WEBVTT - NBA Week 1 Reaction: Spurs' Wemby top 2? + 76ers' VJ Edgecombe EXPLOSION, Clippers embarrassed

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:16.920
<v Speaker 1>The volume. All right, Well, god to hoops tonight. Here

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>at the Volume Heavy Friday. Everybody. Hope all you guys

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>had a great first week. I'm very excited to get

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>into our mail bag today. I got caught up on

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>three more games from the Wednesday Night Slate. I swear

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>my eyes are gonna be squares soon. I watched ten

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of the first sixteen NBA regular season games. It's been

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>an absolute grind this week. We had three fun live

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>shows over the last few nights. But I'm very excited

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to kind of bounce around and get to the stuff

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't talked about yet. We do have a

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>handful of questions related to some of our regular teams

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that we cover often on the show. But we're gonna

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.319
<v Speaker 1>be breaking down three games from Wednesday Night Slate. We're

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>gonna hit Raptors, Hawks, We're gonna hit Clippers, Jazz, We're

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna hit six Ers, Celtics. I've got questions from some

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>other teams around the league, some big picture basketball kind

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of philosophy questions, all sorts of interesting stuff from you

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>guys in today's mail bag. You guys are the joke

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>before we get started. Subscribe to the Hoops and I

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channels. You don't miss any more of our videos,

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter and underscore jcnlts. You guys don't

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>miss how announcements. Don't forget about our podcast feed wherever

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcast under Hoops Tonight. It's also super

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>helpful if you leave a rating in a review on

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that front. Jackson's doing great work on our social media

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 1>feeds Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok. Make sure you guys follow

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>us there. Then, the last but not least, keep dropping

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>mail bag questions in the YouTube comments again in our

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>full episodes. Right, mail bag, colon, write your question. We're

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>going to get to them mostly on Fridays, but about

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>once a week throughout the remainder of the season. All right,

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 1>let's talk some basketball. So first question, shout out to

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Harry weston the question that allowed us to get to

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>all of these games. Out of the other games on

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>opening night, who surprised you the most? I think Charlotte

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and Toronto could have sneaky good seasons and VJ Edgecomb

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>looks like the future in Philly. Also, what happened in Utah,

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I would argue Veja was the biggest surprise from that

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday Night Slate. But I thought that this question was

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a great opportunity for us to just quickly bounce through

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a couple of game reactions. I caught up on Raptors, Hawks, Clippers, Jazz,

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and six or Celtics this morning. I'm just gonna go

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>ahead and give you guys my takeaways on all three

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of those games. So, first of all, I haven't had

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the chance to watch Charlotte yet, although I caught them

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in preseason. I thought they looked good in preseason. I'm

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>generally not as high on Charlotte as some of my

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>peers are, just because I think they're kind of generally

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>unserious and they have a very injury prone set of

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>core players. But we will get to the Charlotte Hornets

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>at some point in time down the line. Starting with

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:37.519
<v Speaker 1>Raptors Hawks, I thought Toronto's size, length, and athleticism in

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>their starting lineup popped off the screen right away. When

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you have Brandon Ingram and Scottie Barnes, who are, in

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>addition to being two really big forwards, Barnes brings a

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>strength and power element, Ingram brings a length element. Ingram's

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>more of an over the top shooter. Barnes is more

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of a rim pressuring type of player, but both of

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>them are pretty high level playmakers for the forward position.

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Yaka Pertl obviously a big, strong center, kind of an

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>underrated player in my opinion, and then RJ. Barrett obviously

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the more athletic kind of two three swingmen

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>out there at two through five. They're just very physically imposing,

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and they came out with super impressive defensive intensity right

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>from the jump, and they it just was a carryover

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>from what we saw from the tail end of last season.

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:27.119
<v Speaker 1>If you guys remember, they ran the floor insanely well

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in transition, kind of flipping the script on what Atlanta

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>typically likes to do. Toronto had forty three transition points

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>in this game. They had an offensive rating over one

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>forty on their transition possessions. Just a combination of really

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>poor Atlanta transition defense, which we'll get to in a minute,

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and just how athletically imposing they can be when they're

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>running the floor and brandon ingram right out. The gates

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>came out super aggressive, scoring off of off ball action

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and on ball action, just curling around screens and getting

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>into the middle of the floor. His scoring polish was

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>immediately apparent. I think he going to make life a

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>lot easier for them on that end, especially when they

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>get into crunch time, which obviously they did not experience

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>in this particular game. I thought RJ. Barrett was fantastic.

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>He hit some much needed threes early in the game

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to space the floor, did a great job pressure in

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the rim. He obviously played really really good defense as well,

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>and the Raptors just went into Atlanta and smacked them.

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>They had seven guys in double figures. Grady Dick had

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty off the bench. He hit a bunch of jumpers

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>from all sorts of ranges all over the floor. They

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>were just six for twenty five from three and yet

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>they logged a one twenty two offensive rating. And it

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>was a combination to two things. Obviously, the transition pushes.

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>When you have over forty transition points in a game,

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty unusual number to see there. That's a

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>big way to boost your offensive rating. And then the

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>second piece of it is when they got in the

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>half court, they had a lot of really impressive ball

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in player movement. They got in and out of actions quickly.

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>They ran a lot of actions on every possession, and

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that stood out to me is

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>they do have more playmaking talent than you would think,

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>like for all the limits in terms of shooting talent.

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 1>We've seen this before with teams like the Golden State Warriors.

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Now they weaponize shooting in the form of Steph and

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Buddy Heeled now and Klay Thompson. In the past they

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>weaponized shooting to create that initial advantage, but from there

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>they tend to have less shooting than most teams, but

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they just break you down with really crisp decision making

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>and movement right and obviously for Toronto, they don't have

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the thread of the shooting, so it'll be harder for

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>them to break down elite defenses. But one of the

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>things I thought they did really well was they just

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>passed and moved in and out of their actions well

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and got a lot of really good looks at the

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>rim they had. I don't have the number directly in

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>front of me. They had a million points in the

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:41.919
<v Speaker 1>paint in this game. That was a huge part of

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>how they controlled the offensive end of the floor. In

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>this game, they had assists on two thirds of their baskets. Again,

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>anything over sixty five percent and assist percentage to me,

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>is really strong. They started up over that to start

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the season. Again, they can't shoot the ball, but they

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>have real strengths. They're big, they're athletic, they're great at defense,

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>they run the floor and transition well, and when they

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>get in the half court, they have really nice playmaking talent.

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a good recipe for winning basketball games, even if

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>they're shooting will provide issues in certain matchups. Again, Atlanta

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>was pretty disappointing, which we'll get into. I wasn't all

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>bad for Atlanta. Jalen Johnson really impressed me with his

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>passing ability. He lacks that perimeter polish like the jumper

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>still isn't there. There's like some tight spaceball handling stuff

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 1>where he can still have some issues. But he pressures

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the rim well, both in transition and in the half

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>court when he looks to drive. And then he's just

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 1>got really natural feel for seeing the floor and seeing

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the openings that are generated when he pressures the rim.

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>And I was impressed by a lot of his playmaking,

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.239
<v Speaker 1>especially in the first half of that game. He kept

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>them in the game despite Toronto out playing them basically

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 1>in every other matchup. To start, But I was pretty

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>disappointed in Atlanta for a group that has so many

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>great athletes and some guys with some good defensive reputations,

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>right with Dyson Daniels and Nakil Alexander Walker, I thought

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.799
<v Speaker 1>they were just super sloppy guarding the act that Toronto

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 1>was running in the half court, Like they botched switches

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>constantly in this game, and you want to credit the

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 1>Raptors for their movement, for their passing, and again, like

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you do that kind of stuff, it has the potential

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to lead to defense making mistakes. But I thought Atlanta

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>looked like a team that has not been approaching the

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>defensive end with much focus through training camp. I was

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely disappointed there. And then their transition defense was flat

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>out abysmal, which is super strange for such an athletic team.

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>They need to be a good transition defense. Nikhil Alexander

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Walker seems to have taken his new role in Atlanta

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>as like a high volume ball handling role, which I

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>think is a misallocation of what he does well. I

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>think he's at his best when he's guarding the ball

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and then playing with an advantage taking catch and shoot

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>threes and using more of his ball handling ability, driving

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>closeouts and playing when the defense is already compromised rather

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>than attacking out front. Now he's going to have to

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>do a certain amount of that because Atlanta's not as

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>heavy on ball handling as Minnesota was. But I did

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>think that his shot selection was a little questionable in

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>this game. Atlanta just got out played from the jump.

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>So not a good start from the Hawks. They need

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to have a better showing a night two Clippers Jazz.

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the strangest opening night performances that

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I've ever seen. I have a ton of respect for

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the Clippers organization. I think they have one of the

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>best coaches in the league. I think they have a

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>well run front office that has a good feel for

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>how to build a modern NBA team, and I think

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>this roster in particular is built for regular season success.

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>But holy shit, did they come out flat and in

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the opening minutes. I primarily blame Kawhi, Leonard In Viza

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Zubats for the initial run that Utah went on. Utah

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 1>was basically just running Lori Markinen and off of like

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>downscreens from Walker, Kessler and Kawhi and Zoo just defended

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it super poorly. Kawhi was applying little to no pressure

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>physicality on market In in his lock and trail. He

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>was getting caught on screens and not getting out to

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>him when he was shooting. When market In would curl,

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>he was just kind of lazily jogging behind. And then

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Zoo like was just essentially not helping Kawhi on either

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>side of the action. Wasn't showing up high when Marketing

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>would come off the screen, wasn't helping when Marketing would curl,

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>but then also leaving Walker Kessler open because Kesler ended

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>up hitting two threes early in the game, which shout

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>out to Walker Kessler. I know in the game plan,

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of gonna let him take that, right, but like,

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 1>if you're not gonna help on the curls in on

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the at the level stuff, then you've got it. You

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>can't also just leave him wide open. You're basically just

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>floating around out there. And so Kawhi and Zoo came

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>out super flat defending those actions early, and Marketing and

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Kessler torched them. They take an early double digit lead,

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and then once the bench group started to work their

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>way into the game, it turnovers became a massive problem

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>for the Clips, like use of Nurkic comes in and

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:50.599
<v Speaker 1>just starts pressuring the high post entry on Zubats and

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Brook Lopez and forces a couple of turnovers right away

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that led into runouts, and the Clippers had like a

0:09:56.679 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>half dozen of these super bizarre unforced turnovers where like

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you're just throwing the ball right to the other team

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>or just throwing it out of bounds because the guy

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>you're throwing it to is not paying attention. Just they

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>literally looked like they were asleep. And it was crazy

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>because the next thing you knew, it was the early

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>third quarter and Tyler's calling a time out because the

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Clippers are down by thirty seven on the road in Utah.

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Like it was just bizarre, and Tyler took the blame.

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure the Clippers will bounce back with a

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>win tonight, but it was pretty crazy. I'm not gonna lie.

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>They definitely did not look ready for the start of

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>the season. I do want to credit Utah like they

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.559
<v Speaker 1>came out and played great basketball. They have a very

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>good front court with Kessler and market In. Those are

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>talented guys when they're healthy and on the floor, and

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>they you know, just a casual reminder that even with

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>bad teams in the NBA, there's a lot of talent

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>out there, and if you come out and you bring

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a lack of daisical effort, I don't know that you

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>can get away with it anymore night to night in

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the regular season. I mean I rooted for the Lakers

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in a game that they lost to the Jazz last year,

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Like this is a bottom feeder that puts some really

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>high level basketball players on the floor. I thought Keante

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>George was great all night. Bryce Senseibah came in and

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 1>torched them from three. Hit a couple big ones in

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the late third quarter or late second quarter. Excuse me,

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that helps kind of blow the game open. Really nice

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:12.679
<v Speaker 1>debut for the Utah Jazz, high energy performance to kick

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the Clippers. But today's show is brought to you by

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>our new presenting sponsor, hard Rock Bet. The NBA is back,

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>which means it's time to shoot your shot on hard

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Rock Bet, your home for hoops action all season long.

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Need a little help with your first bet, check out

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the streaks heating up inside the hard Rock Bet stats hub.

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>You can find live odds to bet on all these

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>streaks right in the hard Rock Bet app. The Hornets

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 1>have failed to cover the spread in ten straight games

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>as home favorites. The Calves have covered the spread as

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a road underdog against the Eastern Conference eight times in

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a row. The Calves are also on a seven game

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>winning streak against the Atlantic Division. The Orlando Magic have

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>covered the spread in four straight games as home favorites.

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't tried your first bet on hard Rock Bet,

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>there's still plenty of time for you to get one

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty dollars in bonus bets if you win.

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Just bet a five. Just place a five dollars bet

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and if it hits, you get not only your winnings,

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>but one hundred and fifty dollars in extra bonus bets. Plus.

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>All week on hard Rock Bet, you can get an

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>NBA parlay boost for the games. There's new promos every day.

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>You can boost your same game parlay or your same

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Game Parlay Max so your bet pays extra winnings. And

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday, if you're already betting on the hard Rock

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Sportsbook app, you know what that means. It's the last

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 1>day to use your legendary rewards. Drops open up the

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>app today you could have a bonus bet or who

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>knows What's in there? More drops every Thursday. The rewards

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and promos are NonStop. Download the hard Rock Bet app

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>today to make your first deposit payable and bonus bets

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>not a cash offer offered by the Seminal Tribe of

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Florida and Florida offered by the Seminal hard Rock Digital

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>LLC in all other states. Must be twenty one plus

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>and physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee,

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>or Virginia to play. Terms and conditions apply. Concerned about

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>gambling in Florida called one eight three three play wise

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.719
<v Speaker 1>in Indiana, if you or someone you know has a

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 1>gambling problem and wants help, call one eight hundred and

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 1>nine with it gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia.

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Six are Celtics. What a debut for VJ edgecomb thirty

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>four points and seven rebounds looked like the perfect compliment

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to Tyrese Maxi. I've always loved the idea of like

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>hyper athletic guys alongside skill guards in the backcourt, so

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:37.719
<v Speaker 1>like essentially the Polish finesse type of guard, even though

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Tyrese I think brings insane speed to the table obviously,

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>but that's why he's able to go for forty right,

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>he has the skill piece, and then off of him,

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I want an athlete that can rebound, defend, and can

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>score with an advantage. And the key kind of storyline

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in the game defensively was that Boston was roaming off

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of VJ edge comb all night and then in his

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>on ball reps they were going under his picks. Boston

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>essentially dared VJ to beat them all night long, and

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>VJ just did. He got six unguarded catch and shoot

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>threes and made three of them. He hit two off

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the dribble jump shots versus passive coverages. I thought he

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>did a wonderful job of slashing in the half court

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>when he had a chance, Like there was a play

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>where Peyton Pritchard was nail helping off of I think

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>it was Tyrese on the right wing and Peyton Pritchard

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>digs down into nail help Vj's just standing on the

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>left wing. This was early in the game. Talk about

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>those baked in driving lanes all the time. Right when

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>there's nail help, he's closing out on one of your shoulders,

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>all you have to do is rip the other direction

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and you kind of have guaranteed dribble penetration right swing

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>past to VJ. He just ripped left immediately on the catch,

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>got a dunk. He in a transition push, ended up

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>catching Xavier Tillman in a cross match and the sixers

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of space the floor nasty left or right crossover, went

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>up and dunked it because he got there so fast

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 1>at Boston's help, was not able to step over. He

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>had some super dynamic transition plays. He got a ridiculous

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>lob in the second half that was thrown way behind

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>him in traffic where he took off off his right foot,

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>caught it with two hands and dunked it from almost

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>behind his head. In the first half, one of the

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>plays that really got me excited for his potential. He

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>had this nasty full speed euro step where he kind

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of like attacks and semi transition, gets a little bit

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of a downhill, gets some momentum going downhill, and Jalen

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Brown steps up to help at the rim and at

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>full speed, he like plants his right foot in Euros

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>back to the left for like a lefty soft finish

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>off the glass. Just a ridiculously athletic play. And even

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>on the shots he missed, I thought he got great separation,

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>like he was able to just get to these like

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>really nice lift and rhythm, little mid range pull ups

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that he just happened to miss because right now he's

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>still not quite that polished, and that stuff will come

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>in time. And so that's why VJ to me feels

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>very safe as a bet to be an All Star

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 1>in this league, because if he can stay healthy, the

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>reports about his character and his work ethic are great,

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and he's just a transcendently athletic guard. And so what

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>an exciting backcourt partner for Tyrese Maxey, who was amazing

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>in this game. His pull up three was dialed in.

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>He ended up hitting three in a row in the

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>second half that closed a double digit Celtics lead, and

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>all three of them were nasty. He had like three

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>or four ridiculous like hard drive to the right into

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a pullback, durable quick step back three, or he was

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>moving super fast but if you like froze it like

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>trimmed out the move before he's straight up and down

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>on the pull up jump shot. Just a really impressive

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>display footwork and athleticism. He ended up going for forty

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>in this game, and then they just have all these

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>forwards who just play hard off of them. Obviously, Kelly, Youubray,

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>we all know he's been in that starting lineup for

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a little while now. He hit the biggest shot of

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the night, a little action off the right side where

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that Sam Howser made a poor defensive decision. He helped

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>off the strong side corner when it was pretty unnecessary,

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and so it was a little easy kickouts. One of

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>those things were in the moment you're like, okay, Kelly

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>had been off from three for most of the game,

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time, you stick to your defensive principles.

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Like Quentin Grimes was already wide open at the top

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of the key on this play, in large part because

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:13.239
<v Speaker 1>his man was already helping. So it was just kind

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of like an unnecessary overhelp from Sam Hauser, And that

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 1>pass back across your body to the top of the

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>key to Grimes is a much tougher pass to make

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>than like a little five foot shovel pass to a

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>wide open man in the corner. Kelly Ubre hits that shot.

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>It effectively amounted to the game winner because they were

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>down two when he hit that shot. But I was

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>also really impressed by Dominic Barlow and Jabari Walker. The

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>two of them both just kind of crashing and cutting

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and running constantly and just wrecking havoc at the rim

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>just by being big athletes off of the attention that

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>was garnered by their guards. Honestly, the only disappointing thing

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>if you were a seventy six ers fan was that

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Joel Embiid looked like an absolute shell of himself. Like

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Jackson and I were joking before we started recording, like

0:17:57.440 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he made a single move towards the

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 1>best in that entire game. Every time he caught it

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>was just kind of like a face up jumper. You

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>had Jalen Brown in a post up and like just

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>spun over his left shoulder for a super difficult fade away.

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>You could tell the lift isn't there. The left shoulder

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>fade away. As a classic example, that's one of the

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 1>toughest shots in basketball for a right handed player because

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you have to pivot and like square up in mid

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 1>air and he just didn't get close to enough lift

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and so he kind of just flung it up there

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't really have much of a chance to

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>go in. He had some plays in help side it.

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>He has a couple plays, like he had a block

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 1>in transition in the second half where you're like, whoa,

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that was kind of like a throwback little play. But

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>like for the most part, he didn't really seem very

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>vertical or mobile around the basket and help on defense.

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>He just kind of looked he looked like his knees

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>are shot. But let's hope that he's just working his

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>way back and then he can continue to get better

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>as the season progressive. It made me happy to see

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>him out there playing, but it was definitely disappointing to

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>see just the level of physical aggression that he had.

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>But what a fun backcourt to root for. Now you

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 1>have Quinn Grimes too, Like obviously he was there last year,

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 1>but do you have Quentin Grimes and Jared McCain as well,

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Like you have four really good guards. Grimes had a

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>huge three late off the left wing, kind of a

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>contested one when they really needed it. Jared mccaina obviously

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>will be back eventually when his thumb gets better. It's

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 1>fun team for Sixers fans. I would imagine that the

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>edgecomb stuff had to have been the antidote to the

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe El embiid frustrations on the Celtics front. They got

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>stagnant late. They started spamming Jalen Brown Jalen Brown high

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>post ups and he hit one of them, but there

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>were some misses in there, and it just kind of

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>got stagnant and they got away from some of the

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff they were doing earlier in the game. They did

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>control the majority of the game, though in large part

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>because they do have a lot of talented perimeter players

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>like Derek White, Peyton Pritchard, Jalen Brown, and Anthony Simons

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 1>all had moments in the game where they had big

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>stretches on offense where they put some points up and

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of got into a little bit of a flow.

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Anfrony applied some more rim pressure than he did in preseason.

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 1>He had a big semi transition dunk where he crossed

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>his man up and went up off his right foot

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and dunked it with two hands. Yeah, the only thing

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>that really stood out to me, They just struggled to

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 1>guard in large part because their front courd is just

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 1>so limited, and that's a fast sixers team, and so

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>when you don't have rim protection behind them, it just

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>puts your guards in a really tough spot. And man,

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 1>that center rotation looked brutals. Zavi or Tillman missed several

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>threes that looked like they had no chance to go in.

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Right at the end of the game late off of

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a miss from Jalen Brown, he had a point blank range,

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 1>little kind of touch floater hook thing that was like

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 1>three feet from the basket that he left short. That

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:37.719
<v Speaker 1>was a huge miss. In crunch time. Luca Garza couldn't

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>hit a shot. Nimi Kuita was probably the best guy

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that we saw last night. He put up a decent

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>stat line. Sits on Wednesday put up a decent stat line,

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>but it was just jarring to see that core juxtaposed

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>with what we saw last year from the Celtics from

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the center position. All right, let's start getting into our

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>mail back questions. Jason, I understand you're a Lakers fan

0:20:58.119 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and also a Lebron fan, but I believe that you've

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>too much stock into the stardom of Luca and have

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>them ranked too high on your championship contenders list. To me,

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>at most, they should be closer to the bottom of

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the puncher's chance tier, behind teams like the Knicks, Clippers,

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>t Wolves, and Warriors. Those teams, while they had their flaws,

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 1>are better constructed than the Lakers, And to me, it's

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>foolish to be blinded by a potential all time great

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 1>season by LUCA turning into a deep playoff run. In

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the parody era of the NBA, I've yet to mention Lebron,

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>who is forty year old star and can be a

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>star on offense on any given night, but defensively he

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>can be picked on when not going against star power

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>against power style offensive players, and can be caught ball

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>watching at times. And I feel like that, combined with

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.239
<v Speaker 1>your other two best players in Luca and Reeves not

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>being plus defenders, as a recipe for another first round exit.

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So there's an interesting point you're making, which I want

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 1>to get into in a minute. I do disagree with

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the specifics, like Lebron was one of the

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>best ISO defenders in the league last year and had

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a stretch really for like two thirds of the season

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>where he was an all defense level player. He got

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>off to a rough start to the year, but like

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to me, Lebron when he's healthy in this actually in

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a role like this alongside Luca where he doesn't have

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>to do as much offensively, I think he's one of

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>the most important defensive players on the Lakers. To be

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>honest with you, I thought you saw the absence of

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>him in a big way against the Warriors. He is

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>a huge part of their ability to kind of like

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>troll the back line off of Golden State's actions. And

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 1>he's just one of the most attentive defenders and better

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 1>communicators on the team. I mean, he was second team

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>All NBA last year. I don't know what it is. Like,

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I get it he has sciatica. He's out to start

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the year, But like, he just had two seasons where

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 1>he played seventy games and made the All NBA team twice.

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I somehow he's still underrated. I don't know how that

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 1>keeps happening. But like I'm I don't think the Lakers

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>have a Lebron problem. Let's just put it that way.

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>That said, like I do agree with you that I'm

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers I'm lower on than when I originally did

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>my Contenders video. So to be one hundred percent transparent,

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>we recorded our contender rankings in early October. I want

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 1>to say it was like on October second, Okay, so

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it was before I had seen them play any basketball.

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>It was based on the fact that the Lakers won

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty games last year and they were the three seed,

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and looking at the improved version of the Lakers with

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 1>like Luka Doncic being in better shape and them essentially

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>adding three rotation level players for nothing and only losing

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Dorian Finney Smith, who by the way, I think Dorian

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>has been very important over the years. But like again,

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>this was a team that couldn't even play a center

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>against Minnesota. They get a guy like DeAndre and who's

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 1>very flawed but at least can play the position. You

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 1>hit a guy like Marcus Smart, who's a big upgrade

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>over someone like Jordan Goodwin, for example. Like that was

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>what that was my rationale when I originally put that together.

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>But I did a recording with the Nerd Sesh guys

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple weeks after that. It was like mid mid October,

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>like October fifteenth or sixteenth or so, where I had

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:48.199
<v Speaker 1>seen them play in preseason a few times, and I

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>was pretty underwhelmed, and I talked about how I was

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna put a couple teams ahead of them, and right

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>now I agree. Like so I originally my contender rankings,

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>if you remember, I had Denver, Oklahoma City, Cleveland, Minnesota.

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 1>Then I the Lakers at five after what I've seen

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>from preseason in camp, and by the way, this list

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>is constantly in a shift throughout the season. My preliminary

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>rankings in like early October, those are essentially on paper rankings,

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>but on paper means nothing when you throw the ball

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>up in the air and we're on the hardwood and

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>we're playing basketball, right So, like, we have a bunch

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>more data. Now, we have training camps from all these teams,

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>We have a handful of regular season games. The two

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>teams I would clearly put above them now are Houston

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>and Golden State. I think I'm inclined to put Golden

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>State at that five spot, potentially even that four spot

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>above Minnesota. I kind of have Minnesota, Golden State in

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Houston kind of vying and competing for that next spot

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>behind Denver and Oklahoma City at this point. Again, that

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 1>could change in a few weeks, but that's just where

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm at right now. But it's a long season and

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I expect a lot to change over the course of

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the year. The Lakers are playing bad basketball right now,

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>but they have a lot that they can clean up,

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:56.479
<v Speaker 1>and they have a bona fide top tier superstar at

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 1>the top at like the peak of his powers, and

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Lebron James will eventu return to this team. I think

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly possible that he ends up getting traded or

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>something or bought out or something like that, but I

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>still think it's far more likely than not that he

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 1>plays basketball for the Lakers until he retires. And so

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>at some point late October or excuse me, late November

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>early December, he's gonna return to this team, and he

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>immediately addresses a lot of their biggest concerns in terms

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of just like size and physicality and basketball IQ and

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:25.679
<v Speaker 1>defensive communication on the back line and all that kind

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. So like they're gonna have some The Lakers

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>are gonna have something to say at some point. I

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what level they'll be able to reach.

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Right now, they look pretty mediocre and unathletic, so I'm

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>dropping them to seventh, behind Houston and Golden State, as

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 1>well as the original four teams that I named Denver,

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma City, Cleveland, Minnesota. After that point, like, I'm just

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 1>not super high on the Knicks. I know they won

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>their first game. I'm keeping an open mind with the

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>new coaching staff. I want to see what they've got.

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 1>But like, to me, the Knicks, if you literally just

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>remove four wins against the Celtics in the second round,

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>were incredibly underwhelming all season law last year. It's gonna

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>take a lot for me to kind of turn around

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 1>my opinion on the Knicks. And then the Clippers literally

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>went into Utah and got their asses beat. I'm like,

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not about to jump onto to the Clippers bandwagon

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:17.360
<v Speaker 1>two day of all days, Like, the Lakers have looked disappointing,

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>but so have the Clippers so well. We'll continue to

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of evaluate that over time. Like if two weeks

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.479
<v Speaker 1>from now we're gonna do power rankings, I'm gonna talk

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 1>about contender rankings when I make changes as we kind

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of work our way through the season. But yeah, like

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in early October, October second I had the Lakers at five,

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm dropping them to seven at this point, with Houston

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and Golden State moving above them, is there a world

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in which Jonathan Cammingham matures to a point where he

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get traded off the Warriors? Also, simply calling Steph

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>the greatest shooter of all time doesn't do his greatness justice.

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 1>He is one of the greatest scorers and greatest players period.

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree to me. Steph is the fifth greatest

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 1>perimeter player of all time, just behind Michael Jordan, Lebron James,

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 1>Kobe Bryant, and Magic Johnson. I agree with you that

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:04.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, like defining his game as just elite

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:09.919
<v Speaker 1>shooting is a huge, you know, like disservice to what

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 1>he's accomplished in this league. I think he's the best

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>off ball mover in the history of the league. He's

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the most conditioned athletes in the league. I mean,

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 1>the dude has put in a ton of work in

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>his body. Do you guys remember when he hit that

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 1>I just watching the highlight again this morning. He had

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 1>like a thirty seven footer last night to tie the

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>game at one twenty. Like it was literally a thirty

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>seven footer off of a ball screen, and you know

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 1>he runs over He kind of like signals to call

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the time out to the Denver bench and then he

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>runs over and he just flexes, and you're like, holy shit,

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Like Steph is jacked. Like he has clearly worked a

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 1>ton on his body, which is, by the way, has

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>helped him to become a better, more useful defender, and

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>has helped him to handle off ball contact and just

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.719
<v Speaker 1>in general get open easier. And as the league has

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>become more physical, like I saw a bunch of times

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 1>on Opening Night where he's like throwing win moves on

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Gabe Vincent and getting open because he's just so damned strong.

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Now he's legitimately much stronger than a guy like Gabe Vincent, right, So,

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>like he's putting a ton of work there. He's a

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>very good passer. This is a guy who does a

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of his work off the ball. But if they

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>ran like twenty eighteen Rockets offense or twenty nineteen Rockets

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>offense where they just spam Steph high pick and rolls

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>spread with shooting, I think Steph could get up around

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 1>eight to nine assists per game easily. I think he's

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 1>a high level passer in that regard, And then I

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>think he's one of the best competitors of his era. Like,

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy that is, you know, wired in

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a way that drives him to a different extent than

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 1>many of the players in this league. So I agree

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>with you that kind of synthesizing him down to just

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a great shooter doesn't do him justice. To your question

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>about Johnathan Kaminga, I absolutely think there's a world in

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>which Jonathan Kminga matures to a point where he doesn't

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>get traded off the Warriors. I mean, anybody who's close

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to the Warriors will tell you that. Even though there's

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people in their basketball operations that have

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>been skeptical about him in his fit, Joe Lakub loves

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the guy, Like Joe Lakub is obsessed with Jonathan Kaminga

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and wants to keep him. And so if Jonathan Kaminga

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>plays well enough over the course of the next three

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>months or so, I think it's more likely than not

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that he doesn't get traded. I'm a big believer and

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>let's not overreact to one game or two games under

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>any circumstances. We talked about this after the Lakers game,

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Like both the Lakers and Denver are big, slow teams.

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>When you're big and slow and you've got Steph Curry,

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna cut him to pieces in a lot of ways.

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I've talked at length about how Steph in particular causes

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>massive problems for Denver's pick and roll defense because Jokich

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>is slow and he can just get to his spots

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>whenever he wants to. That's not me trying to pour

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>cold water on the Warriors. It just means I want

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to see them against some different types of matchups, Like

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>when you're playing against really and athletic perimeter defenses, the

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>job changes and suddenly those reads become like instead of

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>having like this big of a window to make a read,

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it's more like this big of a window to make

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>or read. Like everything just gets a little bit faster.

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Everything just gets a little bit more difficult to read

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and to process. And so those are the kinds of

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>games where we're gonna see a different challenge for Jonathan

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>kaminga right. But what we've seen early in the season

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>is he's knocking down his catch and shoot threes, which

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely crucial. He's making good reads in the offense.

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>He's being aggressive, but not too aggressive, like he's he's

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>not completely shelving Jonathan kaminga the scorer, but he is

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of refining it and being picky about when he's

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>when he's going, and he's playing great defense. I thought

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>he was a monster defensively down the stretch against Denver

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>so like, and he got cooked by Luca, but Luca's

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Luca right, so like overall, like he's off to a

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>great start. But the Warriors have played two teams that

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of like slot nicely into their into their advance.

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying this retroactively. I said last year

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>after the first time the Lakers played the Warriors with

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Luka Doncic, I was like, Oh, the Warriors are too

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>fast for them. This is a bad matchup for the Lakers.

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I even said before the playoffs, I was like, if

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers met the Warriors in a playoff series, I'd

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>be inclined to pick the Warriors. That was after they

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>played in the regular season and they I think they

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>went into La and beat them with Luca Lebron in Austin, right.

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And then I've said before the season at length that

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of teams that can upset Denver are teams

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that have really high level pick and roll players and

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that have speed. And I mentioned like Luca against Denver,

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and I mentioned Steph against Denver in particular. Those are

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 1>just matchups that I think are favorable for Golden State.

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>That's the strength. Like I think Denver is the championship favorite.

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>So if you match up well against Denver, that's a

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>huge feather in your cap if your goal is to

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>win a championship, Like that means that Like let's say

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that Denver meets Oklahoma City in the second round for

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>some reason, and they eliminate Oklahoma City and then Golden

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>State faces Denver in the conference finals all of a sudden,

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>like there's like a very significant window for Golden State

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to slip through there and win a title. Now, Golden

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>State did provide some issues for Oklahoma City last year.

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>We talked about this in our Oka see like who

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>can beat Oklahoma City series, And like I think Jimmy

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and Horford and Draymond are just such high IQ defenders

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that they can cause some problems for Oklahoma City's offense.

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>But what I specifically worry about the Oklahoma City matchup

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>for Golden State is just they have all that speed,

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's the kind of thing that I think could

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>be a very different type of challenge for a Golden

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 1>State team that does lack offensive firepower once you get

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>off of steph. So I'm just curious to see it. Like,

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors have aced every test so far, but there

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>are more tests down the line, and as long as

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Minga keeps performing well in those tests, He's going

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a Warrior at the end of the season,

0:32:56.640 --> 0:33:02.959
<v Speaker 1>and he very well might be a Warrior long term.

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Next question, you mentioned last season's Lakers team handling the

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Warriors better due to Anthony Davis being able to roam,

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>slash protect the rim, allowing the perimeter defenders to overplay

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the three point line. Looking towards the season, which playoff

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>teams would give Golden State the most trouble and conversely

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>teams who Golden State fans should hope to be a

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>match up in May. So again, this is just really

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 1>quick follow up to what we were just talking about.

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the teams in particular that worry me for

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Golden State are really fast and athletic perimeter teams that

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 1>are also high IQs. So like, for instance, one of

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the things that always worried me about Minnesota is Minnesota

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of guys that, despite being good defenders,

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 1>can lose their attentiveness off ball and they can lose

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>track of guys like Steph. This was something that happened

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in the regular season in Minnesota Golden State matchups, and

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it was why Golden State I think, in a lot

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of ways presented problems for Minnesota when they were healthy.

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Last year. That series was kind of like a coin

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>flip to me if both teams were healthy, But Golden

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 1>State presents a lot of problems with them because Minnesota

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>struggles to track off ball shooters. But specifically Oklahoma City

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>is a team that I have my eye on. Oklahoma

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 1>City provides that combination of high IQ speed that's not

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>going to lose track of Steph and they're not gonna

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>botch as many switches as other teams, and they have

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>rim protection and Chet Holmgren to roam around the basket.

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna present some problems. Another team I think is

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the Clippers. They have some really high level perimeter defenders

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.319
<v Speaker 1>in Chris Doun and Derek Jones Junior that can chase

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Steph around while also having high IQ off ball defenders

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:36.319
<v Speaker 1>and some rim protection with Zoo. We saw that in

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the late regular season game last year. So there are

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>teams that I think present a different challenge for Golden State,

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and I am just curious to see what they look

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>like when they run into those teams. But I do

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 1>think Golden State matches up well with a team like

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers. I do think Golden State matches up really

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>well with a team like Denver and then Minnesota just

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>because of their lack of off ball attentiveness. Do you

0:34:57.520 --> 0:34:59.760
<v Speaker 1>think there's a chance the Spurs don't have to trade

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to in the Chip next season or in any other

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>or in other words, what is the lowest limit that

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 1>has to happen for the Spurs to not just be

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the contenders, but to really see that it

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>could happen like Oklahoma City in Game one last season,

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in game one of the regular season, that was when

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma City went into Denver and kick Denver's ass. If

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you guys remember, So, here's the thing. I'm gonna say,

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the same thing that I was talking about with Golden State.

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:24.319
<v Speaker 1>It's very encouraging for showing for the Spurs. You don't

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 1>even have dearon Fox and yet all your young guards

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>play pretty well. Your defense just utterly demolishes Dallas. Victor

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>women Yama is hoop and his ass off, Steph Castle's

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 1>throwing lobs in transition, and damn near getting a twenty

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>point triple double. There's a lot of upside with what

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you saw from that one particular matchup, but it was

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 1>a team that I think was a good matchup for

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 1>san Antonio, right, Like Dallas is super light on shooting

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 1>and ball handling that allows Victor women Yama to roam

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the paint really well right on the other end of

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:58.279
<v Speaker 1>the floor. Like we talked about that night, I think

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Victor can kind of cook any bigger player in the

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 1>league because they're all too big to be able to

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>move with him, but they're all not big enough to

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>actually bother him because he's so damn tall. So, like,

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I think there'll be different challenges with San Antonio, Like

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma City's a classic example where they're going to be smaller,

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>quicker up underneath you, and it's going to be a

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 1>lot more about processing and shooting. And you know, this

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 1>is a San Antonio team that's light on shooting, right,

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think, like it's ridiculous to overreact to one

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 1>game against a heavily flawed Dallas Mavericks roster. But we'll

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:35.879
<v Speaker 1>just continue to watch them and see how they develop. Yes,

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 1>if Steph Castle and Devin Vessel and Dylan Harper and

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:43.400
<v Speaker 1>all these guys just blossom and Deer and Fox is

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 1>a big bounce back season that's closer to two years

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 1>ago rather than last year, then yeah, they might not

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>need to make a trade, and they might be able

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to just kind of naturally improve internally and make a

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 1>run for the championship at some point in the next

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:58.319
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. But I think it's more likely than

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>not that over the course of this season, their limitations

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and shooting and just youthful inconsistency lead them to want

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to bring veteran shooting in and just a little bit

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>more of like a solid, kind of like higher floor

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 1>option at some of their position groups. Now, the thing

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:19.760
<v Speaker 1>is is Victor is messing up timeline stuff, because Victor

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>very well might be just a legitimate top tier superstar

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:25.719
<v Speaker 1>this year. It seems likely at this point after what

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>we saw on opening night. And so if Victor is

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:30.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be that guy, all of a sudden, you're

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>in your championship window now and so it kind of

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 1>changes your calculus when you're building the team. So it's

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 1>just something to keep an eye on. We're gonna go

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:41.320
<v Speaker 1>quick through these last ones here. How do you unlock

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 1>BAM's offense? If you're spo I think Bam kind of

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 1>is what he is at this point as an offensive player.

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>He is a guy that struggles to make anything that's

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 1>not a dunk and like that. Just yes, he's improved

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>as like a standstill three point shooter, but he's not

0:37:56.680 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a really high level jump shooter by any stretch of

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the imagination. He struggles with hooks, he struggles with floaters,

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 1>he struggles with layups, damn. Similar to Anthony Davis, although

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Ad has done a lot better in terms of his

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:11.440
<v Speaker 1>short range shot making, like his hooks and his floaters,

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:14.360
<v Speaker 1>but similar like Bam to an even greater extent, just

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 1>has never added the offensive polish necessary to be a

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:20.360
<v Speaker 1>super high level offensive player. To me, he kind of

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:21.919
<v Speaker 1>is what he is at this point. He's a five

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>out big. He's a guy that can play on the

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:26.439
<v Speaker 1>perimeter as a screener, dribble handoff, guy that makes good

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 1>decisions with the basketball, sets good screens, and rolls hard

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to the rim and he's good at hitting backcutters like that,

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to me is just kind of his destiny as an

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>NBA player at this point. What kind of season do

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you think Klay Thompson is about to have. It feels

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 1>like he is completely faded out of media discussions. Well, ye,

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>he's not the same player used to be. I don't

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 1>think Clay is going to be a super prominent player

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in NBA media discussions because Clay is now at this point,

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, not one of the ten or fifteen best

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:58.880
<v Speaker 1>two guards in the league anymore. So one of the

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>things that's going to be tricky with Clay is he's

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 1>the one dead serious shooter on the team and so

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be accounted for in the in the

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 1>game plan, Like opponents are going to put their most attentive,

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 1>best lock and trail defender on Clay and they're going

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to count for a mall game and just dare everyone

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:19.840
<v Speaker 1>else to shoot. He's not a guy that's going to

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 1>put the ball on the floor and create offense for

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 1>himself at this point, and the lack of playmaking talent

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>on the roster is leading him to be like, even

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:29.800
<v Speaker 1>when he does get left open, whether it's transition chaos

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:32.360
<v Speaker 1>or offensive rebound chaos, Like they don't always get the

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 1>ball to him, So I just don't really see him

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>as a guy that's gonna have too much of an

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>impact at this phase in his career. Hi, Jason, my

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 1>brother and I watch basketball like junkies and have had

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 1>this hypothesis that the game is evolving at a rate

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 1>where the skill level will soon turn basketball into a

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 1>punish league. Essentially, I believe that the majority of the

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 1>smallest defensive laps is like a bad head or a

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 1>slow rotation, will be the most important margins for successful teams.

0:39:57.680 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I wanted your thoughts on that. I love the show

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and your team's contra to the game. I love much

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 1>love from Brooklyn, So first of all, thanks for supporting

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:07.439
<v Speaker 1>the show and for the kind words. What you're talking

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>about is something that I'm a huge believer in the

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:13.880
<v Speaker 1>idea of, essentially, like capitalizing on the small advantages that

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 1>occur in actions, whether it's like you said, like a

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:18.960
<v Speaker 1>guy hedges for too long and the guy who slips

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>out of its wide open at the three point line,

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 1>or this team is slow in rotation, so if we

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 1>just move the ball around we're going to get open shots.

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little bit more complicated in the

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 1>sense that like those kinds of advantages happen on almost

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>every possession somewhere. It's a lot of it has to

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 1>do with playmaking talent. Like you talk about punish as

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in punishing mistakes. In order to punish mistakes, you need

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 1>two things. You need a high IQ player with the

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 1>ball that will find that mistake and hit the pass

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it hit the opening. And then you need too, a

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>guy that's actually going to make the defense pay in

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that opening, whether it's hitting a catch and shoot shot,

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 1>racking a close out and getting all the way to

0:40:57.200 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the rim, or racking a close out getting to the

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 1>middle of the floor and make the next read in

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:04.759
<v Speaker 1>that chain. Essentially, it's going to be about reading and reacting.

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a copycat league. There's going to be a lot

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of basketball operations professionals and coaching professionals that are going

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to look at teams like Indiana. We talked about how

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>last night, I think Indiana, irrespective of talent, plays the

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 1>best basketball in the NBA because of all the things

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that you specifically are mentioning. So all these entities around

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the league are going to watch that and they're going

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to go like, we need to do this. Why do

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you think you're hearing every every fucking team in training camp?

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:34.879
<v Speaker 1>We want to run more. We want to run more.

0:41:34.920 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 1>We want to know why, because running works, and so

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:39.400
<v Speaker 1>they want to be better basketball teams, and so they

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 1>know that that's a way to improve their basketball team.

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And so essentially everyone's going to start hunting these things.

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:47.879
<v Speaker 1>More transition pushes more action in the half court, which

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to generate those kinds of small defensive lapses

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 1>like you're talking about. From there, it's going to be

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 1>reading and reacting and play finishing, hitting those gaps with passes,

0:41:57.040 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 1>making the right decision against the advantage, and then finishing

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the play by hitting shots. Can you see Jaden McDaniel's

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>turn into a number two for Ant? No? I don't

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:09.440
<v Speaker 1>really see that in his future. I see him as

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 1>being a guy that can do some weak side scoring

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 1>forward stuff, you know, hitting threes, driving closeouts, doing damage

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 1>on the glass when he's being ignored. I don't see

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:20.080
<v Speaker 1>him as a legitimate number two. The kind of player

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that I keep coming back to for Ant is like

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a skill guard. I know it'll never happen. But like

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Austin Reeves is an example of a player that I

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 1>think would be a beautiful fit alongside Anthony Edwards. Kind

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of like a skill, finesse guard that's good at getting

0:42:34.160 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to the foul line, that has like high level mid

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 1>range scoring chops that just in general is like a

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:44.280
<v Speaker 1>finesse like offensive engine type of player off of ANT.

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:45.799
<v Speaker 1>Like that's the kind of guy that I look at

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 1>as like a legit number two off of Ant, a

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:52.319
<v Speaker 1>skill guard alongside Ant's like bulky athleticism in rim pressure. Right.

0:42:53.600 --> 0:42:55.840
<v Speaker 1>But I really like Jayden. I think he looks great.

0:42:55.960 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the jump shot is real. I just think

0:42:57.960 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 1>once you start talking about number two's, I think they

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 1>just need to be a little bit more refined in

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of their offensive skill four more quick ones. As

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you continue to get more and more success in the

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>niche of basketball content analysis, will there ever be a

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>time where you take your talents to covering the NFL

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>as well? I have your post notifications on for X

0:43:14.239 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and I love your football takes when you have them.

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Keep up the great work. So I love the NFL.

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I've loved it since I was a kid. The long

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and short of it, is is that like every year

0:43:25.239 --> 0:43:28.279
<v Speaker 1>right about now, when the NBA regular season starts, it's

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:30.280
<v Speaker 1>really hard for me to just give it the attention.

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Right Like, there was a game on last night. I

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:36.480
<v Speaker 1>was working, so I wasn't gonna watch it, right, And

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:38.799
<v Speaker 1>same thing goes for Sunday. There are times where like,

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:40.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's Sunday and it's like, Okay, I want

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to sit down and watch. But then it'll be like, well,

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 1>there were some games on the Friday night and Saturday

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 1>night slate that I need to get caught up on,

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:47.799
<v Speaker 1>and so I'll just get my laptop out and I'll

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:50.480
<v Speaker 1>just start watching film. And you know, it kind of

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 1>takes me back to the the kind of like that

0:43:54.239 --> 0:43:57.919
<v Speaker 1>like cliche that Lebron uses. It's that keep the main

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:01.759
<v Speaker 1>thing the main thing, Like I don't want to sit

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 1>there and start talking about the NFL if I haven't

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:08.360
<v Speaker 1>put in the necessary work. What I like, what allows

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:10.080
<v Speaker 1>me to cover the game the way that I do

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 1>is that I put an enormous amount of work into

0:44:13.840 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 1>watching NBA games and learning about how the NBA works

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:19.360
<v Speaker 1>on both ends of the floor and talking to smart

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 1>NBA people. And so it's one of those things where

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to like take resources from that department

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and dedicate them to the NFL and have my NBA

0:44:29.280 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Speaker 1>work suffer. And so is there a version of this

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in the future where maybe I'm doing it. I'm not

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:36.840
<v Speaker 1>going to say never, but in the short term, I

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:38.799
<v Speaker 1>think it's far more likely than not that I just

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 1>stay in my wheelhouse and cover the NBA. With the

0:44:43.640 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Bucks shooting so many threes, I feel like we, I'm

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a fan of, lead the team and lead the NBA

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in three point attempts and we can come out of

0:44:50.440 --> 0:44:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the East. Do you see the vision? I did not

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:54.959
<v Speaker 1>see Milwaukee versus Washington. That was one of the games

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:57.319
<v Speaker 1>that I did not watch the first through the first

0:44:57.320 --> 0:44:59.759
<v Speaker 1>few games. But we saw this last season towards the

0:44:59.840 --> 0:45:02.239
<v Speaker 1>end the year Steady died of Jannis on the ball,

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of guard screens surrounding him with a ton

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of shooting, and Yanni's just kind of playing driving kick,

0:45:07.760 --> 0:45:09.960
<v Speaker 1>like get to the basket and finish, draw fout or

0:45:10.040 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 1>spray out to a shooter. Right as far as leaning

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>into three point attempts, like again, like when you're not

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:18.960
<v Speaker 1>good compared to the best teams in the league, you

0:45:19.120 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 1>want to apply as much variance as possible, right, So

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense for the Bucks to be a team

0:45:25.680 --> 0:45:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that takes a lot of threes and that gives up

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of threes because essentially, if they protect the

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:33.359
<v Speaker 1>rim and they force the other team to shoot, they

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 1>might go cold. And if you shoot a ton of threes,

0:45:35.680 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you might get hot, and you're gonna win on the

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:39.480
<v Speaker 1>nights when you get hot from three and the other

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 1>team doesn't. But ultimately it comes down to quality. I

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:44.480
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in inflating your three point attempts just for

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the sake of inflating your three point attempts. A bad

0:45:47.239 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 1>three point shot isn't worth three points, it's worth zero points.

0:45:51.160 --> 0:45:54.279
<v Speaker 1>You want to generate the highest available shot quality in

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:55.880
<v Speaker 1>any situation. A lot of it will be game plan

0:45:56.000 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 1>dependent too, depending on how your opponent is guarding things.

0:45:59.680 --> 0:46:01.960
<v Speaker 1>But if the Bucks end up generating a ton of

0:46:01.960 --> 0:46:03.880
<v Speaker 1>threes with shooting off of Giannis, I think it's a

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:06.920
<v Speaker 1>smart approach to increase variance to give them more of

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 1>an upset threat. Big fan of the show and have

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:11.840
<v Speaker 1>learned a ton about the game from your channel, So

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:12.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you for what you do. Thank you for the

0:46:13.000 --> 0:46:15.280
<v Speaker 1>kind words and for the sport. My question is simple,

0:46:15.280 --> 0:46:17.800
<v Speaker 1>do you think it's insane to think that Wemby genuinely

0:46:17.880 --> 0:46:20.160
<v Speaker 1>might be the best player live right now? And what

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 1>would need to happen for that to be the consensus

0:46:21.960 --> 0:46:24.080
<v Speaker 1>in your opinion? Thanks again. This kind of takes me

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to like the Kobe Lebron debate in the late two thousands.

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:29.960
<v Speaker 1>If you guys, remember, it's very possible that we're looking

0:46:29.960 --> 0:46:32.640
<v Speaker 1>at this thing in like three weeks and Wemby's averaging

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty five, fourteen and six with like five blocks or

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of some insane shit like that, and then all of

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:40.360
<v Speaker 1>us are like, oh my gosh, this one to be

0:46:40.400 --> 0:46:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the best player in the league. Similarly, Lebron in the

0:46:43.080 --> 0:46:45.960
<v Speaker 1>late two thousands was just a wrecking ball is winning

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:50.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty games with weak rosters and putting up absurd stat

0:46:50.800 --> 0:46:54.799
<v Speaker 1>lines and crazy highlights every single night. But like when

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it came to slow down playoff basketball against the best

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 1>teams in the league, Kobe still better than him. In

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the late two thousands, no surprise, Lebron was in his

0:47:03.600 --> 0:47:06.800
<v Speaker 1>early to mid twenties. Kobe was in his early thirties

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and was more refined at that point, and he had

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot more experience, right, But like the becoming the

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:15.799
<v Speaker 1>best player in the NBA, becoming the best player in

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:18.439
<v Speaker 1>the world is a playoff game. It is very much

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:23.480
<v Speaker 1>about solving the puzzle of four elite opponents in two months,

0:47:23.800 --> 0:47:25.839
<v Speaker 1>having to beat them four times out of seven, when

0:47:25.880 --> 0:47:28.839
<v Speaker 1>all the game planning is geared around your weaknesses. So

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things where like, there's nothing Wemby

0:47:31.640 --> 0:47:33.960
<v Speaker 1>could do in the regular season that would convince me

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that he's the best player in the world. That is

0:47:35.960 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 1>an honor that I personally wouldn't consider him for unless

0:47:40.239 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 1>he was doing it in the playoffs and you know,

0:47:43.200 --> 0:47:47.040
<v Speaker 1>carrying his team to like it's not even so much

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:49.520
<v Speaker 1>like he has to win the title necessarily, although that

0:47:49.640 --> 0:47:53.520
<v Speaker 1>is the ultimate kind of like, you know, signal that

0:47:53.560 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you've arrived on that front. But to me, it's more

0:47:56.280 --> 0:47:59.279
<v Speaker 1>just like him thriving in the playoffs and being a

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:02.920
<v Speaker 1>dominant player off player, and like not experiencing a drop

0:48:02.960 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 1>off from regular season production to playoff production. When he

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 1>can tie those two things together, which obviously we haven't

0:48:08.600 --> 0:48:10.560
<v Speaker 1>even seen that yet, that's when I would start to

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:14.760
<v Speaker 1>consider him to be the best player alive. Last question, Jason,

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I enjoy your content, keep up the good work. Fist bump.

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask as a thunderfan, I'm starting to

0:48:19.480 --> 0:48:21.799
<v Speaker 1>worry about Chet. Obviously, we want him to stay healthy

0:48:21.840 --> 0:48:24.799
<v Speaker 1>and be careful for those bumps he's absorbing, but we're

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 1>also worried about how his offensive skill will only show

0:48:27.040 --> 0:48:29.319
<v Speaker 1>in flashes while other times he just can become a

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:31.920
<v Speaker 1>non factor, especially in the clutch. What do you think

0:48:31.960 --> 0:48:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you should be working on to stay more consistent? So

0:48:34.200 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I get triggered with this kind of thing. I feel

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:39.880
<v Speaker 1>like it's really hard for big lanky dudes that aren't

0:48:39.960 --> 0:48:44.600
<v Speaker 1>super polished, like Kevin Durant for example, to be ball

0:48:44.640 --> 0:48:49.080
<v Speaker 1>handlers in like physical late game environments, especially like I

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:51.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's one thing when you're big and strong like

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Jokic or Lebron or Luca, when you have like real strength,

0:48:56.400 --> 0:48:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you can thrive in that physicality and get to your

0:48:58.719 --> 0:49:00.840
<v Speaker 1>spot still. But like a lot of the thinner players,

0:49:00.920 --> 0:49:04.480
<v Speaker 1>especially when they're not super polished, they can get kind

0:49:04.480 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of dislodged and beat up a little bit in those situations.

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:10.400
<v Speaker 1>And so I don't really ever see Chet as being

0:49:10.480 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 1>like the guy that you're just gonna run the offense

0:49:13.280 --> 0:49:16.480
<v Speaker 1>through and crunch time, not unless he becomes a dramatically

0:49:16.480 --> 0:49:18.680
<v Speaker 1>better jump shooter, which he just hasn't been to this

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:21.319
<v Speaker 1>point in his career. But I'm still super high on Chet.

0:49:21.360 --> 0:49:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Like I think he's still one of the most underrated

0:49:22.880 --> 0:49:24.799
<v Speaker 1>defensive players in the league. He's a huge part of

0:49:24.800 --> 0:49:28.000
<v Speaker 1>what they did defensively in last year's playoff run. I

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:30.040
<v Speaker 1>do want to see him improve as a catch and

0:49:30.040 --> 0:49:32.480
<v Speaker 1>shoot jump shooter, Like he's got to start beating nail

0:49:32.480 --> 0:49:34.640
<v Speaker 1>help with those above the break threes off of the

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:38.480
<v Speaker 1>right and left wing. But like, yeah, I think I'm

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:41.480
<v Speaker 1>not gonna say I've learned this lesson with Shay. I

0:49:41.520 --> 0:49:43.279
<v Speaker 1>don't want to put a ceiling on anybody, so I

0:49:43.280 --> 0:49:44.879
<v Speaker 1>don't want to sit here and pretend is though Chet

0:49:44.920 --> 0:49:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is incapable of becoming a guy that can become a

0:49:47.400 --> 0:49:50.439
<v Speaker 1>high usage player in crunch time, But right now he's

0:49:50.480 --> 0:49:53.360
<v Speaker 1>too thin and two and lacks the polish necessary to

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:56.480
<v Speaker 1>be that kind of guy outside of spurts, especially early

0:49:56.520 --> 0:49:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in games and in regular season context. But the main

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 1>thing for me is, like if he gets to the

0:50:01.520 --> 0:50:04.840
<v Speaker 1>point where he's like a forty percent knockdown, you know,

0:50:04.880 --> 0:50:07.800
<v Speaker 1>above the break three point shooter when he's open, that'll

0:50:07.800 --> 0:50:10.560
<v Speaker 1>be plenty. Offensively, that's all. That's all the thunderneath from him.

0:50:10.640 --> 0:50:12.719
<v Speaker 1>He does enough damages a cutter along the baseline and

0:50:12.719 --> 0:50:15.600
<v Speaker 1>as an offensive rebounder, and with what he does defensively,

0:50:16.000 --> 0:50:18.759
<v Speaker 1>and he can provide little pops of scoring throughout the

0:50:18.760 --> 0:50:21.880
<v Speaker 1>game off the dribble, obviously inconsistently, but he can do that.

0:50:22.160 --> 0:50:24.920
<v Speaker 1>To me, the main like kind of barrier between where

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:27.960
<v Speaker 1>he is right now and like making the thunder unbeatable

0:50:28.200 --> 0:50:29.399
<v Speaker 1>is like he's got to get to the point where

0:50:29.400 --> 0:50:31.239
<v Speaker 1>he can hit forty percent of his unguarded catch and

0:50:31.239 --> 0:50:33.640
<v Speaker 1>shoot threes above the break. All right, guys, it's all

0:50:33.719 --> 0:50:35.879
<v Speaker 1>have for today. As always, a sincerely appreciate you guys

0:50:35.920 --> 0:50:38.560
<v Speaker 1>for supporting us and supporting the show. But he will

0:50:38.719 --> 0:50:41.520
<v Speaker 1>be back on Monday. Enjoy your weekend. Lots of basketball

0:50:41.560 --> 0:50:43.279
<v Speaker 1>to get into when we get some Monday, I would

0:50:43.280 --> 0:50:43.960
<v Speaker 1>see you guys then