WEBVTT - And, This Is Why Reid Hoffman Doesn’t Fear Artificial Intelligence 

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Corruption. We're living in the greatest hyptocracy. You're in my lifetimes.

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Someone gets you a billion dollars in crypto, you'r bot period.

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:11.720
<v Speaker 1>So the question is where do they go as they

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>get more power than The answer is Elon became a narcissist.

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Gavin Newsom and this is read Offman. Well, welcome,

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>my pleasure to be here the first time in the

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Governor's match.

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 2>It is not bad, right, yes, bad, and it's you know,

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 2>it's you know now, I don't know, it's not, but

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 2>it's you know, we're blessed to be here, but I'm

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 2>blessed to be here.

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Look how many books you written? Six?

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Six best selling books? Two podcasts one's not enough.

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you know everyone it was getting to the point

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>where everyone had a podcast, so I had it too.

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 2>To the most you know, I mean you've been You've

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 2>been around sort of og started a few companies. You're

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 2>part of this mafia, this mob called PayPal.

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Yes, although I try, you know, everyone likes the mafia

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing of it. We didn't do anything criminal.

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>It's PayPal network.

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'll get to I want to get to you know,

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 2>do you guys obviously embrace that a little bit. Yes,

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 2>and you know, we'll also talk about you know, it's

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of broken apart a little bit, the old the

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 2>pal version of the mafia started this company LinkedIn. Yeah,

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 2>and you're currently though not maybe for long. We'll talk

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 2>about that on the Microsoft board. And you've got a

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 2>number of AI companies that you've started up, and you

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 2>also have invested seems like everywhere in the AI space,

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 2>and you're doing.

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>A lot of angel investing.

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 2>So all of that and you haven't even turned sixty

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 2>years old coming up, but not quite.

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not quite.

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 2>But I really wanted to get you read to talk

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.919
<v Speaker 2>about the AI in the broadest sense because we've looked

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 2>we're just everybody's ringing their hands, the doomers, the gloomers,

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 2>it's going to take our jobs.

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>The anxiety is boiling.

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 2>You're seating and representing polls and just anecdotal feelings. People

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 2>are angry about data centers. People are furious that their

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 2>kid who went to Stanford and got this unbelievable degree

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 2>is not getting as many interviews as mom and dad

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 2>expected their perfect child to get.

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>But you have a different take on all this.

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 2>You're a little bit more optimistic about this.

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>So, I mean, first you've got to acknowledge people are

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>in pain having difficulties, right, I mean, and yes, there's

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>difficulties with entry level jobs. And if you listen to

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the press, including by the way, a bunch of the

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>AI people who make, you know, foolish statements like white

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>collar blood bath and other kinds of things, they go, well,

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>it's AI's fault. And it's like, actually, if you actually

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>look at it thus far, it's not AI's fault. Doesn't

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>mean there won't be an impact from AI and all

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>this stuff and entry level jobs, but the pain that's

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>being felt right now is overhiring from covid is tariffs,

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, screwing our economy and business planning, and when

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and when all of that kind of stuff happens, businesses go,

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do no hiring until I figure out what's

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>going on. Right.

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 2>So you're saying some of those big headlines that we

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 2>saw box and others that somehow suggested or at least

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 2>added in the press release maybe a number of factors,

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 2>including AI, and then the mainstream press runs with AI overhyped.

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well overhyped, but it's a natural reason for a

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>CEO to say that, because if I was like, oh

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>I overhired and I mismanaged, it's my fault. No, No,

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm strong. I'm taking advantage of AI. AI is replacing jobs.

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I am just being a really good CEO and and

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and manager of my shareholder capital, which like like CEOs

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>are smart people. Pick reach you one you want dorowy

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>or Dori B. It's like, oh, take door B, thank

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you very much.

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 2>So what do you make then, of the college graduate

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 2>and the unemployment rates that legitimately, at least numerically statistically,

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 2>what's the causation of that? What would you what's the

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 2>factor that how would you factor AI in that respect? Well,

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 2>what do you think, more broadly is the reason that

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 2>those numbers are higher?

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think what is factually case is that a

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>wide range of businesses are like, we don't know if

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>we should be hiring new entry level people right now.

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Some of it's like, well, we're doing layoffs because we

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>hired too many people during the pandemic and and and

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>then did this whole remote work thing which is not

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>really working out and refactoring it, and da da da,

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and then there is oh and uh, and now we've

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>got trade war going on with global tariffs, which are

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>increasing cost to consumers, cost to businesses, costa and so

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>like like, and we got volatility central like, hey, it's July.

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>We're starting a new war, right like you know da.

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's like like in all those cases, what businesses do.

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>The very first thing I do is let's not encour

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>any new expenses. It's let's not hire any new people

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>except the very clear people we need entry levels are

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>usually like, oh, these are people we need five years

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>from now. Well, we don't know we need five years now,

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>so let's not do that. It's also let's not do

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a new lease. Let's not like it's like, let's let's

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>just chill. So that's the primary driving actual factor. Now

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that being said, And by the way, there are a

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>few places which are AI related, like for example, the

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>metal layoffs are we need to free up costs for

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>spending on compute and so we're gonna do So it's

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>not that there's zero, it's just that the broad brush

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you know kind of college grad is not actually in

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>fact yet, Like if it's a percentage from AI, it's

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>like five, it's not you know, it's not thirty or fifty.

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 2>So you talk about I mean some that have used

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 2>some pretty aggressive language about a white color blood bath,

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 2>but I mean you And I don't know if Dario

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 2>said that or not, but I mean it was specifically

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 2>not surprising on the basis of the question I'll ask,

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 2>which is obviously he's because of his emphasis and he

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 2>put on numeric about fifty percent of why collar jobs

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 2>be eliminated. At least knew why collar jobs in the

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:12.359
<v Speaker 2>next well five years, less than five years by twenty thirty. Again,

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 2>hyperbole from your personspective and your guys. You know you're

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 2>a fan of Dariayes. I'm a huge fan of Darios.

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>And look, Daria frugally gets criticized that he's doing it

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 1>for like kind of promoting his own technology, and this

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is how important my technology is. There. No, Daria is

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 1>very principled, right, He's like, look, I think that there's

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 1>a real worry here and it's not on like society

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>should be ready. I'm trying to help society figure out

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 1>getting ready. So I appreciate Dario's principle, his motivation, et cetera. Now,

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:46.720
<v Speaker 1>after he said that, I called Daria and I said,

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 1>look what you said is not heard the way you

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's heard, right, because what people here is, well,

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:56.919
<v Speaker 1>if that's going to create a huge blood bath and

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the outcome, why are you building AI so fast?

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Why are you doing all the stuff? Right? Is it

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>just to make yourself rich? Right? Because what they hear

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is they hear the Hey, everyone, I have this really

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>great technology that's going to like ruin half of your

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>lives and good for me and sucks to be you. Right,

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what they hear. That's not what you meant to say,

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>but that's what they hear. And so and so I

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>was like, look, I think the I said, Daria, the

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>better thing to say is we're going to have a

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of job transition, and there's a lot of uncertainty

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of what's going on, and it could have a really quick,

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>massive impact and we should be figuring out what to

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>do on it, right, right? And is that so?

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you've talked about it in the terms of

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 2>a cognitive industrial revolution, and you talked about not being

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 2>poland rather be England take advantage of this, and and

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 2>that's and you've done that in the context of making

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 2>the case that we, you know, we should be accelerists,

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 2>though probably with the notion of a steer.

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so you're not naive sometimes you slow down on

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the curve and.

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Slow down on the curve. But vehemently opposed to this

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of precautionary principle framework. This notion of this is

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, we've just got to put a damn pause

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 2>on this.

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So so let's start with the pause because it's simple,

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>which is, say you issue a call for a pause,

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and you have two groups of people, the group of

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>people who pause and the group of people who don't pause.

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>The group people pause and go, oh, I hear you.

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>The humanist stuff really matters and I care, so all pause,

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and then the people go I don't give a shit

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and they keep going. So then what kind of AI

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 1>is built? Right? Not good? It actually has a negative impact. Right.

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>That's the reason why I'm vehemently opposed to like this

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:37.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of like pause and kind of things, and say, well,

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>what if we can get everyone to pause, Like, well,

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>what's your plan to get everyone to pause? Including China?

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>And everyone? Look like, is this that all realistic? So

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>my strategy tends to be, how do we keep like

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you want the good guys to win? E g. The

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>things that are pro like humanist human you know, like

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Pope's awesome and cyclical, like you know,

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of like like keeping human beings at the center,

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.239
<v Speaker 1>keeping a notion of what is a positive to society.

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>By the way positive societies over years. That doesn't mean

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that there won't be massive transformation, things that will be

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>painful and difficult to get through, but like having a

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>this is how society is better with this as where

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>we're going.

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 2>So when people hear that, I mean the good guys,

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean tech is getting slaughtered in the context of

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 2>public opinion. People just don't trust anybody. The whole issue

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 2>of truth and trust, obviously it has been accelerated social media,

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 2>but now obviously with AI deep fake this deep fake

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 2>that voice and we can get to even your own

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 2>interesting avatar in that space. But this notion of trust

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 2>and you know, someone may be listening to go okay, yeah,

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 2>read this is easy for you to say, you know,

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 2>sitting on the Microsoft board and obviously investing in all

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 2>these places. You got two of your own AI companies,

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 2>you know, come on, man, So.

0:09:55.760 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I am not of the view that like frequently what

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>it is is like just trust us, right, like like

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>like you know, it's like, look, we're in a very

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>low trust environment overall, right, low trust of almost every institution,

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>even mixed trust of historically great trust institution doctors and

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>so on. So it's like, so there's an overall thing,

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>so they just trust us. But then you have to

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>say is like, okay, well you have to prove my

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 1>trust before you do anything. Well, that doesn't really work,

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't work in any of these places, right,

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>So the notion is to say, well, do the things

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately are building trust over time, and then when

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>people really investigate, like, ah, you're doing something that's fairly trustworthy. So,

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:44.719
<v Speaker 1>like we're talking about Dario, one of the things that

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Dario did is it said, Okay, we're going to build

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>AI with a kind of a constitution. I actually don't

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>think they should have used that word, but like you know,

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it could be a it could be a set of

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>principles like you know whatever, you know.

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:01.959
<v Speaker 2>What if fends you have a constitution, sir.

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, I, for one, I am a huge believer in

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the American constitution, right it is our I'm.

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 2>A little old school like you. I appreciate that we'll

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 2>get to that a little bit later.

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Look that that is our religion is the constitution, right,

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>so like we stay with that. And it's a little

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of saying, oh, implying that this is a constitution

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>is not really like a constitution is a sacred document

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:31.839
<v Speaker 1>for me, so and so and so. The but here's

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>here's how we're gonna build trust is here is the

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 1>document that is central to all of our training of

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>our eyes. So you can read it, you can come

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and on to us, you can suggest changes, you can

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>understand where we're going, what we're trying to do. That's

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the kind of thing that I think you know needs

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to be there. Transparency. Yes, that's that's the beginning, and.

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 2>That's along the lines. I mean, you and I've had

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 2>these conversations over the years. In California's regular tour, a

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 2>framework SP fifty three which we advanced was around this

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 2>issue of transparency exactly for frontier models, these large language models.

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>What about this?

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think from your perspective, it'd be interesting

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 2>to hear your perspective about some of those contours. I Mean,

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 2>we talk about Dario as the you know, the good

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 2>guy and is in for a lot of folks that's

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 2>through purely political lens because of some of the issues

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 2>he had with p Hexic and the Department of War

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 2>issues around Mythos, which I'm interested in your take on

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Mythos and the fact that he pulled that back what

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 2>that means or what that suggests. But it also has

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 2>the origin story that played out very publicly with Sam Altman,

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 2>with Elon Musk. All those origin stories of which you

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 2>had a front seat, sir, front.

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Seat, front seat, and participation on someone.

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 2>An actual board seat is relasd to open AI exactly.

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>So look, most of the people creating AI, you know,

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:04.079
<v Speaker 1>are like kind of unique human beings. Yes, so you know,

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and part of it because by the way, geniuses frequently

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>are right and so and usually you know, with folks

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>who like it's pretty easy to attack anybody. I mean,

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you've had the experience. I've had the experience of it's

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>like an attack by a negative person who is willing

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to invent shit or build on what is a small

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 1>thing to make it into a huge thing. Is one

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of the things that kind of flows its Now I

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>have the you know, the fortune of knowing all of

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the head like every head of all these labs and

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 1>so I have a pretty good sense of what their

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>actual moral characters are and what the things are. And

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>many of them are good human beings. That doesn't mean

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 1>they're perfect, right, but they're good.

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 2>But it's a nice I mean, I want to pause

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 2>on that because I mean, objectively from your perspective, many

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 2>are good human beings. Yes, because they've been I mean,

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 2>these guys really have been vilified across the spectrum. Yes,

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 2>and you know, and perhaps more so even today with

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 2>the first trillion air being minted, et cetera, and all

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 2>that issue which.

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 1>I wanted on that I didn't say, all we're good

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>human We'll get to specifically to that human being.

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 2>But this notion that most are good human beings, but

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:18.959
<v Speaker 2>they're also trapped by incentives, right, I mean, we're all

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 2>creatures of incentives. In this notion of the incentive, as

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 2>you suggest to accelerate at peril. If it's not us,

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 2>it will be someone else once you rather the American

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 2>stack in the context of what Jensen talks about in Nvidia,

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 2>this notion of the American stack with the American values

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 2>to the extent possible. But what I mean those incentives

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 2>aren't necessarily even good people for good behavior.

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so in any incentive system, you will get some

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>good effects on it and some bad effects. No incentive

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>system is only good effects, right right. So so you know,

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, you have an incentive system to try to

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>make more money, Well you try it, like it creates

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>jobs and par activity, but you also do a whole

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>bunch of other things. Like so it's a blend, right,

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and you get people, you know, uh, selling cigarettes and

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>other kinds of things. So and so I think the

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>incentive system. What you have to do is say, how

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>do we tune the incentive system so that the major

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>incentives mostly align with good outcomes. Now, part of the

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>reason why is you already noted the England versus Poland

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and the industrial revolution. If we are the society that

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of has called it the primary pole position, and

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>how AI does this next industrial revolution which I think

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to be bigger than the previous industrial revolution?

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>And where this then we can sort out how the

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>economics society works. Like if you say, well we have

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the massive economic benefit it careers to our society, and like,

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>well it's only these seven companies, Well we're in a society.

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>We can broaden that out. Something you say, well, any

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>any you know company that has you know, profitability above

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>per employee now has an extra tax that's used to

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>pay for all the rest society. And if you own

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that industry, you can do that. If you don't own

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that industry, It's a little bit like when people you know, say, hey,

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I hate these social networks. And by the way, there's

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>some real social network issues. Although I always, to my

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>own defense, you're LinkedIn one.

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Of the few, if not the only, yes, social network

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 2>that actually had no better I mean right, yeah, I

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 2>mean kids are doing fine on LinkedIn.

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes they're on that, Yes, exactly, like LinkedIn works just fine.

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's doable. But if you said, hey, we ban

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>social works, even ignoring a LinkedIn, questions like, what would

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you want it to be only Chinese social networks? No, no,

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you'd rather have the social networks here and have our

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>ability to shape them. Now, of course we need to,

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>there's the political melee around it and all the rest,

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>but you want it to be a US property that

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>you're shaping. And the same thing with AI, And that's

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason I'm an accelerationist. It's like one

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of the things I was saying a couple of years ago,

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>is we want AI to be American intelligence. Right, So

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:04.439
<v Speaker 1>it's like like it matters, right, And and that doesn't

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 1>mean at any cost. Nothing is at any cost, right,

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Like if you said, well, like it would it would

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:16.959
<v Speaker 1>destroy an entire generation of children. That's a horrific Like

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>can we avoid that and still be acceleration at ansorus?

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>I think yes, But it's like, Okay, what are the

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>things we do in order to do that? Now? I

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>do want to wrap back to one of the things before,

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>because I think this is very important given you know,

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>we've seen you know, uh, you know, American college students going,

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>I've I hate AI, right booing, Ye have you given

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a did you do a commencement? You know, probably smart

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>enough not to do it this year? It needs that, yes, well,

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 1>because you're showing up to try to offer something to

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>help them, right, Like the usual protest and commandment speech

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is sleeping you asleep? But what do you mean when

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>do you make it? But it reinforces the anxiety?

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, no, no, and I get it highly educated people

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 2>that are played by the rule.

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and I feel I look, I understand, I feel

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 1>the pain. Right. So, but the question is, and this

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is why I think it's so important is Look, it

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is completely legitimate for college graduates to be going, you know, hey,

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 1>the older generations, the boomers, ceter you really fucked it

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>over for us. We got all this shit going on

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:27.239
<v Speaker 1>and this is on your watch and you suck. I

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>get it, and I think it's a legitimate gripe, right, Like,

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 1>but in crisis, this is the thing I really want

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the kids to hear, you know, the college kids. Crisis

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>is opportunity. And by the way, you can be the

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>AI generation. You should be using it. You should be going, hey,

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>company X, you need people to help you, like AI

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>aify your company. I can be the person doing it.

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>You shouldn't be trying n opt out. It's a disaster

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>for you, right, And I'm saying it for them. Look,

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any steak in. Like the entire current

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 1>graduating class could all say we refuse to use AI.

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>It makes no difference to me, but it will be

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>terrible for their lives. Right. And so it's like, look,

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>embrace and figure out how to make it useful to

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you and then have that help amplify your career and

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 1>life path.

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 2>And you continue to make that point it's about amplification,

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:27.400
<v Speaker 2>it's about having a copilot. But this notion back to turbulence,

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 2>this idea that the transition, So talk about the transition

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 2>the context. Look, if Dario's over stating the short term,

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 2>are we understating the long term or is it just

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, modest fits and starts, a scale, scope speed?

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Where are you and all that?

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 2>How do you calibrate all that if you're policy maker

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 2>sitting in this seat, how do you begin to anticipate

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 2>where that stress, where that friction, where the real turbulence

0:19:57.680 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 2>is going to come.

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, some of what I thought you guys did that

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>was really smart with SB fifty three was get data,

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>start monitoring, start asking questions, like because it's like, Okay,

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>what's really happening here? Not Oh I watched her like

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 1>like some journalist wrote a story about one case, you know,

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah blah. Yeah, that's not the way to

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>do it. That's that's like like the dumbling olk. Oh

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>my god, we should restrict airplane travel because it's unsafe.

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>It's like no, no, no, it's the drive to the airport

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that's unsafe. The plane is actually so much safer, right

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>per mile per minute. Everything else is like no, the

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.880
<v Speaker 1>plane is much better. So it's like making policy decisions

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>based on data, and we should be getting the actual data,

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>not the hysteric kind of responses and start there is

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>actually in fact with important. Now that being said, you know,

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 1>as a rough template, we want to be thinking of,

0:20:54.640 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>okay AI is this transformative tsunami that's coming and within

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:05.439
<v Speaker 1>a small number of years jobs there will be a

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>large number of jobs that will be completely transformed. Some

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of those jobs will be they're just all done by AI.

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Some of them will now be clerical jobs. What kind

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 1>of jobs?

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 2>See, people have their theories of this, and of course anthropic,

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 2>but it's out literally the pie chart, yes, of what

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of jobs are most likely to be impacted?

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>What's your theory of that case? So those pie charts

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>are usually limited in that they say, if the tasks

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of doing the jobs are only the ones today and

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 1>that there aren't new tasks, this is what looks like

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>there will be new tasks. Now that being said, For example,

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a relatively small n number of

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>years before a customer service person, a customer calling customer

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>service says please put the A on. It's a lot

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>more helpful, right, because you have a human being trying

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to follow a robotic script by looking at the screens

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 1>or yeah, it's going to do that so much better,

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.679
<v Speaker 1>just like there's rules for human beings, but they're like

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at what's going on with the pattern of AIS

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and trying to reimagine that's not the bulk customer service jobs.

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.360
<v Speaker 1>So like that's one. I think there's a lot of

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>like there's a whole classes of sales jobs that I

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>think will be much more AI. And you begin to

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>get to this weird sci fi story where the AI salesperson,

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the sales agent calls the company AI agent to listen

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to the AI sales agent, and there's a whole thing

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that kind of navigates through. It's a whole weird, weird

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>universe that will happen. That will happen, Yeah, en years

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and not three, maybe ten, like not twenty, right, right,

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and so and so those will be like kind of

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 1>swaths of jobs. But here's the thing, and it's that

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 1>new task thing that was mentioning earlier, which is basically

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>there will no longer be there were very few human

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>jobs that are just humans by themselves. We will all

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>have teams of agents that are working with us and

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>doing But actually, in fact, what you can see from

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the pattern of already looking at it is you actually

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>get to some pretty incredible increases in performance where the

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:17.880
<v Speaker 1>human brings in the things that the AI don't have.

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And look, one of the questions is will the ais

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 1>not have those for a long time? Will they get

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>them quickly? We don't know it's all coming right. My

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>bet would be we're very adaptive like this whole like

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>human beings will be replaced and we'll have our cognitive faculties.

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:36.919
<v Speaker 1>Goes all the way back to the printing press and writing.

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Like I actually think there's areas of where we make

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:42.479
<v Speaker 1>good judgment, Like people say, oh my god, look at

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>look at cloud code, like there's no need for engineers anymore.

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll actually talk to a whole bunch of people who

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>use cloud code. And I've used it myself intensively, and

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I've I've used codex and open ai, and I've used

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft Copilot. And by the way, some of it is

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>just amazing, like amazing, Like if you had told me,

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:05.880
<v Speaker 1>like you would asked me even like say five eight

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>years ago, would I be seeing this? I said, no, no, no, no,

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 1>that's not like yet They're like, yes, here it is.

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>That's amazing. On the other hand, it breaks on weird shit, right,

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 1>And so part of the human thing is like orchestration.

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like, okay, like, for example, how how does coding

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>work at open AI. Well, they have a big screen

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and they have multiple agents working, and they're like, oh,

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 1>oh that one's stuck. We got to get that one unstuck, right,

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>da okay this, and and it makes them hugely more productive.

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Now if you thought, well, it makes them huge alial productive.

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>They're just doing all the work. We don't need anyone

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>else doing all the work. It's like, look, there's infinite work.

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 1>It's like, now maybe there will be say, for example,

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>tech companies may more naturally be at you know, call

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it fifty percent of the current engineering crew. That doesn't

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 1>mean that those engineers. It's like other engineering firms start

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 1>more competitors, etcetera, etcetera. It's just the producttivity of how

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you operate. It's like the humans aren't replaced in all

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 1>cases by AI. They're replaced by humans using AI, and

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 1>so you want to be the humans using AI. And

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>then this gets back to I think this is a

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>central point, is like, well, what's the thing you should

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:18.479
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about? Is one is monitoring, and then the

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>other one is how do we help AI be part

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of the solution. Because the thing that's driving it at

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>scale and speed is AI. We need solutions that work

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>on the same capability set. So, for example, okay, how

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>do I help AI? How do I have AI helping

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>people make job transitions? I want to be seeing that, right,

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>So you're like, one of the things you could do

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>right here at the mansion is you could say, hey, great,

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, California is the center of the AI revolution

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in the world. It's part of the reason why fifty

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>three mattered. Hey, I want you guys to all come

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>by and tell me about how AI could be useful

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in helping people all ranges. I want to hear about

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>blue collar, white collar, multiple industries. How does that help

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>those people you know, find the right work, do the

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>right work, you know, have pride in their work. I

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 1>just we're going to have a we're gonna have a

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>day here in the mansion. You're going to come talk

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 1>to us about it because I want to hear you

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it, right Because by the way, ultimately if

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you're not delivering on this, then I have to apply

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 1>more pressure because, like, my responsibility is to the citizens

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>of the state. And look, I'm very happy that we

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:46.120
<v Speaker 1>have the AI revolution and the economics flowing in from

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 1>that and all the rest. But I care about all

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>my citizens, So tell me what you can do for them. Yeah.

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, I mean there's notion of using AI the thing

0:26:56.560 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 2>that has displaced that worker, to help find and place

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 2>that worker in a new opportunity, a new career that's

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 2>not quote unquote just training per se and the old

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 2>sort of Black and White movie community college construct.

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Yes, but I want to if I could, I want to.

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to get back.

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 2>There's so many areas on computing issues, limited limiting issues

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 2>in that space, and what's going on with data centers,

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, and where we are in terms of the

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 2>competitive landscape.

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:24.360
<v Speaker 1>But you, I was I didn't know this.

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 2>You you were at Stanford back in the talk about

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Black and White movie. Wasn't that It wasn't just a

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 2>couple of years ago, but way back when, and you

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 2>were studying what was simplistic solutions?

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>What the hell is this symbolic system? Yeah, what the

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>hell is this? Well, it's artificial intelligence.

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 2>So so I was part of you as an undergraduate

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:47.679
<v Speaker 2>and an AI degree. You had an AI degree, Yes,

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 2>when no one had ever heard of this nonsense, Well

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 2>not no one, when most of folks ever.

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Heard of it.

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 2>Yes, even though we started realizing we all had it

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 2>and we've all been using it for decades. But there's

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 2>notion of jen ai the thing that we kind of conflained.

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>That was what was new.

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:04.919
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and so you so it was it just a

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 2>natural inkland? I mean, did you see the future then?

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, was it just a major that started to

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 2>present itself? No one else was in the class, and

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 2>you figure.

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 1>It out, get in, get an a in this one.

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>The No, it was so what people assume people in

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 1>my kind of role, and many many people in my

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of role are fascinated by technology. I'm not. I'm

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.199
<v Speaker 1>fascinated by human beings, okay, right, And so what I

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>was interested in was human thought and human language, and

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>so how do we understand ourselves, how do we insenter

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>each other, how do we communicate? How do we get

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to a better understanding talking to each other? Etcetera, etcetera.

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>And that was what most interested me, And so like

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I looked at you know, do I do anthropology or psychology?

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Like I was looking at the whole range. But I

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>was like, what's the thing that in doing this I

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>could actually make the most interesting things. I've always had

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a belief that we evolve ourselves through technology, like this

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>is a you know, these glasses, these are a piece

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of technology, this podcast, and that's actually how we evolve

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>our state as human beings and who we are and

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>so on. Right, And so I was like, Okay, this

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>AI thing, that's interesting, right, so I'll go do that,

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and I did it some Olcays is a multidisciplinary major,

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>so it included psychology, included linguistics, included philosophy, so you know,

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>did all of that as a part of it. And

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>he went to Oxford and got it. Philosophies, yes, because

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>well what I concluded at Stanford was none of us

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>understood what thinking I'm speaking was, right, So here we

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>are trying to build AI and we have no sense

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of what that is. Maybe philosophers did. Went to Oxford

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>included philosophers didn't.

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Either, And so give me, I mean, this is what

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 2>year where you're studying this stuff?

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Roughly nineteen eighty five, to nineteen ninety three ninety three

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>in that both Oxford and the and so AI as

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>we know it today.

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 2>In the context of the vernacular of this sort of

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 2>notion of gen ai et cetera, I mean, the origin story,

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 2>they tend to lazily go back. It's sort of like

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of biotech maybe seventy nine with genen tech

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 2>or something. There's a lazy punitrard that. But is that

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 2>punitry accurate to suggest somehow in the mind's deep minds

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 2>of Google that sort of the origin stories started to

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 2>take shape early twenty thirteen fourteen, range, How would you

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 2>describe what we are addressing or dealing with today in

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 2>the context of that origin story? Where did it really

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 2>begin at a scale that we're now more accustomed to.

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, so, by the way, like many technological revolutions, including

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>modern ones, there have been multiple like oh, in five

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>years we'll be having AI and invent new science, and

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that goes all the way back to the eighties, goes

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>back to the eightiesies. Yeah, so here we are. We're

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>there because what happens is some achievement happens and then

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>people go aha, So like we beat human grand master

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>at chess. Yeah, that was the hard problem. And now

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 1>it'll be inventing physics and you're like not so much

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and so like cycling through it. And that was actually

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>part of my conclusion in Stanford was like, no, none

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of these technologies, none of these current technolical approaches will work.

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>So what's the thing that got me back in AI

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>was a three hour meeting with demsisabas Uh, the CEO

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and co founder of deep Mind. And what I realized

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that he had that he had like he is the

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the the he and his co founder is

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the original kickoff.

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Of the deep And it's not I mean again, it's

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 2>not Microsoft, it's not Anthropical AI, it's not SpaceX as well.

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's that's the I mean, if you really

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 2>want to start to understand in luck and understanding.

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>And what Demis realized was we have scale compute, and

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>with scale compute we can create scale intelligence. Now, his

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>original idea has been less of the important thing, which

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>is self play. So it had pong and go and

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it plays against each other. But the answer was we

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>can apply a lot of compute to evolve a competent machine,

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a with cognitive capabilities and I was like, you're right.

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>We now have scale compute and what's more, we have

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>scale data and we have scale engagement, you know, through

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>internet and mobile. The revolution, a revolution, a massive revolution

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is here now. Did I know when I walked out

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of that meeting, you know, and at you know, King's

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Cross that I was like, Oh, actually it won't be

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the self play. It will actually be these these things

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>called transformers, these large language models that read the trillion

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and a half words on the Internet and use that

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>as a learning basis to create something. No, I didn't

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 1>know that well, I didn't know is this is now

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a revolution? And so I was like, okay, how do

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I help? And you know, for me, I'm not adverse

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to doing stuff commercially. Obviously I've done a whole bunch

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of stuff commercially. But for me, I look across the

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>whole spectrum. I go, Okay, what's the stuff that I

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>should do as a founder, as investor, What's the stuff

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that I should do as a content provider and author?

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>What's the stuff that I should do talking to you know,

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>people who care about society like you and others? And

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>what to do? Like, how do I go from you know,

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>humanity society, industry. And that's the order of which I

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>care about them, right, Humanity first, society second industry third

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>industry can be very useful for society and humanity. But

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you like part of the like when we were talking

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>about that earlier steering and shaping, well, we want to

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>steer and shape industry to go. It should be on

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:36.239
<v Speaker 1>average massively positive for society over time, right. And if

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that's not, the director in it needs to be fixed

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 1>right now over time, not this year necessarily right, right,

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>there's always costs of transformation and all the rest now

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and so I went, that's the revolution we're in. And

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>so for me, I think that's twenty thirteen or twenty fourteen, right,

0:33:57.200 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's and that's why when like Sam called me

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and said, hey, I'm thinking of pulling this thing together

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>with you know, for AI for humanity, will you help,

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:09.799
<v Speaker 1>the answer is yes. It was one of the things

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:12.879
<v Speaker 1>where I had just gotten my partners at Greylock really

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 1>focused on crypto, and I was like, oh, I'm gonna

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:17.720
<v Speaker 1>stop doing this crypto thing because this AI thing is coming.

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>And they're like, what AI thing. I'm like, Oh, it's coming.

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 1>And and actually, you know, I think you know, I

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>think my partner is at Greylock were the first venture

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>partnership that saw GBT four because I got Sam's permission,

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I was on the board of open AI to say, hey,

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>come in and demo this and and and show this

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:37.959
<v Speaker 1>because there was there was a six month period where

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>GBD four was not public because we're like, oh is

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:44.439
<v Speaker 1>it safe enough and all the rest, and you know, they

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 1>were doing it. I was like, okay, look, I think

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 1>it's safe enough. Is it okay to show the partnership?

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:50.760
<v Speaker 1>And Sam's like, yeah, yeah, this this since you're serving

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 1>on a five one C three board of open AI

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to do this, this is the least we could do. Yes,

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:57.799
<v Speaker 1>you could go show them you know what's coming.

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Goal there's or there's some interesting I I and I

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 2>don't you know, I don't want to get in a gossip,

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:07.799
<v Speaker 2>but I think it's interesting because it's instructive to a

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of people, and it's also I think connects a

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:14.279
<v Speaker 2>lot of your own personal relationships and dots. So you

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:16.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, you were notoriously, as we were alluding to earlier,

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 2>part of the Payfoul mafia, and those are the brand

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 2>names today and Elon Musk obviously, Peter Thiele, David Sachs,

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 2>less of a brand name, but increasingly trying to be

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 2>one in terms of association with the Trump administration. Musk

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:38.799
<v Speaker 2>allegedly and Larry Page, co founder of Google, had a

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 2>conversation that, as at least Musk's telling goes, Musk was

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 2>concerned that Larry wasn't taking this jen Ai seriously enough

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 2>in terms of its downside risks, and decided to go

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 2>off on his own, made the same contacts you made

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 2>with Sam Altman and others, uh, and went down this

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 2>path of a five oh one c three and tried

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:04.280
<v Speaker 2>to birth open ai.

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Is that reasonably accurate? That is reasonably accurate. I think

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 1>it was a conversation. I think it was. You know,

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Larry was kind of saying, was you know, you know

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>it's probably too simplistic, but you know, kind of articularly

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a transhumanist perspective to Elon that you know naturally freaks

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>someone out because the rational response to that is that

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>it's almost strange, right and so and so it got

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>very concerned about it. Now, you know, in Elon's case

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 1>in particular, it's the you know, Elon has the definition

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of a Messiah complex. So it's like, no, no, I have

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to be the one building AI, not anyone else. So yeah,

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 1>there's the there's a little bit of the I'm worried

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 1>about it generally, but it's also the I'm worried it's

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you not me. Uh.

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 2>I think that's sort of proven itself a little bit,

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 2>this turn of notion of going back. Even when you

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 2>said the glasses, which is interesting technology I can see

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 2>better if you've been aiding and a better and as

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:04.240
<v Speaker 2>a human that technology it's not just you know ones

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 2>and zeros, yes, though you know now the now they're

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 2>becoming one zero asth meta uh and others I think,

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:13.400
<v Speaker 2>and now Apple's coming out with their own version. But

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 2>what this this notion of technology trends? I mean you

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:24.320
<v Speaker 2>reminded when what what what allegedly Larry said to Elon

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 2>that freaked Elon out is what guys like Peter Teal

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 2>couldn't even answer. You know, I think it was a

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 2>seventeen second pause in an interview about you know, human

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 2>beings and technology. But when you yeah, you sort of

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 2>invited that in with the glasses, I mean, what what

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 2>is all that?

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean for folks that may not be.

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Familiar with some of this, but maybe familiar with the

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 2>anxiety that some of these conversations have induced. More broadly,

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:50.839
<v Speaker 2>what is the suggestion is this? Are we just all

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 2>in a simulation or something?

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that the point?

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 2>There's that kind of there's a cast of few of

0:37:56.480 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 2>those conversations of them. Yes, It's like it's like like, actually,

0:38:03.520 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 2>I was sitting with two of my friends at the time.

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.319
<v Speaker 2>Elon was one of them. Yes, right, I won't like

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 2>and they're like, oh, yeah, everyone smart I know is

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 2>living in a simulation. And I was like, am I smart?

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:20.839
<v Speaker 2>And they're like yes.

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, well, then not everyone.

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 2>And it wasn't I remember the origin that we had

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 2>second life, we had some of these virtual realities. Maybe

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 2>they were alluding to a version of playing around with that,

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 2>but they mean quite literally, we're in a simulation.

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, And so I think simulation is the kind of

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:44.319
<v Speaker 1>classic theory that gets people to like the kind of

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Christian theory of intelligent design about how we get created

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 1>or the Firman s parad I was like, we have

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 1>questions we don't know the answers to therefore, right simulation

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, no, no, we have questions we don't

0:38:57.120 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>answers to stop, like, we will try to figure out

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the answers of those questions. Like the simulation theory stuff

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is like, sure, there's unknowns, like, for example, the classic

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 1>one that you usually used to argue with this is

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:14.839
<v Speaker 1>we don't have signals that there's other intelligent universe in life,

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 1>in the universe and so you know, like with radio

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>waves and statistics and all the rest, we should have that. Well, okay,

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that's an interesting puzzle. That's an interesting question. Why do

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 1>we not have that? And but like and therefore we're

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in a simulation is like, that's a lot of cognitive

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:38.360
<v Speaker 1>theoretical infrastructure to explain this in a similar like like

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the hey, we have an unknown about the complexity about

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 1>how human brains evolved and what the intermediate steps looked like, Well,

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>therefore there must be a creator. Well there's a lot

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of it's an unknown and by the way, therefore them

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:57.560
<v Speaker 1>must be a creator. And therefore, by the way, the

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 1>creator must be my religion, not any of the other twenties.

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Like it's like what like it's like, no, no pause

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>on the mystery, right, and then go, okay, we have

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:09.280
<v Speaker 1>an unknown answer, So there's a whole bunch of craziness.

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think coming back to the first part of

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 1>your question, I think is very important because I think this.

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:16.399
<v Speaker 1>I've been giving some speeches in Italy, like I gave

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 1>one a Bologna and Perusia because I wanted Silicon Valley

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to remember some of the important humanist nature of the Renaissance,

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 1>which is, what is it to really be a humanist

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>when you're thinking about this technology? And it's not just

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>self declaration I am humanist? Like no, that that that's nice,

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it's better than I'm not right, But it's like, well,

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 1>what is it to be humanist to say, Look, I

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:49.880
<v Speaker 1>have a theory about why the work I'm doing will

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:54.879
<v Speaker 1>cause a much better result for call it at least

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of humanity. Then the next thing is, and

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm transparent about it, I'm talking about it. I'm giving

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:07.239
<v Speaker 1>you a chance to critique me, dialogue with me, et cetera,

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. And then this is a super important thing

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:14.719
<v Speaker 1>is I'm not like a narcissist about it. I don't

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 1>come to my theory of humanity because I go, well,

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 1>this's good for me, right, or or I'm the most

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>genius person in the world. Everyone else's theory of humanity

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 1>is bad. Mine is the good one. But you know,

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 1>engage in dialogue, get critique, understand kind of what's going

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:35.759
<v Speaker 1>on for this. That's what being a humanist for technology

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is right, and we have some right great. Doesn't mean

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that they don't make mistakes Dario sam et cetera. But

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>they're they're actually, in fact, they are committed. And you

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 1>can tell they're committed because they do things that are

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 1>not in their own economic self interest and they invest

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:57.879
<v Speaker 1>in it in order to try to make it work.

0:41:57.960 --> 0:42:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't mean they're perfect, doesn't. I mean it's not worth

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 1>speaking up and say, hey, do X do also more

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of X or less of why? Perfectly good thing to do.

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 1>It's part of the reason why we have the dialogue

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:12.919
<v Speaker 1>about it, to say, hey, the way that we try

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to make decisions about because because your answers, these technologies

0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:20.440
<v Speaker 1>will build by small groups of people right and will

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 1>have humanity level impact. And you're like, okay, you can't

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 1>then say hey, we're gonna have a un global voting day.

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 1>That's not the way it's gonna work. So the dialogue

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:36.799
<v Speaker 1>and bringing up the concerns about what it is is

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that iteration is the way that we get to being

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 1>more broadly humanist.

0:42:42.520 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 2>What are the great anxieties? And you triggered it this

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:48.759
<v Speaker 2>notion that it's a handful of people. Yeah, and you know,

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 2>we talked about the American version and least having a

0:42:53.440 --> 0:42:57.600
<v Speaker 2>chance at regulating something within our quote unquote jurisdiction. But

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:03.760
<v Speaker 2>regulatory capture is real. Yeah, just massive obscene off the charts.

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:07.879
<v Speaker 2>Wealth comes with massive obscene influence to write the rules

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 2>of regulations to and the incumbency protection racket, So lock

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 2>everything out and lock everybody out to buy politicians. Yes,

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:20.319
<v Speaker 2>I mean, so how does that play in? I mean,

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 2>that certainly plays it. That is playing into people's anxiety

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 2>in a profound and outsized way.

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 1>How do we address both? And so when you have

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a tsunami like this, and this is

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to some degree talking to you, talking to the Dems

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:38.879
<v Speaker 1>on this, who tend to be the oh fight all

0:43:38.920 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the wealthy power, and you're like, you need capital on

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:45.880
<v Speaker 1>your side too, right, politically right, So have that as

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a good theory of the game. So the issue is say,

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 1>and like for example, and I'll come back to AI,

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 1>but this is like the mistake the dems made with crypto,

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>which is like, there's a huge amount crypto wealth. If

0:43:56.560 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 1>we just go attack it and go, hey, we're just

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:00.759
<v Speaker 1>going to try to kill all of you. The go

0:44:01.120 --> 0:44:03.279
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to kill us. Okay, we're going to vote

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:05.279
<v Speaker 1>the other way with not just our votes but our

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 1>dollars and all the rest. And it's like, okay, that's

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:10.240
<v Speaker 1>really painful and causes a whole bunch of bad outcomes

0:44:10.239 --> 0:44:12.880
<v Speaker 1>for society. So again you go, well, how do we

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:14.840
<v Speaker 1>shape it. It's like, look, we're not trying to like

0:44:15.280 --> 0:44:17.200
<v Speaker 1>extinguish all of you. We're trying to make sure that

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:21.879
<v Speaker 1>crypto has the right positive function in society. And they say, well,

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't envision anything. It's like, well, I come call me.

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I can envision things. Right, there's payments, there's much cheaper

0:44:29.160 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 1>banking systems, there's all kinds of things. Let's just shape

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it that direction. Yeah, I get it. You don't like

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:39.040
<v Speaker 1>because who does like terrorist ransom coin? Right, like like

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, like there's a bunch of bad shit we

0:44:41.000 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 1>should do bad shit about that, Or the question of

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 1>well it's this random speculation. It's like, well, look, we

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 1>do allow betting in various ways, let's try to contain

0:44:49.600 --> 0:44:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it and make sure it's not too bad. You know,

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 1>same reason why we go. You know, alcohol has a

0:44:55.440 --> 0:44:58.239
<v Speaker 1>bunch of bad outcomes, but it's better for society if

0:44:58.280 --> 0:45:02.120
<v Speaker 1>we go. Sure, it's okay if when you get to

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:05.879
<v Speaker 1>age you drink, don't drive. But it's like that kind

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:08.359
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. You get to shape it right, because there's

0:45:08.360 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 1>certain ways. Now you get to AI and you say,

0:45:10.120 --> 0:45:13.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, an AI wealth generation, and it's like shit,

0:45:14.000 --> 0:45:18.000
<v Speaker 1>this is creating a massive amount of economics that will

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:22.400
<v Speaker 1>have massive impact politically. And by the way, what shared

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:27.760
<v Speaker 1>across all this economics is a interest in not having

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the economics of the AI industry like trimmed, right. And

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:37.440
<v Speaker 1>by the way, some of that trimming is a terrible idea,

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:39.759
<v Speaker 1>which is let's just reduce our own American wealth. Some

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of it, like taxation for helping the rest of society,

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:49.279
<v Speaker 1>can be a good idea. Right. So it's and you know,

0:45:49.680 --> 0:45:51.840
<v Speaker 1>getting it right is hard, but I think it's doable.

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:55.799
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, well, then you go to, well, who

0:45:55.800 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 1>are the people who would be with me on, hey,

0:45:58.280 --> 0:46:01.800
<v Speaker 1>we should tax AI in some good ways, robot tax

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever else, and I'll make it happen. What are the

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:05.640
<v Speaker 1>ways we do that? So we take off some of

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the AI wealth that fights on our side for helping society,

0:46:10.640 --> 0:46:13.319
<v Speaker 1>and we fight against the other AI wealth that's like no, no, no,

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I should take my trillion dollars and be able to

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:19.239
<v Speaker 1>do whatever the hell I want. So easier said than done.

0:46:19.239 --> 0:46:22.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this gets too And we talk about that turbulence,

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 2>and we talk about the transition and using your vernacular,

0:46:25.280 --> 0:46:27.560
<v Speaker 2>and there's a lot of conversations about all right, if

0:46:28.120 --> 0:46:32.879
<v Speaker 2>this does have a more pronounced impact sooner than we anticipated,

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:35.480
<v Speaker 2>and we don't have the answer to what to do

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:37.920
<v Speaker 2>about that, and we don't have the AI solution to

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:41.279
<v Speaker 2>address the AI problem in terms of that transition, this

0:46:41.360 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 2>notion of universic basic income versus universic basic capital, this

0:46:45.640 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 2>notion of equity, this notion of ownership broadly shared so

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 2>that we can address some of that anxiety. We all

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 2>have a mistake in the game. You tend to be

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:59.480
<v Speaker 2>on the UBC yes side of this equation. But the

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:01.960
<v Speaker 2>question I have for you is not where you are

0:47:02.040 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 2>on that simple question the binary, at least in that context,

0:47:05.160 --> 0:47:07.680
<v Speaker 2>which is hardly the binary. But the question I posed

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 2>is how the hell you do it.

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Who's going to do it?

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:13.520
<v Speaker 2>You think Sam's gonna he says two and a half percent.

0:47:13.800 --> 0:47:16.719
<v Speaker 2>You know what, they're about to go public. We've we've

0:47:16.760 --> 0:47:18.879
<v Speaker 2>called fort in California. Why doesn't he do it here

0:47:18.880 --> 0:47:20.880
<v Speaker 2>in California. Let's well, happily take two and a half

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:23.439
<v Speaker 2>percent a year in this his home state that helped

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 2>birth this damn industry. I think he's going to pick

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:26.719
<v Speaker 2>up the phone after hearing this.

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh he might. I'm like, Sam cares about the stuff.

0:47:30.520 --> 0:47:34.320
<v Speaker 2>To his credit, he put out exactly and to his credit,

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:35.680
<v Speaker 2>yes he put that out.

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, he put that out. He's been running universal basic

0:47:39.520 --> 0:47:43.719
<v Speaker 1>income experiments, funding it himself in Oakland. Like like like

0:47:44.120 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 1>he's here's the moment. Yeah, so this is the moment.

0:47:46.680 --> 0:47:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all these I pos coming, Dario, here's the moment.

0:47:50.200 --> 0:47:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes. No, So like I think he do a great

0:47:53.280 --> 0:47:57.880
<v Speaker 1>called ass right now. I actually believe of all of

0:47:57.920 --> 0:48:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the open Ai folks and all of the Tropic folks,

0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:04.320
<v Speaker 1>they're very philanthropically minded.

0:48:04.719 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 2>So I think like the foundation, I mean, objectively, you

0:48:08.600 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 2>can you can dismiss these I get the populist these guys,

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 2>but they did put a foundation with the largest in

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:19.040
<v Speaker 2>the world yes, exactly. That they set up exists, yes,

0:48:19.600 --> 0:48:22.360
<v Speaker 2>and has tens a bit over one hundred billion dollars.

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Today, Yes, exactly, and so and what I think is unlike,

0:48:26.680 --> 0:48:29.239
<v Speaker 1>for example, take the Open AI Foundation. I don't think

0:48:29.239 --> 0:48:31.480
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be sitting on their hands, right. And

0:48:31.520 --> 0:48:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I actually think one of the things that you know

0:48:33.080 --> 0:48:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you should do, and I think California should do, you know,

0:48:35.880 --> 0:48:40.520
<v Speaker 1>uh it should be, is hey, you guys, uh, you know,

0:48:40.960 --> 0:48:46.440
<v Speaker 1>we're only possible because of California, right, Like we provided

0:48:46.680 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the platform by which you guys could do this, could

0:48:50.080 --> 0:48:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you guys, you know, disproportionately focused on helping our state

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and doing stuff we'd love to talk?

0:48:55.360 --> 0:48:59.360
<v Speaker 2>You supposed to take your capital gaze to Texas, Yes, Texas, Florida,

0:48:59.400 --> 0:48:59.719
<v Speaker 2>et cetera.

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:03.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like, yeah, like you couldn't have made this without us, correct,

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:08.239
<v Speaker 1>so in fact, so please contribute back, right or contribute

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:11.040
<v Speaker 1>back without the police. Yes, we're grateful for the job

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 1>creation of the innovation. We're grateful for all the energy

0:49:13.200 --> 0:49:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and daring.

0:49:13.920 --> 0:49:17.280
<v Speaker 2>We're very very proud of your success and and please

0:49:17.400 --> 0:49:20.240
<v Speaker 2>yes and time, yes, yes, right, because like for example,

0:49:20.280 --> 0:49:23.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, space had forward impossible without this state, yea

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Tesla exists without the regulations.

0:49:25.840 --> 0:49:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Impossible period without this state. Thank you, right, So it's like.

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:31.480
<v Speaker 2>You're welcome, Elan, and thank you for your innovation and

0:49:31.560 --> 0:49:32.279
<v Speaker 2>daring as well.

0:49:32.360 --> 0:49:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, extremely importantly, I'm pretty sure you're gonna ask me

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:39.719
<v Speaker 1>a question where I'm about to dump on you lot,

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:43.759
<v Speaker 1>but for a good reason. But this is amazing for

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:46.040
<v Speaker 1>me to have to ask. Yes. But why isn't I mean,

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:49.560
<v Speaker 1>so let's you open that door. Why doesn't he feel

0:49:49.600 --> 0:49:53.399
<v Speaker 1>this way? I mean, honestly, well, because me, what what? What?

0:49:53.400 --> 0:49:53.960
<v Speaker 1>What is it?

0:49:54.080 --> 0:49:56.200
<v Speaker 2>You know? I remember there was a different guy though

0:49:56.400 --> 0:49:57.719
<v Speaker 2>I was with someone the other day. I said, no,

0:49:57.800 --> 0:49:59.600
<v Speaker 2>he was always this guy and I said, well, you

0:49:59.640 --> 0:50:02.720
<v Speaker 2>didn't or that way in the fifteen interactions I had,

0:50:03.200 --> 0:50:04.640
<v Speaker 2>you know him better than anybody.

0:50:05.120 --> 0:50:09.120
<v Speaker 1>So the people are a dynamic. So the question is

0:50:09.160 --> 0:50:12.560
<v Speaker 1>where do they go as they get more power, more

0:50:12.760 --> 0:50:15.120
<v Speaker 1>sycophants around them, and so forth. And the answer is

0:50:15.239 --> 0:50:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Elon became a narcissist to who he wasn't a narcissist.

0:50:19.400 --> 0:50:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I think he was a small narcissist and now he's

0:50:21.640 --> 0:50:26.279
<v Speaker 1>a big narcissist, right, and like he lies through his

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:29.040
<v Speaker 1>teeth constantly. I don't know if he if he tells

0:50:29.080 --> 0:50:33.000
<v Speaker 1>him self stories about it, like and it basically like

0:50:33.080 --> 0:50:38.359
<v Speaker 1>the like like the whole pitiful open AI lawsuit, it

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:42.680
<v Speaker 1>was pathetic and courts agreed. Yes, well, and it's pathetic

0:50:43.160 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 1>written out large for everyone to see. Yeah, that too,

0:50:47.719 --> 0:50:51.520
<v Speaker 1>right now, It's like it's a court of law with

0:50:51.520 --> 0:50:58.160
<v Speaker 1>with truth in like documents, depositions, et cetera. It's just pathetic.

0:50:58.360 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like the no, no, no, Like I'm trying to

0:51:01.040 --> 0:51:03.279
<v Speaker 1>do anything possible to argue that you guys are wrong

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and I was right, and it's like, no, they were

0:51:05.719 --> 0:51:06.520
<v Speaker 1>right and you were wrong.

0:51:07.719 --> 0:51:11.920
<v Speaker 2>But it's just I mean, so it just I mean,

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:14.920
<v Speaker 2>I guess, I mean, it's just a classic clinical definition

0:51:14.960 --> 0:51:15.719
<v Speaker 2>of narcissism.

0:51:15.880 --> 0:51:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, and like, for example, he goes I like,

0:51:18.960 --> 0:51:22.960
<v Speaker 1>for example, he helps found open ai as like we

0:51:23.040 --> 0:51:26.439
<v Speaker 1>need to have AI for the benefit of humanity, not

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:29.839
<v Speaker 1>just Google, okay, and he goes, oh, should I should

0:51:29.880 --> 0:51:33.680
<v Speaker 1>have my own? So he gets XAI started, and in

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a desperate bid for market share, he's like, oh, yeah,

0:51:38.280 --> 0:51:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. If we create a whole bunch of like

0:51:41.760 --> 0:51:45.719
<v Speaker 1>pornographic images, some of which your children, your journalists have

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:48.799
<v Speaker 1>been reporting on this et cetera. And that's because it's

0:51:48.840 --> 0:51:53.880
<v Speaker 1>more important that I have this AI thing than this

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:56.319
<v Speaker 1>damage that we're doing to children and all the rest

0:51:56.360 --> 0:51:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. It's like, it's crazy.

0:51:58.680 --> 0:52:00.960
<v Speaker 2>So do I mean, by the way, just I mean

0:52:01.239 --> 0:52:04.520
<v Speaker 2>accelerating and fast forward. I mean space space X is

0:52:04.520 --> 0:52:08.320
<v Speaker 2>a pretty remarkable company on the basis of the facts

0:52:08.320 --> 0:52:11.239
<v Speaker 2>and evidence starlink in particular from a sort of cash

0:52:11.239 --> 0:52:13.640
<v Speaker 2>flow perspective, an ROI perspective.

0:52:13.640 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And a goodness for society.

0:52:15.520 --> 0:52:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and by the way, I've seen that firsthand in

0:52:17.520 --> 0:52:21.239
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the Amazon, which actually really inspired and

0:52:21.280 --> 0:52:25.560
<v Speaker 2>surprised me to be that, in fact universally awkwardly connected

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:28.399
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of the rainforest, even more so than

0:52:28.440 --> 0:52:32.080
<v Speaker 2>frankly out here in the Silicon Valley. But I'm curious,

0:52:32.280 --> 0:52:35.840
<v Speaker 2>just you know, with regardless SpaceX in the IPO, I mean,

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:37.680
<v Speaker 2>there's other component parts of that that are a little

0:52:37.719 --> 0:52:40.600
<v Speaker 2>more dubious and questionable. There are folks out there, deeply

0:52:40.640 --> 0:52:42.279
<v Speaker 2>more cynical than I am that just call it a

0:52:42.360 --> 0:52:44.280
<v Speaker 2>dam Ponzi scheme period full stop.

0:52:44.320 --> 0:52:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Where you are on then, for example, yes, look, so

0:52:49.040 --> 0:52:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm a small investor, but I think it's nuts, right,

0:52:54.760 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 1>It's I mean, it's like look, for example, you look

0:52:58.719 --> 0:53:00.880
<v Speaker 1>at the they just look at the pspectus. And the

0:53:01.680 --> 0:53:04.879
<v Speaker 1>biggest part of it is payments from Anthropic for these

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:10.320
<v Speaker 1>data centers that are horrific for the environment, are badly

0:53:10.360 --> 0:53:14.319
<v Speaker 1>set up in their networking equipment. That nominally, he's trying

0:53:14.320 --> 0:53:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to restart XAI for the third time by Cursor to

0:53:18.239 --> 0:53:19.360
<v Speaker 1>go somewhere.

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:22.600
<v Speaker 2>By sixty billion dollars sanan Scho based company that five

0:53:22.680 --> 0:53:24.880
<v Speaker 2>years ago didn't exist.

0:53:25.000 --> 0:53:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and it's like okay, and I'm glad he's buying Cursor,

0:53:28.600 --> 0:53:30.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, great, hopefully something will come of it.

0:53:30.880 --> 0:53:33.960
<v Speaker 2>What are they vibe? What is vibe coding? Sorry to

0:53:33.960 --> 0:53:36.800
<v Speaker 2>go down that rabbitries, but it's a vibe coding company.

0:53:37.160 --> 0:53:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's one of the early revolutionis of how do

0:53:42.280 --> 0:53:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you have AI accelerate your coding? And Vibe coding is

0:53:46.440 --> 0:53:48.359
<v Speaker 1>a part of that. It's not the whole thing. It's like,

0:53:48.719 --> 0:53:53.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, like basically, anyone who is coding who's not

0:53:53.520 --> 0:53:56.360
<v Speaker 1>using AI right now or not. Everyone called it ninety

0:53:56.360 --> 0:53:59.759
<v Speaker 1>plus percent. If you're coding and not using AI, you're

0:53:59.760 --> 0:54:04.600
<v Speaker 1>making mistake, right, so and and it's only getting better,

0:54:05.000 --> 0:54:11.439
<v Speaker 1>right and both Claude codex. Uh sorry, claud code open

0:54:11.440 --> 0:54:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a codex. I think Microsoft Copilot. I think we'll have

0:54:14.920 --> 0:54:19.319
<v Speaker 1>a good entry here are all, you know, I think

0:54:21.120 --> 0:54:24.799
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental way has changed the entire world in terms

0:54:24.840 --> 0:54:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of how we operate. So and dropics willing to buy

0:54:28.400 --> 0:54:31.839
<v Speaker 1>the revenue, but like that is your primary revenue thing

0:54:32.080 --> 0:54:36.239
<v Speaker 1>in the thing that you're going public on, like this

0:54:36.320 --> 0:54:39.640
<v Speaker 1>is in the government. Yes, well, and then you're like, oh,

0:54:39.719 --> 0:54:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the dj is saying they've got to drop the lawsuit

0:54:42.960 --> 0:54:45.400
<v Speaker 1>because this is part of our national scurity defense, Like well,

0:54:45.440 --> 0:54:48.439
<v Speaker 1>that's none of that's in their perspectives. And by the way,

0:54:48.840 --> 0:54:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the entire XAI thing, Elon himself said it's a complete

0:54:53.320 --> 0:54:55.960
<v Speaker 1>train wreck. We're rebuilding it. I was like, well, you know,

0:54:56.000 --> 0:54:58.319
<v Speaker 1>if you had like honor integrity, you'd say, well, we'll

0:54:58.360 --> 0:55:00.920
<v Speaker 1>hand back those government contracts because we just said our

0:55:00.960 --> 0:55:04.680
<v Speaker 1>product was a complete train wreck. Right. It's like, you know,

0:55:04.800 --> 0:55:07.560
<v Speaker 1>so just it's all corruption, I.

0:55:07.480 --> 0:55:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Mean corruption, Yeah, I mean you just call it.

0:55:10.880 --> 0:55:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, call what it is. Call it what it is. Yeah,

0:55:13.320 --> 0:55:16.840
<v Speaker 1>we're living in the in the in the greatest kleptocracy

0:55:16.880 --> 0:55:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of your.

0:55:17.200 --> 0:55:21.480
<v Speaker 2>In my lifetimes, and it's I want to circle back

0:55:21.520 --> 0:55:24.200
<v Speaker 2>on that stay tuned for those that are tuning in

0:55:24.719 --> 0:55:25.840
<v Speaker 2>on that, because.

0:55:25.560 --> 0:55:26.600
<v Speaker 1>That deserves some attention.

0:55:26.960 --> 0:55:29.279
<v Speaker 2>But as we sort of bounce back and forth the

0:55:29.320 --> 0:55:32.680
<v Speaker 2>anthropic data center point you made in this notion of compute,

0:55:32.800 --> 0:55:34.680
<v Speaker 2>and you made the point the biggest limiting factor in

0:55:34.760 --> 0:55:37.760
<v Speaker 2>terms of the acceleration is less. The chips is important

0:55:37.800 --> 0:55:40.520
<v Speaker 2>and profound as they are, it's really about the compute.

0:55:40.600 --> 0:55:43.200
<v Speaker 2>And so it gets to the question of data centers

0:55:43.239 --> 0:55:45.360
<v Speaker 2>and all the anxiety and data centers which has actually

0:55:45.400 --> 0:55:46.800
<v Speaker 2>been sort of a leading indicator of one of the

0:55:46.840 --> 0:55:50.240
<v Speaker 2>reasons people have such animis towards AI because they connect

0:55:50.239 --> 0:55:52.680
<v Speaker 2>the dots. And there's been a few studies DC Maryland

0:55:52.920 --> 0:55:57.040
<v Speaker 2>that's sixty percent of the growth of those retail or

0:55:57.120 --> 0:55:59.560
<v Speaker 2>rather residential utility bills have been attached to the issue

0:55:59.560 --> 0:56:00.600
<v Speaker 2>of data or growth.

0:56:00.840 --> 0:56:01.920
<v Speaker 1>So where are you and all that?

0:56:01.960 --> 0:56:05.319
<v Speaker 2>I know you've said we blamed AI for everything. So

0:56:05.600 --> 0:56:08.879
<v Speaker 2>the issue of utility costs which have been growing yep,

0:56:09.160 --> 0:56:12.320
<v Speaker 2>separate from AI, certainly haven't been benefited.

0:56:12.760 --> 0:56:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're not benefiting centers. Look, I think that the

0:56:15.400 --> 0:56:19.160
<v Speaker 1>clear thing for you and other folks to do is say, look,

0:56:19.560 --> 0:56:24.200
<v Speaker 1>we want to enable data centers that are very positive

0:56:24.200 --> 0:56:27.560
<v Speaker 1>contributors to communities. So, for example, very easy one is

0:56:27.600 --> 0:56:31.799
<v Speaker 1>to say, hey, if you're building a massive data center,

0:56:31.960 --> 0:56:34.239
<v Speaker 1>you have to provision power at like one hundred and

0:56:34.280 --> 0:56:39.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent, right, and that thirty percent is that's amongst

0:56:39.920 --> 0:56:44.759
<v Speaker 1>the things that you're contributing back, right and so so.

0:56:44.880 --> 0:56:47.720
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, who should benefit from that, Well,

0:56:48.040 --> 0:56:50.359
<v Speaker 1>the local residents who should have a choice whether they

0:56:50.360 --> 0:56:55.920
<v Speaker 1>want that or not. Their powerbells go down right as

0:56:56.000 --> 0:56:56.400
<v Speaker 1>part of that.

0:56:56.719 --> 0:57:00.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean the irony is the data centers are getting

0:57:00.520 --> 0:57:05.400
<v Speaker 2>subsidies on their bills and we're socializing an increase on

0:57:05.440 --> 0:57:06.320
<v Speaker 2>everybody else's.

0:57:06.360 --> 0:57:08.279
<v Speaker 1>No, and so what it should be is that you

0:57:08.320 --> 0:57:11.319
<v Speaker 1>should contribute. Look, we will help you because, by the way,

0:57:11.920 --> 0:57:14.719
<v Speaker 1>knowing from the inside Microsoft board and other things they

0:57:14.760 --> 0:57:18.480
<v Speaker 1>care about, here, you are walking conflict. Yeah I don't know,

0:57:18.560 --> 0:57:23.480
<v Speaker 1>but that's a conflict, but information informed. Look what do

0:57:23.560 --> 0:57:26.640
<v Speaker 1>these hyperscalers care about. They care about reliability, ability to

0:57:26.680 --> 0:57:29.880
<v Speaker 1>construct the thing, ability to deploy it, ability to manage

0:57:29.880 --> 0:57:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it the right way, et cetera. Look, if you said

0:57:33.160 --> 0:57:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to have like your cost structural increase because

0:57:36.440 --> 0:57:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you have to have a one hundred and thirty percent

0:57:38.400 --> 0:57:41.959
<v Speaker 1>contribution for the power stuff. They would sign that deal

0:57:41.960 --> 0:57:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in a heartbeat if you gave the like if you

0:57:44.760 --> 0:57:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you said hey, and and by the way, they do more.

0:57:47.440 --> 0:57:48.720
<v Speaker 1>It's like, well, what are you going to do for

0:57:48.760 --> 0:57:51.760
<v Speaker 1>local community in terms of jobs? Right, we want we

0:57:51.760 --> 0:57:55.440
<v Speaker 1>want to see something serious here. Look, it's a simple

0:57:56.080 --> 0:57:58.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of like like simple set of asks.

0:57:58.320 --> 0:58:01.120
<v Speaker 2>And in the absence of that, they'll take what you're

0:58:01.160 --> 0:58:03.240
<v Speaker 2>giving because it's of course tasting for these things.

0:58:03.840 --> 0:58:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's twenty five percent of all their base load.

0:58:05.800 --> 0:58:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Now, yes, it's data centers, which is off the charts insane.

0:58:09.320 --> 0:58:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and so you should it should be an ask

0:58:11.680 --> 0:58:15.000
<v Speaker 1>for we will help you do this stuff. These are

0:58:15.040 --> 0:58:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the things you need to do. And by the way,

0:58:16.400 --> 0:58:18.320
<v Speaker 1>if someone else give you a better deal, fine, go

0:58:18.360 --> 0:58:19.040
<v Speaker 1>with this someone else.

0:58:19.160 --> 0:58:21.320
<v Speaker 2>This notion of jobs though, I mean, the construction jobs

0:58:21.320 --> 0:58:24.280
<v Speaker 2>are legit and we should celebrate that. And these are

0:58:24.360 --> 0:58:28.160
<v Speaker 2>good high paying jobs and and and careers, and people

0:58:28.240 --> 0:58:31.560
<v Speaker 2>bounce around even they're temporary and get the benefit of that.

0:58:31.600 --> 0:58:33.400
<v Speaker 2>But there are not a lot of jobs on the

0:58:33.400 --> 0:58:34.360
<v Speaker 2>permanent side of this.

0:58:34.640 --> 0:58:37.120
<v Speaker 1>No, although, for example, when you're going to hyperscalers, let's

0:58:37.120 --> 0:58:39.120
<v Speaker 1>take Microsoft. The thing I would ask if I was

0:58:39.240 --> 0:58:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a local areas, I'd say, I want you to open

0:58:41.520 --> 0:58:44.840
<v Speaker 1>up a Microsoft office here. Now you're talking, just open

0:58:44.960 --> 0:58:45.760
<v Speaker 1>up a Microsoft office.

0:58:45.760 --> 0:58:48.880
<v Speaker 2>We need to be better Dan negotiators, yes, whereas I

0:58:48.880 --> 0:58:52.960
<v Speaker 2>mean we just yeah, okay, I mean I'm having a

0:58:52.960 --> 0:58:56.720
<v Speaker 2>hard time arguing with these these deeper points. What about

0:58:56.760 --> 0:58:59.720
<v Speaker 2>this notion of these things being what is it's the

0:58:59.760 --> 0:59:03.000
<v Speaker 2>g don't last very long, right, just a few years?

0:59:03.440 --> 0:59:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, because the next ones are so much better.

0:59:05.720 --> 0:59:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Right, So is this I mean back to froth even

0:59:10.320 --> 0:59:13.560
<v Speaker 2>KKR big promoter in the future, I mean saying a

0:59:13.560 --> 0:59:17.880
<v Speaker 2>little froth here, Sam said, bubble Mark, you know all

0:59:17.920 --> 0:59:20.120
<v Speaker 2>these guys, I mean, you know, the.

0:59:19.640 --> 0:59:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Zucker Birds of the world.

0:59:20.760 --> 0:59:23.800
<v Speaker 2>You're like, ah, yeah, I mean so this knows where

0:59:23.800 --> 0:59:27.640
<v Speaker 2>are you in the bubble on the sort of frothy bubble,

0:59:27.960 --> 0:59:29.600
<v Speaker 2>so of this and the capex in this.

0:59:29.600 --> 0:59:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Space and that the ROI is you.

0:59:33.640 --> 0:59:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Know or is it? It's electricity to you?

0:59:36.200 --> 0:59:40.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's ultimately electricity where we're getting intelligence

0:59:40.480 --> 0:59:46.600
<v Speaker 1>at the cost and scale of electricity, and that's just great.

0:59:46.640 --> 0:59:48.000
<v Speaker 1>And so for example, it's one of the reasons why

0:59:48.000 --> 0:59:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the challenges are just wrong. Like they said,

0:59:51.120 --> 0:59:54.880
<v Speaker 1>well you know, uh, you know, climate impact, and you're like, well, actually,

0:59:55.000 --> 0:59:57.160
<v Speaker 1>let's just make sure that AI is applying something to

0:59:57.560 --> 1:00:01.200
<v Speaker 1>grid analysis and power running. And so then as you say, hey,

1:00:01.360 --> 1:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>if all of a sudden, all of the h facts

1:00:03.920 --> 1:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and laundry machines and all the rest were intelligent devices

1:00:07.400 --> 1:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that ran when it was cheap on the grid and

1:00:10.840 --> 1:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>all the rest and was doing power management net very

1:00:14.080 --> 1:00:16.080
<v Speaker 1>positive benefit. And we've already seen Google do that with

1:00:16.080 --> 1:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>their own data centers and all the rest. Like, it's

1:00:18.120 --> 1:00:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of stuff there, And I think the

1:00:20.320 --> 1:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>same thing in terms of ultimately that doesn't mean that

1:00:24.440 --> 1:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>there won't be some things that are Ponzi schemes and

1:00:27.400 --> 1:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>some things that are major economic losses. But a bubble

1:00:33.800 --> 1:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is oh, this isn't sustainable. It all just kind of

1:00:37.320 --> 1:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>falls down and it has domino effects other things. The

1:00:41.000 --> 1:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>short answer is, like nthropics revenue is limited by its compute.

1:00:46.240 --> 1:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>It has more demand that it can provide right now,

1:00:49.480 --> 1:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and so that like this isn't like oh, no one

1:00:52.960 --> 1:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>wants this. It's no, no, This intelligence at the scale

1:00:57.400 --> 1:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and cost of electricity is massively useful, massively wanted. So

1:01:04.360 --> 1:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean you say well, maybe we built that data

1:01:08.080 --> 1:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>center for fifty billion and action ends up being worth

1:01:11.440 --> 1:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>forty billion, and we've got some operating losses, but by

1:01:15.240 --> 1:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the way in operating it, it operates profitably and all

1:01:18.480 --> 1:01:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the rest, and we just have to take a charge down.

1:01:20.800 --> 1:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>That's not a bubble, that's volatility in a market.

1:01:24.280 --> 1:01:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what do you make of a market which is

1:01:27.760 --> 1:01:31.280
<v Speaker 2>so fierce in the competition this notion, that of super intelligence,

1:01:31.320 --> 1:01:34.280
<v Speaker 2>this race to this holy grail and then a nanosecond

1:01:34.360 --> 1:01:36.200
<v Speaker 2>I shut every competitor down.

1:01:36.280 --> 1:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I quite literally talk about the Messiah complex. I own

1:01:39.240 --> 1:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the world in my palm of my hand, maybe literally.

1:01:44.760 --> 1:01:49.840
<v Speaker 2>That a company like Google and Gemini are uniquely positioned

1:01:50.240 --> 1:01:55.280
<v Speaker 2>against an anthropic, against open ai and others just on

1:01:55.320 --> 1:01:57.760
<v Speaker 2>the token question that they can sort of do what

1:01:58.200 --> 1:02:02.080
<v Speaker 2>companies Amazon infamously many other companies do, and that's just

1:02:02.200 --> 1:02:05.600
<v Speaker 2>gut their competition and price them out by lowering the

1:02:05.640 --> 1:02:09.560
<v Speaker 2>cost below their actual cost and have tokens as lost

1:02:09.600 --> 1:02:11.840
<v Speaker 2>leaders until they bleed out their competition.

1:02:12.160 --> 1:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, they definitely are the cheapest price tokens of the

1:02:16.200 --> 1:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>major stuff today and it's not having that much of

1:02:19.120 --> 1:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>an impact. Interesting, right, so right, So it isn't that

1:02:24.360 --> 1:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to say it's an it's a not an issue to

1:02:26.520 --> 1:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to. But like for example, when people kind

1:02:30.280 --> 1:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of check token costs across call it. You know, you

1:02:35.080 --> 1:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>know open Ai and Thropic and Google. Google's by far

1:02:38.480 --> 1:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and away the cheapest, but the heat and usage is

1:02:42.080 --> 1:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>still an open eye and and and Anthropic and by

1:02:46.000 --> 1:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, within the enterprise context Microsoft, right and so,

1:02:50.720 --> 1:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>so yes, that's a worry, but it's not really playing

1:02:53.480 --> 1:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>out that way now. Some of it is you know,

1:02:56.120 --> 1:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>for example, you know Google missed the curve on the

1:02:59.720 --> 1:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>code agent thing, right.

1:03:01.880 --> 1:03:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

1:03:02.240 --> 1:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Some of it's you know, kind of other things Google.

1:03:05.920 --> 1:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>And look, I'll just so it just doesn't look like

1:03:08.160 --> 1:03:12.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm Microsoft, you know, dumping on Google. Like Google missed

1:03:12.520 --> 1:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of different productization things, so did Microsoft. Right. So,

1:03:16.960 --> 1:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>so it's like, you know, there's a bunch of stuff there,

1:03:19.040 --> 1:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and so did open Ai. I mean, is there investing

1:03:21.120 --> 1:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in Sora? Yes? First, you know, and I what is it?

1:03:23.320 --> 1:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>What was it? Banana something? I like it? No banana? Google? Uh?

1:03:28.440 --> 1:03:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile Anthropic sort of plug it along?

1:03:30.720 --> 1:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah no, No, last year and this year you're of entropic, right, right?

1:03:35.080 --> 1:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>What happened with mythos what did it mean to you? It?

1:03:37.200 --> 1:03:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Was it overhyped? Was it a Dario once again? Doomskall?

1:03:41.200 --> 1:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Here I was? I mean, is it you know?

1:03:43.600 --> 1:03:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Was it just the friction of just anyone's sort of

1:03:46.960 --> 1:03:50.040
<v Speaker 2>pushing back against Petex's and Trump and so they need

1:03:50.080 --> 1:03:53.080
<v Speaker 2>to be banished? Is it Elon making the calls in

1:03:53.120 --> 1:03:55.479
<v Speaker 2>this competition in sex saying we want these sont bitch

1:03:55.480 --> 1:03:56.000
<v Speaker 2>shut down?

1:03:56.040 --> 1:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>What is what does mythos represent to you? So mythos

1:03:59.400 --> 1:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is I think both real and overhyped. Right, it's a weird.

1:04:03.280 --> 1:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I've ever said that sentence before. And

1:04:06.080 --> 1:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>it's real because they tuned they had a coating sharp lead,

1:04:11.320 --> 1:04:16.160
<v Speaker 1>they tuned it to cyber. That was a genius and

1:04:16.200 --> 1:04:19.840
<v Speaker 1>genius for both. And they did the responsible thing of saying, hey,

1:04:20.160 --> 1:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>let's try to allow a bunch of different places, which

1:04:22.960 --> 1:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>your critical infrastructure, which are both within the kind of

1:04:26.040 --> 1:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>public sphere and also private shere banking, et cetera. Let's

1:04:29.680 --> 1:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>make sure that all of that is hardened early before

1:04:32.280 --> 1:04:34.920
<v Speaker 1>this stuff is and we're doing a very responsible role

1:04:35.000 --> 1:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>out for all that. And that's the real And then

1:04:37.960 --> 1:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the overhyped is you know, like you know it would

1:04:41.360 --> 1:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>be the end of the you know, it would just

1:04:44.080 --> 1:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>be catastrophe if it came out. And you're like, yeah,

1:04:46.680 --> 1:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's quite that. I just think it's

1:04:49.280 --> 1:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>like more train wrecks, right, Like, there would be some

1:04:52.200 --> 1:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>real costs, but I don't think it would be the

1:04:54.080 --> 1:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, end of civilization or anything else. Now, what

1:04:59.320 --> 1:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that happened is because you know, in thropics

1:05:02.600 --> 1:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to be responsible, uh we as far as I

1:05:07.120 --> 1:05:10.280
<v Speaker 1>understand from the outside looking at the administration, there's a

1:05:10.280 --> 1:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of different people jockeying for control and the AI sphere,

1:05:14.120 --> 1:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>there's there's there's people who are like, oh, we hate

1:05:16.680 --> 1:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>all tech, we hate big tech. Let's just close all

1:05:19.560 --> 1:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>this AI stuff down. That's like banning, et cetera. There's

1:05:23.120 --> 1:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>people who are like, oh, this is a commercial thing,

1:05:25.680 --> 1:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I should own it. It's like best end, et cetera.

1:05:28.520 --> 1:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>There's you know, sacks going there should be no controls here.

1:05:31.720 --> 1:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>The only way that AI becomes American intelligence is there's

1:05:34.320 --> 1:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>zero control, you know. And so like there's a melee

1:05:38.360 --> 1:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>within the UH, within the White House to which tends

1:05:42.760 --> 1:05:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to really only the factions that tend to ultimately win

1:05:45.720 --> 1:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is you know, is there a big payoff for someone

1:05:47.640 --> 1:05:51.959
<v Speaker 1>in the clyptocracy, right, so, I think. And they don't

1:05:52.160 --> 1:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>like anthropic because they also like to be that we

1:05:54.600 --> 1:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>are the big you know, swinging you know, things right

1:05:59.760 --> 1:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>in and we don't like that they're not rolling over

1:06:02.560 --> 1:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and going, you know, yes, sir, you're my master. And

1:06:05.720 --> 1:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>they're like, they're principled. And by the way, we live

1:06:08.800 --> 1:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in a country by which uh, you know kind of uh,

1:06:12.800 --> 1:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>individuals are citizens, organizations, companies must follow the law. But

1:06:19.120 --> 1:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the law is not I do whatever the fuck you

1:06:21.280 --> 1:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>tell me to do, right, it's we follow the law, yes, right,

1:06:25.560 --> 1:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>both and yes yes, and so.

1:06:27.720 --> 1:06:31.120
<v Speaker 2>The law, well, we'll get to the role of God later, yes, exactly.

1:06:31.640 --> 1:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>And so so their principle about that, and that's what

1:06:34.320 --> 1:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to hold up to and what they

1:06:36.680 --> 1:06:38.479
<v Speaker 1>were doing, and it was like, no, no, you must

1:06:38.520 --> 1:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>do what we tell you to do. It's like, no,

1:06:40.640 --> 1:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily, right, you know. And so so it's like, ah,

1:06:44.800 --> 1:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>we have an option to show them whose boss, right, right,

1:06:48.440 --> 1:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>You're like, ah, I don't think that's that, by the way, Frankly,

1:06:51.680 --> 1:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an American We should be celebrating achievements

1:06:55.600 --> 1:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of Americans. Of things that we do and so worth

1:06:58.000 --> 1:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's like to say, no, no, you must be

1:07:00.080 --> 1:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>following hair leader's commands. Whoever hair leader is, whether it's

1:07:05.400 --> 1:07:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a you know, uh, you know, uh, left wing version,

1:07:08.800 --> 1:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>right wing version, whatever it is, Yes, it's like no, no, no,

1:07:11.760 --> 1:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it's like we follow a rule of law together. There

1:07:14.680 --> 1:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you go.

1:07:16.560 --> 1:07:20.960
<v Speaker 2>So Sam took advantage of this from a competitive perspective

1:07:21.000 --> 1:07:22.520
<v Speaker 2>at open AI and said, we're good.

1:07:22.840 --> 1:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what did you make of that? I wish you'd

1:07:25.840 --> 1:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>called me beforehand. Yes, it was a mistake. It didn't

1:07:30.360 --> 1:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't go over well.

1:07:31.760 --> 1:07:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well so maybe Trump folks did.

1:07:35.200 --> 1:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I haven't talked to Sam about this yet, partially because

1:07:37.520 --> 1:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it all happened very quickly, and then I was like,

1:07:39.120 --> 1:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and then it happened at that point showing up and

1:07:41.320 --> 1:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>saying I wouldn't have done this. It's like not very

1:07:43.360 --> 1:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>constructive and helpful, you know. I undoubtedly part of what

1:07:47.880 --> 1:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Sam's trying to say. Look, if the if the good

1:07:51.120 --> 1:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>principled people like you know, anthropic and open ay bowed,

1:07:55.040 --> 1:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>then it's only left to the unprincipled people like XAI.

1:07:58.760 --> 1:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I get it. It's a challenge issue. It's not straightforward, okay,

1:08:02.200 --> 1:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>but this would be a would have been a very

1:08:04.680 --> 1:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>good chance to say no, no, all of us principled

1:08:08.080 --> 1:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>companies should stand together and we should sort this of

1:08:11.080 --> 1:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it all together, right, And so we're like, we're not

1:08:15.000 --> 1:08:18.719
<v Speaker 1>going to jump in. We also think these principles. And

1:08:18.760 --> 1:08:21.519
<v Speaker 1>what happened is he quickly deluded himself as like, oh,

1:08:21.560 --> 1:08:24.519
<v Speaker 1>this is solvable technically. It's like, no, the Anthropic people

1:08:24.560 --> 1:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>are good technically too. There's from Open AI, and he

1:08:27.800 --> 1:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>was oh, shit, that doesn't work. Yeah. Yeah, that's the

1:08:30.320 --> 1:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>reason why Anthropic was going, We're not going to do

1:08:32.200 --> 1:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it this way, right, And so it's like and you know,

1:08:36.880 --> 1:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the part of what happens is the competition gets so

1:08:39.479 --> 1:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>ferocious that it's like the ah, I'm just communien. It's like, no, no,

1:08:44.280 --> 1:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>there are some places you put the competition aside, and

1:08:48.240 --> 1:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>when it's humanity and society, you put the competition aside.

1:08:53.160 --> 1:08:56.559
<v Speaker 2>What they're not putting aside at Open AI is this

1:08:56.680 --> 1:08:57.680
<v Speaker 2>notion of AI.

1:08:57.640 --> 1:08:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Into the physical space.

1:08:58.760 --> 1:09:03.320
<v Speaker 2>They're actually trying to lean into that partnerships with Johnny

1:09:03.360 --> 1:09:08.120
<v Speaker 2>and others, and that gets even to what Elon's doing

1:09:08.200 --> 1:09:11.880
<v Speaker 2>and Dexterity robots. The robots are coming physical AI we're

1:09:11.880 --> 1:09:16.360
<v Speaker 2>seeing it manifest and you know, driverless cars, driverless planes,

1:09:16.439 --> 1:09:20.360
<v Speaker 2>or flightless planes or pilotless planes shortly or at least

1:09:20.360 --> 1:09:24.200
<v Speaker 2>flying cars in the vernacular of the Jetsons, which is interesting.

1:09:24.200 --> 1:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>They're doing a reboot of the Jetsons. Seems to make

1:09:26.160 --> 1:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>some sense in this world they were living. But what

1:09:28.840 --> 1:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>is that? I suspect it'll be a little bit more

1:09:32.760 --> 1:09:35.559
<v Speaker 1>mixed than the Jetsons, just in the current cultural context.

1:09:36.000 --> 1:09:39.120
<v Speaker 2>I suggest you're right, or believe you're right. So what

1:09:39.320 --> 1:09:41.599
<v Speaker 2>is the physical AI? I mean, we could talk about

1:09:41.680 --> 1:09:43.320
<v Speaker 2>robots as a separate thing, but what do you think

1:09:43.320 --> 1:09:43.920
<v Speaker 2>what I mean?

1:09:44.240 --> 1:09:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

1:09:44.720 --> 1:09:48.840
<v Speaker 2>What do you think where Sam's going with with open

1:09:48.880 --> 1:09:50.520
<v Speaker 2>AI and the partners.

1:09:50.200 --> 1:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>With Johnny Ivy and others.

1:09:51.479 --> 1:09:55.640
<v Speaker 2>In terms of designing some reedy revolutionary there's sort of

1:09:55.680 --> 1:09:59.720
<v Speaker 2>an Apple esque, you know, Steve Jobs, Johnny sort of.

1:09:59.760 --> 1:10:02.879
<v Speaker 2>This is, you know, imagining the future without the constraints

1:10:02.920 --> 1:10:05.000
<v Speaker 2>of what you already know a race or mania, forget

1:10:05.000 --> 1:10:07.800
<v Speaker 2>what you already know, design a project, a product for

1:10:07.840 --> 1:10:10.160
<v Speaker 2>the for the AI agent. It's not constrained by the

1:10:10.200 --> 1:10:11.000
<v Speaker 2>thinking of the past.

1:10:11.680 --> 1:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>So just like within a small number of years, none

1:10:15.760 --> 1:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of us will be doing anything that's like knowledge or

1:10:18.800 --> 1:10:22.559
<v Speaker 1>information work without having multiple AI agents that we are

1:10:22.560 --> 1:10:25.479
<v Speaker 1>managing a workflow and so doing and that's small and

1:10:26.200 --> 1:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>five maybe right, Like you know, there's no longer such

1:10:29.280 --> 1:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a thing as a human individual contributor. There's a human

1:10:32.040 --> 1:10:34.639
<v Speaker 1>manager of agents maybe working on a team with other

1:10:34.720 --> 1:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>humans managing agents and all the rest and all the

1:10:37.439 --> 1:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, and there's what's happening. That's an amazing transformation.

1:10:44.439 --> 1:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>There will be within a small number of years some

1:10:48.520 --> 1:10:55.519
<v Speaker 1>amazing AI bringing into the work into a workplace. Will

1:10:55.520 --> 1:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>it be the kind of Johnny you know, reimagination of

1:10:58.680 --> 1:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the phone, et cetera kind of thing. Will it be

1:11:02.960 --> 1:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the rebirth of manufacturing in America through robotics and all

1:11:09.040 --> 1:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the rest. Will it be autonomous vehicles which you know

1:11:12.760 --> 1:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll call will bring enormous like health savings, you know, deaths,

1:11:20.320 --> 1:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>other kinds of things enormous. And by the way, there's

1:11:24.479 --> 1:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>obviously job transitions. Although by the way, like we're short

1:11:28.439 --> 1:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of truck drivers.

1:11:29.840 --> 1:11:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is remarkably because it hasn't come yet.

1:11:33.240 --> 1:11:36.599
<v Speaker 1>It's scale. It's coming, right, yes, yeah, But by the way,

1:11:36.680 --> 1:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>even if all truck manufacturers started manufacturing only autonomous trucks today,

1:11:41.680 --> 1:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>it's at least ten years before there is over half

1:11:44.280 --> 1:11:46.519
<v Speaker 1>of the trucks in the road, or autonomous drugs. Right.

1:11:46.560 --> 1:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, so there's even there's an adjustment, right,

1:11:50.240 --> 1:11:54.519
<v Speaker 1>and so so all the stuff and we want it, right,

1:11:54.560 --> 1:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I get. It's like people say, well, I don't want disruption,

1:11:56.240 --> 1:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I want disruption of what I.

1:11:57.600 --> 1:12:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Want robots, I want my humanoid Robut I do, yes, actually.

1:12:01.680 --> 1:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>You do, right. It doesn't mean you want every different

1:12:04.360 --> 1:12:07.439
<v Speaker 1>version of them, right, but like, for example, like take

1:12:07.479 --> 1:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>autonomous vehicles, like like, we have over forty thousand deaths

1:12:12.680 --> 1:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>per year. That doesn't count injuries, maiming, et cetera, et cetera, Right,

1:12:17.280 --> 1:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Like that's a cost in human lives. What's more, you go, well,

1:12:21.200 --> 1:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you care about environment? Well, if you can actually in

1:12:24.000 --> 1:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>fact have the grid manage all the more efficiently massive

1:12:28.000 --> 1:12:30.599
<v Speaker 1>environmental impact, right, so you want all that And it's

1:12:30.600 --> 1:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>like yes, And by the way, you say, well, what

1:12:32.439 --> 1:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>happens the truck driver jobs? Like, well, one, not a

1:12:34.760 --> 1:12:36.559
<v Speaker 1>lot of people doing them. They hate the fucking jobs.

1:12:37.000 --> 1:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>And then two, yes, the central thing we should be

1:12:40.720 --> 1:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>doing and this age of AI revolution is how do

1:12:44.080 --> 1:12:48.519
<v Speaker 1>we help figure out large swath of people, like get

1:12:48.600 --> 1:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>new kinds of jobs, whether it's entrepreneurial new starts, whether

1:12:52.160 --> 1:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>it's things that we're doing with society, whether it's like

1:12:55.400 --> 1:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>all of that stuff. We need to lean in heavily too,

1:12:57.920 --> 1:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>because the jobs will be changing. And most people say, legitimately,

1:13:02.560 --> 1:13:04.559
<v Speaker 1>I like my job. I don't want it to change,

1:13:04.600 --> 1:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, yeah, it happens, right, and we'll help, right.

1:13:10.320 --> 1:13:13.439
<v Speaker 1>But that's that's I think how it so much of

1:13:13.479 --> 1:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the focus.

1:13:14.200 --> 1:13:18.240
<v Speaker 2>And you, as you're speaking, got me thinking about in

1:13:18.280 --> 1:13:21.680
<v Speaker 2>your two AI companies that you've that you've founded, co

1:13:21.760 --> 1:13:25.599
<v Speaker 2>founded yea, not all those others. I think everyone we've named,

1:13:25.640 --> 1:13:29.200
<v Speaker 2>you've you've invested in U. We can get to that

1:13:29.560 --> 1:13:33.519
<v Speaker 2>in a minute, but this so much of our time

1:13:33.560 --> 1:13:35.400
<v Speaker 2>and energy. I was talking to Ezra Klein about this

1:13:35.840 --> 1:13:38.880
<v Speaker 2>and back east a week or two ago, and he said,

1:13:38.880 --> 1:13:41.760
<v Speaker 2>be good to mix in I'm paraphrasing him, and I

1:13:41.880 --> 1:13:44.320
<v Speaker 2>want to talk out of school some of the good

1:13:44.360 --> 1:13:47.559
<v Speaker 2>stuff along the lines of what you now are sprinkling

1:13:47.600 --> 1:13:50.040
<v Speaker 2>in and you're you're investing very directly just in the

1:13:50.120 --> 1:13:52.599
<v Speaker 2>area that we you know, you talked about twenty thirty

1:13:52.640 --> 1:13:55.440
<v Speaker 2>years ago. People were focused on the issue of breakthroughs

1:13:55.560 --> 1:13:58.920
<v Speaker 2>in medicine. Yes, breakthroughs. I mean I can live longer,

1:13:59.040 --> 1:14:02.920
<v Speaker 2>healthier life. So I mean, where are we Let's talk.

1:14:03.000 --> 1:14:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's now paint a more positive picture of what AI

1:14:05.960 --> 1:14:10.200
<v Speaker 2>can do for good for society, not just for Elon.

1:14:10.320 --> 1:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>So he's worth six trillion.

1:14:12.120 --> 1:14:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Dollars by the time my daughter graduates college.

1:14:15.520 --> 1:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, So Manasi. So director Muker ge Ujol Singh and

1:14:20.479 --> 1:14:22.679
<v Speaker 1>I have co founded and the idea is to create

1:14:22.720 --> 1:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a drug discovery factory with AI. And it's the best

1:14:26.960 --> 1:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>shot I think we have seen ever in human history

1:14:30.200 --> 1:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>for doing a lot of cancer curing and a bunch

1:14:32.960 --> 1:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of other things too. Because AI, it's like a search problem.

1:14:36.920 --> 1:14:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Biology is more complicated than all of his other shit. Right,

1:14:40.760 --> 1:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like he said, well, you know, there's there's more

1:14:44.120 --> 1:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>moves and go than there's atoms in the universe, And yeah,

1:14:46.960 --> 1:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>goes a child's simplicity tool relative biology. But now that

1:14:52.880 --> 1:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>we've got scale compute, it's like, Okay, what's the thing

1:14:55.960 --> 1:15:01.519
<v Speaker 1>that is going wrong with leukemia? Can we something that

1:15:02.040 --> 1:15:05.479
<v Speaker 1>allows us to monitor stuff early, allows us to figure

1:15:05.520 --> 1:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>out what might be going wrong and something that might

1:15:09.280 --> 1:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>be an easy therapeutic that might be as simple as

1:15:12.000 --> 1:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>an injection or a pill. Because you create a small molecule,

1:15:16.120 --> 1:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>an antibody, a protein, et cetera, that combined with the

1:15:22.680 --> 1:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of the thing that's going wrong and

1:15:25.520 --> 1:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>disable the bad thing and not have serious toxic side effects.

1:15:31.640 --> 1:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a difficult charch problem. And right now what we

1:15:35.000 --> 1:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>have is we have And by the way, I think

1:15:36.760 --> 1:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll continue to have genius clinician PhDs researchers doing stuff.

1:15:43.120 --> 1:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it takes away their job, but we

1:15:45.920 --> 1:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>have them like it's like they're doing all the computation

1:15:48.840 --> 1:15:51.519
<v Speaker 1>by hand and they're trying to be brilliant and figure

1:15:51.520 --> 1:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>out something. So like figuring this out takes them a

1:15:54.240 --> 1:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>decade to have a maybe I've got I started a

1:15:57.160 --> 1:16:00.479
<v Speaker 1>decade and I got one maybe right, Well, I can

1:16:00.560 --> 1:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>now go all right, here are like I did today's compute,

1:16:05.520 --> 1:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I generated one hundred maybees. Let's sort through which of

1:16:09.080 --> 1:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>these things might be worth looking at more, Which are

1:16:12.000 --> 1:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I should earn it more, et cetera, And and and

1:16:15.120 --> 1:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and how do we run that through the entire process

1:16:18.000 --> 1:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>by which we do, of course we want to do

1:16:19.840 --> 1:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>safety checking and so forth, and is our theory that

1:16:22.960 --> 1:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>it is is non toxic. Okay, we've we've included in

1:16:27.160 --> 1:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>our in our search and how the air works. But

1:16:30.240 --> 1:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>let's test it, right, and let's run through it. Like

1:16:32.960 --> 1:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>we should have that because that's part of what makes

1:16:35.200 --> 1:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>our medicine system. Like we have the envy of the

1:16:38.680 --> 1:16:44.479
<v Speaker 1>world in the pre RFK junior FDA, you know, kind

1:16:44.479 --> 1:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of like of of like gold plated medicine. Right, So

1:16:49.640 --> 1:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>when the reasons like if you're if if it's accepted here,

1:16:52.040 --> 1:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it's accepted everywhere, right, and and let's let's let's keep

1:16:57.360 --> 1:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>our rigorous standards. Maybe we could figure out how to

1:17:00.920 --> 1:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>make it more efficient in various ways. I think that's

1:17:03.000 --> 1:17:07.439
<v Speaker 1>a good thing to do. But and then deliver more medicines.

1:17:07.760 --> 1:17:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, this is part of like the

1:17:09.240 --> 1:17:12.559
<v Speaker 1>AI for humanity. Is if you said, like and you know,

1:17:12.640 --> 1:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, like what I will categorically assert is

1:17:16.520 --> 1:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>AI has the best shot in human history of curing

1:17:20.280 --> 1:17:25.599
<v Speaker 1>all cancer. Right, Like if we if we can deliver

1:17:25.720 --> 1:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>even our percentage of that, right, that's huge.

1:17:28.760 --> 1:17:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Have we though, I mean, we've been saying this for

1:17:31.400 --> 1:17:34.439
<v Speaker 2>a few years and there's exponent I mean, I feel

1:17:34.479 --> 1:17:38.439
<v Speaker 2>like AI's exponent. I mean, I know, we're always just

1:17:38.600 --> 1:17:42.080
<v Speaker 2>right around the corner here, we are just fusions.

1:17:41.640 --> 1:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Just a few weeks.

1:17:42.320 --> 1:17:45.240
<v Speaker 2>It's it's like, you know, it's like the Iranians are

1:17:45.280 --> 1:17:47.560
<v Speaker 2>just you know, they're right there with fusion, fusion a

1:17:47.640 --> 1:17:48.479
<v Speaker 2>couple of weeks away.

1:17:48.560 --> 1:17:54.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, whatever, So where are we? So so at at

1:17:54.600 --> 1:17:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Mansi we have we have some of the world's brightest

1:17:57.680 --> 1:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>computational chemists and some of the chemistry that the AI

1:18:02.040 --> 1:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>has been saying, how about this. They're like, that's really interesting,

1:18:06.040 --> 1:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that might work. I've never seen that before, and that

1:18:08.680 --> 1:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>gets exciting. Yeah, and we're calling this to move thirty

1:18:11.280 --> 1:18:15.799
<v Speaker 1>seven off alpha go of we're getting maybe move thirty

1:18:15.800 --> 1:18:19.920
<v Speaker 1>seven chemistry. Right, So it's a very interesting like it's like,

1:18:20.680 --> 1:18:22.519
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting, and how do.

1:18:22.520 --> 1:18:24.519
<v Speaker 2>We socialize it? I mean, that was the point Ezrah

1:18:24.600 --> 1:18:26.800
<v Speaker 2>was making to me. It's one thing again just in

1:18:26.880 --> 1:18:31.200
<v Speaker 2>the hands of you, sir, God bless you, rather you

1:18:31.320 --> 1:18:34.000
<v Speaker 2>than these others. But the point being, how does you

1:18:34.000 --> 1:18:38.120
<v Speaker 2>know it's it's a compute for you know, the UC

1:18:38.320 --> 1:18:42.519
<v Speaker 2>system and the CSUS and for forty million Americans in California,

1:18:42.560 --> 1:18:45.880
<v Speaker 2>for three hundred and fifty million Americans for society written

1:18:45.920 --> 1:18:49.600
<v Speaker 2>large so so it's not about modernization. It's not just

1:18:49.640 --> 1:18:52.680
<v Speaker 2>about the commercialization in the context of an ROI that

1:18:52.920 --> 1:18:57.080
<v Speaker 2>is in numeric and I know there's the sort of

1:18:57.080 --> 1:19:00.479
<v Speaker 2>free enterprise case that that is. You know, we don't

1:19:00.479 --> 1:19:02.519
<v Speaker 2>even get it at the larger philosophical point.

1:19:03.040 --> 1:19:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, one of the things I think it's important for

1:19:05.400 --> 1:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>everyone to think about is we don't have the AI

1:19:07.479 --> 1:19:12.599
<v Speaker 1>revolution except through the commercial sector. The capabilities of doing

1:19:12.680 --> 1:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>it in any other sector than the commercial sector do

1:19:15.280 --> 1:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>not exist. Because what you need is you need to

1:19:18.320 --> 1:19:23.599
<v Speaker 1>be able to apply scale teams with scale resources, and

1:19:23.640 --> 1:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>like scale teams I mean thousands of people, tens of

1:19:26.160 --> 1:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>thousands of people, scale resources billions, two hundreds of billions

1:19:30.520 --> 1:19:34.679
<v Speaker 1>in risk environment where a lot of this will fail

1:19:35.160 --> 1:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>as you're going, no other sector other than the commercial

1:19:38.120 --> 1:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>sector can do it. And that's because people go, well, sure,

1:19:41.960 --> 1:19:44.599
<v Speaker 1>I'll build a billion dollars here that I might lose, right,

1:19:44.880 --> 1:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>because I'm not going to then be castigated for it

1:19:47.800 --> 1:19:49.599
<v Speaker 1>or else because it's like, look it's my billion dollars,

1:19:49.640 --> 1:19:51.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to do it, etc. And that's part of

1:19:51.560 --> 1:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>what gets to the scale compute, scale data centers and

1:19:53.720 --> 1:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>all the rest now, So we when we think about

1:19:57.080 --> 1:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>this is we say, well, how do we shape it?

1:20:00.680 --> 1:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Back to some of your earlier questions about like, well,

1:20:03.000 --> 1:20:05.719
<v Speaker 1>what should you know, folks in your chair be doing?

1:20:06.640 --> 1:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Like what we want in your conversation with ISRA, what

1:20:10.000 --> 1:20:15.360
<v Speaker 1>we want in short order is at minimum three assistants

1:20:16.200 --> 1:20:20.120
<v Speaker 1>given to every citizen, state, country, et cetera. One medical,

1:20:20.240 --> 1:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>one legal, one educational. And we want them to be

1:20:24.400 --> 1:20:28.719
<v Speaker 1>very competent, and we want them to be essentially equivalently free,

1:20:29.240 --> 1:20:32.679
<v Speaker 1>no matter if it's like a low cost does a matter,

1:20:32.720 --> 1:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>if it's like ad subsidized, a matter of like whatever,

1:20:35.840 --> 1:20:40.360
<v Speaker 1>And it can be done without the state paying anything.

1:20:40.960 --> 1:20:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Because if you go to say Google, Microsoft, Open AI

1:20:45.439 --> 1:20:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and thropic and you say, look, if you're willing to

1:20:50.439 --> 1:20:54.360
<v Speaker 1>build this on what you're doing, what would you want

1:20:54.400 --> 1:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>from us that would make it worth your while to

1:20:58.560 --> 1:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>do it? Because, by the way, the money you'd get

1:21:01.320 --> 1:21:03.400
<v Speaker 1>from us, you don't care about relatively all the omeerning

1:21:03.439 --> 1:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you're getting like just being paid. We don't have to

1:21:06.040 --> 1:21:08.519
<v Speaker 1>spend public money on this. What do you want from us?

1:21:08.520 --> 1:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>They might say, well, you know, we got like we've

1:21:12.760 --> 1:21:15.400
<v Speaker 1>got some permitting problems and these three data centers and say, well,

1:21:15.479 --> 1:21:17.880
<v Speaker 1>as long as you clear with the local community jobs

1:21:17.880 --> 1:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>electricity sort will help you with your permitting problems if

1:21:21.040 --> 1:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you do this right, like or oh well, look, we

1:21:24.920 --> 1:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>would love to be in the healthcare business, but like,

1:21:27.120 --> 1:21:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the medical liability stuff is so intense. Could you give

1:21:30.200 --> 1:21:34.599
<v Speaker 1>us a channel of safe harbor that could be by

1:21:34.600 --> 1:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>an independent review committee that you set up from the

1:21:37.720 --> 1:21:42.920
<v Speaker 1>amazing hospital system in California and say, hey, give us

1:21:42.920 --> 1:21:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a parameters of safe harbor to operate. And if you

1:21:45.720 --> 1:21:47.559
<v Speaker 1>give that, then we'll be learning and we'll be building

1:21:47.600 --> 1:21:50.439
<v Speaker 1>an industry off this great and then we will provide

1:21:50.479 --> 1:21:54.439
<v Speaker 1>a medical assistant that's twenty four to seven available to

1:21:54.680 --> 1:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>every citizen of California. May I prefer the US, but

1:21:58.880 --> 1:22:01.879
<v Speaker 1>we're just sitting here in californ Are you fine anything

1:22:01.880 --> 1:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of that, because then, by the way, I have access

1:22:06.040 --> 1:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to this kind of medical thing of twenty four to seven,

1:22:08.479 --> 1:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I can call a doctor and get an answer for

1:22:10.920 --> 1:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>something I need. Very few people have that, right right,

1:22:15.200 --> 1:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I would love it if every single person had it

1:22:18.000 --> 1:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>for their kids, for their partners, for their grandparents, for

1:22:21.120 --> 1:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>their family members, for their friends, et cetera. And by

1:22:23.880 --> 1:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the way, these things can give really good medical advice.

1:22:28.439 --> 1:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>No medical advice is perfect, but they can give really

1:22:30.439 --> 1:22:33.360
<v Speaker 1>good medical advice. So there's medical advice. And so it's

1:22:33.400 --> 1:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>like take them the kind of medical thing that only

1:22:36.360 --> 1:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the ultra wealthy have access to and make it democratically

1:22:40.320 --> 1:22:47.920
<v Speaker 1>available like every citizen. Legal assistant, right, Okay, currently, like

1:22:47.920 --> 1:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>like law law is expensive, right, and so currently like

1:22:53.000 --> 1:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>when a guy, when a person's kind of going into

1:22:55.680 --> 1:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>like signing a rental contract or an employment contractor anything else,

1:23:00.840 --> 1:23:04.400
<v Speaker 1>most people can't afford lawyers, right, and I'm like, I

1:23:04.439 --> 1:23:09.400
<v Speaker 1>trust that it probably works out. It's okay, et cetera. Right, Well,

1:23:10.040 --> 1:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>legal assistant, like it will help you with your rights,

1:23:14.120 --> 1:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>with what goes on with with how to interface this,

1:23:17.320 --> 1:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Like that's why we have these laws to help protect you.

1:23:21.280 --> 1:23:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Now we have an agent that can help navigate that

1:23:25.560 --> 1:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and say we want to make sure that's provided to

1:23:28.160 --> 1:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>every citizen. Nice, right. And then education, same thing, and

1:23:32.120 --> 1:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>they say they're with the education.

1:23:33.680 --> 1:23:38.760
<v Speaker 2>So we talk about democratization and and you know, I've

1:23:38.880 --> 1:23:40.960
<v Speaker 2>had a strong theory that it's the same fight that

1:23:41.040 --> 1:23:43.880
<v Speaker 2>if order to save democracy, which I've been particularly passionate

1:23:43.920 --> 1:23:47.599
<v Speaker 2>about Prop fifty redistricting and pushing back against what's happening

1:23:47.600 --> 1:23:51.200
<v Speaker 2>in Washington, DC, that we have to democratize the economy,

1:23:51.680 --> 1:23:54.360
<v Speaker 2>that this notion again of just concentrated wealth. I'm joking

1:23:54.360 --> 1:23:57.200
<v Speaker 2>about the six billion trillion dollars. I mean, I think

1:23:57.240 --> 1:24:00.600
<v Speaker 2>it's realistic. Yeah, uh, you know, maybe you know my

1:24:00.680 --> 1:24:05.240
<v Speaker 2>oldest daughter graduation, but certainly my youngest son. That we'll

1:24:05.240 --> 1:24:07.920
<v Speaker 2>see that you already have ten percent of people on

1:24:08.000 --> 1:24:09.719
<v Speaker 2>two thirds of wealth. You have a thirty year old's

1:24:09.760 --> 1:24:11.880
<v Speaker 2>not doing better than his or her parents for the

1:24:11.880 --> 1:24:15.439
<v Speaker 2>first time in American history. There's just growing anxiety between

1:24:15.439 --> 1:24:17.680
<v Speaker 2>the imbalance between the rich and the poor. You've got

1:24:17.680 --> 1:24:21.639
<v Speaker 2>twenty states, it's still seven dollars twenty five cent minimum wage,

1:24:21.680 --> 1:24:24.040
<v Speaker 2>people working full times at ending up on welfare. I

1:24:24.080 --> 1:24:26.840
<v Speaker 2>talk about corporate subsidies, so those corporations are getting benefit

1:24:26.880 --> 1:24:31.000
<v Speaker 2>of that. You talked in terms you use the word

1:24:31.040 --> 1:24:34.599
<v Speaker 2>coletocracy that a lot of people are using right now.

1:24:35.040 --> 1:24:37.679
<v Speaker 2>And I talked about regulatory capture, and I talked about

1:24:37.800 --> 1:24:40.840
<v Speaker 2>that concentration of wealth ultimately becomes concentration of political power,

1:24:40.840 --> 1:24:43.559
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. What do you make of the world we're

1:24:43.560 --> 1:24:45.960
<v Speaker 2>living in today? What do you make of the state

1:24:46.479 --> 1:24:49.439
<v Speaker 2>of our union in relationship to all of this.

1:24:51.200 --> 1:24:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, I always when a new administration kind

1:24:59.360 --> 1:25:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of comes in the power, even when I disagree intensely

1:25:02.200 --> 1:25:05.360
<v Speaker 1>campaign and I'm quiet initially because I want them to

1:25:05.360 --> 1:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>be successful. We want I agree, right, it's like we

1:25:09.439 --> 1:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>want for society for citizens. And it's just like like

1:25:17.439 --> 1:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the level of like call it Chernobyl squared catastrophe is

1:25:24.360 --> 1:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>just huge. It's like, no one has a theory that

1:25:28.520 --> 1:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>tariffs lead to better economics for your average citizen. Well, yeah,

1:25:35.360 --> 1:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe he doesn't buy eggs and gasoline, you know, and

1:25:40.240 --> 1:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>so uh, you know, no one who understands how economics

1:25:43.720 --> 1:25:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and economies work, yes, right, and so, and it just

1:25:47.320 --> 1:25:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it just goes down the list, and then you get

1:25:48.920 --> 1:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to the like like the absurdity of like maybe that

1:25:53.280 --> 1:25:57.120
<v Speaker 1>like the iconic one is uh, you know, when Trump's

1:25:57.160 --> 1:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>being given the plane, even Laura or leaves the leaves

1:26:02.160 --> 1:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the plane, leaves the boat. No, no, don't accept that.

1:26:04.960 --> 1:26:09.200
<v Speaker 2>By the way, we are a huge investor in that plane.

1:26:09.240 --> 1:26:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Not just the four a million dollars the Gutari government

1:26:11.280 --> 1:26:15.160
<v Speaker 2>gave to Trump, but the nine hundred almost one billion

1:26:15.240 --> 1:26:17.639
<v Speaker 2>dollars in the Pentagon budget.

1:26:17.680 --> 1:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>To retrofit.

1:26:18.720 --> 1:26:22.600
<v Speaker 2>It was also appropriated, and that is a plane he

1:26:22.680 --> 1:26:23.639
<v Speaker 2>will take with him.

1:26:23.760 --> 1:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Yes, to the foundation he will take with him. Yes, yes, exactly.

1:26:27.720 --> 1:26:32.479
<v Speaker 1>So like it just like it's just it's it's it's

1:26:32.720 --> 1:26:36.360
<v Speaker 1>not just I think, frankly illegal, but it's gross and

1:26:36.400 --> 1:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>non American, right, I mean, it's not It's like, what

1:26:39.880 --> 1:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>we stand for is not the rip off everything that

1:26:44.880 --> 1:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you can out of the public offers to benefit yourself.

1:26:48.400 --> 1:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>But that's happening. And these are your old friends. Some

1:26:51.080 --> 1:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of these were my old friends.

1:26:52.439 --> 1:26:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I knew some of these guys. When

1:26:55.520 --> 1:26:58.439
<v Speaker 2>they seem to be completely indulgent in us, it's not

1:26:58.520 --> 1:27:02.840
<v Speaker 2>just showing up. It's it's they're the beneficiaries all.

1:27:02.720 --> 1:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>This, Like it is. The thing I mentioned earlier is like,

1:27:05.240 --> 1:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, Elon acknowledges that the XAI stoff is a

1:27:07.840 --> 1:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>complete train wreck catastrophe, and you're like, okay, well hand

1:27:10.640 --> 1:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>back your government contracts. That would be the honorable thing

1:27:13.880 --> 1:27:16.439
<v Speaker 1>to do. And by the way, I'm you know, that's

1:27:16.479 --> 1:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>against my own you know, very small shareholder and small with.

1:27:21.400 --> 1:27:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Large is not small to the rest of us. But

1:27:23.680 --> 1:27:25.840
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate your point, yes, but why the hell are

1:27:25.880 --> 1:27:28.120
<v Speaker 2>they doing. I mean, seriously, it's not just Elon, It's

1:27:28.160 --> 1:27:31.040
<v Speaker 2>it's all these I mean, I've got knee pads right

1:27:31.080 --> 1:27:32.639
<v Speaker 2>there for sale on my Patriots sight.

1:27:32.720 --> 1:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>For a damn reason, I had to go.

1:27:34.280 --> 1:27:36.519
<v Speaker 2>I dropped your note. I love this, God bless you, man.

1:27:36.560 --> 1:27:39.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean not everyone does. But it wasn't just for

1:27:39.240 --> 1:27:41.519
<v Speaker 2>the CEOs and the brand names. But it's for you know,

1:27:41.720 --> 1:27:44.880
<v Speaker 2>law firms talking about law. It's about the universities that

1:27:44.880 --> 1:27:47.559
<v Speaker 2>we're selling out. It's about you know, all these you

1:27:47.560 --> 1:27:50.559
<v Speaker 2>know folks that you used to count on selling their

1:27:50.600 --> 1:27:51.679
<v Speaker 2>soul to get the deal.

1:27:52.160 --> 1:27:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how these people look at themselves in

1:27:53.880 --> 1:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the mirror. I mean it's like, look, it's what's the

1:27:56.840 --> 1:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>price of your honor, your integrity? Yours is crazy? Right like?

1:28:02.800 --> 1:28:06.360
<v Speaker 1>And and look, if you're a citizen that has any

1:28:06.640 --> 1:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, power, which basically is all of these people,

1:28:09.040 --> 1:28:12.959
<v Speaker 1>including myself, state of your principles, some of the most.

1:28:12.760 --> 1:28:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Powerful people in the world, and they're falling prey to

1:28:17.360 --> 1:28:18.360
<v Speaker 2>this bullshit and.

1:28:19.479 --> 1:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>They're rationalizing it. Oh, the the Dems would be worse.

1:28:22.840 --> 1:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And you're like, in what planet right like like, like

1:28:27.280 --> 1:28:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is the sky purple where you live? I mean what like,

1:28:30.520 --> 1:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>what's what what's going on? It's probably red the the

1:28:34.560 --> 1:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, and so uh, you know, it's kind of

1:28:38.040 --> 1:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the the question of like, how do you defend this stuff?

1:28:42.320 --> 1:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's it's it's like, for example, the

1:28:47.080 --> 1:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Iranian war will have massive impact on your average American citizen.

1:28:54.880 --> 1:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, even as Homos opens, the ships haven't been

1:28:58.280 --> 1:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>haven't been going for you know, months. We're not like

1:29:02.560 --> 1:29:05.559
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate the fact that the market's like, oh, really

1:29:05.600 --> 1:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>hopeful it's back and we're gonna lower lower the price

1:29:07.880 --> 1:29:10.799
<v Speaker 1>of oil futures. This will work through.

1:29:10.680 --> 1:29:12.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, whether there's some estimates or where you

1:29:12.840 --> 1:29:15.240
<v Speaker 2>look at the total costs over trillion dollars, not the

1:29:15.360 --> 1:29:18.040
<v Speaker 2>fifty billion. Yes, it's the direct cost the costs that

1:29:18.080 --> 1:29:20.599
<v Speaker 2>have been born, yes, globally, yes, all the.

1:29:20.560 --> 1:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Rest of us. And that's to every American citizen, right,

1:29:24.439 --> 1:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>And then the notion of oh well, because like the

1:29:28.960 --> 1:29:33.479
<v Speaker 1>classic one is a all apologies excepted because I know

1:29:33.560 --> 1:29:36.479
<v Speaker 1>this is not true of you, you know, and and

1:29:36.520 --> 1:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>actually many politicians, but they got all politicians are crop

1:29:39.200 --> 1:29:42.479
<v Speaker 1>Trump's just more and more straightforward, right, and you're like.

1:29:43.920 --> 1:29:46.000
<v Speaker 2>No, he's gonna he does it openly.

1:29:46.240 --> 1:29:47.519
<v Speaker 1>Yes, at least seeson Man.

1:29:47.600 --> 1:29:49.400
<v Speaker 2>That's he's the most transparent.

1:29:51.640 --> 1:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Everyone was getting plained. He's just the first one who's

1:29:54.040 --> 1:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>acknowledging it's no, that's not the case. Not the case, right,

1:29:57.439 --> 1:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>not the case and so and by the way, you

1:29:59.840 --> 1:30:06.519
<v Speaker 1>know someone who says, hey, uh, you like whatever politician acts, Oh,

1:30:06.640 --> 1:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you misreported that. You probably should have said, hey, this

1:30:10.200 --> 1:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>weekend was a gift. Okay, small dollars. What do you

1:30:15.240 --> 1:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>think that corruption like like like like people think about it.

1:30:19.520 --> 1:30:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Would you have been bought off by that nick? No,

1:30:21.840 --> 1:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>it was a mistake. Okay, these things can happen. Someone

1:30:26.280 --> 1:30:31.439
<v Speaker 1>gets you a billion dollars in crypto, Yeah, yes, you're

1:30:31.479 --> 1:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>bought period. Yeah.

1:30:32.920 --> 1:30:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well we get to the UAE and then the

1:30:35.000 --> 1:30:37.599
<v Speaker 2>fact they got high valued chips in yes, turn things

1:30:37.600 --> 1:30:40.960
<v Speaker 2>that were denied in the previous administration exactly after we're

1:30:41.000 --> 1:30:42.240
<v Speaker 2>a liberty financial deal.

1:30:42.439 --> 1:30:43.679
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and all that, and.

1:30:43.600 --> 1:30:45.719
<v Speaker 2>How well I can go down to litany a list,

1:30:45.960 --> 1:30:48.000
<v Speaker 2>including just the usc fight and how it was paid,

1:30:48.080 --> 1:30:51.679
<v Speaker 2>bonuses were paid in the Trump back crypto exactly. Can't

1:30:51.680 --> 1:30:54.720
<v Speaker 2>make this stuff up. Also, you can't make up the

1:30:54.720 --> 1:30:57.759
<v Speaker 2>fact that you know you must have teld me the truth.

1:30:58.040 --> 1:31:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Did you feel an inclination at first? You're like, all right,

1:31:01.280 --> 1:31:03.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to turn the page. A lot of my

1:31:03.479 --> 1:31:07.439
<v Speaker 2>friends are going to the inaugural, you know, even if

1:31:07.479 --> 1:31:12.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm not invited. You know, you know, we wish this

1:31:12.320 --> 1:31:15.280
<v Speaker 2>guy success. Maybe he's different this time. Maybe he learned

1:31:15.280 --> 1:31:18.679
<v Speaker 2>his lesson after all, you know, being on the receiving

1:31:18.800 --> 1:31:22.320
<v Speaker 2>end of you know, so much stress during the Biden years.

1:31:24.360 --> 1:31:26.760
<v Speaker 2>You must have gotten calls from friends of yours that

1:31:26.840 --> 1:31:29.639
<v Speaker 2>did go is like, read, brother, I'm just doing this

1:31:29.720 --> 1:31:31.879
<v Speaker 2>because it's the right thing to do for my company.

1:31:31.920 --> 1:31:35.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm a fiduciary. What I mean, what how did you

1:31:35.479 --> 1:31:37.800
<v Speaker 2>You chose not to do any of that? You're paying

1:31:37.800 --> 1:31:39.639
<v Speaker 2>a price for that. I want to talk about that briefing.

1:31:39.760 --> 1:31:43.439
<v Speaker 2>But you chose not to. Most folks chose too.

1:31:43.800 --> 1:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Look, I think the important thing is to say look,

1:31:51.040 --> 1:31:54.959
<v Speaker 1>and people may not realize. It's like people can see

1:31:55.160 --> 1:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that you were you were. What's the price that you're

1:31:57.920 --> 1:32:05.479
<v Speaker 1>putting on your own honesty? And frankly, the only kind

1:32:05.479 --> 1:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of price side to accept from my honesty is is

1:32:08.080 --> 1:32:11.240
<v Speaker 1>saving millions of children. If there was something where I

1:32:11.320 --> 1:32:13.559
<v Speaker 1>were where you say, okay, this would save millions of children.

1:32:13.600 --> 1:32:15.679
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to be dishonest, Okay, I would take

1:32:15.680 --> 1:32:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that trade.

1:32:16.400 --> 1:32:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Contrast that to doge in usaid.

1:32:18.640 --> 1:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, five hundred thousand children, Yeah, probably dead because

1:32:25.000 --> 1:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of that. Yeah right, great job. Yeah, ip, Yeah, I'm

1:32:29.000 --> 1:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the defender of children. I see lots of corpses, right,

1:32:33.680 --> 1:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and so the I think that the look the exhortation

1:32:41.439 --> 1:32:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is look at yourself in the mirror and see it.

1:32:43.360 --> 1:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, if the person goes I look

1:32:44.800 --> 1:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>at myself in the mirror, I'm just fine because I

1:32:46.680 --> 1:32:49.439
<v Speaker 1>don't care. Then we have to speak about it. And

1:32:49.479 --> 1:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the reason I wouldn't go. That's part

1:32:51.920 --> 1:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of the reason I don't like. You know, I got

1:32:54.760 --> 1:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>these funny phone calls from people saying, hey, you know,

1:32:58.320 --> 1:33:01.559
<v Speaker 1>for twenty million dollar is the right thing I can

1:33:01.640 --> 1:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>make your your your Trump problems go away.

1:33:04.080 --> 1:33:06.839
<v Speaker 2>And you literally got to call it like, don't donate

1:33:06.880 --> 1:33:09.120
<v Speaker 2>to this, so that the equivalent of a ballroom at

1:33:09.160 --> 1:33:11.400
<v Speaker 2>the time, Yes, exactly, And it's like.

1:33:11.560 --> 1:33:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I can knock your things and it's just sick. This

1:33:13.800 --> 1:33:17.479
<v Speaker 1>is happening, Yes, happens, Yes, it's it's it is It's

1:33:17.520 --> 1:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>like like that is Unamerican right, I stand for what

1:33:21.479 --> 1:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the country like aspires to be and should be. This

1:33:25.479 --> 1:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>is corrupt, this is fucked no possibility.

1:33:28.880 --> 1:33:32.400
<v Speaker 2>And you and I share something sadly in common, which

1:33:32.600 --> 1:33:34.599
<v Speaker 2>is just the elephant in the room. So it would

1:33:34.600 --> 1:33:37.360
<v Speaker 2>be either of it. We can act like it didn't exist.

1:33:37.400 --> 1:33:41.320
<v Speaker 2>We can edit it and say, but the Department of Justice.

1:33:41.200 --> 1:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, which is being instrumented as as a personal and

1:33:47.200 --> 1:33:51.920
<v Speaker 1>corruption corrupted to a personal attack vehicle for President Trump.

1:33:51.920 --> 1:33:55.559
<v Speaker 1>In your case, it's political opponents, right, which is no.

1:33:55.920 --> 1:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Our whole point from George Washington's you know, seating of

1:34:00.800 --> 1:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and and the and what this country stands for is

1:34:03.880 --> 1:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>we do not allow the instrum the state to try

1:34:07.800 --> 1:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to corrupt the political process for people running for office.

1:34:11.600 --> 1:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, I'm gonna I'm gonna stand up, because

1:34:14.479 --> 1:34:18.720
<v Speaker 1>what's the basis of your Department of Justice investigation? Like,

1:34:19.040 --> 1:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>do you have any evidence? Do you have anything?

1:34:22.120 --> 1:34:22.280
<v Speaker 2>No?

1:34:22.280 --> 1:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>No, we're just harass them. We'll just we're gonna look

1:34:25.000 --> 1:34:27.880
<v Speaker 1>for something. And and we're not gonna look for something

1:34:27.920 --> 1:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in red states, We're not gonna look for something. We're

1:34:30.000 --> 1:34:31.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna look for something. And oh, who are the people

1:34:31.880 --> 1:34:34.320
<v Speaker 1>who might be running, you know, for probably let's look

1:34:34.360 --> 1:34:37.599
<v Speaker 1>for them, right that are running against us, right right.

1:34:37.520 --> 1:34:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Or those that donate yes to the other team.

1:34:40.479 --> 1:34:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, this one is crazy. So look, I have

1:34:43.600 --> 1:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the honor of being called out three times by you know,

1:34:48.920 --> 1:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump for and Trump administration, actually twice by Trump and

1:34:53.000 --> 1:34:58.440
<v Speaker 1>once most recently, uh, kind of indirectly for like investigation.

1:34:58.560 --> 1:35:01.480
<v Speaker 1>The first one was in TIFA, which which is like

1:35:01.479 --> 1:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>like an organization that they can't name a member of,

1:35:06.040 --> 1:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>an activity of, a leader of, and a tributal action,

1:35:09.520 --> 1:35:12.439
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. But whatever that is. Maybe I've been financing it,

1:35:12.840 --> 1:35:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Like what are you talking about, So.

1:35:15.080 --> 1:35:17.639
<v Speaker 2>You've been doing how many years you've been financing Antifa?

1:35:17.760 --> 1:35:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Well, like and can you point it out to me?

1:35:20.360 --> 1:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I would love to see it. Oh well I will like, like,

1:35:23.240 --> 1:35:26.479
<v Speaker 1>as far as I know, I have never financed anything

1:35:26.560 --> 1:35:29.599
<v Speaker 1>even remotely in the same universe. Yes, right, but whatever.

1:35:29.880 --> 1:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So now, most recently, you know, some lawyers for Egene

1:35:33.960 --> 1:35:36.599
<v Speaker 1>Carroll came to me and said, we have a woman

1:35:36.840 --> 1:35:41.679
<v Speaker 1>who is the victim of sexual assault, who is being

1:35:41.840 --> 1:35:46.599
<v Speaker 1>slandered and attacked and wants to go to court and

1:35:47.120 --> 1:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>would you like make a five one seri? Your donation.

1:35:50.240 --> 1:35:53.240
<v Speaker 1>By the way, totally legal to finance legal cases. By

1:35:53.240 --> 1:35:55.559
<v Speaker 1>the way, it would even been financial little legal cases

1:35:55.600 --> 1:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to say, hey I get a percentage of the proceeds.

1:35:57.840 --> 1:36:01.320
<v Speaker 1>That's actually like no, no, no, I think what's important here

1:36:01.439 --> 1:36:05.720
<v Speaker 1>is that a that that a VIC, a survivor of

1:36:05.840 --> 1:36:10.120
<v Speaker 1>sexual assault, can have her day in court with an

1:36:10.120 --> 1:36:14.639
<v Speaker 1>American jury who makes the decision. Yes, I will I

1:36:14.680 --> 1:36:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that that is an important thing as being Americans. I

1:36:17.320 --> 1:36:21.760
<v Speaker 1>will I will finance that, right versus financing a ballroom, yes,

1:36:21.880 --> 1:36:23.880
<v Speaker 1>versus finance and wall room. And I have no economics.

1:36:23.920 --> 1:36:26.960
<v Speaker 1>It was literally like like like if economics come back

1:36:26.960 --> 1:36:31.120
<v Speaker 1>from it, she is the survivor, she should get that, right,

1:36:31.240 --> 1:36:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I like, I am just helping her have her you

1:36:35.240 --> 1:36:37.479
<v Speaker 1>know kind of ability to speak her truth in court.

1:36:38.240 --> 1:36:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Twelve jurors, probably at least three of them were Trump voters, right,

1:36:42.320 --> 1:36:47.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, twice demonstrated is nope quick universal you know,

1:36:47.560 --> 1:36:49.720
<v Speaker 1>like you like kind of you know, like the entire

1:36:49.800 --> 1:36:54.000
<v Speaker 1>journey went yep, this is this is bad. And now

1:36:54.080 --> 1:36:57.559
<v Speaker 1>because it's like wow, you know, so now the DOJ

1:36:58.520 --> 1:37:01.479
<v Speaker 1>should be investigating this. They started with will and will

1:37:01.600 --> 1:37:05.720
<v Speaker 1>will investigate Egene Carroll right, and you're like, so wait

1:37:05.960 --> 1:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you're investigating the victor, the survivor and the victim of

1:37:10.120 --> 1:37:16.320
<v Speaker 1>sexual assault, which uh, an American jury has found in

1:37:16.400 --> 1:37:20.360
<v Speaker 1>favor of So you, as the DJ are investigating her

1:37:20.400 --> 1:37:26.559
<v Speaker 1>and now no, we're investigating the thunder right, well for what? Right?

1:37:26.640 --> 1:37:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, I was like, and by the way,

1:37:30.840 --> 1:37:35.400
<v Speaker 1>would I do it again? Yes, like a h a

1:37:35.520 --> 1:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>woman who has been assaulted by a very powerful rich man,

1:37:40.240 --> 1:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>she should have her ability to speak her truth through

1:37:43.160 --> 1:37:43.599
<v Speaker 1>a jury.

1:37:45.200 --> 1:37:47.360
<v Speaker 2>And wait, so I love the clarity. I would even

1:37:47.400 --> 1:37:49.639
<v Speaker 2>do it again. I mean, you've been defiant, you said,

1:37:49.920 --> 1:37:53.360
<v Speaker 2>quote unquote, I will not bend the knee. Your lawyers

1:37:53.360 --> 1:37:55.960
<v Speaker 2>may have said, hey, reed, uh, why don't we just uh,

1:37:56.960 --> 1:37:59.120
<v Speaker 2>why don't we Why don't we similar it down a

1:37:59.120 --> 1:38:01.000
<v Speaker 2>little bit here and see if we can work something out.

1:38:01.200 --> 1:38:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Why do you feel like you need to be so

1:38:02.960 --> 1:38:04.320
<v Speaker 2>clear and defiant?

1:38:04.320 --> 1:38:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Look, my lawyers, who are extremely good, said you have

1:38:07.840 --> 1:38:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the following risks. But one of the things I love

1:38:10.120 --> 1:38:12.360
<v Speaker 1>about my lawyers is the head and we admire the

1:38:12.400 --> 1:38:15.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that you're you're you're, that you're doing the right

1:38:15.280 --> 1:38:17.360
<v Speaker 1>thing that period. And that's part of the reason that

1:38:17.360 --> 1:38:20.559
<v Speaker 1>they like to damn right, goddamn right, yeah, and uh.

1:38:20.680 --> 1:38:22.360
<v Speaker 1>And this thing is playing out in real time. This

1:38:22.439 --> 1:38:25.559
<v Speaker 1>is just a few weeks ago there, yes, exactly, yeah

1:38:25.600 --> 1:38:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and so and as you know, maybe it's still going,

1:38:29.120 --> 1:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's not. Who knows, who knows.

1:38:33.400 --> 1:38:36.759
<v Speaker 2>Uh read a hell of a hell of a journey.

1:38:36.840 --> 1:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>This conversation has been around.

1:38:39.400 --> 1:38:41.559
<v Speaker 2>The globe, and I'd be remiss if I didn't just

1:38:41.800 --> 1:38:45.559
<v Speaker 2>circle back on one final thing, and that is you're

1:38:46.240 --> 1:38:50.240
<v Speaker 2>over under assessment. You've been a lifelong Democrat. You've been

1:38:50.240 --> 1:38:52.479
<v Speaker 2>trying to sort of work with a party from within,

1:38:52.640 --> 1:38:55.680
<v Speaker 2>trying to sort of strengthen our muscles, strengthen our you know,

1:38:56.080 --> 1:38:59.559
<v Speaker 2>our our approach and tactically and substantively in policy, and

1:38:59.600 --> 1:39:03.160
<v Speaker 2>also just in terms of you know, how we're successful

1:39:03.160 --> 1:39:04.840
<v Speaker 2>and just building coalitions, et cetera.

1:39:04.880 --> 1:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>What's your make of the.

1:39:07.720 --> 1:39:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Overview of this whole autopsy and where we are and

1:39:10.920 --> 1:39:13.479
<v Speaker 2>the lessons we learned or didn't learn from the last election,

1:39:13.640 --> 1:39:16.960
<v Speaker 2>and where we stand as a party the Democratic Party today.

1:39:18.360 --> 1:39:20.479
<v Speaker 1>Well, one major mistake we made in the last election

1:39:22.320 --> 1:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that the next election we simply won't, which is most

1:39:27.000 --> 1:39:29.519
<v Speaker 1>American people think DC is broken and want to change.

1:39:30.120 --> 1:39:33.000
<v Speaker 1>And the problem is, like you know, uh, you know,

1:39:33.080 --> 1:39:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Kamala's chance was to say I'm different than Biden, right,

1:39:37.120 --> 1:39:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and like, yes, he was a necessary stabilization for the

1:39:41.040 --> 1:39:44.600
<v Speaker 1>catastrophe that was Trump won, and they'll be necessary stabilization

1:39:44.680 --> 1:39:49.280
<v Speaker 1>for the infinite catastrophe that is Trump too. But like

1:39:50.000 --> 1:39:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing that people feel pain and feel that there

1:39:54.360 --> 1:39:56.960
<v Speaker 1>needs to be a change in DC is broken. That's

1:39:56.960 --> 1:40:01.639
<v Speaker 1>going to be important, yep. And it's you know, including like, hey,

1:40:02.240 --> 1:40:06.400
<v Speaker 1>until we figured out what's going on for us, could

1:40:06.439 --> 1:40:08.800
<v Speaker 1>we like really limits slow down what's going on with

1:40:08.840 --> 1:40:12.880
<v Speaker 1>migration because like like I don't know how migration is

1:40:12.880 --> 1:40:15.519
<v Speaker 1>better for me, right, so you know that kind of stuff.

1:40:16.439 --> 1:40:20.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think probably the most central thing is there's

1:40:20.080 --> 1:40:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Democrats who don't understand why business is

1:40:24.120 --> 1:40:28.439
<v Speaker 1>so important. They don't understand it pays for everything. It

1:40:28.479 --> 1:40:32.880
<v Speaker 1>pays for the Medicare, it pays for Social Security, it

1:40:32.880 --> 1:40:36.280
<v Speaker 1>pays for jobs. It's like really important. You got to

1:40:36.320 --> 1:40:39.240
<v Speaker 1>be the I'm pro business, right, it just got to

1:40:39.240 --> 1:40:42.280
<v Speaker 1>be you can't be pro job and anti business, yes exactly.

1:40:42.600 --> 1:40:46.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's like stop being like, stop doing anti business

1:40:47.040 --> 1:40:50.599
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric because people go, wait, that's totally broken, right, then

1:40:50.600 --> 1:40:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what part of what this like socialist means. Right,

1:40:54.360 --> 1:40:57.920
<v Speaker 1>It's like, so like be pro business. Now you may say, well,

1:40:57.960 --> 1:41:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I want business to contribute more. Okay, be more specific

1:41:01.040 --> 1:41:03.639
<v Speaker 1>about what that is, and then go on that as

1:41:03.680 --> 1:41:05.640
<v Speaker 1>part of what you're doing. It's like, look, I'm very

1:41:05.720 --> 1:41:08.479
<v Speaker 1>pro business, and I think business can contribute more in

1:41:08.479 --> 1:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the following ways. I want business to succeed, and I

1:41:11.720 --> 1:41:14.439
<v Speaker 1>think we should get business like it's a I want

1:41:14.479 --> 1:41:17.960
<v Speaker 1>business succeed. Of course you do. It's what gives us

1:41:18.040 --> 1:41:21.120
<v Speaker 1>jobs and everything else. And so being pro business in

1:41:21.120 --> 1:41:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that regard and I think that's that's part of the

1:41:24.600 --> 1:41:28.439
<v Speaker 1>thing where there is like I just don't think it

1:41:28.640 --> 1:41:33.680
<v Speaker 1>works to say the real problem is in earlier elections

1:41:33.760 --> 1:41:39.919
<v Speaker 1>we weren't anti power enough, where anti power means anti business,

1:41:40.320 --> 1:41:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and so it's like, no, look we do. Look, all

1:41:44.280 --> 1:41:47.799
<v Speaker 1>societies have pillars of power. They have pillars of power

1:41:47.800 --> 1:41:50.760
<v Speaker 1>in politics, they have pillars of power in business, they

1:41:50.760 --> 1:41:54.200
<v Speaker 1>have pillars of power in celebrity. They have pillars of power.

1:41:54.520 --> 1:41:57.519
<v Speaker 1>And what you really want is a distribution of power. Now,

1:41:57.560 --> 1:42:00.680
<v Speaker 1>when you get to a trillionaire, you go, hey, he

1:42:00.720 --> 1:42:02.920
<v Speaker 1>should be limited about how he can buy elections and

1:42:02.960 --> 1:42:07.200
<v Speaker 1>do other kinds of shit, right, Like that's important because

1:42:07.280 --> 1:42:10.479
<v Speaker 1>that's a corruption on that kind of power. But by

1:42:10.520 --> 1:42:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the way, part of the reason why, like I have

1:42:12.400 --> 1:42:18.000
<v Speaker 1>not been worried about the scaling tech companies is because

1:42:18.040 --> 1:42:19.960
<v Speaker 1>if we were this is one thing has had like

1:42:20.360 --> 1:42:23.240
<v Speaker 1>eight plus years ago, If we were five to seven

1:42:23.360 --> 1:42:25.839
<v Speaker 1>scale tech companies heading the three, I'd have a concern.

1:42:26.439 --> 1:42:29.639
<v Speaker 1>If we're five to seven heading the fifteen, they compete

1:42:29.640 --> 1:42:31.840
<v Speaker 1>with each other and they're balancing out their power and

1:42:31.880 --> 1:42:35.200
<v Speaker 1>all the rest. And by the way, I'm right right

1:42:35.360 --> 1:42:39.080
<v Speaker 1>in Nvidia, Open Ai, and Thropic it's more and more

1:42:39.120 --> 1:42:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and more competing with each other. And that competition is

1:42:42.320 --> 1:42:45.360
<v Speaker 1>part of how we govern the system in terms of

1:42:45.400 --> 1:42:49.120
<v Speaker 1>how we're doing it, so being more business intelligent and

1:42:49.240 --> 1:42:52.519
<v Speaker 1>pro business generally, and the thought shouldn't be how do

1:42:52.560 --> 1:42:54.559
<v Speaker 1>we limit business? The thought should be how do we

1:42:54.640 --> 1:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>shape business to help society?

1:42:57.400 --> 1:43:00.320
<v Speaker 2>And so in this I mean so it's interesting at

1:43:00.320 --> 1:43:01.720
<v Speaker 2>the core, and I think it goes to you know,

1:43:01.760 --> 1:43:04.839
<v Speaker 2>you had some issues with Lena Kon at the FTC

1:43:04.960 --> 1:43:08.439
<v Speaker 2>and the context and then the brand of Biden. Yeah,

1:43:08.600 --> 1:43:11.759
<v Speaker 2>sort of took a shape in a completely different direction,

1:43:12.040 --> 1:43:13.960
<v Speaker 2>including by the way, in the crypto space, as you

1:43:13.960 --> 1:43:17.559
<v Speaker 2>were implying earlier that there was an opportunity there. Yes,

1:43:17.760 --> 1:43:20.160
<v Speaker 2>and they just turned their back because of the excesses,

1:43:20.200 --> 1:43:24.640
<v Speaker 2>but without looking at the sort of baseline benefits of

1:43:24.720 --> 1:43:28.880
<v Speaker 2>blockchain or democratizing access to banking and not having the

1:43:28.920 --> 1:43:32.680
<v Speaker 2>friction and the capture of the banking system and the

1:43:32.720 --> 1:43:34.280
<v Speaker 2>fee structures and the rest.

1:43:34.400 --> 1:43:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. So what we want is we want democrats

1:43:38.560 --> 1:43:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to say we're business intelligent and we're proposing things that

1:43:43.120 --> 1:43:48.599
<v Speaker 1>shape it to the better benefit of the working class. Great,

1:43:49.800 --> 1:43:50.280
<v Speaker 1>all for it.

1:43:50.760 --> 1:43:54.200
<v Speaker 2>And you are aware on the Billionaire's text or read

1:43:54.360 --> 1:43:56.640
<v Speaker 2>where are you on the billionaires tax? You know my

1:43:56.720 --> 1:43:59.759
<v Speaker 2>position as a state level, but what about that debate

1:44:00.320 --> 1:44:02.960
<v Speaker 2>and how does that play in to your broader point?

1:44:03.640 --> 1:44:08.719
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not at all opposed to increasing progressive taxation.

1:44:09.320 --> 1:44:11.160
<v Speaker 1>You and I have talked about the income taxes here.

1:44:11.080 --> 1:44:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Withore California is a perfect example right.

1:44:14.560 --> 1:44:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Now. But the the way that it's proposed and implemented

1:44:20.439 --> 1:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>is a disaster, right. I mean, it's the you know,

1:44:27.240 --> 1:44:29.599
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like the hey, fuck you, we hate

1:44:29.640 --> 1:44:31.679
<v Speaker 1>you guys, We're going to take money from you. Well,

1:44:31.720 --> 1:44:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them respond to that very rationally say great,

1:44:34.800 --> 1:44:37.439
<v Speaker 1>we're going on another state. Right, And by the way,

1:44:37.560 --> 1:44:40.400
<v Speaker 1>not only do they take the they reduce the perspective

1:44:41.040 --> 1:44:42.280
<v Speaker 1>billionaire's tax.

1:44:42.200 --> 1:44:45.360
<v Speaker 2>The annual income tax that we were otherwise enjoying is

1:44:45.400 --> 1:44:46.280
<v Speaker 2>no longer with us.

1:44:46.360 --> 1:44:48.439
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's a disaster.

1:44:48.320 --> 1:44:51.599
<v Speaker 2>As this state has discovered. It's not anecdotal. I mean, yes,

1:44:51.640 --> 1:44:54.160
<v Speaker 2>people say, oh, it's bullshit. No, it's not bullshit. And

1:44:54.200 --> 1:44:56.760
<v Speaker 2>we have actual names, real people, and then we have

1:44:56.880 --> 1:44:59.320
<v Speaker 2>dozens of people they don't know about because they don't.

1:44:59.120 --> 1:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Want to make a big deal all about it. Exactly.

1:45:01.200 --> 1:45:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I personally know fifteen people have moved.

1:45:03.120 --> 1:45:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't say that, yes, because I'm at twelve.

1:45:06.280 --> 1:45:10.080
<v Speaker 2>So let's compare the list. Yes, so it's a disaster

1:45:10.200 --> 1:45:14.439
<v Speaker 2>now part of By the way, and someone watching this

1:45:14.520 --> 1:45:17.439
<v Speaker 2>may be like rolling their eyes of course read mister

1:45:17.479 --> 1:45:21.160
<v Speaker 2>billionaires saying this Newsom's captured by these guys as well.

1:45:21.240 --> 1:45:24.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's why this is a chummy conversation. But

1:45:24.680 --> 1:45:30.000
<v Speaker 2>the notion of the California billionaires tax at a state level,

1:45:30.640 --> 1:45:32.760
<v Speaker 2>this is a real thing. I mean, just by the way,

1:45:32.760 --> 1:45:35.040
<v Speaker 2>it's where the teachers opposed it. Yes, that's why the

1:45:35.080 --> 1:45:38.920
<v Speaker 2>firefighters opposed it. That's why vast majority of organized labor

1:45:39.160 --> 1:45:42.720
<v Speaker 2>opposes the California Billionaire's Tax, which I think is an

1:45:42.760 --> 1:45:46.800
<v Speaker 2>incredibly important point to make. It's not just you saying

1:45:46.800 --> 1:45:49.639
<v Speaker 2>it to me, who's well known in my opposition that said,

1:45:49.680 --> 1:45:54.000
<v Speaker 2>it's at a federal level. This notion of again you

1:45:54.040 --> 1:45:57.400
<v Speaker 2>say progressive tax system, but this notion of a tax

1:45:57.439 --> 1:46:02.519
<v Speaker 2>system that does but inheritance needs to be reformed. Does

1:46:02.560 --> 1:46:05.519
<v Speaker 2>it stepped up basis need to be reformed.

1:46:05.680 --> 1:46:07.639
<v Speaker 1>Look, I think it's good to do all of these

1:46:07.640 --> 1:46:12.120
<v Speaker 1>things right. Look, it's good to say, Look, we are

1:46:12.160 --> 1:46:16.080
<v Speaker 1>not in a place where, roughly speaking, progressive taxation eg

1:46:16.720 --> 1:46:19.519
<v Speaker 1>as you make more money, you pay a higher percentage

1:46:19.520 --> 1:46:21.439
<v Speaker 1>of tax. H'ch just a higher number, but a higher percentage,

1:46:21.920 --> 1:46:24.439
<v Speaker 1>not to infinite. I actually think roughly when you get

1:46:24.479 --> 1:46:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to fifty, you start getting weird perverse incentives, like you

1:46:28.400 --> 1:46:30.920
<v Speaker 1>go to, I'm now charging with seventy percent tax. The

1:46:31.280 --> 1:46:33.080
<v Speaker 1>answer is, oh, I'm now going to work more on

1:46:33.120 --> 1:46:35.200
<v Speaker 1>how are I not pay the seventy percent tax than

1:46:35.200 --> 1:46:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you're in the next dollar? Roughly at fifty to fifty,

1:46:38.920 --> 1:46:40.960
<v Speaker 1>many not all, but many people go, I'll just earn

1:46:41.000 --> 1:46:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the next dollar, right, I'll find now. But the problem

1:46:44.360 --> 1:46:47.160
<v Speaker 1>is the net effective rate for wealthy people is wall below.

1:46:47.000 --> 1:46:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Fifty because it's not on their income, it's on the corpus,

1:46:51.200 --> 1:46:55.120
<v Speaker 2>it's on the capital. It's the benefits that accrue then

1:46:55.240 --> 1:46:57.040
<v Speaker 2>to having a lower tax rate.

1:46:57.160 --> 1:47:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so capital game. So this we should be fixing.

1:47:01.479 --> 1:47:04.400
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, we already have versions of wealth

1:47:04.439 --> 1:47:06.800
<v Speaker 1>tax like property tax a good way. I actually like

1:47:06.840 --> 1:47:09.519
<v Speaker 1>the whole Pieter terror tax. I think it's a small thing,

1:47:09.560 --> 1:47:10.800
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's a good thing to do.

1:47:11.280 --> 1:47:14.519
<v Speaker 2>And Mendami obviously popularized it, but it's happened in many

1:47:14.520 --> 1:47:16.800
<v Speaker 2>other cities incluely San Francisco, and a version it's in

1:47:16.840 --> 1:47:18.880
<v Speaker 2>litigation and other parts of the globe have been doing

1:47:18.920 --> 1:47:19.320
<v Speaker 2>it for years.

1:47:19.360 --> 1:47:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I think it's a good like. It's a

1:47:20.840 --> 1:47:23.800
<v Speaker 1>small one, but an example of this is a good one. Right,

1:47:24.280 --> 1:47:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And so what are the ones that we can do

1:47:27.360 --> 1:47:31.639
<v Speaker 1>that are healthy in the system and also don't have

1:47:33.320 --> 1:47:37.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, a weird kind of massive double tax you

1:47:37.479 --> 1:47:40.280
<v Speaker 1>know kind of things and are coherent across it and sort.

1:47:41.120 --> 1:47:45.040
<v Speaker 1>But progressive tax is good. And of course the incentive

1:47:45.120 --> 1:47:48.400
<v Speaker 1>is to try to avoid tax, right, I mean the

1:47:48.479 --> 1:47:52.280
<v Speaker 1>natural deetive everyone has that incentive, right, but let's try

1:47:52.320 --> 1:47:55.439
<v Speaker 1>to make it so that it's that you're like, okay,

1:47:56.360 --> 1:47:58.519
<v Speaker 1>because this is the thing I like when people call

1:47:58.600 --> 1:48:01.080
<v Speaker 1>me and ask me about the the California wealth tax,

1:48:01.120 --> 1:48:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I say, look, here is how I would try to

1:48:03.920 --> 1:48:07.679
<v Speaker 1>introduce new taxes in California. Whether it's raising the income

1:48:07.760 --> 1:48:11.000
<v Speaker 1>or house, I would say, hey, we're going to tax

1:48:11.439 --> 1:48:15.000
<v Speaker 1>very much disproportionate from the wealthy. The wealthy have had

1:48:15.120 --> 1:48:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a huge benefit of being in California because that's how

1:48:18.160 --> 1:48:21.400
<v Speaker 1>they've made all their wealth and all the rest. So yes,

1:48:21.520 --> 1:48:23.800
<v Speaker 1>we wish that they would just go along with it.

1:48:23.840 --> 1:48:27.360
<v Speaker 1>But of course everyone wants to avoid tax, but like

1:48:27.680 --> 1:48:29.400
<v Speaker 1>pitch it to them in terms where you're like, I'm

1:48:29.439 --> 1:48:32.719
<v Speaker 1>fixing the problem, right, Like, hey, we're creating a sovereign

1:48:32.760 --> 1:48:37.000
<v Speaker 1>wealth fund for being able to fund ongoing you know,

1:48:37.080 --> 1:48:41.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of prosperity of California's Like Okay, then like okay,

1:48:41.720 --> 1:48:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I like, I'm I still would rather not pay more tax, right,

1:48:45.479 --> 1:48:47.280
<v Speaker 1>but it makes sense to me that it opens the door.

1:48:47.280 --> 1:48:48.840
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, so many of the conversations we've

1:48:48.880 --> 1:48:50.400
<v Speaker 2>had with many of the people, including a number of

1:48:50.400 --> 1:48:52.840
<v Speaker 2>people that have left, are in laws lines where they

1:48:52.920 --> 1:48:56.479
<v Speaker 2>would they have publicly stated, not just privately stated, they

1:48:56.520 --> 1:48:58.599
<v Speaker 2>would support something along those guts.

1:48:58.760 --> 1:49:02.479
<v Speaker 1>So because it's economic rationality, because because in addition to

1:49:02.600 --> 1:49:07.240
<v Speaker 1>first thing, you know, uh f you you wealthy people,

1:49:07.280 --> 1:49:10.479
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna just charge you for this. And it's like, well,

1:49:10.520 --> 1:49:13.880
<v Speaker 1>are you charging me for what, oh, the huge shortfall

1:49:14.000 --> 1:49:20.360
<v Speaker 1>from Trump's you know, a big beautiful betrayal betrayal HR one, Yes,

1:49:20.400 --> 1:49:22.839
<v Speaker 1>big cuts to medicaid, which we have these huge costs

1:49:22.880 --> 1:49:25.880
<v Speaker 1>because cutting medicaid, So we're going to charge you for that.

1:49:25.920 --> 1:49:29.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like, well, that's not a one off issue. That's

1:49:29.280 --> 1:49:31.360
<v Speaker 1>going to continue on going. And you're telling me this

1:49:31.400 --> 1:49:36.519
<v Speaker 1>is one off. I don't believe you by that. Amen. Well,

1:49:36.600 --> 1:49:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that sentiment, and obviously I.

1:49:39.880 --> 1:49:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Believe very strongly we're gonna have to address the tax

1:49:42.240 --> 1:49:44.960
<v Speaker 2>code federally in a in a profound way.

1:49:45.120 --> 1:49:46.120
<v Speaker 1>In California many.

1:49:45.920 --> 1:49:48.479
<v Speaker 2>Ways has some clues, it has some models, and I

1:49:48.520 --> 1:49:52.240
<v Speaker 2>mean compare California most progressive tax rate states like New

1:49:52.280 --> 1:49:55.519
<v Speaker 2>York as well, but to the most regressive states like

1:49:55.560 --> 1:49:58.519
<v Speaker 2>Texas and Florida that tax their low wage earners more

1:49:58.520 --> 1:50:02.160
<v Speaker 2>than we tax our highway. So the question objectively, is

1:50:02.200 --> 1:50:04.840
<v Speaker 2>who is the high tax state, the highest tax rate

1:50:05.200 --> 1:50:08.600
<v Speaker 2>for the one percent. Ninety nine percent don't live in

1:50:08.640 --> 1:50:11.400
<v Speaker 2>the one percent, and so this is but this notion

1:50:11.520 --> 1:50:14.880
<v Speaker 2>that there's a tonality here, there's a sentiment around but

1:50:14.960 --> 1:50:19.320
<v Speaker 2>grudging success. There's aspects of this that I think there's

1:50:19.400 --> 1:50:21.040
<v Speaker 2>nuance on what you're saying that I think is important

1:50:21.080 --> 1:50:21.840
<v Speaker 2>as a Democrat.

1:50:22.120 --> 1:50:25.439
<v Speaker 1>I certainly share. Thanks for sharing all this time.

1:50:25.520 --> 1:50:27.920
<v Speaker 2>It's been a lot of fun, and thanks for coming

1:50:27.960 --> 1:50:32.360
<v Speaker 2>to you know, Governor Reagan's mansion, who I think had

1:50:32.439 --> 1:50:33.640
<v Speaker 2>seventy percent tax right.

1:50:34.920 --> 1:50:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Yes, well, And I think that's one of the reason

1:50:36.680 --> 1:50:38.519
<v Speaker 1>I was online, is like it just creates a huge

1:50:38.560 --> 1:50:40.240
<v Speaker 1>incentive to try to do something of it. But it's

1:50:40.280 --> 1:50:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure and I look forward to nex