 1>it was a pro tools file. It was so they

0:55:59.280 --> 0:56:03.520
<v Speaker 1>transferred a digital file onto a record. So the whole

0:56:03.520 --> 0:56:06.400
<v Speaker 1>difference for anything that's ever been put to a record

0:56:06.400 --> 0:56:08.840
<v Speaker 1>from a digital file is out the window. Your arguments

0:56:08.880 --> 0:56:12.839
<v Speaker 1>just totally moot because you started out with a digital file. Yeah,

0:56:12.840 --> 0:56:17.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's a huge digital file, but it's still digital,

0:56:17.080 --> 0:56:21.000
<v Speaker 1>which means it's not in precise representation of the exact same,

0:56:21.280 --> 0:56:23.799
<v Speaker 1>same thing. But other people say, well a records not neither.

0:56:23.840 --> 0:56:25.799
<v Speaker 1>There's just too many, too much room for air, it

0:56:25.840 --> 0:56:28.239
<v Speaker 1>can't possibly be precise. But I think you said it

0:56:28.239 --> 0:56:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to choose. Yeah, I agreed you got

0:56:31.600 --> 0:56:34.319
<v Speaker 1>anything else about Vinyl records because I could keep going. Man,

0:56:34.360 --> 0:56:38.680
<v Speaker 1>this is fun. Uh A little fun tidbit about my mom.

0:56:38.680 --> 0:56:41.680
<v Speaker 1>When she was little living in Memphis, Tennessee. She my

0:56:41.719 --> 0:56:44.160
<v Speaker 1>granddad took her into I think it was called the

0:56:44.200 --> 0:56:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Memphis Recording Studio that's pretty on the nose and recorded

0:56:48.480 --> 0:56:53.239
<v Speaker 1>her playing um, the clarinet or something and left with

0:56:53.280 --> 0:56:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a record and that later became Sun Records. So technically

0:56:57.560 --> 0:57:01.480
<v Speaker 1>my mom recorded where a wasp pressly recorded. That is

0:57:01.520 --> 0:57:04.319
<v Speaker 1>pretty amazing, man, I think that's true. That's a story

0:57:04.360 --> 0:57:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I got. I'm sticking to it. I think there's a

0:57:06.760 --> 0:57:09.839
<v Speaker 1>very charming story to end on Charles. So let's go

0:57:09.920 --> 0:57:14.719
<v Speaker 1>instead to listener mail. How about that? Ah? Yeah, this

0:57:14.760 --> 0:57:18.440
<v Speaker 1>is a quickie about de farting a lot after colonoscopies,

0:57:18.480 --> 0:57:21.840
<v Speaker 1>which we talked about the vine. Hey, guys, I am

0:57:22.000 --> 0:57:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Chuck the gastro and grology technician, huge fan of the

0:57:26.880 --> 0:57:29.960
<v Speaker 1>show and I don't think I missed a single episode.

0:57:30.000 --> 0:57:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I was regarding your different experiences after colonoscopies because I

0:57:33.960 --> 0:57:36.880
<v Speaker 1>was super farty and you don't remember being super party, right,

0:57:36.920 --> 0:57:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I was super high. That's right. Uh. Air is injected

0:57:41.840 --> 0:57:45.040
<v Speaker 1>during the procedure to purposefully distend the colon for a

0:57:45.040 --> 0:57:48.320
<v Speaker 1>better view of all the walls and easier passages to

0:57:48.400 --> 0:57:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the holy land. And it makes your hands puff up

0:57:51.200 --> 0:57:53.720
<v Speaker 1>like a cabbage patch kid, which everybody likes to see.

0:57:54.440 --> 0:57:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Some facilities use air, which will result in the fart party.

0:57:58.800 --> 0:58:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Some facilities use the more expensive carbon dioxide, which is

0:58:02.680 --> 0:58:05.920
<v Speaker 1>absorbed by your colon breathe out your lungs and results

0:58:05.920 --> 0:58:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in a more comfortable experience. This is a possible cause

0:58:09.000 --> 0:58:13.120
<v Speaker 1>for the difference between your experiences. You may still get

0:58:13.160 --> 0:58:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a little gassy after CEO two, um, but I can

0:58:15.800 --> 0:58:19.280
<v Speaker 1>assure you that recovery rooms in the CEO two facility

0:58:19.360 --> 0:58:21.960
<v Speaker 1>are not full of farts and is a more pleasant

0:58:21.960 --> 0:58:24.800
<v Speaker 1>experience for the patient in general. Did you go to

0:58:24.840 --> 0:58:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Bargain Bargain Barn Hospital for yours when cold to colon ascopes?

0:58:29.800 --> 0:58:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Are us spatulous city or the colon Barn? I guess

0:58:35.360 --> 0:58:38.760
<v Speaker 1>so it was pretty fun. I enjoyed the fart barn Um.

0:58:38.800 --> 0:58:41.560
<v Speaker 1>And this is from Chuck and he says, ps g

0:58:41.800 --> 0:58:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I is the best department butts in guts for the wind.

0:58:45.160 --> 0:58:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Nice nice work. Chuck. Nice work you two, Chuck. Uh.

0:58:49.800 --> 0:58:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks man. If you want to be like Chuck, either

0:58:52.320 --> 0:58:54.560
<v Speaker 1>one well, no really, the one that just wrote in.

0:58:54.800 --> 0:58:57.200
<v Speaker 1>You can write into us too and send us an

0:58:57.200 --> 0:59:04.520
<v Speaker 1>email to Stuff Podcasts and i art radio dot com.

0:59:04.560 --> 0:59:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know is a production of I heart Radio.

0:59:07.360 --> 0:59:09.919
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts My heart Radio, visit the i heart

0:59:09.960 --> 0:59:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:59:12.880 --> 0:59:16.520
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows. H