WEBVTT - This Is What the US Just Did to China on Semiconductors

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm Geo Wist and I'm Tracy Alloway. Tracy, do you

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>ever want to write a book? One day? Yes? You

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>know this, Joe. You know this because I try to

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 1>make you write a book with me all the time.

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to write a book. It seems like

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work. No, it would be fun. Well,

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>first of all, it is a lot of work. I

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 1>wrote two book proposals last year and it nearly killed me.

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a very long story for another time. But I

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>think it would be fun. We should do it. All

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>thoughts the book come on. Maybe I could see an

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Odd Lots book. But here's what would worry me about

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>writing a book, which is you, we could have a

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>book idea today, in two maybe we get a deal

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>sometime in and then they're like it's going to come

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>out and fall six, congrats like that. It's like, I

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>don't have time. It's just too long. And then here's

0:00:59.920 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the thing that I would worry about is that by

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the time like August two comes out, it's like maybe

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>no one at all cares about what we want to

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>say in our book. All I'm going to say in

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:11.759
<v Speaker 1>response to that, is how many game stop books came

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>out in like, there were at least three, and they

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.559
<v Speaker 1>all came out within a year of it actually happening. Yeah,

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and by then no one cared anymore. There's my point, Okay.

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I take the point that it's very difficult to write

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a well researched book that says something new and interesting

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>on a topic at exactly the right time ahead of

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>it kind of blowing up in the public consciousness. That

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is difficult. But our guest today has done that. We're

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be speaking to a guest who has a

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>new book out, and I think the timing could not

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>have been better. I don't even know how the timing

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>was possible, right, So this is actually a book on

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a topic that we First of all, we should say

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that we have had this guest on before talking about

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a topic that kind of became core all thoughts content

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and also a core issue for the rest of the world.

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>It truly exploded into the public's consciousness in a way

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that I don't think any of us weren't necessarily expecting

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>when we first started talking about this. I think that

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:13.119
<v Speaker 1>was back in like late nineteen and then COVID happened,

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:17.679
<v Speaker 1>and everyone became focused on this particular issue or thing,

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and then fast forward a couple of years and it

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:24.519
<v Speaker 1>also became an issue of strategic and even military importance.

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So we've done semiconductor episodes in the past.

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>We've done several of them, and we sort of tried

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to trace the semi conductor supply chain, and one of

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the companies at the end or somewhere in the semi

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>conductor supply chain that's very important is the Dutch Advanced

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Lithography Maker a SML, which applies equipment, and so we're like, okay,

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:45.239
<v Speaker 1>who should we talk to about a s m L.

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I never said, you gotta talk to this guy, Chris Miller,

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>who knows all about them. And at the time, he

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 1>was writing this book, and the book has just come out.

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>It's out, and of course the timing is perfect. So

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Chris Miller, he is the author of Chip War, The

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Fight for the World's Most Critical techno Oology. And of

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>course we just had the Biden administration announcing new restrictions

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>on semi conductor technology export to China, which is something

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.959
<v Speaker 1>we briefly touched on in a recent episode with Dan Wong,

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>But it is truly the perfect guest with the perfect timing,

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the perfect guest with the perfect timing. I'm thrilled that

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 1>we have Chris back on the show to talk about

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>this new action and how they fit in the broader

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>context and his research. So Chris Miller, thank you so

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>much for coming back on the podcast, Thanks for having

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>me back, and congratulations. Just like incredible timing, because I mean,

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the book just came out right and then right then

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>we have everybody talking about the chip war basically because

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of these actions by the Biden administration. Well, that's right,

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that this the timing of the regulations that were released

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago. We're a bit of a

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>surprise to me, but I think the trajectory was pretty

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>clear from the last time we spoke about two years ago,

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to see more tightening of controls and

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>more bifurcation between the US and China developing separate some

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>conector ecosystems. Wait, was the trajectory clear, because you know,

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>my impression was there was a lot of noise during

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration about technology security and these types of issues,

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>but no one was necessarily expecting the Biden administration to

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>take this up to the extent that it did. So

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the export controls that were announced recently, well maybe you

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>can tell us, like how extreme are they in your view?

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>But do you think it was expected? Were you expecting

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>something along those lines? Well? I think so. I mean,

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the Trump administration's actions, I think

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you've got to differentiate a bit between sort of what

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.479
<v Speaker 1>the Twitter feed was showing any individual day and the

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 1>direction of travel of the National security bureaucracy underneath it.

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think the bureaucracy was trending in the same

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>direction actually, from the late Obama administration in terms of

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>greater skepticism of inbound investment into U S SMI connector firms,

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>from in terms of greater concern about the difficulty of

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:07.799
<v Speaker 1>preventing chips from reaching military end users in China, greater

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>confidence that computing power and some my conductors would be

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>critical to the future of military power, and thus concerned

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that China's access to U S ship technologies would have

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a military benefit. All that has been developing for really

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>about a decade in Washington and is less driven by

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the question of of who's president and more the collective

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>assessment of the Pentagon and the Commerce Department and then

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>our security councils involved, and that's been a pretty steady intensification,

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 1>even though the politicians at the top have have differed. Sorry,

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just looking again at you know, your book was

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>released October four, and the restrictions I think we're announced

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>October seven or right around there, so basically the same day.

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, before we get again to these specific restrictions,

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think when we talked about a s

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>m L in our episode, you know, even at that time,

0:05:56.600 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a s mL, I believe was restricted from exporting its

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>most advanced technology to Chinese companies. And maybe they were

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>still able to export some technologies, but not the most

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>advanced lithography. You know, you mentioned some of the factors

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 1>driving concerns about constraining Chinese semiconductors. But where did this

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>really start the story of the US deciding that, you know,

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>limits on technology transfer would be part of our foreign

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:28.119
<v Speaker 1>policy with China. Well, I would actually start the story

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>before China was the focus, because there have been limitations

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>on semi conductor technology transfer since the invention of the

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 1>first chips. And if you think back to where chips

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>came from They emerged out of demands to miniat your eyes,

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>computing power to fit and guidance computers on missiles during

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the Cold War, and so there's been a deep into

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>relationship from the earliest days between defense technology and the

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>chip industry, and so controls have been part of the

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:59.559
<v Speaker 1>US government strategy since that time. So during the Cold

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 1>War So Union, there were really extensive controls placed both

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>on the transfer of chips to the Soviet Union and

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:09.239
<v Speaker 1>also the transfer of chip making equipment and so in

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, what we're seeing today is just a

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>continuation of that process of trying to control technology transfer

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that's militarily relevant. Now it's different because the target is

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>different at this time it's China. And it's different because

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>unlike in the earliest days of the chip industry and

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:28.559
<v Speaker 1>the late nineteen fifties and nineteen sixties, at that point,

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>most chips were going towards some sort of military use,

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>whereas today percent of chips are going towards civilian uses.

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>So so that's different. But the basic concept that you

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>want to control the ability to produce advanced ships because

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>they have military uses is basically something we've always had now,

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:48.119
<v Speaker 1>certainly there's been a shift in the policy towards China

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of years, driven by a couple

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of factors. I think one most important is that the

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>military balance in general between the U S and China

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>has shifted. Whereas a decade or two ago is clear

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the U S military area was far stronger, today that's

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>less clear, especially when you look at potential hotspots like

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the Taiwan Straits, and so it's easy to find analysts

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>who say the US would have a hard time defending Taiwan,

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>which wouldn't have been the case a decade or two ago.

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's one. More concerned about the Chinese military capabilities.

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Two is that China plays a bigger role than ever

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>before in the global electronics and computing supply chain. Still

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a circumscribe role, and we can talk about the specifics,

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>but nevertheless its relative weight is more important than certainly

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a decade or two ago. And then third, China's trying

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to catch up technologically in advanced semiconductors and through a

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>number of industrial policy programs, the most famous of one

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 1>which is probably made in China. It's specifically targeting its

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 1>hip industry with really substantial subsidies, and and so this

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>has raised concern not only Knew US, but particularly then

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 1>US that China might succeed in reaching the cutting edge

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.959
<v Speaker 1>and a number of key technologies which would have both

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>technological and economic but also potentially uh military implications on

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the road. Right. So this is actually something we were

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>speaking with Dan Wong about, the the Gavicale tech analyst

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>who also wrote a little blurb for your book. So

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it's nice to see multiple odds guests come together in

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that way. But can I ask, like just a very

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>general step back question. I think it's become really common

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>nowadays to say that semiconductors are the new oil in

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the sense that they're you know, military lee and strategically significant.

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>But are they really like oil in the sense that,

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, they don't necessarily seem bounded by geography. I mean,

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not like we're trying to pull out a finite

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.479
<v Speaker 1>resource from the ground. We're trying to build up expertise

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and technological capability to make additional chips available. And you know,

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>there are some fabs in the US, not a lot,

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>but the Chips Act is all about building more of

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>these chips factories so I guess what are the parallels

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>with oil and what are the key differences. Yeah, I

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>think you're you're right that there are obviously differences with oil.

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>The geographic distribution is one difference though, Actually I think

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>oil is more geographically distributed than chip making capabilities, especially

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>at the leading edge. And if you look at Saudi

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Arabia produces ten or fifteen percent of the world's oil supply.

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>By contrast, Taiwan produces over a third of the world's

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>processor chips every year. And if you're talking about the

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>most advanced processor chips or SML has got a far

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>bigger role in the lithography production process percent of the

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 1>leading edge of UV lithography compared to what everyone else

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>has in the oil industry. So in terms of concentration,

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>we actually have more concentration at multiple parts of the

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>chip supply chain than than Saudi Arabia or even OPEC

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>as a whole has. So if you're worried about the

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>risks of supply cutoffs, there's more reason to be concerned

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>about some my conductors. I think that concerned about oil.

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>So this is something that you touch on in your book.

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>But when COVID happened. There were plenty of businesses that

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>were disrupted by the pandemic, and semiconductors became a big

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>issue around that time. And we can argue about whether

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 1>or not there were semiconductor shortages because of the chips

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>makers themselves, or because the companies putting in orders massively

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>underestimated demand and things like that. But what role did

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic play in I guess highlighting these shortage issues

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that you just described, or maybe shortage isn't the right word,

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 1>it's it's uneven distribution. I guess yeah, I think that's

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the right way to describe it. And you know, the

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>shortage context has to be understood in that supply increased

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>dramatically in terms of aggregate chips produced in one It's

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>just that demand grew even faster and that created this

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>set of shortages in certain subsets. I think if you

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>actually look at the track record in both of those

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>pandemic years of the global chip industry and producing chips,

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to say it it's sailed through the crisis

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>with comparatively few disruptions. The fact that supply increased dramatically

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>across the board, the fact that you know, we had

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>major economies that played a big part in the chip

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>supply chain being shut down for several months, if not

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>longer across COVID, and yet the number of disruptions were

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>actually quite limited, suggests the extent that which the supply

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>chain actually works pretty well and in producing the chips

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that are needed. And when you look at where we've

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>seen the most disruption in terms of shortages, which is

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the auto sector, I think there's a pretty good argument

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that what we're seeing is not a chip shortage but

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a automaker inability to properly plan the number of hips

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that they need, which is the problem that they faced.

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 1>Automakers made an error in early slashing their chips sales

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:11.199
<v Speaker 1>just as demand for smartphones and PCs, etcetera was spooming

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>because of the work from home trend, and as a result,

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>when they came back to their chip suppliers a couple

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>months later and said, actually, we're not gonna need to

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>cut demand as much as we expected, they found that

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 1>capacity was already reallocated. So this is really more a

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>question of how automakers managed their procurement and they're just

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in time procurement processes than anything to do with chips

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 1>per se, and if you look at specific disruptions to

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the shipmaking process one you'll find that factory fires or

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>ice storms and Texas were probably just as impactful as

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>any sort of COVID related disruption. But you know, all

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>that is to say that certainly COVID put semi conductor

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>shortages in the headlines in a way that catalyzed politicians

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to take the issue more seriously into act. And I

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think we would have seen the Chips and Science

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Act passed and the way that it did had it

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>not been for the fact that COVID made this and

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>visceral and seeming to be relevant to the typical person.

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 1>By the way, speaking of all the people who have

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>glowingly blurbed your book, I see Admiral stephrevious. Also is

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>one here another odd Lots guests, So I'm glad to

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 1>see the odd Lots crew so represented. All right, let's

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>get to the new news. And of course, as we

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>discussed there, there were already restrictions on what kind of

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>technology could be exported to China. But why don't you

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of summarize what was the status quo and say September,

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>where were we a month ago, and how dramatically have

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>things changed with the new announcements from the Commerce Department

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and the Biden administration on exports, like just summarize, give

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>us the big picture differences of them versus now. So

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>one month ago, there were i'd say two main categories

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of restrictions that applied to China. First was for equipment

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>at the most cutting edge, so UVY lithography machines being

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the best example of this, that were impossible to transfer

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to China, and it's really only referred to a small

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>set of tool roles that only restricted Chinese ability to

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>move to the most advanced process nodes in producing logic

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>ships and certain types of memory ships as well. But

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it was the most cutting edge set of machinery that

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>was the first restrictions. And then second there restrictions on

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>specific Chinese firms that were restricted either from accessing US

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>technology or also in some cases accessing production capacity in

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan at t SMC that use US technology, and so

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Huawei is the best example of this, but there were

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>also a bunch of Chinese firms that were assessed to

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>have links to the Chinese military, and so these were

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the two sets of restrictions that were in place today.

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>After the new set of regulations, these have been broadened

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty substantially. And so, first off, the the set of

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>equipment that is no longer possible to ship to China

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>is expanded a lot, so it's no longer just the

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>most cutting edge, is also tools that are actually kind

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of one or two generations, with three generations behind the

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>cutting edge today. So in the logic chip making space,

0:15:56.000 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>anything that's headed towards the facility that's sixteen nanometers or

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>blow is no longer possible to send to China. So

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>so this is not the most cutting edge ship like

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you find an iPhone processor, for example, But this is

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a much broader swath of chips, and there's a whole

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of chips that you still can send equipment forward

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to China, but there's a broader definition of the cutting

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>edge which is designed to more tightly restrict China's ability

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to advance. So that's that's one big change. The second

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>is that there's a new set of restrictions on the

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>ability to send certain chips to China, and this focuses

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>on chips called GPUs, which are used in artificial intelligence

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>applications and data centers. And alongside this there are restrictions

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>on sending chips to Chinese supercomputers. So this set of

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the restrictions focuses on limiting China's ability to develop capabilities

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and artificial intelligence and advanced data centers, so that this

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>is a new focus area. And then three, there is

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a set of restrictions on US persons, so citizens, Green

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>card holders and US companies on interacting with a bunch

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of different firms in the Chinese ship industry. And this

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is new. Before there weren't any restrictions on individuals in

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>such a broad fashion working in the Chinese ship industry.

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 1>And this is going to have major effects because there

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>are actually a lot of dual citizens who are working

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in Chinese ship industry, including CEO, so some of the

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>biggest firms in China. And so this this is a

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>new escalation of the controls designed again to take apart

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to decouple the U s and the Chinese ship industry

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>at the cutting edge. But all of this is to

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>say that there's still no restrictions on anything that's not

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>cutting edge for the most part, and so the goal

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of the regulations is to be fairly targeted in saying

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:29.880
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to allow any progress in the cutting edge,

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>but we're still leading all of the lighting edge, mostly unrestricted,

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's still targeted, but it's pretty sweeping in

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the sense that it's saying no more progress towards advanced notes.

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>So that third point about Americans or Green card holders

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>no longer being able to do that kind of work

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in China, That's exactly what I wanted to ask you about,

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>because this seems to be so far one of the

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>things that is getting a lot of attention, one of

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the most extreme things. And we've already seen at least

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>one semiconductor company talk about how it's having to like

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>send people home or at least cut off their access

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>at work. But first of all, how exactly does this

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>restriction work in practice? And then secondly, I have seen

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 1>some people talk about an expectation that maybe some of

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 1>these companies are going to get some type of exemption.

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>What's the possibility that that happens, and that some of

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the extreme moves that have been outlined in these export

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>controls are actually not necessarily rolled back, but they're sort

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of softened through these types of exemptions. Well, the Commerce

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Department in their announcement did clarify where they were likely

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to give exemptions and not likely to give exemptions, and

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>so they were pretty clear that for foreign chip firms

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>operating in China, and again there's it depends on the specifics,

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>but there's their scope for receiving exemptions. So companies like

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>t SMC or some of the big South koreanship makers

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>have facilities in China and the goal of these restrictions

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>is not to impact their production, so there will be

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.120
<v Speaker 1>exemptions for their ability to acquire certain types of machinery

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>things like that. But across most the other restrict restrictions,

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the Commerce Department has what's called a presumption of denial,

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 1>which means that you can apply for license, but the

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>presumption is that it will be denied. And again there's

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of nuance in this, but I think broadly

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>we should treat this as as something that's not a

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 1>bureautic kick up, and that in fact, most of the

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 1>places where the Commerce Department has said there will be

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a presumption of denial will be a place with there's

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>lots of licenses that are denied, and probably people won't

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>apply for licenses in the first place. I I think

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't. We shouldn't assume that these are regulations that

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>are accidentally overly broad. I think the by administration put

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>two years of work into this, and I think they

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty clear sense of what they're trying to accomplish.

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:48.199
<v Speaker 1>And my guess is that looking at the impact in

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>the first couple of days after the regulations were now,

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it's there more or less seeing results that they had anticipated.

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>So what's it going to do the sort of in

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the first order effect, I mean, long term, maybe China

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>will redouble or accelerated effort at building out its domestic capabilities,

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.360
<v Speaker 1>But what is the effect going to be tomorrow and

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in the short term on Chinese tech? The short term

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 1>effect is that China is going to buy a lot

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>less equipment from US suppliers, but also as a result

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>from Japanese and Dutch suppliers, just because there's no point

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in buying half a production line. So the overall equipment

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 1>sales will be decreasing. Again, it's not across the board,

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>because for lower tech production that's still possible to acquire,

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>but but there will be an impact on equipment firms,

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and you've seen that reflected in their public statements. That's

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>one to There are a number of Chinese firms that

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>were close to the cutting edge that will be directly

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 1>impacted by this. So one example is the Chinese nand

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>memory producer called y MTC, which was in the process

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of being of having its chips qualified for use in

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Apple's iPhones. Apple was reportedly going to buy y MTC

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>ships for a large chunk of its iPhones going forward,

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and that firm was targeted by these regulations, and so

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 1>now according to media reports, Apple is no longer going

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to be buying y YMTC ships for its iPhones. And

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>so for firms that are are directly impacted like that,

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>because they're right at the cusp of being at the

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>cutting edge and therefore directly impacted by these regulations, we're

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 1>going to see their ability to produce and their ability

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to expand directly impacted. And then third, we're going to

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>see disruption of of individuals, jobs and livelihoods because of this.

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Tracy mentioned the restrictions and individuals. That's going to have

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a pretty dramatic effect because there will be people in

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>positions of having to choose between continuing their work or

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>potentially renouncing cititionship or green cards, and that's a that's

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a dramatic effect. Now, you know, this isn't isn't new,

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 1>because there's lots of companies around the world that Americans

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 1>are barred from doing business with. But I don't think

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>many people in who are impacted by this. We're expecting

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>this type of regulation, and this is probably the part

0:21:50.040 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>of the rules that have most surprised people in the industry.

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, I asked Dan Wong the same question, but

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.199
<v Speaker 1>I would love to hear your response as well. But

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.360
<v Speaker 1>what kind of reaction would you expect from China here?

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So we've already had some statements from various officials talking

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>about how it's going to endanger China's economic recovery and

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>how it's generally a very bad thing for the economy.

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But would you expect any concrete measures from China after

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 1>these restrictions? Yeah, it's an interesting question because on the

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 1>one hand, you know, I think you'd hypothesize that China

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>has to do something in retaliation. On the other hand,

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the track record of China's responses

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to prior iterations of semiconductor export controls, China hasn't done

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 1>much when the US put Huawei on the entity list

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>and thereby restricted the transfer of a lot of US

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>chips and chip technologies to wah Way. China issued some

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>angry statements, but ended up doing nothing, despite the fact

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that these restrictions hobbled one of China's biggest tech firms,

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>which was I think a pretty striking demonstration of of

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 1>where escalation dominance in this sphere. If you will, stands

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that China felt like actually any sort of retaliation would

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>leave it worse off than not retaliating. Now, this is

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a an order of magnitude more impactful than the Huawei restrictions,

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>although it's in some ways a bit more opaque since

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't target a single firm and sort of hidden

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>in the specifics of Commerce Department regulations with which most

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>people don't understand. But I would think China would feel

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>more pressure to retaliate this time. But if you ask yourself,

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 1>what's the best way for China to retaliate in a

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>way that imposes more costs on the US than it

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>does in China, it's not obvious that there's a great

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 1>option there. In China still deeply dependent on importing ships

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.479
<v Speaker 1>across the board, and China's economy, of course, is as

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>weak as it's been in many years, so this isn't

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a time when j Ping wants to probably impose further

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>cost on the Chinese economy. And in particular, if you're

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese electronics firm or from in the semi connector space,

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you're desperate right now to keep the connections that you

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>do have open, because if there's any way you're gonna

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 1>get around the current regulations, it's going to be by

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever collaboration you have still functioning with leading firms in

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>other countries, and so keeping those those lines of communication

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and cooperation open with from other countries is really crucial,

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I think for China's hopes of finding some way to

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>counter these rules. So I'm not sure actually if China's

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>going to take a dramatic retaliatory step, even though I

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 1>think there's obviously a political impetus in China to do

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>something and to look like you're not just taking these

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>restrictions lying down. So you know, it's easy enough, and

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I kind of did, maybe lazily enough, but it's easy

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>enough to say, Okay, well, this is going to hurt

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>China in the short term, but in the long term,

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>they're only going to you know, accelerate their own work

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>on building out an advanced domestic semiconductor industry, which they might,

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 1>but like that seems still really hard, even if you

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>have the entire sort of like force and money of

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the government. And I'm just thinking back to when we

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>talked before, and the one one of the details that

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I remember from our conversation was like a SML itself

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>is a customer of a company that makes the smoothest

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 1>substance on Earth, because that's important, I guess, like for

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the mirrors to like shoot the light or whatever. And

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it does not seem inevitable that China can

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>catch up. I mean, we know, like the challenge that

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Intel has with catching up to Taiwan, Semi, etcetera. And

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>without this sort of like best expertise of this very

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>globally integrated supply chain, Like what is it? How do

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you assess China's chances of becoming a tech leader in

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the space with so many restrictions. Well, I think it's

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be really hard. Is catch up possible? I

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's certainly possible over some time frame with some

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>amount of expenditure, But I think the timeframe is long,

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.719
<v Speaker 1>and the expenditure is going to be large, and so

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>China might decide that it's not willing to pay the price.

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:04.959
<v Speaker 1>If you look just at the this the space if

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>some connected manufacturing equipment, which is in some ways the

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 1>space on which all these other restrictions depend, the reality

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>is that the number of companies in this space is

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>very limited. Most of the key firms have been in

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>their market position for several decades and in some cases

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:24.400
<v Speaker 1>almost half a century, and their supply chains, as you mentioned,

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>involved sourcing some of the most complex and heavily engineered

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>products ever made, and so it's just going to be

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to do so. In addition, we're seeing more

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and more the US government targeting China's firms in this space.

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So there's part of the restrictions are that we're rolled

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>out recently limit the transfer of component parts to Chinese

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.360
<v Speaker 1>equipment manufacturers, which is again deliberately designed to make their

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>process of advancement harder. And if you think about what

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>it takes to make a machine tool in this space,

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's one thing to make a machine tool

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that can do a specific process once or even a

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>dozen times or hundred times, but to make a commercially

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 1>viable machine tool in the chip industry, you need a

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>machine that not only is able to move materials at

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>almost the atomic level, but it also needs to do

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>so with you know, basically perfect run time, perfect accuracy,

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and to be cost competitive. And and that's something you

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>can only really develop, I think, when you're closely collaborating

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>with the firms that are going to be using your equipment.

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>And so if you look at how innovation in the

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>in the machine part of the machine tool part of

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the chip industry happens right now, it happens in really

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 1>deep collaboration with the customers t smc Intel, Samsung, etcetera.

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Because the tools have to be optimized for those customers.

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And so if you're in China today trying to develop

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>your own machine tools, you're working with firms that have

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>lower volumes, especially at the cutting edge. They're actually not

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>producing the most cutting edge chips. And that's a harder

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.199
<v Speaker 1>environment which to produce machine tools that are going to

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>compete at all with the cutting edge you can acquire abroad.

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 1>So if you've got this closed loop innovation system where

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>everything is second or third best compared to what you

0:27:58.560 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>can get in Taiwan or what you can get in

0:27:59.920 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the other lands. It's just a really hard environment to

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>catch up in. So this actually leads nicely into something

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you about, because, of course we've

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 1>been very focused on the US efforts to restrict cutting

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>edge chip technology into China. But the other plank of

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>U s strategy is to build up its own self

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>sufficiency when it comes to semiconductors. And in the book

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that there's growing discussion among US officials about

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>potentially using export controls on chip design, software and manufacturing

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>equipment that comes from the US. So a lot of

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the chips, as we've discussed on this podcast numerous times,

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 1>they're designed in the US and then those designs are

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>shipped out to Taiwan to be actually manufactured or whatever.

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>And so if you were to impose export controls on

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the designs or the software, that could, in effect, I guess,

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>pressure Taiwan to roll out more technology into the US

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and Europe or allow the US and to build up

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>their own expertise. Do you think that's the next step

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in these export controls. Is that something that you see

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>on the horizon. Well, I'm not aware of it. Having

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>been discussed at the government to government level. It is

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>something that you can find written about and think tank

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>policy papers, and your discussed to some extent in in Washington,

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>d C. I don't know if the US government is

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>going to go to to that level, and I think

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>that would be a pretty dramatic step. You know, It's

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>one thing to impose extuport controls on countries that you

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>see is primarily competitor. Something else to impose them in

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>country countries that you see primarily as a partner. And

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>so I think there would be some medicines in the

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>US to use that type of coercive strategy visa vi Taiwan.

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>But I think it is true that everyone in the

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>industry knows that the US does have the ability to

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>impose these controls, and indeed, the US already has imposed

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>controls on China in a way that forces Taiwan Taiwanese

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>firms to take certain steps they wouldn't otherwise taken to

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese customers. And so the fact that the US

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>has this threat I think probably does influence both how

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>US government officials and Taiwanese government officials think about the dynamic.

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>But if you look right now at at what Taiwan

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>these firms, And really that just means t SMC has

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>planned in the United States in terms of opening new facilities.

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>They're opening one facility in Arizona. It will be relatively

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>small in terms of its capacity, and most of t

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>s MC's capital expenditure going forward is still going to

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>take place in Taiwan. Even if you include the Arizona facility,

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the new facility in Japan, potential facilities and Singapore and

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Europe that are being discussed, we're still talking about a

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 1>company that's primarily focused in Taiwan, especially when it comes

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to its most advanced production nodes. So right now, I

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think t SMC is planning to dramatically diverseify away

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>from Taiwan in nor do I think it feels really

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 1>substantial pressure to do so. A little bit of pressure,

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>but not not substantial un of pressure to make it

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 1>change its business model. By the way, when you were

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about, you know, the jail lenge of getting the

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>equipment to run perfectly each time, I remember our episode

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>we talked to Willy she at HBS and like the

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>math is just mind boggling, Like nine point correct execution

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>is like not anywhere near sufficient for how like many

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>steps and how right everything has to go. But I

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>want to pivot to the Chips Act. And you know,

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Tracy mentioned that, yes, part of strategy right now is

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>constraining China's ambitions. But also there's been you know, legislation

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that move forward in the US, A laws passed designed

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to bolster US capacity. What do you see, like, how

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>would you ascribe just sort of big picture the significance

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of that act and how much do you think that's

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>going to move the dial in terms of sort of

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>bringing setting t SMC aside bringing on shore to the

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>US more more capacity. So I think the Chips Act

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest move in semi connected policy since the

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties that we've seen from the US government. In

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the there was a trade war with Japan, which was

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>at the time a big chip maker, and the U

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>S and POST bunch of threaten to impose a bunch

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of tariffs on on Japanese ship imports until the Japanese

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>agreed to limit their semi connector exports and that was

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a big focus of policy at the time, and then

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:14.719
<v Speaker 1>for about four decades, at least three decades, US policymakers

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>more or less ignored some my conductors as a as

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a policy issue, in part because U S firms appeared

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to dominate them, and that's obviously changed. The Chip and

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Science Act will do two main things. First, it allocates

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine billion dollars to subsidizing the manufacture of chips

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in the US, mostly focused on leading edge ships, but

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>with some funds for lagging edge and then second to

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 1>votes on twelve billion dollars to R and D efforts

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>in in ships and so on. The On the manufacturing side,

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there's no doubt that the subsidy funds will

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>result in more manufacturing facilities being built in the US,

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's sort of a simple economic calculation. And I

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>think we've already seen many of the firms that would

0:32:56.640 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>be impacted, Samsung and t SMC, Intel, Mike Run already

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>in the process or in the announcement stage of of

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>opening new facilities. So so there will certainly be an

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>impact on the amount of chip making in the US.

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to dramatically change the status quo? You know,

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it depends what you mean by that. But right now

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the US produces ten or fifteen percent of chips. We're

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to see that go up to fifty or

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>anything near that level anytime soon, but we will have

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>more leading edge ship making in the U S and

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>we otherwise would have. I think that's that's pretty clear.

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the more interesting part actually is the R

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and D funds, because my guess is that when we

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>look back in ten years time and ask what was

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the biggest impact of the Chips Act, it will actually

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>not be the subsidization of manufacturing, but actually the R

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and D because the amount of money that's going into

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>chips R and D is is really substantial. There's always

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>been some via the National Science Foundation and some via DARPA,

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>but twelve million dollars is a big influx over a

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>fairly short period of time, and so I think this

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>actually has the chance to have a really substantial impact

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>overcoming decade. So just listening to this and the amount

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of money and effort that the US is going to

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>put into building out its own ships capacity, is the

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>US actually aligned with some of its allies such as

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan potentially Europe when it comes to its plans for

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 1>chips Because it feels like there's a tension here if

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 1>the US has to balance between saying we're going to

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 1>build out our own capability versus we're going to take

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:25.280
<v Speaker 1>market share away from TSMC, which is a huge company

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:27.800
<v Speaker 1>in Taiwan, of course, which is one of the US's

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:31.839
<v Speaker 1>major military allies in the Asia region. That does seem

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>like a bit of a balancing act. Yeah, it is,

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and especially when you set that next to the export

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:41.879
<v Speaker 1>control side as well, which imposes interesting differential effects on

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 1>on different firms um some some negative, some positive, depending

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>on which control you're looking at. And so I think

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you do need to look at the Chips Act funding,

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:52.959
<v Speaker 1>which applies both to US firms and for non US

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>firms building facilities in the US, alongside the X four

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>controls as part of a unified strategy to coerce and

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a tracked the world's ship firms more into the U

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 1>S ecosystem and less into the Chinese ecosystem. In terms

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 1>of advanced fabrication subsidies, I think there's certainly is a

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>bit of a zero sum dynamic between the US and

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan and the US and Korea in the following sense

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that both the SMC and Samsung prefer to have most

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of the capacity in their home country, and they prefer

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to have most not all of their R and D

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in their home country. And they prefer that both three

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>economic reasons that their businesses work quite well and the

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 1>current set up, and also I think for political reasons,

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and so the extent that the US is is pushing

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:39.320
<v Speaker 1>for more investment in the US, there there is a

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 1>bit of a zerosum dynamic. Now the US is not

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>just pushing, it's also subsidizing, so that helps to compensate

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:47.240
<v Speaker 1>them to some extent. But I think you're right, Tracy

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to suggest that t SMC wouldn't have been pushing for

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>any of these changes if it were in charge. It's

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it's responding to shifts that governments are imposing on the

0:35:55.640 --> 0:36:00.399
<v Speaker 1>this my conductor industry more generally in terms of other

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>subsidy programs in Japan, Singapore, from Europe, I think it

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>depends who you're looking at. The Japanese, for example, have

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>subsidized t SMC to build a facility in Japan, but

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not focusing on leading edge, is focusing on a

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>more of a lacking edge node that is critically relevant

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>for Sony, which is a big customer of t s

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 1>mc s and so that doesn't really conflict much at

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 1>all with with what the U S is planning to

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 1>spend money on. With Europe. Europe's own chips bill is

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 1>still a work in progress, and I think we're gonna

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 1>have to wait and see what actually Europe decides to

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>spend its money on. I I worry most actually about

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:36.799
<v Speaker 1>potential market inefficiencies created by europe chip subsidies, since they

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>remained quite unclear as to where they're headed. I think

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>it's harder to imagine that Europe will succeed leading edge

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing simply because it has less infrastructure even than the US.

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:48.399
<v Speaker 1>But if Europe puts its money towards lagging edge manufacturing,

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that's an industry that already is getting plenty of subsidies

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 1>from around the world, including from China. So I think

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 1>there are questions to be asked about how Europe actually

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 1>plans to spend the fifty billion euros that it intends

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to devote to the industry. So mentioned that, Okay, the

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:04.799
<v Speaker 1>US is probably not going to dramatically jump over the

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>next several years in a share of global semiconductor manufacturing,

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>but it presumably the goal is for it to increase

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit in ten years or however many years. What

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 1>would we have to see to say the Chips Act

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:20.720
<v Speaker 1>was a success or what would constitute success? I mean again,

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and even R and D can sometimes be ambiguous what

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that turns into in terms of commercialized products. So from

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>your perspective, what would constitute okay, this bill actually achieved

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a taim I think part of the way to conceptualize

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 1>this bill is as an insurance policy. And it's an

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 1>insurance policy that is protecting us in case of some

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of escalation around Taiwan, which could disrupt hip production

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and if so, it would be dramatically costly for the

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>world economy, and so so calculating the efficacy of an

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>insurance policy is a hard thing to do, especially because

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 1>ideally you don't have to cash it in. But I

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 1>think that is the right way to look at this.

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:59.399
<v Speaker 1>And again, it's not that we're going to go from

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.760
<v Speaker 1>scale dependence in Taiwan to zero, but that on the margin,

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to become less dependent on the supply of

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>chips crossing through the Taiwan straight and that that reduces

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the risk in case of some sort of war, and

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 1>it also reduces China's ability to use our reliance on

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan as a as a mechanism of pressure. So I

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:17.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's that's the first thing is that there is

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of a national security insurance mechanism here that is

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 1>is hard to price in economic terms. The second thing

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on R and D, I think actually we should be

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>able to pretty clearly know in a decade's time whether

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the R and D funding worked or didn't work, and

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 1>if if we can't find clear evidence of pretty direct

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 1>lines between spending and commercial successes, I think we should

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>tell ourselves that it it failed. And this is where

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's the most work actually to be done

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 1>at the Commerce Department and else where in the US

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 1>government is that it's it's easy to dole out funds

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to subsidize evance manufacturing, especially when the number of plausible

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:55.279
<v Speaker 1>firms that could be involved is really limited. And if

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you're going to build an advanced logic facility, there's only

0:38:57.560 --> 0:38:58.880
<v Speaker 1>three firms in the world they're going to do it,

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and the US government will probably give money to all

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>three of them, so that that job is relatively easy.

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>The harder job is how do you set up and

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:08.359
<v Speaker 1>build out a R and D infrastructure that will fill

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:10.359
<v Speaker 1>some of the gaps that we currently have, and that's

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a much harder task, but I think in some ways

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 1>an even more important one. So since you mentioned the

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 1>idea of the US kind of hedging disruption in Taiwan,

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:22.799
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask a question that's getting a lot

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of attention at the moment. You know, loads of people

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter talking about theoretical situations and various possibilities here.

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:35.320
<v Speaker 1>But if there was some sort of invasion of Taiwan

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:39.239
<v Speaker 1>or some sort of military action against the country, how

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>would you expect that to impact t s MC. And

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the things that comes up in

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:48.719
<v Speaker 1>these discussions is the idea that if China did a

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 1>full on invasion and they took over all the fabs

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in Taiwan, would they be able to just keep manufacturing

0:39:55.880 --> 0:40:00.080
<v Speaker 1>semiconductors like they were before the invasion or is there

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:03.279
<v Speaker 1>something particular about the chip making business that makes that

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>scenario more difficult. Well, I think if if we have

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a sort of D Day style invasion, if you will,

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 1>the likelihood that any semi chectural facilities in Taiwan remain

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 1>intact after the fact is pretty low. We're talking about

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:20.439
<v Speaker 1>the most precise machinery ever made. Chip fabs are full

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of explosive gases. It seems perfectly designed to not survive

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a war. And even if by some miracle, t SMCS

0:40:28.160 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 1>facilities did survive a war, you'd still need all the

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 1>personnel in place, and in place in a way that

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to keep facilitating the production process rather than

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>sabotaging it. And you still need supplies from abroad because

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 1>t SMC relies on chemicals, for example, sourced from from

0:40:44.760 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Japan and elsewhere. So I think it's it's implausible, close

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to a zero present probability that China could invade Taiwan,

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 1>would have a massive war, and at the end, China

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:59.240
<v Speaker 1>would have perfectly functional chipmaking facilities. Now, whether Chinese leaders

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 1>understand that, you know, I don't know. I don't know

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to what extent they've dug into the chip making production process.

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:07.719
<v Speaker 1>And I do worry a bit that there is a

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:10.320
<v Speaker 1>fair amount of discussion in Chinese social media, for example,

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and even among Chinese government aligned analysts about taking Taiwan

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 1>but to seize the chip fabs. But I think that

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:20.399
<v Speaker 1>idea is a fantasy. But I also think that when

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you envision military escalation scenarios there's a lot that could

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>happen between peace where we are right now and a

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>D Day style invasion. And in those types of coercion,

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:32.600
<v Speaker 1>coursive measures or gray zone measures, if you will, in

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:36.879
<v Speaker 1>military lingo, that's where I think you could envision down

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:40.239
<v Speaker 1>the road, China applying pressure making demands on Taiwan, and

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 1>if Taiwan doesn't feel like it has the backing of

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the United States or doesn't feel like the U S

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>could actually successfully come to its aid militarily, Taiwan might

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:50.880
<v Speaker 1>be pressured too, for example, change its regulations when it

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 1>came to access to t SMC s FABS. And so

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that that's a more plausible scenario to me, which which

0:41:56.640 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 1>could still have dramatic implications for the United States. And

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you can terms also in military terms. Chris Miller, it

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:05.879
<v Speaker 1>was such a treat to have you back on and

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of again extraordinary confluence of expertise, news and new

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:13.439
<v Speaker 1>book out. Appreciate you coming back on odd lots. Well,

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me back. Thanks so much, Chris. That

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:31.839
<v Speaker 1>was great. It was fantastic, Trazy, that was great. I mean,

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Chris really was the perfect guest. But you know, just

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of like working backwards through some of the things

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that he discussed, you know, the implausibility of Taiwan semiconductor

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:45.120
<v Speaker 1>capacity like holding up in like a sort of like

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 1>true like hot war style invasion. I think, like, just right,

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that's an interesting point to start because again, you know,

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:56.240
<v Speaker 1>ship manufacturing is so complex, relies on such a global network,

0:42:56.400 --> 0:42:58.799
<v Speaker 1>relies on so much sort of embedded expertise of the

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 1>people who work there. It really is sort of hard

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to imagine that you could have that and the chip

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>fabs just keep running, right. This was sort of why

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I asked that question about the oil analogy at the beginning,

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:12.400
<v Speaker 1>because I think, you know, lots of people look at

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it and they go, oh, it's a strategic resource. People

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>use chips for military applications. There's actually some great anecdotes

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 1>in Chris's book about how Russia's lack of chips is

0:43:22.920 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 1>basically hindering its invasion of Ukraine. Right now, the temptation

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 1>is to draw a direct parallel between oil and chips,

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:34.480
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, there is a key difference.

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:38.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can build up your own semiconductor capacity

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 1>in many respects, it's far more difficult than you know,

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>just installing an oil rig to pull crude oil out

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of the ground. It does seem to take years and

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 1>vast amounts of money, but there is that possibility. It's

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:55.719
<v Speaker 1>not bounded by geography in the same way that oil is.

0:43:56.000 --> 0:43:58.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, another thing that's really helpful trying to create

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is the sort of distinction. And both are important, but

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:06.239
<v Speaker 1>the distinction between leading edge and lagging tech and both

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 1>are preticulational. I mean, we started talking about chips, you know,

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the big themes was like, well, what's going

0:44:11.120 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 1>on with the automakers that's not advanced tech? Right? A

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:16.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of that stuff was like the least advanced chips.

0:44:17.200 --> 0:44:19.960
<v Speaker 1>It was, you know, stuff to like that displayed an

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 1>image on a dashboard or something like that, about as

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 1>basic as it gets. But if you don't have that,

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 1>then you know, it doesn't matter that is leading edge

0:44:27.760 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 1>or sort of lagging edge or whatever. If you don't

0:44:29.680 --> 0:44:32.200
<v Speaker 1>have it, you can't make the car. And so, you know,

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the Chips Act, and as he put it,

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, this sort of insurance against this disruption, like, Okay,

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe the subsidies won't necessarily bring the leading edge manufacturing

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 1>or expand that, but expanding access to the lagging edge

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>is also pretty crucial, you know, the ubiquity of chips

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and everything from cars to refrigerators and washing machines or

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:57.160
<v Speaker 1>whatever appliance. I do find that kind of concerning the

0:44:57.239 --> 0:45:01.560
<v Speaker 1>idea that you could use chips to hold the global

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 1>economy hostage for a certain strategic or military goal in

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the same way that you know, to some extent, Russia

0:45:08.800 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 1>has used oil and gas to do the same thing

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:14.239
<v Speaker 1>that worries me, it does. You know. The other thing

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:17.400
<v Speaker 1>about that, though, is like again, because there's so much interconnection,

0:45:17.480 --> 0:45:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and you brought up software. You know, I'm glad you

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:21.480
<v Speaker 1>brought that out because actually, at some point we should

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:24.520
<v Speaker 1>do like a design software thing, go back to the

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 1>supply chain. But like everybody depends on anyone everyone else, right,

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 1>So in a way, it's hard to imagine like this

0:45:31.600 --> 0:45:34.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of like standoff like without like really hurting yourself

0:45:34.920 --> 0:45:38.360
<v Speaker 1>because everyone, you know, it's so cross border. You mentioned

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:42.319
<v Speaker 1>like Japanese chemicals and software that might be designed in

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:44.319
<v Speaker 1>the United States, which I think the US is still

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:47.319
<v Speaker 1>really good at designing a design software, And so it's

0:45:47.400 --> 0:45:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that sort of makes the chips chips chips diplomacy tricky

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and unique in the sense that it seems really hard

0:45:55.640 --> 0:45:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to like hurt your enemy or hurt another entity without

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 1>harming yourself. Chips Diplomacy is a good way of putting it.

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:06.239
<v Speaker 1>That should be the name of our book, Joe. The

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 1>market for good semiconductor books, I think has just been

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:16.400
<v Speaker 1>filled knockoff version of chip wark Tray chip Diplomacy. All right,

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:19.239
<v Speaker 1>shall we leave it? Let's leave it there. Okay, this

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:22.319
<v Speaker 1>has been another episode of the Odd Lots podcast. I'm

0:46:22.320 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Alloway and I'm Joe wi Isn't Thalt. You can follow

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at the Stalwart. Definitely follow our guest

0:46:31.080 --> 0:46:34.239
<v Speaker 1>Chris Miller. He's at c R Miller One. Follow our

0:46:34.280 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 1>producer Kerman Rodriguez at Kerman Arman, and check out all

0:46:38.080 --> 0:46:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of our podcasts at Bloomberg under the handle at podcasts.

0:46:41.800 --> 0:47:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening year to