WEBVTT - Week 9 Breakdown, TNF Recap, Start/Sit Questions 

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Forever Show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences.

0:00:30.360 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Listen Dodd didn Yeah, welcome your Friday from five, Die Fro,

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Sat Francis, Franky stand ball ladies and gentlemen, your PF

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>with that, we welcome you inside of Studio thirty four.

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>This is the BFFs. He's Frank standfell I am Greg.

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>What's telling a month? Greg Susman. Happy Friday to you, Bud.

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Fun game last night, unless, of course, you were at

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>forty nine bettors like this guy. That did not work out.

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>But it was a fun game all around. We had

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake and Emmanuel Sanders in the lineup. They shout

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>buy you, shout out to me, shout out to you.

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>We don't do that. We don't do that often. You

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>overruled us. It was great. So basically it worked out

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>on the team we all own together, Frank Mike Flora like, off,

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>we have Kenyan Drake, we have Damarius Thomas, and we

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>have Lashawn McCoy. We had to decide on a flex

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and it did not look good for Kenyan Drake going

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 1>up against that vaunted forty Niners defense. So I voted

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>for Lashawn McCoy. It's a very good vote. Mike voted

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>for Damarius Thomas. Frank voted for Kenyan Drake and controlled

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the lineup and started Kenyan Drake and I had no

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 1>idea if we had him in until after the first

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 1>play in the game. I was like six yards or whatever,

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and we just write Drake and that bart as soon

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>as I saw I literally didn't like look at my text.

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I just looked at the app to see if Kenyan

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Drake was in the lineup, and he was let's go, BFF.

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>It's nice job, Greig. How are you doing? Though? Um?

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I did want to bring up something about your wardrobe today.

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>An unnamed producer downstairs said that you look like you're

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>going to a slumber party. That's rude. Was it. I'm

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna fire that one. I'm off the air. I can't

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>tell you that to a slumber. I'm somebody who works

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>in anonymity. Huh, So I'm just I'll just sort out parting. Yeah,

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the you know, those Henley type shirts

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>are ones that like come with the dual set of pajamas,

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>like you have like the matching pants, like the plaid

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>pajama pants, and you have you have like the button

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>up shirts. My thought, we're gonna sleep. I got the

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>hen Lea. You got the bacon neck crew neck underneath,

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>so I had like the Henley which I you know Friday,

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it's colored shirt, so like not really coldly, Man, you're good.

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>You're the only person that was on air today to

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>not be wearing a sports jacket. How do you feel? Great?

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Great bard Gage, Sean wasn't wearing sports jacket. He hasn't

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>been on Oh well yeah he was on the morning.

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I have to well, you know, you're you're the only

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>host on the network so far today until at the

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>window of course. Man, I got my own personality stress

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>down Friday for Greg's suster afterwards, different sweater, like you know,

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>what are you going to sleep. Whose friend's house is it?

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>F Jeff manle my own apartment. Dude getting married? Like

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>eight days you're gonna see Jeff Jeff there? How does

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that feel? Jeff will be there. I am very excited

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>for your wedding. I'm probably I might be more excited

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>for your wedding. I agree, you know, I'm very excited

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to a hang out with Nando. Be be hounded by

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>all of your friends and see watch you try and

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>step on a class. Absolutely to be great. It's gonna

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>be great. Uh. Last night, Um, as we said, Kenny

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and Drake Emmanuel Sanders got the job done for a

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>roll of teams. That's good. The bad Kevin Coleman very bad.

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 1>That whole thing that we said yesterday about taking the

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>over in his total yardage prop von if we could

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>just kind of delete that from existence, from the Internet,

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>from audio boom wherever, like, just delete that because it

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>never happened. Of course, what am I even talking about? That?

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>Brita was very good, fifteen carries for seventy eight yards.

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>This was frustrating. I still think most weeks Kevin Coleman

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the guy Greg and he played

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>more snaps and he still saw, you know, sixteen running

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>back opportun nities. He was targeted four times in the

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>past game met Brita only targeted twice. So look, these

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>things are gonna happen whenever there's a running back by committee.

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's still a really good team with a really

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>good offensive line and they want to run the football.

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I think last night was an outlier game. It was

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a really good matchup. And you know what, I give

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 1>credit to Kyle Shanahan because you should change up your

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>game plan, your offensive game plan based on the deficiencies

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of the team that you're playing. Now, I'm sure that

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>they could have run the football more against the Cardinals

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and it probably would have worked out. But going into

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>this game, Kyle Shanahan likely knew that the Cardinals are

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>very weak against the past and that's exactly what he did.

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>And we saw a career day out of Gucci Garoppolo

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>greg four touchdowns over three hundred yards. Yesterday on the show,

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>we were debating Jimmy Garoppolo or Kyler Murray. Kyler Murray

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>ended up having a pretty good game as well, saved

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>by not the bell but by Andy is a Bellah

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>see what I did there? But Jimmy Garoppolo. I ended

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>up going with him in my super flex lineup. I

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>benched Kyler Murray, I have Minshew in there. I feel

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty good about it. Greig, Absolutely you should feel good

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>about that was a great decision, Frank, I was proud

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of you. Manuel Sanders awesome game as well. Man. This

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>guy just continues to defy all sports medicine logic. Again.

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I understand he's getting further and further removed, but at

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>age thirty one, thirty two, whatever he is to be

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>playing at this level coming off a torn achilles greg

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it truly is commendable and it looks like we might

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>have a legit, high end wide receiver three on our

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>hands moving forward for Emmanuel Sanders, how about this, I'll

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>throw it out there for you. Obviously, this was a

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>great matchup. Do you try and sell Emmanuel Sanders considering

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 1>he has scored in back to back games. I would absolutely.

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>The Services before nine is unlike last night. They don't

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>really throw the ball. It's not their game and they

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>want to run the football. There's another game coming up

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>against the Cardinal soon, I believe me so. In my

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>in a pool, that idea of the Survivor player pool.

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>So I saved that George Kittle and Jimmy g for

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the next one, the one at home in two weeks.

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Last night I used Tevin Coleman hopefully kills healthy enough

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to play. Know what's gonna happen, Frank, Tevin Colan's gonna

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>have four touchdowns in two weeks, and Kiddo and Jimmy,

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you gonna do nothing. That's a lot. You can't get

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it right. But you know, I'm looking at the matchup

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>coming up for Sanders yes Seattle next week. While it

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>says that you know the fantasy numbers show that the

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks are tough against opposing wide receivers, I don't think

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that they're a very good defense. And I think that

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you can actually pass on Seattle. We'll get to that

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later on Arizona coming up, Green Bay

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore secondary getting healthy for Baltimore. It's not really a

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup. Again, it's sell high. If you can sell

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Emmanuel Sanders for a wide receiver too that you can

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>trust every week. Sure, but if you don't get fair value,

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>then just keep them in right it out. I think

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:41.239
<v Speaker 1>the matchup is pretty good. I agree with you, okay.

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>On the other side over the break, we had a

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>lot to talk about because there's a lot of players

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>returning from injuries, and there's some players that well are

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>now injured. So we're gonna get to t Y Hilton

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and the Colts. What are we re turning? They talked

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about that when you filled it on

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the Frenzy too. They added to the Sewan Jackson they

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>looked to be coming back here this weekend. So we'll

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>breakdown all of that. What you do, who you start,

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>who you sit, trying to answer every one of those

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>questions over the next hour or so. It's Frank Stafford,

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Greg Saucerman, You're a Fantasy best friends forever here on

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the grid. Get on it. I want to be the

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA DFS competition

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>with Daily Rodal dot Com and dominate on fandel and

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros with Daily Rodal

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>dot Com optimizer and the most accurate projections in NBA DFS,

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>plus line up alerts, breaking news, lake swap support, and

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>much more. Safe ten percent on winning NBA DFS advice

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>with promo code Dunk. Visit Daily Rodo dot com backslash

0:08:43.840 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>dunc to learn more. All right, well, well, well, welcome

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>back to the Fantasy VFS live on the Sports Grant

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 1>TV Network. Frank Stamfill joined by Frank Susman shamming out

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>here on a Friday. Frank, you showing off some of

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>those dance let's go pre wedding eight days away? Are

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:28.959
<v Speaker 1>you going to lift the chair next week? About that?

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>And my lots lift the chair? Lift the chair? Sure man?

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, alright, I feel so honored now. Believe me,

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>most of my friends go to the bar so they

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>don't have to lift the chair. Story Greg, I have

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>never been to a Jewish wedding, and I am so

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>pumped because I've heard they are crazy. They are really

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>like the ord the Docks Jews, like they're really crazy. Sorry,

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>how much tequila will be at your wedding? Too much tequila?

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>All right? Let me let's break it down, Franklin, Let's

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>get right into it. I want to start with Indianapolis.

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>They played Pittsburgh this week and the spread I leave

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Indie was a one point favorite last night check. And

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:03.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how this has changed now that t

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 1>hy Hilton has been ruled out. Hilton is out for

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the next three to four weeks, according to head coach

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Frank Reich, with a calf injury among the Hilton can

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:14.839
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of damage to the Colts. And for

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>fantasy owners, what do you do if you're at t

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Y Hilton owner. I think the first thing you could

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>do is look to pick up Zach Pascal. But as

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:26.839
<v Speaker 1>we talked about on the Fantasy Football Frenzy, this is

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver by committee type of position when it

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>comes to the Indianapolis Colts. Before the San Francisco forty

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Niners acquired Emmanuel Sanders, they were running a similar system

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.719
<v Speaker 1>where they had three, four, even five wide receivers that

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>they would rotate in or out. And I think that

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're going to see with the Indianapolis Colts

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.319
<v Speaker 1>as they try and fill the shoes of t Y

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Hilton again. Josh Gordon is on waivers and can sign

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>with a team at four pm today, so pay attention

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 1>to his name. It'll be interesting to see if he

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>lands with the Indianapolis Colts. I definitely would have some

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>interest in that, But for me, Greg the next man

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>up is Zach Pascal. He played the snatch last week,

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.439
<v Speaker 1>did absolutely nothing with those snaps, but at least he

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>was on the field, and we have seen at times

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>this year he does have a good rapport with Jacobe

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>bur Set. I don't really like him in this matchup

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>without t Hy Hilton because the Pittsburgh Steelers secondary has

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>played really really well since mca fitzpatrick has joined the team.

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely think Fitzpatrick and the Steelers secondary has been really

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>really good since join since mckefits patrick joined the team.

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, z I, fescal is probably the guy.

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 1>I I agree with you, but against micafitz Patrick in

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the secondary, I probably don't throw him out there unless

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I have to. To me, you look at the tight ends.

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>We're still winning. Word on Eric Ebron, who I know

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't practice yesterday. We'll see if you're turning to practice today.

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen anything on it um, but both Eric

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Iron Jack Doyle. They're in play this week against Pittsburgh

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a tembens that has allowed production of the tight ends,

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 1>and we were just talking about the Colts tight ends

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>yesterday in our leftover segment. It's a good matchup. As

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, Greg Steelers allowing the eighth most fantasy points

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to opposing tight ends so far this season, and if

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Eric Ebron is out, Jack Doyle could be in play

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>for a mon Ster monster game. I think this is

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>more of a low scoring affair, grinded out game. I

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>think we see a lot of Marlon Mack. I think

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>we see a lot of the tight ends here, Jack Doyle.

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>If Ebron is active, he'll be involved as well. Maybe

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a Zach Pascal sprinkled in there,

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately I think it's a lot on Marlon Mack

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.959
<v Speaker 1>and the tight ends. Maybe maybe I'll just throw this

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>out there. Niheim Heinz starts to get a little bit

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>more involved as well. That makes sense. Zack Fascal is

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 1>going to the number one guy outside. You mentioned ninety

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>over ninety percent of the snaps last week, the Big

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Game two weeks ago. Maybe you'll see Chester Roger score

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>touchdown that usually happens with. I think Paris Campbell has

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>upside two where he has been banged up all season

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. He is a rookie wide receiver, so we've

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 1>seen some inconsistencies out of him. I was a Dion

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Kane guy. He was given some opportunity early on the season,

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>but again, just not getting the opportunities now and when

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>he got the chance earlier in the year, he really

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't make the most of it. Is that on him?

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it was he wasn't just being targeted enough. But

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what they say, Normally, if you're getting targeted,

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>it's because you're open. So if you're not, then maybe

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you're struggling against the opposing defense. So we'll see what happens.

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>But again, I think a lot of mac a lot

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of tight ends and look to pick up Zack Pescal

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:10.439
<v Speaker 1>All right, let me move on to let me go

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to the good side, right bad and then good the

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>good Davante Adams looks to be returning. Well, actually, I'm sorry,

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>let me stay in this game. Because James Conner also

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 1>didn't practice today for the Pittsburgh Steelers. I don't I

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen a listing on him yet, but he did

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>not practice on the third consecutive day. I gotta imagine

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>it's Jalen Samuel's time. That's what it looks like normally,

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, if a player is not practiced all week

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>long going into Friday as well. I know that James

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Conner said that he would like to play and expected

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>to play this week. Even Virginia said that James Conner

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>should be able to play in this game, but ultimately,

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:47.959
<v Speaker 1>if he doesn't practice, it looks more and more like

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Jaylen Samuel's is going to be the guy. So as

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of now, I have James Conner ranked is my RB thirteen.

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>If he's out Jalen Samuels maybe not to that level,

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 1>but would still be a really really good option. A

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.439
<v Speaker 1>top fifteen, top twenty running back. He is a legitimate

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>RB two and the way to attack the Colts defense

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>is on the ground. They allowed four point four yards

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>per carry to opposing running backs so far this season.

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Great for me. Juju Smith Schuster, we saw him have

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the monster game last week. I think he's a low

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.439
<v Speaker 1>end wide receiver too. I'm not really worried about this

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Colts defense, more so worried about the efficiency of Mason

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Rudolph and to me, Deontay Johnson. In the games that

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Mason Rudolf has started and finished, Deontay Johnson has scored

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>three touchdowns in those five games, so I am excited

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>about him. I think that he's a solid wide receiver.

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Three play all right, fair enough? Da Johnson a sleeper

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>for you this weekend. Let's move on to the good.

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Like I tried to do a moment ago, that's in

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay where Jamonte Adams is practice yet again today.

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>It looks like he's going to be trying to give

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>this one a go on Sunday, which is great news

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>for Aaron Rodgers and the Green Bay Backers, bad news

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>for you if you own any other wide receiver on

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the Backers. On the other side, the Los Angeles Chargers

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen has practiced. He looks ready to rock this

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>weekend as well. But the new offensive coordinator in Los Angeles,

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>what do we expect. I'll start off with the Packers

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>side of things and Davanta Adams. Look, we need you back, buddy,

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>because it has been tough sledding without you, especially in

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>those deeper leagues. You know, I have Davanta Adams on

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a few teams and he was my first round pick.

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I was very bullish, and you know he's likely going

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to see Casey Hayward in this matchup. Casey Hayward still

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a very good player. Is he as good as he

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>once was? I'm not so sure. So if Davanta Adams

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is active, you're getting him back in your lineup, and

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you can't really trust any of the other Packers wide receivers.

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Greg we were saying that without Davante Adams active, and

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>now with him back, I think it's a lot of him.

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of the running backs as we've seen

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>so far. And you know, we're gonna see maybe three

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to four targets to Jimmy Graham, a few deep shots

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>per game to MVS, you know, three to four targets

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to Geronimo Allison. But nobody is going to demand targets

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>like Davanta Adams and Aaron Jones are going to. Last week,

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>we just saw David Montgomery had breakout monster game against

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>this Los Angeles Chargers defense, which means like Aaron Jones

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>in this spot. Yeah, twenty touches last week, monster game

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>against the Kansas City Chiefs. I have them inside my

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>top twelve. So we're excited about Aaron Jones. And if

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you're desperate, there's four teams on a buy. I think

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Williams is a high in flex. I have him

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>as my RB twenty six, that in that range, so

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a high n RB three. He is

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a good flex option. On the other side, Greg Philip

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Rivers has been consistent. It's gonna be interesting to see

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>what they do with the new play color in with

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the Los Angeles Chargers, they probably lean on the run

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more, but if they fall down, fall

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>behind against this Green Bay Packers team, very good offense

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>for the Green Bay Packers and they're gonna have to

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball. Obviously, Philip Rivers solid quarterback. He's my

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>QB thirteen. He's been consistent. He's not gonna wow you,

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>but you know, to fifty to two, seventy five and

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns, it seems like a pretty safe floor for

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers. Greg. This is a really good matchup for

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers running backs as well, since they have returned

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Eckler of the snaps Melvin Gordon five three percent of

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the snaps during that span, eleven carries per game for Gordon,

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>four targets per game for Gordon. Eckler just four carries

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>per game during that span, seven point eight targets. Obviously,

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that's helped out by that monster sixteen target performance. But

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay allows the ninth uh the seventh most fantasy

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>points to opposing running backs. They allowed four point nine

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>four yards per carry, the most in the NFL, So

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm back in. I like Melvin Gordon as a solid

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>RV two and I like Austin Ekeler as more of

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>a low nd RB two. I think in PPR you're

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 1>getting him in your lineup. When they asked a couple

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of questions based on the players he's talked about already, Frank,

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Austin Ekeler, would you rather start

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>Austin Ekeler or Jalen Samuels if he starts, If Jalen

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Samuels is active without James Connor, definitely, Janleen Samuel. Would

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you rather start Austin Ekeler or Jamal Williams. I will

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>go with Austin Ekeler. I think both are good matchups,

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>but I trust Austin Ekeler to be more involved. In

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the past game, you know, Jamal Williams has scored touchdown,

0:17:57.680 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 1>but it hasn't come up with a lot of yardage,

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 1>so they have been flukey touchdowns where he just randomly

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>gets pulled into a play in the red zone and

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>ends up scoring a touchdown. I think Alson Ekelor is

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>actually a little bit safer Okay, we are going to

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>take a break. When we come back on the other side,

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 1>I want to get into Philadelphia and Chicago. A lot

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of people are really high on Jordan Howard this week

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>in the revenge game for Philadelphia. They expect to get

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to Shawn Jackson back in this offense on Chicago middle

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Robinski maybe on his last legs. And I had somebody

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>asked me last night, Hey, can I start Anthony Miller

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>this week? It's gets Philadelphia's brutal secondary and I'm like,

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>what am I missing something? So he has had at

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 1>least fifty receiving yards in three straight craps. He tells

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>me about the targets and like, what am I missing

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>here when it goes to Anthony Miller? So I tope

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 1>me Frank can help me out with that. A whole

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>lot more to come. This is the BFFs here on

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Sports Grid. I want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire.

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Dunk on your NBA DFS competition with Daily rodal dot

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Com and dominate on fandel and draft kings this season.

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Compete with the pros with rod dot Com optimizer and

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the most accurate projections in NBA DFS plus line up alerts,

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, lake swap support, and much more. Save ten

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk.

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Visit daily rodo dot com backslash dunk to learn more.

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>All right, so we'll get to this breaking news at

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:36.479
<v Speaker 1>the moment. But before I do that, I'm gonna mind

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you to dunk on your NBA d f S competition.

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Daily Roder dot com if you with

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the pros on FanDuel and DraftKings with the Daily Roder

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>dot com optimized are the most accurate projections and all

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of NBA dfs, you'll get a lot of alerts, breaking news,

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>late swamp support, and so much more. Save temper center

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>winning NBA DFS advice with the promo code dunk. That's

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Daily Roder dot com slash dunt to learn more. Jailor

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>order dot com slash dunk ten percent off now Daily

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>order dot com where millionaires are made. We told you

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 1>about James Conner a few moments ago. Practice report is out. Frank,

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>he's listened as doubtful for this Sunday. Fire up the

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Jaylen Samuels fire him up. Indeed, as they going to

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the break that a lot of people, including yourself, really

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>like Jordan Howard this week. Why is that and where

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>does he fall on your rankings? Yeah? So in games

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that the Eagles have won so far this year, and

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>they are projected to win this one, they are five

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>point favorites as of now, Jordan Howard averaging sixteen point

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>eight Fantasy points per game, whereas in losses the averages

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a six point one Fantasy points per game. Miles Sanders

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to play, he was banged up earlier in

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>the week. Chicago normally a vaunted run defense without a

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Cheam Hicks, the past couple of weeks, they are not

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the same. We have to start to get that through

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>our skulls. Chicago has allowed eight total touchdowns of running

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>backs over their last four games. Jordan Howard has eight

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>rushes inside of the five yard line this season. That

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>is tied for the third most in the NFL. Chicago

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>also allows the third most receptions for a game to

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>opposing running backs. Greig so Miles Sanders might even be

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>in play here as a PPR flex, but given the

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Bears are giving up so much production

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to running backs, they're giving up a lot of touchdowns. Recently,

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Greg Jordan Howard excels in games where the Eagles are

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>playing with the lead. I expect that in this game

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. The revenge factor as well. I have him

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>inside my top twenty at the running back position. Jim

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Day has Jordan Howard at RB fourteen. Wow, that's really

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 1>really high. Yeah, we're in on Jordan Howard this week.

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Big spot here for Jordan Howard this week. Play. He's

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 1>she certainly versus Chicago. That makes that makes a lot

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 1>of sense um as well. Do you want to hit

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>on Anthony Miller Anthony Miller, Well, look, if you're desperate,

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>there are four teams on a BI I understand why

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>people are thinking about it because I actually saw that

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>he has been pretty consistent recently and it's a good matchup.

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles secondary is getting healthier, so we have to

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>remember a lot of that production production that they gave

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 1>up was while guys were banged up. Ronald Darby wasn't

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in the lineup. They were without Mills as well, so

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>keep that in mind. Their secondary is getting healthier. Anthony

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Miller at least fifty two receiving yards in three straight games,

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>only three targets last week, but did have nine and

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>seven the two weeks before that. I am slightly intrigued.

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>If you play in a deeper league and you can

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>pick him up and stash him, I'm more interested in

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>doing that. I don't know that I throw him in

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>my line up this week, Craig. Fair enough. Let me

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>continue to want to get back earlier in the day.

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>It's in London, Frank, the first game of the day

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 1>between the Houston Texans and the Jacksonville Jaguars. In this one,

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 1>you were just talking to me during the break. Do

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>we start Kenny Stills after last week's disaster of an outing?

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Can we go back to him? You've been all over

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Chris Conneye this week. Now some other possibilities have opened

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>up with a Zach Pascal, for instance, what do we

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>do in both of these instances in Jacksonville and in Houston.

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>So I'll start off with the Houston Texans um the

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, specifically, you're starting DeAndre Hopkins. There's nothing to

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>see there, Kenny Stills. He played the same amount of snaps,

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>ran the same amount of routes as DeAndre Hopkins. So

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>he was on the field last week. But you have

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to know this is who Kenny Stills is He's a

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 1>lot like Will Fuller. He has that breakout potential on

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a weekly basis, but he also has a very low

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>floor and according to Pro Football Focus, he's actually gonna

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>see the tougher matchups. A J. Boyer does not shadow

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 1>opposing wide receivers. He plays his side of the field,

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and according to Pro Football Focus, a J. Boyer plays

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>on the same side of the field as Kenny Stills.

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 1>So I'm looking at this as a tougher matchup for

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>him this week, Greg, And if you don't plan to

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>play him, you can probably drop Kenny Stills for someone

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 1>else who has more upside because they do have to

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>buy in Week ten. On the other side the wide

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>receiver position, I like DJ Chark a lot going up

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>against this Texans secondary. There. They are allowing the third

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>most fantasy points to opposing wide receivers so far this season.

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I think d J. Chark is gonna have some success.

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>D D. Westbrook is questionable. Looks like he is leaning

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>towards playing. I'm not trying away from Chris Conley. I

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 1>think that D D. Westbrook is gonna be limited. I

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>think there's a chance he might even leave this game

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>once again. He left the game last week. I think

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you have to bump Chris Conley down the rankings a

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit, Greg, But it's still a really, really good matchup.

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Even if he doesn't see the seven eight targets that

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>we were hoping for. If he's if he sees five

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>or six against this defense, the way that he has

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.880
<v Speaker 1>been targeted recently the air yards over the past two weeks,

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that he could break off a big play.

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm still starting Chris Conley. I'm also still starting Kenny Stills. Man.

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 1>Like we talked about this last week that our our

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 1>process in our heads, it was kind of right, although

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it didn't happen. And I think when you picked him up,

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.199
<v Speaker 1>this was the opportunity wanted me, wanted him for these

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>two games. I like him in this spot against Jacksonville.

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>I like him more than Jay Johnson. We were just

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about, right, like, more than Chris Conley. Did you

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 1>start Conley or Stills and start Kenny Stills? Probably? I

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>think he's a better chance of a big play. Both

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 1>are the big playing guys. I think Henny Stills a

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>better chance of big play because I trust the Shawn

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Watson more than just Gardner Minshew. Yeah, the Jaguars secondary

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>is not nearly as good as it was when they

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>had Jalen Ramsey, obviously, but I'm still kind of worried.

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Me personally, I would go with Chris Conley. I think

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>high doesn't play as a high ind flex option. He's

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot like Jordan Howard. The games that they have won,

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.640
<v Speaker 1>he's average eleven Fantasy points per game. In the games

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 1>they lose, the averages under seven fantasy points per game.

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>So you know, back in Week two when they faced

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars, he went for twenty rushing twenty rushing attempts

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>for ninety yards. I think he's a high inflex Duke Johnson,

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>nothing more than a ppr biweek replacement. Obviously, you're using

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Leonard for Nette and Darren Fells, Greg, I really like

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Darren Fells. The Jaguars just allowed two touchdowns to Ryan Griffin,

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and Darren Fellows just scored two touchdowns himself. I don't

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 1>know that he's gonna do that again, but he is

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>inside inside my top ten. I like him a lot.

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Gardner Minshew spoke a lot about him on the Fantasy

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Football Frenzy. He has a top ten quarterback for me.

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 1>This week Dayne hask Is making his NFL debut as

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a starter in Buffalo actually had like a fart in Buffalo.

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh this week's hand on Josh Allen and the Bill's

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>tough spot. Good defense in Buffalo, fantasy wise haven't been

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>as good as you hope they would be, but Buffalo

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.959
<v Speaker 1>going against Washington. Love love love the Bills defense as

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 1>a stream this week if they are available. Loved them

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>for DFS as LL You gotta get away from Terry

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>McLarin in the spot. We saw his production completely fall

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.120
<v Speaker 1>off the map in the second half of that game

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>last week when Dwayne Haskins came in. I understand Haskins

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>has been practicing with the first team, so he should

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 1>be more prepared, but it's still a very tough secondary.

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>The Bills are six in past defense. Dv Away, I

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>like Adrian Peterson. Greg I keep going back to the

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>well with these old running backs. I don't know why,

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:26.239
<v Speaker 1>but AP has seen the workload since Bill Callahan has

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>taken over nineteen carries per game, and the Bills just

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>allowed a big game to Jordan Howard, big game to

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders there twenty eight and run defense div Away

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I like Adrian Peterson has a high end flakes option

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 1>greg this week. On the other side, Josh Allen. He's

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>not the upside play that we thought he was. He's

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>not rushing for as many yards as he was last year,

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>but he has been a safe play, which I didn't

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 1>really think that we would say about Josh Allen this week.

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 1>But he's giving you modest rushing production. He's not throwing

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.199
<v Speaker 1>for a ton of yards, but he's given you one,

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe two touchdowns per game. While did secondary is not

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a good one. I like Josh Allen. He's a fine quarterback.

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 1>He's inside my top twelve. I think he's a pretty

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>safe option this week. Francore and Devin Singletary again, pretty

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>good matchup. We just saw what Dalvin Cook and Alexander

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Madison did against this Washington defense. They're not a good

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>defense all around. So personally, I like Frank Gore a

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit more than Devin Singletary. I know Singletary got

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 1>the snaps last week, but they were playing from behind.

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I think they go back to Francore this week. I

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>like Francore a little bit more, but both are flex

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>options for me. Both flex options at the running back spot.

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>For Buffalo. With Washington, the biggest thing I want to

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>mention there is guys coming back. There is guys this week.

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>But talked about him during practice, frank he's on his

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>way back, which obviously a good thing, of course for

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the Washington football team. Frankly hit on one last game

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 1>quickly on they get a quick one um before we

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>hit our next break. And that's with Carolina and Tennessee.

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>The news coming out for Carolina is Cam Newton's not

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>come back anytime soon. He saw a second foot specialist

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>in Wisconsin and surgery seems likely, which we came about

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>six to nine months. Rehab has not worked for him.

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>On the other side with Tennant, was are you saying, Carolina,

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuel is questionable? According to Ron Rivera, it's more

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.719
<v Speaker 1>like probable. But he isn't practiced all week. How's he probable?

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 1>I think he practiced, didn't I think he didn't practice

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday practice something that he didn't practice. We hold on,

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 1>didn't practice Wednesday, practice Thursday, didn't practice Friday. I think. Nevertheless,

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Ron Rivera has said he's more like probable than questionable,

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>not guarantee, but there's definitely question marks. Surrounding Curtis Samuel.

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, Ryan Tannehill makes another start to

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Lenny Walker will not play for the Tennessee Titans, leaving

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>John new Smith to get another start for Tennessee. Heads

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>were chaking down. Yeah, I don't really love this game

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 1>for fantasy just all around. It's a low total forty one.

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Carolina Panthers are a four point favorite.

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean that spread might have changed, but three and

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorite for the Carolina Panthers. I just

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>don't expect a lot on either side here. Obviously, using

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey, it's a good matchup for Greg Olsen. The

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Titans have allowed four touchdowns to tight ends so far

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>this season, but Greg Olsen has had thirteen yards or

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>less in three of his last four games, so it's

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>hard to trust any of these tight ends that we

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about that are lower end streaming tight ends. Me personally,

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I would go with Darren Fells over Greg Olsen. But

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>once we get into that mix with the Ryan Griffins

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of the world, the Jack Doyle's I like Doyle more

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>than I like um more than I like Greg Olsen

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. In this spot, Greg, but I do like.

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I like DJ Moore, I like DJ More just because

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Kurs look, they say he's probably I don't think that

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>he's on healthy. I'm not that scared off by the

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee Titans secondary as well, their twentieth this season. In

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>past defense TV away, So to me, d J. Moore

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a high end wide receiver three, I would kind of

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>steer away from Curtis Samuel. I just don't think that

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>he's one healthy. Very big game coming for Derrick Henry

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>greg I love him for doing a lot this week

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. He's had at least fifteen carries in every

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>game this season. Carolina has allowed eight total touchdowns to

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>running backs over their last three games. We just saw

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>what Tevin Coleman did last week. Very excited about Derrick

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Henry in the spot, and I want to get away

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>from the Titans wide receivers. It's just is it gonna

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>be Corey Davis? Is it gonna be a J? Brown shast?

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Defense for Caroline has actually been good their third and

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>past defense v away once again. If you need a

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>streaming tight end, doesn't look like Delaney Walker is gonna play.

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>John who Smith played last week, led the team in targets, receptions,

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards and scored a touchdown. So he's right in

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that mix. He's in that mix with the Doyle, the

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Darren Fells, the Greg Olsen, that back end, top twelve

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>tight end this week, top tight end that this week,

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Jack Doyle, John H. Smith, but not Chris Herndon. He's

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>un likely to play for the New York Jets. We'll

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>talk with the Jets and the Dolphins. Patrick Mahomes not

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>so much against the Vikings, Vikings and Chiefs hold. I

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>want to go, not much time to do it the

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>best weekend when we come back, you're thefs. Want to

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot com and dominate on

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros with

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Daily rodal dot Com optimizer and the most accurate projections

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts, breaking news, lake

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 1>swap support, and much more. Save ten percent on winning

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS advice with promo code Dunk. Visit Daily Rodo

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com backslash dunc to learn more. BFFs, Rocket and Rolling.

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I've got a silent disco tonight. It's a Halloween related

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>one as well. So you bet your sweet Willie. The

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Stashes coming out tonight and tomorrow night. My family their

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>annual Halloween party. Still celebrating Halloween, will just snash be

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>out on Monday. I haven't decided you what do you think?

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Should I keep it around? No? Why? I don't want

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that on my wedding. We can't have this. Oh well,

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>if you don't like it, it's day coming. I knew

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that was coming, all right, I said before the break.

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>The Jets not expected to get Chris Herndon back quite yet,

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>as the waiting for Herndon continues. Jets facing the Dolphins.

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>If you watch the FanDuel hurry up games in the

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>fresh No really, Oh yeah, my god, he did it

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>for you. He called you out as if things couldn't

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>get for my New York kids. Honestly, I might be

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>room for the Dolphins too. Just hey, if they win

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 1>this game. If the Dolphins cannot, how how do you

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>bring back Adam Gates if they lose this game? So

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping that that's the same reaction that they have.

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 1>The Squeaky Wheel gets the oil. Levian Bell all week

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about how he wants to be used more this

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>week heading into this matchup against Miami, and I really

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>hope he does because it is a great matchup. They

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>allow the most fantasy points to opposing running backs. We

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 1>just saw James Connor have a monster game. Love Levian

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Bell on fandal DFS this week seven thousand dollars. Sam Donald,

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I think is a streaming quarterback, not to the level

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of Derek Carr and Gardner Minshew. He is my quarterback

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>sixteen on the week, but again should be able to

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>have some success. Miami Dolphins have allowed multiple touchdowns in

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>every game but one, even against Mason Rudolph last week,

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>which means if we like Sam Donald, greg, we have

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to like the weapons for the Jets. I think it's

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a good bounceback spot for both Robbie Anderson and Jamison Crowder.

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>They're both inside my top thirty six their wide receiver

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>threes like Robbie Anderson a little bit more. We've seen

0:33:57.600 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins give up some big plays and we know

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that that's what Abby Anderson excels at. If you are

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>desperate for a tight end and you cannot pick up

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Fells and you cannot pick up Jack Doyle. I think

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that Ryan Griffin isn't play. Miami Dolphins defense is very bad.

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 1>Chris Herndon is not playing. Ryan Griffin just scored two

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns as well, so I think I think he is

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>in play as a streaming tight end. On the other side, look,

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much defense is gonna be in

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>this game. The total is like super low because the

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>teams are bad, but they're very bad on defense. So

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>if it's magic, if you're desperate in the super Flex League,

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he's in play. Mark Walton seven percent of

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the snaps last week. The Jets give up a ton

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of touchdowns, they give up a ton of receptions. I

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.439
<v Speaker 1>like Mark Walton has a high inflex option this week,

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:45.240
<v Speaker 1>DeVante Parker and Preston Williams greg start everybody in this game. Basically,

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the defenses are very bad. Defenses are bad, These teams

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>are bad. These coaches at the's one of them very bad. Sorry, Frank.

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>The Kids Cheese are hosting the Minnesota Vikings. We don't

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 1>expect Patrick Mahomes play in this one, although next week

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly seems like a possibility. Nate Taylor just tweeted out

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>as I was going through this matt Patrick Mahomes is

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 1>questionable for Sundaye's injury report. I will come out later today,

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 1>but he I guess they're gonna call him questionable. I

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 1>don't expect him to play, but I can't see him

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:20.760
<v Speaker 1>being like the active backup. I guess great. That helps

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>nobody exactly nobody. I hope that Patrick Mahomes place doesn't

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 1>affect anything right though, because you're obviously gonna start Tyree Hill,

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 1>You're obviously din start Travis Kelsey running backs. You're gonna

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>handle separately the Patrick Mahomes and you don't feel good

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>about the running backs here in this spot regardless. The

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Vikings are tenth in the NFL in run defense dv

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>A way, they've been very stingy. They allow the fifth

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 1>fewest fantasy points. You don't know if it's gonna be

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 1>McCoy because the last time we saw McCoy he was

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 1>holding the ball out like a loaf of bread, like

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 1>he always does. He fumbles the football. Damian Williams comes

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>in and ends up scoring your touchdown this week. So

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>how do you trust any of the Chiefs running backs

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>given that it's a committee. They can't run, block, and

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a tough match up against Minnesota, I would stay

0:35:57.520 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 1>away from all those guys. Like you said, Greg, you're

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 1>using entire re kill, you're using Travis Kelsey obviously. Sammy

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.799
<v Speaker 1>Watkins is first game back played scent of the snap.

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:08.879
<v Speaker 1>He had eight targets that accounted for of the targets share.

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 1>The Vikings secondary not very good. I'm actually kind of

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 1>in on Sammy Watkins this week, Greg, and I feel

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>like nobody is talking about him. Whether Matt Moore is

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback he targeted Sammy Watkins all those times last week,

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:22.399
<v Speaker 1>the eight targets, and if not, Patrick Mahomes is back,

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and you gotta feel good about this pass game regardless.

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think, you know, if you're kind of desperate

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 1>for a wide receiver and you've been looking for a

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>reason to start Sammy Watkins, I feel pretty good about

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>him against this against the Vikings this week. That secondary

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is not what it once was, certainly not. The roads

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 1>have been open for most of this season. Trey Wayne

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:42.400
<v Speaker 1>is actually played better, uh than Java Rose. It feels

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 1>like he might be better than Xavier Rose at this point. Yeah,

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.359
<v Speaker 1>at least this season for Minnesota. The expected to get

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Adam feeling back, which is good at Kansas cy Secondary

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>actually looked better than you'd think with the with the

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:58.359
<v Speaker 1>UM Minnesota Vikings guys, he started, how you always would

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty much you do. But the problem is, we really

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen a game this year, Greg. We're both Feeling

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and Diggs have gone off. And the Chiefs, to their credit,

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 1>their past defense has played really well this year, their

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 1>fourth and past defense d v o A, and they're

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 1>not allowing a ton of fantasy points to opposing quarterbacks

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>or wide receivers. So I think you're still using Feeling

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:23.839
<v Speaker 1>and Diggs if you are not. Adam Feeling ruled out

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 1>for Sunday. All right, fire up the Stefan. Since I

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 1>said he was the hottest commodity in fantasy football, that's

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly what he's been. Maybe not, but still we're firing

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>up Stefon Diggs. Forget about everything I just said, but

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>not really. It is a tougher matchup. They're playing good

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>against wide receivers in the past games, but the targets

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be there for Stefon Diggs. They have been.

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>He's gone for at least a hundred and forty yards

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in three straight games. He's you know, I had some

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:52.760
<v Speaker 1>really big games. He had the three touchdown game against

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles. If you own Stefen Diggs, I think you

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:59.360
<v Speaker 1>are throwing him out there, and maybe if you're really desperate,

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>BC john pon. But I think that there are a

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of other options this week that we've talked about

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that might be available, from the Chris conn Lee's to

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the Zach Pascal's. I don't think that you have to

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:11.319
<v Speaker 1>do the BC Johnson thing. And obviously, Greg, we loved

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Cook for DFS. We do talk you have to

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 1>play Vin Cook in DFS this week. Latest news Adam

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Steelan out this week for the Minnesota Vikings. Let's continue

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:22.879
<v Speaker 1>on Frank, let me get to I'm not I'm gonna

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:24.320
<v Speaker 1>skip over to Troy in Oakland. See we get we

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 1>thought a lot about that yesterday, so we have time.

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll come back. I want to make sure everybody in

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that game, it's all you need to know. I want

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to hit on Seattle and Tampa Bay. Russell Wilson and

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks taking on Tampa Bay Buccaneers team once again

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 1>without O. J. Howard in the lineup. He has been

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>ruled out. Cameron Bray, We're still a waiting. We'red on

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:45.360
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen that one yet. Um, but it's Seahawks

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in the box. Yeah. O J. Howard has already been

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:50.240
<v Speaker 1>ruled out. We gotta see what happens here with Cameron.

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Brad was talking about this with the Fellas over on

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Football Frenzy. The Seahawks have allowed the fourth

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:57.800
<v Speaker 1>most fantasy points to opposing tight end, So I understand

0:38:57.840 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it feels like we're kind of getting sucked back into

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:02.839
<v Speaker 1>the can break trap. But he had six targets last

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 1>week and one of those was in the end zone.

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>The process was there. I think that in a game

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:09.839
<v Speaker 1>with a total of this high grade of fifty two

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>points total, one of the highest on the week, that

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 1>if you're desperate for a tight end again, like we

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:16.959
<v Speaker 1>keep saying that the tight end position is terrible, because

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:20.399
<v Speaker 1>it is, but every single week, the process is there

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 1>for a few tight end streams, and I think it's

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 1>there once again for Cameron Braid, for Jack Doyle, for

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Griffin, for Darren Fells, for a few of those

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. So I'm going back to the well. It'll

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see what happens between Chris Godwin and

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Evans I don't think that the Seahawks secondary is very good.

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 1>They just allowed matt Shop mat Shop to tour for

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:44.240
<v Speaker 1>over four hundred yards last week. So yes, Jamis Winston

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>is inside my top twelve at the quarterback position. With

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 1>a total this high, I think we see some back

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and forth. I think this is a big Russell Wilson

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 1>blow up week. We've seen that in games. How about

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 1>this great first step In games decided by six points

0:39:57.120 --> 0:40:00.040
<v Speaker 1>or less, Russell Wilson is averaging twenty nine point in

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:03.319
<v Speaker 1>three fantasy points per game. In blowouts this season where

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 1>he is won by seven points or more, he is

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>averaging fifteen point three points per game. So, like I've

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:10.840
<v Speaker 1>said all year long, when it comes to Russell Wilson,

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 1>when the games are competitive and you get some back

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and forth between the two teams, Russell Wilson is going

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to have monster games. Guess what. This past defense for

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay Bucks not very good. I love Tyler Lockett,

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I love DK Metcalf This week, I love Russell Wilson.

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Chris Carson tough matchup going up against this Bucks run

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:32.239
<v Speaker 1>defense their first in the NFL, and run defense TV

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 1>away doesn't matter. Chris Carson has seen at least twenty

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>carries in four straight games. You start everybody in this

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>game outside of whoever the Seahawks tight end is. We're

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 1>not doing that again. We're not touching the Tampa Bay

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Bucks running backs because I just think that we're getting

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of throwing the football here. And I hope

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that this is a game where both Evans and Godwin

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 1>could go off greg because they have played seven games together,

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 1>they have only had big games in the same game

0:40:56.960 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 1>twice so far this season. I think we get one

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of those games again this week. Sail secondary has not

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:04.279
<v Speaker 1>been good this year, a big low spot potentially for

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Chris Gonwin and Mike Evans if Jamis Winston could just

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.120
<v Speaker 1>get the ball to his top two wide receivers. The

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 1>next game up for US, Frank brings us to Denver

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 1>in Mile High City as Bronco's host Baker Mayfield and

0:41:15.239 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the Browns. The Ronco's Brandon Allen when making his first

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 1>start of the year, but potentially not his last, as

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Joe Flacco was placed on injured reserve earlier today. He

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 1>has done for the season. We will see Drew Lock

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 1>at some point, but he is not the active backup,

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 1>he will not be ready to go. Ripen will be

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the backup off the practice squad for Denver as Brandon

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Allen makes his first start against Cleveland, and Greg, I

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 1>wish that I could tell you more about Brandon Allen.

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 1>What I can. I know that's supposed to be my job.

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what to expect from this guy. And

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:45.319
<v Speaker 1>it sucks because Courtland Sutton has been so consistent this year,

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 1>at least seventy receiving yards in every game this season.

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:52.440
<v Speaker 1>But it's a tough Brown secondary. Brandon Allen making the

0:41:52.480 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 1>first start of his career. Courtland Sutton, whereas he was

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:58.240
<v Speaker 1>inside my top twelve last week at the wide receiver position,

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:00.759
<v Speaker 1>more of a low end wide fever two for me

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 1>this week because of that, those those question marks regarding

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Allen and this pass game. But what the Broncos

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>should be able to do is run the football. We've

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 1>seen the past two weeks. Royce Freeman has scored a

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:15.720
<v Speaker 1>touchdown each of those. Philip Lindsay a little bit banged

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:17.799
<v Speaker 1>up this week. Pay attention to that he's been dealing

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:19.800
<v Speaker 1>with a risk injury. He actually had surgery on that

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:22.760
<v Speaker 1>risk in the off season. So just really pay attention

0:42:22.840 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to the the status of Phillip Lindsay heading into this game.

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 1>But I like both Lindsay and Freeman as top twenty

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:31.440
<v Speaker 1>running backs. The way to attack the Browns defense is

0:42:31.560 --> 0:42:34.880
<v Speaker 1>by running the football. We would have liked no offense

0:42:34.920 --> 0:42:37.440
<v Speaker 1>if Flacco was the quarterback because fans just saw eight targets.

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:39.640
<v Speaker 1>But again with Brandon Allen, let's take it away and

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:42.800
<v Speaker 1>see approach and see what happens this week. Greg, Baker

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield so far this season not very good. He you know,

0:42:45.760 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 1>he had a lot to say about Daniel Jones. Daniel

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Jones performing a lot better than Baker Mayfield. Baker has

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a six touchdowns and twelve interceptions on this season. Obviously,

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you're starting Nick Chubb. This is the last game of

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 1>huntless Chubb, so it's gonna be interesting to see next

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:04.840
<v Speaker 1>week how this usage breaks down between Nick Chubb and

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt. Greg. I asked Jim Day about this on

0:43:09.400 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the Frenzy. I asked, do you start Odell Beckham? How

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:14.799
<v Speaker 1>do you feel about him? Because all logic says tough

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 1>matchup against Chris Harris. The Broncos have been stingy against

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. This here in fantasy. But how do you

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 1>bench him right? Like he was your first second round

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 1>pick and if he goes off on your bench, you're

0:43:25.200 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna feel terrible about You're still You're stuck. You are stuck.

0:43:28.680 --> 0:43:31.919
<v Speaker 1>I agree, And if I own Odell Beckham, he's still

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a top twenty wide receiver for me. This week. Again,

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:37.360
<v Speaker 1>like Jim said, you can't explain it, but you just

0:43:37.440 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 1>gotta still roll out there with Odell Beckham. You know,

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the target share hasn't been where it wasn't years past.

0:43:43.160 --> 0:43:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Still it's a very good Mark Jarvis Landry for me,

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:48.399
<v Speaker 1>more of a low end wide receiver. Three this week

0:43:48.520 --> 0:43:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Sunday Night Football, Lamar Jackson and the Baltimore Ravens taking

0:43:52.840 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>on the New England Pages. I really like Lamar Jackson

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:58.879
<v Speaker 1>and the Ravens in this game. What are we doing?

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:01.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what do we do? Win? Man? This

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 1>is like one of those games were like, yes, the

0:44:03.719 --> 0:44:07.719
<v Speaker 1>a f C North, it's coming, Like they're gonna show

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 1>up and they're gonna stop the New England Patriots. Well

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:12.840
<v Speaker 1>guess what. Big Ben and the Steelers played the Patriots

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:14.919
<v Speaker 1>in Week one. Great. They were three and a half

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:20.120
<v Speaker 1>point underdogs they got demolished. It just sets up for

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:23.839
<v Speaker 1>another one of those games. And it's tough figuring out

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:26.719
<v Speaker 1>whether you should use Lamar Jackson or not, because the

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Patriots takeaway your offense is best weapon. Their offenses best

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 1>weapon is Lamar Jackson being able to run the football.

0:44:34.000 --> 0:44:35.279
<v Speaker 1>And I think that they're gonna do a lot of

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever the Chargers did last year Greg where they have

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:39.800
<v Speaker 1>more DBS on the field, a lot of speed on

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the field. They really try and put that spy on

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson and have him try to beat them passing

0:44:45.960 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the ball. With that being said, I cannot trust Hollywood

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Brown in the spot. I know that he is likely

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:53.320
<v Speaker 1>going to play. I can't do it against his secondary

0:44:53.600 --> 0:44:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I understand he's one of those guys that can really

0:44:55.760 --> 0:44:58.480
<v Speaker 1>just make your week with one big play. I can't

0:44:58.520 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 1>do it. It's his first game back from injury. I

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:03.239
<v Speaker 1>am fading Hollywood Brown this week. Mark Andrews. I am

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:05.800
<v Speaker 1>still going to use Ham because he's gonna have to

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:07.799
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball to somebody. The targets have been there

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 1>for Mark Andrews hasn't necessarily been getting it done recently,

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:12.719
<v Speaker 1>but they're gonna have to score some points. I think

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes from Mark Andrews. Tom Brady still inside of

0:45:16.080 --> 0:45:18.719
<v Speaker 1>my top twelve, but the Ravens secondary is getting healthier, Greg,

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Smith is back in the spot you're still using.

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 1>Julian Edelman. I want to take another wait and see

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 1>approach with Mohammed san new versus Philip Dorset, Tony Michelle

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 1>more of a low n RB two and I think

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 1>James White as always high inflexing PPR leagues. Master look

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:35.799
<v Speaker 1>this weekend with your lineups come up next is wayer talk,

0:45:35.840 --> 0:45:38.480
<v Speaker 1>followed by out the window for Frank Stavil. I'm Greg Sousman,

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:40.719
<v Speaker 1>have a great weekend, enjoy the games. We'll see you

0:45:40.760 --> 0:45:46.040
<v Speaker 1>get him Monday. We hope. I want to be the

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 1>next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA DFS competition

0:45:50.040 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 1>with Daily Rodal dot com and dominate on fandel and

0:45:53.120 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros with Daily Rodal

0:45:56.160 --> 0:45:59.759
<v Speaker 1>dot com optimizer and the most accurate projections in NBA

0:45:59.840 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 1>d f S, plus line up alerts, breaking news, lake

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:06.560
<v Speaker 1>swap support and much more. Safe on winning NBA DFS

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:09.799
<v Speaker 1>advice with promo code Dunk Visit Daily road dot com

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 1>backslash dunk to learn more. So what did happen? What

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:26.160
<v Speaker 1>did Here's what you missed on the BFPS. As we said,

0:46:26.239 --> 0:46:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake, Emmanuel Sanders got the job done for a

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:32.239
<v Speaker 1>roll of teams. That's good. The bad Heavin Coleman very bad.

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:36.160
<v Speaker 1>That whole thing that we said yesterday about taking the

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 1>over in his total yardage prop Von, if we could

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 1>just kind of delete that from existence, from the Internet,

0:46:42.239 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 1>from audio boom wherever, like, just delete that because it

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:48.359
<v Speaker 1>never happened. Of course, what am I even talking about?

0:46:48.680 --> 0:46:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Brita was very good. Fifteen carries for seventy eight yards.

0:46:51.960 --> 0:46:54.400
<v Speaker 1>This was frustrating. I still think most weeks Tavin Coleman

0:46:54.480 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the guy greg and he played

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:59.840
<v Speaker 1>more snaps and he still saw, you know, sixteen running

0:46:59.840 --> 0:47:02.440
<v Speaker 1>back opportunities. He was targeted four times in the past game,

0:47:02.480 --> 0:47:05.840
<v Speaker 1>met Brito only targeted twice. So look, these things are

0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen whenever there's a running back by committee. But

0:47:08.000 --> 0:47:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it's still a really good team with a really good

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 1>offensive line and they want to run the football. I

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:14.160
<v Speaker 1>think last night was an outlier game. It was a

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:16.360
<v Speaker 1>really good matchup, and you know what, I give credit

0:47:16.400 --> 0:47:19.879
<v Speaker 1>to Kyle Shanahan, because you should change up your game plan,

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:22.920
<v Speaker 1>your offensive game plan, based on the deficiencies of the

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:25.359
<v Speaker 1>team that you're playing. Now, I'm sure that they could

0:47:25.400 --> 0:47:28.360
<v Speaker 1>have run the football more against the Cardinals and it

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 1>probably would have worked out. But going into this game,

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Shanahan likely knew that the Cardinals are very weak

0:47:34.120 --> 0:47:36.080
<v Speaker 1>against the past, and that's exactly what he did. And

0:47:36.160 --> 0:47:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we saw a career day out of Gucci Garoppolo greg

0:47:38.800 --> 0:47:41.640
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns over three hundred yards. Yesterday on the show,

0:47:41.680 --> 0:47:44.879
<v Speaker 1>we were debating Jimmy Garoppolo or Kyler Murray. Kyler Murray

0:47:44.920 --> 0:47:47.040
<v Speaker 1>ended up having a pretty good game as well, saved

0:47:47.120 --> 0:47:49.640
<v Speaker 1>by not the bell but by Andy is a Bellah

0:47:49.760 --> 0:47:51.920
<v Speaker 1>see what I did there. But Jimmy Garoppolo I ended

0:47:52.000 --> 0:47:53.880
<v Speaker 1>up going with him in my super flex lineup. I

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 1>benched Kyler Murray. I have Minshew in there. I feel

0:47:56.640 --> 0:47:59.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty good about it. Greig, absolutely you should feel good

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:02.320
<v Speaker 1>about that. A great decision, Frank, I was proud of you.

0:48:02.760 --> 0:48:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Emmanuel Sanders, awesome game as one man. This guy just

0:48:05.760 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 1>continues to defy all sports medicine logic. Again, I understand

0:48:11.239 --> 0:48:14.719
<v Speaker 1>he's getting further and further removed, but at age thirty two,

0:48:14.760 --> 0:48:16.759
<v Speaker 1>whatever he is to be playing at this level coming

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:19.360
<v Speaker 1>off a torn achilles greg it truly is commendable. And

0:48:19.520 --> 0:48:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it looks like we might have a legit high end

0:48:21.600 --> 0:48:24.360
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver three on our hands. Moving forward for Emmanuel Sanders,

0:48:24.440 --> 0:48:25.759
<v Speaker 1>how about this, I'll throw it out there for you.

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Obviously this was a great matchup. Do you try and

0:48:28.080 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 1>sell Emmanuel Sanders? Considering he has scored in back to

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:34.760
<v Speaker 1>back games. I would absolutely the Santancis four niners. Unlike

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:37.120
<v Speaker 1>last night, they don't really throw the ball. It's not

0:48:37.200 --> 0:48:39.399
<v Speaker 1>their game and they want to run the football. There's

0:48:39.400 --> 0:48:41.640
<v Speaker 1>another game coming up against the Cardinal soon. I believe that.

0:48:41.760 --> 0:48:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So in my in a pool, that idea of the

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Survivor player pool. So I saved that George Kittle and

0:48:48.560 --> 0:48:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy g for the next one, the one at home

0:48:51.320 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in two weeks. Last night I used Tevin Coleman. Hopefully

0:48:54.120 --> 0:48:57.000
<v Speaker 1>kills healthy enough to play. You know what's gonna happen, Frank,

0:48:57.080 --> 0:48:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Tevin Coleman's gonna have four touchdowns in two weeks, and

0:48:59.480 --> 0:49:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Kiddo and Jimmy, you gonna do nothing. Absolutely, that's a

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:05.120
<v Speaker 1>lock the lock in entry you can't get it right.

0:49:05.520 --> 0:49:07.160
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I'm looking at the matchup coming up

0:49:07.160 --> 0:49:09.399
<v Speaker 1>for Sanders. He has Seattle next week. While it says

0:49:09.520 --> 0:49:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that you know, the fantasy numbers show that the Seahawks

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:14.800
<v Speaker 1>are tough against opposing wide receivers, I don't think that

0:49:14.840 --> 0:49:16.120
<v Speaker 1>they are a very good defense, and I think that

0:49:16.120 --> 0:49:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you can actually pass on Seattle