WEBVTT - Taxi Driver Review | Archive

0:00:21.244 --> 0:00:24.604
<v Speaker 1>Film Spotting is presented by Regal Unlimited, the all you

0:00:24.645 --> 0:00:27.565
<v Speaker 1>can watch movie subscription pass that pays for itself in

0:00:27.685 --> 0:00:31.365
<v Speaker 1>just two visits. See any standard two D movie anytime

0:00:31.725 --> 0:00:34.845
<v Speaker 1>with no blackoutdates or restrictions. Sign up now on the

0:00:34.885 --> 0:00:37.284
<v Speaker 1>Regal app or at the link in our description and

0:00:37.445 --> 0:00:41.685
<v Speaker 1>use code film spot twenty six to receive fifteen percent off.

0:00:42.445 --> 0:00:44.805
<v Speaker 1>Wednesdays are when we like to drop something from the

0:00:44.845 --> 0:00:49.925
<v Speaker 1>Film Spotting Archive, that massive collection that's available at all

0:00:49.965 --> 0:00:52.925
<v Speaker 1>times to Film Spotting family members. But on Wednesdays we

0:00:53.004 --> 0:00:56.085
<v Speaker 1>share something with all of you. Now, on Friday Show,

0:00:56.125 --> 0:00:59.204
<v Speaker 1>we're going to take another look at Best Picture nominee

0:00:59.245 --> 0:01:02.124
<v Speaker 1>one battle after another. That's coming ahead, But right now,

0:01:02.365 --> 0:01:04.884
<v Speaker 1>for this week's Archive Show, we have a film released

0:01:05.245 --> 0:01:08.005
<v Speaker 1>fifty years ago this weekend that went on to be

0:01:08.045 --> 0:01:12.604
<v Speaker 1>nominated for four Oscars a year later, Martin Scorsese's Taxi Driver.

0:01:13.125 --> 0:01:13.884
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, how about that?

0:01:13.925 --> 0:01:17.485
<v Speaker 3>Best Picture, Best Actor for de Niro, Best Supporting Actress

0:01:17.565 --> 0:01:22.084
<v Speaker 3>for Jodie Foster, and score Bernard Hermann. Josh it lost

0:01:22.164 --> 0:01:25.884
<v Speaker 3>all four? How about that? Did we forget to mention

0:01:26.045 --> 0:01:29.725
<v Speaker 3>Martin Scorsese's nomination? No, we did not, Because Martin Scorsese

0:01:30.164 --> 0:01:34.884
<v Speaker 3>did not get nominated. We have actually reviewed Taxi Driver

0:01:35.365 --> 0:01:38.604
<v Speaker 3>twice on the show. We did discuss it as part

0:01:38.604 --> 0:01:41.684
<v Speaker 3>of our seven from seventy six Best Year Ever series.

0:01:41.765 --> 0:01:44.964
<v Speaker 3>That's what you're gonna hear first. But I was talking

0:01:44.964 --> 0:01:46.605
<v Speaker 3>to Sam and I said, you know, why not as

0:01:46.645 --> 0:01:48.925
<v Speaker 3>a little treat, let's really dip into the archive. Let's

0:01:48.965 --> 0:01:52.925
<v Speaker 3>make it a two fer. Originally, twenty eleven, Dana Stevens

0:01:52.965 --> 0:01:56.325
<v Speaker 3>guest hosted with me and we talked about this show

0:01:56.885 --> 0:02:01.325
<v Speaker 3>as part of a thirty fifth anniversary conversation. We did

0:02:01.325 --> 0:02:04.485
<v Speaker 3>that along with our top five Robert de Niro scenes.

0:02:04.525 --> 0:02:07.684
<v Speaker 3>So me and you and me and Dana talking about

0:02:07.725 --> 0:02:08.644
<v Speaker 3>the film Taxi Driver.

0:02:08.685 --> 0:02:09.205
<v Speaker 4>How about that?

0:02:09.565 --> 0:02:11.965
<v Speaker 1>Lots of Taxi Driver talk. You had to go to

0:02:12.005 --> 0:02:14.885
<v Speaker 1>the archive, the basement of the archives, yes, to get

0:02:14.925 --> 0:02:17.485
<v Speaker 1>that other one, and yeah, double dip.

0:02:17.325 --> 0:02:17.765
<v Speaker 4>Here for you.

0:02:18.045 --> 0:02:21.565
<v Speaker 3>There you go from March twenty twenty one, here is

0:02:21.565 --> 0:02:24.845
<v Speaker 3>that seven from seventy six conversation, and then way back

0:02:24.965 --> 0:02:27.285
<v Speaker 3>to twenty eleven, myself and Danas Stevens.

0:02:27.805 --> 0:02:29.725
<v Speaker 5>You just want to go out and again, you know,

0:02:29.845 --> 0:02:32.364
<v Speaker 5>like really really really.

0:02:32.165 --> 0:02:33.125
<v Speaker 2>Do something.

0:02:35.805 --> 0:02:36.405
<v Speaker 6>Taxi life.

0:02:36.445 --> 0:02:42.484
<v Speaker 2>You mean, well, knot's.

0:02:44.644 --> 0:02:54.245
<v Speaker 5>Oh, I just want to go out I really, I

0:02:54.285 --> 0:02:57.445
<v Speaker 5>really want to got some bad ideas in my head.

0:02:57.484 --> 0:02:57.845
<v Speaker 6>I just.

0:02:59.605 --> 0:02:59.685
<v Speaker 5>So.

0:02:59.845 --> 0:03:03.605
<v Speaker 1>Taxi Driver released in February of nineteen seventy six. It

0:03:03.764 --> 0:03:06.844
<v Speaker 1>won the Palm d'Or at the can Film Festival that May,

0:03:07.325 --> 0:03:10.405
<v Speaker 1>and went on to become the seventeenth highest grossing film

0:03:10.484 --> 0:03:14.565
<v Speaker 1>of the year, Nominated for four Oscars, including Best Picture.

0:03:14.965 --> 0:03:18.845
<v Speaker 1>Scorsese himself, however, not nominated for Best Director. That didn't

0:03:18.845 --> 0:03:23.205
<v Speaker 1>happen until Raging Bull. The screenwriter of Taxi Driver, Paul Schrader,

0:03:23.285 --> 0:03:26.924
<v Speaker 1>also not nominated. However, Robert de Niro and Jodi Foster.

0:03:27.044 --> 0:03:30.445
<v Speaker 1>They both got acting nods, along with the posthumous nomination

0:03:30.565 --> 0:03:37.005
<v Speaker 1>for composer Bernard Herman, who died shortly after completing the score. Now, Adam,

0:03:37.125 --> 0:03:39.445
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even going to try to compete with your

0:03:39.485 --> 0:03:42.445
<v Speaker 1>brilliant recent silence of the Lambs set up when you

0:03:42.525 --> 0:03:45.925
<v Speaker 1>played Hannibal Lecter. Instead, I'm just going to steal a

0:03:46.005 --> 0:03:49.525
<v Speaker 1>question that our producer Sam posed about Taxi Driver in

0:03:49.605 --> 0:03:52.405
<v Speaker 1>this week's Film Spotting newsletter. And if you want to

0:03:52.445 --> 0:03:55.605
<v Speaker 1>get that weekly email from Sam, just sign up at

0:03:55.605 --> 0:03:59.725
<v Speaker 1>filmspotting dot net slash newsletter. In it es listeners would

0:03:59.805 --> 0:04:05.365
<v Speaker 1>Travis Bickle have participated in the January sixth Capitol riot. Now,

0:04:05.405 --> 0:04:08.365
<v Speaker 1>I'll admit this wasn't on my mind as I contemplated

0:04:08.405 --> 0:04:09.964
<v Speaker 1>revisiting Taxi Driver.

0:04:10.285 --> 0:04:11.045
<v Speaker 4>But it should have been.

0:04:11.485 --> 0:04:14.685
<v Speaker 1>In my book Movies Are Prayers, I included Taxi Driver

0:04:14.925 --> 0:04:17.565
<v Speaker 1>along with another best year ever title that we've considered,

0:04:17.645 --> 0:04:20.685
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety nine's Fight Club, in the chapter on movies

0:04:20.725 --> 0:04:22.205
<v Speaker 1>as prayers of anger.

0:04:22.965 --> 0:04:23.365
<v Speaker 4>Anger.

0:04:23.765 --> 0:04:27.885
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, a particularly male white American anger was definitely

0:04:27.925 --> 0:04:29.964
<v Speaker 1>on display by those who attack.

0:04:29.725 --> 0:04:30.604
<v Speaker 4>The Capitol Building.

0:04:31.165 --> 0:04:34.085
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, it's probably one of the defining qualities of

0:04:34.165 --> 0:04:37.724
<v Speaker 1>Robert De Niro's Travis Bickle. So I'm really curious to

0:04:37.725 --> 0:04:40.964
<v Speaker 1>hear what you think of Sam's question, Adam, do you

0:04:40.964 --> 0:04:44.205
<v Speaker 1>also see some similarities between what happened earlier this year

0:04:44.245 --> 0:04:47.685
<v Speaker 1>in DC and what we see in Taxi Driver? And

0:04:47.765 --> 0:04:51.445
<v Speaker 1>are there maybe some important distinctions we should also consider?

0:04:52.844 --> 0:04:57.525
<v Speaker 3>Well, I do think Taxi Driver poses a bit of

0:04:57.565 --> 0:05:01.365
<v Speaker 3>a challenge if you try to suggest that it's too

0:05:01.445 --> 0:05:06.765
<v Speaker 3>timely or speaks to our current situation, Because one, this

0:05:06.844 --> 0:05:10.125
<v Speaker 3>is a movie that is so distinctly a nineteen seventies

0:05:10.205 --> 0:05:14.445
<v Speaker 3>movie made in nineteen seventies New York, and there is

0:05:14.525 --> 0:05:18.205
<v Speaker 3>specific content within the film that covers that sort of

0:05:18.245 --> 0:05:22.005
<v Speaker 3>social and political malaise that we all id identify with

0:05:22.445 --> 0:05:26.844
<v Speaker 3>America in the nineteen seventies. Palatine's message when he's giving

0:05:26.844 --> 0:05:31.365
<v Speaker 3>his rallies definitely is touching on that, even stylistically, Josh

0:05:31.404 --> 0:05:34.125
<v Speaker 3>the end of the film, and I didn't have a

0:05:34.245 --> 0:05:36.565
<v Speaker 3>chance to fully verify all this. I'm going off of

0:05:36.605 --> 0:05:39.005
<v Speaker 3>my notes from the last time we talked about this

0:05:39.085 --> 0:05:41.085
<v Speaker 3>movie here on the show. It was myself and Slate's

0:05:41.165 --> 0:05:44.165
<v Speaker 3>Dana Stevens on the movie's thirty fifth anniversary, so ten

0:05:44.245 --> 0:05:47.364
<v Speaker 3>years ago April twenty eleven, we talked about it. But

0:05:47.565 --> 0:05:50.805
<v Speaker 3>the reason why you get that really jarring shift in

0:05:51.445 --> 0:05:55.245
<v Speaker 3>the way the film actually looks at the end when

0:05:55.284 --> 0:05:58.045
<v Speaker 3>all the violence and bloodshed is happening, I believe has

0:05:58.045 --> 0:06:01.645
<v Speaker 3>something to do with them having to desaturate it and

0:06:01.725 --> 0:06:05.964
<v Speaker 3>make it somehow less gory to appease.

0:06:06.005 --> 0:06:07.485
<v Speaker 2>The MPAA or something.

0:06:07.565 --> 0:06:10.805
<v Speaker 3>So you've got that aspect which probably wouldn't happen today

0:06:10.805 --> 0:06:14.364
<v Speaker 3>if Taxi Driver was being released. And the film is

0:06:14.404 --> 0:06:18.924
<v Speaker 3>also so completely told from Travis's point of view that

0:06:19.005 --> 0:06:22.805
<v Speaker 3>whether or not Travis is representative of some larger disillusionment

0:06:22.805 --> 0:06:26.605
<v Speaker 3>and anger is really almost impossible to gauge. I mean,

0:06:26.645 --> 0:06:29.044
<v Speaker 3>even these rallies that Palatine's ad, it's not like there's

0:06:29.125 --> 0:06:32.085
<v Speaker 3>a ton of people in the crowd. The other cabbys

0:06:32.165 --> 0:06:34.044
<v Speaker 3>that he interacts with, they don't seem to really be

0:06:34.165 --> 0:06:37.364
<v Speaker 3>of a similar political mindset or bent at all. He

0:06:37.725 --> 0:06:42.085
<v Speaker 3>is unique and Taxi Driver is unique. But I'm going

0:06:42.165 --> 0:06:44.565
<v Speaker 3>to give you here a contradiction that I think is

0:06:44.645 --> 0:06:47.805
<v Speaker 3>fitting for a movie that is full of them. I did,

0:06:47.844 --> 0:06:51.284
<v Speaker 3>on this viewing, find it more timely than ever, and

0:06:51.365 --> 0:06:53.965
<v Speaker 3>yet somehow I didn't connect with it. I didn't connect

0:06:53.964 --> 0:06:57.005
<v Speaker 3>with the material the same way I did ten years ago.

0:06:57.325 --> 0:06:59.685
<v Speaker 3>And maybe that's because I saw it on the big screen.

0:06:59.964 --> 0:07:02.685
<v Speaker 3>Then it was re released for that anniversary, and when

0:07:02.725 --> 0:07:04.485
<v Speaker 3>the Blu ray came out, so I actually got to

0:07:04.525 --> 0:07:06.564
<v Speaker 3>see it, and it felt like the first time because

0:07:06.565 --> 0:07:09.325
<v Speaker 3>it had been so long since I had previously seen

0:07:09.565 --> 0:07:12.205
<v Speaker 3>the film. Certainly I had my full attention on the

0:07:12.205 --> 0:07:15.005
<v Speaker 3>film in the theater versus the distractions and the burnout

0:07:15.045 --> 0:07:18.525
<v Speaker 3>that come with watching things at home these days. But

0:07:19.205 --> 0:07:21.805
<v Speaker 3>maybe Josh, it gets back to your quot. Maybe the

0:07:22.085 --> 0:07:24.965
<v Speaker 3>disconnect for me this time which let me be clear

0:07:25.285 --> 0:07:27.885
<v Speaker 3>still saying it's a great film, But maybe the reason

0:07:27.885 --> 0:07:30.205
<v Speaker 3>it didn't quite resonate with me as much this time

0:07:30.285 --> 0:07:34.805
<v Speaker 3>is related to that timeliness. Not that I'm any more

0:07:34.925 --> 0:07:38.645
<v Speaker 3>or less sympathetic towards Travis Bickle here ten years later,

0:07:38.685 --> 0:07:40.885
<v Speaker 3>I don't know where you even start with the sympathy

0:07:40.965 --> 0:07:45.085
<v Speaker 3>question with Travis Bickell, But with Dana in twenty eleven,

0:07:45.125 --> 0:07:49.085
<v Speaker 3>I made the point that Travis doesn't hate Palatine, even

0:07:49.125 --> 0:07:52.445
<v Speaker 3>though obviously he plans to assassinate him. There's this larger

0:07:52.525 --> 0:07:55.085
<v Speaker 3>kind of sense of alienation on his part that he

0:07:55.285 --> 0:07:59.045
<v Speaker 3>is tapping into. And maybe that's what frustrates him so much,

0:07:59.125 --> 0:08:01.285
<v Speaker 3>is that there's the sense of futility and he needs

0:08:01.325 --> 0:08:03.085
<v Speaker 3>a target, he needs someone to take it out on.

0:08:03.605 --> 0:08:07.045
<v Speaker 3>And I said then that today we're so divided culturally

0:08:07.085 --> 0:08:09.485
<v Speaker 3>and politically, the bickles out there can easily find a

0:08:09.525 --> 0:08:12.885
<v Speaker 3>target to take down. I actually invoked Jared Lee Loughner

0:08:13.365 --> 0:08:15.925
<v Speaker 3>back in that review in Arizona twenty eleven, ended up

0:08:16.005 --> 0:08:21.405
<v Speaker 3>killing six people, I think, and shot US Representative Gabby Diffords.

0:08:21.885 --> 0:08:25.725
<v Speaker 3>And that seems almost quaint now, doesn't it? Me invoking

0:08:26.125 --> 0:08:30.245
<v Speaker 3>that figure ten years later, our cultural and political divide

0:08:30.845 --> 0:08:33.525
<v Speaker 3>is obviously that chasm has just grown. We've got the

0:08:33.605 --> 0:08:36.645
<v Speaker 3>racial unrest that has been heightened over the past year

0:08:36.765 --> 0:08:39.645
<v Speaker 3>or two. And then you've got those insurrectionists you mentioned

0:08:39.685 --> 0:08:42.564
<v Speaker 3>storming the capitol. I mean, on some level, yes, aren't

0:08:42.565 --> 0:08:45.405
<v Speaker 3>they all Travis Bickle? And then you factor in two

0:08:45.445 --> 0:08:48.205
<v Speaker 3>how much of Travis's rage is driven not only by

0:08:48.325 --> 0:08:52.805
<v Speaker 3>racial animus but also anger towards women, which that's very

0:08:52.805 --> 0:08:56.645
<v Speaker 3>clear as well. But Sam also not only gave you

0:08:56.684 --> 0:09:00.285
<v Speaker 3>great fodder for your setup, he made a great comment

0:09:00.325 --> 0:09:03.125
<v Speaker 3>to me and our slack, which was, you know, Travis

0:09:03.125 --> 0:09:06.285
<v Speaker 3>Bickle in nineteen seventy six was really dangerous, but at

0:09:06.365 --> 0:09:09.285
<v Speaker 3>least he was isolated. You know, I mentioned his community

0:09:09.405 --> 0:09:11.245
<v Speaker 3>if you will. It was just those other cabbies and

0:09:11.245 --> 0:09:13.125
<v Speaker 3>he has nothing in common with them, and they don't

0:09:13.165 --> 0:09:16.165
<v Speaker 3>really seem to want to hang out with him much either.

0:09:16.804 --> 0:09:20.005
<v Speaker 3>But now, as Sam pointed out, everything he's engaging in,

0:09:20.525 --> 0:09:24.885
<v Speaker 3>whether it's the porn, the journal writing, the stalking, that's

0:09:24.885 --> 0:09:27.565
<v Speaker 3>all just moved online, in Sam's words, over the last

0:09:27.605 --> 0:09:30.365
<v Speaker 3>half century, right, So he's no longer a dangerous loaner. Again,

0:09:30.405 --> 0:09:32.084
<v Speaker 3>these are Sam's words. I want to get them right,

0:09:32.125 --> 0:09:35.605
<v Speaker 3>because they're very eloquent. Now instead of being a dangerous loaner,

0:09:35.845 --> 0:09:40.525
<v Speaker 3>he can join a community of dangerous loaners. And again,

0:09:40.564 --> 0:09:42.485
<v Speaker 3>it's not really for me about whether I'm more or

0:09:42.525 --> 0:09:45.725
<v Speaker 3>less sympathetic to this gun toting in cell, but maybe

0:09:45.765 --> 0:09:49.804
<v Speaker 3>I am a little fatigued the way the damage done

0:09:50.005 --> 0:09:53.325
<v Speaker 3>by damaged people like Travis has warned me out to

0:09:53.365 --> 0:09:56.125
<v Speaker 3>the point where I'm a little less enamored with the

0:09:56.125 --> 0:09:58.765
<v Speaker 3>filmmaking and the boldness of the vision. And I'll just

0:09:58.804 --> 0:10:00.605
<v Speaker 3>say too, you know, we talk about some of this

0:10:00.684 --> 0:10:05.405
<v Speaker 3>high minded stuff and that disillusionment and alienation. The reality

0:10:05.485 --> 0:10:10.245
<v Speaker 3>is that Schrader has scripted something pretty elemental here, which

0:10:10.285 --> 0:10:13.084
<v Speaker 3>is maybe why it's ultimately so profound and revealing still

0:10:13.125 --> 0:10:16.365
<v Speaker 3>so many years later. Our friend Brett Merriman out in

0:10:16.525 --> 0:10:19.365
<v Speaker 3>La quoted Paul Schrader's comments from an interview in his

0:10:19.485 --> 0:10:22.645
<v Speaker 3>Letterbox Review, where Strader said the script is simple. The

0:10:22.684 --> 0:10:25.165
<v Speaker 3>girl he wants he can't have, and the girl he

0:10:25.205 --> 0:10:27.925
<v Speaker 3>can have he doesn't want. So he tries to kill

0:10:27.965 --> 0:10:30.525
<v Speaker 3>the father of the first girl and fails, but succeeds

0:10:30.525 --> 0:10:33.045
<v Speaker 3>in killing the father of the second girl. That's about it,

0:10:33.365 --> 0:10:36.005
<v Speaker 3>Paul Schrader says, but it is right. Palatine is a

0:10:36.045 --> 0:10:39.525
<v Speaker 3>revenge target because of Betsy's rejection, and Sport is a

0:10:39.564 --> 0:10:45.125
<v Speaker 3>revenge target because of Iris's illicit and unnatural acceptance which

0:10:45.205 --> 0:10:47.445
<v Speaker 3>he can't deal with. So I don't know if I

0:10:47.445 --> 0:10:49.325
<v Speaker 3>got around to answering your question or not. There are

0:10:49.365 --> 0:10:52.005
<v Speaker 3>certainly things about it that make it distinct and make

0:10:52.045 --> 0:10:55.125
<v Speaker 3>it feel uniquely of its time, and make Travis Bickel

0:10:55.325 --> 0:10:57.724
<v Speaker 3>feel uniquely of his time, and then there's so much

0:10:57.765 --> 0:11:00.205
<v Speaker 3>about it that feels so relevant today.

0:11:00.365 --> 0:11:05.045
<v Speaker 1>Sadly, I understand the weariness you might have experienced with

0:11:05.085 --> 0:11:11.605
<v Speaker 1>this because the realities that it showcases have ballooned and

0:11:11.725 --> 0:11:14.245
<v Speaker 1>have become more in our face. And to be honest,

0:11:14.245 --> 0:11:18.325
<v Speaker 1>here's a distinction. Someone like Travis, if he had popped

0:11:18.405 --> 0:11:20.565
<v Speaker 1>up in the last four years, would have been in

0:11:20.684 --> 0:11:24.485
<v Speaker 1>bold and by those holding the highest office in the land.

0:11:24.564 --> 0:11:25.965
<v Speaker 4>And so that's a distinction as well.

0:11:26.085 --> 0:11:30.325
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like Palatine, you know, would in his stump speeches,

0:11:30.365 --> 0:11:31.765
<v Speaker 1>would be encouraging Travis.

0:11:32.005 --> 0:11:33.165
<v Speaker 4>That's a distinction, right.

0:11:33.205 --> 0:11:36.525
<v Speaker 3>That's definitely, And Josh real quick to your point. Palatine

0:11:36.525 --> 0:11:38.805
<v Speaker 3>does interact with him earlier in the film before maybe

0:11:38.845 --> 0:11:42.245
<v Speaker 3>Travis has has gotten full on into the headspace he

0:11:42.365 --> 0:11:45.245
<v Speaker 3>ends up in, but interestingly he embraces him until he

0:11:45.285 --> 0:11:46.645
<v Speaker 3>starts to sound really crazy.

0:11:46.925 --> 0:11:49.645
<v Speaker 1>But he's still kind of like he still kind of

0:11:49.645 --> 0:11:52.365
<v Speaker 1>walks that line where he lets Travis hear what he

0:11:52.405 --> 0:11:56.525
<v Speaker 1>wants to hear. That's right, And in recent years it's

0:11:56.564 --> 0:11:58.804
<v Speaker 1>not even kind of like trying to split those hairs.

0:11:58.885 --> 0:12:00.765
<v Speaker 1>It's just been I know this is what you want

0:12:00.765 --> 0:12:02.405
<v Speaker 1>to hear. I'm going to feed it to you and

0:12:02.445 --> 0:12:05.805
<v Speaker 1>foment these things. So that's a distinction to Sam's point,

0:12:05.804 --> 0:12:08.605
<v Speaker 1>which is very good about Travis going online. I would

0:12:08.645 --> 0:12:14.125
<v Speaker 1>add that imagine Travis Bickle not watching Soul Train or

0:12:14.125 --> 0:12:17.165
<v Speaker 1>whatever it was on his television all day or soap operas,

0:12:17.285 --> 0:12:20.645
<v Speaker 1>but watching Fox News or Newsmax or listening to Rush

0:12:20.684 --> 0:12:25.285
<v Speaker 1>Limbaugh odd day every day and feeding that into his

0:12:25.325 --> 0:12:30.965
<v Speaker 1>psyche as well. So, yeah, you anyone concerned about what's

0:12:31.005 --> 0:12:33.805
<v Speaker 1>been happening over the past couple of years watches Taxi

0:12:33.845 --> 0:12:37.684
<v Speaker 1>Driver now and it feels a lot closer, it feels

0:12:37.804 --> 0:12:42.165
<v Speaker 1>less like an isolated incident. Travis is not unique. This

0:12:42.245 --> 0:12:47.605
<v Speaker 1>is what we've sadly discovered and what these online communities

0:12:47.684 --> 0:12:51.445
<v Speaker 1>have have showed us is that Travis Bickle is not unique.

0:12:51.445 --> 0:12:53.804
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of Travis Bickle's out there, some

0:12:53.885 --> 0:12:55.965
<v Speaker 1>who will go as far as he went in terms

0:12:56.005 --> 0:12:59.765
<v Speaker 1>of actual violence. And you know that we have also

0:12:59.845 --> 0:13:01.925
<v Speaker 1>learned in reports a lot of different people were part

0:13:01.925 --> 0:13:05.005
<v Speaker 1>of that attack on the Capitol. So it's it's simplistic

0:13:05.045 --> 0:13:07.084
<v Speaker 1>to just lay Travispickel on top of all of them.

0:13:07.085 --> 0:13:09.885
<v Speaker 1>But I think there are a lot of similarities. You've

0:13:09.925 --> 0:13:12.245
<v Speaker 1>touched on some of them. The anger, the racial motivation,

0:13:12.605 --> 0:13:15.845
<v Speaker 1>the idea of looking for a target, and politicians make

0:13:15.925 --> 0:13:19.285
<v Speaker 1>easy targets. You know, That's that is why he can

0:13:19.325 --> 0:13:22.365
<v Speaker 1>shift his animosity toward Palant who previously he was going

0:13:22.445 --> 0:13:25.045
<v Speaker 1>to support, because he wanted to get close to Betsy, right,

0:13:25.365 --> 0:13:28.445
<v Speaker 1>And that's another thing in common on the day at

0:13:28.485 --> 0:13:32.605
<v Speaker 1>the Capitol. Blue lives matter until they didn't, you know,

0:13:32.645 --> 0:13:35.765
<v Speaker 1>because the ideology wasn't what was driving a lot of

0:13:35.804 --> 0:13:38.245
<v Speaker 1>those folks. It wasn't any sort of principle. It was

0:13:38.285 --> 0:13:41.285
<v Speaker 1>the anger that was driving them, and the fact that,

0:13:41.445 --> 0:13:44.325
<v Speaker 1>like Travis, they believe they were acting on the side

0:13:44.365 --> 0:13:48.525
<v Speaker 1>of justice. You know, he sees himself as this angel

0:13:48.605 --> 0:13:52.485
<v Speaker 1>of justice throughout the movie and interestingly the way the

0:13:52.525 --> 0:13:54.365
<v Speaker 1>film ends, which I do want to get back to

0:13:54.365 --> 0:13:57.765
<v Speaker 1>and spend a little time on that he's again emboldened

0:13:57.765 --> 0:14:01.245
<v Speaker 1>in that the media portrays him in the reports that

0:14:01.605 --> 0:14:03.325
<v Speaker 1>we could talk about whether that's in his head or not,

0:14:03.365 --> 0:14:05.725
<v Speaker 1>but what we're presented with is the media portrays him

0:14:05.725 --> 0:14:08.885
<v Speaker 1>as this savior. So so yeah, definitely resonates in a

0:14:08.885 --> 0:14:13.565
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways that are that are tiring. I think

0:14:13.605 --> 0:14:17.045
<v Speaker 1>the thing that stood out to me this time was

0:14:17.205 --> 0:14:22.405
<v Speaker 1>how much of the dent in the active cultural consciousness

0:14:22.445 --> 0:14:25.125
<v Speaker 1>that Taxi Driver has made. I would used to think

0:14:25.205 --> 0:14:28.885
<v Speaker 1>like it was the violence, it was Scorsese's filmmaking, which

0:14:28.925 --> 0:14:31.645
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to, and some of the other craftsmanship. I

0:14:31.645 --> 0:14:33.805
<v Speaker 1>think it's all d Niro's performance. I think if you

0:14:33.885 --> 0:14:38.885
<v Speaker 1>had anyone other than de Niro in this part, Taxi

0:14:38.965 --> 0:14:42.245
<v Speaker 1>Driver would have been, you know, maybe a nineteen seventies

0:14:42.925 --> 0:14:47.525
<v Speaker 1>gritty curiosity that would have a lot of admirers. For

0:14:47.565 --> 0:14:49.925
<v Speaker 1>the craftsmanship that's on display, I don't think it would

0:14:49.965 --> 0:14:56.845
<v Speaker 1>have rocked the film world. De Niro is just astounding here.

0:14:56.885 --> 0:15:00.565
<v Speaker 1>The defining characteristic for me watching this again that he

0:15:00.605 --> 0:15:03.405
<v Speaker 1>brings to Travis Bickle is that the guy is assaultive.

0:15:03.805 --> 0:15:07.925
<v Speaker 1>He is assaultive in every instance. Even when he's talking

0:15:07.965 --> 0:15:11.285
<v Speaker 1>to the manager applying for the job to drive a taxi.

0:15:11.365 --> 0:15:14.845
<v Speaker 1>His grin, his grin is just it's like two degrees

0:15:14.845 --> 0:15:18.565
<v Speaker 1>too smiley, right, Or when he's at that rally, he

0:15:18.605 --> 0:15:21.245
<v Speaker 1>goes right up to the security agent in the sunglass.

0:15:21.605 --> 0:15:25.205
<v Speaker 1>He's way too way too familiar with him, stares right

0:15:25.285 --> 0:15:28.645
<v Speaker 1>through the guy's sunglasses, like to make eye contact when

0:15:28.645 --> 0:15:31.485
<v Speaker 1>he's watching TV. The way he slowly pushes it over

0:15:31.605 --> 0:15:34.285
<v Speaker 1>till it falls. There's an assault of nature. This and

0:15:34.365 --> 0:15:37.085
<v Speaker 1>one thing I caught at him on a revisit. This

0:15:37.125 --> 0:15:40.205
<v Speaker 1>is all set up by an early throwaway gesture, no

0:15:40.325 --> 0:15:43.125
<v Speaker 1>idea if DeNiro, you know, improvis this or whatever. But

0:15:43.205 --> 0:15:46.325
<v Speaker 1>he's done interviewing at the taxi garage, he's walking out.

0:15:46.365 --> 0:15:50.365
<v Speaker 1>Another taxi is pulling in past him, and he gives

0:15:50.445 --> 0:15:52.965
<v Speaker 1>it as he walks past a little punch. He just

0:15:53.045 --> 0:15:57.765
<v Speaker 1>punches the taxi. And that is how the guy lives.

0:15:57.805 --> 0:16:02.845
<v Speaker 1>He's always imagining that everything he encounters needs to be punched.

0:16:02.845 --> 0:16:06.365
<v Speaker 1>But why because it's done something to him? And who

0:16:06.405 --> 0:16:08.485
<v Speaker 1>knows what he thinks about that taxi. Maybe it pulled

0:16:08.485 --> 0:16:12.525
<v Speaker 1>too close to him, but it deserved a punch. When

0:16:12.565 --> 0:16:15.165
<v Speaker 1>he is sitting in the coffee shop with other cab

0:16:15.245 --> 0:16:17.565
<v Speaker 1>drivers and one of them just asks him, how's it hanging,

0:16:18.445 --> 0:16:20.245
<v Speaker 1>his instinct is to look at the guy like he

0:16:20.325 --> 0:16:23.205
<v Speaker 1>insulted his mother, and he gives it a few pauses

0:16:23.565 --> 0:16:28.085
<v Speaker 1>and then says, what's that he's looking? He's always looking

0:16:28.165 --> 0:16:31.405
<v Speaker 1>for something to punch. And then and then the you know,

0:16:31.485 --> 0:16:34.885
<v Speaker 1>the the level beneath that de Niro gives.

0:16:34.605 --> 0:16:37.205
<v Speaker 4>This is, of course the loneliness.

0:16:37.005 --> 0:16:40.405
<v Speaker 1>The phrase he says, being God's lonely man.

0:16:40.565 --> 0:16:43.125
<v Speaker 4>You know, that's we'll get to that.

0:16:43.205 --> 0:16:45.645
<v Speaker 1>I'm the only one here seeing I'm sure, But I

0:16:45.685 --> 0:16:47.165
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about that in the context of this

0:16:47.205 --> 0:16:49.405
<v Speaker 1>idea of loneliness, because I think the brilliance of nearest

0:16:49.405 --> 0:16:52.485
<v Speaker 1>performance is that. And maybe this is your sympathy question too,

0:16:53.045 --> 0:16:56.405
<v Speaker 1>that you were wondering about. I always felt that loneliness

0:16:56.525 --> 0:16:59.965
<v Speaker 1>underneath the burden. He felt as God's lonely man, the

0:17:00.005 --> 0:17:03.645
<v Speaker 1>only guy on earth, he feels who sees what's happening

0:17:03.765 --> 0:17:05.405
<v Speaker 1>and is going to do something about it.

0:17:06.085 --> 0:17:09.605
<v Speaker 6>Listen you, you screw heads. Here is a man who

0:17:09.685 --> 0:17:14.244
<v Speaker 6>would not take it anymore, who would not let listen

0:17:14.285 --> 0:17:19.405
<v Speaker 6>you you screw heads. Here's a man who would not

0:17:19.605 --> 0:17:22.805
<v Speaker 6>take it anymore, a man who stood up against the scum,

0:17:23.645 --> 0:17:27.205
<v Speaker 6>the dogs the film. Here is someone who stood up.

0:17:29.485 --> 0:17:30.045
<v Speaker 6>Here is.

0:17:35.805 --> 0:17:36.485
<v Speaker 4>Deadly.

0:17:38.485 --> 0:17:42.085
<v Speaker 3>I think the loneliness is so crucial because it's there,

0:17:42.525 --> 0:17:46.925
<v Speaker 3>underscoring every aspect of Travis's life, but also almost every

0:17:46.965 --> 0:17:50.565
<v Speaker 3>aspect of the film. If you think about Iris Jodie

0:17:50.565 --> 0:17:54.725
<v Speaker 3>Foster's character, the young prostitute, and what she needs from

0:17:55.285 --> 0:17:59.685
<v Speaker 3>the Harvey ki tell Pimp character, what Sybil Shepherd's character

0:18:00.725 --> 0:18:05.605
<v Speaker 3>is doing having any involvement whatsoever with someone who's clearly

0:18:05.645 --> 0:18:10.045
<v Speaker 3>a little disturbed like Travis's, but it's because she does

0:18:10.125 --> 0:18:12.965
<v Speaker 3>need some kind of connection herself. Even it's there, I

0:18:12.965 --> 0:18:15.285
<v Speaker 3>think in every aspect of this film, and in terms

0:18:15.325 --> 0:18:17.325
<v Speaker 3>of what stood out to me this time. And I

0:18:17.365 --> 0:18:19.685
<v Speaker 3>looked at my notes from twenty eleven obviously after I

0:18:19.805 --> 0:18:22.085
<v Speaker 3>saw the film, and two of the big things I

0:18:22.125 --> 0:18:26.645
<v Speaker 3>focused on were still really prominent and wonderful this time,

0:18:26.965 --> 0:18:28.925
<v Speaker 3>and I'll save them as we get a little bit

0:18:28.965 --> 0:18:31.765
<v Speaker 3>more into the craft. But it's the score, the Bernard

0:18:31.765 --> 0:18:35.485
<v Speaker 3>Hermann score, his final score, and the cinematography, some of

0:18:35.525 --> 0:18:38.925
<v Speaker 3>the stylistic choices, but specifically Michael Chapman's work. But the

0:18:39.005 --> 0:18:42.845
<v Speaker 3>other big thing was, yeah, believe it or not, Robert

0:18:42.925 --> 0:18:46.325
<v Speaker 3>de Niro's performance, because I think all the previous times

0:18:46.325 --> 0:18:48.125
<v Speaker 3>I watched this movie, I sort of just took it

0:18:48.125 --> 0:18:50.925
<v Speaker 3>for granted, And even in that review in twenty eleven, Josh,

0:18:51.165 --> 0:18:53.605
<v Speaker 3>I took it for granted, didn't really spend any time

0:18:53.605 --> 0:18:56.085
<v Speaker 3>on it, because in fairness, we were doing our top

0:18:56.085 --> 0:18:58.165
<v Speaker 3>five Robert de Niro scenes on that show, so I

0:18:58.205 --> 0:19:00.885
<v Speaker 3>was like, Okay, well, we'll just save it, and I

0:19:00.925 --> 0:19:03.405
<v Speaker 3>did put a taxi driver's scene in that top five.

0:19:03.685 --> 0:19:08.325
<v Speaker 3>But de Niro's performance for me this time was the

0:19:08.405 --> 0:19:12.645
<v Speaker 3>magic and the scene I picked back in twenty eleven,

0:19:12.765 --> 0:19:15.005
<v Speaker 3>My number three de Niro scene was actually the one

0:19:15.045 --> 0:19:20.085
<v Speaker 3>where he goes to volunteer and he kind of asks

0:19:20.125 --> 0:19:23.885
<v Speaker 3>out Sybil shit for the first time. It just does

0:19:24.005 --> 0:19:28.405
<v Speaker 3>catch you so off guard because he seems there to

0:19:28.565 --> 0:19:31.605
<v Speaker 3>actually be trying to make a meaningful connection and seem

0:19:31.765 --> 0:19:34.725
<v Speaker 3>somewhat normal in the way he's going about it, and

0:19:34.765 --> 0:19:37.645
<v Speaker 3>he actually has the nerve to ask her out. And

0:19:38.165 --> 0:19:40.085
<v Speaker 3>de Niro's got to do some heavy lifting there, because

0:19:40.125 --> 0:19:44.125
<v Speaker 3>we know a lot about that character that Betsy doesn't know.

0:19:44.685 --> 0:19:47.725
<v Speaker 3>And in order for us to believe that he's going

0:19:47.805 --> 0:19:50.645
<v Speaker 3>to get her to actually even just go around the

0:19:50.645 --> 0:19:53.245
<v Speaker 3>corner and have coffee with him, it's got to be

0:19:53.285 --> 0:19:56.085
<v Speaker 3>something in his performance. And I think there's an earnestness

0:19:56.125 --> 0:20:00.165
<v Speaker 3>and there's a conviction that she can't deny. Hi.

0:20:01.045 --> 0:20:03.645
<v Speaker 7>I like to volunteer, Greg, I'll take you right over here,

0:20:03.685 --> 0:20:04.885
<v Speaker 7>so I run volunteer.

0:20:04.685 --> 0:20:07.765
<v Speaker 4>If you don't learn, why do you feel that you

0:20:07.845 --> 0:20:08.805
<v Speaker 4>have to volunteer to me?

0:20:09.205 --> 0:20:11.485
<v Speaker 7>Because I think that you are the most beautiful woman

0:20:11.525 --> 0:20:12.165
<v Speaker 7>I've ever seen.

0:20:13.965 --> 0:20:14.405
<v Speaker 5>Thanks.

0:20:15.445 --> 0:20:16.645
<v Speaker 4>What do you think of Palentine?

0:20:17.205 --> 0:20:24.445
<v Speaker 1>Well, Charles Palentine, the man you're volunteering to help at present, I'm.

0:20:24.285 --> 0:20:26.205
<v Speaker 7>Sure he'll make a good present. I don't know exactly

0:20:26.245 --> 0:20:28.325
<v Speaker 7>what his policies are, but I'm sure makes a good one.

0:20:29.325 --> 0:20:32.165
<v Speaker 3>You said that he's assaultive, and that's accurate. But it's

0:20:32.205 --> 0:20:36.245
<v Speaker 3>this assaultive style that's mixed with an earnestness and an

0:20:36.245 --> 0:20:41.485
<v Speaker 3>earnestness that then crosses over into complete uneasiness and awkwardness.

0:20:41.525 --> 0:20:44.685
<v Speaker 3>And you're right, it's that off putting smile. The scene

0:20:44.725 --> 0:20:47.365
<v Speaker 3>with the manager he was applying to this time was

0:20:47.405 --> 0:20:49.484
<v Speaker 3>one that stood out to me as well, and the

0:20:49.525 --> 0:20:53.085
<v Speaker 3>moment I loved in particular is when everything's going pretty

0:20:53.085 --> 0:20:55.165
<v Speaker 3>well up until this point and he makes a joke.

0:20:55.525 --> 0:20:57.165
<v Speaker 2>He tries to crack a joke. He tries to do

0:20:57.205 --> 0:20:59.005
<v Speaker 2>what normal people do. Josh.

0:20:59.085 --> 0:21:01.965
<v Speaker 3>He makes a joke and he says, my driving record's clean,

0:21:02.205 --> 0:21:05.085
<v Speaker 3>like my conscience. And now the guy turns on him,

0:21:05.285 --> 0:21:07.845
<v Speaker 3>what are you doing? You bust in my balls? And

0:21:07.845 --> 0:21:12.765
<v Speaker 3>that smile, that completely obnoxious smile that is too big,

0:21:13.765 --> 0:21:17.085
<v Speaker 3>then turns immediately to consternation, and he knows that he's

0:21:17.125 --> 0:21:20.325
<v Speaker 3>now being punished. And like I said, he just tried

0:21:20.365 --> 0:21:22.725
<v Speaker 3>to do what he thinks normal people do, try to

0:21:22.725 --> 0:21:25.365
<v Speaker 3>make a little connection, try to engage in some small talk,

0:21:25.605 --> 0:21:27.525
<v Speaker 3>and he's instantly rebuked by it.

0:21:27.565 --> 0:21:30.085
<v Speaker 2>And I think that he's so unhinged.

0:21:30.365 --> 0:21:33.645
<v Speaker 3>But there's a sincerity to it that De Niro conveys

0:21:34.005 --> 0:21:37.645
<v Speaker 3>that makes Bickle fascinating. It's not only the smile, it's

0:21:37.645 --> 0:21:40.405
<v Speaker 3>the little fidgets. It's the physicality, like the punch of

0:21:40.405 --> 0:21:43.485
<v Speaker 3>the taxi cab you mentioned. And then the scene where

0:21:43.565 --> 0:21:46.245
<v Speaker 3>if you do feel for Travis at all, the scene

0:21:46.245 --> 0:21:48.685
<v Speaker 3>where I think it is most blatant, at least it

0:21:48.725 --> 0:21:50.365
<v Speaker 3>was for me on this rewatch, I wonder if there

0:21:50.405 --> 0:21:53.525
<v Speaker 3>was a scene for you. But it's when he takes

0:21:53.925 --> 0:21:58.205
<v Speaker 3>Betsy to the porno theater and she gets so mad

0:21:58.245 --> 0:22:03.445
<v Speaker 3>at him, and he's apologizing, and if you think about

0:22:03.445 --> 0:22:05.965
<v Speaker 3>what he even says, even when they're walking in and

0:22:05.965 --> 0:22:08.805
<v Speaker 3>she questions it, he says, no couples, I see couples

0:22:08.805 --> 0:22:11.405
<v Speaker 3>here all the time. Again, it's like this is normal behavior.

0:22:11.445 --> 0:22:15.485
<v Speaker 3>He thinks it's normal behavior. And everything he's doing with

0:22:15.525 --> 0:22:19.085
<v Speaker 3>her is an approximation, as best as he can do,

0:22:19.605 --> 0:22:23.245
<v Speaker 3>of what he thinks a man should do with a

0:22:23.245 --> 0:22:26.405
<v Speaker 3>woman on a date. And yes, he's dangerous, and you

0:22:26.445 --> 0:22:29.725
<v Speaker 3>see that forming, but he's so confused and so lost,

0:22:29.765 --> 0:22:31.725
<v Speaker 3>and he wants to please her so much that you

0:22:31.765 --> 0:22:34.765
<v Speaker 3>really do see the hurt. He's not hurt because he

0:22:34.845 --> 0:22:38.365
<v Speaker 3>can't believe she doesn't like his choice. He's hurt because

0:22:38.725 --> 0:22:41.525
<v Speaker 3>he had no idea she wouldn't like his choice. And

0:22:41.565 --> 0:22:43.605
<v Speaker 3>there's a moment I'd never really paid attention to before

0:22:43.925 --> 0:22:47.125
<v Speaker 3>with them. I think she lobs this at him as

0:22:47.165 --> 0:22:51.365
<v Speaker 3>she's going away. Remember earlier she says that he reminds

0:22:51.365 --> 0:22:52.925
<v Speaker 3>her a little bit of Chris Christofferson.

0:22:53.165 --> 0:22:53.885
<v Speaker 2>So what does he do.

0:22:54.325 --> 0:22:56.805
<v Speaker 3>He goes to the record store and he buys a

0:22:56.845 --> 0:23:00.245
<v Speaker 3>Chris Christofferson record and watching it this time, I'd forgotten

0:23:00.245 --> 0:23:03.365
<v Speaker 3>about it. I thought, Yeah, that's so relatable. Who hasn't

0:23:03.405 --> 0:23:05.605
<v Speaker 3>done that. Like, you're interested in somebody and you find

0:23:05.605 --> 0:23:07.845
<v Speaker 3>out what their favorite movie is, or their favorite song

0:23:07.925 --> 0:23:10.045
<v Speaker 3>or performer is. You want to understand what kind of

0:23:10.085 --> 0:23:12.085
<v Speaker 3>makes them tick. You want to speak the same language.

0:23:12.085 --> 0:23:15.245
<v Speaker 3>You're gonna start loving the things they love. Except that's

0:23:15.285 --> 0:23:18.085
<v Speaker 3>not what he did. He bought it for her, right,

0:23:18.165 --> 0:23:20.605
<v Speaker 3>He somehow thinks that even though she's already said she's

0:23:20.645 --> 0:23:23.525
<v Speaker 3>a fan of his, and she probably owns the record already.

0:23:23.525 --> 0:23:25.205
<v Speaker 3>I think she says to him, I already have it.

0:23:25.525 --> 0:23:28.485
<v Speaker 3>I wished you kept it for yourself. That he didn't

0:23:28.485 --> 0:23:31.005
<v Speaker 3>even bother to listen to it. He admits, that's exactly right.

0:23:31.045 --> 0:23:32.645
<v Speaker 3>It didn't occur to him to listen to it, right,

0:23:32.765 --> 0:23:36.725
<v Speaker 3>broken record player or not. He's just so focused on

0:23:36.765 --> 0:23:41.085
<v Speaker 3>trying to please her and going through those motions that

0:23:41.765 --> 0:23:43.805
<v Speaker 3>it of course blows up in his face. But he's

0:23:43.845 --> 0:23:47.805
<v Speaker 3>not actually interested in expanding his understanding of the world

0:23:47.845 --> 0:23:48.125
<v Speaker 3>at all.

0:23:48.485 --> 0:23:50.285
<v Speaker 1>No, that's what it is, going through the motions. How

0:23:50.365 --> 0:23:52.925
<v Speaker 1>much of his life is going through the societal motions

0:23:52.925 --> 0:23:58.325
<v Speaker 1>he's observed but doesn't quite know how to genuinely engage

0:23:58.325 --> 0:24:00.605
<v Speaker 1>in himself. Yes, I'll give you a scene that jumped

0:24:00.605 --> 0:24:03.925
<v Speaker 1>out to me where there's some sympathy for Travis Spickele

0:24:04.285 --> 0:24:06.245
<v Speaker 1>And actually this will give me an example to talk

0:24:06.245 --> 0:24:08.565
<v Speaker 1>about the filmmaking too. This choice is scarces he made.

0:24:08.605 --> 0:24:12.645
<v Speaker 1>But there's a moment after the date where he's trying

0:24:12.685 --> 0:24:15.125
<v Speaker 1>to get Betsy back and he's on a payphone in

0:24:15.165 --> 0:24:18.005
<v Speaker 1>a hallway of a building. A payphone is on the wall,

0:24:18.085 --> 0:24:20.325
<v Speaker 1>and the scene begins with him in the center of

0:24:20.365 --> 0:24:23.125
<v Speaker 1>the screen talking on the phone and the conversation. We

0:24:23.205 --> 0:24:25.605
<v Speaker 1>already know that this is not going to go well,

0:24:25.645 --> 0:24:27.685
<v Speaker 1>and sure enough, as he goes on and on, it's

0:24:27.805 --> 0:24:30.605
<v Speaker 1>we can tell this is just he's really bottoming out.

0:24:30.405 --> 0:24:30.925
<v Speaker 4>Here with her.

0:24:31.005 --> 0:24:35.165
<v Speaker 1>Right, you do feel for the it's kind of an embarrassment, like,

0:24:35.445 --> 0:24:38.085
<v Speaker 1>why aren't you recognizing yet that this is not going

0:24:38.165 --> 0:24:41.165
<v Speaker 1>to work? And so you feel some sympathy. Then Scarsese

0:24:41.245 --> 0:24:44.605
<v Speaker 1>does something interesting. The camera cut slides, well, it doesn't

0:24:44.645 --> 0:24:48.645
<v Speaker 1>even cuts, It slides to the right away from de

0:24:48.725 --> 0:24:52.125
<v Speaker 1>Niro and then settles on a hallway going the other way.

0:24:52.165 --> 0:24:56.005
<v Speaker 1>That's completely empty. There's even an open door, and basically,

0:24:56.125 --> 0:24:59.245
<v Speaker 1>just like we've given up, she's given up on him first,

0:24:59.565 --> 0:25:03.245
<v Speaker 1>you're given up on him and the camera, the camera

0:25:03.365 --> 0:25:06.605
<v Speaker 1>itself has now given up on him. So I think

0:25:06.605 --> 0:25:09.285
<v Speaker 1>there are some subtle things like that Scarase does because

0:25:09.325 --> 0:25:13.005
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised that there wasn't as explosive as this

0:25:13.085 --> 0:25:17.245
<v Speaker 1>material is. It's relatively reserved filmmaking from him. If you

0:25:17.325 --> 0:25:20.925
<v Speaker 1>compare not Scarsese to other filmmakers, he's always more dyna

0:25:21.325 --> 0:25:24.205
<v Speaker 1>than most filmmakers. But if you compare Taxi Driver to

0:25:24.325 --> 0:25:25.845
<v Speaker 1>a lot of his other films, I mean, there are

0:25:25.885 --> 0:25:29.245
<v Speaker 1>flourishes here and there, overhead shots, those sorts of things,

0:25:30.085 --> 0:25:32.685
<v Speaker 1>but it's really reserved compared to a lot of his stuff.

0:25:32.685 --> 0:25:34.845
<v Speaker 1>You get a little moment like that, or you get

0:25:34.845 --> 0:25:39.645
<v Speaker 1>the one where how he reveals the infamous mohawk. It's

0:25:39.685 --> 0:25:42.245
<v Speaker 1>not with like a quick shot a close up. It's

0:25:42.245 --> 0:25:46.445
<v Speaker 1>another camera slide right to slide across to bring Travis

0:25:46.485 --> 0:25:49.565
<v Speaker 1>in the crowd into the frame. From the weight, we

0:25:49.605 --> 0:25:53.605
<v Speaker 1>see his waist, so it slides over, then pauses and

0:25:53.645 --> 0:25:55.525
<v Speaker 1>then slides up to show us his head and the

0:25:55.605 --> 0:25:58.845
<v Speaker 1>reveal that he's really like this is this is hairstyle

0:25:58.925 --> 0:26:00.765
<v Speaker 1>number three. I think in the film. First he has

0:26:00.845 --> 0:26:03.325
<v Speaker 1>kind of a boyish normal cut. Then you can tell

0:26:03.405 --> 0:26:05.885
<v Speaker 1>later he's begun to cut his own hair and it's

0:26:06.285 --> 0:26:07.885
<v Speaker 1>not looking too good, and then.

0:26:07.765 --> 0:26:09.045
<v Speaker 4>We get this.

0:26:09.245 --> 0:26:12.605
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of little touches like that that I

0:26:12.725 --> 0:26:14.765
<v Speaker 1>noticed this time. And the other thing I gotta say

0:26:14.765 --> 0:26:20.005
<v Speaker 1>about Scosese, though Top five director Cameo. I mean, he

0:26:20.205 --> 0:26:22.485
<v Speaker 1>is so good in this scene because, and here's what

0:26:22.565 --> 0:26:25.685
<v Speaker 1>jumped out to me, how scary he is as this

0:26:25.925 --> 0:26:30.165
<v Speaker 1>jealous husband stalking his wife at another man's apartment. Scarcese

0:26:30.325 --> 0:26:34.605
<v Speaker 1>is not trying. There is some ugly violent taboo talk there,

0:26:35.045 --> 0:26:39.085
<v Speaker 1>but unlike happens in a lot of you know, Tarantino films,

0:26:39.085 --> 0:26:41.485
<v Speaker 1>for example, Scarsese is not trying to be cool with

0:26:41.525 --> 0:26:45.405
<v Speaker 1>the language at all. He just know, he just embraces

0:26:45.445 --> 0:26:49.565
<v Speaker 1>the ugliness of it, and it is a really effective

0:26:49.965 --> 0:26:52.605
<v Speaker 1>what forty five one minute performance.

0:26:53.565 --> 0:26:58.565
<v Speaker 8>You see the woman in the window? Do you see

0:26:58.765 --> 0:27:04.005
<v Speaker 8>the woman in the window? Yeah, you see the wind,

0:27:05.325 --> 0:27:12.045
<v Speaker 8>So I want you to see him because that's my wife.

0:27:10.845 --> 0:27:11.805
<v Speaker 7>That's not my appartment.

0:27:13.645 --> 0:27:17.085
<v Speaker 3>It's one of the best, most disturbing scenes in the film.

0:27:17.085 --> 0:27:19.565
<v Speaker 3>And of course Noir was on my mind this week

0:27:19.605 --> 0:27:22.005
<v Speaker 3>as we are going to talk about this gun for

0:27:22.085 --> 0:27:25.125
<v Speaker 3>Hire later in the show, and obviously Taxi Driver is

0:27:25.165 --> 0:27:27.845
<v Speaker 3>indebted to Noir, but it occurred to me that that

0:27:28.085 --> 0:27:31.605
<v Speaker 3>entire sequence could almost be its own film. That's its

0:27:31.645 --> 0:27:36.045
<v Speaker 3>own ure war playing out right with the cuckolded husband

0:27:36.485 --> 0:27:39.565
<v Speaker 3>and the man she's up there with and that whole

0:27:39.645 --> 0:27:43.405
<v Speaker 3>illicit affair. So I found that fascinating. I always silhouet

0:27:44.205 --> 0:27:47.045
<v Speaker 3>right exactly, yeah, right in the shadow there, right. It

0:27:47.165 --> 0:27:49.965
<v Speaker 3>definitely makes sense. But did you also catch because I

0:27:49.965 --> 0:27:53.445
<v Speaker 3>didn't catch this apparently back in twenty eleven, that Scorsese

0:27:53.565 --> 0:27:55.165
<v Speaker 3>I think, has two cameos in the film.

0:27:55.245 --> 0:27:57.485
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's the first time. Yeah, the first time we

0:27:57.485 --> 0:28:01.245
<v Speaker 1>see Betsy. We notice him leering at her before we

0:28:01.325 --> 0:28:04.205
<v Speaker 1>notice her, Yeah, which is saying something because Sybil Shepherd

0:28:04.245 --> 0:28:07.965
<v Speaker 1>is just dazzling in this movie. I mean, she's very funny,

0:28:08.045 --> 0:28:10.965
<v Speaker 1>very quick as well in terms of her performances, but

0:28:11.045 --> 0:28:14.525
<v Speaker 1>just such a dazzling contrast to the grime of life

0:28:14.525 --> 0:28:15.365
<v Speaker 1>we otherwise get.

0:28:15.885 --> 0:28:17.565
<v Speaker 3>So I was going to get into the score and

0:28:17.605 --> 0:28:19.565
<v Speaker 3>some more of the filmmaking stuff, but as we're talking

0:28:19.645 --> 0:28:22.125
<v Speaker 3>about the cast and how good some of the supporting

0:28:22.165 --> 0:28:26.405
<v Speaker 3>players are, I mean, coming off just rewatching Silence of

0:28:26.445 --> 0:28:30.365
<v Speaker 3>the Lambs. It's pretty striking to see for me how

0:28:30.405 --> 0:28:33.645
<v Speaker 3>fully formed as an actress Jody Foster was even at

0:28:33.645 --> 0:28:37.165
<v Speaker 3>that age. Because that's also a remarkable performance, Like there

0:28:37.205 --> 0:28:42.325
<v Speaker 3>is an ease to that performance and an intellect to it,

0:28:42.405 --> 0:28:45.685
<v Speaker 3>which you talked about in relation to Clarice that comes

0:28:45.725 --> 0:28:50.045
<v Speaker 3>through that has nothing to do with sort of childlike precociousness.

0:28:50.165 --> 0:28:53.605
<v Speaker 3>It's just not there in Foster's performance, and it's so good.

0:28:54.125 --> 0:28:55.405
<v Speaker 7>So what are you gonna do about support in that

0:28:55.485 --> 0:29:03.125
<v Speaker 7>old bastard when when you leave, I don't know, just leave,

0:29:03.725 --> 0:29:04.405
<v Speaker 7>you leave.

0:29:04.925 --> 0:29:05.765
<v Speaker 2>Got plenty of the girls.

0:29:05.845 --> 0:29:07.005
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, but you just can't do that.

0:29:07.045 --> 0:29:07.765
<v Speaker 4>What are you gonna do?

0:29:10.165 --> 0:29:10.845
<v Speaker 2>What do you want me to do?

0:29:10.925 --> 0:29:13.045
<v Speaker 7>Call the cops? Well, the cops don't do nothing, you know.

0:29:13.125 --> 0:29:16.325
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he look sport never treated me bad.

0:29:16.365 --> 0:29:18.005
<v Speaker 7>I mean, he didn't beat me up or anything like

0:29:18.045 --> 0:29:18.845
<v Speaker 7>that once, But.

0:29:18.845 --> 0:29:20.965
<v Speaker 6>You can't allow him to do the same at a girl.

0:29:22.125 --> 0:29:23.365
<v Speaker 4>She's so self possessed.

0:29:23.925 --> 0:29:25.605
<v Speaker 1>The scene of the two of them in the diner,

0:29:25.685 --> 0:29:28.845
<v Speaker 1>you know, talking about why she's why she's chosen this

0:29:28.965 --> 0:29:32.285
<v Speaker 1>life as much as she's had a choice yeah, and

0:29:32.325 --> 0:29:36.845
<v Speaker 1>what twelve or thirteen when filming this, so again we

0:29:36.885 --> 0:29:38.485
<v Speaker 1>can talk about you know, how.

0:29:40.125 --> 0:29:42.605
<v Speaker 4>Is that such a great thing? As good as she.

0:29:42.605 --> 0:29:45.365
<v Speaker 1>Is in the movie, you know that you would you

0:29:45.405 --> 0:29:48.485
<v Speaker 1>would want someone at that age in this sort of part,

0:29:48.605 --> 0:29:53.085
<v Speaker 1>but certainly Foster had the talent to pull it off.

0:29:53.165 --> 0:29:54.765
<v Speaker 1>It's an incredible performance.

0:29:55.125 --> 0:29:56.605
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it really is. Now.

0:29:57.045 --> 0:30:03.245
<v Speaker 3>The Bernard Hermann score, the dissonance of the grimy, sleazy

0:30:03.325 --> 0:30:07.485
<v Speaker 3>New York that we see, and the corruption of probably

0:30:07.565 --> 0:30:10.525
<v Speaker 3>multiple characters, but certainly of Bickel in his own mind,

0:30:10.885 --> 0:30:16.645
<v Speaker 3>against the often lushness of that old Hollywood orchestration. It

0:30:16.725 --> 0:30:22.645
<v Speaker 3>really is so startling and often John and maybe it

0:30:22.725 --> 0:30:26.445
<v Speaker 3>goes back to what Schrader was saying that on some level,

0:30:26.525 --> 0:30:28.645
<v Speaker 3>this really is a movie just about a man and

0:30:28.725 --> 0:30:32.805
<v Speaker 3>his romantic problems, or it could be about Scorsese and

0:30:32.925 --> 0:30:36.765
<v Speaker 3>it's its own kind of twisted love letter to New

0:30:36.845 --> 0:30:38.925
<v Speaker 3>York City in some way. But I really think it's

0:30:38.965 --> 0:30:43.485
<v Speaker 3>that ironic contrast which also takes us, maybe we're not

0:30:43.565 --> 0:30:45.685
<v Speaker 3>ready to get there yet, but to the end of

0:30:45.725 --> 0:30:49.085
<v Speaker 3>the film and why I don't see it as a fantasy.

0:30:49.245 --> 0:30:51.765
<v Speaker 3>But I'll talk here instead about the cinematography I mentioned

0:30:51.765 --> 0:30:56.725
<v Speaker 3>in Michael Chapman, those eerie, sickly greens really stood out

0:30:56.725 --> 0:30:58.445
<v Speaker 3>to me this time as he drives the streets of

0:30:58.485 --> 0:31:01.845
<v Speaker 3>New York City, and even from the very beginning in

0:31:01.885 --> 0:31:04.565
<v Speaker 3>the credits where you get that blurry effect where it's

0:31:04.605 --> 0:31:08.605
<v Speaker 3>almost like an impressionist canvas movie that is, like most noirs,

0:31:08.685 --> 0:31:11.965
<v Speaker 3>actually very expressionistic. But there's just this sense from the

0:31:12.085 --> 0:31:17.005
<v Speaker 3>very beginning that there's going to be a complete distortion

0:31:17.125 --> 0:31:20.485
<v Speaker 3>of reality with regard to how Travis perceives the world,

0:31:20.605 --> 0:31:25.845
<v Speaker 3>including these fantasies where he sees himself as the romantic lead,

0:31:25.965 --> 0:31:28.205
<v Speaker 3>you know, when he's out with Betsy, for example, and

0:31:28.285 --> 0:31:31.845
<v Speaker 3>we get that score that kicks in. You mentioned the

0:31:31.965 --> 0:31:34.405
<v Speaker 3>camera move when we see as the mohawk for the

0:31:34.405 --> 0:31:37.925
<v Speaker 3>first time. It comes through that distortion of reality in

0:31:38.005 --> 0:31:40.805
<v Speaker 3>all of the mirror shots of Travis, the reflections, the

0:31:40.885 --> 0:31:44.325
<v Speaker 3>sudden camera pans. Again, there's a real intent here to

0:31:44.525 --> 0:31:47.845
<v Speaker 3>jar the audience. You know, I'd never noticed this before either,

0:31:47.925 --> 0:31:50.565
<v Speaker 3>but he mentions pretty early on that the rain is

0:31:50.605 --> 0:31:53.445
<v Speaker 3>going to come and wash all this scum out, And

0:31:53.525 --> 0:31:56.245
<v Speaker 3>not too long after, Scor says he draws our attention

0:31:56.365 --> 0:32:00.885
<v Speaker 3>as he's driving to a fire hydrant shooting water right

0:32:00.965 --> 0:32:03.485
<v Speaker 3>over the street, and as he's about to approach it,

0:32:03.925 --> 0:32:06.805
<v Speaker 3>he has the wherewithal to roll up his window and

0:32:06.805 --> 0:32:08.605
<v Speaker 3>to not get sprayed by it, you know, as if

0:32:08.605 --> 0:32:11.165
<v Speaker 3>somehow he's not going to be he's not going to

0:32:11.165 --> 0:32:13.765
<v Speaker 3>be baptized by the street, if you will, or maybe

0:32:13.805 --> 0:32:17.725
<v Speaker 3>this stand in for the rain. The water isn't isn't

0:32:17.725 --> 0:32:20.405
<v Speaker 3>going to get him. He's exempt from the rain in

0:32:20.445 --> 0:32:23.485
<v Speaker 3>some way, depending on your reading of it. But it's

0:32:23.525 --> 0:32:27.125
<v Speaker 3>notable that while he might not get sprayed, his car does.

0:32:27.445 --> 0:32:30.845
<v Speaker 3>And then the view out his windshield Scorsese lingers on

0:32:30.885 --> 0:32:32.885
<v Speaker 3>as he's looking at those New York City streets, and

0:32:32.925 --> 0:32:34.885
<v Speaker 3>it takes a while for all that rain to go

0:32:34.965 --> 0:32:38.165
<v Speaker 3>away and the blurriness to go away. That's the entire

0:32:38.245 --> 0:32:40.885
<v Speaker 3>film and Travis's view of the world in a nutshell.

0:32:40.925 --> 0:32:43.445
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's the most impressionistic shot is when the water

0:32:43.565 --> 0:32:46.325
<v Speaker 1>is rolling off the windshield and you see those lights

0:32:46.365 --> 0:32:50.245
<v Speaker 1>and as you talk about the green in Chapman cinematography,

0:32:50.685 --> 0:32:54.005
<v Speaker 1>and also I would say the red glow that we

0:32:54.085 --> 0:32:56.605
<v Speaker 1>get in so many neon signs, it's almost like those

0:32:56.645 --> 0:33:00.805
<v Speaker 1>signs which the movie associates a couple of times with

0:33:01.165 --> 0:33:03.325
<v Speaker 1>Porn Marquis, Porn Theater, Marquee.

0:33:03.325 --> 0:33:05.285
<v Speaker 4>It's like they've bled.

0:33:05.005 --> 0:33:08.685
<v Speaker 1>Into the atmosphere somehow, and it's not just the signs

0:33:08.845 --> 0:33:12.525
<v Speaker 1>giving off that light anymore. It's everything. And then that's

0:33:12.605 --> 0:33:16.045
<v Speaker 1>maybe how it feels in Travis's head. It's very different

0:33:16.085 --> 0:33:18.925
<v Speaker 1>than not too long ago we discussed Paris, Texas the

0:33:19.045 --> 0:33:22.325
<v Speaker 1>ven Vendors film, and the the beauty of the neon

0:33:22.445 --> 0:33:26.765
<v Speaker 1>signs in that movie, it's there is beauty. There's a

0:33:26.765 --> 0:33:29.805
<v Speaker 1>crispness and a clearness and a sharpness to it. And

0:33:30.005 --> 0:33:34.365
<v Speaker 1>here Chapman takes the same material and gives it alluridness

0:33:34.445 --> 0:33:39.005
<v Speaker 1>and an infectiousness that carries over into the entire rest

0:33:39.165 --> 0:33:41.725
<v Speaker 1>of the film. And I would also say about the

0:33:41.765 --> 0:33:46.405
<v Speaker 1>Hermann score, Yeah, it's as you're describing it. It's it's

0:33:46.445 --> 0:33:49.245
<v Speaker 1>like a split personality score, isn't it, Because we have

0:33:49.485 --> 0:33:53.405
<v Speaker 1>these we have these sexy, mournful saxophones, which would be

0:33:53.525 --> 0:33:56.965
<v Speaker 1>very much of the period. It's it's very seventies. And

0:33:57.045 --> 0:33:59.045
<v Speaker 1>then that's Travis's fantasy.

0:33:59.205 --> 0:34:00.245
<v Speaker 4>And then we get.

0:34:00.125 --> 0:34:03.365
<v Speaker 1>Our reality, the viewers reality, which is where you hear

0:34:03.405 --> 0:34:08.205
<v Speaker 1>those threatening suspense chords that that are reminiscent of some

0:34:08.325 --> 0:34:10.885
<v Speaker 1>of Hermann's work for Hitchcock, I put it's it was interesting.

0:34:10.925 --> 0:34:14.285
<v Speaker 1>The day after I watched this, I put on I

0:34:14.364 --> 0:34:18.045
<v Speaker 1>just chose Psycho and maybe another Herman score is more

0:34:18.085 --> 0:34:20.884
<v Speaker 1>reminiscent of Taxi Driver what we get here, but may

0:34:21.205 --> 0:34:24.325
<v Speaker 1>was there a lot of a lot of similarities there

0:34:24.364 --> 0:34:26.805
<v Speaker 1>In listening to those back to back, we just get this. Yeah,

0:34:26.844 --> 0:34:32.365
<v Speaker 1>it's old Hollywood instrumentation, but also the threatening suspense nature

0:34:32.485 --> 0:34:35.485
<v Speaker 1>of it. So we've talked about Trader, mentioned Trader a

0:34:35.525 --> 0:34:38.325
<v Speaker 1>couple of times. There's one thing about the script that

0:34:38.365 --> 0:34:41.765
<v Speaker 1>I really want to highlight, which I just think is

0:34:41.805 --> 0:34:45.444
<v Speaker 1>so clever and has a lot of thematic resonance too.

0:34:45.565 --> 0:34:49.285
<v Speaker 1>And it's the trail of the twenty dollars bill. And

0:34:49.445 --> 0:34:52.605
<v Speaker 1>this is the bill that Harvey kai Tell's Sport throws

0:34:52.645 --> 0:34:55.245
<v Speaker 1>at Travis to get him to leave when he yanks

0:34:55.245 --> 0:34:57.845
<v Speaker 1>Iris out of the cap the first time that he

0:34:57.965 --> 0:35:01.485
<v Speaker 1>encounters Sport, I think, and it lands on his seat.

0:35:01.605 --> 0:35:04.485
<v Speaker 1>He looks at it with disgust because he's this is

0:35:04.525 --> 0:35:06.405
<v Speaker 1>the first time he started to entertaining these ideas of

0:35:06.445 --> 0:35:08.525
<v Speaker 1>saving Iris. Right, she gets yanked out of the cab,

0:35:09.045 --> 0:35:11.045
<v Speaker 1>he leaves it there, crumpled on the seat till he

0:35:11.045 --> 0:35:13.365
<v Speaker 1>gets to the garage at night, and then pauses and

0:35:13.405 --> 0:35:16.125
<v Speaker 1>then kind of shoves it in his pocket. We see

0:35:16.165 --> 0:35:21.125
<v Speaker 1>that bill again, I think three times later. I think

0:35:21.125 --> 0:35:24.885
<v Speaker 1>he almost pays for something once but doesn't use it.

0:35:24.885 --> 0:35:27.685
<v Speaker 1>He uses different cash, still it's crumpled up. At the

0:35:27.685 --> 0:35:29.925
<v Speaker 1>coffee shop, he owes a guy some money, five bucks,

0:35:30.325 --> 0:35:32.725
<v Speaker 1>so we see him pull that out next to the

0:35:32.765 --> 0:35:35.365
<v Speaker 1>other cash he has. And then the last time we

0:35:35.405 --> 0:35:37.925
<v Speaker 1>see it is when he rents the room with Iris,

0:35:37.965 --> 0:35:39.725
<v Speaker 1>where he thinks he's going to convince her to leave.

0:35:39.805 --> 0:35:42.205
<v Speaker 1>He's got to pay this guy to rent the room,

0:35:42.245 --> 0:35:45.925
<v Speaker 1>and he slams it in the guy's hand, and running

0:35:45.965 --> 0:35:48.805
<v Speaker 1>through all those make it seem like this really obvious,

0:35:49.125 --> 0:35:52.245
<v Speaker 1>heavy handed symbol. But maybe it isn't a script, but

0:35:52.285 --> 0:35:55.285
<v Speaker 1>the way Scorsese kind of just lightly makes space for

0:35:55.325 --> 0:36:00.605
<v Speaker 1>those moments makes it incredibly, incredibly effective. And yeah, I

0:36:00.685 --> 0:36:02.805
<v Speaker 1>was just curious if that was in the original script

0:36:02.805 --> 0:36:06.005
<v Speaker 1>and if the versions I saw online are true it was.

0:36:06.045 --> 0:36:07.125
<v Speaker 4>I think that's a great touch.

0:36:07.485 --> 0:36:09.725
<v Speaker 3>Well, it is a great touch, and it is subtle

0:36:09.805 --> 0:36:12.205
<v Speaker 3>enough that I probably missed. I'm pretty sure I missed

0:36:12.205 --> 0:36:14.645
<v Speaker 3>at least one of the times you mentioned, and it's

0:36:14.685 --> 0:36:18.805
<v Speaker 3>not something I'd paid any attention to before on previous viewings.

0:36:18.845 --> 0:36:21.364
<v Speaker 3>And yet this time, when he leaves it on the chair,

0:36:21.485 --> 0:36:24.165
<v Speaker 3>you see how he considers the money in a close

0:36:24.245 --> 0:36:26.725
<v Speaker 3>up when it's thrown in in the first place, and

0:36:26.765 --> 0:36:29.405
<v Speaker 3>then when he gets back and he parks the cab,

0:36:30.045 --> 0:36:32.245
<v Speaker 3>he has to make that decision and as a symbol

0:36:32.445 --> 0:36:36.205
<v Speaker 3>of again kind of his own corruption but his sense

0:36:36.245 --> 0:36:39.725
<v Speaker 3>of moral superiority, that he's not going to take that money.

0:36:39.965 --> 0:36:43.685
<v Speaker 3>But of course he also sort of maybe and this

0:36:43.725 --> 0:36:46.005
<v Speaker 3>would be fitting for Strader. It's almost like a cross

0:36:46.005 --> 0:36:48.605
<v Speaker 3>he bears, right, It's that he's going to keep that

0:36:48.605 --> 0:36:51.045
<v Speaker 3>twenty dollars bill because it's going to be the reminder

0:36:51.125 --> 0:36:54.525
<v Speaker 3>to him of what he's not total he hopes to

0:36:54.565 --> 0:36:54.805
<v Speaker 3>not be.

0:36:54.885 --> 0:36:56.645
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's his token in that way. I agree. It's

0:36:56.885 --> 0:36:58.645
<v Speaker 2>a great screenwriting touch.

0:36:58.805 --> 0:37:01.525
<v Speaker 3>So Dana and I did talk about the ending in

0:37:01.565 --> 0:37:05.285
<v Speaker 3>twenty eleven, and it turns out my thoughts about it

0:37:05.445 --> 0:37:09.365
<v Speaker 3>haven't really changed since then. In short, there is a

0:37:09.405 --> 0:37:13.685
<v Speaker 3>reading of the film that suggests maybe everything that happens

0:37:13.765 --> 0:37:18.125
<v Speaker 3>after the blood bath is a fantasy, and there's different

0:37:18.285 --> 0:37:23.525
<v Speaker 3>evidence people point to, including the overhead shot, which is

0:37:23.525 --> 0:37:27.364
<v Speaker 3>almost like a view from heaven it's been suggested there

0:37:27.405 --> 0:37:29.765
<v Speaker 3>near the end. And then the fact that everything that

0:37:29.805 --> 0:37:32.285
<v Speaker 3>happens in this I totally agree with, everything that happens

0:37:32.325 --> 0:37:36.844
<v Speaker 3>after the police show up seems somehow a little bit

0:37:36.885 --> 0:37:41.285
<v Speaker 3>tacked on false or maybe like a fantasy. You certainly

0:37:41.365 --> 0:37:44.405
<v Speaker 3>see it in that exchange with Sybil Shepherd when she

0:37:44.445 --> 0:37:49.285
<v Speaker 3>gets in the cab, and that's something where it's definitely

0:37:49.285 --> 0:37:53.125
<v Speaker 3>not clear from watching it that we are supposed to

0:37:53.205 --> 0:37:55.485
<v Speaker 3>completely believe that she ever got in the car. There's

0:37:55.525 --> 0:37:58.205
<v Speaker 3>something about the shot reverse shot of him looking at

0:37:58.205 --> 0:38:00.685
<v Speaker 3>her and us only seeing her in the rearview mirror.

0:38:00.725 --> 0:38:03.725
<v Speaker 3>It's almost again like it's his perception, he's projecting her

0:38:03.805 --> 0:38:06.845
<v Speaker 3>there in the backseat. That all said, where do you

0:38:06.885 --> 0:38:08.125
<v Speaker 3>fall on that theory?

0:38:08.205 --> 0:38:08.485
<v Speaker 2>Josh?

0:38:08.805 --> 0:38:11.045
<v Speaker 1>So, I think this takes us back to Chris Christofferson

0:38:11.205 --> 0:38:15.765
<v Speaker 1>actually in that conversation, because one other question that we've

0:38:15.805 --> 0:38:18.565
<v Speaker 1>touched on lightly but is why did Betsy ever even

0:38:18.605 --> 0:38:21.205
<v Speaker 1>agree to go get that cup of coffee with this guy?

0:38:22.325 --> 0:38:25.965
<v Speaker 1>And so that's already kind of planting this seed of

0:38:26.165 --> 0:38:29.645
<v Speaker 1>how much of his interaction with her is he imagining

0:38:29.685 --> 0:38:32.485
<v Speaker 1>now the movie toys with us because she gives him

0:38:32.485 --> 0:38:35.005
<v Speaker 1>a reason and thereby gives us a reason. She says

0:38:35.045 --> 0:38:38.844
<v Speaker 1>she's interested, she's intrigued by his contradictions, and that's what

0:38:38.925 --> 0:38:41.605
<v Speaker 1>makes her think of the Christofferson song The Pilgrim, Chapter

0:38:41.645 --> 0:38:45.205
<v Speaker 1>thirty three. So we could tell ourselves that, Okay, she's curious.

0:38:46.325 --> 0:38:50.325
<v Speaker 1>But I really think not everything, but a vast majority

0:38:50.365 --> 0:38:53.844
<v Speaker 1>of what we see between Travis and Betsy is some

0:38:53.885 --> 0:38:56.725
<v Speaker 1>sort of fantasy. And think of what he tells her

0:38:57.245 --> 0:39:00.364
<v Speaker 1>in that conversation. He says he could tell she wasn't

0:39:00.405 --> 0:39:04.045
<v Speaker 1>a happy person when he watched her talk to Albert Brooks.

0:39:04.685 --> 0:39:07.325
<v Speaker 1>But we've been given and I forgot how many scenes

0:39:07.325 --> 0:39:10.925
<v Speaker 1>we got between Brooks and Shepherd. We get like a

0:39:10.965 --> 0:39:14.165
<v Speaker 1>fair amount of them, and every time we get one

0:39:14.165 --> 0:39:16.925
<v Speaker 1>of them, they seem to be pretty happy. They have

0:39:16.965 --> 0:39:20.845
<v Speaker 1>a rapport, they're flirty, they're like giving it back and

0:39:21.085 --> 0:39:21.924
<v Speaker 1>forth to each other.

0:39:22.125 --> 0:39:24.605
<v Speaker 3>His distorted view of the world, he's a threat, so

0:39:24.685 --> 0:39:25.645
<v Speaker 3>he perceives those.

0:39:25.525 --> 0:39:27.325
<v Speaker 4>Guys exactly exactly.

0:39:27.485 --> 0:39:30.085
<v Speaker 1>So why you know she is She seems to be

0:39:30.125 --> 0:39:34.605
<v Speaker 1>a happy person, so right, it's his distorted perception. Now,

0:39:34.725 --> 0:39:38.325
<v Speaker 1>I don't think everything after the massacre is a fantasy,

0:39:39.045 --> 0:39:41.285
<v Speaker 1>and this takes us to the top of our conversation.

0:39:41.445 --> 0:39:44.245
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a very there's some interesting commentary in

0:39:44.285 --> 0:39:47.925
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Travis is celebrated as the hero, and

0:39:47.965 --> 0:39:50.805
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more revelatory. We're living with that now,

0:39:50.965 --> 0:39:54.645
<v Speaker 1>right with the media distortion of things makes it extra

0:39:54.685 --> 0:39:58.485
<v Speaker 1>resonant today. But I do think that her getting in

0:39:58.485 --> 0:40:02.645
<v Speaker 1>the cab is fantasy. And here's here's why.

0:40:02.725 --> 0:40:03.285
<v Speaker 4>And it's a.

0:40:03.325 --> 0:40:07.365
<v Speaker 1>Very brief filmmaking touch. It's partly the look in the

0:40:07.365 --> 0:40:09.685
<v Speaker 1>rear room mirror that you talked about, where she seems

0:40:09.765 --> 0:40:13.364
<v Speaker 1>like she's in this dream space. It's almost like we're

0:40:13.405 --> 0:40:15.805
<v Speaker 1>not in the cab anymore, but we're into this portal

0:40:15.845 --> 0:40:19.165
<v Speaker 1>to another dimension, right how the mirror frames her. But

0:40:19.325 --> 0:40:22.085
<v Speaker 1>if you notice, there's a really weird moment. He drops

0:40:22.085 --> 0:40:25.245
<v Speaker 1>her off on this leafy tree line, nice street, her home,

0:40:25.325 --> 0:40:29.525
<v Speaker 1>we presume, and pulls away, watches her in the rearview mirror,

0:40:29.565 --> 0:40:32.045
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden, he does a double take.

0:40:32.445 --> 0:40:35.765
<v Speaker 1>The sound on the soundtrack actually distorts, it's almost like

0:40:35.765 --> 0:40:38.845
<v Speaker 1>a record scratch, and he looks back in the mirror

0:40:39.245 --> 0:40:42.405
<v Speaker 1>and the immediate next thing we see is not her

0:40:42.485 --> 0:40:46.925
<v Speaker 1>leafy green street, but it's the neon soaked, grimy streets

0:40:46.965 --> 0:40:50.444
<v Speaker 1>that he usually drives down. And so I think that's

0:40:50.485 --> 0:40:53.045
<v Speaker 1>the transition of he was just imagining that he was

0:40:53.085 --> 0:40:57.924
<v Speaker 1>with another woman in another place, and in reality he's

0:40:58.365 --> 0:41:00.645
<v Speaker 1>right back where he had been at the beginning of

0:41:00.645 --> 0:41:01.125
<v Speaker 1>the film.

0:41:01.365 --> 0:41:04.005
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I think we're completely aligned. If you're suggesting

0:41:04.045 --> 0:41:07.445
<v Speaker 3>that maybe some of the sequences with Shepherd even earlier

0:41:07.765 --> 0:41:10.405
<v Speaker 3>were fantasy, potentially, is that what you're saying.

0:41:10.205 --> 0:41:12.844
<v Speaker 1>I would say his experience of it, or you know,

0:41:12.925 --> 0:41:17.685
<v Speaker 1>the way it's being presented, is the way he's sort.

0:41:17.405 --> 0:41:18.285
<v Speaker 4>Of seeing it.

0:41:18.725 --> 0:41:22.005
<v Speaker 3>Well, again, I'm completely aligned with him seeing the world

0:41:22.125 --> 0:41:25.085
<v Speaker 3>completely differently than everyone else around him, including the people

0:41:25.365 --> 0:41:26.685
<v Speaker 3>he's sitting across from.

0:41:27.005 --> 0:41:28.005
<v Speaker 2>And I agree with you.

0:41:28.485 --> 0:41:31.205
<v Speaker 3>I think that we're supposed to read that entire exchange

0:41:31.245 --> 0:41:33.085
<v Speaker 3>in the cab at the end with Sybil Shepherd as

0:41:33.125 --> 0:41:36.725
<v Speaker 3>a fantasy, But that doesn't mean everything that happens at

0:41:36.765 --> 0:41:40.285
<v Speaker 3>the end is a fantasy. I do reject that, and

0:41:40.325 --> 0:41:43.285
<v Speaker 3>I reject it one for the reason you said, which

0:41:43.325 --> 0:41:48.645
<v Speaker 3>is there is a beautiful, profound irony in the way

0:41:48.685 --> 0:41:51.405
<v Speaker 3>he is celebrated, which again comes back to this idea

0:41:51.485 --> 0:41:55.965
<v Speaker 3>of the perception of reality, because it's very easy to

0:41:56.165 --> 0:41:58.285
<v Speaker 3>just put what he did into frame it the way

0:41:58.405 --> 0:42:02.885
<v Speaker 3>the media does, which is, you know, vigilante rescues, rescues

0:42:02.965 --> 0:42:06.405
<v Speaker 3>girl and kills a pimp. You know, if you just

0:42:06.445 --> 0:42:07.885
<v Speaker 3>look at it that way and you don't see what

0:42:07.965 --> 0:42:09.765
<v Speaker 3>we saw, or you don't know a little bit more

0:42:09.805 --> 0:42:12.404
<v Speaker 3>about the situation and how disturbed Travis is, it's very

0:42:12.445 --> 0:42:17.525
<v Speaker 3>easy to buy that narrative, even the narrative that Iris's

0:42:17.565 --> 0:42:22.245
<v Speaker 3>parents are probably selling to themselves right, and isn't completely

0:42:22.245 --> 0:42:25.245
<v Speaker 3>true about how she's assimilated back home and boy, she's

0:42:25.285 --> 0:42:27.805
<v Speaker 3>been rescued. It's all tied up in this idea that

0:42:27.885 --> 0:42:31.445
<v Speaker 3>the world misperceives what Travis did. Travis now sees himself

0:42:31.445 --> 0:42:34.085
<v Speaker 3>falsely as a hero, and this idea of kind of

0:42:34.125 --> 0:42:38.645
<v Speaker 3>a collective bloodlust, where as Americans we all go, well,

0:42:38.765 --> 0:42:41.165
<v Speaker 3>damn right, they had it coming, so he did the

0:42:41.245 --> 0:42:44.965
<v Speaker 3>right thing. If it's all a fantasy, then that commentary

0:42:45.165 --> 0:42:48.045
<v Speaker 3>is completely watered down. And what else is watered down

0:42:48.605 --> 0:42:51.404
<v Speaker 3>is the moment you spoke to at the end, which

0:42:51.445 --> 0:42:55.645
<v Speaker 3>is that amazing punch of the grabbing of the review mirror,

0:42:55.645 --> 0:42:57.844
<v Speaker 3>I think right, and the jarringness of it, and all

0:42:57.845 --> 0:43:00.565
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden, we're back to a certain reality. And

0:43:00.605 --> 0:43:04.165
<v Speaker 3>I think that certain reality is coming back from the

0:43:04.165 --> 0:43:07.925
<v Speaker 3>fantasy that he was just engaged in with Sybil Shepherd

0:43:07.925 --> 0:43:10.165
<v Speaker 3>in his back seat. But it's also this reality that

0:43:11.245 --> 0:43:15.525
<v Speaker 3>any progress somehow that Travis seems to have made, this

0:43:15.645 --> 0:43:21.765
<v Speaker 3>idea that maybe by committing this act and being the

0:43:22.085 --> 0:43:25.405
<v Speaker 3>Avenger has somehow now set him right with the world

0:43:25.885 --> 0:43:29.885
<v Speaker 3>and he's no longer going to be a threat to society.

0:43:30.285 --> 0:43:32.765
<v Speaker 3>We know in that moment, with that cut and with

0:43:32.885 --> 0:43:36.285
<v Speaker 3>the sound, that that's not true, that Travis is still

0:43:36.325 --> 0:43:37.645
<v Speaker 3>disturbed as he's ever been.

0:43:38.125 --> 0:43:40.165
<v Speaker 1>And do you think maybe even like the letter from

0:43:40.165 --> 0:43:44.645
<v Speaker 1>mister Steinsma from Iris's father, which which seems to be

0:43:44.725 --> 0:43:47.404
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a practice run for Schrader's hardcore, because

0:43:47.565 --> 0:43:49.364
<v Speaker 1>I think that came a few years later and had

0:43:49.485 --> 0:43:52.205
<v Speaker 1>a similar plot about a father going after his daughter

0:43:52.285 --> 0:43:55.765
<v Speaker 1>runaway daughter. But I wonder if even that is imagined,

0:43:55.885 --> 0:43:58.565
<v Speaker 1>because just because of the detail of the father making

0:43:58.965 --> 0:44:01.525
<v Speaker 1>so many excuses about how we can't come out to

0:44:01.565 --> 0:44:04.445
<v Speaker 1>see you, like we don't have any more money, and

0:44:04.485 --> 0:44:08.125
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like he's inventing these reasons why these people

0:44:08.205 --> 0:44:11.485
<v Speaker 1>won't actually interact with him because maybe they don't exist.

0:44:11.965 --> 0:44:14.845
<v Speaker 3>Well, we saw earlier him writing a note that was

0:44:14.965 --> 0:44:18.325
<v Speaker 3>mostly a fabrication to his parents, so I wouldn't put

0:44:18.325 --> 0:44:21.365
<v Speaker 3>it past him to fabricate that letter paying true to

0:44:21.445 --> 0:44:24.605
<v Speaker 3>him as a hero either. For more on our seven

0:44:24.645 --> 0:44:27.445
<v Speaker 3>from seventy six Best Year Ever series, including previous and

0:44:27.485 --> 0:44:31.645
<v Speaker 3>future reviews, visit film Spotting dot Net Slash seven from

0:44:31.685 --> 0:44:32.325
<v Speaker 3>seventy six.

0:44:34.325 --> 0:44:36.325
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, people do anything in front of a taxi drive.

0:44:36.365 --> 0:44:40.525
<v Speaker 7>I mean anything. People too cheap to run a hotel room.

0:44:40.725 --> 0:44:41.685
<v Speaker 3>Or drive a hurry up.

0:44:41.685 --> 0:44:44.165
<v Speaker 7>Well this people want to embarrass you. It's like here,

0:44:44.205 --> 0:44:44.805
<v Speaker 7>not even there.

0:44:44.805 --> 0:44:47.445
<v Speaker 6>It's like, you know, like a taxi driver doesn't even exist.

0:44:47.725 --> 0:44:50.805
<v Speaker 3>I've seen there from Martin Scorsese's Taxi Driver, a movie

0:44:50.805 --> 0:44:52.925
<v Speaker 3>that was part of one of my favorite Best Picture

0:44:52.925 --> 0:44:55.965
<v Speaker 3>crops ever in nineteen seventy six, along with Network and

0:44:55.965 --> 0:44:58.525
<v Speaker 3>All the President's Men and Rocky, which did win the

0:44:58.565 --> 0:45:00.365
<v Speaker 3>Oscar and I love Rocky, don't get me wrong, but

0:45:00.365 --> 0:45:03.485
<v Speaker 3>I'd rank it probably fourth behind those other three movies.

0:45:03.765 --> 0:45:06.805
<v Speaker 3>There were no wins for Taxi Driver, despite four nominations

0:45:06.845 --> 0:45:10.165
<v Speaker 3>for Best Picture, obviously supporting Actress for Jodi Foster as

0:45:10.205 --> 0:45:13.725
<v Speaker 3>the twelve year old prostitute, Iris for Score and for

0:45:13.925 --> 0:45:15.805
<v Speaker 3>Best Actor for Robert de Niro in one of his

0:45:15.925 --> 0:45:19.565
<v Speaker 3>most memorable roles ever as Travis Bickle, the disillusion lonely

0:45:19.645 --> 0:45:22.165
<v Speaker 3>Vietnam vett who watches quote all the animals come out

0:45:22.165 --> 0:45:24.005
<v Speaker 3>at night from the seat of his cab and hopes

0:45:24.045 --> 0:45:26.605
<v Speaker 3>that someday a real rain will come and wash all

0:45:26.605 --> 0:45:29.965
<v Speaker 3>this scum off the streets. In honor of Taxi Drivers

0:45:30.005 --> 0:45:32.725
<v Speaker 3>thirty fifth anniversary and the Blu ray release coming out

0:45:32.725 --> 0:45:35.965
<v Speaker 3>this Tuesday, AMC Theaters had screenings across the country on

0:45:36.045 --> 0:45:38.884
<v Speaker 3>March nineteenth and March twenty second. Dana, we both caught

0:45:38.925 --> 0:45:40.765
<v Speaker 3>it on the big screen. It was the first time

0:45:40.805 --> 0:45:42.645
<v Speaker 3>I'd seen it in more than fifteen years, so I

0:45:42.685 --> 0:45:44.565
<v Speaker 3>almost felt like I was watching it for the first time.

0:45:44.605 --> 0:45:47.765
<v Speaker 3>I know from listening to your Slate Spoiler Special podcast

0:45:47.805 --> 0:45:51.085
<v Speaker 3>that you had a similar reaction to it and are

0:45:51.165 --> 0:45:54.805
<v Speaker 3>always erudite and often contrarian. Film spotting producer Sam van

0:45:54.845 --> 0:45:57.365
<v Speaker 3>Halgren also got a night out and saw the re release,

0:45:57.485 --> 0:45:59.884
<v Speaker 3>which prompted some chatter between us over email. I hope

0:45:59.885 --> 0:46:02.125
<v Speaker 3>he won't mind that I'm going to poach the question

0:46:02.325 --> 0:46:04.125
<v Speaker 3>he posed to me and oppose it to you now,

0:46:04.245 --> 0:46:06.165
<v Speaker 3>because I think it's a really good one. He acknowledges

0:46:06.245 --> 0:46:08.565
<v Speaker 3>that de Niro is beyond brilliant as bikel and he

0:46:08.645 --> 0:46:11.685
<v Speaker 3>gets why it's so beloved, but he ultimately wonders, what

0:46:11.885 --> 0:46:14.885
<v Speaker 3>makes this a great film today as opposed to in

0:46:14.925 --> 0:46:15.364
<v Speaker 3>its day?

0:46:15.765 --> 0:46:17.085
<v Speaker 2>How do you answer that? Ah?

0:46:17.125 --> 0:46:19.885
<v Speaker 9>So his argument was that it's locked in to the

0:46:19.965 --> 0:46:23.165
<v Speaker 9>mid seventies, it's time and it feels dated. Now. Wow,

0:46:23.245 --> 0:46:25.245
<v Speaker 9>I topically disagree, but I don't really have an argument

0:46:25.285 --> 0:46:27.525
<v Speaker 9>except to say that I just don't feel that. Watching

0:46:27.525 --> 0:46:30.085
<v Speaker 9>the movie, I felt that it was incredibly topical and alive,

0:46:30.205 --> 0:46:31.765
<v Speaker 9>and I had that feeling that you feel when you

0:46:31.805 --> 0:46:33.325
<v Speaker 9>watch a great work of art and say, wow, this

0:46:33.365 --> 0:46:35.364
<v Speaker 9>says something new to me now than it did when

0:46:35.405 --> 0:46:36.005
<v Speaker 9>I first saw it.

0:46:36.365 --> 0:46:37.005
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree.

0:46:37.045 --> 0:46:38.925
<v Speaker 3>I think that in its grittiness and its style and

0:46:38.925 --> 0:46:41.125
<v Speaker 3>that sense of alienation that just pervades the whole film,

0:46:41.165 --> 0:46:44.485
<v Speaker 3>there's no doubt it's a nineteen seventies American film, in

0:46:44.485 --> 0:46:46.605
<v Speaker 3>a nineteen seventies New York film. You probably know this

0:46:46.605 --> 0:46:48.645
<v Speaker 3>a lot better than I do. That Times Square just

0:46:48.685 --> 0:46:51.045
<v Speaker 3>doesn't exist anymore. A lot of those scenes that we

0:46:51.085 --> 0:46:53.805
<v Speaker 3>see of him walking or in his cab late at night.

0:46:53.845 --> 0:46:55.844
<v Speaker 3>But I do think it's a great film today. I'm

0:46:55.885 --> 0:46:58.285
<v Speaker 3>with you because it does seem timeless to me as well.

0:46:58.325 --> 0:47:02.565
<v Speaker 3>It's still very audacious cinematically, especially in how it depicts violence.

0:47:02.605 --> 0:47:04.245
<v Speaker 3>I think that still shocks you a little bit. And

0:47:04.285 --> 0:47:06.725
<v Speaker 3>I think that the politics of the movie are largely

0:47:06.805 --> 0:47:10.485
<v Speaker 3>secondary to this very vivid portrait of paints of loneliness.

0:47:10.525 --> 0:47:13.325
<v Speaker 3>I think that the senator who's running for president, Palatine,

0:47:13.325 --> 0:47:15.285
<v Speaker 3>his speeches are really full of kind of the same

0:47:15.325 --> 0:47:18.925
<v Speaker 3>bland rhetoric we hear today. It's sort of universal, and

0:47:18.965 --> 0:47:20.965
<v Speaker 3>I think that sadly, there probably are a lot of

0:47:21.085 --> 0:47:23.165
<v Speaker 3>Travis Bickles out there. In some ways, they're may be

0:47:23.245 --> 0:47:25.805
<v Speaker 3>even more dangerous because I was thinking about it. You know,

0:47:25.845 --> 0:47:28.405
<v Speaker 3>Travis's enemy, if he has one, he thinks he has

0:47:28.445 --> 0:47:30.405
<v Speaker 3>a lot of them. But there it's really just himself.

0:47:30.445 --> 0:47:32.965
<v Speaker 3>He's more self destructive than anything. You see how he

0:47:33.125 --> 0:47:36.045
<v Speaker 3>eats and how he lives. But there isn't one group

0:47:36.085 --> 0:47:38.844
<v Speaker 3>of people that he can pinpoint as the cause of

0:47:38.885 --> 0:47:42.165
<v Speaker 3>his miserable life. He doesn't hate, even Palatine, the guy

0:47:42.205 --> 0:47:45.645
<v Speaker 3>he plans to kill because he just really doesn't have

0:47:45.645 --> 0:47:47.405
<v Speaker 3>any conviction about that one way or another. I think

0:47:47.445 --> 0:47:49.485
<v Speaker 3>he's caught up in a more general malaise, this kind

0:47:49.525 --> 0:47:52.245
<v Speaker 3>of intangible malaise, which is also what makes it so frustrating,

0:47:52.325 --> 0:47:54.285
<v Speaker 3>makes it so you have such the sense.

0:47:54.125 --> 0:47:55.605
<v Speaker 2>Of utility that you can't pinpoint.

0:47:55.645 --> 0:47:57.405
<v Speaker 3>And I think that today, one of the things that

0:47:57.445 --> 0:48:00.685
<v Speaker 3>struck me were so divided culturally and politically that the

0:48:00.725 --> 0:48:04.245
<v Speaker 3>bickles out there can probably more easily find a target

0:48:04.285 --> 0:48:06.885
<v Speaker 3>to try and take down. I think about Gabrielle Gifford's

0:48:06.885 --> 0:48:07.885
<v Speaker 3>in Arizona.

0:48:08.165 --> 0:48:09.884
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean, I think that's another thing that makes

0:48:09.925 --> 0:48:12.685
<v Speaker 9>this movie. Again, to answer Sam's question, that makes it

0:48:12.725 --> 0:48:15.005
<v Speaker 9>still vibrant now, is that in nineteen seventy six when

0:48:15.045 --> 0:48:16.845
<v Speaker 9>it was made, it was a prophecy, right, it was

0:48:16.885 --> 0:48:19.245
<v Speaker 9>a prophetic kind of film, And now it's actually happened

0:48:19.325 --> 0:48:21.205
<v Speaker 9>multiple times over. It's just weird to think that this

0:48:21.245 --> 0:48:23.765
<v Speaker 9>movie was made when John Lennon was still alive, before

0:48:23.765 --> 0:48:26.685
<v Speaker 9>Reagan was even president, much less you know, the assassination attempt,

0:48:26.845 --> 0:48:28.845
<v Speaker 9>of course by someone who was obsessed with Jodie Foster.

0:48:28.885 --> 0:48:31.245
<v Speaker 9>I mean, you could, I guess even argue that taxi

0:48:31.285 --> 0:48:34.085
<v Speaker 9>driver created some Travis Bickles, right, but at the very

0:48:34.125 --> 0:48:37.605
<v Speaker 9>least it predicted this, this whole series of Travis Bickles that

0:48:37.645 --> 0:48:39.725
<v Speaker 9>have existed, I mean, including the Columbine Shooters. You could

0:48:39.725 --> 0:48:42.325
<v Speaker 9>connect so many acts of violence to this kind of

0:48:42.325 --> 0:48:44.805
<v Speaker 9>psychology that you see taken apart in Travis Bickle. That

0:48:44.845 --> 0:48:47.125
<v Speaker 9>feels familiar to us now because of you know, current

0:48:47.165 --> 0:48:49.245
<v Speaker 9>events that have answered it, and because this movie's become

0:48:49.285 --> 0:48:51.605
<v Speaker 9>so iconic, But it must have felt so strange at

0:48:51.605 --> 0:48:53.405
<v Speaker 9>the time that this was the hero of a movie.

0:48:53.445 --> 0:48:55.805
<v Speaker 9>You know that this guy obviously an antihero, but that

0:48:55.845 --> 0:48:57.525
<v Speaker 9>he was the protagonist of a movie.

0:48:57.765 --> 0:48:59.125
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely.

0:48:59.165 --> 0:49:01.805
<v Speaker 3>I think that the interesting part about it is you

0:49:01.845 --> 0:49:04.285
<v Speaker 3>do sympathize with him even though he's clearly derained, just

0:49:04.325 --> 0:49:06.765
<v Speaker 3>because he is such a lonely character. I think that

0:49:06.805 --> 0:49:09.565
<v Speaker 3>the way the loneliness is depicted throughout the film, you

0:49:09.605 --> 0:49:11.844
<v Speaker 3>even see it in all of the supporting characters and

0:49:12.085 --> 0:49:15.445
<v Speaker 3>in his encounters with them. I think about Albert Brooks

0:49:15.485 --> 0:49:17.045
<v Speaker 3>as his character. He doesn't get much screen time, but

0:49:17.045 --> 0:49:19.885
<v Speaker 3>he's clearly just pining for Sybil Shepherd and she's completely

0:49:19.965 --> 0:49:23.165
<v Speaker 3>ignoring him, and she's drawn to Travis, which seems sort

0:49:23.165 --> 0:49:25.205
<v Speaker 3>of hard to believe on its face, but I think

0:49:25.245 --> 0:49:27.805
<v Speaker 3>it's just because of his earnestness and his conviction for her.

0:49:27.885 --> 0:49:29.844
<v Speaker 3>Even if it's just the fact that he's just in

0:49:29.885 --> 0:49:32.445
<v Speaker 3>love with her and seems to be totally devoted and

0:49:32.485 --> 0:49:36.165
<v Speaker 3>passionate in whatever she is, that's at least something that

0:49:36.285 --> 0:49:38.605
<v Speaker 3>Albert Brooks certainly isn't bringing to the table, and that

0:49:39.005 --> 0:49:41.885
<v Speaker 3>gets her somehow connected to him in a way that

0:49:41.925 --> 0:49:44.165
<v Speaker 3>she's willing to explore. And I think even the great

0:49:44.205 --> 0:49:47.085
<v Speaker 3>Martin Scorsese's scene, I really love his cameo in this

0:49:47.165 --> 0:49:49.045
<v Speaker 3>film where he ends up getting in the car just

0:49:49.085 --> 0:49:52.405
<v Speaker 3>as a fair and he makes him park outside this

0:49:53.365 --> 0:49:55.685
<v Speaker 3>apartment and he says, his wife's up there, and he's

0:49:55.685 --> 0:49:57.605
<v Speaker 3>angry that his wife is cheating on him. His wife's

0:49:57.805 --> 0:49:59.525
<v Speaker 3>cheating on him with a black man, which he also

0:49:59.565 --> 0:50:01.885
<v Speaker 3>doesn't like, and he says, I'm gonna actually do something

0:50:01.885 --> 0:50:04.605
<v Speaker 3>about this. You get that same sense of alienation and

0:50:04.645 --> 0:50:07.045
<v Speaker 3>loneliness from that character, And that scene is actually really

0:50:07.045 --> 0:50:10.125
<v Speaker 3>pivotal because it's what, in the end, seems to spark

0:50:10.165 --> 0:50:13.045
<v Speaker 3>something in Travis. It seems to give him this sense that,

0:50:13.085 --> 0:50:14.725
<v Speaker 3>wait a second, I sit here and complain a lot

0:50:14.765 --> 0:50:17.245
<v Speaker 3>about what I see going on in society. I didn't

0:50:17.245 --> 0:50:18.605
<v Speaker 3>think that, you know what, I could actually go out

0:50:18.605 --> 0:50:20.725
<v Speaker 3>and get a forty four magnum and do something about it.

0:50:21.085 --> 0:50:22.884
<v Speaker 9>So it's only after that that he starts thinking about

0:50:22.965 --> 0:50:25.765
<v Speaker 9>about assassinating the politician. I think, so, Yeah, I think

0:50:25.765 --> 0:50:27.485
<v Speaker 9>you're right. I think that happens earlier in the movie

0:50:27.725 --> 0:50:30.565
<v Speaker 9>than I remembered. Yeah, the scorseseic cameo apparently was something

0:50:30.565 --> 0:50:32.165
<v Speaker 9>that was put in at the last minute because whoever

0:50:32.285 --> 0:50:33.765
<v Speaker 9>was going to do it dropped out of the movie,

0:50:33.765 --> 0:50:35.005
<v Speaker 9>and it was just sort of like, hey, this is

0:50:35.005 --> 0:50:36.885
<v Speaker 9>a low budget movie, let the director do it. But

0:50:37.045 --> 0:50:39.125
<v Speaker 9>it ends up being so perfect, right, because it ends

0:50:39.165 --> 0:50:41.325
<v Speaker 9>up sounding as if it's sort of the soul of

0:50:41.365 --> 0:50:43.525
<v Speaker 9>the movie speaking, and it's actually some of the worst

0:50:43.525 --> 0:50:46.645
<v Speaker 9>and most violent, horrific, racist, sexist language in the whole movie.

0:50:46.645 --> 0:50:48.405
<v Speaker 9>And it doesn't come out of Robert Nero's mouth, that

0:50:48.445 --> 0:50:51.725
<v Speaker 9>comes out of the directors, right, So it's this weird displacement.

0:50:51.485 --> 0:50:53.725
<v Speaker 3>It is, I think too. Did you notice the Scorsese

0:50:53.845 --> 0:50:55.085
<v Speaker 3>pops up in another scene.

0:50:55.245 --> 0:50:57.404
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, when he's watching Sybil Shepherd walking into the building

0:50:57.445 --> 0:50:58.085
<v Speaker 9>in the white dress.

0:50:58.165 --> 0:51:01.605
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's just sitting there along the building there and

0:51:01.725 --> 0:51:04.165
<v Speaker 3>just happens to be someone that Travis walks by. And

0:51:03.965 --> 0:51:06.085
<v Speaker 3>it's so weird that he's in the film later, but

0:51:06.125 --> 0:51:07.325
<v Speaker 3>he's also in that early scene.

0:51:07.325 --> 0:51:08.405
<v Speaker 2>I don't know quite what to make.

0:51:08.565 --> 0:51:10.765
<v Speaker 9>He's such an unmistakable bystander. It's kind of funny to

0:51:10.765 --> 0:51:12.245
<v Speaker 9>put him in if you don't want him to be noticed,

0:51:12.245 --> 0:51:15.845
<v Speaker 9>because it's this short, little stubby guy with a black unibrow.

0:51:15.885 --> 0:51:17.725
<v Speaker 9>I mean, nobody else looks like Martin Scorsese.

0:51:18.005 --> 0:51:20.805
<v Speaker 3>We were talking about loneliness and kind of those supporting characters. Obviously,

0:51:21.325 --> 0:51:24.645
<v Speaker 3>the Jodie Foster character, she's someone too who is willing,

0:51:24.685 --> 0:51:27.765
<v Speaker 3>it seems, to prostitute herself because at least someone will

0:51:27.805 --> 0:51:30.365
<v Speaker 3>listen to her. This character that Harvey Kayitel plays sport.

0:51:30.645 --> 0:51:33.485
<v Speaker 3>He says he loves her, he'll somehow validate her existence.

0:51:33.525 --> 0:51:36.005
<v Speaker 3>And the only reason, actually, I don't mind the scene

0:51:36.045 --> 0:51:39.685
<v Speaker 3>between Foster and kit Tell where Kitell basically does this

0:51:39.725 --> 0:51:43.005
<v Speaker 3>Berry White esque soliloquy talking about how happy he is

0:51:43.085 --> 0:51:44.565
<v Speaker 3>to be with her and how happy he is to

0:51:44.565 --> 0:51:46.805
<v Speaker 3>have a woman who loves her man and they're dancing.

0:51:47.245 --> 0:51:49.645
<v Speaker 3>It's a bizarre scene because it does kind of take

0:51:49.685 --> 0:51:51.725
<v Speaker 3>you out of the moment when you realize that Travis

0:51:51.805 --> 0:51:54.165
<v Speaker 3>isn't around. Every other moment in the film has been

0:51:54.245 --> 0:51:57.405
<v Speaker 3>kind of through his lens and he's not there, and

0:51:57.445 --> 0:52:01.205
<v Speaker 3>it felt really obtrusive and unnecessary. But then it does

0:52:01.285 --> 0:52:03.965
<v Speaker 3>explain Iris if you put it in that context of loneliness,

0:52:04.485 --> 0:52:07.685
<v Speaker 3>it makes sense that she is this character who finally

0:52:07.725 --> 0:52:10.765
<v Speaker 3>feels a connection to someone. Clearly her parents aren't giving

0:52:10.765 --> 0:52:13.045
<v Speaker 3>her the kind of validation she needs. This character does,

0:52:13.085 --> 0:52:14.725
<v Speaker 3>and then you see the link she's willing to go

0:52:15.005 --> 0:52:15.965
<v Speaker 3>to continue getting that.

0:52:16.205 --> 0:52:18.045
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think that scene accomplishes a lot actually when

0:52:18.085 --> 0:52:21.165
<v Speaker 9>Kyell and Foster dance together, because it humanizes them in

0:52:21.165 --> 0:52:23.045
<v Speaker 9>some way that makes the act of violence at the

0:52:23.125 --> 0:52:25.205
<v Speaker 9>end of the movie more horrifying. Right, They're not just

0:52:25.485 --> 0:52:27.805
<v Speaker 9>a pimp and his hooker, but there are two people who,

0:52:27.845 --> 0:52:30.085
<v Speaker 9>in whatever twisted way, care about each other and need

0:52:30.125 --> 0:52:32.325
<v Speaker 9>each other right. And then also the music in that

0:52:32.405 --> 0:52:34.325
<v Speaker 9>scene I just thought was incredible. The moment that Kayitell

0:52:34.365 --> 0:52:36.205
<v Speaker 9>goes over and puts the needle down on the record

0:52:36.405 --> 0:52:38.884
<v Speaker 9>and the music that comes out is Betsy's theme. It's

0:52:38.885 --> 0:52:41.365
<v Speaker 9>the theme, the saxophone theme that's been associated with Sybil

0:52:41.365 --> 0:52:43.565
<v Speaker 9>Shepherd through the whole movie. It's the love theme, right,

0:52:43.605 --> 0:52:45.844
<v Speaker 9>but somebody else's love theme. It's just a brilliant use

0:52:45.885 --> 0:52:47.405
<v Speaker 9>of sound. I mean, and as you know, I'm just

0:52:47.485 --> 0:52:49.725
<v Speaker 9>in love with that Bernard Herman's score for that movie.

0:52:49.845 --> 0:52:51.605
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And why don't we go ahead and jump into that,

0:52:51.645 --> 0:52:54.285
<v Speaker 3>because that is a big discovery for me with this

0:52:54.325 --> 0:52:57.165
<v Speaker 3>film the second time around, as well, seeing it again

0:52:57.245 --> 0:52:59.845
<v Speaker 3>on the big screen and hearing that Bernard Hermann score

0:53:00.045 --> 0:53:02.725
<v Speaker 3>and the romanticism of that main theme that you talked about,

0:53:02.765 --> 0:53:05.445
<v Speaker 3>Betsy's theme. You did write really eloquently about it. I

0:53:05.445 --> 0:53:07.005
<v Speaker 3>want to link to that in the notes for the

0:53:07.005 --> 0:53:09.285
<v Speaker 3>show if anyone wants to check it out. But the

0:53:10.485 --> 0:53:13.645
<v Speaker 3>split there, there's kind of this schizophrenic quality to the

0:53:13.685 --> 0:53:15.605
<v Speaker 3>score where you get something so lush and so are

0:53:15.685 --> 0:53:18.085
<v Speaker 3>romantic and so New York as you see him driving around,

0:53:18.565 --> 0:53:22.165
<v Speaker 3>but jextaposed with all these kind of degraded, you know, images,

0:53:22.205 --> 0:53:25.525
<v Speaker 3>But then also those main themes that you hear throughout

0:53:25.525 --> 0:53:28.844
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the film when he's training, if you will,

0:53:28.925 --> 0:53:31.525
<v Speaker 3>for his assassination, or he's thinking about the things he's

0:53:31.525 --> 0:53:33.725
<v Speaker 3>going to do, and he's really getting worked up about

0:53:33.725 --> 0:53:36.965
<v Speaker 3>the ills of society. It's so dark, it's so menacing,

0:53:37.245 --> 0:53:40.325
<v Speaker 3>and again such a contrast to that great Betsy's theme

0:53:40.685 --> 0:53:41.245
<v Speaker 3>and very.

0:53:41.085 --> 0:53:43.285
<v Speaker 9>Old fashioned, right, I mean, it's like monster movie music

0:53:43.445 --> 0:53:46.205
<v Speaker 9>or horror movie music. For some reason this particular screening,

0:53:46.245 --> 0:53:49.765
<v Speaker 9>going and seeing this thirty fifth anniversary restoration, I was

0:53:49.805 --> 0:53:51.565
<v Speaker 9>just really struck by the music. It almost seemed like

0:53:51.605 --> 0:53:54.245
<v Speaker 9>the whole movie was just this huge jazz improvisation, you know,

0:53:54.285 --> 0:53:56.765
<v Speaker 9>like the music works so perfectly with the film. And

0:53:56.845 --> 0:54:00.005
<v Speaker 9>I know that Herman always insisted on extreme control, like

0:54:00.045 --> 0:54:01.525
<v Speaker 9>he wanted to write the music he wanted to write,

0:54:01.525 --> 0:54:03.245
<v Speaker 9>and the director had to work around it. And I

0:54:03.245 --> 0:54:05.005
<v Speaker 9>don't know whether this happened with Scorsese, but I know

0:54:05.005 --> 0:54:07.485
<v Speaker 9>with Hitchcock sometimes the scenes would have to be extended,

0:54:07.485 --> 0:54:09.965
<v Speaker 9>and Hitchcock would make them thirty seconds longer because there

0:54:09.965 --> 0:54:12.085
<v Speaker 9>were thirty more seconds of music that Hermann wanted him

0:54:12.085 --> 0:54:12.364
<v Speaker 9>to use.

0:54:12.485 --> 0:54:13.805
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's interesting that you mentioned it.

0:54:13.805 --> 0:54:16.924
<v Speaker 3>It's almost like Walldawall jazz, because of course Scorsese often

0:54:16.965 --> 0:54:19.445
<v Speaker 3>gets lumped into that category as someone who has wall

0:54:19.485 --> 0:54:21.364
<v Speaker 3>to wall rock and roll music. It's almost like it's

0:54:21.405 --> 0:54:24.485
<v Speaker 3>just images going with the sound and mean Streets is

0:54:24.485 --> 0:54:26.325
<v Speaker 3>a lot like that, and then you have Taxi Driver here,

0:54:26.525 --> 0:54:28.525
<v Speaker 3>where you get this full orchestra, as you mentioned, this

0:54:28.605 --> 0:54:31.805
<v Speaker 3>really old fashioned, kind of classic score. It actually reminded

0:54:31.845 --> 0:54:35.045
<v Speaker 3>me a lot of those great Miklosh Roscha scores from

0:54:35.325 --> 0:54:37.925
<v Speaker 3>the noirs, like Double Indemnity and The Killers. They're just

0:54:38.005 --> 0:54:40.844
<v Speaker 3>so again menacing and oppressive. It's almost as if these

0:54:40.885 --> 0:54:43.485
<v Speaker 3>characters just have the weight of the world on their shoulders.

0:54:43.485 --> 0:54:45.405
<v Speaker 3>And I think that what I really loved about it

0:54:45.445 --> 0:54:48.165
<v Speaker 3>is it does put this movie squarely in that context

0:54:48.165 --> 0:54:50.685
<v Speaker 3>between old Hollywood and New Hollywood. It's clearly a New

0:54:50.725 --> 0:54:53.205
<v Speaker 3>Hollywood film in its audacity and its style, but at

0:54:53.245 --> 0:54:56.765
<v Speaker 3>the same time it's rooted in the films that Scorsese

0:54:56.845 --> 0:54:59.645
<v Speaker 3>grew up obviously loving and idolizing. And I think actually

0:54:59.845 --> 0:55:02.285
<v Speaker 3>about the end of the film, that great shot that

0:55:02.325 --> 0:55:05.925
<v Speaker 3>everyone talks about deservedly so where after all the violence,

0:55:05.925 --> 0:55:09.485
<v Speaker 3>we get the overhead shot, the ceiling, that aerial view.

0:55:09.525 --> 0:55:11.685
<v Speaker 3>It's great, but then when it cuts outside and you

0:55:11.765 --> 0:55:15.405
<v Speaker 3>get the crowded streets and the crowded street and you

0:55:15.445 --> 0:55:18.005
<v Speaker 3>have the cop cars showing up and the sirens going,

0:55:18.165 --> 0:55:20.125
<v Speaker 3>it really reminded me of something like straight out of

0:55:20.125 --> 0:55:22.645
<v Speaker 3>Sunset Boulevard. It's the ending of that movie when everyone's

0:55:22.645 --> 0:55:25.085
<v Speaker 3>showing up on the scene, or even the beginning of

0:55:25.125 --> 0:55:26.645
<v Speaker 3>that movie when all the cars and you hear the

0:55:26.645 --> 0:55:29.925
<v Speaker 3>sirens blaring as they're going to Norma Desmond's house. So

0:55:30.205 --> 0:55:32.485
<v Speaker 3>it clearly has that influence on it.

0:55:32.605 --> 0:55:34.605
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I didn't thought of the Sunset Boulevard, but you're right.

0:55:34.645 --> 0:55:36.405
<v Speaker 9>It's almost a direct reference to that. And it's that

0:55:36.445 --> 0:55:39.285
<v Speaker 9>same kind of sense that this personal, intimate, painful story

0:55:39.325 --> 0:55:41.565
<v Speaker 9>you've been seeing has suddenly become an event on the

0:55:41.685 --> 0:55:44.245
<v Speaker 9>nightly news and you have to switch into that other context.

0:55:44.245 --> 0:55:47.005
<v Speaker 9>And you're right, it's the same exact note as Sunset Boulevard.

0:55:47.245 --> 0:55:49.485
<v Speaker 2>It makes sense to have that noir influence a little bit,

0:55:49.525 --> 0:55:49.685
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:55:49.685 --> 0:55:51.805
<v Speaker 3>I mean, obviously, the movie mostly takes place at night,

0:55:51.845 --> 0:55:53.485
<v Speaker 3>and he sees himself. I think, is this kind of

0:55:53.565 --> 0:55:56.924
<v Speaker 3>dark hero, this dark knight of the underworld. But what's

0:55:57.005 --> 0:55:59.285
<v Speaker 3>troubling about it, of course, is there's no mystery to solve,

0:55:59.325 --> 0:56:01.845
<v Speaker 3>there's no fem fatale to try to blame, there's no solution,

0:56:01.965 --> 0:56:06.245
<v Speaker 3>there's no resolution, there's just life. And that's what makes

0:56:06.285 --> 0:56:08.125
<v Speaker 3>it feel, I guess, so heavy and so bleak. So

0:56:08.405 --> 0:56:10.844
<v Speaker 3>I think we should at least touch on the ending

0:56:10.925 --> 0:56:12.484
<v Speaker 3>of the movie. I know this is something you talked

0:56:12.485 --> 0:56:16.364
<v Speaker 3>about with John Swansburg in your spoiler special, and I'm

0:56:16.405 --> 0:56:18.205
<v Speaker 3>exactly with you, guys. I was just nodding my head

0:56:18.205 --> 0:56:19.765
<v Speaker 3>the whole time I was listening to you, because if

0:56:19.765 --> 0:56:22.205
<v Speaker 3>you had asked me to describe the ending of Taxi Driver,

0:56:22.245 --> 0:56:23.765
<v Speaker 3>and I would have bet any amount of money that

0:56:23.805 --> 0:56:26.525
<v Speaker 3>I knew it. I would have recounted the shootout with

0:56:26.605 --> 0:56:28.605
<v Speaker 3>the pimps and the gun to the head and that

0:56:28.685 --> 0:56:31.565
<v Speaker 3>amazing overhead tracking shot. That's the end of the movie, right,

0:56:31.685 --> 0:56:33.685
<v Speaker 3>And then come to find out, no, it's not. I

0:56:33.725 --> 0:56:37.205
<v Speaker 3>completely forgot about the end with the paper clippings and

0:56:37.245 --> 0:56:40.165
<v Speaker 3>that whole coda with the letter from Iris's parents, which

0:56:40.245 --> 0:56:42.525
<v Speaker 3>in itself just seems kind of crazy. But I'll let

0:56:42.565 --> 0:56:44.525
<v Speaker 3>you jump in on how much of a shock that one.

0:56:44.685 --> 0:56:46.844
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I don't know what's your policy on spoiling here

0:56:46.885 --> 0:56:48.884
<v Speaker 9>on film spotting. Can we assume that a movie that's

0:56:48.925 --> 0:56:50.925
<v Speaker 9>thirty five years old we can now talk about the

0:56:51.005 --> 0:56:52.005
<v Speaker 9>ending of I would hope.

0:56:52.045 --> 0:56:53.404
<v Speaker 2>So, so let's go ahead and go for.

0:56:53.365 --> 0:56:53.805
<v Speaker 1>It, all right?

0:56:53.845 --> 0:56:56.445
<v Speaker 9>Well, so, yeah, you have this strange coda right, So

0:56:56.445 --> 0:56:58.045
<v Speaker 9>that after the scene that we just talked about the

0:56:58.045 --> 0:57:00.645
<v Speaker 9>sunset boulevard referencing, you know, pulling out and seeing the

0:57:00.725 --> 0:57:04.125
<v Speaker 9>cops arriving at the crime scene of the brothel or whatever.

0:57:04.565 --> 0:57:07.565
<v Speaker 9>Then suddenly we cut to I guess sometime in the future,

0:57:07.725 --> 0:57:10.245
<v Speaker 9>and again we hear Betsy's theme. We hear that, you know,

0:57:10.325 --> 0:57:14.365
<v Speaker 9>romantic theme, and there's this kind of ironic pan across

0:57:14.365 --> 0:57:17.045
<v Speaker 9>this wall of clippings that you realize is on Travis

0:57:17.045 --> 0:57:20.285
<v Speaker 9>Bickle's wall in his apartment. Taxi driver becomes local hero

0:57:20.685 --> 0:57:23.925
<v Speaker 9>save prostitute and gun battle, and that either in his

0:57:24.005 --> 0:57:26.125
<v Speaker 9>mind and his imagination. I guess some people think that

0:57:26.165 --> 0:57:28.125
<v Speaker 9>this is happening only his imagination, but the film doesn't

0:57:28.125 --> 0:57:30.885
<v Speaker 9>signal that in any way. It just seems that realistically

0:57:31.085 --> 0:57:33.325
<v Speaker 9>he's now become this hero. He somehow talked his way

0:57:33.325 --> 0:57:35.565
<v Speaker 9>out of the massacre and made himself look like the

0:57:35.565 --> 0:57:38.965
<v Speaker 9>hero of it. And he gets a letter from Iris's parents,

0:57:38.965 --> 0:57:41.685
<v Speaker 9>Iris being the Jodie Foster Child prostitute character, saying thank

0:57:41.725 --> 0:57:43.285
<v Speaker 9>you for returning our daughter to us. So he's a

0:57:43.325 --> 0:57:45.885
<v Speaker 9>hero to them. They even say, menacingly, maybe you can

0:57:45.925 --> 0:57:48.485
<v Speaker 9>come and visit us in Pittsburgh. Sometime and you think, oh, boy,

0:57:48.525 --> 0:57:52.605
<v Speaker 9>Taxi Driver to the Pittsburgh Years. And then there's a

0:57:52.645 --> 0:57:54.565
<v Speaker 9>coda to the coda, right, then there's the insane part

0:57:54.565 --> 0:57:57.485
<v Speaker 9>where he picks up Sybil Shepherd's character Betsy as just

0:57:57.525 --> 0:58:00.125
<v Speaker 9>a random fair. There's a lot of coincidental cabfairs in

0:58:00.205 --> 0:58:02.245
<v Speaker 9>this movie, right, because he also picks up the politician

0:58:02.245 --> 0:58:04.485
<v Speaker 9>that he's planning to kill earlier, that's true. He drives

0:58:04.485 --> 0:58:08.005
<v Speaker 9>Betsy back to her apartment, and there's this strangely nostalgic

0:58:08.045 --> 0:58:10.685
<v Speaker 9>feeling to that scene, almost as if John and I

0:58:10.765 --> 0:58:12.445
<v Speaker 9>were saying, almost as if it's like the TV show

0:58:12.485 --> 0:58:15.205
<v Speaker 9>Taxi instead of the movie Taxi Driver, Like, hey, you're

0:58:15.205 --> 0:58:17.525
<v Speaker 9>all right, Travis Bickle, you know, but it has to

0:58:17.565 --> 0:58:19.845
<v Speaker 9>be ironic and it has to be maybe a fake

0:58:19.845 --> 0:58:21.765
<v Speaker 9>out of some kind, right, can't be meant to be

0:58:21.845 --> 0:58:24.365
<v Speaker 9>left with the feeling that Travis Pickol's just okay.

0:58:24.765 --> 0:58:26.605
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think maybe you guys touch on this

0:58:26.645 --> 0:58:28.805
<v Speaker 3>as well. The one cue that Paul Schrader, the writer

0:58:28.885 --> 0:58:30.885
<v Speaker 3>who we haven't mentioned yet and Scorsese he gives you

0:58:30.965 --> 0:58:33.085
<v Speaker 3>is in that Bernard Hermann score where you have that

0:58:33.125 --> 0:58:36.605
<v Speaker 3>moment of the backward sound that cues you, and cues

0:58:36.645 --> 0:58:38.725
<v Speaker 3>de Niro. He responds to it as if he's hearing

0:58:38.725 --> 0:58:41.445
<v Speaker 3>it in the scene where he quickly looks in the

0:58:41.445 --> 0:58:43.445
<v Speaker 3>review mirror, and it's the sense that there's still something

0:58:43.525 --> 0:58:46.165
<v Speaker 3>lurking back there. There's still something in his psyche that

0:58:46.245 --> 0:58:48.765
<v Speaker 3>suggests that all is not well with him and things

0:58:48.805 --> 0:58:50.845
<v Speaker 3>are not going to go very well. He's going to

0:58:50.925 --> 0:58:52.725
<v Speaker 3>have another moment like this, but maybe he's not going

0:58:52.805 --> 0:58:55.285
<v Speaker 3>to be regarded as a hero when that happens. So

0:58:55.485 --> 0:58:57.925
<v Speaker 3>that part is really interesting. But yeah, it's hard to

0:58:57.965 --> 0:59:00.205
<v Speaker 3>really get a handle on what they were going for there,

0:59:00.325 --> 0:59:02.365
<v Speaker 3>because first of all, you are surprised that he's alive

0:59:02.405 --> 0:59:04.245
<v Speaker 3>at all. And then I don't think you really buy

0:59:04.285 --> 0:59:06.685
<v Speaker 3>that Iris is actually just back home in Pittsburgh and

0:59:06.805 --> 0:59:09.005
<v Speaker 3>is really doing fine. Would she really just go back

0:59:09.045 --> 0:59:11.645
<v Speaker 3>and resume her life as a teenage girl. It seems

0:59:11.725 --> 0:59:12.965
<v Speaker 3>kind of hard to swallow.

0:59:13.085 --> 0:59:15.325
<v Speaker 9>And her home life could not have been as happy

0:59:15.365 --> 0:59:17.205
<v Speaker 9>and christian as all met right if she ran away

0:59:17.245 --> 0:59:19.565
<v Speaker 9>from it and so fiercely refused to go back to it, you.

0:59:19.525 --> 0:59:21.605
<v Speaker 3>Wouldn't think so, And then you do in the Sibil

0:59:21.645 --> 0:59:24.765
<v Speaker 3>Shepherd part, And that is the one part where you said,

0:59:24.845 --> 0:59:27.005
<v Speaker 3>they don't really signal you in any way that this

0:59:27.085 --> 0:59:30.445
<v Speaker 3>could be like a dream. That's the one part anyway

0:59:30.445 --> 0:59:32.765
<v Speaker 3>of the coda that seems like there's something so dream

0:59:32.885 --> 0:59:34.565
<v Speaker 3>like about it. We don't even see her get in

0:59:34.645 --> 0:59:36.925
<v Speaker 3>the taxi, right, He just gets in. They say he's

0:59:36.925 --> 0:59:38.485
<v Speaker 3>got a fair He gets in, Alton, he looks in

0:59:38.485 --> 0:59:39.285
<v Speaker 3>his rearview mirror.

0:59:39.485 --> 0:59:40.605
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I could be wrong.

0:59:40.605 --> 0:59:42.325
<v Speaker 3>I didn't go back and watch the DVD, but I

0:59:42.325 --> 0:59:45.205
<v Speaker 3>don't think we actually see Sybil Shepherd except in the

0:59:45.245 --> 0:59:48.085
<v Speaker 3>rearview mirror. So there is this sense that it's all

0:59:48.125 --> 0:59:50.645
<v Speaker 3>his perspective and it's just in his head that maybe

0:59:50.685 --> 0:59:52.485
<v Speaker 3>she's there, And it does seem crazy that she would

0:59:52.525 --> 0:59:54.205
<v Speaker 3>get in and now we see her in the back.

0:59:54.005 --> 0:59:55.125
<v Speaker 2>Seat, I think, do we okay?

0:59:55.205 --> 0:59:57.605
<v Speaker 9>I mean we see her from that perspective that you

0:59:57.645 --> 0:59:59.125
<v Speaker 9>see him in the front seat and her behind him

0:59:59.165 --> 1:00:00.685
<v Speaker 9>in the back seat. You definitely get a sense that

1:00:00.725 --> 1:00:01.765
<v Speaker 9>she's really riding in the.

1:00:01.725 --> 1:00:04.245
<v Speaker 3>Cab, because all I remember is the shot where he

1:00:04.365 --> 1:00:05.965
<v Speaker 3>sees her for the first time, and that's how he

1:00:06.045 --> 1:00:07.965
<v Speaker 3>sees her is through the mirror, right, So it gives

1:00:07.965 --> 1:00:10.965
<v Speaker 3>me the sense that he's he's fantasizing almost that it's her,

1:00:11.445 --> 1:00:14.165
<v Speaker 3>and their conversation is really bizarre. You wonder where could

1:00:14.165 --> 1:00:16.445
<v Speaker 3>they possibly go in terms of any kind of relationship

1:00:16.685 --> 1:00:19.845
<v Speaker 3>from there. But with that all said, what does make

1:00:19.885 --> 1:00:21.845
<v Speaker 3>you think it has to be legitimate or that they're

1:00:21.845 --> 1:00:23.805
<v Speaker 3>playing it straight in some way is that I've never

1:00:23.805 --> 1:00:26.925
<v Speaker 3>heard Scorsese or Straighter say anything that suggests otherwise. They've

1:00:26.965 --> 1:00:30.205
<v Speaker 3>both always kind of dismissed those readings and said that,

1:00:30.285 --> 1:00:32.365
<v Speaker 3>you know what, it really is legit, And that's why

1:00:32.445 --> 1:00:34.805
<v Speaker 3>we added that part with the score, so you'll realize

1:00:34.845 --> 1:00:37.165
<v Speaker 3>that all isn't really well with the world. And actually

1:00:37.205 --> 1:00:39.525
<v Speaker 3>scor says he does the same thing in The King

1:00:39.525 --> 1:00:42.205
<v Speaker 3>of Comedy, I think maybe a little bit more successfully.

1:00:42.205 --> 1:00:44.965
<v Speaker 3>But both characters, if you think about Rupert Pupkin and

1:00:46.045 --> 1:00:48.525
<v Speaker 3>who de Niro plays here, Travis Bickel, they're both lonely,

1:00:48.565 --> 1:00:51.765
<v Speaker 3>they're both delusional, and at one point at the end

1:00:51.805 --> 1:00:54.045
<v Speaker 3>of the film. I'm not spoiling anything for anyone who

1:00:54.045 --> 1:00:56.085
<v Speaker 3>hasn't seen The King of Comedy, but he really sums

1:00:56.165 --> 1:00:58.725
<v Speaker 3>up his philosophy. He says that it's better to be

1:00:58.805 --> 1:01:01.285
<v Speaker 3>king for a knight than schmuck for a lifetime. And

1:01:01.325 --> 1:01:03.845
<v Speaker 3>I think that, actually, though in a much darker way.

1:01:03.845 --> 1:01:06.085
<v Speaker 3>I think Travis Bickel would agree with that. And so

1:01:06.325 --> 1:01:09.205
<v Speaker 3>both films actually have these really cynical codas where the

1:01:09.245 --> 1:01:11.965
<v Speaker 3>heroes are redeemed they do something really wrong, but the

1:01:12.045 --> 1:01:16.245
<v Speaker 3>heroes are redeemed by I guess society's thirst for sensationalism

1:01:16.325 --> 1:01:19.445
<v Speaker 3>or the Taxi Driver anyway, this thirst for blood and vengeance,

1:01:19.485 --> 1:01:22.405
<v Speaker 3>and I think that somehow end up being these statements

1:01:22.445 --> 1:01:26.165
<v Speaker 3>on redemption. Scorsese obviously wants these characters to be redeemed

1:01:26.205 --> 1:01:28.045
<v Speaker 3>in some way even after they do terrible things.

1:01:28.125 --> 1:01:29.965
<v Speaker 9>In King of Comedy, for some reason, it works better

1:01:29.965 --> 1:01:31.805
<v Speaker 9>for me. I don't know why. I think the iron

1:01:31.885 --> 1:01:33.765
<v Speaker 9>at the end of Taxi Driver is just somehow wrong.

1:01:33.805 --> 1:01:36.325
<v Speaker 9>The movie's not a social satire really, and suddenly for

1:01:36.365 --> 1:01:37.965
<v Speaker 9>the link of that code, it's as if it were.

1:01:38.165 --> 1:01:39.445
<v Speaker 9>It's as if the end is like the end of

1:01:39.445 --> 1:01:42.205
<v Speaker 9>Network or something, you know, where you sort of envision

1:01:42.245 --> 1:01:44.325
<v Speaker 9>this dystopic future where things are going to keep getting

1:01:44.445 --> 1:01:46.565
<v Speaker 9>worse and worse. It just doesn't go with the mood

1:01:46.605 --> 1:01:49.005
<v Speaker 9>of Taxi Driver. Somehow. To me, the ending feels like

1:01:49.005 --> 1:01:50.845
<v Speaker 9>a flaw, one of the few flaws in a really,

1:01:50.845 --> 1:01:51.765
<v Speaker 9>really great movie.

1:01:52.045 --> 1:01:53.605
<v Speaker 3>I think I'm with you on that, but it's certainly

1:01:53.685 --> 1:01:56.365
<v Speaker 3>fun to discuss. One other quick thing I'll mention that

1:01:56.485 --> 1:01:58.245
<v Speaker 3>really struck me on the big screen. I never noticed

1:01:58.285 --> 1:02:01.645
<v Speaker 3>on the small screen before. Is it really was disappointing

1:02:01.685 --> 1:02:05.125
<v Speaker 3>to see how Scorcese had to desaturate the colors during

1:02:05.125 --> 1:02:08.285
<v Speaker 3>the violence. He had to really shift the look of

1:02:08.285 --> 1:02:10.245
<v Speaker 3>the film completely in order to get an R rating.

1:02:10.285 --> 1:02:12.085
<v Speaker 3>They had to try to make it a little less vivid,

1:02:12.165 --> 1:02:14.765
<v Speaker 3>I guess, and I know Michael Chapman, the cinematographer, has

1:02:14.805 --> 1:02:17.125
<v Speaker 3>said that that was something he when they restored it,

1:02:17.165 --> 1:02:19.765
<v Speaker 3>he went out searching for the original film and apparently

1:02:19.845 --> 1:02:22.325
<v Speaker 3>it had been destroyed later, I guess has said that,

1:02:22.645 --> 1:02:24.765
<v Speaker 3>you know, that's fine. He thinks he actually came out

1:02:24.965 --> 1:02:27.405
<v Speaker 3>good that way. It's something that ended up working in

1:02:27.445 --> 1:02:29.245
<v Speaker 3>the end for the film. I don't think it really did.

1:02:29.245 --> 1:02:31.045
<v Speaker 3>And on the big screen I really noticed it. It was

1:02:31.085 --> 1:02:33.205
<v Speaker 3>almost as if someone had had flipped a lens or

1:02:33.205 --> 1:02:35.685
<v Speaker 3>something on the projector when it cuts to that scene.

1:02:35.725 --> 1:02:37.885
<v Speaker 9>It's true that it's strange looking blood. I hadn't attributed

1:02:37.885 --> 1:02:39.725
<v Speaker 9>it to the color, but that moment, that famous shot

1:02:39.725 --> 1:02:41.685
<v Speaker 9>where he's holding his fingers to his head and gun

1:02:41.685 --> 1:02:43.805
<v Speaker 9>style and then this blood is slowly dripping off. Oh

1:02:43.845 --> 1:02:46.605
<v Speaker 9>it's so powerful still and so gross, and the viscosity

1:02:46.605 --> 1:02:48.325
<v Speaker 9>of the blood really struck me that it was like

1:02:48.365 --> 1:02:51.405
<v Speaker 9>a lot of extra carro corn syrup in there or something.

1:02:51.925 --> 1:02:55.005
<v Speaker 3>Well, a taxi driver obviously a film that provokes some

1:02:55.045 --> 1:02:58.645
<v Speaker 3>good discussion. Again out now in this thirty fifth anniversary

1:02:58.645 --> 1:03:01.325
<v Speaker 3>celebration of it, it played. Unfortunately if you missed it, well,

1:03:01.325 --> 1:03:03.645
<v Speaker 3>you can catch it in its Blu Ray release coming

1:03:03.685 --> 1:03:06.125
<v Speaker 3>out this Tuesday. And I mentioned it once, but you

1:03:06.125 --> 1:03:08.325
<v Speaker 3>can read Dane his great article about the Bernard Hermann

1:03:08.325 --> 1:03:10.685
<v Speaker 3>score over at slate dot com. We'll put a link

1:03:10.725 --> 1:03:13.165
<v Speaker 3>in the notes for this show at film spotting dot net.

1:03:13.325 --> 1:03:15.325
<v Speaker 7>Some guy's got to be a secret serviceman.

1:03:16.325 --> 1:03:16.365
<v Speaker 9>What.

1:03:17.085 --> 1:03:18.805
<v Speaker 6>I was just curious because I thought maybe i'd make

1:03:18.845 --> 1:03:19.245
<v Speaker 6>a good view.

1:03:23.765 --> 1:03:26.805
<v Speaker 1>Access to the film Spotting archive is just one of

1:03:26.805 --> 1:03:29.885
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of joining the Film Spotting Family. You'll also

1:03:29.885 --> 1:03:33.805
<v Speaker 1>get bonus shows, a weekly newsletter, early access to events,

1:03:33.805 --> 1:03:38.205
<v Speaker 1>and more. To join, go to Filmspottingfamily dot com and

1:03:38.685 --> 1:03:42.165
<v Speaker 1>through January thirty one, if you use promo code Supreme,

1:03:42.245 --> 1:03:45.765
<v Speaker 1>you'll get twenty percent off. That's promo code Supreme.

1:03:46.085 --> 1:03:49.045
<v Speaker 5>This conversation can serve no purpose anymore.

1:03:49.885 --> 1:03:50.365
<v Speaker 2>The burn